{"meta":{"query_hash":"d8b39b6224b4","filters":{"topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies"},"cohort_total":1323,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1323,"exported":1323,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d8b39b6224b4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Experimental+Behavioral+Economics+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W105892963","doi":"10.1007/978-0-8176-8355-9_2","title":"Signalling Victory to Ensure Dominance: A Continuous Model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Birkhäuser Boston eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Victory; Dominance (genetics); Economics; Population; Evolutionarily stable strategy; Microeconomics; Biology; Game theory; Political science; Demography; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.055622012054996256,"score_gpt":0.30624021585600836,"score_spread":0.2506182038010121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105892963","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15479124,0.0028904222,0.63154256,0.0071037896,0.0004789578,0.0001824463,0.0010981064,0.00041151626,0.201501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187813,0.0014729848,0.030446474,0.0006130122,0.00023853262,0.00026837725,0.00022991214,0.00007812056,0.047871333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999456,0.00019266024,0.000016313643,0.00011638778,0.00008889734,0.00012973351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979157,0.0012966131,0.00020669503,0.000110681875,0.00018589364,0.0002843103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013550473,0.00085659453,0.0011058057,0.00052433443,0.0007163648,0.0027543341,0.0033165545,0.0036571836,0.013254791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041831755,0.00045230682,0.0011144483,0.0006780099,0.002127302,0.0020882683,0.0013233501,0.0023977868,0.0017844773],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001242367,0.00014219228,0.0010157514,0.0001303888,0.000050664596,0.00040588828,0.00023812066,0.3566122,0.0022115957,0.6266168,0.0038358995,0.008616267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006743214,0.00006908077,0.0003369601,0.000025006942,0.000025281866,0.00006851363,0.000052309813,0.8245438,0.00008748089,0.17225683,0.002440023,0.000027393891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006260919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031818075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013254791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019563837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011216989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044341683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1210829728","doi":"10.1007/s10551-015-2834-7","title":"The Effect of Cognitive Moral Development on Honesty in Managerial Reporting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Business ethics; Deception; Moral development; Moral agency; Reputation; Profit maximization; Lying; Social psychology; Moral hazard; Economics; Psychology; Moral reasoning; Cognition; Microeconomics; Profit (economics); Incentive; Political science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.20196732953306684,"score_gpt":0.41347867865381255,"score_spread":0.2115113491207457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1210829728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98979783,0.00010465139,0.00066417176,0.0007195474,0.00001625212,0.000025215597,0.000022709355,0.0000073562,0.008642287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992342,0.000033166,0.00033367824,0.00004345256,0.0000116196225,0.000007526859,0.000007014044,0.000004774235,0.0003245856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991771,0.005949229,0.00029847177,0.00045530527,0.0008601863,0.0006657196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7261154,0.21063669,0.03374373,0.010965796,0.009385977,0.009152315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113323415,0.00032934887,0.0002953066,0.00066499243,0.00090678,0.0028885219,0.00070251717,0.0013298994,0.006176167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1355705,0.00045918114,0.00038714992,0.0005221302,0.0033083635,0.0016325768,0.0018396203,0.002823225,0.00035640856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012813471,0.012772093,0.7011377,0.00042833955,0.00055699394,0.0013281059,0.015108349,0.009833755,0.023677869,0.07260606,0.0020661114,0.14767107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000665051,0.0017666308,0.93184143,0.000088686735,0.00021861578,0.00038753622,0.0031526878,0.009414872,0.0057609538,0.045261733,0.0013247994,0.00011706069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021936106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023627486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113323415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016874712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024533023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059931874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W121689203","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4615-1047-5_4","title":"An Ethical Behavior Interpretation of Optimal Control","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in computational management science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lagging; Interpretation (philosophy); Reputation; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Control (management); Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02211825693640807,"score_gpt":0.36472671239395926,"score_spread":0.3426084554575512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W121689203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009858319,0.0017235897,0.33031952,0.026897859,0.0011828076,0.000059520888,0.00010654176,0.00008281274,0.62976897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80723387,0.0017310667,0.07041003,0.0053145564,0.00196851,0.0004023335,0.000106776206,0.00016613874,0.11266677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798334,0.0010736986,0.000065074775,0.0002085551,0.000544274,0.00012498142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998231,0.0010270809,0.00013820812,0.0002586099,0.00026464852,0.000080520185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002668987,0.00071230077,0.0005281689,0.0008341971,0.0011165764,0.0034277025,0.0012212709,0.0032676233,0.008388287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046367417,0.00036109332,0.0005711581,0.0006995208,0.007834552,0.0038141932,0.0010095119,0.004147764,0.00073317945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011010122,0.0000044008248,0.000009736235,0.0000034702011,8.165985e-7,0.000004032316,0.000028748505,0.00029253896,0.0000143669,0.9973882,0.000910437,0.0013421521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000220543,0.0000016480523,0.000019134677,0.0000048830548,7.957999e-7,0.000006848795,0.000011250219,0.0009619135,0.000018951363,0.9967891,0.0021818443,0.0000013611177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087053125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008531538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008388287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019969447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013070115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028061569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125477027","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2700821","title":"Delegation and Nonmonetary Incentives","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Incentive; Economics; Microeconomics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Bureaucracy; Principal (computer security); Wage; Liability; Principal–agent problem; Labour economics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.028188964862930713,"score_gpt":0.3123099247660842,"score_spread":0.2841209599031535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125477027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6650674,0.0012732063,0.058547493,0.007695344,0.00032285886,0.00025331503,0.00014095017,0.000098906276,0.2666006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98489016,0.00019219171,0.0021689578,0.00020180934,0.000101126585,0.00007664831,0.000012561573,0.000010874911,0.012345711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924273,0.004614108,0.00050551817,0.0006338871,0.0007345933,0.0010845497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.933402,0.04471815,0.0095904535,0.007858547,0.0018507673,0.0025800825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015430223,0.00070451706,0.0012054966,0.00081481185,0.0011781321,0.0031453301,0.00076179317,0.002474701,0.018959155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05465941,0.0004713192,0.000589815,0.00069158705,0.0032907124,0.003975724,0.0025971048,0.0015522756,0.0009958252],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010767665,0.0011060481,0.0101691615,0.00032667757,0.00008519837,0.00029825084,0.0014491703,0.0051402985,0.001548416,0.936808,0.0021206473,0.039871346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004913157,0.00027189546,0.013966893,0.000062507446,0.00006830469,0.00028039236,0.0006787687,0.009211676,0.0006328183,0.96849567,0.005809053,0.000030692354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041472056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005053106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018959155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011854476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015862059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081603825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135063449","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1799294","title":"S-Shaped Incentive Schemes and Pay Caps","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Public economics","score_opus":0.02973854192931048,"score_gpt":0.29888146078981015,"score_spread":0.2691429188604997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135063449","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32341823,0.00084466254,0.44415167,0.009292773,0.0006394923,0.00094795943,0.00059036183,0.0007335763,0.21938124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9344782,0.00027199852,0.029555466,0.00083631376,0.00013635142,0.0003188406,0.000062347804,0.000088761946,0.0342517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959116,0.0022582118,0.0002250133,0.00056362286,0.00047790757,0.00056377554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96814865,0.019082237,0.0040475493,0.005235456,0.0016789342,0.0018072419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008704745,0.0011134184,0.0017733874,0.000948798,0.001171597,0.003699679,0.0025421022,0.0051141516,0.030084338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055826765,0.0010104298,0.0014567648,0.0010507286,0.0037863657,0.0068349447,0.0029850574,0.00319121,0.0017425292],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035864342,0.00012623798,0.0004202769,0.00009114058,0.000019603998,0.000051528717,0.00022718676,0.006783268,0.00071957766,0.9704615,0.002369757,0.01837136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001966798,0.00017209923,0.0004810042,0.000049014234,0.000022537248,0.0000750562,0.00013053433,0.030810064,0.0003491921,0.9643201,0.0033682187,0.000025586414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084731705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063109875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030084338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017004197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018857672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100642145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1451823751","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2374074","title":"The Effects of Vertical Pay Dispersion: Experimental Evidence in a Budget Setting","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispersion (optics); Business; Economics; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.011867541076422043,"score_gpt":0.31313010505781,"score_spread":0.301262563981388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1451823751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98807573,0.00047221145,0.002052318,0.00058022345,0.000055808967,0.00007296181,0.00010258792,0.000019510022,0.008568637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964141,0.00026126206,0.0017320166,0.00013402231,0.00003914712,0.00006646441,0.000078814184,0.000017237542,0.00125694],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957534,0.002587954,0.0003114108,0.00042842294,0.0006121342,0.00030665917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8703617,0.1032721,0.013808171,0.008844446,0.001241001,0.0024725238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007423445,0.000866007,0.00088963564,0.0006743209,0.00082402467,0.002886678,0.0010249902,0.0017994735,0.0147996545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073232986,0.00065505895,0.000337748,0.0008160671,0.0020279933,0.0019535776,0.0015508425,0.0022532532,0.00089527393],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14507775,0.09812914,0.15689665,0.00335089,0.0027976597,0.001081003,0.007877951,0.06598507,0.06468195,0.18263048,0.009330207,0.26216123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.035287425,0.05237793,0.32397494,0.0014315107,0.002508598,0.0008752014,0.007399789,0.09794367,0.022019112,0.44072473,0.014900524,0.00055657927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001881361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010858912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147996545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009865955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009084217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049509764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146497676","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-05219-8_3","title":"Moral Hazard in Teams Revisited","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral hazard; Observability; Incentive; Free riding; Microeconomics; Economics; Mechanism (biology); Period (music); Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04945383716365428,"score_gpt":0.3220406329871564,"score_spread":0.27258679582350215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146497676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.289184,0.009949997,0.18321295,0.06802561,0.0030905819,0.00013160017,0.00015986495,0.00016600084,0.4460794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313837,0.0017388418,0.008290623,0.0015215443,0.0011190393,0.00010538741,0.000023092109,0.000054203178,0.055763643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997974,0.0013178268,0.000040047777,0.00017034943,0.00023778003,0.0002599035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914915,0.006325696,0.0005458005,0.0006083983,0.0003888001,0.0006398659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005000161,0.0005667261,0.0011319477,0.0006424136,0.0021512266,0.0034725647,0.0016500275,0.005101771,0.012378065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014910284,0.0004761168,0.0008954966,0.00083916076,0.0043100137,0.004954895,0.0017603121,0.005761143,0.000763774],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041853018,0.000054752163,0.00038189813,0.000033057764,0.000015136579,0.00008851442,0.00045192556,0.004050193,0.00007782624,0.9793265,0.006995343,0.008482988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003060682,0.000010340788,0.00020702413,0.000015105192,0.000006186018,0.000026976084,0.00016096723,0.00764897,0.00002862476,0.9897584,0.0021014547,0.0000052469873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025233845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016585294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012378065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001648122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015125134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041408777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481372458","doi":"","title":"The Market for Philosophers: An Interpretation of Lucian's Satire on Philosophy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph-Humber","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Empire; Quality (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021545905375661704,"score_gpt":0.32521104824188435,"score_spread":0.30366514286622265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481372458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024317123,0.011152956,0.029946856,0.23088592,0.001379342,0.00006830515,0.0002121947,0.00018403017,0.7018533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88533616,0.0035893929,0.010209163,0.033412106,0.0021899396,0.00020134528,0.00008823579,0.00021159522,0.064762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749774,0.001233796,0.000055633474,0.0002863999,0.0005620623,0.000364311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727017,0.0017643062,0.00022908013,0.00020020302,0.0003409367,0.000195226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003768991,0.00062092097,0.00055833627,0.003397883,0.0058026835,0.008608212,0.0014762412,0.0053918455,0.009555662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058609745,0.00034526127,0.0006856341,0.0023354515,0.038681634,0.013609796,0.0039960206,0.0051362864,0.0009831856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034496936,0.000003731054,0.000020931002,0.000005708504,5.3642617e-7,0.000010717336,0.0007744934,0.000034114044,0.000011113309,0.99584454,0.0027691126,0.0005216642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000209343,0.000011601453,0.0001406694,0.000041649106,0.0000024485403,0.000042741256,0.0008967589,0.00062233873,0.000050840157,0.9278514,0.07030859,0.000010028153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006123469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004751444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009555662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008719104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002834223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06326181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486237550","doi":"","title":"ASYMMETRY AND COLLUSION IN INFINITELY REPEATED CONTESTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Collusion; Economics; Aggregate (composite); Microeconomics; Rent-seeking; Information asymmetry; Contrast (vision); Repeated game; Complete information; Econometrics; Asymmetry; Game theory; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0633196086410843,"score_gpt":0.39650923038357255,"score_spread":0.33318962174248823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486237550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79415536,0.00094530726,0.11767234,0.0027511518,0.00015969701,0.00011362584,0.00014431564,0.00009560722,0.083962604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453294,0.00022052093,0.003175824,0.00009241059,0.000064739485,0.000031258925,0.000025793006,0.000011140335,0.001845394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250716,0.0033246519,0.0003838661,0.00069317134,0.0015389564,0.001552249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94841933,0.030983506,0.013323117,0.004356207,0.0010829266,0.0018349107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057370183,0.000747036,0.0015541923,0.0010569748,0.0017658923,0.004686658,0.0017133876,0.0021913408,0.012587799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030589828,0.00046842764,0.001345852,0.0012043455,0.0049302736,0.0052088173,0.00503287,0.0027363123,0.00089103257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048188458,0.00019772428,0.004304058,0.00021774617,0.0001225327,0.0006796954,0.00089439796,0.020666838,0.0045381812,0.9504503,0.0016707316,0.015775902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009877859,0.00014730466,0.0022227464,0.000057056568,0.000051967,0.00052457495,0.0004150016,0.07936995,0.0011318419,0.9137951,0.0021194753,0.00006616842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068292156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005914067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012587799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016370602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008969893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042110324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486658751","doi":"","title":"When is Bargaining Successful? Negotiated Division of Tournament Prizes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Tournament; Stochastic game; Agency (philosophy); Microeconomics; Economics; Bargaining power; Affect (linguistics); Ideal (ethics); Business; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01931406636289367,"score_gpt":0.32301788818363525,"score_spread":0.30370382182074157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486658751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154734,0.00079102657,0.014784201,0.0023353875,0.00008146464,0.00012395025,0.00017697526,0.00004079649,0.06619298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761224,0.00016956363,0.0010882127,0.00004967105,0.000033649678,0.00004277422,0.000061248225,0.000010251392,0.0009324475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926216,0.0058782455,0.00055348093,0.0010061665,0.0013684226,0.0019314626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.915346,0.061521474,0.014127042,0.0027453254,0.0016176665,0.0046424954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013566157,0.0003174964,0.0009800891,0.0011836162,0.0016342681,0.007864084,0.0012382529,0.0028290905,0.012870166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08721367,0.0004864065,0.00054664706,0.0018341751,0.0034066914,0.007285304,0.0023306746,0.0027049787,0.001524157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003482836,0.0017512699,0.28981885,0.0005254436,0.0006430623,0.0024931226,0.011208106,0.03206384,0.0038492829,0.5190817,0.0046719243,0.1304105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006291486,0.0017727626,0.1652481,0.0003834431,0.0002589715,0.0015574972,0.025124975,0.08669975,0.003244523,0.70213294,0.012688733,0.00025916618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009425549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089317246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013566157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011748251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010217787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071745515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487695474","doi":"","title":"Individual Decision Making in Exogenous Targeting Instrument Experiments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Preference; Maximization; Stochastic game; Nash equilibrium; Econometrics; Simple (philosophy); Best response; Computer science; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06529984280503574,"score_gpt":0.30415873122411385,"score_spread":0.2388588884190781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487695474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97563803,0.000052551764,0.01880143,0.00027915396,0.000030440919,0.00019667268,0.00012504461,0.000081770326,0.0047949627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857043,0.000069757574,0.0114874765,0.00019864562,0.00001613605,0.00033338295,0.00009919147,0.000016996773,0.0020740747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939361,0.0040853443,0.00023711353,0.0006284574,0.00075348746,0.00035950853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854779,0.0083918525,0.0031978893,0.0021413954,0.00030219412,0.00048878364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090620695,0.00042341606,0.00075540453,0.00037480224,0.0005953239,0.002101839,0.0007100739,0.0013174528,0.0034465885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02834733,0.0003413315,0.00023615405,0.0005456135,0.0014803677,0.00087170536,0.0010029122,0.0013771115,0.00063930353],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035905063,0.027637653,0.083781645,0.0010229975,0.0008861576,0.00073379965,0.0083649885,0.12878008,0.18008038,0.21795087,0.008137941,0.30671835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004740703,0.024692887,0.11473134,0.00024116869,0.00043092016,0.0004302664,0.0025472213,0.4496038,0.08033166,0.30686006,0.015004997,0.00038496696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004253995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032183487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090620695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068570965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005655236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047925353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488708921","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.903159","title":"The Origins of Bubbles in Laboratory Asset Markets","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Financial economics; Business; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.008119363061957225,"score_gpt":0.28982301425708523,"score_spread":0.281703651195128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488708921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714877,0.00072420586,0.008388543,0.002621187,0.0000725529,0.00003276337,0.000108679065,0.00016277967,0.01640168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986035,0.00009141877,0.0006590449,0.00006068781,0.000024553881,0.000012978286,0.000022293669,0.000015309712,0.00051036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995376,0.00022853317,0.000018612467,0.000057426194,0.00008989846,0.000068044385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847751,0.011161421,0.0015470095,0.001348116,0.0005713184,0.00059690647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016471377,0.00013284925,0.00029538767,0.0005828897,0.00047672098,0.0013960367,0.0005256302,0.0014635623,0.005330276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019557092,0.00029578223,0.00018163463,0.000270367,0.0016684344,0.001995252,0.0007024823,0.0012017632,0.00037499113],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017855418,0.0013886512,0.0729965,0.0003758439,0.0001351776,0.0015225584,0.003547623,0.011587167,0.0621335,0.72753435,0.011685094,0.10530805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047537798,0.0005166936,0.09981449,0.000111747824,0.000099358534,0.0011946567,0.0019307823,0.082227126,0.024319021,0.77755797,0.011628344,0.00012445239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085008284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006437835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005330276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005887151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035141702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017831504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488941809","doi":"10.1257/aer.20141222","title":"Why Do People Give? Testing Pure and Impure Altruism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Eli Lilly and Company; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Economics; Power (physics); Social psychology; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Psychology; Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.04427259914443659,"score_gpt":0.36372812720256625,"score_spread":0.31945552805812966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488941809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842821,0.00044094955,0.0036500143,0.0025052757,0.000096735166,0.00007348179,0.00035111152,0.000011983714,0.008588327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976882,0.00017369415,0.0007087603,0.00040801414,0.000030344827,0.00008381944,0.00011149731,0.0000043993323,0.00079128833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954638,0.0034947393,0.00014511701,0.00048808407,0.00025958376,0.00014868563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9179809,0.056844935,0.01748575,0.004265975,0.0019989484,0.0014233348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009977681,0.00029329426,0.00066103437,0.0004927116,0.0006288577,0.0014230249,0.00049886387,0.0012814734,0.008365734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04519348,0.00021201996,0.00034257825,0.0006554099,0.002324604,0.00087181956,0.0009236412,0.0009880315,0.0007629269],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071246536,0.0035476824,0.70067894,0.0015138653,0.0023411813,0.0003404211,0.0056733834,0.0074453834,0.0061421576,0.106138915,0.014210413,0.144843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016016591,0.004765603,0.7846374,0.00037488894,0.0010288649,0.00030701616,0.008912108,0.028696563,0.0040806923,0.15253703,0.01286548,0.00019260454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011360245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000991573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009977681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085259706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034706743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052767634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492051929","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.311962","title":"Just How Cooperative are Kibbutz Members? Field Experiments on Israeli Kibbutzim and in Israeli Cities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Economic geography; Geography; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.046608985861072,"score_gpt":0.3221694723409622,"score_spread":0.27556048647989023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492051929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987153,0.00001423646,0.0000531182,0.00008017373,0.0000032899077,0.00002688623,0.000018274852,0.0000011874804,0.0010874758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975483,0.000026788206,0.00020032877,0.000081963306,0.0000045598895,0.000068110996,0.000078103345,0.0000028055824,0.001989147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983327,0.0009965779,0.000038972565,0.00020738767,0.00012753424,0.00029683806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927341,0.0036439355,0.0007463569,0.0006112053,0.0008988524,0.0013655111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043412624,0.0005314532,0.0006095408,0.00074584805,0.004259187,0.0017478633,0.0014895706,0.0016122644,0.005273444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005056036,0.00041249974,0.000216322,0.0010332084,0.0036349227,0.0011529103,0.0013943373,0.00152131,0.0007023518],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027777094,0.06611169,0.5938834,0.0004094982,0.00048508268,0.0014742363,0.14351232,0.003940824,0.05998558,0.02042216,0.01067884,0.07131924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031016406,0.013111658,0.6724752,0.00013873226,0.00036864076,0.00021558373,0.26787335,0.007080202,0.013545054,0.008219964,0.0136690615,0.00020086988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040466122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088479675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040466122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00286494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015025015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080461204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494910428","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12178","title":"The Implicit Incentive Effects of Horizontal Monitoring and Team Member Dependence on Individual Performance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Audit; Productivity; Business; Control (management); Work (physics); Psychology; Knowledge management; Industrial organization; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Accounting; Computer science; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.1270471914607094,"score_gpt":0.4120736429913295,"score_spread":0.2850264515306201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494910428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940316,0.000056196262,0.0025163593,0.00012774723,0.0000044355065,0.000011942587,0.000029355364,0.000009334254,0.0032131148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951696,0.00001131907,0.0003442896,0.000011067044,0.0000047386025,0.000004292999,0.000008142315,0.0000013810836,0.000097777935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316484,0.004502039,0.0003321874,0.0004927644,0.0010883901,0.00041971082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8241832,0.12269356,0.033300374,0.012828628,0.003608747,0.0033855014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083906,0.00026657214,0.00048674858,0.00060675974,0.00048226464,0.0012554121,0.00040374414,0.00057502784,0.0036543524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055415988,0.00025484845,0.0002562907,0.00049928296,0.0015607992,0.0010117361,0.0015164684,0.00091387244,0.00016591407],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019497226,0.001610063,0.8807115,0.00012740187,0.0003032755,0.00012610339,0.00122899,0.008577807,0.0073686326,0.014495571,0.0003585718,0.0831424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053466825,0.0004950311,0.97722036,0.000033651006,0.000078019635,0.00007539182,0.00034205732,0.012006175,0.0017945928,0.007415273,0.00045225778,0.00003379422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011446347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014036689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006410733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006789862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044374287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495228547","doi":"","title":"Partners and strangers in non-linear public goods environments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Public good; Stochastic game; Public goods game; Turnover; Random assignment; Psychology; Social psychology; Public economics; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Advertising; Statistics; Management","score_opus":0.08881872769104508,"score_gpt":0.4093413398679774,"score_spread":0.3205226121769323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495228547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912443,0.00013143716,0.0029813568,0.00015788396,0.000021051737,0.000048914837,0.000045733428,0.000029901154,0.0053394926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695134,0.00006968315,0.001166457,0.00006981352,0.000007882903,0.00006393729,0.000044400218,0.000011070697,0.0016154452],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926206,0.0052456837,0.0002298837,0.0008388636,0.00067088293,0.00039403304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618254,0.025347413,0.004376987,0.0054604257,0.00050556794,0.002484344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008573403,0.0005433459,0.0011884505,0.00067248003,0.0010018197,0.0025989213,0.000771032,0.0014941997,0.0071484824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033108074,0.0005294459,0.00031537918,0.00037163333,0.0024583382,0.0024469565,0.0032329361,0.0013809747,0.0011330055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.057938408,0.02393336,0.25763562,0.0031827402,0.001601487,0.0038811432,0.032198716,0.03927622,0.17773814,0.11520674,0.004509768,0.28289774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008050133,0.03491008,0.34760478,0.00040152777,0.0013438284,0.0037582912,0.025530718,0.08293188,0.047705077,0.42493597,0.022093669,0.0007340753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006666489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000947346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008573403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043681363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030081646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045341015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498346340","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2179522","title":"Generosity and Political Preferences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Politics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03370211143937208,"score_gpt":0.33033495965096543,"score_spread":0.29663284821159336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498346340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96086216,0.0002441863,0.0013708262,0.0010670951,0.000014772244,0.000009890753,0.000081258666,0.000005413048,0.036344443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998481,0.000040637202,0.00010386439,0.000043892975,0.000012491279,0.0000034885447,0.000020903622,0.0000014201331,0.0012923969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933344,0.00040916353,0.000023698336,0.00004928965,0.000078065736,0.00010633008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260616,0.0050797733,0.0010263213,0.000366262,0.00020498638,0.0007165257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017452195,0.00014633832,0.00022105128,0.00079822965,0.000484859,0.0019555544,0.0001673228,0.0008922524,0.013788906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087753255,0.00013389297,0.00014851043,0.0005055992,0.00076600624,0.0010031903,0.0008560283,0.0006535016,0.00055055966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030473347,0.0013119191,0.43852422,0.00015706527,0.00032664175,0.0008227419,0.0033160262,0.003287586,0.0050782566,0.4490929,0.0030885132,0.09194678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030186382,0.00047162198,0.42203662,0.00004860333,0.00017458104,0.000933963,0.005941617,0.008568181,0.0012612235,0.5530022,0.007204598,0.000055021395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023740315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045874063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013788906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002782293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013183615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04612851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502955258","doi":"","title":"Shut Up and Fish: The Role of Communication when Output-Sharing is used to Manage a Common Pool Resource","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Outcome (game theory); Affect (linguistics); Economic rent; Communication in small groups; Group (periodic table); Resource (disambiguation); Aggregate (composite); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Common-pool resource; Commons; Group behavior; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Biology; Communication; Ecology; Fishery; Computer network","score_opus":0.07473653638090287,"score_gpt":0.37656488790361087,"score_spread":0.301828351522708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502955258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788936,0.00009920204,0.006068748,0.0005591072,0.000029345776,0.000030234085,0.00005091962,0.00004306648,0.014225793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955564,0.000034501543,0.0021774122,0.00008129462,0.000012997639,0.00002902012,0.000029017576,0.000019676676,0.0020597256],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849963,0.0008074979,0.000049752507,0.00022674035,0.00024169439,0.00017469196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920358,0.004223413,0.0016258983,0.001046664,0.00026438595,0.0008038091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001932992,0.00038566615,0.00049599976,0.0005212081,0.0008775243,0.0014665765,0.0006277069,0.0012258114,0.009244657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010306116,0.00023374414,0.00034296143,0.0003351849,0.0014879736,0.0016626654,0.0015635974,0.0010743462,0.000508638],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010398571,0.0037915239,0.18752553,0.0010636442,0.0005671981,0.0019691817,0.013248291,0.015671719,0.42340553,0.08579231,0.0035500478,0.2530164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000651493,0.0070689768,0.66455466,0.00019318689,0.00053419516,0.0009506812,0.0095157875,0.06823185,0.06694323,0.16925794,0.011842143,0.0002558022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077544124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008373588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009244657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075350754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005391969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030926466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508040273","doi":"","title":"Explanation and Misrepresentation in the Laboratory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Digital Archive @ GSU","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Iowa State University; University of Alberta; Lehigh University","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Incentive; Predictability; Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.0294576730208357,"score_gpt":0.3268772199227506,"score_spread":0.2974195469019149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508040273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98880076,0.00028698053,0.005316865,0.0009295829,0.000098247365,0.00012423682,0.0000674977,0.00010356534,0.0042724046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99204504,0.00015238833,0.0054722973,0.00055401406,0.00009117634,0.00018235363,0.00008303133,0.000033198554,0.0013864691],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98513436,0.009853456,0.00080987683,0.00138718,0.0022369735,0.0005782299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82445073,0.11212909,0.02897657,0.02984822,0.0019671787,0.0026282156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140591385,0.00083077577,0.0009934722,0.0006443126,0.0005991817,0.0024676495,0.0013756485,0.002173583,0.0058545885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08462281,0.0006551407,0.0004992375,0.00034348285,0.0022746508,0.002003114,0.002118011,0.0020299426,0.0005766343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033401277,0.033703152,0.25333205,0.0025333308,0.0015847684,0.0027020571,0.020427251,0.012883807,0.28189608,0.047470156,0.009964258,0.30010194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011342606,0.059689745,0.37940562,0.0009033782,0.0016039738,0.004960543,0.008392428,0.08256072,0.19602647,0.20558956,0.048405472,0.0011195918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029317068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026810757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140591385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007080977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006735065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07435274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509832277","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2277215","title":"Innovation Tournaments with Multiple Contributors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01337145359568718,"score_gpt":0.2854533703343966,"score_spread":0.2720819167387094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509832277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92650485,0.00019031447,0.037974775,0.0012155062,0.00047296975,0.0005259374,0.00032518827,0.00039542874,0.03239517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98454916,0.00003327135,0.0035946378,0.00010559788,0.00011278881,0.0001774192,0.00006566452,0.000020031113,0.011341382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399054,0.0030373826,0.00022549546,0.000977038,0.00047255913,0.0012970775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94135845,0.03695426,0.0051286053,0.0066978163,0.0015491095,0.008311777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077771023,0.0007153698,0.0024009517,0.001064424,0.001897217,0.004810967,0.0027689228,0.0033199198,0.039854657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031892687,0.0007001534,0.001297363,0.0007921687,0.0012921405,0.0032754554,0.002580574,0.0026369747,0.0018589639],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025009131,0.0112419585,0.10405831,0.0016524573,0.0025519386,0.0038312168,0.0025073024,0.102101125,0.01188973,0.51319695,0.038437594,0.18352236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006064828,0.0062407875,0.032552935,0.000100168625,0.0009174016,0.0012303592,0.0020330166,0.47371224,0.002621698,0.46113652,0.013046285,0.0003437265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070237624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020598588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039854657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008619702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010667919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13332707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509868282","doi":"10.3386/w17636","title":"Rewarding Altruism? A Natural Field Experiment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Surprise; Incentive; Altruism (biology); Donation; Blood donations; Social psychology; Psychology; Natural experiment; Prosocial behavior; Intervention (counseling); Economics; Microeconomics; Blood donor; Medicine","score_opus":0.5531828343491543,"score_gpt":0.6017014197933672,"score_spread":0.04851858544421295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509868282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99397814,0.00007564699,0.0020222333,0.0005964894,0.00005524338,0.00036372765,0.0001307468,0.00002619406,0.0027516605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98475826,0.00013203747,0.00915236,0.0013687413,0.00007182115,0.0017908876,0.00016329644,0.000010760179,0.0025517275],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971545,0.0021205083,0.00007956469,0.00031603058,0.00020330444,0.00012619885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745318,0.017938515,0.0028463234,0.0028050712,0.0004361273,0.001442093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006741505,0.0004892577,0.00066407793,0.0002715551,0.0009949825,0.00071280083,0.00071910693,0.0013942376,0.004217318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011005446,0.00039991565,0.00038709177,0.00016984926,0.0017778871,0.0006431794,0.0006696057,0.0014287716,0.00033944464],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10946553,0.24808554,0.19191547,0.0022937683,0.002146948,0.002444262,0.0062803654,0.012145496,0.22725466,0.0387384,0.021969613,0.13725983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.042146675,0.2752995,0.44943672,0.00044029742,0.0011741879,0.0032356,0.0028607384,0.055837918,0.047274273,0.07943405,0.04235811,0.00050196244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011860715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019740316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006741505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047767648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051836396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035652936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512238612","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2009454","title":"Hey Look at Me: The Effect of Giving Circles on Giving","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.018946429072907937,"score_gpt":0.28778736628668894,"score_spread":0.268840937213781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512238612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696502,0.0005596893,0.00018638588,0.0028368002,0.000119311764,0.000034097076,0.00011741955,0.000034482062,0.026461633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957789,0.00016001813,0.00010717106,0.00027596546,0.000060256883,0.000016036987,0.000038033126,0.00002596777,0.003537605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676955,0.0022726697,0.000086094384,0.00023487174,0.00026397142,0.00037280115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.856397,0.10151565,0.014123475,0.006397054,0.001973327,0.019593483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049135215,0.0004288314,0.0010902238,0.00080584164,0.0025425244,0.0046647773,0.0013973475,0.0035955955,0.049331218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07534311,0.00066633645,0.0004667326,0.0010354602,0.0027772277,0.0026120613,0.002689103,0.00446136,0.0027076593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12783436,0.07553621,0.4636709,0.0013427852,0.0013284656,0.0015994584,0.032405272,0.008010596,0.01485074,0.074312754,0.020843554,0.17826492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069233165,0.006792843,0.88737106,0.0002582341,0.0013243556,0.00048258013,0.020600107,0.0066103167,0.004522649,0.052493278,0.012251764,0.00036943864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004508778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045766244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049331218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012079282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010666252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16502935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514470069","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2119054","title":"Team Structure and the Effectiveness of Collective Performance Pay","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.010222790207440735,"score_gpt":0.2872137500332889,"score_spread":0.2769909598258482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514470069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96218306,0.00023921988,0.0034905132,0.0008155935,0.000066728775,0.000021986672,0.000030114645,0.000020381758,0.033132356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987527,0.000038593498,0.00028281487,0.000028877448,0.0000251736,0.000009358645,0.000010098949,0.0000040737345,0.0008482857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757427,0.0013609856,0.00009614423,0.00023372506,0.00042977222,0.00030513338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659752,0.023032846,0.005069963,0.0024822492,0.0011605013,0.0022792262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055081537,0.00029653215,0.00047836112,0.0008227308,0.0008115256,0.0026029958,0.0004664417,0.0013939389,0.007351134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03209775,0.00022658316,0.000251987,0.0005281357,0.001286151,0.0014571457,0.0013891403,0.0008807409,0.0006272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004767599,0.004177122,0.28317043,0.0005307701,0.00096500845,0.0004881974,0.0061126435,0.041423228,0.011898124,0.3808718,0.0055192728,0.26007578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069155183,0.0023217355,0.4629971,0.00011743052,0.00032114328,0.00022736857,0.0050100894,0.0560634,0.002468257,0.4655188,0.0041684024,0.00009469974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005394642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004518672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007351134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075985666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054090744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02913028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515219692","doi":"","title":"Economic Returns to Social Capital in the Urban Informal Sector in Developing Countries: Micro Evidence from Small Textile Producers in Bolivia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Informal sector; Shadow (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Developing country; Economics; Enforcement; Economic capital; Capital (architecture); Individual capital; Constraint (computer-aided design); Social mobility; Business; Economic system; Labour economics; Market economy; Human capital; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07051699850028051,"score_gpt":0.36959488197501444,"score_spread":0.29907788347473396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515219692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993617,0.000074972166,0.00002466745,0.000038201648,4.2908565e-7,0.0000050477347,0.000071348375,5.3682226e-7,0.00042301847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961346,0.00008424695,0.000024691106,0.0000071362088,8.2333435e-7,0.0000051443244,0.000079846526,4.0655715e-7,0.00018438887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995466,0.00016287585,0.000017937567,0.00004673414,0.000039684655,0.00018608119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997276,0.0009439767,0.001202817,0.00015043787,0.0001656538,0.00026110353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007787896,0.00021637359,0.00025548314,0.0013969656,0.00068583444,0.0014910784,0.00039711865,0.00027670266,0.0015822425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031502515,0.00021356536,0.00017574205,0.002145154,0.0014312767,0.0006234273,0.0014505645,0.0005357113,0.00017548502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010664044,0.00012847722,0.98892844,0.00002951053,0.000046043584,0.00014896697,0.0036342198,0.000699013,0.00020764548,0.00058748643,0.00018337097,0.0053002797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000136877825,0.00005584319,0.9910795,0.0000325469,0.000017214756,0.000035461686,0.007499339,0.00041359648,0.000100128535,0.00024746766,0.00050039164,0.000004924064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06413553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078297414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06413553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002087127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005001787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12752444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515895933","doi":"10.1007/s10683-015-9454-z","title":"Keeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive load","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Dictator game; Dictator; Cognitive load; Cognition; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Frame (networking); Psychology; Economics; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08691653876396958,"score_gpt":0.3859635600512308,"score_spread":0.2990470212872612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515895933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935226,0.000027798742,0.0019504732,0.00032182634,0.000009791735,0.000017440461,0.000015055062,0.000010810826,0.0041241236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990237,0.000020721529,0.0004064134,0.000036608424,0.000011763501,0.000017067741,0.0000070865663,0.0000025354057,0.0004741152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986671,0.00087521994,0.00004896099,0.00008427739,0.00015409337,0.00017037723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984463,0.01062369,0.0021949173,0.0010493677,0.0003560493,0.0013129325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021141244,0.00053211796,0.00058721437,0.0003471644,0.00048192573,0.0015143501,0.0005402041,0.0006142966,0.005081044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014921005,0.00015873199,0.00020531991,0.000224266,0.0015287094,0.0017129774,0.00092986017,0.0009505955,0.0002725163],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030005483,0.015833855,0.14631873,0.0016370014,0.00075219374,0.0017733721,0.01541219,0.13981375,0.10826326,0.34099063,0.0078335665,0.19136609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002769354,0.0065673124,0.16357952,0.00011067574,0.00022069395,0.0003055698,0.0070268884,0.29733908,0.01309144,0.5038713,0.0048787226,0.00023948084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012927548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009350646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005081044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073005276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002994333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016997814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518199953","doi":"","title":"Crowding Out and Imitation Behavior in the Solidarity Game","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Contradiction; Imitation; Crowding; Social psychology; Causality (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Economics; Positive correlation; Correlation; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Medicine; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.055896309420707474,"score_gpt":0.3429066639293901,"score_spread":0.2870103545086826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518199953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99180716,0.0000489308,0.0050644926,0.000100622725,0.0000032218652,0.0000112197695,0.000009527154,0.000010263606,0.0029444143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863464,0.000021924352,0.00064390135,0.0000128114925,0.0000022702825,0.000007848346,0.0000075809944,0.0000022792206,0.0006666181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998589,0.0009071922,0.00005236222,0.00013262045,0.00015868791,0.00016016238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881661,0.00759942,0.002590442,0.00055465905,0.00022785967,0.0008616064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031190654,0.0003623601,0.00058166956,0.0004998225,0.0005013905,0.00093910866,0.00033644418,0.0007848851,0.002953103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012807231,0.00017964595,0.00025016148,0.00021206646,0.0015417924,0.0009145609,0.00096952886,0.0006746253,0.0002910161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005280135,0.0017026826,0.3364203,0.00041583792,0.0005584505,0.0032186636,0.014001925,0.113661215,0.096609354,0.31076026,0.003500642,0.1138705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035048643,0.001720656,0.21528374,0.0000683507,0.00013485446,0.0014886117,0.0048595136,0.5117821,0.008624187,0.2522829,0.0032118228,0.00019272204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011645871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008919226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031190654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000506471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026393318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016495407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519378081","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2250290","title":"Honest on Mondays: Honesty and the Temporal Distance between Decisions and Payoffs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Honesty; Cadet; Payment; Psychology; Names of the days of the week; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Law; Finance; Theology","score_opus":0.01961554967450885,"score_gpt":0.29141881277515413,"score_spread":0.2718032631006453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519378081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531301,0.0011769714,0.016418632,0.0024531079,0.00013247092,0.000031692816,0.00023196923,0.000035672496,0.026389282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678445,0.00013783132,0.0013755045,0.000068739384,0.00003500123,0.000013827521,0.0000688634,0.000014583241,0.0015011737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970879,0.0015172407,0.00019671839,0.0005356415,0.00043573932,0.00022683041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8964564,0.076707155,0.017453881,0.0051146904,0.0019244868,0.002343387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071702525,0.00030928547,0.0008166751,0.00071617507,0.0008701779,0.0036949976,0.00093392143,0.0020136368,0.0105539635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101753995,0.00057683134,0.00045717295,0.0007462174,0.0019878962,0.004715884,0.0024140622,0.0031343114,0.00059029425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007863721,0.0012684397,0.31699973,0.00055432157,0.001133754,0.0014717461,0.011838163,0.025544392,0.008958509,0.48659593,0.0045804423,0.13319094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003275025,0.0010180683,0.4183669,0.0001438632,0.00038597395,0.0009311634,0.004190231,0.05866552,0.0016305071,0.5102883,0.0037727351,0.0002791996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022701349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025945418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105539635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008362931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006005158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037920356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521079568","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1975146","title":"Language, Deception, and Social Loss in an Investment/Trust Game","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Investment (military); Social psychology; Psychology; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030587207795095574,"score_gpt":0.3244035917397576,"score_spread":0.29381638394466203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521079568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690533,0.00015000545,0.01318913,0.0018579692,0.000028223438,0.000043007458,0.00004468419,0.000020676138,0.01561313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811375,0.000039699113,0.00056107144,0.000053856405,0.000007512685,0.000014403674,0.000006014477,0.0000025522138,0.0012010991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975674,0.0014512137,0.00012825016,0.00014708203,0.00031341164,0.0003927319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707182,0.022392698,0.004038829,0.0009848106,0.00046714285,0.0013983098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049219104,0.00057070993,0.00086304883,0.0004406714,0.00081097253,0.0033100243,0.00078675937,0.0021102913,0.0066930796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024714727,0.0003209809,0.0003666051,0.00029366554,0.003281969,0.0038103596,0.0016360234,0.0029710326,0.00030736715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008379653,0.0035821714,0.054311547,0.00054069347,0.00044863403,0.003170045,0.007908088,0.10294784,0.018472636,0.7411307,0.003460803,0.055647243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085243076,0.0019392708,0.028077794,0.00007249224,0.00026338839,0.00090824947,0.004127584,0.316641,0.0016825577,0.64399195,0.0012482994,0.00019497715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021641375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017277243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066930796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013019987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011598577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026029885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521335306","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1762050","title":"Splitting an Uncertain (Natural) Capital","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Natural capital; Economics; Natural resource economics; Business; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.034417436261223656,"score_gpt":0.31458743069418865,"score_spread":0.280169994432965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521335306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84102255,0.0002846328,0.108638994,0.0022636265,0.00018641466,0.00014714275,0.0003049667,0.00010955388,0.047042258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98955756,0.00007719627,0.0053282925,0.00007777234,0.00003234116,0.00002444081,0.000034205692,0.0000065975555,0.0048615998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990845,0.00022891263,0.00005418702,0.00022809584,0.0002690611,0.00013528817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477357,0.002323578,0.00077994814,0.0011557679,0.00030888067,0.0006582086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014636425,0.00033775732,0.00050869543,0.0003122709,0.0006107416,0.0022592656,0.0011514291,0.001380999,0.011510027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008668266,0.00028748598,0.00034832355,0.00034932554,0.0015054317,0.0041891807,0.0015114918,0.0013003579,0.00045651582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008721947,0.00047146215,0.01034578,0.00025889144,0.00016555956,0.0014739833,0.0011312598,0.06353199,0.013807483,0.8497557,0.0027827425,0.05540294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008610055,0.0005088687,0.0066275857,0.000040037914,0.00008587552,0.00043135998,0.00071595534,0.10860088,0.0037401214,0.87209755,0.00700634,0.000059306094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006017786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005317699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011510027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079427345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067239674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03850484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522285147","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1568863","title":"The Impact of Empowering Investors on Trust and Trustworthiness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.015486735266448498,"score_gpt":0.3462954865465549,"score_spread":0.3308087512801064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522285147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98536104,0.000120011704,0.0007692727,0.00065139803,0.00001868003,0.000013773608,0.00001759428,0.000010275856,0.0130378995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995378,0.000032622353,0.00008912363,0.000020263407,0.000008585231,0.0000025096158,0.000002289564,0.0000012763802,0.0003054644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972344,0.0015525457,0.00015948377,0.00019770279,0.00035806966,0.00049782224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8425619,0.11794054,0.022439353,0.007514872,0.0031178,0.006425467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006541034,0.00029601355,0.000363817,0.00041485837,0.0007864412,0.0022375858,0.00030837717,0.0014589735,0.007968468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058923196,0.00028258638,0.0003203557,0.00029747534,0.0018825219,0.0024307428,0.0014318444,0.0015761661,0.00037228243],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012049641,0.0059187384,0.67112696,0.00046318947,0.0006411701,0.004127587,0.008723124,0.0148910275,0.015952788,0.13097166,0.0020044995,0.1331295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016055562,0.0048670243,0.7214373,0.00016703311,0.0009663839,0.0014407539,0.0072247265,0.021205664,0.008620805,0.2265714,0.005672803,0.0002206324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008555794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011096209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007968468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063131656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009422837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034592688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523616597","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1488627","title":"Economics and Greed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics","score_opus":0.014044954007493988,"score_gpt":0.29284841546096746,"score_spread":0.27880346145347346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523616597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09900878,0.0051612114,0.007364563,0.036569733,0.0007229099,0.000040062336,0.00057786814,0.00011042815,0.8504444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82177985,0.0019272259,0.0010661688,0.0030322224,0.00036250806,0.000025717403,0.00022364997,0.00008045105,0.17150228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981298,0.00095636985,0.0000736275,0.00019148712,0.00040186892,0.00024688564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98993695,0.0042689275,0.0019478145,0.0013015334,0.0012068038,0.001337906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027262943,0.00036942074,0.00047044555,0.0020324953,0.0011468006,0.0065609016,0.000592938,0.0026550703,0.05609978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016858233,0.00014036283,0.0002836761,0.001919949,0.0038105333,0.00397902,0.0015075948,0.0025660011,0.0072057545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013972749,0.00021443535,0.013528209,0.00005548856,0.00004592019,0.00011870444,0.0009141261,0.00093112636,0.00016840392,0.9227819,0.01827195,0.042830013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043678363,0.00008784181,0.015494351,0.00015086442,0.000024592124,0.000299157,0.0027418071,0.0010904802,0.00023396529,0.8562092,0.12359365,0.00003035911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017811279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024218445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05609978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015105078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009139007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18767244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524264576","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.91403","title":"'Pocket and Pot': Hypothetical Bias in a No-Free-Riding Public Contribution Game","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Free riding; Public goods game; Economics; Sample (material); Investment (military); Dictatorship; Service (business); Microeconomics; Private good; Public economics; Political science","score_opus":0.11367876986588714,"score_gpt":0.3208513001625058,"score_spread":0.20717253029661864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524264576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345871,0.00006792129,0.045127027,0.0020684728,0.000046270172,0.00025462193,0.000100865574,0.000075363634,0.017672263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905501,0.000030778185,0.007039616,0.00022785374,0.000007118674,0.00007518062,0.000021436857,0.000007870702,0.0020400956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949098,0.0037239937,0.00016524813,0.00029093036,0.00064290984,0.0002671082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770288,0.01798765,0.0021395788,0.0014552784,0.00049378374,0.00089485955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071734344,0.0004003339,0.00072069,0.0003241814,0.0005275365,0.0013675856,0.0006694264,0.0013188991,0.0031336304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040122125,0.00023862177,0.0003161396,0.00023116656,0.0024421099,0.0018466761,0.00093485706,0.00127013,0.00029087267],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01110313,0.0017655309,0.07565963,0.0005487816,0.0004118646,0.0017582066,0.010305266,0.06458632,0.040454704,0.67228746,0.0070220227,0.11409717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015138504,0.0027151902,0.048202526,0.00014568036,0.00018947535,0.0008371094,0.0029089083,0.39978942,0.00995383,0.52219206,0.01129697,0.00025503602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024647699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029782944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071734344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013822365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010102253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037937224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524460852","doi":"10.1111/iere.12278","title":"TESTING THE THEORY OF MULTITASKING: EVIDENCE FROM A NATURAL FIELD EXPERIMENT IN CHINESE FACTORIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Shanghai University of Finance and Economics","keywords":"Salary; Human multitasking; Natural experiment; Incentive; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Field (mathematics); Margin (machine learning); Factory (object-oriented programming); Econometrics; Piece work; Operations management; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.09977232027245421,"score_gpt":0.41427948496994166,"score_spread":0.31450716469748746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524460852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976432,0.00005847996,0.00086220814,0.00010247552,0.000006963617,0.00006218146,0.00005992709,0.0000060908396,0.0011983857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984132,0.000068322224,0.0007045686,0.00010628821,0.000008366476,0.00010648484,0.00010165827,0.0000036035622,0.00048754056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662256,0.0017550493,0.00019868556,0.0006420827,0.00043185655,0.0003497838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96274775,0.02215663,0.00702217,0.0055845263,0.0014655171,0.0010234265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011420439,0.00067914807,0.0008621049,0.0004722135,0.00091281673,0.0009683357,0.0010548533,0.0009766388,0.0044610975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01550562,0.0003667451,0.00067422393,0.00044524242,0.0028473064,0.0009616691,0.0007930714,0.00081144366,0.00038102356],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03381303,0.03927677,0.61248004,0.0016601183,0.0028746424,0.0011498503,0.007562627,0.023354419,0.110191345,0.035145447,0.005089923,0.12740189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029311709,0.015717672,0.9283733,0.00008411535,0.0007736107,0.00008478453,0.0014409956,0.025213312,0.012373965,0.009957103,0.0028843556,0.00016567727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017527713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015837295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017527713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017211959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014555029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060397804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524650971","doi":"10.1002/mde.2566","title":"Status Incentives and Performance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial and Decision Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Earnings; Task (project management); Preference; Rank (graph theory); Investment (military); Economics; Field (mathematics); Microeconomics; Finance; Political science; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03147272269470319,"score_gpt":0.3047976738363163,"score_spread":0.2733249511416131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524650971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474911,0.00062036456,0.0028243389,0.0007766691,0.000059606897,0.0000659592,0.00014144418,0.000025710327,0.047994692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663156,0.00015298925,0.0006008849,0.000060099148,0.000026723368,0.000024538274,0.00004585778,0.000005455662,0.0024518345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977077,0.0010732566,0.00013993256,0.00022061473,0.0005883121,0.00027018323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98359156,0.0065439134,0.0052663973,0.0010606399,0.0010055386,0.0025318647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042689415,0.00046299247,0.00033718208,0.0008934273,0.0008011246,0.0023293155,0.00025709713,0.00080752705,0.009615975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017639225,0.00014758184,0.00018614215,0.00055236917,0.0012500219,0.0012616334,0.0014024549,0.00055673113,0.0009734032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00442187,0.0054011024,0.46292308,0.0008783432,0.0002968376,0.00039894262,0.00486089,0.008620249,0.03220661,0.21142496,0.006623649,0.2619434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030935754,0.0055346624,0.8325758,0.00020611731,0.00010980779,0.00027408902,0.0020368905,0.008570798,0.005252141,0.13093475,0.014061182,0.00013442773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006492504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007590016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000823795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058448745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032168686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526333971","doi":"10.1002/9781444390933.ch25","title":"Cooperation and Competition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.021312148751085887,"score_gpt":0.32354608079397984,"score_spread":0.30223393204289395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526333971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025778364,0.014477233,0.024087114,0.014421666,0.0009376181,0.00012225556,0.00011949905,0.00004164148,0.92001456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8629137,0.017387208,0.014188818,0.0049524186,0.0009410249,0.00053832517,0.0002522752,0.000071642506,0.098754495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547786,0.0021484944,0.00019652965,0.000657019,0.0010854005,0.00043473713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758935,0.001190842,0.00026271696,0.0002991054,0.00035723063,0.0003007286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034846673,0.00052346376,0.0007586837,0.0013778114,0.0021787633,0.005643985,0.0009071909,0.0018594328,0.014523651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004356802,0.00023627003,0.00042230613,0.0015087366,0.017953653,0.0055157775,0.004083134,0.0023343696,0.001048248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055781643,0.0000086736845,0.00025025685,0.000030212384,0.0000049168384,0.000015421207,0.0012034504,0.00012937028,0.00006021247,0.988861,0.0018104358,0.007620402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012150426,0.000036715715,0.0018603958,0.00018536564,0.0000086592545,0.00020999271,0.0021319904,0.00029982103,0.000086261905,0.85511327,0.14003724,0.000018200002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033274656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028428126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014523651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024599289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003264416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048586488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526929508","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00412.x","title":"Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":292,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Class (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1593704642482241,"score_gpt":0.2634155631892495,"score_spread":0.10404509894102543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526929508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2455494,0.0055224397,0.37933865,0.1105576,0.0021011804,0.0008103959,0.0015371814,0.0014408233,0.25314233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94732976,0.001263029,0.030295406,0.016705232,0.000741124,0.0009175198,0.00035386902,0.00016166092,0.0022323923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97030365,0.017415125,0.000835365,0.0071578594,0.003765802,0.00052209117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8681096,0.07104697,0.009156209,0.043511387,0.0067033437,0.0014725202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037890617,0.0009983263,0.0022800516,0.0015880179,0.0014829788,0.0029981409,0.004298592,0.0045128227,0.010870689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13028501,0.0005349653,0.0015140689,0.0007878416,0.01999526,0.0063096117,0.004953536,0.0054500583,0.001252162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073311775,0.0007222864,0.01805265,0.0009956888,0.0007129888,0.00045281785,0.0025320363,0.007930136,0.0054947636,0.9018067,0.010859051,0.049707662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000178676,0.00030455587,0.009102219,0.0001746667,0.00008805354,0.00019938454,0.00040716238,0.0072601815,0.0013052701,0.9733487,0.00757555,0.000055628967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028848092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009068892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037890617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002765399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013645445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20038712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529583694","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.002","title":"Commitment and matching contributions to public goods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public good; Commit; Matching (statistics); Economics; Public goods game; Microeconomics; Focus (optics); Public economics","score_opus":0.05846319174969902,"score_gpt":0.37008096427473475,"score_spread":0.31161777252503575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529583694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476517,0.0001541556,0.009650437,0.0015847626,0.000064729196,0.00008976275,0.000064498614,0.000056512003,0.040683325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935968,0.00005058569,0.0012702799,0.00007472802,0.000029711402,0.00002874446,0.00002004858,0.000014259454,0.004914792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967753,0.0018036128,0.00014390265,0.0002949955,0.0005148337,0.00046724215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9428252,0.039878298,0.0048190397,0.007295899,0.0017072852,0.0034744204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009937802,0.00049705594,0.0009529918,0.0011274145,0.0014395041,0.003945789,0.0012291612,0.0025996382,0.016940227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06353857,0.00073922984,0.00050672865,0.001258984,0.0018471464,0.0021262395,0.0026089994,0.0024597382,0.0009991704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051784962,0.00357175,0.046280824,0.0003174578,0.00030700158,0.00045301308,0.004460868,0.022041323,0.010864867,0.813932,0.0039887247,0.08860368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007289564,0.00039836258,0.03293005,0.000049873885,0.00021166736,0.00018693531,0.0020150833,0.047287785,0.0026217417,0.9109086,0.002611086,0.000049929324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000867828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008175829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016940227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013744824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013487559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056670725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531664435","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.257616","title":"Here's Something You Never Asked For, Didn't Know Existed, and Can't Easily Obtain: A Search Model of Gift Giving","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Psychology; Advertising; Social psychology; Business; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.045151385944285825,"score_gpt":0.33760758966402976,"score_spread":0.29245620371974396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531664435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55224305,0.0016911499,0.18506293,0.02525904,0.00024784368,0.00036020516,0.0009985548,0.00055829267,0.233579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95793283,0.000673645,0.0069671217,0.0006164841,0.000099514844,0.00012766,0.0001424093,0.000083600986,0.033356797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980051,0.0011610024,0.00006203293,0.00024973584,0.0001645013,0.00035769012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869431,0.009064967,0.0013011041,0.0008802098,0.0006412484,0.0011693827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004426453,0.0012979172,0.002654545,0.0021220925,0.0030754006,0.006029589,0.0038315647,0.009317946,0.03576988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021283539,0.0012497404,0.0020083266,0.0029086191,0.005499765,0.011159462,0.0024512038,0.004687519,0.0039797346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048551336,0.0004908639,0.0034217027,0.00019856617,0.00006197983,0.00066111726,0.0025016337,0.039493103,0.00039388568,0.93447465,0.006012395,0.011804621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005265091,0.00017559729,0.0013308788,0.000062949955,0.000101920254,0.0005015839,0.00111822,0.16227932,0.000085757965,0.8314993,0.0022435035,0.00007439236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01618887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008320318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03576988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032715593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002072485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119662166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540031158","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1369209","title":"Emulation in Teams and Families","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Emulation; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.010601225748614473,"score_gpt":0.3075231490266084,"score_spread":0.2969219232779939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540031158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81053597,0.0003095041,0.13274643,0.0022989076,0.00010591572,0.00007303722,0.0001465875,0.00015038908,0.053633243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022245,0.000062959705,0.005181691,0.000059676793,0.000025933583,0.000051785093,0.00003814262,0.000015111352,0.0043422855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642724,0.002528621,0.000093631905,0.0003723523,0.00018671519,0.00039143435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97823,0.014445089,0.0025242956,0.0023268522,0.0009839794,0.001489684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004090466,0.00046161553,0.0010904574,0.0008105773,0.0018905893,0.0022293006,0.0011238588,0.0014988511,0.014580879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025896654,0.00027688686,0.00078128115,0.0007125553,0.0022383076,0.0044866377,0.002674088,0.0011500984,0.0005407837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028991493,0.00015975893,0.0033296878,0.000044812914,0.0000392911,0.00017735687,0.00153167,0.011953832,0.00031321903,0.9555541,0.0022687535,0.024337659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010939003,0.00014055539,0.0012053716,0.000022143413,0.000021892489,0.00017930752,0.0016709936,0.057060804,0.0002981503,0.9371666,0.002111207,0.000013556085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001252462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067849434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014580879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009210799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079948455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04877788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540287813","doi":"","title":"Robustness of Level-k Reasoning in Generalized Beauty Contest Games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Predictive power; Robustness (evolution); Beauty; Private information retrieval; Computer science; Mathematics; Social psychology; Psychology; Physics; Political science; Chemistry; Statistics","score_opus":0.1029547175652267,"score_gpt":0.4018851204680235,"score_spread":0.2989304029027968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540287813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8340617,0.0005770369,0.15105681,0.0031929242,0.00006138838,0.0000984839,0.0004502897,0.00053327804,0.009968013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99448144,0.00015718774,0.004123119,0.00021917756,0.000043536416,0.00002904959,0.0001803196,0.00004979807,0.00071638677],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921428,0.0045497343,0.0003170091,0.001460654,0.0007126705,0.00081715203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85620457,0.105883546,0.021061925,0.011804606,0.0020751136,0.0029701309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021738725,0.0011867032,0.0033512006,0.0017789775,0.0013184588,0.004912237,0.002885335,0.0031754812,0.0055533713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11718671,0.0011069905,0.0023483492,0.0012923509,0.0053166086,0.0066611934,0.00288925,0.003941818,0.0005587813],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013051382,0.0003181959,0.02773863,0.00031674086,0.00096584094,0.00045026775,0.0010241012,0.62056535,0.0016934273,0.32403526,0.0030741103,0.018512964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100823694,0.00008947464,0.003151187,0.000030146459,0.00006200376,0.000062986604,0.0000871511,0.6295833,0.00020443852,0.36635658,0.00022155326,0.00005037914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074958233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037800327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021738725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027444386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017006974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11496675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543976746","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.300500","title":"The Strategies Behind their Actions: A New Method to Infer Repeated-Game Strategies and an Application to Buyer Behavior","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Repeated game; Complement (music); Economics; Microeconomics; Inference; Econometrics; Market power; Game theory; Bayesian inference; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Bayesian game; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04588480874108092,"score_gpt":0.39078905448124984,"score_spread":0.3449042457401689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543976746","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13603237,0.00015097519,0.8604286,0.00014555479,0.00001967812,0.00019260528,0.00068465056,0.00050646736,0.0018392103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.633791,0.00014854602,0.36277282,0.00005613229,0.000028125187,0.00041031992,0.000742864,0.00009378513,0.0019563406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988091,0.00048157698,0.00008358017,0.0003335411,0.0002280206,0.0000641496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97684175,0.019537045,0.0009585249,0.0014792559,0.0008549906,0.00032844068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002797707,0.00083590427,0.0010190979,0.0026777415,0.00048305254,0.0011549043,0.0013662694,0.0012656039,0.0038708835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027081223,0.0006281991,0.0010941743,0.0016344929,0.00073652575,0.0032382803,0.0009991989,0.0019274645,0.000857989],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013327459,0.0013914688,0.16651408,0.0005803366,0.0013498049,0.00058105646,0.0035626525,0.104140446,0.011100239,0.10075059,0.0025949492,0.6061017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080101825,0.00016372673,0.0134860575,0.00004352437,0.00014746701,0.00027521528,0.00021644332,0.89885545,0.0025333317,0.08293876,0.0011888285,0.00007108496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059156995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007559355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059156995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055680546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011645728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014795899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546602608","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12147","title":"Communicated Values as Informal Controls: Promoting Quality While Undermining Productivity?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada","keywords":"Piece work; Productivity; Statement (logic); Compensation (psychology); Incentive; Value (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Control (management); Task (project management); Constraint (computer-aided design); Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Mathematics; Management; Law; Political science; Statistics","score_opus":0.37935037352157736,"score_gpt":0.49190657370232277,"score_spread":0.11255620018074541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546602608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95524126,0.00024715636,0.014465092,0.002201266,0.00007641542,0.000082185776,0.000034679913,0.000073946365,0.027578013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976763,0.000036558286,0.0017020325,0.00010388705,0.000018621196,0.00002343676,0.000004889,0.00000959113,0.00042456668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98429424,0.011170907,0.00059002865,0.00087876886,0.0022152436,0.00085096795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88505256,0.06443548,0.025742479,0.016017504,0.0039474517,0.004804463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012013501,0.00062961486,0.00042371548,0.00064608565,0.00090837973,0.004682138,0.0009551657,0.0013481766,0.007655439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076864414,0.0003426856,0.00027071757,0.0005936654,0.0050109574,0.0037076543,0.0028130556,0.0017503385,0.00037617428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006647167,0.0066965893,0.16858815,0.0021078314,0.00043870654,0.001040128,0.0258633,0.009884736,0.08336198,0.36548215,0.0023990397,0.32749018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003140435,0.007373421,0.32731977,0.0013858608,0.0007788446,0.000724516,0.017923592,0.038988188,0.06507525,0.50007063,0.03682143,0.00039806205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077302643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007724561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012013501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019086022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019412264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0635342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547735339","doi":"10.1111/labr.12038","title":"Employers' Efforts to Deter Shirking in Teams: Evidence from Job Vacancies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Supervisor; Profit sharing; Labour economics; Work (physics); For profit; Public relations; Economics; Management; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.03345311348953637,"score_gpt":0.335333684089142,"score_spread":0.3018805705996056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547735339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916324,0.000405939,0.00029273218,0.0005158426,0.000022353714,0.00003318136,0.00010671543,0.000004162507,0.0069866525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988122,0.0001383313,0.00012543186,0.00017099503,0.000018839746,0.00002628894,0.000063007865,0.0000020854168,0.0006428674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928833,0.0052636717,0.0003243975,0.00043982666,0.00070241676,0.000386237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7593367,0.16670623,0.052592568,0.010917026,0.0046990765,0.0057484093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009608214,0.00031508523,0.00048618775,0.0007839099,0.0012976341,0.0014434776,0.0007942583,0.0017003187,0.012404114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06297748,0.00040553222,0.00043313636,0.0005963396,0.0013011086,0.0008066461,0.0015931437,0.0015163161,0.0010850411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0073800962,0.010325547,0.8886913,0.00091257127,0.0009245655,0.00037880096,0.0056375633,0.0013890184,0.002025211,0.0038786884,0.0036216523,0.07483484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003099475,0.0025693495,0.988176,0.00019911752,0.0001632642,0.00010734569,0.003307201,0.00091158954,0.00061238476,0.0012500721,0.0023661389,0.000027518694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002928806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036997523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012404114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047337782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043744218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050813675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154796124","doi":"","title":"Voluntary Contributions to Property Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Turnover; Public good; Production (economics); Economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.050304354966888856,"score_gpt":0.39289616095302926,"score_spread":0.3425918059861404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154796124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711132,0.00013199996,0.004977137,0.0002713981,0.000065042615,0.00017656744,0.00032088673,0.0000795407,0.02286415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926427,0.00004868415,0.001937173,0.000062039115,0.000019911837,0.00024667024,0.00009758541,0.000023013417,0.0049222433],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953426,0.0022211124,0.0002606918,0.00072385673,0.0010889852,0.00036277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549669,0.027530637,0.0052523296,0.00944475,0.0013414385,0.0014640645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006010093,0.00068567,0.0009383864,0.0005618366,0.00084580295,0.0016577211,0.0010366273,0.0012428535,0.016856968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022822898,0.00033888847,0.00034271515,0.0005157691,0.0016934365,0.0013227074,0.001899352,0.001792068,0.0010742816],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033058643,0.03162386,0.09568496,0.0027490368,0.00073276187,0.00070404203,0.0041845674,0.044944335,0.31216767,0.24898346,0.0066641592,0.21850248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007317467,0.037547402,0.24330804,0.00035207628,0.0004851698,0.0009295918,0.0029190753,0.073236935,0.15624553,0.43047893,0.046786804,0.0003929542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030616747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031973506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016856968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007637496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072373246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056392193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549004164","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1040.0280","title":"Redesigning Teams and Incentives in a Merger: An Experiment with Managers and Students","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Sorting; Compensation (psychology); Affect (linguistics); Work (physics); Executive compensation; Industrial organization; Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024974292324398132,"score_gpt":0.3621166280870421,"score_spread":0.33714233576264396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549004164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981509,0.000024370856,0.0005203335,0.00027479333,0.000042972075,0.00021896171,0.000027089201,0.000016407914,0.0007241707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99305624,0.000060645165,0.002725816,0.00029710578,0.00009557333,0.0007451494,0.00007609481,0.000011359571,0.0029322435],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498546,0.00241757,0.00038914403,0.0007043727,0.000683518,0.00081992167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94484097,0.031533472,0.008375673,0.004511327,0.0012871948,0.009451391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097859,0.0014222675,0.001653558,0.0006501042,0.002861308,0.0044783503,0.002404916,0.006164214,0.007789549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03191535,0.0014113131,0.00074696157,0.0007080771,0.0032725595,0.0028828213,0.0026037872,0.0041733705,0.001192955],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.15680324,0.5961141,0.06619213,0.0009880214,0.0010873481,0.00082777196,0.016349334,0.017825617,0.041510988,0.017252162,0.004581857,0.08046737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.13074876,0.552483,0.10981726,0.0003658631,0.0016884708,0.0005273028,0.018084662,0.09313413,0.031422924,0.048310786,0.012568166,0.000848729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014807654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018581544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0097859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011468076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027469727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05175346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549090861","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1290040","title":"Social Image Concerns and Pro-Social Behavior","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of California, Irvine","keywords":"Donation; Prestige; Unobservable; Sample (material); Incentive; Ceremony; Population; Newspaper; Advertising; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Business; Law; Microeconomics; Geography; Demography; Econometrics","score_opus":0.044347915575772306,"score_gpt":0.35964862319138263,"score_spread":0.31530070761561035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549090861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776953,0.00016754576,0.000265592,0.0008422012,0.000009995722,0.000009725187,0.000030105783,0.0000031170032,0.020976376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991025,0.000042548065,0.00006433462,0.00005472431,0.000009878819,0.0000038111891,0.000012580831,0.0000014645402,0.0007081518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993419,0.000388628,0.000019307035,0.00004990139,0.00010989028,0.000090420166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895275,0.0044811703,0.0035298602,0.0004466031,0.00040000884,0.0016148384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013206411,0.00026995435,0.00015468753,0.00072861405,0.00064755033,0.0020862233,0.00021076486,0.0009879256,0.007596556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006990523,0.00014200022,0.00018084368,0.00040800776,0.0012277705,0.0007083872,0.0006529708,0.0009203903,0.00030537424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023602676,0.0046904706,0.8725553,0.00014205402,0.0002751004,0.0005824903,0.007613338,0.00061984605,0.0047737653,0.053359777,0.00096241245,0.052065272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011685065,0.0006046234,0.95855105,0.000028777127,0.00010007757,0.0002868089,0.008155417,0.0015751537,0.0008186154,0.027485427,0.002253076,0.000024157871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010961054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019206639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007596556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057674065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038806518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025412977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550176450","doi":"10.1111/tesg.12086","title":"Randomising Development: Geography, Economics and the Search for Scientific Rigour","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rigour; Innovator; Argumentation theory; Positive economics; Human development theory; Economics education; Applied economics; Economic methodology; Economics; Philosophy and economics; Regional science; Neoclassical economics; Management science; Social science; Mainstream economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economic growth; Higher education; Entrepreneurship","score_opus":0.022623570924293897,"score_gpt":0.2887603467630427,"score_spread":0.2661367758387488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550176450","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09852205,0.03687974,0.49331346,0.25872192,0.0031187315,0.002712203,0.00084947975,0.0004382094,0.10544418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8840931,0.0066163745,0.089865886,0.012352577,0.0010991968,0.0030697393,0.00016383399,0.00014618158,0.002593081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.57991105,0.38938826,0.0060892613,0.009497868,0.013598393,0.0015151921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20754242,0.717528,0.027419487,0.036772802,0.009315529,0.0014218519],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3331569,0.00069341314,0.0031288913,0.0030053186,0.0020529698,0.007969776,0.0033318014,0.00439065,0.0095987795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5623905,0.00056570553,0.001134718,0.0031298865,0.04048749,0.00862245,0.0059008705,0.0045646164,0.0007723045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046536323,0.0001468042,0.005304389,0.0020224338,0.0005638394,0.00010725235,0.001963565,0.004463273,0.0004100744,0.92243487,0.0040393784,0.058078807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028490488,0.00017697115,0.001909922,0.0013025107,0.00012218552,0.000058171743,0.0006757443,0.0039332006,0.00052622624,0.9778685,0.013091903,0.000049746966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023441068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017263974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3331569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007056257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008228086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82233626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552617249","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1028541","title":"On the Formation of Buyer-Seller Relationships When Product Quality is Perfectly Observable","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Observable; Quality (philosophy); Business; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Geometry","score_opus":0.09392808243586026,"score_gpt":0.3496523069794418,"score_spread":0.2557242245435815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552617249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244171,0.002143241,0.09468227,0.0079643335,0.00013565169,0.00036976003,0.00077443005,0.00014231395,0.06937093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850139,0.0019269811,0.0063633276,0.00024012208,0.00017643362,0.00013015083,0.0002125036,0.000025423104,0.0059111505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651957,0.0022522735,0.00013195304,0.0004064756,0.00026429864,0.00042536185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89288783,0.09423973,0.0072746975,0.002766876,0.0010210852,0.0018098479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007879856,0.0006675864,0.0022307478,0.00096606417,0.0011552722,0.0037340932,0.0021470697,0.003940315,0.019233871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05070861,0.001282827,0.001030786,0.0010809267,0.0037555117,0.007921317,0.0022720464,0.0025526723,0.0013073917],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011660609,0.0006720502,0.011276507,0.0005062805,0.00017059312,0.00072461256,0.0015073948,0.05277714,0.00224924,0.89853764,0.0038709133,0.026541581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044584332,0.0003512474,0.008908597,0.0000830454,0.00012835365,0.00025330376,0.00076442474,0.15431714,0.0005953238,0.83227617,0.0018039701,0.00007254437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021180725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014725211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019233871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013608348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014258303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06434375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556374755","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.05.005","title":"Donor coordination in project funding: Evidence from a threshold public goods experiment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; University of Miami","keywords":"Public good; Popularity; Salient; Economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Public finance; Business; Marketing; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.317671617904195,"score_gpt":0.40518470935819084,"score_spread":0.08751309145399583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556374755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97700953,0.00019359014,0.0032041306,0.0018387976,0.000061180275,0.00017572856,0.00009051607,0.000045405694,0.017381068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977912,0.00005751023,0.00070972904,0.00026253064,0.000020419922,0.00012846735,0.000029867258,0.000008424158,0.0009917904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857245,0.009888399,0.0005915378,0.0010427397,0.0013481461,0.0014046404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8647029,0.096367784,0.018312588,0.011121405,0.002261312,0.007234073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029742068,0.00045320447,0.0013016404,0.00082028686,0.002095559,0.0040520397,0.0013616891,0.0039778673,0.011233116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07531772,0.000530392,0.00040539965,0.0012563218,0.004524695,0.0031690188,0.0030409172,0.0026540528,0.0008483314],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10503599,0.060036078,0.20401631,0.002014715,0.0019823762,0.0017018714,0.00946034,0.029152108,0.02994459,0.36781818,0.020296618,0.16854076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.054952756,0.021543201,0.26291257,0.0005980599,0.0020671524,0.000765531,0.009577924,0.04315968,0.017491188,0.566054,0.02045329,0.0004245894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028411124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002446358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029742068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019115784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004799176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15729296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557150535","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom090017","title":"Behavioral Decision Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Decision theory; Normative; Axiom; Rational choice theory (criminology); Lexicographical order; Causal decision theory; Decision rule; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Process (computing); Decision field theory; Range (aeronautics); Management science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Economics; Decision support system; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Decision engineering; Business decision mapping; Engineering","score_opus":0.024086523510746884,"score_gpt":0.33046392371456,"score_spread":0.30637740020381315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557150535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034974217,0.011146134,0.3454135,0.024684636,0.000820632,0.00072602456,0.0015594721,0.00022083557,0.5804546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86663723,0.009796268,0.085917115,0.004559959,0.00062212895,0.0010157764,0.0010411816,0.0000970443,0.030313259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286836,0.004564348,0.00032359883,0.0007158843,0.0011379339,0.0003898812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878187,0.008729307,0.0010079227,0.000738317,0.0012054619,0.00050026487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072242264,0.0011052118,0.0010896339,0.0020304662,0.0011590256,0.006036912,0.0017897162,0.0027374667,0.020764962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142403,0.00032232094,0.00089398684,0.0023332427,0.0057988386,0.0034542193,0.0018771625,0.0031345303,0.0021630349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001607112,0.000041241106,0.0011944777,0.00011574332,0.000035237492,0.000037646405,0.00023163449,0.005430842,0.000049350103,0.9769208,0.0032536734,0.012673328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001715359,0.000022657709,0.0004312994,0.00012544432,0.000017336139,0.000043264547,0.00019501074,0.009323049,0.000049824266,0.9722344,0.017525602,0.000015015974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029421076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020007694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020764962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048214826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003279998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06946576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557620084","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2274266","title":"Learning More by Doing Less: Capacity and Competition in Bayesian Persuasion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Competition (biology); Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.013058089274437107,"score_gpt":0.27376114967920123,"score_spread":0.2607030604047641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557620084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9489422,0.00036926792,0.008626379,0.0032514813,0.000054787153,0.000047370442,0.000065335305,0.00005275858,0.0385906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799997,0.000043084077,0.0008008691,0.00014331956,0.000035571,0.000019244297,0.000015643607,0.000015632617,0.000926671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318874,0.003982695,0.0002961736,0.00090336933,0.0009596793,0.0006692732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.802918,0.16663465,0.008927906,0.010660311,0.003597872,0.0072612194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011858517,0.000639299,0.0013113111,0.0012131152,0.0011667318,0.004987378,0.0015708527,0.0042855516,0.01683908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098863915,0.00093221007,0.0006669117,0.0007772219,0.004059152,0.008983824,0.00339918,0.003397541,0.0010668203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0065980125,0.0049162647,0.11894885,0.0010950598,0.00073787896,0.0010596698,0.01175336,0.038567398,0.018594202,0.6437557,0.0050133727,0.14896017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082887284,0.0008611553,0.06169836,0.00011204092,0.00023619157,0.0006686649,0.0026054394,0.060531322,0.0017145515,0.86832803,0.0021946582,0.00022073416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016414969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012772274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01683908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009493673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001110516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06271464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558553756","doi":"10.1007/bf03396731","title":"Discussion of “The Effect of Sunk Costs on the Outcome of Alternating-Offers Bargaining Between Inequity-Averse Agents”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Schmalenbach Business Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Microeconomics; Point (geometry); Focus (optics); Inequity aversion; Positive economics; Inequality","score_opus":0.06048597782086401,"score_gpt":0.37675219108202274,"score_spread":0.3162662132611587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558553756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16012949,0.0034208037,0.18171175,0.19048259,0.0030506232,0.00028370856,0.00076893833,0.00025929997,0.45989278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444675,0.0013865987,0.016267003,0.013078374,0.0011731426,0.00023285122,0.00007672389,0.00007795263,0.023239885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536777,0.0025736007,0.00018540453,0.00051093305,0.0008080363,0.0005542171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644181,0.029463403,0.0020802768,0.0020928371,0.0013281801,0.00061725744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012541595,0.00044213628,0.0009732688,0.00059721037,0.002465133,0.0036824835,0.0038170896,0.0074717887,0.027556313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049594935,0.0005154757,0.0017452578,0.00082665496,0.005716443,0.0058899266,0.002245876,0.006896796,0.0011444902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010129728,0.000053928285,0.00063868513,0.00009086649,0.000039003407,0.00012728908,0.00020337227,0.004586189,0.00047645473,0.97816694,0.0074637323,0.00805229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050919276,0.00005545779,0.0019232339,0.00007763211,0.00006174403,0.00010549372,0.0002477024,0.010679518,0.00076904293,0.974708,0.011274942,0.00004639119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023241949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026781987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027556313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001980464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021685616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09218502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561205027","doi":"10.1007/s10058-003-0100-4","title":"Solomon's Dilemma: An experimental study on dynamic implementation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Incentive; Social dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Microeconomics; Economics; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Social Welfare; Social choice theory; Computer science; Positive economics; Game theory; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10126192240019376,"score_gpt":0.45010881536895275,"score_spread":0.348846892968759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561205027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6870479,0.0063454453,0.21267827,0.014112572,0.0015093947,0.0037769324,0.00040805602,0.00029725887,0.07382423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91942495,0.002999979,0.06282688,0.0022010426,0.00037858065,0.005293362,0.000087173,0.000083100895,0.006705075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98837864,0.008844208,0.00041507056,0.0008323843,0.001239754,0.00028994287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9254756,0.064294204,0.00406132,0.004212228,0.0010862309,0.0008704187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015498116,0.0016061272,0.001485305,0.0010573474,0.0011354965,0.00263585,0.0021406747,0.0034113454,0.0063839727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09612049,0.00056310854,0.00075440784,0.0009132017,0.0074630696,0.0050799744,0.002099826,0.0029111789,0.0004547676],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006865158,0.010082793,0.0035311214,0.0018647532,0.00041838374,0.00021774182,0.004376061,0.015761428,0.0073109656,0.81548995,0.007851204,0.12623037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062931525,0.010584584,0.0034310396,0.000762815,0.0004255077,0.00032484168,0.0016134793,0.0490229,0.005754418,0.899704,0.021894325,0.00018888741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009606576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007698892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015498116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019567674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00319047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08196288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562381284","doi":"10.3386/w16645","title":"Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs About Others","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Upset; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.35726639352354833,"score_gpt":0.5667964038341873,"score_spread":0.20953001031063895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562381284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555844,0.00012275374,0.021327306,0.0009062708,0.000018960984,0.000036265286,0.00004155881,0.00006456046,0.021898014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406,0.000029841167,0.0036271114,0.0002130098,0.000009067134,0.000014480371,0.0000147291075,0.000014020969,0.002017551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814415,0.0009744173,0.00006263274,0.00016765128,0.0004331045,0.00021805438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912526,0.003427023,0.0028993986,0.0015034238,0.00037153234,0.0005460313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002022237,0.00055892323,0.0004895913,0.0003365887,0.00061937125,0.0010151878,0.00053413404,0.00073666224,0.0044890344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008063502,0.00026779005,0.0003339645,0.0001689742,0.0011969198,0.00092555024,0.0014456275,0.0014745705,0.0006008911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057328297,0.0028122382,0.27485543,0.0009413586,0.0010612179,0.0028670565,0.009239098,0.038285762,0.18311447,0.19995032,0.005410078,0.27573007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012056535,0.0053675747,0.26059684,0.0001342241,0.00086055323,0.0041452274,0.00548716,0.12554827,0.07987486,0.49538338,0.021156844,0.00023955479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000978675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001342303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044890344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043930847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037537472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015017331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566017147","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1919073","title":"Social Exchange and Risk and Ambiguity Preferences","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Social risk; Social exchange theory; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Actuarial science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05669939263747618,"score_gpt":0.3189094434176322,"score_spread":0.262210050780156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566017147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96354276,0.00048633493,0.005501185,0.0012752168,0.000031037824,0.00001590137,0.000030597366,0.000008799209,0.029108165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856526,0.000092593364,0.00044090953,0.000039315866,0.000019066929,0.0000044498292,0.000008027449,0.0000026301584,0.0008277989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987423,0.000749954,0.000057923055,0.00008810825,0.00025450805,0.00010711944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98235923,0.013537667,0.0019978648,0.00078074733,0.00037774944,0.0009467485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038966397,0.0003630193,0.00045173155,0.00072489865,0.00066424254,0.0036237217,0.00029398492,0.0016325037,0.009138081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02157075,0.00027877203,0.00030259552,0.00055860076,0.0018312949,0.0032270208,0.0011965648,0.0013462848,0.0002458521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004045654,0.0017884359,0.091231175,0.00028324043,0.00032050518,0.0013474695,0.006593427,0.0144116795,0.0051628007,0.80934936,0.0012481693,0.064218126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037451816,0.0003936759,0.056179617,0.000044766133,0.00011645476,0.0005113021,0.003291121,0.015082465,0.00074671657,0.9215608,0.0016346584,0.00006396017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032582326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003630759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009138081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048337263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034673707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030569911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568614560","doi":"10.1002/mde.2550","title":"The Primacy of Entrepreneurs in Exploiting Long‐Distance Exchange","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial and Decision Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Instinct; Welfare; Economics; Narrative; Market economy","score_opus":0.03623245317520066,"score_gpt":0.3122508728629031,"score_spread":0.27601841968770247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568614560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953121,0.000048614744,0.00032218132,0.000080429425,0.0000033645445,0.000010501531,0.000009496993,0.0000026656762,0.004210684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995084,0.000014259823,0.00015476906,0.00001511894,0.0000017838782,0.000009946372,0.000006309,0.0000016955394,0.00028780662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986582,0.0007384596,0.00008067427,0.00020697866,0.00014455807,0.00017107972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850176,0.009127903,0.0026792418,0.0017289977,0.00022723356,0.0012189667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003672455,0.00016061963,0.00032660295,0.00045396917,0.0007534071,0.0022067325,0.00029904558,0.0009804575,0.004325421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013540159,0.00034354473,0.00011454692,0.00020574672,0.0022120937,0.0011937756,0.0021426366,0.0009998907,0.00026993942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010999999,0.0069292677,0.6968404,0.0005295948,0.00039626553,0.0014534129,0.029529976,0.003127258,0.104160175,0.043686856,0.0008952595,0.101451576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043401448,0.0031022872,0.92906207,0.00010722397,0.0001682049,0.0012100247,0.016787807,0.0055779535,0.01051557,0.02778367,0.0051467926,0.00010439787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025005537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005061658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004325421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021820336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021248379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019421995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569477954","doi":"","title":"Comparative experimental evidence from Peru, Chile, and the U.S. shows substantial variation among social groups","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Public good; Explanatory power; Relevance (law); Ultimatum game; Preference; Economics; Public economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.02878182819046008,"score_gpt":0.2642123126168668,"score_spread":0.2354304844264067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569477954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9580803,0.0016252442,0.00073562167,0.0021779272,0.000025441128,0.0000417025,0.001473355,0.000017540011,0.035822798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927249,0.0014006479,0.0005411886,0.00033091896,0.000026307796,0.00010203588,0.0015022662,0.000013193014,0.0033585557],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845386,0.0010321242,0.000058467675,0.00014510495,0.00017933232,0.00013110328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98212653,0.0104918815,0.0033531077,0.0018689055,0.0017359541,0.00042357977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037563378,0.00026391455,0.00034124413,0.0014890019,0.0012964661,0.0012539045,0.0005735655,0.0005017665,0.011914617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146372365,0.00018720192,0.00020696581,0.0028554015,0.001965027,0.00074038777,0.0014920813,0.0005081354,0.0010103865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003311298,0.0038416036,0.71513414,0.0013905845,0.0013596917,0.0006557218,0.030732686,0.0018211768,0.0058675334,0.04926241,0.02809973,0.15852349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025519606,0.00048139403,0.95517004,0.00025467042,0.00022146225,0.0001297054,0.013819319,0.00054899335,0.0014439129,0.008742975,0.018883158,0.000049155926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0242663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04177929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0242663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011118386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007502056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04825014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570505895","doi":"10.1023/a:1025415730078","title":"Evolutionary Stability in the Investment-Opportunism-Retaliation Game","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bioeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Equilibrium selection; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Stability (learning theory); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Evolutionarily stable strategy; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mechanism (biology); Evolutionary game theory; Selection (genetic algorithm); Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Best response; Economics; Repeated game; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08019208051458514,"score_gpt":0.33370568373552373,"score_spread":0.2535136032209386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570505895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97341216,0.00013379604,0.01950441,0.0008364486,0.000011526962,0.000021260308,0.000047397167,0.000025554862,0.006007464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966599,0.00007717529,0.0019567683,0.00003646132,0.00000761008,0.000012661467,0.000022358377,0.0000052093246,0.0012218558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924576,0.00042377735,0.000028791777,0.00010043569,0.00007756814,0.00012369586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892876,0.008172967,0.0012265982,0.00040570335,0.0003980017,0.00050911936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029560754,0.0003361534,0.0007944571,0.0008612768,0.0008811791,0.0020404817,0.00094516465,0.0020494852,0.0031250622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01709513,0.00030093006,0.00042288163,0.0003867283,0.0016249663,0.0021678167,0.00092731125,0.001217539,0.00023176573],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011075505,0.00041599758,0.042839583,0.00021228485,0.0003342147,0.0011604766,0.0017505412,0.25923675,0.01619626,0.6338947,0.002526087,0.04032557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014852616,0.00023967147,0.016251951,0.00002817659,0.000080815684,0.0006113605,0.0005608326,0.6262762,0.0009697202,0.3537897,0.0009781865,0.000064799766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017361292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001473348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031250622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094538345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006443205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015633404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571659945","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.990942","title":"Which Way to Cooperate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.0339594537168719,"score_gpt":0.3094130547314147,"score_spread":0.2754536010145428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571659945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20902625,0.001007771,0.08140215,0.05296906,0.0027482791,0.000743098,0.0014334056,0.000787531,0.64988244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419878,0.00047683655,0.027529618,0.005447153,0.00031681266,0.000786193,0.0005239712,0.00029265,0.122639075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964965,0.0015713993,0.00020851246,0.00061059126,0.0005283801,0.00058461726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163,0.0021254516,0.00089014036,0.0026080972,0.0010786118,0.0016677349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036422142,0.0006176458,0.0007771993,0.00094765064,0.001896439,0.0039359774,0.0012247156,0.0030467021,0.055036027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013001239,0.0005483086,0.0012511935,0.00045571756,0.002466901,0.007149095,0.0030564475,0.0036518588,0.013285979],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006858529,0.0006945784,0.011359912,0.00059982936,0.00047598232,0.0005149465,0.004394877,0.0024698514,0.010368927,0.78395665,0.05434476,0.13013384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002706913,0.00043051678,0.0068978798,0.00034256326,0.00022896586,0.0009189939,0.009380534,0.008896426,0.003291637,0.84444106,0.12474323,0.00015750705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060294056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011959972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055036027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006923358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002341089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18411386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572190787","doi":"","title":"Foundations of Team and Cooperation Management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economia. Seria Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Profitability index; Incentive; Business; Meaning (existential); Supply chain; Externality; Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.032446153529930445,"score_gpt":0.32600987719712465,"score_spread":0.2935637236671942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572190787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025264844,0.009786582,0.4364967,0.019219251,0.000808036,0.00021798805,0.00028511725,0.00018393145,0.5077376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87776655,0.0069140075,0.07781194,0.0011895737,0.0011410447,0.0005692232,0.00022995341,0.00007389736,0.034303796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967539,0.0014639619,0.00016662804,0.0005792882,0.00063031324,0.00040596578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961915,0.0018344696,0.00057509,0.00054572755,0.00048040974,0.0003727314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029712317,0.00059472444,0.0005684318,0.0015126445,0.002558801,0.0048997737,0.0013814081,0.002341578,0.008742966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004560404,0.0002630163,0.00071099144,0.0013924238,0.01090078,0.0041093985,0.0028749846,0.0019468747,0.001339803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016138785,0.000004684449,0.000058321963,0.000014422584,0.0000026032137,0.000015217908,0.0001443923,0.0007144251,0.000018495224,0.9960681,0.0004887503,0.0024689657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066976004,0.000011523484,0.00015110752,0.000039085742,0.000002975851,0.000030853535,0.00014349684,0.003472796,0.000034237775,0.9734629,0.022638796,0.000005618621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039880634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013525311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008742966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039663976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027697906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029248118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572378578","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1136229","title":"Incentive Design and Trust: Comparing the Effects of Tournament and Team-Based Incentives on Trust","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Incentive; Tournament; Endowment; Affect (linguistics); Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Communication source; Business; Trustworthiness; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.020396472783349686,"score_gpt":0.28182113734164554,"score_spread":0.2614246645582959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572378578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99688834,0.00009491856,0.0009799607,0.00016653836,0.000030379517,0.00003508382,0.000027929356,0.000007676567,0.0017690887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895096,0.000033965778,0.00040901042,0.0000367443,0.0000118204225,0.0000313209,0.000021667829,0.000004849579,0.0004995199],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478865,0.0037613148,0.0002645291,0.00030834676,0.00042706172,0.00045008498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90615845,0.070260644,0.0124992365,0.004697829,0.0015766934,0.0048070294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008548201,0.00038552316,0.0007453962,0.00040492363,0.00046764396,0.0015800438,0.0006253661,0.0011931633,0.0060851024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062391516,0.0003179641,0.0004580886,0.00040867997,0.0009258135,0.0011769134,0.0010495876,0.0012579635,0.00039554163],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.19650516,0.034030672,0.45206833,0.0013075359,0.0023999354,0.0005669852,0.0041217417,0.02776423,0.031320475,0.04094442,0.0036155907,0.20535496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013267527,0.047823448,0.7723516,0.00021375131,0.0019229153,0.00060064375,0.0032768354,0.094067894,0.009495842,0.051123604,0.005546051,0.00030994514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015637529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016832919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008548201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010107673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010956544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04520774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572893874","doi":"10.1111/jems.12078","title":"Experimental Study of Firm Bounded Rationality and the Pattern of Trade","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Bounded rationality; Bounded function; Profit maximization; Rationality; Maximization; Heuristic; Profit (economics); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.047697814106372964,"score_gpt":0.3267185160051642,"score_spread":0.27902070189879125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572893874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940759,0.00003042372,0.0029807074,0.00014262309,0.000013861833,0.000086662665,0.0000787611,0.000012996121,0.002577996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970886,0.000033641256,0.0022085423,0.000052009873,0.00000997965,0.00010970902,0.000051324583,0.0000033483796,0.00044289543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978471,0.0014133058,0.00013082495,0.00024152007,0.00023948564,0.00012776953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460388,0.04440914,0.0047746385,0.0038172218,0.00050049974,0.00045969494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036113278,0.00040257254,0.00041339805,0.00025085316,0.00035388483,0.001075636,0.00066098745,0.0008298845,0.0025293375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020028982,0.00027434112,0.00024509663,0.00035966138,0.0013314849,0.00095645705,0.00070163293,0.0009969852,0.00014968702],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029280437,0.07563342,0.24472074,0.001464667,0.0021039795,0.0016872536,0.008728703,0.18029138,0.17455845,0.1618488,0.0032895803,0.1163927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009627994,0.051180743,0.19930446,0.00021475238,0.0006635664,0.00093620253,0.0043676635,0.4184361,0.11535073,0.1866731,0.012776289,0.00046840202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078039576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058679335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036113278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058982265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049835176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019098759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575418371","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1820922","title":"Stated Social Behavior and Revealed Actions: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries Using Representative Samples","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; Econometrics; Geography; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.11898919051166164,"score_gpt":0.4044844957084001,"score_spread":0.2854953051967385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575418371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983541,0.0002072638,0.00015029647,0.000042106545,0.0000043863733,0.000026686916,0.00032098492,0.0000015356308,0.00089275214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733835,0.00034820946,0.00020175568,0.000070367656,0.000008334911,0.000059913924,0.0014543154,0.0000028431386,0.0005160445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977443,0.001399118,0.00016124742,0.00025301724,0.0001878309,0.00025451696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986914,0.00608053,0.0040132897,0.0011995663,0.001235684,0.0005570288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041182167,0.0006051274,0.0006920393,0.0016443743,0.0013930604,0.0019160769,0.0009076976,0.0009004523,0.0021529694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008614529,0.00051567325,0.00057596026,0.0036175528,0.0014328635,0.00069170166,0.0018519459,0.00082308915,0.00040866595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038474204,0.00037260438,0.9906792,0.000047697453,0.00028184327,0.00019317082,0.0031446472,0.0002878292,0.00016651906,0.00032388428,0.00033765033,0.0037802334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011435737,0.00027336302,0.9873089,0.00006315648,0.00026444008,0.00012560107,0.009590512,0.00036454227,0.00025976176,0.00019210431,0.001425138,0.000018098623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049132288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06710909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049132288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070789125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060181355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09769261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577688407","doi":"","title":"Opening-Up the Objective Function: Choice Behavior and Economic and Non-Economic Variables – Core and Marginal Altruism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Stylized fact; Microeconomics; Core (optical fiber); Function (biology); Altruism (biology); Preference; Marginal utility; Economic model; Econometrics; Time preference; Demand curve; Revealed preference; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.012932290292872097,"score_gpt":0.2828507525201501,"score_spread":0.269918462227278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577688407","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08014439,0.0012476179,0.87538546,0.00337645,0.00011954046,0.00015697465,0.00041424378,0.00010118106,0.039054163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8432925,0.0014401387,0.11668678,0.00040038774,0.0001472169,0.00048357228,0.00023443047,0.000110606336,0.03720442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998855,0.00077251456,0.000026969323,0.0001480557,0.00008782967,0.00010969353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794585,0.0014507006,0.00014969942,0.0001438502,0.00014020146,0.0001697035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022461528,0.0010191775,0.0012779599,0.0003094787,0.0004749093,0.0023154533,0.0016211469,0.0021563885,0.009394627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004190746,0.00047514745,0.0009960529,0.0007119882,0.0014941365,0.0032710058,0.0011807064,0.0030534982,0.001296986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012401152,0.00016062094,0.00119558,0.00020186999,0.000060142967,0.00019236976,0.00022894793,0.28697976,0.0010374676,0.6805402,0.0027866997,0.0264924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035657402,0.00014356305,0.00082824746,0.00007015613,0.000031823845,0.000120233606,0.00011409215,0.5628969,0.00038456888,0.4292825,0.0060489904,0.000043396936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018434541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013129583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009394627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018956267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012548126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0314281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578187445","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1926209","title":"Reciprocity in Labor Relations: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Long-Term Relationships","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Term (time); Field (mathematics); Labour economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08139292009402183,"score_gpt":0.33365603650532766,"score_spread":0.25226311641130583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578187445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965591,0.000088821944,0.00055614795,0.00015589033,0.000015921813,0.000047011566,0.000039770213,0.0000049153587,0.002532472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677485,0.00012024223,0.0010784885,0.00014348752,0.000025117182,0.0001667285,0.000073665055,0.000008149785,0.0016093634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955057,0.003274012,0.0001764181,0.00043385898,0.00041753444,0.00019240583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9093589,0.06756046,0.00943761,0.00893812,0.0014838618,0.0032210173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010187091,0.00041421936,0.0006520598,0.00058620836,0.0013530537,0.0015542369,0.00090365903,0.0016661714,0.007244829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031130683,0.000595097,0.00029778664,0.00046255902,0.0020552385,0.0013956492,0.001231631,0.0017406679,0.0008883389],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05102485,0.12649786,0.47584054,0.0016221215,0.0016075391,0.0015644679,0.019987097,0.004778389,0.12716281,0.026817333,0.006228504,0.15686859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009878076,0.051318944,0.8487876,0.0003479298,0.0012412998,0.0019136852,0.008973673,0.013374045,0.014402892,0.0399422,0.009535778,0.00028377387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00127648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017189796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010187091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000436676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058981054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05387515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578401508","doi":"10.1086/594527","title":"NERD and Norms: Framework and Experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Computer science; Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Reputation; Empirical research; Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science","score_opus":0.08450054172706681,"score_gpt":0.3577721334519734,"score_spread":0.27327159172490656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578401508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21884695,0.0029361919,0.42371568,0.01645872,0.00045661366,0.005101052,0.0013901072,0.00040973313,0.33068502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8059239,0.0008427097,0.17844972,0.001660278,0.00010265698,0.0056600706,0.00028760426,0.00007759367,0.006995365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97530353,0.01933607,0.00066841225,0.0017024946,0.002373991,0.00061552774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938631,0.050345384,0.0027539618,0.005193129,0.002068251,0.001008369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022340445,0.00082155614,0.0011035027,0.0016746313,0.0026127605,0.0048523676,0.0024119513,0.003675377,0.010475925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04956105,0.0005925179,0.0009117628,0.002046165,0.010594538,0.0065689,0.0049370835,0.004435024,0.00087331404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012332646,0.00059016683,0.0014814377,0.00014938266,0.000016014646,0.00009356324,0.001727836,0.0034566903,0.0003303719,0.9831676,0.0015072697,0.0073564523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043359908,0.00030698918,0.0008933341,0.00013848969,0.00002822554,0.00010630369,0.0016799008,0.027152285,0.00056482427,0.9504335,0.018207166,0.000055323886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004458678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029822136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022340445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047438713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003181564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11814898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578983588","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1936690","title":"On the Value of Improved Informativeness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02719832599223208,"score_gpt":0.29221257679182266,"score_spread":0.26501425079959057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578983588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6276087,0.008264202,0.15672636,0.044930156,0.0007466856,0.00014704654,0.000996497,0.0009163563,0.15966403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862185,0.0006391908,0.0089996,0.00086430606,0.0008885574,0.00003646159,0.0000730453,0.00009273963,0.0021876225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884808,0.007528011,0.00044647505,0.0013427404,0.0015730348,0.0006290117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5909099,0.3635965,0.013047092,0.025193198,0.0044663614,0.0027869432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021834727,0.001193526,0.0024953387,0.0026125854,0.0012273812,0.0054155253,0.003159608,0.0078023737,0.014730122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16024505,0.00092602253,0.00083272747,0.001851262,0.0060873604,0.014274914,0.003233474,0.00650194,0.0009411236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024017696,0.00053058134,0.008676123,0.00064865255,0.00040438052,0.00057491194,0.0006230417,0.041343123,0.0040854462,0.81782925,0.00692266,0.11596006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023723282,0.0002694807,0.0032713206,0.00008202629,0.00017713217,0.0002915496,0.00015426113,0.04610877,0.0017501018,0.94604933,0.0015469271,0.00006195271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034264426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033565352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021834727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017065355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093431113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11547446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580364427","doi":"","title":"Why We Cooperate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04221045640902538,"score_gpt":0.3320510170297955,"score_spread":0.2898405606207701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580364427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10179692,0.0026612626,0.04019797,0.32062283,0.004690216,0.00014985207,0.00036292657,0.00076467637,0.52875334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8412223,0.0010169853,0.00755288,0.052672833,0.0009774928,0.00023564999,0.00020531952,0.0003463325,0.095770314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961748,0.0014102847,0.00010780444,0.0006943859,0.0007271905,0.0008854319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98662823,0.0037282442,0.0014497674,0.002681442,0.0025545647,0.0029578214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044149226,0.00046935107,0.00048307117,0.0007186144,0.0028171716,0.0043193838,0.0010917125,0.00525649,0.031312972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020201197,0.0003854715,0.00059522403,0.00046903885,0.00706514,0.008017082,0.0036435365,0.0048011257,0.01248148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019706684,0.00015854528,0.008255134,0.00021979382,0.00018323786,0.0006168442,0.006507989,0.000839767,0.0038719499,0.75958365,0.1474418,0.07212422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008747645,0.000067434434,0.0047459467,0.00015824584,0.00006323247,0.00067600206,0.006699445,0.0013230675,0.0010999701,0.77890635,0.20609319,0.000079751735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001668845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001563945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031312972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011451854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018411279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1047523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583631408","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.002","title":"Reputation and social (dis)approval in feedback mechanisms: An experimental study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Reputation; Trustworthiness; Private information retrieval; Observability; Set (abstract data type); Imperfect; Negative feedback; Rating system; Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.06530024273687227,"score_gpt":0.3598623804023096,"score_spread":0.2945621376654374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583631408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997486,0.00004102936,0.00052129815,0.0000975225,0.000030249981,0.00007770161,0.000032027656,0.000009621637,0.001704555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973707,0.000045610286,0.0009328016,0.00005935986,0.000044194527,0.00014380926,0.000034160657,0.000012559228,0.0013567513],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956827,0.0025246576,0.00031348816,0.00054190675,0.00056637,0.0003708825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8689904,0.10094141,0.0113170445,0.012923331,0.002173052,0.0036546467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010216993,0.0010594411,0.00093991926,0.0007367925,0.0012429939,0.0026121433,0.0013262142,0.00249529,0.012610483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056331098,0.00078877085,0.00057881756,0.00048581528,0.0033270305,0.0024443204,0.0013930405,0.0029694338,0.00087447476],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12630972,0.30646586,0.19101973,0.002108807,0.0010471842,0.001705648,0.014189451,0.012959408,0.15203318,0.07450051,0.0050865524,0.112573974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.048888866,0.286751,0.38746628,0.00036592197,0.0027412497,0.0027879947,0.008488555,0.11561912,0.05047335,0.089020565,0.0065802196,0.0008169313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011501224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010158921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012610483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010367804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011231289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05403328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585220207","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1820923","title":"To What Extent Do Latin Americans Trust and Cooperate? Field Experiments on Social Exclusion in Six Latin American Countries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; Field (mathematics); Development economics; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.033241379983974625,"score_gpt":0.3392894156798518,"score_spread":0.3060480356958772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585220207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99925953,0.0000129068885,0.00003302267,0.00004136523,0.000002650607,0.000011736803,0.0000058059677,4.8968394e-7,0.00063256006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999127,0.000031734122,0.000108169814,0.000094550414,0.0000028478844,0.000046559253,0.000028629693,0.0000011092565,0.00055948074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985582,0.0009961554,0.000046842106,0.00012789314,0.00007389235,0.00019687138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930252,0.003256176,0.0016743735,0.0008440157,0.00035140384,0.000848982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037478304,0.00056734786,0.0005545917,0.00046859134,0.0023929486,0.0016009117,0.0006325907,0.0009340139,0.0024252464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004938859,0.00027840232,0.00023484658,0.00050071324,0.0027282927,0.00079323194,0.0016593823,0.0010110389,0.0002328011],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036982518,0.045538437,0.750405,0.00030344859,0.0006686717,0.00082394667,0.065031655,0.0017827835,0.044311572,0.011423997,0.0023086746,0.040419307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003612041,0.01463929,0.87475914,0.00013983915,0.00034745038,0.00014778187,0.08606811,0.0033168655,0.0061911205,0.005279342,0.0053794673,0.00011946838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015304889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021986904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015304889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007937681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069218833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030431628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586578638","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1821910","title":"Do Welfare Programs Damage Interpersonal Trust? Experimental Evidence from Representative Samples for Four Latin American Cities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Welfare; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Public economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07085300021523284,"score_gpt":0.37531183029072296,"score_spread":0.30445883007549013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586578638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99896836,0.00005229576,0.00008752924,0.00015983375,0.0000044942185,0.000034416513,0.000068470865,0.000001535761,0.00062303164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988624,0.00010126905,0.00011922082,0.00015143697,0.0000066365774,0.00007730307,0.00020486645,0.0000028456698,0.0004740597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950884,0.0034361235,0.000166505,0.00047002194,0.00041039818,0.00042844255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96396196,0.016983293,0.010338586,0.00474325,0.0025467833,0.001426091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007762891,0.00056696625,0.000599467,0.0008791048,0.002631301,0.0019286841,0.001118932,0.001305095,0.002926825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021498354,0.00048046437,0.0005029061,0.0015413661,0.002814842,0.00097246934,0.0019422588,0.001221524,0.00039726502],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009026068,0.01585134,0.9316954,0.00018437066,0.0013689215,0.00033312413,0.01215708,0.0012415651,0.0021733488,0.0023348415,0.003013209,0.020620788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002058086,0.0027319465,0.9670876,0.00008030124,0.00084226794,0.00007142473,0.020065205,0.0017084057,0.0014024766,0.0016198154,0.0022782523,0.000054193464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04343185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06814901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04343185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018547882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014122017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08635807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588285549","doi":"10.1111/iere.12126","title":"FRAMING OF INCENTIVES AND EFFORT PROVISION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Loss aversion; Incentive; Framing (construction); Lottery; Economics; Intuition; Prospect theory; Framing effect; Microeconomics; Behavioral economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05928257497129681,"score_gpt":0.393319083244135,"score_spread":0.3340365082728382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588285549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79856366,0.0016564542,0.090744436,0.0033780138,0.00017140563,0.0001865706,0.00014856589,0.000071280374,0.10507948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99206585,0.0003484619,0.005787206,0.00015528534,0.000039714938,0.00004507985,0.000025907235,0.00000565923,0.001526765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961932,0.002614859,0.000109782384,0.00028446637,0.00050000474,0.00029781583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889277,0.006598958,0.002282088,0.00096021366,0.000534844,0.00069613755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058610444,0.00064853363,0.0004503978,0.0008072997,0.0005233293,0.0025102214,0.0004941473,0.0015992078,0.0054307156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017388875,0.0005801589,0.00041886195,0.00045067095,0.002247937,0.002249406,0.0011978569,0.0016239918,0.00038317926],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012256324,0.001125792,0.01618583,0.00046275332,0.00018147414,0.0003560805,0.0018428072,0.033355787,0.013704588,0.85613346,0.0016427792,0.07378291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041711578,0.0013513203,0.060261026,0.00032479354,0.0001904586,0.000337608,0.0010755638,0.04607117,0.003656631,0.8757301,0.010407537,0.00017668195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062769785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005709711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058610444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013135386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008633709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030996561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591038285","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1514137","title":"The Social Efficiency of Fairness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.014454438783322344,"score_gpt":0.33078767870678566,"score_spread":0.3163332399234633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591038285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19877979,0.0018892023,0.15351972,0.026861005,0.0005497409,0.00017791548,0.00028403496,0.00006589506,0.6178727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98411363,0.00022682894,0.004234832,0.0008178269,0.00026530726,0.000108307315,0.000025646756,0.000023504752,0.010184288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885175,0.006942974,0.00041517284,0.0013723766,0.0019231985,0.0008287946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96745044,0.023100147,0.0022155454,0.00426876,0.0021509056,0.0008141936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011996799,0.0005160061,0.0011671743,0.0014070716,0.0021842902,0.0047162645,0.001070976,0.0028025322,0.011622247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035702378,0.00040910873,0.0007988003,0.0010771978,0.009862383,0.0060777036,0.0024599244,0.0024246466,0.0005599999],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023865812,0.000021248527,0.00051789783,0.00001562876,0.000024850267,0.000014911163,0.00014753664,0.0008961475,0.000065999644,0.9935503,0.0007189004,0.0040027048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001571344,0.0000112311,0.00063694594,0.000009166643,0.0000117788495,0.000021947859,0.00008910994,0.0016040195,0.000073161624,0.99577856,0.0017435568,0.0000047526723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014628578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010808196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011996799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027859956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024501206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063445926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591101827","doi":"10.4236/tel.2016.66115","title":"Rationalizing Irrational Beliefs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Bank of Canada; Acadia University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Irrational number; Sequential equilibrium; Markov perfect equilibrium; Extensive-form game; Class (philosophy); Subgame; Equilibrium selection; Economics; Sequential game; Computer science; Repeated game; Microeconomics; Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01838283154205816,"score_gpt":0.28566306569360056,"score_spread":0.2672802341515424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591101827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29860938,0.0009378312,0.39450565,0.017942563,0.0003299427,0.00021486025,0.00026168508,0.00041668947,0.28678152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834661,0.00018003224,0.0114491405,0.00092708634,0.00006877009,0.00010394883,0.000053224485,0.000028963217,0.0037226677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500656,0.002354935,0.0002512041,0.00075522496,0.001078502,0.00055347255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98974484,0.0054008085,0.0015106542,0.0018239884,0.0011927088,0.00032698148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004873701,0.0006510371,0.00055021787,0.00083154166,0.00075341424,0.003117672,0.0010268335,0.0018752365,0.005593844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01860538,0.00034515728,0.0005738947,0.00035531327,0.0052229073,0.0038799199,0.0020014283,0.0023796866,0.0005138705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029868514,0.000033542063,0.0010288738,0.000041807274,0.000027763464,0.000089105626,0.0005954231,0.0019628156,0.0005977575,0.9906667,0.00072287186,0.004203408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033885524,0.000024227078,0.0005808447,0.000028465569,0.000017934803,0.00009073141,0.00032208333,0.011559659,0.00049479195,0.9836601,0.0031734328,0.000013846549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010940108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083392096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005593844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015889609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009984043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025774956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592024835","doi":"10.1002/mde.2723","title":"Strategic Experimentation in the Lab","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial and Decision Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Spillover effect; Weighting; Prior probability; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Strategic interaction; Economics; Experimental economics; Prospect theory; Mathematical economics; Strategic complements; Econometrics; Complete information; Game theory; Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11670378720819682,"score_gpt":0.36303723579562736,"score_spread":0.24633344858743053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592024835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86582744,0.00039240895,0.08978997,0.0013709133,0.00026196087,0.0013658168,0.000494651,0.0004361262,0.040060665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629496,0.00017485418,0.028340735,0.0006910033,0.00007914028,0.0023167531,0.00027225824,0.000076227014,0.005099497],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834072,0.011145025,0.0006924717,0.002112387,0.0017596022,0.00088327617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441317,0.03415183,0.0047219386,0.01341062,0.002110166,0.0014738506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013172788,0.000940934,0.000795802,0.00042546602,0.00091867713,0.002164396,0.001426533,0.0014263816,0.010455787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03835404,0.00048162974,0.00062643114,0.00054538215,0.0026029206,0.0018577573,0.0024674488,0.0021592777,0.0016919698],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020027155,0.028983304,0.07798591,0.002482145,0.001438317,0.00098142,0.009150526,0.050293453,0.18934648,0.27377957,0.011972464,0.33355924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056988555,0.060724944,0.04762161,0.0008031054,0.00087888824,0.0012385036,0.0044842865,0.1265385,0.20154685,0.42287424,0.12699899,0.0005912022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039794328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044102207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013172788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082475756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014616464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06966519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595094419","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.323223","title":"Can Groups be Trusted? An Experimental Study of Collective Trust","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Dictator game; Social psychology; Group (periodic table); Element (criminal law); Express trust; Perception; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03939623889895873,"score_gpt":0.321104905245295,"score_spread":0.2817086663463363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595094419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99487984,0.000056448356,0.00091666775,0.00054886646,0.00004439831,0.00006320644,0.000022068318,0.000008348547,0.0034602182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975224,0.00005652353,0.0010491421,0.0001373816,0.000029879553,0.00011926328,0.000024007797,0.000007469653,0.0010539126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965412,0.0022136741,0.00014893318,0.0004823521,0.00038508428,0.00022868118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90435946,0.06819177,0.011141216,0.012747266,0.0010369869,0.002523315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073558018,0.00067390205,0.00061744393,0.00053587503,0.0017574272,0.0019858077,0.001248582,0.002429194,0.011586397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04270773,0.0005566963,0.0004953083,0.00047544396,0.0043325364,0.0032145875,0.001691704,0.0028107958,0.0006703834],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07213365,0.17041156,0.1431182,0.0022272626,0.0020466286,0.002949718,0.046939123,0.011353857,0.122399144,0.28228614,0.009695801,0.13443899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.034729134,0.13375479,0.15448208,0.0006121578,0.002206261,0.0033560663,0.028404694,0.09234512,0.039006896,0.49262515,0.017940413,0.00053739245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074223516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007142023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011586397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007254868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072279334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038901627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599549781","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1021787","title":"Flexible Approximation of Subjective Expectations Using Probability Questions: An Application to the Investment Game","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative distribution function; Random variable; Realization (probability); Probability distribution; Variable (mathematics); Mathematical optimization; Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Interpolation (computer graphics); Function (biology); Econometrics; Cumulative prospect theory; Mathematics; Probability density function; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Expected utility hypothesis; Motion (physics)","score_opus":0.03589985473535956,"score_gpt":0.3613465771750893,"score_spread":0.3254467224397297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599549781","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052421138,0.000101630474,0.9448381,0.00046955215,0.00002683395,0.00007930712,0.00007592681,0.00009844634,0.0018891182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7781348,0.00024748745,0.21859999,0.0001519403,0.00007860452,0.00024845725,0.00018442007,0.00007154729,0.0022827464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928341,0.005345053,0.0002612565,0.0007341459,0.0005982429,0.00022726301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88471216,0.10510941,0.003182686,0.00415801,0.0017754805,0.0010622515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019466853,0.0012068471,0.0019236525,0.0011155801,0.0007064231,0.003359237,0.0031039892,0.0025518772,0.0052927616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11460007,0.0011493728,0.0019315942,0.0013938732,0.0030603977,0.006809115,0.0030596924,0.003880895,0.0002941343],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034391394,0.00024032178,0.004619017,0.0001302346,0.00018809522,0.00037235647,0.0012577259,0.3456479,0.0010985585,0.6079394,0.0010036238,0.03715882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029299403,0.00003496798,0.00053842436,0.000010796972,0.000011574074,0.00003464685,0.00004256169,0.8357928,0.00012887435,0.16315065,0.00020411656,0.000021258094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068959836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033981884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019466853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002075795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013359223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102951765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607029736","doi":"","title":"Inferring Buyer Strategies and their Impact on Monopolist Pricing","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Microeconomics; Economics; Market power; Pricing strategies; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.07784717080084091,"score_gpt":0.41745461103506876,"score_spread":0.33960744023422784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607029736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99610126,0.000037099773,0.003221594,0.000059942075,0.000003854616,0.00002425119,0.00008993849,0.000026491945,0.00043558577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673414,0.000032654836,0.002891012,0.000022222459,0.000004646199,0.000019101954,0.00008455348,0.000005049523,0.00020660803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973224,0.0015748012,0.00014059602,0.00041508928,0.0003666808,0.00018049599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8802591,0.101679325,0.008642101,0.0073705567,0.0010160276,0.0010328589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101078,0.00072138885,0.0008711934,0.0006634254,0.00030949965,0.002021122,0.0011038044,0.0015435022,0.0020270736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056347117,0.00078218186,0.00045828774,0.00047359307,0.000816267,0.0016183533,0.00064120494,0.0017934231,0.000377977],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012618547,0.009846399,0.6372814,0.0009677884,0.0014930535,0.00059053296,0.0022479834,0.14072321,0.066140376,0.020697398,0.00096103665,0.10643225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005149907,0.004584441,0.22033876,0.000045639554,0.00040904846,0.0003043773,0.00042198176,0.7248015,0.027849996,0.020073602,0.0004893555,0.00016634658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001283391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018678139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0101078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008006628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006632051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05345577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607925961","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3149007","title":"Statistical Power of within and Between-Subjects Designs in Economic Experiments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statistical power; Sample size determination; Statistics; Nonparametric statistics; Logit; Context (archaeology); Parametric statistics; Design of experiments; Probit; Statistical hypothesis testing; Power (physics); Computer science; Sample (material); Statistical model; Type I and type II errors; Power analysis; Econometrics; Probit model; Tobit model; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.029334969258140886,"score_gpt":0.3356884213496127,"score_spread":0.3063534520914718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607925961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4334348,0.0043979436,0.49645588,0.0039054246,0.0047092848,0.01275682,0.0016319575,0.0014354195,0.041272458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652737,0.0004614825,0.100669116,0.0016582006,0.0008575845,0.024929352,0.0007274319,0.0011999697,0.004223144],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.45792055,0.44462663,0.01802812,0.035135288,0.039777465,0.004511901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08766947,0.8388172,0.014061817,0.04962491,0.007307918,0.002518715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34864813,0.002493616,0.006883142,0.0036823978,0.0031311794,0.0068931296,0.0044891983,0.010491651,0.01770913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70160776,0.0033674445,0.0057256846,0.0026185925,0.013685814,0.013344007,0.005306436,0.009060666,0.0022047574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.30910766,0.021695001,0.07073886,0.00722965,0.021907905,0.0016834892,0.020334948,0.032600015,0.029535383,0.18420549,0.010639366,0.29032224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06121586,0.056893494,0.2117577,0.0016611322,0.008795115,0.0013049539,0.001881613,0.1143144,0.02661521,0.4856307,0.028707251,0.0012225255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073840003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005998331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65135187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026628254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030914356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8032328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1629608274","doi":"","title":"Yours, Mine, and Ours: The Effect of Ersatz Property Rights on Outcome Based Fairness and Reciprocity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Dictator game; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Baseline (sea); Economics; Outcome (game theory); Property (philosophy); Property rights; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023068835987112003,"score_gpt":0.2643524037572847,"score_spread":0.24128356777017268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1629608274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797298,0.00016452509,0.0029081504,0.00054862146,0.000017543316,0.00002888578,0.00007291822,0.000016537273,0.016513076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972481,0.000059259863,0.0013857405,0.00007393149,0.00000861025,0.00003780368,0.000019094005,0.0000111927175,0.0011562813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889554,0.008258796,0.000299707,0.0007774467,0.0012327493,0.0005357973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8937506,0.07763325,0.013421672,0.011075093,0.0015979883,0.0025214702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014268426,0.00032210562,0.0005212896,0.0005265752,0.0007542957,0.0014618718,0.0006907462,0.0007074141,0.010516397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059212986,0.00026466747,0.00030411943,0.0002646357,0.0031715655,0.0018352483,0.0018271297,0.0015403104,0.00077732233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03450949,0.01161926,0.18142378,0.0010030606,0.00073940784,0.00069406437,0.007116295,0.036918327,0.11275288,0.3046398,0.004573101,0.3040106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027725275,0.020530296,0.34987354,0.00027454618,0.0005834785,0.0010615116,0.0034980646,0.0678388,0.080365874,0.45669076,0.016119633,0.00039095824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073388015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014268426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006980235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053050875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07545954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1648562582","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0925-0","title":"Introduction to the special issue “Experiments on conflicts and conflict resolution”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Interpersonal communication; Conflict resolution research; Resolution (logic); Social conflict; Political science; Positive economics; Social policy; Welfare; Negotiation; Social psychology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0608867681284026,"score_gpt":0.3564326289803791,"score_spread":0.2955458608519765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1648562582","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058660266,0.10699812,0.023360178,0.12753825,0.70695645,0.00021951852,0.0013990536,0.00062638836,0.032315407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003705511,0.042907614,0.0068982113,0.090762265,0.8134043,0.00048629285,0.0012934133,0.00040413326,0.0401382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970354,0.0012199021,0.00031338015,0.00047317048,0.0008250603,0.0001330025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759957,0.018520974,0.0010819561,0.0015423844,0.0018103361,0.0010486468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005880642,0.0022264323,0.0022518088,0.0037533948,0.0013212337,0.0037355071,0.0029450255,0.006963512,0.044124722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018036066,0.0007447273,0.0022887788,0.00239439,0.0029137253,0.004224517,0.0027493134,0.008948719,0.017391874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038061225,0.000073716656,0.00009208381,0.0005612883,0.00003274031,0.000044532815,0.000024532332,0.00013735594,0.0003630133,0.011529143,0.9614806,0.025622938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042072388,0.000078893034,0.0008613541,0.0004747552,0.00004192415,0.00016859976,0.0000315074,0.00031466843,0.00024386338,0.034195542,0.96351343,0.000033519464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000711389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013282425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044124722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015068543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014746288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14761192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1690982000","doi":"","title":"Something to Prove: Reputation in Teams and Hiring to Introduce Uncertainty","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Faculty Digital Archive (New York University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Commit; Incentive; Work (physics); Business; Microeconomics; Mechanism (biology); Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02981140355832251,"score_gpt":0.28446213128365605,"score_spread":0.25465072772533354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1690982000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46165535,0.0027369158,0.27952108,0.052660644,0.0012825984,0.00018304097,0.00031101983,0.0003215982,0.20132777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828896,0.00048300586,0.009054801,0.0010396793,0.00029256867,0.00007018273,0.000020422392,0.000026057789,0.0061235754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490744,0.0032198543,0.00015593474,0.0005310006,0.0006735151,0.00051220594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95678353,0.027650867,0.0075558983,0.005062506,0.001228711,0.0017185145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077538164,0.0003771197,0.0006326392,0.0005518763,0.002067244,0.0042706993,0.0009824281,0.0037425105,0.011393074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039396822,0.0003389426,0.0008342337,0.0007166676,0.0054182047,0.0065751635,0.0024396204,0.00293347,0.000689037],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016318972,0.00020924023,0.0056046206,0.00010562437,0.00007953777,0.00031919687,0.0016218381,0.008180466,0.00089820713,0.95641804,0.0039424994,0.022457492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012024485,0.00016946587,0.0035213477,0.00007256946,0.000058012844,0.00022120209,0.0007433047,0.01693058,0.0006917271,0.96996796,0.007456851,0.000046741497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011330466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008169256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011393074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016994955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010157722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041006625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1703143719","doi":"10.1002/9781444303117.ch10","title":"Extended Contact and Including Others in the Self: Building on the Allport/Pettigrew Legacy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0639327901049491,"score_gpt":0.35367311640147875,"score_spread":0.2897403262965297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1703143719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050081033,0.006615666,0.023791455,0.08792794,0.00071478495,0.00006111912,0.00014889523,0.000059357953,0.8305997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87536603,0.014287081,0.010640728,0.0076640095,0.0010997043,0.00014162797,0.00010942574,0.00014776964,0.09054378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984811,0.0007030985,0.00003268675,0.0002601023,0.00041287488,0.0001101228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911822,0.0056951805,0.0005345864,0.0012626464,0.00061851647,0.00070689473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037144348,0.00041454902,0.00066109834,0.0015513824,0.0031236382,0.00540285,0.0013548855,0.0025569436,0.045340847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009208813,0.00022803961,0.0004137174,0.0020183097,0.01078907,0.016769728,0.0060552373,0.0034520878,0.0022912256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030224335,0.00005451219,0.00093925395,0.00007231265,0.000008475658,0.00006733894,0.0020493332,0.00020237402,0.00005773261,0.9364623,0.009602325,0.05045396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016264436,0.000038497088,0.0044768597,0.000284538,0.000019067822,0.00021782274,0.005293691,0.0010768677,0.00021898957,0.8694107,0.11892344,0.000023212764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004534939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008619055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045340847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018502902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020424721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15168023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1712744850","doi":"","title":"Subjective Performance Evaluation and Collusion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Incentive; Delegate; Microeconomics; Business; Dominance (genetics); Payment; Supervisor; Value (mathematics); Industrial organization; Leverage (statistics); Economics; Finance; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.044728660990061585,"score_gpt":0.30462069660175534,"score_spread":0.2598920356116938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1712744850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67709583,0.0021828723,0.18623848,0.005359058,0.00013660683,0.00039906436,0.00019081112,0.00011903805,0.12827827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935917,0.0001787145,0.004496219,0.00014303366,0.000042331343,0.0000698047,0.000020376861,0.000012726682,0.0014451806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680083,0.019416355,0.0014897445,0.0029758075,0.0064086406,0.0017012215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8884667,0.052961104,0.03499279,0.014434823,0.0064574163,0.0026871504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026676813,0.0009898833,0.0009965266,0.0019892675,0.0014086162,0.004620408,0.0008904244,0.0015440616,0.00507737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06931083,0.00050430925,0.00053110806,0.0011848176,0.009265676,0.0034587164,0.006398259,0.0018212881,0.00044398746],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008979203,0.00046045147,0.07956594,0.0005630357,0.0004546786,0.0005105392,0.013885057,0.015240577,0.0065939673,0.714299,0.0022030394,0.1653258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018263407,0.0006283476,0.072219245,0.00041718886,0.00018464244,0.00036907417,0.0035976556,0.023607792,0.0035220443,0.8860781,0.008981778,0.00021139442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011512657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008367371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026676813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025505947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017596806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14108217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17168921","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2403953","title":"Insensitivity to Prices in a Dictator Game","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Dictator game; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012696909510774299,"score_gpt":0.3064154854022483,"score_spread":0.293718575891474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17168921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91758037,0.00017582937,0.033723008,0.002076182,0.00006218281,0.000065820605,0.00014196966,0.00019030897,0.045984276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476755,0.00013657704,0.0015343708,0.00015016142,0.000029670791,0.000026689877,0.000019481122,0.00003168555,0.0033039264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965887,0.0020505819,0.0001745125,0.0003490455,0.0003972108,0.00043994153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8945047,0.09226441,0.0060454193,0.0042080167,0.0009810275,0.0019964015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006640254,0.00067383656,0.0015856442,0.00093414023,0.00067457167,0.0031971557,0.0011402457,0.0018122394,0.009153274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043709066,0.0010768468,0.000785624,0.00045884555,0.0026830365,0.0028036667,0.0017950833,0.0033532174,0.00070521876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039817495,0.0011126054,0.018974097,0.00061363186,0.00050040137,0.0016271716,0.0022976624,0.08268549,0.034670345,0.814614,0.004406569,0.034516312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005677354,0.00068313995,0.013022325,0.00004070803,0.00020128283,0.0008415781,0.00050080544,0.27132085,0.0036175859,0.7081898,0.00087446376,0.00013971205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011525638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084594276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009153274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091377913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086428784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035117447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17698613","doi":"10.2337/dc07-1057","title":"Five-year prevalence and persistence of disturbed eating behavior and eating disorders in girls with type 1 diabetes.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Development (topology); Mathematics","score_opus":0.022443102412448852,"score_gpt":0.2904657675711295,"score_spread":0.2680226651586807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17698613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986613,0.00025506376,0.00001721543,0.00005488319,0.000008616048,0.000005513697,0.00069287175,0.0000020229975,0.000302463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987545,0.00017213714,0.000024603538,0.000015210757,0.00000620915,0.000007557965,0.00072176167,0.0000011970327,0.00029679868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996693,0.00006797273,0.000046366105,0.00006828824,0.00006173719,0.00008630805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981034,0.00022525317,0.0009948451,0.000081324484,0.00015137934,0.00044389826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079074403,0.00018081383,0.00030306238,0.0010781577,0.0005223886,0.0006430822,0.0005873204,0.00072324055,0.0027633351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026698478,0.0002928427,0.000600573,0.00094202964,0.00028341362,0.0007714531,0.00079100707,0.0010684492,0.00040044784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067403314,0.00004185626,0.999126,0.000004338055,0.000024159945,0.00002600015,0.000095343334,0.0000071755135,0.000020408219,0.000007525843,0.00005783158,0.00052198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013555522,0.000027200933,0.999658,0.0000031700658,0.0000069851444,0.000042998843,0.00020868881,0.000012701771,0.0000042352053,0.000003106312,0.000030202498,0.0000013308439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022289392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021859657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022289392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044552665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003430116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04431933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1771013307","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2421943","title":"The Effect of Effectiveness: Donor Response to Aid Effectiveness in a Direct Mail Fundraising Experiment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Direct mail; Opt-in email; Direct response; Advertising; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Digital marketing","score_opus":0.009628970815928324,"score_gpt":0.32050579545672575,"score_spread":0.3108768246407974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1771013307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996002,0.000035630914,0.00028607197,0.0002612083,0.000055605444,0.00010924334,0.000093404335,0.00001184326,0.0031449767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303037,0.000033124517,0.00057928165,0.00033019914,0.00007926071,0.00040406873,0.00006211308,0.000012508687,0.0054690363],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201196,0.0056608417,0.00034058432,0.0008484564,0.0004601053,0.00067798264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.906088,0.078478664,0.0075454377,0.003488203,0.0009140465,0.003485719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010121163,0.0007328427,0.0012314316,0.00046463916,0.00085420604,0.0028909154,0.0009498165,0.0038956385,0.013082422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035794556,0.0005743144,0.0004171708,0.00045362266,0.0019187982,0.0013025382,0.0014842432,0.00349503,0.0017184976],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.45228451,0.16279545,0.16662318,0.0014700227,0.0013131291,0.00069169165,0.0068948865,0.009777947,0.11265167,0.016027674,0.0036048805,0.06586496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.039940953,0.18324982,0.6567322,0.0002347118,0.002945187,0.00048255682,0.0068199458,0.023259029,0.058106273,0.020712348,0.0069310316,0.0005859092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010917234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009257001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013082422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007889591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001254435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05352646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1791178231","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01501.x","title":"How do additional alternatives affect individual choice under uncertainty?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Choice set; Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.17053212004090765,"score_gpt":0.25991005219110497,"score_spread":0.08937793215019732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1791178231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99245536,0.00010329629,0.0029750962,0.00021151267,0.00001864096,0.000048427297,0.00005681814,0.000009664274,0.004121047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974269,0.00007216895,0.0018696457,0.00006282729,0.000008559187,0.000032711832,0.00003887636,0.0000058406617,0.00048244183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946326,0.0034965165,0.00017880143,0.00055040687,0.000897502,0.00024424648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974757,0.018924639,0.0030732767,0.0016432755,0.0007321833,0.0008696447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006182112,0.0005226292,0.00085886667,0.0004747298,0.0006080339,0.002997206,0.0005870582,0.0016947736,0.0063311085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03161385,0.00036848316,0.00059191964,0.00045709583,0.0011745173,0.0017737462,0.0010598329,0.0012212821,0.00032378142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033710748,0.008414225,0.46499112,0.0018485344,0.0032782075,0.0021116866,0.012076328,0.08784444,0.10634534,0.059021384,0.002411078,0.21794704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015665438,0.010751159,0.5872723,0.00027413046,0.0020441543,0.0005526593,0.0052986294,0.1680898,0.01848533,0.1930511,0.0119740665,0.00064011785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002010717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022474013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063311085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007714311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034344502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03269458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1800142694","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2684276","title":"Competitiveness and the Gender Gap Among Young Business Professionals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Earnings; Gender gap; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Work (physics); Large sample; Business; Competitive advantage; Labour economics; Economics; Marketing; Accounting","score_opus":0.045219592768206016,"score_gpt":0.33622186389060066,"score_spread":0.29100227112239463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1800142694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883504,0.0010040548,0.000046455672,0.0021909124,0.0000618111,0.0000069481016,0.00008026483,0.00000155726,0.008257601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980223,0.00023420007,0.000011871528,0.00023047767,0.000035421428,0.000005186811,0.000035387326,0.0000018159176,0.0014232995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987778,0.00027518498,0.000040361538,0.000119688484,0.00018957247,0.00059739384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914881,0.002833742,0.001377437,0.00012241198,0.0004623396,0.0037158963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021756191,0.00019206316,0.00047980098,0.0012782685,0.0019681267,0.002807617,0.00045738157,0.0017738373,0.011288717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065252776,0.00018239339,0.00029598165,0.0009653843,0.001381345,0.001681502,0.0019683852,0.0012550665,0.0009976289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085824507,0.0010713004,0.9337979,0.000080710866,0.000044555432,0.00078342773,0.023337176,0.00011312042,0.0006696515,0.0123274885,0.0032007883,0.02371566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058684676,0.0004047679,0.9271998,0.00010572898,0.000028519082,0.00025646033,0.061717235,0.0001907788,0.00019226868,0.0055146827,0.004311223,0.000019981466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009220122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0142676225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011288717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008640362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023270417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03776455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1830687873","doi":"10.1002/sej.1192","title":"Explorative Versus Exploitative Business Model Change: The Cognitive Antecedents of Firm‐Level Responses to Disruptive Innovation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Perception; Real estate; Business; Cognition; Disruptive innovation; Risk perception; Test (biology); Marketing; Business model; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.5705799625331941,"score_gpt":0.4566479650460423,"score_spread":0.11393199748715177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1830687873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942872,0.000024882624,0.0014847378,0.00010681608,0.000002771021,0.000030097555,0.000007933715,0.0000052091345,0.0040504206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992731,0.000020805046,0.0005243136,0.000027021091,0.0000021773092,0.00001551562,0.000010415652,0.000001326803,0.00012526962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987494,0.0004826806,0.00007786297,0.00016023012,0.00033614849,0.0001937598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982261,0.009037779,0.00555552,0.0013550565,0.00082960783,0.00096105493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002579168,0.00030931795,0.00019630577,0.0010260777,0.0005025321,0.0019867234,0.00037552253,0.0009237407,0.0017387724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016890295,0.00024778768,0.00040460855,0.00054039905,0.0022026268,0.0014840227,0.0015672782,0.0010741369,0.00012400227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029073874,0.0014525132,0.87516266,0.00021654862,0.00014282814,0.00052728166,0.04088942,0.0037087598,0.014874647,0.01697657,0.000270525,0.045487598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002225003,0.0004481312,0.9519707,0.000047471207,0.000047736332,0.00022089628,0.023373235,0.007893663,0.0018516678,0.012897295,0.001169934,0.00005704863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016863099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003505342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002579168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069983857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068049924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013640106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834981560","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v7n11p154","title":"Herd Behavior in the Insurance Market: A Survey","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Herd behavior; Business; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Herd; Actuarial science; Marketing; Herding","score_opus":0.07368519491276977,"score_gpt":0.3423800590507848,"score_spread":0.268694864138015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834981560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99867225,0.000038022332,0.0003034136,0.000065356435,0.0000015921413,0.000056962668,0.00033469527,0.000006913665,0.0005209027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997147,0.0001225886,0.0011374875,0.00014338702,0.000010657941,0.00010605344,0.00055215106,0.0000035577002,0.00077703357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990922,0.00036895284,0.000109172135,0.00010719019,0.00021195503,0.0001104468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136543,0.0033400827,0.0031437706,0.0006550522,0.0008540843,0.0006415084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020947352,0.00017679756,0.0003230682,0.0013068938,0.00056114356,0.0005981318,0.00029069386,0.00078312564,0.0021674794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005028302,0.00028078543,0.00026893042,0.00088786834,0.00032353858,0.0010685571,0.00047741493,0.0006924354,0.00077259785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053481504,0.00060850097,0.9842743,0.000048725335,0.000036440553,0.00015751713,0.002274959,0.00019107474,0.0015434531,0.00009559401,0.000642558,0.01007333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013117441,0.00089569914,0.9887454,0.000021044092,0.000030945295,0.0004919819,0.004286231,0.0024167716,0.0008651886,0.00012328908,0.00208817,0.000022207243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029369504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030201466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029369504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029194064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027332973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011078119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1885334880","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewu019","title":"Sustaining Group Reputation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Unobservable; Temptation; Punishment (psychology); Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Enforcement; Matching (statistics); Psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0362895295359403,"score_gpt":0.2962594734966095,"score_spread":0.25996994396066925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1885334880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5946582,0.0008471788,0.15730022,0.009272864,0.00042400265,0.00037385093,0.0003758208,0.0012921582,0.23545574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844231,0.00011868915,0.0068573323,0.00046831803,0.00007521274,0.00007489323,0.00007906998,0.000058309834,0.007845144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615014,0.0016428272,0.00015618552,0.0008063741,0.00068455015,0.0005599228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95654327,0.009022485,0.008890286,0.018241653,0.0034975782,0.003804768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058332207,0.00046134365,0.00063762226,0.0011246423,0.0021898295,0.00364541,0.0014854373,0.002037913,0.014482745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034483615,0.00038129263,0.00046179004,0.0007051512,0.0025252467,0.0045276773,0.0048491983,0.0014674552,0.0037762495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043790403,0.00085323,0.072518855,0.0006341901,0.00038216606,0.0011841081,0.0073605548,0.007846442,0.030141803,0.5332994,0.024821378,0.3205199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002847664,0.0015339078,0.07147639,0.00032572623,0.00036408563,0.002415417,0.0051117535,0.03856036,0.014278245,0.7265794,0.13885795,0.00021199108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089801254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010810533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014482745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011268379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020863763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048449576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1886073604","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981410.013.30","title":"Applicant Fairness Reactions to the Selection Process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.06513905595471559,"score_gpt":0.2970561874795578,"score_spread":0.23191713152484222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1886073604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43748936,0.0011258686,0.027248276,0.013437444,0.0005130715,0.00014897573,0.00010155183,0.00007026278,0.51986516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472072,0.0003161801,0.0021675033,0.0012859859,0.00024426705,0.000085282336,0.000021964985,0.000039158313,0.04863254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918282,0.005763134,0.00014451561,0.00040561453,0.0012060673,0.00065250724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97968346,0.015485276,0.0013704436,0.0014675999,0.0012939055,0.00069931627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013537847,0.00031873496,0.0004617414,0.00047217816,0.0015100511,0.0031228985,0.0004651729,0.0020807914,0.017863614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034766935,0.00021992464,0.0003142018,0.0004756543,0.0019055852,0.001250547,0.0012945246,0.0030455813,0.0016132955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010259573,0.0004336097,0.014358073,0.00008975836,0.000048273185,0.00026368268,0.007088374,0.0022948608,0.005063881,0.87606245,0.01441077,0.07886027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002488548,0.00058880565,0.08897039,0.00014804718,0.00013609226,0.0003861845,0.0057881866,0.01837208,0.005276249,0.80813,0.07184168,0.00011342417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013632877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014098046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017863614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012388008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010895173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07159585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1889290940","doi":"","title":"Does Economics Have a Gender","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econ journal watch","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Point (geometry); Positive economics; Gender balance; Documentation; Sociology; Schools of economic thought; Economics; Political science; Social science; Gender studies; Neoclassical economics; Law","score_opus":0.042351292741726373,"score_gpt":0.33656082972270746,"score_spread":0.29420953698098107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1889290940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019096129,0.018703043,0.0012636096,0.7500687,0.007378535,0.000009347069,0.00020243162,0.000034203433,0.20324393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.622015,0.019772127,0.0006160274,0.27768365,0.014153899,0.000042087708,0.00014677395,0.00019377931,0.06537669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587554,0.0015040303,0.00015268041,0.0006420859,0.00085007015,0.00097569916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886375,0.0050722077,0.0013553485,0.0011208548,0.0012594659,0.002554587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006914792,0.00030875666,0.00077021285,0.0014942352,0.0044804383,0.0092693055,0.0007866492,0.0045194747,0.026395738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015181426,0.00021625686,0.0005700706,0.0018048486,0.018994153,0.018574651,0.0048047705,0.0046386546,0.005002216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050785995,0.000023838242,0.0038569535,0.00013685072,0.000013431486,0.00014297994,0.008166853,0.000042051826,0.0001287698,0.86933726,0.085549176,0.03255101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014442564,0.000040832514,0.0051160315,0.0006697193,0.000010005503,0.00025170378,0.010464749,0.000049226273,0.00010399292,0.2783458,0.7049094,0.000024121164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046300786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039349888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026395738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041011153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032564695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08830255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901154405","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00410.x","title":"Optimal supervision intensity, collusion, and the organization of work","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Work (physics); Incentive; Intensity (physics); Work Intensity; Limit (mathematics); Range (aeronautics); Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Industrial organization; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08408422889812837,"score_gpt":0.22029176083022117,"score_spread":0.13620753193209278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901154405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860216,0.00017086517,0.0073519074,0.0003802704,0.000009119481,0.00004810826,0.000047088808,0.00001170115,0.005959357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895775,0.000034653942,0.0007537213,0.000016453345,0.0000046624655,0.00001544458,0.000010477779,0.0000014264688,0.00020543285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966583,0.0016928418,0.0001931558,0.00035123373,0.0004924689,0.0006119655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703096,0.014376895,0.008766208,0.0027309884,0.0015169423,0.0022993963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00596922,0.0003041339,0.00066891714,0.00070776505,0.00074392406,0.0019659195,0.0005587853,0.0008110026,0.0036600833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025175916,0.00032465553,0.00021157284,0.0004620188,0.0022512227,0.0011546105,0.0019380547,0.0005319696,0.00022461009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052898866,0.0030249539,0.38143802,0.0007531129,0.0006214716,0.0005820837,0.005935077,0.15326568,0.021823425,0.27873385,0.0035662507,0.14496624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073096046,0.0013957672,0.40149853,0.00017186592,0.00015289761,0.0002662803,0.0046803425,0.15207417,0.0038127126,0.43247765,0.0026251639,0.000113651375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001608641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015424407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00596922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020305396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012186337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031568646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1909675084","doi":"10.1111/caje.12129","title":"Organizational form and output quality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Winnipeg","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arrow; Microeconomics; Profit (economics); Economics; Quality (philosophy); Information asymmetry; Empirical research; Altruism (biology); Variance (accounting); Industrial organization; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.28236310922576446,"score_gpt":0.2665868590227023,"score_spread":0.01577625020306217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1909675084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512247,0.00030588818,0.007821769,0.000866329,0.000030673516,0.000047749083,0.00022782246,0.000036874062,0.03943814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989115,0.000030057412,0.00042581966,0.00001597327,0.000012107172,0.000006095473,0.000046243644,0.0000032880225,0.0005489367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979139,0.0007186246,0.00013899575,0.00024333269,0.0006915271,0.00029372188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96290934,0.0136311995,0.01242959,0.0036920512,0.0038517304,0.003486164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025620917,0.00021938475,0.00029566887,0.0012592893,0.0006294073,0.003053466,0.00046370953,0.00048627835,0.0064886287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018072957,0.00011475159,0.00026932068,0.0015063586,0.0021121718,0.0012282939,0.0017615563,0.00060563313,0.00044624516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034051182,0.00073546416,0.8138825,0.00022342388,0.0003690863,0.00023263291,0.0022065798,0.01804861,0.0022945707,0.08986817,0.0017759246,0.070022486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001034731,0.0005540066,0.8715488,0.000101569916,0.000079251105,0.00019030346,0.0021773013,0.020150827,0.0012856006,0.09783006,0.0059307823,0.000048151964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010607465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010855626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064886287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014599208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060131046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021706581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911462145","doi":"10.1111/joms.12075","title":"‘Thinking Before Acting’ or ‘Acting Before Thinking’: Antecedents of Individual Action Propensity in Work Situations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Ivey Business School, Western University; Università Bocconi; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Action (physics); Psychology; Propensity score matching; Social psychology; Work (physics); Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.13082133275817234,"score_gpt":0.3874501391796379,"score_spread":0.25662880642146557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911462145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99732995,0.00003618954,0.0004803028,0.00013882,0.000005451801,0.000018440529,0.000019621066,0.0000058579044,0.0019653763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994936,0.000023502189,0.00030143137,0.000020154317,0.000004138157,0.000013655104,0.000025019548,0.0000020793061,0.00011643835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968959,0.0017080153,0.00031942216,0.00030260778,0.00051152764,0.00026252732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586606,0.021504227,0.012743719,0.0016589437,0.0012846903,0.004147848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027662918,0.00022301116,0.00024389305,0.0010480838,0.0007489381,0.001747835,0.000402308,0.0012039521,0.0048489515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022716366,0.00027965772,0.00038374204,0.0006406438,0.0017896002,0.00076146587,0.0011238754,0.0012041775,0.00038581764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016940269,0.00087668153,0.97845125,0.00008374749,0.0001342498,0.00020932908,0.0068253074,0.0011336957,0.0017032996,0.0014348865,0.00020406094,0.0087741045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107739725,0.00014995065,0.9899629,0.000029633411,0.000018452714,0.00014460178,0.0049776835,0.0017629339,0.0001935375,0.0022725265,0.0004524511,0.000024499557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019624366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048489515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044817693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054900406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016221404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914585052","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9134.2012.00350.x","title":"Group Identity and the Moral Hazard Problem: Experimental Evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Moral hazard; Identity (music); Principal (computer security); Collective identity; Stochastic game; Enforcement; Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Incentive; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Computer security; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.10756450140920149,"score_gpt":0.35942220059743907,"score_spread":0.2518576991882376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914585052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790743,0.00034100332,0.008136107,0.0009318059,0.00006160379,0.00013190773,0.000057470024,0.000021482188,0.011244211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381363,0.000268765,0.0044447547,0.0002957219,0.0000386498,0.00014693521,0.000050377752,0.000011025335,0.0009301026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929317,0.004947031,0.00037114733,0.000543358,0.0008910046,0.00031576309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88741845,0.08224459,0.017807856,0.009714266,0.0011257377,0.0016892123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013566475,0.0006215216,0.0006904355,0.0005624252,0.00090843946,0.0015810152,0.00112894,0.002063302,0.010763436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059559446,0.00042386597,0.00035442688,0.00048936077,0.002715958,0.001875099,0.001606375,0.0018443062,0.0006843924],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025345607,0.112290934,0.17430589,0.0038855616,0.001816229,0.0013982219,0.0072436,0.028912222,0.082931705,0.28294823,0.009969712,0.26895213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012123348,0.045964494,0.17443538,0.0011391824,0.0011591204,0.003027753,0.0062822322,0.13598576,0.045735653,0.5521021,0.021610437,0.00043450829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003735226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002928899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013566475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048100002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064050494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07174724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921219746","doi":"10.1111/caje.12123","title":"Leadership and gender in groups: An experiment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Leadership style; Social psychology; Psychology; Legitimacy; Position (finance); Style (visual arts); Transactional leadership; Leadership; Transformational leadership; Outcome (game theory); Shared leadership; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.4937706557438688,"score_gpt":0.28471105061793356,"score_spread":0.20905960512593524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921219746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99162275,0.000035615743,0.0013976033,0.00044117385,0.00017091692,0.0014495043,0.00014388558,0.000056284214,0.004682204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98122793,0.000088517285,0.007736982,0.0009137212,0.00013644113,0.0044122986,0.00017509783,0.000030405019,0.005278745],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963315,0.0017498112,0.00023293709,0.0004953417,0.0006482766,0.000542153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971826,0.018713685,0.0022937811,0.0025909054,0.00090383546,0.0036717253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072495397,0.0009808256,0.00087698054,0.0005216669,0.0021340176,0.0015654803,0.0021172946,0.0021615825,0.012976615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009963329,0.0005783778,0.00044037806,0.00037605848,0.0019754197,0.0014467454,0.0013551422,0.0022218851,0.0013136587],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06616337,0.61775506,0.043755118,0.0009688103,0.00030423782,0.0022230314,0.021199856,0.0023532808,0.15509622,0.01624377,0.009253105,0.06468407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06382551,0.62118745,0.08995235,0.00040913804,0.0006624431,0.001377889,0.016914506,0.03031447,0.077117465,0.05107526,0.04651038,0.0006530859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052278384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063640194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012976615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054978096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009789211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043411136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935159231","doi":"10.1086/697476","title":"When Is Social Responsibility Socially Desirable?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Social responsibility; Corporate social responsibility; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Business; Social Welfare; Rent-seeking; Microeconomics; Politics; Labour economics; Public economics; Market economy; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.060479237253807785,"score_gpt":0.36069334996947766,"score_spread":0.3002141127156699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935159231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64410603,0.0008590142,0.06272713,0.07026705,0.00023073117,0.00016943732,0.0003648355,0.00013109394,0.22114465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962,0.00020451359,0.0014358849,0.000654255,0.000059300644,0.000038916765,0.000024561778,0.000015147665,0.0013674144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955716,0.002429269,0.00010685283,0.0004993193,0.00047823213,0.0009146272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842302,0.008676593,0.003251638,0.0009951602,0.00089450757,0.0019518231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004458468,0.00038791573,0.00077550113,0.0006202219,0.0019457827,0.0039375084,0.00077818683,0.004524066,0.0056193112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0150531875,0.0002967024,0.0005391563,0.00050656253,0.0060940403,0.0043002698,0.0022899823,0.0030943807,0.00043563245],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015231891,0.0003032148,0.008037002,0.00019784566,0.000110041576,0.0007934302,0.0020816121,0.01008214,0.0012914477,0.95963883,0.004692048,0.012619964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008472663,0.00005868114,0.0017091761,0.00004274126,0.00002567543,0.00014527047,0.0015995075,0.010569267,0.00019981948,0.980272,0.0052697915,0.000023386687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029390808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034242515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056193112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024946907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002739945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023578942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937306995","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2443216","title":"Incentive Contracts for Teams: Experimental Evidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.02676008710021405,"score_gpt":0.3532767164920996,"score_spread":0.3265166293918855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937306995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9122599,0.0030461557,0.021046896,0.004954672,0.0004662382,0.00058738445,0.00046958233,0.000109170694,0.057060096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922351,0.0007279218,0.0029883154,0.0004649809,0.00017965204,0.00030523547,0.00013382408,0.000024241575,0.0029406354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836464,0.011438551,0.0007413358,0.001124488,0.002015613,0.0010337384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4947157,0.4175041,0.04567094,0.027061047,0.006789521,0.0082587525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040646646,0.0010158428,0.0017484266,0.0012010232,0.002500895,0.0037108017,0.0022251988,0.0048687104,0.03616354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18741286,0.0008035157,0.00087012077,0.0012584524,0.0031947098,0.0045529054,0.0020038586,0.0033863217,0.0022093125],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.041092277,0.034870256,0.16567017,0.004842605,0.0025801426,0.0009672158,0.0057646553,0.038476344,0.004058861,0.35589507,0.025166567,0.32061577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025618711,0.015059664,0.13706735,0.0017278985,0.0016144769,0.0008976782,0.004757897,0.07052672,0.003997452,0.7083702,0.030055385,0.00030663883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001351261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091451127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040646646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012822901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025005082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21496254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939463889","doi":"10.3968/7572","title":"Incentive Mechanisms of Altruistic Behavior With Social Preference Introduced and the Effects Comparison","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Incentive; Preference; Microeconomics; Mechanism (biology); Economics; Social preferences; Welfare; Social psychology; Function (biology); Social Welfare; Public economics; Psychology; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.04675216636538145,"score_gpt":0.320139880520633,"score_spread":0.2733877141552516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1939463889","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21156947,0.0020116766,0.7098486,0.0026827224,0.00032709315,0.0005356764,0.00025851026,0.00015759839,0.07260865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95280516,0.00077155826,0.036378853,0.00022568996,0.00012043297,0.0003616226,0.0000426215,0.000020514597,0.009273665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618226,0.0026189932,0.000112490605,0.00037395486,0.00042264053,0.00028970884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581784,0.0022838218,0.0006522631,0.000568898,0.00045032232,0.00022686881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047474857,0.0009965255,0.0007641511,0.001035616,0.0006489609,0.0014849338,0.0010720402,0.0011549515,0.008443483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009435051,0.00035347466,0.0014764891,0.00065876707,0.0018341439,0.002675869,0.0015351365,0.0015426207,0.00034424863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023117247,0.00023299712,0.0016909947,0.00020152896,0.00015387163,0.00016688564,0.00023101465,0.018499592,0.002183887,0.9478908,0.00076052576,0.027756747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035643735,0.0009444771,0.006558028,0.00012403089,0.00054452615,0.0005322078,0.0002888934,0.15522903,0.002713046,0.821184,0.011405913,0.000119285265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084312423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046432123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008443483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018588665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011143863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028246224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1944513151","doi":"10.1111/ele.12507","title":"Cheaters must prosper: reconciling theoretical and empirical perspectives on cheating in mutualism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Division of Integrative Organismal Systems; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mutualism (biology); Cheating; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.09775052186608461,"score_gpt":0.43445275190937727,"score_spread":0.33670223004329264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1944513151","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039064029,0.9967012,0.00047196515,0.0013682523,0.000076937,0.0000021673477,0.0000032279283,0.0000017965476,0.0009838704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007812392,0.99062014,0.00054000097,0.0005625365,0.00022531669,0.000011947966,0.0000067200453,0.0000025625081,0.00021847026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982482,0.00087013416,0.00015108772,0.0002508026,0.00040167905,0.00007816472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926354,0.006274555,0.0003510243,0.00013827004,0.00046436134,0.00013640393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004689557,0.0008135895,0.0017192635,0.0039621424,0.0007834238,0.0023991205,0.0014917176,0.0027264578,0.001252669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00577372,0.00047288774,0.00044863988,0.0046665887,0.006404009,0.00553183,0.0018441578,0.002911302,0.00036605523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008830904,0.000058529247,0.0010200213,0.023292659,0.00021267557,0.0002501468,0.0020101508,0.0012082831,0.000867394,0.25700024,0.0073364708,0.7066551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003835538,0.0002063713,0.009085202,0.028431194,0.00027157486,0.0016659237,0.0029526334,0.0010295751,0.0008466163,0.27937874,0.675959,0.0001347529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020284797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003394079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004689557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024410263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025712473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024801075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1948149164","doi":"10.5555/2343776.2343828","title":"Behavioral game theoretic models: a Bayesian framework for parameter analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poisson distribution; Computer science; Game theory; Set (abstract data type); Nash equilibrium; Bayesian probability; Behavioral modeling; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Econometrics; Data mining; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0872091897390117,"score_gpt":0.39686572992695873,"score_spread":0.309656540187947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1948149164","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018763439,0.00025242384,0.99414164,0.00068028003,0.000027415257,0.00007751757,0.000290987,0.00011302223,0.0025404117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24477771,0.0027224412,0.7397944,0.0009994378,0.00054520584,0.0020658807,0.0012643189,0.0003873702,0.00744339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99111193,0.0063168616,0.0002814602,0.0008316905,0.0011305211,0.0003275243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721914,0.021928739,0.0017880907,0.002340051,0.0013289285,0.00042275555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01848763,0.0031098214,0.0030190242,0.0044843084,0.0012728221,0.006145986,0.006748076,0.0037052578,0.009465949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055942085,0.0018504602,0.0027368418,0.0039476766,0.0035110596,0.008094511,0.0030625302,0.007203916,0.002250653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022139155,0.00005751306,0.0007205575,0.000092424445,0.00009431354,0.00006299687,0.0001655472,0.16380581,0.00020049674,0.82142586,0.0024610842,0.010891301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016261412,0.00001412967,0.00015910197,0.000035885154,0.000019112647,0.00003599281,0.000033144122,0.39632276,0.000057710684,0.6004833,0.0027979363,0.000024690476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009967676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008508419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01848763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034964737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028938847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097773135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1949822458","doi":"10.1177/001979391006300308","title":"On-the-Job Tasks and Performance Pay: A Vacancy-Level Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human multitasking; Incentive; Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Business; Job performance; Job analysis; Control (management); Work (physics); Labour economics; Job design; Psychology; Job satisfaction; Microeconomics; Economics; Social psychology; Engineering; Management; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.09306568926545622,"score_gpt":0.3444461408677536,"score_spread":0.2513804516022974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1949822458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910253,0.0017592334,0.0007638971,0.0002578498,0.000020313979,0.000025358038,0.0044282116,0.000017693126,0.0017021465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98872656,0.0006282214,0.00033984196,0.000070129114,0.00003811847,0.00004114281,0.008094383,0.000010404416,0.0020513465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981523,0.00092932704,0.00016443772,0.00020549932,0.0002999136,0.0002484679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97689974,0.01171,0.007101283,0.0008604028,0.0021045892,0.0013240078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003592228,0.00021871369,0.0007691119,0.0019924338,0.00041779864,0.0010635732,0.0007847142,0.0006785635,0.0053822566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0132587515,0.00018214574,0.00088392774,0.0047035883,0.00020889723,0.00041938853,0.0007282263,0.00075307,0.001424016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037089616,0.00021038194,0.98444885,0.00011842633,0.00047201873,0.000059233582,0.0001933372,0.0004907233,0.00011347231,0.0003430132,0.002637393,0.0105423415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001450152,0.0000946475,0.99726033,0.000013920224,0.00009604084,0.000032539923,0.00024633232,0.0008274447,0.000028321962,0.00010566911,0.0012743796,0.0000058746205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019803496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021514414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019803496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005951909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059017324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039376438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953625807","doi":"10.5204/qutlr.v9i2.29","title":"Gift Vouchers and Expiry Dates: When the Gift Stops Giving","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT Law Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voucher; Gift giving; Advertising; Business; Marketing; Finance","score_opus":0.045615100564039134,"score_gpt":0.3570529329625724,"score_spread":0.3114378323985333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953625807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0658898,0.01697631,0.019629864,0.03931658,0.0017813788,0.0001725216,0.00038555084,0.000274659,0.8555734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8469842,0.008527938,0.00717117,0.017170569,0.0007083201,0.00020034188,0.00020119928,0.00019627252,0.11883998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233425,0.0031040623,0.00041372082,0.0007110587,0.0025127132,0.00092432176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98843586,0.0065453625,0.0015464419,0.001365484,0.0015992613,0.0005075152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009719444,0.00022391537,0.00046204522,0.0013009148,0.003736334,0.008563677,0.0014421173,0.005894494,0.011769355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03427431,0.00045519613,0.00056947215,0.0014535721,0.008200691,0.014312994,0.002326962,0.0056533697,0.002317405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110227316,0.000033704364,0.0014294306,0.000073145704,0.000005082371,0.000118439944,0.001918514,0.00011969811,0.00020844069,0.94355303,0.016062971,0.036367293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006704267,0.00011666084,0.0075015733,0.00086473604,0.000039110713,0.00056206906,0.0036825342,0.00040412205,0.0013353928,0.31789097,0.6674489,0.00008682546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014746436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013386109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014746436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060113063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006778294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051401973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956484195","doi":"","title":"Task-Specific Abilities in Multi-Task Agency Relations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Ranking (information retrieval); Agency (philosophy); Incentive; Value (mathematics); Contractible space; Computer science; Distortion (music); Cognitive psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06738025006093336,"score_gpt":0.30248162639315374,"score_spread":0.2351013763322204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1956484195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69270694,0.0007050209,0.18494557,0.0019055089,0.000045215947,0.000185347,0.00012645512,0.00006606199,0.11931382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99348044,0.000083671715,0.005064537,0.0000323413,0.000012610247,0.000049118826,0.000012734811,0.0000060218754,0.0012585811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864196,0.008187334,0.00068031205,0.0013962719,0.0020382062,0.0012783459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635274,0.019666314,0.008844745,0.0042856443,0.0016948321,0.0019811082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010509511,0.0009261466,0.0007164136,0.0015857326,0.001994908,0.0056760083,0.0007491101,0.0015272676,0.005943796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02954084,0.0004097213,0.00091313774,0.001505299,0.005534535,0.005799427,0.004527557,0.0017374859,0.00044093843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026935682,0.00021914767,0.013908555,0.00014140886,0.00010824041,0.00032027147,0.0034388287,0.021520216,0.0018598015,0.92700905,0.00044001834,0.030765023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000893203,0.00028268987,0.023956878,0.00006929919,0.000084471656,0.0003085157,0.0030600596,0.053588174,0.0010710615,0.91208744,0.005332176,0.0000699571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015120418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010710035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010509511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019951465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010884803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05558026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958521949","doi":"10.1111/jasp.12169","title":"Understanding why and how individuals choose to help others: indirect reciprocal considerations and the moderating role of situation severity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; Reciprocal","score_opus":0.11107404928166412,"score_gpt":0.35954952477829266,"score_spread":0.24847547549662855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958521949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99251854,0.00018653963,0.0011724815,0.0005178023,0.000008297219,0.000030831376,0.000020541787,0.0000057701177,0.0055392846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992731,0.00007054848,0.00039908072,0.000043086493,0.0000061156807,0.000017196204,0.000009610614,0.0000024033502,0.00017895049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317706,0.0051708263,0.00022780597,0.0005289008,0.0005592439,0.00033606848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96086454,0.028840039,0.00608418,0.0015142165,0.0010988406,0.0015981667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005397116,0.00048883306,0.00037445384,0.0008277952,0.001098412,0.003200592,0.0005139976,0.0010040561,0.008048298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03063896,0.00031833534,0.00068251195,0.00034327595,0.002156686,0.0021824413,0.002637449,0.001314722,0.00027469892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017412272,0.002471177,0.8370172,0.00084153726,0.0014630073,0.0013752551,0.059411135,0.0031532904,0.010494672,0.013663746,0.00061741314,0.06775027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015158116,0.0011331612,0.88938665,0.00040076303,0.0012268565,0.0008756918,0.06735515,0.006580278,0.0033617888,0.026317371,0.0030835655,0.00012712783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011635864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024558953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008048298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006804924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007253005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028542995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960706511","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.12073","title":"Performance benefits of reward choice: a procedural justice perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Resource Management Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Campus Research Board; Griffith University","keywords":"Attractiveness; Perspective (graphical); Procedural justice; Psychology; Reward system; Social psychology; Heuristic; Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08004413005231395,"score_gpt":0.3587381291305037,"score_spread":0.2786939990781897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1960706511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.682432,0.002093942,0.06309858,0.021786088,0.00018462,0.00013985403,0.00025182022,0.00008982434,0.22992338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689925,0.00013353425,0.0015322454,0.00037679958,0.00009053846,0.00002183915,0.000013459151,0.0000150914275,0.00091722363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968034,0.0016531298,0.00007634648,0.0003389963,0.0006671335,0.00046105956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97889733,0.013454369,0.0030871595,0.0017673068,0.0010947555,0.0016991396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042992453,0.00048282763,0.0005149389,0.0009813005,0.0009418156,0.003239347,0.0006492658,0.0014491045,0.006530773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015646042,0.00026209984,0.00067950995,0.0006039862,0.004859179,0.002522343,0.001996859,0.0027754137,0.00029052875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086561945,0.0017144645,0.05405367,0.0002620545,0.00026570444,0.00033569103,0.0024635803,0.010054504,0.007250038,0.8727445,0.0016398834,0.04835023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016414451,0.0007243798,0.16948344,0.00012701584,0.00022955947,0.00021901794,0.0011633568,0.01791543,0.0022039297,0.79981035,0.007862844,0.00009655118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020947543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017609776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006530773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018978211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014976477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022736788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963983178","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1313230","title":"Remain Silent and Ye Shall Suffer: Seller Exploitation of Reticent Buyers in an Experimental Reputation System","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Business; Advertising; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029076740653804507,"score_gpt":0.31091925545047655,"score_spread":0.28184251479667205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963983178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982169,0.00001420991,0.00039100592,0.00013870925,0.0000101732485,0.0000117177715,0.000008350564,0.0000105817635,0.0011983891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878246,0.000008837962,0.00038110555,0.00004026392,0.0000070856186,0.000017834303,0.0000074612926,0.000006161795,0.0007486539],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.998319,0.0010112929,0.000102306585,0.00019407047,0.00018181905,0.00019148069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574504,0.02653286,0.006093683,0.006341246,0.0007251194,0.0028567193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00599783,0.00043040997,0.00096176437,0.00041019733,0.0013117096,0.0025392347,0.0010705012,0.0025866171,0.0078786295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029710554,0.00063299295,0.00031696618,0.00027221977,0.0028534594,0.002168514,0.0018144784,0.0018694566,0.0005922218],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.089238435,0.0725211,0.3357399,0.0015639598,0.0016843794,0.0074131424,0.022395121,0.030352887,0.20669335,0.11158491,0.006930237,0.11388262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01741042,0.075488895,0.3831549,0.00019216498,0.0019347195,0.0057327175,0.018406857,0.3179982,0.03680315,0.13715668,0.0045960387,0.0011253274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008569289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001056644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078786295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006601341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074543024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031719983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964652554","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.09.009","title":"Testing motives for charitable giving: A revealed-preference methodology with experimental evidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Preference; Revealed preference; Econometrics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Public economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.5051004921055419,"score_gpt":0.41413599127870226,"score_spread":0.0909645008268396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964652554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404347,0.0005164183,0.14571314,0.00079075963,0.00014560914,0.0025053415,0.0008920998,0.000105869076,0.008896017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95954365,0.00030499083,0.03599752,0.00021831351,0.00007219353,0.0021146752,0.00023021938,0.000019811763,0.0014986355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582406,0.03617636,0.001291784,0.0020047345,0.0016309884,0.000655502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.581438,0.3598211,0.02441579,0.029045576,0.003964351,0.0013151767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05169243,0.0023394746,0.0030342615,0.001299311,0.0014610862,0.0033882228,0.0033795582,0.0034395044,0.0128078945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14999913,0.0011308279,0.0023545518,0.0019819585,0.004426772,0.0042602876,0.00219755,0.0030082504,0.0007769265],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04353895,0.036770973,0.09055783,0.007331177,0.011547832,0.0009886788,0.003589053,0.091726035,0.017334014,0.5680525,0.0033596999,0.12520337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019492092,0.02823774,0.033739295,0.00046298184,0.008229504,0.0006055396,0.0021257228,0.35960388,0.01456018,0.5271059,0.0052341404,0.00060297834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018047857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017375802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05169243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001818323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018624611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27337897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965689506","doi":"10.1126/science.1132491","title":"The Psychological Consequences of Money","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1341,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Helpfulness; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05722545639759832,"score_gpt":0.403431282558534,"score_spread":0.34620582616093565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965689506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9482997,0.0013535523,0.0009277844,0.004066313,0.00019275163,0.000013811203,0.000039883096,0.000011056151,0.04509516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977012,0.00031848217,0.00018807552,0.00043594377,0.00005478213,0.000006463786,0.000011583986,0.0000040517443,0.0012792672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937266,0.00037377045,0.000018530269,0.00005251728,0.000106947,0.000075506694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770653,0.0013019762,0.0003986793,0.00017044449,0.00010606732,0.00031627977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008402534,0.00021035892,0.00015795384,0.000247451,0.0006626564,0.0012928797,0.00015057773,0.00082042644,0.0060231932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054769106,0.00012251711,0.00017261534,0.00014459934,0.0018936754,0.0009976916,0.0007022213,0.0012497326,0.00023331799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007108838,0.0040124184,0.1629233,0.0011299804,0.00049446494,0.0059258463,0.02322026,0.002461667,0.082876086,0.36880597,0.02145925,0.3195818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000530967,0.004456604,0.5690823,0.00038916478,0.0003589514,0.0051398617,0.025168937,0.002431982,0.014794589,0.29663712,0.08075931,0.00025013767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002689104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024079341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060231932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003183578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020641639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020149589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966766153","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2013.1807","title":"Crowding Out in the Labor Market: A Prosocial Setting Is Necessary","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Economics; Labour economics; Wage; Crowding out; Crowding; Piece work; Microeconomics; Task (project management); Psychology; Social psychology; Incentive; Monetary economics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.025764486301873918,"score_gpt":0.3331718524426072,"score_spread":0.3074073661407333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966766153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95739645,0.00017273412,0.017935514,0.001615893,0.00007934127,0.00018066248,0.00008102937,0.000057376405,0.022481062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409807,0.000040686104,0.0043661995,0.00033362143,0.000037703212,0.00013541679,0.000016176034,0.000011067495,0.00096108945],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943824,0.003404613,0.00019331776,0.00075405656,0.0008315005,0.00043405956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98297334,0.00777125,0.00327138,0.0034401314,0.0005003868,0.0020434596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007100135,0.00074236916,0.0010188775,0.00052278384,0.0020715394,0.0022064783,0.0006549809,0.0012077758,0.0071597784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013584546,0.0005127452,0.00039522594,0.000266406,0.003672483,0.0014936848,0.0024172475,0.0014141229,0.0004459203],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010589113,0.013064187,0.15992057,0.001949011,0.00076805154,0.0017614801,0.018334797,0.026406145,0.26452473,0.26302007,0.007992648,0.23166917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002152315,0.016729789,0.38712704,0.00051502854,0.0005143904,0.00087359344,0.01580722,0.06172406,0.027054098,0.44565022,0.041393895,0.00045831356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000646796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011270832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071597784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000780835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076424907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037549555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966805543","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1002980","title":"Promotion Tournaments and Individual Performance Pay","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Download; Promotion (chess); Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025915217475026623,"score_gpt":0.30758758473485875,"score_spread":0.28167236725983213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966805543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811895,0.0003138973,0.0004392339,0.000575186,0.00004957302,0.00001874094,0.00006823842,0.000018519278,0.017327009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706596,0.000046211546,0.00007158872,0.000064987005,0.000024835266,0.000008314014,0.00003127447,0.000003909318,0.002683066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887484,0.000596682,0.000044373475,0.00010190809,0.00009178339,0.00029033684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97840947,0.011297059,0.0038870547,0.00097635016,0.0006722319,0.0047576665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030445275,0.00028938177,0.0005840019,0.0009012561,0.0009990518,0.00367803,0.0004248508,0.0015611218,0.0216915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012973433,0.0003085439,0.00035219107,0.00086742704,0.0009068025,0.00094887253,0.001186293,0.0015994825,0.0013016341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072686323,0.009496008,0.8237108,0.00016673215,0.00049298315,0.00055734516,0.0018189021,0.0048698494,0.0023226317,0.058318693,0.006300395,0.08467705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044128665,0.0015958963,0.9301542,0.00003133358,0.0001599294,0.0002498068,0.0025030195,0.005989194,0.00038013433,0.054907702,0.0035315845,0.000055842273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012227113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022375188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0216915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007299185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046638394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07256532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968068705","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0052017","title":"Early Sympathy and Social Acceptance Predict the Development of Sharing in Children","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sympathy; Feeling; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Prosocial behavior; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology","score_opus":0.07187730034824152,"score_gpt":0.2915567240121713,"score_spread":0.21967942366392978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968068705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99953055,0.000095180134,0.00002665113,0.000018237673,0.0000015964484,0.0000025871407,0.000062318344,0.0000026685298,0.00026023714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992317,0.00014166354,0.00014262831,0.000006281897,0.0000022841705,0.000011517608,0.00015884047,0.0000023118448,0.0003027469],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996171,0.00007212272,0.000035812183,0.00007956677,0.00009478445,0.000100571946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596393,0.0009992246,0.0020155308,0.00021117151,0.0002563171,0.00055375847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001085131,0.00043478364,0.00033798715,0.00080670917,0.00045186293,0.000985394,0.00036613795,0.0005623091,0.002436362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005098103,0.0003654179,0.00058182736,0.0005257379,0.00052638474,0.00052764156,0.0007615316,0.00081363675,0.0004010266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046589932,0.00006631085,0.9965753,0.000008703858,0.0000103727625,0.000088465364,0.001060611,0.00004835742,0.00033556492,0.000046757294,0.000045001398,0.0016679236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.8922985e-7,0.00004152292,0.9991763,0.0000053935314,0.0000050685617,0.00008688264,0.00046575323,0.000055049448,0.00006721002,0.00002400718,0.00006955439,0.0000024184617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076716808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008861056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076716808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041166085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004478086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01525408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968072657","doi":"10.1145/2600057.2602865","title":"Trick or treat","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Computing and Communication Foundations; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Payment; Mechanism (biology); Contrast (vision); Nash equilibrium; Strategic dominance; Mechanism design; Markov chain; Internet privacy; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Machine learning; Economics","score_opus":0.061742723367801955,"score_gpt":0.3729901114583004,"score_spread":0.31124738809049846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968072657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035096693,0.010318645,0.0309746,0.16129725,0.038620755,0.00068920234,0.0015442206,0.0019980727,0.75104773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06359562,0.007444067,0.012557032,0.11741435,0.0153183425,0.00105654,0.0014874807,0.0011432254,0.7799832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972172,0.00073287135,0.00016282637,0.0006848803,0.0007739387,0.00042830722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959935,0.0008752074,0.0003496644,0.0012404082,0.0008951168,0.0006460875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033313562,0.0012652219,0.00087962847,0.0016455624,0.0030585465,0.0071145874,0.0025204,0.0069443444,0.2831313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014818257,0.000341029,0.0013166624,0.000794557,0.0034816405,0.008702412,0.004683067,0.006924994,0.12193422],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002593139,0.000091233705,0.00064031815,0.00037160906,0.000033686847,0.00039835795,0.00039581768,0.0002455556,0.0005808829,0.3564263,0.51308745,0.12746954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004395157,0.0000420517,0.00024483426,0.00029769243,0.00001677876,0.00042142658,0.00024243457,0.00022656252,0.0002476768,0.06592578,0.93227226,0.000018579056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016620299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001360457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2831313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024961862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035521933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9471686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969807686","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1473474","title":"Focal Points and Economic Efficiency: Role of Relative Label Salience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.010532363588156726,"score_gpt":0.2967155968221004,"score_spread":0.2861832332339437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969807686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96810955,0.0002530999,0.009984276,0.0005506678,0.000011685419,0.00004117283,0.00006241125,0.000022606657,0.020964656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976993,0.0000528593,0.0015498993,0.000021954822,0.00001030469,0.0000114259465,0.000026324064,0.000010140095,0.00061779935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980228,0.00089985883,0.00011569329,0.00036462775,0.0004321613,0.00016493323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622572,0.025204066,0.006927937,0.0029131132,0.001363291,0.0013344163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005436147,0.00037964177,0.0009731775,0.0011637273,0.00076134177,0.0047539542,0.0006752293,0.0016445145,0.009505303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039582025,0.00043252244,0.00030532942,0.000915349,0.0022915243,0.0051139477,0.002435538,0.0011824786,0.00047713815],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007980143,0.0028989478,0.25047383,0.00086510734,0.0011734135,0.0009073366,0.0054857945,0.018110748,0.07422401,0.49279416,0.002220483,0.14286608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000837258,0.0016446143,0.4839492,0.00009965738,0.0005728956,0.00060478965,0.00397973,0.03227805,0.009927037,0.46311435,0.0028314053,0.00016101329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008868762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008738301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009505303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010524964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005231757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031798422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970963130","doi":"10.1177/0022002707300834","title":"Speaking the Same Language","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Conflict Resolution","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Dilemma; Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Social dilemma; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04803257897728521,"score_gpt":0.37650547798703426,"score_spread":0.3284728990097491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970963130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021140013,0.018547855,0.053262383,0.13013878,0.094645426,0.00029903874,0.0048873895,0.0023310483,0.67474806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25446197,0.018098569,0.04232217,0.06804618,0.018829325,0.00082824146,0.0043949755,0.003091952,0.5899266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663,0.0014785253,0.00039342925,0.00055217906,0.00066795765,0.00027795404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954609,0.0012848742,0.0005616338,0.0008511952,0.0014533168,0.00038798343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024752272,0.0010264218,0.0008340163,0.0013826624,0.0024721152,0.007165139,0.0011808684,0.0027333926,0.061852105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072939377,0.00025301473,0.0004584112,0.001298264,0.0033163119,0.004947993,0.0022509154,0.004290652,0.050208967],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003982159,0.00013499262,0.0015289208,0.0011409897,0.00008339083,0.0006926207,0.015729135,0.00019879051,0.0070996396,0.3809521,0.47316563,0.11887546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012549208,0.0000406829,0.00067056634,0.00026215293,0.000012832,0.0006224308,0.0020723708,0.00015880162,0.0010984194,0.011302956,0.98371416,0.000032152668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019173385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019985922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061852105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010972228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013581417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20691586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971030819","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2013.1818","title":"Partnership Formation: The Role of Social Status","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Context (archaeology); Inefficiency; Hierarchy; Action (physics); Position (finance); Business; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.033048374246372955,"score_gpt":0.33270230098155695,"score_spread":0.299653926735184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971030819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99024475,0.00009599473,0.0019964965,0.000260482,0.000013653552,0.00006008239,0.00007889942,0.000011648358,0.0072380304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988881,0.00002492958,0.0005162537,0.000029769923,0.0000035976443,0.000027384069,0.000024567482,0.0000031996462,0.00048221892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571323,0.002731844,0.00018834036,0.0005166462,0.0005688037,0.0002810688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90820754,0.06851328,0.013223132,0.0053123804,0.001410117,0.0033335811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061371354,0.00036918925,0.0004665289,0.0005478875,0.00084932416,0.0021289526,0.0006407513,0.0008892853,0.006911977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040821455,0.00023341454,0.00026269376,0.00047039957,0.001544658,0.0016897564,0.0017951934,0.0012715425,0.00043618216],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006991535,0.009572714,0.69371307,0.0007615034,0.000694982,0.0006903724,0.0042459564,0.020948188,0.10751035,0.0676782,0.0020487488,0.08514432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008725935,0.019244283,0.7336013,0.00022058938,0.0004939165,0.0011591548,0.0053339708,0.09385086,0.041881554,0.09606265,0.007043014,0.00023614045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007758086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081035215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006911977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006246292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060133566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032456636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971481249","doi":"10.3200/jece.36.4.332-344","title":"Local Residential Sorting and Public Goods Provision: A Classroom Demonstration","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Education","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tiebout model; Sorting; Public good; Voting; Microeconomics; Welfare; sort; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Public economics; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03652644799234749,"score_gpt":0.3541244609529096,"score_spread":0.3175980129605621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971481249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.882163,0.00018824103,0.012676659,0.007060971,0.00016394172,0.00033006028,0.00040171682,0.000505422,0.09651007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95189315,0.0002317263,0.014658878,0.00062129163,0.00004921017,0.00031817338,0.00037308637,0.00007135838,0.031783067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908924,0.00048603443,0.000020563835,0.000115502,0.000118890544,0.00016979847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976291,0.0011421783,0.00012043322,0.00023686918,0.00021452065,0.00065683643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016359322,0.00059305126,0.0005643898,0.0003161197,0.0026828414,0.0012735873,0.0020011475,0.0023806624,0.01802236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031399464,0.00022608857,0.0006430835,0.00040769338,0.0012970911,0.0014562065,0.0030377498,0.0027899952,0.0023194354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048068967,0.14040314,0.028075868,0.0011697446,0.00040916135,0.011125616,0.030424448,0.08221192,0.037248064,0.26432326,0.19311738,0.20668454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072993194,0.028148767,0.0454323,0.0005976848,0.00030953824,0.0020453094,0.03342336,0.18675165,0.03736096,0.223872,0.43444058,0.0003185185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051031094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011504444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01802236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013443993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001091292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060290813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972404182","doi":"10.1002/sej.55","title":"Can cognitive biases explain venture team homophily?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Attribution; Venture capital; Entrepreneurship; Cognition; Marketing; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.08406430925408585,"score_gpt":0.35095915442220865,"score_spread":0.2668948451681228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972404182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98664445,0.00024173441,0.0032180548,0.0013793284,0.000027796423,0.000018815159,0.000050715877,0.000012686976,0.008406427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952126,0.000055744156,0.00018955515,0.00006753919,0.000016492231,0.000005524606,0.000010282172,0.0000013827646,0.00013230773],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986267,0.0007049717,0.0000598476,0.00018878089,0.00022547811,0.0001942253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96955276,0.019037643,0.006783298,0.0022932047,0.0011175015,0.001215656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003741343,0.00023686618,0.00046356017,0.0009654891,0.0005393082,0.0020358106,0.00041456916,0.0011839286,0.004332646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035144214,0.00019326678,0.0002801004,0.00068548386,0.0015478712,0.0014614328,0.0012052332,0.0007761295,0.00030648086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089270074,0.00091317546,0.80058336,0.00026929917,0.00057814416,0.0007761939,0.006980237,0.009671762,0.0029465072,0.09232093,0.0035305421,0.08053711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017207854,0.00028718446,0.595049,0.00013558015,0.00030480846,0.0005091522,0.0055967155,0.04897487,0.0013535206,0.34386057,0.0036588614,0.000097705204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010099405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095654774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004332646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005989119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035925698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019786298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972453968","doi":"10.1057/bm.2009.25","title":"The forgotten side of marketing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Brand Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Employer branding; Product strategy; Marketing management; Business; Marketing; Brand loyalty; Product management; Brand management; Brand equity; Brand strategy; Advertising; New product development","score_opus":0.016570517993043047,"score_gpt":0.31295172204880917,"score_spread":0.2963812040557661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972453968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2484434,0.01928598,0.040378723,0.14672981,0.00180652,0.00008473168,0.0002215166,0.00015907036,0.5428903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657814,0.002957622,0.0036990484,0.0064976066,0.0007859946,0.000030316072,0.000028837945,0.000089375026,0.020129852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552685,0.0020835209,0.00010844972,0.0004457728,0.0016423818,0.00019296339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966521,0.021245608,0.0017973292,0.0070196623,0.0024331142,0.0009833854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007805952,0.00054032775,0.0008622823,0.0014459313,0.0022022568,0.009449273,0.001557516,0.005797272,0.023476843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031809043,0.00077039417,0.0003151144,0.0010371553,0.02523351,0.030223377,0.0030600503,0.006468578,0.0017279234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118433,0.0001433168,0.001387093,0.00014977675,0.000025138957,0.00010944032,0.0020493758,0.00026903284,0.000804026,0.961118,0.002846198,0.030980173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024486224,0.000028655211,0.0012976067,0.0001006607,0.000014921637,0.000089514884,0.0005717875,0.0006687698,0.00048299535,0.9885904,0.0081152655,0.0000148569015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006301155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009321505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023476843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016657313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013656209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07853782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972894327","doi":"10.1007/s10683-010-9265-1","title":"On the incentive effects of monitoring: evidence from the lab and the field","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Field (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Experimental economics; Intrinsic motivation; Task (project management); Contrast (vision); Psychology; Principal–agent problem; Crowding out; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics; Management; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.023510018983037784,"score_gpt":0.3250105206478788,"score_spread":0.301500501664841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972894327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98645043,0.0008628401,0.0007486854,0.00043800985,0.00003675228,0.0000744288,0.000105313564,0.000014665434,0.011268823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997156,0.00038213428,0.0007302361,0.00031557452,0.000063248364,0.000077542536,0.000106387175,0.000009054066,0.0011597908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448425,0.0038176388,0.00019675713,0.0005940992,0.00067948725,0.00022769178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88284105,0.0744159,0.02897157,0.008564111,0.0024337634,0.0027736882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009094902,0.0005430585,0.0007091117,0.0009424714,0.0008592284,0.0010213319,0.0009402112,0.0011960184,0.007937781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029180158,0.00038305562,0.00036541317,0.0006588045,0.0023967251,0.00084539125,0.001121036,0.00076486066,0.0004831789],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08087849,0.063737944,0.4959,0.0027154344,0.0021852802,0.00088539516,0.0052614175,0.003855647,0.051197696,0.028207226,0.009096605,0.2560788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023805655,0.012637013,0.9576952,0.00026999853,0.0005952521,0.00021988062,0.0013212794,0.0023304883,0.008096296,0.0066295536,0.007696173,0.00012848293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002588506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002147465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009094902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000778623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004953097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04809904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973870725","doi":"10.1093/beheco/arl084","title":"Coalition formation: a game-theoretic analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Ecology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Outcome (game theory); Value (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Variance (accounting); Investment (military); Microeconomics; Biology; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.030658973400503865,"score_gpt":0.35109525549743925,"score_spread":0.32043628209693537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973870725","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046976913,0.0016628433,0.88872945,0.0026048778,0.00007158726,0.00020823874,0.00023626533,0.00007807768,0.05943178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82199746,0.002835454,0.15538049,0.00040416775,0.00021684788,0.0005755876,0.00028870907,0.00006997943,0.01823127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991677,0.00044229656,0.00003009283,0.000101688136,0.00016099216,0.00009716901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832505,0.0011449569,0.00019773413,0.00009186603,0.00012149861,0.00011889345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015709214,0.0007387615,0.00076142704,0.0011552327,0.0012269391,0.0021295769,0.0013847426,0.0014094689,0.0065831454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005606909,0.00036724523,0.0009413854,0.0010868319,0.0025246849,0.0030468714,0.0015522343,0.0014821253,0.0006200824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075248395,0.000020433148,0.00045201386,0.000052003405,0.000028813432,0.00005921059,0.0001732485,0.09924537,0.00033442676,0.89175856,0.0013125851,0.006555738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011737234,0.000028605391,0.0003198374,0.00003423816,0.00001637681,0.0001220751,0.00013855816,0.4187819,0.00010500634,0.5733585,0.0070698834,0.000013351815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004029855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026294421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065831454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022929844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013071389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022022843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975330323","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2004.00127.x","title":"Self‐Fulfilling Early‐Contracting Rush*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Matching (statistics); Sign (mathematics); Supply and demand; Distribution (mathematics); Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04657617587169613,"score_gpt":0.37123387297751537,"score_spread":0.32465769710581927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975330323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9146322,0.0010950068,0.012021099,0.0020501413,0.000098727185,0.00016613686,0.00010264613,0.000066021115,0.06976806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987076,0.00039969443,0.0018088109,0.0004596604,0.000049557795,0.00005797962,0.000059574828,0.000009361649,0.01007947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902153,0.00042253386,0.00004713582,0.00009375079,0.00019309731,0.00022193826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123126,0.002557201,0.003397195,0.0012948628,0.0005311811,0.0009883199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036538022,0.00025890485,0.00035916487,0.0002668122,0.0007261459,0.0010414897,0.00037683378,0.000984415,0.011692436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008329798,0.00017979469,0.00039854934,0.00014175223,0.000986175,0.0010008486,0.00093556853,0.00093063613,0.0010406729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024848504,0.004862218,0.10293254,0.0011916913,0.00027102366,0.0038417599,0.0051811673,0.0030680837,0.059171196,0.35408896,0.011960456,0.45094603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080471643,0.0068602334,0.37434244,0.00048212102,0.00020640432,0.010048941,0.009147349,0.018568134,0.024551665,0.44603822,0.108746395,0.00020334586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003388447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005330083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011692436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002951754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074723037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976964289","doi":"10.1038/srep06421","title":"The role of institutional incentives and the exemplar in promoting cooperation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Social dilemma; Public good; Public goods game; Nash equilibrium; Institution; Microeconomics; Prosocial behavior; Social psychology; Psychology; Public economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.01120876687293592,"score_gpt":0.2772934177915653,"score_spread":0.2660846509186294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976964289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885394,0.000115858085,0.0039598155,0.0002487658,0.0000142661875,0.00005762448,0.000025454407,0.000026752317,0.00701219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698097,0.00004069924,0.0027056267,0.000049236925,0.000005004839,0.00003217248,0.000011072124,0.000005261408,0.00016991154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952426,0.003224418,0.0002585286,0.00040730927,0.00058538065,0.0002817618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97740084,0.010181554,0.006015788,0.0032798573,0.0008836852,0.0022383532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008022221,0.00034295046,0.00056181225,0.00062776636,0.0009073409,0.0015434809,0.0005786565,0.00087952457,0.0018490797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023883093,0.000282288,0.00023803713,0.00027793448,0.0015222064,0.0009700504,0.0018750179,0.00078876555,0.00016247733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058060223,0.00482817,0.5349458,0.0014802002,0.0011996885,0.0010120365,0.0042413645,0.01735645,0.14226414,0.087036364,0.0019645838,0.19786525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049832405,0.0053857896,0.8461115,0.00025338028,0.0006043573,0.0012378594,0.003754543,0.04125654,0.023738947,0.0681553,0.008748784,0.00025466035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033639497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008692283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008022221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006411866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047386088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04242605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977030967","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000026","title":"Cheating at the End to Avoid Regret","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Regret; Odds; Social psychology; Attractiveness; Psychology; Dishonesty; Logistic regression; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08363307212876142,"score_gpt":0.42287595115970844,"score_spread":0.339242879030947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977030967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84690017,0.092522606,0.029686265,0.013578775,0.00073883927,0.00038217087,0.0007129505,0.0001425389,0.015335794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915411,0.0026331942,0.0025649772,0.0024449348,0.00017148114,0.0001140347,0.000094080024,0.000017485554,0.00041871183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.966858,0.026611438,0.0014076758,0.0027904653,0.0016843986,0.00064802007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78189474,0.18007113,0.024999363,0.0097198635,0.0019578,0.001357166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037260335,0.000441961,0.0018029904,0.0006784319,0.00046176056,0.0019518149,0.0008176593,0.0018465013,0.0030354648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.131017,0.0004840945,0.0040336098,0.00056268094,0.0020298865,0.0027309177,0.0010138989,0.0035195418,0.00019609286],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011934864,0.0015947015,0.46802998,0.014994922,0.07464091,0.0010822918,0.0054163747,0.010440282,0.0055237985,0.03965995,0.0078114825,0.35887036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018314064,0.006110784,0.7894865,0.00433523,0.030380365,0.0018004082,0.0015751789,0.010678191,0.005296682,0.13250063,0.015695456,0.0003091919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006278702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006833011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037260335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007116436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007194685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19705385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980384778","doi":"10.1177/0951629811398687","title":"Paradox lost: Explaining and modeling seemingly random individual behavior in social dilemmas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social dilemma; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Probabilistic logic; Function (biology); Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09402872992152556,"score_gpt":0.353519939892713,"score_spread":0.25949120997118746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980384778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4018036,0.0010921621,0.5578679,0.0068947547,0.00023629416,0.00017672215,0.0002650448,0.0002641888,0.03139941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523594,0.00029784578,0.043274853,0.0002543209,0.00007379748,0.00015578665,0.000050755105,0.00004329584,0.0034900613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895847,0.00073046953,0.000034232533,0.00007713538,0.00011950938,0.00008011568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344975,0.005083106,0.00053835165,0.0003569462,0.00021042563,0.00036142065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028439565,0.0004965741,0.0008207846,0.00071488315,0.0008785358,0.0016065821,0.0017708096,0.0017364648,0.0028809193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015810821,0.00039135973,0.0008439766,0.0005341664,0.0027661843,0.0024031,0.0019813776,0.0020170866,0.0002744594],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070887625,0.000114186485,0.0026720902,0.00007988107,0.000046861056,0.0003376233,0.0005916242,0.43987167,0.00036593553,0.54864144,0.001131383,0.0060764775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038277234,0.000018173563,0.00020675965,0.000008594061,0.0000071767176,0.000040040126,0.000053440086,0.7185681,0.000055507357,0.2802794,0.00071342627,0.000011096919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044041756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030294806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044041756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010193115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015102101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015040457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980819929","doi":"10.1515/bejeap-2012-0040","title":"A Cross-Cultural Real-Effort Experiment on Wage-Inequality Information and Performance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Piece work; Affect (linguistics); Wage; Contrast (vision); Wage inequality; Economics; China; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03626195306006695,"score_gpt":0.38787965266304464,"score_spread":0.3516176996029777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980819929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999363,0.000010855126,0.00011227804,0.000028080005,0.0000047066637,0.000012278447,0.000022181379,0.0000024669514,0.00044400178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990533,0.000011961109,0.00025282442,0.000052664323,0.0000041209228,0.000038098555,0.00003715189,0.0000016582608,0.0005481692],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986688,0.000757111,0.00008043513,0.00022146902,0.00014206374,0.00013012504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123245,0.003992749,0.0020610653,0.0017059789,0.00022961259,0.00077820336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035391941,0.0004779746,0.0005199542,0.00031661044,0.0005830878,0.0012287673,0.0005884015,0.0008826787,0.0041098944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060010524,0.00028776404,0.0002797489,0.00021322172,0.0015358748,0.0004974811,0.0010076099,0.00079367653,0.0003082158],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.054808952,0.11687993,0.32168758,0.0008816171,0.0017782063,0.0013625544,0.014520534,0.013141182,0.38859922,0.015250538,0.0027793658,0.06831039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044357525,0.051307894,0.8510017,0.000116274525,0.0006131905,0.00027527835,0.006218794,0.019197356,0.0560756,0.006874324,0.0035645128,0.0003192775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025286458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019244637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041098944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006927896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045666556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01871723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983629772","doi":"10.1177/0170840612470231","title":"How our Frames Direct Us: A Poker Experiment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; HEC Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Frame (networking); Interpretation (philosophy); Frame analysis; Social psychology; Thematic analysis; Relational frame theory; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.043139709601537395,"score_gpt":0.34115893055541907,"score_spread":0.29801922095388167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983629772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724945,0.00008888715,0.0059546544,0.00077349995,0.00026769305,0.0012364981,0.00014673236,0.000085082684,0.018952426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97568876,0.00010075554,0.013191439,0.0010207455,0.00015189494,0.0028877505,0.00015617069,0.000088046305,0.0067144483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474216,0.0029010908,0.00032011778,0.00089155725,0.0008077156,0.00033730728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622559,0.030378798,0.0015620135,0.003518374,0.0010947271,0.0011903316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008618456,0.00092715886,0.0009426254,0.0005649819,0.0021941608,0.0034681878,0.0017223515,0.0030464067,0.012377837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03408234,0.0007251819,0.00046733872,0.0004948848,0.0029850022,0.0047681616,0.0027150281,0.0043934104,0.0013351586],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03655728,0.14498742,0.025129415,0.002634079,0.00041526693,0.0034561385,0.19131085,0.007090836,0.15925364,0.23085344,0.013869233,0.1844424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030129932,0.13714969,0.08160633,0.0006663649,0.000876888,0.0019172732,0.058325652,0.06436565,0.09217362,0.38838086,0.14328247,0.0011251967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062268553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004466884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012377837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006968862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006214515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045579314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984248728","doi":"","title":"Cui Bono, Benefit Corporation? An Experiment Inspired by Social Enterprise Legislation in Germany and the US","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Max Planck Digital Library","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Legislation; Corporation; Framing (construction); Stakeholder; Public relations; Business; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.026392889447199426,"score_gpt":0.2725395877225206,"score_spread":0.2461466982753212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984248728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885069,0.000052809424,0.00051763066,0.0007956647,0.000046074463,0.00011495104,0.00012880773,0.00001827328,0.009818791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621516,0.000045989953,0.0006654522,0.00045418474,0.000015297483,0.0001637982,0.00006973789,0.000007463992,0.002362812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983392,0.0010350265,0.000064743595,0.00021616832,0.00013327337,0.00021158814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99415874,0.003592384,0.0009000557,0.00069852825,0.00017697323,0.00047333536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004300619,0.00040257024,0.00043196202,0.00041890008,0.0020714242,0.0017901609,0.00060408784,0.001969687,0.008549296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007160893,0.00029485926,0.00029576078,0.0005344394,0.0022142099,0.0014879091,0.00115828,0.0011067014,0.0004874339],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04835656,0.075104736,0.1430635,0.0013595686,0.0008980687,0.002350092,0.06634559,0.015473058,0.06588281,0.39427903,0.034027867,0.1528592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019817846,0.054184023,0.40001297,0.0006772438,0.0019764737,0.00040451626,0.05377744,0.048588514,0.03209611,0.16843763,0.21903889,0.0009882557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019730648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02792565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019730648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023700185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011218442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0392316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984934625","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.001","title":"Resource holding potential, subjective resource value, and game theoretical models of aggressiveness signalling","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Signalling; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer network","score_opus":0.014927237491656958,"score_gpt":0.29895377762043324,"score_spread":0.28402654012877626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984934625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79180783,0.0009781413,0.15438516,0.0058566732,0.000085103355,0.00006035462,0.00018720052,0.000054547396,0.046584934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950282,0.00014597745,0.0024610427,0.00008279849,0.000028311384,0.000022298795,0.000020814954,0.000006959076,0.002203655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990313,0.0006543108,0.000022126509,0.00007371931,0.00009794073,0.000120607554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895279,0.008623928,0.0007093575,0.00034907027,0.00033141975,0.00045835745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032257484,0.00061883166,0.00084494625,0.00086784334,0.0007904789,0.0043486124,0.0018109736,0.0022781065,0.0060107647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012296835,0.00063177943,0.0005581612,0.00088028575,0.00258418,0.004062593,0.0011061566,0.0019793655,0.0003590346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013255839,0.00014158661,0.0028775423,0.000052044004,0.000048955666,0.00014477113,0.0005345405,0.10453351,0.0009645714,0.88574606,0.0007404658,0.004083329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003705957,0.000039064988,0.0015587196,0.000011569282,0.000021899516,0.00006797006,0.00023093559,0.3836061,0.000060080405,0.6140678,0.00027100963,0.000027820734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036604323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003083704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060107647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018957035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071906886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020108044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986061851","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00415.x","title":"VANISHING LEADERSHIP AND DECLINING RECIPROCITY IN A SEQUENTIAL CONTRIBUTION EXPERIMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sequence (biology); Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.29409641692956623,"score_gpt":0.38661403799214994,"score_spread":0.09251762106258371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986061851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927921,0.00003209688,0.0034750013,0.00026310544,0.000023081067,0.000076292235,0.000050151953,0.00003341293,0.0032547924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955042,0.000028676364,0.003054252,0.00011695767,0.00001961629,0.00016678106,0.000028305214,0.000008895613,0.0010723477],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429023,0.003802978,0.00026534533,0.00059682154,0.00073547446,0.00030913984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95296144,0.028557332,0.008571121,0.0061447853,0.00080656906,0.0029586637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008725557,0.00076027855,0.00096712325,0.00045473056,0.00057047495,0.0010115553,0.0008758807,0.001042741,0.0063175303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034186125,0.00041487892,0.00033048558,0.00034122102,0.002089484,0.001067138,0.0014573296,0.0015064669,0.0005674319],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08138997,0.038060762,0.10878942,0.0018644503,0.0011489975,0.0017837753,0.0067603206,0.066841945,0.38295648,0.123278074,0.00525227,0.18187349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018645229,0.08882043,0.21230657,0.00023075398,0.0007072943,0.0014655248,0.001953394,0.23653066,0.06994235,0.36027974,0.008700242,0.0004177964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046918914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000537941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008725557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006843503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082062354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046145678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987509576","doi":"10.1002/sres.922","title":"Simulating institutional controls on consumption patterns in the commons","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Systems Research and Behavioral Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Consumption (sociology); Sustainability; Quality (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Population; Public economics; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Ecology; Social science; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.3744803071249256,"score_gpt":0.502648773842125,"score_spread":0.12816846671719945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987509576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98737025,0.000035985555,0.0073077236,0.00014450491,0.000014849154,0.000031531108,0.0001771288,0.00004757279,0.0048704804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997511,0.000022599226,0.0015364594,0.00001876376,0.0000016753646,0.00002753198,0.000057614343,0.000008096533,0.0008163235],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997421,0.00012240872,0.000010627019,0.00003985682,0.000032507483,0.00005245719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975834,0.0015474,0.00024652213,0.00021963907,0.00016494365,0.00023803835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070473534,0.00028020484,0.00042263215,0.00046407807,0.0003811153,0.00095851364,0.00079504895,0.0006628955,0.004298355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042125667,0.0002507795,0.00041540407,0.0005029953,0.0010135391,0.00093455106,0.00097551727,0.00066130655,0.00017552066],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030288124,0.0002025741,0.0077298596,0.000024881834,0.000042867574,0.000081959966,0.00010249442,0.9775333,0.00079881947,0.011051304,0.0002951728,0.0018338984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000700594,0.000077276934,0.0012710097,0.0000064627266,0.000013867271,0.0000072638964,0.00008511341,0.99247617,0.0003851177,0.0051258197,0.00047097536,0.000010872698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016197324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009639678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016197324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013012703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008516305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032206118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989761990","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1492721","title":"Gender and Generosity: Does Degree of Anonymity or Group Gender Composition Matter?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Anonymity; Composition (language); Group (periodic table); Degree (music); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Physics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.044033095794763534,"score_gpt":0.3145347470824342,"score_spread":0.2705016512876706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989761990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799905,0.0005394213,0.0012523818,0.0027681694,0.00008364262,0.000029989546,0.00024418617,0.00001079427,0.015080943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988085,0.00007043651,0.00011008623,0.00010940583,0.000039959094,0.0000069033345,0.000029452778,0.0000062509635,0.00081897085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598545,0.0024724165,0.00013828703,0.00043536528,0.00042567382,0.0005427784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9244287,0.05582357,0.011405729,0.0033755985,0.0010966889,0.0038696595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007357171,0.00034161747,0.00083413,0.00080233935,0.0010334093,0.0030306012,0.0008106256,0.0020397138,0.022902487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04141405,0.0003191187,0.00067492365,0.00076902285,0.0033803068,0.0033899897,0.0015975717,0.0013698114,0.0010631304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074256537,0.0016931901,0.89266104,0.00026929943,0.0008391817,0.0010838648,0.006450683,0.0008788081,0.0034492686,0.039551258,0.002648018,0.043049816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029249847,0.0007872208,0.91367793,0.00010530155,0.0005656456,0.0008033087,0.009386348,0.0021140056,0.0011390467,0.06748339,0.0035548483,0.00009050971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009820379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013660508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022902487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043751957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067170727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076616466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990046656","doi":"10.1080/00779950903005481","title":"Bargaining under large risk – an experimental analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Economic Papers","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Negotiation; Production (economics); Field (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Variation (astronomy); Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0241818374915136,"score_gpt":0.3278958966848052,"score_spread":0.3037140591932916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990046656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94573575,0.00019872465,0.029238155,0.0010668472,0.000113720875,0.00087717763,0.00027673165,0.000061334824,0.022431493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829266,0.00018422105,0.012611478,0.00037636756,0.00009545812,0.0012517702,0.00014741662,0.00002391554,0.0023828393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924045,0.0048743105,0.0003348009,0.00074441044,0.0011840187,0.0004579423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91228604,0.067897744,0.009142778,0.008403602,0.0013653407,0.00090448145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010716234,0.00070407515,0.0007831484,0.0005087568,0.0008916648,0.001654829,0.0017844813,0.0017857247,0.010765102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050029624,0.00046298164,0.0006988632,0.0005274691,0.0030824845,0.0021249612,0.0013259648,0.0025622342,0.0006125517],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01705419,0.05225299,0.033013783,0.0017503995,0.0012773318,0.000942017,0.005464626,0.094094045,0.09405585,0.6129893,0.008181265,0.07892418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068980483,0.027113518,0.041825384,0.00032901543,0.0005410304,0.00070749095,0.0032236597,0.30521384,0.026964294,0.5714595,0.015297674,0.00042655566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006414259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004243477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010765102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011012324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007426242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056673527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991173255","doi":"10.1007/s10551-012-1287-5","title":"Satisfying Individual Desires or Moral Standards? Preferential Treatment and Group Members’ Self-Worth, Affect, and Behavior","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Business ethics; Quality of Life Research; Social psychology; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Moral standards; Group (periodic table); Self worth; Face (sociological concept); Field (mathematics); Social comparison theory; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Self-esteem","score_opus":0.208961716253069,"score_gpt":0.400071053630909,"score_spread":0.19110933737784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991173255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99768436,0.000038606668,0.00013457252,0.0002295084,0.0000044026096,0.0000037732834,0.000004159416,7.764913e-7,0.0018998656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973565,0.000013991008,0.00007648034,0.000025281079,0.000002733277,0.0000025260385,0.0000032896278,4.1636955e-7,0.00013963821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985108,0.0010251716,0.0000535362,0.00009199359,0.00015768394,0.00016077618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887679,0.00453818,0.0037953095,0.0009534589,0.00038252477,0.0015627191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045704157,0.00019062204,0.00026668806,0.00040366218,0.00080637477,0.0015557604,0.00027375456,0.0010803348,0.00223608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012223265,0.00018314502,0.00019701982,0.0003074249,0.0018903319,0.00063691405,0.00061938603,0.0010356368,0.00015203288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026681633,0.0045863693,0.89015245,0.00007435267,0.0004883779,0.00034486258,0.009257316,0.0028356737,0.0055889618,0.017495861,0.00087696925,0.06563068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021388532,0.000980419,0.95591074,0.000028959706,0.00011546108,0.00023522586,0.008334973,0.0050237635,0.0008370005,0.027387593,0.0008885089,0.0000435325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010228949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021701201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045704157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005261515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050501927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024170935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991430746","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v6n7p11","title":"Gender in Environmental Context: The Effect of Property Rights, Fines, and Empathy Nudging","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Empathy; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Position (finance); Property rights; Social psychology; Language change; Property (philosophy); Economics; Psychology; Public economics; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.014707751847891809,"score_gpt":0.25907060757198014,"score_spread":0.24436285572408833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991430746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99512935,0.0001676964,0.00028200232,0.00016508122,0.000021203894,0.000020338528,0.000036674555,0.0000038332237,0.0041738376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985784,0.00005289271,0.00025189103,0.00007605764,0.000007925856,0.000027527474,0.000022088678,0.000006727947,0.0009763341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586666,0.002642013,0.00014367308,0.0005667081,0.00043809268,0.0003428924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97121173,0.02057582,0.0037075947,0.0012408316,0.0005163238,0.0027477364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037617933,0.0003963016,0.0005810997,0.00037637248,0.00071653066,0.0014514937,0.00050153653,0.0008805081,0.01091485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01715974,0.00025885747,0.00041460057,0.00028820278,0.0014937068,0.0010635235,0.0015378916,0.0010526483,0.00047133944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015753977,0.007740647,0.8290849,0.00044711801,0.0005485335,0.0017153748,0.025556635,0.0014423183,0.054638248,0.006415964,0.0011714742,0.055484768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012193335,0.0019666937,0.9855387,0.00006744738,0.000119297256,0.00021866358,0.0053709936,0.0011376445,0.0020000837,0.0016086341,0.0018100493,0.00003985062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018205625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023030043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01091485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060219364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059934385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036513865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992751472","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.10.001","title":"Formal and informal quota enforcement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resource and Energy Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; Compliance (psychology); Punishment (psychology); Business; Norm (philosophy); Public economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.020744904199691522,"score_gpt":0.2622716975953965,"score_spread":0.24152679339570496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992751472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8646381,0.0005183745,0.02107888,0.0019429472,0.00014574363,0.00027469383,0.0002525393,0.00006661502,0.111082084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588674,0.000049972412,0.0008906605,0.0000890514,0.00001827576,0.000055045355,0.00001627822,0.000004983152,0.0029890276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920133,0.004181884,0.00051874097,0.0007594015,0.0013938138,0.0011328426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88743013,0.08448154,0.012478063,0.01102729,0.0029698177,0.0016132435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011970924,0.00049615017,0.000970668,0.000907743,0.0015311504,0.0043936213,0.0010333271,0.0019002245,0.021383382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053024326,0.00037506854,0.0004540213,0.0009225303,0.0056855567,0.0048840707,0.0018187861,0.0017685547,0.00062894315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019750516,0.0038300739,0.026223712,0.00037526546,0.00014894166,0.00017998068,0.0022453573,0.009473861,0.0029907888,0.9027888,0.0018661127,0.047902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096508686,0.0014317606,0.0499522,0.00022305708,0.00021608161,0.00021799681,0.005635014,0.05229911,0.004532352,0.8734443,0.010955874,0.00012711859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028869924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032058156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021383382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022221177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003036596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071534514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994412339","doi":"10.1139/f01-021","title":"High variability in spawnerrecruit data hampers learning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Resampling; Residual; Statistics; A priori and a posteriori; Statistical power; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.09396116181682326,"score_gpt":0.31949500660433944,"score_spread":0.22553384478751617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994412339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533119,0.00043094903,0.43804768,0.0012694243,0.00014963615,0.000769886,0.00054980145,0.00071997487,0.0047506834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221085,0.0001888674,0.073482186,0.0010334403,0.0001053382,0.0011068977,0.00066321646,0.000288884,0.0010227109],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9490233,0.031006277,0.0029919723,0.006864916,0.008971068,0.0011423678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7375438,0.20251751,0.014763904,0.03851294,0.0056985486,0.0009632873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.070420235,0.00064036273,0.0019904636,0.0010373816,0.0011611063,0.0023559402,0.0020984984,0.0015702067,0.0015753786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18238395,0.00082083617,0.0011718671,0.0017790088,0.0036970412,0.002655987,0.0022342445,0.0026217152,0.0005560876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046764156,0.001383422,0.4183751,0.0021341532,0.0027049456,0.0010556501,0.005213651,0.064293325,0.116551965,0.038462378,0.0055910335,0.33955795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043593912,0.0035999296,0.6271161,0.00040217434,0.00066637166,0.0012769628,0.001309092,0.11443556,0.082485415,0.14550461,0.022372248,0.0003955897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009664936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016077099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070420235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091562554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010508087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37242228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996299332","doi":"10.1023/b:risk.0000009434.18807.bd","title":"A Simple Risk-Sharing Experiment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; York University","keywords":"Ex-ante; Exploit; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Computer science; Actuarial science; Computer security; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02799752562350948,"score_gpt":0.3309313850388068,"score_spread":0.3029338594152973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996299332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97380877,0.0001186848,0.010067555,0.0015463732,0.0003310578,0.0006830751,0.00056226813,0.00015626165,0.012725932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830362,0.00011479984,0.009176497,0.0008680828,0.00013420002,0.0007376343,0.00018177135,0.00003029788,0.0057204748],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890673,0.00046453468,0.00009211543,0.00020976663,0.00021826093,0.00010856966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862705,0.009262741,0.0007742151,0.0026689593,0.00034946314,0.00067424995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034561814,0.0005458247,0.0010309013,0.000226312,0.00061091804,0.0009031426,0.00113706,0.0025629897,0.0137717705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014161091,0.0003520917,0.0005025175,0.00022642702,0.0013163151,0.0015434192,0.0009060744,0.0011749722,0.0009315995],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.13868129,0.074464135,0.013132307,0.0031190503,0.0017600338,0.0013432062,0.0020491246,0.029906128,0.3826884,0.22321491,0.016329277,0.11331212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08025618,0.09849404,0.040762037,0.00027095733,0.0018495095,0.0016738097,0.00075111905,0.092384815,0.08733133,0.5690533,0.026413143,0.00075979694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004920398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003033691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137717705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003677422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007522907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04607117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996357882","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2089522","title":"Level-K Reasoning in a Generalized Beauty Contest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Beauty; Mathematics; Computer science; Art; Political science; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.07361425040236702,"score_gpt":0.3259055615447025,"score_spread":0.2522913111423355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996357882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86313367,0.00015391978,0.053463012,0.0026274752,0.00007627492,0.00010146618,0.00013257761,0.0001691691,0.080142446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916488,0.00003088923,0.0055492395,0.00011317079,0.00002146948,0.000015852718,0.0000329234,0.000015967762,0.0025716443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546236,0.0022287304,0.00025393363,0.00067908585,0.0006154317,0.0007604359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98112315,0.012192062,0.0018899931,0.0031621887,0.0005982766,0.0010344177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054370183,0.0006326848,0.0017423658,0.00064466917,0.0016386955,0.0063526654,0.0016843909,0.004052086,0.017603466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02548278,0.0005998668,0.0013801745,0.000752854,0.0040857233,0.006668341,0.0025445037,0.0035037252,0.0011345451],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013717276,0.00047409392,0.0052126786,0.00022373347,0.000208063,0.0005535884,0.0012164348,0.025505438,0.0030072038,0.93701434,0.0025686335,0.022644114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019310632,0.00007743004,0.0014383071,0.000010672537,0.00003629564,0.000100106205,0.00025626257,0.041398734,0.00026228192,0.95567226,0.0005283002,0.000026144964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023068783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018130272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017603466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001240601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015101165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05888945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996539769","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x13001878","title":"Understanding social networks requires more than two dimensions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Copying; Categorization; Computer science; Social learning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Generalization; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Algorithm; Political science","score_opus":0.2767853292324032,"score_gpt":0.4139428634748593,"score_spread":0.13715753424245614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996539769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037616512,0.0077013746,0.044745397,0.91481966,0.002849055,0.00009724495,0.0002994347,0.00014900905,0.025577178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38050088,0.038054857,0.07865498,0.44121003,0.036462538,0.001236136,0.0008439935,0.00017923678,0.02285744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964935,0.0013681968,0.00028810656,0.00078088837,0.00077379914,0.0002955118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98112583,0.01195266,0.0013875354,0.002097733,0.0024583808,0.0009779811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063962406,0.0010986405,0.0015827134,0.0019302691,0.0032471423,0.007083505,0.003867781,0.010471552,0.008193155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019278273,0.00058657833,0.0008994773,0.0011281058,0.014636308,0.024101956,0.0039972053,0.016948946,0.004462809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004575518,0.000055480214,0.0025198695,0.0005333239,0.00005776571,0.00043815,0.0011796945,0.0009293815,0.00031630686,0.83797884,0.07642564,0.079519875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014407919,0.000022588205,0.001271094,0.00023376785,0.000011304916,0.00049710507,0.0009549569,0.0020981522,0.00010089616,0.9285973,0.06616351,0.00003492236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047567617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044075637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010471552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050889715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002788763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03692323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997258687","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12100","title":"Discussion of “Managers' Discretionary Adjustments: The Influence of Uncontrollable Events and Compensation Interdependence”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Affect (linguistics); Event (particle physics); Subjectivity; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.050269867348149214,"score_gpt":0.3779512745396132,"score_spread":0.327681407191464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997258687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5965917,0.0031537083,0.12105746,0.15389548,0.0015475419,0.0006027747,0.00038586627,0.00017737402,0.12258807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867775,0.00045716105,0.0059247306,0.004388501,0.0004187307,0.00021465606,0.000026847021,0.000021167578,0.0017707632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779831,0.017280594,0.0007251029,0.0011718353,0.0024667906,0.0003724705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75812274,0.22016175,0.009800653,0.0080207,0.003143498,0.000750588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036929283,0.0003526403,0.00057821354,0.00064616755,0.0017012114,0.004135678,0.0020072563,0.0026019576,0.00968377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1204003,0.00038047583,0.0007412325,0.0006935724,0.009798845,0.0046210466,0.0023607935,0.0033342915,0.0003683208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010650161,0.00097207853,0.014946678,0.0004844303,0.00013840519,0.00034404412,0.009201261,0.006258355,0.0045420565,0.8929084,0.0086417785,0.060497537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061159814,0.0011055943,0.05691527,0.0005880308,0.00027104662,0.00015805817,0.01100033,0.027303373,0.011535757,0.8421768,0.048147228,0.00018708968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001885891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017400285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036929283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019302306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018249812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19530302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997306878","doi":"10.1002/oca.877","title":"A dynamic game of status‐seeking with public capital and an exhaustible resource","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optimal Control Applications and Methods","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Consumption (sociology); Differential game; Resource (disambiguation); Markov chain; Markov perfect equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Common-pool resource; Consciousness; Outcome (game theory); Stock (firearms); Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Psychology; Statistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.023230244229671352,"score_gpt":0.39279106676423076,"score_spread":0.3695608225345594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997306878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84795624,0.00020957092,0.09611473,0.003386154,0.000067713736,0.00021752292,0.00035944924,0.00006527798,0.051623337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103117,0.00006168669,0.004010735,0.000062426276,0.000012231011,0.000057025187,0.000026764663,0.0000036162112,0.004734238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988103,0.0006173479,0.000049486953,0.0001655347,0.00014502474,0.00021228338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656206,0.0022204388,0.00041660634,0.00015388284,0.00012623568,0.0005206482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020349622,0.00062577537,0.0009126463,0.00053315057,0.0008756559,0.0021374098,0.001116279,0.0020747257,0.00583021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049960986,0.00038880724,0.00053037074,0.00042742727,0.0020769096,0.0026075607,0.0017240996,0.0011679294,0.00022979158],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090824714,0.0004024413,0.003309914,0.00018940485,0.00012568444,0.0017162987,0.0009358456,0.21883164,0.006599751,0.75377715,0.0019203129,0.011283361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037476784,0.0003606273,0.002376457,0.00004129836,0.00006290142,0.00028304182,0.00064617774,0.6865168,0.0008226102,0.30506742,0.00336037,0.000087538676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004828665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029218185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00583021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028286402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001327576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02052331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998135658","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.004","title":"Honest on Mondays: Honesty and the temporal separation between decisions and payoffs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Honesty; Cadet; Payment; Bidding; Economics; Business; Psychology; Actuarial science; Operations management; Finance; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06312650682521721,"score_gpt":0.34957779877285394,"score_spread":0.28645129194763674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998135658","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32786793,0.43534717,0.06737707,0.06589495,0.0042031626,0.00008380314,0.00077232235,0.00008771947,0.098365925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90334207,0.079833314,0.006773553,0.0024290173,0.0016560953,0.000070089285,0.00023844939,0.00005812496,0.0055993255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763405,0.0013833302,0.00014957417,0.00027141214,0.00039096025,0.00017070083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96384984,0.02747172,0.0050762882,0.0017814589,0.001304017,0.0005166905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007006363,0.00048373564,0.000874549,0.00089599326,0.00063170865,0.0027497893,0.0011135855,0.0023407056,0.0054996004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04643489,0.00045067392,0.00063695933,0.0013144686,0.003465964,0.006116096,0.0013427128,0.0037914973,0.00038909202],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021022994,0.00023851031,0.012249449,0.0017766884,0.00055486255,0.00033370696,0.0019978757,0.004568493,0.0022082508,0.689501,0.011005669,0.27346316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020099734,0.00034106648,0.08096884,0.0016246276,0.0004485398,0.0006020822,0.0013093725,0.0068987203,0.0012372317,0.8624714,0.043729078,0.00016805076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019065376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002084239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007006363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001293684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011909878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037053645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998577083","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.02.001","title":"Volunteering a public service: an experimental investigation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"McMaster University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ecolab","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Public good; Economics; Microeconomics; Subgame; Attrition; Perfection; Stochastic game; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection","score_opus":0.09846419142234707,"score_gpt":0.33249991245153954,"score_spread":0.23403572102919246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998577083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99451715,0.00005005526,0.000956596,0.0003722364,0.0000952301,0.0011873326,0.00010101051,0.00002193457,0.0026984664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872552,0.00018062163,0.0033064454,0.00044215666,0.00018718734,0.004269833,0.00024924334,0.000028070459,0.004081177],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917304,0.0052480916,0.0005496311,0.00087356986,0.0008056925,0.00079267396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8577744,0.11194113,0.008618075,0.014601844,0.0020867942,0.0049776975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015498292,0.0014989375,0.0017369088,0.0010264091,0.0031570916,0.0029950708,0.0026652925,0.005149849,0.014524963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057854306,0.0010910352,0.0010721101,0.00093506277,0.0051944638,0.003237471,0.0021792029,0.0040900134,0.0015815233],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11135413,0.7603126,0.030896826,0.0011107278,0.00057351624,0.000928978,0.0091677345,0.0029643935,0.016880743,0.021696655,0.003542552,0.04057118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.17147422,0.5850692,0.072047785,0.0005646737,0.0023372727,0.0018824197,0.020329267,0.04067322,0.016030692,0.07853214,0.010467092,0.00059207884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022150162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019853937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015498292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012991441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028379855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08196378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000091880","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.021","title":"A behavioral model for mechanism design: Individual evolutionary learning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"California Institute of Technology; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Nash equilibrium; Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Fictitious play; Range (aeronautics); Sequence (biology); Space (punctuation); Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Economics; Physics; Biology","score_opus":0.1557588111844823,"score_gpt":0.3420563759362246,"score_spread":0.18629756475174233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000091880","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012951312,0.00018206844,0.97490853,0.002779917,0.000086539134,0.00010750123,0.00013465402,0.00011539128,0.008734073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6474045,0.00082434504,0.33572656,0.0010863848,0.00029098502,0.0010862014,0.0001912245,0.00008911434,0.013300685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974623,0.0017043365,0.00008083466,0.00034381327,0.00024281327,0.00016593235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927483,0.005452133,0.00040807028,0.0006687806,0.00042986835,0.0002928794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005704341,0.0010377736,0.0015019989,0.0010431474,0.0008819343,0.0025489356,0.003797752,0.003868193,0.011756068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017436454,0.00066156435,0.0014277045,0.00092993455,0.002904105,0.00434543,0.0015856277,0.0029284495,0.0013849582],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036864312,0.00008680974,0.00073618325,0.00008325259,0.00008954497,0.000072134295,0.00013577586,0.102337256,0.0004039799,0.88451046,0.0014932263,0.010014521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075466894,0.000041093917,0.00019475634,0.000015992811,0.000037014823,0.00006763951,0.000024279821,0.29724568,0.000081655686,0.7011464,0.0010504088,0.00001956849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016595466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013640845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011756068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018982658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020295496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03932792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000389213","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12070","title":"Managers' Discretionary Adjustments: The Influence of Uncontrollable Events and Compensation Interdependence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05753325621603622,"score_gpt":0.37531070902970437,"score_spread":0.31777745281366815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000389213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99678063,0.000047799236,0.00069078227,0.000104207465,0.0000051245775,0.000011072306,0.0000085942465,0.0000067820442,0.0023450046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958974,0.000012668737,0.00023087309,0.000024311023,0.0000030049994,0.000005769332,0.0000034501743,0.0000015821196,0.00012870358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995018,0.003256299,0.00030512453,0.00035452514,0.00080281193,0.0002632996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93709695,0.04097519,0.015884867,0.002725412,0.0012503098,0.0020672989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005566213,0.00023999235,0.00022033582,0.00032296227,0.0005431499,0.0019135016,0.00035290193,0.00052412704,0.0024374016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031138917,0.00021798773,0.00024231321,0.0002021861,0.0008118454,0.00074392866,0.0008492291,0.0007918454,0.00014163942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032780676,0.0021631974,0.7723804,0.0004135062,0.00049966754,0.00062926015,0.038699552,0.0075032096,0.06347179,0.0059359265,0.0009723705,0.10405303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007765161,0.00071880926,0.9769483,0.000061143895,0.00009849184,0.000102906204,0.0075335484,0.0059891464,0.0038014692,0.002494333,0.0020845684,0.00008957186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010961603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020464365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005566213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005765007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053254596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029437304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000986405","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2011.10.012","title":"Communication, equity and the voluntary provision of a public good by heterogeneous groups","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Socio-Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Endowment; Public good; Equity (law); Preference; Turnover; Economics; Microeconomics; Distribution (mathematics); Public economics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07030303088881126,"score_gpt":0.31266968484430513,"score_spread":0.24236665395549387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000986405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369078,0.00043727414,0.015264195,0.0038207462,0.00006244621,0.000065620494,0.00007128596,0.000020037336,0.043350585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977937,0.00006548927,0.00048784664,0.00006274027,0.000033587665,0.000015018267,0.000007824271,0.0000025577442,0.0015313221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966628,0.0020285097,0.00010597738,0.00024670505,0.00045524025,0.0005007194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94989896,0.039580204,0.006206453,0.002345239,0.00093533925,0.0010337692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066167344,0.00034857768,0.00049561413,0.0008762443,0.0012576052,0.0035118687,0.0007816867,0.0023677184,0.006352018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029424656,0.00026650762,0.00031802017,0.00075606065,0.003630218,0.0036831184,0.0020558762,0.0010597076,0.0003006413],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017080617,0.0011320239,0.030906606,0.00019019176,0.00012382837,0.0004340122,0.0038169136,0.01669762,0.0051903953,0.8704692,0.0023367351,0.06699443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039713422,0.00034737744,0.022705883,0.000050174018,0.00008945944,0.00018762657,0.00229566,0.022636598,0.00147754,0.9461598,0.0036073413,0.000045413643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028078877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014883548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066167344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017069189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012334266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034993112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001380691","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2012.04.005","title":"Favoritism in asymmetric contests: Head starts and handicaps","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Ex-ante; Head (geology); Microeconomics; Economics; Head start; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.040023953299039294,"score_gpt":0.3312649387049365,"score_spread":0.2912409854058972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001380691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173146,0.0006334578,0.034608297,0.0023013684,0.000081662445,0.00009678188,0.00011717267,0.000085630076,0.04476103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941941,0.000118423166,0.0028220399,0.00014618457,0.000043648997,0.00004220181,0.000023234374,0.000021990836,0.002588353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558276,0.0026754376,0.00015711422,0.00035818043,0.00077529723,0.00045114008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233652,0.06256384,0.005062886,0.005520091,0.0012804948,0.0022075814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010900527,0.000668307,0.0014354871,0.00096307934,0.0012899338,0.003116562,0.0013832717,0.002393404,0.010690332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06766444,0.00060904946,0.00047119168,0.0006077735,0.005493144,0.0045483867,0.0022124946,0.0031000653,0.00057885813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026173738,0.0013793677,0.022771955,0.00039695113,0.00015145194,0.0006990022,0.0036020004,0.013455798,0.009985257,0.8337691,0.0067446046,0.104427114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004711497,0.00055703847,0.023350894,0.00007941784,0.00008708364,0.0004580942,0.0024971494,0.053913258,0.0035545644,0.9118285,0.003112463,0.000090372174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008767704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015404476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010900527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010076934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009521069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057648182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002134037","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00111.x","title":"Broad‐based incentive plans, HR practices and company performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Resource Management Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Productivity; Business; Workforce; Sample (material); Marketing; Human resource management; Knowledge management; Industrial organization; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0553194527108788,"score_gpt":0.3535988639610827,"score_spread":0.2982794112502039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002134037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99281025,0.00028328688,0.0006013875,0.00031578922,0.0000057240636,0.000031431533,0.00008036709,0.000007502865,0.0058643236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939287,0.00006471372,0.00023011593,0.000020919459,0.0000065925265,0.0000065700065,0.000036715774,7.412476e-7,0.0002408108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962276,0.001164111,0.00019894975,0.00022105729,0.0015360157,0.00065232365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9458991,0.022123482,0.020336872,0.0019834496,0.0028745963,0.0067825364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053652935,0.00025655865,0.0002923119,0.0013085982,0.0007422199,0.002360827,0.0004072463,0.00064155826,0.0022554789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021711048,0.00012902459,0.00017759622,0.0014937354,0.0013638261,0.0012987161,0.0015051758,0.00094598846,0.00021531557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017467856,0.00096388813,0.9352555,0.00009277931,0.00011969915,0.00009480648,0.0010254305,0.003326548,0.00085458934,0.0027064434,0.00035104115,0.0550346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008028581,0.00019315748,0.99672204,0.000023114251,0.0000138230425,0.000018753191,0.00074571715,0.00070587156,0.00019373916,0.00077101716,0.00059348874,0.000011254721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014513744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03232936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014513744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028318646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030067689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028858483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002487460","doi":"10.1057/eej.2012.30","title":"Are Women More Generous than Men? Evidence from Alumni Donations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Reciprocal; Liberal arts education; Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Labour economics; Political science; Gender studies; Economics; Sociology; Higher education; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.08112026274024622,"score_gpt":0.35016501636519415,"score_spread":0.26904475362494795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002487460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763148,0.001996949,0.000119591816,0.0028153372,0.00013052764,0.000014128397,0.00011265296,0.0000035124888,0.018492572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996192,0.0007359783,0.000038956256,0.00052911,0.000087130364,0.000008085056,0.000049315633,0.0000020795492,0.0023574643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976109,0.0014659278,0.00007494925,0.00016231505,0.00030126612,0.00038471297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599003,0.022891024,0.009471061,0.0019071825,0.0019365384,0.0038939721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066843485,0.00027699326,0.0004555601,0.00083406403,0.001378954,0.0015513196,0.00045591372,0.0012322166,0.0131252855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027743343,0.00027413692,0.00019015769,0.00076480967,0.0015163494,0.00087894354,0.0013617753,0.0011354571,0.00097004167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007648158,0.0017145049,0.8756331,0.00042351143,0.00046538675,0.00048470352,0.005427958,0.00016159016,0.0006495808,0.009391251,0.0091384435,0.08886181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005738167,0.0011086342,0.962065,0.00044703722,0.0004231041,0.00051791104,0.014030559,0.0002141462,0.0006314802,0.004431096,0.015525029,0.000032068718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025595217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030831923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0131252855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002734264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041265157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043908417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003535680","doi":"10.1007/s00199-004-0488-2","title":"Repeated moral hazard with persistence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Persistence (discontinuity); Moral hazard; Period (music); Public finance; Economics; Compensation (psychology); Econometrics; Hazard; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Incentive; Engineering; Social psychology; Macroeconomics; Physics","score_opus":0.033725914720553675,"score_gpt":0.28054745549170146,"score_spread":0.2468215407711478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003535680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79124564,0.000783981,0.16782866,0.008364454,0.0003201575,0.00010730716,0.00015927313,0.00027893283,0.030911723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927649,0.00011229111,0.002244711,0.00014237768,0.00012529643,0.00002813348,0.000018463235,0.000015185299,0.0045486595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806315,0.0008949651,0.000093052404,0.00033442673,0.00030625978,0.00030817708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9424269,0.03931122,0.00765929,0.0073954505,0.0015334634,0.0016736367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046962607,0.0004480725,0.0010727773,0.0007417568,0.0008616696,0.0024501593,0.0014428309,0.0029626302,0.009305361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038673375,0.0006301374,0.00084549113,0.0007365205,0.003478335,0.0042869747,0.0019394497,0.0042492286,0.000414293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032220565,0.00048524913,0.008072738,0.00014539355,0.000105257306,0.000632151,0.0008549733,0.022196164,0.0011809883,0.9427094,0.0026104073,0.020685203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008333245,0.00010156168,0.0024056574,0.000011586243,0.00003272402,0.00026857466,0.00015138692,0.048626643,0.00019262712,0.9476139,0.00048443588,0.00002747554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078415574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041676138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009305361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009916872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012225803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031129539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003575166","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2008.09.002","title":"A behavioral Laffer curve: Emergence of a social norm of fairness in a real effort experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Laffer curve; Economics; Norm (philosophy); Tax revenue; Microeconomics; Enforcement; Revenue; Public economics; Tax reform; Political science","score_opus":0.10660535140098494,"score_gpt":0.45086483044027376,"score_spread":0.34425947903928883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003575166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9296926,0.00011121678,0.04361373,0.0042018658,0.00007983684,0.00011867315,0.00015864933,0.00026470178,0.021758717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930264,0.000034469016,0.0055836826,0.0002717089,0.000030358515,0.000056148427,0.0000415993,0.00004700194,0.00090865383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829453,0.001000947,0.00004962289,0.00022714648,0.00032085745,0.00010687922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668568,0.022896312,0.0024872408,0.0042075487,0.0015256502,0.0020263642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066891275,0.0002315274,0.0007257105,0.0006388854,0.0008966291,0.0016768713,0.0007829156,0.0019103368,0.0063139996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07057486,0.00025743488,0.0003413873,0.00035865043,0.002533818,0.0020620693,0.0013847867,0.0022183256,0.00041081742],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003219412,0.0016100621,0.0633051,0.00043060243,0.00021361615,0.00071356667,0.007043668,0.028306162,0.08477205,0.68734723,0.013481331,0.10955721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050269027,0.0012977046,0.14363429,0.00012938841,0.000061599414,0.0007076118,0.0021348982,0.31175852,0.012674688,0.52057713,0.006293692,0.00022784757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014260366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009842099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066891275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011746577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010762336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035375953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006722299","doi":"10.1002/smj.359","title":"A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Empirical research; Transaction cost; Extant taxon; Empirical evidence; Asset specificity; Economics; Foundation (evidence); Positive economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.15819853477177018,"score_gpt":0.4083934887742108,"score_spread":0.25019495400244063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006722299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.609513,0.24290326,0.04897643,0.029357376,0.0009703334,0.0007123906,0.0030726576,0.00016093848,0.06433362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96699923,0.022461046,0.0077807563,0.0009979779,0.0004989112,0.00018609218,0.00076563103,0.000029751924,0.00028060036],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.90628624,0.048392024,0.014160316,0.0045081717,0.025552347,0.0011009705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08357739,0.83354163,0.033273745,0.012119401,0.03661115,0.0008767213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.113689005,0.0008248491,0.0018272218,0.03123431,0.0012771952,0.009791705,0.002715014,0.0026069381,0.0071606794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4880281,0.0007215167,0.0015007406,0.028117653,0.0073549943,0.007783286,0.0037692594,0.0024246166,0.0006772165],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013444796,0.00041358318,0.37026122,0.029025653,0.0054713176,0.001551238,0.00654257,0.0035734407,0.0024351534,0.11997034,0.00564432,0.4537667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065225776,0.0018260739,0.6237064,0.048613016,0.00855634,0.0047129327,0.0239824,0.021449303,0.007271897,0.18891753,0.06993703,0.0003748113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013226672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016219867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113689005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026692778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003841447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6012521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007098560","doi":"10.1007/s13752-013-0106-2","title":"Game Experiments on Cooperation Through Reward and Punishment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Public goods game; Punishment (psychology); Public good; Reputation; Social dilemma; Incentive; Dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Strong reciprocity; Psychology; Social psychology; Stochastic game; Empirical research; Experimental economics; Microeconomics; Beijing; Repeated game; Economics; Game theory; Political science","score_opus":0.10700492834509151,"score_gpt":0.36597285849527367,"score_spread":0.25896793015018216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007098560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766876,0.00019557503,0.010333239,0.0008812842,0.000086833425,0.00028552423,0.00020575074,0.000051775398,0.011272355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991039,0.0001724589,0.0052470365,0.00024571968,0.00002862189,0.0004440994,0.000087941284,0.000016151162,0.002719051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715996,0.0019351898,0.00018200242,0.00026497766,0.0002995837,0.00015834042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223212,0.06856502,0.0035728063,0.0036446915,0.00079297804,0.0011033406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005258684,0.0010913054,0.00068504666,0.00059928163,0.0005439016,0.0010743348,0.0012536192,0.0016093908,0.0067108492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031105867,0.00046475208,0.0004141104,0.00045278305,0.002599695,0.0019085757,0.0009683934,0.0018162273,0.00029641486],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.039552156,0.051258735,0.025071552,0.0022189503,0.0016766153,0.0008396879,0.0041101277,0.07936374,0.09064022,0.6137433,0.010117409,0.08140751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022393981,0.042870436,0.04456702,0.00034181806,0.00095232815,0.00091493194,0.0019796765,0.22098598,0.04615946,0.606742,0.0117396545,0.00035266668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001265839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010604393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067108492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012518018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009458511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027810872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007835903","doi":"10.5539/ass.v6n3p17","title":"Do Interactive Theories Really Explain Public Sector Managerial Decision-Making?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Psychology; Positive economics; Public relations; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.018926244559313278,"score_gpt":0.35469634147442847,"score_spread":0.33577009691511517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007835903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4208156,0.004622508,0.1358091,0.04942023,0.0005023462,0.0002639935,0.0009645009,0.00049122435,0.3871104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861631,0.001414609,0.00598505,0.0010884346,0.00020430204,0.0000955943,0.0001899889,0.000039309012,0.0048196116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998226,0.00084469764,0.000041341405,0.00023572332,0.00027659853,0.00037580033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98298705,0.011815855,0.002263994,0.0012922196,0.00079603563,0.00084491714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032893475,0.00073124864,0.00048706998,0.0014169322,0.00078693783,0.003819767,0.0016745158,0.0016056487,0.0249383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013924367,0.00035200312,0.0011713873,0.0013205481,0.0037211587,0.0050978903,0.0017355928,0.0020631666,0.002494145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031021703,0.00074653473,0.07672308,0.0005014598,0.0005017626,0.00039357741,0.0030235539,0.018738084,0.00055912865,0.83578247,0.00788145,0.05483872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000921296,0.00010830145,0.02213213,0.00010470482,0.00014864252,0.00011675722,0.0017744667,0.02866872,0.00024697545,0.9330777,0.013493414,0.000035943645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031260697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026444395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0249383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021530236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014476929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08342695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007849613","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.926076","title":"The Impact of Sex, Value Orientations and Risk Attitudes on Trust and Reciprocity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012463711444012218,"score_gpt":0.3356635394514298,"score_spread":0.3231998280074176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007849613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99600655,0.00009392338,0.0001400174,0.00014347566,0.000009146613,0.0000061717033,0.000031618965,0.0000014949516,0.0035675792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926716,0.000052898762,0.000069220834,0.000015254223,0.0000051176153,0.0000033378249,0.000012556556,0.0000033099711,0.0005711233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980387,0.0011634456,0.00008638761,0.00016037132,0.0002646947,0.00028643612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9195856,0.063310444,0.006146458,0.0026958906,0.0015082839,0.0067532994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042134286,0.0002935897,0.0005279965,0.0005416062,0.0009884429,0.0029899362,0.00039199114,0.0008141812,0.009542646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02732817,0.00037963854,0.00047388117,0.0004687423,0.0018769036,0.001256144,0.0011568883,0.0017867346,0.00046249203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01244761,0.0040376573,0.9231886,0.00015352051,0.00058859575,0.0008024679,0.00495177,0.0013095245,0.009400797,0.010521022,0.00047534925,0.032123014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002723752,0.0014777296,0.9776853,0.000041353796,0.00046433174,0.00044162906,0.003178765,0.0034529297,0.0012119368,0.010988091,0.0007170638,0.00006860084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027872836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051747835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009542646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007543374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011077874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031923354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008900004","doi":"10.1177/0539018407079726","title":"Non-rational compliance with social norms: sincere and hypocritical","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Compliance (psychology); Norm (philosophy); Proposition; Rational choice theory (criminology); Reputation; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Humanities; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics; Criminology; Social science","score_opus":0.040443755830791114,"score_gpt":0.3680077849358786,"score_spread":0.3275640291050875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008900004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43464154,0.0041189664,0.11505667,0.096357964,0.00065044686,0.00013557615,0.0000682225,0.000116647,0.34885398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088216,0.0003892861,0.0030334261,0.0016494632,0.00010906939,0.00003618522,0.000010025368,0.000020989568,0.0038694611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99083334,0.006152185,0.00029062168,0.000754224,0.0014256306,0.0005440765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98858637,0.00635471,0.0018823054,0.0012548295,0.0015098519,0.00041189598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008648722,0.00034122137,0.00036902685,0.0007682051,0.0017031383,0.003979275,0.000732281,0.0023912622,0.0018913759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01746854,0.00023264777,0.00054173556,0.00050883554,0.017128581,0.0052112336,0.0019911418,0.0028460382,0.00029415116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018363984,0.000029192654,0.0012799732,0.000030163881,0.0000088722845,0.00007938602,0.003089801,0.00051705283,0.00019242546,0.9895661,0.000634256,0.004554474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019091593,0.000031191335,0.0019118632,0.000076085336,0.000009155984,0.00008894292,0.0016275576,0.0037083523,0.00032889855,0.9803422,0.011835195,0.000021392216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026056503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014794456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008648722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027474288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017606432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045739353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009233380","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.004","title":"Social distance in a virtual world experiment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social distance; Virtual world; Social psychology; Psychology; Dictator game; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.028564907302867166,"score_gpt":0.33490965350264157,"score_spread":0.3063447461997744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009233380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955135,0.000025226269,0.00071144605,0.00016211146,0.00005173262,0.00007598468,0.00005443016,0.000009786647,0.0033957993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512815,0.000034787594,0.0011470943,0.00011538282,0.00003775337,0.00036511908,0.00007760404,0.0000151957765,0.0030789285],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709713,0.001954174,0.00014615242,0.00029078382,0.00032476487,0.0001869325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703204,0.023101225,0.0016720825,0.0024657869,0.0004751179,0.0019654543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032665362,0.00072558044,0.00083443127,0.0005411944,0.0011696395,0.0023138237,0.0011003462,0.0016950124,0.009006829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026626004,0.00039300966,0.00033717067,0.00045863958,0.0018544171,0.0025215347,0.0018144664,0.0018712138,0.0006059186],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1492686,0.35939658,0.0804056,0.0016441642,0.00145192,0.0012957414,0.017712103,0.038091425,0.080130145,0.15378252,0.008640051,0.10818114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05215657,0.21726051,0.25075364,0.00037720267,0.0017447714,0.0011561968,0.014053828,0.17074166,0.030524498,0.23726617,0.023099756,0.00086527853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001715071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011854921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009006829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006952325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006140548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030130863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009386370","doi":"10.1177/0022002706290432","title":"Economic Transactions among Friends","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Conflict Resolution","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Endowment effect; Endowment; Norm (philosophy); Social psychology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Gift giving; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Psychology; Political science; Law; Conflict of interest","score_opus":0.022842369669473325,"score_gpt":0.313278628474512,"score_spread":0.29043625880503865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009386370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872322,0.00010633647,0.00069426873,0.0001450704,0.000028596638,0.00008556298,0.000056751902,0.000016094524,0.011635143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746275,0.00006545669,0.00056480145,0.00007128333,0.000015978756,0.00009700691,0.00004902479,0.0000047622816,0.0016690015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823076,0.0009411019,0.00010355731,0.00026386848,0.0002999801,0.00016079734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880569,0.0064774184,0.0016908494,0.00221268,0.00043563187,0.0011264744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022430867,0.00029900883,0.00046185544,0.00047215246,0.0008924893,0.0017994001,0.00049531873,0.0008842638,0.011407659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011559496,0.00028416497,0.00023124526,0.0003019002,0.0008396292,0.0019049675,0.0014441492,0.00095620373,0.0008194677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020691345,0.044785783,0.37356317,0.0018749338,0.0011264101,0.002194765,0.031985156,0.0037597327,0.14797002,0.09120972,0.006887001,0.27395198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044399346,0.036315266,0.7283351,0.00032844552,0.0010419264,0.0029154897,0.0143968,0.019954652,0.0577993,0.07103986,0.06302635,0.00040687778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003684286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032330854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011407659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043552904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017872437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03816247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009886798","doi":"10.1177/076737011102600102","title":"Asymétrie du pouvoir dans la négociation commerciale: étude du différentiel de pouvoir perçu et de la différenciation cognitive","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06960205304689496,"score_gpt":0.3738522697252878,"score_spread":0.3042502166783928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009886798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9125102,0.0008525315,0.05045967,0.00042571733,0.000030855437,0.000072084775,0.000050275026,0.00003592891,0.03556274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930199,0.000163563,0.004575863,0.000021538894,0.0000053662734,0.000024896026,0.000015817212,0.000010041727,0.0021629538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829453,0.00066459685,0.00006572723,0.0003444554,0.00049137295,0.00013932196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98724097,0.009373677,0.0012950733,0.0005453484,0.0011264858,0.00041848238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034751398,0.0007295826,0.0007261045,0.0010347501,0.0007153449,0.0045500537,0.00083793624,0.0012911139,0.0071199955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01806522,0.00038325434,0.0008623115,0.00095120067,0.0021293124,0.003378725,0.0016997342,0.001252517,0.0005450639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019665482,0.0013921954,0.23738219,0.0016525935,0.0006000594,0.0019407682,0.021266565,0.09132692,0.062315192,0.33223936,0.0011340353,0.2467835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024813105,0.0018333369,0.33262858,0.00041134565,0.0005999422,0.0017952864,0.01848681,0.32923982,0.027961023,0.27054608,0.015830494,0.00041907167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048935167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028176755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071199955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023048597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010504184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023818731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015569004","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1742086","title":"Is Sin Always a Sin? The Interaction Effect of Social Norms and Financial Incentives on Market Participants’ Behavior","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Financial market; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Finance; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0351015259903844,"score_gpt":0.33143063036851905,"score_spread":0.29632910437813464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015569004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925895,0.0001042652,0.0004653741,0.0008316549,0.000022953223,0.000012599203,0.00003062741,0.00000621574,0.005936763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992213,0.00004403856,0.00021748616,0.00008755424,0.000015770265,0.000010295696,0.000011851698,0.0000041605986,0.00038765703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964469,0.0026623746,0.00009650113,0.00021380065,0.0003151673,0.0002653704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92521787,0.060270216,0.008086733,0.0020650986,0.0011604703,0.0031996388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006231451,0.00024134712,0.000620834,0.00039264245,0.0007146397,0.0021348128,0.0004920086,0.0014851629,0.007865253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032481078,0.00035766914,0.00035764734,0.00031970246,0.0016996639,0.0018043076,0.00096824573,0.00152696,0.00032334833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012909124,0.010219518,0.8361006,0.00036694165,0.0014479713,0.0006846878,0.0066455603,0.00451134,0.016519343,0.04115358,0.002309524,0.067131855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007423431,0.0018515742,0.9472425,0.000042867323,0.00040333558,0.00017094827,0.0031352385,0.0077218562,0.0013413194,0.035782926,0.0014295344,0.00013556294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018531263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030284654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007865253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054822577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008358263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032955468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015953764","doi":"10.1506/69q1-bglg-ma91-yalf","title":"Coordinating Effort under Team‐Based and Individual Incentives: An Experimental Analysis*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Microeconomics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.15509024013669812,"score_gpt":0.4403946607589377,"score_spread":0.2853044206222396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015953764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918332,0.000046300498,0.0031272722,0.00019986456,0.000033265394,0.00034365748,0.00012168288,0.000017148692,0.004277547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950836,0.000056464814,0.002860885,0.00007482242,0.000035067627,0.0007875805,0.000088293455,0.000009950676,0.0010032591],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932498,0.004249488,0.00047809156,0.0006237387,0.00080032676,0.0005985681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9137336,0.058581807,0.014521104,0.00930033,0.0018924016,0.0019708185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010804848,0.0007204064,0.00091611507,0.00058990414,0.0008607768,0.0022114369,0.0014775665,0.0012856838,0.0065549896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048205007,0.00053877535,0.0005906516,0.0006961438,0.0024617526,0.001290729,0.0016116987,0.0016371335,0.00049462565],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11067957,0.2036101,0.08855816,0.0031265172,0.0032190105,0.0011232,0.007906488,0.1856689,0.06774445,0.20306717,0.0070732525,0.11822313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04621609,0.13858943,0.117506236,0.0005569564,0.0019491706,0.00036475132,0.0048358473,0.39936382,0.04277336,0.23339403,0.013830573,0.0006197781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014129692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007753101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010804848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015364299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015228543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057142198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016100280","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0058826","title":"Competition over Personal Resources Favors Contribution to Shared Resources in Human Groups","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Data science; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.045696070245394585,"score_gpt":0.2863021737485089,"score_spread":0.24060610350311434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016100280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98225087,0.00007631821,0.0032283391,0.00039985482,0.000006027404,0.000009954165,0.00000988768,0.0000062685126,0.014012525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906856,0.000016960003,0.0005012142,0.000034837354,0.0000024808974,0.0000037518319,0.0000035613757,0.0000016510382,0.00036703527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989267,0.0006477604,0.000028034387,0.00015379908,0.00012772152,0.00011601417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951881,0.0026373516,0.00091022515,0.00031326342,0.0001532692,0.0007977498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017387667,0.00025308397,0.00030221237,0.00038374166,0.0008165505,0.0016337795,0.0003620761,0.00088673085,0.005639127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062150513,0.00018466992,0.00018527167,0.00022168888,0.002428055,0.00090267975,0.0011921495,0.00036609083,0.00028572787],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002278658,0.001220063,0.4583506,0.00056596816,0.00049300125,0.0020994404,0.011250632,0.024032805,0.06123397,0.33686808,0.0038844505,0.097722284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048599622,0.0016682503,0.45205864,0.00012893359,0.00022922773,0.0021597194,0.009742588,0.07744561,0.0071694735,0.43888107,0.009865756,0.00016475719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010775632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022555839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005639127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005365019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034036834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01886481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017034712","doi":"10.1111/1467-9779.00095","title":"Team Incentives and Organizational Form","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Profit (economics); Microeconomics; Variety (cybernetics); Economics; Marketing; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.03160582250261197,"score_gpt":0.2831220904057499,"score_spread":0.25151626790313797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017034712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59573686,0.0006948157,0.0774756,0.004833848,0.00028996603,0.0005670331,0.00020703688,0.00017897098,0.32001588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848333,0.00018739123,0.00714008,0.00014949097,0.0000827064,0.00019395427,0.000055121352,0.000020327465,0.007337647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945393,0.002482235,0.00030970364,0.00063081284,0.0010429238,0.0009949694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824684,0.003908563,0.004634978,0.0019464758,0.0020350316,0.005006523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004438413,0.00030055674,0.00046968987,0.0013584947,0.0021206036,0.0036475079,0.00063237007,0.0010182302,0.01193626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01732505,0.00020921457,0.0002763926,0.00082974613,0.003951066,0.0027003363,0.0046782354,0.000821746,0.0009223415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012424406,0.0002885212,0.019238694,0.00009879016,0.00004144837,0.00008854935,0.0018381049,0.0051649148,0.000697455,0.9163387,0.0032236925,0.052856933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020867074,0.0004407095,0.034291588,0.00010623043,0.000026280815,0.0002917641,0.0021287778,0.009614127,0.0004173805,0.9145035,0.03793047,0.000040543855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006702304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092100305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01193626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021135684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019117411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0399307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017299608","doi":"10.1177/0022343314524428","title":"Why can’t we be friends? Entitlements and the costs of conflict","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Peace Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Chapman University","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Payment; Conflict resolution; Welfare; Prosocial behavior; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Public economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13922518289732377,"score_gpt":0.46236901885753207,"score_spread":0.3231438359602083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017299608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99372524,0.000056820078,0.0011357986,0.00050525327,0.000028670036,0.00006230944,0.000040504867,0.000014448598,0.00443095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981668,0.000027769944,0.00080593023,0.0001620379,0.000012376497,0.00012331073,0.000015472362,0.000003850424,0.00068243605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968652,0.0021243517,0.00013697996,0.00029396053,0.00032226765,0.00025718744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96846384,0.022388093,0.0041612964,0.0025969995,0.00038736162,0.002002486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034666476,0.0003754454,0.00057338155,0.00026905866,0.00089701667,0.0016784717,0.0007126694,0.0014768126,0.008088877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011576741,0.00032575027,0.00024699373,0.00020797628,0.0015084557,0.0013474873,0.00086644525,0.0016116948,0.0005235266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.054341163,0.095309645,0.3412267,0.0018341873,0.0012436757,0.0023653668,0.009842531,0.02200237,0.19153775,0.10570995,0.00737744,0.1672092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009758931,0.098406084,0.5444889,0.00037049697,0.001174796,0.0016821646,0.013643982,0.07041255,0.057264123,0.16686833,0.035320617,0.0006089986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029073682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004266794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008088877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000621024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030895366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027060032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017302592","doi":"10.1257/mic.3.3.1","title":"Testing Game Theory in the Field: Swedish LUPI Lottery Games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Field (mathematics); Example of a game without a value; Hierarchy; Poisson distribution; Convergence (economics); Test (biology); Repeated game; Population; Game theory; Combinatorial game theory; Statistics; Economics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.04065000272379824,"score_gpt":0.31601405832493745,"score_spread":0.2753640556011392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017302592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97392887,0.00016231844,0.012389716,0.00081410224,0.000059302733,0.00010012315,0.00020716854,0.00006428981,0.012274157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248636,0.00009190865,0.005860079,0.00025076864,0.00003745566,0.00012381622,0.0003294032,0.000020902158,0.0007992194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463767,0.003834907,0.00019268427,0.0005093857,0.00064497365,0.00018036649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90008897,0.08696264,0.004712273,0.0046827435,0.0023963542,0.0011570598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007665635,0.00070370885,0.0009564397,0.0012143158,0.0014869431,0.002254937,0.0013705284,0.0013218184,0.0037709416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059322044,0.00030306526,0.0006556785,0.0010837168,0.002862349,0.0028658586,0.0012011474,0.0019291863,0.0006440762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007748235,0.011569393,0.21694744,0.0013612822,0.0013143226,0.0012987476,0.010631332,0.13909087,0.00997607,0.40365982,0.035058297,0.16134417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022623756,0.0059242058,0.0980721,0.00034396694,0.00022787054,0.0006642218,0.007769019,0.4580003,0.0073684733,0.4062364,0.012829884,0.00030119013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008346337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008970991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008346337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020666854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010416008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04054022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017527665","doi":"10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00074.x","title":"Exchange Relationships in Inshore Fisheries<sup>1</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Forum","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Ethnography; Social exchange theory; Context (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Fishery; Information exchange; Participant observation; Business; Sociology; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Social science; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15938010205149902,"score_gpt":0.3393269111364782,"score_spread":0.1799468090849792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017527665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823544,0.00027174441,0.001171238,0.0008136282,0.000009773301,0.000012408738,0.000015990308,0.00000342505,0.015347376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751943,0.00019639875,0.0003167127,0.00004961213,0.000004044486,0.000009668034,0.000012167706,0.0000015812477,0.0018903151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885845,0.0007277321,0.000049026814,0.00009365578,0.000106856816,0.00016428043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957033,0.0021387155,0.001238613,0.00019737553,0.00024498088,0.000477047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002220337,0.000113962524,0.00015360721,0.0006524228,0.0043755677,0.0025019574,0.00028633958,0.00066786003,0.0058349604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054048644,0.0001575818,0.000086462125,0.00068854145,0.003592459,0.0032867286,0.0024650746,0.00071716745,0.00034549786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035486353,0.0003873591,0.26583523,0.00018698587,0.000051447867,0.0042092367,0.51349944,0.0011861449,0.0035379203,0.12031157,0.0033455011,0.08709428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025507557,0.0002915952,0.3005123,0.00025194907,0.00002962178,0.0012524829,0.6161923,0.0023425517,0.0010635881,0.02936133,0.04861244,0.00006430941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072213234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013417924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072213234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011811132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010552729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019519925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017692326","doi":"10.1177/0048393106296540","title":"The Conceptual Construction of Altruism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Counterintuitive; Altruism (biology); Positive economics; Perspective (graphical); Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Axiom; Social psychology; Experimental economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08451515193369666,"score_gpt":0.37816313947321256,"score_spread":0.29364798753951593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017692326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08538841,0.010784514,0.2547819,0.080613516,0.00086120697,0.000102777565,0.00015621645,0.00013154154,0.56718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97085416,0.001300436,0.017817188,0.0030953365,0.00023168465,0.00018252882,0.000034383622,0.00003140727,0.0064528934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938699,0.004418787,0.00012844395,0.00062170165,0.00068289135,0.00027820945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968837,0.0017206058,0.0004215989,0.00041215378,0.00028266708,0.00027916513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007151275,0.00041259333,0.0004134016,0.0013323303,0.0027704241,0.0035117054,0.0015119785,0.0023080187,0.0032000807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005829083,0.00029732255,0.000494133,0.00086044753,0.032481376,0.004972099,0.0039772084,0.0030819322,0.00037575245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015278421,0.000002009274,0.00004173221,0.0000060296134,9.277522e-7,0.000003728572,0.0005035049,0.00005922531,0.000023163895,0.9987037,0.00021322667,0.0004411932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049137093,0.000009663499,0.0002231738,0.00002874974,0.0000028003801,0.000053786785,0.0004018148,0.00046658627,0.00005951202,0.9825968,0.016146788,0.000005434226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095424784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069104676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007151275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035679908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015983217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03782004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019959679","doi":"10.1287/mksc.2014.0863","title":"Competitor Orientation and the Evolution of Business Markets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Profit (economics); Population; Profitability index; Microeconomics; Business; Dilemma; Marketing; Negotiation; Industrial organization; Reputation; Economics; Game theory","score_opus":0.010250958299739444,"score_gpt":0.282712125215576,"score_spread":0.27246116691583655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019959679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648333,0.00048884924,0.0061768875,0.0007188428,0.000012994638,0.00001817351,0.000012442096,0.000012105002,0.027726524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734217,0.00017895304,0.0013322493,0.00006756454,0.0000055329765,0.0000067442516,0.0000073566844,0.000004062739,0.001055388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994067,0.0003224595,0.000016392782,0.0000916072,0.000077652796,0.00008512849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776196,0.001181666,0.0004203996,0.00012201189,0.00020710987,0.00030689206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001547052,0.00018008758,0.00022957544,0.0005270864,0.0007487711,0.00223373,0.00031610762,0.0009561604,0.0020644532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054695182,0.00019623128,0.00019712694,0.00033696904,0.002480767,0.0017256367,0.00087918475,0.00062803173,0.00015366684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040614093,0.00037596296,0.07214329,0.00012474517,0.00010560183,0.00096192193,0.0041709533,0.03159943,0.019961603,0.7946229,0.0011661671,0.07436131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015560153,0.00068174803,0.1525397,0.00008347373,0.00009775853,0.0014749778,0.005117438,0.10268958,0.004634366,0.70384043,0.028535374,0.00014961755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017822048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014783131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00223373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001443947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050397194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010476649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020066026","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1100.1279","title":"“I Think You Think I Think You're Lying”: The Interactive Epistemology of Trust in Social Networks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Social capital; Order (exchange); Core (optical fiber); Sociology; Lying; Psychology; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social trust; Social psychology; Social media; Computer science; Social science; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06057539570672232,"score_gpt":0.3357281790947471,"score_spread":0.2751527833880248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020066026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42258993,0.0032920088,0.41681606,0.029190438,0.00029765436,0.00013739432,0.00017156888,0.00009672809,0.1274082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900349,0.00043061984,0.008232966,0.00019115968,0.000047527712,0.00005790505,0.000018755074,0.00001052806,0.00097565324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99170387,0.006149266,0.00025097365,0.00072314095,0.000773681,0.00039904873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96406645,0.027433569,0.0046041016,0.0017894339,0.0013567362,0.00074978697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006679427,0.0004345203,0.00042381583,0.002019698,0.0035813337,0.0073509635,0.0011610144,0.002345799,0.0033544626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033918403,0.00040036693,0.0006273776,0.0019023092,0.01537081,0.011514221,0.004112807,0.0023365873,0.00035232186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006269565,0.00004194213,0.0063980743,0.00012621585,0.000043342654,0.00028270212,0.0215863,0.003367342,0.00034533723,0.94944125,0.00065071526,0.01765399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001800503,0.00003954873,0.0028635853,0.0001985778,0.000039239316,0.00027185061,0.0069275186,0.013313031,0.00035177232,0.9683082,0.0076299706,0.000038666643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027318604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001613476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073509635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027312941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016890165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035324633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020601644","doi":"10.1111/1540-5982.t01-3-00003","title":"The evolution of preferences and competition: a rationalization of Veblen's theory of invidious comparisons","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrence; Veblen good; Humanities; Rationalization (economics); Competition (biology); Premise; Philosophy; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Biology; Physics; Ecology","score_opus":0.13260050829242717,"score_gpt":0.22918804145063804,"score_spread":0.09658753315821086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020601644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35946515,0.0013746347,0.26249212,0.011263869,0.00015326875,0.00011810833,0.00020082238,0.0000755404,0.36485648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981118,0.00013665555,0.014159958,0.00026916887,0.000029797959,0.000061736624,0.000026401392,0.000016123216,0.004182043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975163,0.0014694915,0.000059905582,0.00041190904,0.00039997144,0.00014233729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958334,0.002283986,0.00060285185,0.000559969,0.00050855154,0.00021125202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040495982,0.00028413223,0.0003860301,0.0011613264,0.0010031363,0.0027290052,0.0015525084,0.0012789005,0.009129709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013337674,0.00018765297,0.00067117135,0.000885656,0.0068509835,0.0045934254,0.0017015524,0.0014492742,0.0003451181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017842121,0.00000959656,0.0012729652,0.000015618913,0.000011188081,0.000039792347,0.00049107336,0.002268477,0.00013439002,0.9898589,0.00029867922,0.0055814222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011839018,0.000015714633,0.0012977205,0.000014412996,0.000005134478,0.000063040075,0.0002755106,0.0068487464,0.00006979098,0.988422,0.0029675951,0.000008477191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023427221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023122742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009129709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030093603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006257938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030541897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021049355","doi":"10.1109/smc.2013.351","title":"Characterization of a Conflict","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Decision maker; Conflict resolution research; Conflict analysis; Computer science; State (computer science); Operations research; Conflict resolution; Political science; Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.043593511100423886,"score_gpt":0.3248312301162277,"score_spread":0.28123771901580386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021049355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32866433,0.005466339,0.30923107,0.006010276,0.0008209872,0.0011114411,0.0015319351,0.00028001287,0.34688365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95546997,0.00078278716,0.035358034,0.00029868528,0.00022097642,0.00046210177,0.00070898933,0.000041203846,0.0066571725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924562,0.003157483,0.00084978284,0.0014280502,0.0013421944,0.0007662026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982666,0.007294739,0.004827468,0.0016704879,0.0021104866,0.001430809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003921985,0.0008941499,0.0007475416,0.0048656897,0.0034570717,0.0066857827,0.0015408503,0.0017912902,0.009774346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017458018,0.00034736766,0.0008478784,0.0041925535,0.006073399,0.008092456,0.004278436,0.0022138888,0.0009772028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017740068,0.00011265567,0.012691907,0.00025659232,0.000087798435,0.00072884257,0.005702595,0.0041147177,0.00158718,0.9413813,0.0034834093,0.029675495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043144984,0.00022783528,0.01284506,0.00036959175,0.00010664767,0.0029203536,0.014679196,0.024893887,0.0014533672,0.8717066,0.07062776,0.000126482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015760642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007215676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009774346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021870513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015928372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032698452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021374719","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2012.02.009","title":"Uncertainty, task environment, and organization design: An empirical investigation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Delegation; Group decision-making; Microeconomics; Economics; Task (project management); Volatility (finance); Complementarity (molecular biology); Industrial organization; Business; Marketing; Econometrics; Management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0622682827428743,"score_gpt":0.33088230968750487,"score_spread":0.26861402694463055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021374719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970204,0.00017422883,0.0012450109,0.00006085033,0.0000039873653,0.000043292417,0.000022308524,0.0000037719374,0.0014259812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988613,0.00007964754,0.00073825585,0.000017753679,0.000007271801,0.000036212008,0.000025635854,0.000003808126,0.00023016932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968251,0.0019605507,0.00019228637,0.00021158968,0.00052559824,0.0002849081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80962086,0.16593672,0.015666824,0.0042886874,0.0018983114,0.0025886584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008759417,0.00038982154,0.00050750666,0.0009427175,0.00086706394,0.0025878872,0.0007958486,0.0013448788,0.0043081134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068481825,0.00043116766,0.00047057273,0.0007924217,0.00118706,0.0022400133,0.0015454354,0.00085552846,0.00029581043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006790384,0.005283358,0.90580356,0.00037668526,0.00032232414,0.00034380797,0.0054110177,0.011407398,0.0029491682,0.0072390265,0.0005516201,0.0535216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057101,0.004451978,0.9204077,0.00018229858,0.0004764701,0.0005037954,0.00944975,0.04216805,0.0014968162,0.018001806,0.0021508404,0.00013939125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017486538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002758505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008759417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009032652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011934123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04632479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023252096","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2007.11.002","title":"Group and individual risk preferences: A lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02573525417271327,"score_gpt":0.28723643934145,"score_spread":0.2615011851687367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023252096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996271,0.0000038518415,0.00007853371,0.000044041484,0.000011297841,0.000036119458,0.00001552239,0.0000021524936,0.00018133958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640214,0.000025590352,0.0010506466,0.00016135255,0.000033828204,0.0002544411,0.00008247906,0.000007286965,0.001982215],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846387,0.0007551869,0.00010943391,0.00021618564,0.0002122814,0.00024312803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809874,0.012171128,0.0013898108,0.0019063574,0.00030787388,0.0032373199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005425119,0.0011003016,0.0015724914,0.0005684816,0.0017530951,0.0028967657,0.0015184663,0.0029859433,0.0062938854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01267617,0.0011290648,0.0008648377,0.00035071064,0.0023830691,0.0016481716,0.0014828086,0.002833311,0.0010103759],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.3014854,0.46643192,0.078074716,0.00037258433,0.00076915586,0.0009544861,0.015235417,0.007757719,0.0963279,0.0068762563,0.0022592414,0.02345526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.13874266,0.39082578,0.27393985,0.00015924405,0.0012373957,0.00085843354,0.016230436,0.10614188,0.023683922,0.043484073,0.003531882,0.001164424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019364569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019239244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062938854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044240677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028691173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023654541","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12006","title":"Turning Up the Volume: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Mutual Monitoring in Tournaments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Competition (biology); Tournament; Incentive; Mutual aid; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Ecology","score_opus":0.13801588700875175,"score_gpt":0.4179723692988279,"score_spread":0.2799564822900762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023654541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99659026,0.000029106495,0.0010483981,0.00010692217,0.0000366044,0.00013906103,0.0000257948,0.000020832982,0.0020029563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948213,0.000036763544,0.0032596663,0.00016437483,0.000048554502,0.0005241924,0.000040760773,0.000012470221,0.0010920368],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966252,0.0016250972,0.00027989797,0.0005638038,0.0006031879,0.00030279084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97435045,0.015260498,0.004773859,0.0030644296,0.00051925564,0.002031596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033645367,0.0007859902,0.0006533537,0.00038494638,0.0010072845,0.0016902029,0.0012930224,0.0012632314,0.006273828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01933204,0.000598836,0.00038263886,0.00028956225,0.0014075307,0.0013099001,0.0014629526,0.002039839,0.00040605792],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.063676,0.2766481,0.13769838,0.0018077415,0.0010388908,0.0014416482,0.019844223,0.0073981094,0.30354822,0.028911898,0.0030973135,0.15488946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019544007,0.2762561,0.5054737,0.00037553525,0.0012160521,0.0010541964,0.007690738,0.044495553,0.08421116,0.042398624,0.01668561,0.00059863424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033322445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005020385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006273828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046171347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005516362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020988047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023912427","doi":"10.1023/b:puch.0000024169.08329.eb","title":"Modeling Other-Regarding Preferences and an Experimental Test","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Public finance; Dictator; Social preferences; Economics; Equity (law); Dictator game; Extension (predicate logic); Microeconomics; Test (biology); Generosity; Positive economics; Econometrics; Public economics; Political science; Inequality; Computer science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.10513251195478325,"score_gpt":0.37131265558222737,"score_spread":0.26618014362744413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023912427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9295282,0.00008451415,0.05791968,0.0008306945,0.00007189031,0.00018324495,0.00030151452,0.000066501045,0.011013797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871235,0.00004998091,0.009866377,0.00013314484,0.000039783397,0.0002841447,0.0001162663,0.000015075399,0.0023717773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965856,0.0028123725,0.00007095036,0.00022707837,0.00014384069,0.00016013782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9276348,0.064122654,0.0029736585,0.003919762,0.00071330206,0.00063583284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079414835,0.0010939462,0.0010523971,0.00044085982,0.0005285736,0.0015805425,0.0022910894,0.0020748205,0.017576974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03896052,0.00047750893,0.0008978564,0.00058779813,0.0020098218,0.00359786,0.0010190766,0.0016216572,0.00062093575],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02125587,0.022667103,0.026980106,0.00085545937,0.00084240234,0.00052636745,0.0012690835,0.23423837,0.008369172,0.63295376,0.0044456073,0.045596756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027518903,0.003469237,0.003701144,0.000044182805,0.00027798474,0.00007753044,0.0003354852,0.7647404,0.003226476,0.21959686,0.0016891843,0.00008966472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014532995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012590687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017576974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080545165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005695107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058800817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025603861","doi":"10.1080/1350485032000155431","title":"Laboratory markets in counterfeit goods: Hong Kong versus Las Vegas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV; University of Nevada, Las Vegas","keywords":"Counterfeit; Las vegas; Empirical research; Economics; Government (linguistics); Advertising; Business; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02070818098285205,"score_gpt":0.26933606000014637,"score_spread":0.24862787901729433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025603861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975165,0.000083046805,0.00052570703,0.00017733926,0.0000069867388,0.000057120575,0.00003493756,0.0000045929137,0.0015936814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792284,0.00007859677,0.00063449185,0.000094760064,0.0000055465234,0.00009756037,0.00005532231,0.0000023268583,0.0011084789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985592,0.0009549222,0.00005069759,0.00016155913,0.00012346762,0.00015021859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910589,0.0047348184,0.0020684758,0.0011899722,0.00033803866,0.0006098217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036898807,0.00036158954,0.0005775999,0.00042543295,0.0011701889,0.0016887344,0.00061528716,0.00058447995,0.0025972482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043357527,0.0002610442,0.00032388486,0.000410496,0.0036676496,0.0013039327,0.00089344435,0.0005652207,0.00018020337],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036883198,0.033929355,0.57654446,0.0010804333,0.0011244053,0.0022055272,0.017906193,0.020629376,0.054661468,0.13995855,0.008115325,0.10696173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064643323,0.027555319,0.77307236,0.0002977534,0.0010318044,0.0006425656,0.03161947,0.05883305,0.04068781,0.037333116,0.021937128,0.0005253072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040441282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051503573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040441282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022035325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001625446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08041173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027407290","doi":"10.1016/j.jedc.2010.04.007","title":"Learning by doing vs. learning from others in a principal-agent model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.009613576773334917,"score_gpt":0.27063965513834876,"score_spread":0.26102607836501385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027407290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71380025,0.0010102239,0.246462,0.008504326,0.00022395662,0.00021132143,0.00045335628,0.00025221385,0.029082317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97444224,0.00057372794,0.010245378,0.00020381584,0.0001519605,0.000102362654,0.000069735404,0.000035769586,0.014174966],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862456,0.0008063153,0.00006254371,0.00021357059,0.00010917932,0.00018393385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879231,0.008870049,0.0013621568,0.00051960454,0.00035146903,0.00097373937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003923198,0.0011693855,0.0026043865,0.00074663456,0.0010417169,0.0034393785,0.0025737775,0.0043678116,0.0079654865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010930485,0.0009070068,0.0011512466,0.00076391734,0.0023363573,0.0055515463,0.0016386338,0.0021775528,0.0010723369],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081950397,0.00070982205,0.0047110696,0.00022983807,0.00025446303,0.00053389696,0.0006904045,0.5989948,0.001189559,0.37573728,0.0018344276,0.014295027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035859644,0.00018812409,0.0008095829,0.000014393146,0.00007365317,0.000061239014,0.000107593,0.8652394,0.000112090675,0.13257143,0.0004263164,0.000037588703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046088435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026412208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079654865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092871534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011791015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02664715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028304397","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x03420050","title":"Chance, utility, rationality, strategy, equilibrium","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Passions; Minimax; Foundation (evidence); Expected utility hypothesis; Epistemology; Von Neumann architecture; Mathematical economics; Decision theory; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15177526761505353,"score_gpt":0.413830773357662,"score_spread":0.2620555057426085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028304397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32898188,0.035538223,0.22202355,0.04217821,0.000819427,0.00017679388,0.0016970359,0.0003347946,0.36825007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98619777,0.0037849098,0.003801226,0.0003166018,0.000216241,0.000051574076,0.00012118411,0.000014411715,0.005496093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983693,0.00091201725,0.000089822934,0.0002298831,0.0002665938,0.00013236879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424595,0.0043681697,0.0006332821,0.00021276236,0.00032676698,0.00021305474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019451363,0.00062873546,0.00075659144,0.0011554258,0.0006577909,0.003269158,0.00066504756,0.0014985722,0.011829977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010693213,0.00017052983,0.0003761013,0.0019091861,0.0034864233,0.0030528419,0.0009950256,0.0013905546,0.0008089758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007558456,0.000039237857,0.0026668832,0.00017542709,0.000059193513,0.00010797961,0.00013110481,0.01394226,0.0001221938,0.96191424,0.003866643,0.016899128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000174326,0.00002117237,0.0010170203,0.00003866983,0.000012424038,0.0000728766,0.00007154751,0.008246505,0.000057555106,0.9876431,0.0027903297,0.000011378541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037092278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020467658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011829977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022996068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012984222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03957522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028511920","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x03230053","title":"Humans should be individualistic and utility-maximizing, but not necessarily “rational”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Irrational number; Individualism; Expected utility hypothesis; Psychology; Function (biology); Term (time); Social psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2188541640234301,"score_gpt":0.4111443748951959,"score_spread":0.1922902108717658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028511920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34923473,0.0018367332,0.08687514,0.07843743,0.0007853173,0.0001855309,0.0002925446,0.00030095744,0.48205167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674845,0.00035293892,0.013194207,0.0069892467,0.00007951542,0.00005866427,0.00006369173,0.000032769967,0.011744549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988807,0.0004605513,0.000042795127,0.00018975443,0.00030764192,0.0001186097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974348,0.00058573193,0.00054499356,0.00032006303,0.0007895464,0.000325014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019222861,0.00022151985,0.00016515219,0.00019980132,0.0007313002,0.0021912134,0.0003374736,0.0014019602,0.0045631994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047227736,0.00014070372,0.00013229088,0.0001480385,0.0043420214,0.00140435,0.00060179894,0.00089852436,0.0016773207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017634235,0.00016298087,0.012267265,0.0003007533,0.000118801436,0.0003140397,0.0018975103,0.0031149779,0.007462377,0.88748354,0.037202857,0.049498577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009103147,0.00011812375,0.012700197,0.00015015766,0.00004995263,0.00068666565,0.0010122776,0.004476243,0.003687752,0.8779093,0.09905922,0.00005897973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008832129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076810113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045631994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006040803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066941744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015265465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029747413","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2013.1747","title":"The Dark Side of Competition for Status","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":490,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Cheating; Ranking (information retrieval); Incentive; Rivalry; Competition (biology); Rank (graph theory); Social psychology; Great Rift; Microeconomics; Identity (music); Work (physics); Wage; Organizational behavior; Psychology; Economics; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Labour economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.027787169404148552,"score_gpt":0.33001622075961207,"score_spread":0.3022290513554635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029747413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89264697,0.00060299766,0.009614336,0.006103334,0.000089664485,0.000042100874,0.00009447869,0.00006101015,0.090745166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659306,0.000076700606,0.0007690148,0.0004443623,0.000023613682,0.000017098559,0.000014116829,0.000017474867,0.0020445406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954125,0.002511651,0.00012071376,0.0005061261,0.0010231638,0.00042591654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629322,0.019548299,0.007031135,0.0060027605,0.0015946109,0.0028910907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056150793,0.00033861527,0.0007960598,0.00063867896,0.001667011,0.0030859767,0.0007808398,0.0018253392,0.024281701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028683448,0.00036338842,0.00030906027,0.00036442274,0.003741151,0.0030934894,0.0027655342,0.0021110151,0.0013424973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028954598,0.0021903587,0.1101342,0.0009909995,0.00038267006,0.00092743465,0.006363875,0.0058260276,0.112335,0.49017942,0.014119699,0.2536549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058038364,0.0032670707,0.20714171,0.0003836376,0.00026010952,0.0013550712,0.0075429063,0.035320185,0.020262623,0.68644965,0.037120756,0.00031588363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009722933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001746027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024281701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089197326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010564588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0812304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029806185","doi":"10.1163/156853708x358191","title":"Religious Solidarity: The Hand Grenade Experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognition and Culture","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Altruism (biology); Solidarity; Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Psychology; Dictator game; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03890837591352293,"score_gpt":0.322718646065684,"score_spread":0.2838102701521611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029806185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974336,0.000006737143,0.0002834562,0.00006791501,0.000011139868,0.00007649665,0.000024646592,0.00000829611,0.0020877256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965842,0.000014498199,0.0012165367,0.00010853913,0.00000886449,0.00017515599,0.000041353116,0.0000063884586,0.0018443902],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895275,0.0005125386,0.000049976952,0.0001485219,0.00022758605,0.00010863774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909587,0.0046608355,0.0012510932,0.0018473481,0.0002406529,0.0010413704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026236,0.00038017237,0.0005423212,0.000244857,0.0010964746,0.00061834615,0.0006242873,0.00088653056,0.0043074708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008295391,0.0002456176,0.0002005692,0.0001708433,0.0022684226,0.0007118271,0.00091834756,0.0015240461,0.0003436145],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.065255284,0.098220915,0.15567543,0.00074355217,0.0005484346,0.0031191073,0.043355178,0.00368738,0.5085791,0.021579696,0.0055122557,0.09372366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012747897,0.08631823,0.7629998,0.00014144857,0.00032659367,0.0013767873,0.01417531,0.012460873,0.059612524,0.025501704,0.02395525,0.0003835833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007715861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011129814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007715861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006886661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057753717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015341878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030274886","doi":"10.1257/jel.53.1.65","title":"Jon Elster's <i>Securities against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections</i>: A Review Essay","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Economic Literature","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Set (abstract data type); Persuasion; Subject (documents); Economics; Incentive; Positive economics; Phrase; Law and economics; Function (biology); Microeconomics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0589371782380243,"score_gpt":0.4027896647761981,"score_spread":0.3438524865381738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030274886","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000111032445,0.9867901,0.00039008242,0.008251254,0.0010150888,0.0000046049063,0.000011086966,0.0000067310716,0.0034200845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003545609,0.9873089,0.00045224084,0.00368527,0.002221594,0.000018089891,0.000017126838,0.000011236726,0.0027398644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861157,0.00055956177,0.000114107876,0.00019025881,0.00046672105,0.0000577041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480975,0.0036254379,0.00040387482,0.00011164642,0.0009443964,0.00010476765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026505992,0.0005968806,0.0011999438,0.0028322495,0.00063237734,0.0029714168,0.0010708878,0.003429006,0.0040054624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008967046,0.00048391684,0.00046508448,0.005485522,0.0024241162,0.00334617,0.0007450382,0.0023041165,0.0026840996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006868451,0.00005581785,0.00037246305,0.012277949,0.00014020687,0.000059293994,0.0003797357,0.00060318585,0.00027291995,0.10906601,0.32140186,0.55530196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001680817,0.00003320112,0.00096514676,0.005579619,0.00004998987,0.00013802014,0.00019958551,0.00008933843,0.00013600272,0.018897787,0.9738737,0.000020883723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042739874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056658587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042739874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019699286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033787042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014292955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030503897","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.11.004","title":"Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Derogation; Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Job performance; Identity (music); Job satisfaction","score_opus":0.039816639943854044,"score_gpt":0.3421642891389443,"score_spread":0.3023476491950903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030503897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98626757,0.00017798228,0.0031327913,0.0005650083,0.00003249357,0.00004147668,0.00004688768,0.000013029355,0.009722823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988483,0.000028286015,0.00061742554,0.00010891371,0.000023574557,0.00001393678,0.00002013011,0.000007771729,0.00033160165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084115,0.006184196,0.0003241415,0.00074791745,0.0016550815,0.00024751716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81732285,0.14308847,0.01974494,0.012371212,0.005717369,0.0017551382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014515914,0.00028281007,0.0004674245,0.0007022316,0.0007077904,0.002240804,0.00066230854,0.0015065022,0.00544233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13014743,0.00041940575,0.00026290724,0.0006319155,0.0023271148,0.0024036132,0.0011986163,0.0019170977,0.00053317216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010006744,0.004829494,0.676803,0.0006705188,0.00074845337,0.0006842367,0.017843528,0.004301428,0.041599426,0.0907957,0.004189402,0.14752814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031903005,0.0012940324,0.90446615,0.00012829137,0.0003085076,0.00089919,0.00436266,0.018989164,0.0096688075,0.057494104,0.0019071413,0.00016295906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001146088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012962007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014515914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055282866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005661867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07676846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030560560","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2006.08.010","title":"The build-up of cooperative behavior among non-cooperative selfish agents","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microeconomics; Public good; Stock (firearms); Economics; Social capital; Free riding; Private good; Variable (mathematics); Private information retrieval; Collective action; Proxy (statistics); Computer science; Computer security; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023213931738157556,"score_gpt":0.3270609873660507,"score_spread":0.30384705562789316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030560560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913845,0.000037431884,0.003121766,0.00017378772,0.0000050628505,0.0000118791,0.000010427531,0.000022143822,0.0052329744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924374,0.000009562837,0.00037922122,0.000018174094,0.0000017921114,0.000006373893,0.000004814884,0.0000034718132,0.00033281062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999358,0.00029316396,0.000019935604,0.00008606035,0.00012837186,0.00011448573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98908234,0.0053297607,0.0014290069,0.002116044,0.0008915061,0.0011512776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015832636,0.00016185989,0.00029358073,0.0007310371,0.0012201088,0.0014799774,0.0005630237,0.0008461927,0.0026552873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011585037,0.00043611857,0.00027881563,0.00034577347,0.0021026095,0.001320964,0.0018233195,0.00084294146,0.00028933404],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020020967,0.0019019173,0.31681538,0.0004056551,0.0005115818,0.0030673954,0.0390354,0.022069078,0.21050707,0.22758675,0.003333725,0.17276397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022334368,0.0020020884,0.62461275,0.00007728782,0.00035660446,0.0022399363,0.017478596,0.08161683,0.018626792,0.24422239,0.008377453,0.0001659613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072369934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010292717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026552873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046467016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005930855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00888288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030609886","doi":"10.2224/sbp.2001.29.4.359","title":"ARE ECONOMISTS RATIONAL, OR JUST DIFFERENT?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Prisoner's dilemma; Dilemma; Simple (philosophy); Social psychology; Experimental economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.17220376006175764,"score_gpt":0.43653583734462026,"score_spread":0.2643320772828626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030609886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24154897,0.017231295,0.016609626,0.53501266,0.0021224013,0.0000816101,0.000253999,0.00007253714,0.18706688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489229,0.009325305,0.0030547976,0.02745567,0.0011852109,0.00006587887,0.000113847265,0.000027710723,0.009848827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957058,0.0020726386,0.00019677683,0.0005213491,0.0010182051,0.00048521796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98684907,0.008060589,0.002260119,0.0010933109,0.0010245397,0.0007123998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057454645,0.00027996182,0.0005355352,0.0008190075,0.0010433785,0.0049972082,0.0006769426,0.0026156015,0.005223584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036945604,0.00021308515,0.0002517843,0.0008665717,0.010266828,0.0066437805,0.00086679705,0.0018719854,0.0010829964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022449608,0.00012858438,0.028416026,0.00022881385,0.00016485513,0.00030098163,0.005288249,0.00095777586,0.000352873,0.8602677,0.022010282,0.08165935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004576905,0.000029099128,0.008985741,0.00013750786,0.000028698714,0.00016900565,0.0046538743,0.0009518689,0.00013023973,0.9409742,0.04386514,0.000028881712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040729125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023176498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057454645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014454853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012948817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030385315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030747588","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00191","title":"Zero-Sum Bias: Perceived Competition Despite Unlimited Resources","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Zero (linguistics); Psychology; Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Resource (disambiguation); Heuristic; Adaptation (eye); Work (physics); Presentation (obstetrics); Statistics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03877510387499013,"score_gpt":0.34870518523429406,"score_spread":0.30993008135930394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030747588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98023635,0.00022513492,0.0084079495,0.00024508793,0.00005101632,0.000041074825,0.000035029883,0.00002941996,0.010728875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978617,0.000038963393,0.0015528839,0.00014195082,0.000014180463,0.000018653775,0.000028199387,0.000011295584,0.0003320633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797446,0.0005989262,0.00014626762,0.00031926253,0.00080424873,0.00015698107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988084,0.0067708273,0.0025422478,0.001047411,0.0008137113,0.00074185414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036193565,0.00036007137,0.00041940296,0.0006567527,0.0004328095,0.0017944017,0.00041797786,0.0009928104,0.0023231537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021653535,0.00027002773,0.00030184438,0.00036216187,0.0014844475,0.0015354194,0.0013230381,0.0012571046,0.00015087625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068237656,0.0015566933,0.57147914,0.0015911066,0.0010882473,0.0013383846,0.028065357,0.005991397,0.16351564,0.063300855,0.0046948236,0.15055455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032055896,0.0025943907,0.8651517,0.00024051475,0.00031060816,0.0018798022,0.01195637,0.016263137,0.015147219,0.07945353,0.0063601416,0.00032198182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081118004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009491751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036193565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000510473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002524073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019141197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031464481","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x05250148","title":"On the limitations of quasi-experiments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadian Seaplants (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Axiom; Core (optical fiber); Null hypothesis; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2253181199892461,"score_gpt":0.41107101331263346,"score_spread":0.18575289332338735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031464481","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008217126,0.033163734,0.7231075,0.15010183,0.015996601,0.0078105023,0.0023129066,0.0005761737,0.058713708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3575558,0.01306609,0.47305924,0.096149854,0.01064808,0.04082709,0.0008166401,0.00047858682,0.0073987185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3944397,0.5347241,0.016954206,0.018194893,0.03420582,0.0014812188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.12204964,0.7930917,0.014311178,0.054077763,0.015163574,0.0013061555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.55783176,0.002246856,0.0049315253,0.0024983159,0.003708155,0.0059975036,0.007017336,0.0060821297,0.01206779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.73087835,0.0016482812,0.0030063447,0.0031917638,0.026145417,0.014341882,0.006547793,0.012290901,0.0021396778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001173697,0.00026820097,0.002812382,0.004085716,0.0013270335,0.00022198031,0.0031207502,0.0022797845,0.00022122079,0.8851639,0.022355033,0.076970175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009268998,0.00066615554,0.002333052,0.003262925,0.00036428307,0.00035037973,0.0008491705,0.005186432,0.0005106973,0.9037284,0.08166715,0.0001545238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047888337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031085622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44216824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005139557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010225668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54527223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032180065","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2010.01489.x","title":"<scp>Corrigendum: Public Goods Games, Altruism, and Evolution</scp>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Economics; Public good; Microeconomics; Public goods game; Neoclassical economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03737480841384265,"score_gpt":0.29761465154536976,"score_spread":0.2602398431315271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032180065","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032349504,0.001055871,0.001599974,0.14925072,0.834267,0.000028133329,0.0014364208,0.0006493594,0.011389079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032427065,0.0073466357,0.007974908,0.18045975,0.35993612,0.00029760727,0.0033382557,0.0024627117,0.40575695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962017,0.0008027336,0.0005265425,0.00052462524,0.0016701918,0.00027423026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637582,0.009594342,0.00081437494,0.0023784556,0.022670629,0.00078407465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028268867,0.0015975116,0.0018107557,0.0028308707,0.0033370913,0.00512519,0.0028118559,0.0049206633,0.06321996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04430905,0.00089453213,0.0017725831,0.0026317602,0.0022713286,0.0027074663,0.0012666875,0.0070969495,0.029614791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000902262,0.0000032641076,0.000031516767,0.00003633388,0.000005237473,0.00004583485,0.0000076177826,0.000042631244,0.000018666498,0.0013450566,0.9965389,0.0019160705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007214753,0.000033649292,0.0031176505,0.00033900372,0.00009122399,0.00046747614,0.00013915902,0.002218593,0.0009970247,0.017842328,0.97457314,0.00010858541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040186845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050412633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06321996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005824718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041354345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21149182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032802857","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00379.x","title":"<scp>Bargaining by Limiting Cooperation: Withholding Consent for the Level of a Public Good</scp>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Limiting; Outcome (game theory); Marginal cost; Attrition; Microeconomics; Substitution (logic); Private good; Private information retrieval; Marginal utility; Limit (mathematics); Public economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.24807922653423137,"score_gpt":0.3525136563373608,"score_spread":0.10443442980312945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032802857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48569965,0.00033269564,0.3679446,0.006920786,0.00016772901,0.0003315587,0.000090769354,0.00013080788,0.13838142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894756,0.00006128133,0.007820181,0.00026863941,0.000036926773,0.00009736651,0.000009141622,0.000013988608,0.0022168674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98179644,0.013321573,0.00055854867,0.0011860813,0.0019071081,0.0012302704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95233226,0.034304895,0.0058525456,0.0046376237,0.0018633251,0.0010094255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017335257,0.0006698616,0.0008209661,0.0006608992,0.0012045893,0.0033749521,0.001405292,0.002301266,0.00731101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04794097,0.0003946868,0.0008144908,0.00064509106,0.008988142,0.0041874563,0.0032728238,0.0023042643,0.0007269283],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036317675,0.00012070735,0.0012982332,0.0001547063,0.000075908276,0.00035586095,0.0008524347,0.055898562,0.006614763,0.9154576,0.0009950933,0.01781296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001650256,0.00026834573,0.0009199703,0.00009277203,0.000053725318,0.0002606729,0.00046387807,0.12770553,0.0047362926,0.860092,0.005175494,0.00006631977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012408113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006599583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017335257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018575797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002125842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09167868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032887269","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1494","title":"Committing Altruism under the Cloak of Self-Interest: The Exchange Fiction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Prosocial behavior; Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Compassion; Social exchange theory; Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13329243406849026,"score_gpt":0.4162112716150567,"score_spread":0.28291883754656644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032887269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28457057,0.0030928268,0.028883236,0.35632715,0.0026664261,0.000086982225,0.00007849875,0.000063284235,0.32423103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97429895,0.00040767965,0.001682419,0.01132323,0.001035463,0.000033197757,0.000008721534,0.000033598884,0.0111767305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980222,0.0012489364,0.000051233153,0.00020997641,0.00025351284,0.00021408148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98356795,0.012481107,0.0011256691,0.0015494389,0.00065771816,0.0006179645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004199607,0.00028296758,0.0005778973,0.0003536995,0.0022814656,0.0020867437,0.0009262273,0.0067315125,0.0062285727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024734523,0.00017953054,0.00033560407,0.0002887069,0.009244128,0.0038272988,0.0020733124,0.0086611565,0.000632077],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024623817,0.00010361188,0.0013295372,0.00006320501,0.00004463573,0.0003702704,0.0013880453,0.0007425446,0.0005097121,0.9697506,0.012833421,0.01261825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013598599,0.00007415893,0.0015838831,0.000050081297,0.000033419103,0.00033642,0.0005607398,0.0030335158,0.0005661568,0.96841305,0.025183566,0.000029110877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091590785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006592281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067315125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008984926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006595316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022209942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034033745","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.013","title":"Individual evolutionary learning, other-regarding preferences, and the voluntary contributions mechanism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Merge (version control); Mechanism (biology); Economics; Variety (cybernetics); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Variation (astronomy); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05174760641848807,"score_gpt":0.30722176433600407,"score_spread":0.255474157917516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034033745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9074309,0.00033699564,0.051117174,0.0022955576,0.00005964337,0.00006013943,0.00006894171,0.00004239646,0.03858838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320704,0.00009996401,0.0031507567,0.000102589336,0.000014652567,0.000017647557,0.000013863356,0.0000069144157,0.0033865236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983968,0.0010993534,0.000041442716,0.00015351313,0.00014159134,0.00016724525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870558,0.008297581,0.0016104684,0.0018542282,0.0003840147,0.00079782377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063685775,0.00041866116,0.0007131793,0.00047569856,0.0008086918,0.0021637206,0.0009133519,0.0018302734,0.008779549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01836028,0.00028112397,0.0004009429,0.000444578,0.0020812755,0.0028900113,0.0012102978,0.0014337916,0.0003714143],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010985509,0.0012077702,0.022812739,0.00017290686,0.00021869819,0.00030868957,0.0012131288,0.02964569,0.005208124,0.8596226,0.0016884479,0.076802716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024665837,0.0002336005,0.011542441,0.00003197897,0.00007979306,0.00028663123,0.00045610615,0.045991182,0.0009850535,0.93803924,0.0020619174,0.000045394405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062415435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000766848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008779549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006216724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062175654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033680677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035676631","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v4n3p164","title":"Strategical Behavior of Firms and Excise Tax Payment (Revenue Maximization, Profit Maximization, Love, Respect and Trust)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; Payment; Microeconomics; Profit maximization; Economics; Profit (economics); Revenue; Tax revenue; Profit sharing; Commodity; Public economics; Business; Finance; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03131504446270828,"score_gpt":0.3046898441213848,"score_spread":0.2733747996586765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035676631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962573,0.00024627015,0.010484104,0.0010525736,0.000016397613,0.000067335954,0.000053502383,0.000014323777,0.025492426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855167,0.00005888033,0.0006598468,0.00003957467,0.000003029534,0.000009711684,0.000007834735,0.0000013306459,0.00066819333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980241,0.001183349,0.00008503854,0.00018260298,0.00026553025,0.00025930308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876453,0.0059555555,0.004340453,0.00077387935,0.00044119766,0.000843624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002886828,0.0003072661,0.000293339,0.00036903546,0.000532814,0.0018152731,0.0003012774,0.001112726,0.0033802874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009864465,0.00016855854,0.00031507414,0.0003715542,0.0018902374,0.0013159786,0.00080142583,0.0011832145,0.00021560646],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017797303,0.0025380002,0.22317499,0.00044897807,0.0007243565,0.0011893428,0.0035419692,0.073801056,0.026552983,0.58566475,0.0018705475,0.07871335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035788649,0.0027004427,0.35643682,0.00013145822,0.0004060757,0.00088695047,0.010041898,0.13080572,0.01179443,0.4751495,0.011010049,0.00027883128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022194774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029865848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033802874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017555502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009332516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015267193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036969317","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1317835","title":"Does Information Transparency Decrease Coordination Failure?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Coordination failure; Business; Computer science; Computer security; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.012414091284693615,"score_gpt":0.2719276809761116,"score_spread":0.25951358969141797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036969317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928627,0.0010788158,0.015566917,0.019276626,0.00046005382,0.000106662716,0.00031775725,0.00034691876,0.034219246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971934,0.00012763371,0.0009625817,0.0003222078,0.00011226477,0.000023520823,0.000025431686,0.0000133984895,0.0012196678],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963296,0.0018754606,0.00020559646,0.0003855724,0.0004531321,0.0007506791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8732431,0.07171642,0.035966843,0.01055493,0.0032141085,0.00530461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008570226,0.00051684835,0.0009295869,0.00087242573,0.0008996196,0.001934181,0.00064012967,0.0028070589,0.016501255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06163539,0.00038832347,0.00051738735,0.00066316593,0.0016717791,0.0036275734,0.0013997495,0.0017930347,0.0012144159],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026008928,0.009673436,0.2174428,0.002773932,0.0015413245,0.002071349,0.0056648734,0.034176156,0.024607252,0.24008045,0.04632196,0.38963753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009420504,0.00912304,0.23445064,0.00057029823,0.0015067522,0.0013824548,0.005912742,0.078058645,0.015835263,0.62008584,0.02341829,0.00023559942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009837276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083464757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016501255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006785419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020837688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055202186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037843163","doi":"10.1023/b:puch.0000003732.89364.ea","title":"Optimal Policies and Socially Oriented Behavior: Some Problematic Effects of an Incentive Compatible Device","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Dilemma; Incentive; Social dilemma; Microeconomics; Action (physics); Economics; Prisoner's dilemma; Connection (principal bundle); Control (management); Public economics; Mathematical economics; Game theory; Mathematics; Management; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03324468318404796,"score_gpt":0.33931882942322544,"score_spread":0.3060741462391775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037843163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52882123,0.0023663093,0.32991472,0.02795301,0.00043893085,0.0006485697,0.00055794325,0.0002118855,0.10908724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611659,0.00091892586,0.032961722,0.0015239515,0.00025889135,0.00055269373,0.00004927231,0.0000544972,0.0025141486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97750574,0.01806914,0.0007367314,0.0014389216,0.001722296,0.0005272078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75223464,0.22101429,0.0073634535,0.01671795,0.0016236128,0.0010460139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03381573,0.0017453932,0.002635044,0.0013659715,0.0015666098,0.0050311866,0.002884074,0.0067694243,0.009373102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12899566,0.0013284739,0.0014207215,0.0015197087,0.01427343,0.012417362,0.004542917,0.0055133565,0.00040593135],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000456724,0.0005132621,0.0012760481,0.00016376424,0.00007406755,0.000066879235,0.00034101892,0.0043153213,0.0009043037,0.9818227,0.0005207614,0.0095452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003658229,0.00025116527,0.0009888235,0.00005788531,0.000058692443,0.00004648462,0.00014178448,0.012727915,0.0006785904,0.9835945,0.0010587894,0.00002966564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004964541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036205535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03381573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014420322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014061775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17883682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038077708","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-50528","title":"Effects of Decomposition and Categorization on Fraud-Risk Assessments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Categorization; Risk assessment; Accounting; Audit risk; Business; Incentive; Psychology; Risk management; Actuarial science; Computer science; Finance; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.010663884401491047,"score_gpt":0.36450882138557117,"score_spread":0.35384493698408015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038077708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99544597,0.000121928744,0.0013913835,0.00011620927,0.000014568214,0.00004424777,0.000015091979,0.00002885024,0.0028217547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828976,0.00003060284,0.0013343401,0.00003377606,0.000008435154,0.000015384845,0.000023783838,0.000007774654,0.00025607564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847017,0.00859935,0.0010504815,0.0009648773,0.0038488186,0.00083467824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80132496,0.14482707,0.028731763,0.0098503,0.009186262,0.006079652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01120079,0.00057760463,0.00065013056,0.0009445727,0.00056479045,0.0022692764,0.0004772737,0.0006651389,0.004050897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09569984,0.00039163613,0.00049858843,0.00040156982,0.0011881685,0.0015759593,0.0021023334,0.0014020263,0.00029177955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015142979,0.0049108816,0.6149449,0.0007108754,0.000684426,0.0005214541,0.012170311,0.006346359,0.11369482,0.0048116567,0.001158836,0.22490256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025582258,0.0025475088,0.95898,0.00018985484,0.00022898724,0.00035095192,0.005429523,0.013944321,0.010172922,0.005823387,0.0019227966,0.00015379855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011799892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011510382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01120079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089542964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008038411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05923611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038335849","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.001","title":"Does competition affect giving?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Stirling; University of Manitoba; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tournament; Generosity; Competition (biology); Affect (linguistics); Earnings; Economics; Exploit; Dictator game; Natural experiment; Microeconomics; Public good; Altruism (biology); Prosocial behavior; Dictator; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.013343449792761657,"score_gpt":0.30692525780086033,"score_spread":0.2935818080080987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038335849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832434,0.000406011,0.00014256366,0.0017880022,0.00006206396,0.0000073319125,0.00005643793,0.000008766184,0.014285301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891305,0.00009989938,0.000053603962,0.00011364399,0.00001781474,0.000001943677,0.000017268168,0.000004912167,0.00077777717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898344,0.0005564335,0.000036905076,0.00009941514,0.00011080971,0.00021297378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872361,0.0056786994,0.0023654816,0.0009175796,0.0006154982,0.0031866222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018089517,0.00020392297,0.00057110906,0.00044567615,0.00090458855,0.00200261,0.0003893629,0.0016808,0.01956397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015040375,0.00029332476,0.00029130644,0.00044087725,0.0013122233,0.0010958685,0.0007606547,0.0012031032,0.0010005353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013530978,0.008830726,0.8207048,0.00037600964,0.00046979045,0.00082411047,0.0047614826,0.0010194071,0.019942578,0.021294445,0.00497559,0.103269964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003563248,0.0014448575,0.9695262,0.00006180639,0.00025730793,0.0004975893,0.0030748025,0.0013030315,0.0015287123,0.017676312,0.004206963,0.00006608541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00227263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002933996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01956397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005128261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059066905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065447986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038780726","doi":"10.4284/0038-4038-2011.020","title":"Contests for Ranks: Experimental Evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Rank (graph theory); Earnings; Prestige; Baseline (sea); Economics; Statistics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Accounting; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.11168672708103869,"score_gpt":0.39864443395991755,"score_spread":0.2869577068788789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038780726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8184328,0.0063775023,0.0146368975,0.011439233,0.0005580042,0.00032533478,0.00086351275,0.00016136633,0.14720538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990833,0.0011963773,0.0027579586,0.0015602838,0.00032706605,0.00017105596,0.00028857862,0.000042865613,0.002822733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754076,0.016397074,0.0012893995,0.0021261482,0.0038051126,0.0009747244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43694395,0.4571557,0.060363393,0.03405133,0.0066741165,0.004811529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032013528,0.0012303161,0.0016329888,0.0011602395,0.0017659974,0.004104786,0.0022522232,0.003992659,0.029261895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18042473,0.00078071444,0.00089837663,0.0011842529,0.006120187,0.004630663,0.0021921175,0.0030279902,0.0024878618],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03805487,0.029632628,0.16243917,0.009534821,0.0047990824,0.0011272456,0.0044129514,0.01903601,0.014649643,0.45866355,0.033824693,0.22382545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017095404,0.020783475,0.28404784,0.0014058611,0.0020804394,0.0013410517,0.0028348628,0.039025217,0.0117295375,0.5476414,0.07123894,0.00077596016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010801017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010508717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032013528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012245219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010278187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16930568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038961413","doi":"10.1002/job.348","title":"OCB as a handicap: an evolutionary psychological perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Unobservable; Perspective (graphical); Organizational citizenship behavior; Psychology; Evolutionary psychology; Citizenship; Social psychology; Epistemology; Organizational commitment; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02585922953406845,"score_gpt":0.37624583374413934,"score_spread":0.3503866042100709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038961413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86630607,0.0016724891,0.052667752,0.016634498,0.00006657177,0.00003275135,0.000060929444,0.00004204487,0.0625169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971807,0.00020126566,0.0019199494,0.00014243522,0.000012922349,0.0000047650683,0.0000073141455,0.000002397108,0.0005281001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988411,0.0005380607,0.000034741945,0.00023334839,0.0001879377,0.00016479696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954645,0.0020225917,0.0010103468,0.0004575905,0.00050464395,0.0005402561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021115025,0.00036062082,0.00031529137,0.0012150424,0.0012262657,0.0029625373,0.00062952813,0.0018700707,0.0032965324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063647223,0.00021876916,0.00023603925,0.0008016228,0.011036853,0.0031897267,0.0024154787,0.0018640334,0.00011120703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005609931,0.00013297646,0.055454403,0.00011860333,0.000088521454,0.0014259457,0.0061389287,0.00948833,0.0027230564,0.88322806,0.00059665804,0.040548388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002220093,0.00016074281,0.059571065,0.000110258305,0.00006332701,0.0023526808,0.009176104,0.02139599,0.0010217937,0.8965255,0.009517259,0.0000830491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012687106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015115436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032965324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009701351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005625107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011166871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039594432","doi":"10.1108/raf-12-2013-0141","title":"Groupcentric budget goals, budget-based incentive contracts, and additive group tasks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Accounting and Finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Originality; Group (periodic table); Value (mathematics); Goal orientation; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.02096889765896097,"score_gpt":0.30556176337820967,"score_spread":0.2845928657192487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039594432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831088,0.000097920856,0.0057579475,0.00015267718,0.00001936683,0.00017368104,0.0000314501,0.000026877487,0.010631309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912238,0.00007562278,0.006799806,0.000070318245,0.000013257353,0.0002709458,0.000049965973,0.000010327043,0.0014859729],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950755,0.002845707,0.0002177569,0.00040111825,0.0011436869,0.00031627863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97866243,0.009223148,0.006661891,0.0023996055,0.0007307852,0.0023221825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006375518,0.0008120818,0.0005094082,0.0005726502,0.00073503505,0.0018588249,0.00070351304,0.00066915946,0.0034684928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019197606,0.00024284149,0.00033194255,0.0005789961,0.0012228581,0.0012850839,0.002103387,0.0010476056,0.0003926168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015322828,0.040944066,0.29586846,0.0016102607,0.0010376418,0.00036399858,0.008483195,0.040632527,0.052942548,0.1151335,0.0037781794,0.42388287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016397451,0.017574267,0.7904365,0.0003415141,0.0004298596,0.0003055214,0.0047555147,0.051952656,0.0146067105,0.101179905,0.01652187,0.00025588606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060284574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010263915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006375518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010014476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014994664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033717394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039767275","doi":"10.1257/mic.6.3.203","title":"An Economic Theory of the Evolutionary Emergence of Property Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Property rights; Object (grammar); Scarcity; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Economics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Coase theorem; Resource (disambiguation); Law and economics; Computer science; Transaction cost; Political science; Law; Biology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012794023000786667,"score_gpt":0.2862233212600481,"score_spread":0.27342929825926143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039767275","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11382361,0.0020319037,0.5900548,0.019962922,0.00027870043,0.0001275171,0.00032513327,0.00013152866,0.27326393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93682975,0.0016765823,0.03727919,0.0006978135,0.00026473106,0.00016385206,0.00011228839,0.00003730077,0.022938438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994973,0.00021828337,0.00001937715,0.0000772714,0.00010918318,0.00007862564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860877,0.00069107534,0.0002545284,0.00016159564,0.00013165326,0.00015239208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013378749,0.0003770244,0.00033052024,0.00072117156,0.00089242763,0.0025607601,0.0012086038,0.0019522291,0.008034761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004667614,0.00022843304,0.0005430823,0.0009366058,0.003863534,0.0057162237,0.0013892786,0.0018584233,0.0007023069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039752204,0.000010552223,0.0003395389,0.000013293238,0.0000041588464,0.0000616165,0.00007150843,0.006975802,0.00014844757,0.9888053,0.00059972255,0.002966039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009900829,0.000014021948,0.00047855033,0.000018619412,0.0000042570027,0.000104322935,0.000088765744,0.025886668,0.00007089803,0.9672259,0.006089655,0.000008371322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016540908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000995514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008034761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017577668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091483025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026878953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039926716","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00182.x","title":"Punishment Without Cause: Regression and the Effects of Leader Attribution Errors<sup>1</sup>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Attribution; Psychology; Social psychology; Reinforcement","score_opus":0.043492057199979894,"score_gpt":0.390138533012265,"score_spread":0.3466464758122851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039926716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992021,0.00035415217,0.0022472974,0.00031913313,0.000028743027,0.000038721482,0.00010181856,0.000041960924,0.004847196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971795,0.00014472529,0.0010925521,0.00007905305,0.000022202808,0.00003215929,0.000071517505,0.00004688229,0.0013313391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603015,0.0026245585,0.00015752579,0.0004090793,0.00053362804,0.0002450132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85101646,0.117740355,0.020378638,0.0067063905,0.0020285945,0.0021295424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061245803,0.00051199895,0.0005669762,0.0007081203,0.00034638465,0.0010463713,0.0006983049,0.0009997712,0.007774722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069387875,0.00041843773,0.00063456135,0.0003430746,0.0011566255,0.0011874835,0.0010442726,0.001749269,0.0007450355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0348016,0.008312844,0.6609286,0.0005971159,0.001387796,0.0015945492,0.0033381595,0.030709604,0.052800823,0.014653135,0.0029172979,0.18795851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032102343,0.0022782823,0.9544101,0.00005535091,0.0002793298,0.00054137304,0.00032681727,0.02536274,0.0050307685,0.010324558,0.0010079467,0.000061710954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019682036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017122388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007774722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007130152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054915616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032390296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040809306","doi":"10.1080/10478400701389185","title":"Behavioral Data, Cultural Group Selection, and Genetics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Competition (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Test (biology); Kin selection; Cultural transmission in animals; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3247040649360005,"score_gpt":0.5175677918715533,"score_spread":0.19286372693555281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040809306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87980926,0.0029975963,0.06314256,0.009699355,0.0007650408,0.0005199299,0.005481992,0.00012498086,0.0374594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97929126,0.0006867848,0.014406176,0.0020671801,0.000086378466,0.00046216478,0.0012203321,0.00005047395,0.0017291475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98057395,0.013499295,0.0008408331,0.0024971303,0.0021840262,0.0004048458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94903064,0.025837788,0.007633329,0.014082577,0.0023710856,0.0010446417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025828118,0.0004574077,0.0008045511,0.0023191122,0.0013670751,0.0014933783,0.0013421049,0.0009249992,0.005108063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05757453,0.00032334833,0.00042782674,0.0030032347,0.0035450715,0.0014870182,0.0014196166,0.0013721393,0.00048648837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004356276,0.00040791533,0.8746946,0.0004495498,0.0013583141,0.0005528138,0.0048615877,0.0010047159,0.0033659886,0.052409805,0.005427399,0.05503166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008683563,0.00033549342,0.8924112,0.00023120375,0.00035850407,0.0013156361,0.003483568,0.0019589597,0.0019249028,0.07620224,0.021572245,0.000119300996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005120575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074148984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025828118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085854135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006991852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13659382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044698596","doi":"10.1007/s00355-012-0658-2","title":"Public goods provision by asymmetric agents: experimental evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Faculty of Arts, Ryerson University","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Public finance; Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; Asymmetry; Context (archaeology); Marginal cost; Information asymmetry; Experimental economics; Empirical evidence; Public economics; Public goods game; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.1256584447143935,"score_gpt":0.3874670550772041,"score_spread":0.26180861036281056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044698596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671262,0.0017113528,0.008031321,0.0023874668,0.00007975142,0.000120579054,0.00017635709,0.000023033228,0.020343935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938992,0.0015494245,0.002443637,0.00038050007,0.000090087895,0.00012792257,0.00010052283,0.000013919533,0.0013947559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368906,0.0046471884,0.00029541762,0.000439604,0.0006616526,0.0002670182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82389677,0.14341357,0.017391378,0.011942905,0.0023322997,0.0010230795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013408755,0.0011369707,0.001015362,0.001039368,0.000964436,0.002068848,0.0014013834,0.00237446,0.011887126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057444062,0.0006519672,0.0005224705,0.0011633975,0.0046242718,0.003065981,0.0012965038,0.0022010354,0.00073919987],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.049584728,0.061160192,0.08408749,0.00542218,0.0032789195,0.0006828337,0.003936032,0.04039891,0.028081186,0.4314916,0.010246096,0.28162983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017919132,0.013692504,0.06476414,0.0011269539,0.0020616378,0.00087747717,0.0034588373,0.0707783,0.038817506,0.7694117,0.016739536,0.00035224465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013382732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067060196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013408755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011511467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097453356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07091308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045227833","doi":"10.1108/00483481311285228","title":"Putting feedback‐seeking into “context”: job characteristics and feedback‐seeking behaviour","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Context (archaeology); Job attitude; Social psychology; Job performance; Job analysis; Job shadow; Applied psychology; Job satisfaction","score_opus":0.04958684632590118,"score_gpt":0.33860443576113003,"score_spread":0.28901758943522887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045227833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8921924,0.09642173,0.0014421187,0.00293782,0.00016679382,0.000035714907,0.0000961103,0.000011124015,0.006696198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828426,0.01604874,0.0004019471,0.00029673753,0.00008796676,0.000013053139,0.000033739358,0.0000028289817,0.00027227154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989023,0.00071493,0.00005795488,0.00008289217,0.00017239213,0.000069484006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901636,0.0064638387,0.0022289422,0.00021310365,0.0005141505,0.0004163755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019176953,0.00017504317,0.00048039499,0.0005750884,0.0003798657,0.0010155046,0.00025306756,0.0006929414,0.0019501388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008494772,0.00013653445,0.0005302355,0.00071754033,0.00063921395,0.000569178,0.00042728754,0.000587478,0.00017171736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019370086,0.0013953721,0.6095485,0.010658442,0.0020796852,0.00047181128,0.004932434,0.0017500484,0.0056433557,0.0070220074,0.0025204518,0.3520409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006491741,0.00070593675,0.9856505,0.0013196806,0.000673641,0.00042266864,0.0020502633,0.00050978834,0.0006449056,0.0028878432,0.005029547,0.00004037277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018732963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035845067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019501388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004998358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010650738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0101418495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046408102","doi":"10.1007/s10640-011-9501-y","title":"Farsightedness in a Coalitional Great Fish War","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Resource Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Economics; Mainstream; Stochastic game; Political science","score_opus":0.02980134058459067,"score_gpt":0.2279080055078882,"score_spread":0.19810666492329754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046408102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932761,0.000039331328,0.00013405025,0.00044934923,0.000011627481,0.0000048724905,0.0000070857277,0.0000015601108,0.0060760723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990595,0.000015866619,0.000046574314,0.000085901265,0.0000043182354,0.0000036933359,0.000003275817,7.758785e-7,0.00078006234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994753,0.00027465064,0.00001798898,0.00006375812,0.000050962484,0.00011736567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439335,0.0028948747,0.0010569227,0.000553308,0.00015768802,0.000943872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024206857,0.00020978905,0.00034194722,0.000356449,0.0013485543,0.0012961846,0.00030206805,0.0013028124,0.007143249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009113615,0.00016614332,0.00012888625,0.00028538052,0.0032352929,0.001005891,0.0011095539,0.0015464011,0.00023585791],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009411701,0.0072688633,0.37913516,0.00020173156,0.00047233133,0.00433142,0.024227887,0.020784846,0.025348261,0.41029352,0.009355953,0.10916829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010601721,0.0051076952,0.5870631,0.00010003673,0.00016799221,0.0024150054,0.053713206,0.021024054,0.0034071216,0.31189153,0.013876234,0.00017386836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045720455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007577639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007143249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059989054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023896575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046426498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.11.005","title":"The geometry of revealed preference","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Preference relation; Dimension (graph theory); Space (punctuation); Relation (database); Irrational number; Revealed preference; Mathematics; Consumption (sociology); Set (abstract data type); Binary relation; Mathematical economics; Finite set; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.05799301617180113,"score_gpt":0.31267366977119015,"score_spread":0.254680653599389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046426498","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36241207,0.0073414333,0.40760258,0.036062557,0.00047856523,0.0001324896,0.0021322968,0.00044789648,0.18339014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96835595,0.0028207218,0.01812278,0.0007250316,0.0005921047,0.00011657886,0.00032129727,0.00008579107,0.00885974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969043,0.0018212928,0.00014650369,0.00042083595,0.00047811755,0.00022894717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98211896,0.012169094,0.0016500158,0.0018904794,0.0012629388,0.00090859685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032024863,0.0005992531,0.0017522466,0.0023410644,0.0017875835,0.0073886197,0.0018039725,0.0026556423,0.010223631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020131685,0.0008156512,0.0009985346,0.0023746826,0.006839501,0.013274906,0.0026860547,0.0031634474,0.0007839597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008957433,0.0000033846081,0.00007984884,0.00000950216,0.0000055941077,0.000013513291,0.0000455251,0.0004941717,0.000047173762,0.99819833,0.0003344918,0.00075962814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000580219,0.000002751018,0.0000475886,0.0000025342138,0.0000021237388,0.0000138533915,0.000012347069,0.001992584,0.000013876981,0.9975414,0.00036176748,0.0000033941944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023214698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010240293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010223631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031167902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013347872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034201443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046783920","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.003","title":"Social interactions and the salience of social identity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Social psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Ultimatum game; Social identity approach; Cognitive psychology; Social group","score_opus":0.05358302992155926,"score_gpt":0.4654357365300902,"score_spread":0.4118527066085309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046783920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569913,0.000335237,0.001283382,0.0015098036,0.00004436497,0.000012384828,0.000028887593,0.000005108128,0.039789505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949384,0.000060198963,0.00014036955,0.00003548404,0.000019775305,0.0000018880808,0.0000070483593,0.0000019492043,0.00023952722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987392,0.0007424055,0.000041634747,0.00010928051,0.00024539532,0.00012211951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846651,0.009503153,0.0032173533,0.0007463222,0.0006940902,0.0011740479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020139397,0.00018795345,0.00025521487,0.00091874925,0.0010675275,0.002903097,0.00031588468,0.0010281682,0.0047769155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017287469,0.00026799206,0.0001547076,0.0004980832,0.00205175,0.0018839594,0.0013261285,0.00097612845,0.00021065817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044021755,0.0023940422,0.36293462,0.00042974215,0.00036282948,0.002236139,0.016988024,0.0037354368,0.024323026,0.46850467,0.0034875355,0.110201776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030150378,0.0007033188,0.6666467,0.00009042689,0.0002060246,0.0009859876,0.0121830115,0.009743573,0.0027452533,0.2971287,0.009164861,0.00010055825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011561584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013892204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047769155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000665616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042997018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015980422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046970161","doi":"10.1007/s13235-015-0152-4","title":"On the Evolution of Partial Respect for Ownership","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dynamic Games and Applications","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Outcome (game theory); CONTEST; Evolutionarily stable strategy; Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Microeconomics; Economics; Convention; Range (aeronautics); Game theory; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05415431068073182,"score_gpt":0.3529112468394689,"score_spread":0.29875693615873705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046970161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95799375,0.00025250216,0.025189957,0.001571517,0.000021164078,0.000026236983,0.00013327811,0.000027332722,0.014784276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664474,0.00009696046,0.0016262259,0.000038456765,0.000005694238,0.000010136025,0.000026593907,0.000006741483,0.0015443887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993736,0.00031373455,0.000030251784,0.00010037787,0.00006253979,0.00011947926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817578,0.013726325,0.001950702,0.0010441644,0.000609577,0.0009113342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002602955,0.00027141508,0.00070348586,0.00062840024,0.0008181152,0.0027484728,0.0008314308,0.0018039123,0.008972318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02846656,0.00037165353,0.0004569055,0.00065669604,0.002680449,0.004105753,0.0012641095,0.0017213655,0.00018398094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026399703,0.00015529788,0.013667204,0.00008077458,0.000055797187,0.00019484216,0.00089894084,0.031718146,0.0020163388,0.9321558,0.0011462413,0.01764662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006542737,0.00012119564,0.015827097,0.000037474867,0.00003623384,0.00014429197,0.0011456467,0.12113587,0.00052254484,0.85962325,0.0012945331,0.000046371726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049014594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041909176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008972318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022149128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092988677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030015409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047264323","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2000.tb00418.x","title":"A Transaction Cost Primer on Farm Organization","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Production (economics); Asset specificity; Business; Moral hazard; Database transaction; Industrial organization; Agriculture; Asset (computer security); Economics; Microeconomics; Natural resource economics; Incentive; Finance; Computer security; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.025893655355649456,"score_gpt":0.21103375274519406,"score_spread":0.18514009738954462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047264323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065507595,0.079107665,0.4040307,0.07183019,0.00292743,0.00033264962,0.00073890074,0.00022881082,0.43425292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5091848,0.1464452,0.16256155,0.02186709,0.012785248,0.0022974436,0.0007020023,0.00043309826,0.14372353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978181,0.0008460085,0.0001680549,0.0002576224,0.0006679426,0.00024230088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325824,0.0047680684,0.00058561866,0.00050421077,0.000642391,0.00024150136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034708325,0.0010367216,0.0009577214,0.002755347,0.0015555893,0.0053858035,0.002558643,0.0043052565,0.01792886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064688534,0.0005466924,0.0010890305,0.0045823893,0.0064163883,0.008838186,0.0016754325,0.0052163783,0.0025306984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037048255,0.000012362004,0.00007568876,0.000039621234,0.0000036340307,0.000036447225,0.00007300427,0.0012189602,0.00004768498,0.9893562,0.0039511602,0.005181396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004156095,0.00002706212,0.0002225245,0.00016313545,0.0000049250334,0.000098230405,0.000105087565,0.0033760555,0.00005728483,0.9004387,0.09549161,0.00001120951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032683515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016922293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01792886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053708055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002304227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059978068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047450450","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2014.2030","title":"The Effect of Social Interaction on Economic Transactions: Evidence from Changes in Two Retail Formats","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Systembolaget","keywords":"Database transaction; Transaction cost; Interpersonal communication; Business; Retail sales; Marketing; Microeconomics; Interpersonal relationship; Economics; Advertising; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07706026682928804,"score_gpt":0.39440241038615936,"score_spread":0.3173421435568713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047450450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746776,0.00007264216,0.000076296215,0.00008345376,0.0000052893497,0.000010289838,0.00005935437,0.000002316363,0.0022225713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.00009435957,0.0001618528,0.000058232847,0.000009517364,0.00001645661,0.00009511443,0.000004095475,0.00046151504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978739,0.0011551095,0.00013350198,0.00027359623,0.00040200737,0.00016201909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647999,0.02008758,0.008433306,0.003152339,0.001298992,0.0022278626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012658401,0.00035651712,0.00033007312,0.0007731407,0.00072782213,0.0019513133,0.00071130594,0.0009911786,0.0059672627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018662645,0.0003785899,0.0004854174,0.0008188347,0.0016735013,0.0014199662,0.0014449168,0.0011511303,0.0006065773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017764468,0.018434115,0.8502926,0.00039380806,0.0009366009,0.0010719135,0.007841113,0.0018326007,0.020937804,0.002477354,0.0013423502,0.07667522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019879025,0.0029347343,0.98939824,0.000020326108,0.00017221196,0.00021478042,0.002045497,0.0010634464,0.0019412966,0.0010251473,0.00093531277,0.000050122515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030919353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059672627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000533436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001949079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01996249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048571368","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.922188","title":"The Effects of Perceived Fairness on Opportunistic Behavior","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Business; Social psychology","score_opus":0.011862839266217716,"score_gpt":0.2933812577865369,"score_spread":0.28151841852031917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048571368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910115,0.00009524774,0.0005402362,0.00026513173,0.000016822778,0.000014604611,0.000040142484,0.000005128779,0.00801112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992285,0.000027729051,0.0001193544,0.0000290234,0.0000117941545,0.000004927134,0.000010948351,0.000002723862,0.00056493323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974976,0.0015490904,0.0001143909,0.000193519,0.00027227873,0.00037304248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87145513,0.10313198,0.011793451,0.0057788133,0.002316577,0.0055240695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063261907,0.00028084806,0.00043918853,0.0005078314,0.0010882859,0.0019073316,0.0004780459,0.00097387814,0.007091834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040680327,0.000291332,0.0004488888,0.0004005891,0.0012651224,0.0013205826,0.001078753,0.0015429291,0.00031960555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012590385,0.010227353,0.8767334,0.00016549692,0.00046606423,0.00039280768,0.004024407,0.0063080443,0.008323892,0.024418503,0.00085607136,0.055493448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023086587,0.0014184304,0.97427547,0.000024573985,0.0001902321,0.00014454864,0.0013260453,0.0054700277,0.0012182918,0.014827708,0.00082460337,0.000049293885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033005222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044523156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007091834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000763453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000882117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033456445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049287852","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x11001324","title":"Strong reciprocity is not uncommon in the “wild”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.1658005285833292,"score_gpt":0.3998485830052484,"score_spread":0.2340480544219192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049287852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006919659,0.002764442,0.00063563156,0.9874292,0.0033641686,0.000004902308,0.000027892114,0.000026887537,0.0050548767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016334387,0.00244743,0.00061811454,0.9682112,0.0071287826,0.000034448065,0.000020784128,0.000021434951,0.005183434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430084,0.0024965662,0.0003602092,0.0013051315,0.0012019284,0.0003354029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613597,0.030358901,0.002029282,0.0022445659,0.002455627,0.0015519772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00983402,0.000532279,0.0016311738,0.00044564006,0.003622284,0.0036399206,0.0019059768,0.027399022,0.005435598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04248149,0.00044265098,0.00062244735,0.0005468498,0.015283021,0.0074873744,0.002688461,0.036135405,0.005335375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013546066,0.000047067064,0.002495411,0.00019631597,0.000069360685,0.0016518566,0.0009335753,0.00014195559,0.00044120365,0.113475025,0.8381032,0.042309638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009794997,0.00008018725,0.0031172999,0.0003377027,0.00002638403,0.002117109,0.0010917953,0.00048528655,0.00046178914,0.15128058,0.84079546,0.00010845983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051557184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008976053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027399022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024543758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018189151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052007914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050214525","doi":"10.4161/cib.19016","title":"Could shame and honor save cooperation?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communicative & Integrative Biology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Shame; Honor; Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.07770940870388365,"score_gpt":0.4216761315655081,"score_spread":0.34396672286162444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050214525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7402119,0.0024265044,0.029760897,0.055418953,0.0007828136,0.000096477015,0.00016490207,0.00011864929,0.17101897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341184,0.00028145494,0.0013563321,0.0013664883,0.00009135953,0.00003293585,0.000013815291,0.0000127232615,0.0034330997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587774,0.0024321768,0.00009306949,0.00036803834,0.0006826857,0.00054632983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863268,0.005699576,0.003510111,0.0024595459,0.0005572047,0.0014467159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005818081,0.00038571173,0.00043193693,0.0005453073,0.0017750005,0.002736212,0.00066276686,0.0022867129,0.01220028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021313382,0.00024721236,0.0005031972,0.0003314473,0.010335822,0.0048043164,0.0033993865,0.0022071702,0.00061891985],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078040187,0.0005756532,0.02237116,0.0003221194,0.00021235735,0.00073699694,0.010897424,0.0015231515,0.007032035,0.88380337,0.004621037,0.067124344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019235954,0.0009518525,0.040332913,0.00022296909,0.00009986707,0.0011351941,0.007226386,0.001693648,0.0027894073,0.9087272,0.036515187,0.00011306454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046324648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057013554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01220028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010635878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011465733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040813982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050567038","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewq008","title":"Rehabilitated or Not: An Informational Theory of Parole Decisions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.02583830389783392,"score_gpt":0.29623370908906205,"score_spread":0.2703954051912281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050567038","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3310738,0.0017846446,0.39348665,0.027309924,0.000242178,0.00041811055,0.0017357974,0.0002972132,0.24365176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96452576,0.00077838724,0.014833315,0.00120374,0.00030875858,0.00021708719,0.00021516805,0.000056000656,0.017861785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972945,0.0013791888,0.00008671835,0.0004009827,0.00033575008,0.0005028894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794246,0.01534961,0.0022972398,0.0010796539,0.0009164537,0.00093251804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005977788,0.000707613,0.0013218593,0.0011529718,0.0014739865,0.0037551695,0.0020841039,0.0040674577,0.02260568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018353699,0.0007075233,0.0013363105,0.00083016214,0.0030982164,0.0063537457,0.001407941,0.0030316934,0.0016645549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015290783,0.00014794322,0.0019864312,0.00008843341,0.00003894636,0.00024200305,0.0006016082,0.022991128,0.00051627064,0.9613687,0.003780756,0.008084852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011942291,0.00011386485,0.0026413568,0.00005453186,0.00005315395,0.000170592,0.00035485745,0.17002362,0.00017663657,0.8228266,0.0034117396,0.00005366979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005011646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034786784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02260568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029082957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021402135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07562357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050923643","doi":"10.2202/1935-1682.2481","title":"Are You Paying Your Employees to Cheat? An Experimental Investigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Incentive; Compensation (psychology); Task (project management); Anagram; Contrast (vision); Salient; Tracking (education); Piece work; Tournament; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Management","score_opus":0.07143065387735527,"score_gpt":0.39925205805198194,"score_spread":0.3278214041746267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050923643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99619246,0.000038201993,0.0008674649,0.00036408214,0.000039721363,0.00031362625,0.000042641266,0.000015232135,0.002126609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953968,0.00006357325,0.0022466774,0.0004612455,0.000050669696,0.00063504296,0.000041212483,0.0000073124193,0.001097541],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890693,0.007646696,0.00063655287,0.001037013,0.0011514063,0.0004590678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8309396,0.13013041,0.020035058,0.013386738,0.0026008224,0.0029074403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014347041,0.0006731074,0.00076394394,0.00050341425,0.0015570682,0.002116929,0.0015654005,0.0026735517,0.007309131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06009084,0.0004939479,0.0005123978,0.00040011737,0.0025067064,0.0016211409,0.0011108943,0.0023707298,0.00080891215],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08562264,0.3483728,0.21119048,0.0025901815,0.0013833425,0.0022254027,0.029838298,0.006514586,0.09615188,0.042779125,0.011807845,0.1615235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.037847992,0.42668048,0.3019384,0.00095249765,0.0013756097,0.0027314408,0.024256486,0.06853104,0.06245991,0.048535615,0.023835745,0.00085484725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048157855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047943773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014347041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008913063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009304632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07587534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051503280","doi":"10.5931/djim.v7i1.79","title":"The Effect of Respect, Trust, and Fear in Adversarial Stakeholder Relationships: A Case Study on Water Commodification and Stakeholder Engagement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Adversarial system; Stakeholder; Constructive; Public relations; Stakeholder analysis; Stakeholder engagement; Sociology; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.13980543426363196,"score_gpt":0.35442486664236267,"score_spread":0.2146194323787307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051503280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802044,0.00011019681,0.0012505753,0.0027954432,0.000015565745,0.00006594286,0.000008835966,0.000004223361,0.015544792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984946,0.000097025426,0.0003973665,0.00016126636,0.000004153753,0.000040741674,0.0000025748868,0.0000024043243,0.00079982384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97807264,0.018331563,0.0002648685,0.00044909836,0.0011484486,0.0017333871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669858,0.026908455,0.002280982,0.00085634936,0.000917544,0.0020507497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01513952,0.00048964843,0.00045647298,0.0011333941,0.019789599,0.0064232834,0.0014032598,0.0039878683,0.0031167872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0213913,0.00039341673,0.0005762862,0.0009467193,0.013588764,0.005134416,0.009168215,0.004459459,0.0002165831],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003144733,0.0010558483,0.030503528,0.00016261007,0.00004335836,0.008483548,0.8978299,0.0010411625,0.0014925204,0.042052533,0.001078793,0.015941786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042633044,0.00039464314,0.0084679015,0.00014357278,0.000029042836,0.001504083,0.9691506,0.0013733591,0.0009838323,0.008190511,0.009672188,0.00004762341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011067849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018825963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019789599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007124241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004700237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08006638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052937888","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200125","title":"One-round vs Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"French Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Operations research; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.08716835211693134,"score_gpt":0.41825395225525314,"score_spread":0.3310856001383218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052937888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937039,0.000092849594,0.0005483994,0.00018357574,0.00012993655,0.00038432018,0.00011835484,0.000024824876,0.0048138304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914829,0.00012847428,0.0009899404,0.00030134834,0.00022484336,0.0008986052,0.00023328984,0.000030565265,0.00571011],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939209,0.0037740595,0.00027491964,0.0006249636,0.00060352654,0.00080161024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9339893,0.050612826,0.0050302735,0.006434113,0.0015064119,0.0024270962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008900781,0.0012691409,0.0021100442,0.00064819807,0.0026555439,0.0024045063,0.0014633824,0.002712331,0.021150583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035366405,0.0007034467,0.0006988012,0.00067829323,0.0024856653,0.00201444,0.0011385899,0.0023805865,0.0021487316],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.30724135,0.44426024,0.033797145,0.0019264233,0.0014109345,0.00088042696,0.009878721,0.008583452,0.053599812,0.04332365,0.009236977,0.08586087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.14612953,0.5330044,0.16465308,0.00035339384,0.0030514977,0.0010269857,0.010191256,0.03423855,0.026874268,0.052328505,0.027281845,0.0008666564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054261764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047306544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021150583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018168022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018730484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07075578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053995347","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1371645","title":"Ambiguous Solicitation: Ambiguous Prescription","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medical prescription; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.01829816173315111,"score_gpt":0.3155779643004169,"score_spread":0.29727980256726577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053995347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74296355,0.0006318264,0.07329364,0.009965539,0.00037972,0.0005220232,0.0006544775,0.00041795263,0.17117137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388266,0.000059783186,0.0020983422,0.00037328346,0.00006872051,0.0000637132,0.000045973557,0.000029019586,0.0033784315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922231,0.0033828283,0.0007066905,0.0008253119,0.001627292,0.0012347342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9324353,0.045548998,0.007032083,0.010423287,0.0021230404,0.002437296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008866187,0.0005148678,0.0016391822,0.0009307638,0.0017524009,0.0046990053,0.0012679955,0.0048372974,0.019816495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075537324,0.0005982059,0.00076343375,0.0008269496,0.0037080843,0.0060481722,0.0034068092,0.0036988824,0.0013365683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026289343,0.00074770156,0.014630417,0.00026815178,0.0000818245,0.0006643891,0.0022755826,0.0025218856,0.004222963,0.92466694,0.0041769035,0.043114386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004398115,0.00034263925,0.008287534,0.00008488287,0.00008333212,0.00046977043,0.0011585115,0.025325269,0.0021566844,0.9574471,0.004140755,0.0000636753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005947168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000516977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019816495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010213834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020755888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06629276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054322580","doi":"10.2308/bria.2010.22.1.43","title":"The Effects of Incentives on Information Exchange and Decision Quality in Groups","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Quality (philosophy); Wage; Compensation (psychology); Context (archaeology); Information exchange; Microeconomics; Decision quality; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.12151478157463716,"score_gpt":0.5002632734369046,"score_spread":0.37874849186226744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054322580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971392,0.0000286637,0.0008425216,0.00008609675,0.00000732295,0.00004909155,0.000008738533,0.0000071984596,0.0018311548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986162,0.000014267666,0.0011082394,0.000034786066,0.0000065200275,0.000030409223,0.00001009033,0.0000027946871,0.00017672092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887262,0.007058529,0.00066342804,0.0006494197,0.0023252952,0.00057720847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8809875,0.092232764,0.014808103,0.006794,0.001738433,0.0034391817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01279921,0.00042508089,0.0005662358,0.0007710511,0.00071352365,0.0017138516,0.00041190113,0.0008391252,0.0045909164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05376048,0.0003188766,0.00040554535,0.00038850994,0.0012495202,0.0014256346,0.0015827722,0.0010364881,0.00020582188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.053619634,0.051509347,0.40856048,0.001539338,0.0017036424,0.0006294629,0.013910588,0.016167467,0.14185624,0.031009736,0.0014635535,0.27803043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005993813,0.03311993,0.81036377,0.00026936797,0.0007679641,0.0004358926,0.004149101,0.05304631,0.044133153,0.042737186,0.004711373,0.000272097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000483339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003301546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01279921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070100534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006210349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06768948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054537701","doi":"10.1257/aer.100.3.1136","title":"Peddling Influence through Intermediaries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Intermediary; Decision maker; Economics; Microeconomics; Strategic communication; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Telecommunications; Management","score_opus":0.02433761881647466,"score_gpt":0.38094228175101236,"score_spread":0.3566046629345377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054537701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5368745,0.0020758763,0.09807144,0.0071354005,0.00017859787,0.0002016987,0.000260462,0.00028859428,0.3549134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923529,0.00029579768,0.0015222853,0.00017294876,0.00008181817,0.000018042945,0.000016406917,0.000009330584,0.005530427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610305,0.0021332286,0.00016257295,0.0005242657,0.0006687917,0.0004081413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97280526,0.016386377,0.0062322696,0.0023752358,0.0010770502,0.0011236647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003935041,0.00062728487,0.00053980184,0.0016439735,0.001231817,0.0051090955,0.00064901775,0.001929965,0.014892546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023959393,0.00042542545,0.00048719443,0.00091232767,0.002565097,0.004133497,0.0031862084,0.0016859455,0.0016375661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088913046,0.00028925543,0.04842436,0.00040897116,0.00026800434,0.0023077503,0.003998646,0.013040867,0.006701634,0.83363074,0.0049417973,0.085098766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005188995,0.00084248604,0.03017898,0.00039256248,0.000846178,0.002615877,0.003720805,0.08105808,0.0077101984,0.8164134,0.055523906,0.00017852693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016781003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013649735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014892546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013080941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093281246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049820542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055079788","doi":"","title":"Anchoring and Transaction Utility: Evidence from On-line Auctions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Common value auction; Valuation (finance); Empirical evidence; Database transaction; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Database; Accounting; Psychology","score_opus":0.060187159078141476,"score_gpt":0.3535992295458537,"score_spread":0.2934120704677122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055079788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739769,0.0010734793,0.005182232,0.0002949624,0.000021073427,0.000045341927,0.0001820416,0.000035296904,0.019188711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979113,0.000295512,0.0007789395,0.000048993497,0.000023083883,0.000013111684,0.0001731681,0.000012575206,0.000743281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483794,0.0033846118,0.00030458297,0.00033990646,0.0009449728,0.00018797372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8381544,0.11158967,0.033150844,0.011075238,0.0042151595,0.00181463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065462976,0.0005832868,0.0007642323,0.0013222377,0.0005910444,0.0028083685,0.0008746856,0.0012632897,0.011074348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10234696,0.00048741765,0.00039405105,0.0017189729,0.0015100504,0.004138134,0.0013143752,0.0015400948,0.0017051819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012625766,0.0053304234,0.6949045,0.0012219194,0.0013818091,0.0011369704,0.00698383,0.0074330433,0.007383609,0.036712382,0.004538341,0.2203474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012042971,0.0037528002,0.8312275,0.00032965562,0.00061818864,0.0021052465,0.004954743,0.030949157,0.005362632,0.10698888,0.012185319,0.0003216438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014003462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007363352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011074348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038170416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021009895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037047327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055467805","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1204165109","title":"Reply to van Hoorn: Converging lines of evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes; Providence Health Care; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.19847775864048067,"score_gpt":0.4082064272202595,"score_spread":0.20972866857977884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055467805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011858517,0.00067124027,0.000063104984,0.9888869,0.0097454805,0.0000041347485,0.000045004104,0.000012307779,0.00045330005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001246777,0.0003152363,0.00011082436,0.9869134,0.01033182,0.00001569032,0.000019753707,0.000014007875,0.0010324349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99172497,0.003515901,0.0010443855,0.0012058578,0.001944452,0.0005644198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417045,0.04431647,0.001986118,0.0019700096,0.0066279736,0.0033949872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138472365,0.0008400869,0.0021963436,0.0011771315,0.003270168,0.0057930024,0.0034518763,0.052901443,0.007228708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098797254,0.0012269906,0.0011893784,0.0016316429,0.0071727717,0.007055573,0.003135572,0.05499312,0.008017252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000645789,0.000010856901,0.0002595743,0.00004866505,0.000020724663,0.00020991979,0.00009199631,0.000031243984,0.000057922447,0.0027165858,0.9907961,0.005691779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036245206,0.00008559144,0.0018987724,0.00079837657,0.00010137092,0.0014935195,0.0010123756,0.0006768313,0.00066557206,0.06931065,0.9234014,0.00019308187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036463453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051448676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052901443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038079654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054236986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073232055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056556767","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.010","title":"Risk-taking in social settings: Group and peer effects","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; British Academy; Ryerson University","keywords":"Task (project management); Benchmark (surveying); Replicate; Psychology; Social psychology; Investment (military); Actuarial science; Peer group; Peer effects; Economics; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.014877237040858053,"score_gpt":0.2999067155877564,"score_spread":0.28502947854689836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056556767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99721175,0.000042534666,0.0005659618,0.00008358652,0.0000063960306,0.000056188775,0.000019147099,0.000012299124,0.0020021582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983772,0.00003442509,0.00096835534,0.00004162184,0.000015902517,0.00009564012,0.000019254894,0.000006436752,0.00044101468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99058443,0.006292191,0.00030724428,0.0009728426,0.0013510421,0.00049223605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85739994,0.114854835,0.016390638,0.006148818,0.0012248238,0.00398105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061708163,0.00057058514,0.00079853734,0.00074637536,0.00073531736,0.0014389853,0.00062415673,0.0013028522,0.0059621255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0667161,0.00033398203,0.0004921436,0.00046183122,0.0015518935,0.0012318158,0.0016589351,0.0014955343,0.00038080552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04480892,0.081276126,0.3831851,0.0019300508,0.0020792866,0.0019672601,0.017411614,0.03684017,0.1812401,0.017853022,0.0020631508,0.22934526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042815926,0.06537543,0.7719804,0.00019389912,0.0011536637,0.0006512239,0.0063431757,0.065798566,0.041861534,0.0388163,0.0030929402,0.00045128108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011706271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009981361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061708163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083175924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070019544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032634735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058878657","doi":"10.1007/s10683-010-9244-6","title":"Bounding preference parameters under different assumptions about beliefs: a partial identification approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bounding overwatch; Preference; Identification (biology); Contrast (vision); Point (geometry); Investment (military); Social preferences; Point estimation; Economics; Econometrics; Revealed preference; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08366769867478405,"score_gpt":0.3397087259534535,"score_spread":0.2560410272786695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058878657","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052494157,0.0002190599,0.94136935,0.000639458,0.00001560318,0.00009099098,0.00022706532,0.00015560762,0.004788723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88571775,0.0005217997,0.110505946,0.00033358816,0.00007141832,0.00056641904,0.0004408429,0.00007042563,0.0017718532],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842779,0.011341032,0.000657091,0.0015757021,0.0014426564,0.00070565793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67668027,0.29499462,0.008640888,0.015149287,0.00379749,0.0007374854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031108037,0.0016913062,0.0029800353,0.0020806645,0.0009216084,0.0051379856,0.0030760248,0.003106104,0.0055987425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19905972,0.0017725638,0.0028445674,0.0014534184,0.0038551346,0.0085468395,0.0046057208,0.0059538,0.00069162686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004993896,0.00022834544,0.0060201185,0.00037672633,0.00051501766,0.0003142969,0.00076870347,0.5882582,0.0021105486,0.3678527,0.00093503215,0.03212089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043917655,0.000096636584,0.0017305533,0.00010399924,0.00008239808,0.00008173565,0.00014228819,0.70614463,0.0013962082,0.28964463,0.00045921025,0.00007379012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026364606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010211514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031108037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023320476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015792224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16451699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059606874","doi":"10.2308/jmar-50435","title":"Complacency and Giving Up Across Repeated Tournaments: Evidence from the Field","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Incentive; Competition (biology); Dysfunctional family; Reservation; Psychology; Task (project management); Promotion (chess); Microeconomics; Test (biology); Economics; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Political science; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12825610450403369,"score_gpt":0.4685568373153231,"score_spread":0.3403007328112894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059606874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974412,0.00013806282,0.00010569342,0.00012849212,0.000013214997,0.000017568344,0.000042384327,0.0000024813792,0.0021110761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907637,0.00010071089,0.000139189,0.00008574589,0.00002303951,0.000016304337,0.000081190316,0.000002777139,0.0004746743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928012,0.003713729,0.00039063097,0.0009097205,0.0015322764,0.000652419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8579816,0.058037464,0.049366824,0.014692022,0.009064083,0.010858073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014362572,0.00032330392,0.00070439355,0.0024779036,0.0024172096,0.003089438,0.0016510448,0.0013573975,0.0059152287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042841244,0.00045428518,0.00039924125,0.0024135136,0.003908197,0.0010877744,0.0016266528,0.0014300729,0.0006143803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014029377,0.0033845128,0.95887583,0.00009235348,0.0002605905,0.00017979142,0.004534041,0.00032822657,0.0007332926,0.0010752486,0.0011716853,0.027961582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043603588,0.00039766508,0.996126,0.000022835808,0.000020368238,0.000037467104,0.0020118908,0.00020959086,0.00009449802,0.00043310458,0.00058321847,0.000019721345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011535433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012684212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014362572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010899564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010502092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07595748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060564635","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.04.002","title":"Stated social behavior and revealed actions: Evidence from six Latin American countries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Social capital; Pooling; Sociality; Set (abstract data type); Politics; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.06369450479658018,"score_gpt":0.33773198572189084,"score_spread":0.27403748092531066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060564635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980464,0.00018628789,0.0000797161,0.00010079904,0.0000030157244,0.000008349257,0.00012680127,0.0000011889507,0.0014474402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884415,0.0002664209,0.0000898516,0.000042088785,0.000003211682,0.000012158374,0.000341865,0.0000013502004,0.0003988721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990613,0.0005706249,0.00004977494,0.000095715324,0.00006666266,0.00015588284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98832417,0.006451708,0.0032570492,0.00070317386,0.0008209688,0.00044289886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026046988,0.00042068973,0.0005264209,0.0009787313,0.0011607275,0.0017950013,0.0006331055,0.0007910112,0.0028971555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059228856,0.00031316202,0.00035698322,0.0024984896,0.0017691862,0.0006936124,0.0016360515,0.00083986117,0.00026900426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010312551,0.0008972792,0.97513765,0.00012394448,0.0003478729,0.0005202238,0.0068121357,0.0013613296,0.0005336119,0.0026864877,0.0006859853,0.00986235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002369252,0.00034959553,0.9710586,0.00010655342,0.0002552824,0.000113445974,0.022748455,0.0009961976,0.0005329038,0.0009018831,0.0026692385,0.000030902684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0543764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0607925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0543764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008444275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062236545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108119786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060835352","doi":"10.1006/game.2001.0847","title":"Player Types and Self-Impression Management in Dictatorship Games: Two Experiments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Dictatorship; Impression management; Impression; Social psychology; Psychology; Observer (physics); Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03520154320108555,"score_gpt":0.34016513251246117,"score_spread":0.3049635893113756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060835352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99814284,0.00001800723,0.00029699536,0.00006556169,0.000020587722,0.00015778825,0.000047682406,0.000008129284,0.0012423028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99375015,0.00005475159,0.0013460229,0.00011394008,0.000033535624,0.00085243187,0.00012580807,0.000015281154,0.003708043],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976584,0.001052434,0.00023666749,0.00031380806,0.0003694699,0.0003691788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95779127,0.031185057,0.0040741074,0.0031645398,0.0004985727,0.0032864765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038444446,0.0015117624,0.0012774233,0.0006083858,0.0012963112,0.0028430151,0.0019120388,0.0022634098,0.008017551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023672905,0.0009525928,0.0005912396,0.00040570158,0.0022594193,0.0023133273,0.0017528555,0.0025997977,0.0008964177],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1705164,0.5400831,0.09677513,0.0011154287,0.0007869921,0.00078737835,0.013614445,0.0101486975,0.08847735,0.018342165,0.0043466887,0.05500614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.106305,0.2310902,0.41485783,0.00022088629,0.0014397327,0.00090255216,0.012337056,0.1196177,0.057169393,0.04810371,0.006840524,0.0011154012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025414592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003347293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008017551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012510743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010371306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026821315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061456865","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.014","title":"VCM or PPM? A comparison of the performance of two voluntary public goods mechanisms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Public good; Efficiency; Economics; Turnover; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Relative value; Point (geometry); Public economics; Microeconomics; Environmental economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.09093004096530903,"score_gpt":0.35394075409142034,"score_spread":0.2630107131261113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061456865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8874386,0.0039618514,0.043890193,0.005515767,0.0004645716,0.0004110941,0.00040997576,0.0006371758,0.05727089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99330455,0.00041285303,0.003632752,0.00017193182,0.00007625275,0.00008545442,0.000048761,0.000030100546,0.002237399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919852,0.0049001374,0.00035972556,0.0006587787,0.0011192681,0.0009768964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9049434,0.07221094,0.009575358,0.008757797,0.0023761995,0.0021363273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021254793,0.0007086935,0.0016970718,0.0018678558,0.00072943664,0.004249634,0.0019512353,0.004830123,0.012630187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078314625,0.000522749,0.0008318262,0.00096039585,0.002493865,0.0064294576,0.002247506,0.001502767,0.0010809406],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010633012,0.002318312,0.014988027,0.0018569051,0.0004906181,0.0001802996,0.0009860717,0.031235684,0.0097230775,0.6807712,0.0067483326,0.24006842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048284535,0.008481444,0.028298697,0.0006117405,0.0008470834,0.00047008248,0.002387386,0.23810259,0.013797193,0.6869964,0.014907499,0.00027147128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092190254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062155334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021254793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015568918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002211662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112407446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061978740","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0912928107","title":"Reply to Rankin et al.: The efficiency ratio of costly punishment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Climate change; Punishment (psychology); Macro; Sustainability; Economics; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Ecology; Social psychology; Biology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.06057012912941673,"score_gpt":0.3812283554221638,"score_spread":0.3206582262927471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061978740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022425884,0.0018030285,0.00012343739,0.9755023,0.021729581,0.0000050098856,0.00015001177,0.000040468138,0.0004218071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061930846,0.0024026723,0.00027281945,0.91580087,0.07276145,0.000037062862,0.00011586979,0.000056289544,0.0023598042],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961494,0.0014404064,0.00036133965,0.0007554502,0.0010021098,0.00029127786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9528069,0.03525234,0.0017237352,0.0018078327,0.0066357665,0.0017733979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010073587,0.0017976912,0.002653809,0.0013603243,0.003387133,0.0049860463,0.0047359355,0.040011343,0.011155159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07121979,0.0011465881,0.0015430064,0.0020138475,0.0058222613,0.0057683494,0.0026743743,0.041854486,0.010708746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009286704,0.00001735866,0.00019889383,0.000073823176,0.00002199383,0.00008972135,0.00006347833,0.000065753506,0.000058288384,0.002039498,0.9931979,0.0040804665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007016875,0.00017474257,0.004030907,0.0006541626,0.00020645351,0.002038555,0.0010286394,0.0013443575,0.0014244796,0.07521687,0.91287637,0.00030283036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002970821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026185152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040011343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029862868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030600561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05327487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062257683","doi":"10.1017/s1049096511000606","title":"Increased Realism at Lower Cost: The Case for the Hybrid Experiment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Artificiality; Replication (statistics); Voting; Collective action; Computer science; Protocol (science); Field (mathematics); Design of experiments; Realism; Operations research; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.10401947293803424,"score_gpt":0.38674484221865546,"score_spread":0.2827253692806212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062257683","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39279243,0.00054059085,0.5169374,0.007953582,0.0006887024,0.0028409392,0.0004984504,0.00053712924,0.07721078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8670957,0.00009455453,0.12549184,0.001005261,0.00014741636,0.0027536207,0.000072337534,0.00008559105,0.0032536401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761638,0.019144434,0.00060075836,0.0015330445,0.0021629643,0.00039501104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8922837,0.07350162,0.0029834742,0.026446698,0.0031607647,0.0016238366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02593257,0.00053983764,0.0009518938,0.00045440774,0.00082470174,0.0027176426,0.0016453344,0.0026078855,0.013284209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06953224,0.00046693505,0.00057375466,0.0003857776,0.0038575267,0.0037953767,0.0033707845,0.0021943029,0.00093111285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010583804,0.0037299693,0.013598137,0.002005149,0.0008364521,0.00047008207,0.0026465366,0.04565646,0.06940973,0.70833987,0.0042983675,0.13842542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004194258,0.009878551,0.014656909,0.00037420142,0.00047208782,0.00064327806,0.0007535223,0.09241577,0.019683102,0.81511235,0.041466616,0.00034938133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002713618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028036942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97406745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081942516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074309576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13714617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062394221","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00088-3","title":"Exogenous targeting instruments as a solution to group moral hazards","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Moral hazard; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Incentive","score_opus":0.07793790039166727,"score_gpt":0.3059436968522863,"score_spread":0.22800579646061903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062394221","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24124637,0.00024429525,0.7239621,0.0051451363,0.00038790106,0.0002992417,0.00012381803,0.000686396,0.02790469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439569,0.00008656206,0.047007993,0.00040223222,0.000120038494,0.00015689498,0.000022523422,0.000050504732,0.0081963595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619246,0.0023575327,0.00012206708,0.00045126895,0.00041254712,0.00046405976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97572994,0.015432678,0.003338904,0.0038918336,0.00081758224,0.00078904844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006433489,0.00065428775,0.0011960742,0.00061418617,0.0009104199,0.002589665,0.0016821151,0.005300283,0.0107276905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03166113,0.0006866719,0.0006870417,0.00063758914,0.0024703813,0.00235001,0.0029804446,0.0036536339,0.0008699322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038908367,0.0005077326,0.002344493,0.00015247638,0.000103720275,0.00021019336,0.00054926163,0.030979894,0.0028434482,0.9046067,0.004193017,0.05312003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004207777,0.00028335451,0.0009655425,0.000035894307,0.000082689556,0.00013010183,0.00021606099,0.1134104,0.0015799243,0.87947917,0.003360363,0.00003562527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021317476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017921072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107276905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005885751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012457584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03588772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063205152","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2009.00560.x","title":"SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES IN GAMES: AN APPLICATION TO THE OVERBIDDING PUZZLE*","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Probabilistic logic; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Econometrics; Test (biology); Psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.038779206532865394,"score_gpt":0.3818898149478242,"score_spread":0.34311060841495883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063205152","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20097834,0.003965517,0.75543374,0.010786406,0.0002898622,0.0002283151,0.00026718568,0.00015857244,0.027892033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80802214,0.002925332,0.18450774,0.001016909,0.0003269267,0.00039493182,0.00009968361,0.000054290205,0.002651959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554944,0.0033878903,0.00020073263,0.00027374222,0.00049409294,0.0000941366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9229787,0.06927005,0.0036597662,0.0022209634,0.0012938689,0.0005767076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010001783,0.001135939,0.0011451521,0.001273118,0.00074102374,0.001808517,0.0010145464,0.0023024236,0.003191826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05549624,0.00067347765,0.0012412127,0.0015975625,0.0049142046,0.003907716,0.0023163722,0.0040250733,0.0002571464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020628086,0.00020510681,0.0071776216,0.0003704643,0.00015206875,0.0006082773,0.0017986648,0.043910414,0.002128477,0.88784045,0.0018312731,0.053770825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000594486,0.00007515265,0.0024055373,0.000041102416,0.000024496976,0.00012674593,0.00014541778,0.06685018,0.00023637222,0.9278629,0.002131625,0.00004111672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002055071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014872347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010001783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00114074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083774474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05289507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063414602","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_13","title":"Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Loyalty; Value (mathematics); Equity theory; Transaction cost; Promotion (chess); Database transaction; Equity (law); Perception; Marketing; Microeconomics; Construct (python library); Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Business; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.030681116520096245,"score_gpt":0.3873318985018485,"score_spread":0.35665078198175226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063414602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8343359,0.0021255028,0.064068615,0.002845569,0.00024552585,0.00008759914,0.0000890231,0.000039178027,0.09616293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963558,0.000115386756,0.0024388875,0.00011487433,0.00005728424,0.000011547366,0.000012005758,0.000007572066,0.00088664657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949266,0.002582404,0.00020840923,0.0004472389,0.0015665777,0.00026891773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962828,0.023164136,0.006290607,0.0030825373,0.0024829288,0.0021517836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007683156,0.0003719373,0.00044285294,0.0007027796,0.0010862806,0.0037993814,0.0005797341,0.0012969755,0.0031931342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04651904,0.00022286086,0.00041295498,0.0006549653,0.0040425234,0.0046515344,0.0017232759,0.002181462,0.0001602294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013985423,0.0006480583,0.13868822,0.00048422161,0.00043565957,0.00082789245,0.024473952,0.008619149,0.010366294,0.68299717,0.001883688,0.12917718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012969166,0.0009325029,0.17329346,0.0003123023,0.00033278446,0.0009864216,0.011850929,0.02047561,0.0029410908,0.7684462,0.02001116,0.000287879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017315026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017470696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007683156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014907506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006305036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040632904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063493981","doi":"10.1108/08858620510618138","title":"Salesforce control system in high‐tech contexts: do environment and industry matter?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Marketing; Business; Context (archaeology); Exploratory research; Management control system; Originality; Empirical research; Meaning (existential); Industrial organization; Creativity; Economics; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.022095064064280964,"score_gpt":0.2574461658357862,"score_spread":0.23535110177150526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063493981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972838,0.00008255858,0.000065517954,0.000074765136,0.0000037364605,0.0000107083915,0.000010114435,0.0000012452582,0.0024675995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957186,0.000048408045,0.000045667155,0.000028846143,0.0000024066012,0.0000038227445,0.000011168838,0.0000010014952,0.00028676295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985259,0.0005647915,0.000035710236,0.00016956459,0.00030493466,0.00039906724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308807,0.0025468997,0.0019557,0.00027865625,0.0006037383,0.0015269242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014460352,0.00027254436,0.0003060977,0.00062319374,0.001881113,0.0035815497,0.00040082788,0.00041198693,0.0046287603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043957513,0.00022313026,0.00020360472,0.00058264064,0.0022885206,0.00076776085,0.0012483953,0.0006076258,0.00023935664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042461714,0.0007189313,0.97337264,0.000080150705,0.0000801965,0.0002821445,0.010568968,0.00022163521,0.001523334,0.0013118366,0.00023937895,0.011176226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007825389,0.00010954539,0.9894358,0.000020020332,0.000015940484,0.000022829207,0.009338122,0.00018357566,0.00021000297,0.00017643577,0.0004739626,0.000006028451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050794233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113566846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050794233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031194212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037075398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10099715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063944418","doi":"10.1007/s10818-008-9043-8","title":"The bioeconomics of homogeneous middleman groups as adaptive units: Theory and empirical evidence viewed from a group selection framework","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bioeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioeconomics; Homogeneous; Group selection; Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Perspective (graphical); Empirical research; Economics; Proximate and ultimate causation; Sociology; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10666546655325375,"score_gpt":0.34816341150875957,"score_spread":0.2414979449555058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063944418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77186257,0.008485894,0.07706172,0.020664386,0.00015084643,0.00017044891,0.00014466431,0.00003425236,0.12142516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99126786,0.0019704446,0.004906841,0.00040938196,0.0001027543,0.000051914027,0.000029055493,0.0000046548457,0.0012571309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983657,0.0010326365,0.000046899135,0.00017284081,0.00025226787,0.00012957667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911356,0.005940832,0.0015218933,0.00058027427,0.00034281253,0.00047857405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033187242,0.00035875986,0.0005864056,0.0021852113,0.0012893319,0.0027480558,0.0010746487,0.0015842234,0.0046603004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008858292,0.00018100411,0.0002909964,0.0023540335,0.011622664,0.004305479,0.0018555014,0.00092371117,0.00030981554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059350336,0.000078655365,0.010848739,0.000120933655,0.000032616437,0.0001467739,0.0015544672,0.0033909618,0.00028727783,0.96453345,0.00071543996,0.018231275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003501927,0.000083346844,0.0125729665,0.00008168948,0.000024218538,0.000112594826,0.002125376,0.006350546,0.00023689498,0.9703682,0.00799101,0.00001811931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015141597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010423914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046603004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020551924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007638137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017551303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064340659","doi":"10.1007/s10726-011-9263-5","title":"Strategic Behavior in Contested-Pile Methods for Fair Division of Indivisible Items","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Group Decision and Negotiation","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Fair division; Alternation (linguistics); Preference; Division (mathematics); Adversary; Class (philosophy); Focus (optics); Simple (philosophy); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16706845523757302,"score_gpt":0.43525087288654263,"score_spread":0.2681824176489696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064340659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53576213,0.00020492398,0.45449087,0.0004719166,0.000070484384,0.00042508822,0.000053361982,0.00016531347,0.0083559165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88775355,0.00005677764,0.10764704,0.00005727887,0.00002454114,0.000437118,0.000035296027,0.00006167353,0.0039266176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838785,0.012823807,0.00037693168,0.00064489344,0.001786413,0.00048948976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157985,0.073348984,0.0026787512,0.005886255,0.001225265,0.001062336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024226416,0.00075407216,0.0013239861,0.0009737279,0.0014850058,0.0036516609,0.0022114108,0.0019686962,0.0075349184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08280265,0.000901692,0.00079941296,0.0012116012,0.003206224,0.0059251008,0.0035083164,0.0021122391,0.00051824935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007202466,0.002624036,0.0062694135,0.00065738684,0.00026251396,0.00013938913,0.0030929022,0.2047173,0.010082223,0.6466861,0.0017254507,0.11654089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039146148,0.000503695,0.0014840636,0.00004245432,0.00004554762,0.000057262496,0.00030743354,0.78496265,0.0022195936,0.20935908,0.00055664696,0.000070078895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015197102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016421737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024226416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020501658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017656434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12812304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064433738","doi":"10.1002/mde.1293","title":"A cross‐national analysis of affirmative action: an evolutionary psychological perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial and Decision Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Alliance; Ethnic group; Government (linguistics); Variation (astronomy); Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06380181690560409,"score_gpt":0.4145818867110285,"score_spread":0.3507800698054244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064433738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980209,0.00021888535,0.0023350767,0.00046255067,0.000007412787,0.0000095302685,0.00002510312,0.0000028294228,0.016729718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910057,0.00006783079,0.0005776903,0.000019875897,0.000001569786,0.000004163716,0.000010491756,8.068607e-7,0.00021710306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922895,0.00046085138,0.000016578051,0.00009773102,0.00007129543,0.00012453712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970566,0.0016983947,0.00047886692,0.00022127709,0.00034756045,0.00019727752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00287051,0.000117884454,0.00019581636,0.0010903375,0.0011841982,0.0016465639,0.0004146893,0.00043612754,0.00391729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045681233,0.0000860497,0.00025896632,0.0014424964,0.0016327758,0.0012191805,0.0012058181,0.00052661635,0.00008262958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034689868,0.0006099306,0.40557268,0.00019006393,0.0005639933,0.0010904872,0.02363055,0.016640017,0.0047439807,0.4040173,0.0008108243,0.14178333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042092383,0.00031199175,0.7368356,0.00014186942,0.00028862528,0.00070174044,0.04468626,0.03982254,0.0015699612,0.16355291,0.011985958,0.00006044436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038323398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054023913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00391729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013620458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043060078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015180945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064732489","doi":"10.1177/1046496404266546","title":"Vested Interests in the Decision to Resolve Social Dilemma Conflicts","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Small Group Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Social dilemma; Voting; Dilemma; Resource (disambiguation); Social psychology; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Shared resource; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.3019863804057298,"score_gpt":0.49637676844833983,"score_spread":0.19439038804261005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064732489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99199426,0.00003183705,0.0014434943,0.00019992676,0.000004743261,0.00002101541,0.0000046264513,0.000002372249,0.0062976736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951565,0.000007101661,0.00029283657,0.000024278754,0.0000026015314,0.000008738417,0.000002328613,9.4300776e-7,0.00014554268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869735,0.010274371,0.00031940872,0.00053150806,0.0010483462,0.000852771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652202,0.023689318,0.0069230087,0.001064414,0.0012344322,0.0018687248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00994765,0.00021160573,0.00028745967,0.0010300629,0.0012386823,0.0026857953,0.00047288148,0.0010408364,0.002412641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05185168,0.00017855065,0.00024188873,0.0004429513,0.0029673215,0.0015624646,0.0019472445,0.0011958731,0.00020008862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004430248,0.002996002,0.6011836,0.0003238853,0.00047625948,0.0019305496,0.07502631,0.018817563,0.01946582,0.09917708,0.0010629132,0.17510974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006252711,0.003117204,0.5884395,0.00017339786,0.00016001101,0.0015369315,0.08253241,0.073165074,0.009174939,0.22796103,0.012906031,0.00020816815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071848114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009511604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00994765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012581294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006562365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052608788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065243432","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1765(01)00390-1","title":"The ‘spite’ dilemma: spite or no spite, is there a dilemma?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03006414585895394,"score_gpt":0.29404323373143,"score_spread":0.26397908787247604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065243432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25795722,0.010669768,0.054038063,0.4740356,0.0043372028,0.000092900016,0.00013409663,0.00011114659,0.19862401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643639,0.0032831763,0.005394156,0.020383552,0.0019163343,0.00007558399,0.000044872915,0.000036991907,0.004501528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956119,0.0030110881,0.00015567712,0.00037866703,0.0006059831,0.00023658441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599457,0.029775867,0.00437395,0.0029695486,0.0014709916,0.0014641309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01044103,0.00045176773,0.0008504016,0.00068228797,0.0012065219,0.0047528828,0.0014515726,0.007020021,0.0067230472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047310892,0.000297318,0.0003528878,0.00071974046,0.014912205,0.011612228,0.0015453133,0.004356663,0.00084697275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002589691,0.00014820657,0.001645163,0.00022543398,0.0000576261,0.00022969204,0.0018480428,0.00058100914,0.001324337,0.9390268,0.023114707,0.031540066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007535299,0.000053163116,0.0014235922,0.00007189444,0.000015912123,0.00028398406,0.0011539662,0.0014811982,0.00029336163,0.9855075,0.009618439,0.000021623488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041909344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036638082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01044103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009358253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010596354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05521816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066158317","doi":"10.1038/nclimate2024","title":"Intra- and intergenerational discounting in the climate game","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Climate Change","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universität Hamburg; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Climate change; Endowment; Intertemporal choice; Microeconomics; Political science; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.04472592373157338,"score_gpt":0.34808288209181537,"score_spread":0.303356958360242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066158317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802771,0.00025453305,0.0077736955,0.0006074359,0.000022416421,0.000025271718,0.00006089366,0.000005915142,0.01097263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756706,0.00017137195,0.0011147867,0.00003113825,0.000007641061,0.000011480056,0.000014748333,0.0000033935953,0.0010784639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991761,0.0005156934,0.00003048471,0.00009836166,0.0000776882,0.000101691614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98463917,0.013052119,0.0009691119,0.0007208958,0.00018923458,0.00042952175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037126462,0.00044274447,0.00049773534,0.00034436287,0.0004318659,0.0019390363,0.00073693326,0.0008154958,0.0046974043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020960063,0.00035519456,0.00035663016,0.00035702763,0.0015796392,0.0030641393,0.0008010257,0.0017983621,0.0001320654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021470701,0.001361013,0.034969628,0.00016984317,0.00022024686,0.00023093737,0.002029457,0.044616368,0.004628976,0.8775625,0.0008394528,0.031224372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037444785,0.00038376744,0.048057366,0.00005319597,0.00021075178,0.00027304693,0.0015456149,0.14016873,0.0018959179,0.8047826,0.002151276,0.000103377315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005163771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054711555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005163771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018485828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074693136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019634545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066164253","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2012.670752","title":"Belief bias in informal reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking & Reasoning","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Syllogism; Psychology; Task (project management); Informal logic; Argument (complex analysis); Cognitive psychology; Similarity (geometry); Social psychology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.05332454511842592,"score_gpt":0.33961335761915207,"score_spread":0.28628881250072613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066164253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979886,0.00018628937,0.012545905,0.00023810918,0.000053580163,0.00031310148,0.0000790442,0.00007447941,0.0066234423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895886,0.000081771366,0.008414766,0.00027394143,0.000036386144,0.0003391602,0.00010313454,0.000033636763,0.0011286774],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98907197,0.0052045593,0.0009552522,0.0013040808,0.0029331231,0.00053099485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8572669,0.104394026,0.016681815,0.016434785,0.0030827685,0.0021397504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012790838,0.0007806791,0.0007543568,0.0007125499,0.00041440755,0.00215489,0.0008457449,0.0012704185,0.004828466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10002348,0.00046976082,0.0005129869,0.00041026832,0.0018233332,0.0023994641,0.0024938781,0.0021027646,0.0004602765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024868345,0.020985262,0.19240983,0.0029016072,0.0010936842,0.00086572627,0.026531028,0.0073521673,0.36427543,0.06661513,0.0021860774,0.28991574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006854348,0.023976136,0.5733816,0.00070144486,0.0010411367,0.0021869352,0.003434531,0.044116292,0.13637452,0.18800193,0.01928876,0.00064232986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004765145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035524045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012790838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007144327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005117069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06764525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066267142","doi":"10.1007/s10640-006-9062-7","title":"Output sharing in partnerships as a common pool resource management instrument","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Resource Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Incentive; Free riding; Offset (computer science); Shared resource; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Implementation; Session (web analytics); Environmental economics; Common-pool resource; Resource use; Economics; Microeconomics; Operations management; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Finance; Computer security; Advertising","score_opus":0.037375429206366495,"score_gpt":0.2675023487756158,"score_spread":0.2301269195692493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066267142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.837401,0.00012682949,0.088427976,0.001344898,0.000037552094,0.00013686296,0.000055787383,0.000072197894,0.07239697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99623305,0.00002409854,0.0021396156,0.000021110523,0.000007786395,0.00003487667,0.0000047987837,0.000005167355,0.0015294417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642354,0.0022492104,0.00011328253,0.00031697386,0.00046634066,0.00043063844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821967,0.012434156,0.0018041625,0.0020207048,0.0005999688,0.00094432005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006048674,0.00047790373,0.0007877072,0.0006475001,0.0011766079,0.0037551157,0.0009789938,0.0015106068,0.007418279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017629245,0.00036071314,0.0005331872,0.0009752375,0.0042161224,0.0055811848,0.0039747814,0.0012544935,0.0002776392],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005128382,0.0005019683,0.0073666093,0.00007970936,0.00005557599,0.00014011326,0.0010168318,0.02648559,0.0025505805,0.9387977,0.0004738782,0.022018656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015142412,0.00027627987,0.0035644772,0.000023776882,0.00006513043,0.000070911854,0.0010895468,0.06620259,0.001376875,0.9257679,0.0013865257,0.000024576437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005630168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005274938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007418279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014124782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013119676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03198886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067139866","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0303-1","title":"Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding – or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Distributive justice; Distributive property; Inequality; Veil of ignorance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequity aversion; Ignorance; Social welfare function; Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Welfare; Social psychology; Welfare economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.057677384500916425,"score_gpt":0.3749618746046674,"score_spread":0.317284490103751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067139866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6882788,0.010097469,0.03601761,0.049882073,0.0011698188,0.00041916498,0.0005670028,0.00009692854,0.21347104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97795606,0.0022256155,0.007780907,0.0024760943,0.00025140465,0.00031304406,0.000052939962,0.000030706375,0.0089132935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969869,0.0019754313,0.00007515036,0.00039208998,0.00044804843,0.00012237816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804441,0.013750699,0.0014582367,0.0034038012,0.000644168,0.00029895644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008323462,0.00043550998,0.00074066094,0.0005298043,0.0016348844,0.0014726102,0.0008310094,0.0017488928,0.013409342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022805851,0.00028024035,0.0003569087,0.0006203168,0.0066913865,0.0038481054,0.0010651757,0.001583612,0.00062698126],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003406136,0.002713324,0.0054906523,0.0006741709,0.000364177,0.000097973636,0.0030796598,0.0020077508,0.0058653844,0.8483038,0.0150964875,0.11290054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011171603,0.0017022255,0.011118392,0.00024867276,0.00018333935,0.00014924414,0.0015976211,0.0020559211,0.005221709,0.93430436,0.042217817,0.000083551444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002033398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002643782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013409342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013299354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014333301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044858754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068129224","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0448-7","title":"Strategic, sincere, and heuristic voting under four election rules: an experimental study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Heuristics; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Approval voting; Ranked voting system; Anti-plurality voting; Disapproval voting; Heuristic; Economics; Microeconomics; Public finance; Simple (philosophy); Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.056107382864848725,"score_gpt":0.36238059336367967,"score_spread":0.30627321049883094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068129224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980738,0.000013833423,0.00032576855,0.00005021559,0.000012994828,0.000071247865,0.000025891528,0.000003939158,0.0014223417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997207,0.000038110484,0.0011145762,0.000052074272,0.000027317552,0.0002088385,0.00007469781,0.000008314769,0.001269149],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648947,0.0022499736,0.00023038806,0.00031227173,0.00038427958,0.00033367943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93258107,0.05284799,0.0052431272,0.006608822,0.0010176856,0.0017013339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00812469,0.00077685615,0.0009297698,0.0006822938,0.0011512318,0.0021236583,0.0009602161,0.0016078822,0.007978105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038172547,0.00044139367,0.00051140384,0.0005405353,0.0024976935,0.001315872,0.00082648237,0.0020887642,0.00064224587],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12861697,0.3153463,0.18454075,0.0009768506,0.0018450749,0.00072862586,0.014410553,0.040018152,0.058273394,0.1038053,0.006508351,0.1449297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04224735,0.20150255,0.29018772,0.00023548404,0.0017777362,0.0010792952,0.01176634,0.23118804,0.028719664,0.18183036,0.008807304,0.00065818476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009928766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013409556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00812469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000867718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089818623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042967975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069566965","doi":"10.7202/039551ar","title":"Biais Cognitifs et Prise de Risque Managériale : Validation Empirique dans le Contexte Tunisien","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Management international","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03276770572839493,"score_gpt":0.339517054601267,"score_spread":0.3067493488728721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069566965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965904,0.0003498936,0.0007733719,0.00016327196,0.000011375681,0.00008910361,0.00009181824,0.000002033065,0.0019286232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648064,0.00032465789,0.001522024,0.00010146507,0.000020689391,0.00023696458,0.0002058615,0.0000030777383,0.0011046103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334407,0.004812551,0.0002968916,0.0006441275,0.00052083045,0.0003816245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96371156,0.027413933,0.0038176188,0.0015838083,0.0029140764,0.00055901625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016142176,0.0008426588,0.000967026,0.0016200044,0.0021440387,0.00238901,0.0010609931,0.0009745149,0.0041274694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027315049,0.00053244166,0.0009848024,0.0018612966,0.0022968156,0.0013126602,0.0018301177,0.0012821301,0.00035885582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014480585,0.00106872,0.94576603,0.000297625,0.00084114703,0.00045836443,0.011895607,0.0041881665,0.0008440571,0.0053420896,0.00061475317,0.027235271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002726985,0.0011921298,0.9614889,0.00040058154,0.0006155162,0.00013748465,0.015580211,0.011694161,0.00133786,0.0020864725,0.0051395926,0.000054297594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15817848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12163258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15817848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004471338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045621796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31451553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072436783","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.005","title":"Intergroup trust and reciprocity in strategic interactions: Effects of group decision-making mechanisms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychology; Social psychology; Group decision-making; Mechanism (biology); Dictator game; Social dilemma; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02912733385876866,"score_gpt":0.3365004001285343,"score_spread":0.3073730662697657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072436783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907849,0.0002521078,0.0026336561,0.00035572858,0.000018632403,0.00003944367,0.00003397245,0.0000090521135,0.0058724503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980762,0.00017695597,0.0011146566,0.000039940194,0.00001960622,0.000038472543,0.000018685845,0.000011933352,0.00050348137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945087,0.0040136315,0.00015698424,0.00045821312,0.00047784278,0.00038458355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82872677,0.14684953,0.010643593,0.008228752,0.0017428037,0.0038085524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010881625,0.0007415215,0.0010139125,0.0007283155,0.0010113819,0.0043379166,0.00091934303,0.0021912293,0.006070351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08599328,0.00082613324,0.00057032495,0.0005891139,0.0033118136,0.004197352,0.0020424752,0.0029755165,0.0004639912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036654383,0.017811956,0.30633384,0.0016657845,0.0026311437,0.0017451263,0.022258002,0.07014484,0.07263507,0.31721118,0.0033467528,0.14756198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027658213,0.0035183916,0.5869126,0.00022054465,0.0020889104,0.0008618662,0.0034927893,0.09666565,0.010102197,0.29084986,0.002134907,0.00038637183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016313345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017811888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010881625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011246095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010836043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057548165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072895574","doi":"10.1006/obhd.2000.2908","title":"Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Retributive justice; Ultimatum game; Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.022767414162415584,"score_gpt":0.3335386243858938,"score_spread":0.31077121022347826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072895574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97341025,0.0008865861,0.011171154,0.0013061473,0.000078471814,0.000035933594,0.000023545474,0.000019540892,0.013068468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962452,0.00027395444,0.0013271858,0.00008179826,0.000037963582,0.00002175216,0.000010782835,0.0000064499473,0.001994805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968059,0.0022067993,0.00013442454,0.00018952867,0.00035337757,0.00030993234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89744407,0.089009814,0.0075123683,0.0037606335,0.0012998008,0.00097327883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011834827,0.0006362534,0.00096584146,0.0006650156,0.0008697357,0.0027550468,0.0013029781,0.0026821678,0.0063299504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08869817,0.00069758255,0.000465481,0.0008220808,0.0027131825,0.0037257578,0.0009928065,0.0037348098,0.00043127534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007053953,0.0052770413,0.05735633,0.00073685416,0.00048286942,0.0017266381,0.01146659,0.13713306,0.009735639,0.66055,0.0032074738,0.1052736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006071238,0.0013818054,0.054161742,0.00010968353,0.0002643396,0.0006460735,0.0029621671,0.29566455,0.0018928784,0.6408227,0.0013155794,0.00017133917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021271068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016178286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011834827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011430379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009625234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06258929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072912727","doi":"10.1007/s00199-005-0633-6","title":"Inferring repeated-game strategies from actions: evidence from trust game experiments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeated game; Bridging (networking); Inference; Game theory; Computer science; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Best response; Strategy; Normal-form game; Sequential game; Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08386268713124677,"score_gpt":0.3775452311842629,"score_spread":0.29368254405301614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072912727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839204,0.00022924003,0.012441382,0.0002648285,0.000023276243,0.000058265832,0.00017427308,0.00005788053,0.0028304937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993881,0.0002053832,0.005133574,0.00008305563,0.000011410356,0.0000518091,0.00018677252,0.000029826091,0.00041719506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438983,0.003563817,0.00038579258,0.00070150255,0.00077825657,0.00018076027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77984047,0.18094881,0.019693464,0.015534341,0.0026983854,0.0012845958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010079666,0.0010815931,0.0011258438,0.00079035875,0.00051179325,0.002239163,0.0014126821,0.0022446818,0.0038054448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14526764,0.001060262,0.0006236525,0.0007099684,0.0019989184,0.0029627287,0.0009566565,0.0025700955,0.00065412844],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019053254,0.012514409,0.53056806,0.002486599,0.005063193,0.0013030374,0.007969966,0.08821565,0.048522316,0.055103905,0.0051450143,0.2240546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024096335,0.005219979,0.4061529,0.00030010846,0.0015699961,0.0016814822,0.0014210189,0.38300046,0.021672167,0.17249048,0.0036776052,0.0004041656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039020476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030755189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010079666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072309165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007631923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053306997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073956411","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1682052","title":"Competitive Insurance Markets and Adverse Selection in the Lab","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.008478269737307483,"score_gpt":0.284099986143438,"score_spread":0.27562171640613053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073956411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979785,0.00037268552,0.0026276286,0.0016608699,0.00006447229,0.00003253355,0.000057335077,0.00002876173,0.015370648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785703,0.00010477274,0.0005038789,0.00029088752,0.00003148688,0.000021478718,0.000019364714,0.0000070925344,0.0011639113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730945,0.0018906285,0.000061451115,0.0001957042,0.00027061862,0.00027214715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812856,0.010982038,0.0032783072,0.0017530245,0.0004953787,0.0022056962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065188417,0.00035312402,0.000727507,0.00058364635,0.0007363085,0.0033998212,0.0005079911,0.0018937115,0.010762329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020598605,0.00028902388,0.00024124267,0.00037502561,0.002025449,0.001432231,0.0013231422,0.0012748847,0.0007162614],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022400094,0.021965371,0.3718823,0.0004580832,0.00062985666,0.002689374,0.004571177,0.020920048,0.050099168,0.29891992,0.018753165,0.18671152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002441131,0.008494937,0.31192872,0.00011911954,0.00034944134,0.0015280056,0.0044029076,0.09131116,0.00896326,0.55893564,0.011194999,0.00033064128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009029214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011229845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010762329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000769631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009938646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03600359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074224305","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.03.006","title":"The limited effects of power on satisfaction with joint consumption decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Alberta Health; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Power (physics); Orientation (vector space); Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Joint (building); Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09001193481324883,"score_gpt":0.3735681785202299,"score_spread":0.28355624370698107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074224305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922609,0.000045486708,0.00064964505,0.0001575365,0.0000063617517,0.0000102697495,0.000020426389,0.0000044820395,0.0068448912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995778,0.0000096957565,0.00018164287,0.000026366788,0.000003703691,0.000008679831,0.000010659049,0.000002541398,0.00017880749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946332,0.004106232,0.0001588555,0.00032172553,0.0005320103,0.00024800235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90579075,0.075820655,0.006689099,0.0064751776,0.0015813902,0.0036429428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043829298,0.00019907624,0.0003393348,0.0002285751,0.0005570724,0.0011945856,0.0003983249,0.0006579358,0.012897735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033751033,0.00026096255,0.00032361815,0.00024016772,0.0018377912,0.0008938011,0.0014464277,0.0011796582,0.00049282296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023951007,0.008647711,0.70119894,0.0007253816,0.00076460023,0.0015203897,0.00838067,0.005948631,0.099572286,0.017764105,0.0018866481,0.12963971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086868246,0.005230412,0.9555929,0.00007315856,0.00024803306,0.00061323773,0.003926286,0.0069709066,0.008678453,0.015333194,0.0023934024,0.00007134379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053003797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007457482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012897735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035888766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031040033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043147206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074522396","doi":"10.1037/a0038686","title":"Deontic introduction: A theory of inference from is to ought.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Experimental Psychology Society; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Deontic logic; Defeasible estate; Inference; Action (physics); Outcome (game theory); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08316009600504377,"score_gpt":0.4060633831892959,"score_spread":0.32290328718425215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074522396","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035132274,0.004104079,0.69601744,0.020912675,0.0009291092,0.00023976454,0.0006237973,0.00045002482,0.24159086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85102,0.0019161337,0.13072462,0.0038321156,0.0008197574,0.00038667783,0.00051268516,0.00014681366,0.010641239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591345,0.0021318595,0.00021712578,0.0008053162,0.0007527703,0.0001794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908274,0.0064480077,0.000846106,0.0009024807,0.0006832497,0.00029277918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007809199,0.0007408907,0.00060950563,0.0017930826,0.0024784175,0.0039899675,0.0019212114,0.003144348,0.007837892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014075852,0.00082306686,0.001973422,0.0011366593,0.011559675,0.011172045,0.002344255,0.004904398,0.0009032277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000311785,0.000020763577,0.00027725086,0.000094971736,0.000018678782,0.00006601842,0.0016600417,0.000728142,0.0003469586,0.9880107,0.001199316,0.0075460253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021603382,0.00001833354,0.00044574536,0.0000554335,0.000022138693,0.000079161735,0.00016253811,0.0036948286,0.000193543,0.98574406,0.009549494,0.000013117317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042798845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033958117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007837892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034203853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019462734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041299462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075033482","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1400826111","title":"Culture-dependent strategies in coordination games","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Army Research Office; Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative; Advanced Research Projects Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Coordination game; Symmetric game; Stochastic game; Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Demography; Game theory; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Sociology","score_opus":0.04827885247121029,"score_gpt":0.3612380445163604,"score_spread":0.3129591920451501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075033482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99427396,0.00005003968,0.0026190667,0.00006995669,0.0000067093415,0.00004939269,0.000037079248,0.0000062358677,0.0028874318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720544,0.000047496458,0.0021624742,0.000043627948,0.000003877522,0.00008326965,0.000035364905,0.000003695683,0.00041471518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643147,0.0024068996,0.00016303854,0.00054100394,0.00031802134,0.00013948765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97577226,0.015571136,0.0042275297,0.0020626348,0.0009970973,0.0013692423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036776648,0.0004748142,0.000495412,0.00056722836,0.0008016717,0.0018085979,0.0007411417,0.00058565906,0.002022008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030241089,0.00032559255,0.00030461157,0.00037725703,0.0014078432,0.0016409821,0.0013070132,0.00086181134,0.00020623361],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004052587,0.0059485696,0.6487276,0.0007001301,0.0012215051,0.0014878559,0.024709163,0.08110165,0.05760327,0.07300294,0.0021279668,0.099316716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001056158,0.0051708114,0.50718707,0.000117588046,0.0005170066,0.0013219526,0.018006425,0.33470738,0.01800157,0.106033295,0.0074986196,0.00038210853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039399876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004965653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039399876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083130243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044714494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019449592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075365227","doi":"10.1007/s00199-012-0733-z","title":"Revealed preferences and aspirations in warm glow theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Stochastic game; Turnout; Mathematical economics; Public finance; Glow discharge; Quality (philosophy); Econometrics; Public good; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Physics; Epistemology; Political science; Voting; Philosophy; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.05205690546438309,"score_gpt":0.32664235694938376,"score_spread":0.2745854514850007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075365227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9259534,0.00032436912,0.038878277,0.0009493043,0.000026882759,0.000044864777,0.00008601858,0.00002979151,0.033707123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960956,0.00007280726,0.00230171,0.000039584316,0.0000070596125,0.000021524618,0.000020400566,0.000006686227,0.0014346845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998654,0.0007556917,0.000055874327,0.00016442705,0.00020524391,0.00016482535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885909,0.0076648844,0.00082114263,0.0015745164,0.0005206006,0.0008278253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004451151,0.00030021253,0.00062270515,0.00077173946,0.00096084294,0.0031653245,0.00072457304,0.0011398022,0.006195902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017005648,0.00042458603,0.00045044802,0.00070793944,0.003356797,0.0039284113,0.0015957693,0.0020144351,0.00039049104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030427112,0.00023029,0.01795609,0.00008836269,0.000060475566,0.000133059,0.0026039332,0.0049502123,0.000973955,0.9556839,0.00055073213,0.016464835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043048698,0.0001078323,0.010199174,0.000019739377,0.000023056815,0.0000714582,0.0012257231,0.017134314,0.00031052312,0.97014534,0.0006913497,0.00002851011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009859256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009197842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006195902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089366233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004800389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023540258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077189368","doi":"10.4236/tel.2012.21006","title":"Two-Part Tariff Lottery: A Means to Provide Public Good at the Social Optimum","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Public good; Tariff; Pareto principle; Microeconomics; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Public economics; Pareto optimal; Business; Computer science; International economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.030425346589836897,"score_gpt":0.3041962520678044,"score_spread":0.27377090547796745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077189368","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043382354,0.00014510454,0.93160176,0.0009673064,0.00012603535,0.00044260887,0.00014064094,0.00042001007,0.022774238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6465004,0.00021112063,0.33617988,0.00038651653,0.00011811798,0.0011675751,0.000113944385,0.00013191171,0.015190397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959948,0.0028051357,0.0000990444,0.00026151648,0.0005660782,0.00027336943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948474,0.0023545765,0.00045095393,0.0014619215,0.00042340177,0.00046180957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059601897,0.0010980305,0.0014112272,0.0013863049,0.00080768904,0.0020341896,0.0020524638,0.002151805,0.010867674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013685333,0.0006203419,0.0012110047,0.0011726354,0.0023959137,0.0029088045,0.002726634,0.0020519032,0.001489155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009022883,0.00052427023,0.0005036413,0.00022088975,0.00011354815,0.000107255866,0.0002679279,0.075407624,0.005202313,0.83215,0.005851227,0.07874905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064449647,0.0007555208,0.0008355511,0.00007953636,0.000061239014,0.00031397885,0.000073754454,0.33136523,0.0024506906,0.65320414,0.010090976,0.00012487732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032378142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003953337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010867674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011514889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017494672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036356032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077651125","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00383.x","title":"DO WEALTH DIFFERENCES AFFECT FAIRNESS CONSIDERATIONS?*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Odds; Ultimatum game; Reinforcement learning; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Reinforcement; Social psychology; Estimation; Computer science; Logistic regression; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06328826547707916,"score_gpt":0.3877096804470602,"score_spread":0.32442141496998106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077651125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97644025,0.0008301038,0.0033646051,0.0015122051,0.000046528978,0.000018114282,0.00008111379,0.000011688391,0.017695317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988801,0.00015255914,0.00028502208,0.000090684545,0.000015412057,0.0000044247545,0.000012051521,0.000003070514,0.0005566791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947876,0.00031132312,0.000018722207,0.000068096655,0.00005971256,0.00006339176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912464,0.006183519,0.001569253,0.00042968348,0.0002215359,0.00034965182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021591964,0.00019025635,0.0002632235,0.00021339174,0.00021668883,0.00095555256,0.00017109778,0.00058080564,0.0058327643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011034772,0.00012799172,0.00017151708,0.00017812212,0.00074439036,0.00085478084,0.00038628947,0.0005524752,0.00039863258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010391038,0.0020991024,0.45607284,0.0006335473,0.00087642163,0.0013882571,0.002508337,0.01693931,0.07006502,0.16412576,0.0038063086,0.27109405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003423954,0.0022878076,0.7816237,0.00009791367,0.0002877476,0.00049683446,0.0010964863,0.02084841,0.011099982,0.17448571,0.0072532687,0.0000797134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046199124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052869983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058327643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003411184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019300457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019512534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077765601","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.12.006","title":"Do women react differently to incentives? Evidence from experimental data and payroll records","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Incentive; Payroll; Productivity; Economics; Differential (mechanical device); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Accounting","score_opus":0.1282773261068302,"score_gpt":0.3974077183515616,"score_spread":0.26913039224473134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077765601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95803213,0.019379081,0.0017778958,0.0032149781,0.00025614802,0.00024458882,0.0026420911,0.000016659218,0.014436373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98246366,0.009703829,0.00074438384,0.001922578,0.000260162,0.0002788861,0.0019023832,0.000022740527,0.0027013896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872226,0.009548616,0.00064414594,0.0010397646,0.0011165119,0.00042840763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8156746,0.14052436,0.031762168,0.00762645,0.0036026742,0.0008097383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018293124,0.0006668761,0.001293142,0.00096847035,0.00045530268,0.0014144226,0.00102615,0.002017192,0.0113345375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09953495,0.00065376755,0.0008810532,0.0015512694,0.0020789753,0.00115737,0.0007602858,0.0008590332,0.0014755938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.061383612,0.006103042,0.67984545,0.00999631,0.011828952,0.0007694365,0.004500284,0.0023076108,0.005647013,0.008795234,0.017547388,0.1912757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004173758,0.005327212,0.948268,0.0012355082,0.004420531,0.00048478413,0.0018854017,0.0007905334,0.0025777488,0.00831073,0.022388631,0.00013717628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002777678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020947652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018293124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005670586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058306474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09674448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078104137","doi":"10.1007/s10683-012-9324-x","title":"Why do people tell the truth? Experimental evidence for pure lie aversion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vanier College; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Social psychology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08809393005055068,"score_gpt":0.3694782697816091,"score_spread":0.2813843397310584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078104137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909582,0.00020803219,0.0021321662,0.0006513539,0.000038405164,0.00004804782,0.00007036554,0.000016940347,0.00587647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998175,0.00010395374,0.0007859269,0.00025029198,0.000034979268,0.000049560058,0.000037115224,0.000006004375,0.00055710104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940975,0.004085647,0.0004654548,0.00046968734,0.00069849595,0.0001832272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87486994,0.09123293,0.02177531,0.008798575,0.0016873152,0.0016358519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106935315,0.0004209777,0.0005875998,0.00052013464,0.00046326173,0.0013164155,0.000371469,0.0014562357,0.008367462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05074363,0.00042582207,0.00024577125,0.00034465746,0.0019357925,0.0010283176,0.00085687946,0.0012173303,0.0007052413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.045904815,0.026580958,0.47953272,0.0036783824,0.0028396093,0.0014728396,0.013724448,0.006335925,0.15958944,0.09468757,0.007708331,0.15794493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00434195,0.02030201,0.73344916,0.00044985965,0.0009899494,0.002485195,0.0050409455,0.023657154,0.060327172,0.1335999,0.014996155,0.00036054902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017701989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017733901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106935315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018451361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020695517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056553483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079729086","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.001","title":"Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Sowing; Workforce; Labour economics; Economics; Tree planting; Agricultural economics; Business; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Agroforestry; Agronomy","score_opus":0.11697608678920877,"score_gpt":0.3320611405103499,"score_spread":0.21508505372114112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079729086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99816614,0.00008739449,0.00033988475,0.00022235516,0.000014553501,0.00002868523,0.000046871424,0.000009171813,0.0010850629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843496,0.000097126,0.00035198202,0.00013286038,0.00001551901,0.0000378052,0.0000433409,0.0000032223384,0.0008832155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819535,0.0011940368,0.00008828839,0.00017324547,0.00016371702,0.00018532384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9404266,0.043669596,0.00869671,0.0037419314,0.00038793017,0.0030772043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053267404,0.0006558798,0.0008744027,0.0005778364,0.00082511676,0.0021459053,0.00081166404,0.0022763016,0.00655991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020790428,0.00050372846,0.0003683424,0.0006202293,0.0019261487,0.00094913255,0.0010530805,0.0019120486,0.0006309815],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11288522,0.1649527,0.50534785,0.0011227863,0.0020392141,0.0009159353,0.00362841,0.014888282,0.05815328,0.024025992,0.0059570787,0.10608317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024615826,0.030916441,0.84426206,0.0001768155,0.0011132907,0.00034013164,0.0030286764,0.027981088,0.014526295,0.047794413,0.0049547325,0.0002903021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029281445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030125827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00655991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009525629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009662662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028170764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080057710","doi":"10.1007/s13209-011-0059-2","title":"Introducing managerial attention allocation in incentive contracts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SERIEs","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Moral hazard; Principal (computer security); Task (project management); Microeconomics; Benchmark (surveying); Production (economics); Public finance; Computer science; Scale (ratio); Empirical research; Economics; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0334704189792203,"score_gpt":0.29638267452152656,"score_spread":0.26291225554230624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080057710","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093398586,0.0021752187,0.7465698,0.011646061,0.00055811997,0.00034522347,0.0002586734,0.00019747265,0.14485079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91583776,0.00088465377,0.071352854,0.001104077,0.0006143089,0.000371675,0.00004155423,0.00005255016,0.009740574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337935,0.0039244755,0.00026691868,0.0006487141,0.0010549732,0.0007255138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826246,0.010928731,0.002787838,0.0017734761,0.0010965464,0.00078884704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007772545,0.0012176642,0.00090707507,0.0008293055,0.0011758226,0.0037132406,0.0021021722,0.0043280423,0.009428319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02847041,0.00079586415,0.0008225082,0.0010801217,0.0048192204,0.007168854,0.002996552,0.0038763909,0.00057329604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004357164,0.00006633574,0.0004282598,0.000070144466,0.000011587339,0.00007350972,0.00030386896,0.0102554755,0.00070913834,0.97916794,0.00053954264,0.008330692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011575333,0.00012480853,0.00084329804,0.00008972106,0.000022414271,0.00009364145,0.00013037666,0.05360903,0.00061905733,0.9328591,0.011451775,0.000041093128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015434303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008813517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009428319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003454571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027398055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041105688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083250081","doi":"10.1111/j.1911-3846.2006.tb00346.x","title":"Honesty in Accounting and Control: A Discussion of “The Effect of Information Systems on Honesty in Managerial Reporting: A Behavioral Perspective”*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Perspective (graphical); Accounting; Control (management); Psychology; Accounting information system; Business; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04270132143322662,"score_gpt":0.38239327575494747,"score_spread":0.33969195432172083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083250081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021856643,0.029862355,0.058942907,0.756246,0.003835729,0.00011182783,0.00010278951,0.000046272926,0.12899551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8636628,0.018102348,0.013402495,0.084549196,0.012014572,0.0003606842,0.000035179273,0.00005953333,0.0078133205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98365885,0.0116312625,0.0005420622,0.00092970306,0.0025478676,0.0006903115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532882,0.039484337,0.0027809176,0.0016093057,0.0024013794,0.00043592585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02273786,0.00055547385,0.0006472129,0.0013435014,0.0025539426,0.006865127,0.0029252642,0.010998073,0.0032417576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035396643,0.00032541878,0.0011517024,0.001943075,0.029526353,0.00994464,0.002443431,0.0071596624,0.00028260093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012604183,0.000014417743,0.000226515,0.00005085627,0.000010708003,0.000045054396,0.0009930421,0.00026989647,0.00004750345,0.99120027,0.0034567574,0.0036724824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027688595,0.00006098429,0.0014544914,0.00029414953,0.000019955924,0.00007013527,0.0009754359,0.0021275044,0.00031784133,0.9543685,0.040246136,0.000037240643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034355023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031149772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02273786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040220385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038107324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12025076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083299902","doi":"10.1509/jppm.25.1.117","title":"Dishonesty in Everyday Life and Its Policy Implications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; Honesty; Value (mathematics); Everyday life; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.044771794222986036,"score_gpt":0.3649536144742226,"score_spread":0.32018182025123654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083299902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17520864,0.02745541,0.0077495305,0.57645595,0.0013194999,0.000040081548,0.00022179243,0.00004161268,0.2115075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738771,0.011761222,0.0005797159,0.009201183,0.0008165653,0.00002249582,0.000022230111,0.000007671269,0.0037117791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969415,0.0017823685,0.00007130474,0.00031492522,0.0004184913,0.00047139017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982071,0.011906353,0.0027586243,0.00069056236,0.001125729,0.0014478004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031708435,0.0003410142,0.0003478336,0.0009033676,0.0032560935,0.005418912,0.0006902628,0.006403657,0.0070230826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013162235,0.00025616025,0.00028142807,0.0010999909,0.011530155,0.005085588,0.0020753092,0.0040894346,0.00051055104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007657969,0.00026396985,0.013140677,0.00017365039,0.000022067572,0.0008404111,0.003220223,0.0025656645,0.00034659755,0.9270971,0.014464914,0.03778828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034562345,0.00009996769,0.02317947,0.00049364805,0.00002313298,0.00060198834,0.009466783,0.002871259,0.00037158484,0.9184478,0.044336017,0.0000738351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009654608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011177831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009654608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035935207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026240516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02607292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083727721","doi":"10.1257/aer.104.3.1047","title":"Does Money Illusion Matter?: Comment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Illusion; Inertia; Set (abstract data type); Microeconomics; Task (project management); Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.019099378030133465,"score_gpt":0.33353096829239226,"score_spread":0.3144315902622588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083727721","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063448222,0.0025266712,0.0010436041,0.9737212,0.0049468502,0.00003554331,0.0009170715,0.000100023644,0.010364302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18331178,0.0038814691,0.0014169816,0.7853974,0.016687866,0.000120622106,0.00048700033,0.00008064806,0.008616315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379444,0.0014467034,0.00056219543,0.001950406,0.0019498313,0.00029642374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8611564,0.10869198,0.008120212,0.0067864857,0.013224458,0.0020204294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150730945,0.0005559564,0.0009016653,0.0007150689,0.0012285648,0.002181839,0.004755322,0.0103888,0.043862443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12515095,0.00025754143,0.0010352915,0.0012247167,0.005430298,0.009406407,0.0027813073,0.009505002,0.007989291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095787056,0.00013693247,0.013186085,0.0012088034,0.00019715003,0.0007821457,0.001936723,0.00046560212,0.00095280225,0.10184788,0.8470154,0.031312738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071177253,0.00038384108,0.04062854,0.0018379943,0.00030802342,0.0024059145,0.0076786634,0.0032568201,0.004177025,0.3743473,0.5639509,0.00031330436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006754279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035144764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043862443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017994145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002056242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14673448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084707106","doi":"10.2308/accr-50436","title":"Productivity-Target Difficulty, Target-Based Pay, and Outside-the-Box Thinking","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Task (project management); Production (economics); Control (management); Wage; Work (physics); Marketing; Business; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Engineering; Management; Economic growth","score_opus":0.026927381111610256,"score_gpt":0.3115919376023681,"score_spread":0.28466455649075784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084707106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97824895,0.00044131474,0.0046028364,0.00069326663,0.000029727826,0.00006262941,0.000039133403,0.00001411702,0.015868077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987093,0.00009314374,0.0006401068,0.00006915171,0.000016276525,0.00004016299,0.0000119012675,0.0000038938197,0.00041594988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949812,0.0032324032,0.0002043762,0.00041259523,0.0008796262,0.00028983268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9206335,0.059156436,0.012730512,0.004206887,0.0014704391,0.0018022486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093678925,0.00042896369,0.00063572143,0.0006913323,0.0004463794,0.0021449244,0.00071577856,0.0011058047,0.006387851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0458104,0.0002660887,0.00038669954,0.0006401772,0.002006077,0.0019333776,0.0012458473,0.0013490508,0.00033607584],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013468192,0.013281337,0.4420542,0.0019285458,0.0014823186,0.0005149078,0.0053587784,0.037014738,0.023740485,0.23445813,0.0033009597,0.22339745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011134116,0.003842153,0.8168112,0.00019769759,0.00036571515,0.00017516824,0.001934751,0.022296634,0.0044152937,0.1445611,0.004161511,0.00012536894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004906354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006302951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093678925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010456294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068483024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049542785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086094834","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2429862","title":"Cooperation Increases with the Benefit-to-Cost Ratio in One-Shot Prisoner's Dilemma Experiments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Dilemma; Psychology; Economics; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03863948595747183,"score_gpt":0.3183315656867345,"score_spread":0.27969207972926263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086094834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98134804,0.00030487156,0.010408967,0.00063662365,0.000030393896,0.000046124955,0.00004946834,0.00013530323,0.0070402524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966233,0.00010540873,0.0021899482,0.00011007115,0.000018618048,0.000042954616,0.000021804597,0.00002314114,0.0008647766],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957504,0.0026767508,0.0001999643,0.0005334024,0.0005120675,0.00032735415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9200909,0.06298719,0.008407904,0.004470978,0.0016214753,0.0024215572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006148771,0.0006587972,0.0012537673,0.0011050549,0.00053003925,0.0020420437,0.0007784124,0.002272096,0.003583681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03648498,0.0005567197,0.0005466437,0.00046324517,0.002320505,0.0027077598,0.0011031122,0.0021823612,0.00058539124],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0154950665,0.0066895103,0.06548699,0.0029070533,0.001693746,0.0028055077,0.00447275,0.09710354,0.47977507,0.17156816,0.0076350127,0.14436759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014305208,0.008285317,0.16418687,0.0002701064,0.0009812842,0.0034757627,0.0018879976,0.3032727,0.056556832,0.4565738,0.0025624903,0.00051634276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020376824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024175823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006148771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052359723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058185036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032518208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088036840","doi":"10.1016/j.adiac.2013.02.001","title":"The moderating effects of national culture on escalation of commitment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Accounting","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Uncertainty avoidance; Framing (construction); Individualism; Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; Escalation of commitment; Social psychology; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Collectivism; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.01253119223877723,"score_gpt":0.33795845781207257,"score_spread":0.3254272655732953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088036840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967996,0.000075663316,0.00012643507,0.00020002289,0.000012528583,0.0000072378193,0.00003387463,0.0000031206935,0.002741652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916816,0.00004663392,0.0001218952,0.000057037225,0.0000071091727,0.000009155996,0.0000337119,0.0000041542994,0.0005521772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977435,0.0014879118,0.000087512075,0.00022737212,0.00020186669,0.00025181414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645171,0.021570465,0.006311459,0.0035424272,0.0013103914,0.0027481497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036908519,0.00027708412,0.00028119638,0.00037080952,0.0009039251,0.0023414032,0.0005395894,0.0008748014,0.009459906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026781136,0.00030416928,0.00031011578,0.00059131405,0.00093086984,0.0010667213,0.0012899135,0.002182976,0.00056189013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035916336,0.0037389826,0.93466115,0.00010877532,0.0006498382,0.00020600551,0.004595618,0.0012497667,0.0053653363,0.009319019,0.000959829,0.035554133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059347974,0.00032615464,0.9925921,0.000027671213,0.00017485527,0.000050608523,0.0024507504,0.00090625946,0.0011857443,0.0016391408,0.0005647062,0.000022706456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005478674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008229658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009459906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000761905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010625892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03164655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088290411","doi":"10.1506/y6tg-1kq9-12gv-l5yy","title":"Sequential Solutions to Capacity‐Planning and Pricing Decisions*","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microeconomics; Product (mathematics); Plan (archaeology); Economics; Capacity planning; Operations management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.35913076003698324,"score_gpt":0.4656139651512774,"score_spread":0.10648320511429415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088290411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59374905,0.00045071886,0.37892413,0.002434873,0.00011215872,0.00035430203,0.0004249115,0.00033602098,0.023213757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964728,0.00015823715,0.032811157,0.00006870628,0.000020628971,0.00012786296,0.00009868073,0.000026016753,0.0019608291],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828327,0.00089792546,0.000085343636,0.000236546,0.00021584354,0.00028103986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897349,0.007565451,0.0013019026,0.0005033368,0.00045036405,0.00044406138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032108112,0.0010554584,0.0011732918,0.0006505719,0.0007055609,0.0015789488,0.0010118276,0.0018177918,0.0099687865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013194071,0.00088989554,0.00067684904,0.00089161686,0.0013037968,0.0022281576,0.0011492097,0.0017326633,0.00038002525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021157348,0.00013748916,0.00057827105,0.000055677505,0.000044614822,0.00006889529,0.000078671976,0.95529056,0.0006112427,0.033203702,0.0006812236,0.009038083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095529664,0.00008135868,0.00028330213,0.000009922344,0.000011248016,0.000015689904,0.000046555087,0.9220468,0.00036536716,0.07656804,0.00046374073,0.0000126332725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011195644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006837231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011195644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020288473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002894969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033348918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088358674","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2013.09.008","title":"Strategic learning in teams","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics","keywords":"Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Process management","score_opus":0.03294249389327887,"score_gpt":0.3037745731684385,"score_spread":0.2708320792751596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088358674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9232339,0.00026183456,0.040395517,0.001504745,0.00007453423,0.00006250338,0.000030470635,0.000039563507,0.034396935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613273,0.00008220606,0.0016606873,0.000044776913,0.00001497659,0.000033570534,0.000012334372,0.0000040395803,0.0020146442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980856,0.0013102156,0.00005224526,0.00016328257,0.00018920349,0.00019954276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98682004,0.010290634,0.0010281064,0.0006404397,0.00040068635,0.0008199814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034335551,0.0004247522,0.0005836049,0.00057910726,0.0008106051,0.0022446604,0.000601805,0.001281884,0.005148755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019402767,0.00024221852,0.00044558506,0.00044002978,0.0017560633,0.0021666836,0.0014883144,0.0012180442,0.00034764397],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077113457,0.0012968025,0.01991222,0.00020420799,0.00022583186,0.000258705,0.0032487256,0.1326477,0.0018512065,0.7573639,0.004031807,0.07818785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018358603,0.00025741226,0.0043331305,0.000028387418,0.000036968322,0.00005362914,0.0014025719,0.1086723,0.00041188102,0.8829144,0.0016868246,0.0000187423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014872624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012161244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005148755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006652799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009693312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018158615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090017401","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.014","title":"Do conservation auctions crowd out voluntary environmentally friendly activities?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Alberta Water Research Institute","keywords":"Common value auction; Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Turnover; Business; Public economics; Crowdsourcing; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Social preferences; Marketing; Environmental economics; Psychology; Political science; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.031094072854394302,"score_gpt":0.2907493542294987,"score_spread":0.2596552813751044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090017401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805397,0.00029696236,0.0013631462,0.0019293933,0.000040046165,0.000034173358,0.00005980522,0.000018696086,0.015718143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985306,0.00004986426,0.00020673049,0.00026315404,0.000016428612,0.000011032521,0.000019987376,0.0000055003297,0.00089652924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977817,0.0010854889,0.000092511444,0.00029197164,0.0003810466,0.00036726217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92784226,0.048174612,0.015965076,0.0046492754,0.0015843305,0.001784463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007266901,0.0004252979,0.000999366,0.0010196267,0.001018779,0.0034679687,0.0009203145,0.0034798326,0.012262533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038662907,0.00066891045,0.00043719538,0.0009108555,0.0033971,0.0040692873,0.0010681882,0.0011461223,0.0007646759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064453194,0.005014892,0.69217336,0.00057404826,0.0010870058,0.0009267585,0.00457991,0.019679284,0.007429703,0.14578165,0.010171203,0.106136926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007623164,0.00078305276,0.79451114,0.00014200315,0.00031741243,0.0005271566,0.014540297,0.041294813,0.0022866318,0.13584258,0.008827842,0.00016486358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047452403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008093232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012262533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012473108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095979025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04102224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090109262","doi":"10.1007/s10683-011-9291-7","title":"Market composition and experience in common-value auctions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Common value auction; Bidding; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.06591567223714201,"score_gpt":0.33944975647295456,"score_spread":0.27353408423581255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090109262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969259,0.000038321297,0.000439503,0.000016752932,0.0000023114117,0.0000053413337,0.000010481318,0.00000434114,0.0025571985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952495,0.000014643892,0.00012552748,0.000005091922,0.0000037699442,0.0000026258808,0.000015677944,0.000002615344,0.0003049895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987043,0.00047498968,0.000104128056,0.00014923625,0.0003818386,0.00018551861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98335636,0.0066649397,0.0053938897,0.0009326674,0.00077182555,0.0028803607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017801786,0.00019290319,0.00037497396,0.0005444566,0.00028622,0.001424903,0.00032142215,0.00030864013,0.0051098443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014859027,0.00020816593,0.0001880144,0.00028131114,0.00065858196,0.0012974914,0.0010446352,0.00036504638,0.0003510674],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028605566,0.0023003859,0.90907323,0.00012689648,0.0002685469,0.00081806746,0.0037423081,0.005425728,0.017341942,0.0066858917,0.0006373823,0.050718945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012068155,0.0016019654,0.97664684,0.000022638424,0.000063756546,0.0007826205,0.0020667093,0.008519853,0.0021925587,0.0064661494,0.0014523426,0.00006407797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004245787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004785996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051098443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019741528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001530817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017094135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091131086","doi":"10.1007/s10058-013-0145-y","title":"Partnership markets with adverse selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Adverse selection; Pooling; Stochastic game; Quality (philosophy); Sorting; Microeconomics; General partnership; Business; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economics; Industrial organization; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06120988842719486,"score_gpt":0.3394488128902857,"score_spread":0.27823892446309084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091131086","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05227965,0.1712622,0.59163,0.0482184,0.0034216787,0.0007678075,0.00050747837,0.00024385632,0.13166896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78370005,0.115988016,0.06954997,0.0074616,0.005123944,0.0013908566,0.00022821272,0.000069428446,0.016487857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849555,0.0120950015,0.0003576094,0.00074034464,0.0015026877,0.00034881855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9341066,0.05685199,0.0033436695,0.0035452282,0.0016323399,0.00052015204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017487537,0.00082315627,0.0024819921,0.0012921041,0.00088097254,0.0043727434,0.0017902931,0.0028510143,0.009672636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057400268,0.0005737514,0.0009333987,0.0018891547,0.007214025,0.0043444154,0.0019178687,0.0033085712,0.0007008714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008699725,0.000100929545,0.0008385267,0.00042404837,0.000100077086,0.000044410972,0.000058689384,0.0048542935,0.000112615235,0.9381294,0.00470479,0.050545253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011411908,0.000081399725,0.0008216687,0.00019450187,0.00006092274,0.00007843447,0.00004338334,0.008498851,0.00013602436,0.97824836,0.0117008975,0.000021382835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011273372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008894073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017487537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019262955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028812715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09248406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091359944","doi":"10.7202/039733ar","title":"Sur le nombre optimal d’organismes de bienfaisance","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043701874482248805,"score_gpt":0.29626942846831,"score_spread":0.2525675539860612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091359944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5274044,0.005010838,0.32423258,0.009766777,0.00031991236,0.00017806722,0.00028316217,0.00015750206,0.13264672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9007669,0.0016798617,0.07901707,0.00038087962,0.0001030095,0.00034118924,0.00013418005,0.00006196183,0.017514898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627656,0.0018267472,0.00014323658,0.0006944409,0.00060755026,0.00045137957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98641557,0.008585309,0.0014700302,0.0015379881,0.0011045906,0.00088648027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068363207,0.0007630487,0.0010589195,0.0015379552,0.0028491442,0.0052233455,0.0012292062,0.0025240558,0.013417848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023546048,0.00057185174,0.00087800773,0.0009580658,0.004624144,0.0067595756,0.0033135451,0.00267295,0.00085031084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026585,0.000090235844,0.0046840245,0.00023805992,0.000058231253,0.00007282351,0.00090389757,0.019189361,0.0038454372,0.9430232,0.0009121828,0.02671661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010836215,0.00034686737,0.009415713,0.00029748896,0.00007120484,0.00025736194,0.0021589473,0.044855796,0.0041577583,0.90803725,0.030218748,0.00007446507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018696132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002246188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013417848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033536828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025194534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044887125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091481956","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.422180","title":"Taking the Road Less Traveled: Does Conversation Eradicate Pernicious Cascades?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.026521808539509844,"score_gpt":0.30696520022530777,"score_spread":0.2804433916857979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091481956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7522334,0.0023166891,0.015175418,0.05133644,0.0010223947,0.00015947071,0.0002793325,0.00027208525,0.17720485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925863,0.00036912932,0.0012420196,0.0016162841,0.00023376159,0.000034192206,0.00002235713,0.000032116834,0.0038636527],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789494,0.0012706892,0.00004490732,0.00031278943,0.00016976363,0.00030692943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817997,0.01183161,0.002860403,0.0013921147,0.00062789576,0.0014881851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042160186,0.00044857763,0.00073559984,0.000436737,0.0018668576,0.00290007,0.0009919802,0.003749481,0.019164141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02949106,0.00026708274,0.00033796893,0.00032473757,0.0017226886,0.0047820797,0.0016207009,0.0027288806,0.0022744571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00858416,0.00798764,0.061525058,0.002099874,0.00079797476,0.0021429765,0.031421714,0.006467916,0.01765117,0.39402997,0.06703152,0.40026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023424241,0.0024072323,0.075359374,0.00046705286,0.0015075672,0.0009687015,0.024435868,0.033335533,0.007338868,0.7778457,0.073729634,0.00026207586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025053893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029561834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019164141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062055036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014494812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06411046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091826971","doi":"10.1007/s10101-012-0107-9","title":"Property rights out of anarchy? The Demsetz hypothesis in a game of conflict","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics of Governance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Property rights; Microeconomics; Social contract; Property (philosophy); Public property; Public finance; Nash equilibrium; Autocracy; Productivity; Game theory; Ultimatum game; Imperfect; Law and economics; Production (economics); Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.06358191498898413,"score_gpt":0.3016137245631529,"score_spread":0.23803180957416875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091826971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73652947,0.0010715473,0.05223209,0.031431023,0.00023329476,0.000096848846,0.00013423772,0.000051224462,0.17822027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964283,0.00020679476,0.0011713185,0.0003606976,0.000052747073,0.000037112553,0.000008676934,0.000007078287,0.0017272723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968066,0.0020711995,0.00008652776,0.00029069715,0.0003490842,0.00039587822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98115164,0.013620323,0.0023338865,0.0016463641,0.000386862,0.00086095027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007603631,0.00041113436,0.0012560275,0.0007730434,0.001568489,0.0051519214,0.0011382885,0.0033702767,0.011220063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0221444,0.0004468526,0.0006356285,0.0006589674,0.011378663,0.012092842,0.0021251582,0.0031204221,0.00040736297],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011015423,0.00006650081,0.0006754167,0.000033960045,0.000020278509,0.000059360307,0.00029907376,0.0020412884,0.00029908435,0.99308443,0.000717696,0.0025928447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084475876,0.000017534776,0.00054810604,0.000009874531,0.0000088381685,0.00002133393,0.00023484461,0.0038140954,0.000082410384,0.9944575,0.00071418297,0.000006805318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011848757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096699194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011220063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016067321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012778102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040212333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093424736","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2012.12.029","title":"Large distributional games with traits","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013638747406792561,"score_gpt":0.2523488917552714,"score_spread":0.23871014434847887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093424736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6342223,0.0003318026,0.32570177,0.006899729,0.00010719534,0.000118325355,0.0002338291,0.00034852594,0.032036565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98132795,0.00013262747,0.009522759,0.0002842991,0.00009071367,0.00011379932,0.00007890689,0.00004940439,0.008399648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969823,0.0018691642,0.00010217408,0.00033606426,0.00041458601,0.0002957241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95958155,0.033498425,0.002129762,0.0018521047,0.0008207374,0.002117506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003990233,0.00096863514,0.0018376128,0.0010028004,0.001204976,0.0037287218,0.0020556883,0.003319986,0.005704444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030045036,0.0007629338,0.0008472387,0.00062693347,0.0043459623,0.0072825765,0.0034695333,0.0031038206,0.00042895137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008666154,0.00006402831,0.00081487146,0.00005031092,0.000033441123,0.00020765145,0.0002357226,0.026285026,0.00092608115,0.966856,0.0012639936,0.003176113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004993823,0.000025668907,0.00037658686,0.0000067210544,0.000008492984,0.000082258404,0.000080361475,0.11981033,0.00011930351,0.8790853,0.00034101892,0.000013998051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001030981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010469595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005704444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001516192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006732473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021102607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093836392","doi":"10.1007/s10551-011-1000-0","title":"The Influence of Media Cue Multiplicity on Deceivers and Those Who Are Deceived","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Deception; Business ethics; Quality of Life Research; Social psychology; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Advertising; Business; Political science; Public relations; Communication","score_opus":0.1480429269039207,"score_gpt":0.3552668535922856,"score_spread":0.2072239266883649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093836392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98806924,0.0004668868,0.00021751257,0.0013038475,0.000037732938,0.000023141676,0.00006899386,0.0000047789895,0.009807974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990889,0.00010469131,0.000078304285,0.000093870374,0.000034032826,0.000009274645,0.00001649749,0.0000064280603,0.00056798564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929964,0.0045916378,0.00037372726,0.00054566166,0.00071822805,0.0007744751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7158119,0.21769889,0.043426026,0.008886258,0.0051991334,0.008977777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007819998,0.00039135118,0.0007884529,0.0015202805,0.0022935322,0.0060023526,0.00093980425,0.0022685803,0.016940298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17531006,0.00048863364,0.00034510464,0.0009629504,0.002652131,0.003713385,0.0031405957,0.0033378743,0.0007796201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02823894,0.00876297,0.8006102,0.00041124143,0.0010244163,0.0014235313,0.020136373,0.0018035463,0.008982215,0.02441019,0.0036635974,0.10053284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006988315,0.0020073603,0.93109417,0.0002709293,0.0008083493,0.001175357,0.025514046,0.0031527686,0.0036175654,0.02740542,0.004070404,0.0001848261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00418431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049320003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016940298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012921712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014872184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056670964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093864972","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2012.01552.x","title":"<scp>Finitely Repeated Voluntary Provision of a Public Good</scp>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Economics; Public good; Incentive; Microeconomics; Earnings; Finance","score_opus":0.059522998834072464,"score_gpt":0.3193186127786694,"score_spread":0.25979561394459694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093864972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8091878,0.00007863009,0.16222212,0.00079894735,0.000045722023,0.000120239514,0.0000600228,0.0002156229,0.02727099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424756,0.000010561924,0.004373041,0.000034583656,0.000007664969,0.000031417232,0.000008413491,0.000008360318,0.0012782831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765563,0.0014094283,0.00008055916,0.00028383124,0.00030138166,0.0002691895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870352,0.0068045817,0.0024464172,0.0023653917,0.0006720786,0.0006762376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025265696,0.00037548406,0.00046319506,0.00031163412,0.00059347565,0.0013657549,0.001377827,0.00094301027,0.004086744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123794,0.00025483847,0.00057918596,0.00019429353,0.0021813884,0.0014659363,0.0014000162,0.0009358725,0.0004660897],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016212143,0.0013820371,0.010849098,0.00040338785,0.00029058664,0.0015634483,0.0011062039,0.13032994,0.057275567,0.7467636,0.0030679246,0.04534698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024284648,0.0013195247,0.0069906176,0.000069489746,0.00010376965,0.0008812621,0.00049034774,0.55209976,0.014148103,0.41906428,0.0044974103,0.00009258088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010737926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063587964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004086744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091620855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070623803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013671458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094616653","doi":"10.1257/mic.6.4.293","title":"(Good and Bad) Reputation for a Servant of Two Masters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reputation; Homogeneous; Stochastic game; Advertising; Affect (linguistics); Servant; Focus (optics); Reputation management; Business; Microeconomics; Public relations; Psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Communication","score_opus":0.014728855281897543,"score_gpt":0.3219144629730786,"score_spread":0.30718560769118103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094616653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8525836,0.00041421567,0.05117445,0.0060036876,0.00015771756,0.00008747242,0.00031533136,0.00021605578,0.08904761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844748,0.000060443035,0.0017745217,0.00008219696,0.00003308422,0.000013066089,0.000028598086,0.000009483698,0.013523842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865437,0.0005732467,0.000054380664,0.00023801885,0.00015042903,0.00032949288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945774,0.0017918079,0.0014102971,0.000705679,0.000328542,0.0011863044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027284045,0.0004476219,0.00077787397,0.00051769713,0.001099107,0.0030973593,0.0010490738,0.002978892,0.016776294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01031189,0.00029560376,0.00057481934,0.000338522,0.0015839422,0.002247534,0.0015688617,0.0012594975,0.002018108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002830466,0.0006396582,0.056141376,0.00033534569,0.00028508296,0.003399205,0.0028744363,0.074801795,0.012646253,0.763076,0.020204306,0.0627661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005971491,0.0018625449,0.047210686,0.00016142125,0.00039639138,0.0030743878,0.0027311987,0.57864577,0.002797542,0.3424046,0.019847054,0.00027121947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033320484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003210123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016776294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002217093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073587993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056122303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095372111","doi":"10.5539/ijps.v2n1p44","title":"Cognitive Consistency in Purchase Behaviour: Theoretical &amp; Empirical Analyses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Psychological Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Consistency (knowledge bases); Covert; Psychology; Cognition; Perspective (graphical); Empirical research; Social psychology; Empirical evidence; Balance theory; Cognitive reframing; Cognitive style; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3068696957316362,"score_gpt":0.5917371512445959,"score_spread":0.2848674555129597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095372111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692756,0.0046249265,0.004828825,0.0011518386,0.000028434884,0.00017051106,0.00034555554,0.000015779977,0.01955858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964263,0.0012762236,0.0013591951,0.00008872071,0.000046440975,0.00007956044,0.0002354384,0.000007693116,0.0004803202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955095,0.0023862734,0.00024180739,0.00044019625,0.0011308878,0.0002913921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82442456,0.15813419,0.008475397,0.0033433782,0.004409191,0.001213331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00981166,0.00045650557,0.0006738359,0.006225657,0.001155275,0.0027082865,0.0017469343,0.0010067271,0.0120742945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064408556,0.00056295,0.00088166574,0.008784583,0.004125988,0.0035639566,0.0022893494,0.0024353073,0.0007175082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004910201,0.0022396857,0.85111964,0.0008387624,0.0005495151,0.0005293914,0.01233386,0.0027461792,0.0002011644,0.06618015,0.0013686891,0.061401967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000896745,0.00039641935,0.9042388,0.0005993116,0.00041974676,0.0006953993,0.027854027,0.018717326,0.00038897255,0.040983014,0.005556884,0.000060517188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010221407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064157676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120742945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021871554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019045912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0518896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095468191","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2013.10.002","title":"Underestimating our influence over others at work","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Psychology; Wrongdoing; Social psychology; Objectification; Industrial and organizational psychology; Cognitive bias; Face (sociological concept); Cognition; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11829946795814675,"score_gpt":0.45064006788851224,"score_spread":0.33234059993036547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095468191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479079,0.0008635891,0.009489746,0.00402003,0.000085251064,0.000027571301,0.00015384154,0.000019915076,0.03743219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972096,0.0002170121,0.00089476054,0.0006851436,0.000081686514,0.000020437781,0.00004280143,0.000009903822,0.00083865173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98844403,0.008778838,0.00033806195,0.00084462314,0.0012694781,0.00032493414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.782044,0.16297191,0.02562799,0.020312656,0.006023681,0.00301978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013285991,0.00042152047,0.00035422842,0.0009890967,0.0011143008,0.0026197135,0.00066114654,0.0013288492,0.0038249523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07880572,0.00034748425,0.0003498516,0.0008701825,0.0023881283,0.0022592668,0.0010358834,0.0018688393,0.00049482274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007156177,0.0010107434,0.8676608,0.00027774912,0.00085068267,0.00022054205,0.013706343,0.0030796863,0.005787467,0.038102888,0.002426466,0.06616096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008741941,0.0005647995,0.92193234,0.00018321107,0.0004857104,0.0005967922,0.009441489,0.0066036987,0.0066309236,0.04331612,0.010095924,0.00006155916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044461777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039099013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013285991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006823803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07026392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096261678","doi":"10.3386/w14764","title":"Groupthink: Collective Delusions in Organizations and Markets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.30913870582890146,"score_gpt":0.5554329453821987,"score_spread":0.2462942395532972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096261678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47061336,0.0016706081,0.2653624,0.034152895,0.00027631054,0.00029108438,0.00016971015,0.0002212869,0.22724229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847248,0.00035420162,0.00850431,0.0003655163,0.000059080965,0.00013306574,0.000024401552,0.000012425188,0.005822267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915946,0.00047064954,0.00001858388,0.00008080395,0.0001567101,0.000113787544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784315,0.0012264219,0.0003968954,0.00017013472,0.000131357,0.00023204814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016604996,0.0004348696,0.00022210611,0.00077897735,0.001415039,0.0031287381,0.0007686837,0.001391372,0.00642545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036966095,0.0001663865,0.0005753587,0.0004356316,0.0061768494,0.0046361545,0.0024225658,0.0018924373,0.00044082955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026518002,0.00008725395,0.0026693316,0.00003504598,0.000011252611,0.00024839086,0.0036510292,0.0047314423,0.00033970535,0.9777052,0.0016468992,0.008847899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029891104,0.00005639228,0.0018625283,0.00003873335,0.000009013295,0.00019705585,0.0022178625,0.025298867,0.0002064643,0.9607392,0.0093271695,0.000016786335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015978668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093906885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00642545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018826374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010591995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021495223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096292805","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1120.1544","title":"The Behavioralist Visits the Factory: Increasing Productivity Using Simple Framing Manipulations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sustenance; Incentive; Conditionality; Framing effect; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.10360800541626317,"score_gpt":0.39017823743856805,"score_spread":0.2865702320223049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096292805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902518,0.00007925957,0.003903796,0.00051341887,0.000049049577,0.00007777846,0.000038938753,0.0000381768,0.0050477358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936686,0.00010023142,0.0046580983,0.000291629,0.00004449711,0.00017264643,0.000021516922,0.000012150014,0.0010306019],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989617,0.000582446,0.000039713133,0.00021399994,0.00011521059,0.000087011555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945357,0.0030662639,0.0011688407,0.00074440433,0.00009752473,0.00038717984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001914243,0.0005627847,0.00038199936,0.00033134213,0.0004742113,0.0007777821,0.00056768593,0.00067325763,0.0048144585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058951303,0.00028430455,0.00028455458,0.00019552083,0.0010927442,0.0006218226,0.0007763681,0.00096513133,0.00023381681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019032406,0.034932822,0.056439284,0.0016854894,0.0006381034,0.0009970241,0.0074661593,0.010888798,0.5428205,0.051576547,0.0043666395,0.26915613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008697996,0.08424235,0.46595746,0.00043804175,0.0016823794,0.00085631973,0.006283509,0.073941275,0.20304468,0.1255803,0.02878157,0.00049411913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049986393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006092181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048144585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005348784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003979554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01610595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096549894","doi":"","title":"Eliminating Laboratory Asset Bubbles by Paying Interest on Cash","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Dividend; Economics; Value (mathematics); Interest rate; Cash; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Incentive; Present value; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05447201552955512,"score_gpt":0.2940361316361748,"score_spread":0.2395641161066197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096549894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96903616,0.00058138446,0.018849751,0.00060019916,0.00022666623,0.00034216914,0.0002524459,0.0006962455,0.009414989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697618,0.00042534704,0.018736862,0.0004511445,0.00013618733,0.0009583489,0.00032242874,0.00017112144,0.009036811],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999488,0.00012080132,0.000043003423,0.00012591119,0.00012380233,0.00009849836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976107,0.0009888492,0.00040862686,0.00058318296,0.00012281402,0.00028580806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010181599,0.0005773811,0.0007563795,0.00036400763,0.0002676726,0.0008808051,0.0007666657,0.00077842496,0.012044306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030569548,0.00030738593,0.00032460695,0.00020634357,0.0006448372,0.0009873431,0.0011231112,0.0011092066,0.0010917275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008842427,0.016156342,0.004504613,0.0010105955,0.00019853289,0.00032540067,0.0006541063,0.002858421,0.81712365,0.020543193,0.0035691732,0.124213494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056428355,0.04275286,0.026457565,0.00020422769,0.0006009305,0.0008147953,0.00039347628,0.03826376,0.7959887,0.044495407,0.04415448,0.00023087581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027120142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023975773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012044306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018903575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034981422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040292203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097968639","doi":"10.1177/1052562902238321","title":"The Role of Golem, Pygmalion, and Galatea Effects on Opportunistic Behavior in the Classroom","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior Teaching Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Opportunism; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Class (philosophy); Database transaction; Transaction cost; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Epistemology; Business; Law; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02582272871472761,"score_gpt":0.3121888695061382,"score_spread":0.2863661407914106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097968639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228357,0.00431933,0.0021773218,0.0024449201,0.000021402135,0.00003829001,0.00001989884,0.00002972211,0.06811338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997538,0.0010288522,0.0004084948,0.00011332198,0.000008917476,0.0000151912,0.0000034247269,0.000003937674,0.00087991485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978955,0.0013589482,0.000055983255,0.00019137957,0.00033517604,0.00016285943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843216,0.011501081,0.0020891263,0.0009842558,0.0005112101,0.0005927262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025553934,0.0002330676,0.00047677604,0.0011852222,0.001158802,0.0016990781,0.00042516663,0.0007615279,0.0038877456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008209915,0.00019686697,0.00028034512,0.00043291776,0.005788827,0.0015267491,0.0014803424,0.00084447983,0.00016604479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001062155,0.0032941203,0.19064952,0.0014186824,0.00027075358,0.0020519304,0.022955405,0.0016769526,0.012691581,0.44396517,0.0033111454,0.31665266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038603792,0.0016220711,0.7294819,0.0006713354,0.000550148,0.0021133895,0.019775778,0.0025702463,0.012423242,0.18552561,0.04474626,0.00013403551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001419001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028890192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038877456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011194535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001015507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0135143995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098364304","doi":"10.1177/1470594x10387260","title":"Trustworthiness is a social norm, but trusting is not","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Normative; Trustworthiness; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Norm of reciprocity; Salient; Dictator game; Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Express trust; Political science; Public relations; Social capital; Law","score_opus":0.13923733951375733,"score_gpt":0.32465067883424953,"score_spread":0.1854133393204922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098364304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77718854,0.0013986437,0.06124944,0.012733077,0.00055144663,0.00012393652,0.00033196487,0.00015445995,0.14626847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653447,0.00014770104,0.002095929,0.00024248564,0.0000654626,0.000024725914,0.00004033703,0.00001294253,0.00083583896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887494,0.0043354887,0.0012966334,0.0015506773,0.0035562094,0.000511626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94920236,0.014803334,0.015949247,0.008861767,0.0081135,0.0030698343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007836821,0.00027932887,0.0005679476,0.0008089515,0.0017164742,0.0032776995,0.0004590833,0.0008844593,0.0021235521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0332999,0.00020486952,0.00030311267,0.0008831902,0.0065596895,0.004216849,0.0014070785,0.0013824708,0.0002984452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064858363,0.0004668366,0.27991167,0.0012735672,0.000835346,0.0008665762,0.027935967,0.0034972948,0.014174447,0.47878692,0.0069712284,0.18463157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010268468,0.0009818231,0.38816917,0.00057102327,0.00030944488,0.0019218075,0.018366965,0.005917865,0.0059328657,0.51608104,0.061351392,0.0002938737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025278053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018706421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007836821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010176674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013238639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041445553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099087692","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.273661","title":"Simultaneous Signaling in Elimination Contests","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Signaling game; CONTEST; Benchmark (surveying); Private information retrieval; Incentive; Microeconomics; Economics; Valuation (finance); Incentive compatibility; Cheap talk; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06610217744000614,"score_gpt":0.3212713650432098,"score_spread":0.2551691876032037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099087692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8455058,0.0002331472,0.115059204,0.000981177,0.00005828258,0.00019209247,0.00015975405,0.00019000379,0.037620537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924117,0.000067875146,0.0037848873,0.00008397799,0.000026931439,0.00004911097,0.000048552887,0.000018186161,0.003508794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921605,0.0040961388,0.00028275905,0.000628263,0.0010110798,0.0018211858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753264,0.016095033,0.004236543,0.0018727629,0.0011425442,0.0013266106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005667997,0.00095837674,0.0015921162,0.0009579234,0.0012500332,0.0031590685,0.0016699902,0.0016721253,0.008628403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02247034,0.0007189668,0.0010056812,0.00066729955,0.002062406,0.0034795003,0.0019245818,0.0019866885,0.00087204267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051407227,0.0011725755,0.012997819,0.0005247336,0.00028269825,0.001405382,0.002040242,0.12362196,0.022116484,0.7662352,0.004930338,0.059531845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085157214,0.0010794806,0.008233492,0.000056737776,0.00018357795,0.00079552806,0.00084446504,0.50796217,0.00557294,0.46811286,0.006135727,0.00017143751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024557868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002210365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008628403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001464089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014409312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029975593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099434810","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0649","title":"Reorganizing the Boundaries of Trust: From Discrete Alternatives to Hybrid Forms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Reading; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Heuristic; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Point (geometry); Conjunction (astronomy); Information processing; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.04061044996700965,"score_gpt":0.3188282062494052,"score_spread":0.2782177562823956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099434810","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21669695,0.0015909758,0.7037606,0.0061490657,0.00022163664,0.00019965215,0.000091138536,0.00012252084,0.07116747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491452,0.00024824817,0.049182907,0.00017171641,0.000038128626,0.00012515398,0.000024896643,0.000021343292,0.0010424284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98603743,0.009760973,0.00059893256,0.0010060722,0.0021080212,0.00048862916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740835,0.017806208,0.0024133765,0.0033156436,0.0015302531,0.0008510475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00947318,0.0006815091,0.00084510003,0.0016895544,0.0014736889,0.0087004015,0.0014647933,0.0020887703,0.0049905498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043533918,0.00058744696,0.0010978945,0.0014117917,0.015577276,0.017568214,0.006230689,0.0037109125,0.00033252154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055206467,0.000020791638,0.00079696346,0.000059379407,0.000027614542,0.00006413328,0.0021095963,0.004791626,0.00031411168,0.9781211,0.00019555114,0.013443919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001237688,0.000025745792,0.0002331396,0.000021335587,0.000006790449,0.000039113318,0.00051991263,0.0092476625,0.000091793794,0.98861027,0.0011796117,0.000012294437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009804533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007119936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00947318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024249016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096630026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05009955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099522484","doi":"10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.0228a.x","title":"The Supply of Information by a Concerned Expert","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sobel operator; Preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Economics; Decision maker; Revealed preference; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Management science","score_opus":0.0181244914067537,"score_gpt":0.3079245688536715,"score_spread":0.28980007744691777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099522484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2830482,0.0056014233,0.20941901,0.13157146,0.0005664479,0.00018124793,0.0008381863,0.00026653794,0.36850742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740321,0.0020463543,0.00881246,0.0025944551,0.00048824926,0.000058157442,0.00010671043,0.000025702378,0.011835838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546057,0.0019686269,0.00033070968,0.00074935047,0.0011434718,0.00034719706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527294,0.033520114,0.005274681,0.0041321157,0.0031941512,0.0011494651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006811324,0.00035758407,0.0007808395,0.0014128125,0.0011554104,0.004796428,0.0010438309,0.006925787,0.014551688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05283243,0.0005307017,0.00041373755,0.0010072235,0.0017268164,0.008282961,0.001626851,0.002062721,0.002606658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063312444,0.000266011,0.02233199,0.0008718622,0.00024626128,0.0019002629,0.0021321173,0.011836496,0.0051983306,0.7956553,0.013356193,0.14557198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118551165,0.00018610686,0.0058852653,0.00028645433,0.00016907029,0.0018944142,0.0016107082,0.028823057,0.0036782345,0.91581917,0.041462563,0.00006644273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067673845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039006077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014551688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013517167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011700541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048680305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099871253","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1290039","title":"Motivating Altruism: A Field Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Donation; Altruism (biology); Privilege (computing); Blood donor; Affect (linguistics); Legislature; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Variation (astronomy); Business; Social psychology; Economics; Public economics; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Immunology","score_opus":0.03797252141371876,"score_gpt":0.33733445686438307,"score_spread":0.2993619354506643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099871253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997024,0.000026861773,0.0002978659,0.0001394289,0.000017863142,0.00016410011,0.000038012287,0.00000966844,0.0022822102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99252445,0.00009844059,0.0016466897,0.00033211443,0.00004701014,0.0005972766,0.000095133684,0.0000126808745,0.0046461904],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751186,0.00163583,0.00006555512,0.00033906483,0.00018085873,0.00026687415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683687,0.01965976,0.0018984225,0.003936017,0.0015832662,0.0045539355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074349116,0.0012795909,0.00091172766,0.0015177,0.0059170737,0.0019043393,0.001439089,0.0028642958,0.010459779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013919773,0.0009435226,0.00049182825,0.00074955606,0.003475939,0.0014566553,0.0016292529,0.0027879262,0.0016276846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025936991,0.49891984,0.22984041,0.0010134648,0.00025567625,0.0036035127,0.06686337,0.0024041731,0.041099656,0.01941717,0.011520512,0.09912521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010368484,0.17879666,0.6238928,0.0005039206,0.00055200787,0.004149522,0.10845977,0.0099229375,0.012604219,0.02384735,0.026418248,0.00048399542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026929022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004201424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010459779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010320324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015787813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039319992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100463164","doi":"10.19030/ajbe.v3i5.426","title":"The Ultimatum Game, Distribution Of Income And Re-Distributive Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Business Education (AJBE)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Distributive property; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Income distribution; Microeconomics; Inequality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009940775415803783,"score_gpt":0.33793743060835785,"score_spread":0.32799665519255405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100463164","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3150882,0.0013724794,0.41410527,0.009347767,0.0005572987,0.00043402883,0.00017530714,0.00007658858,0.2588431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96729803,0.0005378591,0.019966774,0.0009854871,0.000110566056,0.0002019861,0.000021822781,0.000024702404,0.0108526945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939115,0.0038109198,0.00019810747,0.0005351632,0.00088099885,0.0006633198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98793006,0.007841234,0.0017343399,0.0011280206,0.00070500246,0.00066146103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009071079,0.0012466047,0.0012822071,0.0007574571,0.0018930781,0.0043048398,0.002245093,0.004069629,0.0068635596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022562344,0.00046783526,0.00084587507,0.0009882782,0.005313256,0.007400183,0.0026358212,0.0047871433,0.00051028735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008313475,0.000067428206,0.0004051469,0.00003589911,0.000024091547,0.00007067805,0.00015231934,0.008808512,0.0005244335,0.9852586,0.00042733847,0.004142402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009093814,0.00009896286,0.00069743686,0.000026994865,0.000020635991,0.00010072618,0.00020734775,0.021825165,0.00040552934,0.972911,0.0035926867,0.000022609564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018869279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018257665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009071079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003419243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018984437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047973037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100668549","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2012.0124","title":"The economic approach to ‘theory of mind’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.23056770994414666,"score_gpt":0.38481628123264044,"score_spread":0.15424857128849379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100668549","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041242054,0.96571946,0.0066331755,0.009827774,0.00077170023,0.000009694726,0.00002479089,0.000018250254,0.016582843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018412773,0.97087985,0.002897555,0.0027523134,0.0016553268,0.00004303534,0.000044340115,0.000012458942,0.003302318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991066,0.00038329477,0.000048942093,0.0001168788,0.00028412126,0.00006011845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978818,0.0016308919,0.000104844316,0.000088052584,0.00023862626,0.000055727873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019383499,0.0010063214,0.0011754328,0.0030105896,0.0005866773,0.0019392043,0.0020503942,0.0031827257,0.0031592336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035984206,0.0003139997,0.00070553366,0.0040862877,0.005251456,0.0048975865,0.0011623213,0.003746618,0.0010937883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003598567,0.00004380928,0.0002863916,0.0062298393,0.00013719397,0.00018977762,0.00025801337,0.0022683903,0.00024741387,0.6319744,0.041102495,0.31722626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013198469,0.00003304863,0.0009427674,0.0024175353,0.000047959067,0.00058479176,0.00014489831,0.00073192304,0.00015446366,0.33072138,0.6641779,0.000030266045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026022666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020617172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00329579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00329579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023799378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023912787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101318390","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.986232","title":"Intentions, Insincerity, and Prosocial Behavior","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020496033256182922,"score_gpt":0.34087948990937716,"score_spread":0.32038345665319423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101318390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99060386,0.00010492957,0.0003016163,0.00024578473,0.000008737041,0.000011193426,0.000053026986,0.000005631318,0.008665243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800414,0.00009884673,0.0002696194,0.00005854967,0.000010818852,0.00001890442,0.00005871194,0.0000032868506,0.0014770593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914086,0.00046124513,0.00004841016,0.00008559953,0.00014436472,0.000119568365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820864,0.01059958,0.0040498353,0.0009361347,0.0004877627,0.0018403286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032773507,0.00045050986,0.00032308578,0.0008316483,0.0007703383,0.0023928701,0.0002840642,0.0013246464,0.00796857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015089995,0.0003999031,0.00037339996,0.0005904594,0.0012475033,0.0009119501,0.0010506315,0.001577061,0.00075507705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014330138,0.0029757044,0.9593142,0.000059875158,0.00019188704,0.00022092763,0.0015185126,0.0010687205,0.0014169943,0.009820406,0.00045908516,0.021520814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008072916,0.00077658606,0.9756034,0.000032990178,0.00015761294,0.00023863639,0.0019336973,0.004457556,0.00049244304,0.015570616,0.0006194393,0.000036178757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020180724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030309441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00796857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038131315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054227904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026657522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101848836","doi":"10.2308/jmar.2008.20.1.153","title":"Contracting Frame and Individual Behavior: Experimental Evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Framing (construction); Payment; Microeconomics; Framing effect; Affect (linguistics); Prospect theory; Economics; Business; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Finance; Psychology; Persuasion","score_opus":0.2856676557814522,"score_gpt":0.4767815742491348,"score_spread":0.1911139184676826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101848836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861551,0.00018708722,0.0020096225,0.00024855733,0.000059314574,0.00025261773,0.00014145159,0.000026022424,0.010920103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920672,0.00020714347,0.004654021,0.0003401281,0.00005416228,0.00061856065,0.00018702506,0.000024802623,0.001846879],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225074,0.0048479987,0.000500917,0.00093176565,0.0011731883,0.0002954289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89305854,0.07644607,0.016659008,0.00996626,0.0016873674,0.0021827265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011872119,0.0007445066,0.00077154173,0.00052056834,0.0009208864,0.0021662742,0.0013112794,0.0016138832,0.014621365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045699652,0.00062255235,0.00042005995,0.0004951202,0.0020583665,0.001596977,0.0013359765,0.001873068,0.0011565754],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09747709,0.25437513,0.23408298,0.0030006228,0.0023657174,0.00066678284,0.011311114,0.011281326,0.10840555,0.07640762,0.0075001325,0.19312595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02345996,0.12284335,0.60897344,0.0011008426,0.002411746,0.0010353479,0.004987622,0.05877315,0.051572606,0.10028403,0.023808993,0.0007489482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007481014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046993617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014621365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008190816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005513193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06278646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102123801","doi":"10.1002/cjas.182","title":"Human Resource Management Practices and the Importance of Managers' Perceptions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Business; Perception; Tourism; Marketing; Association (psychology); Resource (disambiguation); Human resource management; The Internet; Public relations; Management; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10478549184304504,"score_gpt":0.38815335186311767,"score_spread":0.28336786002007264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102123801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993558,0.0001756136,0.00042920263,0.00052071863,0.000010357573,0.0000106066445,0.000009562074,0.00000304436,0.005283068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997943,0.000027631948,0.000064016174,0.000026321793,0.0000041121702,0.000002516305,0.0000024092726,4.4163681e-7,0.00007823114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992735,0.0044273604,0.00034170857,0.00033193786,0.0016598778,0.00050415954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9319641,0.042876024,0.014920207,0.0018559864,0.0047134017,0.0036702687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007933767,0.00018691635,0.00016747587,0.0010271036,0.0007928952,0.002739554,0.0003200797,0.00045203872,0.0017583618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044287328,0.0001589501,0.00013214073,0.0006214153,0.0019389145,0.0010496735,0.0009069571,0.00078854384,0.00018539077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033204065,0.000812336,0.82222414,0.00022525123,0.00018922615,0.00050968473,0.094668284,0.0011483076,0.0035203954,0.004231543,0.0010060807,0.071132705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033424367,0.0005086409,0.9038225,0.000104090235,0.000034272034,0.00024104227,0.08635296,0.0016145145,0.0008928845,0.0039354134,0.002399407,0.00006080094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002402669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024176317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007933767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086452503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007415037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041958272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102177865","doi":"10.5555/1838206.1838528","title":"Coalition detection and identification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Computer science; Population; Internet privacy; Public relations; Data science; Computer security; Knowledge management; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07904217333949029,"score_gpt":0.3523602975403669,"score_spread":0.27331812420087664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102177865","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01604386,0.0011300883,0.9715646,0.0015269694,0.00021909371,0.00022731206,0.00021953126,0.00043831137,0.008630357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3737678,0.0013207262,0.6075023,0.0004491814,0.00030452554,0.00039562015,0.0009453128,0.0002102552,0.015104265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934002,0.0025018733,0.00030050767,0.0016967622,0.0016103588,0.0004902868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748437,0.015137023,0.0019573702,0.0046111937,0.0027317319,0.00071903627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007742876,0.0009770688,0.0020930206,0.0044830805,0.0022673286,0.004161078,0.0033713565,0.0026841736,0.006105537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045490462,0.00090845075,0.0017680578,0.002906123,0.0034017814,0.0058661783,0.0061635445,0.0030964923,0.0021948018],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023519639,0.00025867164,0.012797338,0.00041387798,0.00022762582,0.00026151518,0.0010377045,0.068102114,0.0043866215,0.3343645,0.01581169,0.562103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037830305,0.00009432791,0.0031288993,0.000114196235,0.00004875059,0.00060426455,0.00063890597,0.62644064,0.005764567,0.34243828,0.020614127,0.00007516469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036513016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025751696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007742876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022797242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023734088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04094875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103226802","doi":"10.1109/hicss.2013.489","title":"Social Identity and Reciprocity in Online Gift Giving Networks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Internet privacy; Identity (music); The Internet; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Collective identity; Private information retrieval; Advertising; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Psychology; Computer security; Business; Aesthetics; Political science","score_opus":0.06016952030276214,"score_gpt":0.3757438256168819,"score_spread":0.3155743053141198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103226802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98590314,0.00012290338,0.004340458,0.00024142915,0.000008314888,0.0000251881,0.000018999943,0.000011201087,0.009328312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992719,0.000036915837,0.00041971248,0.000011047093,0.0000035786932,0.000010996639,0.0000057602524,0.0000016972767,0.00023832895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947547,0.003909793,0.00017692722,0.00036768345,0.0004844716,0.00030656205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97242546,0.017062757,0.006094173,0.0022653197,0.0009250999,0.0012272793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065354216,0.00025494248,0.0003910409,0.000985318,0.0013889372,0.0022249424,0.00038991653,0.000790073,0.0030121803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036336645,0.00023560305,0.00024958779,0.00052370876,0.0029351695,0.0027067878,0.002222874,0.0006427728,0.00030514493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034161038,0.0022598908,0.40951714,0.0006880978,0.00034929093,0.0016580713,0.040674813,0.02702276,0.017908271,0.32675108,0.001813025,0.16794142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005185847,0.002124768,0.42944735,0.0002810985,0.0004604652,0.0021300185,0.026932096,0.086481884,0.00769139,0.43131053,0.012329951,0.0002918074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086666783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006235945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065354216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007346226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041106757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034563065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103998122","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2011.0367","title":"Shame and honour drive cooperation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biology Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Shame; Tragedy of the commons; Biology; Antithesis; Test (biology); Public good; Commons; Social psychology; Economics; Law; Psychology; Ecology; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.05810618144089682,"score_gpt":0.31094831075147816,"score_spread":0.25284212931058136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103998122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98989886,0.000060644277,0.0009937925,0.00056085,0.000014684008,0.000013055745,0.000009098451,0.0000062646805,0.008442761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999047,0.000027840513,0.0003483139,0.00010301683,0.000004971874,0.0000081987355,0.000003540142,0.0000012584974,0.00045591776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981298,0.0011373063,0.00004471334,0.00016397564,0.00031335815,0.00021080949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98766464,0.005766586,0.0034937642,0.0012679123,0.0003304536,0.0014766044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026440874,0.0002673102,0.0003220184,0.00036860158,0.0007053216,0.0014981227,0.00031447125,0.0014739106,0.005251062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01053016,0.0002817046,0.00026556608,0.00011959321,0.0024888464,0.000973803,0.001812759,0.000979963,0.00035412493],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0082672015,0.0054445593,0.31201494,0.0012420586,0.00066407287,0.0031858282,0.014752128,0.012807365,0.30936372,0.20786524,0.0027099818,0.12168281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010429994,0.009989159,0.5359228,0.00019891465,0.0003591236,0.0032836746,0.012872874,0.03299923,0.035327878,0.3567262,0.010968333,0.000308882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027476047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029224975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005251062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033487537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042457852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017566502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106086532","doi":"10.1023/b:exec.0000040560.94572.60","title":"Individual Decision Making in a Negative Externality Experiment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Maximization; Preference; Nash equilibrium; Stochastic game; Econometrics; Externality; Economics; Simple (philosophy); Best response; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.052089257703316454,"score_gpt":0.3757524417612183,"score_spread":0.32366318405790184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106086532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99677664,0.000012412722,0.00092831533,0.000070386064,0.00002337678,0.00008227795,0.000039853854,0.000013658605,0.0020530096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946989,0.00003625134,0.0025485216,0.00015309807,0.000025244695,0.00024593496,0.000067697685,0.000011240899,0.0022131489],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757093,0.0015091323,0.00013512741,0.00029302793,0.00035603502,0.00013573303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912855,0.0056645186,0.0011565246,0.0010796806,0.00025397603,0.00055981136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044869534,0.0005235271,0.00075558596,0.00027626165,0.00053221843,0.0012607324,0.0005088533,0.00091283984,0.0045764223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009874642,0.00025869487,0.00018726778,0.00022134757,0.0009581174,0.00040532314,0.000626367,0.0011015261,0.00049202965],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.114481986,0.0994868,0.06959826,0.0010013812,0.0008982643,0.0013349985,0.0073921876,0.025909677,0.496565,0.04452126,0.0053486433,0.13346155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023230877,0.26071516,0.22470254,0.00029655313,0.00096716074,0.0014399498,0.0031561337,0.13934287,0.189454,0.12674884,0.029226799,0.00071904954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023582959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018016004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045764223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032869735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025724302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023729563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107498061","doi":"","title":"MALE-FEMALE PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENTIALS: THE ROLE OF ABILITY AND INCENTIVES ⁄","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Université Laval","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Welfare economics; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.019885438965694304,"score_gpt":0.2683721530213151,"score_spread":0.2484867140556208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107498061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776194,0.00027405642,0.0038437843,0.0005964889,0.000020225669,0.00006247777,0.0002831418,0.00002225312,0.017278103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99126667,0.00009135494,0.0005513978,0.0000491043,0.00001012094,0.000029290715,0.000058265883,0.000005052911,0.007938807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990388,0.00031089067,0.000040073992,0.00020515878,0.00019961773,0.00020557908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99135625,0.0053555546,0.0014113048,0.0007185422,0.00039141605,0.0007669765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026980797,0.0003284875,0.0004452717,0.0006528616,0.0005284323,0.0016950261,0.000436605,0.00072595984,0.01970677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009669248,0.00021578169,0.0004532406,0.00056005194,0.0010805529,0.00067204214,0.00086323963,0.00062883674,0.0011093065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014199775,0.0006298658,0.82265526,0.00032131106,0.0003198541,0.0008981106,0.0062486916,0.008249437,0.024634007,0.044697255,0.0014632688,0.088462934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054699165,0.00042333046,0.974146,0.000032010674,0.000060824135,0.0001568094,0.0018223624,0.0043457444,0.0018197487,0.011656965,0.0054397886,0.000041768548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006602482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006152444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01970677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011743931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006440342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06592566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108479509","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.009","title":"Merit pay and wage compression with productivity differences and uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Wage; Economics; Aptitude; Imperfect; Efficiency wage; Labour economics; Test (biology); Perception; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04166463355544299,"score_gpt":0.3040148349133315,"score_spread":0.2623502013578885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108479509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944036,0.00016171575,0.0011726381,0.00046058846,0.000019448866,0.000010369305,0.000037819034,0.000009236857,0.0037246149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911696,0.000025984298,0.00015094833,0.000025748177,0.000026120053,0.000004175304,0.00001462544,0.0000033789142,0.0006320677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983809,0.0005520266,0.000107948836,0.00023098766,0.00039574786,0.00033238664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9056033,0.07937898,0.00765195,0.003914583,0.0011361922,0.0023149105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004311428,0.000339229,0.00078862166,0.00074120384,0.00062854553,0.0035567735,0.00078771054,0.0020933135,0.009475892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06683757,0.00059543684,0.00042488784,0.0007704227,0.0020874685,0.0025049532,0.0015095817,0.0024028246,0.00040364006],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010800106,0.005069072,0.67466664,0.00031044427,0.0007090192,0.003468156,0.00622914,0.057196975,0.014522038,0.13088574,0.002394749,0.0937479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004522301,0.0008939234,0.6958727,0.00004105214,0.00030963513,0.001059789,0.002691377,0.053703245,0.0018829594,0.24211353,0.00083754945,0.00014198967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009303901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058181456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009475892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082612847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058971305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031700015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108509794","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00422.x","title":"NON‐MONETARY INCENTIVES AND OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOR: EVIDENCE FROM A LABORATORY PUBLIC GOOD GAME","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Public good; Economics; Free riding; Nash equilibrium; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Public goods game; Public economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12250454600187691,"score_gpt":0.35822583553702353,"score_spread":0.23572128953514662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108509794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99285626,0.00009779686,0.002294208,0.00028431608,0.000013546313,0.00008333668,0.00009752472,0.000026457621,0.0042465692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968598,0.00009847273,0.0016703111,0.00015210372,0.000013924483,0.00016277655,0.000095430485,0.0000094276,0.0009377056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579394,0.00322227,0.00016670556,0.00024374892,0.00039803534,0.00017536862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8993492,0.07613879,0.015087081,0.0065628076,0.0010872383,0.0017747799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056301104,0.0005361282,0.0007188394,0.00060514815,0.0005966745,0.0013118777,0.00091003266,0.0010681521,0.0039181462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033071667,0.0003441095,0.00034364138,0.00036322718,0.0021165602,0.0010139332,0.00088910357,0.0011855339,0.00043936603],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036411617,0.120373346,0.3393857,0.0025083816,0.0026087794,0.0023819979,0.006449255,0.0649881,0.09792824,0.10383981,0.023676075,0.1994488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014853268,0.054173995,0.4645236,0.0004098497,0.00089723076,0.0020117725,0.0052902023,0.26268122,0.047434907,0.122952074,0.024090026,0.000681868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017724759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017463289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056301104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078618305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005655624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029775202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109160078","doi":"10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00170-0","title":"Contingent social utility in the prisoners’ dilemma","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Dilemma; Economics; Social dilemma; Superrationality; Microeconomics; Public economics; Positive economics; Game theory; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05316950143961248,"score_gpt":0.34107859109735916,"score_spread":0.2879090896577467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109160078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8774369,0.000721458,0.07229459,0.0036086456,0.00011891752,0.00013317507,0.00012351641,0.0000488003,0.045513947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332523,0.00017342906,0.0036469,0.000046700636,0.00002707046,0.00004546646,0.000015917209,0.000010941575,0.002708394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660254,0.0025643683,0.00011120278,0.00017930203,0.00027933667,0.00026328937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791014,0.017620346,0.000972821,0.00089020707,0.00053094147,0.00088424527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007147481,0.00073943974,0.0014182883,0.00084823027,0.0011154765,0.0034945686,0.0012841186,0.0023023917,0.006071983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026247548,0.0007744709,0.00060034153,0.00053720566,0.0035265605,0.005793632,0.0016889009,0.0021613962,0.0002405846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003665972,0.00027669492,0.0015794158,0.00009187824,0.00006446237,0.00026737875,0.00052522717,0.037051164,0.0007079786,0.9497848,0.0009012023,0.00838306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100676545,0.00008701552,0.0013961714,0.000020900921,0.0000239463,0.00009445148,0.00020111963,0.075265996,0.00014161227,0.9221621,0.0004838688,0.00002217877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013251007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092847156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007147481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022487822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001380444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037799895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109322359","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00306.x","title":"WELL‐INFORMED INTERMEDIARIES IN STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Intermediary; Incentive; Cheap talk; Strategic communication; Decision maker; Microeconomics; Distortion (music); Economics; Action (physics); Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Marketing; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06813251749240747,"score_gpt":0.3758682359320779,"score_spread":0.30773571843967046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109322359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3832344,0.008525879,0.21478805,0.038593285,0.00045867058,0.00053305406,0.00040677795,0.0002695709,0.3531903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816077,0.0021593892,0.0075018993,0.0004952876,0.0001632267,0.0001250481,0.00003525217,0.000016712418,0.007895445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951356,0.0034039065,0.00020895817,0.00038453416,0.00047161808,0.000395417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96396375,0.026026856,0.0061626043,0.0018811174,0.0010658276,0.0008999119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00870635,0.0008278389,0.0007599656,0.0013832868,0.0020950832,0.007121021,0.0008922372,0.0050599864,0.015289057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02604954,0.0008496653,0.00048588266,0.0017440636,0.0065764873,0.0088510355,0.0033801044,0.0030947265,0.0017298588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011823056,0.000037180263,0.001343021,0.00011881141,0.000027932056,0.00021420611,0.0007526585,0.007012227,0.00047174832,0.98188925,0.0009937685,0.0070209834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082001534,0.00005219159,0.0006623711,0.000073772426,0.000035007743,0.00011805597,0.0004453285,0.0131603535,0.00033330655,0.9797253,0.0052886093,0.000023724502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014320211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011052623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015289057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025823016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002154895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051147044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109357873","doi":"10.3386/w21695","title":"Overconfidence And Preferences For Competition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Competition (biology); Overconfidence effect; Trait; Economics; Demographic economics; Compensation (psychology); Graduation (instrument); Labour economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.6309883140900789,"score_gpt":0.6065572024868817,"score_spread":0.02443111160319722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109357873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99842036,0.000067860296,0.00007515412,0.00008532068,0.0000034242278,0.0000025830893,0.000044311808,9.226157e-7,0.0013000858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937063,0.000039470888,0.00006789709,0.00004481852,0.0000081990775,0.0000040944533,0.0000591288,6.88267e-7,0.00040510108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931884,0.00026620453,0.00004192579,0.000090414294,0.00016640934,0.00011622774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98314613,0.0040007886,0.008938197,0.00095510855,0.00056211423,0.002397716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014697781,0.00024576727,0.00029673747,0.0007488896,0.0005196569,0.0013901012,0.00029401266,0.00042291186,0.0049351254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007826442,0.00015271823,0.00019356646,0.0005336748,0.000583442,0.00047991466,0.00059264275,0.0008162659,0.00037666247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023944645,0.0005528409,0.98810405,0.000017112341,0.00005896092,0.00008578403,0.0008206772,0.000090439724,0.0008052127,0.000699147,0.00024681108,0.0082796505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015501935,0.00019072555,0.9966642,0.0000110221945,0.00001691835,0.00013213832,0.0011215631,0.00039901232,0.00016300075,0.0010060163,0.0002710369,0.000008832333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027021978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042595128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049351254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003369724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023661743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016509593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109642354","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0157-4","title":"Sabotaging Potential Rivals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"CONTEST; Public finance; Economics; Microeconomics; International political economy; Mathematical economics; Political science; Law; Macroeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.016029290983874855,"score_gpt":0.3097917313304424,"score_spread":0.29376244034656757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109642354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94941247,0.00023208454,0.009456659,0.0009683996,0.000066120694,0.00013975767,0.000060955834,0.000059159072,0.0396043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602157,0.000043282507,0.00096416526,0.000093134695,0.000008129937,0.000044750446,0.000009344194,0.000006697741,0.0028090766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964728,0.0020032178,0.00014825353,0.00038232282,0.0005129981,0.0004803909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96749943,0.021274203,0.0026748371,0.006304662,0.00088239374,0.0013643882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005638951,0.00081497565,0.0020805805,0.00079205894,0.0012780464,0.003867368,0.0013299747,0.0034057542,0.013949098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031731736,0.00060453074,0.00067643437,0.00085119205,0.0030441468,0.0027419913,0.0027605204,0.002550278,0.0008474959],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007296075,0.0033958391,0.02389496,0.00087096903,0.00034890213,0.00086553756,0.0031212487,0.04543905,0.023030382,0.8032622,0.003360009,0.08511492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012758095,0.0027843423,0.010165342,0.00010837391,0.00019703679,0.00067845505,0.00290095,0.13838789,0.006288561,0.82925504,0.007846527,0.00011166403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093235786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012707332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013949098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014373898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017376487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046664357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110066373","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1402963","title":"Moral Bias in Large Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Positive economics; Political science; Econometrics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04936023364340055,"score_gpt":0.36861033783634395,"score_spread":0.3192501041929434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110066373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439208,0.0018879368,0.010842594,0.0037797408,0.00030962276,0.00015010177,0.00012449158,0.000070060305,0.03891468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676347,0.00037875338,0.0012277614,0.000374137,0.00016928563,0.00003109982,0.000033406748,0.000019388777,0.0010025966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904795,0.0065117893,0.00031183328,0.0007488422,0.0014081182,0.0005398679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7030141,0.25168023,0.02174848,0.015544346,0.0055237827,0.0024891135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024147242,0.00041007163,0.0010405519,0.0007672708,0.0012622278,0.0027921572,0.0010354108,0.0020672842,0.015702942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14940232,0.00042349278,0.00036979758,0.0008610754,0.004203441,0.0022105733,0.000996116,0.0026520302,0.0013324122],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015277431,0.009693378,0.23111194,0.0029437728,0.0016837994,0.00077690545,0.0063327444,0.019836292,0.026470384,0.3700661,0.021717956,0.29408935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040725493,0.003420153,0.28356832,0.00030283036,0.00085733633,0.00061545346,0.0023792118,0.042656016,0.010400602,0.6362677,0.0152391,0.00022069797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014461612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016109286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024147242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009593935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001127963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12770432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110561011","doi":"10.5167/uzh-51763","title":"Do groups fall prey to the winner's curse?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Curse; Winner's curse; Negotiation; Benchmark (surveying); Peer pressure; Psychology; Isolation (microbiology); Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.02634804641505426,"score_gpt":0.28000338180795514,"score_spread":0.25365533539290086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110561011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88883126,0.001114937,0.012015051,0.02780878,0.00042376047,0.00019702097,0.00015512224,0.00018952636,0.069264606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852099,0.00026840094,0.0027019884,0.004115801,0.000107054424,0.000094997944,0.000051532046,0.00010310071,0.007347148],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455464,0.002390863,0.00018924728,0.0009523415,0.0011863809,0.00072653394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97075516,0.011455838,0.0073097367,0.0047149076,0.0018687067,0.0038955808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01698191,0.0005990664,0.0013936827,0.0012737378,0.00272831,0.0040546325,0.0013828843,0.003931187,0.017141463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05353514,0.00047858048,0.00044997872,0.0008449962,0.0045664734,0.0054112636,0.0027580145,0.0016078508,0.0036246586],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004477028,0.0027122167,0.33003893,0.0012636674,0.0015744121,0.0009758348,0.017367318,0.0035986109,0.017331325,0.19117661,0.04979347,0.3796906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014608576,0.0034487469,0.28273615,0.0004497975,0.0005751012,0.00067093625,0.025474383,0.012059083,0.008987349,0.5922317,0.071668305,0.00023771345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026704979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00445087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017141463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009211172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001406732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089810014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111660538","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00391.x","title":"THE IMPACT OF ENTITLEMENTS AND EQUITY ON COOPERATIVE BARGAINING: AN EXPERIMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Entitlement (fair division); Negotiation; Bargaining problem; Economics; Equity (law); Outcome (game theory); Arbitration; Pareto principle; Microeconomics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.22314726856148068,"score_gpt":0.4572766982725453,"score_spread":0.23412942971106462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111660538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98379403,0.00005727604,0.0024123015,0.0005773162,0.000120522214,0.0007937546,0.00015162716,0.00003252994,0.012060599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811917,0.00011356963,0.0075654807,0.00093972986,0.00014826942,0.002605983,0.00014298488,0.000027327087,0.0072649806],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960989,0.001839387,0.00024112497,0.0006923401,0.00073979876,0.00038847094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670106,0.025567349,0.0020387764,0.003161484,0.00048337592,0.0017384042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008259582,0.00108812,0.0011293219,0.00038581967,0.0022876705,0.002313601,0.0017459798,0.003072726,0.020277698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144723095,0.00063717697,0.0006938904,0.00062907295,0.0032758787,0.0026036792,0.0025981402,0.0039342465,0.0014768027],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14843756,0.4142889,0.02091681,0.0017252333,0.0007557434,0.001851365,0.016347269,0.010127981,0.15109712,0.12480017,0.011657557,0.0979943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.10824761,0.37689388,0.06446866,0.0003759965,0.0012353342,0.0012915403,0.0071718283,0.0689362,0.056426454,0.2797179,0.03460235,0.00063217327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056151004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005121253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020277698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069070864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012451308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06783569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111925963","doi":"10.3390/g2030277","title":"Voluntary versus Enforced Team Effort","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Incentive; Business; Turnover; Microeconomics; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.07296792968644603,"score_gpt":0.32876823183456316,"score_spread":0.2558003021481171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111925963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61795515,0.0007497446,0.23615366,0.005219852,0.0002982173,0.0005199995,0.0010059037,0.00024147792,0.13785595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787846,0.00015039498,0.0065945517,0.00012962756,0.00004075755,0.00017079894,0.000086841035,0.0000136833505,0.014028854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774146,0.0011366676,0.00008200498,0.0003929222,0.00022577873,0.0004212691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535745,0.0018834554,0.0009869033,0.0006866714,0.00029354473,0.00079192966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025326048,0.0008765369,0.0009567404,0.0004928358,0.0007099938,0.003059486,0.0025689516,0.0031609146,0.012830909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008664608,0.00047168107,0.00071158115,0.00041871407,0.0016945541,0.00300472,0.0018265193,0.0016660682,0.0010637951],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008951536,0.0006290748,0.0039757993,0.00021386727,0.00013815198,0.00078014156,0.0005286198,0.27662084,0.0024944267,0.6901921,0.0035546375,0.019977158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008586846,0.0008209687,0.0025889727,0.00010044436,0.00010765116,0.0002838062,0.00040328185,0.6899854,0.0005252479,0.29738024,0.0068652458,0.00008011636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031450642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022475028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012830909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014635203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012795231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04292369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112375070","doi":"10.1177/0956797609357749","title":"Medium of Exchange Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medium of exchange; Value (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Cash; Unit (ring theory); Face (sociological concept); Unit of account; Face value; Limited resources; Psychology; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Monetary economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.06919331804739795,"score_gpt":0.43332054623924715,"score_spread":0.3641272281918492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112375070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4183976,0.00450237,0.02787265,0.025624583,0.0016979643,0.00011641875,0.00041896504,0.00017598583,0.5211935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843619,0.0005804542,0.0010326171,0.00074600347,0.0002931022,0.000021566057,0.000054309898,0.000057673373,0.012852396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964784,0.0015812471,0.00016855959,0.0005094357,0.00075524434,0.0005071283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97151405,0.01807738,0.0037058853,0.0030108872,0.0012181982,0.0024735334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042802156,0.0003947112,0.00060610403,0.0008645506,0.0021413022,0.008220905,0.00075165223,0.00171304,0.050266333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035573643,0.00025024402,0.00040728142,0.00077263796,0.0031278415,0.010354515,0.0030001,0.0024066863,0.0022894135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009237583,0.0003376278,0.0553797,0.00041587092,0.00028933946,0.00066299754,0.008759529,0.0009729701,0.0029120108,0.8604479,0.009451901,0.05944633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022916075,0.00042853388,0.070726514,0.00053960766,0.00035794266,0.001506515,0.010563188,0.0023054932,0.0022665,0.7925335,0.11842652,0.0001165064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007839855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069164333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050266333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010418281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010324055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16815764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113840499","doi":"10.1506/q69y-hlqf-d134-wgu7","title":"Production Externalities, Congruity of Aggregate Signals, and Optimal Task Assignments*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Microeconomics; Imperfect; Intuition; Economics; Incentive; Task (project management); Aggregate (composite); Production (economics); Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.12373093889696365,"score_gpt":0.4085521763841956,"score_spread":0.284821237487232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113840499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75256675,0.00039481866,0.20823981,0.0016921257,0.000055937468,0.00013760348,0.00018019335,0.0001019511,0.03663077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945933,0.00005802384,0.004598272,0.00004102462,0.000013017216,0.000035218753,0.000027871809,0.0000072243347,0.00062598166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998125,0.0009065156,0.00011114368,0.00030976557,0.00028044728,0.00026708274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864753,0.0073403507,0.0033306319,0.0012050895,0.00076526473,0.00088332104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004913899,0.00056893344,0.0007330949,0.00088842184,0.0006353284,0.0027031242,0.0005331351,0.000990699,0.006357293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022530187,0.00039270477,0.00027456225,0.001028934,0.0020456626,0.0029572053,0.0025407088,0.00112656,0.00033778165],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019611965,0.0008099579,0.02088004,0.00035807223,0.00015336585,0.00046330522,0.0009045657,0.22537883,0.017408874,0.6630956,0.0015979086,0.06698829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002214779,0.000270842,0.021028373,0.00006981717,0.000068986345,0.00011190318,0.0005381936,0.14510848,0.003234671,0.8267672,0.0025367746,0.00004333728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006272541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045974375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006357293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00143435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010222245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025987506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113972250","doi":"10.1177/019027250606900304","title":"Does Trust Beget Trustworthiness? Trust and Trustworthiness in Two Games and Two Cultures: A Research Note","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychology Quarterly","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Dictator game; Social psychology; Faith; Psychology; Express trust; Nationality; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Immigration","score_opus":0.03794551062760809,"score_gpt":0.4602307257074655,"score_spread":0.4222852150798574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113972250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98846275,0.0003318224,0.0027449268,0.00059452275,0.000025055202,0.000021135489,0.000014728097,0.0000036135186,0.0078014173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993451,0.000069443384,0.00036411293,0.00003721456,0.000005371813,0.000008044475,0.000003067681,0.0000016176539,0.00016604103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472165,0.0034495539,0.000270465,0.00048646948,0.00068868545,0.00038315347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374282,0.047962796,0.0071330015,0.0028492005,0.002178428,0.0024483067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066410783,0.00053474813,0.0010502798,0.0008304865,0.0013750584,0.004038854,0.0006137696,0.0010843755,0.0024477225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04288344,0.00047852346,0.00084911176,0.00072440243,0.0059530833,0.0077493303,0.0029913168,0.0022882516,0.00011689215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036736252,0.0022013455,0.5314211,0.0009370009,0.0011839741,0.0015359325,0.06568521,0.005422899,0.0059523797,0.31506774,0.0010333362,0.065885454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004310834,0.0023181867,0.53023237,0.00037105018,0.0007765697,0.0012979887,0.06701224,0.04270637,0.0044455137,0.34643152,0.0035677166,0.0004093086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064324467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004755622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066410783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019217591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000919332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0351218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114449709","doi":"","title":"Leadership and the Aggregation of International Collective Action","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Public good; Dilemma; Peacekeeping; Action (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Matching (statistics); Free riding; Political science; International regime; One shot; Game theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Public economics; Public administration; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05692231045826993,"score_gpt":0.33776622914164356,"score_spread":0.2808439186833736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114449709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72733665,0.001157711,0.11980323,0.0052715503,0.00021712205,0.00013168603,0.00007694896,0.0002019006,0.1458032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889719,0.00026447332,0.0070291036,0.000103472186,0.000061029623,0.00006580586,0.000020788772,0.000011711999,0.0034717266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977927,0.0012034315,0.00007159316,0.00029985246,0.00030358933,0.0003288954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376595,0.0027389224,0.0018356295,0.00066455855,0.00040926939,0.0005856124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037111316,0.00030188813,0.0004830122,0.00094386743,0.0015219388,0.0022950887,0.0005305806,0.00076477503,0.0030775808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009612948,0.00018602364,0.00031198908,0.00074299483,0.0025115807,0.0018309271,0.0025312414,0.0007335222,0.00038041148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001067234,0.0002138593,0.0054967604,0.000094783805,0.000049692746,0.00028964592,0.002378949,0.022674868,0.002098145,0.91074944,0.002446694,0.053400394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007188844,0.00017196724,0.007300642,0.000032780736,0.000024736033,0.00011117365,0.0010004932,0.04886639,0.00048839074,0.93163747,0.0102725215,0.000021548234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001240933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010244128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037111316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012145055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096421584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019626617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114460621","doi":"10.7202/016696ar","title":"Expérimentation de laboratoire et économie : contre quelques idées reçues et faux problèmes","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050693716730190456,"score_gpt":0.3645475371932976,"score_spread":0.3138538204631071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114460621","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07512296,0.042658634,0.33166265,0.26934865,0.0046254573,0.002301164,0.0007377829,0.00036743595,0.27317536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.735952,0.02191649,0.16123365,0.039320465,0.0029059115,0.009433134,0.0002524854,0.00035885992,0.028626967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6756694,0.29238096,0.0046956055,0.010392576,0.015063087,0.0017984755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5556557,0.38200715,0.0119438935,0.0362469,0.01290047,0.0012459052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1474434,0.0015423219,0.0023294762,0.0022118695,0.0051390454,0.013678312,0.0042751264,0.0077103353,0.015089096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24723691,0.0011706187,0.0018252732,0.0034553306,0.04794934,0.014588322,0.008904778,0.0076171826,0.0020565228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043290667,0.00033623038,0.0026206884,0.0019042047,0.00020239978,0.000082885475,0.008063279,0.0012538779,0.00080627744,0.9413768,0.0040695174,0.03885094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066083815,0.0009607128,0.004145204,0.003951238,0.00018434729,0.00020458597,0.008236143,0.002768653,0.0045825965,0.7972611,0.17688558,0.00015899279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054160953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041267695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1474434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009010102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011047788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77976453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114473428","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1656394","title":"Productivity-Target Difficulty, Performance-Based Pay and Outside-the-Box Thinking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Business; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.010957677542600533,"score_gpt":0.27259429866022344,"score_spread":0.2616366211176229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114473428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838833,0.00014052326,0.0030050457,0.00022936215,0.000018565006,0.000032720265,0.000054685457,0.000020473926,0.012615419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979685,0.00003354236,0.00045699754,0.000041500894,0.000023049943,0.000017106784,0.000039575214,0.000015670319,0.0014040758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981675,0.0007172638,0.00012281977,0.0003041187,0.00042236358,0.00026586364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9036565,0.07600103,0.011259492,0.004606358,0.0012043678,0.0032722615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005443171,0.0008088381,0.0008681443,0.0011003829,0.0004338891,0.0037081037,0.0009185471,0.002437711,0.013850917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041408148,0.0004395879,0.0006019188,0.00085096364,0.0013589173,0.0036078328,0.0016423763,0.0025933452,0.0008965518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013770385,0.011552931,0.7735555,0.0003297223,0.00077160983,0.0014634813,0.0043147574,0.024790874,0.021245856,0.061869167,0.0016635347,0.08467218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005903253,0.0016252567,0.85623956,0.000034824192,0.00019056743,0.00044080804,0.0012124033,0.02450731,0.0017759398,0.112758465,0.000531018,0.000093604285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000739838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007208768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013850917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087389874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066004664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046335995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116221922","doi":"","title":"INFORMATION TRANSMISSION IN ELIMINATION CONTESTS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Information transmission; Benchmark (surveying); Microeconomics; Economics; Adversary; Complete information; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.04318853842603173,"score_gpt":0.3779494269867582,"score_spread":0.3347608885607265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116221922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79417676,0.00045827162,0.13735324,0.0018143734,0.0000851963,0.0002597291,0.0004045556,0.00019283047,0.06525505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885069,0.00013017638,0.0048454,0.0001139318,0.00005170746,0.0000962774,0.0001257518,0.000020054902,0.0061096763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424124,0.0029176157,0.00019191823,0.00046247992,0.00054566434,0.0016410784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710877,0.0202957,0.0041727656,0.0019241319,0.0010642364,0.0014554698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00646632,0.0009650242,0.0022344922,0.0016185319,0.001618287,0.0042497395,0.0019729272,0.0024614856,0.016655836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024716072,0.0007458936,0.0012830616,0.0009924443,0.0023280105,0.0043752603,0.0024736335,0.0018773503,0.0011580449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024954192,0.00063327857,0.007041665,0.00046784896,0.00025415703,0.0015052956,0.0013479512,0.1789251,0.004077399,0.76766247,0.00561271,0.029976672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000583078,0.00038650187,0.002994164,0.000048482332,0.00008419814,0.00039014427,0.00042646553,0.44164136,0.00083048054,0.54952466,0.0029984217,0.00009202682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026999125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019403398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016655836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015126646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010960887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055719316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117277881","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00011.x","title":"Market forces meet behavioral biases: cost misallocation and irrational pricing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Activity-based costing; Economics; Microeconomics; Variable (mathematics); Variable cost; Irrational number; Process (computing); Fixed cost; Industrial organization; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.09289770086737785,"score_gpt":0.33610669635951174,"score_spread":0.24320899549213387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117277881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236561,0.00077655073,0.022722444,0.013128688,0.000094618765,0.00007395825,0.00003602135,0.00008386196,0.039427854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960944,0.00014632438,0.002311541,0.00085647334,0.00006207557,0.000021909142,0.000007804915,0.000014161451,0.00048525367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941399,0.0032591207,0.00019012332,0.0005425397,0.0014531782,0.00041521442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460568,0.029397087,0.013075007,0.006827877,0.0035318057,0.0011114306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008486868,0.000389704,0.0005392961,0.0008806889,0.00077604,0.0031800552,0.0006911307,0.0023992746,0.0035280068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07275612,0.0004108115,0.00045742973,0.0005407754,0.006127341,0.0048078927,0.0016013073,0.0023552028,0.00032253243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00135079,0.0015219224,0.17421201,0.00038521018,0.00056740775,0.001015065,0.009445466,0.01440262,0.013578347,0.5849073,0.0045268526,0.19408703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029744807,0.00030142465,0.12787293,0.00011492968,0.00016974431,0.0005032711,0.003097558,0.029590877,0.0035091678,0.82718265,0.007216514,0.000143503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014166058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088818447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008486868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017374204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011772352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04488337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117317377","doi":"","title":"What is Law? A Coordination Account of the Characteristics of Legal Order","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Institution; Order (exchange); Enforcement; Generality; Law and economics; Axiom; Law enforcement; State (computer science); Incentive; Political science; Phenomenon; Law; Set (abstract data type); Social order; Philosophy of law; Business; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Public law; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Management","score_opus":0.015363052112890725,"score_gpt":0.3060935786686784,"score_spread":0.2907305265557877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117317377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11882992,0.0013687107,0.31688866,0.04973353,0.00021336428,0.00023439394,0.00061232323,0.00034798888,0.5117712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97284216,0.0004627206,0.017094338,0.0007958485,0.00018899453,0.00011798204,0.000104663755,0.000057798276,0.008335491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981647,0.00052597193,0.00009298239,0.00045605827,0.00047265182,0.00028776773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947878,0.002049225,0.0010463763,0.0012395141,0.00041183285,0.00046521204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031589756,0.00027063832,0.00053393585,0.001360437,0.0022075968,0.0046365303,0.0011191415,0.0021169763,0.007589295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073139207,0.00030186883,0.0007101372,0.0012897686,0.010786216,0.00974534,0.0024416603,0.0018979333,0.00062607095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038155954,0.000004053692,0.00024086676,0.0000070823908,0.0000024383316,0.000015803893,0.00013042902,0.0012093772,0.000055624612,0.996333,0.00046121812,0.0015363318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012926034,0.000006187458,0.00040738928,0.00000848815,0.000003188568,0.000027319435,0.000065208296,0.0033316582,0.00005100152,0.9920027,0.004079771,0.000004195929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004216012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026188665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007589295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003215972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002839916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025388658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117867051","doi":"10.1093/cesifo/ifn002","title":"Pro-social Motivation and the Delivery of Social Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CESifo Economic Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Perspective (graphical); Exploit; Action (physics); Altruism (biology); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Social psychology; Public economics; Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07789718648076656,"score_gpt":0.330642715630857,"score_spread":0.25274552915009046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117867051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22074327,0.015367855,0.041514985,0.060257368,0.00036261114,0.0003768834,0.00035032476,0.00013136979,0.6608953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98169965,0.005328566,0.003288062,0.00065391883,0.00018379396,0.000138994,0.000046169036,0.000013544847,0.008647219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643046,0.0022347646,0.00011083169,0.00018487958,0.000645992,0.00039312508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927303,0.0040335516,0.0017060313,0.00026518034,0.0005424893,0.0007224267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030766435,0.00039956052,0.00025182223,0.001476982,0.0011720837,0.0038059712,0.0005694162,0.0020433024,0.010006077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008518195,0.00015974643,0.00022998312,0.0018063644,0.0039291074,0.0017324093,0.0018072469,0.0012032029,0.0006771991],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041945746,0.00011706687,0.005466833,0.0002150345,0.000020768595,0.000121115496,0.0013195431,0.0024424042,0.00025257253,0.95030046,0.0023168456,0.037385494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008757994,0.00027311474,0.036515072,0.00075690716,0.00003700828,0.00040935795,0.0057796175,0.008862671,0.00045964817,0.77321184,0.1735492,0.000057949546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003983297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036548492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010006077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004042587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031582008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03347361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118590068","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.961379","title":"Identity, Cooperation, and Punishment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Identity (music); Collective identity; Social psychology; Group (periodic table); Context (archaeology); Social identity theory; Psychology; Social group; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01623415867039201,"score_gpt":0.3374119219920016,"score_spread":0.3211777633216096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118590068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94124943,0.00026286946,0.0019830652,0.00120735,0.000037903217,0.000030151516,0.000041034655,0.000007218044,0.055180967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769825,0.000071982904,0.00029799342,0.000049586484,0.000009546862,0.000009381399,0.000008563165,0.0000015740003,0.0018531521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844724,0.0009420111,0.000057466987,0.00014308178,0.00019604727,0.00021412158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98295397,0.009428733,0.00399247,0.0012964173,0.00046055357,0.0018678543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041593,0.00041421066,0.0006271821,0.0007509009,0.0015555567,0.0030547713,0.0004515456,0.001735099,0.010371514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013685667,0.00020104709,0.0002324642,0.0005828405,0.002781606,0.001489816,0.002025931,0.001287945,0.00054718193],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061150216,0.0077398336,0.31794998,0.00037200516,0.00035755622,0.0013314922,0.0072317426,0.011057433,0.0060853837,0.51856434,0.0044596833,0.11873559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078330684,0.0020567656,0.38539872,0.0000995766,0.00031424066,0.0012203256,0.010047352,0.021965705,0.0016266266,0.57012916,0.0062379865,0.00012020341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009543715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016612319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010371514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091610505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011100724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03469616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118857447","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0075509","title":"Prosocial Bonuses Increase Employee Satisfaction and Team Performance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Business; Psychology; Regulatory focus theory; Social psychology; Job satisfaction; Marketing","score_opus":0.05008463363350538,"score_gpt":0.27487942105902735,"score_spread":0.22479478742552197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118857447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99861956,0.000046215406,0.00012293787,0.00007962902,0.000008596441,0.000011782765,0.000016146667,0.0000049930727,0.0010902506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988219,0.000038650833,0.00029371202,0.00006059986,0.0000108958575,0.00003100633,0.000024200619,0.0000028314184,0.00071604847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906904,0.0005590909,0.000028830917,0.000101738726,0.00011061225,0.00013073107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933031,0.0027203255,0.0014997104,0.0004048888,0.00019993944,0.0018719225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015186837,0.00046496876,0.000329746,0.0004373167,0.00080518157,0.0009321407,0.00027272684,0.0008536776,0.0071847243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043129306,0.00020232785,0.0002747576,0.00020198822,0.0006452494,0.00044313777,0.00082520646,0.0007178423,0.00047330107],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02177654,0.07495859,0.57817715,0.0007027247,0.0009174878,0.0006372336,0.0049551497,0.0043743495,0.070858285,0.0043409853,0.004271926,0.23402959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005070781,0.017364314,0.96895415,0.00005734247,0.00013415248,0.00013037743,0.0017471912,0.0022356743,0.0049110684,0.0021821049,0.0017321089,0.00004448968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007782054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015346806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071847243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038910462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036366895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024035275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119711816","doi":"10.1177/0951629806064346","title":"Skating on Thin Ice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Dictator; Perspective (graphical); Dictator game; Mathematical economics; Economics; Game theory; Public good; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0195897838570992,"score_gpt":0.3400536788799533,"score_spread":0.3204638950228541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119711816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15913634,0.0013210255,0.021446936,0.015955701,0.0020395706,0.00013571705,0.00087323243,0.00051275676,0.79857874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.780825,0.0018180668,0.010949436,0.0022044403,0.0003453098,0.00010179059,0.00092772,0.0005171937,0.20231093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989637,0.00035055465,0.000041973923,0.00018865881,0.0001943333,0.00026078653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982822,0.00041616015,0.00015144802,0.000388472,0.00037248703,0.00038926117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017578028,0.0007858936,0.0007258837,0.0010398276,0.0054458724,0.004562182,0.0009088655,0.0016847758,0.057880584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064244857,0.0003761284,0.00070870324,0.000722204,0.0036478823,0.007605718,0.0051288605,0.0022802132,0.018432176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014764644,0.0002840458,0.014849662,0.0006848416,0.00026551355,0.0011189465,0.013262336,0.007902195,0.0045699147,0.5916987,0.24665768,0.1172297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086892316,0.00035393535,0.00790645,0.0010744632,0.00009247566,0.00054915465,0.023806801,0.0095341485,0.0034354667,0.23798828,0.7150459,0.00012593828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074821985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015076068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057880584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012441438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014819263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19362986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120374824","doi":"10.1561/100.00000015","title":"Self-Interest, Inequality, and Entitlement in Majoritarian Decision-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North; Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Egalitarianism; Reservation; Economics; Value (mathematics); Inequity aversion; Test (biology); Inequality; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Politics; Law; Political science; Statistics","score_opus":0.02709649023627371,"score_gpt":0.37059553503410636,"score_spread":0.34349904479783266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120374824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99232084,0.00003630445,0.0019839148,0.00024202079,0.000007573547,0.000030587657,0.000012257398,0.000004809652,0.0053617014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897975,0.00001973176,0.0005884258,0.000053807402,0.0000054294746,0.0000319666,0.000011294844,0.0000018739996,0.00030756652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571854,0.0031835802,0.00013486826,0.0003029435,0.00036952758,0.00029061368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580164,0.031799957,0.00592722,0.002670987,0.00043391832,0.0011515759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0130438395,0.0006025892,0.00057901954,0.00044947205,0.0006933662,0.0022326696,0.00080131623,0.0011704804,0.004510561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022868607,0.00030009745,0.00038189796,0.00035573408,0.0025705833,0.001572096,0.0015341173,0.0014557109,0.0003415846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023494381,0.022931091,0.25967485,0.0009664975,0.00092918746,0.000639137,0.015638398,0.09428259,0.043912865,0.44711992,0.0027400632,0.087671034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023115312,0.009890007,0.18013331,0.0001536953,0.00030775444,0.00028004774,0.005565355,0.22111982,0.012812524,0.5637471,0.0034788877,0.00019999094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005040481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005625857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0130438395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010648135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044873607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0689832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120470464","doi":"10.1111/apps.12007","title":"When What You Want is What You Get: Pay Dispersion and Communal Sharing Preference","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Trustworthiness; Dispersion (optics); Social psychology; Perception; Psychology; Sample (material); Yield (engineering); Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.06778988769481602,"score_gpt":0.34516598944509885,"score_spread":0.2773761017502828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120470464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99523276,0.00006207685,0.0009585559,0.00024354788,0.0000046366968,0.000006622395,0.000010936022,0.0000029571347,0.0034778083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960357,0.000016577878,0.00020089607,0.000021036594,0.0000029904206,0.0000024942808,0.000007242539,0.0000011503355,0.00014401827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794286,0.0010403498,0.00016529272,0.00015814499,0.00049460056,0.00019877561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98118675,0.0074665598,0.00679053,0.0016531396,0.001124175,0.0017789416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033274544,0.00016803764,0.00021591154,0.0005763903,0.0009586315,0.0021132233,0.0002524321,0.0006644951,0.0027491446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018532258,0.0001686148,0.00021444216,0.0004318087,0.001932534,0.0015627266,0.0011863116,0.0010149069,0.00018076884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088963634,0.0008562773,0.8933684,0.0001288266,0.00039727337,0.00047315095,0.030737007,0.0018100874,0.0062318463,0.014410795,0.00069157203,0.050005075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000555975,0.0006643722,0.93047327,0.000091562644,0.00010327667,0.0007363502,0.032319635,0.0056510586,0.0014554784,0.025642453,0.002708637,0.00009828954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002112247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003252618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033274544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073195243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003972396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017597497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120698475","doi":"10.1007/s10683-007-9190-0","title":"Matching and challenge gifts to charity: evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Matching (statistics); Field (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Empirical evidence; Field experiment; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.06033923894835337,"score_gpt":0.340417903184208,"score_spread":0.28007866423585465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120698475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98793507,0.00042607152,0.0022815818,0.00069408317,0.0001116368,0.00020912068,0.00010987543,0.00003276296,0.008199831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944317,0.00034821426,0.0023787278,0.000623813,0.00009181345,0.0004349778,0.000116841584,0.000015505626,0.0015584176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789995,0.017717442,0.0005308507,0.0012654924,0.0011321862,0.00035448128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77406174,0.1652691,0.037055895,0.0170878,0.002641761,0.0038836463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024511466,0.00060256483,0.0009477969,0.00072927185,0.0012813263,0.001793633,0.001063602,0.0016229979,0.0066070943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09522957,0.00043599863,0.0005262764,0.00056670984,0.003270928,0.0015169154,0.0011941105,0.0015342706,0.0008897836],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0709172,0.18698289,0.3424547,0.0038084371,0.0052578286,0.000812575,0.007299796,0.015827253,0.033172954,0.064679645,0.019254599,0.24953222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024142396,0.09143132,0.67511266,0.0010543852,0.0024752936,0.0009236036,0.006355416,0.026221111,0.029759208,0.09634822,0.045551978,0.00062435557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015325522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015246535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024511466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091370527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008449241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12963063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122504105","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2007.tb00078.x","title":"Teams versus individual accountability: solving multitask problems through job design","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Agency (philosophy); Accountability; Compensation (psychology); Computer science; Principal–agent problem; Microeconomics; Knowledge management; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Finance; Corporate governance; Political science","score_opus":0.12729337086348178,"score_gpt":0.35656011962813533,"score_spread":0.22926674876465356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122504105","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28465635,0.00070141006,0.6819378,0.004837609,0.0002097533,0.0003177067,0.000057902133,0.0002399091,0.02704156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8773451,0.00027013922,0.11774331,0.00030891525,0.00009651696,0.0003920791,0.00003925361,0.000059834747,0.003744881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892079,0.0082044415,0.00026597426,0.00095928204,0.0006174647,0.00074498996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685754,0.018578501,0.0050968193,0.0040533748,0.0009897716,0.0027062164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013052498,0.00092496566,0.0009589914,0.0009846424,0.0019250509,0.0034821315,0.0016067023,0.0024079802,0.0059903557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028189763,0.0005367305,0.0010737,0.00097353774,0.0032944165,0.005304418,0.00502507,0.002010079,0.0005961029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012719844,0.0018166574,0.031418514,0.000630894,0.00030216886,0.0002290369,0.006488912,0.13392277,0.0048130364,0.5495516,0.006197735,0.26335672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039882716,0.001018588,0.0056925896,0.00014415965,0.00009914234,0.00011731558,0.0017957059,0.23821391,0.0023536696,0.7390914,0.01100468,0.000069955335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095697836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013385371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013052498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013610071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027358544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06902903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122782821","doi":"","title":"Contractual Structure and Endogenous Matching in Partnershipso","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Moral hazard; Matching (statistics); Agency (philosophy); Margin (machine learning); Microeconomics; Economics; Productivity; Production (economics); Agency cost; General partnership; Incomplete contracts; Simple (philosophy); Econometrics; Business; Incentive; Computer science; Mathematics; Finance; Statistics","score_opus":0.1424159246408635,"score_gpt":0.40246039399202405,"score_spread":0.26004446935116055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122782821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7893493,0.0005377432,0.17902996,0.0018874574,0.00004381377,0.00018166521,0.00022365584,0.000079050165,0.028667256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878193,0.00016646215,0.008899662,0.00004834757,0.000008830167,0.00004980775,0.00003736467,0.000010420059,0.0029597096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796414,0.001026409,0.0000794458,0.0002528585,0.00026314973,0.00041403293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909986,0.0041664005,0.0023584252,0.00084167253,0.00044226417,0.0011925809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033602412,0.00034765425,0.0008476025,0.0007488118,0.0013794538,0.0026424935,0.0012739998,0.0016568808,0.006436974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019002963,0.0006257637,0.00068048626,0.0011766623,0.00285088,0.00397437,0.002074548,0.001389657,0.0006066886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026127687,0.00032936552,0.0057009393,0.00009525704,0.000061218525,0.0002480412,0.00048012883,0.15982018,0.0014890913,0.8143449,0.0011941792,0.015975408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000978415,0.00007877809,0.0014274423,0.000029685196,0.00001530411,0.00010280471,0.00029329563,0.2895028,0.0003441936,0.7066124,0.001473208,0.000022281198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003465366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025831896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006436974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026422183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024567586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021533847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123588772","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1950455","title":"Group Size, Coordination, and the Effectiveness of the Punishment Mechanism in the VCM: An Experimental Investigation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Punishment (psychology); Group (periodic table); Psychology; Social psychology; Chemistry; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019980743521270054,"score_gpt":0.2796664217568918,"score_spread":0.2596856782356218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123588772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965107,0.000040580537,0.0011262186,0.000088328045,0.000024607705,0.00007312129,0.0000285965,0.00001598497,0.0020919663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995858,0.000034300454,0.0021688328,0.000047178786,0.000022697868,0.00022068802,0.00002769966,0.000015264985,0.00160541],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973671,0.0013491652,0.00015385418,0.00043075628,0.0004389438,0.0002602106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92542535,0.053840455,0.007071972,0.010134065,0.0008642309,0.0026638103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007811345,0.0008046911,0.0013173524,0.00074126536,0.00078246254,0.00179146,0.001709516,0.0017049351,0.0069575887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04374641,0.00045511324,0.00029043097,0.00045276879,0.0018178298,0.0014804052,0.0015585917,0.0016903381,0.00043336683],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12639308,0.09553001,0.13940185,0.0019000941,0.0013425815,0.0014590231,0.0077266996,0.092058636,0.21766394,0.110815495,0.005572512,0.20013607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02682659,0.11782328,0.20534812,0.00036438866,0.0015074098,0.0010986576,0.0040169717,0.43296194,0.04304882,0.16082066,0.0057103136,0.00047288515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009134249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007562126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007811345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000788178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012301386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041310847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124453484","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2147919","title":"On the Consequences of Scarcity: When Limited Resources Promote Agentic Responses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.045396725348427786,"score_gpt":0.3168038388183219,"score_spread":0.2714071134698941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124453484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95644665,0.00034999606,0.0051016044,0.0030734767,0.00008296226,0.000040219446,0.00006439528,0.000013879069,0.03482687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985331,0.00011109448,0.00054329616,0.00017177578,0.000029869067,0.000021481694,0.000012430149,0.000006387658,0.0005704475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985726,0.000826922,0.00006640479,0.00016917982,0.00016088613,0.00020387939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812176,0.0137902545,0.0024201518,0.0012069531,0.0005431512,0.0008219795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035996465,0.0003331101,0.0004694687,0.00047853554,0.0006129196,0.0021661082,0.00040229765,0.0016092806,0.006781692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020126473,0.0002813951,0.0002659895,0.0003065273,0.0019257858,0.0027264734,0.0013604338,0.0012770966,0.00036055772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006914032,0.0031678635,0.17512377,0.001504649,0.0005916226,0.002396995,0.0073782494,0.02880167,0.10849412,0.5368751,0.0065537486,0.12219822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046422766,0.0017045124,0.300101,0.00024212574,0.00039110146,0.00066697644,0.0069380975,0.025796756,0.009169506,0.6486723,0.005726292,0.00012715727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045481508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007438843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006781692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005959248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059670204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022687018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124518790","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.397380","title":"Burning Out in Sequential Elimination Contests","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.030827785192557224,"score_gpt":0.34215061650959705,"score_spread":0.3113228313170398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124518790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9023993,0.00018570566,0.056439765,0.0011792643,0.00014040116,0.00014620447,0.00007227604,0.00015735868,0.03927973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856473,0.000058000704,0.004906773,0.00012371877,0.000049088605,0.000049688562,0.0000321021,0.00003282216,0.009100359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653697,0.0016352548,0.00017008987,0.0003549636,0.00044361182,0.00085910567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667896,0.02350601,0.0035684668,0.0032200033,0.00087942055,0.002036387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008016679,0.0009305594,0.0024204543,0.00083181314,0.0017637929,0.0033212756,0.0016530581,0.003073144,0.022219231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025056463,0.00089668465,0.00088342745,0.0005814207,0.0023994287,0.004435898,0.002161503,0.0026061211,0.0010451708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009764378,0.0021511922,0.009925076,0.00085136044,0.00029089546,0.0010054935,0.0024450647,0.04330249,0.011630355,0.8159701,0.008606784,0.09405678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065932353,0.0011442599,0.0030351449,0.00004828995,0.000101639744,0.00045926296,0.00076226104,0.09963997,0.0017295805,0.8892257,0.0031408807,0.000053545777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048177235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088039227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022219231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005957681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012623277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07433075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125134785","doi":"10.1086/321018","title":"A Theory of Conservatism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Commit; Incentive; Ex-ante; Economics; Preference; Microeconomics; Free rider problem; Welfare; Free riding; Quality (philosophy); Group decision-making; Public economics; Actuarial science; Public good; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0539890021857101,"score_gpt":0.35377254708274775,"score_spread":0.2997835448970376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125134785","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027355915,0.0059588826,0.46629474,0.035386097,0.0008299923,0.00015770242,0.00051956874,0.00035750415,0.46313956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8402215,0.003504806,0.08635012,0.007911481,0.0018284678,0.00052744616,0.00024029223,0.00024807223,0.059167676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929691,0.003057065,0.0004056273,0.001135239,0.0018546006,0.0005782794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98623717,0.0077726617,0.0015416679,0.002605536,0.0014622174,0.00038075855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007535043,0.0007877673,0.0008621226,0.001793815,0.0026851096,0.006242369,0.0020522734,0.003296274,0.015572013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017833883,0.0005120939,0.0015606231,0.001723174,0.013590233,0.0068099406,0.0035230166,0.0038236482,0.0020328532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044966223,0.0000059993936,0.00009101649,0.00002443588,0.000010927151,0.000021530517,0.00014740854,0.0011490759,0.00006214693,0.9946749,0.0011096573,0.0026983104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006834974,0.000004785722,0.000050343053,0.000017165434,0.0000037459567,0.0000208806,0.00001846605,0.0015869255,0.00002967573,0.99305433,0.005203582,0.0000034235527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018245018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011019201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015572013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029123654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052093565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125278726","doi":"10.6018/analesps.29.2.150621","title":"El intervalo estrecho de la depredación percibida – una investigación con 19 grupos","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anales de Psicología","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Surprise; Phenomenon; Perception; Harm; Psychology; Punitive damages; Social psychology; Welfare economics; Economics; Political science; Ecology; Biology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02695787134195673,"score_gpt":0.3575358469317216,"score_spread":0.33057797558976487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125278726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99692804,0.00043549397,0.00020968639,0.00003189875,0.0000056648646,0.000028784832,0.000051698138,0.000002078634,0.0023065757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980708,0.00060699903,0.000328665,0.000026731934,0.000013556584,0.00006189459,0.00010027569,0.0000035465991,0.00078762905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987638,0.0005878665,0.000099641555,0.00023478882,0.0001388472,0.00017512587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529135,0.0029144424,0.0009657767,0.00032513094,0.00030314323,0.00020015746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032726682,0.00030123864,0.0005208483,0.001306638,0.0010396492,0.00095559674,0.0006614024,0.00055645447,0.0033480057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062192995,0.00020173339,0.000626378,0.0009835744,0.0016975285,0.0009953598,0.001556725,0.00045834083,0.00039333833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051743197,0.0031853125,0.79863805,0.00059205096,0.0003921184,0.0018548437,0.039179742,0.00092946587,0.003068971,0.002927031,0.0009491538,0.14310898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083969164,0.0020670758,0.9462605,0.00017917214,0.00025799556,0.0010371864,0.04073327,0.00062454585,0.0011638673,0.0018359749,0.0057121087,0.000044307166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047200625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031893419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047200625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009770469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042376376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017307699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125484340","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2013.12.021","title":"When parity promotes peace: Resolving conflict between asymmetric agents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Parity (physics); Economics; Microeconomics; Agent-based model; Computer science; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.05497787437079471,"score_gpt":0.33659545374274313,"score_spread":0.2816175793719484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125484340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466612,0.00012255424,0.0144230025,0.0042812997,0.00023420567,0.000055532255,0.00006177961,0.000052633466,0.03410794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802387,0.000021873797,0.0011162676,0.00009922318,0.000019711244,0.000013890446,0.000013880104,0.0000075518165,0.0006837711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872535,0.00066684023,0.000060988576,0.00011779513,0.00017907411,0.00024995013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98617065,0.008635605,0.0023825166,0.00094313885,0.00056419446,0.0013040107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033401456,0.00034514608,0.00039971198,0.0005478261,0.0011457463,0.0028845805,0.0007346429,0.0020930893,0.0100518465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03173786,0.00036471954,0.00022451075,0.0003014748,0.0016861148,0.0042787185,0.0023414888,0.0022924696,0.00063131115],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0102833025,0.0033146495,0.06263216,0.00089110323,0.00044049582,0.0026101936,0.008432087,0.029518068,0.05210071,0.63209456,0.014342645,0.18334004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071923493,0.0012493681,0.023139885,0.000090664435,0.00016296814,0.00064151164,0.007015833,0.07030192,0.007753084,0.8839292,0.0049255784,0.000070825474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031784043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036901876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100518465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038697058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008254632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033626795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125543812","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00313.x","title":"<scp>A Case for Bundling Public Goods Contributions</scp>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Welfare; Economics; Inequality; Microeconomics; Scheme (mathematics); Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.05383312982756677,"score_gpt":0.36283215473727287,"score_spread":0.3089990249097061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125543812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62865144,0.000351669,0.2238444,0.009092184,0.00016658912,0.00024068558,0.00016438958,0.0001914073,0.13729714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840866,0.00007303226,0.009985983,0.00023627703,0.000044047974,0.000080011225,0.000018108052,0.000020321913,0.0054557635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531186,0.0026245501,0.00013755226,0.00039248832,0.0005729338,0.00096061203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933616,0.0021486862,0.0011187687,0.0016825437,0.000806237,0.0008822127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063036,0.000411842,0.00077362894,0.00096602645,0.0022538076,0.0029573378,0.0010411831,0.0021015792,0.009044399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010405922,0.00047960295,0.0010527907,0.0009314313,0.0037209396,0.00409082,0.003563479,0.0019964534,0.00078881707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025700487,0.00027751803,0.0029775437,0.00010604515,0.00006625942,0.00045304088,0.00070440053,0.02726001,0.0024011447,0.9382206,0.003867099,0.02340923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001607681,0.00025241362,0.004057523,0.00015045133,0.00007743574,0.0007289836,0.0007003316,0.106971376,0.0016104763,0.8677134,0.017530851,0.000046024958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032049273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002864846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009044399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001618522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015368023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033336997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125920756","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2307154","title":"Too Many Charities? Insight from an Experiment with Multiple Public Goods and Contribution Thresholds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Business; Public economics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01950330754637885,"score_gpt":0.28739813589493546,"score_spread":0.2678948283485566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125920756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97454005,0.00014508836,0.005526931,0.0037594065,0.00014072025,0.0001932976,0.00023270515,0.000092577575,0.015369162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923982,0.000059243874,0.0032442599,0.00089044176,0.000058099213,0.00022664327,0.000055130433,0.0000557754,0.0030122767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.993415,0.0042781043,0.00031859014,0.0006558245,0.00082633796,0.0005061526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84983265,0.12994082,0.0059530432,0.008350492,0.0018048788,0.004118051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013873423,0.00072369486,0.0020600362,0.00054752023,0.0012801643,0.0036278316,0.0016653293,0.0037001108,0.020779204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061701078,0.0008376637,0.0005342229,0.00063694746,0.0034211834,0.0044914493,0.002151466,0.004432275,0.0012372077],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.15707475,0.09536721,0.05858752,0.0032735658,0.0016785795,0.0020660902,0.01117001,0.028079607,0.14494845,0.3584407,0.02032427,0.1189893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.039426554,0.031839367,0.059358563,0.00034298512,0.0017185045,0.0010080879,0.007588532,0.112749495,0.029400188,0.70186675,0.01406332,0.00063768675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008670676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008512974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020779204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010264785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014204971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073370576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125921209","doi":"10.1007/s12110-013-9169-9","title":"A Cross-Cultural Study of Noblesse Oblige in Economic Decision-Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Nature","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Positive economics; Individualism; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Equity (law); Behavioral economics; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Sociology; Reciprocal; Ultimatum game; Social science; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028590677475878006,"score_gpt":0.4243914295115556,"score_spread":0.3958007520356776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125921209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987319,0.000037666712,0.000056808087,0.00004543819,0.0000019872286,0.0000012491554,0.0000025155734,2.0983803e-7,0.0011222957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933225,0.000045973764,0.00010456882,0.000036425306,0.0000011376727,0.0000028068632,0.000005479359,0.00000149122,0.00046972642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987301,0.0009358161,0.000036779853,0.0001128588,0.00009718057,0.00008730954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98984784,0.006800778,0.0010228162,0.0010670655,0.0006858619,0.00057564775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030376546,0.00019022841,0.00018058451,0.00046947054,0.0014662684,0.0015623873,0.0003429405,0.0005439957,0.0021483768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010012714,0.00021728904,0.0001424506,0.00060808344,0.002674354,0.00086522877,0.00085949665,0.00087004737,0.00014769784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012103533,0.003279146,0.61408997,0.0001372755,0.00031259423,0.00088361336,0.2881246,0.0011979808,0.01314422,0.021100717,0.00093402824,0.055585537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005338529,0.0005349954,0.84002733,0.00008744527,0.00009117765,0.0007536827,0.14282915,0.0016322763,0.0025417346,0.0050284537,0.0063431263,0.00007718505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015579302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024545876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015579302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075759285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005793099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03097725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125977041","doi":"10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.127","title":"Feeling Duped: Emotional, Motivational, and Cognitive Aspects of Being Exploited by Others","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of General Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Counterfactual thinking; Social psychology; Cognition; Skepticism; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054211021540773154,"score_gpt":0.41254479895028606,"score_spread":0.3583337774095129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125977041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938088,0.06824818,0.0015478551,0.0072921985,0.00014386178,0.00004882888,0.00013266546,0.000019810663,0.028757865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744726,0.022195097,0.00047290642,0.0009837524,0.00014765613,0.000034807636,0.00005629786,0.0000030714511,0.0016337241],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956864,0.00022921014,0.00001982335,0.00003626631,0.0000924641,0.00005357105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989064,0.00058847124,0.00025917287,0.000050927356,0.00006711035,0.00012795032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009817282,0.0002444653,0.00030277474,0.00070033094,0.00046552357,0.0012176109,0.00025981164,0.0007479702,0.0013677152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021507435,0.00013881086,0.000250063,0.0006950904,0.0018814388,0.0012666984,0.00074130733,0.00095020706,0.00013478774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073254044,0.0013127765,0.29837283,0.0019137308,0.00051439326,0.0030535604,0.04851642,0.00048779638,0.008522615,0.027911365,0.011365645,0.5972963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002437027,0.0004451496,0.93379664,0.0005320421,0.00011701814,0.004720981,0.028705047,0.00041048467,0.0004233949,0.010042355,0.020711012,0.00007143474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001481666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020053831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001481666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005824091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029158292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005191982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125988129","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.913057","title":"To Deceive or Not To Deceive: The Effect of Deception on Behavior in Future Laboratory Experiments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Animal behavior; Social psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.010631321699659335,"score_gpt":0.3400081829139643,"score_spread":0.32937686121430493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125988129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886757,0.00039810353,0.0041734143,0.0011392713,0.000089866386,0.00012455563,0.00015651004,0.000041337298,0.005201211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921583,0.00026025486,0.0043533226,0.0005829766,0.000055353095,0.00028482205,0.00013024395,0.00003072973,0.0021441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937697,0.004190745,0.00036822516,0.00061717234,0.00081553194,0.0002386256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8202013,0.13019682,0.024195647,0.017740278,0.004095149,0.0035708237],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015726626,0.0006698068,0.0006957547,0.00053699146,0.00065546203,0.0019291744,0.00080551195,0.002247149,0.006252691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11763312,0.00048958824,0.00055342785,0.00023665694,0.0013335726,0.0027244603,0.0009150682,0.0033947567,0.00065375236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07277695,0.07144013,0.30063426,0.0015933022,0.0017443168,0.00081977615,0.006184863,0.01657934,0.26931944,0.038118843,0.0070101656,0.21377866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037182346,0.05931286,0.7123627,0.0005745961,0.0015578532,0.0022195848,0.0022715384,0.08096684,0.07250652,0.055173557,0.0086832745,0.0006524609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065148796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012007281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006356157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041772355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08317137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126249824","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1995.538136","title":"Supplementing review strategies with penalties in environmental enforcement","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Inefficiency; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Dilemma; Agency (philosophy); Game theory; Operator (biology); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Operations research; Environmental economics; Computer security; Microeconomics; Economics; Engineering; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04314971016166759,"score_gpt":0.31308208681406574,"score_spread":0.26993237665239816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126249824","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0805342,0.0023131033,0.8628852,0.0063767782,0.00032009382,0.0012426699,0.00012332504,0.0004222306,0.045782387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74105465,0.0010804776,0.24659227,0.0009323186,0.00020365875,0.0011336989,0.00004985963,0.0000754961,0.0088776825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96789026,0.021794638,0.0020700265,0.0024935803,0.004650862,0.0011005859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8883748,0.072647825,0.019950533,0.0089369025,0.007907786,0.002182163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025281547,0.0013478133,0.0013988155,0.002754662,0.0013533513,0.004322272,0.002566614,0.004577363,0.0043029003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08257863,0.0007820723,0.0009265385,0.001501652,0.0037576745,0.007715949,0.0025549945,0.0025447698,0.00077746157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014165483,0.00031546075,0.0022339842,0.0005596806,0.00010753001,0.00037856918,0.00081760803,0.048733193,0.0052386336,0.82454944,0.002123124,0.114801206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003561142,0.0011828605,0.0026347768,0.00037472555,0.00017208376,0.00073643617,0.00072191947,0.21784823,0.0065423017,0.73408693,0.035088655,0.00025495398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013122626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018576876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025281547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002685324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066703595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13370323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126282330","doi":"10.1002/smj.690","title":"Strategy making, novelty and analogical reasoning — commentary on Gavetti, Levinthal, and Rivkin (2005)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Novelty; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Abductive reasoning; Analogical reasoning; Management science; Cognitive science; Cognition; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Analogy; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.095916314487609,"score_gpt":0.35338397222740187,"score_spread":0.25746765773979285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126282330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029563403,0.01770556,0.0003466545,0.96666735,0.013119514,0.0000045379147,0.000026882264,0.000010091565,0.001823648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04299766,0.019380901,0.0017601049,0.8530471,0.07489341,0.00009673167,0.000039546016,0.00006589497,0.007718725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926553,0.0036520232,0.00040369813,0.0010287403,0.0018507101,0.0004094267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95661724,0.03447866,0.0011146544,0.0008394993,0.0061017526,0.00084831583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011699322,0.00083776546,0.0012710292,0.001774845,0.004384588,0.0063617076,0.0056908075,0.028012829,0.0021713781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045445327,0.00050963066,0.0011528565,0.0022402243,0.01528913,0.010252413,0.0024709902,0.025393896,0.0013613643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007182982,0.000025633748,0.00012189704,0.0002876551,0.00002175454,0.00019033432,0.0022245303,0.00034929786,0.0001157535,0.13677855,0.8472489,0.012563786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007254661,0.000041753883,0.00046554845,0.0010781365,0.000022235588,0.00024627877,0.0018274919,0.0007775018,0.0002346029,0.20393269,0.7912276,0.00007364487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015099027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013324164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028012829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010281753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005362719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07459974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126696985","doi":"10.5167/uzh-51762","title":"Effort Provision and Communication in Teams Competing over the Commons","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Communication in small groups; Economic rent; Group (periodic table); Cheap talk; Commons; Microeconomics; Aggregate (composite); Economics; Group behavior; Treatment and control groups; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.029454610783368116,"score_gpt":0.376202175659698,"score_spread":0.34674756487632985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126696985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908981,0.000043477954,0.0021893396,0.0001484576,0.000013921365,0.000014695873,0.0000118816315,0.000009107947,0.006671071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983631,0.00001572377,0.0004892121,0.000025050786,0.000011813251,0.000019559815,0.000010555795,0.0000032930097,0.0010617833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615365,0.0024957438,0.00014019856,0.00032257772,0.00038534,0.000502374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834269,0.008973599,0.0032832813,0.0013466672,0.0004960709,0.0024735432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043013436,0.0005631759,0.00060162204,0.0008998909,0.0016572075,0.0024858946,0.0006952235,0.0014289062,0.0091847805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015931357,0.00031599344,0.00039198776,0.00048456423,0.001489084,0.0014456634,0.002705461,0.00075909815,0.0007223461],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010942863,0.010605772,0.4048366,0.00090746034,0.000785963,0.003823757,0.037454356,0.08066063,0.063294336,0.09305712,0.004367638,0.2892635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002106931,0.010215964,0.5457704,0.00024797805,0.0004957379,0.00097122334,0.034598745,0.1524702,0.009467416,0.22971034,0.013655436,0.00028960427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011193479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011120755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091847805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009919329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062516733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030726135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128459726","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x07000660","title":"The place of ethics in a unified behavioral science","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Sociobiology; Construct (python library); Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Behavioural sciences; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering; Communication","score_opus":0.14558922565938187,"score_gpt":0.4573294970236004,"score_spread":0.3117402713642185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128459726","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017794207,0.015291002,0.3028592,0.41301382,0.0055647343,0.00019990695,0.00017104109,0.00036322686,0.24474294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84236354,0.0056610503,0.09709067,0.035285745,0.007988277,0.0007082686,0.00008754024,0.0002787119,0.010536238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96037513,0.0265198,0.001274597,0.004027366,0.0064252727,0.0013778078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625266,0.02117104,0.0019813005,0.0072423215,0.004359412,0.0027193797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045439936,0.0013320493,0.003105977,0.0035885384,0.0064211413,0.0149339,0.0027064828,0.011611511,0.0026202092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034083296,0.00091386365,0.0012695749,0.0015921829,0.091871075,0.02504838,0.007534312,0.020590208,0.00078778714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007769423,0.000011321944,0.00006834963,0.000018173932,0.000007507322,0.000011055526,0.00036098674,0.00024919992,0.00003988259,0.9970798,0.0005880997,0.0015578553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013457992,0.00001551856,0.000062795116,0.000033213342,0.0000042671163,0.000009581912,0.000083420564,0.0003872248,0.000035812656,0.992949,0.006396797,0.000008886007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025667874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013605768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045439936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009432841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009317568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24031228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128536831","doi":"10.1007/s11238-011-9249-4","title":"Using turn taking to achieve intertemporal cooperation and symmetry in infinitely repeated 2 × 2 games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Monash University; Australian National University; McGill University; City University of Hong Kong; Purdue University","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Repeated game; Mathematical economics; Dilemma; Path (computing); Prisoner's dilemma; Turn-taking; Stochastic game; Turn (biochemistry); Sequential game; Computer science; Game theory; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12269238990374412,"score_gpt":0.3860870284441435,"score_spread":0.26339463854039935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128536831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81275076,0.000104181745,0.17029792,0.00040739428,0.000024986715,0.00011780112,0.000040883493,0.000106625695,0.016149463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884566,0.00003466673,0.01052064,0.000037122514,0.0000054116654,0.00007053408,0.0000124470735,0.000008343191,0.00085418473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996302,0.0025089688,0.00012664725,0.00037262202,0.00028354296,0.00040622623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900832,0.0056762337,0.0024448393,0.00096876925,0.00024019986,0.0005867388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00293581,0.00069215405,0.00071200856,0.0004891614,0.00071158493,0.0014628941,0.0009996626,0.0009946162,0.0022856817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012029958,0.00038918402,0.0008227618,0.00024091193,0.0029967884,0.0020007074,0.0014824459,0.0008373824,0.00025768043],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001163289,0.00052380306,0.009478962,0.00024973226,0.00038405947,0.0011957953,0.0020971964,0.30908042,0.034254555,0.60902077,0.0009588383,0.03159252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003382941,0.0011811748,0.004907145,0.00003961697,0.00009243553,0.00049894885,0.00067985617,0.44420975,0.005397731,0.5400806,0.0024647017,0.00010963766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013164988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013622177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00293581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010259632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010085467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015526235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128712700","doi":"10.1002/mde.1141","title":"Alliances and cost declaration","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial and Decision Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Manitoba; McMaster University; University of Calgary; Syracuse University","keywords":"Alliance; Profit (economics); Revenue; Business; Declaration; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Economics; Marketing; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.048827220687259816,"score_gpt":0.3185505717901657,"score_spread":0.2697233511029059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128712700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30724603,0.0023452903,0.21256465,0.015053425,0.0002933464,0.0006179983,0.0011536647,0.00032295845,0.46040264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636416,0.0005469984,0.006951935,0.00024150994,0.00008874636,0.00017054216,0.00013107633,0.000023363307,0.028204229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586475,0.0018954024,0.000255652,0.00055094215,0.00084730785,0.00058602594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98128307,0.009107563,0.0052612326,0.001966712,0.0011590164,0.0012224363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047300165,0.00059045234,0.0006520346,0.0011874479,0.0017379533,0.006213446,0.0019504172,0.0045767203,0.019957524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030758068,0.00064793957,0.00076368917,0.0014859112,0.0030373295,0.007991744,0.003524902,0.0034423657,0.0013592422],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000589859,0.000068278045,0.0035478983,0.000056665904,0.000021237072,0.0002473847,0.00050986203,0.027497573,0.00017438288,0.9481622,0.0021029767,0.017552538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006576846,0.0001287739,0.0031114186,0.00015319313,0.000062701896,0.00056305726,0.0011031068,0.0845533,0.00037861103,0.869108,0.040705103,0.00006690074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035320309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023830917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019957524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035514308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022292528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06676453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129623343","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00493.x","title":"A CLEAR AND PRESENT MINORITY: HETEROGENEITY IN THE SOURCE OF ENDOWMENTS AND THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Dimension (graph theory); Public goods game; Microeconomics; Public economics; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.09632670282260061,"score_gpt":0.36014340148143087,"score_spread":0.2638166986588303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129623343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98936963,0.00012003254,0.004030914,0.0007789752,0.000021276519,0.000028928755,0.000045526594,0.000008605383,0.0055960906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871635,0.000028645887,0.0008029522,0.0000924496,0.000010637215,0.000021913036,0.000013290573,0.0000033111578,0.0003105213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966091,0.002084554,0.00012311114,0.0005404135,0.00046182267,0.0001811267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727595,0.01800957,0.00492323,0.00253937,0.00046972837,0.0012985757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005756362,0.00027632486,0.00059106154,0.0003135794,0.0008799005,0.0022290163,0.0006553761,0.0009874997,0.005157962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028999131,0.00027119985,0.00020702701,0.0002763199,0.0031820447,0.00201987,0.0027775564,0.0011832865,0.0003971811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023931425,0.008104849,0.14712527,0.0015752403,0.001031352,0.0012417982,0.014337181,0.021539312,0.261368,0.40712148,0.004962605,0.1076614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033164085,0.012405213,0.2236619,0.00045981634,0.001195362,0.0015603562,0.01822479,0.073174,0.057625484,0.59329236,0.014736474,0.00034793152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043391803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049569254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005756362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064302003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005329893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030442894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129798231","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1490","title":"Advice from Multiple Experts: A Comparison of Simultaneous, Sequential, and Hierarchical Communication","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Decision maker; Computer science; Preference; Cheap talk; Block (permutation group theory); Transmission (telecommunications); Information transmission; Private information retrieval; Advice (programming); Operations research; Telecommunications; Mathematics; Computer network; Statistics; Computer security; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.02276200164852509,"score_gpt":0.3332219005814686,"score_spread":0.3104598989329435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129798231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66587526,0.0013284712,0.26865017,0.0021429532,0.00007317819,0.00036492653,0.00013131312,0.0002805806,0.061153125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96659255,0.0002727945,0.030229494,0.00011861294,0.000042488733,0.00007456564,0.0000434945,0.000022847493,0.0026032135],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901135,0.0059863483,0.00036690678,0.0007130094,0.002073572,0.00074659137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9016511,0.08466944,0.005141741,0.004444301,0.003025529,0.0010679228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009857439,0.00066722895,0.0009159301,0.0011838457,0.0008450256,0.0019222002,0.0014019809,0.0022671388,0.007848827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061713845,0.0004209936,0.00075373985,0.0012226525,0.0013652958,0.003404411,0.0014548094,0.001095798,0.0006750579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035717515,0.0010492221,0.020657932,0.0013175408,0.0007598115,0.0010836135,0.004500822,0.2821077,0.008609896,0.33461297,0.0044679134,0.3372607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011243487,0.0016882749,0.012783724,0.00019396708,0.0005567088,0.00066955254,0.0020229924,0.7685627,0.005027682,0.20089015,0.0063399943,0.00013986109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036974438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028934567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009857439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015525202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017313962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052131772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130074778","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.009","title":"Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneous-move games","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalization; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Nash equilibrium; Artificial intelligence; Hierarchy; Introspection; Machine learning; Best response; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.038163416900902074,"score_gpt":0.34476115364482735,"score_spread":0.30659773674392526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130074778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997687,0.000012279664,0.0018760001,0.000040655723,0.0000028987015,0.000017878892,0.000016339187,0.000008976202,0.00033804186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822074,0.000023494094,0.0012774987,0.000014674255,0.000003150729,0.000023354118,0.00005192735,0.0000028182603,0.00038229267],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856025,0.0009945642,0.00005015122,0.0001759791,0.000108487606,0.00011071503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684967,0.027318522,0.002138848,0.00096708897,0.0003721178,0.00070669316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035301181,0.0012070438,0.00066310144,0.00059875235,0.00038215835,0.001328169,0.0011200188,0.0013660139,0.0017459913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028408263,0.0005676743,0.0003756133,0.0003380363,0.00093445013,0.0015956394,0.0006665556,0.0011795964,0.00021170685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060203956,0.011473308,0.40877607,0.0002820286,0.0011509336,0.0004096665,0.0021865326,0.49981314,0.008494115,0.02087992,0.001231545,0.03928234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002385902,0.0015030693,0.07142016,0.00001589298,0.00008413168,0.000060687078,0.00044527737,0.9081343,0.0014058906,0.016458934,0.00018928765,0.000043719014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008495005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012779499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008495005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085022417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007658792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018669248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130344283","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00146.x","title":"GAME THEORY FOR PLAYING GAMES: SOPHISTICATION IN A NEGATIVE‐EXTERNALITY EXPERIMENT","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Risk dominance; Externality; Profit maximization; Moral hazard; Game theory; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Maximization; Experimental economics; Strategic interaction; Utility maximization; Profit (economics); Best response; Incentive; Epsilon-equilibrium","score_opus":0.08465574278075104,"score_gpt":0.4001727410503848,"score_spread":0.31551699826963375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130344283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988025,0.00002389821,0.0053838682,0.00043087482,0.000015146519,0.00023017089,0.000041744897,0.00001780638,0.0058313427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914669,0.000038952192,0.006707486,0.00024339271,0.00001795053,0.00044863106,0.000035262165,0.000011533698,0.0010299643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663687,0.0022542116,0.00019753647,0.0003233747,0.00045326643,0.00013468131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746767,0.016015539,0.0053118384,0.0026200411,0.0004285864,0.000947195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007428499,0.00052072544,0.0003992348,0.00033029186,0.0004554383,0.0017590935,0.0006299897,0.0009869721,0.0047929897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024375744,0.00030884793,0.00021168243,0.0002558266,0.0021001357,0.0018955601,0.0011342982,0.00151288,0.00036642552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02910367,0.057052515,0.13940498,0.0016937751,0.0007066947,0.0011231963,0.022982402,0.027684618,0.20482235,0.40161192,0.007138302,0.106675476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010402291,0.053228933,0.26356125,0.00029498676,0.00042668128,0.0017106553,0.0052923304,0.18090634,0.037525147,0.42220852,0.024045004,0.00039779846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023122123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024495643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007428499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050057797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039337657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039286137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130803419","doi":"","title":"Socially-Tolerable Discrimination","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Racism; Converse; Ethnic discrimination; Sexual orientation; Psychology; Social psychology; Ethnic group; Prejudice (legal term); Gender discrimination; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04614851450496055,"score_gpt":0.2825364460611663,"score_spread":0.23638793155620574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130803419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21729729,0.0007106603,0.043289598,0.01197633,0.00022723178,0.00012289429,0.0006177825,0.00012069442,0.7256375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868057,0.00014808959,0.0014775038,0.0010166093,0.00006972186,0.000052492127,0.0000864145,0.000021224214,0.010322281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954495,0.0018532032,0.00014385044,0.0007730356,0.00095598405,0.0008244615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266255,0.0027328418,0.0011102452,0.0021232679,0.0007041844,0.000666881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033582489,0.0004229161,0.0006550533,0.0005897327,0.0013086064,0.0028589785,0.0007326042,0.0019273428,0.022026706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01269906,0.00017101997,0.0005301724,0.00054037047,0.0038311896,0.0019248208,0.0027894366,0.001929605,0.0015485378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056944624,0.00009035672,0.0024163364,0.000072147974,0.000039762363,0.00011371955,0.00036111817,0.0012487655,0.0007650444,0.97321564,0.005551575,0.016068513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022099854,0.00005251892,0.0029721975,0.000023729317,0.0000147361725,0.00016376679,0.00027029667,0.0012266573,0.00018213315,0.98737806,0.007684443,0.000009414399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000701273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007627277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022026706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013849812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013348922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07368672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131397563","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1118607109","title":"Culture does account for variation in game behavior","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes; Providence Health Care; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Zero-knowledge proof; Computer science; Hash function; Statement (logic); Gas meter prover; Theoretical computer science; Cryptography; Proof of concept; Variation (astronomy); Programming language; Algorithm; Mathematics; Mathematical proof","score_opus":0.06998284075140274,"score_gpt":0.3712387188058362,"score_spread":0.30125587805443343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131397563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2840499,0.003516062,0.014734609,0.59964556,0.002989422,0.000039646315,0.0010758723,0.00020085425,0.09374804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387377,0.00087466545,0.001225234,0.051112168,0.001178137,0.000032083943,0.00017997951,0.000060254435,0.006599759],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985561,0.00067289965,0.00009584591,0.00030753872,0.00019766371,0.00016991225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805798,0.013854453,0.001469953,0.0024400647,0.00092241674,0.0007333546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004141669,0.000351486,0.00058803294,0.00033557176,0.0008421005,0.0015590688,0.0010430834,0.0045881784,0.009125094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03300209,0.0002183478,0.0005226795,0.00030242652,0.001387164,0.0020432568,0.0008803965,0.0039592944,0.0016264035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017260938,0.0005026509,0.2743336,0.00039136826,0.001180226,0.003543828,0.0024529453,0.011963206,0.0039448673,0.2695787,0.21799032,0.21239229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003991862,0.00027155702,0.14417426,0.00026806945,0.00041603716,0.0016687543,0.0021339233,0.05293331,0.0029714936,0.67989504,0.11467859,0.00018988532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056895963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008937456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009125094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015476407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068556325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03052646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131563885","doi":"10.1257/aer.p20151035","title":"Sacred Values? The Effect of Information on Attitudes toward Payments for Human Organs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Actuarial science; Baseline (sea); Public economics; Survey data collection; Microeconomics; Law; Finance; Political science; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.05969034581841102,"score_gpt":0.40609380363904185,"score_spread":0.3464034578206308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131563885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832772,0.00030478937,0.00049686583,0.0027102674,0.000036146877,0.000024754057,0.000044550547,0.000007097014,0.013098344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985684,0.00019757383,0.00027495468,0.0005498603,0.000029943192,0.000014600663,0.000019342404,0.0000028473837,0.00034248925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870775,0.00995565,0.00035183714,0.0006300965,0.0015501125,0.00043475555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81883186,0.14199995,0.027422303,0.0058937697,0.0031460458,0.002706044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013229929,0.00024615915,0.0003616721,0.00048301797,0.000540984,0.0018622234,0.0004229161,0.0016356098,0.0062321625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08318436,0.00028319214,0.0005167567,0.0004646252,0.0030230328,0.0015344854,0.0007703508,0.0023281567,0.0003523632],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027131474,0.018605052,0.6062897,0.0014346343,0.0021514327,0.0007192939,0.018099878,0.0041510086,0.016980369,0.041399423,0.00504394,0.25799382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014445481,0.0052679623,0.9471967,0.0003235145,0.00082639,0.00023030236,0.0054216995,0.0027797446,0.0037215631,0.026884958,0.0057979375,0.00010468245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012549566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012110162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013229929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007737889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055794575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06996733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132529189","doi":"10.1073/pnas.082079899","title":"Competition among cooperators: Altruism and reciprocity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reciprocal; Altruism (biology); Microeconomics; Reciprocal altruism; Economics; Variety (cybernetics); Competition (biology); Reciprocal inhibition; Conjecture; Preference; Public good; Strong reciprocity; Social psychology; Mechanism (biology); Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Game theory; Biology; Computer science; Mathematics; Ecology; Epistemology; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07427980232120192,"score_gpt":0.33437184472512615,"score_spread":0.26009204240392425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132529189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7832525,0.0037718718,0.07208265,0.013267168,0.00009562659,0.000053532294,0.00005951951,0.000066394125,0.12735085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435127,0.0003614674,0.0029804686,0.00025731826,0.000020120944,0.000020431879,0.000010728376,0.00000551143,0.0019926357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972072,0.0020264282,0.00007082231,0.00020315724,0.00027236514,0.00021998968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992353,0.004343713,0.0015338715,0.0009192843,0.000417729,0.0004324555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034759883,0.0002303685,0.000408451,0.00047744226,0.00089332135,0.002122448,0.0004903825,0.0011904025,0.0028788256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087989485,0.00021751,0.000318914,0.00035872124,0.0039439024,0.0023111987,0.0016885279,0.00083681,0.00040721602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022461198,0.00008868073,0.019954827,0.00020606387,0.00011113471,0.0004419038,0.0030429603,0.005898198,0.0043885857,0.9273123,0.0024771849,0.03585362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011415254,0.00018349965,0.011851289,0.0000900448,0.000095622105,0.0010276728,0.0015145841,0.019508723,0.0016490645,0.94014573,0.023758013,0.000061602535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006036818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005736256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034759883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083202915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005141373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018383026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133030911","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1120.1699","title":"License to Cheat: Voluntary Regulation and Ethical Behavior","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"World Anti-Doping Agency","keywords":"Task (project management); License; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026558586706415165,"score_gpt":0.3376834771819342,"score_spread":0.31112489047551906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133030911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84793,0.001161911,0.013241667,0.0116124805,0.00010339278,0.000082498445,0.0000758644,0.000026145775,0.12576604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968389,0.00011519845,0.0006256897,0.00032891615,0.000020168012,0.000027209464,0.00001090141,0.000005437255,0.002027478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171376,0.005807008,0.00033799533,0.0004900523,0.0011468745,0.0005043662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9275464,0.04074843,0.021976423,0.0047905026,0.0028745732,0.0020637128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006772297,0.00021416263,0.00020253708,0.0005798538,0.0012795792,0.0032401555,0.0004964529,0.0019890005,0.0072438656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034678254,0.00014748926,0.00024772674,0.00040008384,0.006756676,0.0018498104,0.0016519569,0.0019324209,0.0003767517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064528844,0.0016996433,0.2645745,0.00032124433,0.00012334116,0.00080337207,0.011660859,0.0030812274,0.0075449245,0.5879699,0.005305503,0.11627012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017022461,0.0012670683,0.38637072,0.000551306,0.0001264852,0.0023039635,0.01878496,0.019447353,0.006097954,0.51556784,0.049085326,0.00022690716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001219425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014711777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072438656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011464751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015126322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035815716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133251226","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2009.01430.x","title":"<scp>Investment in Tourism Market and Reputation</scp>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tourism; Reputation; Product (mathematics); Order (exchange); Quality (philosophy); Incentive; Destinations; Business; Investment (military); Economics; Position (finance); Marketing; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.0231274089675715,"score_gpt":0.30007075237684605,"score_spread":0.27694334340927457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133251226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88568187,0.0011821844,0.022154912,0.004218068,0.000039010207,0.00006750788,0.00035950777,0.00010607544,0.08619092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986468,0.00009182153,0.00024743605,0.000018788187,0.0000065728077,0.000004808012,0.000017509043,0.0000018317506,0.0009643957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954236,0.00016742677,0.00001987117,0.00007564999,0.000067242734,0.00012745931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946367,0.0019070222,0.0020899437,0.00021575106,0.00040537285,0.0007451821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008873939,0.0002032796,0.0004204954,0.0005122977,0.00049897685,0.003182913,0.000568269,0.0012438862,0.008833788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046957084,0.00015543523,0.00030843922,0.0006452153,0.0016959542,0.0018485809,0.0011256541,0.0007362654,0.00038898425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005605927,0.0005900706,0.10856278,0.00047206553,0.00028787105,0.0014267288,0.0005890491,0.24973024,0.008428043,0.57392,0.01236008,0.04307236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011610201,0.00067820883,0.15161513,0.00018041683,0.00015858083,0.0008663427,0.0016154062,0.55701476,0.002024827,0.27706978,0.008504421,0.0001560389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043251356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036179519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008833788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003213286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008987795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029551983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133747822","doi":"10.1007/s10683-016-9477-0","title":"Status quo effects in fairness games: reciprocal responses to acts of commission versus acts of omission","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Ecolab","keywords":"Stylized fact; Reciprocal; Status quo; Commission; Robustness (evolution); Status quo bias; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.05264814465653629,"score_gpt":0.3770706497880237,"score_spread":0.3244225051314874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133747822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9444796,0.00013765691,0.021190431,0.0010269871,0.00011257183,0.00016908208,0.000108219225,0.000042642456,0.032732733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694973,0.000032717016,0.002094111,0.00013628374,0.000016789849,0.00007004522,0.000008080671,0.000008357847,0.0006839448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98687345,0.0093810735,0.0006535147,0.00086941384,0.0015922498,0.00063028076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9054128,0.07329471,0.012072168,0.00526778,0.0019387137,0.0020137932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01519816,0.00068346225,0.00092760805,0.0005953523,0.000710897,0.001918769,0.0006504221,0.0013647967,0.007051301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06890727,0.0003343624,0.0005061735,0.0003542357,0.003406845,0.0021194133,0.0014610306,0.0015511136,0.00038475322],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012168557,0.004158635,0.04328985,0.0014846931,0.0007918578,0.00070879434,0.004579162,0.07111518,0.111836374,0.67949426,0.0031701238,0.06720255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021200518,0.004506154,0.08814594,0.00022283233,0.00041967598,0.00029053394,0.0025878886,0.1554904,0.026117034,0.7148594,0.0049479306,0.0002921861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010316864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009482494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01519816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016489954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008286937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080376506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134364957","doi":"10.1177/0022002708322361","title":"Public Goods Provision and Sanctioning in Privileged Groups","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Conflict Resolution","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Enforcement; Public goods game; Public economics; Free rider problem; Microeconomics; Free riding; Law and economics; Economics; Incentive; Business; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.10776778251207168,"score_gpt":0.3341760000302503,"score_spread":0.22640821751817858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134364957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99342054,0.000033570188,0.0023777648,0.00011277364,0.0000086894715,0.000033604043,0.00000934539,0.0000076159276,0.0039961543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983498,0.00002000866,0.0010503844,0.000018571462,0.0000044594804,0.000025471718,0.000005687776,0.0000018881439,0.0005237769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974064,0.0013810403,0.0001182049,0.00028900703,0.00044588838,0.00035945975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98246115,0.00646013,0.005848357,0.003050006,0.0005470741,0.001633341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029433821,0.00048012577,0.00056459376,0.0006679482,0.0013121039,0.0015692463,0.0005725586,0.000922591,0.0041407896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012734764,0.0002518818,0.00029309327,0.00040823067,0.0024338944,0.001574903,0.0022312847,0.0008448146,0.00026990136],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015457262,0.031876083,0.1612763,0.0012878884,0.0005749037,0.0013865958,0.015523806,0.052049465,0.1686237,0.34720337,0.00299294,0.20174773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005727855,0.03306557,0.23599195,0.000460166,0.0006267437,0.0018732195,0.011076681,0.14703843,0.08776718,0.45169857,0.024297662,0.00037599544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070488616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007802418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041407896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092059723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008842999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015566289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134555263","doi":"10.1506/bwkd-fgc6-yhy9-wxc5","title":"A Laboratory Investigation of Verification and Reputation Formation in a Repeated Joint Investment Setting*","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Matching (statistics); Communication source; Affect (linguistics); Incentive; Investment (military); Experimental economics; Protocol (science); Psychology; Computer science; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Statistics; Political science; Communication; Telecommunications; Mathematics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.15331811833979983,"score_gpt":0.37240084170429033,"score_spread":0.2190827233644905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134555263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962767,0.00003225897,0.002325086,0.000116952695,0.000014170974,0.00009443231,0.000023706443,0.00002290092,0.0010938273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995462,0.000022487002,0.003629462,0.00006124527,0.000018276745,0.00014492382,0.000024004956,0.0000048377874,0.000632748],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933996,0.004757677,0.00022339297,0.00067910814,0.0006277771,0.00031250966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952566,0.02788761,0.008592816,0.007827321,0.0010716218,0.0020545786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006561728,0.0005140542,0.00061526045,0.0003640748,0.0009868776,0.0015298576,0.0009522216,0.0011446036,0.003345507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023063464,0.00051475735,0.00037993977,0.0002779223,0.0018998717,0.0009121899,0.0012719937,0.0013786651,0.0004688404],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037541542,0.16216694,0.14284985,0.0010575817,0.00075325137,0.0027689924,0.010113942,0.015612823,0.42419866,0.0505398,0.0034113803,0.14898531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012824977,0.30568638,0.18697205,0.00022837137,0.0008934751,0.002176955,0.004573041,0.12773937,0.27812183,0.066460185,0.013639026,0.000684385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055117137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044239682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006561728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087829184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070339744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034702122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134638914","doi":"","title":"Gender and Culture in a Threshold Public Goods Game : Japan versus Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Public good; Public goods game; Demographic economics; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Microeconomics; Geography; Communication","score_opus":0.05972623958122736,"score_gpt":0.31006535159203324,"score_spread":0.2503391120108059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134638914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995561,0.00003699107,0.00018840318,0.00014362308,0.0000029085768,0.0000066133557,0.000053631953,0.0000029750256,0.0040038256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910897,0.000039473274,0.00016400758,0.000021785143,7.062911e-7,0.0000038073163,0.000039341514,0.0000013777473,0.0006205486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995091,0.00012845409,0.000012802549,0.00005850904,0.00009154776,0.00019966734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830353,0.00061221386,0.00026719627,0.00007266351,0.00021928694,0.0005251123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006274144,0.0002308078,0.0004716779,0.0004169877,0.0018591629,0.0013327117,0.00040521187,0.00042817416,0.0025223023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003178583,0.00009578165,0.00018075782,0.00072550925,0.0012530187,0.0003909112,0.0005468672,0.00039411173,0.00010646287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007152732,0.0014495662,0.70132864,0.0003315877,0.00046455464,0.0024242918,0.019487161,0.045721956,0.025796684,0.1110962,0.013293474,0.07145321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048893824,0.0008079138,0.81454134,0.00008347828,0.0002955433,0.00035859027,0.044769604,0.11193114,0.0026172076,0.017193442,0.006681894,0.00023085588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8289754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88267714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17102462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072554206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005912955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34406358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136115981","doi":"10.1037/a0012454","title":"Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social dilemma; Social psychology; Incentive; Face (sociological concept); Free riding; Empirical research; Social group; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.14803411440487543,"score_gpt":0.4261600137040048,"score_spread":0.27812589929912934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136115981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7760345,0.0073653962,0.067681886,0.048356123,0.0010927924,0.00036154073,0.0000897416,0.00011622522,0.09890179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864271,0.0007866638,0.007464637,0.0010069129,0.00016039486,0.000068737594,0.000013142616,0.000012642047,0.00405978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364,0.004980733,0.0001305522,0.00034719842,0.0006945763,0.0002069326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97077,0.022362387,0.0037563841,0.00081775244,0.00083168637,0.0014617753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009015004,0.00079502806,0.0004903455,0.0010012706,0.0019645344,0.003244216,0.0008400673,0.003018839,0.004723915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04405376,0.0003361752,0.00041610244,0.0004370233,0.006810837,0.0067576715,0.0031148382,0.0016944185,0.0005228494],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011335213,0.00067888084,0.05375846,0.0010489138,0.00035967946,0.0031977468,0.032925695,0.0061118454,0.0047113355,0.70251954,0.015010776,0.17854372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029070865,0.00072443095,0.013841232,0.00041244488,0.00018734366,0.0020187148,0.0221322,0.018448723,0.0013221398,0.907462,0.033044636,0.000115421935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034693678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000852526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009015004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070764066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007523309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047676504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136324144","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.001","title":"How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Public good; Value (mathematics); Advertising; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.020383066069623392,"score_gpt":0.30480389599865887,"score_spread":0.2844208299290355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136324144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950021,0.00011672612,0.00030524275,0.0003900681,0.00002323716,0.000009866257,0.0000537607,0.000005861155,0.004093155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990872,0.00006541159,0.00010557273,0.00010810579,0.000010009806,0.00000777487,0.000036001482,0.000004905804,0.0005749872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997517,0.0016550913,0.00009370588,0.00024243067,0.00023459145,0.00025720766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97437036,0.014005597,0.006131829,0.001848923,0.0011668387,0.0024763797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004558491,0.00017825788,0.00056124333,0.00048733494,0.00054523716,0.0020266648,0.00029000736,0.0013234327,0.0044635106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027854584,0.00028164338,0.00042900047,0.0005200972,0.00095586444,0.000939792,0.00060361356,0.0015556901,0.0007740758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033349977,0.0019105299,0.9389465,0.0001260859,0.00064569194,0.00035457165,0.0018088527,0.0016486244,0.0073142545,0.003634978,0.0012449462,0.03902999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055939126,0.00046800735,0.9902706,0.000018914228,0.00014644882,0.00027717944,0.0010146564,0.0015514799,0.0008107263,0.004600256,0.00075429224,0.000031529715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015754115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012599785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004558491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043934656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032191954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024107873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136433400","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2005.18779161","title":"HOW DO YOU CLIMB THE CORPORATE LADDER? A MULTI-REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE ETHICAL PREFERENCES FOR INFLUENCING SUPERIORS.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Climb; Consistency (knowledge bases); Predictive power; Power (physics); Conservatism; Social psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11456469959403487,"score_gpt":0.35162257466963587,"score_spread":0.237057875075601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136433400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982553,0.00010282021,0.0003263994,0.0002192634,0.0000018109001,0.0000036423703,0.000025620937,0.0000010310271,0.0010641216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996124,0.000028487177,0.00014846443,0.000016080221,0.0000010928461,0.00000235136,0.000017197777,8.2086774e-7,0.00017317948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989967,0.000707748,0.000022970607,0.0000801984,0.00008583976,0.000106551735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936453,0.0028479814,0.0020702835,0.00031229673,0.00046828698,0.0006558546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029503678,0.00010829464,0.00016327621,0.00052091584,0.00053249643,0.0008748073,0.00020228483,0.00037877745,0.0024363885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00970617,0.00007467498,0.0003267602,0.00054577115,0.00068837806,0.00074270566,0.0006120073,0.0005610313,0.0002876576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041794346,0.00023524479,0.95528054,0.00004455347,0.00026766676,0.00021625274,0.00858575,0.0021597007,0.00084400777,0.004462692,0.001144421,0.026341178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026285723,0.00024599803,0.9740846,0.000023302968,0.00009230153,0.00009954254,0.015079594,0.0056697894,0.00022022497,0.0027472484,0.0016962723,0.000014792884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044955127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010840315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044955127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006181166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032446987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015603244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136838186","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633","title":"The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":557,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Dishonesty; Deception; Cheating; Social psychology; Psychology; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.06535257717907263,"score_gpt":0.38505044718877823,"score_spread":0.3196978700097056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136838186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45334053,0.0053737382,0.24114509,0.03529776,0.0006218003,0.00029157972,0.0001435181,0.00018801472,0.26359785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98478216,0.0003568493,0.0113952765,0.00084887195,0.0001099956,0.00012908706,0.000028678718,0.000025520203,0.0023235194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951794,0.0025895215,0.00017251396,0.00060745707,0.0012112866,0.00023985225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541123,0.03039203,0.0063447533,0.0056210537,0.0023408274,0.0011890142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010303971,0.00047726207,0.00059092295,0.0014492212,0.0020062719,0.0051348326,0.0015936518,0.0020504526,0.004208206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03527831,0.0004112941,0.00060939643,0.0011231262,0.012916514,0.008638009,0.0026175617,0.0040034084,0.00039575697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020722787,0.0002968191,0.011574209,0.00018586418,0.00008975179,0.00037266224,0.043911375,0.0011147268,0.0009475177,0.8790462,0.002372043,0.05988158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087784014,0.00017440646,0.011330061,0.0001668667,0.000069465255,0.0006273357,0.004429105,0.009547931,0.00049470284,0.9638689,0.009139662,0.000063753294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010891644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064279546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010303971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025360496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013873118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05449325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137334353","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2014.2124","title":"Discretionary Sanctions and Rewards in the Repeated Inspection Game","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; York University; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Royal Economic Society; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Sanctions; Discretion; Earnings; Microeconomics; Economics; Behavioral economics; Business; Political science; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.058406483359577197,"score_gpt":0.35969509110057224,"score_spread":0.30128860774099503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137334353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98086137,0.00008264415,0.009657939,0.0004067325,0.00002419116,0.00011776745,0.00006680515,0.000040608196,0.0087418165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959131,0.00003647415,0.0026779785,0.00008966511,0.000008253491,0.00007331505,0.000017868748,0.0000071429504,0.0011761708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948702,0.0031191716,0.0002196502,0.00045566302,0.00075491914,0.0005804949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95428663,0.031727683,0.008113691,0.0033761887,0.00059671095,0.0018991568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054115434,0.0008273374,0.0011338082,0.00049741805,0.00063562393,0.0017418964,0.0014283301,0.002044023,0.0062159495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029492188,0.00042604416,0.0005562177,0.00035299108,0.0016826526,0.0019841564,0.0012592197,0.001997033,0.00034271777],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01869443,0.023245791,0.0942471,0.0012444295,0.001117075,0.0018456893,0.004096223,0.27783543,0.10300765,0.33202773,0.007174991,0.13546339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003633386,0.011160914,0.09042969,0.00018622752,0.0004378566,0.0005800409,0.0013706143,0.6062454,0.012953609,0.2665689,0.00602694,0.0004063814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023883702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036885345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062159495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018111141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012974087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028619349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137403572","doi":"10.1007/s11747-010-0205-6","title":"Productive play time: the effect of practice on consumer demand for hedonic experiences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Task (project management); Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Affect (linguistics); Power (physics); Human capital; Psychology; Business; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.01526773892509172,"score_gpt":0.36188340450019935,"score_spread":0.34661566557510765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137403572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985947,0.00006831008,0.000077303506,0.0000865447,0.0000058807977,0.000012211668,0.000050471932,0.000004689851,0.0011000045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872464,0.00006355227,0.0001585913,0.00003575231,0.000008178116,0.000025381698,0.00007163461,0.0000088275865,0.0009034158],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902475,0.00040734492,0.000044800698,0.00015390896,0.00019618405,0.0001730828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9350293,0.05266865,0.0035749674,0.002047307,0.000849569,0.0058301687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018414318,0.0003728008,0.0005540121,0.0005086656,0.0007230761,0.0021553321,0.0010724212,0.0013536543,0.015446815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028227266,0.0005434593,0.0005525321,0.000475183,0.0013026586,0.0011139835,0.001371733,0.0018777006,0.0006622732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.079552785,0.05602995,0.72917885,0.00043709765,0.0012160514,0.0010969087,0.008342137,0.003459756,0.037800077,0.0034272824,0.0012134397,0.078245685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064411695,0.0043983245,0.9865861,0.00003427304,0.0001928917,0.0001336644,0.0021991278,0.0025765991,0.0010922317,0.0014545663,0.0006473454,0.00004081654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060710046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00960824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015446815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010720433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086329604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051674724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137858987","doi":"","title":"A Simple Test of Learning Theory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Nuffield Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stochastic game; Nash equilibrium; Simple (philosophy); Best response; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection; Test (biology); Fictitious play; Mathematics; Game theory; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013597502479442745,"score_gpt":0.25571713619522957,"score_spread":0.24211963371578682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137858987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48824167,0.0014852872,0.19138053,0.013386096,0.001691168,0.001347221,0.0054441686,0.0010375772,0.29598635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740074,0.00018062751,0.016428536,0.0011419059,0.00038357216,0.0008320898,0.0010254689,0.00008414664,0.005916141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865622,0.0073335376,0.0005744128,0.0023643076,0.0023747692,0.0007908888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8448591,0.13431518,0.004617866,0.008578546,0.0049706264,0.0026586622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012460374,0.0011675485,0.0020807427,0.0021675837,0.0014749357,0.0028472482,0.003254964,0.0026477505,0.06893564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13077545,0.00023524277,0.0018348162,0.0017846064,0.0048434464,0.0065836813,0.0034366355,0.002269164,0.004144724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003915328,0.0018790482,0.05390934,0.0014668198,0.0010956676,0.00056037307,0.0010927687,0.014523855,0.0016194631,0.7610586,0.021380153,0.1374986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011985425,0.003314223,0.027934011,0.00022750857,0.00020824505,0.00039154984,0.0009931803,0.09204194,0.0014027302,0.8529377,0.019252038,0.00009838789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012531136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004580851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06893564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016013745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017027867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2306127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138034836","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.00249.x","title":"The elementary economics of social dilemmas","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Social dilemma; Dilemma; Diagrammatic reasoning; Incentive; Prisoner's dilemma; Delegation; Positive economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Economics; Epistemology; Game theory; Political science; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.12851841989868437,"score_gpt":0.2367032850344933,"score_spread":0.10818486513580894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138034836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056209,0.008146692,0.47186646,0.02202747,0.0006667357,0.0002486228,0.00046264898,0.00021399393,0.4401583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87443566,0.0064559,0.090831615,0.0011238286,0.0004991493,0.0006020491,0.00015334926,0.000079170924,0.025819298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984218,0.000985301,0.000056592675,0.00011227654,0.0003315271,0.00009265028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964359,0.0027723575,0.00019718724,0.00023663777,0.00021935963,0.00013857061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001863181,0.00062801625,0.0005618283,0.0011894709,0.0010822904,0.004260789,0.00078758225,0.0017728127,0.01228833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006887237,0.00039605645,0.00061051786,0.0011041525,0.0070644342,0.005387209,0.0014894996,0.0017786565,0.000874239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002352636,0.0000037100085,0.00002471553,0.000018488052,0.0000016502362,0.0000084898,0.000037369733,0.0019605265,0.000031836375,0.99605983,0.00047144288,0.00137966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005534593,0.0000027606422,0.000028427532,0.000012701473,8.40396e-7,0.0000120301465,0.000022756347,0.0018556918,0.00001807681,0.99357176,0.0044678925,0.0000015740499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010609678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067373354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01228833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027401925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011868536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04110855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138590550","doi":"","title":"A General Test of Gaming","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Dysfunctional family; Measure (data warehouse); Psychology; Test (biology); Simple (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Correlation; Social psychology; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.08320777494675724,"score_gpt":0.34556037275127555,"score_spread":0.2623525978045183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138590550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8042644,0.0003127828,0.07855285,0.0020855537,0.0003756722,0.0012635338,0.004593218,0.0005600271,0.10799202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98924315,0.000046717836,0.0065842667,0.0002232687,0.00005861026,0.00084499,0.00078704813,0.00004462347,0.0021673786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97868663,0.009098629,0.0013989927,0.005679202,0.0041123116,0.0010242602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8336663,0.13231093,0.012628145,0.013416315,0.005420565,0.002557858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014850884,0.0014688475,0.0013849477,0.0013215288,0.0009960819,0.0028446,0.0032687495,0.0032473693,0.06158194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104520425,0.00033719238,0.0016811467,0.0018584818,0.0046849255,0.00533978,0.003023326,0.0025729476,0.0041335695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00957902,0.004882657,0.46869403,0.0020739236,0.0033652652,0.0006872945,0.0038386472,0.015957637,0.007669011,0.36215037,0.011352423,0.10974979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011643746,0.012362964,0.5097791,0.00047374575,0.0008334299,0.001404893,0.0033689453,0.14445654,0.0069647036,0.29901862,0.019912522,0.00026019945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000853142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002468532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06158194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097513257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014475948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20601213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138623668","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00322.x","title":"CARROTS AND STICKS: PRIZES AND PUNISHMENTS IN CONTESTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Punishment (psychology); Economics; Microeconomics; Population; Mathematical economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03274469962926691,"score_gpt":0.35036548519297595,"score_spread":0.31762078556370904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138623668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.614925,0.001508395,0.31920025,0.0028366668,0.0002491693,0.00040979337,0.00015888619,0.00019155283,0.060520295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975135,0.00026459433,0.019632412,0.00012937695,0.000043348664,0.00014025976,0.000022110411,0.000024285275,0.004608555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343395,0.004371365,0.00020812634,0.00051524333,0.0007278559,0.00074352295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97619504,0.016209314,0.0037135521,0.0013031258,0.000705033,0.0018739848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069831586,0.0011777242,0.0017896191,0.0009182881,0.0016606507,0.0041816663,0.0015700355,0.0025691409,0.009796717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038501766,0.00090211316,0.00081185007,0.00091132947,0.0057384106,0.0042627784,0.0021999497,0.0024749567,0.00062448304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013509793,0.00022274563,0.0034776882,0.00032952463,0.0001321573,0.0002982275,0.0008029598,0.11520468,0.0041620494,0.83427405,0.0025314693,0.037213404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039430812,0.00039306615,0.002061864,0.0000657614,0.000051572337,0.00014279586,0.00037531464,0.17945935,0.00066806877,0.81270367,0.0036242323,0.000059993385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015129786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020028872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009796717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002450805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014754696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03693092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138658041","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1329988","title":"Training Without Certification: An Experimental Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Industry Canada","keywords":"Certification; Reputation; Training (meteorology); Outcome (game theory); Business; Marketing; Experimental economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.12939183578326652,"score_gpt":0.4018090973184587,"score_spread":0.2724172615351922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138658041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949738,0.00009674437,0.0006416675,0.00016403713,0.00014022426,0.0017767982,0.00025739564,0.00003508021,0.0019142356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97830623,0.00026851526,0.002322912,0.00046446273,0.00028717672,0.005594196,0.00077800377,0.000045716268,0.011932902],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943053,0.0019701018,0.0004753722,0.0011729103,0.00082618376,0.0012500273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628558,0.020600716,0.0036466538,0.006130026,0.0014087415,0.0053580566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065392,0.0019951141,0.0026814397,0.0013667991,0.0026437694,0.0019907828,0.0026499752,0.0075177,0.023047576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024403932,0.0012133283,0.001181323,0.0009987535,0.0038312278,0.0026388955,0.0029009131,0.0043017073,0.0038423813],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.13388005,0.8136649,0.006574696,0.0006185093,0.00016992453,0.00051641685,0.0016160351,0.0014180364,0.009629442,0.0021990445,0.0018082982,0.027904741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.103602916,0.8147369,0.046779916,0.00034936116,0.0008928178,0.0005141247,0.0030292918,0.0062541086,0.010639145,0.0068047354,0.0060909945,0.00030576295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027503045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023285777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023047576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012235903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032673948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07710177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138800014","doi":"10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00137-3","title":"Detecting other-regarding behavior with virtual players","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Public good; Experimental economics; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.025669123339213784,"score_gpt":0.29698272682299165,"score_spread":0.27131360348377787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138800014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961824,0.000014182706,0.0025581843,0.000027837488,0.000010038493,0.000018691986,0.000060455684,0.00004743823,0.0010806497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963726,0.000012428439,0.0029228611,0.000025522375,0.0000056296944,0.00002202921,0.00006605792,0.0000056718095,0.0005672537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939716,0.00032685444,0.000020699625,0.00011542967,0.00007167848,0.000068048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458164,0.0036136326,0.0006388269,0.00032883897,0.00025773232,0.0005792516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000714367,0.00042599626,0.00039135249,0.00055517664,0.00037503365,0.0008873673,0.0004644711,0.00093106186,0.0026661528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00625978,0.00028401683,0.0001925375,0.00024613357,0.00025040295,0.00060888875,0.00086027215,0.0005786088,0.0004695018],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005764203,0.0025761405,0.81525326,0.0001556265,0.0003283678,0.00063657947,0.0019434436,0.0055749137,0.07947562,0.0024027284,0.0016908546,0.08419828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003918249,0.0053982595,0.63936406,0.000059950748,0.00040434775,0.0020918204,0.003020166,0.30584565,0.03545848,0.0051684496,0.002659237,0.0001377401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009368021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015345966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026661528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017043165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017664272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00891912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139759815","doi":"10.1509/jmkg.67.3.47.18659","title":"Mass-Communicated Prediction Requests: Practical Application and a Cognitive Dissonance Explanation for Self-Prophecy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Normative; Self-fulfilling prophecy; Normative social influence; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Cognition; Social psychology; Social influence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03574554189403385,"score_gpt":0.36938472398907296,"score_spread":0.3336391820950391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139759815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31726068,0.0022459158,0.24011704,0.097433686,0.00088051864,0.00061087415,0.00013716065,0.00028277005,0.34103137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766068,0.00040281663,0.016963767,0.001959,0.00018776282,0.00019143452,0.000020171816,0.000018911198,0.0036492897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597836,0.0026804626,0.000118448705,0.0003477292,0.0006074933,0.00026738588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96643764,0.027416755,0.0024546424,0.0019916594,0.0012519369,0.0004473697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006124244,0.00075762824,0.0004517794,0.00095405924,0.0013011935,0.002708146,0.0023286042,0.0051972587,0.011883048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03152925,0.0003667334,0.0006849771,0.0005998868,0.010727787,0.006667412,0.0023881726,0.0031038593,0.000634059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008935028,0.0003352178,0.0031543293,0.00015668517,0.000025654372,0.0008500793,0.008746493,0.0026137817,0.00091398845,0.95839685,0.0020929065,0.022624625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013828985,0.00012379447,0.0035881037,0.00009586644,0.000022389779,0.00048967544,0.003788768,0.026265126,0.0008125817,0.9561117,0.0085105505,0.000053153995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001451064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010000741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011883048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017222827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013441311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03975278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141157924","doi":"10.1177/0170840605051496","title":"Weber and Legal Rule Evolution: The Closing of the Iron Cage?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Bureaucracy; Law; Closing (real estate); Interpretation (philosophy); Punctuated equilibrium; Shock (circulatory); Institution; Politics; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02300741008953824,"score_gpt":0.3155990569387025,"score_spread":0.2925916468491643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141157924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171468,0.001898433,0.0095703,0.010744856,0.00006982076,0.00002782076,0.0000550546,0.00003507532,0.060451753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956085,0.00049206044,0.0017074128,0.0002963043,0.000049369544,0.000009940481,0.000021078144,0.0000095190735,0.0018057484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878806,0.00053275924,0.000049808852,0.0002482603,0.00020776206,0.0001733515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908929,0.005048403,0.0020972288,0.0010445118,0.00042821406,0.0004887374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036543335,0.00014910339,0.00042593636,0.0013408075,0.0010101305,0.0023229227,0.0006175408,0.0012153056,0.004010499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016324945,0.00020724405,0.00031805687,0.0013044775,0.008077874,0.0069275284,0.0009483823,0.0008366713,0.00024600734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025176507,0.00022284803,0.06799602,0.00008502799,0.000051360734,0.00042695802,0.009065964,0.0047643376,0.0019706534,0.776761,0.0018533771,0.13655059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007297268,0.00018823949,0.1200537,0.000105206804,0.000026329708,0.0004017193,0.0065938374,0.008097408,0.0016071837,0.8367159,0.026077703,0.000059868245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029862556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027076735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004010499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017000969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084139185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01932621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141171670","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.770869","title":"Competitive Burnout: Theory and Experimental Evidence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Burnout; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.01932128048282646,"score_gpt":0.33527654859754746,"score_spread":0.315955268114721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141171670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9282481,0.011718441,0.0066146813,0.005773016,0.00028277488,0.00030250588,0.00022753867,0.000027613472,0.04680539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99315965,0.0032801405,0.0011760921,0.00094593264,0.00015363618,0.000117430616,0.00013975693,0.000009745023,0.0010176166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932811,0.004320759,0.00026040533,0.00063179724,0.0010358717,0.000470021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79148215,0.17798981,0.013658234,0.008177473,0.0060259826,0.002666411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018620329,0.0007958429,0.00086386094,0.0014706021,0.0016999097,0.0024993739,0.0019455752,0.0023388613,0.012501873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053487953,0.00048030296,0.00037838533,0.0015836525,0.0053897006,0.0017515486,0.0016168355,0.0015126351,0.0012938621],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035202548,0.0502598,0.36020616,0.010232225,0.003102054,0.00090056594,0.014325541,0.00795665,0.013153406,0.20262522,0.010705243,0.29133064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009576587,0.020163266,0.54559904,0.004910276,0.0031653547,0.0014625393,0.028877506,0.018770838,0.01705917,0.31948382,0.030542763,0.00038886047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030400872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034415494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018620329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016469565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020170538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09847486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142027349","doi":"10.1086/653504","title":"Investment Tournaments: When Should a Rational Agent Put All Eggs in One Basket?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic game; Investment (military); Decision maker; Microeconomics; Order (exchange); Economics; Promotion (chess); Investment decisions; Labour economics; Class (philosophy); Production (economics); Computer science; Finance; Management science; Law","score_opus":0.08365916277818532,"score_gpt":0.356207604602603,"score_spread":0.2725484418244177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142027349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52164966,0.0026042252,0.33497092,0.026319224,0.0007351683,0.00077451597,0.0007528525,0.00043392245,0.111759506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464049,0.0006848427,0.03840907,0.0011974578,0.00024420331,0.00027492046,0.00023604777,0.00005255673,0.012495944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974554,0.0015292634,0.00009477839,0.00033176356,0.00019228872,0.00039650928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925816,0.00424385,0.0012289095,0.00040571947,0.0003993726,0.0011405257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030401251,0.0007508594,0.0010250498,0.0003297859,0.0012616502,0.0030643155,0.001467008,0.0037725882,0.009973998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01792489,0.0004331603,0.0005236499,0.0005093951,0.0019358838,0.0035419296,0.0012524901,0.0020399245,0.0009132918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017660306,0.00072077103,0.017717352,0.00039130688,0.0003119836,0.0010778935,0.0014798517,0.0787365,0.0032943299,0.7742132,0.022543035,0.097747736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050557754,0.0004968107,0.003291973,0.0000914164,0.00007960267,0.00024167728,0.0008670695,0.17228176,0.0009032651,0.79880035,0.022361822,0.00007878617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001557393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016500949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009973998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001038226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009797189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033366382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143125718","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2009.40003","title":"Metacognition in animals: how do we know that they know?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Binghamton University; State University of New York","keywords":"Comparative cognition; Metacognition; Psychology; Need to know; Animal behavior; Animal cognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Computer science; Neuroscience; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.27136266855031566,"score_gpt":0.4453087482937923,"score_spread":0.17394607974347664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143125718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66912603,0.06970104,0.08588987,0.11170158,0.00066839275,0.00006002606,0.0004129239,0.00014648319,0.062293768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96275073,0.017509898,0.0113836825,0.0049245367,0.00025767932,0.00005226652,0.00013028996,0.000021069205,0.00296988],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897563,0.000418996,0.00004407751,0.0002142306,0.0002535088,0.0000936172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99110246,0.0042396663,0.0016127678,0.0016879448,0.00077679567,0.0005803559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025522693,0.00029856755,0.00065325154,0.0009913401,0.0006002203,0.0026317316,0.0008607595,0.0011918049,0.0016906206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011839763,0.0002545524,0.00030360837,0.00076569244,0.007400453,0.0077923797,0.0013918444,0.0024280502,0.00029943415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037828216,0.00034348216,0.088425316,0.0017490722,0.00069566123,0.0004999538,0.008534913,0.0035630912,0.0070149894,0.3677814,0.007114168,0.5138996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024661276,0.00025999316,0.05183495,0.00044242755,0.000107572516,0.0005291699,0.0021831759,0.0022412608,0.002242189,0.9051331,0.034927066,0.000074480195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014319174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011417598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026317316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000794158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008931797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013497889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143512713","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2274196","title":"Salience, Coordination and Cooperation in Contributing to Threshold Public Goods","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Public good; Business; Law and economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.026198790002711914,"score_gpt":0.328735465055261,"score_spread":0.3025366750525491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143512713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747351,0.00008612331,0.0067481254,0.00040459746,0.000014440716,0.00004666288,0.000020184547,0.000023198618,0.0179217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816483,0.000027813887,0.0011317263,0.000021775417,0.000009646292,0.000016181913,0.000007510648,0.0000053283466,0.00061514054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980149,0.0009817253,0.00008667016,0.00022463042,0.0003834742,0.00030865424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96266377,0.023918733,0.006386412,0.0025661055,0.00093019934,0.0035346663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005229196,0.00050231395,0.0006966581,0.0011710933,0.0010817657,0.0030372415,0.00062247843,0.0022353076,0.0057350327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029109322,0.0004982508,0.00043049656,0.00062436645,0.002466103,0.0020892026,0.0026863841,0.0013855208,0.000346909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005156308,0.004008756,0.21852055,0.0007539028,0.0004182864,0.0015704217,0.009266655,0.047613736,0.058526907,0.55903083,0.002508588,0.0926251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007242289,0.0013464484,0.23928389,0.000054396634,0.00025172453,0.00053750054,0.0043024146,0.06752343,0.0036079474,0.68026817,0.0019771561,0.00012277882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088157726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012560699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057350327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008955559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010963926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027654946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143552630","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500007280","title":"Ambient-Based Policy Instruments: The Role of Recommendations and Presentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Economic Research Service; W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Stochastic game; Presentation (obstetrics); Table (database); Test (biology); Environmental policy; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Environmental economics; Data mining","score_opus":0.01547077637322717,"score_gpt":0.2992001456490958,"score_spread":0.2837293692758686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143552630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86785054,0.0007374382,0.09802715,0.0012820548,0.00011899328,0.0007664664,0.00041995948,0.000369041,0.030428352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96503574,0.00031293463,0.032236382,0.0001465761,0.000034974844,0.00048216086,0.00013168037,0.000026639222,0.0015928335],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98809695,0.009140166,0.00046953218,0.00059555145,0.001452654,0.00024516947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94560015,0.041514467,0.0062389756,0.0042106784,0.0015468379,0.0008889573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008716216,0.00069295004,0.00066820957,0.00041054064,0.00041179822,0.0025174555,0.0011630302,0.0016966317,0.0057947473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056184523,0.00036453395,0.00057003176,0.0004213925,0.0010117872,0.002587194,0.0011131115,0.0015695669,0.0006915573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008315007,0.014360297,0.12492987,0.0042188265,0.0015337653,0.00066935853,0.008364724,0.10503977,0.081920534,0.12369872,0.0041205725,0.5228285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035640397,0.028181858,0.25463286,0.0017334801,0.002124585,0.0009718278,0.009190752,0.3801951,0.05090838,0.2134515,0.053971555,0.0010741078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086595095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089601293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008716216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000904707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086925604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046096265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143947714","doi":"10.1037/a0036673","title":"Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Express trust; Norm (philosophy); Goodwill; Duty; Disposition; Flourishing; Dictator game; Epistemology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.056233172646166375,"score_gpt":0.4034714311614707,"score_spread":0.3472382585153043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143947714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62767065,0.017806271,0.054109115,0.056725137,0.00076918065,0.000051998562,0.00048519412,0.00010997067,0.24227244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958152,0.00087058503,0.00061765994,0.00048712874,0.00006274408,0.000007719284,0.000041960557,0.000014347403,0.0020825926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955071,0.0023805215,0.00028782635,0.0006763958,0.00080952013,0.00033874664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96853775,0.012188486,0.009948873,0.0027698674,0.0034223069,0.0031327065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054290877,0.00023703698,0.00042759682,0.0011199157,0.0021840483,0.0049675764,0.0006367845,0.0018277742,0.0064221025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042649996,0.00028545616,0.0003246636,0.0010163921,0.008595634,0.007427012,0.0022672552,0.00228561,0.0007577242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055193604,0.0002253132,0.1147177,0.00039804046,0.00030900983,0.0009127404,0.025366824,0.0021492995,0.0014924476,0.70935154,0.014507144,0.13001804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005916669,0.00040518094,0.16275841,0.0005875221,0.00020482115,0.0017695145,0.013673228,0.0055056466,0.0013488191,0.7458737,0.06766461,0.00014941112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006744916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057343803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006744916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028628393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012801687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028712094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144137943","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02378.x","title":"Fairness in Children's Resource Allocation Depends on the Recipient","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":375,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Resource allocation; Psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.05279356707324047,"score_gpt":0.39549783901095936,"score_spread":0.3427042719377189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144137943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99766374,0.000052295443,0.00015411437,0.00005279062,0.0000026197615,0.000008218065,0.000016087213,0.0000027865844,0.0020473704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999263,0.000047792768,0.00028971487,0.00001254597,0.0000014666892,0.00000979647,0.000020101126,0.0000024890596,0.00035310237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984059,0.0004740828,0.00011425772,0.0001960072,0.00042136552,0.00038847604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364954,0.0026112262,0.0022768136,0.00037602213,0.00034489442,0.0007414649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027338604,0.00033867045,0.00029744022,0.00036029387,0.00053428375,0.0017281931,0.0002964742,0.00047770224,0.0034131894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011861037,0.00032903062,0.00024641133,0.00018926807,0.0014409017,0.0007050175,0.00088551495,0.00074974896,0.0003047905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002320293,0.0011273212,0.8904499,0.00015219487,0.000104948434,0.0014572621,0.016306551,0.0035443974,0.03376861,0.013912489,0.0009317942,0.03592429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002159568,0.0012357655,0.96530306,0.00008424935,0.00009577652,0.0012838844,0.00659919,0.0034709303,0.010004916,0.0063114534,0.005295162,0.000099578334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004565914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050893654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004565914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079141767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069184013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0144581795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144280931","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.604524","title":"Trust and Reciprocity: Groups versus Individuals and Behavior versus Perceptions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sociology; Perception; Reading (process); Social psychology; Psychology; Norm of reciprocity; Social science; Political science; Social capital; Law","score_opus":0.03146097204104401,"score_gpt":0.33202281751023166,"score_spread":0.3005618454691876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144280931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718436,0.00062050216,0.003695901,0.0013680658,0.00004178372,0.000030891344,0.000059643982,0.000005266869,0.022334235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990126,0.0001624027,0.00033385982,0.000039572285,0.000021089103,0.000012423374,0.000011114575,0.000002901161,0.00040392188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942695,0.003880037,0.00025091943,0.00050550833,0.00077637297,0.00031772951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9318018,0.051659692,0.009854292,0.0027313968,0.001874898,0.0020779413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007994602,0.00034144346,0.00058290974,0.0008545703,0.00076760614,0.0037149785,0.0003314116,0.0013960846,0.008457671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043936655,0.00029768475,0.00033805388,0.00093412877,0.003207341,0.0041019875,0.0014781436,0.0011708601,0.0003757125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053140307,0.0021730512,0.55558807,0.0010939111,0.0010531305,0.00077988044,0.036525346,0.0032230492,0.0062818006,0.2573312,0.0019519579,0.12868458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053305255,0.0023515278,0.6902626,0.00038953946,0.0012937869,0.0010310621,0.03826061,0.012297024,0.0030960313,0.2440168,0.006274476,0.00019345195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008695749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011296576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008457671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007922091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052363117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04228002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145330028","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2013.1826","title":"Rewarding Volunteers: A Field Experiment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Spillover effect; Donation; Population; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Medicine","score_opus":0.02615208978005712,"score_gpt":0.33916354326482345,"score_spread":0.31301145348476633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145330028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990272,0.00008256153,0.0026414956,0.00056060357,0.00012522997,0.002103522,0.00018043797,0.00006836581,0.0039658006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96175575,0.00019491093,0.021467876,0.002152019,0.00018621639,0.007740847,0.00030999992,0.000035622612,0.0061566797],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511755,0.003370668,0.00018750298,0.0006794387,0.00030031608,0.00034440943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689534,0.019849157,0.0027626622,0.0037069581,0.0013630453,0.0033648896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012914289,0.0012956563,0.0013045507,0.0004668029,0.0018947824,0.0015821258,0.0022087179,0.0031104302,0.007131132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012633928,0.000740167,0.0005722206,0.00044468127,0.0019303793,0.0014025191,0.0013057546,0.002303621,0.000800413],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11700711,0.536089,0.05483741,0.0023602482,0.00096377044,0.0026552933,0.01729784,0.011103069,0.12220224,0.022093548,0.014941407,0.0984491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08007044,0.6127057,0.111494705,0.00075882004,0.001336152,0.0014073226,0.008688369,0.051121622,0.04145276,0.0469807,0.04321462,0.00076884695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001997644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024993406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012914289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072433206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013492004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0682981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145380374","doi":"10.1007/s00199-007-0212-0","title":"Punishment, counterpunishment and sanction enforcement in a social dilemma experiment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Enforcement; Earnings; Dilemma; Public good; Public finance; Welfare; Social dilemma; Economics; Law and economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.022756015701475923,"score_gpt":0.33881942245295166,"score_spread":0.3160634067514757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145380374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961384,0.000033598073,0.0011006562,0.00025471553,0.000043399727,0.00014549939,0.000049817856,0.000014752163,0.0022193012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325836,0.00004802588,0.004473133,0.00023305656,0.000024343763,0.00052531,0.000054536413,0.000009707949,0.0013734481],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605834,0.0024809851,0.00023832041,0.00035396795,0.0005156943,0.00035267556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95677644,0.03212737,0.0045432504,0.003118828,0.00066139596,0.002772708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061413916,0.000897079,0.0010939316,0.0005198318,0.00096857466,0.0015656555,0.0014483097,0.0027969196,0.004448141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021941131,0.00042650558,0.00043270946,0.00032538403,0.0023188617,0.0013631462,0.0010310502,0.0024433832,0.00030934624],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11836264,0.3247525,0.06629669,0.002178274,0.0014320697,0.002398667,0.009469533,0.09473863,0.15080838,0.1219296,0.009220179,0.098412916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05877438,0.22719735,0.08350116,0.0005253382,0.00072044955,0.0013783361,0.005480126,0.33774704,0.059423346,0.209705,0.014825488,0.00072189904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072601135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074391335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061413916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008932817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013599033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032479167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146699268","doi":"10.1093/qje/qju021","title":"Extensive Imitation is Irrational and Harmful*","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Imitation; Rationality; Irrational number; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Class (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034997560516687634,"score_gpt":0.3024489094482501,"score_spread":0.26745134893156247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146699268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74131626,0.00050271564,0.19211218,0.0065014935,0.00008564535,0.000095123076,0.00018131224,0.00040496746,0.058800355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99564964,0.00006654205,0.0021639268,0.000120724544,0.00001634736,0.000022551076,0.000016193344,0.000013135624,0.0019309389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588096,0.0019061293,0.0003336141,0.0007063145,0.0007074049,0.0004655465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9297785,0.044764914,0.0106929,0.010394291,0.002535215,0.0018341662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006371569,0.0004713736,0.0009887061,0.00072207564,0.00087690743,0.0019221598,0.0010592066,0.0018060775,0.0038136914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04815565,0.00043378424,0.0006078459,0.0003579891,0.006370883,0.0033379223,0.0025071967,0.001793086,0.00055432064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005879057,0.00022554932,0.043519698,0.00030705085,0.00034780463,0.0022574256,0.0015972492,0.12969953,0.004144149,0.75986296,0.0060223965,0.051428363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051724335,0.00013696314,0.00578007,0.00006379037,0.000048936647,0.00067652436,0.0003793659,0.15989806,0.0014557318,0.8295575,0.0019093151,0.000042024367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015166381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011546423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006371569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001045734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088240625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033696473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146904012","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.031","title":"Prosocial behavior and incentives: Evidence from field experiments in rural Mexico and Tanzania","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"World Agroforestry Centre; Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Michigan State University; United States Agency for International Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Prosocial behavior; Payment; Public economics; Tanzania; Distrust; Premise; Economics; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.08386047576948277,"score_gpt":0.334920429353972,"score_spread":0.2510599535844892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146904012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993468,0.00004144039,0.00007727125,0.00005008677,9.5734e-7,0.000011164353,0.000016274755,0.0000012380514,0.0004548638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992119,0.00008979712,0.00031206626,0.000040758892,0.0000023172202,0.000045223027,0.00002557373,0.0000011581124,0.00027127657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.999064,0.0007038935,0.00002873366,0.0000755116,0.000051768508,0.00007610602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835271,0.011577789,0.0031776733,0.0008709138,0.00035438302,0.0004920681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027928983,0.0003731455,0.0003782198,0.000571733,0.0011450262,0.00066742545,0.00050361827,0.00071800343,0.003237246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007838614,0.00027905047,0.00016656493,0.00045445387,0.0017339579,0.00055146666,0.00052247127,0.0005976147,0.00014244815],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019596301,0.03476518,0.7866975,0.0008636909,0.00076604023,0.0010254212,0.011650942,0.0028393746,0.058843028,0.012331987,0.0020433117,0.06857722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010045862,0.006313336,0.9747809,0.00009945006,0.00025990335,0.00022685889,0.0059308647,0.0030794402,0.0038521353,0.0029849932,0.0014252854,0.000042187825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009395288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020915229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009395288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008174248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005552703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018681228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147117158","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.002","title":"Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution and Human Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Altruism (biology); Reputation; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Trustworthiness; Social psychology; Reciprocal altruism; Psychology; Competition (biology); Dictator game; Microeconomics; Economics; Commons; Political science","score_opus":0.026659224865162014,"score_gpt":0.30992769912022516,"score_spread":0.28326847425506313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147117158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8169675,0.0015372718,0.057207383,0.0115825655,0.00022106196,0.000090853006,0.00008768182,0.00007693831,0.11222879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942782,0.000156608,0.0032402917,0.00032663794,0.000034001903,0.000014285924,0.00001232231,0.0000090514795,0.0019285008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807644,0.0010850502,0.000060091526,0.00022892801,0.0003444905,0.00020504952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98784244,0.00591947,0.0031561581,0.0017387301,0.0005350583,0.0008080118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038050488,0.0005152276,0.0004691703,0.00054739346,0.0012435718,0.0014553851,0.00062295055,0.0029151083,0.007258001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014663607,0.00030071323,0.0004909025,0.00039206122,0.0039278297,0.002794701,0.0015820957,0.0014597991,0.00034876898],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007208327,0.0005841404,0.032255746,0.00063072337,0.00061238935,0.000668352,0.0018474904,0.02656223,0.0141089875,0.85984993,0.004275683,0.057883594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016907867,0.00031756706,0.02821583,0.000058349273,0.00014611609,0.00046676685,0.00074688887,0.023037963,0.002341748,0.9389616,0.005476185,0.00006199685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015834097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002580816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007258001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010525099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014489382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024280429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148021125","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.12.004","title":"Social preferences and voting: An exploration using a novel preference revealing mechanism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Referendum; Public good; Economics; Social preferences; Preference; Public economics; Microeconomics; Mechanism (biology); Social choice theory; Political science","score_opus":0.33988574658920745,"score_gpt":0.38497046166357396,"score_spread":0.04508471507436651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148021125","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45971727,0.0010644355,0.5069178,0.007001538,0.00012255803,0.00017814699,0.00021068197,0.000112790156,0.024674917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959788,0.00058572117,0.036242608,0.00022195943,0.000118261676,0.0000825502,0.000025302927,0.000017873412,0.0029176224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976107,0.0018069448,0.00006942613,0.0001948094,0.00015392434,0.00016424194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780463,0.017890168,0.0016141234,0.0017314274,0.00039890237,0.00031912967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004689782,0.00048313887,0.0012199437,0.0005844967,0.000778314,0.0030708017,0.0016097242,0.0023123566,0.0071306727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02232272,0.00052924285,0.0012965463,0.0010076223,0.002315992,0.0063596126,0.0014503904,0.0018919756,0.00026794558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023700015,0.00025243888,0.0017933943,0.00013398544,0.000078847974,0.00012855954,0.0003978861,0.011279682,0.0013461115,0.96979314,0.00063129165,0.013927552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019311381,0.00011119436,0.0007390789,0.000021298089,0.000065157365,0.00011214676,0.00017345346,0.10040756,0.00027072345,0.89703053,0.00085323304,0.000022435897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005693061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005018213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071306727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007958862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010088716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024802268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148554199","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x03320059","title":"What's a face worth: Noneconomic factors in game playing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Leicester; University of Essex","keywords":"Dictator game; Ultimatum game; Attractiveness; Dictator; Stochastic game; Psychology; Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Microeconomics; Economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1005574956795027,"score_gpt":0.3763676332053072,"score_spread":0.2758101375258045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148554199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95954585,0.0003057257,0.0024317915,0.0018020855,0.000030712417,0.000016826798,0.000034155953,0.000010591449,0.03582222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.000038332375,0.00031955517,0.000056459194,0.000012224033,0.0000030005801,0.0000045926413,0.00000382872,0.00032407366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910235,0.00046421218,0.000036805493,0.00008642469,0.00023588662,0.00007434077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685753,0.008355157,0.0020847954,0.00054865156,0.000719537,0.0014344216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016346999,0.00025725135,0.0002877185,0.00043801093,0.0007535309,0.0035733057,0.0003040362,0.000815467,0.0058154976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013468365,0.00022348242,0.00016213437,0.00033288437,0.0015287604,0.0016336301,0.00073231704,0.0010003523,0.0002597138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034752148,0.0029642426,0.5481968,0.00051362696,0.0005132436,0.0020167,0.0071511082,0.014662179,0.027498934,0.1819478,0.0040213745,0.20703878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016514507,0.0007319747,0.69940513,0.000105875755,0.0002535633,0.00084587623,0.0051241717,0.03748849,0.0030453708,0.24789795,0.004822888,0.000113586466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009744597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001875755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058154976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009958199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005589118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019454777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150672405","doi":"10.1007/s40881-015-0003-5","title":"Naive play and the process of choice in guessing games","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Contrast (vision); Incentive; Process (computing); Computer science; Action (physics); Space (punctuation); Decision process; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Management science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03121432417171604,"score_gpt":0.35918832682424356,"score_spread":0.3279740026525275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150672405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8290546,0.00008667394,0.16125762,0.000679344,0.000015711537,0.0003267382,0.00013832994,0.0001586493,0.008282369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97987753,0.00003576394,0.018822942,0.00008356266,0.000007446076,0.00017054653,0.000051639745,0.000020641255,0.0009298715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807457,0.014051626,0.0008676491,0.0015645268,0.0018931471,0.0008774108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84710485,0.12466915,0.011491193,0.012757763,0.002050456,0.0019265779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019380229,0.0006522373,0.0011281596,0.0007109573,0.0008106074,0.0028854967,0.0011341998,0.0016729534,0.005984053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100193195,0.0007835056,0.0006718756,0.00048144226,0.0062725,0.004924819,0.0023471531,0.0024607154,0.0004792639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071078567,0.0013066599,0.061698575,0.0006853545,0.00041127563,0.0007100509,0.013079809,0.07320162,0.04138003,0.72330636,0.001582528,0.07552991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007026621,0.0011296227,0.021342516,0.000108891,0.00008129956,0.0003500666,0.0011804759,0.27945116,0.011015872,0.6820754,0.0023862328,0.00017579172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010927176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007929289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019380229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012496522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010181236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102493644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151028156","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2014.0213","title":"Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biology Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Competitor analysis; Disadvantaged; Competition (biology); Economics; Intuition; Microeconomics; Inequity aversion; Population; Biology; Inequality; Psychology; Sociology; Ecology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.041231812944095975,"score_gpt":0.3482136346634451,"score_spread":0.3069818217193492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151028156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84332734,0.0003202981,0.06893453,0.007843861,0.00013614408,0.000075784985,0.000039283073,0.00006396297,0.0792589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938455,0.00005924066,0.0044714194,0.0004883138,0.000026805521,0.000034098077,0.000004962222,0.000008932639,0.0010606619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960361,0.0027991668,0.000079675425,0.00030366966,0.0005264983,0.00025493023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895902,0.0071428227,0.0013334759,0.0008108403,0.00043476466,0.00068789563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006210226,0.00038446614,0.00065288186,0.0002936535,0.0022367386,0.0028465525,0.0007876854,0.0020149767,0.0060594603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015176393,0.00027587396,0.00054470083,0.00038209514,0.0033378731,0.0025511598,0.0021680426,0.0026408979,0.0003420186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011501604,0.000644625,0.023988547,0.00036546116,0.00021802296,0.0012771356,0.010491999,0.017936822,0.02456288,0.86913997,0.005011275,0.045213122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039852006,0.0009658324,0.029508986,0.000090375055,0.00014957834,0.000752904,0.003451883,0.05458801,0.0046710433,0.8902988,0.014971242,0.00015288121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013969111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025912025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006210226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011152517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007700917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032843173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151329766","doi":"10.1037/a0031047","title":"Paying it forward: Generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University","keywords":"Generosity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Affect (linguistics); Impulse (physics); Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09514420861119968,"score_gpt":0.4299798813367787,"score_spread":0.334835672725579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151329766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78102154,0.0054536792,0.05437771,0.01097669,0.0001679684,0.00019243792,0.00017388335,0.000060481027,0.14757551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951357,0.00046109967,0.0030245727,0.00032615487,0.000025072553,0.00008935595,0.000019434248,0.000008561241,0.0009099841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196845,0.005997429,0.0002706166,0.000769127,0.0006350901,0.00035935876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601183,0.026210312,0.00689156,0.004255256,0.0011225223,0.0014020815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011335189,0.00032253243,0.00059659546,0.000659659,0.0009866707,0.0028358959,0.00058045564,0.0015217505,0.0051732645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048029695,0.0003293514,0.00036178296,0.00041574994,0.006244966,0.0043320246,0.0029087963,0.0017748905,0.00032691102],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012332434,0.00035661078,0.025119936,0.0007372152,0.00024917224,0.000722841,0.012944202,0.00328521,0.0056701475,0.8363102,0.002172483,0.11119875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002265779,0.00045533024,0.03161104,0.00027776186,0.00016962214,0.0010444449,0.0038629598,0.009075425,0.0015520956,0.9379334,0.013711946,0.00007949568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039018274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051932194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011335189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009329658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006570723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059946954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151415801","doi":"10.1111/pops.12185","title":"When Suspicious Minds Go Political: Distrusting and Justifying the System at the Same Time","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Injustice; Situational ethics; Politics; Social psychology; System justification; Trait; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Compromise; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05282734010238979,"score_gpt":0.38590389597835667,"score_spread":0.33307655587596685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151415801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99357563,0.00003730242,0.0006210249,0.00043794184,0.0000071311483,0.000012831613,0.000008641323,0.0000056790964,0.0052938005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955875,0.000019577172,0.00014869493,0.00007371055,0.0000036538104,0.000004331103,0.0000068209324,0.0000025075608,0.00018196205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968546,0.0015595895,0.0001211802,0.00027524767,0.00067480427,0.0005145089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859439,0.0048346575,0.006094369,0.0011854229,0.0008468596,0.0010947766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026475212,0.00027137782,0.00028164525,0.0018986606,0.0015961409,0.0049309614,0.00040940664,0.0013445792,0.0024267803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019700153,0.00056871166,0.0003498696,0.00060606387,0.0060992357,0.002195931,0.0021556509,0.0020506703,0.00013600236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074072997,0.000939562,0.77012175,0.00012331473,0.00022688493,0.0019499506,0.16050576,0.0006605748,0.0098731695,0.028275434,0.0009612809,0.025621567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004748695,0.00024962047,0.86852396,0.000083549014,0.00015534757,0.001188396,0.09842983,0.002956011,0.0031438724,0.02278727,0.0023162412,0.000118445794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054483213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065404763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054483213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012887967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010939316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014001608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151624134","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2010.01474.x","title":"<scp>Public Goods Games, Altruism, and Evolution</scp>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Assortativity; Altruism (biology); Selfishness; Public good; Economics; Microeconomics; Degree (music); Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Population; Public goods game; Biology; Social psychology; Evolutionary biology; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Psychology; Statistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025677372995883286,"score_gpt":0.2975262935231623,"score_spread":0.271848920527279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151624134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93102354,0.00041220384,0.038371973,0.0036045928,0.000038020615,0.000025156325,0.00008894305,0.000051798404,0.026383756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972101,0.00008740551,0.0015567117,0.00006046394,0.000011357642,0.000008282071,0.000016901999,0.0000042049614,0.0010445667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996432,0.00021671674,0.0000083199375,0.00002910026,0.00005033668,0.000052396303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998052,0.0011237698,0.00041185797,0.00009766032,0.00017103573,0.00014357563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009016009,0.00021272663,0.00026692057,0.0004638587,0.0005178657,0.0013283088,0.0005434269,0.0005775746,0.0023326832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036665052,0.00012594768,0.00036248122,0.00041289494,0.0018399303,0.00105323,0.00064476376,0.0006172845,0.0001540781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015418525,0.00013374032,0.01545014,0.00011737831,0.00011799313,0.00041920372,0.0003360821,0.2734447,0.004951969,0.682709,0.004664943,0.017500622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003872677,0.00008373499,0.009730563,0.000028911638,0.000030449299,0.00023137307,0.0002442498,0.43835476,0.0013025476,0.5478555,0.0020722374,0.00002698873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00249361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018899264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00249361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016017709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005208349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011621714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152066392","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2009.01.008","title":"Cooperation through imitation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Imitation; Stochastic game; Economics; Cartel; Microeconomics; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Collusion; Market economy","score_opus":0.04274892892966939,"score_gpt":0.34254271909802675,"score_spread":0.2997937901683574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152066392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49990454,0.00050484086,0.3273022,0.0028885494,0.00014161912,0.00019428742,0.00012274817,0.00025304407,0.16868822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98481303,0.00010854555,0.008640576,0.00008995078,0.000020999354,0.00008885765,0.000024949648,0.00001491176,0.0061980984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841905,0.0009554079,0.00006282648,0.00020558131,0.00024392415,0.00011321274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927441,0.0050885547,0.000581099,0.0010718915,0.00029303183,0.00022136192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015624394,0.0004439669,0.0005026787,0.00052212254,0.00054515817,0.0013386129,0.00060160767,0.0013171867,0.0047321855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011110434,0.00022853784,0.0005852247,0.00031389046,0.0023738388,0.002376633,0.001338697,0.001012697,0.0005151682],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008567945,0.000093786715,0.002052905,0.000107938584,0.00006981431,0.0001781374,0.0007537157,0.019670403,0.0045233597,0.94860595,0.0012357412,0.022622732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005629703,0.00012061179,0.002438459,0.000030401556,0.000040350023,0.00034559498,0.0002928697,0.10490443,0.001834678,0.8868956,0.003019394,0.000021298463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005454955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028713234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047321855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050003786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061816233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015830755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152506149","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ews019","title":"Time for Blood: The Effect of Paid Leave Legislation on Altruistic Behavior","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Donation; Economic shortage; Legislation; Blood donor; Privilege (computing); Context (archaeology); Turnover; Business; Demographic economics; Legislature; Labour economics; Blood donations; Set (abstract data type); Public economics; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.015986676994951675,"score_gpt":0.2795970868568624,"score_spread":0.26361040986191075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152506149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98887384,0.0005771138,0.0007329036,0.0024059212,0.00006590755,0.000054222917,0.00045132235,0.00003534873,0.006803384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968746,0.00013837578,0.00016660307,0.0003288768,0.00006126776,0.00003481802,0.00014308916,0.000009426643,0.0022429791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994578,0.0035861873,0.00016645658,0.00056828046,0.00029102006,0.000809949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8986827,0.0715004,0.021873863,0.0021309296,0.0009184842,0.0048937425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061025377,0.0003984468,0.00088379375,0.00060435705,0.0012760934,0.0024184852,0.0016316421,0.0026054606,0.018205257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03005646,0.0002930684,0.0011560147,0.00069868035,0.002160846,0.00086608087,0.0018027673,0.0036051185,0.0010787973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009539406,0.008174343,0.8676779,0.0004804442,0.0014190973,0.0014403599,0.002893538,0.026685875,0.0039958786,0.01566256,0.009322977,0.052707672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004969128,0.002672853,0.96695733,0.00010207727,0.00078350387,0.00012743255,0.0028600842,0.015740309,0.0009432753,0.0048982557,0.004335524,0.000082461476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018227255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01939418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018227255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026971472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014584541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060902655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152729560","doi":"10.1080/09645292.2011.577996","title":"The interaction of publications and appointments: new evidence on academic economists in Germany","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); German; Productivity; Panel data; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Higher education; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Sociology; Econometrics; Economic growth; History","score_opus":0.15531644359448896,"score_gpt":0.40583088565121495,"score_spread":0.250514442056726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152729560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937588,0.0019022687,0.00017502741,0.0008168766,0.000025578069,0.000004020326,0.0013923423,0.000010980404,0.001913996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971642,0.0008456496,0.000070900474,0.00009725498,0.000065242486,0.000004377048,0.0011691379,0.000003990147,0.00057909405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978168,0.00063455367,0.00026735113,0.00035297775,0.00044426072,0.00048393197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9394596,0.031371854,0.02295849,0.0019504621,0.0015138311,0.0027456626],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043478054,0.00021277106,0.0006563437,0.0046276334,0.00048240164,0.0021435032,0.000526651,0.0008426291,0.0031475704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018200532,0.00024037206,0.00039107277,0.009610533,0.0007923537,0.0012228319,0.0012331194,0.0006755618,0.0005131268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037149448,0.00014463947,0.9754809,0.0001398178,0.00031997444,0.00032335555,0.0014745622,0.0011264056,0.00035489668,0.0017507646,0.0027096933,0.015803564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015555031,0.000042870823,0.9964042,0.000021483782,0.00010181136,0.000031523057,0.0005387791,0.00027919482,0.00014933564,0.00020941578,0.002195409,0.0000104909195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017077152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027117424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012152125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092789007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033955514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153043675","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2006.03.013","title":"An initial implementation of the Turing tournament to learning in repeated two-person games","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Tournament; Computer science; Turing; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Stability (learning theory); Principal (computer security); Turing test; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.029860080249377894,"score_gpt":0.35872496871509396,"score_spread":0.32886488846571604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153043675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5563527,0.00018641067,0.38897648,0.0017895228,0.0006327457,0.0012800008,0.00017376215,0.0011682666,0.049440265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88900787,0.000055880257,0.102783054,0.00020944138,0.00005863555,0.0005792071,0.00006038306,0.00006487665,0.0071807834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710256,0.0018899208,0.00007905833,0.00024170126,0.00038307393,0.00030371285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417746,0.003666947,0.00010468908,0.00084780727,0.00071829505,0.00048479857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042152195,0.00063425483,0.000904047,0.00042503612,0.0011228166,0.001899596,0.002985712,0.0016218402,0.0055915606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017907748,0.00033042228,0.00073927734,0.00041843177,0.0018937801,0.0011928264,0.0014431532,0.0024199523,0.00036924626],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038987163,0.0047123507,0.0052811094,0.00047424348,0.00037557486,0.0003203724,0.0017704308,0.17687406,0.012936728,0.603147,0.009652177,0.18055724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014434295,0.0022200118,0.0027663636,0.000050792485,0.00011474473,0.00008795955,0.00022421984,0.80249876,0.010278998,0.16675732,0.013446324,0.000111057976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043135285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005506503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055915606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016593831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016488637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022292495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153427846","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1014582","title":"Exogenous Targeting Instruments Under Differing Information Conditions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lakehead University","keywords":"Business; Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.014091055807970822,"score_gpt":0.30394111402959845,"score_spread":0.2898500582216276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153427846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78892666,0.00039221966,0.14348869,0.0040996945,0.00023062793,0.00079130195,0.0019477289,0.0008125546,0.05931063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98918366,0.00014066359,0.005789882,0.00019246928,0.00006297173,0.00017751283,0.00016183442,0.000027697275,0.004263259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912832,0.0033817724,0.0006107915,0.0013999162,0.0013101711,0.0020141806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87474054,0.09158908,0.01680773,0.013074352,0.0023999885,0.0013883122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015704261,0.0011436837,0.0020125436,0.0013603786,0.0007572103,0.006319165,0.0017612317,0.00509439,0.017540937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07497267,0.0009740312,0.00096584286,0.0018099947,0.0030720558,0.0059730327,0.0022730173,0.0034784835,0.0021129258],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051418673,0.0018884015,0.012132423,0.0005922239,0.00028536195,0.00057604717,0.0010163895,0.047287244,0.0078037726,0.86245894,0.0033141433,0.05750312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035404721,0.0017106512,0.01947994,0.00019700282,0.0007853731,0.00036813013,0.0009835873,0.18381462,0.016182479,0.76802117,0.004673613,0.00024308675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050132885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033522898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017540937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019463735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001760428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08305305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153722563","doi":"10.1142/s0219198914500029","title":"DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY AS THE OBJECTIVE OF CONTEST DESIGN","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Competition (biology); Stochastic game; Variable (mathematics); Affect (linguistics); Compensation (psychology); Simple (philosophy); Degree (music); Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08734478404698591,"score_gpt":0.37789300564677064,"score_spread":0.2905482215997847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153722563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20746723,0.0064253258,0.6161158,0.0047619496,0.00032214157,0.0008007576,0.000330202,0.00013283297,0.16364382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93461573,0.0012998896,0.05626932,0.00026530836,0.0001386098,0.00045450157,0.000060735387,0.000045357538,0.0068506193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99077165,0.0052611823,0.00051549484,0.0010265271,0.001879125,0.0005460102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797754,0.012040661,0.0036935147,0.0020022201,0.0014244101,0.0010637849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099811,0.0012318708,0.0009683887,0.001289655,0.000825041,0.004179598,0.0014483568,0.0015827375,0.0075659435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029183302,0.000593369,0.00080432306,0.0012135053,0.00611505,0.0048107565,0.0020082635,0.0023020676,0.00065104297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024272173,0.00014825145,0.0066255694,0.0005431228,0.00010234995,0.000053991294,0.00043344992,0.030051844,0.003925288,0.91253424,0.00095050957,0.044388667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011254615,0.00057189,0.010996263,0.00019367812,0.00007265126,0.00020734723,0.00034063566,0.040282514,0.0024767807,0.9290999,0.015562647,0.00008310291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006637581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001250771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028661597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017364044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052785695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154521588","doi":"10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4","title":"A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":493,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Social dilemma; Interpretation (philosophy); Social psychology; Heuristic; Dilemma; Social choice theory; Identity (music); Social heuristics; Social identity theory; Psychology; Epistemology; Management science; Computer science; Social group; Artificial intelligence; Social change; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.2866024452925895,"score_gpt":0.5185205759269307,"score_spread":0.2319181306343412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154521588","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002541229,0.99058634,0.0017312794,0.0032223067,0.0002663759,0.000014114229,0.000015432093,0.0000068067416,0.0039032102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034509662,0.99342066,0.0014752703,0.0009125398,0.00029320747,0.000029939321,0.000017858927,0.0000038304133,0.00039564332],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794656,0.00087695627,0.00021389629,0.0002134777,0.00067151163,0.00007752242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497235,0.0035533425,0.0003485096,0.00011358994,0.00087407755,0.00013815821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038347451,0.0011915222,0.0020295128,0.0062300516,0.0007974523,0.0033479403,0.002311576,0.0024299256,0.0026975472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073046936,0.00059335993,0.0008158494,0.008624272,0.0051824776,0.0051915767,0.0015938705,0.0032218318,0.001248591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054185282,0.00010248501,0.00063340954,0.020281013,0.00013997665,0.0002428511,0.0010397227,0.0015101988,0.00042638733,0.13769807,0.04247804,0.7953937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023344517,0.00009104723,0.0020295419,0.020464746,0.0001025266,0.0009793966,0.0011395821,0.00047192496,0.0002304788,0.10685831,0.8675453,0.00006379879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046000797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051483302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062300516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004268265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006572324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030968547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154863787","doi":"10.4284/0038-4038-2012.067","title":"Emotions, Sanctions, and Cooperation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Social dilemma; Valence (chemistry); Punishment (psychology); Dilemma; Social psychology; Emotional valence; Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Skin conductance; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019344919218007656,"score_gpt":0.2853273479568009,"score_spread":0.2659824287387933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154863787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988294,0.00026669074,0.0012733944,0.00014147814,0.000016494278,0.000011167283,0.000021342556,0.0000072672447,0.009968149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.0000883093,0.00038094723,0.00003115576,0.000007399387,0.000009940531,0.00001051712,0.0000017639413,0.0002438498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993031,0.00041124262,0.000025154368,0.00006366669,0.00014560753,0.000051212977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670523,0.0015352205,0.0011004085,0.00015371191,0.0001679453,0.00033759876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083460624,0.00024051625,0.00019049595,0.00036431075,0.00031236053,0.0011517835,0.00016703173,0.0004432432,0.0012349644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004154241,0.0001398014,0.00015854926,0.00023579093,0.0006906277,0.00045426356,0.00073098176,0.0005197426,0.00011962367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003220888,0.0041286405,0.6642665,0.0007252443,0.0007134695,0.00130024,0.010299482,0.011358473,0.06913467,0.05062831,0.0019567297,0.18226738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007778628,0.0013486146,0.9590113,0.0000768072,0.0001278465,0.00063718326,0.0019502009,0.010826445,0.0030909467,0.020381693,0.0023951763,0.00007595335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024879898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003107577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0012349644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030040435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016931935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004413843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155014708","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7644","title":"Beyond Equilibrium: Predicting Human Behavior in Normal-Form Games","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Best response; Game theory; Outcome (game theory); Extensive-form game; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Economics","score_opus":0.08053815555827337,"score_gpt":0.359902836620469,"score_spread":0.27936468106219564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155014708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51077956,0.002606337,0.47207198,0.0027010895,0.00012429335,0.0003808885,0.0013861901,0.00060047826,0.009349268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578148,0.00063650444,0.03945539,0.00030016107,0.000058629263,0.0002816304,0.0006707857,0.000057209105,0.00072497554],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99059206,0.0068427804,0.0002929744,0.0014540366,0.00056551007,0.00025260355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9246252,0.062084626,0.00575143,0.004634482,0.0020632553,0.0008409157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018914843,0.0017300228,0.002271894,0.0031392064,0.00087477855,0.0032668032,0.0036333222,0.0021785682,0.003198455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08619532,0.00095545285,0.0021138047,0.00202886,0.002192126,0.008572977,0.0014483153,0.0026174744,0.00057082775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012595593,0.0010189334,0.11146445,0.0009870022,0.00227724,0.0002229533,0.0017552596,0.61576504,0.00094727625,0.1985833,0.0049341405,0.060784776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001454636,0.00036984912,0.0077200634,0.00009458629,0.00023947477,0.00007910453,0.00027806213,0.6960855,0.00042457998,0.29307213,0.0014246374,0.000066579225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009472219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006752799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018914843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020379256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012302598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10003245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155147425","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1100.1206","title":"Deal or No Deal: Hormones and the Mergers and Acquisitions Game","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Testosterone (patch); Ultimatum game; Mergers and acquisitions; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Hormone; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Biology; Endocrinology; Finance","score_opus":0.019968415314694603,"score_gpt":0.3210018035755221,"score_spread":0.3010333882608275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155147425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98518836,0.00067692396,0.0002445572,0.0012366035,0.000019058933,0.000011620554,0.00004681306,0.0000037749735,0.012572301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752337,0.00030532794,0.0001042185,0.00019074637,0.000021138307,0.000005003685,0.00001626931,0.0000010707413,0.0018327655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997849,0.00014063771,0.0000045481042,0.000013619958,0.00002877255,0.000027627892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966912,0.0021999436,0.00068697246,0.00005211538,0.000038372396,0.00033131122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044872347,0.00011363308,0.00014992058,0.00024249672,0.0002668511,0.00094480533,0.00010331323,0.00038232288,0.0038896645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023061365,0.000071745715,0.000073610216,0.00019800098,0.00084919826,0.0003429284,0.00021769363,0.0003538934,0.00021597084],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009798961,0.00876159,0.6542314,0.00039764817,0.0002483136,0.002467004,0.005466026,0.004539899,0.049780883,0.10529308,0.0066898796,0.15232536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021281012,0.0020141725,0.9565668,0.00004208518,0.00006385685,0.00044112984,0.0034565642,0.0043638595,0.0026466658,0.021856349,0.008293883,0.000041835676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015568769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021579813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038896645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036870176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013012171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155176222","doi":"10.3389/fnins.2012.00129","title":"Optimal Short-Sighted Rules","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Relevance (law); Profitability index; Optimal foraging theory; Computer science; Control (management); Intertemporal choice; Cognitive psychology; Ecology; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.04621559973672312,"score_gpt":0.33046441871199594,"score_spread":0.2842488189752728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155176222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80339575,0.0013560366,0.14196311,0.0010994633,0.000104156854,0.000051956024,0.0003182431,0.00013791386,0.051573332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861434,0.00027081944,0.010851585,0.00007978236,0.00002725537,0.000020396361,0.000061993574,0.000024057299,0.0025206676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897254,0.0002953262,0.00009070003,0.0002837125,0.00018707754,0.00017057778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929066,0.0037808258,0.0012602364,0.0011009183,0.0003368883,0.0006146073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001948431,0.0002630632,0.00064039085,0.0003848372,0.00036037853,0.0019831897,0.00076246134,0.0010249829,0.0043687555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013569272,0.0002901783,0.000301046,0.00020301889,0.0012287333,0.0027330716,0.00082833524,0.0010499586,0.0004256041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033542785,0.00021162977,0.0061036046,0.0002756043,0.00010991297,0.00029775486,0.00031835874,0.05677565,0.010672381,0.882711,0.0021545081,0.04003417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008121339,0.00015358774,0.0071890447,0.000040388695,0.000032859774,0.00033040476,0.0002400486,0.12062882,0.0024165576,0.86595625,0.0028839614,0.000046862744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007378767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007342765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043687555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051763206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000533631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01461494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155246814","doi":"10.7202/016995ar","title":"La modélisation des comportements non conséquentialistes en théorie du choix rationnel1","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; cons; Computer science","score_opus":0.205630305780044,"score_gpt":0.38169708706278577,"score_spread":0.17606678128274178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155246814","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20575723,0.0042599323,0.5505452,0.011046124,0.00029349807,0.00018785174,0.00018329866,0.00011672781,0.22761005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368801,0.0018697775,0.04757471,0.00039639266,0.0000709744,0.00024422465,0.00007201869,0.000042404037,0.012849462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741983,0.0015691771,0.00008019156,0.00036929824,0.00044171317,0.00011985575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942887,0.003937893,0.000561679,0.0006813488,0.00039270156,0.000137622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047173593,0.0007313072,0.00052549894,0.0008157429,0.0009470463,0.003010512,0.0015090493,0.0015689378,0.007644395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007038863,0.00057384325,0.0011786884,0.0010185543,0.007505219,0.005172705,0.0018713482,0.0024825553,0.0004898828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017923234,0.000024005541,0.0004477825,0.00006931887,0.000014146787,0.000023988103,0.00072019576,0.0024852809,0.00032636186,0.9930513,0.00012964074,0.002690018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044060343,0.00008016554,0.0011581279,0.00008370184,0.000028271752,0.000053816286,0.00056070933,0.01676107,0.00075213995,0.97132707,0.009127427,0.000023471974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038492538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034702618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007644395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037155908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021984596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026958644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155500066","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2005.11.004","title":"Black Sheep and Walls of Silence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Graduate School of Business; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Simon Fraser University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Silence; Phenomenon; Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Business; Psychology; Criminology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021247018600972754,"score_gpt":0.3025222733988507,"score_spread":0.2812752547978779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155500066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90792876,0.00061093224,0.0018946595,0.004626331,0.00017345455,0.00000971884,0.000036166603,0.00002516216,0.084694766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930066,0.00010707183,0.00028921803,0.00026572327,0.00003849865,0.00000499672,0.00001297678,0.000013974184,0.0062608453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995571,0.00024944622,0.000008657785,0.00004940979,0.00006858332,0.00006666477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723274,0.0014243635,0.0005443638,0.0002644386,0.00015258712,0.0003814498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094583264,0.00020297592,0.00034576212,0.000318728,0.0013691025,0.0018190545,0.00027633278,0.0012073662,0.00960208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005041849,0.00021893693,0.00012350004,0.00019683375,0.0038508705,0.0013235745,0.0014621567,0.0010266795,0.00069847296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070692217,0.000522095,0.080568194,0.00036407285,0.00021229022,0.0052984767,0.13405327,0.0016339713,0.053098574,0.5803984,0.027108913,0.10967259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006095332,0.001950032,0.18418866,0.0005731646,0.0003092218,0.003970087,0.15383062,0.004415482,0.011676933,0.5161774,0.122099705,0.00019913669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013186886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021319685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00960208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028284377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029537446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032122135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155781001","doi":"10.4000/vertigo.3573","title":"Appropriation des ressources naturelles dans une forêt andine équatorienne : vers la gestion patrimoniale des ressources","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"VertigO","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02364640963515514,"score_gpt":0.28233173257934213,"score_spread":0.258685322944187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155781001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94469124,0.0004423466,0.00870084,0.00050929683,0.0000061158644,0.000018269955,0.000048811595,0.00000848414,0.045574512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927417,0.00027736407,0.0024105082,0.000019448364,0.0000024867545,0.000010446568,0.000020611917,0.0000053258136,0.0045121578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994486,0.00024045681,0.00001576101,0.0001244777,0.00009534248,0.00007538795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988809,0.00046079743,0.00030299812,0.00017625718,0.00010464696,0.00007435054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008452889,0.00016700354,0.00021501954,0.00052430417,0.0011058489,0.002450616,0.00029173834,0.00048256674,0.005790504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017343665,0.00016476918,0.00023955254,0.00090049347,0.002763716,0.002142974,0.0012101042,0.00040372933,0.00021927453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053823803,0.00038853884,0.14979465,0.0004735562,0.00016692006,0.0016707334,0.1426584,0.008704295,0.058108926,0.46922398,0.00089533225,0.16737647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088504035,0.0008972831,0.5134698,0.00040136828,0.00020399166,0.0013288799,0.111297175,0.011811405,0.015339992,0.158775,0.18624347,0.00014306791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012571162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026423771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012571162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019232313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010151525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024995983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157118148","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12054","title":"Subjective evaluations with performance feedback","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Commit; Imperfect; Measure (data warehouse); Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.0354564531211177,"score_gpt":0.30948171128470003,"score_spread":0.27402525816358236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157118148","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2689116,0.0023810326,0.54493946,0.0055193743,0.00065437116,0.000737131,0.00051664875,0.0006062974,0.17573418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957238,0.00045783434,0.036766417,0.00042867663,0.00025443634,0.0002765143,0.00011924815,0.00006358761,0.00439519],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96527815,0.023545096,0.00125007,0.0019026049,0.0071884575,0.00083561474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88570064,0.067447856,0.021555204,0.011922178,0.010961146,0.002412899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018954534,0.0014367829,0.00072124036,0.0016602783,0.0007088103,0.004254359,0.00092390087,0.0018502481,0.005703414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13857974,0.0006257855,0.00069033646,0.0013210501,0.0031106847,0.006611377,0.0036064873,0.0021761751,0.00082398654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022488479,0.0014977572,0.049566552,0.0014824107,0.0005571026,0.00044001907,0.0054960623,0.06556248,0.009892976,0.39684942,0.010863588,0.45554274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053912855,0.0036662733,0.07625958,0.0010333307,0.00044656277,0.0005336164,0.0020550676,0.16425349,0.011358057,0.70433855,0.03498515,0.00053123984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010900571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078861264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018954534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018611619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011084012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10024232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158418027","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.019","title":"Preferences, intentions, and expectation violations: A large-scale experiment with a representative subject pool","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Disadvantage; Economics; Inequity aversion; Sample (material); Population; Social psychology; Psychology; Social preferences; Scale (ratio); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Inequality; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04501042284270732,"score_gpt":0.3190607440016473,"score_spread":0.27405032115893996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158418027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99824595,0.000009671598,0.0007221069,0.000053579355,0.000018572504,0.00046324715,0.000068967136,0.000011312506,0.00040661788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874906,0.000056396802,0.0045410804,0.00035442767,0.00009448174,0.003586639,0.00057590305,0.000028824123,0.0032716508],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548846,0.002636656,0.0003690552,0.00058568106,0.0006034045,0.0003167308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97419816,0.017796742,0.0016432476,0.0035413776,0.00094461953,0.0018758513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014003818,0.0009182237,0.0015810339,0.00032367773,0.0015883725,0.0014329336,0.0011088331,0.0018234886,0.005295898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020926872,0.0010964365,0.000692676,0.00036473922,0.0015893317,0.0013373443,0.0012193002,0.0017259414,0.0012820185],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.23150316,0.43374634,0.13266239,0.0005328547,0.0015455879,0.0011870025,0.016014514,0.008797302,0.099987,0.0032854613,0.00630335,0.06443504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.09614413,0.35306495,0.4609173,0.00009199203,0.0022620633,0.0010305209,0.0038399915,0.041008066,0.02109505,0.013748189,0.0062315366,0.00056623406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012558546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015436831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014003818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027860465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014298693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07406014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159756747","doi":"10.1177/031289620102600204","title":"The Effects of Rater Sex and Ratee Sex on Managerial Performance Evaluation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Accounting; Applied psychology; Actuarial science; Business","score_opus":0.03645397046234175,"score_gpt":0.33852266861594443,"score_spread":0.3020686981536027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159756747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997338,0.00019968062,0.0002540719,0.000061002385,0.000026203868,0.000029072886,0.00004138392,0.0000047443614,0.0020458365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874,0.00007600969,0.0002373515,0.000028105704,0.000021984097,0.000028512984,0.000043994685,0.000004487543,0.0008195287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832381,0.010893535,0.0011015792,0.00096778426,0.0031198238,0.00067926216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81920993,0.13776447,0.023278823,0.005851466,0.009503703,0.0043916767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022930145,0.00031975,0.000409819,0.00095884484,0.0005502297,0.0012870394,0.00028489687,0.0004147312,0.004057986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09259867,0.00029982266,0.0004447902,0.00039110443,0.00091629144,0.00067179656,0.00084245,0.0005116745,0.000698239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029024465,0.00040558862,0.9688812,0.00005744417,0.00020130532,0.00018399583,0.003946062,0.00012947996,0.0014964178,0.00019756501,0.00036103156,0.021237522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054027092,0.0014273495,0.9944206,0.000019782456,0.000050897426,0.0002463184,0.0019458493,0.0005311352,0.0006543838,0.00010455861,0.0005131949,0.000031897456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076147454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016329972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022930145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033244037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032064627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12126768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159858563","doi":"10.1177/1043463113492308","title":"An alternative explanation of the chance of casting a pivotal vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Outcome (game theory); Voting; Contingent vote; Representation (politics); Econometrics; Schedule; Economics; Duty; Microeconomics; Political science; Group voting ticket; Law","score_opus":0.0435015546628973,"score_gpt":0.34269821527563304,"score_spread":0.29919666061273575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159858563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08733277,0.0020330315,0.7174446,0.02838506,0.0013451495,0.0005739465,0.00197263,0.0006384282,0.1602744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90866697,0.0008399039,0.03395146,0.0032454312,0.00101612,0.00051165745,0.00051228434,0.00010291292,0.05115328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935766,0.0022870493,0.0002655264,0.001847296,0.0011510369,0.0008725368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833439,0.008713217,0.002253913,0.0038839015,0.0012422507,0.00056288746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008452582,0.0008205461,0.0011841164,0.0015141086,0.0014634562,0.0032302544,0.0034943442,0.004563167,0.0707155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033459973,0.00044527848,0.0014565125,0.0012921281,0.0040661367,0.005868759,0.0024127674,0.0030867339,0.005235843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021395627,0.000068826106,0.0022753244,0.00008742012,0.000035638404,0.00014488414,0.00028472344,0.002949484,0.0004494858,0.9777724,0.0037435293,0.0119742965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002381363,0.00024420608,0.0030634848,0.000060964885,0.000037513702,0.00045837404,0.00015724005,0.018384453,0.0005485343,0.963684,0.013079355,0.000043689393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001847397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019389404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0707155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014655008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016223065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2365669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160205586","doi":"10.2308/jmar.2010.22.1.251","title":"The Effects of Profit-Sharing Contract and Feedback on the Sustainability of Cooperation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Sustainability; Business; Cooperativeness; Microeconomics; Profit sharing; Profit (economics); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Industrial organization; Interpersonal communication; Economics; Finance; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0341116898772737,"score_gpt":0.39920460146074155,"score_spread":0.36509291158346785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160205586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953441,0.00003680269,0.0010401498,0.00010810396,0.000008301698,0.000034761444,0.000013317985,0.000012941317,0.0034016357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992085,0.000010185812,0.0005731055,0.00001979596,0.000003025756,0.000026135704,0.000005487732,0.000002664319,0.00015127144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99143434,0.0055297865,0.00057599356,0.0005178566,0.0014440512,0.00049792003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8623778,0.106956676,0.015936058,0.00765618,0.002512088,0.0045611686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009951615,0.00044350795,0.0004020881,0.00048492855,0.0006997725,0.001502071,0.0006608438,0.00086584524,0.005177276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057314232,0.00030135756,0.00029787808,0.00028445772,0.0022157696,0.0015462339,0.0021789207,0.0010608111,0.00021622736],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029422032,0.029133946,0.29937053,0.001690034,0.0009396589,0.0014545424,0.010874908,0.04672634,0.28786698,0.06617461,0.0014660247,0.22488037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034872435,0.03054265,0.65508664,0.00041063072,0.00090565934,0.0011078137,0.008036054,0.12002116,0.106083065,0.066829085,0.006996658,0.00049334276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066286227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053580734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009951615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015274661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014490052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05262983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160387848","doi":"10.1177/0002716209351516","title":"Why Can’t a Student Be More Like an Average Person?: Sampling and Attrition Effects in Social Science Field and Laboratory Experiments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Attrition; Psychology; Differential effects; Field (mathematics); Differential (mechanical device); Experimental research; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Medicine; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11104097968824096,"score_gpt":0.4605108232160738,"score_spread":0.34946984352783284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160387848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92953014,0.0018789714,0.043174315,0.006585514,0.0006905747,0.0048464225,0.00021543918,0.0001684992,0.012910096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95866686,0.0004334808,0.024646867,0.0065196855,0.00035446172,0.0067903097,0.00013967765,0.000082172264,0.0023665037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.70504695,0.2532795,0.007979526,0.010682437,0.020981371,0.002030222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37876108,0.5197203,0.047854416,0.041055914,0.008476383,0.0041318457],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28061473,0.0008440249,0.0018060947,0.0012261431,0.0044576405,0.0035228007,0.0032535999,0.0053969626,0.006519864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4460782,0.0011993913,0.0015887823,0.0011552151,0.009380867,0.005437325,0.0030954208,0.0043576895,0.0011365636],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0421476,0.03529741,0.47983867,0.0029594128,0.0035728903,0.001671719,0.07828284,0.0032235032,0.016400486,0.063276865,0.014088239,0.25924033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0101649985,0.050702523,0.7448954,0.0018308081,0.002580407,0.0028323624,0.015510807,0.021826603,0.019838873,0.10438208,0.024407292,0.0010279441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015560543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014219303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71938527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017453042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017616324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88713014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161194570","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2004.00165.x","title":"Scaling Up Learning Models in Public Good Games","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Computer science; Scaling; Artificial intelligence; Focus (optics); Discretization; Space (punctuation); Machine learning; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.07721942779228837,"score_gpt":0.32064699864404395,"score_spread":0.2434275708517556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161194570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79780906,0.00026670206,0.19138172,0.0015308299,0.000063621854,0.000095954245,0.000069591566,0.00031471878,0.008467893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99160564,0.000069564194,0.006840329,0.000057502304,0.0000175075,0.00005341979,0.000024422166,0.000015031919,0.0013165766],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921227,0.00047528022,0.000032483378,0.00010193571,0.00007249905,0.00010547051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99213225,0.0059605152,0.0007448076,0.00042681507,0.00033790685,0.00039773982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031148752,0.0007728236,0.0014538573,0.00062410644,0.0005103367,0.0015031842,0.0015000605,0.001716988,0.0035598034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015119861,0.000478321,0.00058365107,0.00036514906,0.0020146922,0.0026941733,0.0014592058,0.0014183923,0.00024368342],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047872145,0.0000811219,0.00087492587,0.000021520782,0.000026985,0.0000550974,0.000064969965,0.972357,0.00019460762,0.023163062,0.0002509745,0.0028619547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019395417,0.000028490525,0.00007589985,0.0000029854496,0.0000041011426,0.00000447356,0.000009985752,0.9837134,0.000035518628,0.016026573,0.000075922144,0.0000032527907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055099325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025384282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055099325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014216793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006399354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016473234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161332161","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewr016","title":"Contract Enforceability and the Evolution of Social Capital","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Civic engagement; Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Social trust; Capital (architecture); Social engagement; Social contract; Business; Blind trust; Key (lock); Individual capital; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Financial capital; Public relations; Human capital; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01783118211710701,"score_gpt":0.248691128225884,"score_spread":0.23085994610877697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161332161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95248103,0.00017704665,0.022771,0.0013315235,0.000014496551,0.000029937315,0.00015234498,0.00007679279,0.022965835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975114,0.000053141826,0.0009844546,0.000022164326,0.0000032380879,0.000008111081,0.00002058461,0.000005584748,0.0013914504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992385,0.0003262271,0.000028475626,0.00012369119,0.00009422115,0.00018885492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391514,0.0027953072,0.001651112,0.00073151337,0.000274176,0.00063279615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001703171,0.0002392403,0.00033417888,0.0005562686,0.0008250233,0.0027689831,0.00050531275,0.0011066478,0.005513712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011797084,0.00031644446,0.0003476569,0.00047088362,0.0024580413,0.002936691,0.001418329,0.0012678691,0.00023613377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042290078,0.00052557874,0.05688205,0.0001230621,0.00012892322,0.00089871295,0.0021483127,0.13443531,0.008068233,0.7578616,0.0019050718,0.03660019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013663377,0.00029695916,0.051422708,0.000058008853,0.00007521967,0.00046748115,0.0014723532,0.2944615,0.0016804263,0.64413095,0.0057027526,0.00009503998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005989353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003762519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005989353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024860068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088753854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018445134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161692260","doi":"10.3390/g4010089","title":"Group Size, Coordination, and the Effectiveness of Punishment in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism: An Experimental Investigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"Zhejiang University","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Turnover; Liberian dollar; Context (archaeology); Economics; Public good; Per capita; Microeconomics; Incentive; Social psychology; Coordination game; Psychology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.013160035733409417,"score_gpt":0.29395128703782497,"score_spread":0.28079125130441557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161692260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990368,0.00009683832,0.0035446654,0.00024714123,0.00005413638,0.00045354236,0.000070993905,0.000025565925,0.00513911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915488,0.000081901075,0.0051462553,0.0001240804,0.000040170224,0.0012476115,0.00006177556,0.00001807405,0.0017314458],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895851,0.006747666,0.0006174371,0.00113875,0.0012230254,0.0006881043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86903256,0.09659237,0.018202625,0.011887013,0.0016117829,0.0026736537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017311879,0.0011995329,0.0015271353,0.001070998,0.000848594,0.001506688,0.0023021311,0.0017893022,0.007992152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060629204,0.0004922952,0.0007225729,0.0006062585,0.00364629,0.002365525,0.0021999248,0.002026387,0.0004369146],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.16267216,0.19316852,0.060920443,0.0045278803,0.003294567,0.0013803951,0.006934248,0.09587431,0.119862445,0.16796231,0.004955756,0.17844693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06315388,0.2750901,0.1208066,0.0007573263,0.0028356356,0.0009395531,0.005218234,0.19465092,0.070492856,0.25293502,0.012546887,0.00057299633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076850527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066222897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017311879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017374406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001529841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09155512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162386615","doi":"10.1007/s10058-023-00333-x","title":"Correlated equilibria and communication equilibria in all-pay auctions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Common value auction; Correlated equilibrium; Economics; Epsilon-equilibrium; Risk dominance; Symmetric equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Private information retrieval; Stochastic game; Bayesian game; Microeconomics; Complete information; Best response; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Game theory; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1420460389061605,"score_gpt":0.4118663514825049,"score_spread":0.2698203125763444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162386615","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1601031,0.018437242,0.73295504,0.010180523,0.00039069232,0.000485426,0.00022830746,0.00019262085,0.07702711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366701,0.0097656,0.046404447,0.0008550135,0.0006180525,0.00058813894,0.00010022481,0.000048385977,0.0049500833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98324686,0.0128345005,0.0005456637,0.0010722834,0.0017198151,0.0005808604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9030778,0.08428763,0.0058966535,0.003657344,0.0024018628,0.00067881687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017249446,0.001262271,0.0027945084,0.0012982306,0.0013813587,0.0062895208,0.0024431986,0.003606304,0.0062181912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07178207,0.0011832836,0.0011201467,0.0021088277,0.0075140367,0.008616811,0.002086407,0.0036288712,0.0004773146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012950765,0.00014677101,0.0005490199,0.0002536735,0.00008632716,0.000041888892,0.00015359482,0.012962377,0.00027496926,0.9711637,0.00094868604,0.013289407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008544754,0.000041013038,0.00028839972,0.00004548765,0.0000305334,0.00002991041,0.000057920723,0.017125327,0.00012412651,0.98134696,0.0008080125,0.000016717526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009745326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088353525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017249446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027543132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027647086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09122491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162836361","doi":"10.1628/093245612799439980","title":"Exclusive Dealing and Market Foreclosure: Further Experimental Results","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Foreclosure; Microeconomics; Economics; Stochastic game; First-mover advantage; Business; Industrial organization; Econometrics","score_opus":0.019914126641153097,"score_gpt":0.29662696720964943,"score_spread":0.2767128405684963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162836361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98728603,0.00017959528,0.0035719753,0.00055313914,0.00006065641,0.00061860564,0.00020755047,0.000041677165,0.0074809007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892729,0.00021388942,0.0047823396,0.00037308031,0.000074695155,0.0012342869,0.00020596596,0.000033842156,0.0038090372],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.994414,0.0027997952,0.00072400045,0.00064570736,0.0009515545,0.00046498288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8883039,0.085551426,0.010737806,0.011767928,0.001740019,0.001898902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008010292,0.0009240153,0.0011884844,0.000616259,0.0015264853,0.0019472963,0.0019303049,0.0022766136,0.020082192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03656623,0.00063150306,0.00063900504,0.0007106961,0.0028910006,0.0036041082,0.002388194,0.0036899804,0.00096363865],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06072573,0.47171092,0.051982887,0.0033097214,0.0009045255,0.0037899888,0.013390977,0.016728727,0.12619625,0.11813477,0.0075807585,0.12554474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.045775615,0.2035753,0.13765755,0.000823009,0.0013544145,0.004569491,0.018162958,0.10417985,0.14617893,0.2947025,0.042098854,0.0009215285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068836065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003679137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020082192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010576602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06718165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163271812","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.975671","title":"Gift Exchange within a Firm: Evidence from a Field Experiment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"","keywords":"Sowing; Productivity; Incentive; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Workforce; Field experiment; Economics; Tree planting; Labour economics; Agricultural economics; Mathematics; Agroforestry; Agronomy; Psychology; Microeconomics; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.041152625411092617,"score_gpt":0.35552818248061197,"score_spread":0.31437555706951936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163271812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99616784,0.00008195158,0.00038875057,0.00030335638,0.000019922667,0.000061321785,0.000047982066,0.00001165524,0.0029172094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980336,0.000069040034,0.00045149954,0.00016949279,0.000018475606,0.000043489057,0.0000596789,0.0000040722766,0.001150562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632674,0.0023515776,0.00017446798,0.0004408205,0.00037796624,0.00032840375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8724051,0.09755896,0.012167374,0.009961372,0.0015212074,0.006385969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011491216,0.0005601619,0.0010095008,0.00090410904,0.002312042,0.00270678,0.0012370199,0.0036691972,0.01239811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038764223,0.00058290415,0.00035772487,0.00077384716,0.002711343,0.0029140287,0.0014213319,0.0023311246,0.0010716282],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10023674,0.2071245,0.47876623,0.0011800627,0.0013108324,0.002420888,0.008030879,0.008035975,0.03644394,0.03381403,0.008123794,0.11451214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029576998,0.060458984,0.7749703,0.00044440044,0.001614321,0.0016692138,0.015107087,0.024224939,0.01771743,0.058586817,0.015185226,0.0004443076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040501314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036948393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01239811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011503126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001113915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06077206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163344200","doi":"","title":"Multi-Level Trust Game with \"Insider\" Communication *","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheap talk; Dictator game; Insider; Endowment; Welfare; Microeconomics; Computer science; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0853580344360836,"score_gpt":0.27387922463369063,"score_spread":0.18852119019760705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163344200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727562,0.00004187903,0.01535296,0.0007931022,0.000059228845,0.00017507254,0.00019290698,0.00007934642,0.0105493935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432534,0.000017581957,0.0036227154,0.00010385318,0.000012928108,0.00012948079,0.0000466274,0.000009646695,0.0017318755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976495,0.0013326306,0.00010931253,0.0002499575,0.00039535237,0.00026326478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98523605,0.009651441,0.0019752744,0.0017774561,0.00033297917,0.0010268538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024856168,0.0004610434,0.0006682118,0.00020566532,0.0005586724,0.0013214968,0.00082378276,0.0013403683,0.008140414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092643015,0.00017818004,0.00042208497,0.0002541409,0.0011324665,0.0016786125,0.0012840225,0.0017291387,0.00056735025],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.050172213,0.029474441,0.036223836,0.002141104,0.0012769245,0.0022849888,0.0066911834,0.124867566,0.16997555,0.415967,0.014106591,0.14681867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008553298,0.0339643,0.037814848,0.00017221717,0.00048599788,0.0010693204,0.0031077135,0.5999497,0.050310884,0.2442861,0.019865789,0.00041978466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010958558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008733585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008140414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009028432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007938168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027232409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165209036","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130903.5758","title":"Contributions for a Community Good: Results from a Field Experiment in India","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"West bengal; BENGAL; Field (mathematics); Voluntary association; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Social science; Geography; Political science; Law; Archaeology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.043969128455009034,"score_gpt":0.3556682059831352,"score_spread":0.31169907752812614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165209036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99718803,0.000016899883,0.00031186454,0.00006781449,0.000011620537,0.00024691867,0.00004128653,0.00001309897,0.0021024446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928523,0.000080701364,0.0027250638,0.00018150156,0.000017789418,0.000638743,0.00012595479,0.000020806825,0.003357206],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949645,0.003127498,0.0002153497,0.00049130153,0.0006520709,0.0005492349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95584494,0.03429243,0.002293229,0.0038285623,0.0016925521,0.0020482636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009587526,0.00086890574,0.0008990793,0.00077369006,0.0031939414,0.0016644178,0.0016990813,0.0010668865,0.003303653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016003102,0.00051744084,0.0005851561,0.00086135895,0.002802239,0.00091103296,0.0018687174,0.0017634145,0.00049873715],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05378407,0.20735225,0.16986765,0.003776813,0.00095451035,0.0044569303,0.18991646,0.004075029,0.19298498,0.008979962,0.007378338,0.15647303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073363017,0.113958985,0.65708,0.00043595862,0.0011376402,0.0008795397,0.13816766,0.00616846,0.0482842,0.005674781,0.020250365,0.00062610896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011633515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019780682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011633515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014354126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019142667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0507043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166713390","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2254895","title":"Biology and the Arguments of Utility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Economics; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016142715328656684,"score_gpt":0.3194402300178848,"score_spread":0.3032975146892281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166713390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10130093,0.014731449,0.032939438,0.20512643,0.000979678,0.000052127376,0.00017147174,0.0000516699,0.6446469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787329,0.0018888691,0.0021669006,0.004682606,0.00084055564,0.000058786187,0.000027910535,0.000032813343,0.011568823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960651,0.0028476336,0.00007626643,0.00033021756,0.0004505888,0.00023023461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849914,0.0118846055,0.00081345363,0.0012901607,0.0006210825,0.00039934754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006461046,0.00050861685,0.00072010444,0.0018133475,0.0021205754,0.0052252915,0.0010985878,0.005808325,0.009487854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022227237,0.00033303737,0.0005427752,0.0010340987,0.021669082,0.007921759,0.0025681318,0.004114122,0.00071177783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015216874,0.000007360056,0.00013521622,0.000010068027,0.0000035601836,0.000017033464,0.00012651576,0.00013855776,0.0000202588,0.9973978,0.0007294055,0.0013990636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013273562,0.0000033302601,0.00012753908,0.000012210721,0.0000019607842,0.000012002842,0.000072609655,0.0002020273,0.000023041997,0.995978,0.0035517847,0.0000022621862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011415401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008967364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009487854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002780195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009003596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034169674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166842047","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1510134","title":"Helping the Helpers: Altruism as a Rational Choice of Donors to a Students Voluntary Organization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Psychology; Turnover; Social psychology; Voluntary association; Economics; Political science; Management; Law","score_opus":0.01513949256712183,"score_gpt":0.33809752960936656,"score_spread":0.32295803704224474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166842047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8939353,0.00016369965,0.03162936,0.0071902154,0.000101217134,0.0001458671,0.000072267256,0.00004076886,0.066721275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369156,0.000033986053,0.0013692913,0.00010514648,0.000019355219,0.0000255983,0.000005887704,0.0000039756637,0.0047452953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976413,0.0016238672,0.00005027537,0.00016235127,0.00017045708,0.00035179633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863035,0.0074434504,0.0023150735,0.0010800079,0.0006055482,0.0022523783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058489875,0.00032760366,0.00042936235,0.00040602442,0.0012189465,0.0027750323,0.001014871,0.0028814906,0.009202998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011518166,0.00031109003,0.00042866505,0.00026097128,0.00287772,0.0020170347,0.0013309092,0.0017000264,0.0004173351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009202661,0.0008542438,0.025432648,0.00011873711,0.00010126818,0.0006864134,0.0028592062,0.01757757,0.0026777158,0.92239875,0.0050771274,0.021296043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048499746,0.0005598467,0.017103856,0.000043046748,0.00011681005,0.0004288222,0.004889531,0.07162414,0.00070772134,0.89881665,0.005138646,0.000085978914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018763703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026919907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009202998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014787582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015788383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030932784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167581780","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2015.01.009","title":"You scratch his back, he scratches mine and I’ll scratch yours: Deception in simultaneous cyclic networks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Scratch; Deception; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Social psychology; Operating system","score_opus":0.034000593908147025,"score_gpt":0.3068732338656179,"score_spread":0.27287263995747085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167581780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82238877,0.00033842053,0.16045167,0.0036333413,0.00010439622,0.00006604084,0.00015343742,0.00017115123,0.012692636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99464095,0.000082589024,0.0037207955,0.00009623267,0.00003482658,0.000024569781,0.000030880426,0.000019866575,0.0013492262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982016,0.00094585674,0.000067227505,0.00031438406,0.00025862156,0.00021226877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87671727,0.10031605,0.0092877755,0.008679586,0.0030566412,0.0019426747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038667838,0.0003989443,0.0007171507,0.0007829507,0.0012671563,0.0019811927,0.001794775,0.0027092309,0.0056997538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07429205,0.0008386549,0.00049428956,0.00076918304,0.0028770058,0.006493786,0.0022867783,0.00306061,0.0004132188],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022303993,0.0005558689,0.04554931,0.0003449968,0.00037281995,0.0027988427,0.0072433427,0.2742321,0.0057763117,0.56104654,0.010234282,0.08961529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079525016,0.00011139305,0.004988538,0.000036883386,0.00007333207,0.0005403598,0.00087018486,0.4910416,0.0005051159,0.50077814,0.00092450087,0.000050410436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043512825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002818151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056997538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079387816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072965276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020449698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169593491","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1110.1322","title":"Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":839,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; CONTEST; Rivalry; Incentive; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Industrial organization; Set (abstract data type); Competition (biology); Marketing; Business; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.09206989126865556,"score_gpt":0.3864339005795512,"score_spread":0.2943640093108956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169593491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935674,0.0005244144,0.0021832013,0.00034279522,0.000011273606,0.00016651249,0.00025247803,0.000016697131,0.0029352682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998235,0.00015387664,0.0007049244,0.000043110213,0.000025461068,0.000088059474,0.00028199676,0.000009830318,0.00045762182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886856,0.006930423,0.00068223523,0.0007601809,0.0017785734,0.001163136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.589574,0.34983286,0.0430127,0.0073644784,0.004395684,0.005820287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01870603,0.0006377347,0.0013110989,0.0027746772,0.0014357715,0.0035530613,0.0020026641,0.0019138814,0.008887134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13782203,0.00067709124,0.0014791975,0.003781667,0.0022231594,0.0030193473,0.00235109,0.0035424968,0.0007392936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028794708,0.006174879,0.87561053,0.0005959462,0.00071001553,0.0006522656,0.002448658,0.036121514,0.00065255247,0.020340338,0.004533886,0.04927996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007453902,0.0019571614,0.7585418,0.00019693695,0.00032831795,0.00089052826,0.004402347,0.19813052,0.0005313491,0.027645262,0.0064713983,0.00015902332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037561255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029483908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01870603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018211518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014000928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098928094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169718437","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01519.x","title":"G<scp>lobal</scp>S<scp>ecurity</scp>P<scp>olicies against</scp>T<scp>errorism and the</scp>F<scp>ree</scp>R<scp>iding</scp>P<scp>roblem</scp>: A<scp>n</scp>E<scp>xperimental</scp>A<scp>pproach</scp>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Free riding; Incentive; Deterrence theory; Dilemma; Punishment (psychology); Economics; Deterrence (psychology); Coordination game; Public economics; Business; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.043000712958731306,"score_gpt":0.27975524834045157,"score_spread":0.23675453538172025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169718437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60756075,0.00029143255,0.014585758,0.00975442,0.0002748544,0.00035762507,0.0008033212,0.00039663067,0.36597523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817422,0.00012007316,0.0020333468,0.0006342325,0.000021223763,0.00009369867,0.00013208325,0.00006602403,0.015157104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979348,0.0007506083,0.00010917396,0.00025866245,0.0006212654,0.00032554337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873707,0.005511272,0.0020937119,0.0015903683,0.00182706,0.0016067919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028134275,0.00035925067,0.00043895433,0.0010745954,0.001513465,0.0031724235,0.000877628,0.0018555562,0.0501257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011320039,0.00016925109,0.00042855108,0.0005398132,0.0022293495,0.0025599967,0.0018139422,0.0014685756,0.003772839],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003954789,0.0053358027,0.07110604,0.001502617,0.0003448766,0.0012683738,0.0031808068,0.14859314,0.050884236,0.45589736,0.09554772,0.1623843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000986036,0.00414284,0.105155416,0.0008431159,0.00024550277,0.0010328619,0.016314538,0.29960006,0.08020278,0.32197666,0.16906224,0.00043797708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011261879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011008046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0501257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002808558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027568687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16768718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169924644","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0513","title":"When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price-Adjustment Routines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Microfoundations; Battle; Economics; Balance (ability); Work (physics); Microeconomics; Stability (learning theory); Industrial organization; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.037290135906944,"score_gpt":0.3419431753096086,"score_spread":0.3046530394026646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169924644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985372,0.00008176649,0.00032708966,0.00030144694,0.00000671759,0.0000122020365,0.00011348644,0.0000068502072,0.0006134148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985158,0.000060629085,0.00023825174,0.000097633514,0.0000075457456,0.000017162436,0.00022550231,0.00000778866,0.00082974596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991683,0.00036295963,0.000044328764,0.00015663737,0.000116669624,0.00015109521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926387,0.0014580166,0.0023638583,0.0012870713,0.0007577216,0.0014946421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003164106,0.00019512656,0.00042714624,0.0009677228,0.0014229375,0.0020703676,0.000715986,0.0011704542,0.0026125347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014279987,0.00038909662,0.00030537514,0.00087281904,0.0011587092,0.0027214577,0.0016833898,0.0023781825,0.0007217127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038876772,0.0019676564,0.94261074,0.00002545938,0.000092947404,0.00041182374,0.025891589,0.00033591755,0.0013768687,0.0024922707,0.0019285212,0.022477385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017922639,0.00070287386,0.98059607,0.000028135539,0.000026118603,0.00023602776,0.010691213,0.0013916206,0.00033976557,0.003059296,0.0028558993,0.00005513322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009992193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012209409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009992193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052799704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062780106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019868016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182758700","doi":"","title":"A Common Pool Resource Experiment with a Dynamic Stock Externality","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Stock (firearms); Nash equilibrium; Profit (economics); Computer science; Sequential game; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Economics; Game theory; Engineering","score_opus":0.0443731207794785,"score_gpt":0.3457939180125563,"score_spread":0.3014207972330778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182758700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997759,0.000010670098,0.0011126602,0.000028874949,0.000011774845,0.00014749126,0.00005432683,0.000017996152,0.00085716293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98899406,0.000034312812,0.006029399,0.000081044214,0.000027966977,0.0015183472,0.00013772197,0.000016202663,0.0031611077],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988921,0.00050133566,0.0000897362,0.00023393074,0.00014254723,0.00014026684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99107295,0.0050631645,0.001102964,0.001781742,0.00024610452,0.00073302543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024701816,0.000672308,0.0009060217,0.00029994815,0.0004679198,0.000613557,0.0008682494,0.0008451137,0.0036663623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047369646,0.00034031758,0.00042575286,0.00032495684,0.0010578411,0.0008349884,0.0010392803,0.0009693519,0.00027753995],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.16515492,0.16957138,0.039523277,0.001253706,0.0013137398,0.0014843773,0.0052966946,0.057966385,0.44996542,0.029390581,0.0023785545,0.076700896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028285265,0.5506667,0.10928869,0.00015718043,0.0010593802,0.0005349129,0.001833393,0.12113402,0.12484178,0.052194595,0.009584416,0.00041965905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043863873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038444818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036663623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032718634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005610713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013063729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183150602","doi":"10.1111/peps.12141","title":"Using a Computational Model to Understand Possible Sources of Skews in Distributions of Job Performance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personnel Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Multiplicative function; Monte Carlo method; Psychology; Econometrics; Job performance; Statistical physics; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Job satisfaction","score_opus":0.27797148353109696,"score_gpt":0.44778811204030117,"score_spread":0.1698166285092042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183150602","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25148833,0.00008737625,0.7312441,0.0017599567,0.000063275205,0.00016206918,0.00030008977,0.00027014015,0.014624622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93336827,0.00011556331,0.062132023,0.00025179845,0.00004302024,0.00031616172,0.00021442534,0.000052530453,0.0035062442],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832255,0.00089001947,0.000054680862,0.00032518883,0.00025176693,0.00015582818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98126996,0.014700319,0.0016272725,0.0016043106,0.0005843225,0.00021388124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047371825,0.00057035213,0.00078106014,0.001040152,0.0005642567,0.0025883438,0.0017487528,0.0012547068,0.005682013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030119617,0.00047754784,0.0010148928,0.00093457603,0.0016147477,0.004146114,0.001335778,0.0017794821,0.0005851207],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017494723,0.00019608041,0.009512093,0.00006115533,0.00007069013,0.0001263679,0.000588168,0.6761537,0.001345848,0.29782733,0.0007304308,0.013213182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000254032,0.000046392495,0.0018223717,0.0000097683505,0.000009728829,0.00006472437,0.000070546615,0.91898257,0.00019392543,0.07824781,0.0005057186,0.000021065698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055196034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004094083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005682013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021876635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001540506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025052905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183658437","doi":"","title":"An Economic Theory of the Evolutionary Origin of Property Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Object (grammar); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Scarcity; Microeconomics; Economics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Law; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06743724778665185,"score_gpt":0.3133946223748547,"score_spread":0.24595737458820288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183658437","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10165674,0.002729283,0.63225657,0.018412288,0.00029641218,0.000108093365,0.00025562054,0.00010271641,0.2441822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93082255,0.0020616916,0.04576799,0.00070031063,0.00029734347,0.0001548743,0.000103304104,0.00003668368,0.020055179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945384,0.00023899444,0.00001909307,0.0000832828,0.00012185717,0.00008294521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988148,0.0005856112,0.00020427181,0.00016053261,0.00012018786,0.00011463944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014408311,0.00039362494,0.00037239975,0.0007653404,0.0008858741,0.0023861728,0.0012456225,0.0019170191,0.006054629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040499964,0.0002174876,0.0005095401,0.00088996254,0.0042160945,0.005184027,0.0012760286,0.0018657215,0.0005955322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003704562,0.000010154775,0.0002455078,0.000011213544,0.0000040355017,0.000047849953,0.000058105154,0.0049421703,0.00014682955,0.9916161,0.00032674102,0.002587605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008706058,0.000014454128,0.00037244995,0.00001785255,0.0000037778232,0.00008562739,0.000057594185,0.016671805,0.000089444016,0.97630686,0.006363767,0.000007677752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013690947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081173325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006054629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001489662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008281885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02025479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184441487","doi":"","title":"The Effects of Compensation Schemes on Self-Selection and Work Productivity: An Experimental Investigation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Productivity; Lottery; Incentive; Selection (genetic algorithm); Task (project management); Work (physics); Piece work; Scheme (mathematics); Econometrics; Salient; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Management","score_opus":0.01323873384538448,"score_gpt":0.2886366586650997,"score_spread":0.2753979248197152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184441487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978115,0.000035324927,0.0005105781,0.00007385026,0.000023563993,0.00015488871,0.000040068182,0.000010960187,0.0013393926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476516,0.000061902465,0.002222194,0.00011011569,0.000038732178,0.0005614318,0.00005604627,0.00001145325,0.00217281],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956864,0.0021210548,0.00040037147,0.00070248893,0.00071954995,0.00037020203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9414936,0.041340653,0.007740305,0.0059151584,0.00095192675,0.0025584134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053570624,0.00084283383,0.00069568807,0.0006447417,0.0008940818,0.0017766849,0.0011675679,0.0014267749,0.008216048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026444664,0.000612695,0.0004338771,0.00035831245,0.0019356471,0.0013638708,0.0015143681,0.0018477399,0.0006722939],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09545634,0.37991637,0.12755886,0.0011566501,0.00079182483,0.0007796473,0.007443019,0.005744224,0.26069286,0.016413996,0.0017978447,0.10224844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02389322,0.4041712,0.37835684,0.0002843855,0.000859317,0.0009869902,0.0040908554,0.028151155,0.118251026,0.03129791,0.009167784,0.00048932165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033550907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034567164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008216048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070174324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080239127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02833116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185870801","doi":"","title":"Pivotal Decision Maker, Agenda Power and Collective Responsibility Attribution DRAFT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Voting; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Replication (statistics); Decision maker; Political science; Law and economics; Collective responsibility; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Economics; Law; Management science; Politics","score_opus":0.03483556908714558,"score_gpt":0.3538420355489632,"score_spread":0.31900646646181763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185870801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27338874,0.0059430134,0.06288336,0.09604533,0.004559849,0.005587941,0.02019613,0.00036555246,0.5310301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913852,0.0015040741,0.015857475,0.0023425897,0.00061006885,0.0022105833,0.0019358156,0.000097795266,0.06158958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478674,0.0033965225,0.00020029995,0.0005012614,0.00073978945,0.00037542311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936487,0.04106048,0.0055187377,0.0053753355,0.009400286,0.0021582253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024508538,0.00081948796,0.0015326915,0.0009772885,0.002713985,0.0040618405,0.001820566,0.002345538,0.07828881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0746946,0.00057499716,0.0005309785,0.0017245568,0.0028149595,0.0022694254,0.0013611964,0.002650454,0.0028664293],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026954575,0.00087876833,0.009284216,0.00073148747,0.00036448016,0.00021863637,0.0020885868,0.005565373,0.0011847131,0.72400844,0.20518667,0.04779314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00382257,0.0008346924,0.061538205,0.0003907952,0.0004946983,0.00007721966,0.0021213607,0.018532643,0.0020025824,0.7629922,0.14692357,0.0002694722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045335233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08946687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07828881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062349807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008857284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26190215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185954281","doi":"10.29173/irie254","title":"The ‘Faith’ factor in the Internet World","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Information Ethics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Hacker; Intellectual property; Internet privacy; Faith; Digital divide; Information and Communications Technology; Public relations; Phenomenon; Information society; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.08670913349538767,"score_gpt":0.41549280846906816,"score_spread":0.3287836749736805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185954281","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11809498,0.022507412,0.022883303,0.44532204,0.001467098,0.00010002253,0.000045532805,0.000043135005,0.38953644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95707846,0.0053027556,0.0020378148,0.025258858,0.00036572458,0.00007466731,0.000008166529,0.00002167365,0.009851791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718156,0.022667581,0.00048245196,0.00069375493,0.003548052,0.00079271774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91415596,0.07044409,0.004780905,0.0038298157,0.004583536,0.0022056382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018785076,0.00021447813,0.00046162916,0.00085040485,0.0038920229,0.009257528,0.00075566303,0.0039108223,0.002795125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03728904,0.00026766854,0.00020851834,0.001143181,0.037970558,0.010637395,0.0044351737,0.005240773,0.00042206887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003509818,0.000057194862,0.0022370378,0.00015738842,0.000013603638,0.0001872477,0.03105697,0.000106338346,0.00016850726,0.93279636,0.009103906,0.024080439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003521292,0.0001575675,0.0039084186,0.0013056844,0.000026713446,0.0007371034,0.080895744,0.0004056287,0.0004067228,0.597425,0.31464395,0.000052376465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014371695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001444458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018785076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002348813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030987598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09934616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186766170","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2020.3595","title":"A Bayesian Level-<i>k</i> Model in <i>n</i>-Person Games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Mathematical economics; Cournot competition; Oligopoly; Computer science; Hierarchy; Set (abstract data type); Adaptive learning; Value (mathematics); Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.10105125570329603,"score_gpt":0.3303209727259928,"score_spread":0.22926971702269677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186766170","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14555424,0.00027558132,0.7963378,0.0039925254,0.0000855757,0.0002331199,0.0007154814,0.0003371258,0.05246853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88628745,0.00030988012,0.09259393,0.00057358126,0.00006910777,0.0002944129,0.00022694969,0.00007255609,0.019572107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978967,0.0010725769,0.000081066304,0.0003412124,0.00029380983,0.00031463828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730384,0.0013027608,0.0005716548,0.00025498465,0.00026478272,0.00030196688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027252885,0.0007934962,0.0012150697,0.00069382257,0.00083553715,0.002575368,0.0027765858,0.0022714345,0.008446961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073127644,0.0006630502,0.0011836658,0.0007746085,0.0025228278,0.0038401752,0.0011640415,0.0022074475,0.0016276777],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015787847,0.00012473743,0.0022804174,0.00007538971,0.000058609174,0.00018237205,0.000538456,0.14185165,0.0010275843,0.84031487,0.0027417252,0.010646296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102584,0.00006455809,0.00084710296,0.000017300028,0.000018219867,0.00008482319,0.00008554376,0.5505735,0.00011645728,0.44609004,0.0019561378,0.000043655116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010353289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008882536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010353289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021829407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012325922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028257906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187004012","doi":"","title":"Trust and Reciprocity: The Differing Norms of Individuals and Group Representatives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Salient; Social psychology; Norm of reciprocity; Perception; Norm (philosophy); Dictator game; Psychology; Group decision-making; Political science; Social capital","score_opus":0.018004883113147355,"score_gpt":0.31186455288344916,"score_spread":0.2938596697703018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187004012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8779588,0.0016070094,0.04240291,0.004116334,0.000107777465,0.000076989614,0.00007377249,0.00004118246,0.07361521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979069,0.00018970273,0.0013556215,0.00010647887,0.000016958178,0.00002897899,0.000013876056,0.0000058749206,0.00037558132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97888285,0.014214801,0.00080209185,0.0013573543,0.0039723315,0.0007705708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93232995,0.042997066,0.012281704,0.0063521825,0.0041426113,0.0018965036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014248047,0.00026368242,0.0004232609,0.001120996,0.0013709272,0.004697904,0.00050749653,0.0011081299,0.0013924914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06418899,0.0002551976,0.0002681449,0.00073794666,0.008578609,0.0050242236,0.003029838,0.0015310104,0.00020141876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009611229,0.00027866964,0.17730148,0.00058896386,0.00032485576,0.00045454517,0.13739733,0.0025292097,0.0066457433,0.5079974,0.0018845405,0.16363612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015251405,0.0010877694,0.22632353,0.0005736925,0.00027810934,0.0014454724,0.07248225,0.010162117,0.0056604436,0.6298032,0.05165735,0.0003735873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017330082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012724373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014248047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012257665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009844013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075351775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189601759","doi":"","title":"Norms of Fairness in Inter-Individual Versus Inter-Team Interactions: The Effects of Egocentric Biases and Gender","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Dictator game; Operationalization; Earnings; Social psychology; Psychology; Dictator; Group decision-making; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03598364817213031,"score_gpt":0.3368019209687492,"score_spread":0.30081827279661894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189601759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845333,0.00012250153,0.003437112,0.00027848387,0.000015010525,0.000018785198,0.000019984805,0.000005595693,0.011569159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940634,0.000022285882,0.00036937656,0.000025750525,0.0000055540486,0.000007833794,0.0000058291366,0.000002730353,0.00015425905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99252135,0.0053629708,0.00021380042,0.00042165033,0.0011384091,0.0003418046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9338045,0.046439085,0.011702705,0.004073203,0.0021996934,0.0017808699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009885636,0.00020508099,0.000302541,0.000553507,0.00058276614,0.0020146212,0.00032112197,0.00049291196,0.0017782206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05615906,0.00016148975,0.00020810442,0.00032440491,0.003098162,0.0014320211,0.0012850539,0.00073862914,0.00015550225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025812725,0.0009105845,0.7586349,0.00017675041,0.00033799824,0.00033483742,0.028740162,0.0064395126,0.012831922,0.09868304,0.0010069768,0.089322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000972942,0.0006810972,0.88947517,0.00008829782,0.00008338204,0.00025336875,0.010155387,0.014060533,0.0046720305,0.07767391,0.0026464725,0.00011302244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017112569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024854206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009885636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081061205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005084748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052280903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199431918","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01721.x","title":"Multilateral tariff cooperation under fairness and reciprocity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Tariff; Economics; Negotiation; Reciprocal; International economics; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.19491329863283607,"score_gpt":0.24844168453881516,"score_spread":0.05352838590597908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199431918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8137079,0.00019148384,0.061178368,0.0016386502,0.00004418217,0.00013018647,0.00006872668,0.00003973899,0.123000816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982054,0.000026258565,0.0010449186,0.000032865246,0.000007988516,0.000017950371,0.000003856659,0.0000019697156,0.0006587266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909378,0.0061125313,0.00032186028,0.0006116642,0.0011403137,0.00087574916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668219,0.019828534,0.006179834,0.003921501,0.0021004109,0.0011478735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011027479,0.00036450577,0.0006098136,0.00046899193,0.001046989,0.0022514982,0.0005078103,0.0011838339,0.0050923913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028515091,0.00022330903,0.00044167796,0.0003133869,0.003446934,0.002473884,0.0024218813,0.0011190941,0.00034441458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005490978,0.00017918338,0.006218611,0.00017601451,0.00010558338,0.00031486462,0.0010497369,0.037105307,0.004390123,0.93469834,0.00048493835,0.014728163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018922535,0.0003323657,0.00684783,0.000059509017,0.000083193794,0.00022291135,0.0010041491,0.08000122,0.0017601784,0.9064616,0.002977962,0.000059742382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00121625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007766226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011027479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013646426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012212413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05831963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202879232","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12816","title":"AFTER THE TOURNAMENT: OUTCOMES AND EFFORT PROVISION","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Arkansas","keywords":"Tournament; Earnings; Economics; Inequity aversion; Microeconomics; Loss aversion; Labour economics; Inequality; Finance","score_opus":0.024455679179238892,"score_gpt":0.32658018697482494,"score_spread":0.30212450779558603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202879232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99047613,0.00008010294,0.0007747294,0.00021331184,0.000022008928,0.000020994357,0.00008025067,0.000012278421,0.008320247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970228,0.000028546003,0.00017192177,0.000054330143,0.000010126504,0.000012970526,0.00007898404,0.000005296685,0.0026150744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994584,0.00023633553,0.000027527465,0.00008119789,0.00008154539,0.00011507643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960592,0.0010629068,0.0013302221,0.0003322043,0.00016844818,0.0010469556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011279124,0.00023566998,0.000257972,0.00025103835,0.0004102714,0.0016986803,0.00030142363,0.00058789976,0.011636733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005638865,0.00011758795,0.000114868286,0.0003054249,0.00048056533,0.00043881958,0.00067308784,0.0006450204,0.0009860472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009683509,0.008363613,0.73418623,0.00022438237,0.000317848,0.00069642224,0.0016980759,0.0051240767,0.046895064,0.022975316,0.005828081,0.1640073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084752166,0.001677689,0.98650485,0.000023914863,0.000036501824,0.00006467324,0.0006150435,0.0024770363,0.0013292683,0.004807478,0.002358157,0.000020697242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012449186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033038822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011636733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046031995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029054785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038928747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208911980","doi":"10.1101/032912","title":"A quantitative interaction between signal detection in attention and reward/aversion behavior","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Office of National Drug Control Policy; National Institute on Drug Abuse; Northwestern University","keywords":"Operationalization; Psychology; Preference; Risk aversion (psychology); Inference; Loss aversion; Cognitive psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.054748440049147785,"score_gpt":0.3207745811177064,"score_spread":0.2660261410685586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208911980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.949347,0.000108845226,0.047794573,0.00021777714,0.000010142002,0.000028176288,0.00008131848,0.00009861935,0.0023135324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997336,0.000015569341,0.0022646843,0.00004013416,0.000004337905,0.000010495493,0.00001620639,0.000011716287,0.00030095832],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990753,0.00045073027,0.000030734303,0.00021431678,0.00016652403,0.00006240282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941654,0.00405773,0.00089110824,0.00052434835,0.00018537,0.00017602876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023369463,0.00029014537,0.00041190386,0.00035280825,0.00012899481,0.000989386,0.0003054523,0.00034506546,0.0029025052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008783824,0.0002475912,0.00029805506,0.00023687589,0.0008655982,0.0007654608,0.0007129214,0.00059967506,0.00014249135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022411286,0.00086989405,0.13821897,0.0004479535,0.0008115723,0.00035194153,0.0009537294,0.034871485,0.7137279,0.040231876,0.0005968639,0.066676706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012279408,0.0015870963,0.70716417,0.000033140663,0.0004099621,0.00037267647,0.00022721932,0.15881725,0.06378895,0.06645406,0.00091266737,0.0001100231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006754884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037240528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029025052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003145252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025995608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012359142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213754417","doi":"10.17192/es2024.0367","title":"Individual Performance after Success and Failure - A Natural Experiment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Overtime; Basketball; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural experiment; Psychology; Overconfidence effect; Association (psychology); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Labour economics; Geography","score_opus":0.019434763688226105,"score_gpt":0.29657775267487524,"score_spread":0.27714298898664913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213754417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975974,0.000022110456,0.0011896099,0.0000318774,0.000016516278,0.00019360868,0.00016589106,0.0000128052425,0.0007701666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368024,0.000043522712,0.0026643649,0.000120208,0.000037866597,0.0011217796,0.00047697098,0.000013534871,0.0018414939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957034,0.002556307,0.00022319386,0.0007674986,0.00046297457,0.00028672352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799336,0.011274223,0.003212617,0.0034174917,0.00054574106,0.0016162698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005166775,0.00054035604,0.00079370715,0.00039285005,0.00065086427,0.0009894874,0.00068676384,0.0010724738,0.004022925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010456951,0.00034701813,0.0004738062,0.00029440646,0.0017194508,0.0006079867,0.001106263,0.0012115285,0.0008056194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.053186867,0.14349164,0.5694716,0.00089412427,0.0013880533,0.0016813691,0.0058887736,0.010829238,0.13384324,0.0077837785,0.0040700138,0.067471296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018766056,0.11202872,0.8376712,0.0000663782,0.00031221,0.0006397327,0.001596785,0.014431654,0.015497851,0.01071083,0.004973978,0.00019403223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069251197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073327543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005166775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040103216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040531406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027324796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215087233","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12181","title":"Voluntary Contributions to a Mutual Insurance Pool","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Context (archaeology); Microeconomics; Turnover; Mechanism (biology); Aggregate (composite); Econometrics; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.032312660929120315,"score_gpt":0.34999673513267254,"score_spread":0.3176840742035522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215087233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953584,0.000050058727,0.03272449,0.0003151724,0.000013231948,0.000069802954,0.000051966133,0.000040650637,0.013150663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642736,0.000013615836,0.0018758567,0.000018202825,0.00000423615,0.000022511256,0.000010301589,0.0000038125002,0.0016241356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983741,0.0010254586,0.000041281863,0.000149312,0.00017111377,0.00023859809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484324,0.0027809537,0.00086585473,0.0006038089,0.00022987633,0.0006762468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031876916,0.0004765343,0.00071403687,0.00043030846,0.00077813125,0.0014145911,0.0008521123,0.0008422775,0.0060365396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007382824,0.00021905157,0.00036965555,0.00023665918,0.0012818463,0.0013284917,0.0019859313,0.0007266246,0.00039501162],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002552588,0.0011941526,0.019376071,0.00030215606,0.00026753926,0.0010396426,0.0019633144,0.23362328,0.030464297,0.65226614,0.0035241013,0.053426575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050737435,0.0008919239,0.006165648,0.000078611105,0.000114135495,0.00036154123,0.001263957,0.63713884,0.007295628,0.33832055,0.0078017204,0.000060147933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006665381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005336041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060365396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008078222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072156073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020194292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217134584","doi":"","title":"Asymmetric Information and Adverse Selection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Information asymmetry; Private information retrieval; Selection (genetic algorithm); Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03492138925272019,"score_gpt":0.36038038721192894,"score_spread":0.32545899795920874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217134584","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33230823,0.0026596389,0.522243,0.010772837,0.0003598778,0.00050254585,0.000523367,0.00017651504,0.13045399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984823,0.0009480532,0.008550551,0.0008595673,0.00036590744,0.0001585172,0.00007155226,0.00002227533,0.004200598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854069,0.007823237,0.00066617824,0.0014399046,0.003377449,0.0012863119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9000408,0.06951867,0.016754419,0.007673673,0.0042018634,0.0018106442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014527194,0.0006179632,0.001587451,0.0017903536,0.0013374627,0.0045917206,0.001645043,0.0026820223,0.009300407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057093456,0.0005353785,0.0012109287,0.0012121034,0.0069368086,0.0056076404,0.0029516555,0.0032148506,0.0007020151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007577645,0.00010978591,0.0053243265,0.00010744501,0.0000887684,0.0002969126,0.00031227292,0.013079651,0.0007499848,0.9645393,0.0013404051,0.013975309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050683586,0.00009044447,0.002903213,0.000044960932,0.000032232612,0.00022847508,0.00015032812,0.020893857,0.00056614174,0.97261983,0.0023814077,0.00003834173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066357275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003374622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014527194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022829704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014794278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225896932","doi":"10.18452/3456","title":"Alternating Offer Bargaining Experiments with Varying Institutional Details","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Bargaining power; Microeconomics; Economics; Power (physics); Game theory; Bargaining problem; Repeated game; Mathematical economics; Physics","score_opus":0.05238230872734814,"score_gpt":0.32848305539086886,"score_spread":0.2761007466635207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225896932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840162,0.00015029714,0.00804487,0.00015362234,0.00006447995,0.0004979836,0.00023623604,0.00008592159,0.0067503615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98491514,0.00018711161,0.009495405,0.00016325472,0.000059628368,0.0015809842,0.00029983785,0.000063165135,0.0032354863],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972319,0.000992582,0.0003443663,0.00054409605,0.0005615525,0.00032543787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97790504,0.01310261,0.0028815295,0.0043406957,0.000699684,0.0010705215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00405595,0.0006356079,0.0006155643,0.00039988346,0.0005921913,0.00130619,0.0019200934,0.0015353917,0.011857875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016343117,0.0005075698,0.0004016573,0.000611785,0.0015230153,0.0017859312,0.0016238086,0.0023220808,0.0010086899],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07113402,0.060414825,0.019370578,0.0026071875,0.0010652003,0.0009914518,0.004807573,0.036341444,0.5589923,0.1644378,0.003628095,0.076209486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022064872,0.11952256,0.078310296,0.00047997202,0.0015454381,0.0012718927,0.0025066773,0.08822149,0.31973,0.33303022,0.03249234,0.0008242128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022469257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001935198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011857875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005519331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000513447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0396685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226635255","doi":"10.1002/jid.3331","title":"Charitable Dictators? Determinants of Giving to NGOs in Uganda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Development","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Dictator game; Endowment; Donation; Dictator; Civil servants; Civil servant; Social psychology; Altruism (biology); Identity (music); Private sector; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.046872505188148214,"score_gpt":0.386493528077665,"score_spread":0.3396210228895168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226635255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99519676,0.00022459163,0.00022525273,0.0005278956,0.000009734949,0.000020452097,0.00004363734,0.0000027605884,0.0037490423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994062,0.0000747211,0.000037745776,0.000015918331,0.0000027928572,0.00001072406,0.0000094783645,0.0000013273366,0.0004412032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620515,0.0027455483,0.00013868314,0.00016581429,0.0001495264,0.0005953069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644803,0.020800957,0.009471595,0.0007701861,0.00081989134,0.0036570444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038208466,0.00023012725,0.00042696585,0.00073578634,0.0015738928,0.0030576973,0.00045710825,0.0008574724,0.014399426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025470909,0.0002964906,0.00015112261,0.00087467016,0.0019570477,0.0009820042,0.0017803761,0.0014363554,0.00092439743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006725319,0.0009147758,0.9577764,0.00014856797,0.00009262869,0.00057113735,0.011372622,0.0019008574,0.00029536607,0.0067530223,0.0018107562,0.017691383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117367774,0.00055964314,0.9239034,0.00035378852,0.00009762123,0.00035464182,0.053531755,0.005617514,0.00038727955,0.009037792,0.0059761545,0.0000630685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070830686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009112806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014399426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010097177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008746548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048170924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232611067","doi":"10.1111/caje.12557","title":"Group size and matching protocol in contests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Collusion; Tacit collusion; Nash equilibrium; Group (periodic table); Protocol (science); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.15618775451952782,"score_gpt":0.2672320895707965,"score_spread":0.1110443350512687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232611067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903357,0.00005234422,0.007144213,0.000070513466,0.000025077552,0.00020566976,0.00003408846,0.000050038267,0.0020822634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933322,0.00002401918,0.0053638117,0.000047499052,0.000011637946,0.00042967082,0.000042666572,0.000026957448,0.00072160177],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926044,0.0066126836,0.0006884761,0.0010798688,0.0018582528,0.00050031155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92233753,0.05492612,0.011177453,0.007742854,0.0019601397,0.0018560487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00987115,0.0005516867,0.0007830361,0.0005154415,0.00052493147,0.0014266213,0.0011853148,0.00073590555,0.0037603248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059215687,0.00030246747,0.00021069695,0.0003534479,0.001315755,0.0011263464,0.0013005597,0.0006615716,0.00039935394],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.057294656,0.02443156,0.07709386,0.00164993,0.00059678714,0.0005470022,0.004733528,0.04270345,0.54865587,0.0591597,0.0017876471,0.18134601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011547055,0.10763282,0.22161178,0.000549705,0.0010904976,0.00112087,0.0030790258,0.2712396,0.25562075,0.114702016,0.011125499,0.00068047736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003727599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031812477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00987115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007525284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008066469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05220431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235946409","doi":"10.7202/1039876ar","title":"Lois et normes : les enseignements de l’économie comportementale","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.122038181668176,"score_gpt":0.3683684387320205,"score_spread":0.24633025706384454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235946409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6123773,0.004218266,0.0967849,0.016897015,0.00036783124,0.00032896735,0.00058496586,0.00011967932,0.26832113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97840184,0.001207746,0.0095700845,0.000568946,0.000096853684,0.00023903852,0.00011340504,0.00005127971,0.009750856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872951,0.0073810965,0.00038346858,0.0015941315,0.002914379,0.00043188335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486506,0.034261465,0.007761241,0.004822602,0.0032609643,0.0012431191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011260535,0.0005001659,0.0006377754,0.0010937091,0.0012580802,0.0051900623,0.00096183957,0.0013170437,0.014792674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052236147,0.00049173617,0.00055523746,0.00145865,0.008638769,0.0069969837,0.0025831428,0.0026139538,0.0007867264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007042825,0.0005043332,0.024155717,0.0006540707,0.00016354231,0.000100828365,0.009760619,0.0037390431,0.004560031,0.90051764,0.0017079011,0.053432032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003519494,0.00079685624,0.09107183,0.0005230273,0.00017732606,0.00017587631,0.010280472,0.012577443,0.007933149,0.8152034,0.060715415,0.00019327232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006207958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045333267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014792674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043966654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032305769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059552133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236019047","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v9n6p179","title":"The Evolution of Citizen Participation and Regulatory Success","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Stochastic game; Enforcement; Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Compliance (psychology); Population; Microeconomics; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Demography","score_opus":0.030437394585205134,"score_gpt":0.3364906311573708,"score_spread":0.3060532365721657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236019047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447751,0.00011416513,0.029004982,0.0015815697,0.000019083604,0.000034681365,0.0001230327,0.000072298026,0.024275215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954733,0.000038799913,0.0015143648,0.000038132173,0.000004883963,0.000016990922,0.00002886061,0.000009405047,0.002875237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803954,0.0009658161,0.000061635605,0.00034652892,0.00017773964,0.0004088002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894181,0.0059793377,0.0017550718,0.0008283694,0.00096082175,0.001058319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033431659,0.0003079265,0.00048262058,0.00084413396,0.00090483116,0.0031091354,0.0006965313,0.0019055605,0.0070157275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02515183,0.0002665442,0.00040263045,0.000620734,0.0018902492,0.002659975,0.0016395507,0.0012759354,0.0005999108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045748413,0.00042300843,0.13753866,0.00016844657,0.00023320256,0.0016669598,0.0052281464,0.120705806,0.014299941,0.6492647,0.0033973174,0.06661646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001329117,0.000439551,0.09220609,0.00007556206,0.00008785304,0.0010247233,0.0041533224,0.35626018,0.0023457098,0.53162026,0.011485655,0.00016826371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032823512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024009747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070157275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014023788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007569899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023469985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236929650","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1136440","title":"Matching and Challenge Gifts to Charity: Evidence from Laboratory and Natural Field Experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.035628808816737,"score_gpt":0.33265678305659413,"score_spread":0.2970279742398571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236929650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919286,0.00024807968,0.00073493837,0.0006567589,0.000048652975,0.000070572685,0.00006106573,0.000021636788,0.0062296903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996563,0.00014656405,0.0006972663,0.00037217795,0.000032993605,0.00007511697,0.00008825337,0.000017211993,0.0020073666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942063,0.003912098,0.00021103781,0.0006125579,0.0007633118,0.00029464296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88206726,0.07704957,0.017782325,0.015828542,0.0019262074,0.0053460216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014908402,0.00065729144,0.001310728,0.0009290295,0.0014664263,0.002478678,0.0012999399,0.003971636,0.013918155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08228244,0.00067248166,0.00044025088,0.0006475121,0.002992183,0.0020796778,0.0016940427,0.0021703101,0.0015662281],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.070222795,0.0931394,0.46395674,0.0019314849,0.0029951867,0.0016278725,0.006523856,0.019663736,0.044683557,0.065397955,0.02201143,0.20784603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016222736,0.033258416,0.63027585,0.00043681537,0.0013035769,0.0026929132,0.007118931,0.044668958,0.019556705,0.21431549,0.029685736,0.00046386762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024463767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018706938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014908402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092219724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092431286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07884413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241883523","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.962146","title":"The Response to Incentives and Contractual Efficiency: Evidence from a Field Experiment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Field (mathematics); Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019205137926086864,"score_gpt":0.34818041144773476,"score_spread":0.3289752735216479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241883523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99229395,0.00012862586,0.0014018556,0.0004409326,0.00005766758,0.00017698458,0.00009852292,0.000020024965,0.00538135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99459654,0.0001281512,0.0018391886,0.0005121083,0.000042599517,0.0002518582,0.00009441485,0.00002889845,0.002506406],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481225,0.0031977133,0.00030582462,0.00067520246,0.0007194103,0.00028959283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87742037,0.09553221,0.011536353,0.010849717,0.001688846,0.0029725716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013047289,0.0007567393,0.0008873351,0.00049201865,0.0008380657,0.0019147058,0.0013581016,0.0034780703,0.011882137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060774013,0.0008658993,0.0003551514,0.00043120465,0.002529886,0.0015843606,0.00084136025,0.0024714873,0.00092094915],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.17247601,0.18327935,0.14428338,0.0019545343,0.0017234292,0.0009593984,0.0059053097,0.012572543,0.28359213,0.060128957,0.010877183,0.12224775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.050583053,0.120537974,0.5475665,0.00048329777,0.0015844607,0.0018776322,0.0036632065,0.04742762,0.06969165,0.13667525,0.019247316,0.0006620245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012036276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079337216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013047289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071973354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094738835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069001496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247381539","doi":"","title":"Human capital investment by the poor: Informing policy with laboratory experiments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Subsidy; Investment (military); Patience; Poverty; Public economics; Population; Economics; Investment decisions; Government (linguistics); Willingness to pay; Business; Actuarial science; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance; Behavioral economics; Psychology; Political science; Microeconomics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029809985929380885,"score_gpt":0.28431874965201115,"score_spread":0.25450876372263026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247381539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9295641,0.0005888762,0.049666848,0.0037755766,0.00017216479,0.0023573139,0.0010045865,0.00012128645,0.01274922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950393,0.0008026833,0.04022916,0.0013959449,0.00011133642,0.0052426676,0.00025407915,0.000018153309,0.0015527741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98522675,0.0131903915,0.00028052714,0.00056989875,0.00037062293,0.0003617127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8987666,0.083387695,0.009765969,0.006371507,0.0009687367,0.0007395293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018887337,0.0009103765,0.0008459069,0.0006204832,0.0007967227,0.0020640611,0.0014896841,0.002239475,0.004008315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04627359,0.0006271196,0.00047870982,0.0008603721,0.0033806025,0.0021297308,0.0014867845,0.0018159065,0.00038281726],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027390862,0.11222869,0.17813846,0.003977454,0.0014519336,0.0020213514,0.016128361,0.11643308,0.060634367,0.27343398,0.016204381,0.19195709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017570442,0.062553175,0.08734941,0.0010160068,0.0011653029,0.00057400117,0.0095163165,0.18266556,0.051756687,0.53667223,0.048546173,0.00061474246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029102114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027386541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018887337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017345755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019217995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09988701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252399277","doi":"","title":"One Sided Matching: Choice Selection With Rival Uncertain Outcomes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"SAFER; Interdependence; Matching (statistics); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Selection (genetic algorithm); Microeconomics; Choice set; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.10884194709212158,"score_gpt":0.41440908619563066,"score_spread":0.3055671391035091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252399277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192146,0.00011421668,0.072199896,0.00050022814,0.000038384907,0.00023711067,0.00009380848,0.000036145495,0.0075656516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98298174,0.000055767156,0.015166729,0.00013373024,0.000033497123,0.00011074241,0.00004436268,0.000007978481,0.001465457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910445,0.005803388,0.00030996065,0.001337346,0.00093689363,0.0005678779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449389,0.039743677,0.0070884977,0.0059237625,0.00063107756,0.0016742125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012115449,0.00069247733,0.0021903683,0.00042839278,0.00068830233,0.0025848043,0.0015931042,0.0019048786,0.0068597253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043434557,0.00057907274,0.0010873507,0.0007384623,0.0020909838,0.0024873447,0.00201816,0.0020765706,0.00060429773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018939642,0.009655709,0.074892715,0.0009130813,0.0014107925,0.001675932,0.0028942076,0.24993436,0.029797822,0.45927072,0.002810338,0.14780475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016392135,0.0038828019,0.01347053,0.000053440363,0.00023692848,0.00044568517,0.00037420253,0.5477392,0.003948113,0.42643592,0.0016229353,0.00015109031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000599597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043255335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012115449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007739294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000739838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064073384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260488512","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2696613","title":"The Effect of Relative Performance Information and Other Employee Behavior on Noncompliance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Business","score_opus":0.02218106250549764,"score_gpt":0.31882766383177047,"score_spread":0.29664660132627285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260488512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972861,0.00009612231,0.00016753672,0.00023676199,0.000009085948,0.0000139125,0.00009861993,0.000010296051,0.0020815602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873143,0.000036923044,0.00010705017,0.000053168224,0.000013649246,0.000009732385,0.000075897624,0.000004642187,0.0009674668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99459076,0.0035309908,0.00029752858,0.00044062876,0.0005324952,0.0006076929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7995188,0.16558136,0.02153945,0.006289376,0.0016113813,0.0054596663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008966498,0.00040565632,0.00063818035,0.0007730232,0.0007639428,0.0019720523,0.00076379685,0.0017570424,0.00826526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044357516,0.00035264128,0.0007175249,0.0006256776,0.00069196016,0.0010167961,0.00092729524,0.0021576385,0.0007403613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060959854,0.0052927723,0.964435,0.00007654209,0.00040785733,0.00028186702,0.00083007524,0.0015347404,0.0027209504,0.0010931642,0.00040946927,0.016821494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008606123,0.0019638657,0.9928779,0.000016761218,0.00016279271,0.00009372117,0.00048801198,0.002262576,0.00090072944,0.0008685562,0.00025343313,0.000025624999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002134818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022806537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008966498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006470994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009506476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047419906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261947549","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1707.02748","title":"Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14120184299828115,"score_gpt":0.2568190108664783,"score_spread":0.11561716786819715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261947549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341744,0.00008634082,0.05693779,0.00043664148,0.000014230084,0.00008351425,0.00005309238,0.000098640325,0.008115255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99245197,0.000035232595,0.006583314,0.000057851285,0.0000058233077,0.000036454385,0.00003064008,0.000010417269,0.00078828895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614954,0.002174047,0.00017332443,0.0004739488,0.0006874689,0.00034161547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95592076,0.03080656,0.0068764514,0.003488109,0.001391083,0.0015170062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008677003,0.0005800696,0.00052499375,0.0006426356,0.00030696567,0.002295653,0.00093357085,0.0011164603,0.0033161622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07188832,0.00046651153,0.00034547594,0.0002705813,0.0018529015,0.0032331592,0.0014403207,0.0014700727,0.00034842384],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005492194,0.0019640673,0.17853779,0.00045220982,0.00059192046,0.0004985188,0.0064503076,0.12590759,0.025063008,0.4728643,0.0026110557,0.17956701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058234594,0.0016895544,0.06838102,0.0000896276,0.0001546809,0.00029489305,0.0009374489,0.46798262,0.006058582,0.44889474,0.00474813,0.00018635532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015683725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012928975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008677003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084003125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050918246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04588896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262192170","doi":"10.7202/1039877ar","title":"Rémunération et effort des travailleurs dans un cadre collectif","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.09154058977996554,"score_gpt":0.3424669233618059,"score_spread":0.25092633358184036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262192170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99701715,0.00018254596,0.0003591889,0.000076744676,0.0000036927484,0.00002037742,0.000049849587,0.0000038344274,0.0022866074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99228024,0.00021346656,0.0010318022,0.00003397396,0.0000074645404,0.00006397532,0.00009524535,0.000005270369,0.0062686168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804544,0.0010245198,0.000069633075,0.00028442295,0.00032071405,0.00025523338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99154973,0.0037902272,0.0017521094,0.00082900375,0.00073437183,0.0013445207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035386158,0.0005610545,0.00056857534,0.00093875977,0.0013787184,0.0014619298,0.00061416277,0.0008225988,0.007396934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070088217,0.00023682215,0.0004803872,0.00069733296,0.0010452186,0.0007965193,0.001276285,0.0007353426,0.00075960654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059948075,0.0062515982,0.7024751,0.0010269328,0.00090312806,0.00092091685,0.036174886,0.005218091,0.064262204,0.00993053,0.0013248771,0.16551696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070505834,0.0025528045,0.97650105,0.000087729524,0.00010444721,0.00013415265,0.009688874,0.0013893945,0.0045482935,0.0013266545,0.0035412638,0.000054858283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012402822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021148391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012402822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011602273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009724318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024745226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263954191","doi":"10.7202/1039883ar","title":"Représentativité et hétérogénéité des préférences dans les expériences de laboratoire","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.10771931912685359,"score_gpt":0.38966616119723413,"score_spread":0.28194684207038057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263954191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94650745,0.0016832871,0.013992053,0.0013301782,0.00012540774,0.0002146893,0.00050931354,0.000020009096,0.035617698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827036,0.0015323146,0.006346169,0.0005063502,0.0000695423,0.0007672251,0.0002940996,0.000026502936,0.007754118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413055,0.0039463267,0.0002023204,0.00076227816,0.0007127066,0.0002458193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842941,0.010828716,0.0017854734,0.001989611,0.0008055373,0.00029659588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063297134,0.00039050874,0.0005511895,0.0006555614,0.0013153264,0.0032465698,0.0008146394,0.00084522815,0.017443383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014859579,0.00033041945,0.000642274,0.001106399,0.0034674285,0.0020083063,0.0019134815,0.0012992065,0.00070683996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037215063,0.009476993,0.2881035,0.0049687703,0.0014809703,0.00076882116,0.18765646,0.0051042363,0.039349463,0.17606394,0.0057665138,0.27753884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040361055,0.003973147,0.7368966,0.0012982526,0.0005769194,0.00064350775,0.07906694,0.002491466,0.012489281,0.06910719,0.09269701,0.0003561506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00485905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006355453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017443383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019390077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096733106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05835396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265293019","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2278125","title":"When Parity Promotes Peace: Resolving Conflict between Asymmetric Agents","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Parity (physics); Economics; Microeconomics; Agent-based model; Computer science; Political science; Law; Physics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06105220207686857,"score_gpt":0.35016413271174235,"score_spread":0.2891119306348738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265293019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8841974,0.0002859872,0.029930243,0.008045753,0.00039986227,0.00009153191,0.00013515186,0.00007907192,0.07683494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679285,0.000052839387,0.0017086973,0.00017326392,0.000041848933,0.000022090853,0.000020768473,0.000012751159,0.0011749922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985305,0.00078287884,0.00006621487,0.00016096071,0.00020508334,0.00025438977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837794,0.010782564,0.0026307132,0.0010284164,0.0005038561,0.0012751067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038576957,0.000417236,0.00047773728,0.0006037908,0.0010410645,0.0032729576,0.0007002765,0.0025260132,0.011300342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036980085,0.00038735074,0.00026555493,0.00038923338,0.0018543254,0.004877493,0.0024037105,0.0026240963,0.0007382987],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057245893,0.0017672025,0.029470557,0.0008961504,0.00033139644,0.001603013,0.0055517657,0.0178153,0.023976,0.774557,0.012591995,0.12571503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003288366,0.00047325384,0.0077996207,0.0000482394,0.00008635006,0.00030712303,0.002708681,0.027730884,0.0024804748,0.9552014,0.002803598,0.000031652526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025740027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002797129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011300342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035130378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007242937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03780347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266021971","doi":"10.1257/aer.p20161011","title":"Supply and Demand for Discrimination: Strategic Revelation of Own Characteristics in a Trust Game","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Exploit; Economics; Microeconomics; Strategic interaction; Dictator game; Adversary; Test (biology); Experimental economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.049829542864178414,"score_gpt":0.35610368753111565,"score_spread":0.30627414466693725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266021971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699266,0.00016612478,0.015324076,0.001223465,0.000009031827,0.00004205218,0.000080910955,0.000014116283,0.013213599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985342,0.000056074998,0.000786041,0.000052851698,0.0000061968667,0.000015374839,0.000017263166,0.000002526456,0.0005295997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982855,0.001014569,0.0001132544,0.00017282942,0.00021423456,0.00019966057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638067,0.027913513,0.0046857796,0.001635256,0.0008036445,0.0011550825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032733777,0.0003849062,0.0008304145,0.0004237666,0.00056301354,0.0018785167,0.0006207636,0.001956113,0.007704679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022824762,0.00047229003,0.00046046101,0.00039976626,0.0016643862,0.003369732,0.00096401613,0.0016281053,0.00041624048],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006660851,0.0040478026,0.21415025,0.0012576592,0.00068552897,0.002718406,0.0053100223,0.04088268,0.056357577,0.5558932,0.0031952378,0.108840756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012975301,0.0021653124,0.14491548,0.00015533883,0.00038901856,0.0024628842,0.0047806217,0.26634282,0.005441197,0.567598,0.0042344737,0.00021742693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010861192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010999176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007704679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009635349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004618854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025774717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266833733","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1117575","title":"Information Disclosure in Multistage Tournaments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.01615059939562083,"score_gpt":0.29678401641695584,"score_spread":0.28063341702133504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266833733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789788,0.00032597626,0.008787672,0.001129401,0.000066863126,0.00008877579,0.00008399657,0.000041949872,0.01049659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971704,0.000057927715,0.0005572124,0.00005388587,0.000023278519,0.00002285465,0.000022115624,0.0000026108037,0.0020896124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946359,0.003130975,0.00030100948,0.0003917362,0.0005940213,0.0009463427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9132323,0.06639144,0.011810418,0.0037112874,0.0016766414,0.0031778612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010252816,0.00037336684,0.0011004001,0.00075316866,0.0012621111,0.00446985,0.00082358735,0.0024700768,0.0088997595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049762398,0.000586162,0.0005825609,0.00085390004,0.0011340987,0.002393963,0.0016859736,0.0019203558,0.0003803808],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015536766,0.00751394,0.24019684,0.0009079013,0.0008023246,0.001572453,0.009260505,0.07280714,0.0065691965,0.43612283,0.0110453265,0.19766484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015609426,0.0035379643,0.11730022,0.00017249148,0.00047798833,0.000796056,0.004679406,0.2451775,0.002406131,0.6186311,0.005057059,0.00020317933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011278893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016178933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010252816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091406656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011939672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054222763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268135532","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0041812.s001","title":"Appendix S1 - Measuring the Distribution of Spitefulness","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Consistency (knowledge bases); Object (grammar); Psychology; Social psychology; Distribution (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09578480815964278,"score_gpt":0.3774505009252542,"score_spread":0.2816656927656114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268135532","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016013341,0.00036344476,0.011102462,0.00079057406,0.00061173236,0.0127180545,0.90913826,0.001969114,0.04729309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09928495,0.0017373974,0.096015655,0.0028175046,0.00036120278,0.091025524,0.569425,0.0030256207,0.13630715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973116,0.000649966,0.00054232834,0.0003106466,0.0010251706,0.00016025218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92650944,0.044165257,0.004387879,0.006843317,0.016168952,0.0019251453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032735239,0.0013266236,0.0011803191,0.0028091138,0.002090957,0.001993666,0.0018623485,0.001595622,0.70121676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05304714,0.0013259661,0.00066351704,0.003528411,0.0007350816,0.0016775237,0.0016106808,0.0018132516,0.16853638],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063447695,0.0014512972,0.0139432335,0.0024908457,0.000046372403,0.00017509959,0.00090248935,0.0008338293,0.0012184147,0.0027363608,0.8766165,0.09895108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014639131,0.0013139363,0.12528655,0.0030529138,0.00012750851,0.0009512361,0.003906571,0.00254542,0.0050626667,0.029403523,0.826457,0.00042868985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052692834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013007096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70121676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014629596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023340199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42617804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270862519","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2698697","title":"Accounting for Needs in Cost Sharing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Cost accounting; Business; Management accounting","score_opus":0.05756149631296115,"score_gpt":0.35880869660735865,"score_spread":0.3012472002943975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270862519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852999,0.0008190053,0.07525637,0.0069204685,0.00016826652,0.0002442438,0.0004281513,0.00015097618,0.13071273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915903,0.00009403178,0.0039114123,0.0000697416,0.000031339932,0.000039013812,0.000034143304,0.000019001689,0.0042111385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954594,0.0018867748,0.0003042168,0.00040849607,0.0011722079,0.0007688312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729307,0.016044341,0.003282631,0.0040324274,0.0025188613,0.0011909594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00617665,0.0008279924,0.0011346418,0.0011549818,0.0012539756,0.003741757,0.0015657151,0.0028604171,0.013783161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04371938,0.00065863907,0.00076302607,0.0015790181,0.0022153133,0.011963093,0.0028247517,0.0024447239,0.00047005402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050063943,0.0004410855,0.017544463,0.00034263823,0.00013315855,0.00035165242,0.0022278542,0.040179864,0.0011055452,0.8692438,0.003911835,0.0640173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045629764,0.00013549559,0.009374101,0.000065320244,0.00012988808,0.00016696184,0.001833967,0.07092275,0.00057661714,0.9132332,0.003473454,0.000042488078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003979795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003894277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013783161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038279823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003272732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04610926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272118186","doi":"","title":"When Do Punishment Institutions Work","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Incentive; Institution; Public good; Social dilemma; Psychology; Social psychology; Power (physics); Law and economics; Criminology; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14570604705151968,"score_gpt":0.4245764031003735,"score_spread":0.2788703560488538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272118186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7245002,0.0041922107,0.025627404,0.033645496,0.00090255996,0.0005554439,0.0007567499,0.00064355246,0.2091764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888026,0.00059326336,0.0032385304,0.0021455358,0.00007547152,0.00018665545,0.00008335004,0.00011246908,0.004762009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99169415,0.0045111533,0.00035248444,0.001052009,0.00085745583,0.0015327515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9592517,0.012699592,0.014694798,0.0056471354,0.0026607292,0.0050460715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010652993,0.0006162505,0.0010255709,0.0010995227,0.0016634705,0.0053352313,0.0014645925,0.0037740543,0.020926105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044670533,0.00053400703,0.00065038406,0.000700606,0.0040166997,0.006643318,0.0032810252,0.0016226548,0.003409527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024085878,0.0027356744,0.14766382,0.0022230877,0.0009065558,0.0012978766,0.0066057732,0.0087433085,0.024115521,0.54373103,0.028786708,0.23078212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018531999,0.002958217,0.22705184,0.0021844925,0.0006124332,0.0015864152,0.015246,0.014589808,0.018768553,0.56912124,0.14565076,0.00037709586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082043145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090791774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020926105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019360369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002053937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07000482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276874999","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12393","title":"Trust, ability‐to‐pay, and charitable giving","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Altruism (biology); Public good; Crowding out; Economics; Willingness to pay; Pleasure; Microeconomics; Foundation (evidence); Crowding; Donation; Public economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.02635092922957176,"score_gpt":0.3070224688771838,"score_spread":0.28067153964761204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276874999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9263988,0.00081412523,0.008649004,0.003955591,0.000052836273,0.000040456307,0.000121229365,0.00002164318,0.059946425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999263,0.000069434034,0.00010817371,0.000029005034,0.000007802371,0.0000046361824,0.0000050591966,0.0000011198247,0.0005117842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834824,0.0009801814,0.00007348815,0.00009597211,0.00017666287,0.0003255981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722898,0.013654334,0.00931471,0.0010558459,0.0012600735,0.0024252457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028013864,0.00024010269,0.00039964262,0.00080280734,0.0009682914,0.0026472656,0.00035572762,0.00089963886,0.007848014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01734347,0.00014076049,0.00026903633,0.00097433577,0.0025181489,0.001339033,0.0017513328,0.0013345248,0.00028924496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091709977,0.001451158,0.28818324,0.00038846204,0.00039263107,0.0007105567,0.0036015478,0.028420113,0.0010957128,0.60721236,0.0045320587,0.06309505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001861971,0.000559551,0.24172282,0.00037191808,0.00024272755,0.0005592802,0.0074982424,0.036233243,0.0011906929,0.7005497,0.010726149,0.00015953263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026434725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023328054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007848014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017501327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070601323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026254237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280707386","doi":"","title":"Kitchen Confidential? Knowledge Transfer and Social Norms in Gourmet Cuisine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Intellectual property; Business; Confidentiality; Field (mathematics); Internet privacy; Law and economics; Advertising; Commerce; Industrial organization; Computer security; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.035890309328776925,"score_gpt":0.3074934225617203,"score_spread":0.2716031132329434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280707386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916808,0.0000655569,0.0006804281,0.0004488931,0.000003781674,0.000013374136,0.00000912906,0.0000043961036,0.007093666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999521,0.000017653278,0.00015001064,0.00002581082,0.0000014817715,0.000006377188,0.000004158082,9.2278225e-7,0.00027265158],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793756,0.001162638,0.000071518116,0.00027541167,0.00030803782,0.00024489526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97858423,0.011372199,0.0063851234,0.001358713,0.00094426813,0.0013555376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040067807,0.00021523448,0.00032106717,0.00075897085,0.0017840908,0.0023256207,0.00045122416,0.0012292841,0.007634966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021354908,0.00015624182,0.0001393695,0.00046003744,0.0031861118,0.002293336,0.0016993895,0.00071341515,0.0002470884],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031259295,0.0039346814,0.55374336,0.00046875197,0.00027947195,0.0049194475,0.104863994,0.0044032233,0.03651486,0.15522397,0.0017489734,0.13077334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049856433,0.0021238863,0.7072476,0.0001965521,0.00017843762,0.0010969818,0.0986347,0.018079683,0.005518607,0.15470116,0.011482913,0.00024090838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077311657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008803412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077311657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014974202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010666207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025541484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281151414","doi":"10.5555/2615731.2615807","title":"Improving the efficiency of crowdsourcing contests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Crowdsourcing; Mechanism design; Incentive; Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Social Welfare; Microeconomics; Welfare; Production (economics); Economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023323112895569594,"score_gpt":0.30451267365277596,"score_spread":0.28118956075720636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281151414","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3530708,0.00073707313,0.61734784,0.0018629091,0.00013578653,0.0007137035,0.00019076277,0.0007881027,0.025152937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949903,0.0001648353,0.04504129,0.00015406318,0.000046214547,0.00020684565,0.00006600172,0.000101021295,0.00431676],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.987133,0.007592261,0.000575588,0.0015828595,0.0016220805,0.0014942515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94426167,0.037828986,0.0062752967,0.007115316,0.0022260454,0.0022926764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020059973,0.0016643299,0.0032233007,0.0015426155,0.0016880318,0.003636564,0.004136631,0.002869009,0.0070788716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06294695,0.0007864483,0.0011239354,0.0012870063,0.0028298385,0.0049593616,0.0053957133,0.0019882964,0.0014217563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020018702,0.0014109618,0.00874333,0.0010470129,0.0003667357,0.00045700755,0.0016175484,0.5083425,0.018691592,0.27843755,0.0062947017,0.17258912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036933232,0.0005938344,0.0017511242,0.00006820833,0.000067004104,0.00013462144,0.00035160495,0.800239,0.003940118,0.1880147,0.0044067972,0.000063657055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018351733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012478093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020059973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019384208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027665275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10608852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282660891","doi":"10.15185/izawol.238","title":"Incentives for prosocial activities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IZA World of Labor","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.032229414427558695,"score_gpt":0.356412525291707,"score_spread":0.3241831108641483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282660891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047211103,0.0020910178,0.012400402,0.036871735,0.0013103519,0.0003378752,0.0016431246,0.00039499017,0.8977393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78327155,0.0020580487,0.011262791,0.0069909357,0.0013896322,0.00054853543,0.0006715059,0.00009459714,0.19371234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707735,0.0013128994,0.00009366851,0.00018278729,0.0008343283,0.0004989995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905076,0.003627833,0.0014568134,0.0009790075,0.0011743014,0.0022544703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028808755,0.00041366773,0.0003336345,0.0008621567,0.0013394547,0.0021511908,0.0006029535,0.0022091148,0.0815435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014882058,0.0003343532,0.00038231688,0.0005192685,0.00093520805,0.0017546663,0.0018327928,0.0019505862,0.0056349924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043518218,0.0005485015,0.0075469147,0.00024219412,0.000042953397,0.000119328986,0.00028249816,0.0019018621,0.0013797325,0.60031587,0.22092837,0.16625659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039106878,0.00064118055,0.061049066,0.000661111,0.000057400444,0.00048519098,0.0008388927,0.004995644,0.0018415526,0.21884139,0.71006626,0.0001311033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023992222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064013945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0815435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015074923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025464685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2727902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283907089","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2699295","title":"Contest Incentives, Effort Levels and Betting Markets in European Football","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Football; Incentive; Economics; Tournament; Financial economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.02505142072702321,"score_gpt":0.3061194774920543,"score_spread":0.2810680567650311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283907089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99837875,0.00007410847,0.00019970722,0.000066246874,0.0000042955267,0.0000049282003,0.000018822773,0.0000025586826,0.0012505878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880505,0.00002338567,0.00007765003,0.000023836452,0.0000073855404,0.000004668943,0.00003316586,0.0000022162242,0.001022659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893516,0.0005127256,0.00007131581,0.00011450771,0.000099913406,0.00026630363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875858,0.0067259944,0.0029220663,0.00044342986,0.00029541668,0.0020273665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005477407,0.0004852657,0.00081219483,0.0009296028,0.0006658698,0.0035658302,0.00050393614,0.002209076,0.011407606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014775367,0.00046878678,0.0003387047,0.0006639337,0.0009625642,0.001478911,0.001236319,0.0009361695,0.0007026082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021497892,0.012531576,0.8256298,0.00021468347,0.0004104641,0.0010912409,0.003393969,0.021973066,0.022663265,0.038436677,0.0019132759,0.05024411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040927122,0.00094332866,0.9669429,0.000029539908,0.000056998935,0.00013845242,0.0011139212,0.014678877,0.000576482,0.014520258,0.0005401455,0.000049788283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032507034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037719086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011407606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007734837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051704864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03816229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283909138","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2342229","title":"Strategy Inference in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Dilemma; Superrationality; Mathematical economics; Inference; Game theory; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024044814479422215,"score_gpt":0.32580642844855306,"score_spread":0.30176161396913087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283909138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79600227,0.00030194846,0.18595411,0.003348283,0.00006442491,0.0002171094,0.00016149163,0.00015232159,0.01379799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974206,0.0001689586,0.02326087,0.00015496767,0.00003349366,0.00009382096,0.00006886223,0.000020237332,0.0019928874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931439,0.004637183,0.00041889705,0.0007367938,0.0006686293,0.0003945797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8993537,0.09324484,0.0035405522,0.0019061378,0.0011575863,0.0007972798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017513946,0.00080026814,0.002005822,0.0014271743,0.0009128699,0.0039030917,0.0024723585,0.0031554098,0.005618038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08630966,0.0010139709,0.0010264007,0.0008763023,0.002747809,0.004836866,0.0016665863,0.002668911,0.00042162213],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022893434,0.001415076,0.03208513,0.00054711953,0.00090066966,0.0009496293,0.0032529277,0.2051489,0.0033554132,0.6763291,0.002597887,0.07112893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002739071,0.00017872018,0.0038204424,0.000044731118,0.00007313797,0.00012784547,0.0002732802,0.48338118,0.00044214897,0.51105505,0.00028010912,0.000049471393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045025586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028214215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017513946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016342603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024946777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09262371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286610784","doi":"","title":"Trust and Reciprocity in Inter-Individual Versus Inter-Team Interactions: An Experimental Study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Operationalization; Social psychology; Salient; Perception; Dictator game; Psychology; Norm of reciprocity; Reciprocal; Social preferences; Strong reciprocity; Game theory; Sociology; Political science; Social capital; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.05250877146721626,"score_gpt":0.37981195984114424,"score_spread":0.32730318837392797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286610784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99529475,0.000030400483,0.00076723855,0.00017392662,0.000020592372,0.00022943103,0.000046557318,0.000009104068,0.0034278685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340445,0.00010889984,0.0030839718,0.00021963805,0.00005545096,0.0011465701,0.00009705364,0.000010559027,0.0018734307],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385095,0.0037897148,0.0004196008,0.0007625698,0.0008139412,0.00036321822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9341,0.04244298,0.008309359,0.01047419,0.0018638743,0.0028096796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008309351,0.00066430453,0.00061256305,0.00063163164,0.0021297075,0.0024930765,0.0014030059,0.0017388362,0.00722306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033884197,0.0006271319,0.00042298564,0.00050641963,0.0037197538,0.0022613143,0.0022531997,0.0029588607,0.00085174537],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023607677,0.43033525,0.20718302,0.0013398472,0.000653284,0.0027171394,0.08319426,0.0056890445,0.06937358,0.06837208,0.006076427,0.101458415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016216153,0.20479573,0.4394812,0.0007004124,0.0010016668,0.00425335,0.07274482,0.06084911,0.040264633,0.11084434,0.047931407,0.00091723615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092890067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010587046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008309351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081742636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071655493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043944538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289915384","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12230","title":"The Role of Informal Controls and a Bargaining Opponent's Emotions on Transfer Pricing Judgments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Cooperativeness; Adversary; Perception; Control (management); Social psychology; Counterintuitive; Transfer pricing; Psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Personality; Management","score_opus":0.0869384705110878,"score_gpt":0.3753837634907503,"score_spread":0.2884452929796625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289915384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962579,0.000014284464,0.00046294378,0.000035118854,0.0000044494145,0.0000078571475,0.000003916101,0.000002995563,0.0032106044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957937,0.00000750943,0.00016088119,0.000016061556,0.0000028160982,0.0000067987908,0.000004136401,0.0000024499561,0.00021994843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752575,0.0014848601,0.00010754885,0.00020455132,0.00047126715,0.00020602436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98545897,0.009629171,0.0029023043,0.00071125757,0.0005628188,0.000735473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036101665,0.00036015804,0.00025966924,0.00033532295,0.0006262106,0.0023341987,0.00028312707,0.0004962835,0.0031604564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016717969,0.00018691974,0.00018534376,0.0001791492,0.001380009,0.0007259159,0.0011311921,0.0010346737,0.00014345166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007601514,0.0033287636,0.64495414,0.00034664536,0.0004904332,0.0010081035,0.059354734,0.006374869,0.17250594,0.014956094,0.00082927186,0.088249445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013237332,0.00082021137,0.9565004,0.00005962483,0.00013644602,0.00012906849,0.013969155,0.010535762,0.011355412,0.0050734733,0.001184734,0.00010330897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009285671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000835968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036101665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005827367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023084476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01909262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290614284","doi":"","title":"Free riding and the provision of candy bars","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Free riding; Public good; Repetition (rhetorical device); Free rider problem; Test (biology); Economics; Demographic economics; Business; Microeconomics; Incentive; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04747750836052008,"score_gpt":0.29467090437649074,"score_spread":0.24719339601597065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290614284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253692,0.002471545,0.000764343,0.002013019,0.00006447985,0.00015512126,0.010327728,0.00008847229,0.05874608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796423,0.00064792606,0.0005021721,0.000070646885,0.00001535585,0.000020437275,0.002154738,0.000013091936,0.016933437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796766,0.00030729597,0.00007307346,0.00017755319,0.0007413397,0.00073315157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98834,0.0027445862,0.004593118,0.0008856942,0.0013957132,0.00204101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014374733,0.00024190923,0.0005368459,0.00218879,0.003157962,0.00209036,0.0017153934,0.0011127971,0.026741395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011593618,0.00032415515,0.000487472,0.0028453425,0.0012679483,0.0009215328,0.000988425,0.00095540413,0.0012816143],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015870408,0.0012412411,0.81333685,0.000516675,0.00025351904,0.0008006106,0.006018224,0.0038552426,0.0007803547,0.023542507,0.03342228,0.114645496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007215432,0.00015790839,0.9362218,0.0001480649,0.00008087886,0.000119571785,0.0065043955,0.0019794225,0.0002758524,0.0018710956,0.05250029,0.00006849477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88137704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93385226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88137704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010103479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009865219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23864305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291883909","doi":"10.14264/uql.2016.88","title":"When reciprocity becomes back-scratching: an economic inquiry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Scratching; Externality; Zoning; Value (mathematics); Discretion; Microeconomics; Economics; Public economics; Business; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Management; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.045543744108503904,"score_gpt":0.3118714590933004,"score_spread":0.26632771498479646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291883909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71789753,0.002267637,0.04060668,0.020493995,0.00015158979,0.00032095672,0.00021210515,0.000050449344,0.21799906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540555,0.00052050024,0.0016099291,0.00020617392,0.00006571226,0.00007381791,0.000024436953,0.000011554014,0.0020823416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99074847,0.0060037477,0.0003517972,0.00097622705,0.00088092807,0.0010387514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472503,0.04083894,0.005640178,0.002633913,0.0020225442,0.001614173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012738105,0.0002698463,0.0007274817,0.0014882484,0.0032638377,0.00907824,0.001266813,0.0032396428,0.009980441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061393805,0.0004255348,0.00069642375,0.001479423,0.011387049,0.013304952,0.0043825842,0.0031466356,0.00044125968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019813236,0.000190004,0.022411913,0.0002383116,0.000079086196,0.0009319356,0.010041707,0.003309317,0.0006661514,0.9367157,0.0020146824,0.023202855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100980804,0.00016705428,0.02029489,0.0002716857,0.00011558014,0.000952957,0.027688988,0.021049421,0.0005088184,0.90134174,0.027412936,0.00009495872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002079172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017376009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012738105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035840552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013469139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06736636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292782706","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2444129","title":"A Peek Behind the Curtain that Conceals Self-Dealing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Peek; Aesthetics; Psychology; Visual arts; Art; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.021102215494669785,"score_gpt":0.3144716330711732,"score_spread":0.2933694175765034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292782706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51149327,0.0014311498,0.053732112,0.050808623,0.0014106592,0.00010766178,0.00019101595,0.0004636213,0.3803618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829045,0.00016252139,0.0023267341,0.0024468151,0.00010258183,0.000022375725,0.000021232261,0.00011079033,0.011902527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972704,0.001312159,0.000085586806,0.00036952688,0.000679463,0.00028289977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98534113,0.0056866026,0.002168143,0.0049882913,0.00082632457,0.0009895286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004657636,0.00030163839,0.000522661,0.00055159867,0.0032225011,0.0045466362,0.0007938596,0.0034942285,0.017716762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031302113,0.00048488975,0.000265398,0.0004224203,0.009743624,0.008716764,0.0044918396,0.0050941505,0.0019586969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005144274,0.00023763784,0.0068011545,0.00014896134,0.00006986893,0.0005717307,0.030099194,0.00035893027,0.006472484,0.9031484,0.016524654,0.035052575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013730001,0.00041303688,0.012244977,0.00042154998,0.00013803142,0.0015221885,0.022150861,0.0031887766,0.006119176,0.8171482,0.13639753,0.00011842099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009774948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064767845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017716762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081256486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012453028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059268475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295373936","doi":"10.1038/srep20479","title":"Negative outcomes evoke cyclic irrational decisions in Rock, Paper, Scissors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation","keywords":"Downgrade; Outcome (game theory); Predictability; Psychology; Irrational number; Social psychology; Vulnerability (computing); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Computer security; Statistics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.04529148366380453,"score_gpt":0.35191200824788854,"score_spread":0.306620524584084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295373936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99870527,0.000007343017,0.00015880178,0.0000142532435,0.0000031196128,0.0000063444727,0.0000053445383,0.00000518043,0.00109431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987142,0.000020761745,0.0004232188,0.000025219026,0.000003274285,0.000020231984,0.00002156421,0.0000069608627,0.0007645126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986418,0.0006460869,0.000092976275,0.00013422924,0.00035010796,0.00013483738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952956,0.0025724182,0.0012279005,0.00040176135,0.00012766701,0.00037463906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016018937,0.00032796554,0.0002843094,0.00034043565,0.0003018064,0.0009836452,0.00024575743,0.00047769834,0.0036979616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010579505,0.00022007545,0.00019737313,0.00018002748,0.00075369753,0.00040195955,0.000815326,0.00057622057,0.0004168492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018201414,0.0064506344,0.41722336,0.00069021544,0.00048650702,0.0025324826,0.015737412,0.005034985,0.3982297,0.005906099,0.0018672313,0.12763993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003266996,0.014638849,0.9142396,0.00011560101,0.00017553337,0.0011267553,0.008517517,0.010121968,0.037310574,0.008560963,0.004726314,0.00013974655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008276953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015365419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036979616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001569557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019801722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012370884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297266521","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2016.02.007","title":"Group size and cooperation among strangers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Population; Social dilemma; Dilemma; Population size; Repeated game; Norm (philosophy); Strategy; Microeconomics; Group (periodic table); Game theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Demography; Mathematics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.015526680631253858,"score_gpt":0.28157183364675614,"score_spread":0.2660451530155023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297266521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992803,0.000024584653,0.000057787693,0.000043672055,0.0000025146035,0.0000013529454,0.000003657024,0.000001363515,0.00058481924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975806,0.000008849565,0.000052693085,0.000009277901,0.000003178454,0.0000023850582,0.0000063718485,9.058611e-7,0.00015812079],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999428,0.0003554841,0.000024730873,0.00006492326,0.00007180007,0.000054989057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98468345,0.009349166,0.0023874715,0.0011546033,0.00040573993,0.0020195094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015604657,0.00016088971,0.0003389056,0.000666933,0.000703332,0.00086831144,0.0002872189,0.00069135835,0.0032037667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009758307,0.00018484185,0.00020673822,0.00021897952,0.0010612695,0.0005055529,0.00070958113,0.0005463723,0.00024292113],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003981399,0.0020275102,0.9270133,0.00008284648,0.0003614374,0.0011124752,0.0050502517,0.0015421322,0.02577445,0.005847279,0.0007949621,0.026412006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017616275,0.0012305944,0.97889495,0.000018009361,0.00013407532,0.0010581686,0.0040251976,0.004702266,0.001166877,0.008117192,0.00044223623,0.000034252374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006790998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013190673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032037667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032187873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019679229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01071769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301745598","doi":"","title":"Rewarded for unreliability: how the feedback of audiences advantages fast learners","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Advertising; Multimedia; Psychology; Mathematics education; Business","score_opus":0.06344856284527556,"score_gpt":0.3403860926089073,"score_spread":0.27693752976363173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301745598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546573,0.0002445258,0.0137161845,0.0024993538,0.000021228516,0.00007011717,0.000093270435,0.00006043106,0.028637474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983284,0.00004540394,0.0007095297,0.00009086701,0.0000071576524,0.000011860659,0.0000103739285,0.000005071616,0.00079147407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967463,0.0020701569,0.000107526634,0.00038280178,0.00037854392,0.00031463755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408868,0.043135718,0.009034266,0.0031541702,0.0019553688,0.0018337312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00719102,0.0003639301,0.00041664043,0.00065800943,0.0008410933,0.0028345117,0.0006189738,0.0014824655,0.0074352245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062184438,0.00026142376,0.00033424544,0.00050042843,0.0024370595,0.0024590292,0.0015272064,0.001422386,0.0004895332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002827548,0.0013347975,0.47853076,0.0005710402,0.00038946755,0.0012646156,0.017953992,0.07516071,0.010922503,0.1836801,0.004125515,0.22323892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065197656,0.0021799493,0.47095135,0.00028847158,0.0004613175,0.00052057044,0.014840567,0.16810212,0.009214557,0.31798184,0.014509811,0.00029755855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008473204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00862826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008473204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021955674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001069357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038030207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302394415","doi":"10.1080/17470218.2015.1136339","title":"Knowledge Central: A Central Role for Knowledge Attributions in Social Evaluations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Attribution; Certainty; Psychology; Proposition; Social psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09523741762811148,"score_gpt":0.4679857563378971,"score_spread":0.3727483387097856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302394415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883122,0.00032692446,0.002625842,0.00023894159,0.000024890736,0.000052365307,0.00007867601,0.000020072763,0.008320224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.00007842743,0.00066286564,0.00005421765,0.000016262285,0.000020334313,0.000051050498,0.000008656758,0.00022438947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996093,0.0017433383,0.00032838306,0.0007822244,0.0007897196,0.00026341088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8568588,0.105937675,0.018380858,0.010258327,0.0043487013,0.0042155934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0130389,0.00045103536,0.0007895721,0.0012659047,0.0009635896,0.0024053988,0.00053743285,0.0012134654,0.007768552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09052498,0.00054155744,0.0003752459,0.00070804474,0.0025146287,0.0037353314,0.0019940683,0.0013220084,0.0003879677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008586713,0.0027893188,0.73464245,0.001007759,0.0009026965,0.00046484987,0.020568423,0.0027460547,0.02730449,0.022103796,0.0016414815,0.17724198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027543772,0.00058724807,0.9539341,0.00010440249,0.00024524354,0.00020811106,0.0014461202,0.0044687027,0.0029399027,0.034340456,0.001341453,0.00010886893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00237185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024187807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0130389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072217465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005646171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06895715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309531994","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Communities, Cooperation, and Communication: Taking Experiments to the Field","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development; Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Indigenous; Field (mathematics); Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.034476000405854045,"score_gpt":0.239124330354657,"score_spread":0.20464832994880294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309531994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770066,0.00038419667,0.0074524046,0.0018992914,0.00018152512,0.0019403604,0.000055718494,0.000055530127,0.011024255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474861,0.0008133385,0.04076754,0.0019846081,0.00013572135,0.0059741833,0.000075203185,0.000023317978,0.0027399594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96967936,0.026265906,0.00046494845,0.0011755985,0.0015277491,0.00088655425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96083295,0.028070908,0.0033246544,0.0042024627,0.0016885871,0.0018804631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023452215,0.0011519783,0.000663128,0.0006982989,0.0046578506,0.0027389769,0.0029345583,0.0018910563,0.0018918144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030210285,0.0005790598,0.0006625525,0.0005569856,0.010127863,0.0029327201,0.004594773,0.0027411282,0.00019401584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071858685,0.045977987,0.10754999,0.004125016,0.0009640946,0.0035760263,0.3716661,0.0069696093,0.0888575,0.06371426,0.0084019285,0.2910117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006617752,0.14925355,0.18710193,0.0026442138,0.0020525095,0.002431008,0.32656062,0.013794177,0.08568507,0.10857966,0.11405336,0.0012261447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005285955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00769225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023452215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002020645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024677976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12402862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312637437","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914000742","title":"Anxiety and Vote Decision Making in Winner-Take-All Elections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Anxiety; Voting; Spoilt vote; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Contingent vote; Law; Group voting ticket; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.02869358154781161,"score_gpt":0.34609379815877117,"score_spread":0.3174002166109596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312637437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979444,0.00003132469,0.000059106278,0.000079274854,0.0000043753375,0.0000058403325,0.000016535783,0.0000018618874,0.0018572855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996444,0.000017384933,0.000031901804,0.000026773545,0.000004731999,0.000004877048,0.000019275822,0.0000012456467,0.0002494295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980153,0.0012347258,0.000057992776,0.00012971884,0.00022576381,0.00033655844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860698,0.007566279,0.0036858679,0.00049082865,0.000469088,0.0017180926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019234447,0.00021460415,0.00046209543,0.0006002972,0.0008996345,0.002868289,0.0002357082,0.0009244468,0.0033819797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011446411,0.00025109007,0.00032538341,0.00044415254,0.0009203321,0.0005040985,0.0006867036,0.0012296283,0.0004621258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002432273,0.0028972928,0.9588105,0.000088768866,0.00026567714,0.0004120187,0.009574818,0.0012027081,0.005854677,0.002637873,0.0009515924,0.014871789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060870094,0.00058843894,0.99003696,0.000011186295,0.00005341917,0.00008302447,0.0051440937,0.0016483351,0.0003724142,0.0014012197,0.000565968,0.000034078865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037254728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053159255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037254728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005553407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034599457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011313796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313673732","doi":"10.1257/aer.20140105","title":"The Evolution of Strategic Sophistication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Novelty; Economics; Element (criminal law); Foundation (evidence); Cognition; Microeconomics; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05932454525516984,"score_gpt":0.36558302986109653,"score_spread":0.3062584846059267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313673732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8675401,0.0014216709,0.022501796,0.0048698983,0.00004456944,0.000019654188,0.00009954498,0.00006176581,0.10344094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995836,0.0003859988,0.0017388958,0.00012114542,0.000011656848,0.000005257762,0.000019985935,0.0000074834848,0.0018736147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992372,0.00032612061,0.000031676966,0.00016471805,0.0001300941,0.000110233406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663144,0.0015575581,0.0007332642,0.00044477562,0.00038451745,0.00024852098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013994391,0.00021717616,0.00017980704,0.00070284156,0.00043524368,0.0019557897,0.00037597012,0.0010154586,0.003563063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008988707,0.00020337578,0.00021159282,0.00058961636,0.0024531365,0.0022280123,0.0013189719,0.0009894497,0.0003662942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015977849,0.00006144585,0.035655305,0.00016237466,0.00016469987,0.0005815382,0.002493208,0.02361783,0.009955818,0.837509,0.002070831,0.08756822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004507086,0.00017196254,0.09038526,0.00009926361,0.00007259089,0.0012266068,0.0013652731,0.031029698,0.003207886,0.8294784,0.042828057,0.000089911075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010368313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009236989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003563063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010661295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037312735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011919677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320696083","doi":"10.5751/es-05664-180404","title":"The Role of Information in Governing the Commons: Experimental Results","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Commons; Environmental resource management; Business; Political science; Geography; Environmental science; Law","score_opus":0.012320101082137202,"score_gpt":0.28135019800574745,"score_spread":0.26903009692361024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320696083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872558,0.00039570808,0.004483844,0.00039542795,0.00005959682,0.00051275356,0.00019860966,0.000052100924,0.0066462047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896492,0.0003337442,0.006598192,0.00025235568,0.00007596547,0.0012817249,0.00017715251,0.000044987537,0.0015866436],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591017,0.0019723165,0.00049988437,0.00067946804,0.0005603105,0.0003777214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9023431,0.08311125,0.0054319804,0.006693511,0.0011629891,0.0012572291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068608667,0.00094923936,0.0008625523,0.0005670843,0.00097508694,0.0015915767,0.0012735862,0.0016431607,0.00832149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033814188,0.0004660593,0.0006000784,0.00048384033,0.003098053,0.003165335,0.002042519,0.0018252853,0.0005156727],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.080196686,0.19700149,0.043112237,0.008307648,0.001680252,0.0018566033,0.010658595,0.051360186,0.35389712,0.08178303,0.0050947424,0.16505146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026926147,0.16333596,0.07014504,0.0011291908,0.0024651692,0.0014500776,0.00506212,0.10485283,0.36748686,0.23188818,0.024427883,0.00083052175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000744662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043810194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00832149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007018683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093028106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03628415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325122960","doi":"10.5751/es-07424-200208","title":"Breeding cooperation: cultural evolution in an intergenerational public goods experiment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Fishery; Economics; Biology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09545651516751376,"score_gpt":0.36953053893358545,"score_spread":0.2740740237660717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325122960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987196,0.000012900492,0.0005239867,0.000037290312,0.000010190308,0.000044811197,0.000017279172,0.00000729208,0.0006266899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948383,0.0000299922,0.0027531788,0.00010414633,0.000016206031,0.00044503307,0.000058013786,0.000012633939,0.0017425469],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986358,0.00087781646,0.0000634115,0.00019109646,0.00013558472,0.000096196694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988825,0.006800321,0.0011051381,0.0019408121,0.00035964794,0.0009691404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034329582,0.00037073228,0.00045392028,0.0003951879,0.0007833137,0.0010594381,0.00074446836,0.0009554815,0.002665694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067982078,0.00027293,0.00023282554,0.00028221455,0.0012085687,0.00058955903,0.0010957953,0.0014164863,0.00024479209],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027669298,0.12441286,0.12300482,0.00049374177,0.0007479042,0.0015230263,0.022004886,0.01368131,0.5501104,0.022246592,0.002239103,0.11186612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072749825,0.13292785,0.5557714,0.00019251935,0.001054123,0.0015031986,0.009501804,0.09533797,0.12814528,0.048735466,0.01896813,0.0005872413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089517963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013550776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034329582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005987184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043574293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018155456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337774726","doi":"10.1007/s11266-016-9747-7","title":"Visible Minorities and Majority Giving","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credence; Outreach; Population; Social psychology; Sample (material); Focus (optics); Religious organization; Minority group; Psychology; Political science; Ethnic group; Demographic economics; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.013133977630171772,"score_gpt":0.2968716731808018,"score_spread":0.28373769555063005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337774726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98449415,0.00025938256,0.0004940619,0.0013385452,0.00003399349,0.000019360965,0.00002508125,0.0000037655134,0.013331622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999318,0.000035167483,0.00003755155,0.000071500144,0.000017368851,0.0000030468418,0.0000037976495,8.2595403e-7,0.0005127727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995989,0.0022908968,0.00012963772,0.000311992,0.00047049718,0.00080793863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972658,0.010538294,0.010328671,0.0012205122,0.00089220825,0.004362263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004666633,0.00019663866,0.00041160497,0.00084346655,0.0023242526,0.0024968418,0.00048458038,0.0009374704,0.010566096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023404637,0.00013427513,0.00037538295,0.00042723864,0.0018325713,0.0009337331,0.0023252557,0.0016906132,0.00061097654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016258975,0.0016090361,0.8722542,0.00012571579,0.00020212181,0.0008338547,0.01281551,0.0011019381,0.001796139,0.037893705,0.0017572968,0.067984685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020611404,0.0010989526,0.884249,0.00038130084,0.00024007852,0.00093730836,0.040584933,0.0047483607,0.0030434183,0.053518277,0.010889752,0.0001025192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036145034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003386106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010566096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008718544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006057667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035347104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340008704","doi":"10.4236/tel.2016.62021","title":"Fairness in an Ultimatum Game","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Index (typography); Economics; Communication source; Microeconomics; Explanatory power; Endowment; Value (mathematics); Game theory; Computer science; Statistics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.018247609569279885,"score_gpt":0.30185172361001067,"score_spread":0.28360411404073077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340008704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7929172,0.00014305743,0.1780178,0.0013383449,0.0001788426,0.0004201295,0.00016632471,0.00020516945,0.026613098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736824,0.000064358675,0.024191804,0.00018926605,0.000031708474,0.00023599935,0.000036655434,0.000010494367,0.0015573694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351984,0.004672737,0.00014800632,0.0005168456,0.00089212006,0.00025050386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97309315,0.020356525,0.00301734,0.001962032,0.00080027425,0.00077070657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010123815,0.00061079254,0.0007504445,0.0004900551,0.0011722785,0.0031574804,0.0012194529,0.0013226791,0.004218768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03340604,0.00031899154,0.000491574,0.0004967663,0.0018585057,0.0022605236,0.0012008866,0.001746116,0.0003560674],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021033643,0.003082031,0.026015773,0.00025517997,0.00026079777,0.0003965517,0.002309225,0.12684578,0.009734749,0.77748656,0.0027468465,0.04876311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008250473,0.0018293507,0.0069928635,0.000037643076,0.0001296667,0.00012152261,0.000437936,0.5171035,0.002940978,0.46320418,0.006235483,0.00014177356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018541578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014868208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010123815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014290757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012864922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053540528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342655522","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2016.1159761","title":"Pre-Authorization: A Novel Decision-Making Heuristic That May Promote Autonomy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Autonomy; Authorization; Heuristic; Psychology; Computer science; Management science; Political science; Computer security; Law; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.08034926735327085,"score_gpt":0.4073628135897223,"score_spread":0.32701354623645146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342655522","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.309436,0.0014067802,0.37116256,0.02854497,0.0009415667,0.0007668957,0.00032377272,0.0006466676,0.28677076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947672,0.00020802257,0.045894645,0.0014008253,0.00008063668,0.00016219195,0.000079621794,0.00007114785,0.0044308854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471766,0.0025124073,0.00028964455,0.000828269,0.0009858576,0.0006661663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835692,0.009148281,0.002381686,0.002375882,0.0014180836,0.0011069457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006110068,0.00054109946,0.00046712026,0.0008678921,0.0016558873,0.005657381,0.001467871,0.0032156755,0.007926928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030644003,0.00027901295,0.0007973338,0.00078088004,0.007331241,0.005654273,0.0024548548,0.003118001,0.0008647586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003034613,0.00022867872,0.012328013,0.0003336957,0.00007992613,0.0007089239,0.0075324597,0.005481986,0.0036682843,0.9156022,0.007518477,0.04621384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105938336,0.00027191328,0.006820502,0.0002905645,0.00005998202,0.00065114436,0.004432665,0.017083067,0.0025846213,0.9263207,0.041238323,0.00014056289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010599046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019038935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007926928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001678034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025229538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032313526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345389150","doi":"10.1177/1088868316644094","title":"The Relative State Model: Integrating Need-Based and Ability-Based Pathways to Risk-Taking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generality; Context (archaeology); Situational ethics; Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Social psychology; Disadvantage; Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.20496681043994724,"score_gpt":0.4753736143602439,"score_spread":0.27040680392029665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345389150","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009807778,0.98994863,0.0027942026,0.0030953418,0.00018448061,0.000033393702,0.000054813238,0.000014355797,0.002894012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009627253,0.9873131,0.001764626,0.0005239453,0.00018098121,0.000053589094,0.000062308725,0.000004679264,0.00046962302],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998928,0.0005103394,0.00011728317,0.00014394385,0.00024017485,0.000060221944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606425,0.0029985732,0.00033776427,0.00007779061,0.0003883676,0.00013313108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034678963,0.0014000989,0.0024334325,0.0030661456,0.0003874244,0.0021849535,0.0025607394,0.0020885507,0.003290345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065215076,0.0005021038,0.0015398037,0.0025862455,0.0022773934,0.0032547414,0.0013180998,0.0027632522,0.00082660024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015513819,0.00014259652,0.004160018,0.03004553,0.0010390637,0.00022246076,0.0006638469,0.002171495,0.00022107946,0.08316406,0.010832669,0.867182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019127177,0.00054735754,0.03212231,0.06097835,0.004393909,0.0041644797,0.0022835901,0.0059665027,0.0007048602,0.30662125,0.58165956,0.00036649592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00519023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052701784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00519023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020376397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042028865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01834023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235430026","doi":"10.1023/a:1025936712704","title":"Fairness in Bargaining","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"University of British Columbia; Northwestern University","keywords":"Negotiation; Set (abstract data type); Social policy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Term (time); Economics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.22566864499312506,"score_gpt":0.5167415842150714,"score_spread":0.2910729392219464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235430026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09889124,0.0066813505,0.09112537,0.034878533,0.0015661313,0.00017754728,0.00014428559,0.000051802566,0.7664837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464459,0.0012961046,0.006333433,0.0021582015,0.0008733018,0.00015666729,0.000035528083,0.000035628076,0.042665295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355775,0.0038455566,0.00019665594,0.00067389035,0.0011494821,0.0005767441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98631775,0.01053673,0.00061460765,0.0012238644,0.00084539264,0.00046163212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010136869,0.0005441881,0.0009789892,0.0011653268,0.0039444286,0.0052171554,0.0010707612,0.0035330313,0.014397634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028309444,0.00038102793,0.00047942746,0.0016183093,0.010645015,0.00623798,0.0018177995,0.0036836888,0.00086893304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013145817,0.000016545177,0.000103446124,0.000008976724,0.0000025716975,0.0000060776165,0.00019126131,0.00022077578,0.000031876458,0.995612,0.00088641915,0.0029069276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064811984,0.0000047330445,0.00015233854,0.0000086793225,0.0000023276507,0.000006286863,0.00007812306,0.00036056005,0.000030314472,0.9970943,0.0022538777,0.0000019148924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002695652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018702504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014397634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029875503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025781868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05360955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2390995900","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.008","title":"In-group favoritism and moral decision-making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cheating; Dishonesty; Social psychology; Stochastic game; Group (periodic table); Affect (linguistics); Social identity theory; Psychology; Lying; Social group; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.019954021541029775,"score_gpt":0.32079482455558883,"score_spread":0.30084080301455907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2390995900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99056375,0.0000335532,0.0009260789,0.00019422796,0.000010188315,0.00001234637,0.000007979463,0.0000047620106,0.008247166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917454,0.000009716611,0.00032545082,0.000021396094,0.000005999581,0.0000050398007,0.0000043782247,0.0000019998768,0.00045155725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979153,0.0012158244,0.00006985817,0.00016875967,0.0003308748,0.0002993944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98762125,0.0060249385,0.002420055,0.0011751101,0.00074224675,0.002016478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004015048,0.0002857309,0.00041611888,0.0005063238,0.0009389029,0.0020904387,0.00038478148,0.0011199083,0.010104752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016482834,0.00018975919,0.00023139149,0.00026773848,0.0012722809,0.0009080708,0.0009141593,0.0014375184,0.00047579463],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008441437,0.019999292,0.6023643,0.00038759236,0.00083910755,0.0008507429,0.009729605,0.012688696,0.0413723,0.14372778,0.0024186228,0.15718059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080083596,0.004229202,0.64204353,0.000060655006,0.00032942023,0.0005985202,0.0065365783,0.034896854,0.0067662653,0.30042917,0.003200693,0.00010824563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003740803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006684784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010104752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007579582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004850058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03380376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395905685","doi":"10.1111/jeea.12152","title":"NORMS MAKE PREFERENCES SOCIAL","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":389,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universiteit Maastricht; European Commission","keywords":"Stylized fact; Ultimatum game; Prosocial behavior; Dictator game; Dictator; Public good; Microeconomics; Robustness (evolution); Selfishness; Economics; Social preferences; Norm (philosophy); Social psychology; Public goods game; Altruism (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Positive economics; Psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.05981172821834749,"score_gpt":0.3085850628450391,"score_spread":0.24877333462669163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395905685","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27592602,0.00059705257,0.4081747,0.018306866,0.00060346245,0.00023359785,0.00056546484,0.00034393507,0.2952488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607764,0.00031453342,0.030172905,0.0016692795,0.00017145567,0.00022571212,0.0001476313,0.000063978485,0.006458059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456936,0.0030829743,0.00018553305,0.00096214685,0.000986693,0.00021326757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985115,0.007460003,0.0018985616,0.0037273807,0.0012518436,0.00054714695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004499868,0.00047102128,0.00042657412,0.00043392382,0.0009065878,0.0033858228,0.0007447177,0.0015522726,0.008294905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022460524,0.00034565252,0.00037060186,0.00032422837,0.0052651186,0.0037132672,0.0017565356,0.0023842892,0.0011750365],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000577669,0.00009797454,0.00253703,0.00007419879,0.000052282096,0.00009386532,0.0013855068,0.0027685307,0.002929104,0.9714076,0.0018949412,0.016701035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039529506,0.00008085974,0.0022966631,0.00003524891,0.000024211418,0.00008551803,0.00052560813,0.0065951194,0.0014074343,0.9666844,0.022195254,0.000030089817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091198226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009135342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008294905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009983982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009210737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02774924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405846578","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2726404","title":"Fishy Behavior: Evaluating Preferences for Honesty in the Marketplace","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing","score_opus":0.0600442558421313,"score_gpt":0.38453941601960523,"score_spread":0.32449516017747393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405846578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994294,0.00003875761,0.0017140711,0.00019195878,0.000008374177,0.000028118295,0.00002724448,0.0000056102294,0.0036917701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883395,0.000017617385,0.0007758533,0.000025174135,0.000007792925,0.0000141780165,0.000014552797,0.0000023037733,0.0003085872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983908,0.00092292065,0.00008741875,0.00016120146,0.0003078182,0.00012986222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97680956,0.013636721,0.0062107313,0.0012109928,0.00074904715,0.0013829827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049520633,0.0004112994,0.00034939445,0.00053347443,0.000500824,0.0017449686,0.00031085787,0.0015644721,0.005637299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029183647,0.00022470327,0.00037877238,0.00023791095,0.0010640677,0.00157562,0.0008086536,0.0010188766,0.0003473743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012074456,0.0034798728,0.83814776,0.00033675903,0.00053790567,0.00070979784,0.0037066657,0.008954682,0.029024532,0.025964629,0.0012494635,0.07581351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006392321,0.0053272545,0.88479316,0.000079236874,0.00033990954,0.00050546206,0.004307501,0.060423274,0.006830063,0.03549882,0.0010866364,0.00016941519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014783342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002077227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005637299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072559365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042601145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026189327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409702217","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-7689","title":"Are Gender Differences in Performance Innate or Socially Mediated?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Incentive; Undo; Field (mathematics); Gender bias; Gender gap; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Geography; Computer science; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.070219332437432,"score_gpt":0.30350918695904927,"score_spread":0.23328985452161727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409702217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73857963,0.026437664,0.007466955,0.021598153,0.00065354723,0.000059780057,0.0012667434,0.00011262518,0.20382491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96281195,0.0066842744,0.0014614117,0.0019675866,0.00022542736,0.000058841582,0.00021695849,0.000024700465,0.026548833],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996056,0.00011822107,0.0000094698835,0.00010493513,0.00009597273,0.00006588835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991559,0.00039822128,0.00019763576,0.00010003608,0.00007675616,0.00007159805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009819804,0.00024916197,0.00028502103,0.000297913,0.0003459786,0.0013113992,0.0004436082,0.00060169917,0.009377655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002608028,0.00012945531,0.00015570105,0.00033660894,0.002528005,0.0012157104,0.000625361,0.0005696486,0.001288277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005330881,0.0006470727,0.22869827,0.0011672719,0.0002215046,0.0011280888,0.019050583,0.0008990074,0.027850874,0.22263144,0.02143171,0.475741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055525215,0.0008089948,0.7746663,0.00076337793,0.00010389308,0.0009775799,0.008277544,0.00082864484,0.0063017528,0.12981215,0.07732614,0.000078053126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015244465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019248904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009377655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050586794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049324683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031371415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415868115","doi":"10.1177/1086026616652667","title":"How Do Money and Time Restrictions Influence Self-Constraining Behavior in Polluting the Commons?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization & Environment","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Tragedy of the commons; Social dilemma; Dilemma; Common-pool resource; Constraint (computer-aided design); Business; Government (linguistics); Consumption (sociology); Environmental economics; Public economics; Economics; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Political science; Law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.012931221811803796,"score_gpt":0.236712335017289,"score_spread":0.22378111320548522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415868115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99901986,0.000017796163,0.00010522328,0.000051679006,0.0000017849118,0.000003464735,0.0000069144553,9.706323e-7,0.0007921545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948895,0.000015550439,0.000109388835,0.000025333602,0.0000016617644,0.0000055400333,0.000010600201,0.0000021133862,0.0003408554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988494,0.00069698907,0.000038564784,0.00015458858,0.000118505464,0.00014194398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861826,0.007497516,0.003509196,0.0007912267,0.0003161127,0.0017032889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00217876,0.00017491252,0.00032697213,0.0004647428,0.00046432682,0.001577007,0.00036141466,0.0007243683,0.0033474856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010962927,0.00023112004,0.00026992118,0.00035396632,0.0012673597,0.00064255507,0.0005524005,0.0006301254,0.0002338411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095469825,0.0020885046,0.97846085,0.000027799324,0.0001817771,0.00018194134,0.0032251228,0.0010453494,0.0032399045,0.0016265734,0.00021767491,0.008749824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021878035,0.00030879452,0.9934657,0.0000067328606,0.000049796952,0.000053110896,0.0018102725,0.001996288,0.00030093675,0.0015866157,0.00038323997,0.00001659051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003195252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069009815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033474856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005450813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044658326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0115225315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W242559983","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1664257","title":"Random Dictators: A First Investigation into Social Von Neumann Morgenstern Preferences","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Von Neumann architecture; Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Expected utility hypothesis","score_opus":0.030467813452560825,"score_gpt":0.29109635812285584,"score_spread":0.260628544670295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W242559983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73486406,0.0004941523,0.17989777,0.0039357506,0.00010832304,0.00015236743,0.00021018945,0.00012261247,0.08021466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796325,0.0002551134,0.010509174,0.0003047336,0.000089274145,0.000093996634,0.000046646077,0.00004331462,0.009025188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978619,0.0014834183,0.00006619926,0.00018028234,0.00022709549,0.00018101471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968257,0.025307486,0.0017478466,0.0029223869,0.001042182,0.00072301866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046574282,0.0003339139,0.00086674007,0.0004553504,0.0011701655,0.0020103727,0.0013964296,0.0014886474,0.0121136615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035293907,0.00040891985,0.0005863511,0.00065621303,0.0020616583,0.0046378667,0.0014492114,0.0018408685,0.00062882056],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012295446,0.000046986166,0.001185094,0.0000571733,0.000019435676,0.00006250592,0.0005171415,0.003960866,0.0004950268,0.98693776,0.001183418,0.005411609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008624833,0.00009005097,0.00071570155,0.000019775065,0.000016597258,0.00010577065,0.00027898338,0.050789684,0.0004289001,0.9454441,0.00199831,0.000025895357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004414717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005687943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121136615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065499183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074379536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040524244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24268426","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2539190","title":"An Experimental Analysis of the Effect of Specificity on Compliance and Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.018733167262495465,"score_gpt":0.32193055940727305,"score_spread":0.3031973921447776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24268426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979716,0.0000225846,0.00046046992,0.00004407262,0.000007606076,0.000041713472,0.00004219813,0.00000837232,0.0014014788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755585,0.000024588311,0.0007921887,0.00006211071,0.000011913808,0.000094582596,0.000051328712,0.0000135200835,0.0013939331],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977083,0.0010996744,0.00017580834,0.00042811318,0.00037625182,0.00021184805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95978683,0.028879981,0.00464638,0.004298429,0.00063725683,0.0017509912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002526751,0.00048488515,0.00074173626,0.00032371044,0.0003365101,0.0009193487,0.00061466434,0.0012001719,0.007963347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020621466,0.00052119495,0.00034560508,0.00027992929,0.0013254143,0.00078049017,0.0011317687,0.001287441,0.0005125451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.18852471,0.084700584,0.12125815,0.00085117744,0.00082772167,0.00054847053,0.002337275,0.008305354,0.4938475,0.010489285,0.0013207116,0.086989075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006858661,0.13539216,0.67386866,0.00012890753,0.00089217885,0.0008187343,0.00074605603,0.034973737,0.1297693,0.013369174,0.0029520271,0.00023050423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066958234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049335073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007963347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006300188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008484437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026640117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460684428","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.11","title":"Competition between Female Friends","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Competition (biology); Dominance (genetics); Normative; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Interpersonal relationship; Political science; Ecology; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.04730834792450947,"score_gpt":0.2765316701869324,"score_spread":0.22922332226242295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460684428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1063263,0.0051386477,0.0047441493,0.0037007951,0.00013132801,0.000018976152,0.00013723501,0.000017980024,0.8797847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779264,0.0019611502,0.00095074635,0.0006533063,0.00010447688,0.000026996047,0.00009481409,0.000015996004,0.11826617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940145,0.00022039826,0.00001468556,0.00013622649,0.00014563587,0.00008163614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994061,0.0003155638,0.00006868364,0.00007239675,0.000053925214,0.000083219675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007130608,0.00019505533,0.00029112404,0.00038682285,0.0011833152,0.001603961,0.0003405277,0.0006725871,0.023556918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013912899,0.00010969954,0.00019113257,0.00035684934,0.0015701851,0.0018186416,0.0015592604,0.0006040196,0.0021051632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008229694,0.00004354681,0.004289479,0.00013132341,0.000030219304,0.00026511465,0.0030677547,0.00038053357,0.0018290922,0.8838796,0.0106377285,0.09536341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004994425,0.00029366944,0.029618308,0.00040281622,0.0000636812,0.002878997,0.005719825,0.0021246115,0.0031357286,0.40551737,0.55015135,0.000043635162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011675834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024237519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023556918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091755687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031693027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078805745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464204866","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12246","title":"Discussion of “Communicated Values as Informal Controls: Promoting Quality While Undermining Productivity?”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada","keywords":"Statement (logic); Affect (linguistics); Productivity; Value (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Task (project management); Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Marketing; Economics; Business; Management; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Law; Philosophy; Statistics","score_opus":0.21684606791649977,"score_gpt":0.46452427125503876,"score_spread":0.247678203338539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464204866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16444995,0.0036930721,0.0231906,0.7475898,0.0028143453,0.00015735946,0.0001426693,0.000071143644,0.0578911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562356,0.0016075242,0.0049763173,0.030009402,0.00095584156,0.00024321458,0.00002065757,0.00003929595,0.005912195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902402,0.00731009,0.00024857264,0.0007000167,0.0011483704,0.0003527587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9327886,0.056916613,0.0036113076,0.0026572784,0.0029983707,0.0010278699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020576496,0.00044782783,0.00044134798,0.0005281191,0.0027679722,0.00693602,0.0023512333,0.00630133,0.010903875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051365666,0.0002580165,0.0005711053,0.000662413,0.011306045,0.008404016,0.0035160095,0.005086008,0.00048231473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043841955,0.0005141092,0.0039637345,0.00062636094,0.00007606146,0.0003638855,0.019945458,0.0009912881,0.0040314076,0.887363,0.032583077,0.049103167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046331965,0.00072767405,0.018443728,0.0016924173,0.00025633565,0.00023319203,0.060679827,0.007170244,0.020751543,0.610265,0.2791081,0.00020863545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017383571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011257688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020576496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024707667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002042025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1088202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467240115","doi":"10.1111/sjoe.12200","title":"Contract Choice: Efficiency and Fairness in Revenue‐Sharing Contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue sharing; Incentive; Revenue; Earnings; Microeconomics; Principal (computer security); Economics; Inequity aversion; Actuarial science; Finance; Inequality; Computer science","score_opus":0.034086252620711736,"score_gpt":0.31812515766726046,"score_spread":0.2840389050465487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467240115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97040814,0.0000958507,0.01650751,0.00049054925,0.000024287028,0.00014267841,0.00005436797,0.000016944668,0.012259587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797994,0.000017663298,0.0015294368,0.000041839954,0.00000996948,0.0000497268,0.000011169676,0.0000046210716,0.00035556976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703096,0.023087382,0.0011386202,0.0014637779,0.0029672405,0.0010333239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8214891,0.14096425,0.017765064,0.014274984,0.0033031814,0.0022034906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037815683,0.00042529468,0.0012205354,0.000488354,0.00093682803,0.002850777,0.00082279084,0.001295921,0.0066513005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09579403,0.00025135497,0.00042029546,0.0005745137,0.004329473,0.0029050868,0.0012272723,0.0013911217,0.0004891957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034777615,0.00814146,0.10539626,0.00093534327,0.0009962268,0.00041679502,0.0072381645,0.06972793,0.04577236,0.5798277,0.0031778207,0.14359236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045866147,0.0076515162,0.13458021,0.000250873,0.00036588762,0.00046914906,0.0034657721,0.2299004,0.025828402,0.585307,0.007297866,0.00029630258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064649625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030135096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037815683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013540051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001198101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19999081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467609113","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2001.10717572","title":"Rational Choice with Deontic Constraints","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Point (geometry); Advertising; Law and economics; Free riding; Free rider problem; Marketing; Internet privacy; Economics; Microeconomics; Public good; Computer science","score_opus":0.04614076893581058,"score_gpt":0.2989282900366215,"score_spread":0.25278752110081093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467609113","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026923517,0.007419813,0.5231431,0.027970076,0.00069905206,0.00024527582,0.0015560681,0.00036961728,0.41167346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7965463,0.0049212794,0.14059334,0.0034582012,0.001159662,0.0007178397,0.0013180762,0.0002144522,0.051070888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934861,0.003504773,0.00039464736,0.0008697395,0.0012564529,0.0004883538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970675,0.0072497027,0.0004937544,0.0013654935,0.0008194923,0.0003647445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008447032,0.0012290762,0.001268481,0.0010186577,0.002247614,0.00570416,0.0020254527,0.0030306098,0.011257345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136190485,0.001190059,0.0014347723,0.0015006198,0.0066212304,0.009899778,0.0028983445,0.004843809,0.0014069263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109988505,0.000005822463,0.000039915874,0.000022082166,0.0000076562355,0.000031372936,0.00009148658,0.0011039419,0.000031238647,0.9959752,0.0011358873,0.0015444215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001887289,0.0000033922397,0.00003213974,0.000014104412,0.0000054632783,0.000015505491,0.000030361809,0.0026766367,0.000024700978,0.99066424,0.006509983,0.0000046046853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009251084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008947472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011257345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00553543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036716906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044672728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473778269","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2015.10.003","title":"Cultivating a better society: Anti-Mafia farm participation increases prosocial motivations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Normative; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.2869784506993543,"score_gpt":0.5453768820879042,"score_spread":0.25839843138854995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473778269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99701774,0.00003478906,0.00009315666,0.00024433935,0.000011278887,0.00000708811,0.0000148992385,0.000005766419,0.0025709178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747974,0.00003232612,0.00022947183,0.000095950374,0.000010381384,0.000021880604,0.000018468274,0.0000023971297,0.002109441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996853,0.0001359639,0.0000053595572,0.00005295907,0.000028281573,0.000092250804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982338,0.0004914572,0.0004026186,0.00013005869,0.000055952485,0.0006861273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051407726,0.00021407689,0.00021639587,0.00020978347,0.00063771795,0.00074227015,0.00019296187,0.0010285465,0.012498865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017570674,0.00018064307,0.00017587416,0.00014814002,0.0004816938,0.00035070867,0.0007897388,0.0006750266,0.0006961839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012026524,0.053559672,0.46377197,0.0005773576,0.000470755,0.0011683138,0.003977371,0.00090476894,0.29950276,0.008732257,0.004981543,0.15032679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020041366,0.004291572,0.9809887,0.000034118264,0.00009639651,0.0001529744,0.0025356053,0.00079665467,0.0048663984,0.002220824,0.0037985798,0.00001773672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012087403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039757085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012498865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023007505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043115325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041812837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476731106","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12248","title":"Discussion of “The Effects of Vertical Pay Dispersion: Experimental Evidence in a Budget Setting”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Public economics; Political science","score_opus":0.07882841448134202,"score_gpt":0.40984510637719307,"score_spread":0.33101669189585103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476731106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8523045,0.0037025486,0.045059703,0.037208535,0.00069108093,0.00063754676,0.00046486311,0.0001407789,0.059790384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848069,0.0005158055,0.008428409,0.0037592147,0.00020936484,0.00035600472,0.000082376646,0.000018007537,0.0018238458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786654,0.017521169,0.00065608055,0.0012586466,0.0015497083,0.00034896497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7855746,0.18032387,0.017030766,0.014094337,0.001872145,0.0011042838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029746411,0.00057968963,0.0010282903,0.0005134135,0.0017658889,0.0023757187,0.0028276814,0.0031326534,0.014779622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119938746,0.00044108302,0.00076532474,0.0008261025,0.0039984924,0.0037818197,0.0029991572,0.0032564618,0.001049858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013243456,0.011797048,0.07740825,0.0025056866,0.002445083,0.00086602883,0.0107783135,0.013584322,0.016721424,0.621626,0.02570056,0.20332378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007889883,0.010145268,0.095196046,0.0011701535,0.0015919626,0.00051277515,0.0068287593,0.035045274,0.015762536,0.7812978,0.044126548,0.0004329428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013156991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011095242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029746411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009228772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070991355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15731597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478189302","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195145397.003.0022","title":"Rationality and Evolution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Game theory; Evolutionary game theory; Ecological rationality; Rational choice theory (criminology); Bounded rationality; Rational agent; Evolutionary theory; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039985355321843184,"score_gpt":0.2608872561946248,"score_spread":0.22090190087278158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478189302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017486619,0.038276706,0.07459161,0.029701002,0.0008194003,0.000071304814,0.00019486135,0.0001409422,0.83871764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8157294,0.026255332,0.028703354,0.005623982,0.0009906295,0.00019025838,0.0003590436,0.00012750499,0.122020535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879885,0.0005513226,0.0000485234,0.00026479323,0.00025543506,0.00008108545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987404,0.0008377687,0.000063513406,0.0001605358,0.00014646309,0.000051496805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014156058,0.0005165504,0.00043695373,0.0008309397,0.00068411336,0.0031457895,0.0008321354,0.0019885048,0.008333449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026724443,0.0002117868,0.0003710231,0.0006281126,0.009505038,0.003764455,0.0013411753,0.0023804938,0.0011543548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018932856,0.0000029229773,0.000049531947,0.000019621573,0.0000030762374,0.000012263139,0.00010884384,0.0006517441,0.000050611052,0.99382764,0.0013885784,0.0038831148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003180691,0.000004104995,0.000087452914,0.00003439628,0.000002786769,0.000023600502,0.000050236893,0.00075470883,0.000049497252,0.9724339,0.026553182,0.0000028989703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027167783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011755677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008333449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027435797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001271906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027878165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483300814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.002","title":"Forest conservation policy and motivational crowding: Experimental evidence from Tanzania","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Payment; Economics; Stylized fact; Dictator game; Ecosystem services; Animal ecology; Public economics; Tanzania; Sample (material); Natural resource economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Ecosystem; Microeconomics; Ecology; Psychology; Monetary economics; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.07841829704190881,"score_gpt":0.3416995561109292,"score_spread":0.26328125906902045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483300814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.000055637458,0.00009284648,0.000108477856,0.000002772529,0.0000090244675,0.000024807478,0.0000017679997,0.0009274511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932325,0.0000587335,0.00018217092,0.00004743053,0.0000033177291,0.000019526808,0.000019658479,0.0000012284522,0.00034476892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996661,0.0002102238,0.0000130435665,0.000032659224,0.000023792065,0.000054182383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254954,0.004846934,0.0015266959,0.00059777434,0.00016288296,0.00031605663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017073383,0.00032430966,0.00028396593,0.00035168967,0.00090044487,0.00057653285,0.00035073725,0.00057296833,0.008158764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055451375,0.00019507244,0.00016024575,0.0003112348,0.0013239698,0.0003541246,0.00050889666,0.00051625527,0.00028371802],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023681471,0.038688622,0.7022706,0.001247066,0.0007925219,0.001498042,0.013851533,0.011076936,0.05779829,0.030367179,0.007326405,0.11140128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017634658,0.0057499195,0.95935655,0.0002219646,0.00038782263,0.00021570991,0.0074473736,0.0076139555,0.0037880354,0.009989409,0.0034015137,0.00006423093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010226473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020457463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010226473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060971396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005441775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027293801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484815716","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12250","title":"Discussion of “Honor Among Thieves: Open Internal Reporting and Managerial Collusion”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada","keywords":"Collusion; Sketch; Honor; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Contrast (vision); Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Stochastic game; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1453678408948473,"score_gpt":0.4454716740595681,"score_spread":0.3001038331647208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484815716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47640392,0.005532382,0.11379529,0.2902367,0.0020160389,0.0003097931,0.0003106401,0.00010706305,0.111288115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898052,0.000693628,0.0038453245,0.003477226,0.0003865333,0.000063387764,0.000018014705,0.000011553749,0.0016991481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97860193,0.0169515,0.00062553125,0.0011562753,0.0019483193,0.0007164569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8012117,0.17427298,0.011028402,0.007955757,0.004036263,0.0014950143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025969055,0.0004873735,0.00087776425,0.000817595,0.00332713,0.0067934897,0.0023494028,0.006078127,0.010758725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08544799,0.00037818463,0.0010045967,0.00076550053,0.010888854,0.00817639,0.0037213073,0.005055794,0.00053749996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028387865,0.0002665354,0.0039389706,0.00021530666,0.000078307625,0.00034924014,0.0052119596,0.0015775014,0.0013889839,0.9683915,0.006517022,0.011780787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002822208,0.00035313112,0.0058017704,0.00043410674,0.00015631964,0.0002946736,0.01059787,0.014256588,0.0035713958,0.9394098,0.02470466,0.00013753491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014771417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008178997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025969055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019642967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001308017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13733917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487158812","doi":"10.1177/1043463114561754","title":"Norms and trades: An experimental investigation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Redistribution (election); Microeconomics; Norm of reciprocity; Norm (philosophy); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13794076445803347,"score_gpt":0.3745872668142628,"score_spread":0.23664650235622933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487158812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96846384,0.00017108841,0.00876344,0.0008405023,0.00017462861,0.000842857,0.00022769676,0.00008234512,0.020433536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98130774,0.00017193748,0.010869784,0.0006226739,0.00010788373,0.0021014833,0.00016459281,0.000047980295,0.0046060053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477357,0.002821577,0.0003956971,0.00078356656,0.0008793168,0.0003462803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9362645,0.045851313,0.0050457073,0.010386912,0.0014849426,0.00096658437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076509267,0.0007581092,0.00070778496,0.0005743059,0.0012272671,0.0026228614,0.0016151506,0.001969311,0.012554936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038950432,0.00062215223,0.00049156556,0.0005089161,0.004020492,0.0026355567,0.0018362532,0.0026771838,0.00081737415],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031008776,0.16041651,0.0684334,0.0034054657,0.00096715277,0.0023504894,0.02912391,0.01938531,0.15500045,0.3817278,0.011708082,0.13647258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017701369,0.10227328,0.08639866,0.00061253016,0.00076785573,0.0023652152,0.0147971865,0.073569015,0.08588831,0.53250426,0.0825569,0.0005653671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044668207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038487793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012554936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008515705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008412512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042000473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494559574","doi":"10.1257/jep.30.3.141","title":"Mindful Economics: The Production, Consumption, and Value of Beliefs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":817,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Wishful thinking; Perspective (graphical); Faith; Social psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Production (economics); Ideology; Denial; Identity (music); Politics; Psychology; Sociology; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.02907658312623609,"score_gpt":0.3156470844145224,"score_spread":0.2865705012882863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494559574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5144785,0.009274775,0.1655879,0.029813478,0.0002396343,0.000111239526,0.0003713963,0.00010276804,0.28002033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137115,0.0006830896,0.005307743,0.00032700598,0.000069349975,0.000027608727,0.000033246186,0.000009479266,0.0021712931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990196,0.00056519173,0.000029339342,0.00010796806,0.00021179314,0.00006615469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176264,0.005368992,0.0009655826,0.0010550407,0.0005194353,0.00032824549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020272965,0.00032678765,0.00027677073,0.0008346531,0.0006830671,0.0031430735,0.00050727866,0.0013269864,0.004102428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012401455,0.00028398054,0.00024971965,0.0007171643,0.004836965,0.0044386867,0.001141614,0.0016305923,0.00018244312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072851944,0.00007194458,0.006129232,0.0000925073,0.000038656082,0.00017038207,0.0014008674,0.0011018444,0.0007472254,0.9661272,0.0005784417,0.023468938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001899315,0.0000394282,0.007418362,0.000073636715,0.000021549231,0.00015243003,0.00050447363,0.0026050922,0.00034810917,0.9840752,0.0047302404,0.000012643191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077145535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005079429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004102428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011684692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005147836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013724029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500076366","doi":"10.1108/s1474-7871(2012)0000021009","title":"Relative Hedonic Utility and Budgetary Conflict Resolution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in management accounting","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Charlotte; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Perception; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Decision maker; Happiness; State (computer science); Test (biology); Resolution (logic); Mode (computer interface); Economics; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Law; Management science","score_opus":0.03482822014061586,"score_gpt":0.32498418669256196,"score_spread":0.2901559665519461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500076366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7685381,0.017945835,0.038425032,0.002370544,0.00026516896,0.00010426976,0.00011590917,0.00006731077,0.17216791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835181,0.003030577,0.006545575,0.00023842744,0.000057761656,0.000048543756,0.000045723526,0.000012800576,0.0065025263],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992674,0.00038754998,0.000032728964,0.00006324119,0.00020777853,0.00004126642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969957,0.0022134772,0.0004337877,0.00013254669,0.00011359711,0.000110921625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012927854,0.00047974085,0.00032501353,0.00041861107,0.00042414627,0.0016458351,0.00050902064,0.0003443271,0.0068178205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388218,0.00014625129,0.000229187,0.0007504284,0.0009879707,0.0013423312,0.0009769324,0.0011925378,0.00028030825],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011890215,0.0019891704,0.04192273,0.0009643878,0.00026066447,0.0004167566,0.005454937,0.009171985,0.010164171,0.37386292,0.0048581245,0.54974514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001706829,0.002174406,0.3802062,0.0005489754,0.0002466505,0.0011970331,0.005776557,0.025238967,0.008547609,0.53062314,0.045074582,0.00019520354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045930746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005303032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068178205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007336844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003808939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022807896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W250229791","doi":"","title":"Ten Dollars on Informational Asymmetries to Win, and Why People Bet on Horse Races","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Horse racing; Economics; Business; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.015077424397373328,"score_gpt":0.2562779879282817,"score_spread":0.24120056353090838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W250229791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59833175,0.0057054944,0.012068172,0.079973675,0.0005706038,0.000075145,0.0008431084,0.00005465752,0.30237743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852787,0.001451068,0.0014980168,0.0060764095,0.00030396332,0.000052125924,0.00012102939,0.000018530287,0.0052001923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977914,0.001161894,0.00010531361,0.00022545051,0.0005402327,0.00017572625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811802,0.013059955,0.0025430112,0.0012022443,0.0014237858,0.0005908301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004141539,0.00050181005,0.00044180534,0.001084857,0.0011603151,0.0038924243,0.00043443957,0.0022104986,0.022520939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0317081,0.00030966522,0.00031921608,0.00055965246,0.004467373,0.0047305534,0.0011192961,0.0018888823,0.001241559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016323368,0.00078364793,0.051137663,0.00039568896,0.0003420559,0.0004944473,0.0032575873,0.0037905117,0.003023636,0.80934846,0.026611164,0.0991828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022210274,0.00035439353,0.07491379,0.00028314142,0.0001961699,0.00041123742,0.0037750835,0.0045422716,0.0013262999,0.8866822,0.027202222,0.00009090657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014619791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016493426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022520939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012425878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006340511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07534003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503694116","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139507684.013","title":"On the role and limitations of experimental and behavioural economics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Positive economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06377682722351875,"score_gpt":0.24052054629592307,"score_spread":0.17674371907240433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503694116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005291668,0.26725882,0.07041743,0.3123993,0.0034820067,0.00012262509,0.00034203182,0.00017655268,0.34050953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39364016,0.30187795,0.10070219,0.10448757,0.014961527,0.0016676045,0.00043846184,0.0006092016,0.08161539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720729,0.022675755,0.0003745009,0.0012854637,0.003219336,0.00037198607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83296686,0.15599222,0.001432085,0.006273224,0.0027172687,0.0006183142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04123321,0.001241215,0.0017259471,0.0023607204,0.0021472955,0.008284689,0.0031096202,0.0042853565,0.009083985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056258313,0.0007638675,0.00073472655,0.002968628,0.04281862,0.01783678,0.0037981505,0.009206608,0.0015976675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010818546,0.00002042333,0.00009125995,0.00014382873,0.000015940055,0.000012514357,0.00027725592,0.00046176344,0.000026446496,0.98013407,0.0068584764,0.0119471215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010037119,0.000007311351,0.00011783447,0.00030307352,0.0000057642887,0.000014926623,0.00013855657,0.00048318284,0.000034634253,0.96121544,0.037660837,0.000008420138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003368858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033090035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04123321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005786934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048917914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21806467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504092054","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139169301.007","title":"Antecedents of the motivational action models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Human–computer interaction; Social psychology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.0780944344492015,"score_gpt":0.27184738955966853,"score_spread":0.19375295511046703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504092054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06178248,0.00457609,0.07535849,0.026310222,0.0004501719,0.00027576988,0.0010817043,0.00023712734,0.82992786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95579726,0.0029544902,0.019331548,0.00073686434,0.00023198652,0.0003847983,0.00045525635,0.00006239642,0.020045396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850357,0.0007840045,0.00004826545,0.00021429261,0.00028256993,0.00016733557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996627,0.002293136,0.00028510747,0.000264155,0.00024075039,0.0002899015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020994004,0.00069947384,0.00041461742,0.001634594,0.0013040924,0.0030280263,0.000998361,0.0014888126,0.039970383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074263727,0.00060994376,0.0009999083,0.0012022605,0.003023481,0.002808868,0.0017172758,0.0026282307,0.0021884432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026234806,0.00008680449,0.0012332412,0.00008356222,0.000015842892,0.00006328123,0.0003743478,0.0014687874,0.00006398133,0.9847296,0.0029833056,0.008871063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003201221,0.000026449032,0.003990148,0.00017704951,0.000027844273,0.00007979021,0.00034657618,0.009777627,0.000103606275,0.9734693,0.011955915,0.0000136188055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034746807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037111382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039970383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027567125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015597696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1337142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508658707","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2561627","title":"Identification of Solution Concepts for Discrete Games","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Computer science; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.020240084013594777,"score_gpt":0.35374122079741455,"score_spread":0.33350113678381976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508658707","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1397165,0.0002855946,0.843924,0.0013556703,0.0000542507,0.00027513262,0.0001849358,0.00013113648,0.014072851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7700146,0.0005500141,0.22163288,0.00020247555,0.00009696113,0.0008524726,0.00050939014,0.00008179784,0.0060594315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997875,0.001038371,0.00014872233,0.0004355091,0.00030154453,0.00020092522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852632,0.011522991,0.0012424,0.00049309427,0.0008412999,0.0006369121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048917173,0.0011765346,0.001467929,0.002803344,0.0011515323,0.0038271334,0.0017588156,0.0024003123,0.0079269465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025395406,0.0007707694,0.0021191563,0.0014270677,0.002892117,0.0074465224,0.003014869,0.0036770778,0.00048919965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043212673,0.00011422161,0.00044116325,0.00011158429,0.00002210816,0.00002199141,0.0005152188,0.010516174,0.0003754726,0.9724578,0.0008721943,0.014508769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041725183,0.000031934163,0.00016105057,0.000027279906,0.00000798361,0.000014434393,0.00016495169,0.10248182,0.00012199253,0.8964962,0.00043971563,0.000010913383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010029739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069059315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079269465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019456485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00237535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026518285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509524881","doi":"","title":"Ethnic Discrimination in the Lab: Evidence of Statistical and Taste-Based Discrimination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Taste; Distrust; Selection (genetic algorithm); Race (biology); Statistical discrimination; Ethnic group; Salient; Social psychology; White (mutation); Psychology; Racism; Variation (astronomy); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Statistics; Gender studies; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.18776065266489914,"score_gpt":0.45866154841850615,"score_spread":0.270900895753607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509524881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908957,0.000079994235,0.0010852253,0.00018224747,0.000033337463,0.000027638467,0.00006871042,0.0000130071685,0.0076141357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972644,0.000047076435,0.00079709914,0.00033961702,0.000021357086,0.000047401067,0.000077952696,0.000009992285,0.0013951056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716336,0.0015790433,0.00013850156,0.00039823583,0.00054233667,0.00017851683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97751313,0.008745885,0.006975232,0.0042443434,0.0008516004,0.0016697387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038564862,0.00029077314,0.00039413388,0.0003709856,0.00061385677,0.0011209768,0.00048779012,0.0007460976,0.007973457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011757868,0.00020442407,0.00021514359,0.0002921283,0.001282345,0.0005387982,0.0009534949,0.0007164283,0.0008683305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0154536655,0.03408314,0.463264,0.0005729273,0.00066543685,0.00084606576,0.0036524723,0.0016148519,0.37276623,0.018639967,0.0046933843,0.08374793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080480723,0.014888261,0.8873637,0.00011788169,0.0002420958,0.0008247032,0.0026452611,0.0045335344,0.06694024,0.014062664,0.0073868614,0.00018999673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052439136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006741696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027045183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030038087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026673913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512030867","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2780170","title":"Strategic Obfuscation and Price Fairness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Obfuscation; Business; Law and economics; Computer security; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.024435323142271537,"score_gpt":0.30743795413796426,"score_spread":0.2830026309956927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512030867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71575534,0.0008200646,0.15512569,0.010256569,0.00063482916,0.00010567871,0.00018982678,0.0005212524,0.11659084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919967,0.000091979724,0.0047416696,0.00024446426,0.00007459742,0.000018165385,0.0000124865655,0.00003448388,0.0027854415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391407,0.002489011,0.0003763452,0.0008234474,0.0015655342,0.0008316639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96138203,0.02071835,0.0040097767,0.011878866,0.0013777682,0.00063312304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068564033,0.00048327242,0.00083997723,0.0005752381,0.0012428926,0.003422782,0.0012039004,0.0028086102,0.0065692635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045772742,0.0005048607,0.00046878099,0.0008273867,0.003970691,0.0049423077,0.002710745,0.0032056584,0.00091512484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007163362,0.00023836932,0.0042056916,0.00009927145,0.00006676782,0.00022730159,0.0009394961,0.005802313,0.0043722307,0.9296832,0.0028272134,0.050821736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006091434,0.000049152146,0.0010294595,0.000015596353,0.00003628544,0.00010477454,0.0001504964,0.014430338,0.0021300588,0.97992855,0.0020452805,0.000019035768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006865073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005037928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068564033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083813234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017257237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036260545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512833475","doi":"","title":"Nonconformity in Online Social Networks","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Normative; Nonconformity; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social influence; Social identity theory; Normative social influence; Convergence (economics); Psychology; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Advertising; Social media; Social group; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04599659739499702,"score_gpt":0.362322098078129,"score_spread":0.316325500683132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512833475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99737966,0.00001141032,0.0012262122,0.00003709984,0.0000020656605,0.000022544784,0.000011943372,0.0000072810476,0.0013017973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988411,0.000009300526,0.0008651023,0.000018999834,0.0000032744827,0.000022837949,0.000014215975,0.0000023570733,0.00022274542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581414,0.0027131329,0.00016956175,0.00051488297,0.00055558013,0.00023274154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94602054,0.038098134,0.008934564,0.004141853,0.0010196958,0.0017852563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005809204,0.00031548293,0.0003885007,0.00055215415,0.00086237804,0.0013808018,0.00063351955,0.00064731593,0.002153989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03530433,0.00030219363,0.00020872122,0.00031853843,0.0013838176,0.0018511158,0.0010191891,0.0009695995,0.00017203334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005445216,0.0111339595,0.72322595,0.00033710562,0.0003248629,0.00080676016,0.015888665,0.02080506,0.06837721,0.032134645,0.000987005,0.12053363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008669455,0.010343099,0.7412699,0.000088845634,0.00022110816,0.001011909,0.010824919,0.14753659,0.024712298,0.05890657,0.0039831637,0.00023455168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001508927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020562909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005809204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007118586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032605042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03072238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513239063","doi":"10.1037/cbs0000021","title":"“I wanted to cooperate, but...”: Justifying suboptimal cooperation in a commons dilemma.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Psychology; Commons; Social dilemma; Tragedy of the commons; Prisoner's dilemma; Social psychology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.23050687382760193,"score_gpt":0.3328023470638322,"score_spread":0.10229547323623028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513239063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58438796,0.0023965077,0.09334085,0.06752505,0.0006267561,0.00035632387,0.00021480372,0.00009684137,0.25105497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98897624,0.00027178187,0.0065621263,0.0016488453,0.000071191505,0.00010494195,0.000015879685,0.00001920418,0.0023298427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98976886,0.007940071,0.00024394384,0.0005743324,0.00072513544,0.00074750825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435427,0.04446752,0.005469249,0.0027622771,0.001732406,0.0020258194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01277867,0.0006615827,0.0008907464,0.00062372023,0.002473763,0.0034840535,0.0014947604,0.0068371044,0.008936595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05732615,0.0003968282,0.0004691131,0.0004895203,0.008945764,0.004709758,0.0031224445,0.003408544,0.0006285941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010001744,0.00028275725,0.0064547765,0.00044137193,0.00019586731,0.0007143563,0.002730105,0.019985622,0.0018777153,0.9349564,0.008307786,0.023053091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014684995,0.00012194892,0.0018196815,0.000091649104,0.000044090248,0.0001471755,0.0011370602,0.02140857,0.00023496407,0.97151744,0.00329925,0.000031345546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023241485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034450153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01277867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030284266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003468933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06758088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517455539","doi":"10.1086/378472","title":"<i>Global Games</i>. By Maarten  Van Bottenburg. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2001. Pp. x+286. $29.95.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Sociology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Download; Library science; Permission; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.017185672025761527,"score_gpt":0.2809930851012304,"score_spread":0.26380741307546884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517455539","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076731306,0.800885,0.006855239,0.03816834,0.009544003,0.00002993179,0.0008848892,0.0005577846,0.14230746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02889821,0.6280934,0.006793028,0.0085746255,0.009742983,0.00016475681,0.0014761777,0.0007040724,0.31555277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997646,0.00006093867,0.000019245626,0.000042727497,0.00007688793,0.000035659803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953055,0.0002287987,0.000061562365,0.000037949616,0.0000768637,0.00006428427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046669276,0.002700457,0.0011700133,0.0021811281,0.00069168984,0.002127219,0.0009640749,0.001419906,0.056547042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013505715,0.001113034,0.00060379884,0.00275476,0.0020926143,0.005965438,0.0015682866,0.0028116128,0.03325669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017063123,0.000013993747,0.00011763981,0.00028528014,0.000011578466,0.000026485812,0.00011933384,0.00032888338,0.00009558469,0.017280119,0.927236,0.05446792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012248427,0.000024157958,0.0010304909,0.0006775881,0.000014078545,0.00019961342,0.00017904036,0.00058860524,0.0001523001,0.0686143,0.928488,0.0000195388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065672975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018311838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056547042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016732081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008226093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18916869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519592928","doi":"10.3386/w22486","title":"Peer Information and Risk-taking under Competitive and Non-competitive Pay Schemes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Incentive; Task (project management); Contrast (vision); Peer effects; Psychology; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Business; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.18734414177895983,"score_gpt":0.49748308717174883,"score_spread":0.31013894539278897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519592928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99426913,0.000077806006,0.0013277759,0.00011656974,0.000008050786,0.000030353462,0.000019635272,0.000012640349,0.0041379347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987128,0.000028967372,0.0006624559,0.000025743333,0.0000070149526,0.000024206698,0.0000160296,0.0000036597116,0.0005190402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503076,0.0024673662,0.00032056635,0.00057827216,0.0012318555,0.0003711092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95723265,0.022169188,0.012284745,0.004587708,0.0009811758,0.0027445618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007689343,0.00048757214,0.0005434308,0.00055034587,0.00044087958,0.0017333803,0.00046309837,0.0010394225,0.0040890053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046272833,0.0002855133,0.00024956447,0.0002733482,0.0010377641,0.0012732914,0.0013576095,0.0010166527,0.0003168272],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012977257,0.01416444,0.6174479,0.0008775381,0.001013476,0.001111025,0.008239443,0.019173734,0.09052234,0.051388983,0.0014817461,0.18160202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006526256,0.008719522,0.9002584,0.00011059603,0.00032085634,0.00046050182,0.0020675699,0.03029599,0.01199401,0.042498596,0.0024423492,0.00017896722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082801364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092346687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007689343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065195817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054314703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040665627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520657446","doi":"10.1177/0956797617695099","title":"When Novel Rituals Lead to Intergroup Bias: Evidence From Economic Games and Neurophysiology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Neurophysiology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.22660147038140424,"score_gpt":0.4570903774402066,"score_spread":0.23048890705880234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520657446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965905,0.00012657899,0.000777883,0.00015517585,0.0000124808585,0.000011310712,0.000022920023,0.000007315152,0.0022959032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983346,0.00010400973,0.001147663,0.00009356471,0.0000070582814,0.000020261397,0.000025658965,0.000007771028,0.00025946787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885774,0.00062711467,0.00008046416,0.00015664962,0.00020011215,0.00007787513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99028987,0.0047685187,0.0027867337,0.0012522141,0.00024611136,0.0006564582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002182352,0.00034797454,0.00039669505,0.00039980817,0.0002649159,0.00084729487,0.00045158583,0.0007227472,0.0017346118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015288513,0.00028966554,0.0002388412,0.00018484535,0.0012493136,0.00073164486,0.0010149847,0.0007178293,0.00014275832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013611332,0.009012213,0.5162992,0.0015342706,0.0022709472,0.0016294701,0.004863421,0.009816023,0.22459984,0.024431707,0.0023981787,0.18953341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004431367,0.0019251625,0.9566681,0.000048273218,0.00018569789,0.0003805215,0.00065923424,0.0092049865,0.007284862,0.021532739,0.0016044482,0.000062721025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006844097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010840105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002182352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028803525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001882038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011541486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539431793","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.009","title":"A sequential game of endowment effect and natural property rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Endowment; Economics; Natural (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Property rights; Microeconomics; Biology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013462536132948925,"score_gpt":0.26498952807588105,"score_spread":0.25152699194293215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2539431793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6296676,0.00027175693,0.3157517,0.0034262042,0.00014960772,0.00045009257,0.0007097439,0.000118334654,0.04945495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685939,0.0001908059,0.016511459,0.00013760336,0.00005555491,0.00015283219,0.00008628508,0.000014839025,0.01425685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797136,0.0010141941,0.00010174117,0.00039373958,0.00023857418,0.00028045225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043876,0.0069445204,0.0008801892,0.0005700635,0.00029415128,0.00087237556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003409793,0.00066730333,0.0017163794,0.000495849,0.0007225182,0.00252966,0.0018067851,0.0024817986,0.012725355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010784547,0.00069996493,0.00083866843,0.00056801416,0.0024319885,0.005505265,0.0012170307,0.0016486775,0.0004520585],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042424555,0.00021359541,0.001742489,0.00011491958,0.00006838245,0.0004526207,0.00021719754,0.06568,0.0036803442,0.92028314,0.0012322407,0.0058907573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003229086,0.00024653447,0.0017463926,0.000015256149,0.000053798878,0.00023576008,0.00014568344,0.26924482,0.0005585565,0.7253558,0.0020225844,0.000051940573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035122293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030533164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012725355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019050193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018988069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04257053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547575120","doi":"10.1002/smj.2556","title":"Conflict inside and outside: Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Resource allocation; Politics; Function (biology); Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Positive economics; Industrial organization; Business; Management; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09259180979436764,"score_gpt":0.36059089634123187,"score_spread":0.2679990865468642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547575120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952722,0.00008467677,0.00033715327,0.00017774245,0.0000030937608,0.000005614159,0.000006422696,0.0000032632558,0.0041097417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997539,0.000017893544,0.00005954933,0.000024681627,0.0000036099225,0.000003578883,0.000004917258,0.0000011113634,0.00013070408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755424,0.001129874,0.00010410947,0.00038883023,0.00051534706,0.00030762074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97922087,0.011297633,0.0052093137,0.0011117891,0.00093003875,0.0022304563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032761202,0.00017761248,0.00039134332,0.0012817456,0.0012712955,0.0029001476,0.00053010695,0.0007249646,0.004196288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022192411,0.00018171934,0.00017358089,0.000851514,0.0018186261,0.0016134492,0.0028559975,0.00064521556,0.0001921172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093286636,0.0013627132,0.79565513,0.00017163102,0.00029575522,0.0006973276,0.05222892,0.003958091,0.012973397,0.018249175,0.0012750673,0.112199955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029809347,0.0002209132,0.9611884,0.000027141878,0.000037743113,0.00009625788,0.018130299,0.0036616824,0.0006469382,0.014857326,0.0010645975,0.000038913367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029789985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00291556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004196288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016726707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054199016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017325997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550079071","doi":"10.3386/w15623","title":"The Behavioralist Visits the Factory: Increasing Productivity Using Simple Framing Manipulations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Framing (construction); Conditionality; Sustenance; Reputation; Economics; Productivity; Marketing; Labour economics; Business; Microeconomics; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.5462732629295765,"score_gpt":0.5867537055625076,"score_spread":0.04048044263293116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550079071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99045146,0.00007821721,0.00371022,0.0005197528,0.000053997752,0.00006828709,0.000055364002,0.000052221192,0.0050104936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362963,0.00009673076,0.004413081,0.00031751595,0.00004465426,0.00016907688,0.00003201642,0.00001623123,0.0012810418],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991222,0.00044511587,0.000034122233,0.0002013852,0.00011015106,0.00008708681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568707,0.0020677922,0.0010063996,0.0007523616,0.00009453442,0.00039187167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016397038,0.00056890654,0.00039873217,0.00034109404,0.0004564366,0.0007273666,0.0005617381,0.0006903819,0.0056967866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050386563,0.00027979718,0.00028698976,0.00018354728,0.000996801,0.00057534967,0.00076976523,0.0010068979,0.0003143933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018118342,0.032334704,0.055448193,0.0015380896,0.0005551473,0.0010169391,0.0060857954,0.008322526,0.6075796,0.043531075,0.004618467,0.22085118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00870354,0.07714184,0.48759258,0.0003881984,0.001501312,0.0009981409,0.0056408327,0.057129443,0.22715168,0.102769636,0.030554488,0.0004282744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000483129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005547902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056967866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051339634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003900537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019057631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555316850","doi":"10.5539/jel.v6n1p218","title":"Faculty Perceptions Pertaining to Attributes of Successful Universities and Future Learning Environments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Perception; Globalization; Sample (material); Context (archaeology); Plan (archaeology); Psychology; Public relations; Marketing; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Political science; Business; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.025655791574064654,"score_gpt":0.3383926963687153,"score_spread":0.3127369047946506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555316850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930408,0.00012873372,0.0003481935,0.00070205034,0.000014888827,0.000015877244,0.00002893807,0.0000063751727,0.0057140994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992125,0.000106361025,0.000105979816,0.000051402774,0.0000056625586,0.0000039504803,0.000015565067,0.0000011997994,0.0004972924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732625,0.00095416204,0.00023008291,0.0001053105,0.00084882084,0.00053531345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97630966,0.006140817,0.0047828495,0.00056455843,0.0036573238,0.008544842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005429013,0.0001251073,0.00022527152,0.0010888708,0.0017084912,0.0034441752,0.0003382194,0.0005926899,0.003909721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017010199,0.00012605739,0.00019712356,0.0012028305,0.0015148873,0.0015951534,0.0013296525,0.00071129785,0.00044150138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017096869,0.00058848,0.8782028,0.00020537502,0.00003696368,0.0004713031,0.0616578,0.0006190665,0.0031152363,0.005489251,0.0018847107,0.047558025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001017393,0.0006216062,0.6519372,0.000105227286,0.000021222131,0.00041953375,0.3282394,0.0006415601,0.0013124305,0.0020553942,0.014569748,0.00006653129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022413575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031837514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005429013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011846387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002546644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028711736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563542046","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2017.2836","title":"The Bull of Wall Street: Experimental Analysis of Testosterone and Asset Trading","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Testosterone (patch); Affect (linguistics); Asset (computer security); Monetary economics; Economics; Value (mathematics); Financial economics; Business; Endocrinology; Psychology; Biology; Computer science; Communication; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04979608366159119,"score_gpt":0.3639613402953688,"score_spread":0.3141652566337776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563542046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99230146,0.00024738366,0.0006137515,0.00040627702,0.000072251445,0.000050161554,0.00017900064,0.000019552228,0.0061100745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819879,0.00041588838,0.002264304,0.00039662328,0.00009243661,0.00021917639,0.00034235927,0.00004266567,0.014238657],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994373,0.00020623222,0.000029877985,0.00010786557,0.00015057855,0.00006816134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838686,0.0007936263,0.00024836446,0.00022283955,0.00008821081,0.00026006036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081811793,0.000246925,0.0002735221,0.00045276558,0.00066564936,0.0011677631,0.00034229457,0.00056610355,0.009517113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021682852,0.00027653255,0.0001992992,0.00029120734,0.0011471699,0.0004054729,0.00052133057,0.000990097,0.0006601838],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025922878,0.043821435,0.19198109,0.00085541833,0.0006393118,0.0022142562,0.009969509,0.0018351052,0.4860485,0.051645268,0.014897434,0.17016982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029309392,0.050683215,0.6119168,0.0003098112,0.0007234878,0.0019246845,0.005339009,0.016395813,0.23087777,0.029429726,0.049146608,0.00032217876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018514779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025370882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009517113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033102068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048761538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03183788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564276048","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002","title":"A note on testing guilt aversion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Inequity aversion; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05590318872847355,"score_gpt":0.32524257566179604,"score_spread":0.2693393869333225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564276048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15061787,0.00865405,0.30236143,0.34105667,0.017865524,0.0019287607,0.00345213,0.00077715196,0.17328635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5439318,0.0059779845,0.2830499,0.10763043,0.006690857,0.0044268887,0.0009111943,0.00030666866,0.04707425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805793,0.013213167,0.0009930916,0.0010615847,0.0037641653,0.00038868835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.763773,0.19952504,0.0040149745,0.02439024,0.0059905443,0.002306137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02652932,0.0018375681,0.0022767098,0.0010974569,0.002447635,0.0021967064,0.005424342,0.0073787956,0.012590816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12339115,0.00061954896,0.0022724257,0.0014775827,0.0083113285,0.0070298896,0.004546226,0.012537479,0.0018675812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016270928,0.0023593474,0.013184643,0.0010791213,0.0005805478,0.0021243698,0.001827123,0.0042122696,0.016062254,0.71373034,0.13407822,0.10913478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093376613,0.0013374313,0.01599581,0.00073521514,0.00021109133,0.0006239732,0.0009146899,0.007930161,0.0073775607,0.9040134,0.059696425,0.00023051875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005173787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068175686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02652932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00108756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025725865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14030218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564421592","doi":"10.82308/8097","title":"A study on heterogeneity in a commons dilemma: an experimental framework","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Dilemma; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11731502998708591,"score_gpt":0.352714984000144,"score_spread":0.23539995401305808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564421592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8565332,0.0010732394,0.08312509,0.0018186086,0.00042307854,0.0042549153,0.0006655483,0.0000655354,0.052040838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496397,0.00066313794,0.034891393,0.00055260886,0.000117911986,0.0066881594,0.00014595597,0.00002545096,0.007275624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926736,0.004859211,0.0002613461,0.0008821033,0.0007488702,0.0005749096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96179914,0.030852985,0.0031063939,0.0020958006,0.0011399799,0.0010057343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009622607,0.0012332293,0.0013277605,0.0009495473,0.0014873233,0.002884288,0.002349633,0.0028771467,0.012220063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021316882,0.00042003614,0.0017295955,0.0009941946,0.0038975095,0.0032100682,0.0028025801,0.0030964068,0.00047145115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011717744,0.023818715,0.0141480565,0.0034933328,0.0010348419,0.0016296769,0.006679862,0.113283575,0.022266807,0.7539141,0.0036250756,0.04438818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008140498,0.033676695,0.010338945,0.0007381353,0.0014787824,0.00035550192,0.008618438,0.25287023,0.007353808,0.6503939,0.025616676,0.00041845685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021232774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017923478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012220063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032650104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028140375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05088979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570857135","doi":"10.1257/pol.20150495","title":"Profit with Purpose? A Theory of Social Enterprise","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Social enterprise; Profit (economics); Business; Matching (statistics); Social economy; Social entrepreneurship; Enterprise software; Balance (ability); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics; Finance; Public relations; Process management; Market economy; Entrepreneurship","score_opus":0.028644777502496496,"score_gpt":0.36384759751580303,"score_spread":0.33520282001330653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570857135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08100211,0.002967412,0.1373902,0.06769214,0.00041136358,0.00014855385,0.00023033566,0.00011379065,0.710044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704386,0.0013239827,0.007997696,0.0020622278,0.00037704819,0.00017147684,0.00006924789,0.000038414815,0.017521374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779737,0.0011453293,0.000048657046,0.000313451,0.00038576167,0.00030947584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957982,0.0023762893,0.00044594915,0.00056714163,0.0003154894,0.0004968346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028289643,0.00052416377,0.0005146798,0.0012352879,0.002333821,0.007863776,0.0009695589,0.0036849962,0.013315447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006249199,0.00022623279,0.0007663998,0.0015135342,0.015901117,0.01304554,0.0032298337,0.0023519457,0.0012761962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004841298,0.000009311186,0.00026354735,0.000010851891,0.0000027894105,0.000011942216,0.00023886985,0.00021707136,0.00002138998,0.99618053,0.00064308755,0.0023958292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007693107,0.000008671605,0.0002531492,0.00002086172,0.0000028609477,0.000023396415,0.00029902547,0.0010856095,0.000021664307,0.99184895,0.006425244,0.0000029781254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001327698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009823425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013315447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031234452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017382404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044544578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573523873","doi":"","title":"User Participation and Honesty in Online Rating Systems: What a Social Network Can Do","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recommender system; Baseline (sea); Incentive; Computer science; Honesty; Dilemma; Online participation; Social network (sociolinguistics); Crowdsourcing; Online community; Filter (signal processing); Rating system; Internet privacy; Data science; World Wide Web; Social media; The Internet; Psychology; Microeconomics; Environmental economics","score_opus":0.1431412220547272,"score_gpt":0.38307357709273093,"score_spread":0.23993235503800373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573523873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6625432,0.002314924,0.2697113,0.02297244,0.00036645183,0.00039138086,0.0005279592,0.00041892624,0.04075349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98228776,0.00030925518,0.01471895,0.000318936,0.00017688714,0.00008815259,0.00011168737,0.00004270101,0.0019455408],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98145455,0.012623823,0.00083862984,0.0019433686,0.002441603,0.0006979623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84814227,0.103295036,0.017098024,0.02168402,0.006661481,0.0031191946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022602137,0.0007190477,0.0013160645,0.0011245442,0.0027428232,0.004608179,0.0012753627,0.0026471273,0.0039358297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10697535,0.00070123415,0.0008661176,0.0012973432,0.0030269355,0.015446191,0.0031514047,0.0022148096,0.0007478594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002175255,0.0012159257,0.23801398,0.0012967938,0.00086505164,0.0009398464,0.018449455,0.051244885,0.010108096,0.32193303,0.0101317745,0.34362587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033598556,0.0012107056,0.09191835,0.0005200115,0.00053542084,0.0014703833,0.0047066426,0.30707917,0.0067060245,0.5614348,0.023756828,0.00032565088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002501905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022195915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022602137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010327848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001153931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580202562","doi":"10.1038/sdata.2016.120","title":"A 4-study replication of the moderating effects of greed on socioeconomic status and unethical behaviour","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Scientific Data","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Replication (statistics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Biology; Demography; Virology","score_opus":0.27686203510584495,"score_gpt":0.48794559857871705,"score_spread":0.2110835634728721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580202562","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20019245,0.70262706,0.01215682,0.0030617611,0.0038122917,0.06274046,0.00495989,0.00042358713,0.010025749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48943624,0.36653072,0.042939544,0.003571607,0.0010768371,0.08525923,0.0049157063,0.00016130743,0.006108956],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934743,0.0032822925,0.0013189646,0.00064938434,0.0010920584,0.00018297583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96333295,0.017532462,0.0037168348,0.0056552943,0.009308874,0.00045352054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024299579,0.0016885631,0.0040733474,0.002758883,0.0010660519,0.001576053,0.0020687722,0.0015289248,0.0034801287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07142268,0.0011806773,0.010082469,0.0032341564,0.0009647374,0.001533449,0.0015070208,0.0027834838,0.0010791919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009322101,0.005400932,0.025326919,0.31271777,0.1018286,0.0011251009,0.0055990084,0.0009406744,0.005395326,0.0031240496,0.011381769,0.51783776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030482994,0.034617506,0.18387206,0.10592184,0.45336574,0.0022190802,0.0037904151,0.0014232036,0.011857011,0.008984934,0.1627004,0.00076491595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008246999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02218077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97570044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017638374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007930859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580917568","doi":"10.1108/jcc-08-2016-0003","title":"Managing team coordination incentives: the effect of payoff differentials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra (JCC) The Business and Economics Research Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Stochastic game; Intuition; Outcome (game theory); Microeconomics; Profit (economics); Business; Team composition; Strategic dominance; Economics; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.03844818156319278,"score_gpt":0.35531617880354843,"score_spread":0.31686799724035564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580917568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45203924,0.00066105666,0.44421294,0.0049776263,0.00020741514,0.00059877237,0.00019881302,0.00024978307,0.09685429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984593,0.00013609622,0.011721178,0.00009221921,0.000040662973,0.00014114255,0.0000141272985,0.000013061217,0.003248653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935207,0.0036733644,0.00028648242,0.00065669976,0.0008428928,0.0010198227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753983,0.01378106,0.005800599,0.0013082495,0.001098174,0.0026135128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007709489,0.00085327047,0.0008459533,0.00081137405,0.001214976,0.0035020437,0.0014784962,0.0023906038,0.0062216637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031648055,0.00060967356,0.000823963,0.00051449344,0.002776492,0.0041200225,0.003454707,0.0019549998,0.00046916967],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047474963,0.00045374947,0.011309409,0.00020740986,0.00011499332,0.0011838129,0.0014562474,0.32481346,0.0036974896,0.62330174,0.0017272679,0.031259622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038789643,0.0009992095,0.0069276416,0.00015981392,0.00012273755,0.0003820553,0.0010599863,0.5837993,0.0011068735,0.39710593,0.007829,0.0001194955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003025015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014159819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007709489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037711833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023288534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04077214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582429154","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12292","title":"Recognizing the Best: The Productive and Counterproductive Effects of Relative Performance Recognition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Management Accountants","keywords":"Dark triad; Psychology; Personality psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Salient; Triad (sociology); Social recognition; Big Five personality traits; Political science","score_opus":0.1451470093209247,"score_gpt":0.40782082505438255,"score_spread":0.2626738157334578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582429154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997544,0.000042737534,0.00038250413,0.00007829393,0.000011168301,0.000021544778,0.000013645388,0.000023892877,0.0018822629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981201,0.000035565477,0.0009397063,0.000077306424,0.000009133605,0.000042863066,0.000017829294,0.000005301508,0.00075213437],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903595,0.00044529123,0.000058524638,0.00017015351,0.00018175178,0.000108462606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906024,0.004739181,0.0021992617,0.0013580993,0.00021172788,0.00088932813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013282449,0.00042342837,0.00029892873,0.00023832936,0.0003619841,0.00081735506,0.00049128546,0.0006015432,0.005114569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063792225,0.00019483374,0.00019210327,0.00012553103,0.0005829525,0.00049965887,0.0007713256,0.00077254296,0.00043346907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019294426,0.07460457,0.13420005,0.0009452618,0.00040396373,0.00051155343,0.0034128486,0.005727906,0.463011,0.007579353,0.0029426864,0.28736642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018300435,0.07037152,0.71381897,0.000180691,0.00040447805,0.0004675955,0.0030402972,0.013688191,0.18092021,0.007890768,0.007186247,0.0002009004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003777681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004278137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005114569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031739712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038968652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01710987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584415300","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2881622","title":"Public Goods, Signaling, and Norms of Conscientious Leadership","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Obligation; Private information retrieval; Economics; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Public relations; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08477715352943281,"score_gpt":0.30755484055253285,"score_spread":0.22277768702310002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584415300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644293,0.00011138082,0.0038546587,0.0015171566,0.00003769073,0.000022839446,0.00007000203,0.000023566627,0.029933348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924505,0.000020127873,0.00024143302,0.000033551718,0.000012438003,0.0000062201134,0.000011670079,0.0000024092149,0.0004271586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981223,0.0010091121,0.00009488047,0.000188615,0.0003297683,0.00025535747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94484407,0.03161183,0.013938794,0.00532911,0.0018494886,0.0024266988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004210083,0.00028270925,0.0002908541,0.0006735868,0.0007411375,0.002899108,0.00040388427,0.0011735908,0.005957865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031401236,0.00022944938,0.00018962826,0.000389274,0.0026735058,0.0013412763,0.0009598827,0.0010806667,0.0002750084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004271369,0.0034192693,0.27966732,0.00037928202,0.0003393563,0.00070441136,0.009264538,0.016822373,0.0141561935,0.55632126,0.004375062,0.11027961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005085494,0.000745492,0.3291501,0.00009092021,0.00011277036,0.00021059456,0.0040618377,0.023742488,0.0020430428,0.6366922,0.0025016014,0.00014030964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015351503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018491503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005957865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008365577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089727395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022265315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584999368","doi":"10.1177/1474704917690740","title":"Bidding to Commit","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bidding; Commit; Action (physics); Battle; Social psychology; Dove; Psychology; Irrational number; Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.10452656840314403,"score_gpt":0.4686431946441735,"score_spread":0.3641166262410295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584999368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6059654,0.00056813145,0.052292287,0.007827005,0.00032788582,0.0003313651,0.00021853636,0.00014294426,0.33232656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808195,0.00012772961,0.005064923,0.001221323,0.00004885776,0.00013816029,0.00008401483,0.000025646248,0.01246982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785656,0.0011141053,0.00012236397,0.00024926517,0.0003830979,0.00027446798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902339,0.0038524584,0.0018116564,0.0020005207,0.0009730402,0.0011284685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028726168,0.00035130195,0.00029295665,0.0002952765,0.0007307822,0.0018113082,0.00047711947,0.0009148564,0.017364401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017153572,0.00018906766,0.0003346032,0.00023334422,0.0013753414,0.0012459162,0.001158798,0.001759647,0.0018122094],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013944621,0.0013945285,0.11204026,0.00076762703,0.00038211214,0.0010412185,0.00940763,0.005859304,0.029392678,0.55799884,0.020864338,0.25945708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046131923,0.0019709344,0.1672531,0.00031883633,0.00031342046,0.0030895781,0.009935677,0.028785255,0.00936614,0.6306251,0.14767289,0.00020780212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006338717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007823033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017364401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005456369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006808035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058089733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588022291","doi":"10.2308/accr-51709","title":"The Effects of Tangible Rewards versus Cash Rewards in Consecutive Sales Tournaments: A Field Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Cash; Business; Marketing; Economics; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03963006586332354,"score_gpt":0.40181851786501355,"score_spread":0.36218845200169003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588022291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967507,0.00005584645,0.00053411926,0.00007698421,0.0000538502,0.0005649462,0.00007242667,0.000018358476,0.001872703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894916,0.00013333767,0.0041015195,0.00040885987,0.00009956384,0.002592333,0.00014754884,0.000016530825,0.003008722],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961701,0.0021197062,0.00026254792,0.0006083036,0.00051364163,0.0003257353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636653,0.026287729,0.004216943,0.0021129875,0.0010261865,0.002690911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054585347,0.0010299055,0.0011675563,0.00044909897,0.0014327986,0.0016038272,0.0019591323,0.0018269924,0.008481634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018338358,0.00078173284,0.0006346294,0.00043297122,0.0013674066,0.0012838237,0.0007561936,0.0024548674,0.0008626912],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.18764599,0.5159536,0.053570393,0.002221247,0.0013008588,0.0007565853,0.0040159454,0.006690237,0.10385398,0.0070670974,0.005299264,0.11162482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.054197874,0.59302616,0.27826625,0.00042360427,0.0015721645,0.00032341227,0.002810494,0.020352483,0.02627693,0.01115741,0.0111668715,0.00042634355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015465955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002376971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008481634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010589169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009931987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02886784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588160677","doi":"","title":"Gender differences in tournament and flat-wage schemes: An experimental study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Piece work; Wage; Margin (machine learning); Context (archaeology); Economics; Compensation (psychology); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Mathematics; Incentive; Social psychology; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.17255370979473791,"score_gpt":0.43343232043234453,"score_spread":0.26087861063760664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588160677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99403906,0.000059153783,0.00067944743,0.00014106357,0.00008315048,0.0002745595,0.00019022718,0.000023282984,0.004510114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98090506,0.00013622826,0.004486458,0.00043106548,0.00011846898,0.0012905088,0.00033080133,0.000045092347,0.012256355],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816006,0.00066215725,0.00017882483,0.00040461772,0.00036594347,0.00022846885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850161,0.008902264,0.0019332883,0.002046649,0.0005383913,0.0015633417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003411051,0.0006056905,0.00085473846,0.00047543467,0.00097177475,0.0016805585,0.0009623463,0.0013677934,0.018795513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009488635,0.00044536954,0.0003525122,0.0003904393,0.0011472387,0.0010739875,0.0010013966,0.001580365,0.0015989892],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0752287,0.4531636,0.072877705,0.0011947954,0.00033731264,0.0013429794,0.01522685,0.0014661985,0.2355102,0.018314011,0.009603774,0.11573385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023804585,0.35072574,0.43986937,0.00038830566,0.00068164646,0.0016014302,0.014703435,0.015972031,0.06275576,0.03575809,0.05311159,0.00062804244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039141328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056570873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018795513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003660427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042290357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0628773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589460606","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2547875","title":"Which Analysts to Believe? Analystss Conflicts of Interest and Societal Trust","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07153635055394296,"score_gpt":0.3585053228275529,"score_spread":0.2869689722736099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589460606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931321,0.0006039473,0.001423568,0.023593076,0.00009215264,0.000022590491,0.00006772383,0.0000097429765,0.042866156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911433,0.00006268769,0.000098056444,0.0002749387,0.000021661332,0.0000036630481,0.0000071802356,0.0000022711697,0.00041506963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933648,0.0038640012,0.00031865307,0.0005251304,0.0012353152,0.00069203903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79556996,0.13274854,0.052226793,0.0055250777,0.008443676,0.0054859906],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110812755,0.00019063296,0.0003178801,0.0012991639,0.0016646952,0.0060888897,0.00057167956,0.0026878754,0.005078471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14470384,0.00026795527,0.00016891895,0.0009777839,0.0032959953,0.0050955424,0.0015125091,0.003116639,0.00044533302],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028520892,0.0014933663,0.52879447,0.00020917953,0.00059409766,0.001263159,0.07340291,0.0022474627,0.0023661228,0.29195765,0.015417137,0.079402454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007480584,0.0005510492,0.34231737,0.00025960876,0.0004974698,0.0010580588,0.14535338,0.012275483,0.002906937,0.46494788,0.028823083,0.00026150473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045833853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044209966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002408191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021732314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05860412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592756405","doi":"10.1111/iere.12280","title":"LEARNING MATTERS: REAPPRAISING OBJECT ALLOCATION RULES WHEN AGENTS STRATEGICALLY INVESTIGATE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Object (grammar); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Welfare; Microeconomics; Economics; Social Welfare; Inequality; Copying; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Macroeconomics; Mathematics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0843278077846868,"score_gpt":0.3867597532850771,"score_spread":0.3024319455003903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592756405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9074609,0.00018209383,0.060655966,0.0013683452,0.000026786807,0.00007674721,0.00003492529,0.000064080006,0.030130088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467057,0.000046026766,0.0044158315,0.00009087732,0.0000075589714,0.000020493675,0.000011938132,0.000007734848,0.00072890724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965402,0.0022207883,0.00013775735,0.00034568936,0.00037963543,0.00037589806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976274,0.015217214,0.0035021293,0.0029667842,0.0013006537,0.00073920895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074475547,0.00022250884,0.00036345195,0.0006132515,0.00063016504,0.003203494,0.000674788,0.0012969589,0.0034257062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036421653,0.0002272957,0.0002635369,0.0004810379,0.002301267,0.00330665,0.0011339438,0.0009289826,0.00038929403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017228158,0.0010090197,0.14021097,0.00044568893,0.00023848568,0.00073816924,0.010399118,0.0377481,0.021324184,0.4292514,0.00262001,0.35429195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001988039,0.00054903165,0.042399764,0.00011919984,0.0001495121,0.00027522203,0.0054049348,0.12498353,0.0105805015,0.8076951,0.0075666257,0.000077907025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000807552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087601255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074475547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008909905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092010933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039386928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593799161","doi":"10.1038/s41562-017-0061","title":"Wise deliberation sustains cooperation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Interdependence; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Scholarship; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.03613907212591424,"score_gpt":0.4007199954993215,"score_spread":0.3645809233734073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593799161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729584,0.0000733081,0.011846594,0.0005472076,0.000047225265,0.000031168096,0.000040161598,0.000083483756,0.014372446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997244,0.000018008901,0.0014844944,0.00006546993,0.000009764488,0.00002653276,0.000022099292,0.000019515208,0.0011101604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980478,0.0008759904,0.00011652567,0.00032295813,0.0003296497,0.00030705082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96269506,0.016772782,0.0051402883,0.012057701,0.0013026298,0.0020314304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034562587,0.0004555373,0.00058731093,0.000600601,0.0005612791,0.0014636257,0.00054636865,0.0013470831,0.006129386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026580079,0.00037323232,0.000391026,0.00039001505,0.0017019695,0.0013201915,0.002237112,0.0014312622,0.0009733643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010037739,0.0047123167,0.14534491,0.00127222,0.0013623959,0.0023065791,0.007783028,0.05507902,0.15098035,0.33815932,0.006944863,0.27601716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008238828,0.004936388,0.14411786,0.0001225488,0.00041107292,0.0016517557,0.0038887272,0.07056624,0.02741579,0.7323868,0.01352109,0.0001578772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025202543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003782207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006129386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003879111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010055696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020504832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596035555","doi":"10.1002/mde.2868","title":"Private information in futures markets: An experimental study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial and Decision Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Private information retrieval; Quality (philosophy); Inside information; Information quality; Economics; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Business; Actuarial science; Information system; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030772822366079297,"score_gpt":0.33716327785993216,"score_spread":0.30639045549385285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596035555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964226,0.00007657897,0.0011612349,0.00014426332,0.000028911392,0.0002835337,0.00005608389,0.000014058208,0.0018127823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915616,0.00018846664,0.0048543513,0.00022310707,0.00008252821,0.0008302697,0.00013831,0.00001910041,0.0021022446],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.995605,0.0021897585,0.0004726381,0.0006211888,0.00078588095,0.0003255962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9360752,0.051487703,0.004762614,0.005628818,0.0009988486,0.0010468812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007935175,0.0010613161,0.0010098058,0.00048276645,0.00092686375,0.0018252705,0.0010242444,0.0023413238,0.0071210642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034810487,0.0008877322,0.0005800961,0.00033919263,0.0021925787,0.0025602838,0.0012176678,0.0023972918,0.0004600135],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06905309,0.38583747,0.07732212,0.0027490035,0.0011524619,0.0028729578,0.046700783,0.008783584,0.22656035,0.03847909,0.0037468828,0.13674217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.040140122,0.4167979,0.20917636,0.00065956556,0.0015736582,0.004645299,0.012281752,0.06570181,0.13828725,0.083346546,0.02629017,0.0010996467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003928686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025402775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007935175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033511905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005349941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041965723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596442302","doi":"10.1257/mic.20170270","title":"Revealing Naïveté and Sophistication from Procrastination and Preproperation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Procrastination; Task (project management); Generalization; Preference; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Management; Sociology","score_opus":0.021216060173539115,"score_gpt":0.3176528180736882,"score_spread":0.2964367579001491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596442302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8837083,0.0002708795,0.080465555,0.001648143,0.000031379855,0.00009538583,0.0005349046,0.00012157083,0.033123765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274606,0.0000740409,0.0053249286,0.00018410957,0.00001881013,0.000028422905,0.000103277875,0.000018292601,0.0015019923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997013,0.0012802185,0.00024579628,0.00066594133,0.00061013864,0.00018482965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95426655,0.021717729,0.013412725,0.008444268,0.0012775713,0.000881101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042408863,0.0004952389,0.0006472289,0.0006684981,0.00049475697,0.002438711,0.0006352769,0.0012320663,0.0075291577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044733573,0.0005271575,0.00039906567,0.00062854943,0.0024681052,0.0031869444,0.001720914,0.0019775312,0.00048258307],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028613384,0.0008835866,0.36259776,0.0009480961,0.0005571864,0.001361574,0.006635507,0.018351404,0.017884055,0.37281013,0.0044179377,0.21069136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019715527,0.00080791453,0.25861096,0.00009957393,0.00021403555,0.0017329879,0.0020572538,0.06645414,0.008690884,0.6527536,0.008194515,0.00018686893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082042837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008540469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075291577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067802175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004960159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025187552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596779534","doi":"10.1057/grir.2012.5","title":"Competitive Insurance Markets and Adverse Selection in the Lab","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Economics; Context (archaeology); Lottery; Crowding out; Pooling; Actuarial science; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Risk neutral; Information asymmetry; Econometrics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Financial economics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.019826437660398186,"score_gpt":0.29986537152260684,"score_spread":0.2800389338622086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596779534","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0922927,0.81676567,0.007401686,0.046201114,0.0007833429,0.000024477926,0.000092195754,0.000034609067,0.036404237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71264476,0.2725589,0.0017821002,0.008257552,0.0015835378,0.00006711124,0.00007095989,0.000019672385,0.0030153163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963995,0.0026041213,0.0000964029,0.0002239392,0.00047724834,0.00019871841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796936,0.016850593,0.0014669519,0.0008097616,0.00082309416,0.00035591781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008408821,0.00041420592,0.00079980073,0.0013131979,0.0005086399,0.0027814792,0.0006641931,0.002334775,0.0030434204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015906503,0.00018062102,0.00038354984,0.001310008,0.004107245,0.0022472173,0.00087824825,0.0015249453,0.000245351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006903076,0.00032150417,0.0067985887,0.0014607055,0.00030573175,0.0001916904,0.0005258246,0.004719921,0.0013892642,0.64712095,0.02836463,0.30811083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026748754,0.0005524057,0.02866596,0.0025121255,0.00028382675,0.00036186422,0.0011330431,0.006108111,0.0014352357,0.83165514,0.12691914,0.00010562417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020971808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025051404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008408821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024050623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015938574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04447061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597989772","doi":"","title":"One Round versus Two Round Elections: An Experimental Study","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07250487254079804,"score_gpt":0.3509379556948731,"score_spread":0.2784330831540751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597989772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98809344,0.00013309988,0.0017579945,0.00021030448,0.00012325455,0.0012293062,0.00013249136,0.000018119137,0.008301902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98468834,0.00022018696,0.005223947,0.00029226448,0.00016988462,0.002408413,0.00019405078,0.000032435542,0.0067706485],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.991032,0.005856053,0.0005396331,0.0009242547,0.0010712702,0.0005767408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91431063,0.072582714,0.004355324,0.005520883,0.0016752803,0.0015552137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010066662,0.0006342092,0.0011217032,0.0004424329,0.002130649,0.0021308186,0.00127914,0.0017208444,0.020043662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044867612,0.00073308963,0.00052797614,0.0006788595,0.0018922717,0.0020005323,0.0013715174,0.0022825913,0.0016540603],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10448372,0.3308141,0.06268355,0.0055925716,0.0010505791,0.0031082083,0.091130875,0.012216215,0.086028315,0.0687121,0.009885438,0.2242944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05578548,0.47393453,0.17726351,0.00081788434,0.0013190489,0.0025171936,0.052142266,0.03410551,0.045818955,0.06361547,0.09145246,0.0012277161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009813794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011087005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020043662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062778755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009001482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06705278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598160996","doi":"10.1002/sej.1252","title":"Employee‐based Innovation in Organizations: <scp>O</scp> vercoming Strategic Risks from Opportunism and Governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Incentive; Corporate governance; Business; Value (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Industrial organization; Flexibility (engineering); Marketing; Salient; Economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.1609482334664625,"score_gpt":0.36909178053262276,"score_spread":0.20814354706616026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598160996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7519016,0.005280504,0.047721963,0.02721941,0.00016065809,0.000110812805,0.00011198012,0.00006227403,0.16743085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534106,0.000871523,0.0015262009,0.00028847627,0.000043948738,0.00002520824,0.000011528666,0.000003990292,0.0018881939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710244,0.0017060018,0.00006869374,0.00020893254,0.00040227428,0.000511723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98742086,0.008114318,0.0021087555,0.0005999982,0.0009117411,0.00084428326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035264737,0.00019313967,0.00026745806,0.0008956839,0.0013088563,0.0055423714,0.00067427853,0.0017611384,0.00524046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007225215,0.00015104077,0.00047912227,0.0010744802,0.0032869438,0.003478958,0.0017778947,0.0011910871,0.00026999865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011759424,0.00040256907,0.065825894,0.00053275184,0.000084747786,0.0005251933,0.006321034,0.029112406,0.00097095966,0.79507124,0.0064365547,0.09459912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051994677,0.00041925404,0.056232534,0.0010758041,0.00012371338,0.00036719197,0.026307473,0.074279964,0.002033637,0.77373296,0.06526408,0.00011140637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042332895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004699583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055423714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038452642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039930576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027899444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599125389","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000136","title":"Who is trustworthy? Predicting trustworthy intentions and behavior.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"University of Chicago","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Trait; Interpersonal communication; PsycINFO; Perception; Variety (cybernetics); Interpersonal relationship; Big Five personality traits; Foundation (evidence); Interpersonal perception; Social perception; Computer science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.08005236641999006,"score_gpt":0.4203434514096276,"score_spread":0.34029108498963756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599125389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99433917,0.00039334444,0.0014368923,0.00051663164,0.00001786622,0.000025541463,0.00010404852,0.0000056159283,0.0031608632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998492,0.00020847164,0.0008412274,0.000052631374,0.0000067629503,0.000013562694,0.00006150773,0.0000021001213,0.0003217247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862254,0.00075989193,0.00013868544,0.00012500757,0.0002649185,0.00008905518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96862733,0.017248414,0.0100033,0.0015024598,0.0011382623,0.0014801506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004524517,0.00025830424,0.00026225482,0.00073932594,0.0005459503,0.0015128065,0.00028575704,0.0007734365,0.0020044567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03971905,0.00025859452,0.00041027358,0.00047162842,0.00071361376,0.0013362786,0.00065518875,0.0010584067,0.00032324845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007455229,0.0001594078,0.9847815,0.000057865534,0.000115656316,0.00009197406,0.0020365047,0.0002158271,0.00015817408,0.00078034634,0.00024854913,0.011279736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012296077,0.0002508528,0.9831139,0.0001871117,0.00013759684,0.00035563618,0.0039682086,0.00550495,0.00035109583,0.0048295744,0.0012609635,0.00002788742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050888075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077085667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050888075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045553688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005788532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023928225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599726650","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2923625","title":"The","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02484747629102468,"score_gpt":0.35107093714722576,"score_spread":0.3262234608562011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599726650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025432338,0.00041046218,0.005831428,0.0056866053,0.0027150628,0.00016786801,0.0016175254,0.00070546346,0.9803223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015090576,0.00035333575,0.0020721916,0.0023192111,0.00033812167,0.00012813289,0.0012878764,0.00022018746,0.9781903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988225,0.00016537137,0.000043095453,0.00025996528,0.00053204445,0.00017706076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976646,0.00023896962,0.00008675218,0.00061572355,0.00095408707,0.00044000547],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011179189,0.000664133,0.00033624348,0.0016633928,0.0019433164,0.0052203266,0.0011363281,0.0020454535,0.47819927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004742669,0.00025335484,0.00044230552,0.0009976774,0.0010992184,0.0018697849,0.0031487814,0.0017147706,0.33495963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013244706,0.00011190002,0.0014753522,0.000120005876,0.00000963736,0.0002177791,0.0004969991,0.0001523099,0.003496044,0.101977125,0.64830136,0.24350902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009685678,0.000016966389,0.0006496672,0.000034079283,0.00000384221,0.00011021825,0.00019300658,0.00011913628,0.00086477114,0.0051992247,0.9927921,0.000007262482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032131425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004619211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52180076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013733506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033234842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605417500","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.082","title":"Properties of ladder tournaments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Tournament; Hierarchy; Ranking (information retrieval); Productivity; Rank (graph theory); Function (biology); Reflexivity; Hierarchical organization; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Process (computing); Econometrics; Externality; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Management; Sociology","score_opus":0.3520935372785382,"score_gpt":0.4814552831862474,"score_spread":0.1293617459077092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605417500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88901854,0.0002571557,0.07716264,0.00070318824,0.00007242392,0.00010703981,0.0007290558,0.00028776133,0.031662237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195015,0.0001152048,0.0044457708,0.000058334754,0.00004221971,0.00006202771,0.00044346353,0.00004753422,0.0028352274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981968,0.00070680847,0.0001295236,0.00026521194,0.00030654654,0.00039523307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697094,0.016791383,0.0055872644,0.0022001015,0.0017977892,0.003914073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032585026,0.00052171934,0.0012796614,0.002016239,0.0015457011,0.0051221517,0.0014026981,0.0014486477,0.013256785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028983556,0.00063460943,0.000866101,0.0019397663,0.0015997719,0.0032905592,0.0013884276,0.0014024095,0.0008448082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011715521,0.00050994795,0.024958408,0.000291338,0.00020628817,0.00043596403,0.0006658889,0.043539815,0.006144632,0.8840613,0.007710951,0.030303946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025328,0.00031428173,0.009262703,0.00006579844,0.000066702814,0.00050435564,0.00033489795,0.13703515,0.0008933841,0.8487583,0.0024598814,0.000051298302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000999596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009314775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013256785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010905494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009597812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04434836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605928872","doi":"10.2308/accr-52655","title":"Do Effort Differences between Bonus and Penalty Contracts Persist in Labor Markets?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Economics; Contract management; Business; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Labor contract; Labour economics; Incomplete contracts; Actuarial science; Labor relations; Incentive; Marketing","score_opus":0.0345518762116223,"score_gpt":0.33506952379374283,"score_spread":0.3005176475821205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605928872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87038106,0.06269823,0.005012077,0.0052735694,0.00013232444,0.00014084869,0.00025512383,0.000022797434,0.05608399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98865837,0.008941248,0.0007555186,0.0006389015,0.00008716361,0.00006868484,0.00008540504,0.000005730791,0.00075898506],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962535,0.0020181702,0.0001978188,0.00048959226,0.00080213865,0.00023873225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96464866,0.027216947,0.0060789827,0.0008075073,0.0009017321,0.00034617912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009697,0.00019421334,0.0006211033,0.00096857833,0.00042311527,0.0017178719,0.00086740224,0.0013993457,0.00722012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034189567,0.00027416882,0.00048369827,0.00112962,0.0024807977,0.0030105382,0.00056690135,0.00083826657,0.00031459],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003279027,0.0028090398,0.08824749,0.0060708136,0.0009531199,0.00028425653,0.0028315953,0.0046691457,0.0061425176,0.41159728,0.002518998,0.47059667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075705524,0.0018056587,0.70690566,0.002885521,0.0004976563,0.00039749313,0.0051204115,0.005159525,0.0025048894,0.24677522,0.027060794,0.00013007266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011636785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013692445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011498531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085325504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0512833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609158008","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000096","title":"The Goldilocks contract: The synergistic benefits of combining structure and autonomy for persistence, creativity, and cooperation.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"University of Virginia","keywords":"Autonomy; Creativity; Psychology; Dilemma; Goldilocks principle; PsycINFO; Social psychology; Incomplete contracts; Self-determination theory; Microeconomics; Knowledge management; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Incentive; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09751145963274113,"score_gpt":0.39596068388203576,"score_spread":0.29844922424929465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609158008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38297912,0.005127689,0.17084163,0.039152924,0.0004833605,0.00033882484,0.0004026846,0.0003162945,0.40035748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604549,0.0009447188,0.027423896,0.0016006861,0.00006269641,0.00016700971,0.000072511306,0.000033537344,0.009240158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978928,0.0009986967,0.00007749629,0.00028212037,0.000583452,0.00016549972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573505,0.0017971734,0.001239488,0.00043903769,0.00027391082,0.0005152468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031665792,0.00030641656,0.00015202766,0.0008742399,0.0016102369,0.0030793487,0.00071486854,0.0014084143,0.0066572763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008154768,0.00021754029,0.0005098913,0.0006952225,0.0073033273,0.0037650808,0.0033728355,0.0015322727,0.0005234054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008449584,0.000106762855,0.008866022,0.00014679067,0.000028803532,0.00017763977,0.0032237116,0.0013253177,0.0023219357,0.9294509,0.00382453,0.050443035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012416825,0.0003596777,0.043269627,0.00038748013,0.000103172206,0.0011983982,0.0037586123,0.010804609,0.003769345,0.8378585,0.09826928,0.00009722766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003295289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044685947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066572763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024330367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003216076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022270799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610560257","doi":"10.1016/j.dib.2017.04.049","title":"Buyer and seller data from pay what you want and name your own price laboratory markets","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data in Brief","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Society for the History of Medicine; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Price discrimination; Monopoly; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Business; Service (business); Marketing; Pricing strategies; Ask price; Advertising; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.1042601774706624,"score_gpt":0.37560050348692436,"score_spread":0.27134032601626196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610560257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89455813,0.00055492035,0.010918816,0.0011119865,0.0002198478,0.0024337475,0.037986957,0.0003357545,0.05187973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082266,0.0004854069,0.012209285,0.000875117,0.00015873396,0.0060197334,0.044504207,0.00018990866,0.027330972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966012,0.0012693498,0.00029939963,0.00045379606,0.0011997132,0.00017651997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595207,0.025009066,0.0043431586,0.0062454552,0.0035683457,0.0013132558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005279668,0.00044223873,0.0007691368,0.0008411795,0.0011107033,0.0012364573,0.0010324523,0.0017768154,0.02097808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019181246,0.00030548548,0.00047934474,0.0012735358,0.0012078161,0.0014545061,0.0011619399,0.0020189572,0.0055984478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.043570872,0.06640234,0.24819629,0.004477614,0.0011314976,0.0017450652,0.00974207,0.008559632,0.077599704,0.08477493,0.17813882,0.27566114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045995843,0.028926456,0.5669047,0.00041902243,0.00054952333,0.0022256183,0.004895896,0.015852824,0.07596518,0.033308726,0.26554853,0.0008039604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014050779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019219943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02097808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055265956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007016975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07017869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610867418","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2981506","title":"Rent Seeking: The Social Cost of Contestable Benefits","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social cost; Economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Business","score_opus":0.050079048721595416,"score_gpt":0.35762072474005363,"score_spread":0.3075416760184582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610867418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7344233,0.001903199,0.025120858,0.008126401,0.00012210579,0.00009120427,0.00044463424,0.00006139414,0.22970684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958774,0.0001863422,0.00075390143,0.00010588943,0.000046078567,0.000013233976,0.000021601656,0.000008976546,0.0029865946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983512,0.00072211074,0.00006111918,0.00016169147,0.0004204622,0.00028330306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98532146,0.010203538,0.001641669,0.0015211457,0.0005604773,0.0007517968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021862888,0.00037320243,0.00078744534,0.0007345529,0.00073169474,0.0036162485,0.0007692119,0.0026020107,0.021830603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017916523,0.00032927166,0.00045285514,0.00070519757,0.0029235778,0.0035545554,0.0013168148,0.0015997802,0.00052660704],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006346989,0.00037598965,0.012917105,0.00027468562,0.00014369079,0.0003966863,0.0006354848,0.0075223222,0.0041150283,0.936341,0.003514181,0.033129167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015428347,0.00027855186,0.028107388,0.000067787325,0.00015160917,0.00048482604,0.00093491003,0.020585665,0.00076523237,0.9416871,0.006725089,0.000057571517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015742277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024268331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021830603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014764674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000923914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07303059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611286339","doi":"10.4000/ei.126","title":"La neuroéconomie : essentielle, mais pour qui ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Économie et Institutions","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14857965534738718,"score_gpt":0.35284897024014655,"score_spread":0.20426931489275937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611286339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043257322,0.13006827,0.046821203,0.5888738,0.0036503724,0.000051565417,0.00038457822,0.00010789024,0.18678503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.743278,0.14440906,0.020945188,0.042887315,0.0066156127,0.00026114623,0.00023575412,0.00016579212,0.04120217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977794,0.0012968269,0.000068909394,0.00034607222,0.00035699693,0.00015188192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945639,0.0033567215,0.00036574714,0.0007128276,0.0006691126,0.00033162397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039954893,0.0004811014,0.00086417084,0.0013578545,0.0018360373,0.008436403,0.000994991,0.0030981973,0.009348411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075014373,0.00021657586,0.00048565434,0.0021440194,0.019909939,0.014088582,0.0027772605,0.0052173035,0.0010817245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025386295,0.000025071162,0.0012035912,0.00015856406,0.000022021191,0.00005899429,0.0020106905,0.00036003793,0.00024852116,0.9700023,0.0051086377,0.02077623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014812834,0.000038080852,0.0024094642,0.00046832726,0.000014519445,0.0001662485,0.0036055984,0.0006341591,0.00021780777,0.8341504,0.15824503,0.000035622325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072454778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007679646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009348411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036821316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034643337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031273603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612345134","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12543","title":"Why Are People Honest? Internal and External Motivations to Report Honestly","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; External validity; Incentive; Test (biology); Social psychology; Control (management); Corporate governance; Trait; Reliability (semiconductor); Predictive validity; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.0913931698259253,"score_gpt":0.4053406107685537,"score_spread":0.3139474409426284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612345134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99277663,0.00006052704,0.0026270999,0.0003164511,0.000020539803,0.00003431166,0.000037730948,0.000008246579,0.004118391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887556,0.000027109412,0.00078803406,0.00006505312,0.000010649448,0.000023205319,0.000018619787,0.0000035835255,0.00018821449],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896299,0.0068440824,0.00068909005,0.00056375656,0.001861189,0.00041202633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88921267,0.05036505,0.04593307,0.0070093456,0.005192105,0.002287752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012569132,0.000311564,0.00030039862,0.000904748,0.000827363,0.0024646206,0.00034971104,0.0007219143,0.0019618901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05373313,0.00025657628,0.00036243128,0.0003840908,0.002004242,0.0010152812,0.0011327405,0.0009724952,0.00026751088],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066568825,0.00044188832,0.9204288,0.00019112673,0.00033014073,0.00020568282,0.014920604,0.0005957288,0.0082193855,0.0071626306,0.0008191315,0.046019185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048726113,0.0005550681,0.96571255,0.00018230613,0.00014517758,0.0003840712,0.012316115,0.004701204,0.005499161,0.0073279957,0.0030111917,0.00011649558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005016178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079780986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012569132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004457418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004348802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06647271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613768839","doi":"10.7202/1039882ar","title":"Combiner les expériences de terrain et la modélisation structurelle : le cas de la réciprocité en milieu de travail","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.035856004016852606,"score_gpt":0.34244353656249704,"score_spread":0.3065875325456444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613768839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.733299,0.00087144243,0.22514324,0.0032703301,0.000113341725,0.00029653407,0.000586036,0.00010558919,0.03631443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98454154,0.00032539028,0.009625199,0.00008089785,0.000025128642,0.00018593673,0.00011285239,0.000019972358,0.005083191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756515,0.0015918808,0.00008917622,0.00031945403,0.0002285257,0.00020574935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98547447,0.011328459,0.0011891959,0.0011768336,0.00048343724,0.000347582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041705198,0.000686471,0.000874174,0.0006512744,0.0006222311,0.0032030009,0.0014376383,0.0014621343,0.0136778755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0190656,0.00041876416,0.0013428241,0.0009504239,0.0018598993,0.0028222345,0.0018951143,0.001646516,0.00074376416],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007918594,0.0004976563,0.07235306,0.00064635254,0.0005357946,0.00058085256,0.008965035,0.4286463,0.0018416472,0.4466367,0.0014892197,0.037015464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002448429,0.0007749448,0.035848226,0.0003361108,0.00036092312,0.00023042533,0.0053199017,0.66382825,0.0009861563,0.279154,0.012751069,0.0001650886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01251816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008790499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0136778755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016226843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013253822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045756996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614975672","doi":"10.7202/1039878ar","title":"Jeu du dictateur et jeu de la confiance : préférences distributives vs préférences dépendantes des croyances","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06285523111793039,"score_gpt":0.3620416791594131,"score_spread":0.2991864480414827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614975672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568709,0.0018038914,0.013702986,0.0007102737,0.000052283092,0.00005946691,0.000117659176,0.000019030436,0.026663436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878807,0.0009800511,0.0050198818,0.00029821254,0.000028749619,0.000074111005,0.00010177182,0.000021872516,0.0055946857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998075,0.00085835485,0.000083569175,0.00039994938,0.0004313256,0.0001518629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278176,0.0043860744,0.0010177258,0.0007904693,0.0006483214,0.00037570446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032109807,0.0005479034,0.0005892453,0.00049210753,0.0010383412,0.0025352621,0.0006279788,0.0010542475,0.008540276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01112825,0.00053091877,0.00064415415,0.0005056546,0.0026939488,0.002208828,0.0011342857,0.0014500432,0.00047628905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029495212,0.0012710751,0.43037298,0.0033492665,0.0015015539,0.0013018881,0.049842473,0.0071450747,0.0814043,0.20403272,0.0024629086,0.21436621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018701726,0.0019857446,0.8080835,0.0007243685,0.0007163015,0.0014976935,0.028410139,0.01086068,0.0151603045,0.09586098,0.036156666,0.00035665324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004112102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007450682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008540276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008161919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009468609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028570056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615113095","doi":"10.7202/1039879ar","title":"Le jeu de l’ultimatum, une méta-analyse de 30 années de recherches expérimentales","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.22198665454432143,"score_gpt":0.4095637276607131,"score_spread":0.18757707311639166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615113095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081550494,0.89004874,0.011293975,0.0016163366,0.0016102816,0.0010356547,0.004130041,0.000084774954,0.008629629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6108305,0.3498629,0.017410036,0.0032800518,0.0009905153,0.003856214,0.0048955497,0.00025251938,0.008621708],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.985344,0.009845618,0.0015250253,0.001601798,0.0014156828,0.00026794334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351813,0.05308381,0.0051806746,0.0031674944,0.0029747162,0.00041201414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022436952,0.0016372716,0.0035112614,0.0024446074,0.0009604522,0.003253855,0.001406572,0.0014734175,0.010099025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06407387,0.0010841896,0.013480427,0.003511592,0.0009801736,0.0022328768,0.0010514996,0.0025215994,0.0011301985],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0121903615,0.00070664583,0.053148214,0.24781625,0.4760853,0.0005134554,0.00305687,0.0027241833,0.0030619442,0.010847803,0.008225878,0.18162309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029578477,0.005493836,0.109826535,0.050599806,0.70261115,0.0005011613,0.0017202009,0.0014281776,0.0037413917,0.011526249,0.10932525,0.00026842364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007839386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016193464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022436952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002160768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043342668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11865932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620778605","doi":"10.7202/1039880ar","title":"Engagement et incitations : comportements économiques sous serment","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.18775730124193526,"score_gpt":0.40153639763331517,"score_spread":0.2137790963913799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620778605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81495863,0.0016933786,0.055207394,0.002400548,0.00026823537,0.0011252558,0.0007536915,0.00008505326,0.12350775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710839,0.00063321344,0.014644934,0.0004981386,0.000091994036,0.0018681881,0.00021662567,0.00005293555,0.010910147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98527783,0.009529692,0.0006419933,0.0019158246,0.0020974888,0.0005371139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735947,0.017047402,0.003983012,0.0033306063,0.0012811653,0.0007631159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080503505,0.0006663793,0.00070770807,0.000548679,0.0014360587,0.0038018874,0.0009610499,0.0013619161,0.021479445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03125159,0.00048271235,0.000723122,0.0010196262,0.004030747,0.0036753856,0.0030362513,0.002028358,0.0010966486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070866495,0.006622387,0.080049664,0.0048284526,0.00097483856,0.00056593714,0.04041988,0.0067582917,0.028954808,0.6313784,0.003632427,0.18872833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022492954,0.008507627,0.31627563,0.0013685452,0.0010942512,0.0005869761,0.025470154,0.011909881,0.02477134,0.48095983,0.12633829,0.00046817417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021696764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002365559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021479445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020636478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019090262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07185596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727254198","doi":"10.3389/fnins.2017.00417","title":"Commentary: Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Competition (biology); Psychology; Front (military); Neuroscience; Cognitive psychology; Biology; Physics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03935405740525623,"score_gpt":0.3176325895317234,"score_spread":0.2782785321264672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727254198","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001890284,0.00053689297,0.00005629673,0.9690197,0.028752306,0.000012933315,0.0002604279,0.000026975245,0.0011453235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031453886,0.00082878047,0.00014187033,0.93123144,0.058404554,0.0000694558,0.000097091004,0.000023217324,0.0060583404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977842,0.0006351168,0.00026295226,0.00045215143,0.0006340378,0.00023153465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836723,0.011083359,0.00068840163,0.00040584197,0.0029183836,0.0012315665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004663325,0.0013028751,0.0016530408,0.000995533,0.0028736633,0.0023580145,0.003082093,0.042178523,0.013078477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033369195,0.0006205243,0.0013211445,0.0007342786,0.0027752933,0.0023872615,0.0012236584,0.032583393,0.012671659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058964866,0.000018058025,0.00015488321,0.000030487527,0.000008483748,0.00018862981,0.000028899249,0.0000206395,0.00004805431,0.0006138189,0.99644583,0.002383371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004367636,0.00015413578,0.003453956,0.0005983624,0.00010505714,0.00136853,0.000460067,0.0009807346,0.0006524117,0.021869369,0.9697639,0.00015668597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073611275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009701007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042178523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037178986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003608551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043751895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2732688990","doi":"10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1250","title":"Magnitude of resource and reputational concern impact generosity and deception in children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Psychiatry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Deception; Reputation; Psychology; Social psychology; Revelation; Political science; Law; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02842430901265202,"score_gpt":0.3526106803967749,"score_spread":0.3241863713841229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2732688990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99944097,0.0000796788,0.00006489458,0.000033363987,0.0000023115133,0.0000065629397,0.000030565436,0.0000010637398,0.00034058327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994899,0.000059092,0.00017312804,0.00001005403,0.0000037480845,0.000011569911,0.000027202637,0.0000010432681,0.00022435693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986291,0.00055968424,0.000109625216,0.0001618457,0.00034615406,0.00019356654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98754054,0.0056043346,0.0051726764,0.00044189487,0.0004252139,0.0008153434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002223262,0.00032142305,0.000339759,0.00045555705,0.00038392242,0.0011421671,0.00029594186,0.00040017135,0.0063001984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013051491,0.00027334585,0.00035396797,0.00025899126,0.00074913766,0.00050021807,0.00078031205,0.0007557469,0.00023947307],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012311935,0.0006826608,0.9809662,0.0001122769,0.00007251784,0.00037778678,0.0015188835,0.00027286686,0.003664676,0.00046300294,0.00022855871,0.010409329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024490813,0.0009530992,0.9953929,0.000026310214,0.00004710425,0.0005842665,0.00072550325,0.00024439546,0.0013946804,0.00026306137,0.00033087994,0.000013410776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013005951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001859039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063001984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005293561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000372882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021076322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734677411","doi":"10.2308/jmar-52559","title":"The Impact of Superior-Subordinate Identity and <i>ex post</i> Discretionary Goal Adjustment on Subordinate Expectancy of Reward and Performance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Social connectedness; Social psychology; Psychology; Incentive; Identity (music); Ex-ante; Social identity theory; Microeconomics; Economics; Social group","score_opus":0.03328579427942409,"score_gpt":0.3947051688372395,"score_spread":0.3614193745578154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734677411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99530303,0.000014489575,0.00013116516,0.000085147134,0.0000038952444,0.000007775425,0.000036811703,0.0000042455986,0.004413453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930704,0.0000082224215,0.00007516616,0.000016743837,0.000002778845,0.000005581489,0.00002176043,0.0000015155566,0.0005611621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990845,0.0004196641,0.00005923354,0.00011688769,0.00017369357,0.00014610363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769588,0.009943286,0.008528909,0.0015222145,0.0006219786,0.0024248036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002418714,0.00015155785,0.00024478204,0.00024744135,0.00047564728,0.0016337088,0.00038562954,0.0003967777,0.012669584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013259488,0.00009502466,0.00015515492,0.00023358373,0.00056876533,0.00045712307,0.0008041974,0.0006960718,0.00057501055],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009973613,0.005414521,0.8710435,0.00019149882,0.00017950371,0.0004296805,0.0037081284,0.006611481,0.033261504,0.019342123,0.0023016126,0.047542818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010723412,0.0010416732,0.98811615,0.00002041108,0.000041040075,0.000042477346,0.0009813291,0.0034124446,0.0027348534,0.0025065022,0.00097458926,0.000021305143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037805662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032620805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012669584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012443631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062750914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04238403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735360125","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12513","title":"Vertical Pay Dispersion, Peer Observability, and Misreporting in a Participative Budgeting Setting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Observability; Dispersion (optics); Peer effects; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.140959576629921,"score_gpt":0.44369971773728206,"score_spread":0.302740141107361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735360125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99327856,0.000098860415,0.0036779528,0.00030626537,0.000010957947,0.000039080427,0.00002769418,0.000011024665,0.0025493884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902606,0.000018419592,0.0006446401,0.000034952347,0.000011300259,0.000015257408,0.000013662847,0.0000017119921,0.00023389116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96857285,0.02038474,0.0020267332,0.0026151624,0.004433371,0.0019671163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7616213,0.09632926,0.11255819,0.017443512,0.005478427,0.0065693837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031920362,0.000616015,0.00091975165,0.0013721609,0.0019410232,0.003775037,0.0012383874,0.0012757769,0.0035298716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07648809,0.00067231915,0.0004705884,0.0011244478,0.002554595,0.0020151476,0.0037311318,0.0017977366,0.00028051704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010139262,0.0013394061,0.94280356,0.000121228644,0.00039426432,0.0004897769,0.0063049453,0.008014734,0.0037440343,0.006361875,0.00042844462,0.028983822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020201474,0.0013452978,0.93051,0.000113638926,0.00016235716,0.0002952834,0.011953453,0.026826125,0.0026113037,0.02374991,0.002097275,0.00013341692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044629658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004716424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031920362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019451631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017401295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16881299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736923880","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12524","title":"Trader Participation in Disclosure: Implications of Interactions with Management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Ask price; Asset (computer security); Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Key (lock); Financial economics; Marketing; Actuarial science; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.1462461853548649,"score_gpt":0.4635537401775476,"score_spread":0.3173075548226827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736923880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98603535,0.00009873666,0.0009699971,0.00088239514,0.000016984735,0.00003789877,0.00003830074,0.000019418589,0.011900918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986273,0.00003275857,0.00044397183,0.00020044182,0.000013875761,0.000039570423,0.00002184286,0.000009286854,0.000610954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97838527,0.015447208,0.0008742759,0.0016596245,0.0023461746,0.0012873729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7610547,0.20663178,0.020572916,0.005337328,0.0027907838,0.0036125483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126837455,0.0002966945,0.0004328134,0.00053510786,0.0015246876,0.005438932,0.00076969474,0.001796681,0.009585914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112315625,0.00033806468,0.00037071336,0.0003516345,0.0020176587,0.003274369,0.0026145459,0.002241958,0.0006451458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049618785,0.0069131246,0.72658104,0.0007914764,0.00048504252,0.0013191381,0.11281638,0.0031321927,0.030157141,0.011311662,0.0023044373,0.099226445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029581666,0.0017006854,0.9186497,0.0002398012,0.00025491216,0.0005122555,0.046175312,0.0065380656,0.0052302154,0.014737778,0.005501832,0.00016363442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063332485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076690427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126837455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078486267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006210287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06707889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737403573","doi":"10.1515/ldr-2017-0015","title":"Profit, Persuasion, and Fidelity: Why People Follow the Rule of Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Reputation; Fidelity; Constitution; Politics; Law and economics; Perception; Political science; Profit (economics); Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07415873560090051,"score_gpt":0.3534028039489157,"score_spread":0.2792440683480152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737403573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6755081,0.10446692,0.01282923,0.052096553,0.00039608832,0.00008960042,0.00009672661,0.00004632102,0.15447047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833413,0.013012912,0.000580904,0.0015636482,0.00009856714,0.000019668096,0.000016727969,0.000006791086,0.0013595541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956441,0.0030711542,0.00017515739,0.00026374956,0.00063632516,0.0002095536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796893,0.016113762,0.002420998,0.0005935349,0.00094183395,0.00024061571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005336456,0.00012674369,0.0003477114,0.00088463665,0.0005753927,0.0024872122,0.00052643643,0.0016514929,0.0030170255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020681094,0.00016357088,0.0002445152,0.0009024243,0.0057062563,0.0029380457,0.0008431721,0.0014011814,0.00025194086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020859076,0.00026293588,0.04072314,0.0025603694,0.00023205979,0.0005835279,0.044377014,0.0012096827,0.0009848377,0.6404943,0.008451287,0.25991225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018351985,0.000428785,0.17494802,0.004787383,0.00023269854,0.0014018957,0.050985053,0.0033113323,0.0012123693,0.5624592,0.19992147,0.000128355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018536794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019257951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005336456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008573275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005419054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028222203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743093496","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.006","title":"Children’s collaboration induces fairness rather than generosity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Inequity aversion; Equity (law); Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Disadvantage; Social preferences; Population; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Inequality; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.051732718374205476,"score_gpt":0.355698193153383,"score_spread":0.30396547477917757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743093496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908828,0.00011611911,0.0012130687,0.00047191198,0.000016254084,0.000009894571,0.000042818825,0.000008360505,0.007238623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985114,0.000064656146,0.0006734705,0.00007716007,0.000008627374,0.000017068507,0.000022639717,0.0000065889612,0.0006185327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969735,0.0014190885,0.00012583325,0.0005977529,0.00052999146,0.00035379664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590179,0.022168998,0.009907675,0.006207481,0.0008673225,0.0018306805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00514035,0.000411917,0.00045577248,0.00046482607,0.00046212296,0.0022173326,0.00048887194,0.0012858014,0.0066653816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023692762,0.00037199951,0.00021624654,0.0004037328,0.002644046,0.0017238705,0.0017037984,0.0015905185,0.00029053233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011368794,0.008518992,0.33304164,0.0011668354,0.0008595687,0.0014079829,0.011005529,0.006072532,0.110947914,0.4307886,0.003677321,0.08114427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00259971,0.003192865,0.5974372,0.00029918697,0.00046647896,0.0011314169,0.006464439,0.0069106943,0.06412357,0.3050392,0.012166273,0.00016895571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096223823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012617254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066653816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010244469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010524984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027185082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749540892","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v9n9p147","title":"Human Resource Management and Nudging: An Experimental Analysis on Goal Settings in German Companies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; German; Human resource management; Control (management); Productivity; Business; Human resources; Marketing; Knowledge management; Economics; Computer science; Management; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.032381472992045766,"score_gpt":0.3585949447735156,"score_spread":0.32621347178146987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749540892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996332,0.00001210183,0.000082224426,0.000010625841,0.0000014496839,0.000036917598,0.000008838669,0.0000010818436,0.0002135597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989286,0.000034855904,0.00038685038,0.000029245408,0.000005248351,0.00012877642,0.00004664253,0.0000014658307,0.00043834574],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968303,0.0020464913,0.00014885311,0.00031932924,0.00030463494,0.00035030107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98564494,0.009856805,0.0020063212,0.001395196,0.00029344534,0.0008034075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004124503,0.000623815,0.0005119272,0.0005212774,0.0009100396,0.0014044209,0.0006326046,0.0009506557,0.002152361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009409434,0.00033904455,0.00034941226,0.00046396774,0.0019278746,0.00073122006,0.0009943187,0.0008370616,0.00021904719],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.045307647,0.32415822,0.28999206,0.0015081427,0.0010332842,0.0014204651,0.095488265,0.020695653,0.085988335,0.019928694,0.0024773786,0.11200182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075185606,0.14497848,0.7578597,0.00021326778,0.0007534,0.00023409483,0.031811852,0.020234723,0.020335237,0.0077930926,0.007856817,0.0004107677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00481831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049460656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00481831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018164271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008466387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021812737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751158865","doi":"10.4236/tel.2017.76106","title":"Endogenous versus Exogenous Fairness Indices in Repeated Ultimatum Games","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Construct (python library); Index (typography); Communication source; Inequity aversion; Social psychology; Stochastic game; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Inequality","score_opus":0.05115202394338729,"score_gpt":0.3162555644589265,"score_spread":0.2651035405155392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751158865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9121797,0.00014485001,0.078760415,0.00021330798,0.000027597564,0.00009875437,0.00005165944,0.00003746813,0.008486335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993331,0.000027144528,0.0061549516,0.00002033991,0.000010512391,0.000033425582,0.000011715805,0.00000451084,0.00040634265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945418,0.003428457,0.00021665725,0.000516546,0.0009214996,0.00037498548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644688,0.023711162,0.007215543,0.0028486645,0.0008066529,0.00094917766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010389006,0.00046751852,0.0005504435,0.00062987895,0.0006174207,0.0021421532,0.00096240966,0.00072673504,0.0019713487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042914737,0.0002496254,0.00040328273,0.000586842,0.0019372652,0.002323997,0.0011071918,0.0013656365,0.00018589065],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014968236,0.0019675114,0.12944603,0.0003084946,0.00038894394,0.0005198234,0.0034597018,0.1240858,0.013028768,0.6424009,0.00066701585,0.08223024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025769358,0.0009929744,0.08847616,0.00007082722,0.00016506203,0.00023756013,0.0010232494,0.44786224,0.006090885,0.45270893,0.0019335279,0.00018090644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010158858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001135462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010389006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012110982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058849656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054942966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753543235","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3022001","title":"Rejections, Incentives, and Employee Creativity: When Chocolate Is Better Than Cash","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Incentive; Cash; Intrinsic motivation; Differential effects; Psychology; Differential (mechanical device); Economics; Marketing; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Business; Macroeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02744310022059251,"score_gpt":0.33234658425745506,"score_spread":0.30490348403686257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753543235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98866886,0.00027915166,0.00029254172,0.0009702736,0.00004513308,0.000019374322,0.000027344173,0.0000067237215,0.00969071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989693,0.00004900126,0.00008978576,0.0001349418,0.00002696035,0.00000938684,0.000020249276,0.0000050401836,0.0006953265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975364,0.0012921019,0.00014384673,0.00021106565,0.000362048,0.00045437308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94666344,0.028539332,0.015527904,0.003025185,0.0010678692,0.0051763505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004876792,0.0004944722,0.00077582966,0.00086740765,0.001412692,0.006088792,0.0007309462,0.0036675746,0.013444461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037269317,0.0003408385,0.00056398055,0.0006142819,0.0022763577,0.0025052237,0.0023899658,0.002708021,0.00072389835],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.059054144,0.020645868,0.7445248,0.00067550474,0.0008221347,0.0010200158,0.0050865607,0.003951317,0.015277232,0.0417923,0.0034667724,0.10368347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032995543,0.0057430444,0.8753166,0.00027143708,0.000593299,0.0004439849,0.013055456,0.006443054,0.0026980408,0.08700276,0.0048403917,0.00029234646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010203613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012679308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013444461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007165581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008033189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044976175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753598526","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2032","title":"How Incidental Confidence Influences Self‐Interested Behaviors: A Double‐Edged Sword","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Altruism (biology); Self-confidence; Low Confidence; SWORD; Social psychology; Confidence interval; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10043095133927911,"score_gpt":0.4425084805309055,"score_spread":0.34207752919162643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753598526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907164,0.00068371376,0.0026838519,0.0005754645,0.00006311949,0.000035002235,0.000099083714,0.000027177613,0.0051161596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962664,0.00019561831,0.0018311692,0.00030590736,0.000029887075,0.00004844974,0.000052672956,0.00003410959,0.0012357364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970708,0.0012787138,0.00013122504,0.0007135392,0.00063408224,0.00017163975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668615,0.022344917,0.0030910878,0.0052736355,0.0009731188,0.0014557745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034232847,0.0004970391,0.0011692413,0.0004522596,0.0005504185,0.0019054898,0.0010413775,0.0014232296,0.010004919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018607102,0.0005602009,0.0007841363,0.00028842656,0.001605115,0.0014865149,0.0019824,0.0017948578,0.0005642204],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019682545,0.010922718,0.54009086,0.0022588316,0.0043298174,0.0017127593,0.009702586,0.004363993,0.1792981,0.0322738,0.00372591,0.19163814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041706345,0.0031651868,0.9479837,0.00027388308,0.0013555409,0.00048217372,0.0012384339,0.0076829703,0.015270866,0.018536068,0.00346169,0.00013238197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010261833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009199261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010004919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033530794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005720491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033469737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754300939","doi":"10.1007/s10683-017-9543-2","title":"Heterogeneous guilt sensitivities and incentive effects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Decision maker; Sensitivity (control systems); Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Population; Inequity aversion; Loss aversion; Microeconomics; Contrast (vision); Econometrics; Mathematics; Inequality; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02715569423082885,"score_gpt":0.328288534944218,"score_spread":0.30113284071338914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754300939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98925775,0.00007353354,0.0064684465,0.00027239256,0.0000070884266,0.00003427947,0.000050444196,0.0000112832095,0.0038247914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993175,0.000011155353,0.00053217815,0.000037106147,0.0000044082235,0.000009827717,0.00001014151,0.0000013430827,0.0000763996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916476,0.0053676195,0.0004298299,0.00094901776,0.0011027944,0.0005031273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8534969,0.11554391,0.016531374,0.010133741,0.0019693926,0.0023246792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011753553,0.0005127735,0.0009624147,0.0008863283,0.00064864114,0.001629955,0.00065214024,0.0012409732,0.0055488064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07894528,0.00043103943,0.00052277365,0.0004311853,0.0027897088,0.0020577093,0.0014456015,0.0015089859,0.00013158421],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008158697,0.0051485957,0.5485646,0.0006303864,0.0022208358,0.0012446882,0.0027212948,0.081733584,0.028542789,0.22849326,0.0019398112,0.090601504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000427448,0.0015260841,0.54891855,0.0000970027,0.00029831045,0.0008130361,0.0007909391,0.09005302,0.0067614196,0.34908134,0.0010814986,0.00015128772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053816667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005252185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011753553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000983954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031080274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06215948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765144685","doi":"10.1002/wmh3.246","title":"Understanding Repugnance: Implications for Public Policy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Medical & Health Policy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Payment; Economic shortage; Procurement; Public economics; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Marketing; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.4083653942265238,"score_gpt":0.5476687481358088,"score_spread":0.139303353909285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765144685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21509333,0.017016187,0.14573866,0.39438534,0.00076972536,0.00044927857,0.0010881784,0.0001228357,0.22533648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97632766,0.0057080835,0.0076491325,0.0074257446,0.00047217042,0.00028420892,0.00014555258,0.000026187434,0.0019612343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884375,0.007447492,0.00036567892,0.0014195262,0.0011864431,0.0011434236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8854314,0.09505199,0.01071283,0.0035810843,0.0034828107,0.0017398433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024797129,0.0010909905,0.0022180756,0.0030445317,0.0028082645,0.009609021,0.0027284578,0.007588368,0.01499348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07546447,0.00068928796,0.0009586302,0.003034785,0.018340606,0.018809306,0.003817106,0.007866206,0.000589932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009539356,0.00039718446,0.0067808195,0.00031000088,0.00007080089,0.00015506573,0.0021984568,0.007315718,0.00021373309,0.95993894,0.003812889,0.018711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021562375,0.000025526178,0.002501523,0.000105243445,0.00001144859,0.000019129533,0.0022518097,0.004968102,0.000087771645,0.9863419,0.0036475456,0.00001840357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006738862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043203314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024797129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007702339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062164324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1311413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765781722","doi":"10.1057/s41599-017-0019-y","title":"Hiring leaders: Inference and disagreement about the best person for the job","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Palgrave Communications","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Luck; Incentive; Focus (optics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Element (criminal law); Adverse selection; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.33719406423744147,"score_gpt":0.457854052522757,"score_spread":0.12065998828531554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765781722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92047143,0.00070549845,0.019613737,0.019571826,0.00010394587,0.00004001967,0.000076562035,0.000018854349,0.039398126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983487,0.000090033085,0.00077561167,0.00041113424,0.000029557741,0.00000934825,0.000012571506,0.0000043875666,0.0003187308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743901,0.019370556,0.00083652115,0.0016516303,0.0026807266,0.0010703637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8473349,0.12189166,0.017067773,0.0055132657,0.0054564364,0.0027358497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029515691,0.00021358105,0.0007024676,0.0010039599,0.0026719307,0.0047339913,0.001043994,0.003091305,0.0044356724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108659945,0.00035636997,0.0003432033,0.00073509174,0.0070639825,0.0031486826,0.0025233475,0.0033059209,0.00059850875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024063408,0.0012117659,0.21155894,0.00069381105,0.0005100917,0.0021914525,0.084586285,0.018619291,0.004485161,0.53371686,0.010690454,0.12932956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001803052,0.0003899773,0.08688625,0.00035374163,0.000106470085,0.00045696084,0.049397066,0.034380335,0.0018080309,0.81634635,0.009541774,0.00015268715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012577603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084935816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029515691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002234979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000998441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1560958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765818854","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2017.2846","title":"High-Powered Performance Pay and Crowding Out of Nonmonetary Motives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Crowding; Incentive; Crowding out; Empirical evidence; Work (physics); Economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Macroeconomics; Cognitive psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0381507439544348,"score_gpt":0.32788503765930144,"score_spread":0.28973429370486664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765818854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435043,0.0006245403,0.029325977,0.0012097791,0.00012576618,0.00048993976,0.00039962845,0.00009344152,0.024226522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300706,0.00006872128,0.0030654646,0.00025609214,0.00003514827,0.00028382306,0.000102789105,0.00002058711,0.0031603668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98351765,0.009004071,0.0010021895,0.0021113642,0.003425398,0.0009393264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8939491,0.0591148,0.022751499,0.01864312,0.0027817602,0.002759782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027147751,0.0005247421,0.0011374636,0.0010284818,0.0015386963,0.0022333963,0.00068663,0.001095222,0.0123510165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061932795,0.00047246992,0.00067068153,0.00068216375,0.0036563757,0.0013625687,0.0032916274,0.0013190454,0.000761303],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057044076,0.0049110274,0.66178733,0.0012670291,0.00084049103,0.00061505893,0.00840819,0.0054635084,0.014241962,0.10895383,0.006998694,0.18080841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029814144,0.0028046968,0.8822203,0.00031329604,0.00024178582,0.00040070256,0.002128245,0.006207917,0.0052993465,0.088765904,0.011185045,0.00013462172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009198981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011847679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027147751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088846975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010141699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14357275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765888400","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2016.10795abstract","title":"Social Categorization Improves Intergroup Helping: A Behavioral Field Experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Casual; Psychology; Social psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Field (mathematics); Perception; Diversity (politics); Clothing; Sociology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.04730244508750666,"score_gpt":0.36190927437805415,"score_spread":0.3146068292905475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765888400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99686265,0.000035310964,0.00056222535,0.00020186167,0.00008297995,0.0004000661,0.0000761013,0.00003933059,0.0017395368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828985,0.00011698818,0.0064119156,0.0008093328,0.0001159219,0.0024643955,0.0002477847,0.00004007586,0.006895171],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.998175,0.00065850076,0.00010930422,0.0005125234,0.00026745885,0.0002770596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290127,0.003021289,0.00083881203,0.0012999143,0.00034154142,0.0015970572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003032169,0.0013237208,0.0011113764,0.00064170465,0.0015971686,0.00096854934,0.0016629527,0.0023027128,0.008687518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068274722,0.0005914792,0.00046048823,0.00026914792,0.0015307122,0.0013034262,0.0012817718,0.003287305,0.0011240821],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048575457,0.66892755,0.009154885,0.0005505557,0.00023942569,0.0003269121,0.0053068763,0.001058837,0.20399599,0.002051703,0.0041398215,0.055671997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023462841,0.7392672,0.1060366,0.0002853872,0.0005342676,0.00054060534,0.0049610278,0.015237009,0.08594411,0.0117048705,0.011699084,0.00032720057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009085494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012726942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008687518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044857914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089810527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029062688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767849061","doi":"","title":"Charitable Dictators? Determinants of Giving to NGOs in Uganda","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment; Dictator; Dictator game; Donation; Civil servants; Sample (material); Chose; Social psychology; Civil servant; Gift giving; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Advertising; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Law; Conflict of interest","score_opus":0.06786416131160465,"score_gpt":0.31200840202215674,"score_spread":0.24414424071055207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767849061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99609464,0.0001629769,0.00016405195,0.0005078413,0.00000745333,0.000017727007,0.000031392712,0.0000024460155,0.0030114278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928373,0.000071730785,0.000042146,0.00002386603,0.0000026277419,0.000010939563,0.000009043849,0.0000014423218,0.00055447203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965025,0.002507506,0.00012213255,0.0001417245,0.00011945341,0.0006066154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97117394,0.016983919,0.0072965645,0.00066045165,0.00069784076,0.0031872592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003662934,0.00024056097,0.00041151076,0.00065627747,0.0016964677,0.0030069805,0.00051957223,0.0009882504,0.012160434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023347616,0.0003350108,0.0001793514,0.00076099904,0.0019249722,0.0010504193,0.001885655,0.0014814613,0.0009221165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009528738,0.0013208995,0.947715,0.00015099617,0.00011464594,0.00067424,0.013783891,0.0027585968,0.0003964333,0.008040828,0.002143325,0.021948328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019977862,0.0007915244,0.90916055,0.00031745012,0.00012561666,0.0003986217,0.062994115,0.008511077,0.00047600854,0.010507092,0.0064460463,0.00007215436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01096455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015735071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012160434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010893439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009084243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040680647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768932845","doi":"10.1108/ijotb-08-01-2005-b001","title":"Simulating the role of institutions on the use of common pool resources","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Common-pool resource; Consumption (sociology); Sustainability; Quality (philosophy); Population; Business; Class (philosophy); Public economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Ecology; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.049410134639455865,"score_gpt":0.3414673032480149,"score_spread":0.292057168608559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768932845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852866,0.0000523116,0.00841795,0.00020989295,0.000016892987,0.000042980435,0.00014299211,0.000037386053,0.0057928404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939346,0.000052913612,0.0048818,0.000031700863,0.0000026900004,0.000059204624,0.000063424435,0.000010024403,0.0009636212],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996189,0.00018830712,0.000017638647,0.00004991889,0.00004260108,0.00008256955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965289,0.0024039142,0.00032698608,0.00022514678,0.00021976793,0.00029519273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008980386,0.00038180113,0.00050643506,0.0006262383,0.0005913081,0.0011118487,0.001030483,0.0010020068,0.003373834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004971344,0.00034304778,0.00050907716,0.00067537767,0.0010293208,0.0011591027,0.0012110359,0.0008622104,0.00014299034],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028295995,0.00027839703,0.010778521,0.000037084996,0.000058766054,0.00009693247,0.00024923548,0.9673579,0.0011729904,0.016700549,0.00033425426,0.0026524907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008622726,0.00010630792,0.001623908,0.000007921148,0.000020930116,0.000010211854,0.0001413928,0.9909122,0.00046627643,0.0060370816,0.0005732932,0.000014207614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019867055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015743537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019867055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016520757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013817291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03950286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769768563","doi":"10.3982/te3074","title":"Multiplier effect and comparative statics in global games of regime change","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative statics; Multiplier (economics); Global game; Statics; Mathematical economics; Constant (computer programming); Economics; Work (physics); Publicity; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Physics; Keynesian economics; Classical mechanics; Political science; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.08388199138925673,"score_gpt":0.374949124869701,"score_spread":0.2910671334804443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769768563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2475966,0.004010771,0.48112097,0.0037431053,0.0002547565,0.00033393956,0.0006472161,0.00032348727,0.26196915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955693,0.002121269,0.031653345,0.00040906257,0.00021996358,0.00036992287,0.0001798313,0.000085190324,0.009268362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794453,0.0011343111,0.00007034257,0.00035686468,0.0002531387,0.00024078744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98612136,0.01067201,0.0014525825,0.0008702576,0.0004550924,0.00042869622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007186854,0.0012953554,0.0014207623,0.002864567,0.0011703478,0.00269819,0.0012464462,0.0017756223,0.02264999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022840854,0.0005191772,0.0019207827,0.0020829798,0.0035518457,0.00731994,0.0025401695,0.0020310266,0.00073812396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057834688,0.00002367242,0.00046558073,0.00012157804,0.000064122934,0.00006541459,0.00014159793,0.01871136,0.000734,0.9723231,0.00059086084,0.0067008785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034584646,0.00009101376,0.001060341,0.000048509617,0.00004050433,0.00013732906,0.00008518227,0.03126045,0.00043185565,0.96370107,0.00308661,0.00002265276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065254036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045971567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02264999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025240425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008804821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07577181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770449548","doi":"10.1086/697744","title":"Discrimination and Collaboration in Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Group (periodic table); Social network (sociolinguistics); Social group; Work (physics); Social psychology; Epistemology; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Communication; World Wide Web; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05229487880594976,"score_gpt":0.3843133056532166,"score_spread":0.33201842684726685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770449548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77516824,0.001654393,0.10394031,0.012032242,0.0001681994,0.00017170029,0.00009766324,0.00007440727,0.10669281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685234,0.00013306345,0.0019288535,0.00017656242,0.00002863622,0.00003210122,0.0000094177885,0.0000044586973,0.0008345936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848043,0.009855477,0.0004326253,0.0015934667,0.001878134,0.0014360821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94281906,0.035206746,0.010194202,0.0034005388,0.0017338935,0.0066455775],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013321369,0.00049040234,0.0009092721,0.0023108919,0.005526803,0.005567406,0.0014767036,0.0031928623,0.0064596566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050944444,0.00037938583,0.0007142928,0.0018783315,0.009072802,0.007213239,0.009613946,0.0031676227,0.00057061797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019374715,0.00029595874,0.019512294,0.0001528783,0.00007767478,0.00025526987,0.005114774,0.018450934,0.0013735135,0.9328169,0.0007217112,0.021034406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095563315,0.00016096464,0.0052738353,0.00006224457,0.000022194368,0.00021907919,0.0017191288,0.020220773,0.00030525101,0.96606576,0.0058095288,0.00004562509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022047772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013847676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036963231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024894266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07045096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773025963","doi":"10.1007/s12232-017-0286-3","title":"Psychology at work","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Quality of Life Research; Psychology; Work (physics); History of psychology; Legal psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Public health; Economics; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.10955931130882113,"score_gpt":0.4578174365350202,"score_spread":0.3482581252261991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773025963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061035324,0.04236498,0.0017108247,0.11039075,0.007912112,0.000058003934,0.00064054935,0.00014521804,0.830674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19968398,0.065327086,0.0016821534,0.041547995,0.008021623,0.00021738176,0.0011325746,0.00014557956,0.6822417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981046,0.000644676,0.000049311177,0.0003006341,0.0005343566,0.00036642424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373925,0.0011266806,0.00032275138,0.0006680228,0.0011176693,0.003025708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017354888,0.00047612155,0.0006941047,0.0013240725,0.0032454852,0.0069108903,0.00073291495,0.0028717797,0.14739871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060442667,0.00022883523,0.00032476356,0.0017925808,0.0034156602,0.004139476,0.0033591716,0.0038922986,0.060864188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004520193,0.0002516525,0.0045880512,0.00030048884,0.000019574405,0.00010400604,0.0016085957,0.00006115885,0.00026624274,0.14394465,0.62659377,0.22221664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008407231,0.000030399113,0.004755235,0.00044276935,0.000008921516,0.00015039477,0.001217575,0.000020024658,0.000042970434,0.03539667,0.9579196,0.000007138023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028539845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044561746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14739871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021335992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077391914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49309778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774387804","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3291646","title":"Free to Choose: Testing the Pure Motivation Effect of Autonomous Choice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024347013553367287,"score_gpt":0.3179443097670058,"score_spread":0.2935972962136385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774387804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98888016,0.000096624804,0.0018222299,0.00040366486,0.00010469046,0.000056416782,0.00020995911,0.000028264605,0.008398064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512947,0.000046727942,0.0009762671,0.0001582077,0.00007294254,0.00007773006,0.00012630125,0.000037015714,0.0033753677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695694,0.0016164244,0.00013001179,0.0006607545,0.00038757315,0.00024825413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8601636,0.11482878,0.0073572383,0.012442395,0.0013699732,0.0038380376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007466009,0.0008934069,0.001220414,0.0007044422,0.0007975153,0.0020704789,0.0017562363,0.0019060702,0.03058085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043976814,0.00050574524,0.00086046767,0.00046625859,0.0026793617,0.0032207218,0.0024917866,0.002518375,0.0017844058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.19059259,0.054732062,0.31257287,0.0022785983,0.0033262195,0.00089617557,0.005802187,0.018028248,0.028667435,0.21943247,0.0105170775,0.15315406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017744262,0.025666317,0.56371975,0.00015588982,0.0029307248,0.0006203575,0.0031381291,0.11078107,0.010025707,0.25590736,0.0088999085,0.00041046512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016049141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091112324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03058085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004792207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089317624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10230315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774391551","doi":"10.1561/102.00000080","title":"To Cheat or Not? Results from Behavioral Experiments on Self-monitoring in Vietnam","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Behavior and the Environment","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Self-monitoring; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11472675238720123,"score_gpt":0.3703077266632948,"score_spread":0.2555809742760936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774391551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99867153,0.00002941559,0.00025448058,0.00005694682,0.0000031271118,0.000025765872,0.000038234983,0.000002307158,0.00091829797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878913,0.000054703494,0.00038733621,0.00007107821,0.0000029445735,0.000045371424,0.000058634687,0.0000028452464,0.00058792566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834573,0.0011418696,0.00010915998,0.00018566046,0.00012731606,0.00009026528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977358,0.01566719,0.0037256535,0.0019406935,0.0006616837,0.0006467998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039765793,0.00022773063,0.00035203565,0.00019466032,0.0003529172,0.0005727398,0.0003398512,0.00040274797,0.0019974615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009242793,0.00016843372,0.0001821921,0.00020072819,0.00071770995,0.0004484654,0.00036584033,0.0005750495,0.00016442139],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009038857,0.02058322,0.73584175,0.0014874612,0.0009632271,0.0007772159,0.023544788,0.010074371,0.07269201,0.008405708,0.003093331,0.11349804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067892665,0.016548729,0.90391403,0.00018302606,0.00027654908,0.00043761032,0.010663993,0.031435523,0.0249845,0.006094452,0.0046672937,0.000115387964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031894164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027803418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039765793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040935745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002773376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021030426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774505863","doi":"10.1257/jel.20151363","title":"Group Selection: A Review Essay on <i>Does Altruism Exist?</i> by David Sloan Wilson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Economic Literature","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Group selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Positive economics; Mechanism (biology); Position (finance); Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0682307705871294,"score_gpt":0.424008813179347,"score_spread":0.3557780425922176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774505863","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005582871,0.99287885,0.000057093814,0.0054375175,0.0011041594,0.0000011696816,0.0000083138175,0.0000014947193,0.00045559395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010893624,0.99256104,0.00008348521,0.0030503217,0.0025975958,0.00000525885,0.000019537301,0.0000029467308,0.0005904212],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992822,0.00024769123,0.00007945225,0.00013441243,0.00021011643,0.000046111927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954982,0.0030622934,0.00034508624,0.00007000664,0.000839052,0.00018542635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022036007,0.0007683442,0.0016471439,0.0026964687,0.00064546097,0.0022228146,0.0009990109,0.0020750782,0.0031042546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058560926,0.0003825661,0.0006839288,0.00566592,0.0018331854,0.003013369,0.0010085064,0.003189786,0.0013853677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001204424,0.000055256678,0.0006915215,0.02547374,0.0002857716,0.00017712111,0.00055083365,0.00037834875,0.0006075126,0.028397633,0.45051455,0.4927472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001334039,0.000045867368,0.0013641727,0.011491409,0.00012701034,0.00038588114,0.00025756503,0.00004425934,0.0000825856,0.008624164,0.97753865,0.000025242152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024936467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029422936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031042546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012966001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033680447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0116539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777242311","doi":"10.1098/rsos.170543","title":"Radical framing effects in the ultimatum game: the impact of explicit culturally transmitted frames on economic decision-making","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Washington State University Vancouver; Washington State University","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Framing (construction); Framing effect; Currency; Economics; Vignette; Modal; Social psychology; Psychology; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Persuasion","score_opus":0.025983075281628694,"score_gpt":0.4016207497758293,"score_spread":0.3756376744942006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777242311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788815,0.00012095653,0.004693733,0.00017112827,0.000044393535,0.00007341558,0.000022679924,0.000016968863,0.015975181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958473,0.00005850153,0.0033743528,0.00009208736,0.000015577594,0.000052131825,0.000017316717,0.00001342806,0.0005293844],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993511,0.0044300104,0.00018193835,0.0006865667,0.00092968903,0.00026076532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736859,0.019421127,0.003590035,0.0019017074,0.00056720944,0.0008339983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074546747,0.00065792043,0.00041508896,0.0005144052,0.0007368059,0.0025575832,0.00063652993,0.0008529075,0.0051472387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0411852,0.000533703,0.00038510314,0.0002842693,0.0026051186,0.001624417,0.0020987212,0.0019758586,0.00027636232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015094026,0.0075609186,0.26692745,0.0019065163,0.0013263487,0.002141004,0.11518325,0.02397684,0.164616,0.1290147,0.0022256784,0.27002737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022723246,0.011632982,0.68199146,0.00064688106,0.0015725237,0.0012023085,0.022208225,0.06410949,0.028519187,0.16795182,0.017162707,0.0007301151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017298105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002119131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074546747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010089691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042217833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0394246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784963345","doi":"10.3998/ergo.2230","title":"Power by Association","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Toronto; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Extant taxon; Power (physics); Association (psychology); Disadvantaged; Bargaining power; Social psychology; Population; Social group; Group (periodic table); Convention; Disadvantage; Homogeneous; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.08212634909215655,"score_gpt":0.43269286503550974,"score_spread":0.3505665159433532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784963345","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11914265,0.0005911635,0.50437975,0.005459041,0.00030834918,0.0002546319,0.0002789797,0.00016690076,0.36941862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533468,0.00030315152,0.027435372,0.00037764895,0.000118530195,0.00021898666,0.00007903913,0.000072234245,0.018048238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962334,0.0015234266,0.0001082885,0.000917815,0.00073936715,0.00047762494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934457,0.002778537,0.0009963987,0.0015740057,0.00044138145,0.00076394284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038519532,0.0006950658,0.00092067104,0.0013243128,0.002214247,0.0044131293,0.001817022,0.0014462639,0.024857558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017878663,0.00039997988,0.001300592,0.0014985008,0.0064747497,0.0074132453,0.005635011,0.0031216862,0.002010633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016470336,0.000027316943,0.0012589046,0.00001347873,0.000010988584,0.00007316244,0.0003483334,0.002936816,0.00016565475,0.98755056,0.00069573754,0.0069026076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015490416,0.000035890218,0.0008465686,0.000016045879,0.000013955493,0.00016054581,0.00018809775,0.01414011,0.00014108952,0.9738564,0.010574088,0.000011840226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020549616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001756599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024857558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016390535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012727876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083156765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785108029","doi":"10.2308/jmar-52033","title":"Inequity Aversion, Incentives, and Personal Norms: The Effects on Budget Preparation and Use","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Honesty; Dishonesty; Business; Affect (linguistics); Norm (philosophy); Control (management); Microeconomics; Public economics; Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.05716292730313087,"score_gpt":0.4133291438304571,"score_spread":0.3561662165273262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785108029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973423,0.000023613075,0.0004460858,0.000053213796,0.0000035583496,0.000010087005,0.000012395957,0.0000038180215,0.002105003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992873,0.000011104132,0.00037596424,0.000022321576,0.0000029227867,0.000013078874,0.000010194944,0.0000023351583,0.00027465084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976152,0.0014859933,0.00010336068,0.00022159371,0.0003865249,0.00018732916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96974283,0.018898897,0.0060377032,0.0021652065,0.0008571593,0.0022982196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038274587,0.00030162517,0.00025763622,0.0004209051,0.00042918554,0.0011444162,0.00031660468,0.00037099337,0.003862916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018108612,0.00019218994,0.00019475944,0.00020403517,0.0012419369,0.00047889378,0.0008992579,0.00072336086,0.00014137752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0097925365,0.014441321,0.83316183,0.00026739624,0.00030757225,0.0004906598,0.005047582,0.007159271,0.05513708,0.01392887,0.0007513727,0.05951457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023171134,0.002318358,0.97087246,0.00003364794,0.00011209617,0.00014818952,0.0016274417,0.010092399,0.0085218195,0.004962882,0.0010255013,0.000053493266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019981614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026865185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003862916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077501574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005540061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020241737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786442470","doi":"10.1109/acii.2017.8273572","title":"How different identities affect cooperation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.06789708566343237,"score_gpt":0.3692748841354964,"score_spread":0.30137779847206403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786442470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98747605,0.0000636271,0.00088745827,0.0003811983,0.000011766372,0.0000084946305,0.000011202631,0.0000033352235,0.011156956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999603,0.000021549342,0.00011421757,0.000026778718,0.0000023472853,0.000003218014,0.0000048270213,9.2566444e-7,0.000223141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965745,0.002478097,0.00009692154,0.00021851005,0.00031954673,0.00031233652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920449,0.0038600562,0.0019129104,0.00046780994,0.0005928585,0.0011214528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033975197,0.00021208324,0.0002446682,0.0004375988,0.0011859394,0.0026666285,0.00024138717,0.0006123518,0.002850773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014348935,0.00011318299,0.00021353096,0.0002317505,0.0017503976,0.0011911897,0.0015080292,0.0006074251,0.00042789406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014448429,0.0008130668,0.78710324,0.00015650937,0.00036707273,0.0008135713,0.027546952,0.0059943954,0.011979345,0.074185126,0.002473522,0.087122336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112238784,0.0005528152,0.88525003,0.00006645186,0.00022437281,0.00056131656,0.03416681,0.012237116,0.0026061814,0.057028335,0.0070895,0.000104789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089638954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008287339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033975197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066390866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026813903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017968059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787295637","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2713840","title":"Performance Measurement and Pay Dispersion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dispersion (optics); Business; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.03467866594128467,"score_gpt":0.3086646041330596,"score_spread":0.2739859381917749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787295637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98105824,0.00047352116,0.0023902429,0.0009789539,0.00004002079,0.000018153736,0.000095994816,0.000028345477,0.014916548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989537,0.000023321349,0.00020799319,0.000023042614,0.00001902328,0.000005895931,0.00003204176,0.0000056916892,0.00072913425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948624,0.0022540125,0.0004546845,0.0006485417,0.0013282425,0.00045206738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91838694,0.05129074,0.0153288115,0.007399431,0.004724194,0.0028699616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007344686,0.00032701014,0.0006525105,0.0022327239,0.0013255046,0.00439026,0.00065427215,0.0015481927,0.005402747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0812236,0.00028963212,0.00026061025,0.0023479871,0.0017550888,0.0031174612,0.002205434,0.0016185597,0.00070622383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020395457,0.0017280236,0.81546944,0.000095530144,0.0002859501,0.00022680308,0.0057305084,0.0050313035,0.0022186348,0.07110883,0.0019716993,0.094093636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058455986,0.00047745343,0.8882943,0.00008337679,0.00007265258,0.00025902668,0.0035474661,0.010754225,0.0013200934,0.092765346,0.002292077,0.000075514894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019496415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011210173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007344686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013723491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064985425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038842916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789995809","doi":"10.17705/1jais.00412","title":"The Impact of Computerized Agents on Immediate Emotions, Overall Arousal and Bidding Behavior in Electronic Auctions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Arousal; Common value auction; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Advertising; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.04011161863484846,"score_gpt":0.35061258109736115,"score_spread":0.3105009624625127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789995809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99921393,0.000008532553,0.00026187376,0.000008499125,0.0000019643428,0.000006443259,0.000004812188,0.0000036282167,0.00049027434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993144,0.000009346733,0.00041099283,0.000016016786,0.0000033942592,0.000013735467,0.000013595138,0.0000029357896,0.00021560171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999226,0.00044324205,0.000053702945,0.00009253533,0.00012372197,0.000060801493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960467,0.0021497326,0.0008872469,0.00038898515,0.00016933968,0.00035806606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008126372,0.00026761417,0.00018856843,0.00015720345,0.00020828625,0.00091086415,0.0001616825,0.00023649067,0.0013316231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060504093,0.00015609633,0.00015837385,0.00009636413,0.00039176957,0.00037303023,0.00048761416,0.00039328545,0.00013858471],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013300646,0.010247299,0.5419403,0.00030379381,0.00055846426,0.0007366117,0.0054218187,0.008218172,0.32340637,0.0018751882,0.00062410644,0.09336737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019886687,0.0063974173,0.9631665,0.000014897814,0.00014676897,0.00039895414,0.0012304701,0.009301097,0.01710034,0.0011742291,0.00082160486,0.000048814243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032537937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041367047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013316231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015124516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013591109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004454732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790823250","doi":"10.1007/s10551-018-3822-5","title":"On the Unethical Use of Privileged Information in Strategic Decision-Making: The Effects of Peers’ Ethicality, Perceived Cohesion, and Team Performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Cohesion (chemistry); Business ethics; Business; Perception; Confidentiality; Group cohesiveness; Team effectiveness; Marketing; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Knowledge management; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.10255219649541338,"score_gpt":0.3632855051114101,"score_spread":0.26073330861599675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790823250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966928,0.000055028264,0.00012429261,0.0004522972,0.0000064208684,0.000008255881,0.0000062347663,0.0000010730982,0.0026536551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996867,0.000039984312,0.00007966366,0.000044573404,0.0000062945946,0.000006221498,0.000005354609,0.0000021234625,0.00012905852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853397,0.009963034,0.0007622407,0.00060807646,0.0022620757,0.0010649046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6517308,0.2663109,0.05419614,0.010197126,0.007544694,0.010020305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016174985,0.00030038028,0.00039354293,0.0010469665,0.0017295798,0.0032940456,0.00081178587,0.00210503,0.0043797493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12848845,0.0003895589,0.0006186792,0.00065449165,0.0053089405,0.002316163,0.0027205234,0.0040166005,0.0003084198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031010949,0.009850527,0.8836823,0.00018510914,0.0007152029,0.000849967,0.037395455,0.0045014652,0.0028033494,0.009077527,0.0009871508,0.04685084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028135555,0.0013475224,0.94305974,0.00017814187,0.0003898152,0.00036652345,0.029964523,0.008770328,0.00208602,0.012043312,0.0013902967,0.00012250053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048334887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007506626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016174985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016627484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024597088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0855425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792805401","doi":"10.3758/s13421-018-0804-x","title":"Reasoning from an incompatibility: False dilemma fallacies and content effects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Falsity; Fallacy; Counterexample; Psychology; Dilemma; Statement (logic); Semantic reasoner; Epistemology; Proposition; Content (measure theory); Deception; Cognitive psychology; Inference; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06499087598819243,"score_gpt":0.3430273998472735,"score_spread":0.27803652385908106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792805401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90097934,0.0007308926,0.02610121,0.0057268958,0.00032944177,0.000338357,0.0003443896,0.0002118314,0.0652376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849242,0.00025567212,0.010663811,0.0008032834,0.00030539947,0.0002292978,0.00023935082,0.0001710188,0.002407948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98821604,0.0055206874,0.00091598474,0.001401373,0.0035255419,0.00042045402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5461012,0.40143427,0.019218843,0.02323511,0.0067317034,0.0032788713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019404018,0.001288793,0.0012982764,0.0030608517,0.0012822016,0.0064919777,0.003121293,0.0059478683,0.029496234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37110943,0.0018911464,0.00093303417,0.0014248664,0.0056627374,0.023803724,0.0045523844,0.006727098,0.001576161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019366823,0.0140852025,0.094196744,0.0022660806,0.0009355113,0.0030948713,0.0143959755,0.013945156,0.035943307,0.5304165,0.011078561,0.26027533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023108963,0.0009381457,0.060126178,0.00028393528,0.00060458016,0.002464259,0.0016467891,0.032996863,0.007672108,0.8869968,0.0037629216,0.00019652025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005826625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003909505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029496234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014735205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014374487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10261953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792900280","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12400","title":"The Effect of Individual and Pooled Profit Sharing Plans on Honesty in Managerial Reporting","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Interdependence; Business; Profit sharing; Profit (economics); Unintended consequences; Marketing; Public relations; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Finance; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11884056044552432,"score_gpt":0.4320507136455278,"score_spread":0.31321015320000345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792900280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99617404,0.000044557855,0.0013611688,0.0002061372,0.000016524546,0.000047826215,0.000028713399,0.000020547488,0.002100552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864024,0.000013906901,0.0010317792,0.000046722005,0.000009400391,0.00004049836,0.000010957872,0.000004181275,0.00020222935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98519915,0.010197519,0.00096097594,0.0011885213,0.0016838709,0.0007699448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75694287,0.16580202,0.050412994,0.019125191,0.002856683,0.0048602945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01714835,0.0005459324,0.0006283644,0.0004341185,0.00096766156,0.002109964,0.0008498641,0.0011754888,0.004206684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08557428,0.000491746,0.00047798597,0.00026719886,0.0018707766,0.0015056961,0.0020575577,0.0016897571,0.0002642749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037210863,0.02033376,0.50582576,0.0012253725,0.001984794,0.0010180662,0.012584329,0.062902555,0.1274764,0.024504272,0.00257199,0.20236194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031018571,0.031842846,0.7727024,0.0003680667,0.0012725396,0.0003798009,0.009274736,0.09658885,0.039875496,0.04012762,0.0039649205,0.00050082995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012246013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001000502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01714835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011645656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012154875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090690196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796027921","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2017.11363symposium","title":"Origins of Social Similarity Within and Across Organizations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Friendship; Affect (linguistics); Similarity (geometry); Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04704211261067974,"score_gpt":0.38384957143261766,"score_spread":0.3368074588219379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796027921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94861037,0.00056507246,0.009646539,0.0016420068,0.000036464568,0.00004253673,0.00006345732,0.000040905576,0.039352734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869233,0.000060435083,0.00078810146,0.000031387623,0.000009056954,0.00000840718,0.000019646779,0.0000060314537,0.0003845406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965012,0.0014319572,0.00012922937,0.0008227118,0.00068174186,0.00043314195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917378,0.0025637313,0.002037771,0.0014453683,0.0009367862,0.001278613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002234104,0.00018476149,0.0004493656,0.0037212525,0.003290858,0.004348173,0.0007188168,0.0011540112,0.0032142056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012816097,0.00035316427,0.00036012128,0.0018200523,0.007357905,0.003464844,0.0046730563,0.0010025487,0.00031614472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002709703,0.00030982873,0.27928528,0.00024142262,0.00026440722,0.0010286714,0.1401367,0.0017006003,0.008405019,0.4333137,0.001753397,0.13329004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006944788,0.00032734463,0.5133294,0.00022230911,0.0001316451,0.0011739014,0.058633164,0.004704626,0.002607528,0.39515162,0.023516294,0.00013278481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028205786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021029036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004348173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001958353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009217564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014208913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796089226","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12393","title":"Subjectivity in Professionals' Incentive Systems: Differences between Promotion‐ and Performance‐Based Assessments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Incentive; Psychology; Subjectivity; Ex-ante; Public relations; Political science; Business; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.23357677743333766,"score_gpt":0.47766274945006676,"score_spread":0.2440859720167291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796089226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933077,0.00006012649,0.0014949763,0.000093027826,0.0000059581566,0.000019269444,0.000015729693,0.000008240311,0.0049949423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994093,0.000015081268,0.00034847576,0.00002149259,0.0000055017636,0.000008645813,0.000012505374,0.0000029264686,0.0001761462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98822963,0.007541952,0.0007321628,0.00089541246,0.0022318154,0.00036904274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85972714,0.10415121,0.019825421,0.008396093,0.0052429405,0.0026571807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018688487,0.00023641132,0.00033585518,0.0011425584,0.00049700023,0.003485986,0.00036534405,0.0007071823,0.0022607266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100355476,0.0002915251,0.0002760176,0.0005271188,0.0023298298,0.0014419723,0.0019735207,0.0008786316,0.0002297206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020814992,0.0010728311,0.8514003,0.0002517938,0.00031908072,0.0003199653,0.041734233,0.0034796621,0.026022792,0.014797,0.00029898717,0.058221713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058876813,0.0005350312,0.97672653,0.000061384264,0.000050833165,0.0001425786,0.0045088595,0.0038249898,0.0032152857,0.009920475,0.00089273334,0.0000625081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009869519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007444935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018688487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064296887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000629425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09883535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797144728","doi":"10.1007/s10683-018-9568-1","title":"Learning to alternate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Institute for New Economic Thinking; California Institute of Technology; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.03568905914505212,"score_gpt":0.3530074482789955,"score_spread":0.3173183891339434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797144728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57838625,0.00019154239,0.35160872,0.0028735609,0.00012839609,0.000168243,0.00020333074,0.00040047843,0.066039495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732389,0.000064882515,0.019526958,0.00040601727,0.0000288507,0.000092177695,0.00009301369,0.00002758067,0.006521512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890137,0.00052958756,0.000040893454,0.000272736,0.00015594292,0.00009949252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956774,0.0020032066,0.0006200818,0.0011255838,0.0002831129,0.00029066374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014574225,0.0004420836,0.00045767397,0.00028289692,0.00032320406,0.0009142455,0.00090583955,0.00082303194,0.008323025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012015651,0.00020977986,0.0004445619,0.0001923995,0.0010791251,0.0019764963,0.0012267967,0.0013364117,0.0010816457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070405257,0.0010328647,0.04205173,0.0002901879,0.00030030767,0.0005367619,0.0010484302,0.24171565,0.018622525,0.46730387,0.01026673,0.21612701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010702192,0.00037187585,0.0065312227,0.000029302286,0.000031542262,0.00034090213,0.0002293043,0.5981562,0.0029624829,0.3838301,0.0073638055,0.000046177945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075538905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064142834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008323025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051704375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034700753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027843237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798252998","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2017.2980","title":"Inferring Commitment from Rates of Organizational Transition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Dimension (graph theory); Perception; Moderation; Mediation; Point (geometry); Psychology; Social psychology; Regression discontinuity design; Econometrics; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.03844631796011418,"score_gpt":0.3426163978382688,"score_spread":0.30417007987815464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798252998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99055207,0.00007329829,0.0042402907,0.0001422774,0.000010167385,0.000044929926,0.00010831742,0.000014990137,0.0048137037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805546,0.000034199238,0.0015334003,0.000038584432,0.000003915893,0.000041322794,0.000078827026,0.0000069857488,0.00020724154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940169,0.0035361443,0.00039424316,0.0008833269,0.0009224227,0.0002469924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170942,0.058935456,0.014132994,0.0058667487,0.002382083,0.0015885272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009478189,0.00030972046,0.00032615362,0.0008629305,0.00041406837,0.0025123798,0.00043476748,0.00088061887,0.004627534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08485878,0.00037290706,0.00040842005,0.0007398577,0.0009941733,0.0024921978,0.0015477644,0.0015759473,0.00040256025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027503562,0.001341178,0.8655384,0.0004249119,0.00055314443,0.00010697076,0.0124375755,0.0075429785,0.009175958,0.01583105,0.0010459309,0.08325158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013962992,0.0011362312,0.95831734,0.00010509297,0.00020149631,0.000070931135,0.0044890824,0.011395085,0.0036124163,0.018838959,0.0015495784,0.00014424097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015176566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019961968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009478189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079181517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039963517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050126076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800720416","doi":"10.1007/s10683-018-9571-6","title":"Communication in bargaining games with unanimity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Unanimity; Bargaining power; Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Economics; Voting; Majority rule; Power (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.038161904863815585,"score_gpt":0.33670298376748387,"score_spread":0.29854107890366827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800720416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8577919,0.0003753862,0.10242815,0.0022008223,0.00009074622,0.00013179997,0.00011248447,0.000100064375,0.036768693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457246,0.00006733091,0.00368345,0.0000815739,0.00007547353,0.000070162,0.000020473955,0.000009212841,0.0014198987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853792,0.011168705,0.00042819223,0.00084607716,0.001415666,0.0007621146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86040974,0.11514977,0.015770808,0.004524977,0.0022731218,0.0018716011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009990288,0.0006769578,0.001071124,0.0011232508,0.0012537242,0.0027273449,0.0011458015,0.0019249959,0.00767065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06472389,0.00048765834,0.00047356417,0.0011482288,0.0031653922,0.0037610822,0.0014781049,0.0019181398,0.0007101694],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019719645,0.0010979107,0.010762107,0.00060288707,0.00022544405,0.0009889149,0.003458466,0.12665659,0.0074627167,0.7939224,0.0028102612,0.050040342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063414784,0.0007006459,0.0070453156,0.000093692695,0.000119593875,0.0003321102,0.0011970903,0.2556091,0.0023986415,0.72885406,0.0029232684,0.00009237411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005710462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035676293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009990288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014158578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082711433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052834332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800738283","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1194","title":"Optimal Distinctiveness in the Console Video Game Industry: An Exemplar-Based Model of Proto-Category Evolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Categorization; Salient; Conformity; Explanatory power; Product category; Video game; Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Marketing; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Product (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Communication; Mathematics","score_opus":0.052473113159376306,"score_gpt":0.3535937267825023,"score_spread":0.301120613623126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800738283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88741976,0.00018271446,0.095504805,0.00061573694,0.000015630876,0.000083279214,0.0000901507,0.0000535748,0.016034305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903902,0.000050510032,0.00841388,0.00003493796,0.000005559636,0.000028643497,0.000038074213,0.000007919829,0.0010303747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915564,0.00033849574,0.00002398378,0.00024198813,0.000108355765,0.00013151825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603856,0.001642087,0.0009437571,0.0004990328,0.0003426835,0.0005339497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002246889,0.0003557512,0.00050909293,0.0014571497,0.0006262306,0.001988796,0.0011703041,0.0011752223,0.0039164973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009084647,0.00027439528,0.000733763,0.00073327165,0.0020741937,0.002930575,0.0012570603,0.00087025424,0.00036154332],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043248315,0.0006578918,0.13968007,0.0002334495,0.000233616,0.0007628661,0.005247624,0.14177674,0.009183416,0.626548,0.0014108209,0.07383299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062514126,0.00032559226,0.05850785,0.00003144262,0.00006486872,0.0005259879,0.0013788817,0.5617852,0.00071751,0.37444738,0.002083993,0.000068744754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025187249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002307233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039164973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015442338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005313083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013101995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801655198","doi":"10.3917/pox.121.0029","title":"Philanthrocapitalism and crimes of the powerful","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politix","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03528795101151381,"score_gpt":0.34334409978575037,"score_spread":0.30805614877423654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801655198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17096971,0.005819324,0.0051371,0.039595462,0.00029102445,0.000034451496,0.000059111335,0.000024304352,0.77806956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718684,0.00086705555,0.00023555003,0.0010709838,0.00010536116,0.000016417223,0.000007538715,0.000011329651,0.025817392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777263,0.0009335358,0.000055999855,0.00022499285,0.00040729286,0.0006054928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981718,0.00072017475,0.00048460046,0.00024315476,0.00012942652,0.0002507518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012864255,0.00025950762,0.00023820011,0.00076683075,0.004608575,0.005424265,0.0007953103,0.002039246,0.007073839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033761775,0.00017261239,0.00024938892,0.00074797304,0.01914675,0.0038290953,0.0053197118,0.0037137452,0.00049831707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009285883,0.000008615683,0.0007066915,0.000021387177,0.0000029176335,0.00013327629,0.008831647,0.000071593575,0.00008564062,0.984303,0.0019699382,0.0038559735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022899076,0.00005659393,0.0063815988,0.00028919594,0.000015923459,0.00081025175,0.03160126,0.0004569615,0.00081145304,0.6088819,0.35063708,0.00003482095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002910747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039803186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007073839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025328093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001698416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023664355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802626151","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.117","title":"Peer pressure on the riverbank: Assessing catch-and-release anglers' willingness to sanction others' (bad) behavior","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations; Freshwater Fisheries Society of British Columbia","keywords":"Reputation; Context (archaeology); Peer pressure; Fishing; Wildlife; Social capital; Social psychology; Business; Marketing; Public relations; Fishery; Psychology; Ecology; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.022206303010103675,"score_gpt":0.29842047137089883,"score_spread":0.27621416836079515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802626151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993332,0.000007229644,0.000028211067,0.000009277868,0.0000017689534,0.00000458198,0.000016175967,0.0000010749566,0.0005984356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993932,0.000016392467,0.000121927085,0.000011272718,0.0000028155575,0.000014697251,0.000044503962,8.150113e-7,0.00039433196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940753,0.00022158869,0.00004644999,0.0001236615,0.00013853,0.00006217539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945093,0.001408644,0.0025511847,0.00028004733,0.0003331228,0.0009177728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009676389,0.00024026526,0.00025329567,0.00036000082,0.0005636461,0.0006381396,0.00024254112,0.0005746763,0.0024902804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005054828,0.00017005375,0.00016829805,0.00025498867,0.00035489872,0.0004702131,0.0005488058,0.00048438367,0.00025240323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038872435,0.0004482458,0.985794,0.000025991621,0.000099471436,0.0001251639,0.0013239366,0.00031301944,0.0050992044,0.00009650328,0.0001894182,0.006096288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005603676,0.00042016857,0.9978005,0.000004658628,0.000020056228,0.000039093284,0.0010517486,0.00030961822,0.00018266622,0.000019480047,0.00014155712,0.000004872846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005931182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019428344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005931182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025595957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026484948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011793315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805928222","doi":"10.15353/rea.v10i3.1448","title":"Games of Two Halves: Non-Experimental Evidence on Cooperation, Defection and the Prisoner’s Dilemma","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Analysis","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Prisoner's dilemma; Dilemma; Superrationality; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Game theory; Epistemology; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.04002254020086318,"score_gpt":0.39807422366115336,"score_spread":0.35805168346029015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805928222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9247754,0.0036649015,0.041351933,0.002767859,0.000093744464,0.00014880425,0.00014498629,0.000041359533,0.027011098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891985,0.0015203732,0.007224531,0.00032950548,0.0000332817,0.00013469669,0.000057834564,0.000011666563,0.0014895743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721575,0.0021223219,0.00009686457,0.0002301961,0.00022036427,0.00011439295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572173,0.035584226,0.004238989,0.0018816439,0.0005519268,0.0005258412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052787215,0.00066670455,0.00072224386,0.0005462463,0.0005561371,0.0017780936,0.0013416014,0.001127312,0.0031463695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023060199,0.00036588794,0.0004595047,0.0003620345,0.0037328352,0.0032471796,0.0011106557,0.0011762175,0.0002780845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013901072,0.0019172193,0.017517569,0.0015463978,0.0005505856,0.0005514927,0.0024919743,0.05092392,0.0051642247,0.8677556,0.0043217586,0.04586924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072040455,0.0013831021,0.01774768,0.0002608426,0.00016053763,0.000439198,0.0012017259,0.11103698,0.0020519579,0.85699815,0.007895694,0.00010373534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001088654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009505162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052787215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008559561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006045621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027916908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807661107","doi":"10.1521/soco.2018.36.3.324","title":"Strategic Actors' <i>In Situ</i> Impressions of Systematically Versus Unsystematically Variable Counterparts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Cognition","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Variable (mathematics); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.07655670084084924,"score_gpt":0.3692642013813975,"score_spread":0.2927075005405482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807661107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968646,0.000010858069,0.0003623629,0.000029921908,0.0000026477264,0.000004988321,0.000008430105,0.000004099686,0.0027121112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997042,0.0000076028628,0.00012295302,0.000007193998,0.0000013967656,0.0000026268551,0.000011551464,0.0000012191791,0.0001411832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911374,0.00043785185,0.00007422686,0.000113831054,0.00016288606,0.000097467615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486536,0.0019133644,0.0019025607,0.00047148415,0.000446845,0.0004003583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017133622,0.00020039601,0.00015252613,0.0005710005,0.0004327829,0.001532207,0.00017430718,0.0003649853,0.0020244247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077445838,0.0001720957,0.00019169122,0.00021022237,0.0010276835,0.0008994644,0.0009898306,0.00049895066,0.00016457228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023122402,0.00077177683,0.7958313,0.00024014493,0.00029937897,0.000723239,0.059856955,0.0019749613,0.090482384,0.008846503,0.00047131226,0.038189836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005245999,0.0010341656,0.94981927,0.00003301474,0.00009570522,0.00023795677,0.031531867,0.0025779617,0.009708618,0.0035707802,0.0012708753,0.00006739094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011169193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015709492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020244247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038265853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018629484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009061277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808538281","doi":"10.2308/jmar-52152","title":"I Know Something You Don't Know: The Effect of Relative Performance Information and Individual Performance Incentives on Knowledge Sharing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Knowledge sharing; Affect (linguistics); Productivity; Business; Knowledge management; Psychology; Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.055299687117598764,"score_gpt":0.3921728445227671,"score_spread":0.3368731574051683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808538281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922329,0.00012493358,0.0016835453,0.0004555015,0.000016262888,0.000046474597,0.000029324468,0.000020358098,0.0053907293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887985,0.000031801945,0.0007624443,0.000059695678,0.000008694798,0.000025604906,0.000007104911,0.0000029433133,0.00022180311],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331313,0.004586782,0.00036251536,0.000520487,0.00064243324,0.0005747103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8553345,0.1067711,0.025224376,0.006295297,0.0018671685,0.004507439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00825884,0.00036367343,0.00055689376,0.0005700301,0.00089507137,0.0018596345,0.0006301308,0.0011330567,0.0050062113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050958,0.00037716157,0.00031123002,0.00043463442,0.0014612902,0.0017997632,0.0016216602,0.0010222022,0.00035482616],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027929723,0.02728609,0.4940257,0.0019732146,0.0010296314,0.001094607,0.009905269,0.028616657,0.08163773,0.04611832,0.0025282318,0.27785486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002383108,0.014237506,0.81761,0.0005805952,0.0011267011,0.0007772105,0.007148773,0.058097895,0.031305827,0.056446724,0.009896279,0.00038932066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095013774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081925537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00825884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009767807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013192609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04367739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809264328","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2018.0180","title":"State-dependent risk-taking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Guelph","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Air Force","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Dual (grammatical number); State (computer science); Selection (genetic algorithm); Value (mathematics); Expected utility hypothesis; Embodied cognition; Computer science; Economics; Business; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.059866263924985993,"score_gpt":0.3327052119303333,"score_spread":0.2728389480053473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809264328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91148686,0.0002229758,0.051471803,0.0015974732,0.000037182625,0.000050092844,0.00013946484,0.000077335186,0.034916777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551827,0.00006930536,0.002464878,0.00005536424,0.0000068730124,0.00001319395,0.000028207283,0.000006608741,0.0018372948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988096,0.00047706324,0.00005555692,0.00032016812,0.00016761129,0.00016993479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964014,0.0013737433,0.0009038165,0.00063139445,0.0002463503,0.0004432322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020549088,0.0003490081,0.00031621434,0.00032367802,0.0004749256,0.0021971934,0.0005650554,0.00084220927,0.006807429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009664295,0.00025221656,0.0006443187,0.00021000521,0.0015505694,0.0018520595,0.0012616345,0.0011039706,0.0006370185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008626494,0.0006448991,0.2147883,0.00023353344,0.000430915,0.0010983046,0.007034414,0.056719497,0.020021463,0.57426584,0.0024121136,0.121488065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006671912,0.00059063354,0.1362679,0.000089383895,0.00027125762,0.0008584214,0.0022707076,0.15377855,0.0060256743,0.6936746,0.0059188497,0.00018721713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018272802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014349335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006807429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088318554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005717518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022773087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809594880","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucy056","title":"Bidding Frenzy: Speed of Competitor Reaction and Willingness to Pay in Auctions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Common value auction; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; Product (mathematics); Economics; Perception; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Auction theory; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17462786958134152,"score_gpt":0.49564941191366824,"score_spread":0.3210215423323267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809594880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99260944,0.00013098119,0.0019083195,0.00004435216,0.000007496549,0.000026135052,0.00001571234,0.000011351298,0.0052462304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983175,0.000058116435,0.0009785092,0.00003345641,0.000011939015,0.000020068015,0.000030403027,0.000013839162,0.00053630513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984548,0.0007696091,0.00012168035,0.00022621785,0.00034568232,0.000082094615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9488351,0.033706944,0.012076026,0.0026719838,0.0015279095,0.001182093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004066658,0.0003262933,0.00037732557,0.001029188,0.00027668235,0.0014774778,0.00034876182,0.00077429786,0.0037842458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034842312,0.00036967383,0.00043435115,0.00048477302,0.00079487433,0.0016942517,0.00057365734,0.0012016274,0.00039743545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006535254,0.0018096622,0.84910613,0.0002531855,0.0006696159,0.00047354857,0.0038505176,0.008348559,0.0543169,0.011948886,0.00060645666,0.062081326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010425155,0.0011035375,0.9807146,0.00002136963,0.00011250875,0.0004947592,0.00061928673,0.007085817,0.002722307,0.0059944927,0.00093243865,0.00009455539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008590516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071503856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004066658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005513902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020574083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021506786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883835757","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2018.07.004","title":"Added surplus and lost bargaining power in long-term contracting","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining power; Ultimatum game; Dictator; Microeconomics; Economics; Dictator game; Term (time); Power (physics); Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.04030333594300492,"score_gpt":0.3547251128670697,"score_spread":0.3144217769240648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883835757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9282667,0.0008523254,0.027981345,0.0019249792,0.00014243502,0.000031947227,0.000046662906,0.00004809376,0.040705528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938823,0.00011263706,0.0012634534,0.00007639845,0.00004802343,0.000013746797,0.000013505011,0.000013597997,0.004576449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979956,0.00086285785,0.00015101736,0.00022633257,0.00036680515,0.00039749246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96966404,0.023579843,0.0019608652,0.0024326686,0.0006734846,0.0016891074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009733447,0.0004060047,0.0010341638,0.0009123042,0.0014490383,0.0046931976,0.0015734207,0.0030916696,0.017815625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032729514,0.0006698278,0.0006714154,0.00078413566,0.0063158516,0.009376853,0.0025466452,0.0040028132,0.0006670706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013725674,0.0005511038,0.0034866857,0.0001714623,0.00008033825,0.0005496538,0.0019215032,0.0063859145,0.003524253,0.9612059,0.00075982104,0.019990765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017224281,0.00016861231,0.0029955904,0.000027948106,0.00005086751,0.00022797106,0.0009490645,0.010388132,0.000536154,0.983888,0.00056477136,0.00003054635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003426085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032157724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017815625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010458655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010030054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05959916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884420191","doi":"10.1037/xap0000181","title":"Disadvantaged but not dissatisfied: How agency ameliorates negative reactions to unequal pay.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"University of Chicago","keywords":"Generosity; Agency (philosophy); PsycINFO; Disadvantaged; Feeling; Social psychology; Psychology; Sense of agency; Applied psychology; Economics; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.06384866609648314,"score_gpt":0.4198941475439356,"score_spread":0.35604548144745246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884420191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939213,0.00022888444,0.0006364741,0.001140617,0.000051918236,0.000017301087,0.000011857886,0.0000066876087,0.0039849468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787736,0.00011784045,0.0005091465,0.00023168637,0.000017426479,0.00002369036,0.000008050222,0.0000032459554,0.0012115274],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991474,0.00058357744,0.000015778198,0.00005573686,0.000116264004,0.00008125651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982023,0.0010418402,0.00031054625,0.00014111369,0.00005410083,0.00024996628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020568557,0.00013548449,0.00014703894,0.00018413978,0.0008317239,0.0009269127,0.00028336796,0.0006031834,0.0050333138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008645457,0.000101937796,0.00019690995,0.00010498594,0.0011472366,0.0006242376,0.00076230115,0.0006258275,0.00028047452],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009245311,0.010478037,0.14059441,0.0006868599,0.00027987492,0.0012200586,0.046953913,0.00088650547,0.046863522,0.014651292,0.009551082,0.7185892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016083128,0.01841457,0.79954386,0.0005258306,0.00052655925,0.0017213244,0.08382162,0.005866867,0.017029513,0.031513736,0.039291188,0.00013661718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007753751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001199217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050333138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025773892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034351886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016838133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885400418","doi":"10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103739","title":"Prosocial Motivation and Incentives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Microeconomics; Public good; Public goods game; Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.0382263458726654,"score_gpt":0.3523679655261146,"score_spread":0.3141416196534492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885400418","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086081766,0.53952736,0.042939298,0.03690133,0.0019641947,0.00021301772,0.00025972942,0.00012389787,0.29198936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7219548,0.24482566,0.009807105,0.005968024,0.0016874829,0.0002886676,0.00013723764,0.00003313723,0.015297893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983175,0.00083952694,0.00007920639,0.00021127927,0.00037956718,0.00017296225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965192,0.0021702778,0.0005737897,0.00015180935,0.00033441305,0.0002505313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029443034,0.0004868806,0.00060634845,0.0010432354,0.00066966057,0.0022418385,0.0006509893,0.0019028019,0.003911716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005215566,0.00018564585,0.0003976088,0.0009226605,0.0035304285,0.0019885604,0.0013223572,0.0012904069,0.0003964153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005287425,0.00007667741,0.0019416931,0.0022560745,0.00010074942,0.0001984117,0.000668541,0.0016808249,0.0010700105,0.8339862,0.004932762,0.15303506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004634474,0.0002721936,0.011538124,0.0035877838,0.0001093861,0.0009377796,0.0009931563,0.0014245844,0.0010883788,0.6261624,0.35376516,0.00007466759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006128396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005952942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003911716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013062273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016990118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015571177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886825252","doi":"10.2308/jmar-52220","title":"The Importance of Task Complexity When Rewarding Nonfinancial Performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Incentive; Business; Finance; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.13754872247734465,"score_gpt":0.42748895485861915,"score_spread":0.28994023238127453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886825252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930188,0.00008092085,0.0030070674,0.000099849414,0.000019007732,0.00008652264,0.000026960615,0.000018023537,0.0036428084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962877,0.000040769846,0.0031413175,0.00003878924,0.00001966538,0.00007450522,0.00003110057,0.000007099604,0.00035899988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554574,0.002309869,0.00038138928,0.0003492075,0.0011360713,0.0002775849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9261005,0.047763485,0.015617812,0.004567612,0.0019131823,0.0040374263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005611585,0.0005465819,0.00052015076,0.0004899792,0.0004213499,0.0020020849,0.00052636646,0.0007857857,0.00327341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04425987,0.00029114183,0.00027952204,0.00032075695,0.00061380875,0.0012066523,0.0012663275,0.00093687937,0.00023397157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018946344,0.01522461,0.4932597,0.0014553637,0.0010296186,0.0005683806,0.003026451,0.036774587,0.20271815,0.013238252,0.001310089,0.21244852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045767197,0.0073390654,0.9494664,0.000119527125,0.00017580428,0.00018325473,0.00044871468,0.021737702,0.009966695,0.0083618,0.0016141548,0.00012927463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043116743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007374918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005611585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005195135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006662008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029677272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887147117","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000144","title":"How to give away your cake and eat it too: Relinquishing control prompts reciprocal generosity.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Generosity; Psychology; Abdication; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); PsycINFO; Reciprocal; Helping behavior; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.11953496524567454,"score_gpt":0.42231370144080443,"score_spread":0.3027787361951299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887147117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95354825,0.00073130976,0.005464975,0.002168789,0.00024716646,0.000064609565,0.00007351287,0.00013158498,0.037569843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99092484,0.00016653571,0.004732726,0.00050043094,0.000026000482,0.000060106,0.000045690573,0.00003197431,0.0035117194],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874926,0.00073262624,0.00004048864,0.0001886446,0.00016522131,0.00012369892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935842,0.0032864127,0.0014817903,0.00067727244,0.00016291319,0.00080755283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022860253,0.00024840125,0.00019264255,0.0002093393,0.0009877853,0.0011908914,0.00045573252,0.0012654231,0.008545628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020417774,0.00025237483,0.00018371834,0.00014182659,0.0013623066,0.0011146368,0.001989702,0.001592933,0.00087012496],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009791045,0.0028695758,0.0980901,0.0018845728,0.00024325095,0.006423461,0.06784147,0.0014394581,0.33666447,0.094207466,0.03017113,0.35037398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000894978,0.00562573,0.54000604,0.0018317194,0.000508144,0.009007342,0.058762338,0.01929292,0.074820586,0.15225323,0.13652682,0.00047017555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004966138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010767289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008545628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003203447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031881427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028587997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888809962","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x18000559","title":"Why do people think that others should earn this or that?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Distribution (mathematics); Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.17635695200837223,"score_gpt":0.3906516284171668,"score_spread":0.21429467640879454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888809962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040196002,0.0013449324,0.00015641056,0.9911097,0.00424766,0.000004628223,0.00003192189,0.000015019016,0.0026878684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009545738,0.0014033628,0.0002168673,0.9718416,0.012718453,0.000023395301,0.000029520696,0.000012719174,0.0042083603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980319,0.0009770946,0.00012875987,0.00025798497,0.00042978246,0.00017449277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890605,0.007386937,0.0008054439,0.0006269451,0.0012093888,0.00091083016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003431291,0.00042027782,0.0008921335,0.00046460304,0.002393315,0.0018565473,0.0011643043,0.024460604,0.0116224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026907833,0.00035808602,0.00052525254,0.0003774914,0.0045438334,0.003794602,0.0010390808,0.029172903,0.01182573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007907976,0.000031618467,0.0012311329,0.00004626321,0.000018669902,0.0010788665,0.00036566966,0.00002595532,0.00013465487,0.011763518,0.9645836,0.020641029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018674386,0.00008234965,0.0032749416,0.0003342561,0.000027034686,0.004932168,0.0012268734,0.00046138468,0.00034278404,0.0782046,0.9108603,0.00006653681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028850096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00443176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024460604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025092473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001456124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038880825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889807906","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1808241115","title":"Endogenous rewards promote cooperation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Social dilemma; Punishment (psychology); Dilemma; Mechanism (biology); Public good; Public economics; Public goods game; Field (mathematics); Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11258287601517507,"score_gpt":0.3726723035238484,"score_spread":0.2600894275086733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889807906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5851661,0.0013218252,0.29668745,0.004981304,0.00029850708,0.0003108407,0.00023978845,0.0007268891,0.110267274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98388636,0.00024289929,0.010684925,0.00028578175,0.00004254123,0.00011147338,0.000022651468,0.000026231895,0.004697072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979582,0.0010960577,0.0000653112,0.00023700722,0.00035961467,0.0002838188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837552,0.00949117,0.0028721145,0.001861036,0.0009429275,0.0010776877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034495362,0.00051066786,0.00048206173,0.00068283436,0.0007959988,0.0016540815,0.0006365933,0.0011621802,0.0088838665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01765302,0.0002851999,0.00053777156,0.00039064258,0.0018904787,0.0017264812,0.0026251401,0.0013031196,0.00095512834],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047097137,0.0005028245,0.007998007,0.00049785303,0.0001046934,0.0003403813,0.0009830913,0.049921628,0.013251105,0.8348845,0.004636809,0.08640817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037487358,0.0005921683,0.012910187,0.00016087617,0.00011624145,0.00051993656,0.0005225789,0.1193846,0.006597335,0.83575374,0.022999765,0.00006766958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059147243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005927306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0088838665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012693657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013515204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029719472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890290588","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.aat2201","title":"The origins of human prosociality: Cultural group selection in the workplace and the laboratory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Advances","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institut Universitaire de France; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Group (periodic table); Competition (biology); Group selection; Psychology; Social psychology; Biology; Ecology; Chemistry; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023516384765304786,"score_gpt":0.3826331499350014,"score_spread":0.35911676516969665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890290588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931097,0.00046129033,0.0010910747,0.00076607923,0.000016854698,0.00001048652,0.000016064501,0.0000068436384,0.0045215404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989503,0.00011089897,0.0005403088,0.00013879607,0.000011909035,0.000012890042,0.000008386574,0.0000031490413,0.00022338759],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733764,0.0019337173,0.000045663874,0.00027011367,0.0002754635,0.00013736519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918281,0.00396301,0.0015022465,0.0012861637,0.0003110755,0.0011093918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028939326,0.00020580852,0.00031240282,0.0006821943,0.0009983791,0.0016361387,0.0005205066,0.00073176174,0.002559036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009427072,0.0002175795,0.00015733782,0.00029103496,0.004429589,0.001048641,0.0015539563,0.00073677354,0.00026132833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030855387,0.005701787,0.68685144,0.00033891678,0.00030200253,0.0017264484,0.019661643,0.0011010917,0.07135117,0.052696664,0.0020501828,0.15513316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021694497,0.002886716,0.9127487,0.0002243284,0.000118712436,0.0012467211,0.01524666,0.003102713,0.007262115,0.050666213,0.006156243,0.00012400896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00136837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019583874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028939326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005731597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005056498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015304804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890546253","doi":"10.1007/s10551-018-4016-x","title":"Correction to: Winning at a Losing Game? Side-Effects of Perceived Tournament Promotion Incentives in Audit Firms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality of Life Research; Tournament; Business ethics; Audit; Incentive; Promotion (chess); Business; Accounting; Economics; Microeconomics; Management; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.07229746766661935,"score_gpt":0.366615277209282,"score_spread":0.2943178095426626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890546253","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008943958,0.00053765636,0.00048224424,0.16742654,0.8223661,0.00004785765,0.004735563,0.00044094067,0.0030686317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11159922,0.005010694,0.004953026,0.20536552,0.36529148,0.0007163209,0.0061830957,0.0016518882,0.29922882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947161,0.0007319967,0.0011688977,0.00082053186,0.0017885541,0.00077384635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9162214,0.029042669,0.0053506615,0.0072746603,0.03782175,0.004288795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042109885,0.001743251,0.0030420187,0.003040401,0.0043924027,0.0045330944,0.004170365,0.014130767,0.08340382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11419053,0.001397649,0.0012191696,0.0039085806,0.0030208086,0.0025344822,0.0022344508,0.01474158,0.0351225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061855004,0.000009633084,0.00029441825,0.000107195774,0.00001527938,0.00022837833,0.000052483145,0.000056025205,0.000029054489,0.0006008177,0.9961216,0.002423379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032375014,0.000055299875,0.011151488,0.0008175283,0.0001020268,0.0010763375,0.00083137234,0.0015873959,0.0006798804,0.0054605054,0.9776899,0.00022448199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03369975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039546765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08340382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005471692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007965405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27901357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891217991","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2019.01.003","title":"Failure of the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak mechanism in inexperienced subjects: New tests of the game form misconception hypothesis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Victoria; Camosun College","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Replicate; Robustness (evolution); Economics; Psychology; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021455679383494127,"score_gpt":0.2746513200103579,"score_spread":0.2531956406268638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891217991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960498,0.00003332707,0.0014287605,0.00022242163,0.000012931277,0.0000191031,0.000054062682,0.000012550504,0.002167069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777883,0.000032004013,0.0007259344,0.00011516826,0.000019786137,0.000035486588,0.000067733956,0.000010511075,0.0012144858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979449,0.00088537287,0.00020911405,0.00038215055,0.0003838545,0.00019449348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91244274,0.06419462,0.0073390068,0.012308575,0.0013005866,0.002414419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011722107,0.00062694424,0.0010653178,0.0007380254,0.0006371979,0.0018132488,0.0014155403,0.0017620667,0.015176436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040984295,0.00035158652,0.00035607247,0.0004269162,0.0023214775,0.0023033558,0.0013937929,0.0017031918,0.0011390847],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022131711,0.014305969,0.6295795,0.00088728766,0.000737725,0.0049371496,0.021867923,0.008256466,0.0470505,0.10376149,0.0054425183,0.14104183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029534146,0.0073118727,0.72469753,0.00012315073,0.0003016723,0.0033887115,0.0058888406,0.06286084,0.012710408,0.17592692,0.0035484363,0.00028824204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009845523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015176436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026125557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065260567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061993122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892100986","doi":"10.1177/0010414018797951","title":"In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Punishment (psychology); Language change; Identity (music); Collective identity; Politics; Social psychology; Group (periodic table); Political science; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1677207942721255,"score_gpt":0.468715102555527,"score_spread":0.3009943082834015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892100986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529311,0.00022373331,0.0033281865,0.0014103048,0.0000319797,0.000022696193,0.00002643303,0.000011916596,0.0420135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998723,0.000045718363,0.00015684537,0.0001468005,0.000011475944,0.0000049027017,0.000008737976,0.000002436661,0.0009001119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665326,0.0020272157,0.0001344733,0.00021446496,0.0004206866,0.00054989755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622038,0.011574911,0.018435167,0.0027579719,0.0020336222,0.0029946323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032514837,0.00020464638,0.0004132141,0.00063812407,0.0014863774,0.0020439385,0.0003553629,0.0008838418,0.007272865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016420383,0.0001368555,0.0002213786,0.00044332497,0.0025127241,0.00090166926,0.0013828363,0.0012279863,0.0005006505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011453986,0.004862383,0.7429142,0.00036793522,0.0005473855,0.0005146951,0.0051456527,0.003932207,0.004907371,0.13113564,0.0032225093,0.10130457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001684485,0.0016042433,0.8796539,0.00014403628,0.00019742384,0.00079395284,0.0061780093,0.009167719,0.0035295407,0.08806425,0.010415712,0.000082724124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013808196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020660383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007272865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010549161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007750412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024330199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893694560","doi":"10.33137/ijidi.v2i3.32189","title":"On the Privilege of Being a Diversity Scholar and How We Choose to Use It","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Privilege (computing); Sociology; Media studies; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04009145653487132,"score_gpt":0.29836185294807865,"score_spread":0.2582703964132073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893694560","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015511122,0.012717041,0.0025887445,0.6493733,0.31113985,0.00003864858,0.000049412356,0.00013763523,0.022404239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050776735,0.025398204,0.008503875,0.48963717,0.37666732,0.0001646673,0.00012235646,0.0008072774,0.04792231],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95868456,0.016889831,0.0030963405,0.0025099274,0.01611598,0.0027034052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7835877,0.09098279,0.013509978,0.009499829,0.059740853,0.04267882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03734603,0.000725771,0.0016333946,0.0029430029,0.013722914,0.04668254,0.0021152322,0.009307898,0.012875203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22845238,0.0006075937,0.000686956,0.0024589216,0.014956342,0.027338091,0.009686207,0.023415321,0.009041612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049107355,0.00003819196,0.0008544935,0.0003321311,0.000032981603,0.00030829993,0.006287864,0.000044901757,0.0002981949,0.033763308,0.9034751,0.0545154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016060492,0.000023777737,0.0003495323,0.00071149226,0.000021727916,0.00031119012,0.006237591,0.000077231714,0.0001532565,0.025704755,0.96633166,0.00006182109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014495268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036587946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04668254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00266059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009900723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894141130","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12461","title":"The Effects of Biasing Performance Measurement Systems on Incentives and Retention Decisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Unobservable; Principal (computer security); Moral hazard; Microeconomics; Economics; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.2164733104195043,"score_gpt":0.41150803340093717,"score_spread":0.19503472298143287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894141130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451645,0.00047227717,0.038619287,0.0032592001,0.00009233206,0.00028315082,0.00010553245,0.00012236445,0.011881468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569255,0.000075869015,0.0035009754,0.0001679719,0.00003195498,0.00004568308,0.00001045891,0.0000059636855,0.00046875756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94872624,0.039695296,0.0022679574,0.0028498843,0.003526897,0.0029337306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59405106,0.28186336,0.088305995,0.020621754,0.009223917,0.0059339018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060535215,0.0009857734,0.0014092764,0.0010154978,0.0018933141,0.005321223,0.0016377643,0.0035770156,0.005758084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19415182,0.0009248322,0.00074019947,0.0009742935,0.0050599286,0.004000428,0.003899704,0.0037794742,0.00064532785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016333915,0.007625568,0.28636035,0.0011442173,0.0013285171,0.00096763927,0.004562149,0.14567272,0.032654252,0.31507137,0.0037161985,0.18456306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004241274,0.011731566,0.18611148,0.0004167666,0.0013213048,0.00050031644,0.0030326273,0.3436221,0.03376412,0.40731016,0.00722645,0.0007217875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002215231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014896585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060535215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037860922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025927569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3201446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894905940","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3192160","title":"CLIMATE GAMES: WHO’S ON FIRST? WHAT’S ON SECOND?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Sequential game; Differential game; Extensive-form game; Repeated game; Screening game; Outcome (game theory); Non-cooperative game; Simultaneous game; Mathematical economics; Damages; Economics; Microeconomics; Game theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Political science","score_opus":0.02762484971438473,"score_gpt":0.32863640208671635,"score_spread":0.3010115523723316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894905940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6584631,0.00335385,0.11103186,0.041668598,0.0011546157,0.00032579206,0.0002750756,0.00012011813,0.18360701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823455,0.0011727979,0.009189016,0.0014773727,0.0001879548,0.000093396164,0.00004326994,0.000028856422,0.005461788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981287,0.0010503551,0.000035046294,0.00019430941,0.00022913504,0.00036232258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934495,0.0043683974,0.0007575144,0.00031555258,0.00038709425,0.00072196923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017313475,0.0008922763,0.0008933047,0.0004447607,0.0016885205,0.0040219356,0.0012358968,0.0025267224,0.006844941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011158937,0.00024586968,0.0009114328,0.00057622197,0.0037374594,0.0062312293,0.0020005638,0.0026579215,0.0005104192],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060508214,0.0006363585,0.009963059,0.00029429872,0.00022132973,0.00041750047,0.0018826361,0.057839572,0.0017531557,0.87280834,0.007499319,0.04607941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001787151,0.00033106245,0.0044410336,0.0001552366,0.000096927295,0.0001740618,0.0035950714,0.11882894,0.0010652739,0.8554948,0.015534087,0.00010482299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004643512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054111816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006844941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020386872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00141368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022898614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895970146","doi":"10.1111/iere.12344","title":"TESTING THE QUANTAL RESPONSE HYPOTHESIS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Semtech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Monotonic function; Nonparametric statistics; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Regular polygon; Function (biology); Mathematical economics; Characterization (materials science); Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.1579511415790759,"score_gpt":0.4026902819311098,"score_spread":0.2447391403520339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895970146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8259767,0.00009425556,0.15806684,0.0013437022,0.000080308586,0.00033395854,0.000881538,0.00011933408,0.013103267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897915,0.000017731329,0.009047978,0.0002021199,0.00003645137,0.00023966056,0.0002517614,0.000017793873,0.00039504323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95996326,0.025055427,0.0018833929,0.0070683067,0.004936987,0.0010926105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63401777,0.2967378,0.026701301,0.03191717,0.008577359,0.0020485546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036983702,0.00042012442,0.001491694,0.0009326534,0.0007544416,0.0015866742,0.0025823382,0.0016475235,0.012605373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19427894,0.00040850978,0.0010657355,0.00089408783,0.004704334,0.0030326075,0.0024298988,0.0020330641,0.0010548859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052744015,0.0034988148,0.42465892,0.00066540774,0.0032103208,0.0005579821,0.0023584173,0.033708967,0.010375169,0.40293184,0.0039118086,0.10884784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077403715,0.003212468,0.26310068,0.00020632184,0.00029339644,0.00050557987,0.0021475416,0.25789675,0.008898695,0.4578706,0.0049022795,0.00019167353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007928072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029027124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036983702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071725494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013256888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19559085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896348643","doi":"10.3390/g9040083","title":"Homophily and Social Norms in Experimental Network Formation Games","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"SFU Community Trust Endowment Fund","keywords":"Homophily; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Network formation; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social identity theory; Social preferences; Psychology; Similarity (geometry); Preference; Norm of reciprocity; Social media; Computer science; Microeconomics; Social group; Economics; Sociology; Social capital","score_opus":0.03264888837365835,"score_gpt":0.3287941157232438,"score_spread":0.2961452273495854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896348643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99423873,0.00002949718,0.0026779992,0.000112928545,0.000019793593,0.00018013656,0.00006260868,0.000012746318,0.0026655432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949988,0.000034723547,0.0035902665,0.000055919376,0.000012975575,0.0005123844,0.00007387971,0.000006401928,0.0007146978],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953597,0.0030581309,0.00031217333,0.0004572527,0.00056141306,0.00025137115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97578716,0.017629178,0.002902906,0.0021497207,0.0005459841,0.0009849546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004633486,0.00047239603,0.00041980736,0.00043988862,0.0006075103,0.0011946178,0.00094324077,0.00069875293,0.0034227462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021932025,0.00027932407,0.00026130638,0.00028712003,0.0017307386,0.0012416176,0.001030349,0.0013663372,0.00020335852],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02606555,0.1161763,0.18264546,0.0030458425,0.0015607143,0.0014990775,0.019491477,0.085448265,0.2285705,0.21317634,0.0061035366,0.11621683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060780137,0.06497695,0.24482349,0.00046017222,0.00067025324,0.00090328173,0.008310829,0.370927,0.10891279,0.17746753,0.015984202,0.00048552547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010671975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014962009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004633486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096201914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047124398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024504483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897832201","doi":"10.1111/deci.12341","title":"Joint Fundraising Appeals: Allocation Rules and Conditions That Encourage Aid Agencies' Collaboration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Competition (biology); Joint (building); Business; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Economics; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.14422429957507568,"score_gpt":0.4242907402585379,"score_spread":0.2800664406834622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897832201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8686921,0.000278468,0.070631,0.001049397,0.0000856392,0.00069344905,0.00019730508,0.00023600279,0.058136635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995647,0.00003245724,0.0035374116,0.000029050896,0.000016057404,0.000111069145,0.000015983396,0.0000065353456,0.000604453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869767,0.005782531,0.0013197843,0.001799028,0.0018469403,0.0022750774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86570054,0.08926213,0.02816316,0.006826446,0.0060919044,0.0039558453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01665997,0.00041152883,0.0009911215,0.0018084147,0.0017528582,0.006023847,0.0014644655,0.0021890202,0.0074376706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11457431,0.00048740365,0.00046353939,0.0010991452,0.0037782697,0.0040555396,0.0020801153,0.0014032151,0.00060267485],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024981955,0.0015299632,0.040005222,0.0004678505,0.00022363747,0.0008056226,0.0025745512,0.15835181,0.010202518,0.70377713,0.0056490274,0.07391448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009174958,0.0013511399,0.051801864,0.0002566179,0.00022150662,0.0007469934,0.0055203205,0.32366535,0.006858452,0.59695315,0.01139873,0.00030838288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022847957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00144631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01665997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022663644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023370152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08810741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899119869","doi":"10.1177/1354816618806729","title":"Sustainable tourism modeling: Pricing decisions and evolutionarily stable strategies for competitive tour operators","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tourism Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Government of Jiangsu Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Tourism; Competitive advantage; Disadvantage; Subsidy; Government (linguistics); Business; Product (mathematics); Industrial organization; Pricing strategies; Marketing; Preference; Economics; Sustainable development; Microeconomics; Computer science; Ecology; Market economy","score_opus":0.03960422984212527,"score_gpt":0.3145504998467476,"score_spread":0.27494627000462235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899119869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6122787,0.0005185816,0.34309408,0.0032347182,0.00010959041,0.00017553194,0.0002257689,0.00006571885,0.040297344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98051363,0.00023141177,0.01144575,0.00010897239,0.000025392534,0.00011801763,0.0000516545,0.000011573159,0.0074936347],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995179,0.00027186246,0.000014475338,0.000071807626,0.000043084186,0.00008089911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986426,0.0008279996,0.00021952174,0.00004382888,0.00010092391,0.00016513122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012873778,0.00097654806,0.00070542574,0.0006558148,0.0006572492,0.0019441812,0.0012696523,0.002450616,0.0047442564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046784994,0.00041000085,0.0009267786,0.0004985304,0.0013231252,0.0017868589,0.0009880866,0.0015253338,0.00030410782],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084653555,0.0001529887,0.0048657237,0.000051456405,0.000073064446,0.00029627612,0.0002828378,0.8008506,0.00091870676,0.18600357,0.0009032707,0.005516853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014905601,0.000035003835,0.00048613592,0.0000059245504,0.000010860605,0.000020208961,0.00009046185,0.9750963,0.00004227817,0.02381841,0.00036945374,0.000010130883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011254559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008103195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011254559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016447563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011798318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022378087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899273628","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3302677","title":"Strategic Investment and Learning with Private Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Private information retrieval; Investment (military); Microeconomics; Strategic complements; Ex-ante; Yield (engineering); Economics; Welfare; Investment strategy; Strategic interaction; Business; Computer science; Market economy","score_opus":0.016490040998908925,"score_gpt":0.28065567954968734,"score_spread":0.2641656385507784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899273628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9008211,0.00072313956,0.035392646,0.0049840515,0.00006548832,0.00007757278,0.00016658244,0.00005332466,0.05771609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993869,0.00023757943,0.001228246,0.00008691128,0.000029679124,0.000017051188,0.0000345663,0.000004446202,0.0044925143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824774,0.0008266664,0.0000977971,0.00021430229,0.00025180617,0.00036169702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619588,0.028948734,0.0041935323,0.0024280385,0.0008346653,0.0016361235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043893806,0.0005625182,0.000740524,0.0006886862,0.00049583695,0.0038797725,0.0005770587,0.0028972807,0.009468327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023976438,0.00040423384,0.0004667793,0.00075659394,0.002409629,0.007058325,0.0016218092,0.0019234848,0.0005926687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001413914,0.0016948007,0.034900267,0.0004227597,0.00028284983,0.0005686359,0.0013363231,0.048008326,0.002292817,0.8360779,0.002591637,0.07040988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113167356,0.00024390199,0.008076835,0.000030257022,0.00008049633,0.000083334635,0.0005178347,0.032655586,0.0006079048,0.9564247,0.001138931,0.000026998245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064004515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093064806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009468327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011360889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012307023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031674683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900682880","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3102576","title":"Better to Give than to Receive: The Positive Effect of Prosocial Rewards on Goal Commitment and Performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.008793892005655843,"score_gpt":0.30914661701299523,"score_spread":0.3003527250073394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900682880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940499,0.00026099986,0.00015061136,0.0006037867,0.000048638834,0.000008510877,0.00004598616,0.000010065018,0.0048215217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983069,0.00012484725,0.00021448589,0.000158052,0.00003078171,0.000010465293,0.000037524645,0.00001239321,0.0011044564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990711,0.00050398085,0.000030647712,0.00014657897,0.00014132976,0.00010625971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98011327,0.011071867,0.0029249599,0.0018085578,0.00035822764,0.0037231776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024638518,0.00042737348,0.00067519356,0.00034940662,0.000830969,0.0018311763,0.0005457576,0.0019027113,0.011622068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015172155,0.00063533173,0.0003916983,0.00036616222,0.0011976315,0.0008575313,0.0014767122,0.002813616,0.0008067149],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08118917,0.048087943,0.6310173,0.0012071583,0.0040176604,0.0014797911,0.0043752952,0.007885207,0.04586532,0.028735828,0.005308562,0.14083074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007692059,0.0021453162,0.9845382,0.000050181658,0.000416571,0.00014212489,0.00057906687,0.0022163189,0.0011618679,0.007086345,0.0008441551,0.00005069678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015913115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002567067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011622068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032993907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006484993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038879693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900834987","doi":"10.17615/qfe9-3916","title":"Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research portal (Tilburg University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Temptation; Dishonesty; Cheating; Honesty; Self-control; Social psychology; Control (management); Psychology; Ego depletion; Resource depletion; Economics","score_opus":0.06139489625286657,"score_gpt":0.35100571733513314,"score_spread":0.28961082108226655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900834987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99402785,0.0003005952,0.00038872074,0.001063658,0.0000073244373,0.000007834419,0.000019484802,0.0000034590803,0.0041810255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999271,0.00009388766,0.00011752613,0.00014124255,0.000008376467,0.0000050080844,0.000009764965,0.0000023168068,0.00035092476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981627,0.00096819113,0.00012735343,0.00020016657,0.00034572458,0.00019603982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565714,0.0225988,0.013958306,0.0033481806,0.001075482,0.0024478626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041749957,0.00021409751,0.0003902352,0.00071281206,0.0008615473,0.001665346,0.0003546745,0.00087466394,0.004963352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025832724,0.0003171793,0.00022107255,0.00038664386,0.0041341446,0.0016580864,0.0014171043,0.0018378375,0.00029648098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047670025,0.0032028414,0.868844,0.00041977776,0.0004022826,0.0022880412,0.020537607,0.0007521878,0.0130696995,0.021273581,0.0018074434,0.062635444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023325747,0.0007474289,0.95227253,0.00015238093,0.00019862682,0.0022646424,0.007434529,0.002038779,0.0029956037,0.029301796,0.0022910838,0.000069390575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012059014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011814287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004963352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005514987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046841917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022079706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901077078","doi":"10.1007/s40881-018-0060-7","title":"Identifying discrete behavioural types: a re-analysis of public goods game contributions by hierarchical clustering","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Economic and Social Research Council; University of East Anglia","keywords":"Typology; Hierarchical clustering; Construct (python library); Cluster analysis; Similarity (geometry); Public good; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Sociology; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.055202307379114655,"score_gpt":0.3806741472488688,"score_spread":0.32547183986975414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901077078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7288398,0.00026790032,0.26374665,0.00035451687,0.00007099207,0.00093537936,0.0021645941,0.00040547492,0.003214692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92810977,0.000041145115,0.068416946,0.000066715926,0.000015847554,0.0006044536,0.0020412367,0.000092674214,0.0006112178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839012,0.010061228,0.0009965362,0.0020537407,0.0023829238,0.0006044981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9120088,0.046580058,0.0073597264,0.024649616,0.008523382,0.00087835215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016041283,0.0005919737,0.001164377,0.005256926,0.0010185485,0.0020168792,0.0023466328,0.0009643886,0.0021178045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07420406,0.0003476514,0.0012520547,0.004026398,0.0019348228,0.0017903245,0.0021722368,0.0015371711,0.0006318875],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002225653,0.0015861132,0.5217925,0.0020093631,0.0015689761,0.00059910974,0.022313295,0.05711383,0.03870451,0.057814214,0.008577514,0.28569496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019666327,0.0004600513,0.44136402,0.0003464756,0.00033724323,0.00043244363,0.009006156,0.40087357,0.011079388,0.1237288,0.011850356,0.00032478978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008872965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00876846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016041283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00177605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010883424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08483541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902625657","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.01.003","title":"Quantity-cum-quality contests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Unit (ring theory); Microeconomics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Dual (grammatical number); Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06421628092183877,"score_gpt":0.37368798849403423,"score_spread":0.30947170757219544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902625657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8179656,0.00073859084,0.06204863,0.0057809213,0.00030255504,0.00020832336,0.0005573225,0.00023443966,0.112163655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994589,0.000055835975,0.0013868506,0.0001268343,0.0000889362,0.000023559971,0.000029462186,0.000019425665,0.0036801193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421966,0.0028910502,0.00026283978,0.0006758062,0.0009891329,0.00096146925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93443084,0.050799247,0.0047712396,0.005416623,0.0018223651,0.002759644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011693544,0.0006616773,0.0019907486,0.0009917996,0.0013220286,0.0056561553,0.0014339822,0.0029840628,0.031314287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059599165,0.0005908757,0.0008401789,0.00090271625,0.0033038557,0.0064967643,0.0021388798,0.0026358627,0.00084010174],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008350451,0.00033965227,0.0025392391,0.00012640993,0.0000552351,0.000078676996,0.00044347704,0.007200609,0.0013260571,0.9760448,0.002551259,0.008459571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029902344,0.00022135618,0.0051823123,0.000017561379,0.00004011598,0.00011392202,0.00028520558,0.043231245,0.00036717774,0.9485105,0.0016926716,0.000038849124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016833873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017918199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031314287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019642445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012945678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10475671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902710514","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2018.09.002","title":"Effectiveness of bonus and penalty incentive contracts in supply chain exchanges: Does national culture matter?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Contract management; Transactional leadership; Supply chain; Forward contract; China; Microeconomics; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Futures contract","score_opus":0.016042486470735612,"score_gpt":0.3343055479781616,"score_spread":0.318263061507426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902710514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956006,0.00007033171,0.0003205154,0.000060308575,0.0000048776747,0.000015112125,0.000010254457,0.0000015650583,0.003916505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992842,0.000064403604,0.00029551418,0.000036988004,0.0000025505615,0.000015276188,0.0000136162,0.0000023124758,0.0002851412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911402,0.0056329546,0.0006338506,0.00047486892,0.0015804747,0.0005377438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9387049,0.029543065,0.016862366,0.0049065687,0.0053191115,0.004663892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01110005,0.00029333367,0.00043478215,0.0005809432,0.0015471699,0.002991792,0.00057776703,0.00053518644,0.0037090513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032766074,0.000237621,0.00036471538,0.0006697534,0.002090574,0.0017744665,0.0015935692,0.00087708293,0.0002644851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009653597,0.0017768369,0.9207361,0.00020309704,0.00037862785,0.00025797248,0.017868416,0.0009306209,0.005103933,0.0037363973,0.00021672867,0.047825906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040562518,0.00082888047,0.96649104,0.000099404955,0.00013032077,0.00013545516,0.026087107,0.0014076137,0.001918476,0.0014012571,0.0014055447,0.00005432619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005397016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108524915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01110005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016414017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001698741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058703423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903408201","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3152537","title":"Clarity Trumps Content: An Experiment on Information Acquisition in Beauty Contests","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Beauty; Content (measure theory); Computer science; Internet privacy; Aesthetics; Art; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.037283779806922025,"score_gpt":0.33491174788736633,"score_spread":0.2976279680804443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903408201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911219,0.000068628506,0.00072358653,0.0004323253,0.00009177127,0.00012414853,0.00006822438,0.000039554478,0.0073298644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923929,0.000070584916,0.002260922,0.00042403347,0.00010582458,0.00018885918,0.00013941921,0.00006940411,0.00434802],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972512,0.0009124174,0.00020627076,0.0004941439,0.00073705363,0.00039891448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449888,0.03981401,0.005398111,0.0049705594,0.0006216989,0.0042067324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051409937,0.0015065689,0.001521089,0.0006041595,0.0020992954,0.0043968847,0.0016422223,0.0037702448,0.031071343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037763577,0.0012094721,0.0005744819,0.00058216404,0.0027923286,0.0042338464,0.0027391047,0.0049675335,0.002117617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.17568517,0.18310663,0.041689746,0.0030935647,0.0012166804,0.0017084435,0.01705467,0.011175231,0.3516976,0.09205594,0.012268516,0.10924789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07773413,0.16674536,0.26163083,0.00062221434,0.001986097,0.0021140722,0.007710973,0.10529891,0.07701867,0.26911134,0.02857086,0.0014565323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012544504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001138044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031071343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075220544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012916581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103943944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903417532","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2019.04.002","title":"The feedback effect in two-sided markets with bilateral investments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Matching (statistics); Microeconomics; Investment (military); Economics; Industrial organization; Monetary economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009240853057730944,"score_gpt":0.30541903614130866,"score_spread":0.29617818308357774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903417532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88964796,0.00048418538,0.06899318,0.0024063264,0.0001928888,0.000102801154,0.00021224588,0.00030225242,0.03765818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942425,0.00014011546,0.002589537,0.0000998504,0.000056377074,0.00002338971,0.000017114302,0.000010144742,0.002820891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987834,0.00053741626,0.000058665955,0.0001471872,0.0002127444,0.00026058307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97636443,0.018843595,0.002055935,0.0010727862,0.0006754569,0.0009877476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003773097,0.00058065675,0.0015108314,0.00067951257,0.0008140877,0.0020556531,0.0013062373,0.002951176,0.016417833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023138452,0.0006433866,0.00081666606,0.00046629526,0.0022258868,0.005796478,0.0015473467,0.0016369871,0.00049652933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001984652,0.0009721647,0.004275873,0.0005142086,0.00016059796,0.001190825,0.0004968711,0.07443518,0.013743917,0.8621092,0.0040065534,0.036110003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077442866,0.000474305,0.0036853072,0.000034017095,0.00012288686,0.00032331795,0.00018760005,0.12586373,0.0016387285,0.86598885,0.00082238915,0.00008450782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012297056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008872895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016417833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078125775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010776684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054923117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W290355159","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.18455291","title":"Mineral exploration as a game of chance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Value (mathematics); Interval (graph theory); Computer science; Game theory; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Computer security; Machine learning","score_opus":0.070895022974621,"score_gpt":0.30527300339308916,"score_spread":0.23437798041846816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W290355159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68507,0.00082777056,0.1942603,0.006160745,0.00021083473,0.00045321978,0.000630964,0.00027638188,0.11210979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711819,0.00024722633,0.018901672,0.00029067777,0.00003168196,0.00019661264,0.00008214424,0.000028688262,0.009039349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975206,0.001590558,0.00008009204,0.00028952208,0.00029881313,0.00022028705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907073,0.007036152,0.0007730531,0.0005469198,0.00022814215,0.00070831383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020978795,0.00080134405,0.0010238547,0.00040361407,0.0009691382,0.0035679939,0.0011598449,0.0021930553,0.015477955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011738902,0.0004054356,0.0008549356,0.00040505297,0.0024764873,0.003452019,0.0018003561,0.0020316676,0.0007713344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010671734,0.00044536882,0.004428758,0.0002248565,0.00018319974,0.00040131444,0.0011003532,0.26913625,0.004162364,0.6936762,0.003700793,0.02147336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029405803,0.00031129934,0.0011982411,0.000039068535,0.000040918218,0.00010274417,0.00031862673,0.54469645,0.00053060666,0.4469576,0.0054577636,0.000052682575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034631207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025047306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015477955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015178084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012977362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051778913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904067975","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12347","title":"Warm glow and the transmission of pro‐socialness across generations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Steady state (chemistry); Overlapping generations model; Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04393911839836668,"score_gpt":0.35770158727362705,"score_spread":0.3137624688752604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904067975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88468283,0.00017708754,0.0683461,0.0017597154,0.000030705392,0.000059831284,0.00016013163,0.000067267174,0.044716295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547726,0.00006363535,0.0016036764,0.00004728346,0.0000063174316,0.0000293611,0.000015227166,0.0000061931505,0.0027511534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933845,0.0002794954,0.000016473592,0.000116922645,0.00005663578,0.0001920464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978471,0.0009171055,0.00065590127,0.00023191741,0.000103692786,0.00024422165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013055645,0.00034959687,0.00034981492,0.00058982463,0.0012513507,0.002155414,0.0006163888,0.00096002116,0.007818319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053195977,0.0003090936,0.00060478057,0.00039181404,0.0032363648,0.002371296,0.0022714096,0.0011011285,0.00038258373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017696674,0.00026793042,0.033600073,0.00009305628,0.0001637746,0.00067900785,0.0046647904,0.09037466,0.0043182517,0.84089327,0.0012775529,0.023490613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008498512,0.00043674023,0.06722858,0.00008860591,0.00014153392,0.00046179598,0.0028762962,0.15207511,0.0010617202,0.7694686,0.005969773,0.00010632719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037582659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028718424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007818319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018135606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066489866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026154876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904368417","doi":"10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.11.002","title":"When Does Money Priming Affect Helping Behavior?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University Canada West; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Affect (linguistics); Priming (agriculture); Payment; Social psychology; Profit (economics); Psychology; Task (project management); Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.03309406089314043,"score_gpt":0.3383845633342416,"score_spread":0.3052905024411012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904368417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949181,0.00035096554,0.00089536124,0.00041457484,0.00010629215,0.0000646845,0.00005473304,0.000031113195,0.0031641729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754035,0.00021368366,0.0010162705,0.00017690347,0.00003787073,0.00015453534,0.00003351122,0.00002536466,0.00080157776],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993011,0.00029916296,0.00003938463,0.00017720254,0.00011559207,0.000067513756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946104,0.0034505946,0.0010341959,0.00044527493,0.0001351972,0.00032435247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012902238,0.00026983136,0.00043058195,0.00018133456,0.00042217557,0.0008848605,0.00026239513,0.00087131414,0.0060729007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010852963,0.00033310754,0.00014852149,0.00013082854,0.00084499054,0.0012695307,0.00050320104,0.0008167513,0.00043663877],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.044185106,0.009300323,0.1021243,0.0022745791,0.00028940057,0.0011496973,0.012151609,0.0010492381,0.622354,0.016024722,0.0030176272,0.1860794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016722718,0.017471299,0.81342673,0.00041384224,0.00069340813,0.0010475162,0.0042677424,0.0028909754,0.11686313,0.030893078,0.010164672,0.00019537593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023023128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033010804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060729007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026329455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028813357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020315886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904461192","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2018-022","title":"Do Evaluators Prefer Candidates of Their Own Gender?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Scholarship; Set (abstract data type); Affect (linguistics); Discipline; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.0893451237330111,"score_gpt":0.36367659076401326,"score_spread":0.2743314670310022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904461192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768099,0.0005997702,0.0011448453,0.003406874,0.00009179131,0.00006906157,0.00026806621,0.000014630858,0.01759508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957644,0.00013395434,0.0003494658,0.00073809247,0.00004759479,0.000034670884,0.00009990591,0.000007144541,0.0028247226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98895055,0.006029022,0.0004164959,0.0008655605,0.0019529214,0.0017854987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527607,0.022647,0.011529267,0.0034831308,0.0041365097,0.005443397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013595336,0.00026439285,0.0008863608,0.0014211255,0.0019019914,0.0020547202,0.0005102166,0.0012549722,0.013418992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05352819,0.00018411783,0.00048193237,0.0013954026,0.0019651842,0.001021097,0.0012463791,0.0009445646,0.0017746971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017804243,0.00024424496,0.91702527,0.00025342123,0.0002395656,0.00022238416,0.003842875,0.00038878736,0.0022259264,0.0037157177,0.0056254044,0.06443595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013681862,0.0004975204,0.975998,0.00011755851,0.000096553274,0.00016125201,0.009361228,0.0004634128,0.0010043174,0.0021749646,0.009951481,0.000036849495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009212407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02872856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013595336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001601562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016196179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07189989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904530011","doi":"10.1177/0048393118810820","title":"Institutions as a Philosophical Problem: A Critical Rationalist Perspective on Guala’s “Understanding Institutions” and His Critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical rationalism; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Institution; Rationalism; Relation (database); Critical philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy of science; Social institution; Critical theory; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.2973331015280518,"score_gpt":0.4699058722947969,"score_spread":0.1725727707667451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904530011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012339462,0.014965705,0.013642996,0.897051,0.0024454826,0.000040956158,0.000031413467,0.000098651406,0.059384275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.779015,0.006914642,0.008528653,0.18422481,0.005040954,0.00034475257,0.000027897633,0.00023519254,0.015668098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98347396,0.010814587,0.00035271363,0.0017901235,0.0023641512,0.0012045602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96910614,0.024162984,0.0014027787,0.0010956152,0.0034672697,0.00076524686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017696168,0.0008377124,0.001083178,0.0048037833,0.009697105,0.01085372,0.0028323303,0.013550347,0.0016401706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036328577,0.0004839358,0.001116026,0.0028846571,0.06905862,0.010320191,0.004449024,0.016239518,0.00034543083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009548109,0.0000048716392,0.000050644114,0.000037117596,0.000005044573,0.000057888272,0.0058675697,0.0001460692,0.0000307989,0.97969216,0.012844398,0.0012539327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024795285,0.000011905727,0.0002184593,0.00037765503,0.00001977654,0.00008606339,0.0041428865,0.00086212193,0.00033125994,0.792411,0.20146433,0.00004972613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014170248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095224045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017696168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017140795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12436575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905467625","doi":"10.1002/soej.12313","title":"Job Security and Risk‐Taking: Theory and Evidence From Professional Football","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Job security; Football; League; Coaching; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Work (physics); Political science; Management; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.037445775347102764,"score_gpt":0.34516806042270365,"score_spread":0.3077222850756009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905467625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98712325,0.0039131553,0.0007168883,0.001129752,0.000018156446,0.000013116368,0.00011242378,0.0000032847224,0.006970005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996287,0.002842976,0.00019828614,0.0001672532,0.000023655153,0.000007888544,0.00010217803,0.0000017139118,0.00036895747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999353,0.00029169556,0.00003166671,0.00010283643,0.00013327735,0.00008747088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793195,0.01632824,0.002688726,0.00052410515,0.00051496254,0.0006244706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026196924,0.00044313882,0.00046886274,0.0011583549,0.0008978645,0.0016465544,0.00060232484,0.00091755606,0.00704412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010441253,0.0003079723,0.0003868673,0.0011020377,0.0016891493,0.0009964216,0.0011083712,0.0011334216,0.00047837864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011017693,0.0018075168,0.90574783,0.000529077,0.00050872157,0.00047380768,0.0045228256,0.0038230189,0.0005227027,0.011564991,0.0013875765,0.06801016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001019719,0.00060724095,0.9707752,0.00036969324,0.00020715238,0.00022792282,0.0044650664,0.0040209424,0.00034269138,0.01584314,0.0029969106,0.000042152882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018079745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015264174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018079745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080456876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005830886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03594905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906068968","doi":"","title":"Does Random Consideration Explain Behavior when Choice is Hard? Evidence from a Large-scale Experiment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Mixed logit; Econometrics; Population; Logit; Sample (material); Scale (ratio); Computer science; Economics; Logistic regression; Machine learning","score_opus":0.13710755546524145,"score_gpt":0.2790846060540916,"score_spread":0.14197705058885013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906068968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98538095,0.00016015845,0.008740936,0.0007358508,0.000022993014,0.00009212207,0.00018336899,0.000039409384,0.0046441625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995001,0.00009914308,0.0033808353,0.00037565408,0.000021505395,0.00012954888,0.00016683289,0.000018797955,0.00080661924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963186,0.0026352988,0.00011639236,0.0004945267,0.00030463102,0.0001305568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89636683,0.07389358,0.013713377,0.013242224,0.0012675823,0.0015163048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090450775,0.00043581246,0.0007982532,0.0003461978,0.00048914464,0.0010672255,0.0008501937,0.0013563327,0.007234736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050078098,0.00032444423,0.0005815679,0.00036875415,0.001458495,0.0013713915,0.00081749685,0.0014527204,0.0007430317],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01748575,0.023968123,0.59482723,0.0018304108,0.0031270366,0.0011336084,0.004736615,0.051469114,0.04438081,0.08169689,0.013851603,0.16149274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027998255,0.008822393,0.5381351,0.0001908047,0.0011104112,0.0008110094,0.0018149512,0.19641726,0.01034706,0.22504556,0.014199491,0.00030613667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012263866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012466896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090450775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045656043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003243805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04783553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908297607","doi":"10.34989/swp-2018-60","title":"Inference in Games Without Nash Equilibrium: An Application to Restaurants’ Competition in Opening Hours","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"McGill University; Yale University","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Bayesian game; Equilibrium selection; Best response; Inference; Risk dominance; Complete information; Competition (biology); Economics; Stochastic game; Bayesian inference; Identification (biology); Repeated game; Game theory; Bayesian probability; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03998359172892577,"score_gpt":0.34795463294849155,"score_spread":0.30797104121956576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908297607","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040390227,0.0006024695,0.9498678,0.002067942,0.00008360995,0.00023753336,0.00026465248,0.00014968604,0.006336142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7130668,0.0013318917,0.27195102,0.0011200364,0.00038589415,0.00090629293,0.0006617434,0.00014879242,0.010427454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877187,0.008282722,0.0005492264,0.001833972,0.0009977015,0.0006176975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8604637,0.13059427,0.0039894218,0.0019533231,0.002022346,0.0009768622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019036775,0.0018359614,0.0046926695,0.002136092,0.0016394329,0.0031504342,0.0036464408,0.0037262426,0.0070918472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10665481,0.0016740167,0.0038894594,0.0026878116,0.004361916,0.0071575074,0.005124502,0.00637107,0.00041760923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018289202,0.00021178032,0.0057193977,0.0002697821,0.0003231834,0.0005719318,0.00088289165,0.35647276,0.00040626898,0.609594,0.0014725861,0.023892514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007885782,0.00004412585,0.00052893156,0.00002962927,0.000035450437,0.00004033029,0.00013222557,0.673088,0.00012378328,0.32490724,0.00095059304,0.00004081593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028004704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021352267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028004704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004404282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003967375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10067725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910230743","doi":"10.1509/jm.16.0476","title":"A Study of Bidding Behavior in Voluntary-Pay Philanthropic Auctions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Common value auction; Business; Revenue; Microeconomics; Turnover; Economics; Marketing; Finance","score_opus":0.052095771182037315,"score_gpt":0.3815003449921936,"score_spread":0.3294045738101563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910230743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99290645,0.000034960347,0.0032286975,0.000120125624,0.000009656696,0.00006548548,0.000026157662,0.000014450468,0.0035939186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994555,0.00002853978,0.0033413018,0.0000735092,0.000009529,0.00007424113,0.00007312241,0.000007866596,0.001836996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969791,0.0020429355,0.00014720489,0.00023867475,0.0003971179,0.0001949497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565699,0.031760514,0.0058579403,0.0025499687,0.0018830604,0.0013786714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042516002,0.000255039,0.00055408763,0.0006435586,0.0012880745,0.0016857673,0.00071201427,0.000882492,0.0028871489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025474792,0.0003236632,0.00047418548,0.0006776988,0.00076865614,0.0011731699,0.00059763977,0.0010991247,0.00048187407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035498133,0.027884904,0.74634993,0.00036815254,0.00049468747,0.0008769749,0.019422214,0.01077731,0.00946793,0.050240103,0.003758832,0.12680925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008794355,0.009539939,0.7633437,0.00013703399,0.00017236386,0.001777289,0.02814693,0.13446707,0.004150896,0.045300253,0.011797453,0.00028768502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002219791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021694119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042516002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000816426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010389938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022484899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912037131","doi":"","title":"Opportunities and Effort: Ex-Post Redistribution in the Lab","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Dictator; Earnings; Inequality; Ex-ante; Economics; Inequity aversion; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Political science; Accounting","score_opus":0.030902209524252794,"score_gpt":0.30345326951854584,"score_spread":0.2725510599942931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912037131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960031,0.000037062877,0.00070416776,0.00026452693,0.0000123720665,0.000024669685,0.00007794192,0.000014346756,0.0028617817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977075,0.000032401007,0.0004759668,0.00016383328,0.00001430087,0.00005283197,0.00006431511,0.000005813459,0.0014830452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982844,0.0009938078,0.00008729422,0.0002227882,0.00016594627,0.00024576028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97522074,0.013960746,0.005591389,0.0033501796,0.00041104175,0.00146582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037891727,0.00039769922,0.0006573892,0.00031906972,0.00063650723,0.0017574832,0.00047683052,0.0011490575,0.0120717585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014005793,0.00039322698,0.0002154735,0.0002025224,0.0011878326,0.0012224603,0.0012439514,0.0013755602,0.0011647014],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.060978238,0.07790445,0.4466712,0.00093337963,0.0008651801,0.0018727372,0.005536519,0.00934097,0.22391678,0.026227044,0.0056446968,0.1401089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036333438,0.04652429,0.8059037,0.00018884636,0.00037689338,0.0008653077,0.0054474394,0.02173531,0.07126578,0.034366254,0.009419321,0.00027359917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000305351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032335203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120717585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037141802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029946896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040384054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912757914","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12482","title":"The Informativeness of Relative Performance Information and Its Effect on Effort Allocation in a Multitask Environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Distortion (music); Computer science; Performance improvement; Business; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Operations management","score_opus":0.043306327383956546,"score_gpt":0.35139574031416315,"score_spread":0.3080894129302066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912757914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954738,0.00006434884,0.002559537,0.00010485298,0.000008655668,0.000056955567,0.000047413618,0.00004881206,0.0016356646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977806,0.000030553238,0.0017768963,0.00004839615,0.000009789889,0.000041054987,0.000028005908,0.000007620455,0.00027715808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.990235,0.0055125803,0.0007610807,0.0010380001,0.0018984968,0.000554858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7927794,0.15131886,0.033202697,0.016347364,0.0022862733,0.0040654084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012909896,0.0006743646,0.00082488684,0.0006480656,0.0007091262,0.0030569113,0.0009168927,0.001122137,0.0028306136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0640533,0.00062001386,0.0003913025,0.0006290408,0.0011557527,0.0015046578,0.0017773244,0.0015740036,0.00032825864],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031683583,0.017862206,0.47649324,0.001198619,0.0011306404,0.0009847468,0.0073933178,0.10597873,0.15092915,0.01446941,0.0014646631,0.19041167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013318006,0.020596985,0.84495676,0.0002108114,0.0006810727,0.00030597355,0.0017387645,0.08306158,0.032614775,0.01114624,0.0029376235,0.00041774908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012419501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012497457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012909896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015159594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009785957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068274856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912973656","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1080656","title":"Transparency and Iterative Negotiations with Trust and Reciprocity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Negotiation; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Accounting; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.021920408547707722,"score_gpt":0.2848098146325135,"score_spread":0.26288940608480577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912973656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5036485,0.0008979073,0.22937274,0.008261164,0.00023119556,0.0004069593,0.00011449366,0.00022089909,0.25684607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890042,0.000109601875,0.007867507,0.00007600709,0.000037417372,0.00010341412,0.000016412905,0.000026880569,0.0027586934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771747,0.015707674,0.001101576,0.001562412,0.0030440884,0.0014095239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75966334,0.18983632,0.022526836,0.018842962,0.006156151,0.002974403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022433156,0.00073041633,0.0009030307,0.0015920079,0.0034323856,0.008257668,0.0015121073,0.0047232127,0.011252664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15011738,0.0012260217,0.0009726384,0.0013752726,0.009926858,0.015730944,0.0052982224,0.0045009986,0.0011073659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041752864,0.00017191238,0.0041693714,0.00017255032,0.00007072441,0.00036554312,0.009063913,0.005926242,0.0007524046,0.95885456,0.00062761194,0.019407662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008706641,0.000070863585,0.0012465266,0.000039644146,0.000039565166,0.00016710955,0.0013717051,0.010370094,0.00038268307,0.98447245,0.0017226997,0.000029482133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013619609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064057764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022433156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021469134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030905777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11863929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913141794","doi":"","title":"Intention-based reciprocity and signaling of intentions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Prosocial behavior; Transparency (behavior); Pessimism; Dictator game; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.12733782555337037,"score_gpt":0.4393309904740234,"score_spread":0.31199316492065304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913141794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91092616,0.00035554706,0.036560852,0.002086093,0.00011990602,0.00010992497,0.00088953465,0.00012098622,0.04883107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944799,0.00009098164,0.0026273201,0.00007346441,0.000024059891,0.000048908263,0.00014181853,0.00002046315,0.0024931347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578947,0.0025462317,0.00022627893,0.0005986031,0.0005747623,0.0002646791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9439368,0.03991718,0.0066094333,0.006093548,0.0022261923,0.0012168114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007165804,0.00039977639,0.00044314895,0.0008932652,0.00046038642,0.0026051074,0.0004908513,0.0017076877,0.0104729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06247955,0.0006406103,0.00043332964,0.0007147878,0.0012414586,0.0026302102,0.0012865363,0.0018811845,0.001540603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033322955,0.00232275,0.24514157,0.0009112273,0.0010006825,0.0006313703,0.007501892,0.023378577,0.025901217,0.52498317,0.007844958,0.15705031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040862607,0.000916088,0.28691328,0.00016286683,0.00045729065,0.00059251586,0.00196235,0.0878021,0.0059714736,0.60952127,0.0050592367,0.0002328856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008157219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049830787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047671737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03789687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913480710","doi":"10.1007/s11229-019-02108-w","title":"Information elaboration and epistemic effects of diversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Centre on Substance Use; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Philosophy of language; Elaboration; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Metaphysics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Process (computing); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010797463862556006,"score_gpt":0.2674388092484245,"score_spread":0.25664134538586847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913480710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5101512,0.008335811,0.109647185,0.03922194,0.00046414585,0.00019887283,0.0006340109,0.00012512304,0.33122167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910262,0.0013898239,0.005644287,0.0005409887,0.00011910927,0.000054793887,0.000064306245,0.000012932192,0.0011475313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419135,0.003501404,0.00041870386,0.00057549303,0.0009920931,0.00032096187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.873987,0.10771476,0.009071902,0.0062249918,0.0023912084,0.0006101094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081754625,0.00044834596,0.0004530084,0.0018461032,0.00083518494,0.0035191101,0.00088513456,0.0017238435,0.014426785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067401744,0.00027550754,0.00068415864,0.001624059,0.0056227418,0.009191787,0.004351446,0.002165222,0.0005305884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005432234,0.00028198393,0.011119143,0.0014940057,0.00020104877,0.00032267612,0.008553745,0.0036880795,0.002981345,0.9168065,0.0012848366,0.052723493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107784326,0.00015334281,0.016173122,0.0006342129,0.00020531163,0.00028209118,0.0032565994,0.0036144378,0.0026899804,0.96163064,0.011206006,0.000046411293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005376793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044895193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014426785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016081608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009718695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048262417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913739756","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvad063","title":"Stereotypes and Belief Updating","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Psychology; Social psychology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Bayesian probability; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022939357073202334,"score_gpt":0.2906530648142982,"score_spread":0.2677137077410959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913739756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97422653,0.00019511423,0.005168995,0.00081466214,0.000035358684,0.000025310545,0.00012268999,0.00003257867,0.01937887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998467,0.000035038287,0.00076954375,0.0000969006,0.000011836428,0.000008371637,0.00003832893,0.000007172847,0.00056588714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965558,0.0017851555,0.00013116664,0.00042498743,0.0008260732,0.00027676133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454879,0.035596736,0.009693676,0.0047754957,0.0030019542,0.001444219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007438167,0.00033707358,0.00033819053,0.0008285294,0.00061905757,0.0020517088,0.00049586623,0.0011345958,0.0070190597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04994497,0.00030369352,0.00026140135,0.000406434,0.0012828613,0.0016409243,0.0010893091,0.001300512,0.0005870529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030017763,0.0016853329,0.66969204,0.00041579048,0.0002414136,0.00068540487,0.036567785,0.005854248,0.033886697,0.03959066,0.0029051097,0.20547375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002695921,0.0016237495,0.8420313,0.000330979,0.00024901968,0.0006251324,0.015830105,0.027709315,0.013008518,0.08608285,0.012039026,0.00020042123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026082292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002075729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007438167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010203517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039337277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917396070","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n1p122","title":"Post-Truth Politics: The Effect of Reminders of Political Affiliation on Partisan Op-Ed Viewership","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Viewpoints; Social psychology; Irrational number; Audience measurement; Realm; Biology and political orientation; Psychology; Political efficacy; Polarization (electrochemistry); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.020546731286074194,"score_gpt":0.32836845320067165,"score_spread":0.30782172191459745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917396070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970061,0.00009499146,0.00009319645,0.00021258912,0.000034729914,0.000017896482,0.0001013319,0.000023301069,0.0024158305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976999,0.000061671126,0.00014486324,0.00009877401,0.000049703034,0.000034056244,0.00013306909,0.000017043889,0.0017608894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986638,0.00056661107,0.00010524156,0.00027862648,0.0001940272,0.0001917327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346928,0.04689773,0.011049783,0.00272057,0.0010788653,0.0035601386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018381281,0.00028718793,0.00055988756,0.00032359932,0.00051944,0.0017575402,0.0005412674,0.0012537942,0.013918005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03616107,0.0002480555,0.0004617674,0.00031095065,0.00055090955,0.0009934566,0.0008436711,0.0019972345,0.0009175757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.041085128,0.015328759,0.8176565,0.00062130264,0.0011658154,0.0008495225,0.021962209,0.0015013873,0.026210247,0.0014763426,0.0036360351,0.068506695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012970023,0.0024225614,0.9916762,0.000029815123,0.00021168205,0.000059023983,0.002041671,0.00083719403,0.0013635345,0.00030857476,0.00089327904,0.000026727532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024175476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001976995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013918005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034365628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026656353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046560407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917497111","doi":"10.1038/s41598-019-39600-9","title":"Peer effects on control-averse behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation","keywords":"Control (management); Stochastic game; Incentive; Social psychology; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Phenomenon; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.017207911558998326,"score_gpt":0.3117681160094495,"score_spread":0.29456020445045117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917497111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99264985,0.00014051677,0.00062739366,0.00011175486,0.000008609485,0.0000150676815,0.000027662585,0.000010000587,0.0064090006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998949,0.00008627127,0.00037608828,0.000033560846,0.000007040152,0.000010590756,0.000013172091,0.0000039201686,0.0005203998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987301,0.00071647065,0.000048222475,0.00014120743,0.00026725154,0.00009672105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98893297,0.0071700215,0.0017781897,0.0010687443,0.00029527064,0.00075487775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016899859,0.00031406945,0.00030796262,0.0003645901,0.00025135855,0.00047121948,0.00016160912,0.00031179073,0.0050913864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079988465,0.00013370631,0.00019916167,0.00011747656,0.0007010344,0.00030055302,0.0006715402,0.0005105201,0.00017285135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009898965,0.010314522,0.5041703,0.0007123911,0.0009616353,0.001835223,0.0042143622,0.005699387,0.25956613,0.026314005,0.0016419133,0.1746712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016555903,0.0049220463,0.9488544,0.000051284078,0.00036043458,0.0005073625,0.0006170401,0.007096123,0.024403082,0.010862469,0.0020883216,0.00007203139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008172351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093435653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050913864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026441427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027536284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017032444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917544524","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3338862","title":"Measuring Belief-Dependent Preferences Without Information About Beliefs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","keywords":"Endogeneity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Contrast (vision); Order (exchange); Econometrics; Point (geometry); Population; Property (philosophy); Mathematics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03746853527361608,"score_gpt":0.30427803812012616,"score_spread":0.26680950284651006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917544524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423819,0.00007476933,0.05320554,0.00008534162,0.000012801713,0.000042868043,0.00042107934,0.000050195213,0.003725424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98781747,0.000042626154,0.011341978,0.000024942654,0.000009058088,0.0000422542,0.00025323936,0.000009213772,0.00045930408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974311,0.0014432751,0.000116581905,0.0004239803,0.00044873328,0.00013634434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96243376,0.030677777,0.002128678,0.0034371652,0.0007805037,0.0005421447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036596674,0.00058490684,0.00058168266,0.00070616126,0.00018144023,0.0017909638,0.0006145434,0.001127465,0.004291008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03619255,0.0003710809,0.0005308403,0.0009883704,0.00044323388,0.0026107745,0.0007797616,0.0011289782,0.0006508395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077624056,0.0057461453,0.4343379,0.0011603597,0.0020737783,0.000302607,0.0017125036,0.07402184,0.06984721,0.07102506,0.0017218898,0.33028823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003241792,0.0031377242,0.31915382,0.00011829343,0.00055396906,0.0003451847,0.00093209295,0.5006138,0.049115226,0.124388285,0.0011056011,0.00021187273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058577996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055904925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004291008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003151838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031153372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019354403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919179801","doi":"10.5406/amerjpsyc.132.1.0123","title":"What Should We Believe?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Library science; Publishing; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Art history; Psychology; Computer science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.06996110043944923,"score_gpt":0.43619237960277124,"score_spread":0.366231279163322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919179801","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009135702,0.9079655,0.00018676098,0.03817771,0.03013428,0.000034756325,0.00042328084,0.000062151776,0.022924246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001783799,0.8925029,0.00032522963,0.030516649,0.021141503,0.00007027094,0.00087531324,0.000055823384,0.05272857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867517,0.00027381512,0.00015722064,0.00017064738,0.00062717317,0.00009588111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635184,0.0011372477,0.00026061392,0.00012441492,0.0017448011,0.00038105578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015246462,0.0008252729,0.0014584374,0.0026692434,0.00063791644,0.003689225,0.0015623829,0.002850514,0.06913451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098733455,0.00046713676,0.0007222404,0.0030327302,0.00092955015,0.0031346884,0.0012867992,0.0052384515,0.04848447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016026124,0.000008002062,0.000047704067,0.0015632532,0.000015943593,0.000029479366,0.000034648834,0.0000136509525,0.0000431011,0.0010028349,0.8774499,0.11977544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059531676,0.00000795779,0.00012631391,0.002345627,0.000014008976,0.00011716033,0.00003472947,0.0000051946636,0.0000151257345,0.00051515776,0.996808,0.0000047614167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036151495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074075633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06913451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020956316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038506582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23127794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920328045","doi":"10.1098/rsos.192090","title":"Preferences and constraints: the value of economic games for studying human behaviour","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wenner-Gren Foundation; Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Psychology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.09869311775605959,"score_gpt":0.3924061539113683,"score_spread":0.2937130361553087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920328045","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07909139,0.0060588433,0.75916845,0.043690007,0.0008686382,0.0005373249,0.00044547368,0.000097929274,0.11004195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7819098,0.003486758,0.20567434,0.0029654575,0.00041655402,0.001577343,0.00013105891,0.00008729882,0.0037512379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699504,0.026577583,0.00057561195,0.0011584956,0.0013914215,0.00034655575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8980755,0.08952635,0.0034400343,0.006077586,0.0015625927,0.0013179085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02594027,0.0015315455,0.0018074937,0.0017476095,0.002276934,0.007411758,0.003343457,0.0032998195,0.0062732273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08661033,0.0009992975,0.0014619366,0.0017882328,0.02314363,0.01649304,0.004770418,0.008304218,0.00046889312],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004323109,0.00006752443,0.0014776505,0.00020994147,0.00008843103,0.000064091946,0.0019892456,0.00949879,0.00015197691,0.9761949,0.00078590924,0.00942834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002615504,0.000044079192,0.00052460807,0.00012525848,0.00001567136,0.000029372539,0.0008020412,0.01376154,0.00007040671,0.9785201,0.0060551986,0.00002549459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005273654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004153525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02594027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038799476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024630926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13718688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921545035","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000186","title":"Signaling when no one is watching: A reputation heuristics account of outrage and punishment in one-shot anonymous interactions.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Reputation; Selfishness; Psychology; Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Heuristics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.13886815499623809,"score_gpt":0.41656066962542393,"score_spread":0.27769251462918587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921545035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83309674,0.0017176744,0.04155935,0.008277833,0.0003050385,0.00019871943,0.0014063682,0.00037900163,0.11305926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940684,0.00019119073,0.0020289735,0.00026542865,0.000024400562,0.000033568955,0.00011562567,0.000021399188,0.0032509647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983553,0.0008697753,0.000081373255,0.00020151987,0.00028794844,0.00020406708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876829,0.006032369,0.003935875,0.0009568376,0.00064833974,0.00074380246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023981803,0.00036067545,0.00039021828,0.00062366104,0.0012791436,0.0020107967,0.0007607366,0.0012806517,0.0124013275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02462673,0.00041224225,0.00046171236,0.00053382694,0.0013871937,0.002236533,0.0013594604,0.0010998201,0.00074666523],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002466983,0.0018068949,0.19887088,0.0016380715,0.0008239621,0.0032061606,0.018750487,0.035404168,0.015559906,0.37477747,0.0802559,0.26643917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003625708,0.001172964,0.40401286,0.0003659278,0.00055938755,0.0016670616,0.006140385,0.15551962,0.0035310579,0.39505568,0.031128285,0.000484159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004746096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061198743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124013275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011185191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059750024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0414865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921843114","doi":"10.65109/jvkr7103","title":"Reinforcement Learning in Stationary Mean-field Games","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Bounded rationality; Mean field theory; Bounded function; Field (mathematics); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Reinforcement; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.027343148694273917,"score_gpt":0.3325606142562802,"score_spread":0.3052174655620063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921843114","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11134677,0.00037535242,0.88160163,0.0008399642,0.000049377297,0.00006991608,0.000036811653,0.000120476274,0.005559671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961397,0.00022214543,0.03587946,0.0001083612,0.000025641855,0.00010861075,0.000030245028,0.000017019744,0.0022114594],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992274,0.0004539281,0.000026761563,0.000103086444,0.00010276028,0.000085959044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650687,0.002790636,0.00027454985,0.00008337535,0.00019581635,0.00014876395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021868984,0.0006175987,0.0010480593,0.00040075392,0.00047837888,0.0009019412,0.0009632664,0.0012059802,0.0015435301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067199427,0.00029641457,0.0005759282,0.000323307,0.0018487313,0.0011790661,0.0009002472,0.0012014237,0.00014877577],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052811996,0.000046746824,0.00062822504,0.000054148968,0.000027277376,0.0000691212,0.000077421886,0.89683366,0.00072171603,0.09302423,0.0004281743,0.00803642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018009885,0.000021388267,0.00007469597,0.0000044895737,0.0000036111603,0.000007088727,0.0000100492325,0.9654136,0.00012184455,0.034125872,0.00019469978,0.0000045678003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004748511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023700455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004748511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014812286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010787171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011565566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927965397","doi":"10.1017/s1744137419000110","title":"Rationing by racing and the Oklahoma land rushes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Institutional Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Competition (biology); Lottery; Rationing; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Land Values; Land use; Property rights; Simple (philosophy); Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Civil engineering; Economic growth; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.011514094126299139,"score_gpt":0.26583821240759803,"score_spread":0.2543241182812989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927965397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918005,0.000089905385,0.0011378764,0.00055871217,0.000008350613,0.000007460817,0.000097114156,0.000010622695,0.0062893317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999067,0.000025837038,0.0002278953,0.00002244444,0.0000035268515,0.000002044109,0.00001731475,0.0000016645421,0.00063216715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960214,0.00014561595,0.000014090228,0.00007457911,0.000056331464,0.000107274165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979678,0.0009597736,0.0006967664,0.00012826211,0.00011026843,0.00013711027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006295914,0.0001583308,0.0004748273,0.0004406777,0.0008135984,0.0013033597,0.00046269002,0.000641705,0.0070314677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023342895,0.00016892217,0.0003005785,0.00053721364,0.0012871216,0.0007745993,0.000602869,0.0006486059,0.00017282994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016441656,0.0016130229,0.4707226,0.00029536616,0.00037340593,0.001947994,0.0031288476,0.25600445,0.0122459205,0.18891166,0.013529053,0.049583625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025378718,0.00085020554,0.47954667,0.00007041058,0.000114341936,0.00048284582,0.0084149,0.3921648,0.0030582114,0.099308096,0.0155519415,0.00018378797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039687872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05035885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039687872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021069702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006147543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07891375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932021542","doi":"10.1007/s10683-019-09639-6","title":"Delegation and coordination with multiple threshold public goods: experimental evidence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Public good; Donation; Earnings; Delegation; Business; Microfoundations; Economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Finance","score_opus":0.05134387755117247,"score_gpt":0.3150426893465098,"score_spread":0.26369881179533733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932021542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641494,0.00045273485,0.013855668,0.0011546918,0.000059787217,0.0001815901,0.00010151659,0.000051990075,0.01999255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672145,0.00011483509,0.0020065794,0.00013042937,0.000023436156,0.00011782861,0.000024718669,0.00000825389,0.0008524754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038345,0.006713973,0.00039976675,0.0009771488,0.0008871945,0.0006384554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8689971,0.08426842,0.0247122,0.01639555,0.0018935971,0.0037331986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015933292,0.00083043514,0.0011007074,0.00068148825,0.0010323073,0.0023708765,0.0012545026,0.0017485855,0.014460092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04724909,0.00047799692,0.00047440117,0.0006736266,0.0037494386,0.0021693953,0.0022667127,0.0018452572,0.0010288366],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.047484018,0.06492852,0.11899737,0.004405988,0.0029392366,0.0019180812,0.005117403,0.092756115,0.05104779,0.42704433,0.010972774,0.17238836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019372765,0.02541583,0.11218512,0.00075317186,0.001543002,0.0010037086,0.003117235,0.1341796,0.024185672,0.6636221,0.0143070975,0.00031470048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088739727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050225295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015933292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012303869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011979886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08426428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932773092","doi":"10.1002/soej.12351","title":"Hierarchy Leadership and Social Distance in Charitable Giving","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Prosocial behavior; Social psychology; Social hierarchy; Social identity theory; Identity (music); Psychology; Transformational leadership; Field (mathematics); Political science; Social group; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.05019623394626738,"score_gpt":0.2974212456051757,"score_spread":0.2472250116589083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932773092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99679536,0.00006739098,0.00018007882,0.00009173358,0.0000104547,0.000014408153,0.0000073861465,0.0000027021458,0.0028304518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938524,0.000035519457,0.000196096,0.000030277824,0.000008521118,0.000016829823,0.0000072412336,0.0000016792907,0.00031844553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420244,0.0042273467,0.00012472278,0.00037230868,0.0006943603,0.00037881458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823759,0.010390116,0.003248361,0.00080842135,0.0004728309,0.0027042888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002956563,0.00031424736,0.0004679916,0.00046832272,0.0010447736,0.0013297626,0.00035085547,0.0005543164,0.0035431364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010689248,0.00019381967,0.00024258783,0.00030042898,0.0022370354,0.0005176429,0.0013317321,0.0012416732,0.00017948107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023247266,0.05570307,0.6016387,0.0009442996,0.0007351383,0.0011652312,0.020857966,0.0058617047,0.09603678,0.028222244,0.0015054748,0.16408214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007775893,0.012160144,0.9627388,0.00007173192,0.00013935585,0.00023495354,0.005772745,0.0029350182,0.005799635,0.007097747,0.0021979723,0.000074240306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013718226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026578584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035431364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012004508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007187455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015636027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2933626765","doi":"10.1111/1468-0106.12293","title":"Effect of religious priming in prosocial and destructive behaviour","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Prosocial behavior; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Social psychology; Dictator game; Prime (order theory); Task (project management); Sentence; Economics; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012865443272634083,"score_gpt":0.3300050308203891,"score_spread":0.31713958754775506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2933626765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947319,0.0011990193,0.00023160607,0.00012951482,0.00004449114,0.00003900418,0.000047042766,0.000016191196,0.003561242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752206,0.00091860705,0.0006300313,0.00011823597,0.00003479766,0.000043471577,0.000034985467,0.00000642919,0.00069130724],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995945,0.00027024536,0.000017813076,0.000050331157,0.000041585048,0.000025638454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961397,0.002778519,0.0005878448,0.00013841613,0.00008237356,0.00027313817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007494636,0.0002660623,0.00028333798,0.00013240156,0.00012001957,0.00026229734,0.00016415899,0.0003482852,0.006268925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043771365,0.00020134215,0.00017618484,0.000081117025,0.0003805881,0.00016941607,0.00023825032,0.00047253474,0.0003197052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09394285,0.023869904,0.05389852,0.005924085,0.0009731365,0.0007547376,0.0017947605,0.0009257774,0.5476022,0.0077327406,0.0026352257,0.2599461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030251497,0.03657831,0.89792234,0.00043381585,0.0010506994,0.0004828529,0.00046712355,0.0011014427,0.05049854,0.0029743037,0.005397649,0.00006779023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041249974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005319993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006268925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016748896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018015559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020971596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938881022","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3373379","title":"Are Auditor Negotiations Impaired During Depleting Times? The Importance of Client Characteristics and Auditor Skepticism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Business; Skepticism; Negotiation; Accounting; Auditor independence; Political science; Joint audit; Internal audit; Law","score_opus":0.010286057415242132,"score_gpt":0.2717769235047824,"score_spread":0.26149086608954025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938881022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950847,0.00010502452,0.00031553378,0.00065807713,0.000010014225,0.000013543044,0.000035478803,0.00001176585,0.0037658806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995671,0.00003446533,0.000078898396,0.000047256828,0.000007353252,0.0000043156856,0.000012774484,0.000005797263,0.00024205247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396557,0.0023722495,0.0005740943,0.0004252962,0.0015242946,0.001138619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8199556,0.08287174,0.073130436,0.008047267,0.0077662775,0.008228683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008714514,0.00018693578,0.0005387556,0.0013022771,0.0013047477,0.0045673233,0.0009998049,0.0015009143,0.007039992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1406084,0.00054513605,0.0002853748,0.0009153813,0.0012757102,0.00317092,0.0013066168,0.002159141,0.00079882285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002081635,0.0006864144,0.94583076,0.000071043825,0.00009102298,0.0010732019,0.0077971183,0.00053917017,0.0020749182,0.0010732065,0.0008309184,0.03785064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049365382,0.00035250073,0.97916836,0.0000668933,0.00006080141,0.0013624834,0.012329414,0.0017688627,0.0010177151,0.002953747,0.00081737497,0.000052346804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033908885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035376004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008714514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010685917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002209895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046087325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940232840","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3871249","title":"Peer Effects in Random Consideration Sets","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Ranking (information retrieval); Nonparametric statistics; Exploit; Computer science; Variation (astronomy); Discrete choice; Covariate; Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Econometrics; Machine learning; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01981977822759635,"score_gpt":0.33393381971571556,"score_spread":0.3141140414881192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940232840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87669337,0.00043580227,0.08020816,0.0015372686,0.00010522787,0.00024281394,0.0002545103,0.0001994183,0.04032343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97981,0.00015587352,0.0069448347,0.000102333106,0.00006781289,0.00018322268,0.000078727746,0.00006716112,0.012590075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284536,0.0044002025,0.00021916386,0.00075166463,0.00092167564,0.0008619673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8796062,0.103822604,0.004580685,0.0071555194,0.0020112705,0.0028237258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011831882,0.000706347,0.002327398,0.0014734743,0.0017399581,0.0035160899,0.0017590199,0.0018109065,0.021271244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07886076,0.0013106095,0.0014230995,0.0011145677,0.002436466,0.0052864742,0.0023822712,0.0021689227,0.00090720475],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011210226,0.000555991,0.0054022283,0.00032006108,0.00022267114,0.00024730514,0.00096028444,0.040975984,0.0014994824,0.9229935,0.003225715,0.022475647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027382674,0.00017772357,0.00624336,0.0000366489,0.00012084943,0.0001208628,0.0002699437,0.11882687,0.00062479166,0.8720554,0.0011938632,0.00005567332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020096076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021241948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021271244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015911139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012680226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07115942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941922629","doi":"10.1145/3290605.3300397","title":"How Do One's Peers on a Leaderboard Affect Oneself?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Recommender system; Peer effects; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Mathematics; Communication","score_opus":0.05557103117818827,"score_gpt":0.33030782713913576,"score_spread":0.27473679596094747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941922629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926738,0.00013286773,0.0008900734,0.00070053013,0.00003311799,0.00001494695,0.00002677254,0.00001672203,0.0055111917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836475,0.00008178551,0.0004111404,0.00010294688,0.000012654044,0.000013402541,0.000023282564,0.0000067922974,0.0009832713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847037,0.0009563605,0.000033661898,0.00017304847,0.00022558325,0.00014092938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037665,0.004109154,0.0021578292,0.00058092474,0.00072791113,0.0020476107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024344272,0.00028983902,0.00035507284,0.00058009115,0.0009325334,0.0020858513,0.00031659534,0.0006851194,0.0037232505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01298111,0.00016003777,0.00027854464,0.00029280057,0.0007862325,0.0008837437,0.0007368897,0.00081534806,0.0006619709],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007061179,0.0023024455,0.81423146,0.00022845113,0.00047006152,0.00041076622,0.028247848,0.00074751815,0.007447785,0.0039201602,0.0042719077,0.13701552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007804164,0.0010188026,0.95553005,0.000062294916,0.00017743546,0.00020859149,0.026152736,0.0022973223,0.0017981051,0.0049167494,0.0076802783,0.00007970665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010824575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020149911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037232505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038591534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002524304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012874663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943316197","doi":"10.3390/g10020020","title":"Voting in Three-Alternative Committees: An Experiment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Contingent vote; Variation (astronomy); SIGNAL (programming language); Approval voting; Bullet voting; Test (biology); Econometrics; Focus (optics); Private information retrieval; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Condorcet method; Political science; Group voting ticket; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.04892200713584727,"score_gpt":0.3607332908096011,"score_spread":0.3118112836737538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943316197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965752,0.00014833755,0.018047744,0.0009483474,0.00035180125,0.003055568,0.0010322894,0.00021926593,0.010444613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513226,0.00013493477,0.035037205,0.0014205158,0.00016182015,0.0051863203,0.0011467092,0.000065406195,0.005524422],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932769,0.0043924567,0.00041629502,0.00068332243,0.0006859906,0.000545008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472163,0.041012947,0.0034273977,0.0049531963,0.0011443442,0.002245952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008873019,0.0013063636,0.0015441335,0.00034612045,0.0010709383,0.001805137,0.002454347,0.0034263446,0.015511967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025841365,0.00069922954,0.001117336,0.000432395,0.0016952245,0.0020511798,0.0013818904,0.0031719953,0.0014483389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.15781267,0.20428486,0.03966898,0.006688794,0.0030932003,0.0017097391,0.008019598,0.10136137,0.119512044,0.17556758,0.039077684,0.14320347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.10696956,0.14958735,0.041265648,0.0006353575,0.0013551695,0.0009089115,0.0034283549,0.37388757,0.060972195,0.20763889,0.05234654,0.0010045001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006570444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071251934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015511967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083552493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012773211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051892698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945036784","doi":"10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-025730","title":"Experiments on Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Cooperation in Relationships","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Cognitive science; Empiricism; Focus (optics); Psychology; Natural (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0548896850145725,"score_gpt":0.35432129763797227,"score_spread":0.2994316126233998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945036784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45902815,0.18161485,0.14830367,0.021033928,0.002315979,0.001215782,0.0007447148,0.00031154993,0.18543138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8064114,0.14054036,0.03957973,0.0042996663,0.0010946905,0.0019695223,0.0006289588,0.00012591947,0.0053497995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935191,0.004087742,0.0004131628,0.0006600419,0.0011085042,0.00021148287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460027,0.047818135,0.0026364787,0.0020025366,0.001110706,0.00042948432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010387456,0.0009974659,0.0009990257,0.0013462963,0.00096893276,0.001716069,0.0018794539,0.0016087044,0.00658779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030060492,0.00044724383,0.0007001237,0.0016380559,0.006245593,0.0048048273,0.0019498634,0.002403013,0.0005993564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001260122,0.0035035487,0.0095451465,0.010963994,0.00086603704,0.00045307973,0.0035020504,0.008948784,0.019052517,0.57946557,0.007863118,0.354576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073388376,0.0037374136,0.039569646,0.0036331455,0.00056506397,0.0010115743,0.0029681206,0.005087281,0.01728323,0.8126806,0.11238175,0.00034818242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000882096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074703066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010387456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018889343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009344349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05493474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947743843","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01216","title":"Considerations of Mutual Exchange in Prosocial Decision-Making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychology; Social psychology; Altruism (biology); Task (project management); Social exchange theory; Helping behavior; Social decision making; Norm of reciprocity; Social preferences; Social capital","score_opus":0.033842384141005946,"score_gpt":0.3936647246339987,"score_spread":0.3598223404929928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947743843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96540725,0.00035829222,0.006172689,0.0006846718,0.000015397492,0.000038322072,0.000015812151,0.000011483362,0.027296131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984861,0.00006785629,0.001198502,0.000028340251,0.000005728878,0.000014852692,0.0000065398644,0.0000035282378,0.00018851593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370545,0.004545121,0.0001737294,0.00042943054,0.00074914406,0.00039709147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978696,0.01387366,0.004258083,0.00094636664,0.0006688867,0.0015569548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008138635,0.00044505697,0.00036041648,0.0008169397,0.0012434237,0.002865285,0.00034689624,0.0010900233,0.0030289593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027796747,0.0003845389,0.00041028435,0.0004296637,0.00296283,0.0019889572,0.0023663535,0.0013822484,0.00015228344],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027155902,0.0024094202,0.4231868,0.0011141826,0.0010207869,0.0018807511,0.06515896,0.017593693,0.022323713,0.30996245,0.001529117,0.15110455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002315312,0.0013163754,0.6162322,0.0002618181,0.00036893832,0.0010492803,0.017125005,0.02115617,0.0045482023,0.32800302,0.009497134,0.00021024937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059875037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096120057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008138635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009820346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008383652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043041766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948567253","doi":"10.1007/s00182-019-00683-3","title":"Self-recognition in teams","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Game Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Order (exchange); Type (biology); Computer science; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.016266233602337102,"score_gpt":0.3307623084666442,"score_spread":0.3144960748643071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948567253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98027724,0.00007759446,0.0027958269,0.00032043923,0.000034047185,0.000011516647,0.000009162278,0.000013471774,0.0164608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983352,0.000008306151,0.00018990833,0.0000164992,0.0000045719153,0.0000038511143,0.000006059121,0.0000018413411,0.0014338077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900275,0.000413152,0.000035512603,0.00017055839,0.00011104385,0.00026711324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939168,0.0024612192,0.0011034233,0.00060331344,0.00056430406,0.001350847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017298524,0.00017013971,0.0004664822,0.0004133403,0.0011258346,0.0024141232,0.00047665037,0.0011926976,0.008968918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008330348,0.00016161175,0.00030459618,0.00029489078,0.00076998497,0.001500442,0.0016714123,0.0006744312,0.0007669276],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033382347,0.0034998346,0.372007,0.00030854932,0.00040286695,0.0015874173,0.017228566,0.03087649,0.0153665,0.2597547,0.014016895,0.2816129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003738188,0.00182968,0.35389844,0.00010932726,0.00018168936,0.0008848691,0.021453211,0.15626082,0.005046287,0.4507029,0.009121164,0.00013779332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017213753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010667758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008968918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005111268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005495622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030004025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949204642","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2930460","title":"Private Information in Futures Markets: An Experimental Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Financial economics; Business; Private information retrieval; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.021770051755502014,"score_gpt":0.3500591788259967,"score_spread":0.3282891270704947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949204642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99656916,0.000060437465,0.0007439606,0.0001649459,0.000027940152,0.000117789146,0.000071273076,0.00000920642,0.0022353104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588156,0.00011729069,0.0014181541,0.000087108936,0.000067492365,0.00020108379,0.00013040646,0.000016079593,0.002080739],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961687,0.002019634,0.00031681484,0.00053032575,0.0006157991,0.0003487098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82821125,0.14297509,0.010092044,0.014695702,0.0016109423,0.002414974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010360522,0.000989001,0.0013061838,0.00069299986,0.0012736643,0.0033390662,0.0016405572,0.003225641,0.016983207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07029307,0.00085265154,0.0006574537,0.00061934703,0.0033101833,0.0055741738,0.0018655752,0.0033841338,0.00089349627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14330812,0.4080225,0.094525896,0.0025420994,0.00119501,0.0029671371,0.015132753,0.022262732,0.072195165,0.13513097,0.0054522273,0.09726544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05892098,0.25131422,0.15591557,0.0005612639,0.0025020256,0.003458813,0.012363269,0.17961623,0.04393778,0.2791201,0.011284606,0.0010051964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011715189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005834228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016983207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008025564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011711306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05681449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950781505","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2971783","title":"Motivating User-Generated Content with Performance Feedback: Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); User-generated content; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Social media","score_opus":0.06772159192302045,"score_gpt":0.3330127915461092,"score_spread":0.2652911996230887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950781505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885244,0.00037567137,0.0045850854,0.0003321632,0.00015991526,0.00093993475,0.00018287418,0.00012832384,0.00477158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99106115,0.0002437532,0.0055242395,0.0003181983,0.0001044569,0.0012229901,0.00015594611,0.00005655464,0.0013127227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705084,0.022527121,0.0011315328,0.0019759105,0.0032731344,0.000583921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48102778,0.47076485,0.02590537,0.0141523145,0.004108085,0.004041484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031258103,0.0012344674,0.001233372,0.0009109565,0.00090510276,0.0025748315,0.00208771,0.0031015554,0.008289113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23225763,0.00087904703,0.00058041053,0.0006686539,0.0022239021,0.0021226904,0.0012939213,0.0020018122,0.001381385],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2293332,0.20162408,0.10615723,0.007314047,0.0035640635,0.00049709337,0.006154113,0.023483872,0.045405246,0.012588073,0.01063666,0.35324234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07814024,0.30317372,0.41949296,0.00181827,0.005447394,0.00071472663,0.0026818395,0.08564952,0.0441615,0.043509647,0.014436123,0.00077413005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012244519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006686695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031258103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097337825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012409692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16531062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955224195","doi":"10.5070/t30039676","title":"“The Exchange Game”: An Engaging Classroom Exercise for Teaching and Learning About Reciprocity and Altruism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Learning Anthropology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Debriefing; Strong reciprocity; Psychology; Core (optical fiber); Sociology; Social psychology; Non-cooperative game; Game theory; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.026014510245904593,"score_gpt":0.35707399209793095,"score_spread":0.3310594818520264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955224195","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23062249,0.0008419613,0.5395209,0.009686942,0.0020166324,0.0035564748,0.00047789662,0.0038272245,0.20944946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45948815,0.001063578,0.48155499,0.0031606934,0.000405819,0.003694425,0.00049357535,0.00040852124,0.049730178],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980743,0.0012603869,0.00006674081,0.00019079568,0.00019798256,0.000209795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975496,0.0015585559,0.00012749473,0.00018539956,0.000109834815,0.00046906088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027696404,0.0012099769,0.0006034919,0.00050459174,0.0015330762,0.0017022784,0.0017430666,0.002271349,0.010784099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060563306,0.0003636253,0.00057121716,0.00024776405,0.0018822736,0.002771801,0.0028529128,0.002983026,0.002813742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016584813,0.011033414,0.0045527043,0.0018049377,0.00011348647,0.002497329,0.051106762,0.010055765,0.05782431,0.2584202,0.16277221,0.43816036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007023414,0.002336659,0.00657418,0.0007358383,0.000061685,0.0024068998,0.009732325,0.02101142,0.01908508,0.10524389,0.8318679,0.00024187972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047114203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012841253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010784099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000556477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009441678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036076367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956070714","doi":"10.2308/jmar-52479","title":"Performance Incentives, Divergent Thinking Training, and Creative Problem Solving","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Convergent thinking; Divergent thinking; Creativity; Incentive; Creative problem-solving; Wage; Training (meteorology); Creative thinking; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Labour economics","score_opus":0.07994997959707,"score_gpt":0.3840159547195735,"score_spread":0.3040659751225035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956070714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910062,0.00009652846,0.0016821856,0.00027173368,0.00001521439,0.000049889302,0.000022629672,0.000016737604,0.006838881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807525,0.000038881448,0.0012834085,0.000046939625,0.000007774362,0.000034951296,0.000014926952,0.0000038612784,0.000494046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754685,0.0014501538,0.00013515791,0.00016419715,0.0005185092,0.00018507401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9484525,0.034827385,0.010438514,0.0021927243,0.0011167258,0.002972085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044838935,0.0004901829,0.0004219848,0.00065932993,0.00050961773,0.001710453,0.0006163236,0.00077096187,0.0061428123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0293945,0.00024667275,0.00021610185,0.0004768301,0.0012853335,0.0012113232,0.0014699334,0.0011412862,0.00027284957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019968342,0.045284912,0.3598466,0.001409752,0.0005163818,0.00091129466,0.004586208,0.034828745,0.11027677,0.13341846,0.0028816785,0.28607076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002216104,0.010559991,0.7640516,0.00033088416,0.00020932504,0.00042270022,0.0016695987,0.056688957,0.02168603,0.13785863,0.0041085347,0.000197697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037445527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027852258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061428123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008367411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066859944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02371335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963764769","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3318717","title":"Black Box Analytics and Ethical Decision Making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Analytics; Ethical decision; Black box; Big data; Psychology; Data science; Business; Computer science; Social psychology; Data mining; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.020585900531678376,"score_gpt":0.3522500567251787,"score_spread":0.3316641561935003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963764769","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15076077,0.0030317472,0.653304,0.033391155,0.0007888819,0.00030534106,0.00047386144,0.0006153811,0.15732883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9268105,0.0007681934,0.06030777,0.0010836849,0.00027112957,0.00026544457,0.00014263779,0.00013616514,0.010214489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98386836,0.012269382,0.00043781407,0.0010151775,0.001810604,0.000598764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8527112,0.12596777,0.007141041,0.007877107,0.0045891097,0.0017136675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020170415,0.0009654463,0.0012422677,0.002339882,0.0020544836,0.0076042786,0.001318602,0.002934907,0.01826591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07824609,0.0005297218,0.00074391585,0.002113859,0.009509681,0.014813919,0.0033939534,0.0037548284,0.0012612195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006681368,0.0000537734,0.00083462714,0.000046866495,0.0000164897,0.000037660153,0.00041448165,0.002537449,0.00008828687,0.9803823,0.0020651517,0.013456108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068597365,0.0000059380905,0.00007789362,0.0000204383,0.000002953652,0.000007663953,0.00012155939,0.0075324136,0.000079119745,0.9911602,0.000980856,0.000004134101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014887644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089191925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020170415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023852694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032957415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106672645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964589796","doi":"10.3390/g10030032","title":"Behavioural Isomorphism, Cognitive Economy and Recursive Thought in Non-Transitive Game Strategy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Sussex","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Transitive relation; Bounded rationality; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02574604071348963,"score_gpt":0.3084862818885397,"score_spread":0.2827402411750501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964589796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56564283,0.007525436,0.33995143,0.003195324,0.00010306342,0.0001257407,0.0000654162,0.00011304016,0.08327774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716813,0.0012603517,0.025784098,0.00011513167,0.000030390005,0.000087346314,0.000025804951,0.000011454328,0.001004203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873525,0.0007684712,0.00006621444,0.0001578336,0.0001914546,0.00008078367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965887,0.0025181347,0.0003633052,0.00028436718,0.00013361684,0.00011181376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018766865,0.00032574407,0.0004968018,0.0010995594,0.0004487763,0.0020154612,0.00051592867,0.00060336944,0.0011502781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048388587,0.0002158782,0.0005751366,0.0005927224,0.011228101,0.004260514,0.0010022693,0.0011671731,0.00008701149],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025982332,0.000025935838,0.0014916634,0.00009681034,0.00003123481,0.000071094866,0.0011608948,0.0033658736,0.0007637499,0.98054725,0.00009303761,0.012326469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007506053,0.000030619103,0.0023855725,0.00002062727,0.000007611209,0.0000777778,0.00024987783,0.005860929,0.00028059015,0.98946077,0.001606685,0.0000113187325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012206673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001045123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020154612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013430165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088278175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009924948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965301361","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2019.10810abstract","title":"P-hacking in Top-tier Management Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Phenomenon; Work (physics); Statistical evidence; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security; Statistics; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040962381841395765,"score_gpt":0.3550538961922862,"score_spread":0.31409151435089044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965301361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9209633,0.0035852524,0.009502248,0.017878963,0.0007167661,0.00020039859,0.0005147366,0.00043842514,0.046199895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490887,0.00056503253,0.0018567994,0.0010505965,0.00045347415,0.0000419516,0.000077181634,0.000033904274,0.0010122946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94589615,0.022806749,0.0068893665,0.004825365,0.016315805,0.0032665762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24969916,0.46109453,0.15798433,0.044233732,0.06552591,0.02146233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045937672,0.00036021948,0.00086727744,0.014782713,0.0043327995,0.0104341265,0.0013453985,0.0020960146,0.0062162443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40443546,0.00045471344,0.0004290655,0.014359687,0.0069407974,0.0077619576,0.0061637433,0.0022423707,0.0009382183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009576499,0.0004961655,0.6941814,0.0013907824,0.0003658366,0.0017474707,0.01609764,0.0013461169,0.0082054315,0.047205314,0.01582582,0.21218036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016283484,0.0010795504,0.83234173,0.00097654515,0.00023469269,0.003144367,0.020460557,0.0052873306,0.008578205,0.087809816,0.039687272,0.00023715297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012426754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020526873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027192016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004505436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24294454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965361382","doi":"10.1007/s11127-023-01053-0","title":"Enumerating rights: more is not always better","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Texas at Dallas","keywords":"Framing (construction); Rhetoric; Politics; Crowds; Entitlement (fair division); Political science; Law and economics; Public finance; Social rights; Constitution; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08107399269273767,"score_gpt":0.3669994274504834,"score_spread":0.28592543475774573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965361382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7580725,0.0062770927,0.021908728,0.09870112,0.00095584855,0.00009664818,0.00039818836,0.000067180445,0.11352271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882819,0.0012720238,0.0035646034,0.003516217,0.00032122454,0.00006750469,0.00005775723,0.000027065,0.0028915694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915455,0.0058003278,0.00026792564,0.00086771,0.0011820408,0.00033646004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.864617,0.10961693,0.010704773,0.011329582,0.0021765912,0.001555096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01410761,0.00048525314,0.0010865167,0.00092031923,0.001190554,0.004877134,0.0010864473,0.003374739,0.026998213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0782226,0.00028396022,0.0003586908,0.0014234452,0.010220118,0.013531755,0.0017904633,0.0036058687,0.00089427736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012942284,0.001980328,0.009861598,0.00067674136,0.0002155142,0.000046408848,0.0015637756,0.0024275128,0.0018917257,0.86296636,0.008007917,0.10906789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002017118,0.00021051499,0.005985618,0.00024072788,0.000066631575,0.000056008477,0.0016667948,0.002257004,0.0013723355,0.9809007,0.007013176,0.00002884472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083020923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086753746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026998213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013100111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011483245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090318024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965732554","doi":"10.1177/1091142120960491","title":"Labor Supply, Taxation, and the Use of Tax Revenues: A Real-Effort Experiment in Canada, France, and Germany","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Economics; Redistribution (election); Tax revenue; Revenue; Indirect tax; Direct tax; Tax rate; Tax reform; Value-added tax; Ad valorem tax; Public economics; Monetary economics; Labour economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05027346089567508,"score_gpt":0.29658044817861434,"score_spread":0.24630698728293926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965732554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99816054,0.00004853403,0.00024206364,0.00009321533,0.0000055182527,0.00009392403,0.00008445617,0.000006670582,0.0012650678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956726,0.00011990715,0.0011874352,0.00011582376,0.0000065881413,0.00017859519,0.00019975312,0.000005571344,0.00251363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870706,0.00049890886,0.00005302888,0.00017548288,0.00025615192,0.0003093627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994528,0.0032378219,0.00058550254,0.00043626217,0.00057348097,0.0006388515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034698893,0.00079585006,0.00086563616,0.00064878335,0.0020870653,0.001340231,0.0013466348,0.0013893653,0.0027893004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064391484,0.0003530966,0.00043097162,0.0007776453,0.0024416056,0.00086134864,0.00079842063,0.00083730614,0.00018361711],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.061180614,0.10306423,0.33810073,0.0019835767,0.002542374,0.0026628852,0.024462065,0.12329896,0.08741066,0.07420256,0.019530423,0.1615609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013727232,0.03055884,0.7584895,0.00038879956,0.0013268201,0.00027902002,0.021382488,0.105043896,0.02084932,0.013566459,0.033572465,0.0008151492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6994706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8011788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30052942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01903525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009191397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6045986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966795488","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2019.12640abstract","title":"The Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay-for-Performance and Punishment-for-Underperformance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Turnover; Incentive; Expectancy theory; Sorting; Compensation (psychology); Business; Psychology; Social exchange theory; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.014370075441166775,"score_gpt":0.29311867266837277,"score_spread":0.278748597227206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966795488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880029,0.00031789384,0.0037177221,0.0006396881,0.000028239665,0.000065519576,0.00012780218,0.000025529545,0.007074775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999173,0.000038184455,0.00042810163,0.00004256872,0.000014568751,0.0000138575615,0.00004141395,0.0000022663048,0.00024610505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933169,0.003062607,0.00056419504,0.0007054564,0.0015482986,0.0008025006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88193345,0.054737825,0.046896238,0.0060307523,0.004958609,0.0054431036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008571522,0.00040664518,0.000568377,0.0020067836,0.000785858,0.0012035817,0.00054694025,0.00091004954,0.0042831087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0552421,0.00020089535,0.00067956274,0.0013734578,0.0021728892,0.0013987535,0.0018833723,0.0012390581,0.000274535],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038982424,0.0007735842,0.9490604,0.0000898045,0.00019686656,0.00009804238,0.00069497566,0.0020096023,0.00083766127,0.010396994,0.0003486092,0.03510368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013304346,0.00027281686,0.99163437,0.000023916988,0.00003764429,0.00004401819,0.0002659806,0.002338357,0.00020449432,0.0047768173,0.0003682192,0.000019997728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023140847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003671014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008571522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001492944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016869304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04533106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967250550","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-19107-8_9","title":"A Review of Experiments on Dynamic Games in Environmental and Resource Economics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Resource use; Group (periodic table); Management science; Operations research; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Environmental resource management; Chemistry","score_opus":0.12448619693549148,"score_gpt":0.504189263872347,"score_spread":0.3797030669368555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967250550","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027416548,0.99764794,0.0006445984,0.0003871707,0.0001253398,0.000022340133,0.00007175857,0.000008628081,0.0008180102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025356903,0.9954717,0.001036467,0.00047101514,0.00014741806,0.00006478608,0.00008670418,0.000006441947,0.00017986028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814487,0.0006774152,0.00034566666,0.00034409564,0.00041403167,0.000073889794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98130196,0.016367575,0.00076595764,0.00041683138,0.0010009268,0.00014672254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004909972,0.0016800961,0.0038970914,0.0039605694,0.00038590207,0.0014534642,0.002035124,0.0017048945,0.0045691705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016740095,0.00062201556,0.0015175648,0.0051357187,0.0015623203,0.0021933245,0.00092175853,0.0016092077,0.000896979],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039592988,0.00032079988,0.00041960127,0.122938834,0.0011016795,0.00007370583,0.000080324964,0.0011175147,0.00093057513,0.013160579,0.022225361,0.83723503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005416524,0.0010098744,0.006777507,0.08822882,0.0048865266,0.0008380968,0.00024844578,0.0008551689,0.002023986,0.043752637,0.850643,0.00019439643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029926824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004298747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004909972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021585512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003716156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025966763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968444738","doi":"10.1016/j.irle.2019.105852","title":"Why consider the lighthouse a public good?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Law and Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Excludability; Public good; Coase theorem; Economics; Private good; Law and economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.051926203850762895,"score_gpt":0.34597868789654995,"score_spread":0.29405248404578704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968444738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021300755,0.014569942,0.00895151,0.81856227,0.0028918257,0.000048873026,0.00019055985,0.00008627906,0.133398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7228637,0.011569408,0.003900027,0.21637934,0.007357965,0.000200662,0.00007231814,0.0001495135,0.03750712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939447,0.0027714395,0.00010761543,0.00088426063,0.001409962,0.00088206655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97543836,0.016898368,0.0017749638,0.002173734,0.0020799038,0.0016347243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007446216,0.00041663207,0.0013653517,0.001344062,0.005734949,0.010159242,0.0016121084,0.01589391,0.017318986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0286932,0.00045586182,0.00083066535,0.0015210551,0.027973693,0.019127924,0.0049166256,0.015284184,0.002351355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060839717,0.000055474226,0.00032548732,0.000104724255,0.000025170953,0.00006602363,0.0003717644,0.00014749006,0.0001293146,0.956854,0.032396477,0.009463197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031122483,0.000015805672,0.0003248628,0.00011873794,0.000016791037,0.000028475644,0.00038330688,0.00013226103,0.00013216118,0.9420326,0.056767892,0.000015957416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064143483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071815653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017318986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005002339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005040098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0579378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969497807","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1908.08203","title":"Outgroup Homogeneity Bias Causes Ingroup Favoritism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; In-group favoritism; Social psychology; Psychology; Group conflict; Population; Inference; Social group; Social identity theory; Sociology; Demography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.19062601699598958,"score_gpt":0.2591376613556003,"score_spread":0.06851164435961071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969497807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98653466,0.00009374705,0.004968237,0.00033978684,0.000023840734,0.000017793956,0.00003368546,0.000044631095,0.007943544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875057,0.00002883638,0.00048146772,0.00007338369,0.000010034853,0.0000063192533,0.000010734598,0.000008022639,0.00063069985],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992286,0.00031051674,0.00003400984,0.00014272693,0.00014212793,0.0001419969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944364,0.0020334737,0.001698877,0.0010579022,0.0002357889,0.00053754816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013233476,0.00033873357,0.0005061335,0.00040964945,0.0006942443,0.00091641495,0.00032695438,0.00067006884,0.004301875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005610659,0.00027869153,0.00030761576,0.000230463,0.0012258319,0.0007086779,0.0013698152,0.0007961277,0.00047928144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029296284,0.0012756315,0.23328023,0.0006456351,0.0005044337,0.0036813887,0.0034300936,0.012243259,0.5596787,0.11045646,0.0049251015,0.06694946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048921414,0.001430197,0.5184173,0.00012243085,0.0004339499,0.004539324,0.0030898887,0.05201365,0.1430531,0.2621004,0.014155964,0.00015458168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060971803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005787285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004301875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041300023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036067254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014391184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969602194","doi":"10.1287/stsc.2021.0126","title":"Value Capture in the Face of Known and Unknown Unknowns","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategy Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Cirque; Value creation; Futures studies; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Microeconomics; Profit (economics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Marketing; Mathematics; Business; Sociology; Industrial organization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.037459657808323416,"score_gpt":0.3427684335639509,"score_spread":0.30530877575562754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969602194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7567381,0.0011000328,0.17736557,0.007427439,0.00007564955,0.00012047538,0.00012382418,0.00007043753,0.05697843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995421,0.00014002464,0.003354201,0.00013242787,0.000024604604,0.000024920266,0.000016736834,0.00000710554,0.00087889447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941638,0.0028415383,0.00020576557,0.00081461295,0.0010545857,0.0009197909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9495451,0.03829387,0.005507339,0.0044453717,0.0012817592,0.00092646526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010057452,0.0005438363,0.0012291763,0.0011149708,0.0014037685,0.005610981,0.0013424341,0.0029042677,0.0038687496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042288523,0.0006061098,0.0007963436,0.0007598972,0.0074087875,0.011509522,0.004788297,0.0034656595,0.00016998306],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021518476,0.0001603115,0.006519112,0.00014885285,0.00011500887,0.0007330208,0.0024891587,0.025454339,0.002198553,0.9425945,0.0007995766,0.018572293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037553593,0.00007847417,0.0021470531,0.00003893083,0.000031725365,0.00016632289,0.00097648444,0.040244628,0.0010068872,0.95383793,0.0013981712,0.000035818648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001730316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010007012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010057452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020221793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012090016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053189516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971088477","doi":"10.1177/0022243719853289","title":"Measuring Rank-Based Utility in Contests: The Effect of Disclosure Schemes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Rank (graph theory); Incentive; Set (abstract data type); Microeconomics; Affect (linguistics); Identity (music); Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.09659236447030613,"score_gpt":0.41454892632699863,"score_spread":0.3179565618566925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971088477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816087,0.0001844934,0.01121068,0.00017458257,0.000029058161,0.00013934741,0.000051513478,0.00002365708,0.0065779323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968323,0.00004992426,0.0025381525,0.000029016219,0.000011970721,0.000046264122,0.000023673767,0.0000050883323,0.00046365178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820839,0.012867752,0.00071583665,0.00084530015,0.0028402023,0.0006470358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81976783,0.1344928,0.031159911,0.009162892,0.0027137918,0.0027027878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016290033,0.000630208,0.0007336896,0.0008027966,0.0007282419,0.0025419004,0.0008210928,0.0008817414,0.0036336707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08805405,0.00029778606,0.0005550084,0.00062558637,0.0021268295,0.0021214655,0.0019008714,0.0015066457,0.00037941497],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0140059795,0.01699503,0.45157942,0.0016041644,0.0014268258,0.00043684564,0.0039002637,0.086057,0.06205767,0.09854131,0.0014428196,0.26195267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011937041,0.034835566,0.68623364,0.00032338445,0.00081814546,0.00086916186,0.0035231956,0.13685271,0.054410752,0.07457624,0.0057768673,0.00058659643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004207701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005739948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016290033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010268766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007666138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086151004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972658270","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1552","title":"Impact of assertive and defensive impression management tactics on recruiter evaluation: The case of post‐failure entrepreneurs in employment interviews","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Impression management; Assertiveness; Trial by ordeal; Psychology; Human resource management; Psychological contract; Public relations; Social psychology; Business; Management; Political science; Economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.15532114049910942,"score_gpt":0.4220164765586089,"score_spread":0.26669533605949947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972658270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963252,0.000019759556,0.00049040973,0.0001789111,0.000005646175,0.000037521513,0.000004794635,0.0000045334423,0.002933186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883527,0.00002706616,0.00035249977,0.00004992525,0.000007209198,0.000043356125,0.0000063853267,0.000002086338,0.00067624764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98923045,0.008432162,0.00026976113,0.00029460102,0.0009244126,0.00084859296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.931802,0.05600351,0.0062785908,0.0017211912,0.002202757,0.0019920655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014670443,0.00036924766,0.0002904407,0.0011186049,0.0031783476,0.002351184,0.00078273506,0.0014273035,0.003916873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054617595,0.0002831646,0.0002223324,0.0003790469,0.0022997502,0.0010333414,0.002187526,0.0011594804,0.00041605879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015857479,0.0018501686,0.23705229,0.0003068047,0.00005557081,0.009103536,0.6483957,0.000690798,0.017009426,0.0047304207,0.0011633899,0.07805608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008736847,0.0014535744,0.24719305,0.00020956529,0.000058010544,0.0025283557,0.72927153,0.0037736124,0.0070835715,0.0020285388,0.006196673,0.00011606618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019227535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042489604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014670443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013735788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012384151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07758564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973460394","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x20190000061006","title":"The Dark Side of Routine Dynamics: Deceit and the Work of Romeo Pimps","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ivey Business School, Western University","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Dynamics (music); Constitution; Deception; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.01782138242712552,"score_gpt":0.27632105999504136,"score_spread":0.25849967756791586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973460394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1058707,0.014180136,0.008478634,0.021869836,0.0005371719,0.000051850606,0.000056477456,0.000068908725,0.84888625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9251535,0.00669692,0.0020660518,0.00091786834,0.00025239625,0.00003730187,0.000024787196,0.00005166598,0.06479946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988657,0.0007186018,0.000022334214,0.00009433864,0.0001794703,0.00011953806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983449,0.0011058507,0.00016153985,0.00021889487,0.00006445625,0.00010436413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001460495,0.00032308887,0.00019686509,0.0006917426,0.0040207324,0.0046066917,0.0006154235,0.001218578,0.004844559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002766526,0.0001743346,0.00014228118,0.0006328437,0.01706291,0.004366263,0.0024327647,0.0025775137,0.00066387607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034145272,0.000025800764,0.0008125032,0.00016054326,0.000004284233,0.00048667387,0.14449178,0.00024677478,0.0002785083,0.7963266,0.011994485,0.045137882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008387093,0.000060326172,0.0054220445,0.0013541887,0.000007927392,0.0010523564,0.099628374,0.000658514,0.0007285617,0.13801976,0.753013,0.000046534366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025845452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040633725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004844559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026061435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011016857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018908918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976718055","doi":"10.3386/w26293","title":"Eat Widely, Vote Wisely: Lessons from a Campaign Against Vote Buying in Uganda","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"International Growth Centre","keywords":"Voting; Spillover effect; Political science; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ballot; Public administration; Advertising; Public relations; Business; Economics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.38982620514558985,"score_gpt":0.5483502466880075,"score_spread":0.15852404154241762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976718055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99568224,0.00021341135,0.00065759907,0.00066090544,0.000013778918,0.00003421691,0.0001580916,0.0000106238895,0.0025691078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821377,0.000082998085,0.00047920737,0.00014049493,0.000016230528,0.000036707796,0.00013599091,0.000004829179,0.00088987075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975116,0.0019524189,0.00004236901,0.0001454319,0.000089988825,0.00025814475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98241156,0.014332871,0.0016073869,0.00067520305,0.00049345545,0.00047946052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035838103,0.00033346182,0.0006606725,0.00073916675,0.0013569638,0.0015066176,0.00062862283,0.0011279231,0.0040708724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023551118,0.00031030359,0.0003905305,0.001099211,0.0014904949,0.0011314395,0.0015590822,0.0015930178,0.00048834377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026681456,0.002635855,0.8289829,0.0006176899,0.00063192076,0.0014974999,0.011642961,0.03352262,0.0010855278,0.01821328,0.01184594,0.08665563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012525112,0.0029424445,0.8086451,0.00029012124,0.00066416315,0.0003481923,0.021360062,0.11625354,0.0025922172,0.027864143,0.017634513,0.0001530096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025262507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028298918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025262507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080677756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059464853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05023092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977894477","doi":"10.1007/s10683-019-09626-x","title":"Fairness considerations in joint venture formation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); General partnership; Joint venture; Economics; Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); International joint venture; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Framing effect; Bargaining power; Public economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Persuasion; Finance","score_opus":0.038825383146580496,"score_gpt":0.312270018420682,"score_spread":0.2734446352741015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977894477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95430076,0.00023642421,0.013593512,0.000671434,0.000049065595,0.00008471915,0.000015353511,0.000013556149,0.03103528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985948,0.000024348003,0.0007750681,0.000040357183,0.000011085606,0.000018740484,0.0000027956137,0.000001453419,0.0005314062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914499,0.0062242644,0.00027128222,0.00046350516,0.0011565543,0.00043446713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94767094,0.038171336,0.00821424,0.0028867482,0.0011904964,0.0018662042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146259805,0.00026038222,0.00041163518,0.0004798314,0.0013579936,0.0022178877,0.00044653175,0.0012514449,0.0076505174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043470863,0.00024678637,0.00028329933,0.00028873002,0.0024730677,0.0017224017,0.0014248041,0.0012887685,0.00029024328],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007603324,0.005583505,0.10761059,0.0007211387,0.00029509177,0.001073541,0.007911225,0.024209341,0.05807518,0.58313036,0.0019354724,0.20185134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010638892,0.005393454,0.13558704,0.00020035652,0.00025519854,0.0005771498,0.0048838123,0.04773984,0.029720815,0.761815,0.012636504,0.00012691702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005074191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004806973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146259805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085758895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010121313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0773505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977899572","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3459643","title":"The Value of Communication: Evidence From a Field Experiment With Entrepreneurs in Togo","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Business; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.017743947942129325,"score_gpt":0.31426711220993936,"score_spread":0.29652316426781006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977899572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963947,0.000032906206,0.000103332924,0.00023589165,0.000008388414,0.000018980465,0.000011100408,0.0000026130876,0.003192092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990706,0.000049984614,0.0001426385,0.000086614935,0.000007987545,0.000024577153,0.000010273548,0.0000038186276,0.00060363434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978447,0.0014219487,0.000071803115,0.00016794451,0.00024587,0.00024764342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232817,0.066006094,0.0044799843,0.002774307,0.0008432136,0.0026146474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044377325,0.0003753808,0.0004208042,0.00077515346,0.0013851995,0.0026567162,0.0005306729,0.0020553754,0.0064878087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025627878,0.00029953837,0.00015321195,0.00045484173,0.0025765172,0.0015017821,0.0016226379,0.001409959,0.0005271419],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05992886,0.08726696,0.4358385,0.0021148575,0.0009247175,0.0037905537,0.076243885,0.004329584,0.12261862,0.03808484,0.004723083,0.16413559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0096230665,0.042415123,0.73916966,0.00069077685,0.0010744402,0.0014532738,0.0877219,0.013843732,0.03119253,0.05569497,0.016791731,0.00032881144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012580492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014597004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064878087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042463496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065509515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02346921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978723349","doi":"10.1086/713759","title":"Motivating Employees Through Career Paths","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Competition (biology); Task (project management); Incentive; Discretion; Business; Labour economics; Industrial organization; Human resource management; Human resources; Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.07091466098441927,"score_gpt":0.34257672634014946,"score_spread":0.2716620653557302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978723349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97861314,0.00009928945,0.0018831147,0.001835764,0.000060309518,0.00005069009,0.000044652694,0.000038734266,0.017374234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99143946,0.00010333187,0.0016551281,0.0002192241,0.000026368063,0.000039317012,0.000032845328,0.00000898601,0.006475372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930215,0.00037953665,0.000015241524,0.00006355549,0.00009971714,0.00013973229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919853,0.003814265,0.0007943536,0.00044787597,0.00045589643,0.0025023827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017387203,0.00027521167,0.0002304118,0.0004803128,0.0008833568,0.0018285739,0.00028532636,0.001011337,0.017658304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009711736,0.00019760228,0.00017674346,0.00035953042,0.00031007885,0.00070908054,0.00091484113,0.0010730511,0.0016186568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002789622,0.02328634,0.30051592,0.00050112157,0.00014962725,0.00037143577,0.008029783,0.0049654376,0.029028332,0.056879733,0.021993347,0.5514894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012911143,0.0087490445,0.6764666,0.0005301219,0.00040992594,0.0005150584,0.029215088,0.025434723,0.013469529,0.18693647,0.056831736,0.00015054236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038986304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010754192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017658304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030473762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001267058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059072852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979084726","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12567","title":"The Effects of Incentive Scheme and Task Difficulty on Employees' Altruistic Behavior Outside the Firm","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Georgia State University","keywords":"Incentive; Task (project management); Altruism (biology); Entitlement (fair division); Feeling; Scheme (mathematics); Piece work; Tournament; Social psychology; Business; Affect (linguistics); Microeconomics; Psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05277561207117747,"score_gpt":0.38493042499219404,"score_spread":0.33215481292101656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979084726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99930537,0.000006384093,0.0000959925,0.000021147414,0.000002057738,0.000008075631,0.0000060907682,0.0000019988072,0.0005528095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943334,0.000005177665,0.00022093562,0.000014326373,0.0000017437936,0.000021356374,0.000008922585,0.0000016441604,0.0002924374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980313,0.0012390487,0.00012643107,0.00019166245,0.0002337033,0.00017785297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763104,0.013591273,0.004889679,0.0020199388,0.00052196905,0.0026667325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024425047,0.00031986253,0.00027915984,0.0002801773,0.0005103097,0.001320137,0.00035309323,0.0004740682,0.004232753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013203015,0.00021682461,0.00020357326,0.00014756453,0.00065197464,0.00043005176,0.0009037081,0.0009109583,0.00026803397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017461073,0.028304802,0.6843655,0.0004138822,0.00042800422,0.00041193064,0.011743023,0.005641392,0.17180519,0.0044692475,0.0009688586,0.07398709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003378285,0.004443951,0.98141724,0.000030439262,0.00006619778,0.00006796858,0.0024450044,0.0039361836,0.0049034157,0.0012812549,0.0010085984,0.00006182086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086782547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013394054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004232753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058853667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004321647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014159977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980159010","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3247329","title":"Sequential vs. Simultaneous Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.017924716436449575,"score_gpt":0.3225586808154708,"score_spread":0.30463396437902124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980159010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85744953,0.0005617076,0.029198993,0.0028102982,0.00040056085,0.0002207479,0.00063941657,0.00013919648,0.1085796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433184,0.000058644706,0.0010014505,0.00007705761,0.00006295559,0.000023773506,0.00006613186,0.00001667114,0.0043614954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.995572,0.0012172997,0.00037599856,0.0010279797,0.0008564578,0.00095037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91262925,0.05539475,0.013102451,0.011829326,0.0034986767,0.0035455318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070366566,0.00050240976,0.0008396523,0.0007033441,0.0010889455,0.0037663386,0.0009450805,0.002216318,0.032979514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06659162,0.00060198706,0.000835616,0.0005735021,0.001785315,0.009460223,0.0023840067,0.0030998043,0.0022364522],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01192489,0.0015574332,0.14759918,0.0012024023,0.0009332723,0.0010647292,0.0061325184,0.013278318,0.0072713722,0.6640073,0.009982188,0.13504638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015285249,0.0029473698,0.1275879,0.00018636914,0.0015129604,0.0017962328,0.0054506464,0.07387979,0.004349674,0.7677179,0.0128394365,0.00020318694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017112391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00222039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032979514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011695665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001258938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11032748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980445744","doi":"10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.01.005","title":"Side-payments and the costs of conflict","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Competition (biology); Economics; Nothing; Public economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.07439886479982401,"score_gpt":0.3544814682579485,"score_spread":0.2800826034581245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980445744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8495197,0.0021194771,0.015038792,0.005891374,0.00018375154,0.00008920804,0.00028295885,0.000031433843,0.12684332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962838,0.000430897,0.0008419956,0.000101407204,0.00006840666,0.000026723674,0.000028711798,0.000008952846,0.0022091905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969477,0.0019781387,0.00017728074,0.0001685732,0.0004337325,0.00029450425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9176412,0.06918049,0.006471098,0.0032752622,0.0017381264,0.0016939206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061976523,0.0006039169,0.0007764313,0.0009912329,0.001151336,0.004277144,0.0007892637,0.0023441268,0.021506993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043906618,0.00049918547,0.00037986552,0.0013246697,0.0025327432,0.005228502,0.0015232778,0.0027875076,0.00066885405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021364402,0.0011554527,0.024587106,0.00033436474,0.0001553848,0.00066745235,0.0017783052,0.021910377,0.0018277288,0.8856043,0.0037432292,0.05609976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020977577,0.00020093928,0.013869981,0.000067338515,0.000078373276,0.0003727736,0.0013620052,0.015545008,0.00033691488,0.9654156,0.0025078885,0.00003343298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037021996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004480802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021506993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012988471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008035057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07194805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982009853","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2019.101481","title":"Public good production in heterogeneous groups: An experimental analysis on the relation between external return and information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Osaka University","keywords":"Production (economics); Relation (database); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.049990311892917215,"score_gpt":0.31091231868709013,"score_spread":0.26092200679417293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982009853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983682,0.000032207696,0.0008684107,0.000056304925,0.000010074248,0.000055447435,0.000025494814,0.0000052948817,0.00057855627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832207,0.000037373182,0.0008709661,0.000032257634,0.000018136976,0.00008474926,0.000044630346,0.0000066944913,0.0005832661],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.997359,0.001652815,0.00018705578,0.00030730365,0.00023319086,0.0002606774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8797307,0.102085754,0.007768416,0.008033869,0.0008240021,0.0015573109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00923426,0.0006381326,0.0012697557,0.0007625929,0.000588498,0.0021614938,0.00095657096,0.0013330785,0.0062119067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03938434,0.00045782208,0.0007590536,0.00054829393,0.0025919704,0.001763139,0.001404322,0.0013652478,0.00031998055],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.20329776,0.17663011,0.14349498,0.0017644775,0.0032122293,0.00137981,0.0058555156,0.055128455,0.20434704,0.0928363,0.0019601155,0.110093236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.032945257,0.13722484,0.2181668,0.00025742632,0.003731713,0.0009954191,0.004656783,0.30021185,0.10720266,0.19087976,0.003030978,0.0006966118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008973864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042348553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00923426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008360783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083773426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048836052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982477320","doi":"10.7202/1065170ar","title":"Endangered Resources: The Role of Organizational Justice and Interpersonal Trust as Signals for Workplace Corruption","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Procedural justice; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Conservation of resources theory; Organizational justice; Distributive justice; Mediation; Psychology; Resource dependence theory; Resource (disambiguation); Deviance (statistics); Interactional justice; Language change; Public relations; Economic Justice; Political science; Perception; Organizational commitment; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.024898856672835513,"score_gpt":0.29332170753795145,"score_spread":0.2684228508651159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982477320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908982,0.00034308687,0.0011688072,0.00083599886,0.000012209316,0.00001396991,0.000021073989,0.0000047635453,0.0067020347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964166,0.000049614086,0.00013973832,0.000033867378,0.0000043748028,0.0000046385326,0.000005646921,0.0000012056861,0.00011914111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957302,0.0026523303,0.00014539747,0.00035918946,0.00056010514,0.00055265625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95903796,0.022835251,0.012703345,0.0014988018,0.0016146887,0.0023099314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031866326,0.00038365825,0.0004867254,0.0015072295,0.00117678,0.003688121,0.00049987657,0.0011607795,0.0025586614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020384146,0.00025993353,0.00039798024,0.0007860992,0.0024167786,0.0026217925,0.0026738541,0.0015500032,0.00012341858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006229946,0.00084329274,0.9056246,0.00023425683,0.00027974506,0.0007186188,0.035127286,0.000944448,0.002022314,0.019846346,0.00033972078,0.03339626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032444994,0.0005121393,0.9494039,0.0002351859,0.00023681157,0.00031521698,0.029246293,0.005038371,0.0007537262,0.012831816,0.0013252209,0.00006891288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042491117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038333482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042491117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017324795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016353194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016852677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983210953","doi":"10.1002/soej.12410","title":"Identity and the Self‐Reinforcing Effects of Norm Compliance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Social psychology; Voting; Compliance (psychology); Collective identity; Identity (music); Psychology; Social identity theory; Politics; Political science; Social group; Law","score_opus":0.0195609721105865,"score_gpt":0.29983702366161613,"score_spread":0.28027605155102964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983210953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693782,0.000060982893,0.0022494628,0.00056095293,0.000015973708,0.00001427372,0.000008866271,0.000007471946,0.02770391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911624,0.000021948106,0.00044741674,0.00004597001,0.00000655686,0.0000062976414,0.0000030210135,0.000002247919,0.00035028867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829966,0.0011424638,0.000051924126,0.0001081843,0.00026851665,0.00012929937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98625016,0.0063019493,0.0044905306,0.0011375524,0.00076317094,0.001056736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033317457,0.00015347646,0.00015147809,0.0004041828,0.00061425474,0.0011252102,0.00022992746,0.0005773294,0.0033841692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013928139,0.00016034234,0.00019020808,0.00016986948,0.0018700564,0.00059353135,0.0009885804,0.00082650245,0.0001624654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027985976,0.0061684307,0.4249333,0.00027192404,0.0002936627,0.0009743126,0.012504249,0.008317732,0.036233332,0.32098314,0.0016027999,0.18491851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026975336,0.0014432173,0.81001306,0.00009763914,0.00016316648,0.0005704022,0.0040002926,0.021206766,0.007435411,0.14877796,0.0059367595,0.00008543806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096283335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010970227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033841692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000639536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058212137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017620206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985357423","doi":"10.3386/w26445","title":"Crowding In with Impure Altruism: Theory and Evidence from Volunteerism in National Parks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Crowds; Crowding out; Crowding; Public good; Liberian dollar; Economics; Empirical evidence; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Public economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Monetary economics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Finance; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.35252145544320596,"score_gpt":0.5578360420899059,"score_spread":0.20531458664669994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985357423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917173,0.00032592966,0.0017737795,0.00074520713,0.000007157004,0.000017396522,0.00006748839,0.000006353326,0.0053394027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938846,0.00007788946,0.0002153273,0.00005013445,0.000008229243,0.000008239271,0.000027285821,0.0000014146298,0.00022297741],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615234,0.0027043861,0.0001380269,0.00042691798,0.00033233993,0.00024592632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9234731,0.045213126,0.022563523,0.0048673633,0.0019319627,0.001950933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061805877,0.00017111229,0.00037004796,0.00092858216,0.0010428062,0.0009477016,0.0006650441,0.0006872814,0.0033442033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027239427,0.0002589552,0.00041147822,0.0010363897,0.0030578428,0.0011637422,0.0020037366,0.00080944656,0.00019993947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005849591,0.0004803306,0.95135826,0.00017152721,0.00029409942,0.00040495675,0.0053828657,0.00273758,0.00040040267,0.012515985,0.0014454258,0.024223646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000815993,0.0003352147,0.96169776,0.00011556031,0.0001784764,0.0003202068,0.009493253,0.0051426557,0.00039147536,0.019749396,0.002457689,0.000036698646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061413716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00834578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061805877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006781013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042626457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032686472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985831047","doi":"10.1016/j.wdp.2019.100143","title":"Youth perspectives in rapidly changing landscapes: Lessons from Peru","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Development Perspectives","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Overfishing; Enforcement; Developing country; Institution; Resource (disambiguation); Common-pool resource; Business; Public economics; Development economics; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.04312101038908208,"score_gpt":0.3265745014578004,"score_spread":0.28345349106871837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985831047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280883,0.0034333994,0.00090657943,0.012402539,0.00003712432,0.000022814858,0.00012717984,0.0000082360875,0.054973733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558604,0.0020839914,0.0001697834,0.0002886915,0.000018824492,0.000017477465,0.000026245794,0.000004431445,0.0018044861],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991697,0.0005627422,0.000012183304,0.000050528837,0.0000461871,0.00015863277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982571,0.0011714372,0.00017678022,0.0000792659,0.00014655064,0.00016869113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078106,0.00021815259,0.00035797324,0.0009486402,0.0029156571,0.0033995383,0.00056403567,0.0011249551,0.0057979124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004682009,0.00013579424,0.00019674256,0.001733443,0.003964002,0.0029471056,0.0032783304,0.001649384,0.00016984681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013490031,0.00027698855,0.06463133,0.000223767,0.000042521526,0.0021579082,0.7544655,0.00039475455,0.00050968176,0.13137446,0.004473399,0.041314702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003486694,0.00015846433,0.07981309,0.00050686515,0.00005056952,0.00066454103,0.79554695,0.00057464465,0.00041295475,0.034503218,0.08771183,0.000022037982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013178057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02889978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013178057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023095126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009609029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026202679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988962338","doi":"10.3386/w26444","title":"A Journal-Based Replication of “Being Chosen to Lead”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Austrian Science Fund; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Lead (geology); Computer science; Internet privacy; Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.5073841443732385,"score_gpt":0.6108498655583017,"score_spread":0.10346572118506314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988962338","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08447578,0.0023738835,0.7222094,0.031364925,0.018737879,0.026947036,0.0047909473,0.0032219393,0.105878204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4950068,0.0006624822,0.41440144,0.012582973,0.0023968176,0.044645667,0.0013073151,0.001094794,0.0279017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6603762,0.25008643,0.015808608,0.02669565,0.04335091,0.0036821738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33548623,0.21436022,0.045575585,0.30502108,0.09205077,0.0075060483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26179036,0.0013883295,0.0023350627,0.002046059,0.0052794376,0.0059325006,0.004231228,0.0068821874,0.023896648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56127346,0.0015780246,0.0028436682,0.0026578773,0.0071558943,0.008741454,0.006597821,0.006615929,0.009645556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01647922,0.002689675,0.031140015,0.0051074685,0.0027159934,0.0007283402,0.011947455,0.0038984867,0.026735362,0.518606,0.079522066,0.3004299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013557284,0.009576594,0.036060013,0.0021321015,0.0026348084,0.0016588551,0.002637584,0.023494488,0.05286889,0.54610544,0.30808204,0.0011919242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017653325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018721172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7382096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034954622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014873029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9103439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989577513","doi":"10.1111/boer.12223","title":"Experimental evidence on personality traits and preferences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Agreeableness; Ambiguity; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Psychology; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Ambiguity aversion; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Extraversion and introversion; Economics; Microeconomics; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.2668619880577941,"score_gpt":0.46795455683467835,"score_spread":0.20109256877688425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989577513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99763453,0.00007339326,0.0002305721,0.000088754285,0.000008977878,0.0000084867925,0.00004577742,0.000003429602,0.0019060724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991585,0.000049404644,0.00026751336,0.00008570985,0.000010290377,0.000014006461,0.000047957517,0.0000025805384,0.00036404596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728584,0.0019888123,0.00012773932,0.00021851882,0.00027174625,0.00010739632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92716974,0.052916102,0.010283372,0.0065170666,0.00096455304,0.0021491495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041790637,0.0003764627,0.00037497163,0.00042601392,0.00036499018,0.0009367504,0.00025431515,0.0005757051,0.0074452953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01972211,0.00028392478,0.00025913154,0.0003151853,0.00080993766,0.0004317391,0.00064818695,0.0007705138,0.00052699144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01800987,0.013344893,0.844955,0.00045259902,0.0009071585,0.0009280913,0.0024656348,0.0019790821,0.060321636,0.0060647763,0.0012231764,0.04934796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003149182,0.0033941665,0.9866513,0.000050934254,0.00013315059,0.000250218,0.00047024118,0.0021207472,0.003418074,0.0023736095,0.0007843904,0.000038325798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045163662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040955827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074452953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016171903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014003931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024907053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991190242","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3233613","title":"Incentive Contracts and Employee-Initiated Innovation: Evidence from the Field","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Employee engagement; Field (mathematics); Industrial organization; Economics; Management; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05414515120416837,"score_gpt":0.37080289003487316,"score_spread":0.3166577388307048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991190242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9591137,0.006920524,0.0010901714,0.0042418176,0.00008402508,0.0000640361,0.00028114204,0.000010539101,0.02819409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955075,0.0022452895,0.00021669685,0.00039900007,0.000096246724,0.000020894007,0.00009800341,0.0000032880969,0.0014130085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957105,0.0024051915,0.00021303268,0.0003897356,0.000797256,0.00048416771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62685734,0.3194904,0.034124486,0.00916351,0.0051920805,0.005172221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016080052,0.00032552832,0.0007418943,0.0023330417,0.0014512368,0.0029105437,0.0012215989,0.0030977554,0.014829328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07059042,0.0002844062,0.00053541345,0.0025592137,0.0028907438,0.002198534,0.00139103,0.0017798499,0.00064645155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011337051,0.013588972,0.65178514,0.0014582719,0.00092188607,0.00092439825,0.0056642164,0.0040425295,0.0014325944,0.08790401,0.006266052,0.2146749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001945103,0.0031230883,0.86910504,0.001182336,0.0007317138,0.0005916409,0.0074109877,0.0047654277,0.0015830626,0.092209585,0.017229645,0.00012233279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032874735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032723898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016080052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012839986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002703735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08504045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993538256","doi":"","title":"A Study of Students' Views of Market Fairness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of economics and economic education research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Perception; Marketing; Economics; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.1440102360512075,"score_gpt":0.4899940334709593,"score_spread":0.3459837974197518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993538256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949173,0.000049233557,0.00015968355,0.00068997144,0.000016424203,0.000020922025,0.000013879919,0.0000027890846,0.0041300054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984049,0.000039494204,0.00007248008,0.00016797679,0.00000909458,0.000018794763,0.000008185141,0.0000020073862,0.0012771022],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336857,0.0032946628,0.00024023301,0.0005266957,0.0015296462,0.0010402307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768124,0.009645261,0.0049448716,0.0007774614,0.004147214,0.0036727912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008704597,0.00034975357,0.0004907879,0.0016258762,0.006008959,0.0070506767,0.0011437127,0.0016979083,0.0061504003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023341507,0.00044063546,0.00042317598,0.0010993226,0.0039565815,0.003591189,0.0030818118,0.0034878363,0.0005181086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018687047,0.001732001,0.25181538,0.000093476636,0.000023368915,0.0006449777,0.7136562,0.00013359476,0.0012493107,0.0080845,0.0028897657,0.01949068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031237287,0.0009915073,0.11836988,0.00012328541,0.000016684007,0.00030457843,0.8514929,0.0007080104,0.0010899844,0.00308276,0.023727521,0.00006167537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003977136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040168692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008704597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034421647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019846673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046034873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995374774","doi":"10.1257/aer.20191780","title":"Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":263,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; League; Adversarial system; Homogeneous; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Law","score_opus":0.024425346274554942,"score_gpt":0.3622983718176935,"score_spread":0.3378730255431385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995374774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99255085,0.00008247774,0.0012844517,0.00019211227,0.000066965804,0.00051414315,0.0003088428,0.000025119936,0.0049750125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867285,0.00014348545,0.0032066612,0.00040031,0.00007104765,0.002076592,0.00040779106,0.000014698163,0.0069509214],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727803,0.0013866294,0.00011735707,0.0006053343,0.00028796296,0.0003247439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97747403,0.013303422,0.0044795056,0.002410923,0.000490723,0.0018413824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062943595,0.0012029834,0.0010604853,0.00059043465,0.0013295308,0.0018813898,0.0020820799,0.0022717859,0.013105991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010771151,0.00054054667,0.0006415197,0.0005349217,0.0020183194,0.0011475709,0.0015712985,0.0023243919,0.00165464],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.24160555,0.39642262,0.10014796,0.0017344649,0.0019498325,0.0009889293,0.005847141,0.016561719,0.07569462,0.03132943,0.01575007,0.111967616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06370748,0.4069289,0.35082924,0.0006071875,0.003004177,0.0005033258,0.00870397,0.060702533,0.022610122,0.05704863,0.02477227,0.00058221054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024117255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031959265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013105991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012451445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000868823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043843925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995901198","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2019.101505","title":"Gender differences in performance under time constraint: Evidence from chess tournaments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Constraint (computer-aided design); Robustness (evolution); Elite; Psychology; Time constraint; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.0809884376156961,"score_gpt":0.3310991299234488,"score_spread":0.25011069230775274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995901198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981067,0.00011187648,0.000035246594,0.00005974831,0.0000068685554,0.0000034580805,0.00018991831,0.0000014138641,0.001484795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987727,0.00006431732,0.000037083973,0.000043906293,0.000011333565,0.000004250322,0.0002927216,0.000005010067,0.0007687156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945277,0.00017725225,0.00003005403,0.00012131358,0.000106073465,0.00011256411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886304,0.0047917543,0.003451205,0.0009009783,0.0005291158,0.001696434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011934453,0.00032892055,0.0005463736,0.00072537165,0.00044637173,0.0010315797,0.00051951775,0.0008587218,0.010001447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00920479,0.00022898629,0.0002730328,0.0009444229,0.0007856367,0.00044131035,0.0005586857,0.00053144305,0.0009052602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006370619,0.0016227775,0.96148646,0.00007675614,0.00038956577,0.00042338012,0.0017092836,0.00050574867,0.00810748,0.0009027626,0.0012896192,0.017115518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046397472,0.00021193174,0.99870324,0.000005399349,0.000024247387,0.000053100237,0.00024223198,0.000091183654,0.00014164978,0.00020780347,0.0002659373,0.0000067507062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010905578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012521533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010905578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029646457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026111313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033458173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997341948","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3218152","title":"Belief Formation Under Signal Correlation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Correlation; SIGNAL (programming language); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Econometrics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02054274071508532,"score_gpt":0.3114067303213736,"score_spread":0.2908639896062883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997341948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302671,0.00008530042,0.05469558,0.0016531211,0.000040173694,0.000040960036,0.00013392598,0.00009659215,0.012987257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99649847,0.000029329645,0.0016201241,0.000058168203,0.000019526971,0.000017007462,0.000038682065,0.000006147722,0.0017125861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763834,0.0010505747,0.00009229514,0.0004377683,0.0003524486,0.0004284992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95133483,0.035941202,0.005137952,0.004041877,0.0019370678,0.0016069949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061940616,0.00040691724,0.00080861006,0.00064461754,0.0005301092,0.002924338,0.000578162,0.0016152083,0.005935724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050381314,0.0005424393,0.0005182808,0.0005255085,0.0014393143,0.0021715807,0.001694697,0.0020588867,0.00056023506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056305155,0.0010460789,0.0527675,0.00031614344,0.0005211705,0.00093078526,0.002886217,0.075862095,0.014813835,0.775774,0.0033462713,0.06610537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004904324,0.00081789284,0.036675695,0.000035412966,0.00030366634,0.00029163674,0.00083857443,0.49696764,0.0034777622,0.45929283,0.00070468255,0.00010378616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011518718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006370719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061940616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082894834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009967996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0327577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001431619","doi":"10.2308/tar-2017-0141","title":"An Empirical Analysis of Employee Responses to Bonuses and Penalties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Quality (philosophy); Unintended consequences; Confidentiality; Economics; Value (mathematics); Turnover; Actuarial science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.13326193194779298,"score_gpt":0.4512261667297845,"score_spread":0.31796423478199154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001431619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981646,0.00004212876,0.00021396483,0.00010104352,0.0000033552037,0.00001494323,0.00084351504,0.0000073562023,0.0006090916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978175,0.00003162451,0.00018387848,0.00004461013,0.00000901767,0.000029118255,0.0012904775,0.0000028023069,0.00059091067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969343,0.0013924063,0.00021899496,0.0004140283,0.00058183685,0.0004583708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96028984,0.019885078,0.013554957,0.0018974365,0.002551284,0.0018214522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043345755,0.0002897379,0.00039490432,0.0017716248,0.0005839685,0.00090125005,0.000781572,0.0009947048,0.0030634329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021660415,0.00021736133,0.00033975157,0.0020131145,0.0004989364,0.00071298395,0.0007090667,0.0009931518,0.00090613525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015240323,0.00018323967,0.9897983,0.000029704875,0.00005271286,0.00006651124,0.0006499351,0.0011432983,0.00026588113,0.00025520744,0.0008727303,0.0065300674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058808096,0.00007862533,0.9946808,0.000010460606,0.000012010336,0.000026677904,0.000947316,0.0033358785,0.00013730218,0.00010111619,0.0006504582,0.000013421594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012751166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014959903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012751166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012464129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007805437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025353909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002670898","doi":"","title":"Insurable Losses, Pre-filled Claims Forms and Honesty in Reporting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University; McMaster University","keywords":"Indemnity; Entitlement (fair division); Actuarial science; Dishonesty; Cheating; Payment; Purchasing; Outcome (game theory); Honesty; Business; Deception; Dice; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Finance; Marketing; Statistics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08695535430881374,"score_gpt":0.40277970212396536,"score_spread":0.3158243478151516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002670898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98052704,0.00021516414,0.008828825,0.00081527536,0.00010234014,0.0005411265,0.00026215173,0.000085174375,0.008622869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847905,0.000112901056,0.011489854,0.00053709507,0.00006528643,0.0008856869,0.00016002431,0.000038898484,0.0019197043],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812521,0.011218546,0.0015679202,0.0024887985,0.0025571987,0.00091545586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70845765,0.20635308,0.05625363,0.022693694,0.0026045726,0.0036374158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020016018,0.00096257427,0.0010671894,0.00046595046,0.0008687211,0.0029170602,0.0017230946,0.0025197768,0.010847242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10992406,0.0012010519,0.00070607377,0.00031320113,0.0039103855,0.0029064585,0.0018750179,0.002986477,0.0011892329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08109983,0.075351536,0.22223729,0.0046297307,0.0012370272,0.0014782269,0.012974709,0.022058414,0.3142302,0.076879926,0.007157176,0.18066593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016491449,0.1384993,0.4229582,0.0010708554,0.0017637017,0.0024501968,0.004817721,0.068994224,0.14194022,0.18364906,0.016135199,0.0012298821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056461577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065994816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020016018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010521255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009936289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10585606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005875144","doi":"","title":"The origins of human prosociality: Cultural group selection in the workplace and the laboratory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Social psychology; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.0513046527046437,"score_gpt":0.4030651362264441,"score_spread":0.3517604835218004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005875144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98828715,0.0007260384,0.0021412682,0.0013434711,0.000026414593,0.000012720565,0.000029016288,0.000011370021,0.007422622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985795,0.00014754485,0.00074673357,0.00018454331,0.000015934918,0.000015451724,0.000011397952,0.0000048202714,0.000294081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974451,0.0017699451,0.00004982454,0.0003103959,0.0002842074,0.00014055554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902317,0.004736823,0.0018323523,0.0017147653,0.00036900266,0.0011153552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029417663,0.00020782839,0.00035312487,0.00067815976,0.0010239732,0.001835175,0.0005418463,0.00086231815,0.0028072738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010928753,0.0002734989,0.00018037559,0.00034689542,0.004846732,0.0012815899,0.0017651485,0.0008410545,0.00032408067],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028266055,0.003945337,0.6281759,0.00044633992,0.00033167648,0.0019859402,0.026463343,0.0013154221,0.08302852,0.07788741,0.00285,0.17074347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019546221,0.0022492888,0.884103,0.00027159302,0.00012522389,0.0015053236,0.015047023,0.0030862356,0.008183231,0.07631962,0.008759244,0.00015480157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014197681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016987798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029417663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061195414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004523072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015557766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008734248","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3541247","title":"Good-Looking Prices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Price discrimination; Vendor; Product (mathematics); Unit price; Economics; Microeconomics; Test (biology); Unit (ring theory); Business; Marketing; Psychology","score_opus":0.031678568183638484,"score_gpt":0.33618706514813035,"score_spread":0.3045084969644919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008734248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19077313,0.0020335373,0.11992211,0.01971232,0.0012641925,0.00013897209,0.0011785183,0.00071287743,0.6642643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91667145,0.0008129471,0.008753402,0.0010331521,0.00044085714,0.00003781662,0.0002042307,0.00013388119,0.07191228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991667,0.0002199925,0.000042147898,0.00017877214,0.00026038892,0.00013199366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957562,0.0017333565,0.00048853044,0.0010105696,0.00057452277,0.00043670123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014797082,0.00041247733,0.00072764955,0.0008271435,0.0009509596,0.004444289,0.0007019925,0.0026742534,0.05966564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013367495,0.00037470023,0.00059964845,0.0008160986,0.0016566458,0.005928585,0.0009904833,0.0026144139,0.004524925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008736355,0.000049540035,0.00052915624,0.000084047155,0.000019611944,0.00010077199,0.00013830009,0.0006937089,0.0009096857,0.97051054,0.0097498465,0.01712748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020695112,0.000021287227,0.000662465,0.000012493045,0.000009589288,0.00015276005,0.00006907996,0.0020435299,0.00026289263,0.99215275,0.0045827017,0.000009683632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050708407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049382995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05966564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085881475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006366307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19960141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010595928","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12882","title":"RECIPROCITY UNDER BRIEF AND LONG‐TIME DELAYS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; Universiteit Maastricht; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Arizona","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Wage; Economics; Labour economics; Efficiency wage; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0818494165616713,"score_gpt":0.33622500996225585,"score_spread":0.2543755934005846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010595928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99501663,0.00016271159,0.0012027334,0.0001385482,0.000020772432,0.000044382912,0.00007495616,0.000010823273,0.0033284884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817336,0.00009744351,0.00074084225,0.000045961195,0.000019348845,0.00009468628,0.00003621386,0.0000067556875,0.00078535464],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974956,0.001328515,0.0001898844,0.00042092273,0.00034105117,0.00022400879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94083613,0.04306783,0.0077374224,0.0060673812,0.00066765636,0.0016235466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053510396,0.00032956843,0.0005359202,0.00029766402,0.00034901293,0.0008493621,0.0005291848,0.0008832806,0.005609212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037274208,0.00026475178,0.00025192671,0.00025778168,0.0012410294,0.0011756512,0.0012120525,0.0009066132,0.00046571952],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07648859,0.024255926,0.12894177,0.0041868216,0.0013513285,0.0012677219,0.010775887,0.042575814,0.367027,0.09998886,0.0037752846,0.23936504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010857469,0.06539235,0.5456957,0.0007174781,0.0014738174,0.0016879522,0.0062218197,0.065787576,0.09583175,0.18271786,0.023075003,0.00054117927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063473586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047496564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005609212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048584843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040206034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028299332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012627677","doi":"10.1017/epi.2020.16","title":"Appraising the Epistemic Performance of Social Systems: The Case of Think Tank Evaluations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Situated; Epistemology; Think tanks; Sociology; Conceptual framework; Management science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Political science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.089840142278987,"score_gpt":0.37679946044124596,"score_spread":0.28695931816225895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012627677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7194859,0.001061438,0.090545975,0.017829161,0.00019266781,0.0005749571,0.00008591176,0.0001331149,0.17009097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313897,0.000064401254,0.006111203,0.000100810044,0.0000131107,0.000082944876,0.00000781676,0.00001444433,0.00046618844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80578756,0.1763318,0.0028355778,0.002106889,0.009968701,0.002969391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6136341,0.33385164,0.017085813,0.013019196,0.01954042,0.0028687662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12372946,0.00082915724,0.00085793703,0.005585781,0.006335634,0.012036138,0.002136268,0.004271073,0.0042050444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2398208,0.00048329664,0.0007954566,0.0031752128,0.023395022,0.0148304,0.0075415713,0.0035221714,0.0002741547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087181735,0.0004913007,0.017886536,0.00090798986,0.00026662846,0.0011229834,0.10362314,0.013520149,0.0015230045,0.7962999,0.0028676144,0.060618997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034710168,0.0008723081,0.016144373,0.0017733268,0.00024785713,0.0005649242,0.12474204,0.050933063,0.006079726,0.76776713,0.030225648,0.00030260286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055669225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004886277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87627053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015267693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00570893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6543517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012963710","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01259","title":"Public Leaderboard Feedback in Sampling Competition: An Experimental Investigation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Competition (biology); Sampling (signal processing); Value (mathematics); Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Test (biology); Sample (material); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Political science; Machine learning; Telecommunications; Communication","score_opus":0.1816447921972595,"score_gpt":0.36025381136148865,"score_spread":0.17860901916422914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012963710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99114007,0.000081522565,0.004291685,0.0001703928,0.00006216981,0.00046482903,0.000096797885,0.000033302815,0.0036593506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199235,0.00007097634,0.0053153983,0.00015138311,0.00006298327,0.0007866917,0.00009210862,0.000015911992,0.0015121812],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939691,0.0033276805,0.00031780836,0.00076694327,0.0011481385,0.00047038824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92125285,0.05818294,0.009171213,0.0072394484,0.0017843321,0.0023691393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00993285,0.001111889,0.001197068,0.00045637134,0.0010925428,0.0016412642,0.0021021722,0.0016896027,0.010528828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032839242,0.00049976364,0.0005576188,0.0005651534,0.0023918538,0.0014921089,0.0016012022,0.0022007623,0.0008053554],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1264005,0.31864852,0.075825185,0.0044924594,0.0015752114,0.0017727292,0.008149144,0.05036644,0.13631566,0.1149306,0.00910676,0.15241681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.040714264,0.30507323,0.11800461,0.0005716921,0.0016769059,0.0012121168,0.0054220883,0.28289193,0.069089375,0.15689811,0.017693888,0.0007517919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095540326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094758114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010528828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011117127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012858779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052530527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014498153","doi":"10.1111/jems.12346","title":"Inefficient incentives and nonprice allocations: Experimental evidence from big‐box restaurants","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive; Profit (economics); Economics; Microeconomics; Quality (philosophy); Wage; Queue; Labour economics","score_opus":0.10681412630995497,"score_gpt":0.33975282292482456,"score_spread":0.2329386966148696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014498153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99434537,0.00014605324,0.0013720831,0.0003834981,0.000027683633,0.0001084555,0.0001393235,0.000018174771,0.00345925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562377,0.0001801061,0.0020333473,0.0002950149,0.000036089645,0.00023748174,0.00019292366,0.000021813164,0.0013795124],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570775,0.0029101435,0.000277709,0.0004087551,0.0004173548,0.00027821586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90342087,0.066738255,0.01437543,0.011130088,0.0025167027,0.0018186783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011785782,0.0006669232,0.00087312347,0.0005995367,0.0010293056,0.0016126811,0.0015673499,0.0017659485,0.011064441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032054428,0.00081883935,0.0004758162,0.00063142274,0.0033171142,0.0013379545,0.0011390114,0.0018637319,0.0008871373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11096787,0.25712305,0.23148161,0.0041190125,0.0032312777,0.0016244778,0.008735458,0.030111935,0.08968876,0.09098334,0.015358251,0.15657495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03927363,0.114852384,0.4934062,0.00068342296,0.0015885363,0.0008622188,0.0069715725,0.07063767,0.06356582,0.18076327,0.026585035,0.0008102593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030424064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029853855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011785782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011225706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008410352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06232989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014557966","doi":"10.1515/jem-2019-0029","title":"Identification of Non-Equilibrium Beliefs in Games of Incomplete Information Using Experimental Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometric Methods","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Matching (statistics); Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Complete information; Rationalizability; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Statistics","score_opus":0.24483184828411664,"score_gpt":0.4821901653592673,"score_spread":0.23735831707515065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014557966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72180957,0.00013075765,0.2741299,0.0005560315,0.0000189538,0.00043585306,0.0003301706,0.00011425047,0.002474496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96912336,0.000064886386,0.029618137,0.00007734264,0.000013902643,0.00036415583,0.0002558047,0.000012249807,0.00047024188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96650255,0.025310773,0.0016141143,0.0031805674,0.002150141,0.0012419081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.521519,0.42102945,0.031840738,0.01902401,0.005207764,0.0013789316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057506483,0.0011392952,0.0026052524,0.0018104039,0.00097651174,0.004126086,0.002732827,0.0030924028,0.0028755085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27318692,0.0013658544,0.001557201,0.0011189535,0.0051558916,0.006313811,0.0026104716,0.0027445885,0.000318224],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003171347,0.002777274,0.08206896,0.0012582367,0.0011571174,0.0007367909,0.0041539934,0.38409516,0.0056616277,0.47031254,0.0008624385,0.043744586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042558677,0.00044890304,0.014599982,0.00010922106,0.00012125937,0.00009237701,0.00060473254,0.73759675,0.003831465,0.24145,0.0006014708,0.00011823192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003458797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022367258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057506483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030762004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016050373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30412698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015828683","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x19002206","title":"Belief as a non-epistemic adaptive benefit","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Irrational number; Epistemology; Psychology; Belief system; Cognition; Social psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08354195938240759,"score_gpt":0.35831461741141707,"score_spread":0.27477265802900946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015828683","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013679625,0.0013975976,0.0009074445,0.97479093,0.0054020234,0.0000083474415,0.000061420265,0.000033371878,0.016030896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060498897,0.0018826945,0.0013004594,0.8917022,0.024623154,0.000076754506,0.000049263155,0.00003696388,0.019829681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986407,0.0005875205,0.00007371158,0.00027583184,0.0003101456,0.00011206247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98814696,0.009109119,0.00038423654,0.0008066088,0.0010616787,0.0004913115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003338766,0.0003455283,0.00063013233,0.00033930567,0.0015045288,0.002300836,0.0010785455,0.021636484,0.012265376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01538869,0.00023442174,0.00048180312,0.00028636632,0.0054603904,0.0027312269,0.0009972084,0.016496481,0.0062266304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026971864,0.00006884509,0.001709891,0.000080338985,0.00003113769,0.0013499185,0.00021131207,0.00025627363,0.0004895002,0.19132043,0.7568745,0.047338124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024185103,0.00006992547,0.003421346,0.00020502173,0.000029185907,0.0015392035,0.00034112902,0.0019689454,0.00071251305,0.4758541,0.51555836,0.000058475143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028365543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004243912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021636484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027350425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013643443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041031778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016530903","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2019.3461","title":"Wage Transparency and Social Comparison in Sales Force Compensation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Incentive; Wage; Sales force; Compensation (psychology); Business; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.08842476663269336,"score_gpt":0.35912051864244715,"score_spread":0.2706957520097538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016530903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96806425,0.00020727621,0.008580294,0.0011295258,0.000023720171,0.00005377077,0.00003691229,0.000017836821,0.021886334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994161,0.000015078206,0.00025721264,0.000023408415,0.0000070682872,0.0000058999544,0.000003650099,0.000001127711,0.00027046684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942022,0.0032383017,0.00026729878,0.00048741925,0.0009348696,0.00086989877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605275,0.021761738,0.012888965,0.0019826074,0.0009455793,0.0018936169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006242327,0.0003088668,0.00056255783,0.00091619324,0.0016504634,0.002574255,0.00046884688,0.0012582366,0.0069388617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027166912,0.00025845302,0.0004380297,0.0007054503,0.0030920277,0.0019857914,0.0023085077,0.0013054736,0.00021968804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032250287,0.0031146999,0.4141545,0.00036773022,0.00044357052,0.0015096145,0.013473334,0.039776146,0.010563662,0.37206873,0.0024694859,0.13883352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045370572,0.001199651,0.51650244,0.00016302832,0.00020514481,0.0004669346,0.009408974,0.072313085,0.0031925442,0.39161852,0.004302372,0.00017360128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014790862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018519635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069388617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019416265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00108246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033012927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016905708","doi":"10.1002/ece3.6201","title":"Consequences of multiple simultaneous opportunities to exploit others’ efforts on free riding","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Exploit; Relevance (law); Resource (disambiguation); Sustainability; Free riding; Computer science; Environmental economics; Business; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Economics; Biology; Computer security","score_opus":0.08844994846657309,"score_gpt":0.3060344294906257,"score_spread":0.21758448102405262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016905708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99497616,0.00006818507,0.0028257456,0.00010999766,0.000006950826,0.000014593913,0.000037575915,0.000013653568,0.0019471137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903286,0.000031019208,0.0006610968,0.000016729553,0.000001908327,0.000011123326,0.000012408352,0.0000024736246,0.0002304465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998659,0.0006581911,0.00008668327,0.00019519831,0.00015238304,0.00024858763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968765,0.024138423,0.003871746,0.0013482234,0.00054025324,0.0013363096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003638764,0.0004810654,0.00053108705,0.0009488084,0.00054830516,0.0010779261,0.0007095433,0.0008132096,0.0052737016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021879587,0.0003296363,0.00070897955,0.00042275788,0.0011253731,0.0013588766,0.0015793474,0.00090160995,0.00021174479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028049613,0.002672177,0.43103382,0.00048299163,0.000877703,0.0028508753,0.0018310016,0.41788644,0.022956913,0.03973602,0.00143646,0.07543061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020612679,0.0029639415,0.25647628,0.00011649197,0.00054568757,0.0013298555,0.003064582,0.68623453,0.005857221,0.041769013,0.0012876249,0.00014852973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002736989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041637584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052737016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070981117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054952345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019243836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017308624","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3025621","title":"Preferences for Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Physics","score_opus":0.041137908551890305,"score_gpt":0.3654517812900881,"score_spread":0.3243138727381978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017308624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63564104,0.00020329318,0.006368502,0.001469877,0.000046501424,0.000052278767,0.00016591609,0.000030643634,0.35602203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925881,0.000030876057,0.00032097005,0.000083842075,0.000015325393,0.000008360983,0.00002887659,0.000008198353,0.006915385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987142,0.00046439024,0.00004712249,0.00015448748,0.00036177388,0.00025795313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352807,0.003072171,0.0007322047,0.0009950569,0.00065639976,0.0010161798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019287824,0.00035374385,0.00022053043,0.00061896053,0.0005287399,0.0031515965,0.00024588822,0.0010086851,0.034023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010921066,0.00017001647,0.00032084412,0.00038223815,0.0010417878,0.0017429555,0.0005311445,0.0012896735,0.0020629987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002787197,0.0013367955,0.14626333,0.0003028882,0.000517528,0.0012670076,0.008981306,0.006399986,0.0323091,0.64622474,0.011913807,0.14169624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005641218,0.002111137,0.27330324,0.0001313675,0.00031661996,0.0028738335,0.015460308,0.013005009,0.011452123,0.61322665,0.06736666,0.00018894508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046585672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083757786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059760245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002118882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11381835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021308099","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3023857","title":"Economic Externalities of Autocomplete: Evidence from Financial Markets","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Economics; Financial market; Monetary economics; Business; Financial economics; Financial system; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.041339842450729816,"score_gpt":0.347083162154001,"score_spread":0.3057433197032712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021308099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854092,0.00033540555,0.00068038463,0.0005214223,0.000009761169,0.000016770999,0.00033273734,0.000031109874,0.012663176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825877,0.00019329262,0.00011623562,0.00006736221,0.000030608953,0.0000063247426,0.000225311,0.000010195393,0.0010919571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994342,0.00021856204,0.000038181766,0.000077462406,0.00014597256,0.00008566174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9395273,0.03659201,0.015501992,0.0041273525,0.0016960499,0.0025553624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002594691,0.00025227043,0.00055388274,0.000983819,0.00055643084,0.0026058026,0.00048743133,0.0009633899,0.017463664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025498526,0.00028622383,0.00039252324,0.0010623154,0.0016807272,0.0024879281,0.0010850432,0.0011866592,0.00073630083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008527118,0.004629974,0.7727686,0.00034964213,0.00057964213,0.0011061789,0.0010359219,0.0153317535,0.003657075,0.10594414,0.006287922,0.07978206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008181576,0.0009763233,0.8622284,0.000068001325,0.00030814862,0.0005139556,0.00122035,0.011684804,0.0013675049,0.11447917,0.0062776916,0.00005739769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025937522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023744395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017463664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006151954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004681587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05842173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022283041","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x19002322","title":"Feelings of obligation are valuations of signaling-mediated social payoffs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Feeling; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Law and economics; Downstream (manufacturing); Psychology; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.14473083438419337,"score_gpt":0.3845644284522444,"score_spread":0.23983359406805105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022283041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024733618,0.0028220292,0.0021055439,0.96955484,0.004414546,0.000014885498,0.00004748682,0.000026734733,0.018540647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09790171,0.004438658,0.0024246986,0.8603735,0.01713847,0.00013434196,0.00003942022,0.000027020178,0.017522244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981166,0.0009392008,0.000097796576,0.0002917871,0.0004185189,0.00013615013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814485,0.0151564935,0.0006426197,0.0008490058,0.0014073051,0.0004961177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004578493,0.000388659,0.00083886785,0.000433303,0.0014455554,0.002179796,0.0014319461,0.017023927,0.007775289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019558815,0.00025099574,0.00043350956,0.00029273945,0.0078048,0.0039150952,0.0013037148,0.017593078,0.0040025893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003646214,0.00012813877,0.0036290786,0.0001880151,0.000057464047,0.0029556158,0.0012558204,0.000304747,0.0010713676,0.29814172,0.5894752,0.102428295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018715196,0.00012589413,0.0068143974,0.00039035885,0.000026238627,0.0031638178,0.00083578896,0.0022171265,0.0008655016,0.52565396,0.45962745,0.00009220622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021313445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003944382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017023927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023955135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014599541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026010871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022346663","doi":"10.3386/w19660","title":"Testing the Theory of Multitasking: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment in Chinese Factories","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Shanghai University of Finance and Economics","keywords":"Human multitasking; Natural (archaeology); Natural experiment; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Engineering; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.5269573836204425,"score_gpt":0.5774153676283118,"score_spread":0.05045798400786927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022346663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978237,0.000041012223,0.000780832,0.00009220054,0.000008587019,0.00011161928,0.000078478566,0.0000076721135,0.0010559631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956963,0.00011012158,0.0021690833,0.00016607324,0.00001535725,0.00033503002,0.00024669347,0.0000064024466,0.0012549867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967098,0.0015844337,0.0002328949,0.0007057458,0.00050820876,0.00025897517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96892256,0.016854947,0.005997255,0.0053054504,0.0017162304,0.0012034778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102837235,0.0008888507,0.0007164003,0.00048651616,0.0012720635,0.00075203524,0.0012316516,0.0009307993,0.0031872024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016159004,0.0004184924,0.00068304106,0.00046698094,0.003090604,0.0010837653,0.00089975074,0.0009284123,0.0004070305],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03852939,0.05118795,0.58666605,0.0017014559,0.0020027575,0.0013646585,0.017432502,0.01299058,0.11430849,0.017315686,0.005883642,0.15061681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030717086,0.021203972,0.92707217,0.0000919084,0.00055419566,0.00013127558,0.00242557,0.01698376,0.016351946,0.008000024,0.0039216434,0.00019185121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026643509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026754055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026643509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016557461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017140231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0543862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023120748","doi":"","title":"Farsightedness in a coalitional Great Fish War","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers du GERAD","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Mainstream; Economics; Stochastic game; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019069327541412124,"score_gpt":0.279130291858589,"score_spread":0.2600609643171769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023120748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5902841,0.00095420127,0.30508956,0.004671372,0.00017725713,0.00012824804,0.00027543376,0.0001208286,0.09829909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871567,0.00026520822,0.005551808,0.00017490367,0.000050385373,0.000035821242,0.000037579524,0.000013265583,0.006714386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987909,0.00045762677,0.000045462377,0.00025918917,0.00015156726,0.00029523537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937457,0.0030825415,0.0016214238,0.00050100527,0.00034352063,0.00070578215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002627171,0.0007172005,0.0009907938,0.00078118185,0.0014120996,0.0025006272,0.0015756801,0.002311931,0.008212544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011006857,0.00038381043,0.0011708902,0.0005514872,0.004255666,0.0036668396,0.0040857913,0.0024818126,0.00061016245],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014591284,0.000071915165,0.0024346053,0.0000803811,0.000056359986,0.00077156763,0.00077637535,0.11325001,0.001064404,0.87264025,0.0015076675,0.0072005684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009265291,0.000112760354,0.00074813364,0.000035926238,0.00003682327,0.00023275841,0.0004653637,0.21749936,0.00032161365,0.77740765,0.0029994475,0.00004749442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042421655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003067125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008212544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016153221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000985695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027473688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023254920","doi":"","title":"Introduction to the special issue “Experiments on conflicts and conflict resolution”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Social conflict; Conflict resolution research; Interpersonal communication; Welfare; Resolution (logic); Political science; Conflict analysis; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09011609405960007,"score_gpt":0.40689299562502346,"score_spread":0.3167769015654234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023254920","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013725695,0.0856655,0.06915325,0.14278229,0.60797876,0.0002616369,0.004591726,0.0013381827,0.086856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011458746,0.04271832,0.016588502,0.04477021,0.79833007,0.00062681263,0.0042892634,0.001271494,0.07994671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965945,0.0014164427,0.00033256135,0.00055494043,0.0009693587,0.00013226963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797856,0.01470199,0.0008851822,0.001966104,0.0018205107,0.0008405582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045727594,0.0018221984,0.0024486633,0.0040776907,0.001224635,0.004419637,0.0019482754,0.005346894,0.0903209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019894691,0.0006773537,0.0020691415,0.0032825102,0.0023666203,0.00422192,0.0022377167,0.0062372885,0.024112534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035814603,0.000044837685,0.000110447065,0.0005217085,0.000043751974,0.000047053436,0.000036835652,0.00022941781,0.00032823326,0.0326275,0.93668383,0.029290523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044036187,0.000046783072,0.001061913,0.0003789973,0.000044612712,0.0002092924,0.00003945252,0.000619088,0.00020644927,0.106558464,0.89075345,0.000037496124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006692602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009229194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0903209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015780027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013942204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30215353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023829253","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0434-0","title":"Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Negotiation; Variance (accounting); Public finance; Group (periodic table); Homogeneous; Microeconomics; Economics; Experimental economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.025479076836590914,"score_gpt":0.32521643728205907,"score_spread":0.29973736044546817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023829253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88443655,0.00047659673,0.06428239,0.0090766065,0.00015636954,0.00020583304,0.000071189235,0.00009384826,0.04120057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888842,0.00018028359,0.0067233914,0.00050318765,0.000055753088,0.00009622307,0.000027865635,0.000028225742,0.0035008483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328774,0.0048179883,0.00014447949,0.0004612923,0.0004019716,0.00088650384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574728,0.030085348,0.00506045,0.004877558,0.0007081373,0.0017956662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015959047,0.0011677141,0.0019085828,0.00068929157,0.0015462568,0.004062558,0.0018145009,0.0057257144,0.013700558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0419116,0.00069420954,0.0009861266,0.0007898697,0.0042566378,0.007178445,0.002504684,0.0028707462,0.0010289052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047357953,0.0040512206,0.028563732,0.0010146799,0.00075485837,0.00038871882,0.0057996707,0.041753408,0.006873861,0.79664534,0.010646946,0.0987718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056285394,0.00041351994,0.0032763637,0.00003498519,0.00008251908,0.00011418103,0.0014813917,0.026488911,0.0007025322,0.96387786,0.002937118,0.000027731785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011608043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015456105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015959047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000862593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017714268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084400475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025772844","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20201093","title":"Stories at Work","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Pairing; Variety (cybernetics); Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Public relations; Business; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.048691855494443714,"score_gpt":0.30236703722919783,"score_spread":0.2536751817347541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025772844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11819218,0.0013866007,0.04629906,0.015337545,0.0003836091,0.00049032073,0.00090021035,0.00035452066,0.816656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90902853,0.0010238339,0.014817186,0.0010409371,0.0001085531,0.00039313248,0.00068222854,0.00010674994,0.07279884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948369,0.0030830277,0.00018112303,0.0005609389,0.0007464635,0.0005915987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99144894,0.0021598833,0.0011887273,0.0013567773,0.00069943984,0.0031461532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027855015,0.0006218223,0.0002972868,0.00090092816,0.00418398,0.005926143,0.0015066843,0.0017483458,0.044974186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01025105,0.00039648617,0.000459563,0.0006867177,0.0027165574,0.0050521353,0.0046564955,0.0013642464,0.006261064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003877533,0.0005936649,0.022850456,0.00046901393,0.0000659024,0.0018296946,0.043330006,0.0021997287,0.001723721,0.65986055,0.07366105,0.1930285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005314689,0.0002923783,0.008630451,0.00042643072,0.000044287386,0.0011994869,0.039211746,0.002879084,0.000888419,0.18090294,0.7654161,0.00005555995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018611487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032085658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044974186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018892651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001694509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15045363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028356743","doi":"10.4000/travailemploi.9284","title":"Motivation prosociale et don de travail : une comparaison entre le secteur privé et la fonction publique d’État en France","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Travail et emploi","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02175171788832222,"score_gpt":0.31428137315929683,"score_spread":0.29252965527097463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028356743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828841,0.0014733033,0.0010582559,0.0019566203,0.000024381503,0.0000151911445,0.00022747603,0.000009966843,0.01235081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766976,0.00029044185,0.00025794594,0.00013074832,0.00001716018,0.000016442382,0.00007253633,0.0000069219564,0.0015380197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642,0.0017620879,0.00013482432,0.00037954244,0.000847141,0.00045634937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824479,0.009183386,0.004193724,0.0005339777,0.002638985,0.0010019582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042387745,0.00017732718,0.000302236,0.0024277582,0.001860534,0.0027641433,0.00049317983,0.0007245858,0.005201158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009602094,0.00015534101,0.000482731,0.0033563343,0.0016274127,0.0018826231,0.0013158326,0.0007525123,0.00027136644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026275535,0.00013255875,0.8044998,0.0003386776,0.00028556827,0.00034555525,0.117317505,0.00067359064,0.0008414845,0.01798277,0.0024542734,0.054865327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009495223,0.00007249835,0.9556769,0.00010151571,0.00004105159,0.000095923875,0.031368695,0.00051619957,0.00010721603,0.0008037956,0.011182299,0.00002440372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16994722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16975999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16994722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006458014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33791602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028690898","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101441","title":"Greener Than Thou: People who protect the environment are more cooperative, compete to be environmental, and benefit from reputation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Cooperativeness; Environmentalism; Reputation; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Dilemma; Social dilemma; Public good; Valuation (finance); Public relations; Psychology; Internet privacy; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04069126218292223,"score_gpt":0.3160660076738234,"score_spread":0.2753747454909012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028690898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695673,0.00016426148,0.0043147593,0.002190457,0.000081556085,0.00004192306,0.00006242933,0.00003730777,0.023539977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962626,0.000042906773,0.0015703308,0.0007188278,0.000017661043,0.0000372319,0.000022247708,0.0000073860574,0.0013206612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992403,0.000347488,0.000029863522,0.00017652335,0.00011124337,0.0000945239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961964,0.0011448715,0.001366676,0.00043504965,0.0002140196,0.0006430133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017503718,0.00027005273,0.00031490417,0.00043760965,0.0007353419,0.0013723327,0.00023104383,0.0010856315,0.011102966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004921847,0.00020798003,0.0003392468,0.0004059109,0.0016220162,0.001554259,0.0009223225,0.0007134278,0.0006260528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003295189,0.004182219,0.53143764,0.0013174491,0.0009075651,0.0017797627,0.029915852,0.0025000195,0.09573092,0.15814513,0.017402682,0.15338553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057350216,0.0017627818,0.8548904,0.00014327727,0.00038228225,0.0024372085,0.013956338,0.0064098584,0.0058262516,0.091031745,0.022378104,0.00020818168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073917484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085003173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011102966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033642864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029948525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03714317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032238315","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13088","title":"The effect of priming on fraud: Evidence from a natural field experiment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Technology Assessment international; Universität Innsbruck; Austrian Science Fund; University of Exeter","keywords":"Honesty; Priming (agriculture); Natural experiment; Dishonesty; Credence; Prime (order theory); Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04979675101211685,"score_gpt":0.37030605905441016,"score_spread":0.32050930804229333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032238315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879291,0.0002223758,0.002833335,0.0004958647,0.00008290849,0.00032674382,0.00011173816,0.000055319364,0.007942506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938791,0.00017908546,0.003943382,0.0005950247,0.00006897988,0.00032491368,0.00008016495,0.000025111847,0.00090424775],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413896,0.0041975426,0.00024784062,0.0006493668,0.0005891311,0.00017719803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8923413,0.08082636,0.014733006,0.008933741,0.0013757878,0.0017898162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069944467,0.00060046226,0.00072471006,0.00029796443,0.00068111334,0.00088006107,0.0006680141,0.0016345693,0.005803517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03938109,0.00053863955,0.00033037786,0.00022372289,0.0016551174,0.0011171065,0.00076847384,0.0014720045,0.0006087121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.099343196,0.09515889,0.160329,0.00326486,0.0011434829,0.0016923969,0.00564431,0.0059988727,0.44251144,0.038211167,0.009640442,0.13706194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0113277715,0.110768706,0.6569478,0.00050248276,0.0012635307,0.0027998602,0.0012083699,0.022746485,0.12996413,0.04274188,0.019313904,0.00041512572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071845896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044220037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069944467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005080352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046959697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036990583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033415115","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102845","title":"Identifying communication spillovers in lab-in-the-field experiments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"New York University; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Variation (astronomy); Field (mathematics); Inference; Order (exchange); Control (management); Cheap talk; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0632424105590697,"score_gpt":0.3608847441657303,"score_spread":0.2976423336066606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033415115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6827686,0.0012547134,0.27546662,0.0024928458,0.0006231963,0.010968562,0.002513253,0.0006118759,0.023300312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81967205,0.00082890823,0.14653715,0.0022677614,0.00019743216,0.02473108,0.00086816243,0.00009731125,0.0048001716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9572384,0.036097344,0.0012052828,0.0028157006,0.0017254073,0.000918039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7694154,0.17569716,0.027277913,0.021127626,0.004350531,0.00213143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060492065,0.0013188192,0.0016254499,0.0010799433,0.0018469115,0.0021564604,0.0027409056,0.0026074862,0.007359062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10319731,0.0010343031,0.0015288601,0.0013592008,0.003196692,0.0032187859,0.0029256246,0.0036050705,0.0010517486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025215581,0.04284217,0.1978081,0.011239724,0.005357286,0.002759381,0.016327491,0.060530074,0.09702304,0.24018617,0.017887484,0.28282347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010560787,0.08423611,0.23952796,0.0032295273,0.0052700327,0.0014474738,0.0067796293,0.09531941,0.086645804,0.38517946,0.08049909,0.0013046298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001444277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001961305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060492065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021350149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018559411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3199165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033462471","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/rm2tq","title":"Choosing an Electoral Rule: Values and Self-Interest in the Lab","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; British Academy","keywords":"Pessimism; Outcome (game theory); Voting; Democracy; Majority rule; Self-interest; Value (mathematics); Institution; Political science; Interest group; Public relations; Social psychology; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Law; Epistemology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09462497453305768,"score_gpt":0.36184846535247545,"score_spread":0.26722349081941776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033462471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927004,0.000027559796,0.0014357299,0.00023878178,0.000011334479,0.000023568084,0.000021619764,0.0000069646403,0.0055340547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976649,0.000022610648,0.0010170445,0.00018201976,0.0000086336195,0.00004250695,0.000025578325,0.00000684408,0.0010296772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963899,0.002915476,0.00006120831,0.00024881645,0.0002238783,0.00016064996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904095,0.005604443,0.0013232739,0.0015892694,0.0004050448,0.0006684686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051853796,0.0001880845,0.000330433,0.00022802135,0.00082664785,0.0025607124,0.00027968464,0.0006838317,0.0046904427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008771548,0.00019388011,0.0001704024,0.00020552007,0.0027894182,0.0007190771,0.0007821822,0.0008043381,0.00055256713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014403288,0.026847862,0.40761963,0.00067511806,0.0007139388,0.00085988856,0.031245053,0.009408406,0.2321463,0.13557984,0.0071447277,0.13335595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029433384,0.022110097,0.59928346,0.00024206411,0.00044518968,0.00072615943,0.025339862,0.031957824,0.081185155,0.18918057,0.046157345,0.0004288564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006119807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072090776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051853796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004738349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002912659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027423263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037454891","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v34i10.7208","title":"Gifting in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (Student Abstract)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Reinforcement learning; Reinforcement; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.21832020423111345,"score_gpt":0.3927524565995398,"score_spread":0.17443225236842633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037454891","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34188607,0.0011320866,0.61617446,0.0062190527,0.0003623648,0.00010951515,0.00006046271,0.00035519848,0.03370088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979624,0.00015191431,0.01741835,0.00013457166,0.00004924449,0.000038259077,0.000007798299,0.000013896563,0.0025619413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991186,0.00063676585,0.000022063352,0.00007824249,0.00009347733,0.00005083195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468344,0.0037353558,0.0004685219,0.00035662716,0.00033205125,0.00042411068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027847385,0.000268586,0.00045290843,0.00028037827,0.0005054787,0.00093976705,0.0007225733,0.00078820426,0.004077075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012544412,0.00013285785,0.0003640328,0.00022850798,0.0016655695,0.0014501453,0.0010036147,0.0013975432,0.00026381644],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024981314,0.00022497443,0.0035208627,0.00014686582,0.00007491821,0.00018643308,0.0003379188,0.42471433,0.0023347372,0.51440626,0.0024115872,0.05139132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082669285,0.00015320344,0.000756882,0.000025253785,0.000013487901,0.000044661127,0.000054898934,0.73489815,0.0007311576,0.2603942,0.0028304756,0.0000149288335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013365123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008420508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004077075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010451702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053962803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014727294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037792658","doi":"10.65109/upta1170","title":"Testing Axioms Against Human Reward Divisions in Cooperative Games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Context (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Shapley value; Axiomatic system; Social choice theory; Simplicity; Game theory; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13052319208164828,"score_gpt":0.38075557770475577,"score_spread":0.25023238562310746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037792658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5563665,0.00010544314,0.42292005,0.0031404619,0.000104849016,0.00043692155,0.00037464642,0.00028510296,0.016266024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9285206,0.000049600963,0.06958649,0.00056354766,0.00003969542,0.00073857984,0.00019005708,0.000033620443,0.0002777014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9050261,0.0670892,0.004524506,0.009595157,0.012551185,0.0012138464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41119272,0.5023493,0.0305832,0.039039332,0.015154155,0.0016812243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06816595,0.000946708,0.0011921738,0.0014813838,0.0025654035,0.003576931,0.0038877807,0.002722769,0.0034630252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35200298,0.00069142453,0.0012158534,0.001552552,0.013595201,0.007462685,0.0035268825,0.0032010237,0.0003939532],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012349607,0.0010954604,0.039347745,0.00062044954,0.00060207845,0.00019195324,0.0051182793,0.062019765,0.004752707,0.832309,0.0024164421,0.050291125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006875851,0.0009343856,0.014212931,0.00016881668,0.0001599015,0.0001512869,0.0019673312,0.18697521,0.010509743,0.77915955,0.0049447026,0.00012842663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025680182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021178548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06816595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035180768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036059392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36050034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038464999","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3343700","title":"A Political Reciprocity Mechanism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mechanism (biology); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Law and economics; Political science; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.016551761785548267,"score_gpt":0.3134389622482794,"score_spread":0.2968872004627311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038464999","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14608249,0.0002678847,0.72400105,0.0023380676,0.0001501314,0.00056887046,0.0003383754,0.00033907135,0.12591395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8608212,0.0001848223,0.12389978,0.0002514799,0.00009514055,0.0006298643,0.000112135465,0.000060005535,0.01394564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946807,0.0032874835,0.00018927561,0.000692523,0.00073629036,0.00041374765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98977697,0.005793103,0.00156476,0.001859083,0.00056129723,0.00044484792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070741577,0.0007149762,0.000761439,0.0009883464,0.001378715,0.0027925265,0.0017847924,0.002348785,0.01240683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019376917,0.0003725771,0.0010467676,0.0007478245,0.0029764771,0.0046245684,0.002034274,0.0017493839,0.0014968843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028595994,0.000040899966,0.0002768078,0.000032296826,0.000017192446,0.000038824848,0.00011253923,0.006075873,0.0007589686,0.9859606,0.00050779694,0.006149587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014494169,0.00014339139,0.00035247963,0.00003292471,0.000046759356,0.00022075017,0.00013035355,0.09837885,0.0016162468,0.8826746,0.016225042,0.000033692224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051888207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003924338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01240683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010338933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013703555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04150498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039469087","doi":"10.1111/caje.12503","title":"Identification of firms’ beliefs in structural models of market competition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Exploit; Economics; Discrete choice; Nonparametric statistics; Market structure; Investment (military); Complete information; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1294357922387585,"score_gpt":0.24701779524097392,"score_spread":0.11758200300221541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039469087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8564393,0.00011349135,0.13674128,0.0010903282,0.000008820758,0.00009215665,0.0002571532,0.00007597753,0.005181588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617445,0.00006648696,0.0030629039,0.00002335397,0.0000066647544,0.000034277928,0.00009249976,0.0000038851963,0.00053548266],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974916,0.001527583,0.0000890313,0.0002822916,0.00021976342,0.00038968172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93968695,0.049627,0.00734697,0.0016784278,0.0010056531,0.0006549875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063787242,0.0005785763,0.001308053,0.0011648523,0.00053421245,0.0027220063,0.0012010136,0.0017139105,0.002748844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032084323,0.0005791059,0.00087215396,0.0010017591,0.0019527607,0.002976917,0.0015029066,0.0016886678,0.00021570001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062111253,0.0005935792,0.033390164,0.0001878482,0.0001916288,0.00025363703,0.0014286478,0.5675304,0.0012468568,0.37835926,0.00093567383,0.0152612105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096352735,0.00008646992,0.0037648543,0.000030108391,0.00003020128,0.000026139345,0.00031943095,0.8352787,0.0003965288,0.15966569,0.00027700074,0.00002854226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009273812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076587712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009273812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025099015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014840199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03373432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041708415","doi":"10.3390/g11030025","title":"Switching Competitors Reduces Win-Stay but Not Lose-Shift Behaviour: The Role of Outcome-Action Association Strength on Reinforcement Learning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Predictability; Outcome (game theory); Association (psychology); Competitor analysis; Adversary; Reinforcement; Reinforcement learning; Competition (biology); Action (physics); Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Management","score_opus":0.04860363658271985,"score_gpt":0.32687971047128217,"score_spread":0.27827607388856235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041708415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99942905,0.000020483678,0.00019822633,0.000024581916,0.000002654014,0.0000030417655,0.000007267128,0.0000058371743,0.00030885145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907756,0.000019810344,0.00038102406,0.000028945136,0.0000028095299,0.0000149954885,0.000026002188,0.000009123518,0.00043959802],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995977,0.00012173416,0.000025628906,0.000077724995,0.00010213679,0.00007505355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998418,0.00051144586,0.00029516904,0.0002346433,0.000068006484,0.00047282543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005888369,0.00026508947,0.00047947746,0.00018291708,0.00019663005,0.00043751308,0.0002653517,0.00033562296,0.0038242422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024233945,0.00018144457,0.00015887387,0.000084180465,0.00051557913,0.00025319788,0.0005709284,0.0006979164,0.00022681056],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006651412,0.0056828284,0.051660944,0.00018572496,0.00023095908,0.0001309825,0.0006386436,0.0015148212,0.8798717,0.0008211385,0.00040142902,0.052209377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003434557,0.011635229,0.87940145,0.00003032829,0.00018507066,0.0002638512,0.00045980807,0.011662497,0.09196394,0.0023736001,0.0016218439,0.00005896065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001367837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003080624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038242422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021614532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003270429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012793362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042086603","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09515-w","title":"The usual suspects: do risk tolerance, altruism, and health predict the response to COVID-19?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social distance; Altruism (biology); Preference; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Order (exchange); Test (biology); Distancing; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Actuarial science; Social psychology; Time preference; Public economics; Microeconomics; Medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.0957986529106418,"score_gpt":0.35966463277520727,"score_spread":0.2638659798645655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042086603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5830632,0.0840058,0.01154354,0.29932588,0.0026377935,0.00013907389,0.0021125162,0.000077425466,0.017094688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9378979,0.022391057,0.0031508505,0.029976971,0.0029045534,0.00011768911,0.0004759523,0.000025667388,0.003059297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681807,0.002120613,0.0001279022,0.0005608459,0.0002367588,0.00013585907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95164555,0.035778113,0.0063965283,0.0034024182,0.001713295,0.0010641546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008819837,0.00051355833,0.0010397512,0.00067573274,0.0005594837,0.001919749,0.0014384544,0.004006929,0.0068781245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048805255,0.0004156901,0.00065862964,0.00080458604,0.0045434064,0.002504814,0.00074461097,0.004014897,0.0010383584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030703796,0.0022959749,0.5506277,0.0018583124,0.004160841,0.0003972904,0.0018207034,0.0034350664,0.0013102272,0.12754601,0.029360017,0.27411753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003495794,0.00093526515,0.5219492,0.0013303781,0.0010128911,0.00037329795,0.0042726863,0.01009878,0.0009089945,0.43985096,0.018735243,0.00018281092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033308454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027827388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008819837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060121506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090625184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04664427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042235589","doi":"10.1038/s41467-020-17326-x","title":"Attentional priorities drive effects of time pressure on altruistic choice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Generosity; Deliberation; Gaze; Cognitive psychology; Happiness; Psychology; Altruism (biology); Dynamic inconsistency; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.030344596740705478,"score_gpt":0.3542720468057548,"score_spread":0.3239274500650493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042235589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909766,0.00010766584,0.003920045,0.00023327123,0.00000811191,0.0000073621304,0.000028123219,0.000017093485,0.0047017024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991159,0.00003698114,0.00053190056,0.000025496298,0.0000032629189,0.0000037535485,0.0000059657614,0.0000045924967,0.00027211074],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996476,0.00015778189,0.000013527196,0.00006355054,0.000057571917,0.000059847283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956617,0.0024215372,0.00087602873,0.00031872775,0.00020036756,0.0005216699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011113764,0.00021184052,0.00020444121,0.0002665686,0.00031233788,0.00094883057,0.00024434135,0.00040991607,0.0027475334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007900782,0.00019314558,0.00023336559,0.00016665405,0.00055224594,0.00064202526,0.0009793587,0.0005497888,0.00020517976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006488556,0.0009153306,0.2392143,0.00065992324,0.00046163241,0.0017187994,0.0071794856,0.041282997,0.4773369,0.120655514,0.0023256629,0.10176097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021381176,0.0010564366,0.78161716,0.000056802764,0.0002403409,0.00049694045,0.001608293,0.10060742,0.0164886,0.09514048,0.002350603,0.0001229873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016823715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014731368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027475334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067513733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036775324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009191394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042772102","doi":"10.1080/23311975.2020.1791444","title":"Motivational congruence effect: How reward salience and choice influence motivation and performance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cogent Business & Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Salient; Social psychology; Congruence (geometry); Attribution; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.02713571396406606,"score_gpt":0.27206964203502004,"score_spread":0.244933928070954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042772102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895209,0.0001729805,0.002389162,0.000310473,0.000030887273,0.00005628964,0.00006070716,0.00002183547,0.0074367053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782085,0.00004156791,0.0013519439,0.00008535741,0.00001465019,0.00003632706,0.000039692153,0.000015453066,0.0005942203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828374,0.000668617,0.00008493243,0.00032417665,0.00050353544,0.00013502357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934001,0.0037574116,0.0012207886,0.0005282697,0.00025359154,0.0008399293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024998235,0.0003114105,0.00040598036,0.000327768,0.0004141694,0.0011781085,0.00037890347,0.00051673234,0.006407785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010763558,0.00026812343,0.0003329212,0.00022037406,0.00094384217,0.00085033104,0.001443373,0.0008038254,0.0004104101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014450903,0.008626498,0.5186051,0.0007144988,0.00062678184,0.00038177517,0.0042895,0.0023739045,0.3074725,0.02818741,0.001288745,0.11298241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026385413,0.0017717555,0.9750862,0.00003104074,0.00013424335,0.00011349783,0.00027209867,0.0027967633,0.011054221,0.0070760776,0.00136047,0.0000396731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006281395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058571296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006407785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035136554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005451833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021436214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042961264","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1922345117","title":"Communicating sentiment and outlook reverses inaction against collective risks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Goodwill; Negotiation; Collective action; Skepticism; Action (physics); Investment (military); Social psychology; Business; Psychology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.16779160524465905,"score_gpt":0.397061171640045,"score_spread":0.22926956639538595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042961264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802706,0.00006928636,0.0025198907,0.00053564686,0.00008339926,0.000018155379,0.000036208316,0.00005061949,0.016416114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752945,0.00005345406,0.0009033416,0.00018229571,0.000020530479,0.000015560723,0.000024056875,0.000012595041,0.0012586656],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931705,0.00035593685,0.000022677918,0.00008813752,0.00010720236,0.000109082415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424475,0.0023561143,0.0016331894,0.000722294,0.00026814922,0.0007755715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015660892,0.0004155972,0.00029905213,0.00023863635,0.00043618467,0.0012035548,0.00029145757,0.00072734756,0.0043283813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008584102,0.00018393499,0.00021780594,0.0001397529,0.00074662355,0.00069868634,0.0010273193,0.0009459417,0.00065441866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005776032,0.0038292138,0.16639562,0.0011905917,0.00048831874,0.001700416,0.008638279,0.014573658,0.45781162,0.059755042,0.01234978,0.26749143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009370484,0.009446116,0.64932436,0.00034607764,0.000664156,0.0011146184,0.011535288,0.099576935,0.06690243,0.12366542,0.036224656,0.0002629011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006494506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068742875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043283813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029918132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041418345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014479816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043548026","doi":"10.1007/s40881-020-00089-y","title":"Laboratory experiments can pre-design to address power and selection issues","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Statistical power; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Operations research; Type I and type II errors; Econometrics; Data science; Management science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03439750883467117,"score_gpt":0.3490918061838405,"score_spread":0.3146942973491693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043548026","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050395142,0.0007543005,0.8707117,0.011089356,0.0027768558,0.022360092,0.0003860928,0.0015465416,0.03997991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3157189,0.00048302877,0.616333,0.0087778075,0.0010987819,0.051019493,0.00018409603,0.00044254822,0.005942345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81596094,0.16261697,0.0058971527,0.0049561844,0.009106978,0.0014617343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6361494,0.24917758,0.027161377,0.07053814,0.013928404,0.0030450788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21776718,0.0014535208,0.0014525357,0.0012992567,0.0018869487,0.0033047383,0.0028827307,0.0036508818,0.016483838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29425257,0.0013072429,0.0011740805,0.0010374734,0.0057955463,0.0052773375,0.0027713003,0.004860899,0.003604317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010252105,0.0068340423,0.012772758,0.0030806558,0.0010691315,0.0004403309,0.0035570287,0.011688857,0.020369077,0.4174922,0.030484717,0.4819591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009652211,0.029031644,0.021473082,0.0018670873,0.00066494045,0.0004308956,0.001122253,0.030022703,0.049720474,0.6681453,0.1874887,0.00038074979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031426144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058100803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7822328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001917459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004373728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96463233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045505278","doi":"10.1257/mic.20180190","title":"Market Panics, Frenzies, and Informational Efficiency: Theory and Experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Microeconomics; Momentum (technical analysis); Financial economics","score_opus":0.013222230028469766,"score_gpt":0.2780582811134507,"score_spread":0.26483605108498093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045505278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98872817,0.00008857188,0.0033862286,0.00035009117,0.000058307196,0.00044715442,0.0001935182,0.000103890896,0.006644029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905186,0.00015912257,0.005497887,0.00039653055,0.000045562865,0.0007908961,0.00014275224,0.000032069285,0.002416589],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904376,0.0003151505,0.000079976475,0.00026184766,0.00017772855,0.00012150123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860567,0.009460258,0.0021051858,0.0013792721,0.00028170724,0.00071691175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002510213,0.00077570695,0.00067066395,0.0004463309,0.000501014,0.0018333703,0.0012634323,0.0015008507,0.009303536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012926872,0.0005251494,0.0004274564,0.00034614454,0.0017716046,0.0019636743,0.0013577285,0.0015541916,0.00074810605],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07449421,0.17923614,0.085352875,0.003032924,0.001277439,0.0011839203,0.007077993,0.038605858,0.27778774,0.14469019,0.020504763,0.16675597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031163706,0.14156666,0.136749,0.000468081,0.0018170028,0.0011830467,0.0036906044,0.32293713,0.06646639,0.27533835,0.017927887,0.00069215894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005063532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042578715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009303536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007460439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006861119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03112346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046135651","doi":"10.3386/w22203","title":"Image Versus Information: Changing Societal Norms and Optimal Privacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Image (mathematics); Computer security; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2895510375317426,"score_gpt":0.5334361439577245,"score_spread":0.24388510642598193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046135651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8374689,0.00034728737,0.117128305,0.0055532763,0.00005199188,0.000086938584,0.00016097528,0.0000543039,0.039147988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99287546,0.00011293385,0.00607875,0.000112604,0.000016618185,0.00002420675,0.0000126925715,0.000007346261,0.00075955753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797505,0.001128483,0.00006320048,0.00029441493,0.0002856696,0.00025324326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879171,0.0072506205,0.002657955,0.0012436846,0.0005161024,0.00041451567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028453222,0.00034294723,0.00042992446,0.00048482898,0.0006908384,0.0028785095,0.0006889849,0.0014748563,0.0027526137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020382999,0.00026832265,0.00039782893,0.0004469657,0.00285448,0.0040273373,0.0015171076,0.0012972888,0.00018547865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003811652,0.0003562238,0.011132048,0.00013966445,0.00008889159,0.000192328,0.0009364799,0.060479008,0.0055463575,0.8845922,0.00086766406,0.03528797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118199605,0.0002374015,0.0073160776,0.000042603788,0.000058117133,0.0001126947,0.00082637306,0.13888218,0.0037798777,0.84624404,0.002339541,0.000042992677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012234622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009710552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028785095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002173941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095274847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015773177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047529065","doi":"10.2308/jogna-19-014","title":"The Right Stuff: Are Not-For-Profit Managers Really Different?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Governmental & Nonprofit Accounting","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Extraversion and introversion; Social psychology; Locus of control; Ambiguity; Entitlement (fair division); Psychology; Harm; Public sector; Profit (economics); Business; Public relations; Economics; Personality; Microeconomics; Big Five personality traits; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027476462216929065,"score_gpt":0.30175893180894675,"score_spread":0.2742824695920177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047529065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95918596,0.0018119343,0.0008529226,0.027874188,0.0002565502,0.00001759215,0.00003455958,0.000009175962,0.00995698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725,0.00032249663,0.00009995178,0.0019141692,0.000057378536,0.000005566495,0.000009951962,0.0000021738338,0.00033835508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572974,0.0026092331,0.00016968715,0.00027076597,0.00076884637,0.00045169878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803305,0.007207882,0.0070537794,0.0008384454,0.00193626,0.00263309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064852643,0.00013018194,0.00028050313,0.00064020837,0.0016269286,0.0036416918,0.0005238703,0.00094025687,0.0032769563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02872591,0.00011179564,0.00020029477,0.0007909295,0.004164893,0.0036759444,0.0011826769,0.0013870504,0.00029150507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079150696,0.0005296885,0.69230145,0.0005375171,0.0002472846,0.00095822953,0.08678503,0.0002071167,0.0018581683,0.027778983,0.017921926,0.1700831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079731435,0.0005047695,0.5014769,0.000984106,0.00015761792,0.0008991841,0.4279272,0.00086545467,0.0015799168,0.036811497,0.028606456,0.00010712494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013481529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024122188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064852643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000967774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010458884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034297764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048692915","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2915309","title":"Opportunity Cost, Inattention and the Bidder's Curse","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Curse; Economics; Winner's curse; Business; Microeconomics; Common value auction; Sociology","score_opus":0.04512286418043411,"score_gpt":0.357556620431001,"score_spread":0.3124337562505669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048692915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92493755,0.0014745253,0.005290267,0.0014201504,0.0001193273,0.000059622384,0.00015539589,0.000030535364,0.0665126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99363434,0.0002279876,0.00043107115,0.00011131921,0.000023784349,0.000016443262,0.00001847567,0.000011822828,0.00552474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922407,0.00028949865,0.000050013037,0.00010155828,0.00013377343,0.00020107641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029887,0.0058347112,0.001948991,0.00064162357,0.00033728936,0.0009385107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002630274,0.0003940768,0.0009506004,0.00045050555,0.00072923367,0.003505367,0.00044822905,0.0018903131,0.013554413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015609555,0.00032569066,0.0003180508,0.0003428104,0.001307936,0.0019051697,0.0013251764,0.0018790781,0.0006860799],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00810097,0.0029837375,0.19429561,0.0009528098,0.0005552017,0.0029459207,0.0041637034,0.023228865,0.025966054,0.6024742,0.012755941,0.121577024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008567504,0.0027969035,0.31191975,0.00023444957,0.00042644743,0.0020617766,0.004136198,0.043817703,0.0026907758,0.6163182,0.014494407,0.00024660953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001866807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002288144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013554413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010414043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009839189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045344055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048832335","doi":"10.3390/g11030031","title":"Against All Odds: Tentative Steps toward Efficient Information Sharing in Groups","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Outcome (game theory); Class (philosophy); Group (periodic table); Face (sociological concept); Noise (video); Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Sociology; Machine learning; Logistic regression; Social science","score_opus":0.0698662782665776,"score_gpt":0.3344721677805406,"score_spread":0.264605889513963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048832335","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084803045,0.0008807833,0.8229947,0.043009635,0.0006604035,0.0010956728,0.00021961826,0.00079444,0.045541726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57972914,0.00040061184,0.4118063,0.0020643699,0.00030377335,0.0013739589,0.00010066636,0.00012497033,0.0040962384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96533304,0.025126003,0.0011086648,0.003253259,0.0036263284,0.0015528076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8889631,0.060640544,0.007866445,0.031840555,0.005489208,0.0052001863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041568093,0.0019257088,0.0022234959,0.0021447234,0.004735938,0.007929133,0.00662792,0.0056607407,0.0100740725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11279818,0.0011385368,0.0015839572,0.0013977182,0.016602961,0.01997198,0.011990692,0.0061249407,0.0024336374],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000896031,0.0008985672,0.003454487,0.0005950756,0.00018538689,0.00018722955,0.0036518527,0.025239974,0.002407968,0.8728751,0.0072519737,0.08235633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001693898,0.00016624853,0.0003425833,0.00008633032,0.000021308546,0.00003875251,0.00063359214,0.024864228,0.0007534041,0.9684947,0.0043917834,0.0000375919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016262727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013244168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041568093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028452196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007880176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2198357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049597070","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3227085","title":"Experimental Evidence on Unique Integer Games","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Integer (computer science); Integer programming; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Mathematical optimization","score_opus":0.04034205254329567,"score_gpt":0.37110711161965443,"score_spread":0.3307650590763588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049597070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88245004,0.0010875171,0.01803835,0.0030150067,0.00016499074,0.000110013556,0.0004510349,0.000114098875,0.09456897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929432,0.00046573888,0.00305474,0.00036898025,0.000050192273,0.00008241464,0.00022119167,0.000030534626,0.0027829683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962535,0.0022855585,0.00027710068,0.0004050038,0.0005446878,0.00023425298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8403813,0.12866984,0.014302306,0.012260064,0.0024449164,0.0019416144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009642801,0.0009809294,0.0008446759,0.0008785396,0.000717151,0.0018394819,0.0012369079,0.0012705353,0.031031301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08488784,0.0004296635,0.000333652,0.00067767844,0.0028049026,0.003570336,0.0014999898,0.0016572516,0.0016327354],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011277316,0.007456421,0.029939083,0.0024781614,0.00050497794,0.0006906309,0.0021411865,0.015261752,0.016631734,0.7709217,0.010054497,0.13264263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027818882,0.0035107152,0.047672473,0.00046526123,0.00032518746,0.0011411338,0.0017590853,0.032732237,0.011228156,0.8818602,0.016358092,0.00016562651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036871177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003707982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031031301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053919764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053101697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10381007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3065247877","doi":"10.3390/g11030035","title":"A Note on Stabilizing Cooperation in the Centipede Game","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Nash equilibrium; Repeated game; Centipede; Normal-form game; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Iterated function; Non-cooperative game; Sequential game; Extensive-form game; Game theory; Simultaneous game; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07118643388488594,"score_gpt":0.3554206541494938,"score_spread":0.2842342202646079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3065247877","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12276308,0.0019436403,0.6681973,0.005163142,0.0008086408,0.00016455882,0.000094454655,0.00034148438,0.2005237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306743,0.0012379155,0.055449534,0.0009499269,0.00024302049,0.00031133048,0.000049013623,0.00008602027,0.01099892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982492,0.0008708922,0.00007253784,0.00026648067,0.0003245196,0.00021639717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954006,0.0030052916,0.00036240416,0.00068657805,0.0003023337,0.00024281384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020842468,0.0008063479,0.00065837364,0.0006108743,0.0011152257,0.001801604,0.0012459672,0.0016821704,0.0043913918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112672215,0.00029375992,0.00075847446,0.0006604081,0.0057647135,0.0033583941,0.003487845,0.0032130508,0.0007012783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005262855,0.000018937155,0.0001909137,0.000040908857,0.000010550956,0.00009296266,0.00022988894,0.0125555685,0.0017417291,0.9751999,0.0010499433,0.008815979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047286492,0.00012056342,0.0002347783,0.00006424727,0.000017756178,0.00011701175,0.00013402164,0.07226509,0.0015645999,0.9144506,0.01094551,0.00003859941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017401095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011577152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043913918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012314845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011090529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014690697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087469684","doi":"10.1162/1542476053295304","title":"Trust, Social Capital, and Economic Development","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Socialization; Incentive; Process (computing); Capital (architecture); Economics; Communism; Trustworthiness; Positive economics; Economic system; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027390449417848666,"score_gpt":0.28933369144611637,"score_spread":0.2619432420282677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087469684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58343863,0.016338963,0.048226405,0.026922569,0.00020586688,0.00013841495,0.0007497156,0.00010198733,0.32387748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316096,0.0029553333,0.0013946174,0.00010276445,0.00003186452,0.000021632703,0.00004774358,0.0000035049657,0.0022815168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990398,0.0004918463,0.000036377267,0.00010110994,0.00013713758,0.0001938045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531794,0.0026481897,0.0010751529,0.00022383333,0.00029871796,0.00043617006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001544366,0.00037721926,0.00037834293,0.0011873444,0.0009481406,0.0031315133,0.00030078465,0.0009396587,0.004999632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006136719,0.0001376444,0.0001830593,0.0018573747,0.0032559712,0.0031270774,0.0020734288,0.00091789797,0.00020580695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006753546,0.00010339958,0.014046038,0.00013910458,0.000075774165,0.00014710249,0.00086540414,0.0067674625,0.0001328978,0.9407165,0.0019352536,0.035003565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027052707,0.00006128932,0.015969403,0.00013783431,0.000034696233,0.00011036856,0.0009186927,0.0064337,0.0001959972,0.9633076,0.012779154,0.000024118448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038157445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002748682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004999632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030195867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011968742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02190876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W308755600","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2312927","title":"Sizing Up the Competition: The Interactive Effect of Tournament Prize Structure and Social Identification with Fellow Contestants on Total Effort of Contestants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Competition (biology); Sizing; Identification (biology); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Art","score_opus":0.008487311482230865,"score_gpt":0.27842779419807895,"score_spread":0.2699404827158481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W308755600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99798834,0.000049468254,0.000121680234,0.00007219408,0.0000088576235,0.000006214294,0.000026737605,0.000004318467,0.001722165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984145,0.000019869316,0.00013575701,0.00003913394,0.000011163761,0.0000070068877,0.000045990455,0.000008691543,0.0013177504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887294,0.00059392455,0.000045687088,0.00015484732,0.000090573085,0.00024198981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97751504,0.013866119,0.0019945877,0.0007389574,0.00029650689,0.0055888244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023675754,0.00044096302,0.00085400656,0.00044671423,0.0008546179,0.0027892287,0.0008324161,0.0012054157,0.016131721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009540095,0.00047360596,0.00044305096,0.0004041864,0.0008407483,0.0009906957,0.0016267915,0.0016760636,0.00072818884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.042465553,0.011547466,0.80760324,0.00031754014,0.0016607121,0.0009750042,0.0031839542,0.007985495,0.069504954,0.008573413,0.00206021,0.04412247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031522333,0.0021594136,0.9863469,0.000020801364,0.00023024017,0.00010005025,0.0010726978,0.0054043713,0.0011037065,0.0026693165,0.0005294011,0.000047966198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023759368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007893269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016131721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051469164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000841044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053965986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088757667","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/u34pr","title":"Eat Widely, Vote Wisely? Lessons from a Campaign Against Vote Buying in Uganda","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Spillover effect; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ballot; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Advertising; Economics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.07324659946339057,"score_gpt":0.366214548360716,"score_spread":0.2929679488973254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088757667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751535,0.00073174207,0.0021535172,0.0049456228,0.00010009591,0.00017136343,0.00009242468,0.000028773431,0.016623057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612635,0.0002590248,0.0006952056,0.0005768026,0.000029776618,0.000117729396,0.000018918761,0.000007077506,0.0021690612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948272,0.0041268403,0.000060492974,0.00018981527,0.00019017767,0.0006054564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878941,0.0090353675,0.0014540299,0.0005131692,0.000449912,0.0006534539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004935448,0.00048312507,0.0008366937,0.0005500931,0.0021041958,0.001850455,0.0010098197,0.0019031607,0.008247908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018230164,0.00034388324,0.0003599102,0.0006664746,0.0032803847,0.0016221652,0.0019720278,0.0019930124,0.00068420364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01615593,0.03252045,0.16974425,0.004618391,0.0011280294,0.0032097248,0.055929072,0.04320263,0.0077850325,0.21299057,0.03496721,0.41774872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013077587,0.033599894,0.34456435,0.0020703638,0.0014224119,0.00079703564,0.104724094,0.089692496,0.012552164,0.25945163,0.13759717,0.0004508273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009001782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010802024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009001782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016541162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018397201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027592003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090582738","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3576680","title":"The Impact of Vertical and Horizontal Wage Dispersion on Employee Collusion and Effort in Tournaments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Horizontal and vertical; Dispersion (optics); Labour economics; Wage dispersion; Wage; Business; Economics; Industrial organization; Efficiency wage; Geology; Geodesy; Physics","score_opus":0.015645105189166193,"score_gpt":0.31828281032222006,"score_spread":0.3026377051330539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090582738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99838805,0.000053277112,0.00018017572,0.00006388013,0.0000035312573,0.0000036988665,0.000014569334,0.0000030788162,0.001289773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961543,0.000010543043,0.000045508496,0.000009207205,0.000004562372,0.000002010234,0.000014730284,0.0000013601871,0.000296635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812144,0.00082984834,0.00012468986,0.00020360584,0.00025725382,0.00046309835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9310538,0.05196384,0.00757644,0.0022823557,0.0011779136,0.005945591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032050812,0.0002444977,0.00056582416,0.0007672269,0.0008404564,0.0034200116,0.00053333456,0.0011465701,0.0071370252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02856517,0.0003377971,0.00030433838,0.00062685815,0.0012294779,0.0012601293,0.0019050835,0.0012535851,0.0004883231],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008196255,0.0031017822,0.8944049,0.000120383425,0.0004938788,0.00056413724,0.0028540993,0.013176094,0.01225383,0.015474191,0.0008105291,0.048549887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018561099,0.0011015492,0.9684899,0.000030623287,0.00009469807,0.00012233402,0.00253731,0.0137122255,0.0008228238,0.012555421,0.000303692,0.000043882068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017676296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002764259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071370252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006555386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046122496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023875773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092853244","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2020.09.008","title":"Sentiments, strategic uncertainty, and information structures in coordination games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Comparative statics; Pessimism; Global game; Coordination game; Information structure; Affect (linguistics); Complete information; Perception; Computer science; Mathematical economics; SIGNAL (programming language); Microeconomics; Mechanism (biology); Game theory; A priori and a posteriori; Economics; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.034329472463711964,"score_gpt":0.29911365128172074,"score_spread":0.26478417881800875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092853244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94510835,0.0003570497,0.031052258,0.002306686,0.000044331744,0.00006593377,0.00015208701,0.000024766226,0.020888556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997186,0.00014210194,0.0020408474,0.0000587577,0.000018839593,0.00003149939,0.000025994621,0.000005130197,0.000490862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780613,0.0015027755,0.000092971684,0.00016599051,0.0002816934,0.00015036578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96162647,0.03246034,0.0036436305,0.00091230206,0.0007082106,0.00064904045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051814155,0.0005274098,0.0006593613,0.00055695727,0.00052240805,0.0028294,0.00042873554,0.0010260234,0.0024835498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040811393,0.00044908485,0.0003016827,0.0006767507,0.0020474214,0.0034106988,0.0007264204,0.0015297834,0.00016056695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019515237,0.00083477295,0.025007075,0.00029114357,0.0002519436,0.00016787543,0.0023236587,0.0978137,0.004812593,0.82366014,0.00289287,0.039992716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003072384,0.00027083588,0.018585376,0.000041623243,0.00008642279,0.000049407616,0.0008834213,0.17776379,0.0006235998,0.8003925,0.000939161,0.000056497804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015930466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001528831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051814155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001451838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008032657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027402282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093481705","doi":"10.1145/3415197","title":"On the Desiderata for Online Altruism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Microsoft (Canada)","funders":"FP7 Ideas: European Research Council","keywords":"Nudge theory; Inequality; Donation; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Public relations; Altruism (biology); Psychological intervention; Public good; Public economics; School choice; Political science; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.20941626698987234,"score_gpt":0.4061599600962245,"score_spread":0.19674369310635217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093481705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34950143,0.0014911034,0.1756651,0.14765948,0.00070425065,0.0002643751,0.00039010282,0.0005033664,0.32382083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703671,0.00031727686,0.018116124,0.0039553302,0.00021917933,0.00022319682,0.000053385476,0.0001017871,0.006646671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98767006,0.009134885,0.0003180278,0.0010382332,0.001386538,0.00045232518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95525813,0.03210491,0.0032687834,0.0053118244,0.0021360593,0.0019202547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013264628,0.0004310815,0.00050088344,0.00051445595,0.002456018,0.006416373,0.0013374335,0.0031332923,0.023785973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05078684,0.00041725455,0.0006008364,0.0005734015,0.008847748,0.0105766095,0.0043824846,0.0036787344,0.0018101465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025310213,0.00025689646,0.007859937,0.00021207434,0.000038230963,0.00012670642,0.0067511215,0.0016856795,0.0009186745,0.92976475,0.006751263,0.04538157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017043264,0.00026086203,0.007751181,0.00021166593,0.00005080622,0.00029340474,0.0042145373,0.009645543,0.0010280482,0.9166907,0.059622806,0.00005995943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010679837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008815482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023785973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014688973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013246761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07957202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094487948","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12657","title":"What Is a Good Rank? The Effort and Performance Effects of Adding Performance Category Labels to Relative Performance Information*","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chartered Institute of Management Accountants; Institute of Management Accountants","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Competition (biology); Performance improvement; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Social psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Combinatorics; Operations management; Biology","score_opus":0.0634782639948212,"score_gpt":0.3530129186625277,"score_spread":0.2895346546677065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094487948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98662496,0.000100599114,0.00186739,0.00045122168,0.00004570352,0.00007385448,0.00010042351,0.000060332906,0.010675377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959849,0.000049501992,0.0025085134,0.00014161604,0.000037274807,0.00007417401,0.000057532343,0.000019515977,0.0011270083],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898936,0.00666368,0.0005294679,0.0007523121,0.00177278,0.00038812374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7815848,0.1783999,0.02312591,0.009730105,0.0035353778,0.0036238693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009747996,0.0005550097,0.00060398586,0.00069232326,0.0005938327,0.0026800754,0.00067518104,0.0011449973,0.010061112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07865743,0.00034159533,0.00034831476,0.00071655255,0.0015072117,0.0020895486,0.0013709455,0.001298337,0.0010522142],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033765476,0.027421406,0.32172883,0.0027223078,0.0007993699,0.00037424237,0.0052818777,0.028096471,0.1376469,0.035699774,0.00519239,0.40127096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015101922,0.023680223,0.84992695,0.0004060315,0.00066557195,0.00016995594,0.0033495843,0.048662566,0.030505687,0.030787647,0.009964774,0.00037086793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007876393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010946613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010061112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000921287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058655237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05155295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095725677","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2020.101196","title":"Behavioral implications of using an online slot machine game to motivate employees: A cautionary tale","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Organizations and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of South Carolina","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.0682290347722682,"score_gpt":0.3484660226081192,"score_spread":0.280236987835851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095725677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9086456,0.00043666502,0.0046010683,0.047960747,0.00043313156,0.00022428724,0.00007808772,0.000046229277,0.037574094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98659384,0.00028114766,0.0022866116,0.005456082,0.00014284127,0.00011779164,0.000021398388,0.000014172758,0.0050861244],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854976,0.001009001,0.00005397158,0.00010211752,0.00018377946,0.000101336555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96372396,0.0312515,0.0015755255,0.0013480684,0.0012102448,0.00089073286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037165512,0.0004141491,0.00026423205,0.0003286372,0.001380997,0.0019112953,0.0011043515,0.0028236157,0.010433934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030589232,0.00021571442,0.0002972381,0.00026818275,0.0020357177,0.0021547484,0.00086919306,0.003166343,0.00062163034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0078111775,0.057324406,0.21924847,0.0014034685,0.00088065345,0.0021174138,0.020891096,0.014725754,0.04727309,0.22066739,0.058817506,0.34883964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027902168,0.013471133,0.46689728,0.00090079353,0.0009311608,0.0008174651,0.08572156,0.070001565,0.02789432,0.2664605,0.06366377,0.0004503126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032119423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049121347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010433934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072085485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010306083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034905016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095946541","doi":"10.3390/g11040048","title":"Communication, Expectations, and Trust: An Experiment with Three Media","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Social media; Affect (linguistics); Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Internet privacy; Dictator game; Face-to-face; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Advertising; Communication source; Communication in small groups; Computer science; Business; Telecommunications; Political science; Sociology; Communication; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05277298720551105,"score_gpt":0.32836436309566414,"score_spread":0.2755913758901531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095946541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962048,0.000027700085,0.0010353373,0.00011715679,0.000043764772,0.0005358039,0.000088314235,0.000025969439,0.0019211706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98678476,0.000085568165,0.0061320947,0.00018268228,0.000049021117,0.0032088752,0.00014287315,0.00003726713,0.0033767796],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958688,0.002058467,0.0005001903,0.00051055104,0.0006335649,0.0004284992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93900985,0.050098754,0.003532433,0.003152583,0.0011010403,0.003105341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004544004,0.0017660208,0.0012322905,0.0007933654,0.0015477261,0.0033937842,0.0017525601,0.0022119293,0.008434414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032017548,0.0010820471,0.000783718,0.00043976327,0.0017188338,0.0026840563,0.0023930704,0.0033621853,0.0007246859],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14409135,0.41633007,0.07098287,0.003817063,0.0018328236,0.0030407808,0.050170146,0.026606517,0.15826164,0.02653958,0.0040061558,0.094320975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.059888348,0.43230358,0.15316154,0.00065013365,0.0029966515,0.0010845533,0.019274097,0.17393829,0.07623401,0.058563013,0.020711511,0.0011942978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013311267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010043364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008434414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010273639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009103739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028215945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096991995","doi":"10.1257/aer.20171175","title":"From Extreme to Mainstream: The Erosion of Social Norms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Mainstream; Victory; Preference; Economics; Positive economics; Public good; Outcome (game theory); Political economy; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Sociology; Demographic economics; Public economics; Political science; Psychology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.07505025608584882,"score_gpt":0.3517531864111646,"score_spread":0.2767029303253158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096991995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8340095,0.0026837545,0.016652774,0.017445434,0.00019673031,0.000054508986,0.00014625836,0.000090350506,0.12872058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579597,0.00049107685,0.00082386966,0.0014623771,0.000060593356,0.000015436626,0.000021843125,0.000009674341,0.0013192873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774903,0.0011681103,0.000070392205,0.00033688702,0.0004975367,0.00017802561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98961186,0.004691242,0.0027862787,0.0016244232,0.00059321796,0.0006929497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031636157,0.00016776643,0.000339533,0.00050789915,0.0010130599,0.0026393835,0.0005149004,0.0013307647,0.006460125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01185005,0.00019390932,0.0002502538,0.00053483224,0.0063736304,0.0034545937,0.0018759444,0.00237847,0.00040086036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011702178,0.0005520787,0.04032874,0.000637961,0.00020087682,0.00055664487,0.011799837,0.0017494633,0.014273799,0.6889842,0.010733741,0.22901246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003128536,0.0013050905,0.14674401,0.00050314737,0.00016182965,0.0010748515,0.011589199,0.004650256,0.0049794945,0.75332904,0.07523832,0.000111920934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096922816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010946111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006460125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008076225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004519056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021611273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100863244","doi":"10.1038/s41598-020-76506-3","title":"Defectors’ intolerance of others promotes cooperation in the repeated public goods game with opting out","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Public good; Opting out; Public goods game; Social dilemma; Intuition; Microeconomics; Homogeneous; Social preferences; Preference; Social psychology; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Psychology; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06792022782544527,"score_gpt":0.3190567223572096,"score_spread":0.25113649453176434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100863244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903459,0.000020086216,0.004783852,0.00024977146,0.0000052781847,0.000010023919,0.000006220794,0.000012404617,0.004566419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998659,0.000018163822,0.0009049111,0.000031363026,0.0000037084014,0.000008859527,0.0000032324683,0.0000024898502,0.00036835944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980532,0.0012309627,0.00010524093,0.00016079417,0.00023386648,0.00021583145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98289317,0.008609347,0.005595228,0.0010988584,0.0003151593,0.0014882323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004437305,0.0005478507,0.0007193756,0.00074782054,0.0006750093,0.0015554109,0.00049817486,0.00096063653,0.0018116366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00861954,0.0003267001,0.00046263312,0.0002759105,0.002974788,0.0009692744,0.0014563916,0.0011339427,0.00012738572],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072156936,0.0049157436,0.22727726,0.0009660532,0.0008571254,0.007587278,0.013503348,0.054638553,0.19496681,0.39837164,0.002770945,0.08692956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012333463,0.00526092,0.21386504,0.00012993703,0.00059281697,0.0047899787,0.007813059,0.24112165,0.016169438,0.50437236,0.004374411,0.00027711652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065709575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007557444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004437305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005743349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049036235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023467004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107211679","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-52970-3_5","title":"Dynamic Games of Common-Property Resource Exploitation When Self-image Matters","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Dynamic modeling and econometrics in economics and finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Property (philosophy); Nash equilibrium; Renewable resource; Resource (disambiguation); Common-pool resource; State (computer science); Pareto principle; Point (geometry); Computer science; Microeconomics; Environmental economics; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Renewable energy; Ecology; Algorithm; Operations management","score_opus":0.036542343635084726,"score_gpt":0.2587409591824273,"score_spread":0.22219861554734255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107211679","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35081202,0.0010072094,0.36297947,0.00925807,0.00028412693,0.00018373925,0.00047851112,0.0001775034,0.2748193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95381194,0.00039246646,0.009347005,0.00030207695,0.00007517447,0.000111721165,0.00008033661,0.00003859224,0.03584069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933594,0.00033653973,0.000017871196,0.000081153186,0.00009484793,0.00013369964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973061,0.0019141755,0.00022275336,0.0001993932,0.00010466628,0.00025288248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012227136,0.0006136111,0.00076367246,0.00027342173,0.00061598007,0.0024437055,0.0013589633,0.0020666579,0.008752707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007503252,0.00043190524,0.0005742613,0.00034391813,0.0022402988,0.004361869,0.0013432909,0.0021373243,0.0004035985],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002931097,0.00003281033,0.00035425258,0.000022230963,0.000016414264,0.0000748756,0.00018257546,0.01736607,0.00040194023,0.9754582,0.002770424,0.0032908667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017966533,0.000014694066,0.0003944321,0.000010130173,0.0000068289455,0.00006015903,0.00014197668,0.08500654,0.00008897451,0.9124212,0.0018243733,0.000012654363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027288795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027234177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008752707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00137523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000871347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029280722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107637869","doi":"10.1108/jes-07-2020-0340","title":"The commons problem in the presence of negative externalities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Commons; Economics; Microeconomics; Common-pool resource; Stock (firearms); Network effect; Originality; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1294461438151356,"score_gpt":0.3922144477684421,"score_spread":0.2627683039533065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107637869","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3696622,0.0013381331,0.50148165,0.010687492,0.00038789518,0.00021607375,0.00043750534,0.00014881424,0.11564021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98115367,0.0003340818,0.010377312,0.00031323815,0.000092690476,0.00007774038,0.000043928467,0.000032997777,0.0075743697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978981,0.0009511603,0.00007593012,0.00037113746,0.00029024412,0.00041338097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884399,0.008665996,0.001253853,0.0005270575,0.00046744363,0.00064575573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003052154,0.00064677355,0.0012726354,0.000709014,0.0014912497,0.0035159262,0.0015956355,0.0027184647,0.0066048317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009847852,0.0005347466,0.0012662943,0.000669015,0.005313954,0.004765569,0.0039490964,0.0029873417,0.00026817355],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012672915,0.00008827139,0.0020082851,0.00016170384,0.00009816012,0.0014933897,0.00033731348,0.21333846,0.0015099964,0.7710139,0.0027385366,0.007085268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004145879,0.00007338392,0.0011220188,0.00005847195,0.000040774088,0.0003099766,0.00058747065,0.24716343,0.00058535143,0.7456231,0.00434438,0.00005021473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004332621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002880359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066048317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024634148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016726283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022095323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109723720","doi":"10.1177/0146167220976683","title":"Balancing Prosocial Effort Across Social Categories: Mental Accounting Heuristics in Helping Decisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Heuristics; Psychology; Yesterday; Social psychology; Helping behavior","score_opus":0.08007367581281588,"score_gpt":0.4029989415909036,"score_spread":0.3229252657780877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109723720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99611735,0.00009575437,0.0017568014,0.000120199016,0.000004120628,0.000024132487,0.000013072021,0.00000811343,0.0018603957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.000034381424,0.0012578045,0.00003823513,0.0000035252335,0.000015421394,0.000018154597,0.0000020548664,0.00010642071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986469,0.0007359835,0.00006670273,0.00017548872,0.00020738808,0.00016758303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791422,0.011042532,0.0065936274,0.0015564056,0.00066438114,0.0010008281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00364404,0.0005861455,0.0003190226,0.0015424268,0.00063461484,0.002119594,0.00047701166,0.00082037714,0.0013722348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025162745,0.000361297,0.0004090881,0.000690763,0.001784625,0.0014052565,0.0011368971,0.0007637601,0.00008803447],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018295767,0.0014366435,0.8092042,0.00036482242,0.00053516787,0.00049840857,0.01929187,0.009821123,0.011509361,0.014336614,0.0008893464,0.13028288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015357228,0.0006956315,0.9274743,0.0001244714,0.0002081756,0.00039206893,0.011162536,0.026538303,0.0028719413,0.028669555,0.001580456,0.0001289976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023520656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004287127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00364404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009560083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048444094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019271731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109972539","doi":"10.33921/pwoe2097","title":"Psychological Cues to Political Stands: An Experiment with Italians on Regional Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interpersonal Relations Intergroup Relations and Identity","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Politics; Autonomy; Test (biology); Cognition; Social psychology; Heuristic; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.06356767073333103,"score_gpt":0.3944631291746033,"score_spread":0.33089545844127227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109972539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955016,0.000009307237,0.000049092272,0.00010281663,0.000010012937,0.000047067853,0.000019986714,0.000003598581,0.004256568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955869,0.000042938726,0.0003138217,0.00022179284,0.00003272499,0.000099352466,0.000089906884,0.000008134258,0.0036044456],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.999108,0.00042247775,0.00003694123,0.00015135795,0.00011433316,0.00016683119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972264,0.0014661287,0.00037985554,0.00044959073,0.000082717444,0.00039532228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022509443,0.00067457615,0.00055941654,0.00035598595,0.00198834,0.0018744308,0.00060097384,0.0017386368,0.007249084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047540804,0.00040521534,0.00040286468,0.00038344416,0.0022007476,0.0006561305,0.0015971336,0.001963523,0.0010177492],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.056353625,0.168991,0.19082168,0.00087955536,0.00043345348,0.0031231516,0.24607089,0.0028896402,0.23905003,0.016223447,0.010256669,0.064906895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009001081,0.09814908,0.7485284,0.00021697754,0.0006370535,0.0008538126,0.07000053,0.007879133,0.015936276,0.011058054,0.037251007,0.00048856187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007819306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007818334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007819306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009512682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005063571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024250627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111398964","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3817857","title":"Homophily, Peer Effects, and Dishonesty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Dishonesty; Peer review; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Econometrics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01025515353490487,"score_gpt":0.2968796256110483,"score_spread":0.28662447207614344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111398964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98305166,0.0005231655,0.00091131247,0.0004806896,0.000021498157,0.000017198625,0.00009886776,0.000006646025,0.014888939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905986,0.00012457081,0.00009947187,0.00004524289,0.000022187409,0.0000056826716,0.00001543404,0.0000018460953,0.0006257721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771464,0.0012453728,0.000095440206,0.00026947694,0.00043377918,0.00024136368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9234193,0.058816344,0.009938069,0.0040895003,0.0009621207,0.002774702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052042995,0.0002759171,0.00062964606,0.0010432712,0.00086101174,0.0019744553,0.0004205658,0.0011375649,0.01018266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026162883,0.00026011377,0.00020286333,0.0007053179,0.002130126,0.0018926024,0.0012819757,0.001346188,0.00046603466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029943264,0.0026047379,0.79447234,0.00038881277,0.00077345007,0.0013543477,0.005939669,0.005474181,0.006552906,0.09017118,0.0029392196,0.08633489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003253966,0.0010993831,0.832903,0.0000961522,0.00053621206,0.00085417775,0.0047131865,0.014200505,0.0018274356,0.14128828,0.0020504813,0.00010582978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011576494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018806905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01018266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004928351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030092662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034064353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112971624","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12540","title":"The whip and the Bible: Punishment versus internalization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Università degli Studi di Trento; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European University Institute; University of Warwick","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Internalization; Punishment (psychology); Social psychology; Sample (material); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Variety (cybernetics); Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Empirical research; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Statistics; Politics","score_opus":0.05442706499360215,"score_gpt":0.34239451913833546,"score_spread":0.2879674541447333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112971624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37884945,0.0028419485,0.16179791,0.0349436,0.0005697709,0.00013247816,0.0004609703,0.00019586903,0.42020795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912102,0.0002870304,0.0034004387,0.0006718972,0.00008976023,0.000036999623,0.000025547773,0.00003297393,0.0042450572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559504,0.0026237185,0.00015150722,0.0004768835,0.0008341151,0.00031867117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98086953,0.012035503,0.0030213853,0.001988719,0.0014536637,0.00063117174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038056653,0.00030759172,0.0009117081,0.0010774415,0.0014650808,0.0039752726,0.001064277,0.002280862,0.013796851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02512534,0.00036255532,0.00043676034,0.0010647856,0.008254584,0.0037756485,0.002129598,0.003208422,0.00080143113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008135679,0.00007954732,0.003172651,0.0001259274,0.00002271836,0.00009696564,0.0009692113,0.0052730595,0.00037342092,0.97666913,0.002649565,0.010486416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030951043,0.00005962369,0.005072554,0.00011235695,0.000016404087,0.00011547172,0.00056672574,0.024674784,0.00024502943,0.96260136,0.0064683207,0.000036325433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028437264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002585284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013796851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025890823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011565099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046155035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113706740","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2226","title":"Individual differences in exploring versus exploiting and links to delay discounting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Discounting; Temporal discounting; Delay discounting; Preference; Exploit; Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Cognitive psychology; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.298145339055819,"score_gpt":0.4214703928566457,"score_spread":0.1233250538008267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113706740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998857,0.00008802255,0.0003429794,0.00002472858,0.0000047515473,0.000005476727,0.000058549937,0.0000039792203,0.0006145501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995776,0.00003082151,0.00020408536,0.000010986876,0.0000028450552,0.0000030212443,0.000035438483,0.0000027011272,0.00013253657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992719,0.0003008554,0.00006877634,0.00016736759,0.00014607434,0.00004507474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741527,0.016350674,0.005152507,0.0025393004,0.00063862174,0.001166212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029367316,0.00025377213,0.00028874323,0.0006532267,0.00017179713,0.0008295094,0.00024543336,0.00037662082,0.002002565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017688712,0.00019175374,0.00018137884,0.0005094509,0.00051289966,0.00032226348,0.00030644052,0.0007765982,0.00015184368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014275106,0.0005518375,0.97305876,0.0000454019,0.0002641412,0.00010625252,0.0013864154,0.0019115952,0.0061190245,0.0010661117,0.00020349018,0.013859447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013692503,0.00033323115,0.99375373,0.00001137539,0.00004436735,0.00012060813,0.00023379784,0.0025678894,0.00087823736,0.0017642375,0.00025619403,0.00002256352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011171348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010367285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029367316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017242484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012094025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015531123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117943738","doi":"10.1093/icc/dtaa055","title":"Can trust induce vertical integration? An experimental study of buyer–seller exchanges with distinct competencies and specific investments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Corporate Change","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Competence (human resources); Vertical integration; Dual (grammatical number); Business; Database transaction; Work (physics); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.38141949839622796,"score_gpt":0.32729142610778506,"score_spread":0.05412807228844291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117943738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99632746,0.000028281547,0.0005483423,0.00017978053,0.000016687274,0.00008263743,0.000023584818,0.000004857701,0.0027884857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977428,0.000036189987,0.0010533811,0.0000977427,0.000018429013,0.00014073699,0.000026179525,0.0000047383005,0.00087988656],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972191,0.0017969235,0.0001896235,0.00032770282,0.00024752592,0.00021913108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415763,0.044407476,0.0068801767,0.0050178235,0.0005908957,0.0015273279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005985398,0.00045436985,0.000509704,0.0003523709,0.0010812125,0.0021900514,0.00087690237,0.0017869966,0.014579659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028869983,0.0005710182,0.00037401268,0.00038492453,0.002298231,0.0023194342,0.0015212281,0.0023583868,0.0005931188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07822935,0.29403505,0.1302588,0.002311801,0.001313163,0.0034827031,0.022498285,0.010650847,0.18921567,0.16242808,0.0040895054,0.10148678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.051633578,0.20859002,0.22529717,0.0006967763,0.0014555856,0.002855915,0.024763174,0.11505707,0.11386585,0.23544997,0.019698327,0.00063649495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005539147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050982134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014579659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000763472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000557719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048773825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118234076","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3662817","title":"Giving Customers Decision Rights: A Field Study of Pay-What-You-Want Pricing at a Performing Arts Theatre","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Performing arts; Field (mathematics); Business; Advertising; Marketing; Public relations; Political science; Visual arts; Art; Law","score_opus":0.020775869170550007,"score_gpt":0.3097954926902608,"score_spread":0.2890196235197108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118234076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959934,0.000011129416,0.0003689298,0.00027276308,0.000015554937,0.00012384511,0.00003038297,0.0000065952754,0.0031774316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948397,0.000032748747,0.0008887828,0.00033915517,0.000030315148,0.00016598322,0.00005993871,0.00001420627,0.003629072],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509984,0.0033188707,0.00010830359,0.00044922536,0.00041809244,0.0006056761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94723576,0.04022961,0.0026672056,0.0038498265,0.0020205332,0.003997044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009555161,0.0006019082,0.0006897023,0.0012265659,0.008013541,0.0041571674,0.002454822,0.004112602,0.012577673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038480558,0.0011686172,0.00052304904,0.0011440443,0.0047519086,0.004007156,0.001635346,0.005403496,0.0015272676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015241443,0.3116684,0.20422815,0.00056354067,0.00024336553,0.0033593718,0.27932772,0.0044230307,0.015438538,0.044881728,0.01810756,0.1025172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004134244,0.048015915,0.3460244,0.00036464885,0.00025105666,0.0015991724,0.48532367,0.03340129,0.0064393785,0.040364303,0.033314507,0.00076735317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012869222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016126236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012869222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002248765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022893841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050533116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119017534","doi":"10.1111/csp2.336","title":"Measuring behavioral social learning in a conservation context: Chilean fishing communities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Science and Practice","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Walton Family Foundation; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social learning; Social capital; Psychology; Experiential learning; Collaborative learning; Context (archaeology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.24780857409801627,"score_gpt":0.41339755347860835,"score_spread":0.16558897938059208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119017534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992888,0.000009236124,0.0001246689,0.000021546268,7.308895e-7,0.000031141346,0.00004655858,0.0000014441542,0.00047589763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991487,0.000014054627,0.0005295225,0.000009954444,0.0000014298048,0.00008133461,0.00007019772,7.913433e-7,0.00014405258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999049,0.00047051403,0.000053674386,0.0001632973,0.00013546126,0.00012809996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639565,0.0011546116,0.0010568271,0.00035251415,0.000615752,0.00042475323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021825815,0.0002736069,0.00023705076,0.0017084935,0.0014714117,0.00081702997,0.0009200195,0.00039808554,0.0012346127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059089847,0.00018394603,0.00019769519,0.001214878,0.0012187916,0.0007114276,0.0020230813,0.00042397913,0.00014310777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005897742,0.00042831682,0.9724644,0.000088631394,0.000048630096,0.00014686305,0.012738261,0.00052427046,0.0017135459,0.00023913688,0.00024783675,0.011301128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009860084,0.00015777099,0.9811643,0.000030245868,0.000012189788,0.00004207003,0.015854402,0.0013352685,0.00045009068,0.0002886369,0.0006403218,0.000014768224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038141005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06853194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038141005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019575031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015191799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07583803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121045634","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12910","title":"Democratic Competition for Rank, Cooperation, and Deception in Small Groups","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Incentive; Competition (biology); Ranking (information retrieval); Public good; Rank (graph theory); Position (finance); Temptation; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Microeconomics; Politics; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.04226517156096901,"score_gpt":0.32483212836634867,"score_spread":0.2825669568053797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121045634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734759,0.0000952756,0.005755996,0.00076330506,0.000020671536,0.000038617967,0.000014025744,0.00000882301,0.019827537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989034,0.000016291351,0.000594122,0.000056693247,0.0000067467486,0.0000140299935,0.0000032023268,0.0000013196579,0.0004041193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947529,0.0038240545,0.00011776075,0.000293727,0.0006015589,0.00040994454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96853596,0.016620139,0.009006484,0.003081256,0.00071403536,0.0020422009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005793409,0.00030012382,0.00034286792,0.00046046037,0.0012079363,0.0014357837,0.00046284922,0.0007415084,0.005832681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018315589,0.00018401972,0.00020196704,0.00023054716,0.004050691,0.001061076,0.0019393889,0.00079052337,0.00023079063],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041611837,0.0043967273,0.21886994,0.0005828938,0.00039865065,0.0011118391,0.0074568717,0.027618006,0.07399204,0.53435534,0.00393699,0.12311959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010877239,0.005988204,0.34516796,0.00014424836,0.00020398188,0.0009781895,0.005424985,0.07758059,0.012633005,0.53468704,0.015921762,0.00018231763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007236221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013632508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005832681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011817951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007808443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030638814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121146656","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1411802","title":"High Stakes Behavior with Low Payoffs: Inducing Preferences with Holt-Laury Gambles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.018222330054463463,"score_gpt":0.2843640713194704,"score_spread":0.26614174126500695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121146656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398794,0.000029011024,0.0442369,0.00038793875,0.000024922805,0.000088384804,0.000035294175,0.00013849456,0.0151797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98709583,0.000025345731,0.010748657,0.00010345324,0.000012252539,0.000069007845,0.000021876325,0.000025718464,0.001897781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998973,0.00056612666,0.000042117346,0.00011623051,0.00017519615,0.00012727655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430287,0.0034391524,0.00056405587,0.00093735906,0.00016205257,0.000594512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002378298,0.00056995894,0.00051252556,0.0002782264,0.00032641992,0.0012926193,0.00046249974,0.00077826245,0.004969945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010602164,0.00029113653,0.00038668036,0.0002657282,0.00087079837,0.000983312,0.0011421171,0.0014983524,0.0005214494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014716288,0.014692151,0.05181289,0.00097198243,0.00039400763,0.0012948862,0.0034915963,0.027906306,0.23649275,0.43376306,0.006271513,0.20819256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029762702,0.010004639,0.050928343,0.00013806736,0.00049255945,0.0010360703,0.0010218691,0.20432143,0.06888723,0.6541357,0.005861833,0.00019597501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010258373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025530468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004969945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003141527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003238966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01662618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121146696","doi":"","title":"Is response time predictive of choice? An experimental study of threshold strategies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Predictive power; Response time; Econometrics; Simple (philosophy); Threshold model; Power (physics); Statistics; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.06822831216575556,"score_gpt":0.3994197880024522,"score_spread":0.3311914758366966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121146696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98255724,0.00009848029,0.015236613,0.0002187491,0.000022493732,0.00005862686,0.00011920036,0.000032781976,0.0016557336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959662,0.00006108731,0.0033110667,0.0000956941,0.000019226978,0.00006405041,0.00007421917,0.000022399823,0.00038596475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934222,0.0047124987,0.00019710974,0.0009647608,0.00054915156,0.00015436657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8676875,0.10869069,0.012448977,0.00898993,0.0012327649,0.00095010013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011819167,0.0004827418,0.0007791986,0.00044014113,0.00020590884,0.0011173418,0.0007198773,0.00073646393,0.0029423076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07439838,0.00030901522,0.00031113627,0.00041958308,0.0012084524,0.0015682008,0.00059655815,0.0013970248,0.00028552065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037992265,0.009893375,0.39708224,0.001091927,0.0019190472,0.0005011441,0.0051393826,0.042173047,0.25872576,0.05368939,0.0017708901,0.19002151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095902826,0.02132927,0.5721546,0.00015824291,0.0009021617,0.0004978543,0.00094160694,0.22240362,0.07298908,0.10461998,0.0026754474,0.00036912528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045945434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028627296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011819167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003739922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042437072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0625065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121169315","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvaa008","title":"Reputation With Opportunities for Coasting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Observability; Incentive; Ask price; Microeconomics; Business; Rest (music); Computer science; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.12724000651048864,"score_gpt":0.32296335369778034,"score_spread":0.1957233471872917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121169315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5221742,0.0011196657,0.3671469,0.011474886,0.00015894663,0.00016268832,0.00079205766,0.00039477446,0.09657595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916598,0.00014002497,0.0047339723,0.00009860391,0.000056448556,0.000028276314,0.000044690016,0.000023433575,0.0032147258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959715,0.0015130276,0.00024377237,0.0009810989,0.0006414203,0.0006491787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94535005,0.026890222,0.015140498,0.006851963,0.0024178936,0.003349385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004336945,0.0006073661,0.0010257927,0.0010070312,0.0013768144,0.004048087,0.0009960259,0.0029331665,0.012824364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03525477,0.00082227273,0.0011263733,0.00079719734,0.0039675543,0.0061366432,0.0026980566,0.0027164668,0.0009181765],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025170634,0.00015740507,0.010488635,0.0001908831,0.00010664464,0.00031858057,0.0006070981,0.035621665,0.0026143568,0.9285954,0.0024418177,0.01860573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006721512,0.00017750793,0.0075070285,0.000083102714,0.00007113224,0.00022993851,0.00016795857,0.06217486,0.0008367778,0.9257863,0.0028351797,0.00006304239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018562903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017623905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012824364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026606014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012813458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042901754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121185054","doi":"","title":"Contracting with Private Rewards","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Incentive; Moral hazard; Microeconomics; Principal (computer security); Order (exchange); Work (physics); Contractible space; Economics; Principal–agent problem; Balance (ability); Private information retrieval; Incomplete contracts; Employment contract; Business; Public economics; Psychology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.08633152171484369,"score_gpt":0.4075603465257056,"score_spread":0.3212288248108619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121185054","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07205343,0.0014234801,0.80778855,0.009293492,0.0004056038,0.0002997119,0.0006804401,0.00021973049,0.10783555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86132723,0.0018042967,0.07582365,0.0008333064,0.00040157343,0.00045942568,0.0002438148,0.00006713526,0.059039578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967085,0.0016989678,0.00011705093,0.0005644476,0.00048398512,0.00042702619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934011,0.003475099,0.0010724638,0.0010839989,0.00042026615,0.0005470799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036617646,0.0010067477,0.00097346166,0.00050915167,0.0008518943,0.0027159902,0.0015735991,0.0028803921,0.011117094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010699096,0.0006132383,0.0011802657,0.0006137757,0.002503619,0.0031162228,0.0022885436,0.0033807424,0.0016436707],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053390042,0.00007865345,0.0004540452,0.0000573127,0.000021343218,0.000118061,0.00013842592,0.022624983,0.00033110837,0.96494514,0.0018197228,0.009357769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007703752,0.00007259367,0.00027719716,0.000042823158,0.000015655287,0.00015130066,0.00006190871,0.13174908,0.00024921767,0.85913557,0.008140897,0.000026786474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019256731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013044967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011117094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020838988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024894858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037190378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121190403","doi":"","title":"Intuitive Optimizing: Experimental Findings on Time Allocation Decisions with Newly Formed Ventures","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Wage; Context (archaeology); German; Work (physics); Entrepreneurship; Wage growth; Experimental economics; Test (biology); Economics; Affect (linguistics); Microeconomics; Business; Labour economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.01828642221979156,"score_gpt":0.31270124382078796,"score_spread":0.2944148216009964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121190403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99495924,0.000074015275,0.0014802652,0.00011081875,0.000012346188,0.000044857865,0.000030462139,0.000010073321,0.0032780243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966732,0.000078480916,0.002004519,0.00007560079,0.000012801678,0.00009199768,0.000049685852,0.000010857228,0.0010027203],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997505,0.0015358216,0.00016439424,0.0003047766,0.0003490777,0.00014092705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95336854,0.034743782,0.0062721106,0.004059559,0.00039603453,0.0011598669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054033548,0.00053009455,0.00042832317,0.00051842525,0.0003712251,0.0016645361,0.00062788394,0.0006928952,0.0060691517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036576223,0.00045052235,0.000290043,0.0003028247,0.0020294192,0.0015447728,0.0009998864,0.0011800475,0.00029499707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05005964,0.07109415,0.18260118,0.0022891643,0.0012387221,0.0014270941,0.02088329,0.045892194,0.20930181,0.14829989,0.004322734,0.2625901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071684485,0.054264795,0.54590917,0.00043005956,0.00073825475,0.001457646,0.0068910597,0.10773868,0.055351697,0.2027123,0.016760942,0.0005770165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039734642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034745113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060691517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042527664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003241987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028576016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121214592","doi":"","title":"On-the-Job Tasks and Performance Pay: A Vacancy-Level Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human multitasking; Incentive; Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Job performance; Business; Job analysis; Work (physics); Control (management); Labour economics; Psychology; Job satisfaction; Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Engineering; Management; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.019419382707052287,"score_gpt":0.2964281364577172,"score_spread":0.2770087537506649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121214592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99591726,0.00014146576,0.00048199308,0.00016042833,0.000015142528,0.00001336883,0.0024574543,0.000017310322,0.00079556735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938579,0.00004573605,0.00018321589,0.00003665205,0.000024896703,0.00002047728,0.0046429913,0.000009801281,0.001178416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973658,0.0011913781,0.00019818779,0.00031535415,0.0003557682,0.0005735361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9576697,0.021577517,0.011097809,0.0024575174,0.0020186382,0.005178816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039069643,0.00033913608,0.00079436426,0.0017352486,0.0008723123,0.0016301894,0.0012423499,0.0012632891,0.008535045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015996916,0.00025958754,0.0009839737,0.0028878476,0.00046276697,0.00073148456,0.0013997876,0.0017042996,0.0020649158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004334574,0.00030576385,0.99272597,0.00002845341,0.00021979283,0.00005832295,0.00021409101,0.00056612864,0.00015740305,0.00022842178,0.0014715053,0.0035907254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013211422,0.00014060516,0.9967444,0.0000059019526,0.00003729964,0.000029772626,0.00031724834,0.0019326702,0.000046873905,0.000119365446,0.0006028761,0.00000974007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012951548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013798253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012951548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005880584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005464095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028552592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121239346","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1291582","title":"Words Speak Louder Than Money","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.03531371975292162,"score_gpt":0.30403146978685,"score_spread":0.26871775003392834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121239346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6747213,0.0013545281,0.008591688,0.0122882305,0.002930412,0.00008059352,0.00071323535,0.0003357535,0.2989843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639316,0.00034290264,0.0015283293,0.0040729456,0.00062565954,0.00006201959,0.00020882147,0.00017994292,0.029047659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976107,0.0009536635,0.00012246244,0.00042207277,0.00067840714,0.00021261927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857948,0.009459181,0.0022236367,0.0008128774,0.0008722357,0.0008372636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012884254,0.00067658944,0.00070285465,0.00092601636,0.0010226517,0.0041283476,0.00040615568,0.0022969171,0.056452814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021978967,0.00033660524,0.0002652174,0.0006437589,0.0013977587,0.0035338472,0.0015355386,0.001971309,0.007972454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0124675,0.002121666,0.06135808,0.0028654102,0.0009997541,0.0016377249,0.038760673,0.0025359315,0.19945791,0.32147193,0.08118373,0.27513963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023924492,0.0054285605,0.19287224,0.00072177383,0.0019037058,0.002592206,0.045249496,0.006684969,0.03703493,0.54195297,0.16264448,0.00052229635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059367897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045986468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056452814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004670323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030628833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18885344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121257091","doi":"","title":"Leadership and the aggregation of international collective action","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Economic Papers","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Dilemma; Public good; Action (physics); Law and economics; Politics; Matching (statistics); Free riding; Political science; Peacekeeping; Game theory; One shot; Economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Public administration; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07117588967259483,"score_gpt":0.3245206502818727,"score_spread":0.2533447606092779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121257091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66433996,0.002349005,0.1497822,0.0075754817,0.00037907547,0.0001458716,0.00011556695,0.00032482133,0.174988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98633945,0.00045307656,0.0074343462,0.0001376371,0.00010421316,0.00007227032,0.00003541933,0.000018186913,0.0054054153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978891,0.0011010233,0.00006924209,0.00029837177,0.0003105752,0.00033164106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451953,0.0023011458,0.0016020983,0.000553169,0.00043142145,0.000592691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003387133,0.0003156848,0.0005004778,0.0010609911,0.0016167822,0.0027405117,0.0005672173,0.0007931432,0.0038519425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010460065,0.00019803876,0.00032013527,0.0008246829,0.0026595881,0.0020389492,0.0025002253,0.0007573907,0.0005159028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000869846,0.00014606783,0.00454222,0.00010775597,0.00004922055,0.00028309133,0.0021250357,0.024942467,0.0015918202,0.9025685,0.003981223,0.059575606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053677293,0.000116423376,0.0054593794,0.000035787318,0.000022542577,0.00009979002,0.00082149287,0.045889765,0.00037161625,0.93439794,0.012712664,0.000018944556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013716317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011766774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038519425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013318044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009995197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017913103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121338716","doi":"","title":"Flexible Approximation of Subjective Expectations Using Probability Questions: An Application to the Investment Game","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative distribution function; Random variable; Realization (probability); Probability distribution; Variable (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Mathematical optimization; Interpolation (computer graphics); Computer science; Function (biology); Econometrics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Probability density function; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Motion (physics)","score_opus":0.08024487100362991,"score_gpt":0.41919749979305687,"score_spread":0.33895262878942695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121338716","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06851339,0.00008453236,0.92982954,0.00024880533,0.000017891769,0.000054579647,0.000046819456,0.00009083522,0.0011136585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80289775,0.00012563379,0.1957262,0.000049959657,0.000024028308,0.00012668026,0.00008096904,0.00003715807,0.00093163067],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785304,0.0016296423,0.00006805012,0.00013812588,0.00021972964,0.00009141351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97193515,0.024765203,0.0010302699,0.001202851,0.00075707404,0.00030944284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008983183,0.00064729585,0.0007805028,0.00090501265,0.0004397134,0.0011722757,0.0012651822,0.0013454669,0.0021858239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04103355,0.00045916054,0.0009124433,0.0010470254,0.001361013,0.0018495569,0.0013005239,0.0020638776,0.00016024528],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015747431,0.00010842173,0.0033145964,0.00006491548,0.00004687872,0.00017049034,0.0004680593,0.8794877,0.0011781768,0.089446194,0.00030755327,0.025249556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007524836,0.000022384362,0.00025894638,0.0000054056472,0.0000023456964,0.000012997968,0.000016665275,0.9855192,0.00014228807,0.013859371,0.00014441623,0.000008620604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069119604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003655827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008983183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012499075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073163473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04750818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121373642","doi":"","title":"After the Tournament: Outcomes and Effort Provision","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Competition (biology); Incentive; Affect (linguistics); Meritocracy; Microeconomics; Economics; Piece work; Business; Marketing; Psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.04181356571944037,"score_gpt":0.3779062802707052,"score_spread":0.3360927145512648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121373642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99548197,0.000042706666,0.00047711135,0.00008775298,0.000014274714,0.00001553616,0.00003406054,0.0000074622403,0.0038391855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977525,0.000021551707,0.00024093909,0.000051007897,0.000010740635,0.000018089984,0.000059223832,0.0000058356627,0.0018401095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940217,0.0002467804,0.000027174166,0.00010654032,0.00009673021,0.00012059573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587065,0.0011647764,0.0015055118,0.0003643316,0.00014926535,0.0009454649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014789694,0.00033685516,0.00038101902,0.0002248293,0.00046573198,0.0017626531,0.00023320389,0.00071572955,0.007496618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005300829,0.00014966363,0.00017893495,0.00023884211,0.0005238119,0.00043359635,0.0005455467,0.0009664674,0.00064274523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02608221,0.018977173,0.630825,0.00040513702,0.00055189297,0.0007689529,0.0025566432,0.009623648,0.15684529,0.025751395,0.00380256,0.1238101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035859604,0.0076333303,0.9613306,0.00003172787,0.00008698921,0.00014467245,0.00072759506,0.006783326,0.0069903936,0.013820016,0.002043052,0.000049720675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000584221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010634242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007496618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003360036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002713372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025078714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121395857","doi":"10.1111/jeea.2016.14.issue-3","title":"Norms Make Preferences Social","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Prosocial behavior; Dictator game; Dictator; Public good; Social preferences; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Altruism (biology); Inequity aversion; Context (archaeology); Public goods game; Norm (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Experimental economics; Psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematics; Politics; Inequality","score_opus":0.09781314353854885,"score_gpt":0.4019846094530693,"score_spread":0.30417146591452043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121395857","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081260666,0.00087273907,0.5604417,0.023721173,0.00065281225,0.00012026221,0.00054068083,0.00034864063,0.33204144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91750634,0.0006962278,0.06061835,0.0022970755,0.0004401764,0.00018643851,0.00023109431,0.0001209972,0.017903432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979976,0.000793046,0.00008255073,0.000443679,0.00051279675,0.00017033675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532795,0.0019620878,0.0006655834,0.001138433,0.0006219176,0.0002839435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022165752,0.0006447054,0.00048700918,0.0007506415,0.0013026493,0.0030189452,0.00097601366,0.0021886243,0.010784049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008916607,0.00037879622,0.0007111284,0.0005059994,0.0042309486,0.00532422,0.002058734,0.0027220466,0.0019243427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007765607,0.000015093872,0.00044908762,0.000018812902,0.0000116083565,0.000050308543,0.0003376984,0.0010761038,0.00025590215,0.99057895,0.0011114494,0.006087259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007064997,0.000010206714,0.00034171977,0.000013161857,0.000006900046,0.0000692557,0.0001098544,0.0028423243,0.000120429475,0.98802865,0.008441213,0.000009226022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013776893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011607729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010784049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010771536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074018916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036076248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492379","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0244651","title":"Unequal treatment toward copartisans versus non-copartisans is reduced when partisanship can be falsified","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Incentive; Suspect; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.2977925214585867,"score_gpt":0.3574274262822817,"score_spread":0.05963490482369499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121492379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630853,0.00020030959,0.011170252,0.0017590862,0.00007706349,0.00013706303,0.00015195881,0.00007297372,0.023346025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965149,0.000043546253,0.0017914494,0.00032161752,0.000022658105,0.000086143424,0.000043334683,0.000013174451,0.0011631475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936814,0.0065117013,0.00044014974,0.0013010585,0.0015825493,0.00079644716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91205215,0.052733645,0.018065788,0.012780793,0.0015288482,0.002838715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012461243,0.0004135496,0.000996988,0.0006018351,0.0010791019,0.0017892137,0.0007674774,0.0013309143,0.016321115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06395187,0.0003665504,0.00038127866,0.0005080364,0.0027420763,0.0016998459,0.0021948603,0.0018051466,0.0009840417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022346381,0.01229039,0.28612265,0.0014340987,0.0016982678,0.0010130912,0.010752355,0.013323163,0.12295555,0.20205526,0.009282289,0.3167265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025122443,0.012910163,0.53584784,0.0003877354,0.0012451154,0.000969346,0.005769029,0.028294032,0.051576436,0.33187792,0.028375907,0.00023424695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005828039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078696257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016321115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085032586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006350408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06590217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121521931","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.237380","title":"Luck, Effort and Reward in an Organisational Hierarchy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Hierarchy; Business; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.013817746277793334,"score_gpt":0.3062034097473952,"score_spread":0.2923856634696019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121521931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976077,0.00015688935,0.002587549,0.00049851893,0.000011241717,0.000022458695,0.000023698047,0.000009370305,0.02061316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982749,0.0000394609,0.0005247163,0.00002529031,0.0000056538042,0.0000065944905,0.00000690808,0.0000021997123,0.0011141935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989569,0.00043493585,0.000047388865,0.000098086166,0.00017659417,0.00028601912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99279,0.0035398572,0.0015072784,0.00039941055,0.00039605293,0.001367458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002310384,0.00033037626,0.00043901897,0.0009952873,0.0011683578,0.0032043224,0.0004734166,0.0012603794,0.0054348144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008207077,0.00031278367,0.00028313193,0.000748744,0.0032823575,0.0023398073,0.0015339062,0.0009473707,0.0004570022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027034234,0.0020404088,0.24652857,0.00048329323,0.00027040884,0.001070793,0.014011372,0.030249061,0.015068838,0.6010998,0.0025927767,0.08388131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004925807,0.0016769709,0.4811584,0.00007431595,0.0001932776,0.0003843159,0.008737799,0.034154125,0.0011127468,0.46891835,0.002970109,0.00012710158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037301586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058739497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054348144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018030326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011810574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018181264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121547049","doi":"","title":"The Tragedy of the Commons in a Fishery when Relative Performance Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Profit (economics); Overexploitation; Relative price; Stock (firearms); Economics; Commons; Efficiency; Fish stock; Microeconomics; Natural resource economics; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05010053309858701,"score_gpt":0.35326000537366903,"score_spread":0.303159472275082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121547049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7090701,0.0005301694,0.1629221,0.010287501,0.00015876818,0.0001577443,0.00056701526,0.00013875768,0.11616793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98528844,0.00014314111,0.002927202,0.00016597565,0.000031429357,0.000043148695,0.000035376834,0.000011478519,0.011353682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999206,0.00026582467,0.000021079388,0.00019122945,0.00010825939,0.00020760356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985196,0.00065634586,0.0003486352,0.00014647849,0.00010153615,0.0002274045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012785499,0.00063728995,0.00091316435,0.00053681387,0.0015169891,0.0027676208,0.0015780433,0.0030247401,0.008115929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037312328,0.00040960085,0.0009900711,0.0006158571,0.0036269047,0.005268454,0.0023433429,0.002004245,0.000516623],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002723489,0.00025331174,0.007977409,0.00009324792,0.000055310775,0.0008315831,0.001064213,0.1352791,0.0020518517,0.8407187,0.0020872855,0.009315581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012479264,0.00028091468,0.006800445,0.000057636626,0.00007436446,0.00034330107,0.0010986148,0.256364,0.00046127266,0.7292405,0.0050539505,0.000100269885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020768622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01926979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020768622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031724565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016425522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04129547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121597534","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1014382","title":"Individual Responsibility and the Funding of Collective Goods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics","score_opus":0.033544857898325196,"score_gpt":0.34957808765710924,"score_spread":0.31603322975878406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121597534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5412559,0.0017466545,0.032358345,0.018693937,0.0003177941,0.00011992685,0.00014567014,0.00014131295,0.40522045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905681,0.0002379031,0.00088637753,0.00014554964,0.00009696444,0.000040842853,0.000014507879,0.000012390988,0.007997427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390876,0.003325775,0.0002498176,0.00038352315,0.0010596979,0.0010724349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432795,0.036883328,0.0075105657,0.005305911,0.004184328,0.0028363306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011460388,0.00036642325,0.0006074153,0.0013292731,0.0016941008,0.0038217797,0.0009112404,0.0035831206,0.011558297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05115329,0.0002802417,0.00042244126,0.000965812,0.0040251366,0.0035767932,0.0024573023,0.0016676489,0.0006969988],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024078917,0.00017334019,0.0058628656,0.00011085226,0.00005312945,0.00014941405,0.0014969767,0.003216977,0.00063865096,0.9553823,0.0026512449,0.03002354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015276326,0.00007930311,0.0066676475,0.00005835,0.00004726156,0.00010788802,0.00069442706,0.0031531786,0.00054418424,0.97361237,0.0148604885,0.000022175987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022120734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019840628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011558297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002323912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004151514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060609102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121604005","doi":"","title":"Testing Motives for Charitable Giving: A Revealed-Preference Methodology with Experimental Evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4415392989728306,"score_gpt":0.4752262105873812,"score_spread":0.03368691161455056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121604005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5603335,0.00033986944,0.4238937,0.0011490767,0.00012838544,0.0025466774,0.0012515219,0.00023322256,0.010124038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902798,0.00023972215,0.10358709,0.0005049741,0.000063523075,0.0036930286,0.00033112065,0.000033142365,0.0012676258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9287514,0.062043555,0.0015939206,0.004140506,0.002781114,0.0006895446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6067052,0.30187595,0.03644281,0.04982243,0.003995044,0.0011585769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055999603,0.0016305789,0.0020509514,0.0010964088,0.0013558225,0.0031085976,0.003755717,0.0029402634,0.007098653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17868744,0.0010491532,0.0025647874,0.0020732295,0.0047168713,0.0044039143,0.0025337504,0.0034046422,0.0006767268],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011458444,0.01598679,0.09995981,0.0036490276,0.0058324537,0.0007460248,0.0036352244,0.11342635,0.012760485,0.60631794,0.0040733204,0.12215416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041557606,0.011282162,0.029844701,0.00028987866,0.001678959,0.00037872585,0.0011214366,0.33187824,0.01137885,0.60089874,0.0066967546,0.00039581323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018582455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015124226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055999603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027075848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001725354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29615778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121613258","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00452.x","title":"THREAT AND PUNISHMENT IN PUBLIC GOOD EXPERIMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Public good; Earnings; Welfare; Economics; Social dilemma; Public economics; Institution; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Market economy; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.13171269925703155,"score_gpt":0.3810343282951341,"score_spread":0.24932162903810257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121613258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93417746,0.0006003511,0.029263409,0.0028446354,0.0002051216,0.0006782251,0.00025607971,0.00012946682,0.031845294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871454,0.0002064085,0.009435333,0.00051203487,0.000058253845,0.00068396627,0.000048809758,0.000018705081,0.0018910596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839071,0.012971351,0.00049940473,0.00075136375,0.0014007221,0.0004700493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8984562,0.080634035,0.011710497,0.006190541,0.0009909136,0.002017854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017011102,0.0011119102,0.0010188153,0.00097175484,0.0010849362,0.0026952736,0.0011495118,0.002858223,0.0064079603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05413142,0.0005746191,0.0004417247,0.0007850242,0.005037186,0.0029859317,0.0019529345,0.0024711345,0.00041341974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028047215,0.026130194,0.027991068,0.0023728963,0.0008729744,0.0012134061,0.0053453245,0.079295665,0.059641402,0.69047236,0.006421097,0.07219641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010881897,0.022636563,0.020464594,0.00035384204,0.00031846802,0.0005891257,0.0013372949,0.110380635,0.016641835,0.7978089,0.018300137,0.00028686362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038024722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003242556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017011102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016587623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095938036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08996439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121625436","doi":"10.1108/s0193-230620160000019007?utm_campaign=repec&amp;wt.mc_id=repec","title":"The Impact of Risk-Aversion and Stress on the Incentive Effect of Performance-Pay","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Salary; Incentive; Pay for performance; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics","score_opus":0.022030888520734704,"score_gpt":0.35944125479952144,"score_spread":0.33741036627878673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121625436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99732745,0.00007164651,0.0006619602,0.0000814832,0.000015847812,0.000015367905,0.000028220977,0.000009511894,0.0017885834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.00002873987,0.0005317635,0.000052204774,0.000010957982,0.000017247829,0.000015115182,0.0000045207157,0.00042043556],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984493,0.00093037164,0.00007341797,0.00015703584,0.00025627052,0.00013351963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980427,0.012579,0.0029568616,0.0018486291,0.00037254102,0.0018160287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027621817,0.00047622772,0.0005823889,0.00029299382,0.00028776596,0.00097295444,0.0003315535,0.0005497775,0.0060193148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01049217,0.0002927082,0.00034296865,0.00012373427,0.00076465623,0.00040380514,0.00093292625,0.00087730016,0.00031752998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.061936457,0.037363235,0.34349746,0.0007802379,0.0013337958,0.00068271195,0.0021240117,0.008686767,0.4174018,0.011255828,0.0012765714,0.11366113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012562433,0.025886094,0.91010046,0.00010822519,0.00047610456,0.00033830744,0.0004702929,0.014329499,0.03623988,0.00902247,0.001627353,0.00014498907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003542531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002567116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060193148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022935073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028719177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020136654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121647238","doi":"","title":"Linear Public Goods Experiments: A Meta-Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"EconLit; Public good; Public goods game; Public economics; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.26676177204175394,"score_gpt":0.4640765202169693,"score_spread":0.19731474817521538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121647238","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08789629,0.83260554,0.06284639,0.0023215637,0.0032812543,0.0063430085,0.0014523478,0.0008202558,0.0024334057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85744846,0.09379288,0.033208966,0.002046138,0.0008391186,0.0104562,0.0008405174,0.00020102464,0.0011666975],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.8159257,0.15913773,0.0107745435,0.0072277,0.0058228327,0.001111518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7283522,0.24233505,0.012473433,0.012403247,0.0036057348,0.00083028286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11370649,0.0041511804,0.017557116,0.0064172577,0.0010247423,0.0043686163,0.0035049955,0.0035699422,0.0048009665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22682834,0.0020904287,0.040528033,0.0050632595,0.002483636,0.003241634,0.0025595252,0.0033266211,0.00040327274],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01033488,0.00010471443,0.0022860777,0.048389565,0.92659837,0.00014184153,0.00012462,0.0011746467,0.00031044154,0.00080665364,0.0003933465,0.009334983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005415717,0.0015721268,0.0020521195,0.0038407089,0.98198366,0.00007720624,0.00007844952,0.0009755861,0.00041072635,0.002576712,0.0009739059,0.000043106993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027110493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029989192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88629353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003303157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002246232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6013446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121707986","doi":"","title":"Medium of Exchange Matters: What's Fair for Goods is Unfair for Money","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medium of exchange; Unit of account; Value (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Cash; Unit (ring theory); Business; Face (sociological concept); Microeconomics; Commerce; Economics; Monetary economics; Finance; Computer science; Payment","score_opus":0.022179086099455292,"score_gpt":0.3325744238614608,"score_spread":0.3103953377620055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121707986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5439919,0.0030568421,0.051592384,0.062152844,0.0015576014,0.00017386269,0.00017217275,0.000092826565,0.33720958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941553,0.00024731437,0.0014228824,0.0015766313,0.000232556,0.000026331736,0.000013998904,0.000030422927,0.0022946713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832708,0.009636435,0.0006245225,0.0016459423,0.003400472,0.0014217545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9393576,0.03708017,0.01002798,0.007912495,0.0029748317,0.002646892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019646341,0.00042721382,0.0008546257,0.0011074477,0.0037679565,0.00928904,0.0009769351,0.0033200493,0.011225671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08773131,0.000286815,0.00064753584,0.0010468385,0.0156962,0.015436961,0.0030003379,0.0041204584,0.0007481331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069953885,0.00023208154,0.023071093,0.00026374514,0.00023441229,0.00022700176,0.011712821,0.0012616942,0.0015826143,0.91088027,0.00477727,0.0450575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080579055,0.00020412171,0.01682096,0.00020952226,0.00013803403,0.000263294,0.00661708,0.0017672619,0.0011783902,0.9574479,0.015191081,0.000081761085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021800636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001637552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019646341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021374107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017449802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10390103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121720199","doi":"10.3386/w21953","title":"Supply and Demand for Discrimination: Strategic Revelation of Own Characteristics in a Trust Game","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Georgia State University","keywords":"Revelation; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.4731055588950466,"score_gpt":0.5629223440392835,"score_spread":0.08981678514423697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121720199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228595,0.00014093574,0.04150571,0.004890414,0.000038446364,0.00016862717,0.00024269948,0.000059147318,0.03009462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956937,0.00005721234,0.0023578831,0.00020099775,0.00001300165,0.00004150011,0.000025385401,0.0000063406815,0.0016039509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759585,0.0015061845,0.0001326701,0.00025142988,0.00024172284,0.0002720125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96835816,0.023893075,0.0035421147,0.0017928767,0.00054906064,0.0018647654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047984566,0.00047607097,0.0011543939,0.00045536258,0.0010656223,0.0024222604,0.0009682223,0.0032547924,0.008237524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028259223,0.0005686493,0.00058330264,0.0003506563,0.0025568546,0.0038378742,0.0015984122,0.0028284704,0.0006140285],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006348536,0.0030721186,0.09178317,0.0007492229,0.0006335106,0.004032213,0.0050954013,0.04891452,0.040925287,0.7358583,0.0072545432,0.05533319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014004969,0.0013235015,0.026960352,0.000087552515,0.0002148795,0.0014507957,0.002069891,0.25703812,0.003322922,0.7024277,0.0035182727,0.0001855004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002193742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002496171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008237524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013435046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001142314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027557194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121763541","doi":"10.1257/aer.20151211","title":"Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Voting; Joins; Composition (language); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Social psychology; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05431795187416083,"score_gpt":0.3773323199515434,"score_spread":0.3230143680773826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121763541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736183,0.002587509,0.001591636,0.0042911517,0.000117173615,0.00006734884,0.0007377735,0.000016131613,0.016972886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967429,0.0005042186,0.00023446127,0.00039258963,0.00012602653,0.000027209335,0.00027975888,0.000007113931,0.0016856769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923213,0.004758222,0.00029350238,0.0007753766,0.001071903,0.00077976956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9364658,0.034531612,0.020475734,0.0020513902,0.0026921746,0.0037832016],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117679285,0.00022994894,0.00068948045,0.0015834868,0.00092193065,0.0021018132,0.0005815843,0.0009012475,0.01321542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052847452,0.00016761741,0.00037411664,0.0018071592,0.0010756314,0.0013120908,0.0009708525,0.00060713635,0.0016689522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011068295,0.00019437981,0.93093055,0.00015113359,0.00026225523,0.00020359739,0.0016160499,0.0008572032,0.0005539885,0.005607291,0.0053990893,0.053117584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012229031,0.00031033673,0.9789667,0.000120929806,0.00013965047,0.00013299337,0.003776249,0.0011200095,0.00032366326,0.0060220137,0.008947847,0.000017285984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052594603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008081776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012894424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091495324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062235475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121770210","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12245","title":"The Effects of Vertical Pay Dispersion: Experimental Evidence in a Budget Setting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dispersion (optics); Economics; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.09174426249754448,"score_gpt":0.42234516071046174,"score_spread":0.33060089821291727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121770210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966049,0.00009551259,0.00056170416,0.00013768525,0.000018082452,0.000049815008,0.000034263845,0.000006033611,0.002492031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674016,0.00011897114,0.0020008604,0.00011002948,0.000030567404,0.00012060761,0.000060428072,0.0000075734783,0.000810832],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.994144,0.0037023753,0.00044105464,0.0005763689,0.0008613478,0.00027483923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9285341,0.043621812,0.017073391,0.0071983817,0.0012774211,0.002294923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008282581,0.0007438581,0.0006036199,0.00062352646,0.0010641306,0.0017308358,0.0010150113,0.0010494371,0.007624727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03855712,0.00054876815,0.0003034498,0.0006548648,0.001850721,0.0014535554,0.0015113982,0.0018578493,0.00058175914],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.098713875,0.26901904,0.2678389,0.0016048361,0.0019570007,0.0007897009,0.010797547,0.02030776,0.10366136,0.053910438,0.0047991495,0.16660039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02347173,0.14616835,0.61059606,0.0009065789,0.0015228476,0.00071329926,0.0077322787,0.06497875,0.037394024,0.09443362,0.0115784975,0.0005040146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015593517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013544029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008282581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083821063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006663971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043803036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121796051","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i4.2904","title":"Belief-Overkill in Political Judgments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Position (finance); Politics; Social psychology; Adversary; Psychology; Phenomenon; Political science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.04405389901281902,"score_gpt":0.35689316373343605,"score_spread":0.312839264720617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121796051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97451437,0.00023217963,0.00441483,0.0007898742,0.000034716966,0.00007669567,0.0001258988,0.000047722406,0.019763649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785185,0.00007606161,0.0010236147,0.00029855108,0.0000408112,0.000041655476,0.00010467882,0.000022206383,0.00054070103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906448,0.004344484,0.00045727767,0.0016345934,0.0024243728,0.0004944405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84439623,0.11357402,0.024374502,0.010850474,0.004874734,0.0019299776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011269234,0.00035043826,0.0005876536,0.0013665896,0.0011292149,0.0031261588,0.0004651865,0.0013965972,0.0056201327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12188045,0.0007554744,0.0004504139,0.0014310157,0.003988092,0.0030516554,0.0022830584,0.0026667311,0.0004483331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066362857,0.0030961533,0.7107289,0.0010344194,0.000899363,0.0007062305,0.04590043,0.0049417606,0.034363348,0.06425745,0.0051547685,0.12228095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002795437,0.00060352887,0.93783516,0.00008259175,0.00013871463,0.00028568914,0.0038312043,0.005468974,0.0034733769,0.045312397,0.0025444166,0.00014440336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034470998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029010605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011269234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001466985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064140355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05959809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121805640","doi":"","title":"Bidder Motives in Cause Related Auctions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Donation; Revenue; Incentive; Business; Microeconomics; Affect (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Economics; Marketing; Psychology; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.04623500691531485,"score_gpt":0.3706853966378209,"score_spread":0.32445038972250606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121805640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96623504,0.0001151138,0.01832758,0.00034421738,0.0000137910865,0.00008677751,0.00003134537,0.000028441813,0.014817671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99527645,0.000022001532,0.0018255835,0.00004890111,0.0000063718726,0.000027746364,0.000020170264,0.0000050123126,0.0027676015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655616,0.0023861309,0.00011254935,0.0002190677,0.00048365878,0.00024255522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99066013,0.0056389747,0.0015545923,0.0010497777,0.00049024227,0.0006062124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046236636,0.00029577798,0.0006284823,0.00091350026,0.0009152854,0.0021837146,0.00048461225,0.001089881,0.009229833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017313508,0.0003720096,0.00047521607,0.0004264997,0.0010848638,0.0013973182,0.0010717354,0.0007968446,0.00074813666],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035740384,0.002353824,0.33472848,0.00043147884,0.00051089434,0.0010519817,0.0059897047,0.025124645,0.019612351,0.4987672,0.004159101,0.10369632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054491975,0.0016445582,0.32638496,0.00008770453,0.00032038393,0.0024142705,0.007095918,0.19978203,0.003923222,0.44367394,0.013928769,0.00019931451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060609216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009994297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009229833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067343307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036257054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030876875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121815616","doi":"","title":"How Internal Transaction Costs Drive Compensation Schemes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Business; Transaction cost; Database transaction; Computer science; Operations management; Economics; Database; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.02473502686663868,"score_gpt":0.28024232435505136,"score_spread":0.25550729748841267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121815616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87295437,0.00070044206,0.03003191,0.0041405912,0.00015589393,0.00010088486,0.00030378063,0.00014844169,0.091463625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922766,0.000088077395,0.0010465651,0.00008548232,0.00001944667,0.000012952311,0.000034310346,0.00001716865,0.0064194095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987313,0.00046694395,0.00008138519,0.00016876531,0.00030394073,0.0002476097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785982,0.013606133,0.0029797915,0.0021441665,0.0017287965,0.0009429817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002621472,0.0002397449,0.00043458928,0.000685014,0.0006819674,0.004724993,0.00072987884,0.0020688195,0.030633654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030230554,0.00042793935,0.00029511802,0.0006357518,0.001195409,0.004094219,0.00080082275,0.0017196817,0.0017369268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012234958,0.0006854248,0.022129435,0.0003838634,0.00011787094,0.00033531553,0.0016721785,0.0356801,0.0069230236,0.8378055,0.0087539395,0.08428984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024346323,0.0003125635,0.028548999,0.000102215,0.00013480395,0.00028440345,0.0021790203,0.0993356,0.0037820027,0.8539326,0.011067551,0.00007682332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008999256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007467883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030633654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011681931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009759524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102479815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121817667","doi":"","title":"Learning by Doing vs. Learning from Others in a Principal-Agent Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social learning; Stochastic game; Artificial intelligence; Principal (computer security); Proactive learning; Machine learning; Computer science; Convergence (economics); Reinforcement learning; Moral hazard; Active learning (machine learning); Microeconomics; Robot learning; Knowledge management; Economics; Incentive","score_opus":0.06594586622558594,"score_gpt":0.3855538787927779,"score_spread":0.31960801256719196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121817667","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13907723,0.0005613777,0.8393239,0.0033413675,0.000104330975,0.00013328264,0.000156313,0.00017908867,0.017123207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92509794,0.000509782,0.063752554,0.00022229624,0.00010285723,0.00020104925,0.00004958912,0.00003611723,0.01002776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772996,0.001383028,0.000077263016,0.00032251186,0.0002719443,0.00021528818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953382,0.002812156,0.00067394803,0.00053477957,0.00026722602,0.0003737155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033160897,0.0010114074,0.0015412692,0.0004182812,0.00062802696,0.0023342485,0.0024428987,0.002758909,0.004984719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00758662,0.00048650577,0.001110643,0.0005943289,0.002641717,0.003628747,0.0016315869,0.0024041575,0.0007010758],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013797043,0.00015675124,0.0010626776,0.000095399766,0.00006457669,0.00021658516,0.00031559798,0.47457322,0.0009379198,0.51133513,0.00073920534,0.0103649935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008254639,0.00008779612,0.00016288308,0.000011832566,0.000017422228,0.000032784275,0.000031857384,0.8578648,0.00018917865,0.14058901,0.0009115302,0.000018296163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002695015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015006728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004984719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011452945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001170346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017537355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121828862","doi":"","title":"Exclusive Dealing and Market Foreclosure: Further Experimental Results","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Foreclosure; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.05742270332982658,"score_gpt":0.3256830930765083,"score_spread":0.2682603897466817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121828862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846482,0.00020074293,0.0038183848,0.0007402364,0.00007380337,0.0007980062,0.0002464191,0.00004481522,0.009429275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98731947,0.00022912968,0.0054107807,0.00049573544,0.00009009212,0.0017608283,0.00021503486,0.000034709436,0.0044442383],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300075,0.003698003,0.00083541434,0.0007732253,0.0011609835,0.00053166825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86674756,0.103961006,0.012377008,0.012900084,0.0019437972,0.0020705194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009449184,0.0009839962,0.0012605902,0.000627394,0.0017152465,0.0021518993,0.0021444529,0.0024857183,0.0215999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043721344,0.0006704927,0.0006778205,0.00079846283,0.0031811316,0.003988558,0.0026403728,0.0040005613,0.0010578089],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.059488777,0.48726478,0.05302026,0.0032722016,0.000898286,0.0036464713,0.015393171,0.015501706,0.10047901,0.12491283,0.008389384,0.12773316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.050885446,0.20887348,0.15049371,0.00082446326,0.0014584012,0.004155419,0.020938044,0.09191677,0.11061985,0.3130028,0.045860097,0.00097139674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078244833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004347455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0215999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072134106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00120628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07225883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121850668","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12450","title":"The Effect of Environmental Risk on the Efficiency of Negotiated Transfer Prices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Profit (economics); Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Transfer (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.05421118508535101,"score_gpt":0.36916293821556095,"score_spread":0.31495175313020995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121850668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97615516,0.0001052547,0.012195545,0.00022749396,0.000008859485,0.000057522335,0.000030749492,0.000030266645,0.011189165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977514,0.0000240115,0.0017607887,0.000013941935,0.000004187294,0.000017177386,0.0000119592,0.000009653594,0.00040689713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895499,0.00678956,0.0006567711,0.00073617604,0.001481001,0.00078656717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8383779,0.12780374,0.01790404,0.010452813,0.0037164614,0.0017449787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014034163,0.00036257296,0.0006244575,0.00075654674,0.0007953649,0.0028967974,0.00090126466,0.0009728664,0.008586354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095285244,0.0004039116,0.00055037526,0.00055832614,0.0019480082,0.0039370935,0.0020701361,0.0015830909,0.0005447099],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008359904,0.0051373336,0.38597295,0.000589466,0.0013679933,0.0012359404,0.006629903,0.2553458,0.04464565,0.11472841,0.0011411861,0.1748455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006616961,0.005174892,0.46623966,0.00015653533,0.0005560897,0.00092716265,0.008159265,0.34448078,0.029346813,0.13985834,0.0040801675,0.0003585878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000980628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006152282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014034163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014753796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084454706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07422066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121871855","doi":"10.1111/(issn)1542-4774/issues","title":"Compensation Policy and Worker Performance: Identifying Incentive Effects from Field Experiments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Welfare economics; Endogeneity; Incentive; Economics; Humanities; Political science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06403185532275983,"score_gpt":0.40889193233070553,"score_spread":0.3448600770079457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121871855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98488164,0.00023422552,0.010551001,0.0001362387,0.0000268252,0.0005390162,0.0004798368,0.00003480134,0.003116466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865675,0.00025691526,0.007881862,0.00015320555,0.000029517303,0.0010260912,0.00041017958,0.00001615212,0.0036586064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943619,0.003918709,0.00029354577,0.000596567,0.00051430275,0.00031504937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9355579,0.049959134,0.006617763,0.005722251,0.0013310361,0.0008118547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014317501,0.00071192166,0.0008230355,0.0007116402,0.0005855606,0.001103672,0.0010570096,0.0014992608,0.0052780034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03324408,0.0005184999,0.0006730888,0.0007465279,0.0013585252,0.0010864411,0.0009897876,0.0009989614,0.00053773],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.045986086,0.065394,0.40631574,0.0036150825,0.0021625524,0.0006889744,0.0067499513,0.09713862,0.10738818,0.023236996,0.004571483,0.2367523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004185313,0.09498049,0.7206781,0.0005387438,0.0012142446,0.00035461815,0.0026491259,0.07419621,0.05672108,0.032690085,0.011365418,0.00042656448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021696957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028427679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014317501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009793162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007892185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07571906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121887177","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2468466","title":"Using Cognitive Dissonance to Manipulate Social Preferences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Self-perception theory; Self-justification; Social psychology; Perception; Psychology; Cognition; Dictator game; Public good; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06885200833619166,"score_gpt":0.3759623466475722,"score_spread":0.30711033831138057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121887177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737552,0.000042201907,0.0071254587,0.00036224438,0.00010686796,0.000093739814,0.00006582864,0.000049796094,0.018398525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933503,0.000036235455,0.00450947,0.00017871012,0.000018865372,0.00012477832,0.00001771028,0.000023356777,0.0017405952],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985177,0.000588774,0.000066941844,0.000262559,0.00043120226,0.00013278588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98801535,0.00859162,0.0013219698,0.0012199667,0.00029885166,0.0005523191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002690313,0.0008826088,0.00041941938,0.00053230464,0.0005804999,0.0014982768,0.00062903576,0.00085809367,0.0078114606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014605261,0.0002381606,0.00021627912,0.0004762328,0.0013264031,0.001066317,0.0011014076,0.0014114637,0.0003281582],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023252495,0.023661096,0.021548064,0.0012699408,0.000689896,0.000585849,0.0068276785,0.012181287,0.5442359,0.23895822,0.0028826518,0.12390687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020517344,0.018991113,0.11034217,0.0002674472,0.0011691912,0.0005859528,0.0040873303,0.1197236,0.30981857,0.39454585,0.019285053,0.000666404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058006187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005685819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078114606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072119985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058218016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026131928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121906881","doi":"","title":"Group Size and Cooperation Among Strangers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Nanyang Technological University","keywords":"Repeated game; Dilemma; Norm (philosophy); Prisoner's dilemma; Population; Social dilemma; Population size; Repetition (rhetorical device); Strategy; Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Psychology; Game theory; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Demography; Political science; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.026085963239995198,"score_gpt":0.2654202027778316,"score_spread":0.23933423953783642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121906881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964483,0.000035523655,0.0013677356,0.00011665556,0.0000034399807,0.00000427558,0.0000034087018,0.000005323208,0.0020152852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995197,0.000014603023,0.00027229468,0.000014771257,0.000002541493,0.000003692571,0.000002682468,0.0000011594329,0.0001686304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985682,0.0009527198,0.0000382828,0.00016605218,0.00017504717,0.00009956144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98207563,0.011233778,0.0043803547,0.0010395111,0.00043618234,0.0008345579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002499633,0.00020169455,0.00025757187,0.00037792386,0.0005250876,0.0009147831,0.0004953348,0.00064341055,0.0013968844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014688319,0.0001242378,0.00014170169,0.00016786758,0.0017764887,0.0008962332,0.000962367,0.00040109426,0.00014227412],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041023875,0.0029647292,0.4396863,0.00042481394,0.0006009437,0.0035813423,0.017115204,0.06800957,0.10036934,0.22669262,0.0025267883,0.13392588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062301994,0.0053822426,0.4041463,0.000115256444,0.00030926755,0.002307269,0.010809488,0.16845235,0.012397218,0.38971704,0.005527539,0.00021289416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006431264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046432656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002499633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046735478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020584973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013219535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121907980","doi":"","title":"Framing Manipulations in Contests: A Natural Field Experiment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"CONTEST; Framing (construction); Incentive; Economics; Productivity; Loss aversion; LOOM; Wage; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Engineering; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10511580117151492,"score_gpt":0.4308856926460635,"score_spread":0.3257698914745486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121907980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99246913,0.000051120966,0.0023842242,0.00018645886,0.00010342055,0.000908617,0.00017897216,0.000042731255,0.0036753395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815856,0.000119027645,0.0099466555,0.00065234804,0.00010426486,0.0034907921,0.00023766547,0.00003029573,0.0038334392],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818546,0.00067658117,0.00012236777,0.00040548266,0.00034290718,0.00026721077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917469,0.004491571,0.0013325698,0.0010691199,0.00030849173,0.0010513719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00322308,0.0014711595,0.000986518,0.0005186482,0.0013794886,0.001144977,0.001299836,0.0018900828,0.008218806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062360205,0.0005603467,0.0006369833,0.00037533644,0.0018467966,0.00075932714,0.0012739919,0.0025337879,0.00058122905],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.067426465,0.2713263,0.037342396,0.0026779547,0.00086039834,0.00201282,0.009412687,0.010874198,0.48122078,0.03672799,0.008987313,0.07113076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.037144,0.38922447,0.21707706,0.00056633167,0.0016694036,0.0011696297,0.0055110315,0.080154896,0.1454291,0.08361875,0.037535407,0.000899942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010913028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018287296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008218806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009337492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010122153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02749461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121918030","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2022.105523","title":"Strategic investment and learning with private information","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Hausdorff Center for Mathematics; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst France","keywords":"Interim; Private information retrieval; Microeconomics; Investment (military); Strategic complements; Externality; Economics; Ex-ante; Welfare; Strategic interaction; Complete information; Social learning; Learning-by-doing; Coordination failure; Production (economics); Computer science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.022303221949120475,"score_gpt":0.2764308570992626,"score_spread":0.2541276351501421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121918030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.886011,0.0007464137,0.05652186,0.006205483,0.00009448497,0.000084718165,0.00015614052,0.000060676088,0.050119124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939335,0.00025153265,0.0021288868,0.00010479392,0.000038087932,0.000019920986,0.000029967465,0.000005387761,0.0034880445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840945,0.00082413,0.000091609916,0.00017961496,0.00023426878,0.00026098755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509132,0.040817663,0.0035541838,0.0025503035,0.0009445992,0.0012199844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00476791,0.0005466718,0.0008115732,0.000647009,0.0004901593,0.0035488901,0.00069245853,0.0026424206,0.006737959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028437797,0.0005009966,0.0004868961,0.0007237231,0.0027795725,0.007243831,0.0014117446,0.0019555218,0.0003781066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008556645,0.0010938882,0.015800383,0.00028216388,0.00020159286,0.00036984644,0.0009476542,0.05812168,0.0017578927,0.8742215,0.002035715,0.044312045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008939879,0.0001252172,0.0034215047,0.000018457386,0.00004860713,0.000058718964,0.00028107368,0.044723403,0.00046564112,0.9500838,0.0006645943,0.000019599183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072978216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090804836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006737959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011890766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013150965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025215447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121946553","doi":"","title":"Inputs, Incentives, and Self-Selection at the Workplace","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Salary; Productivity; Absenteeism; Exploit; Selection (genetic algorithm); Production (economics); Adverse selection; Business; Labour economics; Quality (philosophy); Information asymmetry; Demographic economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.02221801256016859,"score_gpt":0.33903487586116227,"score_spread":0.3168168633009937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121946553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970921,0.00009041248,0.0008715846,0.00014521735,0.0000024757985,0.0000067740457,0.000021652937,0.0000044515946,0.0017652399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992248,0.00004147839,0.00021797302,0.000028565157,0.0000043505993,0.000003600007,0.000012110553,0.000001182316,0.00046588044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892527,0.00057213765,0.00004023885,0.00011550375,0.00017432947,0.00017251913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895084,0.0055077,0.0034389773,0.00057455624,0.00040249492,0.0005679069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015812253,0.00019616244,0.00034742165,0.0004197217,0.0004256794,0.0011907087,0.0002307706,0.00062882714,0.0025170757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006605555,0.0002037053,0.00019039534,0.00029098862,0.00068838004,0.0005256374,0.00066152716,0.00040742123,0.00028351552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010245577,0.0013766345,0.8941993,0.00015479754,0.00022554121,0.00050771167,0.0033849739,0.0075737974,0.025998116,0.007960839,0.00038298932,0.057210762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045704306,0.0005311631,0.98168725,0.000026696513,0.000032641503,0.000088873116,0.0014027602,0.0052183648,0.0023749026,0.007694582,0.00086785073,0.000029151197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010596017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001486715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025170757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005573778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002826198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008420467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121950414","doi":"10.1023/a:1011484722011","title":"Value Orientations, Income and Displacement Effects, and Voluntary Contributions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Displacement (psychology); Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Space (punctuation); Psychology; RADIUS; Turnover; Demographic economics; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.013757684853198612,"score_gpt":0.33459320983964214,"score_spread":0.3208355249864435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121950414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99585295,0.000031935695,0.0008662253,0.000025058202,0.0000045515067,0.000021352234,0.000027987626,0.0000053274753,0.0031646732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887115,0.000015917973,0.00055374333,0.0000097819975,0.0000027033298,0.000016829767,0.000022839831,0.0000040252844,0.00050295074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984849,0.00082853547,0.00006209365,0.00016306882,0.00036481695,0.00009650697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758828,0.017943302,0.0027033202,0.0020870902,0.00059731014,0.00078607776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035124263,0.00038109277,0.0003923362,0.00034027264,0.0003183563,0.0009440333,0.00034538555,0.00031777073,0.0055888915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019421682,0.00021545602,0.00018810299,0.00026178718,0.0009025223,0.00045466382,0.00066743436,0.0004972483,0.00027486082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02143503,0.009172223,0.6841255,0.0005170606,0.00047965578,0.00045678153,0.0032433427,0.009260534,0.1331509,0.02752559,0.0010089627,0.10962438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003324394,0.002972676,0.95473456,0.0000291494,0.00013803325,0.0001514389,0.0009711116,0.010112742,0.012957241,0.016068509,0.0014807247,0.00005134085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007529975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000945062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055888915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038145806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020834483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018696725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122008452","doi":"","title":"Incentives for Accuracy in Analyst Research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.11644698553370293,"score_gpt":0.38993679380742896,"score_spread":0.27348980827372604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122008452","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40047237,0.002063514,0.4147326,0.024697322,0.00028580977,0.0015647238,0.0010849425,0.00081051333,0.1542882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96438694,0.00039457172,0.021174233,0.00042012153,0.0001542097,0.0003520002,0.00008760632,0.000034442586,0.012995807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97677124,0.0131132165,0.0012020065,0.002497119,0.004109125,0.0023071999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8503013,0.089675635,0.039482765,0.010345751,0.0054814247,0.0047130464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026048362,0.0010115549,0.0011713733,0.0022766232,0.0018384387,0.0070040375,0.0023134768,0.005968184,0.013000529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11952777,0.0013433696,0.0008825012,0.0022269948,0.003352489,0.008491713,0.0026387412,0.002980109,0.0017658016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008167498,0.000537122,0.027114714,0.00028392667,0.00011582207,0.00044927085,0.0018470711,0.084315255,0.0022402878,0.82898426,0.003185203,0.050110262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086452,0.00073660666,0.025369547,0.0002155966,0.00013097514,0.0008689638,0.00084789173,0.23568131,0.0014417747,0.70511615,0.028495649,0.00023101724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003501696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020263186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97395164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006581561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055707917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13775855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122053511","doi":"","title":"Rent Seeking: The Social Cost of Contestable Benefits","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rent-seeking; Economic rent; CONTEST; Economics; Public economics; Politics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Political science","score_opus":0.050079048721595416,"score_gpt":0.35762072474005363,"score_spread":0.3075416760184582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122053511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4996158,0.003012788,0.057536714,0.016760707,0.00017965114,0.00011979683,0.00056012714,0.00008742026,0.42212704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211806,0.00036058127,0.0012270793,0.00022280627,0.00006403298,0.00003124482,0.000035562614,0.000016306598,0.0059243874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979988,0.00078490283,0.00007215402,0.00021157229,0.0005548329,0.00037775116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929972,0.0036366638,0.0011006359,0.0012437269,0.00052654126,0.000495243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001832908,0.000420485,0.00065249926,0.00074993196,0.0011198219,0.0030505746,0.00069741905,0.0017341049,0.013747893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009987586,0.00022684407,0.00054671685,0.00073307945,0.0051165344,0.0033851024,0.0026205024,0.0017704758,0.0005237879],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001807383,0.00014494751,0.006554234,0.00010390465,0.000077360426,0.0002479858,0.00045105116,0.0061381874,0.0013509698,0.96230733,0.002473121,0.019970097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048807884,0.0001382975,0.009668335,0.000061924125,0.000058433216,0.00036008467,0.00057908474,0.011346237,0.00057722523,0.9653674,0.011762621,0.00003155255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020138696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002136145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013747893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026744555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009645743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0459913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122092225","doi":"","title":"Norms from outside and from inside: An experimental analysis on the governance of local ecosystems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Santa Fe Institute; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Dilemma; Commons; Common-pool resource; Corporate governance; Externality; Business; Social dilemma; Public economics; Set (abstract data type); Prisoner's dilemma; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Game theory; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05356278903339689,"score_gpt":0.3650366975695853,"score_spread":0.3114739085361884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122092225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986216,0.000011654003,0.00035627955,0.00001712144,0.0000034990826,0.00011235985,0.000016602251,0.0000027029507,0.00085836917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725854,0.000029799947,0.0013727965,0.000027471408,0.000006974887,0.00047724726,0.00004121128,0.0000047479484,0.0007811545],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968093,0.002035259,0.00015171024,0.0004371576,0.0003160378,0.00025042528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851849,0.011056155,0.0016944648,0.0013750949,0.00029059956,0.00039882804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033065637,0.00039707567,0.00046908806,0.0003200019,0.0007733374,0.0009076401,0.0007816933,0.00049236673,0.0033806039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008857748,0.00023713779,0.00035374888,0.00024840978,0.0021328116,0.0006816705,0.00090600224,0.0008606464,0.0001574639],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07233366,0.22329232,0.16326188,0.0033478444,0.0013641708,0.001783303,0.049282454,0.030022394,0.26143432,0.028137421,0.0024516138,0.16328867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017785659,0.2834926,0.4330444,0.00037881057,0.0013133804,0.00049358973,0.027867524,0.08405267,0.11125226,0.02672732,0.013089112,0.0005026864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003113346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044402042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033806039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011397522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057663315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01748699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122096277","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2020.3683","title":"Joint vs. Separate Crowdsourcing Contests","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Crowdsourcing; Incentive; Randomness; Joint (building); Computer science; Microeconomics; Operations research; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07375452277205599,"score_gpt":0.3403048771253577,"score_spread":0.26655035435330166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122096277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6541524,0.00089374423,0.25138152,0.00291611,0.00045145844,0.0012122558,0.0006276338,0.00025697975,0.08810797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98073834,0.00011419089,0.012191512,0.00014235484,0.000098371966,0.0003089441,0.00007205296,0.000029856845,0.0063044433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834035,0.007607513,0.00067585224,0.0025160364,0.0023356897,0.003461413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966413,0.016551541,0.0064733434,0.0050632046,0.0012331244,0.0042656506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115790935,0.0017164643,0.0032880174,0.0010236382,0.0021221552,0.0055334275,0.003058648,0.0038834675,0.01712915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032981195,0.0008937313,0.0019330581,0.0010928067,0.0045860293,0.006644077,0.0050431406,0.0032185887,0.0010619997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039757458,0.0016075204,0.0060980446,0.00084620423,0.0003834028,0.0005047286,0.0012405014,0.20599179,0.0083996225,0.6974246,0.0068218894,0.066705965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009762754,0.001456216,0.007725516,0.00016898014,0.00021282095,0.0003255462,0.0013290901,0.38935018,0.002652504,0.58662516,0.008937707,0.00024008084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015109502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025458543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01712915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027474575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025980708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06123686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122106113","doi":"10.3386/w18986","title":"How Do Voters Respond to Information? Evidence from a Randomized Campaign","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized experiment; Randomized controlled trial; Political science; Medicine; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.3281586320571719,"score_gpt":0.5335683305081024,"score_spread":0.2054096984509305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122106113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95931697,0.0012947035,0.015507762,0.0032162014,0.00026617362,0.0006617155,0.0017928449,0.00007423779,0.017869316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920751,0.00043375316,0.0036654337,0.00069697184,0.0001449063,0.00035076257,0.00078558916,0.000023301956,0.0018242544],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808834,0.014666612,0.0009124027,0.001441466,0.0014162399,0.0006799108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.688509,0.2516126,0.022555165,0.031118097,0.005188464,0.0010167377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024707148,0.0005967794,0.0013924072,0.00061624666,0.00073795265,0.0017179733,0.0011506715,0.0020207325,0.012720036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15501131,0.0006185663,0.0008570567,0.0010559417,0.0018432707,0.0012845015,0.0011851743,0.0020096286,0.0020396265],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12003401,0.018095918,0.2949115,0.009203106,0.006832407,0.0009864765,0.008323875,0.04962556,0.017708898,0.1153753,0.031478614,0.32742432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03214515,0.023695553,0.48102245,0.0012765615,0.0060520144,0.00080851745,0.004061236,0.1598376,0.024628244,0.21021734,0.055734754,0.00052061165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019453596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018384341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024707148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063889206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005124105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13066548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122107096","doi":"10.71889/5fylantbak.30790274","title":"Emotion Venting And Punishment In Public Good Experiments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Sanctions; Harm; Enforcement; Welfare; Free rider problem; Law and economics; Deterrence (psychology); Social psychology; Public good; Criminology; Psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06735331585376313,"score_gpt":0.3016781365056023,"score_spread":0.23432482065183918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122107096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96850276,0.00023486285,0.012002086,0.0010650284,0.000106947155,0.00019503337,0.00015409909,0.00009305829,0.017646182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939201,0.0000865234,0.0038693373,0.00028515403,0.000034541248,0.00027845256,0.00003948762,0.000017393959,0.0014689282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951094,0.0035262043,0.00016352716,0.00042546148,0.000523566,0.00025168902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97732246,0.014409286,0.0042700204,0.0027468102,0.00031106308,0.00094032683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006683275,0.00057389715,0.0007190155,0.00044157673,0.0006573193,0.0016756785,0.00085022295,0.0015208487,0.005935201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02531481,0.00036954507,0.00030789213,0.0003492078,0.0023093752,0.001446695,0.0012103417,0.0015628842,0.00038322347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037654635,0.052924063,0.072951615,0.0034570696,0.001463213,0.0012360492,0.0068962732,0.074018404,0.1690909,0.4024992,0.011926452,0.16588221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008576686,0.033467893,0.1508691,0.0004130906,0.0007149065,0.000488771,0.0020816983,0.14248912,0.037608095,0.604295,0.018628249,0.00036747413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042382497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039071613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006683275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088793185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004566142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03534496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122146379","doi":"10.1007/s10679-005-7594-2","title":"What's in a Name? An Experimental Examination of Investment Behavior","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"European Finance Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Investment (military); Business; Identity (music); Key (lock); Information asymmetry; Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Law; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.08860038147063207,"score_gpt":0.38395628026383133,"score_spread":0.29535589879319923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122146379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99548846,0.00006782919,0.0006005991,0.00028084082,0.000041350613,0.00009703943,0.000087081535,0.000011607572,0.0033252286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941029,0.0001200768,0.0019033739,0.00032378282,0.00003488158,0.00036773933,0.000092896706,0.0000112234975,0.0030432367],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987286,0.0005510462,0.000110148205,0.00031160135,0.00019868925,0.0000998755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841182,0.010132462,0.0026461198,0.0020174705,0.0005270109,0.00055876456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028773313,0.0003985015,0.00060407975,0.0002157395,0.00064484304,0.001500742,0.0005296554,0.0012170004,0.008771941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016421529,0.0003219905,0.00023574619,0.00024495317,0.0012541326,0.0011836416,0.00070828496,0.0012592839,0.0006699644],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.058227222,0.12650716,0.15455562,0.0023246817,0.0008623923,0.0016181518,0.027965836,0.0032303387,0.39568526,0.058693197,0.0100923395,0.16023777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023399422,0.10770442,0.5181839,0.0005984945,0.0019507753,0.0020943787,0.01807539,0.032491818,0.12016908,0.10436133,0.07019731,0.0007737165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008313698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089773186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008771941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040977346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037727033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029345036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122249789","doi":"","title":"Peer Pressure, Incentives, and Gender: An Experimental Analysis of Motivation in the Workplace","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep Limoilou; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Peer effects; Peer pressure; Payment; Work (physics); Labour economics; Piece work; Peer group; Demographic economics; Economics; Business; Psychology; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.09119251862624919,"score_gpt":0.4097082775887354,"score_spread":0.3185157589624862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122249789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99825376,0.000036005633,0.00033987247,0.00007899381,0.000016453358,0.00006264583,0.00003629225,0.0000040368855,0.0011718837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973271,0.00005853116,0.00091067515,0.00009661511,0.00003814664,0.0002050142,0.000037795966,0.000005320068,0.0013207723],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794155,0.0011449264,0.00011898024,0.0002838709,0.00034251786,0.0001682229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97685474,0.016883783,0.0031776796,0.0015454375,0.00033811692,0.001200199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002911089,0.00042199023,0.0005771349,0.00033076643,0.00075720024,0.0012347667,0.00070948445,0.0010271854,0.0061976695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013289603,0.0002981645,0.00024548086,0.00026822416,0.001288952,0.0006587995,0.00089010585,0.0007309807,0.00037498557],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07965578,0.21589483,0.20646647,0.0017181574,0.00074899313,0.0011213665,0.01962402,0.0048381835,0.2908655,0.019106401,0.0035279088,0.15643238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014751404,0.17923583,0.68798614,0.00027565996,0.0006363865,0.0007047489,0.0079615675,0.020878308,0.03923125,0.040300943,0.007680926,0.0003569238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048757912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054677785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061976695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005122171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043809216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020733237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122280611","doi":"","title":"Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Ultimatum game; Retributive justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03922844708461832,"score_gpt":0.3511654990373572,"score_spread":0.3119370519527389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122280611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.851443,0.0020398723,0.10760801,0.0023741582,0.000094191135,0.000100602905,0.00006998984,0.00007514042,0.0361951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928653,0.00037156642,0.0045701945,0.00010274689,0.000036449954,0.000036395213,0.00001904591,0.000010128189,0.0019881767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386346,0.0039547477,0.00022366105,0.00052852917,0.0008742044,0.0005553007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.924933,0.05057176,0.016491937,0.004257003,0.002399758,0.001346625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112243695,0.0005600076,0.0010277873,0.0012019612,0.0013706936,0.003150548,0.0013197139,0.0021941252,0.00521838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08389095,0.00065723225,0.00058371364,0.00086169055,0.0035490252,0.006928762,0.0024022246,0.003646586,0.0006993378],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016331176,0.0005544178,0.053916637,0.00036116893,0.00037431016,0.0019914047,0.012717562,0.107487746,0.0067230356,0.71556324,0.002192169,0.09648524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019683324,0.0005852312,0.03571442,0.00013853716,0.00014887609,0.0011251424,0.0028133525,0.34352106,0.0014052583,0.6099931,0.0041581327,0.00020002636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022410802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013077392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0112243695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015187011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071032776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05936086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122287671","doi":"10.6082/bj5zh-3s548","title":"A complete characterization of equilibria in an intrinsic common agency screening game","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Sequential equilibrium; Equilibrium selection; Inefficiency; Characterization (materials science); Choice function; Bayesian game; Markov perfect equilibrium; Pooling; Economics; Delegation; Nash equilibrium; Solution concept; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Computer science; Repeated game; Microeconomics; Game theory; Physics","score_opus":0.11444208751867102,"score_gpt":0.4044755460034551,"score_spread":0.29003345848478407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122287671","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30288845,0.0001506833,0.64434385,0.00073858374,0.000013331626,0.0002233463,0.0006393339,0.00030565736,0.050696887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275422,0.00020355651,0.0661949,0.00011695758,0.00001913905,0.00048963574,0.00028074972,0.000051479718,0.0051013506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760747,0.00075788685,0.00014093817,0.00054390344,0.0005873225,0.0003624737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693966,0.0012395545,0.00065285404,0.00039887943,0.00047731216,0.0002918566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024774887,0.0009647199,0.0014181607,0.0012582588,0.001008137,0.0029274137,0.001453058,0.0011934157,0.004937191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005985292,0.00047801377,0.0011446788,0.0009983683,0.0024513972,0.0036975264,0.0018844457,0.0016556146,0.0006384261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005626246,0.00009177078,0.00085010077,0.00006356419,0.000034466564,0.00010606733,0.00039309647,0.044153232,0.002893438,0.94241685,0.00060195575,0.008339108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005353145,0.000104223014,0.0009541967,0.00007226233,0.00002701078,0.00016474843,0.00024839977,0.25395268,0.0027065652,0.73835033,0.0033129097,0.00005312865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010366593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006879603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004937191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001649662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002141496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016516566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122307403","doi":"","title":"Trust and Reciprocity with Transparency and Repeated Interactions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Trustworthiness; Business; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Accounting; Microeconomics; Economics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04795535918346737,"score_gpt":0.3748682102082235,"score_spread":0.3269128510247561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122307403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98696196,0.00016734083,0.0041422197,0.0002833817,0.00001267177,0.000073773816,0.00007363085,0.000014250624,0.008270809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877053,0.00004524277,0.00078724214,0.000024249252,0.0000057339435,0.000050738843,0.000027542068,0.000003621785,0.00028519527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98311275,0.011082089,0.00077677023,0.0015908967,0.0026123356,0.000825181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8206643,0.10407339,0.04882003,0.01632998,0.0053026145,0.0048096916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008903621,0.00040740686,0.00067603355,0.00076832296,0.0011400264,0.0026300487,0.00053395337,0.0009799168,0.0028348742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071513996,0.00041615477,0.00051744725,0.00040806725,0.002261707,0.0019911542,0.002289737,0.0019519858,0.00024744347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050250697,0.004510919,0.76680595,0.0011495256,0.0014162996,0.0016259906,0.024839688,0.011766101,0.03343659,0.032458078,0.0013014216,0.11566439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003896173,0.004280035,0.9100534,0.00017646991,0.0005508398,0.001280526,0.0051193326,0.016796492,0.007980089,0.04888607,0.0041930107,0.0002940639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019201767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016669179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008903621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013467618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089529186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04708743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122320447","doi":"","title":"Reciprocity in Labor Relations: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Long-Term Relationships","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Wage; Reciprocal; Incentive; Economics; Labour economics; Efficiency wage; Term (time); Field (mathematics); Measure (data warehouse); Social psychology; Psychology; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.4358009311532001,"score_gpt":0.4316087397504564,"score_spread":0.004192191402743739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122320447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966634,0.00008302461,0.0012104933,0.00013151964,0.00001495342,0.0001363738,0.00004420718,0.000008703498,0.0017073303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935382,0.00014015743,0.0037631665,0.00023699354,0.00003090305,0.000557651,0.0000931628,0.000008148405,0.0016316507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918332,0.0061981706,0.00033045054,0.0007619973,0.0005710142,0.0003051907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9120126,0.05876684,0.011762923,0.012782305,0.0017731973,0.0029021243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014345072,0.00047980508,0.0006383482,0.0004524588,0.0014483153,0.0011299849,0.0011525693,0.0012980545,0.0040607336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032990858,0.00072977203,0.000392643,0.00036298452,0.0023257225,0.0012437749,0.001321797,0.0015624096,0.000552653],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0301034,0.17584997,0.39951822,0.002185545,0.0014847957,0.0014257382,0.032661393,0.005742397,0.14562698,0.01283241,0.004469578,0.18809962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053592455,0.13303876,0.77954674,0.00043220696,0.00069540716,0.00129836,0.00936825,0.011552016,0.025634471,0.017200213,0.015538345,0.00033592485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001536038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024720787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014345072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006721283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063489436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07586485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122334545","doi":"","title":"The Heritability of Moral Standards for Everyday Dishonesty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; Variation (astronomy); Social psychology; Psychology; Perception; Heritability; Honesty; Sample (material); Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.017052697244416895,"score_gpt":0.3227497663510579,"score_spread":0.305697069106641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122334545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969369,0.000149052,0.00078848435,0.00009805339,0.000011576425,0.0000059523645,0.000095265365,0.000010115989,0.0019047258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995808,0.000032542033,0.00020302029,0.0000049794294,0.0000045064057,0.0000020947382,0.000039446335,0.0000031967515,0.00012945221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977597,0.0007990854,0.0001432371,0.00060044933,0.0004902679,0.00020727339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801799,0.008346008,0.005764125,0.003717704,0.00090267265,0.0010895676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026758525,0.0003045163,0.00042385265,0.0012940414,0.00047027518,0.0013664945,0.00037970894,0.00067247654,0.003395168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01814187,0.00033782868,0.00028872918,0.00071286643,0.0016290568,0.0004164913,0.0010021371,0.0010835521,0.00028588268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000920538,0.00008819224,0.9818957,0.000017826884,0.0001613148,0.00024716297,0.0020932714,0.00035429286,0.002135318,0.0021348142,0.00023288645,0.010547199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024206336,0.000022591024,0.9978853,0.000008900424,0.000018207358,0.00021332987,0.00021686919,0.00021725897,0.00012944231,0.0011550462,0.00012020215,0.000010488684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005058964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00397752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005058964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039090784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002905196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014151394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122349375","doi":"","title":"Voting with Your Pocketbook - A Stochastic Model of Consumer Boycotts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Phenomenon; Limiting; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.09898084786620777,"score_gpt":0.3291366594855031,"score_spread":0.23015581161929533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122349375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6517545,0.0005923034,0.26964882,0.0056725554,0.00013480242,0.0002707335,0.0006194575,0.00028150834,0.07102522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734638,0.00020703844,0.007402003,0.00018093051,0.000055144654,0.00008580919,0.0001032055,0.000024745472,0.018477375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835485,0.00079645164,0.000058888378,0.000272361,0.0002498262,0.00026760757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966102,0.0018507887,0.00059869926,0.00037407927,0.00020641241,0.00035982128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019047935,0.00058899546,0.0008609364,0.00046151056,0.00080933276,0.0024317075,0.0020819015,0.002563853,0.009704603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006676773,0.00044502135,0.0009208903,0.0007124477,0.0019454133,0.0027266573,0.0010535512,0.00209154,0.00084070914],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045189334,0.00032221357,0.0035988383,0.000072430084,0.000059661073,0.0010818973,0.0012188915,0.24204545,0.0027283316,0.7342282,0.0033096052,0.010882589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002791389,0.0001883471,0.0019596566,0.000029185585,0.000035564695,0.000262416,0.00047537975,0.75304985,0.00047485804,0.23784524,0.0053260173,0.00007429098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008135822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005711642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009704603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016261572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075237284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0324651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122362963","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1446191","title":"On the Relevance and Composition of Gifts within the Firm: Evidence from Field Experiments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Composition (language); Field (mathematics); Business; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.030910218000512836,"score_gpt":0.33218218008165284,"score_spread":0.30127196208114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122362963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99263555,0.0003507991,0.0006092563,0.00026486636,0.000015984566,0.000036359525,0.00003091982,0.000008422832,0.006047959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847907,0.00023317328,0.00046221731,0.00010773616,0.00001941252,0.000018622073,0.00003839554,0.0000063105504,0.0006350523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538606,0.0027830414,0.00023919113,0.0006199775,0.0007421496,0.00022958822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8358601,0.12920596,0.017937139,0.010064752,0.002616726,0.0043154615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014427571,0.0005478504,0.0010102422,0.0015858609,0.0012525098,0.002500173,0.0010025277,0.0029307168,0.010565244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074219294,0.00059522176,0.00032135964,0.0008901339,0.0031284853,0.002847814,0.0017140997,0.0017984838,0.0010128842],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06148309,0.033495147,0.46930918,0.002152733,0.0014662114,0.0016434339,0.009663314,0.013912299,0.12001837,0.060121518,0.0039349347,0.22279985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044853445,0.008891143,0.86911386,0.0003050185,0.0008542577,0.0008317239,0.004527053,0.008749322,0.013283776,0.08233085,0.0064115026,0.00021614121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017352923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014050558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014427571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088442856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000634243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07630122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122378996","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2016.03.001","title":"Search, Effort, and Locus of Control","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Locus of control; Psychology; Personality; Perception; Social psychology; Reservation; Locus (genetics); Computer science; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.037074276669714516,"score_gpt":0.31625920749497627,"score_spread":0.27918493082526175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122378996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98923886,0.00086337794,0.0017891858,0.000494055,0.000017440745,0.000008750275,0.00007515274,0.000012852312,0.007500353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919575,0.00011245834,0.00020125488,0.000026691794,0.000015509508,0.000004403913,0.000019375406,0.000004087448,0.0004204504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921083,0.00037743957,0.000046639692,0.00013276658,0.00015086234,0.00008129229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740128,0.018608958,0.004128199,0.0016703327,0.000455461,0.0011242278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030847066,0.0003149552,0.0004543293,0.001000178,0.0002938302,0.0023140833,0.0002978738,0.0010901854,0.0042538154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019798396,0.00028046436,0.00020728871,0.00078934035,0.0010780946,0.0013763326,0.0007474804,0.000596881,0.00021457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004202857,0.002408606,0.7934326,0.0002997797,0.00096804596,0.0005770987,0.0027762437,0.014737568,0.009894448,0.08041474,0.0018709628,0.08841711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038761838,0.0008300876,0.854656,0.000065460714,0.00032316722,0.0005348271,0.0011293541,0.022989241,0.0009151394,0.11731984,0.00076305296,0.000086131455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000618192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055362465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042538154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029186884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002588165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016313672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122382032","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1907727","title":"How Competitive are Female Professionals? A Tale of Identity Conflict","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03420495177365881,"score_gpt":0.3534398093441699,"score_spread":0.3192348575705111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122382032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9044559,0.0002974643,0.0012430219,0.024850465,0.000090310416,0.000012381882,0.000032373388,0.0000050729823,0.069012955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997903,0.00005257946,0.000110017274,0.0006603335,0.000029445782,0.0000039844003,0.000005785172,0.000002303787,0.0012325927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666446,0.0019991463,0.000049505117,0.00025219444,0.0005658843,0.00046874327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863637,0.006931792,0.0020436572,0.00047217862,0.0008905424,0.0032981776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004462663,0.00021299292,0.0003402663,0.0009590307,0.005592889,0.0063369335,0.0005958527,0.0023350215,0.007480804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01748535,0.00018852492,0.00013822575,0.00057746534,0.0046017263,0.0036824048,0.0023856508,0.0019263523,0.0005580497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015362666,0.0014659802,0.38862568,0.00015737252,0.00017890881,0.0025272064,0.15487929,0.00072597654,0.0057848166,0.256548,0.02535273,0.16221777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014946927,0.0008526885,0.22796176,0.00016543019,0.000104091334,0.002228561,0.5191894,0.0036618353,0.0018165013,0.20158611,0.04214193,0.000142158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026350555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00402602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007480804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013170582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011674984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025025785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122407674","doi":"10.1002/jae.1227","title":"Measuring the willingness to pay to avoid guilt: estimation using equilibrium and stated belief models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Estimation; Willingness to pay; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1006240333100561,"score_gpt":0.3220042931027572,"score_spread":0.2213802597927011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122407674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9161335,0.00010658025,0.081370555,0.00042329956,0.000012276856,0.00008196775,0.0002646469,0.000058699225,0.0015483905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891123,0.00004222985,0.010129508,0.000031701686,0.000007781446,0.00008975872,0.0002443234,0.0000060271814,0.0003363977],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905096,0.007512323,0.00030517695,0.0007308969,0.00058139296,0.0003605282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8417992,0.13618618,0.012073254,0.0068646367,0.002273061,0.0008036736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01941829,0.0009066987,0.001288947,0.0014741437,0.00036181542,0.002869653,0.0024312458,0.0024692782,0.00553628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10398376,0.00072034536,0.0016966552,0.001374379,0.0017259604,0.0029589804,0.0014856198,0.0025093046,0.000677374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003352154,0.002071954,0.37995836,0.00065664697,0.002327583,0.00033484524,0.0034224659,0.43681288,0.0026403558,0.09851054,0.0013719911,0.068540215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002521946,0.00076539227,0.062802285,0.00008921913,0.00027591854,0.00014592534,0.0006298224,0.86269313,0.0014341323,0.07036406,0.0004403955,0.000107546475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003754021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022660324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01941829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015590591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006539773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10269493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122429368","doi":"10.20381/ruor-24745","title":"Visible Minorities and Majority Giving*","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Population; Social psychology; Focus (optics); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Demography","score_opus":0.10361756646080082,"score_gpt":0.3791756733160428,"score_spread":0.27555810685524196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122429368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759173,0.0006256836,0.00066186086,0.0014506737,0.000067699344,0.000024501502,0.00003762352,0.0000058282426,0.021208944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844754,0.0000975856,0.000119255776,0.000121048324,0.000036494683,0.000005126992,0.000008241449,0.0000020625937,0.0011626469],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974081,0.001268039,0.00012993364,0.000223151,0.00045179785,0.00051897374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987151,0.0033550581,0.0057328637,0.0006903036,0.0005210536,0.0025495861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037565324,0.00025322227,0.00039786572,0.0008069094,0.002160368,0.002581497,0.0005146703,0.00076542137,0.010218224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012272426,0.0001194782,0.00045312112,0.0005110511,0.001953125,0.0009362409,0.0029513359,0.0015316148,0.0005606878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013580124,0.000978217,0.87015355,0.00016342581,0.00019098962,0.00073219324,0.01670928,0.00046781593,0.0022470204,0.024833854,0.0012957614,0.080869906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117826654,0.0012118333,0.9116122,0.0003453224,0.00022298348,0.0011744237,0.032647654,0.001660028,0.0028676202,0.02890549,0.019154757,0.000079883124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033507915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003914145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010218224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080848683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058348814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034183383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122517105","doi":"","title":"Voluntary Contributions to Reduce Expected Public Losses","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Turnover; Welfare economics; Economics; Investment (military); Actuarial science; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08741319043467079,"score_gpt":0.41471232248243595,"score_spread":0.3272991320477652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122517105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8569406,0.00091008603,0.096238606,0.0016473873,0.0002513184,0.0008441253,0.0007530724,0.0005229679,0.041891854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803037,0.00023532771,0.007179733,0.00011771295,0.00004256464,0.00049482216,0.00014574322,0.000045123877,0.011435352],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274397,0.004170633,0.00027654564,0.000745409,0.0012310714,0.0008324708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95247823,0.029957246,0.0073223533,0.006478688,0.0022697872,0.0014937271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01377692,0.0011104309,0.0011739732,0.0012093501,0.00084557093,0.0024683445,0.001362481,0.0012866828,0.017874938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053983666,0.0005107596,0.0010357097,0.0009866365,0.0011693147,0.0021777465,0.0026846027,0.0015048805,0.001645592],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011404125,0.005451304,0.11283377,0.0016101717,0.0011048379,0.0006460301,0.0041434565,0.24884811,0.013085497,0.27923566,0.0102157,0.31142133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020200869,0.008920973,0.13006581,0.00074668275,0.0013093291,0.00054881786,0.0038171664,0.3364206,0.012050164,0.45613846,0.047720738,0.00024115706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017535599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002238032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017874938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002140186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031861193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07286018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122552509","doi":"","title":"Inferring Repeated Game Strategies From Actions: Evidence From Trust Game Experiments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeated game; Core (optical fiber); Set (abstract data type); Repeated measures design; Computer science; Inference; Sequential game; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Normal-form game; Strategy; Screening game; Best response; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.18701266987782655,"score_gpt":0.4496993051932814,"score_spread":0.26268663531545483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122552509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9554591,0.00041951265,0.039410204,0.0005325946,0.000037263682,0.00015035263,0.0005189167,0.00007856138,0.0033935267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98807424,0.00022465641,0.010773841,0.000100748126,0.000016811207,0.000101059624,0.00036824364,0.000026016634,0.00031438924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98880506,0.007077056,0.00089772395,0.0012027983,0.0017686778,0.0002485969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70585716,0.24252464,0.025395723,0.018670274,0.0062128073,0.0013394449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011555366,0.0007689602,0.0006962595,0.0008590094,0.00067229103,0.0014621587,0.0014228699,0.0015297019,0.0022913804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17126293,0.000645056,0.00067521096,0.0008365138,0.0026690618,0.003042869,0.0010941045,0.0022676112,0.0005150931],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012356145,0.011152752,0.49138543,0.0051071364,0.003764384,0.0015697787,0.018958619,0.066974185,0.04495725,0.08082357,0.007027053,0.25592372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001951767,0.008936073,0.40844038,0.0007532152,0.0014978794,0.0024748787,0.004843385,0.31208247,0.057133906,0.18880273,0.012456804,0.0006265015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002201903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021727849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011555366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006557448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005266078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06111133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122601488","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2164387","title":"To Belong or to Be Different? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Collectivism; China; Social psychology; Scale (ratio); Identity (music); Taste; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Subject (documents); Advertising; Political science; Geography; Business; Individualism; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04345623960190523,"score_gpt":0.36303709040846316,"score_spread":0.31958085080655796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122601488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99791664,0.00006624647,0.00013605577,0.0002725854,0.000015293504,0.000026066315,0.00007196372,0.0000026149735,0.0014925143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980178,0.00007729754,0.0002056108,0.0003673559,0.000014489965,0.00004412879,0.00014458597,0.0000048286543,0.001123906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630404,0.0017858964,0.00013241293,0.0007885258,0.0005027787,0.00048630746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97887164,0.010140513,0.00505418,0.002835734,0.0011943778,0.0019035033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009357738,0.00058810634,0.0008684927,0.00076712423,0.0023445685,0.0016379857,0.001506381,0.0017578657,0.00920159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012503981,0.0004158181,0.0004211698,0.0011397728,0.004033428,0.0014986857,0.0014635511,0.0012377653,0.0009096612],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012360482,0.009734208,0.87146693,0.00047141316,0.0011287653,0.0014429246,0.022294268,0.0006602527,0.020968318,0.008413543,0.0063150795,0.044743948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071421865,0.0012652881,0.98080975,0.00004778516,0.00027099674,0.00018062141,0.00837641,0.0011241728,0.0013429577,0.0029562265,0.0028453756,0.00006615687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031634852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040956683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031634852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012425581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015552464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06290144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122606683","doi":"","title":"When Good Advice is Ignored: The Role of Envy and Stubbornness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Luck; Remuneration; Task (project management); Sunk costs; Psychology; Social psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Fallacy; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.03423515371925136,"score_gpt":0.31972666201714534,"score_spread":0.285491508297894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122606683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976534,0.0001045394,0.00033164214,0.000104908926,0.0000065511763,0.000016412067,0.000012811727,0.000009213845,0.0017605579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840516,0.000064325235,0.00078360364,0.00010459701,0.0000068591658,0.000021742224,0.000024329893,0.00001291637,0.00057653117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535286,0.0025627383,0.00022134266,0.00058435276,0.0009179536,0.00036079498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9018554,0.08057301,0.009693869,0.0030142842,0.0020222343,0.0028411713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006807761,0.0003300511,0.0007173667,0.00043282085,0.0010234368,0.0022430676,0.0005997522,0.0015420002,0.0023296268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07014904,0.00040435558,0.0002499388,0.0002892924,0.0012075722,0.0016777855,0.0009501555,0.0016476136,0.00022194628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010693014,0.006375078,0.7297133,0.0009968914,0.0007009212,0.0013075428,0.05990588,0.0039769467,0.05639978,0.0031617878,0.001558747,0.12521017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039414305,0.004603561,0.9509228,0.00020187958,0.0003470029,0.000429195,0.01564188,0.010965912,0.0065578814,0.0061485507,0.0035908446,0.0001962846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064427643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009293271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006807761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007630596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009157346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03600329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122631126","doi":"","title":"Pro-Social Motivation and the Delivery of Social Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Exploit; Incentive; Perspective (graphical); Altruism (biology); Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Social entrepreneurship; Social psychology; Business; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.020530253995590893,"score_gpt":0.28134743523932676,"score_spread":0.2608171812437359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122631126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29985628,0.009660864,0.0949749,0.04069228,0.00026020207,0.00047756403,0.00022094986,0.00012977507,0.5537271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851798,0.0024785667,0.0054959464,0.00039701376,0.00014315167,0.0001445005,0.000027392849,0.000012615758,0.0061210147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959741,0.0026625888,0.000113754206,0.00019772805,0.00062273577,0.00042905463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930896,0.0034554712,0.0016563974,0.0002974727,0.00052798365,0.0009730379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032955315,0.00046100476,0.0002988193,0.0013075256,0.0013046731,0.00364064,0.0006221949,0.0019326995,0.0059503955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007875391,0.00020627117,0.00030767792,0.0010639258,0.0035502936,0.0020486962,0.0019680462,0.0011903913,0.0004524614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052749936,0.0002257938,0.0051776553,0.00020331165,0.000034815774,0.0001411877,0.001458536,0.002877157,0.00038565067,0.95741624,0.00093834696,0.03108862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085995904,0.00037842063,0.018400952,0.0003972277,0.000043242613,0.0003381006,0.0033238174,0.009016868,0.00061481626,0.8873436,0.08000854,0.000048512356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017548802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018090163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059503955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002430804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029645495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019906044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122703912","doi":"10.1007/s10683-016-9479-y","title":"Clever enough to tell the truth","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Thursday; Generalizability theory; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Cognition; Sample (material); Replicate; Computer science; Theology; Developmental psychology; Philosophy; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04009964862919802,"score_gpt":0.3279990547548164,"score_spread":0.2878994061256184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122703912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94317716,0.0003898979,0.005573859,0.008481937,0.00028909036,0.00015032565,0.00017406244,0.00004768006,0.04171598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950262,0.00013599328,0.0013796885,0.0013767536,0.000089253794,0.00003142643,0.00005810348,0.000008918397,0.0018938561],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938532,0.0038688316,0.00031119,0.0006157761,0.0009938517,0.00035702015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9125509,0.059846785,0.012092764,0.010003168,0.003066705,0.0024395473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011389997,0.0003502781,0.0005716373,0.00039660317,0.0012971325,0.0026291409,0.0005819674,0.001687002,0.017214762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05495347,0.00032850314,0.00027875954,0.00022063937,0.0027172123,0.002133313,0.00073189003,0.0018697858,0.0019216852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01611907,0.011477774,0.39765197,0.0019499091,0.0020696023,0.001983382,0.019303171,0.008792069,0.054775257,0.15259394,0.03724834,0.2960356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033407663,0.010942993,0.46170625,0.0010569572,0.0008078246,0.0029295944,0.027503978,0.06613336,0.022461198,0.33341223,0.069249675,0.00045511915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009164648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007540308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017214762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060951203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070403854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06023681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122708905","doi":"","title":"Status Quo Effects in Fairness Games: Reciprocal Responses to Acts of\\nCommission vs. Acts of Omission","year":2012,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Archive @ GSU","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Commission; Reciprocal; Status quo bias; Social psychology; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03210051660577752,"score_gpt":0.3431802167454882,"score_spread":0.3110797001397107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122708905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93373126,0.0001547272,0.015949368,0.001159972,0.0001016601,0.00016154241,0.0001372649,0.000029488527,0.04857476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644023,0.00004469345,0.0021153723,0.000159942,0.000018098646,0.000091436035,0.000013337624,0.000008375049,0.0011085154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912952,0.0062658554,0.00040579343,0.00061265414,0.00095961255,0.00046078183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94847995,0.04019098,0.0065531638,0.00268479,0.00080467993,0.0012863515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010704322,0.0006186598,0.00065952505,0.00054692227,0.00073197787,0.0017204644,0.0005762184,0.0012451794,0.0068352525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046143964,0.00029937536,0.0005353293,0.0003355527,0.003247857,0.0021631615,0.001577112,0.0014819878,0.00036034864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011697893,0.0034426688,0.03972435,0.0011768914,0.00060311996,0.0007454238,0.007017507,0.05179797,0.08552013,0.72480124,0.0031985657,0.07027432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023473387,0.004055569,0.11612937,0.00021395991,0.0004310945,0.0003292025,0.0034515874,0.120028086,0.02278617,0.72308826,0.006866586,0.00027277274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001255741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011804951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010704322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015246666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007596289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056610525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122745554","doi":"","title":"Information Precision and Common Value Partnership Dissolution: An Experimental Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Private information retrieval; General partnership; Value (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Information quality; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Actuarial science; Information system; Computer science; Finance; Political science; Law; Computer security; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04642740058851983,"score_gpt":0.3874682056733874,"score_spread":0.34104080508486756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122745554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98970044,0.00009108958,0.0042102975,0.00025675155,0.000027520593,0.00028103738,0.000058875605,0.000023193368,0.0053507634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944108,0.00011390399,0.0037272745,0.00015140958,0.00002860245,0.00031938156,0.00006413825,0.000011216851,0.001173319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406505,0.003248462,0.00043075698,0.0006378725,0.0012666811,0.0003511574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9216372,0.057898052,0.00855924,0.009188713,0.0015530838,0.0011637569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008276462,0.000779813,0.0010051955,0.00062865217,0.0011269088,0.0026147559,0.0018874012,0.0017278903,0.0070253043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047954988,0.0007006123,0.0005732791,0.0006685303,0.0027130637,0.003455313,0.0024055166,0.003150843,0.00069682347],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.044546455,0.22302707,0.11270069,0.0028629256,0.0015380109,0.004306438,0.018319579,0.050302044,0.096097305,0.26556057,0.008194177,0.17254475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027365986,0.16236076,0.088406324,0.0005640376,0.0014714774,0.004505532,0.013519194,0.21860288,0.093549006,0.36389112,0.024975825,0.00078789704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006706917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003789602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008276462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009335855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008641824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04377061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122774093","doi":"","title":"Herding and Contrarianism in a Financial Trading Experiment with Endogenous Timing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Herding; Herd behavior; Economics; Rational expectations; Financial economics; Financial market; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.1358727300900198,"score_gpt":0.3312612554717709,"score_spread":0.19538852538175108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122774093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99938774,0.00001324824,0.00035585545,0.00001894793,0.0000025144805,0.000013533846,0.0000072140524,0.0000020582293,0.00019888999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702483,0.00003037426,0.0022701775,0.00007802917,0.000011005593,0.000073929325,0.000027181883,0.0000035914163,0.00048084598],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988998,0.0005836142,0.000085409774,0.00021740417,0.00012406387,0.00008971507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898788,0.00687778,0.0014105722,0.0011842613,0.00016400786,0.00048453864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003870461,0.00027663328,0.0005138671,0.00028650532,0.00043102994,0.00085185043,0.00030165422,0.00067189167,0.0013889042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065176715,0.00033665643,0.00019469504,0.00024501228,0.0009860077,0.000688484,0.0004939003,0.0006557492,0.00011366233],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028104974,0.0323844,0.24528395,0.0004682604,0.00075027125,0.0008399347,0.009921903,0.007177155,0.54962295,0.012282158,0.00086475274,0.112299226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00434509,0.095587395,0.6593225,0.00011736902,0.00066336646,0.0013267379,0.002793976,0.038491517,0.16121231,0.031210722,0.004642081,0.00028685716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005389752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073345785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003870461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024632443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022984306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020469189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122775382","doi":"10.4284/0038-4038-78.3.954","title":"Focal Points and Economic Efficiency: The Role of Relative Label Salience","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Focal point; Coordination game; Dominance (genetics); Pareto principle; Cardinal point; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Operations management; Optics","score_opus":0.021016456581208338,"score_gpt":0.2971565940916458,"score_spread":0.2761401375104375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122775382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144693,0.00027846347,0.04350235,0.00069783407,0.000021112028,0.00009975779,0.00005525776,0.00005219141,0.040823624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946126,0.000055869263,0.004648224,0.00004403828,0.000008298921,0.00003038747,0.000014089124,0.000011135247,0.00057537376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960194,0.0020761774,0.00019077347,0.00048107374,0.0009514806,0.00028115953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96506864,0.024550064,0.0046563474,0.0029212066,0.0012798724,0.0015238659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006286168,0.00062174,0.0007635713,0.0011960269,0.00087010994,0.0033027283,0.00067815586,0.0009885894,0.0050169397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039019227,0.0003365234,0.00043644797,0.0007300844,0.0029209573,0.0037695568,0.0026784167,0.0013874909,0.0003280525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014389452,0.00084842206,0.05076758,0.00062884146,0.00048487046,0.00051952153,0.003512636,0.038302407,0.06986403,0.72837096,0.0016711263,0.10359076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051437446,0.0017199462,0.096232586,0.00015337074,0.0002947937,0.00048087,0.0027820868,0.08639662,0.023320634,0.78210735,0.0058376975,0.00015966098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000603136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064004917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006286168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010877128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071802875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03324485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122775579","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.00476.x","title":"What you don't see can't hurt you: an economic analysis of morality laws","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Morality; Sanctions; Enforcement; Externality; Argument (complex analysis); Incentive; Law and economics; Economics; Credibility; Law; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.1904188478117805,"score_gpt":0.27284665726606483,"score_spread":0.08242780945428432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122775579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37624326,0.004026631,0.26028374,0.041449897,0.00049749593,0.00018559277,0.00023450267,0.00009037362,0.3169884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98493356,0.00078326004,0.006827563,0.00062306604,0.00017896858,0.000068485155,0.00001865815,0.000026837362,0.0065396414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974412,0.0016065338,0.000052421226,0.00020377796,0.00038872627,0.00030742455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909247,0.0062066414,0.0010623614,0.0007183328,0.0006456524,0.00044227525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004121077,0.00038735478,0.0006810607,0.00078256987,0.001535611,0.0030099854,0.000926594,0.0023049521,0.0062120655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01068827,0.00037247414,0.00082782714,0.0005170129,0.00820592,0.004147376,0.0014909144,0.0029900628,0.00031161364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001888632,0.000054032942,0.0004785157,0.000033190427,0.000015982787,0.000050339222,0.000120514065,0.011392788,0.00018261092,0.9839752,0.0008251956,0.0028526671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023013214,0.000024012552,0.000913642,0.000037406324,0.000010819653,0.000030565516,0.00008591848,0.040836923,0.00008626652,0.9558648,0.0020740414,0.000012560511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035463045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016498403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062120655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034726488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016112768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025196016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122793383","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3068665","title":"The Multiplier Effect in Two-Sided Markets with Bilateral Investments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multiplier (economics); Economics; Monetary economics; Business; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01270893969402091,"score_gpt":0.33461391981311583,"score_spread":0.3219049801190949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122793383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90562814,0.0006632749,0.035664268,0.0023644022,0.00014674621,0.000113760965,0.00023611079,0.00011613276,0.05506722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908421,0.00023844051,0.003124937,0.00007941376,0.00007708932,0.000031998512,0.000027061953,0.00001008375,0.0055689435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991271,0.00039595907,0.000043107033,0.00011971344,0.00012118248,0.00019300853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98169106,0.013594937,0.0024348241,0.00085649063,0.00045763716,0.00096499437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003516516,0.00066023064,0.0011998952,0.000877174,0.00067554886,0.001848485,0.00090741005,0.001922117,0.025736814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018654184,0.0004923501,0.000685889,0.000569416,0.001507674,0.004915014,0.0017803235,0.0015879612,0.0005843967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019897139,0.0006355445,0.0065252525,0.00043527968,0.0001499308,0.00070144504,0.00031262508,0.020538537,0.006935722,0.92217606,0.002880551,0.03671939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076577713,0.00083143474,0.009987837,0.000059787526,0.00023101499,0.0003567456,0.00031537062,0.038428128,0.0019400269,0.94492185,0.0020902718,0.00007174476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006684924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070782343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025736814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005958351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009672933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086098194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122799569","doi":"","title":"On the Optimality of Diverse Expert Panels in Persuasion Games","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Observability; Persuasion; Homogeneous; Action (physics); Decision maker; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Management science; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.12412802555403944,"score_gpt":0.41028074640536105,"score_spread":0.2861527208513216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122799569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46140358,0.0016139351,0.43595085,0.0088594565,0.00020211778,0.00048264832,0.0005445143,0.00024832808,0.09069447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583984,0.0008370742,0.03404156,0.0010349201,0.00020361785,0.0003223202,0.00018536135,0.000082231716,0.004894576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98769593,0.008687273,0.0005001152,0.0010393591,0.00095110905,0.0011261712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9242019,0.06598714,0.004124037,0.0018747348,0.0014954731,0.0023167431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0132961655,0.0019512594,0.0028434559,0.0014601501,0.0013790532,0.004111421,0.0017684494,0.0052308957,0.005665764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055360217,0.0010644195,0.0010730553,0.0008993963,0.0040845573,0.0047381856,0.0036077814,0.003344299,0.0010115404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015377157,0.00048737877,0.003898566,0.00063692156,0.00030583053,0.0006114301,0.0013066176,0.2777705,0.0071410583,0.6707749,0.0053241,0.03020504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040710854,0.0002993491,0.0011615081,0.00010488079,0.00006576806,0.00016903196,0.0002204052,0.2935697,0.0010424582,0.7012468,0.0016562984,0.00005675533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010757477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069638924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132961655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019991563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017114581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070317745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122851751","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.03.006","title":"Psychologically-based voting with uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Collège Lionel Groulx; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Regret; Turnout; Comparative statics; Margin (machine learning); Voting; Economics; Victory; Monotonic function; Ex-ante; Value (mathematics); Contrast (vision); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Statistics; Politics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.08416249220569813,"score_gpt":0.3459078448053319,"score_spread":0.2617453525996337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122851751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963868,0.0001094088,0.0098831225,0.0017904515,0.00006978936,0.00004403416,0.000076586155,0.000023513525,0.024135128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988933,0.000016918486,0.00043956455,0.000053313837,0.000018889566,0.000008515348,0.000015441523,0.0000030402682,0.00055092224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677247,0.0020761178,0.00010976286,0.00027923673,0.00041888468,0.0003435647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610995,0.02860084,0.004308768,0.0034843918,0.001403995,0.0011024775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058357213,0.00024500457,0.00051552826,0.0005098332,0.0007679252,0.0035633233,0.00069587707,0.0015426954,0.009002573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04654884,0.00033099955,0.000351044,0.0005264984,0.0020156356,0.001966042,0.0011295656,0.0014393294,0.0004085053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047747158,0.002532443,0.14167374,0.00034778178,0.00067182555,0.00058238686,0.005235964,0.04696637,0.007925316,0.708822,0.0045946226,0.0758729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003907248,0.0006854792,0.11880664,0.000026472742,0.0001966159,0.00021891855,0.0030326948,0.07245602,0.0015652275,0.80035216,0.002193404,0.00007547707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007085452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007653116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009002573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083413196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045556272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03086263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122874040","doi":"10.1093/rof/rfn023","title":"An Experimental Test of the Impact of Overconfidence and Gender on Trading Activity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"European Finance Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Illusion of control; Calibration; Asset (computer security); Econometrics; Economics; Test (biology); Order (exchange); Illusion; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Finance; Computer security","score_opus":0.13352223539154545,"score_gpt":0.40803060725629575,"score_spread":0.2745083718647503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122874040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973711,0.00005107732,0.0003632227,0.000068435365,0.00002765529,0.000059835947,0.00008735429,0.0000055402334,0.0019657584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966893,0.000058678837,0.0008939944,0.00012201981,0.000028503573,0.00017324364,0.000094874464,0.0000080256295,0.0019313126],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.997929,0.00086167123,0.00018330473,0.00040059205,0.0004567755,0.00016855868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97277796,0.017400831,0.0046916585,0.003150332,0.00065834343,0.0013208087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003693704,0.00047581576,0.00066544005,0.00031425216,0.00036972106,0.0011295199,0.00053749763,0.0010633513,0.009546388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012376694,0.00033849408,0.00025061553,0.00023665803,0.0009783412,0.00065603637,0.0007741713,0.0011831078,0.0006515684],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09724232,0.15808745,0.20799412,0.0011808174,0.00087955495,0.0009727294,0.0041512004,0.002708197,0.41406998,0.012488706,0.002822068,0.097402856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076937396,0.19240971,0.6522333,0.00017533393,0.0007415452,0.00088950177,0.0020337356,0.012152554,0.10702088,0.017995032,0.006378185,0.00027650085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028219895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002688035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009546388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002691064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028120764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03193587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122888240","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2006.08.009","title":"Competitive burnout: Theory and experimental evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; CONTEST; Nash equilibrium; Hierarchy; Argument (complex analysis); Competition (biology); Economics; Pareto principle; Equilibrium selection; Game theory; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Repeated game; Operations management; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04102717084791311,"score_gpt":0.34287770492071457,"score_spread":0.30185053407280144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122888240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460075,0.0041634724,0.014355777,0.0042139385,0.0001443053,0.00020890559,0.00016226585,0.00003970194,0.03070409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950126,0.0014795902,0.0017895087,0.00047361018,0.00007002002,0.00010722982,0.00008603513,0.0000121631765,0.00096937426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946149,0.0038793348,0.0001713372,0.00033486632,0.00070348347,0.00029614157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85040563,0.12999013,0.008612881,0.0061791516,0.0031342232,0.0016778464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013993761,0.0010675528,0.0011413884,0.001278847,0.0011890801,0.0024014406,0.001761718,0.002104383,0.006916053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059469286,0.0005115667,0.0003575754,0.0014269983,0.0056693596,0.0018200228,0.001434883,0.0015536383,0.0005819887],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018520681,0.042626172,0.16057628,0.006460664,0.0021904542,0.00051734276,0.010984443,0.026531724,0.011820577,0.49909917,0.014407681,0.20626497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006123593,0.005819616,0.1835586,0.0012312274,0.0010349418,0.00046504894,0.010422425,0.06672493,0.008118368,0.7035984,0.012665886,0.00023693078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035394111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028458703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013993761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00141847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015851143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074006915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122888768","doi":"","title":"A Dynamic Game of Emissions Pollution with Uncertainty and Learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Distribution (mathematics); Environmental economics; Economics; Environmental science; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.03758673357435343,"score_gpt":0.3502064330854952,"score_spread":0.31261969951114177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122888768","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19771108,0.005920144,0.36447814,0.11409856,0.0043711476,0.0002552082,0.0023401843,0.00037085084,0.31045473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277979,0.0023903847,0.011709866,0.0014319648,0.001364175,0.00011728641,0.00037302918,0.00008219268,0.054733183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867636,0.0006485514,0.00007433219,0.00025852307,0.00022634769,0.00011591985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995269,0.003728114,0.00029776496,0.00012476696,0.0002670329,0.00031319092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017508559,0.0005899635,0.0011985251,0.0003876396,0.0007666909,0.003171804,0.0011821892,0.0033362014,0.01590066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007826079,0.00034508918,0.0007258204,0.0007364749,0.0021586223,0.0032726263,0.0010557711,0.0026451463,0.00050416],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000176943,0.00006777496,0.0006251489,0.00022507655,0.00009269147,0.00064926734,0.00024864165,0.16190305,0.0011170009,0.8028837,0.019981286,0.012029364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008465019,0.000035746027,0.0006141178,0.000039678413,0.000021805436,0.00009799658,0.000104081795,0.18236604,0.00014000382,0.803677,0.01277311,0.000045717512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046012634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026542472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01590066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037852398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016889562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053193033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122892243","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12139","title":"Effect of Concession‐Timing Strategies in Auditor–Client Negotiations: It Matters Who Is Using Them","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Negotiation; Audit; Business; Accounting; Perception; External auditor; Psychology; Internal audit; Political science","score_opus":0.26934168074401443,"score_gpt":0.4867070833681202,"score_spread":0.21736540262410575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122892243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98323244,0.00010286208,0.003634894,0.00031083735,0.000016944903,0.00006921552,0.000008005748,0.000023745823,0.012600955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982843,0.000029991937,0.001350681,0.000038805938,0.0000066960956,0.000036398873,0.0000047052977,0.0000063297375,0.00024213937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95528793,0.034013826,0.0022836924,0.0015420628,0.005908741,0.00096372917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62093663,0.29985434,0.049042903,0.01311308,0.009397915,0.0076551326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028144782,0.00039331624,0.0004133817,0.0007740451,0.0011650416,0.004746148,0.0008251624,0.0013436902,0.004339874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19740894,0.00041435444,0.000326902,0.00045404342,0.0026556284,0.0029540395,0.0014152282,0.002398711,0.0004291199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009559891,0.009043757,0.5554076,0.00084819575,0.00075205165,0.0009770643,0.044680394,0.013822668,0.044628367,0.053255763,0.00095150643,0.26607284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011609172,0.007681636,0.76438934,0.00057819067,0.00054913916,0.00092419994,0.06066027,0.06697686,0.026597908,0.061561067,0.00842949,0.0004910196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012100224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001143479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028144782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016358233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020004439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14884561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122902129","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.273512","title":"Cooperation through Imitation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Imitation; Outcome (game theory); Cartel; Economics; Microeconomics; Welfare; Psychology; Social psychology; Collusion; Market economy","score_opus":0.08706804009842602,"score_gpt":0.3345623662022349,"score_spread":0.2474943261038089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122902129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48593318,0.00096885394,0.38225168,0.0031685533,0.00010541718,0.00020784805,0.0002867931,0.00029040282,0.12678732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818225,0.00022207353,0.006814452,0.00010836384,0.000029817087,0.00009224574,0.00004466502,0.000016776976,0.0044892333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984921,0.000693221,0.00006200197,0.0003246605,0.00023526372,0.00019261235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949715,0.0024508212,0.0009974315,0.0009644324,0.00028062647,0.00033515834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001770932,0.0005296198,0.0004903231,0.0006173992,0.00076812896,0.0016856638,0.00087548315,0.0013702993,0.004228651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008999745,0.00023832348,0.0005311729,0.00032111342,0.0024530876,0.0029234788,0.0017175726,0.0008767437,0.00059919193],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010824535,0.00008852997,0.0040335874,0.00014916973,0.00011333364,0.0003432136,0.00076655694,0.061492067,0.0062020957,0.9015374,0.0017802557,0.023385469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005870779,0.00018739344,0.0026684506,0.000047590966,0.000044340497,0.00037702257,0.00027188752,0.17742829,0.0015646232,0.8123115,0.0050032763,0.000037017642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010397101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005500396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004228651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010272798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007273753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014146268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122904757","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3163499","title":"Peer Effects and Risk-Taking Among Entrepreneurs: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Conformity; Peer effects; Risk aversion (psychology); Social psychology; Peer pressure; Psychology; Social influence; Social network (sociolinguistics); Field (mathematics); Entrepreneurship; Marketing; Business; Economics; Political science; Expected utility hypothesis; Social media","score_opus":0.03001416900556984,"score_gpt":0.360206965807841,"score_spread":0.33019279680227115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122904757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950459,0.0009542401,0.00033463066,0.00020166123,0.000015056721,0.000023691273,0.00003938288,0.000003686966,0.0033818102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998271,0.0007887522,0.00026571247,0.00008201651,0.000027929473,0.000026001842,0.00003712046,0.000002452917,0.0004989881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593747,0.0027628855,0.00012119416,0.00051298493,0.00044518625,0.00022024263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93895555,0.040429506,0.0132572325,0.0031972483,0.0015968423,0.0025636023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057515497,0.00046677663,0.00046311232,0.0008325565,0.0009918271,0.0013814983,0.0007008166,0.0010577771,0.0051938207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026215844,0.00035065712,0.0002573988,0.0005793676,0.0017035819,0.0010814844,0.001395578,0.00092204,0.0006817845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038457583,0.00866927,0.8914896,0.00054189784,0.00076999125,0.001148896,0.00783696,0.0007194062,0.0036277017,0.003707532,0.00095381116,0.07668914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026934672,0.0041660564,0.9757225,0.0002182566,0.0004721546,0.0006049016,0.0060513415,0.0010358185,0.0028448645,0.0043737954,0.0041776956,0.0000633686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001425818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013313486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057515497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028908148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029005492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030417442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122918218","doi":"","title":"The Relation between Information and Heterogeneous Ability in Joint Projects - An experimental Analysis -","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Relation (database); Econometrics; Joint probability distribution; Computer science; Economics; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.19582681534072222,"score_gpt":0.41709618303277746,"score_spread":0.22126936769205524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122918218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951257,0.00006356134,0.002872193,0.0001536058,0.000010679595,0.00007833522,0.00005086944,0.000009774516,0.0016352588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756145,0.000047865884,0.0014957291,0.00004299973,0.00001443293,0.00016271895,0.000046551784,0.0000051163292,0.0006232196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080384,0.006474424,0.00042702968,0.00091113127,0.0007689247,0.00061471405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7967252,0.15843447,0.023676049,0.015826294,0.0017343962,0.003603647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013557928,0.0007341239,0.0009879604,0.0007261954,0.00088242773,0.002391144,0.0009848216,0.0018350903,0.00551407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08997938,0.0004533307,0.0006334716,0.0005754404,0.0027005277,0.0019953828,0.0025989853,0.0017983057,0.00049996405],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034005728,0.07314116,0.5032244,0.0015717385,0.0023122833,0.0020135336,0.012258993,0.087039754,0.07446908,0.09684412,0.0029145018,0.110204786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005796033,0.055332925,0.37772545,0.00033446922,0.0012686083,0.0021560807,0.01050204,0.2389317,0.031468123,0.26875746,0.007073895,0.0006531332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006423958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043025595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013557928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000666284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006222015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122953275","doi":"","title":"Cooperation, Trust, and Social Capital in Southeast Asian Urban Slums","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse","keywords":"Vietnamese; Social capital; Demographic economics; Social trust; Voluntary association; Social psychology; Socioeconomics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.04135156103609399,"score_gpt":0.35240506619837486,"score_spread":0.31105350516228086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122953275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946505,0.000014645472,0.000037918187,0.000028260945,6.479503e-7,0.0000036765782,0.000006495803,5.6654295e-7,0.00044276586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998467,0.0000135314895,0.000038394013,0.0000049350037,4.5274288e-7,0.000005762247,0.000005327286,2.4183987e-7,0.00008465889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992023,0.0004797588,0.000040382503,0.00007480852,0.00007888976,0.00012390806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99269706,0.0027368402,0.0026023025,0.0003692175,0.00035176796,0.001242814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021648824,0.0003633366,0.00026483813,0.0006769142,0.0012078787,0.0012556734,0.0003087025,0.0003523395,0.0025690566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060198056,0.00023297743,0.00013954104,0.0005160391,0.0015340617,0.00086029555,0.0016863677,0.00046718062,0.00013545954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007566552,0.0011495329,0.9199295,0.00011497153,0.00010335037,0.0007480046,0.056171056,0.0008460715,0.004058948,0.0021309562,0.00043691663,0.013554009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000648383,0.0010130752,0.92569923,0.000066082765,0.00006264656,0.00017335684,0.06475549,0.004704115,0.0008585031,0.0017403458,0.0008291142,0.000033207845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012079473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014697985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012079473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008818158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039127024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024018347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122959491","doi":"10.65109/ptgw7037","title":"Emergent Communication under Competition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Competition (biology); Computer science; Negotiation; Key (lock); Competitive advantage; Work (physics); Telecommunications; Business; Marketing; Computer security","score_opus":0.09364837091696904,"score_gpt":0.3900745182768744,"score_spread":0.29642614735990536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122959491","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3916288,0.0004971302,0.48018077,0.009480942,0.0002482319,0.00024871793,0.00042495687,0.00050275284,0.116787665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731179,0.00014638211,0.020077499,0.0006053868,0.000071889226,0.00019596236,0.0000895919,0.00007195109,0.005623434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705243,0.0015314941,0.00009321758,0.0004615177,0.00046301816,0.00039826805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889192,0.006676773,0.001111763,0.0012883177,0.0008212884,0.0011825691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028905221,0.0005432677,0.00071980525,0.00060221064,0.0016498397,0.0021186057,0.0013292585,0.0019701472,0.007802622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019860148,0.00030438454,0.00062937726,0.0003662495,0.0028162892,0.004061638,0.0028860155,0.002028334,0.0008203545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015483866,0.00009678815,0.0024630772,0.00013253048,0.000050419316,0.00048507767,0.0010486944,0.040168844,0.0034618091,0.9328822,0.004832492,0.014223206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006876535,0.00010290043,0.0009227072,0.000028121942,0.000016989206,0.00030737917,0.00050994626,0.19865653,0.0007809838,0.7934585,0.0051106117,0.000036485388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011907434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093656126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007802622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00136644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012423245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026102424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122971359","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2015.04.004","title":"The social and ecological determinants of common pool resource sustainability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Common-pool resource; Commons; Dilemma; Resource (disambiguation); Stock (firearms); Social dilemma; Economics; Sustainability; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Biology; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.027796623830050236,"score_gpt":0.3068090863243638,"score_spread":0.2790124624943136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122971359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99404293,0.00004612555,0.00039973293,0.0004099068,0.000002485596,0.000006215588,0.000021612757,0.000001829943,0.005069166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997503,0.000015845217,0.000043162934,0.000011000204,0.0000024407427,0.0000026488303,0.0000052281293,7.6765787e-7,0.00016859821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928766,0.00037684492,0.000023048866,0.00007085455,0.000095422176,0.00014620973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851756,0.011236339,0.0015077612,0.00065625145,0.00044167007,0.0009823716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002104218,0.0001374723,0.00030535998,0.00068178226,0.00071318843,0.0015923256,0.0003259777,0.0008004939,0.006760684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011648629,0.00025947546,0.00022578567,0.00062202534,0.0033785983,0.0017158965,0.0013227208,0.0004532933,0.0001349018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077950157,0.0019208627,0.79778355,0.00008746808,0.0004026009,0.0005871187,0.003909087,0.014277133,0.0042673773,0.1394218,0.0014471922,0.03511627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004694279,0.00016161667,0.8865878,0.000014575325,0.00008952505,0.00009986403,0.005439096,0.012855446,0.00045497276,0.092975,0.0012477655,0.000027406593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075589544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017962003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075589544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011746673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011217592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022616744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123005241","doi":"","title":"Allocating Awards Across Noncomparable Categories","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Competition (biology); Simple (philosophy); Constant (computer programming); Sociology; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.097320865033154,"score_gpt":0.4266311668415581,"score_spread":0.3293103018084041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123005241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8428086,0.0007755472,0.12548526,0.0027072986,0.00021238899,0.0007151926,0.001194208,0.00047226954,0.02562922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700426,0.0002497735,0.020376867,0.00016400976,0.000083609964,0.0002257047,0.00037598173,0.0000394822,0.008441907],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889072,0.0046994993,0.0006363912,0.0024082153,0.0012719337,0.0020768233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712269,0.016450359,0.0034708648,0.0044970587,0.0019636606,0.0023912757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013010445,0.0010153392,0.003071,0.0022799606,0.0018156985,0.0060383882,0.0033577865,0.002948385,0.019613653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058381688,0.001064629,0.0013854371,0.0031917957,0.0016862063,0.0037919509,0.003401767,0.0018380404,0.0026828132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012368395,0.0040176767,0.14428017,0.00076899934,0.0011264737,0.0006697894,0.0015053994,0.18637252,0.014614868,0.2217489,0.016508535,0.39601824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013390229,0.002949782,0.0930416,0.00011612432,0.00067493913,0.0007847828,0.002726932,0.44587985,0.0062354794,0.4320677,0.013808421,0.0003752708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050705434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047921776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019613653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031480286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002596344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06880659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123006309","doi":"","title":"Psychological Incentives, Financial Incentives, and Risk Attitudes in Tournaments: An Artefactual Field Experiment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University; McGill University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Field (mathematics); Finance; Business; Psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04802590907462506,"score_gpt":0.3547743189162922,"score_spread":0.3067484098416671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123006309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951492,0.000029434115,0.0018739515,0.00011651881,0.000068334884,0.0008401508,0.00026370597,0.000034942477,0.0016238561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98685455,0.000078314166,0.0060376916,0.00034109896,0.00007114603,0.0031274282,0.00037207443,0.000014235355,0.003103512],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706,0.0016660698,0.00019519734,0.00044406863,0.00032684195,0.00030784734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793417,0.01134761,0.003031866,0.0040902426,0.0007922648,0.0013962891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074172923,0.0013230924,0.0011393304,0.00045823798,0.0010312707,0.0017727241,0.0017235639,0.0023581614,0.0063072597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012315562,0.00059427286,0.0008656465,0.00056956714,0.0019614524,0.0010730134,0.0010349562,0.0022562668,0.0006906853],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.18885039,0.3505698,0.149435,0.0026345002,0.0018701841,0.0023560731,0.006718493,0.043104723,0.11040226,0.03948364,0.012443134,0.09213181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.060999382,0.29693177,0.3690151,0.00035558039,0.002756765,0.0005216032,0.0030935502,0.15369351,0.039472345,0.04681432,0.025481652,0.0008643542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016946162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016968456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074172923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010658955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097021356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03922683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123022216","doi":"","title":"Sorting, Incentives and Risk Preferences: Evidence from a Field Experiment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sorting; Incentive; Transaction cost; Sample (material); Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08818923948812288,"score_gpt":0.40410754109815855,"score_spread":0.31591830161003565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123022216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99435234,0.0002205303,0.0017498721,0.00030508213,0.000025122536,0.00023506356,0.0001602372,0.000021504966,0.002930241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900143,0.00044716493,0.005798536,0.0007347649,0.000047075137,0.000513748,0.00023306695,0.000018152647,0.0021931424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455714,0.0030370874,0.00040985414,0.0007869529,0.0009855799,0.00022338619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90914446,0.06521326,0.013178134,0.008863681,0.0016246703,0.001975741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011606175,0.00072141807,0.00097088254,0.00066935207,0.0010855048,0.0017684335,0.0011289659,0.002076635,0.005684789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029918065,0.0006151825,0.00044207182,0.00066773786,0.0027690833,0.0015113832,0.0010122851,0.001264234,0.00076287676],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06929556,0.14460276,0.3584422,0.0034470714,0.0020135343,0.0011580832,0.009307735,0.00786405,0.17173667,0.02049522,0.009798088,0.20183906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013646993,0.106798284,0.710244,0.0007356494,0.0013109236,0.0017263782,0.00499476,0.02037413,0.049042113,0.06934888,0.021259882,0.0005179461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010899184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012216717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011606175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000480376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006556457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06138003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123095390","doi":"10.32920/14639850","title":"Group Size, Coordination, and the Effectiveness of Punishment in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism: An Experimental Investigation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"Zhejiang University","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Turnover; Context (archaeology); Liberian dollar; Economics; Social psychology; Per capita; Psychology; Incentive; Public good; Microeconomics; Demography; Population; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.016936817950044925,"score_gpt":0.3134566374438525,"score_spread":0.29651981949380757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123095390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914278,0.0000957875,0.0028014898,0.00023651538,0.000054180666,0.00043430456,0.00006852201,0.000023449884,0.004857938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201375,0.000083976985,0.004582147,0.00012813708,0.000044587086,0.0013113687,0.00006120659,0.000016051059,0.0017587332],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893357,0.007052593,0.0005746297,0.0012006072,0.0011999576,0.0006365817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8663791,0.097484075,0.019117,0.012666101,0.0016425217,0.0027112132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017592544,0.0009783086,0.0014022279,0.00094409584,0.0008728602,0.0014330073,0.0021000598,0.0017328572,0.009094468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05364664,0.00044602528,0.00067121326,0.000618246,0.0037268822,0.0020340444,0.0020644777,0.0019103704,0.0004810053],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.19081216,0.22474262,0.065808155,0.00410319,0.0031278273,0.0013092239,0.007100212,0.063363805,0.117811374,0.12727392,0.0043877773,0.19015978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06743966,0.34699115,0.15743914,0.00078044145,0.0030422192,0.0009059762,0.0056669163,0.12724757,0.06957969,0.20578474,0.01456667,0.00055579783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064271066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005331892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017592544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014989926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001491677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09303939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123137710","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.422780","title":"Do Buyer-Size Discounts Depend on the Curvature of the Surplus&#x0D;Function? Experimental Tests of Bargaining Models","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Curvature; Function (biology); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.0268624573855813,"score_gpt":0.307694885014867,"score_spread":0.28083242762928573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123137710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98694545,0.00009183187,0.0052218917,0.00046972846,0.000027817341,0.000045110555,0.0001539419,0.000040179824,0.007004069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813193,0.00005167682,0.00089836185,0.00006396632,0.000009582918,0.000019457584,0.000056353747,0.000021188574,0.00074739935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788374,0.0011922396,0.00012872896,0.0003179486,0.00032020218,0.00015710863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8835103,0.09227442,0.01196589,0.009988412,0.0010680619,0.0011928786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113343075,0.0005102295,0.0006557298,0.000424251,0.00023367083,0.002433598,0.001570366,0.0018435244,0.015018007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08706055,0.000683504,0.00054495636,0.00038161463,0.0019069177,0.0034352508,0.0009934731,0.0023295216,0.0012609769],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048164316,0.009934307,0.10455117,0.0011786923,0.001171356,0.0005032316,0.00336499,0.087586865,0.17897744,0.48690003,0.00397074,0.073696904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005125371,0.0072301794,0.18453327,0.00017498377,0.00064232474,0.00052196905,0.0016926448,0.41599098,0.057067495,0.32341897,0.0031763632,0.00042542248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082627975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034065076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015018007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009731552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040946656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059942305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123155431","doi":"","title":"Incentives and Contract Frames: Comment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Moral hazard; Microeconomics; Compensation (psychology); Social contract; Work (physics); Principal (computer security); Affect (linguistics); Principal–agent problem; Shareholder; Contract theory; Economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Finance; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Corporate governance; Engineering","score_opus":0.07100900687069894,"score_gpt":0.2993729549544925,"score_spread":0.22836394808379357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123155431","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009379061,0.0011350926,0.0010954373,0.9773645,0.0061508673,0.00005977084,0.0003281833,0.00006809016,0.012860304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0156167755,0.0009405936,0.0015549602,0.96503067,0.008458584,0.00034094934,0.00008314807,0.000043180647,0.007931254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880262,0.00238715,0.0008204779,0.0029978554,0.0048568356,0.00091145094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9268881,0.050593868,0.0026841823,0.0049295286,0.013325209,0.0015790919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01844111,0.0009408887,0.0014479816,0.0009541447,0.0050514187,0.004423134,0.007870505,0.037825704,0.019799378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07533877,0.0007910953,0.0018636971,0.0015968744,0.013352944,0.011971741,0.004840448,0.029163504,0.00995153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000849231,0.000071302464,0.000607804,0.00021433734,0.000015345877,0.00013804086,0.0017104598,0.00017814901,0.00031651204,0.226808,0.76332796,0.006527227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017845252,0.00012624743,0.003438798,0.00061359,0.00004032571,0.00026471543,0.0027245074,0.000553484,0.0008893325,0.17212686,0.81892806,0.00011554826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02466678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020906318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037825704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00606096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006897639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09752709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123166068","doi":"","title":"Sustaining Group Reputation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Temptation; Punishment (psychology); Enforcement; Group (periodic table); Information exchange; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06595488783711036,"score_gpt":0.4010077268727902,"score_spread":0.33505283903567984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123166068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8579404,0.00033712742,0.0539665,0.0029943755,0.00023010568,0.00033567558,0.00019305017,0.0008074939,0.083195254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911566,0.00005321178,0.00487608,0.00029714068,0.000038340862,0.00008584045,0.00005188365,0.00003788309,0.0034031435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961616,0.0017019119,0.00016343598,0.0007626105,0.0006674388,0.0005430458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604343,0.008570045,0.006913873,0.017805317,0.0026537701,0.0036226518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056763473,0.00053777156,0.00069929654,0.00088850607,0.0017612485,0.0027706993,0.0013138227,0.0017719386,0.0111950785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02661732,0.00035942916,0.00043705959,0.00045495186,0.0016857842,0.0033115398,0.0040509044,0.0015083316,0.002082737],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014557899,0.004112793,0.1362453,0.0011962372,0.00066519034,0.0016220188,0.010695938,0.011253883,0.146902,0.25092942,0.016503733,0.41841775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010926976,0.011229117,0.21368112,0.00050302857,0.00095031824,0.0043398575,0.00948402,0.06184628,0.093734056,0.4521718,0.1504747,0.00049297867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005674671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008286344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111950785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008717746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016816051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037451327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123185955","doi":"","title":"Charitable Giving and Charitable Gambling: An Empirical Investigation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Public economics; Economics; Social psychology; Advertising; Business; Marketing; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.058232524562622866,"score_gpt":0.3614644789642001,"score_spread":0.30323195440157724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123185955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927003,0.000966654,0.00042893173,0.0010166519,0.000016450787,0.0000860799,0.00075876294,0.000019197772,0.0040070727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995665,0.00082537887,0.00029822736,0.00011588574,0.000025037922,0.000027642654,0.0008125849,0.000007594593,0.0022226458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665076,0.0011624849,0.00016143637,0.00030765205,0.00077110913,0.0009465733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9260252,0.048266307,0.013531474,0.0019554636,0.0048662066,0.0053552375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005867104,0.00061591814,0.0012358156,0.0030145799,0.0032482382,0.0029992315,0.0027289805,0.0014390539,0.01204484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038291935,0.00041732754,0.0009637764,0.0053650565,0.0030835117,0.0019654077,0.0021235005,0.0034537795,0.00089469145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003976656,0.0010133786,0.97486883,0.00015599215,0.00025526693,0.00035105782,0.0018859891,0.001229358,0.00008285873,0.0041907174,0.0021873883,0.013381525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012793805,0.00024140472,0.97016555,0.00019255477,0.00034301108,0.0002710035,0.013054137,0.008705261,0.00013837966,0.0024191462,0.004276674,0.00006485625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75043494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77746207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75043494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009255251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011893848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5020696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123345868","doi":"","title":"A Pure Hedonic Theory of Utility and Status: Unhappy But Efficient Invidious Comparisons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Economics; Happiness; Expected utility hypothesis; Consumption (sociology); Equating; Welfare; Set (abstract data type); Utility theory; Microeconomics; Inequality; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Public economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.09459937346405597,"score_gpt":0.4050021232385682,"score_spread":0.3104027497745122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123345868","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2940915,0.0009893917,0.5023248,0.0048476825,0.00022755215,0.00009673941,0.00028541885,0.000097069336,0.19703987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729941,0.00030122447,0.019323241,0.00019929041,0.000110158166,0.00005998376,0.000064090375,0.000024724102,0.006923229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988889,0.0005371422,0.000034290042,0.00019970087,0.00022448027,0.000115522016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808717,0.0007416651,0.0003848928,0.0004515722,0.00019446298,0.0001402779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018029459,0.0004955376,0.00048177212,0.00080598914,0.001026324,0.0034786323,0.00090019533,0.0009149354,0.008128983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074352208,0.0002821976,0.0005835905,0.0011012014,0.0038619891,0.007267324,0.0018479404,0.0015656472,0.00061768765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013094516,0.000017262999,0.00038370877,0.0000115870125,0.000006486492,0.000013282954,0.00013209062,0.0013818649,0.00015186219,0.992019,0.00034554163,0.0055242446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006714362,0.000015298054,0.0005821643,0.000008334367,0.0000048962243,0.000020503725,0.00007479309,0.006599844,0.00007528938,0.99135804,0.001248692,0.000005553008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097327534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006570303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008128983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013328114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045803448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027194142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123354546","doi":"10.1177/0001839213500032","title":"Keeping up Appearances","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":601,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Prosocial behavior; Reputation; Impression management; Repertoire; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06331496867873718,"score_gpt":0.3928850514864522,"score_spread":0.32957008280771505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123354546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3019177,0.00096272083,0.010552402,0.0041101263,0.001022371,0.00011104593,0.0003135597,0.00067152746,0.6803385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7803495,0.00042144835,0.004291537,0.0016733174,0.00026934672,0.000041794072,0.00027069042,0.00033522694,0.2123472],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847096,0.0003071353,0.0000454626,0.00027405823,0.00062718365,0.0002752453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701774,0.00041531742,0.0006298713,0.0006515547,0.0006190608,0.00066635484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010460558,0.00045561005,0.00032229666,0.00088104303,0.0026364315,0.0034541488,0.00068445865,0.0011339011,0.051502366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00505979,0.00025555235,0.0004738121,0.00049612176,0.0014965265,0.0030502786,0.0028217528,0.0019426655,0.012534452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058903405,0.00057900837,0.08887443,0.00047443737,0.00015786997,0.0024965869,0.05862853,0.0005527192,0.020156179,0.11849712,0.11117587,0.5978182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034969995,0.0004252608,0.09405055,0.00020354104,0.00012306785,0.002493422,0.027573757,0.0010753196,0.0028242252,0.0123242615,0.8587672,0.000104533625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002249818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033943532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051502366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008864627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041689907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17229259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123429316","doi":"","title":"Demographic Differences and Reactions to Performance Feedback","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Perception; Psychology; Phenomenon; Social psychology; Negative feedback; Sample (material); Attraction; Positive feedback; Race (biology); Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.019588952643122177,"score_gpt":0.2857821058949995,"score_spread":0.26619315325187737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123429316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991073,0.00003694293,0.000059239977,0.00003419071,0.000005366705,0.000003601644,0.000014032081,0.0000012709,0.0007380839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996598,0.000030911004,0.00004085669,0.00002226589,0.000008527752,0.0000032967741,0.00002282691,8.620398e-7,0.00021071202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987393,0.0006538536,0.000079435136,0.000096133204,0.00030664034,0.00012459808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845346,0.006539034,0.005897927,0.00046921917,0.0010938286,0.0014652652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001691419,0.0002508235,0.00018569862,0.00046005868,0.0002592215,0.0005384594,0.000098722885,0.0002742543,0.0023575288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013151053,0.00009468808,0.00015647901,0.0001680136,0.00032137037,0.00024914247,0.00042127038,0.00043622917,0.00034672613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013113943,0.00043202486,0.96936506,0.00004473481,0.000059453072,0.00020296845,0.0036865578,0.0001724688,0.006778568,0.00012303545,0.0001617613,0.01766201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000892159,0.00057116937,0.9966599,0.0000074734007,0.0000105215595,0.000112459675,0.0015302183,0.0001604878,0.00059069425,0.00007321325,0.0002647231,0.000010325447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005610524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000765001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023575288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001651185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001088313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008945167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123465296","doi":"10.1257/jep.30.3.249","title":"Can War Foster Cooperation?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":747,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Cohesion (chemistry); Political science; Spanish Civil War; Social psychology; Civic engagement; Political economy; Criminology; Development economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032702589402824965,"score_gpt":0.33168902689103735,"score_spread":0.2989864374882124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123465296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5231667,0.010480188,0.010086337,0.06517679,0.0008960545,0.00008227466,0.00023194587,0.000057187186,0.38982254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879192,0.0036903482,0.0006547983,0.0019634753,0.00018445757,0.00004510699,0.000039264713,0.0000103476705,0.0054930286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722123,0.001534505,0.000056852896,0.00033449693,0.00020512797,0.0006477118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928981,0.0034288347,0.0014448143,0.0005494877,0.0004773816,0.0012013922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034346126,0.00044672907,0.00037270147,0.0011238545,0.0019951512,0.0031585372,0.00065660966,0.001924298,0.024683807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010003866,0.0002816471,0.0004429057,0.00085098774,0.0046336423,0.0044002947,0.004906304,0.0014027742,0.0018613836],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048586837,0.00060139236,0.05310026,0.0010016044,0.00028186745,0.001435986,0.016348694,0.002796557,0.0026384937,0.75426227,0.01547896,0.15156806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018848873,0.00075723,0.088636026,0.00093220145,0.00019995219,0.0012521426,0.032066155,0.0022163952,0.0012819207,0.73284745,0.13954693,0.000075070864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011387217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019072444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024683807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011087841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012360286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08257556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123546390","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.244577","title":"On the Efficiency of Markets for Managers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.013709269474902934,"score_gpt":0.29571823978647566,"score_spread":0.28200897031157274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123546390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73760974,0.002895769,0.10781364,0.01699317,0.00012110734,0.00020698101,0.00033025746,0.00013601097,0.13389328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882957,0.0005254304,0.0055613974,0.00028208178,0.00010871365,0.00006347255,0.00006853797,0.00003053904,0.005064099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945314,0.0036985814,0.0002105011,0.00044401965,0.00060790125,0.00050760916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84801686,0.13318197,0.008066849,0.006815803,0.0028135828,0.0011049164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012921677,0.00060466444,0.0011525973,0.0011538981,0.00093308446,0.005054137,0.001956447,0.0028401453,0.016320625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08585291,0.00050868426,0.000722822,0.0009174052,0.004285182,0.009843845,0.0018522171,0.0019344332,0.00090225064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053545105,0.00033380283,0.008456338,0.00016476476,0.00011077173,0.00011446079,0.0005992991,0.01979915,0.0012105164,0.9330818,0.0028488068,0.032744847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002644274,0.00017494126,0.0064955647,0.000046643192,0.00007770645,0.00011249186,0.00057777733,0.041608967,0.0010730871,0.9470644,0.0024775697,0.000026454707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014756916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008877876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016320625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020393266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017538471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06833714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123548321","doi":"","title":"Are You Paying Your Employees to Cheat? An Experimental Investigation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cheating; Piece work; Task (project management); Anagram; Compensation (psychology); Incentive; Argument (complex analysis); Contrast (vision); Tournament; Psychology; Social psychology; Salient; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Management","score_opus":0.15674884489756633,"score_gpt":0.4236017963758199,"score_spread":0.2668529514782536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123548321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98764414,0.00009239179,0.0002929696,0.0006360605,0.00007719056,0.0017034356,0.00021990217,0.000014362098,0.009319501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758958,0.00027992067,0.00289197,0.0015950692,0.00011411987,0.0054605105,0.00041796057,0.000022057924,0.013322544],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922052,0.0038322287,0.00050262583,0.00087562745,0.0019603858,0.00062395085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92003614,0.05769747,0.008499838,0.0065522525,0.0032089083,0.0040053846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0134375375,0.0007819672,0.0011572896,0.00085342827,0.005316402,0.0030923998,0.0027701345,0.0034011963,0.01882056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03608124,0.00096485694,0.00058626477,0.0009537267,0.0023859765,0.0021029806,0.0013219159,0.004442532,0.0022040093],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07369824,0.4473198,0.1683281,0.0018641318,0.00075779855,0.0038646783,0.088851206,0.0018622073,0.01966252,0.031739146,0.038877834,0.12317441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04378043,0.17147598,0.54539466,0.00092306954,0.0011219725,0.0016209037,0.099760056,0.019958554,0.0074311295,0.032916386,0.07453388,0.0010830129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012163443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020976003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01882056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028206327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002959508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071065366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123568030","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Social Value Orientation and Risk Attitudes on Trust and Reciprocity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Dictator game; Psychology; Social preferences; Social value orientations; Communication source; Value (mathematics); Trustworthiness; Preference; Microeconomics; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05228795966890992,"score_gpt":0.43017492479171954,"score_spread":0.3778869651228096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123568030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958621,0.000060171355,0.0004963543,0.000055117638,0.0000037359837,0.000012371058,0.000020104295,0.0000030594654,0.003487044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994936,0.00003617254,0.0001968612,0.000012300728,0.0000030009016,0.000009428777,0.000014999115,0.0000022804477,0.000231347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628156,0.0022609895,0.00015538598,0.00028035088,0.00071135286,0.00031036278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95387375,0.03133472,0.0075022816,0.0023000042,0.0011395019,0.0038497075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039434996,0.00032383573,0.00033329404,0.0005423465,0.00045301425,0.0017346423,0.00021975611,0.0003925968,0.0029057884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024303818,0.00018105398,0.00038090226,0.00034885528,0.0010736105,0.00065885595,0.00082735706,0.0011501998,0.00023653984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038650702,0.0027019992,0.9159211,0.00010104151,0.00040654308,0.00033632835,0.003346983,0.0013168479,0.012373869,0.006932194,0.0002944737,0.052403554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057052377,0.0010020727,0.98701954,0.000020961292,0.00013033353,0.0002193393,0.0008962422,0.0033352976,0.0015266283,0.005139317,0.0006143005,0.000038911687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001591035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021974298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039434996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063841976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004683437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020855486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123634367","doi":"","title":"Reducing Moral Hazard in Employment Relationships: Experimental Evidence on Managerial Control and Performance Pay","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral hazard; Commission; Incentive; Download; Control (management); Empirical evidence; Revenue; Developing country; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Accounting; Microeconomics; Finance; Economic growth; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.04253355937290161,"score_gpt":0.31454294953434964,"score_spread":0.27200939016144804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123634367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907486,0.00022567259,0.0017075144,0.0005965631,0.000029706242,0.00005135574,0.000029962339,0.000012476756,0.006598102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986355,0.000089790345,0.0005646625,0.00012451647,0.000026743157,0.00003762567,0.0000129787995,0.0000026037533,0.00050562614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464345,0.003958143,0.00018338028,0.00038360685,0.00045547838,0.0003759921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9105724,0.06356491,0.016297264,0.0064459974,0.00075912324,0.0023603362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008272247,0.00042984105,0.00047549568,0.00048096568,0.0008254365,0.0015430445,0.0009016245,0.001387049,0.009389294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041671276,0.00032456487,0.0003504416,0.0003558334,0.0027467795,0.001142474,0.001156093,0.0011726336,0.00052747515],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02274994,0.11566037,0.35578796,0.0018977472,0.001099559,0.00066812866,0.006512206,0.022248952,0.04037115,0.075509764,0.0031848277,0.3543094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057039615,0.032678664,0.7921306,0.00039009014,0.00057097257,0.00035964744,0.0041443165,0.03503834,0.014653779,0.10607533,0.008055683,0.00019863705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000867023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008181655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009389294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069362234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008367458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04374832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123649591","doi":"","title":"The Louis-Schmelling Paradox and the League Standing Effect Reconsidered","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"League; Competitor analysis; Economics; Preference; Consumer choice; Order (exchange); Revenue; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Sports economics; Consumer demand; Loss aversion; Management","score_opus":0.05333632669558491,"score_gpt":0.37811577848501554,"score_spread":0.32477945178943063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123649591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3763774,0.022395706,0.04175234,0.19255517,0.0015829033,0.00004599336,0.00072639564,0.00016479434,0.36439937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95798135,0.0043213028,0.0032002581,0.009461746,0.0010132705,0.00003179409,0.000112575886,0.00006029357,0.023817372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999481,0.00015538922,0.000020924497,0.00013108653,0.00012516169,0.00008650132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965204,0.0021791756,0.00044644286,0.00031868368,0.00030703034,0.00022819103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021721697,0.000312203,0.00079423527,0.0007626263,0.0013602535,0.0029890696,0.0007901536,0.0025904581,0.019435935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007331689,0.00020559062,0.0007901347,0.0009584041,0.005123401,0.006094612,0.001778638,0.0037885914,0.0011164816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096468786,0.0000360239,0.0014231387,0.000048880214,0.000019043116,0.00011622194,0.0002548422,0.0009787513,0.0001926692,0.9731215,0.0055650766,0.018147346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038163478,0.000025572754,0.0017731105,0.000040352745,0.000011419732,0.00007572124,0.00017987404,0.0017551167,0.00011937825,0.9745044,0.021459278,0.000017594193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046984525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035102905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019435935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016119229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088506035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06501973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123693920","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.006","title":"Communication in multilateral bargaining","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cheap talk; Economic rent; Economics; Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Voting; Power (physics); Test (biology); Public economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06714544321384773,"score_gpt":0.3396332812284158,"score_spread":0.27248783801456805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123693920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58499265,0.0019579956,0.049914043,0.024020843,0.0005988609,0.00009834759,0.00012364525,0.000097504664,0.33819616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99161375,0.00020867368,0.0009920434,0.00022463575,0.00016695708,0.000023166602,0.000012385296,0.000011827311,0.0067465287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957944,0.0028718913,0.00011501158,0.00024542847,0.00046166588,0.0005115242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95274574,0.041799884,0.002301274,0.0011758897,0.0010560974,0.0009210356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006067941,0.00043413814,0.00080755743,0.0010996478,0.0024359215,0.0059147887,0.0008633935,0.004133642,0.028897189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031968027,0.00056969665,0.0005295713,0.0012342723,0.0037957593,0.006482429,0.0021402542,0.0030409433,0.0010451638],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000291323,0.0002683537,0.0011691188,0.00008680075,0.00002931304,0.00026155944,0.001689536,0.006624469,0.000370854,0.9738929,0.002110994,0.013204841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010686545,0.00005020433,0.0009631784,0.000031284944,0.000026130727,0.00007931212,0.0010828133,0.014305035,0.00015434364,0.981536,0.001644195,0.000020543052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015500262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008993602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028897189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015617015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012733612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09667075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123730689","doi":"","title":"Identifying Ideology: Experimental Evidence on Anti-Americanism in Pakistan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Gratitude; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Anti-Americanism; Politics; Social psychology; Government (linguistics); Political science; Wage; Quarter (Canadian coin); Positive economics; Political economy; Prosocial behavior; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.12068969509787368,"score_gpt":0.4734319371553631,"score_spread":0.3527422420574894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123730689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980599,0.000007642277,0.00013988759,0.000043149455,0.0000049800815,0.000023264516,0.00003882068,0.0000014777075,0.0016807441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844754,0.000028028157,0.00038960233,0.00006728333,0.0000084416215,0.00005601172,0.00006811573,0.0000024178735,0.00093244313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819523,0.0011125794,0.00007576267,0.00023667834,0.0002516064,0.00012817983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985603,0.008558543,0.0034781254,0.0012739112,0.00042451237,0.0006619315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037598338,0.00035392464,0.000310878,0.0002586024,0.0010981566,0.001276409,0.00028250073,0.0006403249,0.005679632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007805926,0.00029866293,0.00012717709,0.0003479462,0.0016336411,0.00038520555,0.00077178364,0.0008067283,0.0007095672],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024313742,0.061210293,0.6771829,0.0004901072,0.0005389041,0.0005207476,0.023253618,0.0014093377,0.12637003,0.008988479,0.002437084,0.073284864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011474892,0.011510831,0.96020037,0.000040772018,0.0001456093,0.00018863201,0.0049529998,0.0019177686,0.015025553,0.0018770929,0.0029289327,0.000063978005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022300845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028009443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005679632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037308165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004733997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01988411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123764657","doi":"","title":"Equilibrium Selection in Experimental Cheap Talk Games","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit van Amsterdam; York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Equilibrium selection; Mathematical economics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Range (aeronautics); Cheap talk; Economics; Measure (data warehouse); Extensive-form game; Computer science; Econometrics; Game theory; Repeated game; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Machine learning","score_opus":0.08174657596010759,"score_gpt":0.40998396347093263,"score_spread":0.32823738751082504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123764657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6376728,0.000258287,0.35006306,0.000745372,0.000056475812,0.00039090076,0.00031724124,0.0003537172,0.010142125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95285875,0.0000666534,0.045404583,0.00015606124,0.00002335608,0.0004821538,0.00016378662,0.000040176088,0.0008044212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840641,0.011071443,0.00071382977,0.0015757858,0.0021216401,0.00045323028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9316455,0.048697565,0.0071511273,0.00929542,0.002239206,0.0009712384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022738531,0.00093546964,0.0014066905,0.0011733052,0.0009068897,0.0020244112,0.0016338712,0.0014101592,0.0025588279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099438764,0.00068003696,0.0009648436,0.00070444524,0.0036848811,0.0032532304,0.0020194491,0.00190883,0.00030893894],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029233568,0.00085298833,0.022697985,0.0006175604,0.00061290443,0.00019094502,0.0024237859,0.19103888,0.019312343,0.71282804,0.0023229143,0.044178292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005395859,0.0008543614,0.007734029,0.00006145148,0.000094150644,0.00008986051,0.00028953017,0.37009034,0.009128745,0.6095037,0.0014897976,0.00012434347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012341223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009893993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022738531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001720358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007301025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12025428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123880098","doi":"","title":"Contracting Frame and Individual Behavior: Experimental Evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Framing (construction); Microeconomics; Affect (linguistics); Task (project management); Prospect theory; Contract theory; Framing effect; Economics; Test (biology); Business; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Psychology; Persuasion; Engineering","score_opus":0.07419967319472585,"score_gpt":0.35772738780991414,"score_spread":0.2835277146151883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123880098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98219246,0.00026291245,0.0021902155,0.0003244505,0.000058821566,0.0002089935,0.0001793215,0.000026767575,0.014556229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364036,0.00021386518,0.0032638407,0.0003182406,0.000046473146,0.00041188754,0.00018082015,0.000025609068,0.0018989039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925707,0.0048294556,0.0004300081,0.000852883,0.0010396426,0.00027739987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87839985,0.088985525,0.017733695,0.011019529,0.0017500462,0.0021112466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012520036,0.0006591646,0.00074318,0.00051457214,0.0008825781,0.0022379148,0.0013056346,0.0016038899,0.017789902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046546154,0.0005620455,0.000384687,0.00050052116,0.0022979479,0.0015711047,0.0014093536,0.0018764687,0.0014819787],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0882877,0.20125845,0.2714426,0.0032761416,0.0024598858,0.00070854503,0.01242968,0.011793401,0.085186146,0.10286692,0.008991747,0.21129875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021741934,0.091555774,0.619953,0.0011430654,0.002406712,0.0011043737,0.0057491385,0.05590147,0.045178685,0.12708284,0.027484322,0.0006987039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079331885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045650883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017789902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007911628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000515432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06621301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123886504","doi":"10.1002/soej.12185","title":"Experimenting with Contests for Experimentation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Alaska Anchorage","keywords":"CONTEST; Innovator; Test (biology); Private information retrieval; Rent-seeking; Microeconomics; Economics; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.0624275397065968,"score_gpt":0.3911075495851841,"score_spread":0.3286800098785873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123886504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92584413,0.00043205856,0.039168846,0.0013968999,0.00045518734,0.0040944717,0.0010504131,0.00026773682,0.027290307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523053,0.00023879495,0.033121455,0.0007824441,0.00017942915,0.008023811,0.0005229224,0.000079447665,0.004746288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837875,0.009714837,0.0012367867,0.0018732493,0.0019973002,0.0013903525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81934196,0.14349847,0.011690367,0.019704696,0.002323967,0.003440554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018098399,0.0015207937,0.0019310032,0.0007264363,0.0011928071,0.0027591952,0.002938058,0.0034225043,0.0141763985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06618763,0.0008526166,0.0013658408,0.0011934959,0.003149693,0.0036037194,0.0023267826,0.0048012943,0.0012100812],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.077659234,0.10599255,0.045423783,0.0070563545,0.0024005196,0.0014814716,0.009138032,0.13667285,0.067521006,0.40330958,0.019246154,0.12409848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.045821667,0.097884536,0.031390607,0.000764336,0.0010170325,0.0009300447,0.0030841276,0.2770924,0.039332435,0.43243945,0.06960746,0.0006359888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055880874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006266046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018098399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013368693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017569538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09571463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123890511","doi":"","title":"Mutually Acceptable Courses of Action","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Action (physics); Norm (philosophy); Contingency; Completeness (order theory); Bayesian game; Computer science; Social choice theory; Rationalizability; Rationality; Game theory; Mathematics; Epistemology; Repeated game; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.031687547657604474,"score_gpt":0.368748455121844,"score_spread":0.33706090746423956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123890511","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044003237,0.00019487408,0.86039704,0.0031350313,0.0001010257,0.00037133094,0.00021066572,0.00021325897,0.091373526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72614354,0.0002080671,0.26163793,0.00046817775,0.000083812774,0.000859437,0.00014997277,0.000079224854,0.010369849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902373,0.0047574784,0.0005786601,0.0015254222,0.0020408658,0.0008602677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139297,0.0033618042,0.0013411554,0.0020237886,0.0011216603,0.00075859454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071828878,0.00095425016,0.00072905264,0.0010744162,0.0023054432,0.003765691,0.002336685,0.0029085102,0.0069505125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015780414,0.0004921575,0.0015165781,0.0006673425,0.00619348,0.005990904,0.003797844,0.0033518951,0.00076521316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054532957,0.000018296285,0.00013157117,0.000013158905,0.000009649303,0.000026611977,0.00018963493,0.002505155,0.00014871974,0.99396163,0.00023768158,0.0027525004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013188383,0.0000218222,0.00007636508,0.000018745419,0.000008206544,0.00003669916,0.00010843456,0.01089539,0.00020676843,0.98361844,0.004983682,0.0000122548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016990482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022276975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071828878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022331127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00406105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037987173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123894731","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12388","title":"Horizon‐Induced Optimism as a Gateway to Earnings Management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Iowa; Deloitte Foundation","keywords":"Optimism; Accrual; Earnings management; Earnings; Incentive; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Business; Economics; Work (physics); Optimism bias; Psychology; Microeconomics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17908945337446255,"score_gpt":0.4616582257947086,"score_spread":0.28256877242024603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123894731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952864,0.00004656634,0.0012122906,0.00017737075,0.000008593329,0.000017248141,0.000025549658,0.000010889839,0.003215159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991829,0.000016907952,0.0005241575,0.000034081015,0.000003283472,0.0000069122802,0.0000096205395,0.0000015499734,0.00022058409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994153,0.00029022834,0.00003496446,0.00008064247,0.00010903146,0.00006997886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927462,0.003013724,0.0025862528,0.0009142382,0.00016561782,0.0005740307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018641212,0.00015430216,0.00018248873,0.00015878589,0.00019414947,0.0009812013,0.00021322639,0.00044778088,0.003520254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007966252,0.00018656398,0.00014723453,0.00009923388,0.00055131747,0.0004991702,0.0004827589,0.0008510541,0.00016937344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011180599,0.0063913893,0.4614354,0.00072167825,0.00042424182,0.0007026215,0.0072856555,0.019542903,0.31378442,0.048864316,0.0019831122,0.12768364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045720872,0.005386837,0.8947501,0.00009903205,0.00023010052,0.00028544018,0.002107752,0.022358833,0.028042648,0.042311393,0.0038381156,0.00013252306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027437173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045035334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003520254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003390331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028166297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011776388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123926317","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2010.12.004","title":"Cognitive dissonance, pessimism, and behavioral spillover effects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Spillover effect; Optimism; Psychology; Economics; Ultimatum game; Task (project management); Social psychology; Cognition; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05577889083599797,"score_gpt":0.44496609157325234,"score_spread":0.3891872007372544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123926317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873723,0.00069323013,0.00053799985,0.0007669097,0.000026466738,0.000021418029,0.000057039408,0.0000070647484,0.0105177015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904543,0.00021100289,0.0001997836,0.000100880985,0.00002756873,0.000010198203,0.000023165438,0.000002637342,0.0003793223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991749,0.00038390668,0.000036603735,0.000117545984,0.00018874495,0.00009825644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97436893,0.019767873,0.0023742737,0.0014741461,0.0004990783,0.0015156518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041897055,0.0006905349,0.00056093954,0.0008848508,0.0006420528,0.0019931907,0.00041291246,0.0016456156,0.0075974553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024845492,0.00055615645,0.000403692,0.0005249382,0.0013101334,0.0011770967,0.0012942818,0.0021302355,0.00030298898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015218437,0.016115153,0.7125053,0.0007564723,0.001439188,0.0015837624,0.0056980387,0.020162307,0.025049802,0.08640366,0.0036777284,0.11139029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008609893,0.0010567639,0.9015269,0.00008698354,0.0005822765,0.00048431943,0.0014216448,0.012911392,0.0015628218,0.07853899,0.00086524984,0.000101665355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016709922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017250469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075974553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063751923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065807375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025416017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123941765","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2011.11.002","title":"The impact of empowering investors on trust and trustworthiness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Business; Trustworthiness; Microeconomics; Dictator game; Profit (economics); Order (exchange); Empowerment; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09543982587763039,"score_gpt":0.43330913197978993,"score_spread":0.33786930610215954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123941765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99027425,0.0001193419,0.00051129184,0.00061352237,0.000017387832,0.000008053447,0.000013211551,0.0000072160483,0.008435893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967194,0.00003245007,0.000062868734,0.000018984236,0.00000836071,0.0000014606563,0.0000019086447,0.0000010707588,0.00020086786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978179,0.0012725245,0.00011801628,0.00014113497,0.0002709702,0.0003794695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8708597,0.096929826,0.017839586,0.0055131502,0.0027074816,0.0061502405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005162466,0.00024959922,0.00029825006,0.00036670858,0.000727626,0.0018459107,0.00025750778,0.0011952366,0.006487126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053781357,0.00025423928,0.00030211703,0.00025684256,0.0015964084,0.0019773864,0.0011349753,0.0014898649,0.0003190332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009511238,0.00467089,0.76974905,0.00030495302,0.00057086936,0.0036308835,0.0061413646,0.011265054,0.013086055,0.065725096,0.0018063568,0.1135382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011307951,0.0030609635,0.837276,0.00011717059,0.00071379327,0.0012569616,0.005103148,0.01578919,0.0054312395,0.12631522,0.0036504692,0.00015505226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089811767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012246193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006487126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049871247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027302027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123971925","doi":"10.3386/w13728","title":"Matching and Challenge Gifts to Charity:Evidence from Laboratory and Natural Field Experiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Natural experiment; Field (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Empirical evidence; Field experiment; Empirical research; Work (physics); Public relations; Engineering; Political science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.3844320949969801,"score_gpt":0.5417322907169845,"score_spread":0.15730019572000437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123971925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845823,0.00062602386,0.0027219648,0.00082328764,0.00014679089,0.00025756905,0.00013583372,0.000043136566,0.0106631145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99208915,0.0005967118,0.0033163575,0.0009415991,0.00012359458,0.0006034049,0.00017113665,0.00002110467,0.0021369725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.978888,0.017426914,0.0005244851,0.001440878,0.001332055,0.00038761867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8171118,0.12857907,0.03293666,0.01490723,0.0022705935,0.0041946536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022676202,0.00064749364,0.0009680059,0.00078207377,0.0014308392,0.001800301,0.0011230573,0.001566008,0.005674604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08906861,0.00044623218,0.0005531578,0.00059876696,0.003055454,0.0016416602,0.0012975989,0.0015779096,0.0008846952],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.057774756,0.1810084,0.34227398,0.0036789735,0.005112357,0.0008119576,0.00839206,0.011122408,0.027201286,0.054250147,0.023450663,0.28492308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02042625,0.082477935,0.71639323,0.0010114615,0.0024126892,0.0009334599,0.0062507507,0.017099634,0.022655914,0.07764302,0.052094717,0.00060095335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017183814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019853588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022676202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089729065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009512632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119924664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123974172","doi":"10.1108/eb022917","title":"OTHER‐REGARDING BEHAVIOR AND BEHAVIORAL FORECASTS: FEMALES VERSUS MALES AS INDIVIDUALS AND AS GROUP REPRESENTATIVES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Conflict Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Allocator; Psychology; Social psychology; Dictator game; Perception; Group (periodic table); Contrast (vision)","score_opus":0.09461163029119965,"score_gpt":0.4250516973873859,"score_spread":0.33044006709618623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123974172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99908173,0.000008988543,0.00007932707,0.000023292507,0.0000022350582,0.000003945178,0.000013865483,0.000001230133,0.00078545784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902344,0.000015623342,0.00013574358,0.000015357557,0.0000038149315,0.0000093937615,0.00003283222,0.00000119058,0.00076261425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995758,0.00023374171,0.000022246064,0.000048298487,0.00006231397,0.000057567835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995233,0.002247455,0.0015666045,0.00022335343,0.00021542732,0.00051408657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012631918,0.00021665597,0.00018021814,0.00039016825,0.000300645,0.00069756294,0.00013669403,0.0003657802,0.0031897088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049812295,0.00012595982,0.00012902767,0.00012695632,0.0002907479,0.000433195,0.00035892957,0.0004402702,0.00049729977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024102414,0.0017533533,0.9397359,0.000047947182,0.00006910026,0.0002072912,0.008675426,0.0011581595,0.018653175,0.0010340076,0.0005914389,0.025663815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006446192,0.0019154479,0.9739516,0.000014957066,0.000042289637,0.0002149813,0.010070917,0.006780421,0.0053351517,0.0005009465,0.001060435,0.000048442325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013233073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018359326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031897088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020723081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009712708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010670662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123975840","doi":"","title":"Social Norms, Information and Trust among Strangers: Theory and Evidence","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Norm of reciprocity; Norm (philosophy); Dictator game; Social psychology; Enforcement; Social trust; Psychology; Political science; Social capital; Law","score_opus":0.06813235815825446,"score_gpt":0.3955739809478897,"score_spread":0.32744162278963523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123975840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87353116,0.023182636,0.019531766,0.014471068,0.00018669391,0.00013806795,0.00052793114,0.00005297647,0.068377666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909601,0.0055410215,0.0020980511,0.0006068114,0.000106198655,0.00005392053,0.00012707552,0.000012421653,0.00049441674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895566,0.005461807,0.0006929547,0.0017683037,0.002136966,0.00038339695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67745125,0.23704405,0.057074916,0.01553918,0.010493385,0.002397194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01736934,0.00063662155,0.0012921268,0.0030658818,0.0015759239,0.0051543587,0.0017838394,0.0030827336,0.005106006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09981375,0.0007322999,0.00044294834,0.0031745364,0.013000407,0.006129897,0.002110522,0.0022083216,0.0006544686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019538116,0.0014933979,0.42122042,0.0037881588,0.0018174796,0.0012644338,0.015331031,0.0067496723,0.0019271773,0.29982397,0.0052322103,0.2393982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046735952,0.001139603,0.42302406,0.002306671,0.00074537686,0.001681264,0.010974967,0.017616617,0.002846391,0.5099103,0.028901104,0.00038623498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005176787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028561985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01736934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017096521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091634993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09185898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124039062","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12181","title":"Honor Among Thieves: Open Internal Reporting and Managerial Collusion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada","keywords":"Collusion; Openness to experience; Business; Honor; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Test (biology); Accounting; Industrial organization; Internet privacy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.28376017312101187,"score_gpt":0.4759981839339439,"score_spread":0.19223801081293201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124039062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98778605,0.00013484113,0.002289571,0.0009421272,0.000014101092,0.000030952884,0.00002219232,0.000008633786,0.008771527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941266,0.000034415534,0.00026531125,0.000071744136,0.000009131315,0.0000084938465,0.0000054934826,0.0000013125431,0.00019148765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.985713,0.009379608,0.00096142123,0.0008109591,0.0020968693,0.0010380622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7426097,0.13385877,0.09481042,0.01928276,0.004585041,0.004853306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153104365,0.00029575572,0.00046498518,0.0009788097,0.0016353918,0.0038810053,0.00061664236,0.0012529995,0.0066438974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0888235,0.00034198244,0.0002983459,0.00063881016,0.004162319,0.0028815372,0.003804644,0.0017138052,0.0002573583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027326797,0.002644856,0.76858324,0.0003856897,0.00046438523,0.0011625746,0.02271311,0.0048549594,0.010533616,0.0831939,0.0020384954,0.100692555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004595501,0.002126043,0.72688246,0.0004344784,0.00044218154,0.0012722816,0.03578343,0.021378176,0.009825329,0.1940791,0.007042303,0.0002746115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011181356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009145505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153104365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001102869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009448644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08097029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124051585","doi":"","title":"Why Do People Give? Testing Pure and Impure Altruism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Extant taxon; Download; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.013677167855048565,"score_gpt":0.282056130074914,"score_spread":0.2683789622198654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124051585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933744,0.0000779576,0.0015939701,0.00045806906,0.000039992436,0.00009289833,0.00023879993,0.0000104032415,0.004113363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978278,0.000033629392,0.00082602364,0.00022937267,0.000025498786,0.0002955217,0.00011876603,0.0000051831403,0.00063816615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917818,0.0057929857,0.00042206305,0.0010364889,0.000564305,0.00040243284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8708214,0.09555875,0.018545652,0.010528852,0.0017527296,0.0027925607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013737016,0.0004195853,0.0007403158,0.00038194348,0.00083519134,0.0012533965,0.00092285353,0.0015133186,0.006745654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04564036,0.00035246415,0.0007051492,0.00035812156,0.002401733,0.0015614608,0.0013848817,0.0017801836,0.00074823794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036110893,0.01414388,0.78629297,0.0014895346,0.0031125203,0.0005254898,0.012663714,0.0063541024,0.021478223,0.049637146,0.004008002,0.06418346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027397915,0.01575737,0.87419194,0.00017776186,0.0011030156,0.0003193598,0.0074293725,0.027472334,0.011143319,0.05312344,0.0063241236,0.00021823398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012134267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074164016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013737016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007230403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049612887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07264918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124071159","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3247418","title":"How Incentive Framing Can Harness the Power of Social Norms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Incentive; Business; Public relations; Political science; Microeconomics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.014068925758773708,"score_gpt":0.29753442073043934,"score_spread":0.2834654949716656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124071159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2681528,0.0009094165,0.27232808,0.023906311,0.0006430851,0.00023823579,0.00024947402,0.00023223994,0.4333403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98029274,0.0002059909,0.014431007,0.0007769954,0.00015099894,0.00007609782,0.00002432882,0.000049266448,0.003992629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161494,0.005497949,0.00023977827,0.00089899235,0.0011889372,0.0005594174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491218,0.03956508,0.0034388022,0.00545355,0.0014468891,0.0009739445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012810428,0.00071040285,0.0007367339,0.001058567,0.0014522529,0.005297104,0.0013527502,0.0032701122,0.013659868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05197158,0.00063984055,0.00056668016,0.00072982564,0.0066014347,0.007993298,0.0025178278,0.0031939521,0.00084658543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007143693,0.00011113935,0.0014245964,0.000071590446,0.000041571508,0.000087428496,0.0009713449,0.0020349587,0.0012956756,0.9811664,0.0009978836,0.011725934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058634978,0.000052833748,0.00078155485,0.000029499353,0.000030965693,0.00004792978,0.00028384392,0.0051356754,0.0005146042,0.9894028,0.0036417723,0.000019937715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010657111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012918807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013659868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010712858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017767763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067748785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124091406","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12489","title":"Controls and Cooperation in Interactive and Non‐Interactive Settings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Teamwork; Control (management); Work (physics); Task (project management); Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04840583164141663,"score_gpt":0.404707121111373,"score_spread":0.3563012894699564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124091406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99510574,0.00004785728,0.00066747534,0.000056297937,0.000003704815,0.000016228221,0.000017438108,0.0000061157966,0.0040792185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999803,0.00001033494,0.00008380372,0.000004354254,0.0000013313532,0.000006363439,0.0000070531623,9.0680334e-7,0.000082968734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99018985,0.0066819964,0.00042464177,0.0007351983,0.001080346,0.00088803424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385533,0.03669142,0.013462924,0.0054272995,0.001631678,0.0042333365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059098164,0.00054604147,0.00034309732,0.0014060362,0.0012470596,0.0022553587,0.0007095676,0.00073211885,0.003699559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024672456,0.0002760242,0.00032424385,0.0005953557,0.0036627008,0.0010925282,0.0023347638,0.00067060645,0.00015946427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005217946,0.008502363,0.84526795,0.00030257905,0.0005864642,0.0020300169,0.01741123,0.0098849675,0.014779592,0.048279013,0.0011829516,0.046554845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059462985,0.003089552,0.9203245,0.00010583195,0.00022408256,0.00066243194,0.013604042,0.018249907,0.005347694,0.034344535,0.0032830404,0.00016973134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041018086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030382585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059098164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014661351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060745265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03125447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124102801","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1970489","title":"Productive Versus Destructive Efforts in Contests","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.042717970322970436,"score_gpt":0.3188870401166649,"score_spread":0.2761690697936945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124102801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93743926,0.00016847067,0.0026417575,0.0004820429,0.000026269361,0.000042826603,0.00003236997,0.000013436668,0.059153564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978678,0.00004110155,0.00031782986,0.00003688542,0.000020871608,0.000019159186,0.000011845943,0.000007471684,0.0016771569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536824,0.0019867325,0.0002526574,0.00044649735,0.0009750138,0.0009708941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95627695,0.027338522,0.007405111,0.00287479,0.0015922693,0.004512288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075702085,0.00059762574,0.00072149024,0.0017252176,0.0015021933,0.006224666,0.00076219876,0.0023796388,0.013272545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033607196,0.00055675843,0.0003642069,0.00097538985,0.00386134,0.0038461501,0.0030310752,0.0019844228,0.00065926835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043913135,0.0036694296,0.13840526,0.0005813535,0.00027976886,0.0007426193,0.015721276,0.0072199665,0.020736422,0.7337499,0.0020860776,0.072416514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006375913,0.0016098411,0.34747183,0.000181966,0.00034542065,0.0008016452,0.022367682,0.021479435,0.003962455,0.59329116,0.007720306,0.00013059507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063722127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014814283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013272545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086751924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090342393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04440111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124138475","doi":"","title":"Heterogeneous Productivity in Voluntary Public Good Provision: An Experimental Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Turnover; Public good; Context (archaeology); Productivity; Marginal product; Teamwork; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.018491834120676977,"score_gpt":0.31858234866574436,"score_spread":0.3000905145450674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124138475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99200046,0.00004939842,0.003881676,0.00017142238,0.00003186671,0.00025740813,0.000059031234,0.000017613213,0.003531161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580294,0.00004447724,0.0024438899,0.00008481627,0.00003006334,0.00062776287,0.000043032258,0.000010544724,0.0009125385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.990008,0.006985103,0.00048515567,0.00075129594,0.0010826195,0.0006878219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8894414,0.08470875,0.01202901,0.0108486395,0.0011990166,0.0017732945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014207446,0.0008234167,0.001207854,0.0006823159,0.00088693533,0.002289112,0.0014167333,0.0014892217,0.005783056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06317386,0.00048583862,0.00062784174,0.0006461621,0.002821758,0.0016482358,0.0021226944,0.0019821518,0.0004665907],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.137829,0.19552293,0.081740856,0.0027645277,0.0020524252,0.0014566919,0.012801645,0.061666694,0.15206975,0.1997985,0.0041566663,0.14814028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.034837577,0.14259107,0.13688442,0.0005821564,0.0022104576,0.00078788673,0.007187812,0.19113116,0.063215345,0.40731695,0.012689905,0.00056530855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005648846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029151177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014207446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013924191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010583855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07513708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124167992","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1938474","title":"Bargaining and Reputation: An Experiment on Bargaining in the Presence of Behavioral Types","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Psychology; Economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06619053427527125,"score_gpt":0.3601217285986612,"score_spread":0.29393119432339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124167992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852271,0.00008873069,0.002338303,0.00089289586,0.0003120361,0.00029966666,0.000111191905,0.000044677057,0.010685291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919404,0.00009348722,0.0032014446,0.00047486692,0.00018413863,0.0005048852,0.0000882079,0.000042943775,0.0062158136],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926859,0.0034897763,0.0005357551,0.0012120222,0.0011269978,0.00094957853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9091189,0.06597103,0.007216365,0.01017427,0.0008928259,0.0066266577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014763606,0.0018107531,0.0024437413,0.00071292685,0.0029617895,0.0051510124,0.0027260429,0.006832049,0.029542029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03869499,0.0013405253,0.0010707434,0.000737333,0.00437787,0.0046848943,0.0027735087,0.00706686,0.0028613776],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2557198,0.27817693,0.033150945,0.0022606596,0.0016885683,0.0024355834,0.010723384,0.017217577,0.18309955,0.14736639,0.009611743,0.05854887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1526291,0.27056,0.08096365,0.00057041115,0.0022219885,0.002151124,0.009581374,0.12379323,0.04083934,0.2996347,0.015892055,0.0011630247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006469872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005139761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029542029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080850685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015479907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09882796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124176333","doi":"","title":"The Social and Ecological Determinants of Common Pool Resource Sustainability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Common-pool resource; Commons; Resource (disambiguation); Dilemma; Sustainability; Matching (statistics); Economics; Natural resource economics; Corporate governance; Social dilemma; Tragedy of the commons; Environmental economics; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Microeconomics; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.061727269550524065,"score_gpt":0.41815410398531216,"score_spread":0.3564268344347881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124176333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98132175,0.000086625776,0.008870348,0.0010394423,0.000009593844,0.000016359383,0.000041164214,0.00000818686,0.008606559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891484,0.000039325958,0.0005552689,0.000031537515,0.000005491448,0.0000057459447,0.00000502049,0.0000013836809,0.00044148494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996897,0.00015099655,0.000008549586,0.0000484795,0.00003249273,0.000069772934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685055,0.0014834248,0.0010481491,0.0001349266,0.00012866783,0.00035432432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011566877,0.00018414117,0.0002709595,0.0003457481,0.0005382013,0.001266173,0.00044864888,0.00067925715,0.0032350158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047408734,0.00012846956,0.00023016105,0.00023087185,0.0015550901,0.0011548653,0.00094838504,0.0004404925,0.00012331764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003679516,0.00064539775,0.16533627,0.00016057317,0.00026681676,0.0010407126,0.0016744847,0.083282225,0.009536938,0.69150907,0.003948951,0.042230632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009072999,0.00027173065,0.137661,0.000038421083,0.00013054532,0.00035620062,0.0025023525,0.34504703,0.0014120558,0.5075257,0.0048875427,0.00007676039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028121741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031703385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032350158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007940494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005750421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010822177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124184487","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.06.006","title":"Consuming your way to efficiency: Public goods provision through non-distortionary tax lotteries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Impact Fund","keywords":"Lottery; Economics; Ad valorem tax; Microeconomics; Consumption (sociology); Public good; Private good; Revenue; Tax revenue; Public economics; Distortion (music); Consumption tax; Tax reform; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04886818119543592,"score_gpt":0.32681174474995256,"score_spread":0.27794356355451666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124184487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6785549,0.0005486443,0.24368761,0.005498291,0.00019220081,0.000431386,0.00033597864,0.00030570247,0.07044525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986484,0.00010299822,0.0083888555,0.000085956526,0.000021884502,0.000045418667,0.000017566588,0.000014270944,0.0048391907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845266,0.00089399656,0.000050002553,0.00017556708,0.00023700346,0.00019075353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98758125,0.0076212203,0.001661717,0.0021694887,0.0005118676,0.00045439843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028760526,0.0005736494,0.0009595489,0.0005137087,0.0006742345,0.0031146293,0.0015238198,0.0016088953,0.011355868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01524749,0.0005317701,0.0006852428,0.0005886856,0.0022404513,0.0041362206,0.0015017376,0.0018422779,0.0005726205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020633417,0.0012005176,0.0026833718,0.0002763074,0.00017672022,0.00013369702,0.0004457634,0.05513676,0.0022182749,0.885303,0.003382712,0.0469795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065642054,0.0003898454,0.0029004894,0.000045865694,0.00019191268,0.00012426873,0.00027720947,0.1464628,0.0018251361,0.8442996,0.0027663694,0.00006010475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017231576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014649385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011355868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016950398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018897048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0379892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124221901","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1208869","title":"Group Identity in Markets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Group (periodic table); Chemistry; Art","score_opus":0.013510861005058114,"score_gpt":0.32986736105495185,"score_spread":0.31635650004989374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124221901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82432395,0.00028435534,0.021050885,0.0048178453,0.00016562377,0.00008428442,0.00008956829,0.00005082562,0.14913265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928893,0.000055405395,0.0013228116,0.00008819072,0.000032786626,0.000020209158,0.000022366852,0.0000056569097,0.0055631744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988416,0.00049688807,0.000040638974,0.00020150018,0.00021519717,0.00020430611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952615,0.001879617,0.0008161963,0.0007381976,0.0004595371,0.0008451117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002448952,0.00020216934,0.00070161116,0.0012308764,0.0034067722,0.003982495,0.0005375246,0.0020811944,0.017505629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095070265,0.00021839942,0.00035406588,0.00084948394,0.0030488262,0.004686026,0.0023884394,0.0011975922,0.0010302013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000169421,0.00014344101,0.006462138,0.000030130477,0.00001575249,0.00008042199,0.0022187093,0.000611629,0.00039530164,0.9678808,0.0017128033,0.020279476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066100365,0.00008508373,0.008089389,0.000016814933,0.000018470852,0.00008013889,0.0031558087,0.0028445907,0.00017677723,0.98207253,0.0033821191,0.000012081003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012217509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009313608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017505629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007972905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001001532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0585621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124259092","doi":"10.1506/eh3a-xdfu-vnkd-djyg","title":"Managing Perceptions of Technical Competence: How Well Do Auditors Know How Others View Them?*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Competence (human resources); Reputation; Psychology; Perception; Extant taxon; Task (project management); Accounting; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.07407417809437432,"score_gpt":0.38110515406970247,"score_spread":0.30703097597532814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124259092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963883,0.00008610751,0.00068048376,0.0001978837,0.000004143765,0.0000079129695,0.000016841765,0.000006040423,0.0026123177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996973,0.000026750207,0.00014116906,0.000016093476,0.000003842591,0.0000031298907,0.000010919851,0.0000013157196,0.000099485806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940911,0.0030955654,0.00039288832,0.00042561447,0.0016043683,0.00039058775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89394367,0.044092745,0.040399063,0.009392073,0.008625797,0.0035465923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009962676,0.00029788318,0.00035618112,0.0011974102,0.00072933367,0.0038385557,0.00037436353,0.0007003169,0.0016343512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068395406,0.00026812113,0.0003404985,0.0006592853,0.0013327205,0.0023603512,0.001337636,0.0010573952,0.0002658412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029790658,0.0002699132,0.93992573,0.00006341648,0.00016386183,0.00008305009,0.014731878,0.0011594251,0.002483752,0.0008569864,0.00037362293,0.03959058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011514156,0.0002674306,0.98175657,0.000055334767,0.000042471333,0.00009030694,0.010995041,0.0030324103,0.0011625903,0.0017745451,0.0007664028,0.000045358196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003491387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026626685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009962676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009018866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006666207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0526883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124283874","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2757970","title":"Clever Enough to Tell the Truth","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019864559007789016,"score_gpt":0.3099711998289908,"score_spread":0.2901066408212018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124283874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057272326,0.0051890286,0.03737003,0.70335627,0.009983588,0.00015526985,0.0012076047,0.00030783433,0.18515807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8213305,0.0028595624,0.016808577,0.1267154,0.003394508,0.00020534973,0.0005425947,0.00026255337,0.027880931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98655313,0.007402066,0.0008529819,0.0016642343,0.0026099414,0.0009176609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91477466,0.053436454,0.007413695,0.013753972,0.007772191,0.0028490468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015686713,0.00068729906,0.0014673232,0.00093719503,0.003281785,0.0069542793,0.0014034978,0.010302868,0.031640235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11784695,0.00058319647,0.00061627396,0.00068739837,0.008656412,0.010481264,0.0023860433,0.009208535,0.0082134055],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090157817,0.00041384742,0.0056368117,0.0005456239,0.0005424194,0.00043354355,0.002646631,0.0012958758,0.0015762289,0.7148114,0.21015589,0.0610401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016768456,0.00007648402,0.0016610551,0.0002226017,0.0000792215,0.00028680867,0.001924449,0.0018821871,0.0011889238,0.9264919,0.065955795,0.000062944164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015002526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001445786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031640235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018677651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028253119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10584712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124333356","doi":"","title":"Employee-Based Innovation in Organizations: Overcoming Strategic Risks from Opportunism and Governance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Incentive; Corporate governance; Business; Industrial organization; Appropriation; Flexibility (engineering); Salient; Microeconomics; Value (mathematics); Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.053844500325371164,"score_gpt":0.3278016502256714,"score_spread":0.2739571499003003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124333356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77329326,0.00043169752,0.19028504,0.0024330197,0.000030428204,0.00013777608,0.0000348114,0.000063141495,0.033290792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99421364,0.00009094453,0.005040839,0.00003832676,0.000010346977,0.000038781578,0.0000040639857,0.000002931305,0.0005601346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628484,0.0021436678,0.00013944278,0.00030351963,0.0003722597,0.00075626594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98416257,0.009509573,0.003607768,0.0012088197,0.0005412506,0.00097005407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054608416,0.0003140904,0.00050785317,0.0006593302,0.0010763042,0.003565559,0.0008200301,0.0021679148,0.0021107502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012537208,0.00032593793,0.0005344376,0.0005580622,0.003036156,0.003516606,0.0026007018,0.0011209452,0.00014722146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022453032,0.00053368835,0.030127008,0.00034560356,0.00012405621,0.0007214343,0.002882291,0.099139355,0.0061023687,0.798896,0.0006952193,0.06020854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013442223,0.000606335,0.021680973,0.00018345659,0.00011820924,0.00047803685,0.003161765,0.13013104,0.0030075891,0.8329229,0.0074916203,0.00008372184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001069001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012992752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054608416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015847968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024848636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02888006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124388295","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2529895","title":"Statistical Power of Within and Between-Subjects Designs in Economic Experiments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statistical power; Sample size determination; Statistics; Nonparametric statistics; Context (archaeology); Logit; Design of experiments; Statistical hypothesis testing; Parametric statistics; Probit; Computer science; Statistical model; Type I and type II errors; Power (physics); Sample (material); Censored regression model; Probit model; Power analysis; Tobit model; Econometrics; Mathematics; Regression analysis; Algorithm","score_opus":0.029334969258140886,"score_gpt":0.3356884213496127,"score_spread":0.3063534520914718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124388295","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4334348,0.0043979436,0.49645588,0.0039054246,0.0047092848,0.01275682,0.0016319575,0.0014354195,0.041272458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652737,0.0004614825,0.100669116,0.0016582006,0.0008575845,0.024929352,0.0007274319,0.0011999697,0.004223144],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.45792055,0.44462663,0.01802812,0.035135288,0.039777465,0.004511901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08766947,0.8388172,0.014061817,0.04962491,0.007307918,0.002518715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34864813,0.002493616,0.006883142,0.0036823978,0.0031311794,0.0068931296,0.0044891983,0.010491651,0.01770913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70160776,0.0033674445,0.0057256846,0.0026185925,0.013685814,0.013344007,0.005306436,0.009060666,0.0022047574],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.30910766,0.021695001,0.07073886,0.00722965,0.021907905,0.0016834892,0.020334948,0.032600015,0.029535383,0.18420549,0.010639366,0.29032224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06121586,0.056893494,0.2117577,0.0016611322,0.008795115,0.0013049539,0.001881613,0.1143144,0.02661521,0.4856307,0.028707251,0.0012225255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073840003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005998331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65135187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026628254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030914356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8032328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124400327","doi":"","title":"Subjects in the Lab, Activists in the Field: Public Goods and Punishment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Public goods game; Public good; Punishment (psychology); Experimental economics; Field (mathematics); Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; Subject (documents); Public economics; Economics; Level playing field; Business; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07300168745334323,"score_gpt":0.40415006182361146,"score_spread":0.33114837437026823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124400327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991302,0.00004848699,0.0025189924,0.0002970905,0.000020170964,0.00017665816,0.000050943916,0.000015659816,0.0055699055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943293,0.000049136514,0.0014639273,0.0002737279,0.00001537805,0.00049140665,0.00005950107,0.0000060187035,0.0033116452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969975,0.0021700175,0.000079737496,0.0003091089,0.00021947363,0.00022413835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98424155,0.009007079,0.0034801515,0.0013569952,0.0003666138,0.0015475454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060382765,0.00052330963,0.0006436086,0.0003757895,0.0009953552,0.0016158889,0.000552869,0.0010329555,0.0077932063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010043723,0.00029932684,0.0002089546,0.00028752902,0.001955293,0.0008197407,0.00102648,0.0006844214,0.00086361065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.057493575,0.07086687,0.36932254,0.0018522918,0.0013830019,0.0024506021,0.01737009,0.026984237,0.1741438,0.13729295,0.010658543,0.13018145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015993305,0.11252658,0.5270696,0.0004890836,0.00092313846,0.001908043,0.03643782,0.08417878,0.035417967,0.15142545,0.03317892,0.00045138915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008844378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013284184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077932063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007025298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085436023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031933844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124410671","doi":"","title":"Strategic Behavior and Social Outcomes in a Bottleneck Queue: Experimental Evidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; University of Toronto; Strategiske Forskningsråd","keywords":"FIFO and LIFO accounting; Queue; FIFO (computing and electronics); Bottleneck; Queueing theory; Microeconomics; Welfare; Social Welfare; Computer science; Nash equilibrium; Service (business); Economics; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Operations research; Operations management; Computer network; Mathematics; Economy; Political science","score_opus":0.1421228778870754,"score_gpt":0.4427574110406211,"score_spread":0.3006345331535457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124410671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99585295,0.000052017847,0.0017604906,0.00019195216,0.0000072773805,0.0000319583,0.000057238678,0.000011215273,0.002034924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978423,0.00007584677,0.0014857273,0.00007958412,0.000006352304,0.00006745816,0.00005142857,0.0000051710344,0.000386239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982337,0.0011757415,0.000073722156,0.00018196485,0.00019235563,0.00014247214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720676,0.02002959,0.004525544,0.0016302782,0.00077225105,0.0009747804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042994716,0.00042852983,0.00039787102,0.00041592214,0.0006312254,0.0009630251,0.0007872297,0.0008857943,0.0041839443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017503537,0.00025083235,0.0002670919,0.00035798465,0.0014961988,0.0011651481,0.00068005186,0.0010496086,0.0003764155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017423846,0.094581604,0.3946896,0.0019793492,0.0018466188,0.0012034848,0.00861664,0.10366626,0.073254436,0.16919333,0.0125139775,0.12103091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051836553,0.029999644,0.22732814,0.00033545506,0.0005959171,0.00056484365,0.008199317,0.445263,0.027898163,0.24518675,0.009027386,0.0004176801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021038784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002381119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042994716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073323044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063621154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0227381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124438654","doi":"10.5167/uzh-40976","title":"Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Negotiation; Variance (accounting); Homogeneous; Microeconomics; Group (periodic table); Economics; Simple (philosophy); Experimental economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.02996903852314615,"score_gpt":0.27285048105804677,"score_spread":0.24288144253490063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124438654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6992172,0.0009820482,0.19142966,0.017876022,0.00041065592,0.0003665161,0.00022083752,0.0004178247,0.089079216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777124,0.00023445956,0.012928512,0.0006634173,0.00013772654,0.00012025297,0.00006970642,0.00009860404,0.008034849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944886,0.0031539574,0.00019627782,0.00070180005,0.000381718,0.0010775831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553876,0.030854965,0.0049076388,0.005320208,0.0008907602,0.0026387533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013082687,0.0013148955,0.003063663,0.0008584821,0.002260019,0.0053543574,0.002516197,0.0073283403,0.02567749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048751183,0.0009380262,0.0015839775,0.0010954082,0.003741915,0.010982767,0.0039843246,0.0041117645,0.0021022144],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030236559,0.0015241512,0.01392524,0.0010033193,0.0005223724,0.00055118004,0.0038926036,0.04527718,0.0034158092,0.80480987,0.023003593,0.09905109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002871772,0.00015623368,0.0010771877,0.000022529586,0.000054329998,0.00010556963,0.0007542398,0.02867796,0.00028701208,0.9656835,0.0028752508,0.000018988503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014207906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014846956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02567749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082828355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018566542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08589983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124440090","doi":"","title":"Cooperation through Coordination in Two Stages","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Outcome (game theory); Action (physics); Stage (stratigraphy); Coordination game; Repeated game; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Operations management; Game theory","score_opus":0.0989836243136354,"score_gpt":0.4574203701777406,"score_spread":0.35843674586410523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124440090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73375875,0.00026336353,0.20509017,0.0011077553,0.00009413806,0.00071907043,0.00022785377,0.000286167,0.058452867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557425,0.00007206413,0.0371282,0.00013751812,0.0000124558355,0.00041059652,0.00006117788,0.000019239906,0.006416346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968659,0.0015275104,0.00014864931,0.0006044731,0.0004232748,0.0004300913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954034,0.0017592261,0.0009900697,0.0010005889,0.00029006298,0.00055667583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002516458,0.0007504713,0.00060961104,0.00039210162,0.00071549596,0.001689701,0.0010060531,0.0011598134,0.007933287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059674834,0.00050280907,0.0006655393,0.00027614762,0.0018642631,0.0016224881,0.0024020346,0.0010834241,0.00064325234],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032638002,0.0015703045,0.014110957,0.0007471704,0.00040587652,0.0008453822,0.0035528585,0.05999007,0.11017782,0.7183828,0.004067286,0.08288564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013769503,0.0042524026,0.020645896,0.00015576389,0.00027470672,0.0006651141,0.00096262764,0.22362022,0.019058011,0.7029057,0.025883298,0.00019929478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009311568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010470119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007933287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00115743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012836349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026539505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124445838","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1540137","title":"Can We Infer Social Preferences from the Lab? Evidence from the Trust Game","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator game; Cheap talk; Social preferences; Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Data science; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.041553544278627064,"score_gpt":0.32625498537267733,"score_spread":0.28470144109405027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124445838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96495795,0.00068097754,0.012158519,0.0024247204,0.00004996443,0.000041746483,0.000458403,0.000039129067,0.019188566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968528,0.00030883835,0.0014403819,0.00024402322,0.000022469936,0.000023638224,0.00015143078,0.000013384553,0.00094309484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946438,0.004073992,0.00019956233,0.00044682343,0.0004392708,0.0001964759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8216233,0.13825361,0.019899346,0.014670952,0.0034525858,0.0021002812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010748869,0.0006594229,0.0009704696,0.00077924685,0.00080472743,0.0024774699,0.0012095586,0.0018627252,0.011203021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09373637,0.0006557157,0.0004605493,0.00087119546,0.0024701534,0.0040911636,0.0013673753,0.002089634,0.0014970403],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015424082,0.004505576,0.5799641,0.0016048505,0.0027294091,0.001805654,0.0070123035,0.032412983,0.010472598,0.13793036,0.01409888,0.19203918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015063965,0.0024492186,0.427468,0.00034994868,0.001038433,0.0011518674,0.005186685,0.11974392,0.0083036795,0.41904122,0.013378677,0.00038200253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005417555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00494432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011203021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077223056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005083963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056846082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124452521","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2009.11.003","title":"Nonmonetary sanctions and rewards in an experimental coordination game","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Outcome (game theory); Coordination game; Stochastic game; Microeconomics; Economics; Pareto optimal; Pareto principle; Yield (engineering); Test (biology); Contrast (vision); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Computer science; Law; Operations management","score_opus":0.02670778486587449,"score_gpt":0.3363534368664437,"score_spread":0.3096456520005692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124452521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99391705,0.00003604943,0.002274835,0.00035020759,0.000037042297,0.000079750054,0.00007186879,0.000020983216,0.0032121702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967063,0.000028860111,0.0017028531,0.00006037043,0.000014163881,0.000104600345,0.000032371056,0.000010223863,0.0013403937],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982212,0.0009765696,0.00013973111,0.00025342175,0.00018870494,0.00022032637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9422114,0.04838763,0.004183267,0.002309237,0.00061465416,0.00229386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051161973,0.0011995421,0.0015990707,0.000502654,0.000879986,0.0025362642,0.0017278173,0.0023468817,0.007842232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033361293,0.00078950025,0.00050342747,0.00040043524,0.0023202212,0.0022650592,0.0011734734,0.0023756383,0.00029383777],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08238483,0.04495979,0.036277197,0.0016501835,0.0013229371,0.001956965,0.0034444672,0.4314924,0.059065513,0.2886817,0.008039596,0.04072445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0141402595,0.011605372,0.019811757,0.000067248875,0.00048738762,0.00028868555,0.001088304,0.8103684,0.0043764147,0.13644005,0.0010671109,0.0002589402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037219264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003542586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007842232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020574566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02705735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124475489","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2517886","title":"Statistical Power of within and Between-Subjects Designs in Economic Experiments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statistical power; Sample size determination; Nonparametric statistics; Context (archaeology); Logit; Statistics; Parametric statistics; Probit; Statistical hypothesis testing; Design of experiments; Computer science; Power (physics); Sample (material); Type I and type II errors; Statistical model; Tobit model; Censored regression model; Econometrics; Probit model; Power analysis; Mathematics; Regression analysis; Algorithm","score_opus":0.029334969258140886,"score_gpt":0.3356884213496127,"score_spread":0.3063534520914718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124475489","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4334348,0.0043979436,0.49645588,0.0039054246,0.0047092848,0.01275682,0.0016319575,0.0014354195,0.041272458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652737,0.0004614825,0.100669116,0.0016582006,0.0008575845,0.024929352,0.0007274319,0.0011999697,0.004223144],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.45792055,0.44462663,0.01802812,0.035135288,0.039777465,0.004511901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08766947,0.8388172,0.014061817,0.04962491,0.007307918,0.002518715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34864813,0.002493616,0.006883142,0.0036823978,0.0031311794,0.0068931296,0.0044891983,0.010491651,0.01770913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70160776,0.0033674445,0.0057256846,0.0026185925,0.013685814,0.013344007,0.005306436,0.009060666,0.0022047574],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.30910766,0.021695001,0.07073886,0.00722965,0.021907905,0.0016834892,0.020334948,0.032600015,0.029535383,0.18420549,0.010639366,0.29032224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06121586,0.056893494,0.2117577,0.0016611322,0.008795115,0.0013049539,0.001881613,0.1143144,0.02661521,0.4856307,0.028707251,0.0012225255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073840003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005998331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65135187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026628254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030914356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8032328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124498148","doi":"","title":"A New Necessary Condition for Implementation in Iteratively Undominated Strategies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Computer science; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Numéraire; Incentive; Deception; Function (biology); Term (time); Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028502136017797743,"score_gpt":0.3221686553027946,"score_spread":0.2936665192849969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124498148","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12637682,0.00027605513,0.8058284,0.004598055,0.00018319649,0.0011078416,0.000860435,0.0011075765,0.059661705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7614788,0.0004221544,0.22703835,0.00116541,0.00016502883,0.002407469,0.00072654185,0.00032306425,0.006273237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97790056,0.0074389847,0.003446866,0.003842551,0.0044131433,0.0029577976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8684872,0.08132671,0.013778906,0.019816888,0.0126596615,0.0039306106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01409098,0.0013081547,0.0026384513,0.0015039194,0.0018659364,0.004942214,0.0033455119,0.0063528516,0.014779894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10359,0.0017140403,0.0032059802,0.0011670074,0.0066033583,0.014349232,0.0061433185,0.008026492,0.0025474776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020855706,0.0003919645,0.0021481765,0.00037650665,0.00009670191,0.00031216326,0.0007121963,0.007838095,0.007269974,0.96272767,0.0020223819,0.015895726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003004624,0.00043347036,0.0013938482,0.00020825764,0.000086378735,0.0004192917,0.0003084539,0.06500886,0.009310892,0.9183017,0.004134123,0.00009428204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086923194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065374514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014779894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019850328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006836758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074521124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124539936","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14669100","title":"Gender and Generosity: Does Degree of Anonymity or Group Gender Composition Matter?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Dictator game; Anonymity; Dictator; Psychology; Social psychology; Composition (language); Group (periodic table); Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.13506798123962527,"score_gpt":0.3519981605538151,"score_spread":0.21693017931418984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124539936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760951,0.000531298,0.0028936558,0.0014919318,0.00008831521,0.000053845528,0.0003879928,0.000017183513,0.018440671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997299,0.00011565459,0.0005515421,0.00017307786,0.000028780332,0.000028365064,0.00008022001,0.000016787564,0.001706658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.00086050684,0.00007079264,0.00026923785,0.0002215531,0.00016342284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98049873,0.012859056,0.0036266411,0.0012390143,0.00036481532,0.0014117381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031000536,0.0002495859,0.0006844446,0.00044095394,0.00035657847,0.0014814346,0.0005127689,0.00073453295,0.01665501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01743246,0.0001519158,0.00033771805,0.0003902337,0.001494875,0.0014307764,0.00097071467,0.0007201699,0.00066484476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025896206,0.0024383236,0.65613645,0.000913352,0.0009900148,0.0012934367,0.0056050913,0.0014353116,0.04911103,0.07123191,0.0063310144,0.17861788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022435068,0.0011526715,0.937435,0.00010757608,0.00031544635,0.0004323066,0.0027277917,0.0032032824,0.006429889,0.04273143,0.005172188,0.00006799312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075221766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080742163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01665501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044972272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047165135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055716515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124612177","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2246914","title":"Uncertainty, Risk, and Incentives: Theory and Evidence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Actuarial science; Economics; Econometrics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.016392972562492145,"score_gpt":0.31029915157465154,"score_spread":0.2939061790121594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124612177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4509424,0.29634807,0.045194674,0.061476015,0.0007515447,0.00026782617,0.0008087395,0.0000885827,0.14412217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469447,0.044614,0.00414269,0.0022928617,0.000724216,0.00008043422,0.000099598845,0.000015308538,0.0010861303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940102,0.0031755958,0.00035183594,0.0007119363,0.0014048576,0.00034558852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7233424,0.25129327,0.016818004,0.0040637325,0.0033090536,0.0011734703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017140578,0.0010419079,0.0016991777,0.0027190298,0.0010187906,0.0075988006,0.0017393684,0.004710107,0.01176697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09662342,0.0007359525,0.00064578775,0.0027056294,0.0065525714,0.006988018,0.0018888185,0.00271979,0.0006151731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027582769,0.0014323514,0.079042844,0.0031067114,0.001112197,0.0003760415,0.0012709515,0.015220461,0.00062140205,0.6596922,0.0060353098,0.22933115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039995552,0.00025586828,0.031494416,0.0012453563,0.0003384968,0.00023779231,0.0009918233,0.007080401,0.00045936796,0.9463265,0.011081875,0.00008813953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028389965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001929865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017140578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021503773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021033378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09064913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124683185","doi":"","title":"Status Characteristics, Cognitive Biases, and Incentives in Teams","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Principal–agent problem; Compensation (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Social hierarchy; Social psychology; Psychology; Hierarchy; Cognition; Social status; Social comparison theory; Microeconomics; Economics; Sociology; Management; Social science","score_opus":0.021859319814725733,"score_gpt":0.32848176903733084,"score_spread":0.3066224492226051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124683185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97098786,0.0002800633,0.0095813535,0.0007965907,0.000023801022,0.00002381737,0.000024164401,0.00000762343,0.018274777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868995,0.000080988895,0.0007166004,0.000024998932,0.00001344278,0.000010446728,0.0000044719127,0.0000011205966,0.00045795506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786276,0.0013272562,0.00008778553,0.00013005351,0.0003577268,0.00023450812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856252,0.008442361,0.00408576,0.0005863067,0.00050740974,0.0007527917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038017537,0.00025533827,0.00033005612,0.0006353102,0.0007591712,0.0024404237,0.0003089401,0.0007542436,0.0018489697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018109528,0.00019422908,0.0002470427,0.00063138636,0.0018829762,0.0015110018,0.0010870752,0.0005629867,0.000116063246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011120868,0.0007912517,0.21502094,0.00020085512,0.00021713963,0.0005976775,0.007539376,0.04502197,0.0036759828,0.64101976,0.0014043099,0.083398655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003067922,0.00064378756,0.15631743,0.00009224939,0.000106693755,0.0002911413,0.003850425,0.051157035,0.0011135257,0.78038734,0.005658608,0.0000749421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011340713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011181409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99619824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010890119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055600435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02010578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124709108","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12251","title":"Giving Customers Decision Rights: A Field Study of Pay‐What‐You‐Want Pricing at a Performing Arts Theater*","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ticket; Revenue; Business; Homogeneous; Database transaction; Advertising; Marketing; Computer science; Mathematics; Database; Finance","score_opus":0.02309110815815694,"score_gpt":0.3387271005526607,"score_spread":0.31563599239450374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124709108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99784243,0.000011828899,0.00019663273,0.00020840875,0.000010232461,0.00011547124,0.00003118162,0.0000027433084,0.001581097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958507,0.00004172418,0.00079075684,0.00043272832,0.00003418271,0.0002527563,0.000064156004,0.0000045122874,0.0025284777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664414,0.0022123843,0.00009054474,0.00031749217,0.0002791955,0.0004563284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97603637,0.015610334,0.0026208225,0.0019821636,0.0017227603,0.0020276092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008006879,0.0003962015,0.00047972274,0.0012568561,0.006268759,0.0026372506,0.0013111619,0.0018683207,0.007990942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013597581,0.0007619453,0.0004177956,0.0008151679,0.0032615238,0.002309782,0.0010190634,0.0030743408,0.0010414425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010474042,0.2377279,0.380208,0.0004411648,0.00017021789,0.0030820023,0.21129699,0.001687506,0.013940044,0.018769877,0.013286786,0.10891547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002259079,0.042975765,0.48984808,0.0002667351,0.00013183783,0.0013852328,0.40435213,0.011709256,0.004926679,0.013629487,0.028100874,0.00041489088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014046651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011572278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014081916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014973767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042344987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124714751","doi":"10.1111/1475-679x.00029","title":"Can Auditors Predict the Choices Made by Other Auditors?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Ambiguity; Task (project management); Dimension (graph theory); Accounting; Ambiguity tolerance; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Economics; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06110627111279423,"score_gpt":0.4136819209327842,"score_spread":0.35257564981999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124714751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953892,0.000069840404,0.0014325224,0.00039191585,0.0000093534045,0.000021616697,0.00005726618,0.000016711674,0.0026115929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998582,0.00005257677,0.000728528,0.00009915698,0.000016126642,0.000008834849,0.00006388516,0.0000032316982,0.00044571116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968581,0.0015446662,0.00018420482,0.00043443346,0.0005912604,0.00038738656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94001466,0.031121122,0.016637733,0.007232204,0.0017563851,0.0032378798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008008898,0.000397465,0.00074679154,0.0010903645,0.00059393625,0.0022080177,0.00053841627,0.001733712,0.0032756391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060244735,0.0003501175,0.00054532837,0.0005789541,0.00088947976,0.0033015024,0.0009287432,0.001144179,0.0009466003],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012097508,0.00050596107,0.9607185,0.000034951754,0.0001645963,0.00008927184,0.0006296868,0.004903705,0.0016467317,0.0011109007,0.0005370245,0.028448928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018602575,0.0009769732,0.9272183,0.00005356663,0.00011796583,0.00032448838,0.001473154,0.055883627,0.0021662586,0.010114812,0.0014053611,0.000079462705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042196894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004196772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008008898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000503569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061272486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042355597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124815436","doi":"","title":"Can a raise in your wage make you worse off? A public goods perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public good; Wage; Externality; Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Labour economics; Private good; Value (mathematics); Efficiency wage; Microeconomics; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.08412150150425464,"score_gpt":0.4016841625182645,"score_spread":0.3175626610140099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124815436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30553016,0.005765391,0.09112357,0.1697004,0.0008469272,0.00010595523,0.00037452788,0.00013231135,0.4264208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855016,0.0010514641,0.0025788418,0.0022344964,0.00022679602,0.00003555897,0.000024605999,0.000025537727,0.008321217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986386,0.0006191554,0.00003339849,0.0001751385,0.00017404258,0.00035964046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969874,0.0014981459,0.000681449,0.00031450304,0.00022738862,0.00029110725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021660507,0.00079517544,0.0008693765,0.0009788717,0.002033604,0.0041140593,0.0012539959,0.0036246788,0.014929516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050526313,0.00031472888,0.0008467403,0.0006732813,0.006992622,0.0048766416,0.0021423858,0.0033686915,0.0008947627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118895834,0.0003155943,0.0031059436,0.00009323355,0.00006929593,0.00042234885,0.0010046983,0.006306825,0.0011409969,0.96486115,0.0046306592,0.017930314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039353938,0.00006285888,0.0020321906,0.000047119553,0.00003195556,0.00010284674,0.0008634911,0.0040120063,0.000528361,0.9852586,0.0070061777,0.000015027027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001957247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001864841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014929516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024249025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010524557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049944162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124916701","doi":"10.1007/s10683-010-9242-8","title":"Gender and generosity: does degree of anonymity or group gender composition matter?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Dictator game; Dictator; Anonymity; Social psychology; Composition (language); Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06667957574396627,"score_gpt":0.32374766165264923,"score_spread":0.25706808590868296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124916701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929468,0.00020338356,0.0011841382,0.00041439885,0.000031152216,0.000023979632,0.00008087409,0.0000051280836,0.005110225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919814,0.00004773824,0.00023904954,0.000060501745,0.00001352137,0.000013766482,0.000016919324,0.000004789038,0.0004055247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962077,0.002598059,0.00013913364,0.0003636255,0.00042216288,0.00026924652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632563,0.025248386,0.006568999,0.0021487246,0.0006557313,0.0021219442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052306177,0.00019890281,0.0005987832,0.0004098526,0.0004261912,0.001474692,0.00041300082,0.00057020894,0.007944184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027260996,0.00016535468,0.000262515,0.00033260742,0.0017907473,0.0010236508,0.0009029438,0.00064568495,0.0003032416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02263235,0.0024087413,0.80025214,0.00043527433,0.0006975261,0.0007520763,0.003913176,0.0015404886,0.051994458,0.029232167,0.001583616,0.08455793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021886936,0.0018812165,0.96438974,0.000078909,0.0002736016,0.00042674528,0.00216165,0.002648644,0.005861439,0.019905765,0.0020917421,0.00006155704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003967637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006503412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007944184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004020201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043299515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027662516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124930116","doi":"","title":"The Limited Effects of Power on Satisfaction with Joint Consumption Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Power (physics); Social psychology; Orientation (vector space); Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Joint (building); Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics; Business; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01775885486682338,"score_gpt":0.2868247698443955,"score_spread":0.2690659149775721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124930116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98793507,0.00007529077,0.0011239436,0.00023046753,0.000008606921,0.000017980617,0.00004022077,0.0000059876916,0.010562366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999244,0.000017333809,0.00032784132,0.000037672584,0.000005302135,0.000017849454,0.000024638097,0.0000038825187,0.0003215095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421257,0.004331434,0.00019821852,0.0004135918,0.00056603504,0.0002782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87667423,0.101703666,0.007388781,0.008507935,0.0015853238,0.004140065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050795963,0.0002580561,0.00039588526,0.00024856947,0.000548957,0.0011518499,0.0004973948,0.0007513854,0.015199374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040592063,0.00029119427,0.00038796623,0.00030281776,0.0018575939,0.0011698456,0.0017171542,0.0012807864,0.0006131659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02847849,0.009373773,0.6750392,0.0010146063,0.0008590322,0.0013811389,0.007870395,0.008130529,0.0803417,0.023724185,0.002128032,0.1616589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013546156,0.008407502,0.9332829,0.00010526917,0.00034123939,0.0007832336,0.0042499574,0.0086099105,0.010727053,0.028617915,0.0034230845,0.000097266755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005753343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083769165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015199374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039283058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041244668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050846934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124966940","doi":"","title":"The \"Sales Agent\" Problem: Effort Choice under Performance Pay as Behavior toward Risk","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.04848254071497034,"score_gpt":0.3333178565323012,"score_spread":0.2848353158173309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124966940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91995853,0.00017382533,0.061021846,0.0025612845,0.00005882177,0.00022205668,0.00032742633,0.000081652935,0.015594603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97920716,0.00014393135,0.014753674,0.00017894909,0.000042073414,0.00025901146,0.00012527448,0.000027191727,0.005262785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729604,0.0019289446,0.00009661025,0.00032728334,0.00018520879,0.00016583288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832893,0.012917944,0.001706707,0.0010693691,0.00019539472,0.00082128326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00605735,0.000842109,0.0014928202,0.0003580384,0.00080568815,0.0022907024,0.0009898451,0.0030072709,0.010102253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021469725,0.00047804406,0.00065167085,0.00044683064,0.0017876158,0.0030365905,0.0014041823,0.002348175,0.0005565627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009776737,0.0057237786,0.065988,0.0009092927,0.00055579847,0.0012339208,0.0036384598,0.21198595,0.018255739,0.5646687,0.008649796,0.108613856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014084858,0.0013088484,0.021045353,0.0001000008,0.00012838274,0.00026200368,0.0011190604,0.5445912,0.0022388268,0.42347872,0.004210267,0.00010877657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011873941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084402977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010102253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097613357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010347067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033795357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124967584","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.179537","title":"Detecting Other-Regarding Behavior with Virtual Players","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eCommons (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Computer science; Experimental economics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Human–computer interaction; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.058899045467680024,"score_gpt":0.25997037695193936,"score_spread":0.20107133148425935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124967584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888503,0.000020385436,0.008907183,0.000047180863,0.000011892932,0.0000373869,0.00015905662,0.00008622667,0.001880346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390584,0.000012323829,0.005060707,0.000028128128,0.0000058455416,0.000030207624,0.00011475624,0.000008117194,0.0008340637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896395,0.00055541005,0.000033680655,0.00021683254,0.00012772689,0.00010231939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99087745,0.006476878,0.00096652895,0.0006169795,0.0004157673,0.0006464428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011841721,0.00042205784,0.00048757842,0.00065990543,0.00039603247,0.0010522231,0.0005080187,0.000996959,0.003095837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008447284,0.0002888338,0.00024041653,0.00038217293,0.00030252716,0.00082105485,0.00096766517,0.0006488131,0.00054221624],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050001,0.0022129042,0.8061319,0.00018492846,0.00036755504,0.0006298583,0.0021692067,0.0095978435,0.06366482,0.0057945834,0.0018480939,0.10239818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028548462,0.0030114492,0.43363005,0.00005010557,0.00036827705,0.0016298095,0.0030399598,0.5035295,0.03999704,0.011075778,0.0032534448,0.00012916181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001051417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013941262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003095837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020134734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021397976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010356605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125061572","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00267.x","title":"<scp>Promotion Tournaments and Individual Performance Pay</scp>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Promotion (chess); Principal (computer security); Private information retrieval; Selection (genetic algorithm); Microeconomics; Business; Public economics; Pay for performance; Marketing; Economics; Computer science; Computer security; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04732575247320255,"score_gpt":0.3015401493755481,"score_spread":0.2542143969023456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125061572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90001774,0.00048680758,0.034199197,0.0021571622,0.00009296522,0.00015646353,0.00020568469,0.00012004475,0.062564105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944559,0.00008382163,0.0023569562,0.000082918734,0.000045087425,0.000047458234,0.00003389918,0.00000976354,0.0028842662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728155,0.0016460282,0.000051713116,0.00019321393,0.0001492734,0.0006781361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99179465,0.0036362607,0.0026190716,0.00032843108,0.00029777156,0.001323742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036531321,0.0006168822,0.0006587812,0.00082522456,0.0008730657,0.002378619,0.0007844798,0.0011822674,0.014274511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102422675,0.0004021759,0.00054177997,0.0008389013,0.0017164438,0.0016326661,0.0012060227,0.0011727756,0.0007886491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046445853,0.004934822,0.08003212,0.0007420663,0.00067665766,0.0008205188,0.0006113742,0.29785752,0.007738595,0.4286226,0.017580526,0.15573853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010109519,0.003079641,0.08952631,0.00016242648,0.00028947837,0.0005316225,0.0011147425,0.55807614,0.0026410213,0.33447447,0.008954757,0.0001384666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017899827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027413564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014274511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016850405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001090081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047752976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125123872","doi":"","title":"Volunteering a Public Service: An Experimental Investigation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Attrition; Public good; Perfection; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Subgame; Stochastic game; Power (physics); Economics; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection","score_opus":0.11858980069538154,"score_gpt":0.40309998826432847,"score_spread":0.2845101875689469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125123872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99452835,0.000045891422,0.0010117358,0.000281717,0.00005233403,0.0006962423,0.00009519676,0.000032638767,0.0032559244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900474,0.00012978082,0.00344911,0.00037970234,0.00011159631,0.0024895812,0.00018170982,0.000020867981,0.0031901244],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707687,0.001688215,0.00018869922,0.00038304395,0.0003972034,0.00026595962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95638937,0.032016,0.003100303,0.005082213,0.0011983477,0.0022137486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069488343,0.00088822714,0.0008182279,0.00055646,0.001617472,0.0016851423,0.0014873602,0.0022156222,0.011812035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018251585,0.00049569353,0.00045849034,0.00052837085,0.0024150177,0.0017063592,0.0012027749,0.0024929591,0.001212153],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07498924,0.7075457,0.03803317,0.0015184216,0.00043021695,0.0016346623,0.014522872,0.004399346,0.04049972,0.026729418,0.0075628627,0.08213443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07107126,0.63321316,0.09026292,0.00057270087,0.0010776921,0.0020535062,0.015992207,0.057513982,0.031594314,0.069044985,0.027182005,0.0004212892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005683221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038527444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011812035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054146553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008399168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039515197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125150461","doi":"","title":"Incomplete Information and Rent Dissipation in Deterministic Contests","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"CONTEST; Economic rent; Complete information; Robustness (evolution); Microeconomics; Monotonic function; Economics; Rent-seeking; Competition (biology); Information asymmetry; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.056283576148350174,"score_gpt":0.3920246619725444,"score_spread":0.3357410858241942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125150461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79880685,0.0007832208,0.16117315,0.0022643963,0.000070248876,0.00010208234,0.00041049268,0.00010312532,0.036286395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929322,0.00015371382,0.004003186,0.000074420095,0.000023453014,0.0000330149,0.000056656878,0.000019249304,0.002704039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620396,0.001516983,0.00023931303,0.0004177074,0.00062905654,0.0009930503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756005,0.014832383,0.005269694,0.0026212465,0.00073076476,0.00094545755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005401287,0.0005667547,0.001609191,0.00084339664,0.000870513,0.0028438277,0.0012680074,0.001202635,0.0051302714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029807603,0.0007073817,0.0010480742,0.0006357181,0.0037819112,0.0037310484,0.0022347185,0.0016896719,0.00042283247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048039088,0.00018172163,0.0035841614,0.00017449052,0.00010022556,0.00034730003,0.00040544657,0.13533539,0.002361781,0.84313285,0.0017119555,0.012184313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012334065,0.00011829539,0.004005498,0.000044629633,0.000038945225,0.000128535,0.0001713742,0.291943,0.0006927244,0.7015004,0.0011782764,0.000054889366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024198142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018620339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005401287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023936476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013716285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02856505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125154258","doi":"","title":"Male-Female Productivity Differentials: The Role of Ability and Incentives (Revised)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Productivity; Demographic economics; Differential (mechanical device); Sample (material); Labour economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.012647646485718554,"score_gpt":0.28886178872324203,"score_spread":0.2762141422375235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125154258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492688,0.0022374066,0.009352725,0.004010233,0.00006884697,0.00009032485,0.0004791203,0.00003989991,0.034452632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556583,0.00021808516,0.00080816355,0.00020469783,0.0000467553,0.000015154301,0.00004817267,0.0000034230452,0.0030897162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989236,0.00029016333,0.00006803807,0.00021861107,0.00026565755,0.000233968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99036914,0.004224744,0.0027343633,0.00090222165,0.0011676011,0.0006017863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031403063,0.00050743675,0.0005242332,0.001009171,0.0007392816,0.0017799286,0.0009089884,0.0007517006,0.008570424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012863923,0.00019767841,0.000502449,0.0007863452,0.00212344,0.0009100821,0.0009706403,0.000817699,0.00060015445],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005285864,0.00021999549,0.797535,0.0002525264,0.0002666356,0.00078859256,0.004016879,0.004445614,0.0042306217,0.06086262,0.0021446228,0.12470822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033048625,0.00017119887,0.9645353,0.000073690164,0.00008853165,0.00024518126,0.00126505,0.0030476556,0.00063708634,0.024747735,0.0051167044,0.000038830734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034500938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03449345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034500938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014720416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009891947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06860024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125188014","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2168681","title":"A Nested Contest: Tullock Meets the All-Pay Auction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Economics; Symmetric equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; Lottery; Aggregate (composite); Game theory; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection","score_opus":0.040157665437055096,"score_gpt":0.341502119241518,"score_spread":0.30134445380446295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125188014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46417034,0.0008329928,0.3258548,0.008090789,0.000609466,0.0003363389,0.0003984378,0.00042446968,0.19928238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594551,0.00018630942,0.02114563,0.0004717124,0.00020840685,0.000112297304,0.00007476269,0.00010676334,0.018239107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.994111,0.0031039964,0.0002359632,0.00085427373,0.00087752356,0.0008172288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98159456,0.011160457,0.001843897,0.0026164257,0.00075676484,0.0020278653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081338445,0.001002626,0.0039200503,0.0007859104,0.0030424425,0.008680621,0.002372801,0.0058595994,0.026373591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035962768,0.0010032137,0.001488719,0.0006264091,0.0036861307,0.010052369,0.0037173848,0.0044515,0.0024333803],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093678944,0.00029729737,0.0009849077,0.00013701193,0.00008298117,0.00028508747,0.00047598232,0.008173356,0.0012775436,0.9692606,0.005542278,0.012546308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021311411,0.00011086094,0.00034536212,0.00001923361,0.000031590607,0.00019706205,0.00015801721,0.0381486,0.00013886431,0.95894057,0.0016592272,0.000037540616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016781354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019536158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026373591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014289845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022735354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088228464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125267825","doi":"","title":"Single- and Double-Elimination All-Pay Tournaments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Investment (military); Economics; Suspect; Microeconomics; Aggregate (composite); Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.062379861128550824,"score_gpt":0.2704629140612542,"score_spread":0.2080830529327034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125267825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96023697,0.00008356425,0.021269979,0.00010413137,0.00005624596,0.00023739834,0.00015002984,0.000061027862,0.017800614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98739105,0.00003611944,0.008825897,0.000049333936,0.0000103957245,0.00016815927,0.00011824263,0.000010693986,0.0033901255],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852896,0.0005951311,0.00007523072,0.00022382275,0.0003564769,0.00022031822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949464,0.0025662228,0.0006987618,0.0008176029,0.00032692513,0.0006441619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015721605,0.0003074835,0.00049643964,0.0003316158,0.00041211062,0.0011377952,0.00082607416,0.00043321255,0.0052708634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067201336,0.00016455361,0.0003313203,0.0003248695,0.0006442371,0.0006927688,0.0007618106,0.0006231516,0.00033615582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022846095,0.008150617,0.06481382,0.00092670845,0.00079018966,0.00056361983,0.001736072,0.08364701,0.064855635,0.30483532,0.01006986,0.436765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006355835,0.022872671,0.18690428,0.00017029465,0.00038280833,0.0016209356,0.0017262597,0.42883036,0.037101272,0.27873215,0.03495619,0.00034695442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004973388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010904393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052708634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005158249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046437702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017632782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125292484","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3442024","title":"Value-Capture in the Face of Known and Unknown Unknowns","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Mathematics; Economics; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.012140046274947861,"score_gpt":0.292603927957607,"score_spread":0.2804638816826591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125292484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85758793,0.0008231167,0.042031433,0.011888387,0.00019297897,0.00012958677,0.0002511676,0.00006961502,0.087025635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480975,0.00014226389,0.0015231825,0.0001934001,0.000050495524,0.000022017637,0.000028481854,0.000008628736,0.0032217726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727803,0.0011964978,0.00009470444,0.000494771,0.0003360484,0.000599902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96371025,0.026815258,0.0045946557,0.0030024545,0.0007525568,0.0011247749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073181316,0.0005432674,0.0014101195,0.00054745085,0.0014053534,0.0056034992,0.0013128233,0.0049945223,0.014785519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044563312,0.0006971622,0.000518346,0.00053775567,0.003761311,0.009083698,0.0039697937,0.0043867826,0.00058741786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026662303,0.0008506466,0.018665817,0.00040829755,0.00028826145,0.0015138478,0.0039559477,0.035795737,0.0047972286,0.88292384,0.0056757093,0.042458504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019123696,0.00024223056,0.0055059805,0.00004260124,0.00006594605,0.00023897874,0.0021114682,0.053189807,0.0006854803,0.9361793,0.0014917594,0.00005532994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020037356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015214788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014785519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001174806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001156409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049462497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125406352","doi":"","title":"On the Incentive Effects of Monitoring: Evidence from the Lab and the Field","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Field (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Intrinsic motivation; Crowding out; Task (project management); Principal–agent problem; Experimental economics; Contrast (vision); Psychology; Baseline (sea); Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Management; Monetary economics; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029839978204081956,"score_gpt":0.3094957217481794,"score_spread":0.27965574354409745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125406352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660385,0.0028959725,0.0016896222,0.00081347534,0.00008221069,0.00012093101,0.00012723572,0.00003004864,0.028201988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940333,0.0013317073,0.0016224592,0.0006485954,0.00012711404,0.00011833109,0.00013773605,0.000020828,0.0019600056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307173,0.004801315,0.0002514035,0.00073701964,0.0008792209,0.00025927534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8609695,0.09317457,0.029623454,0.010904535,0.0023762719,0.002951586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010752429,0.0007118708,0.00073706004,0.0011062741,0.0008864398,0.0011096479,0.0010447293,0.0013315026,0.007622891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033715405,0.00041238475,0.00048749658,0.000618655,0.0027543327,0.0010203613,0.0013632831,0.0009274327,0.0005776511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0654945,0.045430046,0.35971704,0.0037922782,0.002718439,0.0009862882,0.0055048,0.0036756773,0.04965397,0.03397486,0.00868325,0.4203689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028246848,0.018479474,0.93004304,0.00057954015,0.0010732948,0.0004535906,0.0016197527,0.0027279814,0.013155963,0.011584946,0.017284313,0.00017329947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014164061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011778914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010752429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065473217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004822274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056864917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125406397","doi":"","title":"Mechanism Design with Collusive Supervision","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supervisor; Collusion; Principal (computer security); Adverse selection; Stochastic game; Microeconomics; Principal–agent problem; Welfare; Economics; Mechanism design; Rent-seeking; Information asymmetry; Business; Industrial organization; Computer science; Computer security; Finance; Market economy; Political science; Corporate governance; Management","score_opus":0.0849612216292014,"score_gpt":0.3720818672712673,"score_spread":0.2871206456420659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125406397","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05766619,0.0011478543,0.91439176,0.0026188765,0.00019209701,0.00056342117,0.0001931323,0.0002500865,0.022976525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88470674,0.0009765106,0.10084644,0.0004634337,0.00025091405,0.0011497288,0.000097159704,0.00004315043,0.01146582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989502,0.0065801446,0.0004238176,0.0013140561,0.0013242911,0.00085561676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97263026,0.017305844,0.0045089247,0.003060328,0.0013805429,0.0011140783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012056329,0.0014512194,0.0019479101,0.0011107895,0.0011701933,0.003253258,0.0035586706,0.003663703,0.0090582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023303384,0.0009414627,0.0016867693,0.0012708083,0.0033544113,0.0041020773,0.0034716341,0.0027954981,0.0010971449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038671933,0.00023166754,0.0012790018,0.00036839448,0.00021133074,0.0005180592,0.0004554975,0.14212988,0.0016605024,0.8297771,0.0019408619,0.021040922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005929987,0.00032506508,0.0003325828,0.000064071835,0.00010039161,0.00028328586,0.00008302471,0.39549655,0.0006994239,0.5973429,0.004629351,0.00005030961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087290467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043111053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012056329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022727933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002466218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06376076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125416965","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3080990","title":"When do we punish people who don't?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Political science; Criminology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020650333224905892,"score_gpt":0.3192558690522152,"score_spread":0.2986055358273093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125416965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42939824,0.0041834703,0.0077248043,0.3916647,0.007827248,0.00015276148,0.00016935587,0.00014406498,0.1587353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93767357,0.0009180271,0.0017378221,0.049794998,0.0005404376,0.0000848754,0.00002496027,0.000045457833,0.0091798715],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345446,0.0037517305,0.00021783922,0.00041276318,0.0011378832,0.0010254498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96676874,0.013365309,0.0075651673,0.0024002613,0.0037559313,0.0061445134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00863834,0.00022442087,0.0005035542,0.00041878034,0.0028221644,0.0029842474,0.00063492765,0.004353833,0.0072398717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059495516,0.00018829032,0.0003556623,0.00037810695,0.0054914514,0.0026486749,0.0011673248,0.004689633,0.0015997407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011809387,0.002353108,0.24513604,0.0005557269,0.0010039008,0.0013601274,0.018440884,0.0010647252,0.0030404122,0.17063217,0.22466974,0.33056223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095234625,0.0015742062,0.19053498,0.0015936481,0.0008265791,0.004203087,0.06965325,0.005052709,0.004388775,0.5166125,0.20418887,0.00041895022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027422523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050202752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00863834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089314947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002313894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045684457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125417866","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.49318","title":"'Pocket and Pot': Hypothetical Bias in a No-Free-Riding Public Contribution Game","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public good; Free riding; Public goods game; Economics; Sample (material); Dictatorship; Investment (military); Service (business); Microeconomics; Private good; Public economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08730076961228124,"score_gpt":0.30796803846879883,"score_spread":0.2206672688565176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125417866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428125,0.00005765616,0.03816523,0.0018714092,0.000042116546,0.00027339024,0.000082083425,0.000067255976,0.016628318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916339,0.000026147989,0.00622387,0.00022694652,0.0000062106797,0.000076146716,0.00001755451,0.0000063889365,0.0017827316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942675,0.004274794,0.00018353558,0.00030545346,0.0006701995,0.00029866773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762561,0.018479688,0.0022899306,0.0014722036,0.0005194227,0.0009826989],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007964666,0.00040641634,0.0007034366,0.00032753462,0.0005702896,0.0013968652,0.0006886747,0.0013354192,0.0029588365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041788314,0.00025165518,0.00030874283,0.00021667955,0.002502362,0.0018880194,0.0009901036,0.0012816638,0.00028843756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01272189,0.0023159212,0.09734107,0.000568769,0.00045283663,0.0020300527,0.01265647,0.07132074,0.045575492,0.62202585,0.007309127,0.12568185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016931073,0.003535184,0.058688745,0.00016712009,0.00021799127,0.00097521907,0.003863533,0.44097176,0.010951951,0.46603352,0.01260341,0.00029850937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024671918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031539402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014367863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010657945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04212171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125435789","doi":"","title":"Economic Methodology: A Bibliometric Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Mainstream economics; Economic methodology; Perspective (graphical); Pluralism (philosophy); AKA; Positive economics; Field (mathematics); Social science; Citation; Philosophy and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Applied economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09945842021444136,"score_gpt":0.4026826303580388,"score_spread":0.30322421014359746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125435789","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07340951,0.111455016,0.44771665,0.03690174,0.0020220082,0.0006191415,0.008607644,0.0010526228,0.31821564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7269436,0.08603354,0.1609798,0.001978652,0.00799501,0.0013725066,0.004528397,0.00029484904,0.009873702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974189,0.014828145,0.0017138072,0.0012228128,0.007557249,0.000489075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9362931,0.0507678,0.00508135,0.002961264,0.004193964,0.0007025054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018181162,0.0009351243,0.0018096329,0.08558989,0.0018380239,0.012000344,0.0013827255,0.0020306564,0.005832521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061770197,0.0004665582,0.00090905075,0.11832653,0.0035061147,0.009747843,0.0031144784,0.0012659945,0.0014836532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003169742,0.0000822887,0.021929208,0.0023271958,0.00041716322,0.00018018934,0.0021448375,0.004559303,0.00045341472,0.7652419,0.01429045,0.18834239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023709812,0.00006918857,0.028039373,0.001243045,0.00014086632,0.0005829816,0.0037356738,0.015711188,0.00061950687,0.7434953,0.20626397,0.000075153715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023488821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019200186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98181885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032299936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030849178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096152306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125466937","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1673167","title":"Effort Provision and Communication in Teams Competing Over the Commons","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Business; Knowledge management; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009454201740235892,"score_gpt":0.3086991335739715,"score_spread":0.29924493183373563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125466937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918439,0.00007470838,0.001119076,0.00029225004,0.00002205244,0.000012397591,0.000013159174,0.0000049619007,0.006617436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998569,0.000028842745,0.00023538664,0.000030939325,0.000016689954,0.000016324148,0.000009240956,0.0000038829426,0.0010897281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457127,0.0034619686,0.00021748303,0.0004148728,0.00042840902,0.0009060986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9250485,0.05228996,0.011771375,0.0028536255,0.0013552879,0.006681281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006844973,0.00071027636,0.00088629243,0.001475936,0.0021759558,0.0047906274,0.0009372012,0.003410166,0.010187452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03793656,0.0005982663,0.00047081002,0.0010270464,0.002019721,0.0027235576,0.003600543,0.0014960548,0.0008993869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015016059,0.010320238,0.5006523,0.00087849563,0.0008856952,0.0046280734,0.077415146,0.06348593,0.02571036,0.13028948,0.006029385,0.16468886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015934441,0.0047064293,0.5584149,0.00030776556,0.00064691895,0.0011192083,0.076166354,0.10682021,0.002855963,0.24144468,0.0055687623,0.0003554176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030750628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023859777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010187452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012129898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012608104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036200106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125469774","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3339572","title":"Informational Inequity Aversion and Performance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Tournament; Inequality; Economics; Microeconomics; Differential (mechanical device); Loss aversion; Econometrics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020002981125971587,"score_gpt":0.30129900142445953,"score_spread":0.28129602029848794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125469774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97578216,0.00023411721,0.0013471302,0.0006045582,0.000024355053,0.00000773919,0.00009142343,0.000013153774,0.021895306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979709,0.00006736618,0.00014390223,0.000039918883,0.000014322008,0.0000034027971,0.00002759368,0.0000035795938,0.0017291019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940324,0.00024788053,0.000037856225,0.00008631437,0.00011481369,0.000109833316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854901,0.009192857,0.0026683623,0.0011657451,0.000412757,0.0010702708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002725335,0.0002633804,0.0003279396,0.00046590224,0.0002572261,0.002213142,0.00018520262,0.0008424886,0.011715592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016018208,0.00014986697,0.00020901796,0.0004765361,0.0006604733,0.0008702733,0.0009363841,0.0007305465,0.0007791975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008441321,0.0072582676,0.5201756,0.000595399,0.0008989597,0.0007170673,0.0024619012,0.02174799,0.014673994,0.28557974,0.0060309772,0.13141885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022850046,0.0016106634,0.67201996,0.00007569916,0.0003260853,0.0003643998,0.0014748351,0.022311613,0.0034986201,0.29518455,0.0028171916,0.00008784758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036015682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003007098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011715592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036236926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032511642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039192557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125478092","doi":"","title":"Competing for Talents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Order (exchange); Sorting; Business; Population; Quality (philosophy); Rank (graph theory); Pecking order; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.08035329562632469,"score_gpt":0.4144172328810717,"score_spread":0.334063937254747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125478092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81091905,0.0006208302,0.012729485,0.00462915,0.00015209007,0.00010763275,0.00030990088,0.00006579383,0.17046611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98589015,0.00011844429,0.00083826296,0.0003634728,0.000054348642,0.000030492321,0.000085111504,0.000007826044,0.012611824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985103,0.00042404496,0.000053790838,0.00021168982,0.0003198421,0.0004803423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99320847,0.0028023517,0.00094304985,0.0005945833,0.00066539476,0.0017861244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017468384,0.00037461522,0.00064858334,0.00071904087,0.0015558663,0.0029724215,0.00089526153,0.002157815,0.040437203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009606993,0.00016841204,0.00039648256,0.00084985275,0.0011386008,0.0013303162,0.0015308048,0.0009856485,0.0029248458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012806393,0.0014894055,0.08452277,0.0009663113,0.000422121,0.002869644,0.003176385,0.02665806,0.024435733,0.67642665,0.031152707,0.14659962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055917935,0.0016055509,0.104754806,0.00017225539,0.00033135625,0.0026684068,0.005557334,0.08392897,0.006663705,0.7303631,0.06320759,0.00018773135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015353449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014633622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040437203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013463148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007153351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1352759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125482961","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12504","title":"Managerial Discretion and Task Interdependence in Teams","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Interdependence; Task (project management); Compensation (psychology); Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Knowledge management; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.05722226220032372,"score_gpt":0.3966737028215963,"score_spread":0.3394514406212726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125482961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98940897,0.00014392985,0.001709052,0.00021564537,0.000012191513,0.00001332952,0.000018045179,0.000008694704,0.008470266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946016,0.000021510414,0.00020222213,0.00001737008,0.000008412424,0.0000062160434,0.00000868367,0.0000023051207,0.00027309218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431396,0.0032317836,0.0003326244,0.00041064937,0.001101622,0.0006094452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92846406,0.03447253,0.024400199,0.0040603112,0.003041842,0.00556108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042893747,0.00028400248,0.00036638253,0.0011822347,0.0013022858,0.0022544917,0.00048606607,0.0005451124,0.0037861443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02911827,0.00020759214,0.00028664796,0.00068185275,0.0012674067,0.001018778,0.00231044,0.0007720297,0.0003219552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014260105,0.0014802957,0.8675028,0.00025244142,0.0003523904,0.00076335284,0.011248208,0.016588422,0.007890259,0.016892394,0.0013070542,0.07429643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017777842,0.0005808791,0.9352957,0.00016727707,0.00011006589,0.00036095892,0.0059422976,0.01894928,0.0016334298,0.031885777,0.004810567,0.000085946296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016064513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001579382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042893747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013076414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009012063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022684634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125528488","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3491456","title":"Extemporaneous Coordination in Specialist Teams: The Familiarity Complementarity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Business; Psychology; Operations management; Public relations; Knowledge management; Process management; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.016854364197640144,"score_gpt":0.31222532975211975,"score_spread":0.2953709655544796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125528488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928791,0.00044539035,0.0325218,0.00093037635,0.000054080956,0.000043118784,0.00007392836,0.000051624593,0.03708885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958187,0.000053438373,0.0011347812,0.000047895177,0.000038498805,0.0000122762995,0.0000130296985,0.000005696913,0.0028757202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828124,0.0006391543,0.000070354625,0.00041748764,0.00024800235,0.0003438372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96847713,0.018213725,0.0058751768,0.003867826,0.0011503049,0.0024157122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030308608,0.0002795151,0.0007399406,0.0005220847,0.0009147487,0.0021702822,0.0008886648,0.0016946146,0.016863838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020310676,0.00035019813,0.00037950824,0.00048873475,0.0015450765,0.003541036,0.0026153403,0.0009871827,0.0010375585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053126626,0.0024838308,0.106900826,0.0010226582,0.00054678216,0.0034955898,0.008871851,0.04632628,0.027126366,0.51658547,0.0077718417,0.27355593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010331566,0.00372065,0.18727711,0.0001390168,0.00044211946,0.001884289,0.0062725674,0.06539333,0.0035694863,0.72282386,0.007255193,0.00018927807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001675696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022604805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016863838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066332234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089372194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0564152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125572070","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02288.x","title":"The Importance of Emotions for the Effectiveness of Social Punishment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Punishment (psychology); Enforcement; Dilemma; Social psychology; Social dilemma; Psychology; Norm (philosophy); Criminology; Law enforcement; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04086561205198113,"score_gpt":0.36480562562368835,"score_spread":0.3239400135717072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125572070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665341,0.00019323092,0.003493059,0.00046812554,0.000054333374,0.000034851775,0.00003940127,0.000022831975,0.029160088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884343,0.00003487953,0.0006430046,0.000043259748,0.000007975408,0.000012851914,0.000007759686,0.000008937359,0.0003979827],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830127,0.00093038275,0.0000929039,0.0002019599,0.0003322457,0.0001411242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865356,0.0074688867,0.0034255667,0.00095561816,0.00065255124,0.00096167676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018268331,0.00034553558,0.00026633107,0.00026248497,0.0004876767,0.002263623,0.00031836267,0.0009526192,0.0071574943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014509906,0.00020192814,0.00020306923,0.0001259358,0.0011036715,0.0010051572,0.00097582315,0.0012516946,0.00041983117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014999288,0.00873257,0.2503448,0.0021576276,0.0007223543,0.0017625147,0.011592181,0.016400166,0.30287826,0.14850941,0.005041355,0.23685946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008267622,0.004989565,0.7625028,0.00037799805,0.00060370285,0.0015666307,0.004520122,0.047109403,0.05607258,0.11250882,0.0086978655,0.00022366978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017372642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011475476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071574943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006098909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035891894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023944259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125578588","doi":"10.1007/s40505-014-0051-7","title":"Changes in probability distributions and the form of compensation contracts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory Bulletin","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Econometrics; Mathematics; Probability distribution; Measure (data warehouse); Mathematical economics; Order (exchange); Principal (computer security); Distribution (mathematics); Economics; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016566968962995244,"score_gpt":0.2682261996606823,"score_spread":0.25165923069768703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125578588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8911592,0.0002983647,0.08184843,0.002498532,0.000062730236,0.00009000691,0.00027434397,0.00015500272,0.02361351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991751,0.00010143443,0.005871756,0.000063769105,0.00001943509,0.000022400778,0.00006227942,0.000020124366,0.0020878857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958864,0.0020826242,0.0002888948,0.00062550715,0.000797198,0.0003194714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90440387,0.07063004,0.012151875,0.007857985,0.0032454433,0.0017108411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093436735,0.0002483816,0.00044739645,0.0011573143,0.0006001307,0.004475955,0.0011436136,0.0016346454,0.0086066695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12366864,0.00059537415,0.00037669894,0.0012123748,0.0024374397,0.005839783,0.0009534345,0.0023318212,0.0005029114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000866579,0.00070746,0.051264875,0.00013184063,0.00013267006,0.00029912204,0.002023713,0.036533635,0.006701531,0.8176506,0.0019305213,0.081757545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009526158,0.00012874199,0.051833432,0.000019975834,0.000033813365,0.00032884197,0.0006633937,0.06339783,0.0011605049,0.88074183,0.0015492778,0.000047076566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008062649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070654025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093436735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017779329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007386731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049414635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125581595","doi":"","title":"The Effects of Analyst‐Country Institutions on Biased Research: Evidence from Target Prices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Optimism; Value (mathematics); Cross country; Business; Monetary economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09482154707211984,"score_gpt":0.42745183366777295,"score_spread":0.3326302865956531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125581595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994272,0.00038969325,0.0007960378,0.00021044338,0.0000048427996,0.00001783454,0.0000676078,0.0000062062268,0.0042353277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946374,0.00011223647,0.0002445182,0.00002508663,0.0000061040387,0.0000069401726,0.000029374673,0.0000023526457,0.00010958467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889369,0.007124301,0.00059400016,0.0009409496,0.0018553,0.0005485086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72192895,0.14443636,0.1043869,0.014522235,0.008239003,0.0064864913],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010764437,0.00021845651,0.00030252198,0.0012770675,0.0007767207,0.0020409732,0.000540634,0.00064116763,0.0032050477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08816131,0.0002210192,0.00034480158,0.0014555999,0.0017611384,0.0015322238,0.002015745,0.00075010414,0.00026113255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068934663,0.00024457133,0.98201936,0.00005439095,0.00021878662,0.00008692959,0.0013993172,0.0002621201,0.00046801683,0.0011341119,0.00016517084,0.013257898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039388804,0.00020564522,0.99486333,0.00003108194,0.00011940293,0.00015554717,0.0011393039,0.0006106499,0.0009767807,0.0012157119,0.000630229,0.000012891384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023039544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026175515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068495487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085524603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056928456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125599757","doi":"","title":"Why Would Nature Give Individuals Utility Functions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Rule of thumb; Preference; Simple (philosophy); Function (biology); Subjective expected utility; Isoelastic utility; Mathematical economics; Embedding; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Algorithm; Evolutionary biology; Biology","score_opus":0.019290157149014903,"score_gpt":0.3160450413419997,"score_spread":0.2967548841929848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125599757","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13706668,0.003572074,0.41425905,0.14100222,0.0014861246,0.00012671066,0.00053347385,0.00062368426,0.30133003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397992,0.0011773143,0.030847091,0.0060003106,0.00032077444,0.00012068249,0.00007283233,0.00014485378,0.021517016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861705,0.00073236413,0.000034660363,0.0002136358,0.00021424645,0.00018799231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534875,0.0021827968,0.00037404697,0.0007908771,0.0009561394,0.00034742404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004571136,0.0005444532,0.0005165209,0.0006666903,0.0009901305,0.0030900296,0.00069789315,0.0033798842,0.00702773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023109248,0.0003338547,0.00038281086,0.00053961744,0.0037167983,0.006146327,0.00093412824,0.002044846,0.002688833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071562325,0.000037720656,0.0025524523,0.000062567124,0.000056042136,0.00007334969,0.000677387,0.0044802763,0.0004468783,0.9600697,0.0075253523,0.023946632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003203942,0.00002278692,0.0008011509,0.000026138914,0.000013754418,0.000085323714,0.00023758854,0.004503089,0.00027919695,0.9788835,0.015096439,0.000019011297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019096377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012782246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00702773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012598075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006154812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02417481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125613737","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00304.x","title":"Loyalty Rewards Facilitate Tacit Collusion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit collusion; Commit; Loyalty; Collusion; Microeconomics; Business; Profit (economics); Marketing; Economics; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.12542904191998486,"score_gpt":0.3151476960383635,"score_spread":0.18971865411837865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125613737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7939828,0.00026122373,0.15940395,0.0011416691,0.000059502854,0.00019586297,0.00019349251,0.00017824177,0.044583216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453074,0.00007676164,0.002256947,0.00007042693,0.000011031849,0.000028554929,0.000015664353,0.000005919967,0.0030040515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984114,0.0006222996,0.00005711117,0.00023746856,0.00019462414,0.00047703178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870799,0.005546312,0.004474087,0.0016381528,0.00046395272,0.00079754886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024352982,0.0008167548,0.0008402334,0.0006102656,0.0011366897,0.002451234,0.001194069,0.001587841,0.011544702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012762731,0.00043855785,0.00094064046,0.0005043323,0.0017903417,0.0027077289,0.0025065348,0.0016239455,0.00083509187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007278495,0.0006705337,0.024878722,0.00023555159,0.00034893234,0.0017401968,0.0022009963,0.3099532,0.007841053,0.59124875,0.0037366336,0.056417625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002577627,0.0005366401,0.01103665,0.00005454074,0.00016954695,0.00056669954,0.00073705526,0.62963444,0.0013637331,0.35139436,0.004112407,0.00013617116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005137827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041042594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011544702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012768522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009219755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03862089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125671986","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.269601","title":"Anonymous Single-Profile Welfarism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Anonymity; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Economics; Computer security; Welfare","score_opus":0.0959730918354107,"score_gpt":0.35058808465474534,"score_spread":0.25461499281933464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125671986","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32379523,0.00024015862,0.46672952,0.0037675316,0.0002255551,0.00024566113,0.0004190524,0.00028647206,0.20429087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713122,0.000061824365,0.01747954,0.00023397093,0.000044320197,0.00010482354,0.000061926214,0.00003431475,0.010666937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99004,0.0054784515,0.00038144892,0.001523531,0.0018040302,0.0007725302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803255,0.008449623,0.002058679,0.006785524,0.0017120223,0.00066868257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064918757,0.00036341907,0.00060432823,0.000778784,0.002673662,0.0038483997,0.00094400503,0.0012437879,0.0058849617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018249867,0.00023761262,0.0007225454,0.0006829122,0.004373696,0.0056818435,0.004493456,0.0021256458,0.0007958926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116101604,0.00004987728,0.0010112188,0.000047837228,0.00002101794,0.000114214665,0.0021287852,0.00183239,0.0009183802,0.9728689,0.0012425078,0.019648625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027462667,0.000066226414,0.0008748047,0.000035195673,0.000021241287,0.00031226795,0.00094003597,0.0117237605,0.0019686336,0.9649665,0.019024933,0.000038877813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004367093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004923107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064918757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012317525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085846987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034332693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125683143","doi":"10.1177/0022002711420971","title":"The Paradox of Revenge in Conflicts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Conflict Resolution","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Construct (python library); Welfare; Economics; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06494431798797173,"score_gpt":0.3711350868096183,"score_spread":0.3061907688216466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125683143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77378386,0.0021708226,0.07521095,0.012792588,0.00016247261,0.00008422492,0.000044974993,0.000032249125,0.13571793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349797,0.00028666065,0.0039892197,0.00024305405,0.00002111429,0.000022876351,0.0000054796055,0.000004297843,0.0019294478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969907,0.002315132,0.00007151638,0.0001411913,0.0002616559,0.00021971087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98688614,0.010641331,0.0010941405,0.00055075163,0.00035646762,0.0004711673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046866955,0.00036055894,0.00046866076,0.00047830955,0.0019554659,0.003773631,0.0008937338,0.0021397327,0.0033222528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016115503,0.00029759618,0.0005961796,0.0005985681,0.0061601633,0.0055275685,0.0024363839,0.0019358497,0.00016496127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011167925,0.0000738921,0.0008705597,0.00006933951,0.000033470176,0.00024174235,0.0022450006,0.006549338,0.0005192032,0.9815964,0.0005944219,0.0070949076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008405001,0.00010549806,0.0009209005,0.000046061752,0.000023673932,0.00027620266,0.0016101967,0.020261215,0.0005073048,0.9691385,0.006999947,0.000026446147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006350315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057034806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046866955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015683807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007841274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024785936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125715612","doi":"10.3386/w17579","title":"Laws and Norms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5311018754944059,"score_gpt":0.5772342071228249,"score_spread":0.04613233162841901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125715612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08247069,0.0058714384,0.2366574,0.052488316,0.00103183,0.0001669113,0.0004740847,0.00025099117,0.62058836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93359095,0.0026298957,0.03499085,0.00523212,0.00078485394,0.00030198935,0.00017709564,0.0001322032,0.022160053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99148965,0.0038953426,0.00044345323,0.0016985144,0.0019650497,0.00050798716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98729646,0.007609855,0.001628472,0.0018753745,0.0012232797,0.0003664876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082340455,0.00043138943,0.00059271447,0.001054261,0.0024916006,0.005711274,0.00094745925,0.0023197986,0.00543748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019895809,0.00040766093,0.00047336426,0.00088335347,0.022157088,0.0063895835,0.002667803,0.0033007858,0.0007791801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033659226,0.0000041471144,0.00019530152,0.000011608773,0.000003690761,0.000011000424,0.00035841472,0.00027124913,0.000051096238,0.9958403,0.0004600232,0.0027897602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007133599,0.000008564761,0.0003342893,0.0000402144,0.0000043991727,0.000023953053,0.00019655754,0.00055544183,0.0001038145,0.97051436,0.028202167,0.0000091264055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041048406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002173852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082340455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026038243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002548373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04354626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125733186","doi":"10.57938/12ca4d37-3d05-451f-bda9-8a6403e4dd2d","title":"Heterogeneous productivity in voluntary public good provision - an experimental analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Turnover; Public good; Productivity; Context (archaeology); Marginal product; Marginal utility; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.021004187650612065,"score_gpt":0.2800903747340331,"score_spread":0.259086187083421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125733186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99292666,0.000036843016,0.0022095144,0.0002023471,0.00002415277,0.00020475869,0.000069220856,0.00001560195,0.004310923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705076,0.000025643863,0.001386168,0.00008008799,0.000022469598,0.0005639762,0.000037766975,0.000009071537,0.00082409166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841218,0.011678796,0.00066871074,0.0009379103,0.001671247,0.00092148583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87474597,0.09427613,0.01380597,0.013832935,0.0015208779,0.0018181911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017659206,0.0005681614,0.0009804869,0.00065634656,0.0010227165,0.002483426,0.0014082695,0.0013728569,0.006140187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07715173,0.00044525194,0.00051240437,0.0006733031,0.0030919383,0.0016010604,0.0022991027,0.001891492,0.00048078367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11310139,0.17763989,0.11856782,0.0022474062,0.0017688087,0.0013562703,0.01787525,0.057143446,0.12474871,0.22413898,0.0053459248,0.15606618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03162308,0.11172941,0.23016289,0.00055751234,0.0015933423,0.0006589442,0.011704145,0.14970492,0.06845939,0.37434718,0.018839344,0.000619891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088075065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046440004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017659206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018009724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012022457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093391895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125745365","doi":"","title":"First in Village or Second in Rome","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ranking (information retrieval); Sorting; Quality (philosophy); Pecking order; Order (exchange); sort; Organizational structure; Space (punctuation); Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Political science; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.06556048133398198,"score_gpt":0.38642893263550815,"score_spread":0.3208684513015262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125745365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18105122,0.0023292615,0.0018901823,0.0099962745,0.004534997,0.00039467055,0.008636452,0.0011304795,0.7900364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1967305,0.0003758857,0.0011577301,0.0008230183,0.00036078316,0.00009366713,0.0013923106,0.00018216281,0.7988841],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997887,0.000033555185,0.000007925826,0.00005402654,0.000023361064,0.000092380535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996823,0.000021394844,0.000026931262,0.000024153831,0.00003097674,0.00021424828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020385005,0.0004336929,0.0004671886,0.0005952717,0.0034004305,0.0012315853,0.0005981497,0.0009343877,0.2166025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032526124,0.00019479326,0.00030773427,0.0005694273,0.0005313086,0.0006409416,0.0013000644,0.00088867714,0.054064747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015862281,0.0011917158,0.034665335,0.00094988133,0.0000845288,0.012358473,0.005627708,0.00062949,0.007836241,0.043338314,0.68302363,0.20870847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011749625,0.00022568328,0.03131942,0.00013728518,0.000017117734,0.0010183471,0.0026559003,0.00025433634,0.00078488386,0.0018257584,0.9616151,0.000028561637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005221535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017026186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2166025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006301134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007239356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7246076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125755607","doi":"","title":"Social Norms and Trust among Strangers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic game; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Dilemma; Norm (philosophy); Repeated game; Prisoner's dilemma; Incentive; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Game theory; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.0789062513741874,"score_gpt":0.33523035638631926,"score_spread":0.2563241050121319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125755607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874548,0.00009031507,0.000968127,0.0004033847,0.00001627313,0.000015637006,0.00004706295,0.0000058000514,0.010998742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913245,0.000023601648,0.00013880577,0.000020650432,0.000004818183,0.000006853304,0.000012997524,0.0000025635366,0.0006571801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597365,0.002533613,0.00016592063,0.00026775766,0.0008296135,0.00022954679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94310343,0.035934266,0.009652105,0.005532081,0.0030451776,0.0027329847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005156589,0.00019595122,0.00044636047,0.0007086472,0.0010979516,0.002991459,0.000352893,0.0009112757,0.004372046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04438199,0.000290043,0.000176716,0.00046739998,0.00190719,0.0014380271,0.0009624587,0.0008980994,0.00034267627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034276424,0.0030243616,0.74174756,0.0002665745,0.0006330628,0.0011617785,0.031797163,0.0034908922,0.008705847,0.127428,0.0044651492,0.07385207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000358702,0.001094712,0.81210864,0.0001054037,0.00026053528,0.00087979896,0.018740406,0.019684926,0.0030501492,0.13672066,0.0067983945,0.00019777278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043398347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004399716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005156589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012217503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049601373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027270973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125773732","doi":"","title":"Secure Implementation in Production Economies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Impossibility; Outcome (game theory); Mathematical economics; Mechanism design; Best response; Computer science; Epsilon-equilibrium; Game theory; Strategic dominance; Social choice theory; Function (biology); Mechanism (biology); Strategy; Solution concept; Production (economics); Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.06685339477087714,"score_gpt":0.3775728427619928,"score_spread":0.31071944799111567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125773732","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08017348,0.0012907793,0.7810483,0.004317531,0.00011787527,0.00031144012,0.00024282579,0.0004482362,0.1320496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90879315,0.000798619,0.073476836,0.00037607187,0.00012404444,0.00056710956,0.00014047137,0.000082298735,0.015641406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411523,0.002513337,0.00043358427,0.0009965408,0.0013861663,0.00055507437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303883,0.0032717255,0.00081606366,0.00209822,0.0005481243,0.00022706873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045622615,0.00080467266,0.0010737246,0.0010924522,0.0013327708,0.0043793023,0.00095682614,0.0025256695,0.00855036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011582957,0.0006041627,0.0014594404,0.0012736474,0.00740491,0.008326469,0.00458178,0.0030366366,0.0013388539],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056523586,0.000008595866,0.00014299568,0.00001936883,0.000006089792,0.000031211315,0.000067082496,0.0019005955,0.00009832805,0.9943885,0.00019685115,0.0031347359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142974395,0.000014620074,0.000087445645,0.000012314788,0.0000034344791,0.000037133752,0.000029571716,0.005313532,0.00015695876,0.99112356,0.0032023373,0.0000047660014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085263734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038377166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00855036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002365003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015405774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028603733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125797944","doi":"","title":"Failure of the Becker-Degroot-Marschak Mechanism in Inexperienced Subjects: New Tests of the Game Form Misconception Hypothesis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Victoria; Camosun College","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Economics; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical economics; Task (project management); Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07592720752415208,"score_gpt":0.3688246051986475,"score_spread":0.2928973976744954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125797944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855274,0.0001921408,0.007588837,0.0007383884,0.000028245846,0.00008710744,0.00017704994,0.00003005711,0.005630742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995773,0.00007602153,0.0025940626,0.00036280122,0.000030261084,0.00012864523,0.00013364313,0.00001388783,0.00088762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99052,0.005633697,0.00066143536,0.0013263781,0.0015163966,0.00034202603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7862952,0.15113764,0.02343178,0.03460657,0.0028342493,0.0016946428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022821179,0.0005557744,0.0013100985,0.00058753404,0.0009156544,0.0019144352,0.0016693638,0.0018903627,0.009617979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.110593274,0.0004229558,0.0005120062,0.00066127564,0.0032400277,0.002667595,0.0014123928,0.0027410097,0.00088570657],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028019864,0.017588055,0.4921866,0.0015502846,0.0013872541,0.0012731228,0.023634784,0.0111645395,0.029085342,0.12066571,0.0074066133,0.26603785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038596538,0.009154635,0.52401716,0.0002912479,0.0006610397,0.0019082088,0.0076499283,0.0823244,0.021129461,0.33728242,0.01129951,0.00042231206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009678837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000629395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022821179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006219225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007531924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12069136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125854747","doi":"","title":"Do Wealth Differences Affect Fairness Considerations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Welfare economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09157171985244918,"score_gpt":0.4128425497678202,"score_spread":0.32127082991537104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125854747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747372,0.0003645977,0.0011306312,0.0007185832,0.000029416507,0.000013795735,0.000069338,0.0000069411003,0.022929491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984363,0.00005709849,0.00012427777,0.00006039977,0.0000085719275,0.0000044958188,0.0000140131915,0.0000031564866,0.0012917243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901795,0.00045050285,0.000040555427,0.00012997852,0.00014692987,0.00021397628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99049956,0.004846431,0.0026137093,0.0007844516,0.00039594967,0.00085994956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003152488,0.00016872578,0.00033335408,0.00044826604,0.0006318854,0.0018479518,0.00021661118,0.00072718953,0.011947401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017748881,0.00017078644,0.00022197845,0.00031035504,0.00087949104,0.0011295719,0.0008857036,0.0006513114,0.0008171371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006493303,0.0015473707,0.7181399,0.00029419715,0.0005160746,0.00067520945,0.010854006,0.00625803,0.010824467,0.10357995,0.003662165,0.1371553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032882678,0.0012550328,0.88311327,0.000103681516,0.00023787633,0.0002750271,0.0060658413,0.0050157816,0.0026391991,0.09175535,0.009150285,0.0000597138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022288423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025863845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011947401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005569904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003529921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039968014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125879886","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.05.004","title":"Belief formation under signal correlation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Kyoto University; Seoul National University","keywords":"Neglect; Correlation; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Variance (accounting); SIGNAL (programming language); Statistics; Social psychology; Positive correlation; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03303881041886576,"score_gpt":0.3153874025557272,"score_spread":0.2823485921368615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125879886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309094,0.00009227597,0.057043612,0.0011823265,0.000027396021,0.000068547524,0.000104613944,0.000058212157,0.010513608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956963,0.00005044051,0.0029094745,0.000055861372,0.000018146864,0.00003768245,0.000029153027,0.000006718747,0.0011961596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952362,0.0030316664,0.00016238983,0.00052101,0.00058602705,0.00046270812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89259875,0.0899026,0.008704485,0.005129102,0.0022723645,0.0013927348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00982916,0.00060383166,0.0011379301,0.00080789416,0.0005632478,0.003580277,0.0008206024,0.0016244535,0.0037967202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073657654,0.0007218809,0.00056605396,0.0007180345,0.0026001562,0.0031544126,0.0016114096,0.0019725056,0.00027163615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020925116,0.0006765551,0.013528876,0.00018054387,0.00023254387,0.00024961168,0.0013169245,0.09251677,0.0052122367,0.8616698,0.0011485077,0.021175144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046728185,0.00034715937,0.008573504,0.000023535147,0.00010428555,0.00011325911,0.000371639,0.5358004,0.001830553,0.4520001,0.00030776934,0.000060439084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022060028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011286723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00982916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016616264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016579807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051982224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125999496","doi":"10.1111/caje.12190","title":"Disclosure policy in Tullock contests with asymmetric stochastic entry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Ministry of Education - Singapore","keywords":"CONTEST; Competition (biology); Balance (ability); Economics; Microeconomics; Public economics; Econometrics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09172961729927048,"score_gpt":0.23325935540843418,"score_spread":0.1415297381091637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125999496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150898,0.00026171128,0.061438378,0.0010191665,0.000044514793,0.00013286747,0.00011467445,0.000095233154,0.021803683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970476,0.00003881157,0.0017165156,0.000050125607,0.000013319218,0.000025730087,0.000011890046,0.0000056445974,0.001090432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914688,0.0048848386,0.00039679778,0.0007609361,0.0008181543,0.0016706097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95779663,0.029089915,0.006999928,0.0029677886,0.0011275143,0.0020182123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010029916,0.0005747544,0.0016694386,0.0006379255,0.001129188,0.0038793578,0.0012215478,0.0017814797,0.0055144387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03618069,0.00043481676,0.00048414525,0.00046418543,0.002442807,0.0029106624,0.0026511073,0.0016555508,0.00049964554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002362969,0.0009951863,0.009848785,0.00037266602,0.00012123989,0.00071173714,0.0012048532,0.14367251,0.0128105795,0.7912439,0.002117661,0.034537867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053732365,0.0007941216,0.005020966,0.00011221392,0.00006439437,0.00029224815,0.0008127354,0.3968694,0.0046880934,0.58797723,0.002694701,0.00013666054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009653699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001065899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010029916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016396778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015796346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053043902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126020388","doi":"","title":"When Herding and Contrarianism Foster Market Efficiency : A Financial Trading Experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Herding; Herd behavior; Irrational number; Economics; Boom; Information cascade; Loss aversion; Asset (computer security); Econometrics; Financial market; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Market efficiency; Risk aversion (psychology); Efficient-market hypothesis; Expected utility hypothesis; Finance; Stock market; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06841145724035191,"score_gpt":0.3109428824340457,"score_spread":0.2425314251936938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126020388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975222,0.000029504357,0.00040616578,0.00013342516,0.000014439864,0.00005912952,0.000030916024,0.000014723541,0.0017895828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562705,0.000054632594,0.0021394098,0.00025222133,0.00002179793,0.0002293807,0.000057596528,0.000015582826,0.001602275],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990771,0.00032802892,0.00010901952,0.00019044029,0.00015644707,0.00013892441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900309,0.005365069,0.0019135034,0.0014607634,0.00017549073,0.001054313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030193727,0.00055439776,0.00062321126,0.00040313936,0.0005712667,0.0015901468,0.00065421825,0.0017172096,0.0056991507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009387289,0.00043357548,0.00028305285,0.0002341193,0.0014220251,0.001559708,0.000945925,0.0014874849,0.0004927405],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06295371,0.104094066,0.1159692,0.0009743675,0.0009498412,0.0017398344,0.006704835,0.005902901,0.5515075,0.035770413,0.0048771184,0.10855623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018726923,0.18386811,0.37887222,0.00036243215,0.0012864299,0.0024606772,0.0033752844,0.07154096,0.1839602,0.13991624,0.015116106,0.00051446597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027737647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024754799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056991507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028252468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002732294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019065559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126024015","doi":"","title":"Gift exchange within a firm: Evidence from a field experiment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Productivity; Sowing; Incentive; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Workforce; Labour economics; Tree planting; Demographic economics; Agroforestry; Psychology; Microeconomics; Horticulture; Biology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10050095001383261,"score_gpt":0.4203078434260809,"score_spread":0.3198068934122483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126024015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970299,0.000079977704,0.00078523793,0.00023794235,0.000015999873,0.000096772936,0.00009991819,0.000016075339,0.0016382128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969523,0.00010329279,0.0014609677,0.0003247403,0.000024518187,0.00016398398,0.00012640016,0.0000063376806,0.00083735614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487877,0.0034309942,0.00028974537,0.0006562167,0.0004898543,0.00025449684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8372959,0.12594448,0.020226078,0.011218074,0.0019226808,0.0033926957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011938122,0.0004924121,0.00097172015,0.0005821172,0.0011464194,0.0013756682,0.001303826,0.0021150773,0.0046310103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034341432,0.0005059159,0.00040407528,0.00049557444,0.002276441,0.0017694042,0.0010902747,0.0017130018,0.00056188536],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05462113,0.14260386,0.54901505,0.0022160115,0.0019149872,0.0029831666,0.012025235,0.0069678673,0.09078876,0.013859529,0.0084711285,0.11453334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009123351,0.07173385,0.84289837,0.00036209563,0.0011497054,0.0013844824,0.0074149864,0.020496927,0.021187019,0.014389866,0.00948063,0.00037871956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024667142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025821233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011938122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088237517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005048508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063135564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126102119","doi":"","title":"Cooperation and framing effects in provision point mechanisms: Experimental evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Public good; Public economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Engineering; Persuasion","score_opus":0.06995065222693517,"score_gpt":0.39197583513709094,"score_spread":0.3220251829101558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126102119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674557,0.00095134845,0.014314493,0.00060205744,0.00008033777,0.00020641176,0.00008331068,0.000037842732,0.016268533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99397475,0.00034929812,0.00457394,0.00015637609,0.00005046474,0.00019124037,0.000040334035,0.000010829784,0.00065271294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98799384,0.00806041,0.0005390344,0.0013138822,0.001659658,0.00043323368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8445231,0.11840931,0.017778838,0.015085084,0.0022728138,0.0019308844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01951991,0.0010923966,0.00079651433,0.0010804706,0.00086899055,0.0013054059,0.0012557864,0.0018983876,0.008302827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050731294,0.0006773191,0.0006193473,0.00064009824,0.004080399,0.0019215845,0.0022213133,0.0014117938,0.0006134482],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022949701,0.036230464,0.17967609,0.006309776,0.002557003,0.0012179285,0.015291886,0.016682073,0.14170346,0.23326612,0.0047380747,0.3393775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077329637,0.043821853,0.40889305,0.0014074107,0.0031966616,0.0024668316,0.0066822525,0.052435745,0.08819275,0.3606558,0.023813909,0.0007007493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046512013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002893997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01951991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059871696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041773825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103232384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126102699","doi":"10.1086/688178","title":"Politicians' Luck of the Draw: Evidence from the Spanish Christmas Lottery","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aaltodoc (Aalto University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Lottery; Luck; Status quo; Happiness; Voting; Economics; Preference; Public economics; Advertising; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Business; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03791000987834946,"score_gpt":0.268821884392943,"score_spread":0.23091187451459355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126102699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98760206,0.00040438262,0.00021787403,0.0006490587,0.000032740114,0.000011753215,0.00029998107,0.0000044439435,0.010777666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981675,0.00015474609,0.000062252,0.00012377845,0.00003939251,0.000005933998,0.00030537744,0.0000071337663,0.001133689],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975606,0.0013755788,0.000097287426,0.0002997167,0.00035820113,0.00030863174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780552,0.011521683,0.0058178585,0.0021110652,0.0015320086,0.00096217426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005745982,0.00018193344,0.00071386405,0.000704265,0.00087380176,0.0015376938,0.00062291644,0.000777626,0.011322361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017620666,0.00020656758,0.00031352678,0.0012332891,0.0014571992,0.00044940156,0.00092453224,0.0008675168,0.0021883536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01028674,0.0022548384,0.9076485,0.00054319185,0.0008323963,0.00055049005,0.0044682254,0.002223852,0.0018327492,0.00877239,0.0144178895,0.046168786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035067517,0.00028566693,0.9862996,0.000040662122,0.00013313018,0.00007824565,0.0029557112,0.0011453254,0.00036340285,0.0017553032,0.006562615,0.000029660658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01621579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02179424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01621579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006436838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037170615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037877023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126125600","doi":"","title":"Gender Differences in Repeated Competition: Evidence from School Math Contests","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Competition (biology); Incentive; Period (music); Psychology; Shot (pellet); Task (project management); One shot; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Sociology; Biology; Management","score_opus":0.0482617008854249,"score_gpt":0.31237850315217824,"score_spread":0.2641168022667533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126125600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961306,0.00016950308,0.00018814368,0.00007561108,0.000010990636,0.000008492598,0.00008150084,0.000004076927,0.003330985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989536,0.00005498141,0.00011849206,0.00005007852,0.000014848286,0.000010327745,0.00008257135,0.000005047618,0.0007101548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984805,0.00067006197,0.00008530117,0.00028772897,0.00030891428,0.00016748626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97406715,0.01298328,0.00733533,0.00232873,0.00092220126,0.002363385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025754634,0.00026322703,0.0005353844,0.0006095576,0.00045022072,0.0009349007,0.0005046442,0.00081049657,0.01131048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142958015,0.00032099313,0.00021368494,0.00040881793,0.001219867,0.00044479358,0.0007825822,0.00046780426,0.00086223765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008649876,0.00403417,0.89120406,0.0003409726,0.0004066483,0.0007215747,0.005201585,0.0007002278,0.04221195,0.004659381,0.0018881141,0.039981432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009515604,0.0010773711,0.9942755,0.000015302594,0.000027264534,0.00023422754,0.0005772926,0.0004407679,0.0011386896,0.0012728265,0.00082212704,0.000023420798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016726038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021178953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01131048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002494303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025106204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037837327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126127372","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2703385","title":"Voluntary Contributions to a Mutual Insurance Pool","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Context (archaeology); Microeconomics; Turnover; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.02184929590107329,"score_gpt":0.34190164588275773,"score_spread":0.3200523499816844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126127372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92636824,0.00019346207,0.016398171,0.0012933011,0.00006981019,0.00032946875,0.00015863948,0.00017886976,0.055010136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98190826,0.00002826218,0.001763891,0.00005180365,0.000042489322,0.000075019394,0.000029140081,0.000009766067,0.01609144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589705,0.0019058393,0.00018660464,0.0004897432,0.0007588355,0.0007618542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874515,0.0048743496,0.0018861211,0.002610393,0.00083651993,0.002341171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006798359,0.00059740455,0.0009916963,0.0010017806,0.002327313,0.0030404227,0.0016773863,0.0028840208,0.012687144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021148792,0.00045127576,0.00060352904,0.0005312377,0.001495946,0.0026042254,0.0049341954,0.0013506821,0.0012567071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038746009,0.0024391308,0.04001125,0.00029279882,0.0002793248,0.0014876699,0.004758592,0.016938427,0.017434906,0.79850125,0.013006798,0.10097523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015127248,0.00379962,0.051199794,0.0002588526,0.00069227576,0.0018274712,0.004219761,0.14435492,0.010480598,0.7102154,0.07124344,0.00019511735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084802136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013317321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012687144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011066451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029314305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04244274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126131485","doi":"10.1111/iere.12151","title":"BUBBLES, CRASHES, AND ENDOGENOUS UNCERTAINTY IN LINKED ASSET AND PRODUCT MARKETS*","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dividend; Asset (computer security); Product market; Economics; Replicate; Profit (economics); Financial economics; Business; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.058990245523264526,"score_gpt":0.3404501426556532,"score_spread":0.28145989713238867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126131485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903858,0.0006645394,0.00553116,0.00029468813,0.000014238061,0.000043125277,0.00007471945,0.000024168376,0.0029674754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975521,0.0003135279,0.001501345,0.00010099038,0.000016799911,0.000053495158,0.00008399091,0.000007668299,0.00037015084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991297,0.00046401907,0.000056621466,0.00010138729,0.00017081253,0.00007757637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693319,0.021851005,0.0061909216,0.0015393582,0.0004699644,0.0006169347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031929228,0.0002933552,0.00043093957,0.00047197723,0.0002324522,0.00086457195,0.00037210595,0.0007469043,0.00419789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021454899,0.00028215913,0.00027180297,0.00029583692,0.0011549635,0.0018545637,0.00085354573,0.00087946915,0.0001648465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014919372,0.013856142,0.33521038,0.0021330342,0.0013480021,0.0018197161,0.006788327,0.03197397,0.09178117,0.20966765,0.00671157,0.2837907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013379698,0.008103806,0.5402795,0.00021362414,0.00046595634,0.001600118,0.0026322405,0.08603542,0.020432586,0.3324687,0.006151427,0.00027866755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088869623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007244877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00419789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042296125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030561484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016885936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127913862","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008342","title":"Steady steps versus sudden shifts: Cooperation in (a)symmetric linear and step-level social dilemmas","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social dilemma; Dilemma; Endowment; Asymmetry; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.12608948589994914,"score_gpt":0.3899755030676575,"score_spread":0.2638860171677083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127913862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942637,0.0000199505,0.0042299395,0.00007005886,0.0000040911154,0.000016779797,0.00000559774,0.0000050059425,0.0013848153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859256,0.000008043586,0.0012396929,0.000016429098,0.0000013299543,0.0000109730245,0.0000029695748,7.726066e-7,0.00012729339],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976992,0.001607436,0.000095316296,0.00015490984,0.00028899513,0.00015421498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820617,0.012781299,0.00299467,0.0007731281,0.00046231234,0.0009268981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003839557,0.00026794456,0.0003655653,0.00036103014,0.00033071128,0.0011912442,0.00044865996,0.00068716484,0.0020406933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013803257,0.00015342291,0.00026676207,0.00014429756,0.0020370018,0.0010401912,0.0014033032,0.0006086746,0.00019133369],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010710918,0.004081403,0.10912656,0.0019526449,0.00085387303,0.0024627782,0.009517338,0.18383001,0.3242019,0.22573192,0.002034362,0.12549627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011962554,0.0059447316,0.11909233,0.00016916692,0.00021682655,0.0013658189,0.008433598,0.37286893,0.061424542,0.42621973,0.0027953861,0.00027269666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019023857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002813232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003839557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048596578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040474048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020305753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128378487","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3680063","title":"Laws and Norms with (Un)Observable Actions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Observable; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03596546746462437,"score_gpt":0.294931717904797,"score_spread":0.25896625044017263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128378487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4817316,0.0004747571,0.39960647,0.007426617,0.00043233705,0.00023480652,0.0006324522,0.0002168834,0.10924412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96793324,0.00020932192,0.022889528,0.00031494373,0.00027136697,0.00021366366,0.00015066529,0.000032157608,0.0079851365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98768055,0.0057334974,0.00077726354,0.002441088,0.002442647,0.0009249734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9219368,0.050657522,0.012648336,0.009594381,0.0034836605,0.0016793308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008731745,0.00077996746,0.0009970583,0.0012294704,0.001170651,0.005604291,0.001684763,0.002850205,0.006350962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04606182,0.0007649824,0.0011395753,0.001068288,0.009309072,0.0101344725,0.0021292383,0.0034277434,0.00042617662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028848315,0.00006713444,0.0009331772,0.000028669001,0.000015968075,0.000071081224,0.00045857328,0.0018538729,0.00016918124,0.9933389,0.00022308597,0.0028115392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027670649,0.000023645827,0.0005908682,0.0000076205542,0.000010617045,0.000039978535,0.00009519904,0.0073290598,0.00013993111,0.99120116,0.0005254932,0.000008785067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028120913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019531604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008731745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014608838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017874474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0461784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128846824","doi":"10.1086/727513","title":"The Effect of Manager Gender and Performance Feedback: Experimental Evidence from India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Development and Cultural Change","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Management; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08657638724302943,"score_gpt":0.32441447540079643,"score_spread":0.237838088157767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128846824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786025,0.00004336679,0.000116246956,0.00007258001,0.000005268128,0.00002807085,0.000034715707,0.0000031287668,0.001836362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841416,0.00008945825,0.00034049287,0.00010440632,0.000008110846,0.000048440455,0.00005453344,0.000004112082,0.00093630777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657637,0.0022394552,0.0001801076,0.00028263248,0.00039504614,0.00032644952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95769584,0.032579497,0.00522185,0.002864447,0.0008492501,0.0007891554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004719845,0.00039536803,0.00037119078,0.00045403797,0.0009959129,0.0012060669,0.0009520993,0.0005621784,0.0035153383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014352448,0.00031656577,0.00038645227,0.00062164105,0.002411698,0.0004570719,0.00087371893,0.00079322746,0.00045665944],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08558899,0.074730456,0.56307423,0.0019072437,0.0015909697,0.0012152813,0.042448983,0.004728243,0.07171103,0.009549938,0.003808352,0.13964623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037881841,0.032973707,0.9051053,0.00016209288,0.0012540305,0.00024454462,0.017009184,0.0036815833,0.026566125,0.0031815388,0.0058620507,0.00017168572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014930161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014256668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014930161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013006942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011191767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02968651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129051990","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/wgtz9","title":"Knowledge Attributions and Lottery Cases: A Review and New Evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Ticket; Attribution; Denial; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Computer security; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4402258415314432,"score_gpt":0.5071420795348951,"score_spread":0.06691623800345192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129051990","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033932584,0.9982035,0.00018301452,0.00028508474,0.00004889254,0.000008960599,0.000021824242,0.000004115357,0.00090527843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004547462,0.9945633,0.00028114129,0.00030793896,0.00009467994,0.00002665578,0.000038073158,0.0000031847874,0.0001376134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965507,0.0013405187,0.00057619286,0.00052555575,0.0009178294,0.00008926395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493149,0.04478962,0.0032253545,0.0007095472,0.0016204511,0.00034013292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006276326,0.00089775806,0.002741711,0.007313076,0.0005601408,0.0025642016,0.00199435,0.0026772106,0.005694659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0322611,0.00078357547,0.0013692434,0.0072926083,0.0035176103,0.004525851,0.0015397047,0.002118889,0.0009562287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021256719,0.00014325234,0.0018098131,0.087957986,0.00082235987,0.0001694646,0.000457161,0.00034572292,0.00015531278,0.014825507,0.010380312,0.88272053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019216807,0.00039640637,0.027005473,0.22664279,0.003072259,0.003723638,0.001965734,0.000481597,0.0008933778,0.051457994,0.6839241,0.0002444638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028793528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038338015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007313076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019562228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032875782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033192754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129242113","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2020.3814","title":"Bounded Rationality in Strategic Decisions: Undershooting in a Resource Pool-Choice Dilemma","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bounded rationality; Dilemma; Resource (disambiguation); Normative; Seekers; Function (biology); Benchmark (surveying); Economics; Rationality; Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.13192691624929845,"score_gpt":0.38811223863132666,"score_spread":0.2561853223820282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129242113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6668033,0.0006319054,0.27078995,0.0052735102,0.000085380634,0.0002598216,0.000053192256,0.00005515396,0.056047834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814106,0.00012222258,0.01011999,0.00023466564,0.000020740783,0.00010845113,0.000009133471,0.00000750567,0.0012362838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823682,0.013650573,0.0004428832,0.0009731005,0.0017503127,0.0008149093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9529541,0.038274556,0.0043655178,0.0021153581,0.0011366634,0.001153747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016891545,0.0007068568,0.0011140874,0.0008470321,0.0011795784,0.0031662574,0.0010346698,0.0016298014,0.0016792495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04335674,0.00033646537,0.0006731158,0.00070933264,0.008688458,0.0039417753,0.0023526913,0.002173151,0.00019656161],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047153863,0.00021240169,0.0074005825,0.00018213793,0.00015838971,0.00066292984,0.0042651445,0.09447903,0.0027217641,0.86461294,0.00095243606,0.023880627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001153568,0.00014781412,0.0019414874,0.000045585202,0.00002370192,0.00011092506,0.0008959966,0.10939883,0.0006729681,0.88453466,0.0020819504,0.000030758772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018879871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011259688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016891545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002073874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021725274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089332044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129817335","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3745282","title":"Do Performance-Contingent Incentives Help or Hinder Divergent Thinking?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Public economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03586758148832879,"score_gpt":0.30583808940219315,"score_spread":0.26997050791386434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129817335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715256,0.0007548701,0.0036495025,0.003320656,0.00017204392,0.000048328115,0.00006129426,0.00005026594,0.020417403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962226,0.00026519303,0.0021205521,0.00033618388,0.000046935857,0.000030560153,0.000023268862,0.000014943886,0.00093979563],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980414,0.0010729595,0.00011540684,0.00018192234,0.00030751713,0.00028076363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95646137,0.029619742,0.007283493,0.0022694601,0.0009148319,0.0034511157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005322349,0.00046560258,0.00047907274,0.0003659138,0.0004719952,0.0016515268,0.00074263243,0.0017616651,0.0095642675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046151143,0.00032181985,0.0002570155,0.0003204247,0.0011439442,0.002236762,0.0011252863,0.0013318546,0.000834477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022496277,0.016108923,0.15465523,0.002083129,0.0007707144,0.0008623969,0.004946625,0.008690498,0.043913573,0.17507382,0.006514406,0.5638843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0093530575,0.009036004,0.31475776,0.0009309187,0.0010236648,0.0010790748,0.0051310346,0.032550383,0.020093562,0.58300763,0.022764912,0.0002719268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003015924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005199465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095642675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035246482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012771782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031995714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129966876","doi":"","title":"Motivating Bureaucrats Through Social Recognition: External Validity — A Tale of Two States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Social recognition; Bureaucracy; Intervention (counseling); External validity; Psychological intervention; State (computer science); Field (mathematics); Public economics; Resource (disambiguation); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Politics; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.11800855087469107,"score_gpt":0.41700750357853344,"score_spread":0.29899895270384236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129966876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92177707,0.000999001,0.028122678,0.012449669,0.0006355258,0.0012020713,0.00037760244,0.000092915,0.03434352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947431,0.00009031697,0.0027210051,0.0011058704,0.00006381642,0.0005622723,0.00010022217,0.000024794877,0.000588668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9014202,0.078441806,0.0025227133,0.008238118,0.007473355,0.0019038809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7057091,0.20559666,0.026242323,0.044464197,0.015417969,0.002569769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10635657,0.00070553203,0.0012952418,0.00208034,0.0046217134,0.004430668,0.0023028795,0.0021775,0.005600697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19295985,0.00058052863,0.0015819586,0.0017582439,0.019873992,0.005582241,0.011027686,0.0033746792,0.00035061585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056160875,0.0028502666,0.6883151,0.001044765,0.0022735482,0.0003582629,0.03307605,0.004287668,0.0021103204,0.14122853,0.0047540567,0.11408547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010839168,0.0056996625,0.69354117,0.0021561142,0.0019713857,0.00030185794,0.03708609,0.025082517,0.0066823824,0.20078245,0.025173131,0.00043937375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008677708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004812488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10635657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003852197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035535155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.562474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130276747","doi":"","title":"Do Religious Contexts Elicit More Trust and Altruism? Decision-Making Scenario Experiments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Prayer; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology; Theology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021054405991684046,"score_gpt":0.34128971830852517,"score_spread":0.3202353123168411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130276747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948355,0.000029185994,0.0017452113,0.00016385067,0.00002803264,0.0006458803,0.0001463012,0.000012122707,0.0023939558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988821,0.00006822268,0.006664018,0.0002462533,0.000038566333,0.0022585366,0.00025529656,0.000006709184,0.0016413678],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962239,0.0027832452,0.00021660932,0.00030252145,0.00028465374,0.00018907328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629294,0.027601613,0.005068487,0.0019594696,0.00049430947,0.0019467118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048145275,0.00075951027,0.0005436668,0.00023787828,0.00066862337,0.0013546583,0.00084254437,0.0018050504,0.009331891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019373478,0.00034615048,0.0002962962,0.0002436295,0.0008565897,0.0010150466,0.0009035626,0.0016005909,0.00061491015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0929615,0.23171997,0.21370018,0.0040659425,0.0015212413,0.004427946,0.024059052,0.060687613,0.2030003,0.059619598,0.009289391,0.09494732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03525273,0.16324599,0.36469385,0.0004525028,0.0010058399,0.0017500034,0.011989756,0.18699373,0.0702542,0.13050881,0.03295222,0.0009003149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002836461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042140615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009331891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004288087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035099947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03121823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131152344","doi":"10.5296/ieb.v7i1.18318","title":"Getting Published in Top Journals: Is the Deck Stacked Against You?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Economics and Business","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Field (mathematics); Library science; Political science; Data science; Regional science; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03651585599458626,"score_gpt":0.33879601051838854,"score_spread":0.3022801545238023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131152344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9067247,0.012103221,0.0029951432,0.038798746,0.001398039,0.00007748595,0.0031043736,0.00009004065,0.034708213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98718643,0.0035527742,0.0012608885,0.0022492255,0.0024384258,0.000033705724,0.00082695746,0.00006473767,0.0023868626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841591,0.004447525,0.0023040953,0.0018892302,0.005899727,0.0013003212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48752534,0.28807217,0.1558787,0.0155965695,0.03359123,0.019335972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019554615,0.00029423335,0.0011273753,0.008481224,0.002524753,0.012103612,0.0011499117,0.0014834047,0.011242578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20219555,0.00024122934,0.0005229705,0.017977176,0.0029885052,0.008331128,0.0022855243,0.001955691,0.0030452628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005315643,0.00028360597,0.84134984,0.0010549824,0.0004037246,0.00036908308,0.0065144366,0.0006824767,0.0012159843,0.0133788455,0.019675422,0.114539966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006635485,0.00050251087,0.9049237,0.0005346521,0.0002980928,0.0008958538,0.01734778,0.0016958751,0.002244441,0.024966588,0.046403896,0.00012040995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019982592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036881194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012885586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002501981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10341591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132289252","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2022.02.004","title":"Making sense of monkey business: Re-examining tests of animal rationality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Maximization; Bounded rationality; Test (biology); Ecological rationality; Utility maximization; Statistical hypothesis testing; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10228400457588395,"score_gpt":0.3685863646561372,"score_spread":0.26630236008025326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132289252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98259705,0.00016017805,0.0033797054,0.0010139077,0.00003010486,0.000020637244,0.000068048605,0.000024591738,0.012705754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643123,0.00009775321,0.0017661598,0.00023497368,0.000016206131,0.000044186432,0.00007477499,0.000022967472,0.001311881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865156,0.00067514036,0.00006779586,0.00025077283,0.00025784472,0.00009690252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651249,0.02114727,0.0048928196,0.0071359905,0.0010526198,0.0006463633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030022343,0.0006483352,0.0004727012,0.0005944953,0.00065911975,0.002211758,0.0007469759,0.0016604,0.0053127497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035813775,0.00027561001,0.0004092523,0.00046053805,0.0036264877,0.0027828498,0.0016190051,0.0016900308,0.0006812133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056501357,0.0034628245,0.37178832,0.0011931186,0.0012158741,0.0031889433,0.028307578,0.02775828,0.12288622,0.16123888,0.0071036187,0.26620626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058830326,0.0041851257,0.3487973,0.00039706685,0.0007768629,0.002417598,0.018333947,0.12017879,0.066704325,0.40676054,0.03062004,0.00024006101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025046233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020711883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053127497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051901984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068000454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017772913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132291840","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3390202","title":"Self-Confidence and Reactions to Subjective Performance Evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Punishment (psychology); Incentive; Psychology; Social psychology; Sample (material); Perception; Population; Contrast (vision); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.016641110880052955,"score_gpt":0.33119839358821096,"score_spread":0.314557282708158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132291840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99727947,0.000050683197,0.0001061736,0.000038624137,0.000008422906,0.0000071494637,0.000033857115,0.0000032705234,0.002472316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991353,0.000035228048,0.000079952384,0.000029690547,0.0000115158045,0.000009010535,0.000062794556,0.0000042092884,0.00063231017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848723,0.00070781494,0.00012816279,0.0001244079,0.00038525276,0.00016706399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94616383,0.029898258,0.01431442,0.0024077122,0.0027983552,0.0044174683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028309003,0.00037833824,0.00032259242,0.0008437181,0.00029410823,0.0022011676,0.0002615245,0.0011443343,0.0036456732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030619463,0.00024992833,0.00041597747,0.0005095893,0.0006447346,0.0005762431,0.00072253647,0.0016387509,0.00064066437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032174743,0.0019493038,0.9642134,0.00010403422,0.0002982224,0.00030452805,0.0050160466,0.0011377282,0.007055815,0.0008986851,0.00030551094,0.015499236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044336608,0.0009089056,0.9944944,0.00002216284,0.00005681023,0.00016549323,0.0014827003,0.0011112004,0.00091805536,0.0004981342,0.00026069328,0.000037085945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001200715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009933757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036456732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003032696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023027914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014971435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132369220","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3791643","title":"Honesty in the City","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027602670061134597,"score_gpt":0.3308831019292823,"score_spread":0.3032804318681477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132369220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6521228,0.00087713415,0.0029898824,0.045240197,0.0003461464,0.000043730237,0.00017035136,0.00002745514,0.2981823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929953,0.00010892405,0.000076099575,0.00040487992,0.00006544458,0.0000052264395,0.000014916299,0.0000053291665,0.006323785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961456,0.0018038009,0.000111477486,0.00048276223,0.00065430603,0.00080205715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851151,0.0063756295,0.003672956,0.0016653123,0.0015977913,0.001573134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030229175,0.00016318812,0.00057044154,0.00078485144,0.0044867997,0.006575774,0.0004942411,0.002974836,0.012375925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015035939,0.00027331902,0.00033406448,0.00094882055,0.006217058,0.0032052074,0.0030789434,0.0031548159,0.0007427889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004273437,0.00019398805,0.045464143,0.00008778065,0.00013961525,0.0005050777,0.011830092,0.0021501917,0.00044801788,0.90078896,0.016567342,0.021397375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000247774,0.00023111182,0.12945838,0.00015281123,0.00020108758,0.00027610522,0.035874106,0.006549367,0.001105512,0.74082327,0.08492921,0.00015127845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013470962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012141661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013470962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003135645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002767476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041401565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132972018","doi":"10.3386/w28456","title":"Sticky Price for Declining Risk? Business Strategies with “Behavioral” Customers in the Hotel Industry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Mode (computer interface); Zero (linguistics); Marketing; Economics; Econometrics; Business; Price setting; Price discrimination; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Actuarial science; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.5322324342437739,"score_gpt":0.603713671873488,"score_spread":0.07148123762971414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132972018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99511117,0.00004117194,0.0011053236,0.000480135,0.0000037021368,0.000010297738,0.000042130625,0.000009674235,0.0031963733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928266,0.00001667532,0.00019242286,0.00005667033,0.0000041464905,0.000003221539,0.000023631008,0.0000013815134,0.0004192339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995727,0.00015040088,0.000019590276,0.0000972212,0.00006650522,0.000093667615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935939,0.0031177364,0.0020500035,0.00041533558,0.00021487755,0.0006080923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013224852,0.00017162946,0.000323136,0.00036518963,0.0006339279,0.0018931888,0.0005394036,0.001297382,0.0061493334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010204448,0.00021480376,0.0003251524,0.0003309904,0.0010009888,0.001094312,0.00051994453,0.001423938,0.0005096365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088444626,0.0013561471,0.86585087,0.00009700953,0.00015484051,0.0014587423,0.0037226372,0.015464514,0.005293649,0.044318493,0.0044215103,0.056977175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013900978,0.00044345803,0.7743941,0.000041282816,0.00008410088,0.0008910479,0.0063348,0.15464808,0.0010625555,0.059900653,0.001953148,0.000107760105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008379201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010460331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008379201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007730268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038486434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02057153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134397292","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12675","title":"The Benefits of Deliberative Involvement in the Design of Incomplete Feedback Systems<sup>*</sup>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational architecture; Feedback control; Control (management); Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Engineering; Control engineering","score_opus":0.2300144460080249,"score_gpt":0.39813618685877605,"score_spread":0.16812174085075116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134397292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8258766,0.00020477318,0.16316001,0.0007395209,0.00004028387,0.00029868775,0.000023969138,0.0003708211,0.009285273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96243,0.000035106972,0.036697406,0.00005719816,0.000010399894,0.00008213905,0.000021871734,0.000026837784,0.000639059],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838335,0.0119755855,0.00078368676,0.00089193863,0.0017834937,0.00073185214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8600053,0.096112065,0.018726498,0.013944214,0.007767936,0.0034438823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019411586,0.00069232035,0.00035334867,0.0006289908,0.0008482068,0.0026469978,0.0011448523,0.0009829149,0.0031364858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07548083,0.00045917722,0.00044632217,0.00025013284,0.0014797997,0.0027043342,0.0023651416,0.0010589059,0.00041849396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005707761,0.005711635,0.11680361,0.0020867132,0.00040887416,0.0016008331,0.024955435,0.22528115,0.08287343,0.068854064,0.002055465,0.46366107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009786509,0.012732898,0.052275285,0.0012415488,0.0007486415,0.0010681666,0.00995299,0.72478503,0.08144905,0.08511926,0.029333336,0.00031511785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049820996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073740684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019411586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095561624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015942991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102659464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135141455","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.07.002","title":"Proportional resource allocation in dynamic <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" id=\"d1e23\" altimg=\"si2.svg\"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math>-player Blotto games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HEC Montréal; Universiteit Maastricht; Durham University; King's College London","keywords":"CONTEST; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Battlefield; Function (biology); Resource allocation; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Theology; History","score_opus":0.03575639619963152,"score_gpt":0.3183540602306411,"score_spread":0.2825976640310096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135141455","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29144657,0.00029710022,0.646251,0.001059915,0.00010316566,0.00033600113,0.0002460702,0.0002400241,0.0600201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470762,0.00011923531,0.038119115,0.00014900706,0.000034691147,0.00024073587,0.00006135028,0.0000624486,0.014137262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967836,0.0015932678,0.000104446466,0.0006322074,0.00036008938,0.0005264543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972193,0.0015728368,0.00043004073,0.0003194426,0.00015515772,0.00030315603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026906226,0.0010137449,0.001171467,0.0007447489,0.00104744,0.0025115388,0.00199811,0.0011635715,0.007106875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008883329,0.0007803741,0.000868424,0.00056584575,0.0021703113,0.004324064,0.0025967269,0.0013225323,0.0006493104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003445453,0.00023534756,0.00096171396,0.00013296593,0.00008604827,0.00016391282,0.0003340849,0.1566395,0.0033798206,0.81490636,0.0020603852,0.020755207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104734674,0.00017171021,0.00074504665,0.000022205013,0.00003030695,0.00012537873,0.00012203037,0.40530226,0.0009029912,0.5888378,0.0035904432,0.00004512997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025695404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031693864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007106875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002470534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013566194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023774862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135270000","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3422197","title":"Strategic Uncertainty and the Power of Extrinsic Signals – Evidence from an Experimental Study of Bank Runs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Economics; Business; Econometrics; Financial system; Physics","score_opus":0.038239705477957825,"score_gpt":0.3437231164757313,"score_spread":0.30548341099777343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135270000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955479,0.00010852579,0.0006771864,0.00016707064,0.000008535147,0.000010390677,0.00003090175,0.0000056641265,0.0034438907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930763,0.000072050214,0.0002281803,0.000054241835,0.000012372647,0.000009246874,0.000023275632,0.0000050770122,0.00028788962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965402,0.002408291,0.00019536013,0.00031510484,0.00039662936,0.00014449973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88738376,0.08554087,0.017671263,0.006760568,0.0012830729,0.0013604633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008077354,0.0004660304,0.00056963036,0.00041593862,0.00061829784,0.0026088532,0.00071874587,0.0016485404,0.0052970187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055740453,0.000446279,0.00022282112,0.00048415796,0.00200395,0.0015711198,0.0007751458,0.0012145899,0.00043369597],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0568149,0.01799419,0.57094175,0.00152648,0.0037111798,0.0017306246,0.0126403645,0.053362165,0.07199329,0.08084085,0.004564194,0.123879954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004563438,0.011083588,0.7805072,0.00018761642,0.0013183587,0.00077241316,0.0040168916,0.05669586,0.013866912,0.121374935,0.0052640233,0.00034879748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012065461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013480097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008077354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047005873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006265506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042717636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135385542","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.01.007","title":"Honesty in the city","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Business Economics, University of Canterbury; University of Canterbury","keywords":"Honesty; Reputation; Trustworthiness; Field (mathematics); Control (management); Psychology; Deception; Social psychology; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Sociology; Management; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06594454570867668,"score_gpt":0.3494827279642342,"score_spread":0.2835381822555575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135385542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88260823,0.0004785438,0.0052988846,0.016429622,0.00012369874,0.000042296655,0.00009207118,0.000018118293,0.09490859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969602,0.00009965864,0.00020810934,0.0001543917,0.000020727082,0.000007269682,0.00001059475,0.0000035031333,0.0025356512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966613,0.0022714727,0.00007420612,0.00027438166,0.0003572409,0.00036137784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98551327,0.009027162,0.0022248067,0.0014306902,0.00093701715,0.0008671519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031163606,0.0002208366,0.00053007685,0.0006164452,0.0021807565,0.0045589716,0.00051904755,0.0018921897,0.0058084163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015161861,0.00026203014,0.00028405368,0.000729307,0.005225608,0.0028391422,0.0019512958,0.0022065497,0.0003719653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050108146,0.00028587,0.029508898,0.000093936615,0.00013456876,0.00026486602,0.0069117174,0.010298149,0.00069122674,0.9256905,0.0065978863,0.019021327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002758314,0.0001786653,0.05680673,0.000077399374,0.00010582076,0.000118323,0.0147874,0.03127822,0.0009761173,0.87322843,0.022080787,0.00008619115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011122307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009120779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011122307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022803566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001913141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022115171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138939449","doi":"","title":"Against All Odds: Tentative Steps Toward Efficient Information Sharing in Groups","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Outcome (game theory); Class (philosophy); Noise (video); Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Group (periodic table); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Machine learning; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.03679585823370738,"score_gpt":0.31469558569590345,"score_spread":0.27789972746219604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138939449","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082946055,0.0009520601,0.823866,0.041519903,0.0006599944,0.0009133141,0.00028626772,0.0008059919,0.048050288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66036975,0.000488544,0.3295654,0.002251494,0.00050739845,0.0013760534,0.00013018295,0.00014057204,0.0051706643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.96872497,0.021672526,0.00096583425,0.0034349926,0.0035400991,0.0016615165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8874563,0.061328493,0.008760469,0.032150224,0.0051242597,0.00518016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036317788,0.0018237968,0.0028981874,0.002021932,0.005085226,0.008563434,0.0074295644,0.007074633,0.013462834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115957245,0.0011699141,0.0017674371,0.0019321422,0.015228814,0.022221904,0.013152192,0.0066708303,0.0030630934],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092503964,0.0007040879,0.0032884781,0.00047765323,0.00016640825,0.00017835028,0.003230882,0.025160372,0.0018145207,0.87981844,0.0073611396,0.07687472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014121967,0.00012250974,0.0002821918,0.000056939298,0.00001822797,0.000034018332,0.0004864029,0.025610644,0.00042962807,0.96880126,0.0039848154,0.00003203199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001719956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011574936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036317788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028451856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007163477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19206905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141446936","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvab015","title":"Interventions with Sticky Social Norms: A Critique","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Università degli Studi di Trento; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European University Institute","keywords":"Externality; Economics; Incentive; Subsidy; Public economics; Welfare; Psychological intervention; Social Welfare; Microeconomics; Public good; Market economy","score_opus":0.07771707457599791,"score_gpt":0.38737716026732044,"score_spread":0.30966008569132253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141446936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063017614,0.008745664,0.20327681,0.37714162,0.0023673829,0.0005472178,0.0006640699,0.0005227024,0.34371698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9172157,0.003196648,0.024628827,0.03586961,0.0027820542,0.0011382233,0.00006163728,0.00023731618,0.014870049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9642165,0.022277877,0.00096012984,0.004428279,0.0066166115,0.0015006664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8610115,0.10808528,0.009900771,0.014454183,0.0050512813,0.0014969484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04000802,0.0013550816,0.0027312615,0.0015747022,0.0024849891,0.0040262565,0.0043871365,0.011927558,0.016482392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102884434,0.0007473108,0.0018364682,0.0012027227,0.02325892,0.008635483,0.004348412,0.010252376,0.0017347479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113926195,0.000087697554,0.00051313796,0.00028962822,0.000088049026,0.00008201954,0.00041407126,0.005106475,0.00017587357,0.9724072,0.00472383,0.01599797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013279975,0.00005596533,0.0003618026,0.00008721629,0.000021878122,0.000032814554,0.00009159089,0.0029879233,0.00013573059,0.9882762,0.0078009292,0.000015050041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038287952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018313593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04000802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006311439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004159215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21158516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145938715","doi":"10.1111/caje.12677","title":"Endogenous timing and income inequality in the voluntary provision of public goods: Theory and experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public good; Inequality; Economic inequality; Public goods game; Social preferences; Income distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics","score_opus":0.2815280098624844,"score_gpt":0.27497790558205853,"score_spread":0.00655010428042585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145938715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98950255,0.00003181401,0.0041389135,0.00019565987,0.000028145414,0.0003139077,0.00006175275,0.000016246495,0.005710946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966097,0.000027900629,0.0021964505,0.000071057635,0.000010600918,0.00033488817,0.000016087099,0.000005274427,0.00072815147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496305,0.0032776694,0.00021532187,0.0005211351,0.0005851534,0.000437792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94405794,0.044059657,0.0051862677,0.0045953877,0.0008126626,0.0012880564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008069496,0.00052933616,0.0007146094,0.0003562927,0.0010831197,0.001746777,0.0013552242,0.001462798,0.008023865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025834512,0.00042578636,0.00034920513,0.0005369577,0.0025183943,0.0019429494,0.0019318406,0.0017894369,0.00048135486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07663273,0.19135404,0.120493315,0.0019416474,0.00064427796,0.0015096011,0.01446986,0.05945237,0.12769642,0.27202603,0.004533034,0.12924667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03143344,0.08550621,0.11587964,0.0005216487,0.0009242481,0.0008875879,0.011368295,0.27166215,0.11643906,0.34409913,0.020560453,0.00071813964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014113098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089531404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008069496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013917695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013040948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04267609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147435052","doi":"10.1525/elementa.2021.00120","title":"Awards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Elementa Science of the Anthropocene","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Cover crop; Soil conservation; Set (abstract data type); Business; Psychology; Marketing; Geography; Agroforestry; Computer science","score_opus":0.03330007501756107,"score_gpt":0.381953533572525,"score_spread":0.34865345855496394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147435052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0089581525,0.001691622,0.00861549,0.009513151,0.007901864,0.00069783034,0.0051426673,0.0021326763,0.95534647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0591955,0.0020803248,0.007106237,0.0054312297,0.0021213556,0.0005719077,0.0067056017,0.0010919641,0.91569585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931102,0.0014561572,0.000520331,0.0007099939,0.0030963912,0.0011068662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867426,0.0020119038,0.0009556396,0.0016420038,0.004583869,0.0040640137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053703366,0.0008125505,0.0006909671,0.0033855622,0.0032621487,0.0066338694,0.002169321,0.0023127857,0.40836796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022031508,0.00034944707,0.00073853554,0.003003282,0.0010452365,0.0041923923,0.005639852,0.002233819,0.20138654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002522258,0.00023187637,0.0033812495,0.00030898722,0.000021117376,0.00028862368,0.00069414865,0.00022119966,0.0005693058,0.07468316,0.68235123,0.23699687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018695666,0.0000528589,0.0013196679,0.00007377608,0.0000046180808,0.00016846124,0.0002304965,0.000087240565,0.00010461632,0.004164518,0.9937604,0.000014542035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002552925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004978437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40836796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001877403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003683677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150124497","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3504910","title":"Persuasion Bias in Science: An Experiment on Strategic Sample Selection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Comparative statics; Persuasion; Contrast (vision); Sample (material); Selection (genetic algorithm); Test (biology); Experimental economics; Welfare; Selection bias; Order (exchange); Psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Social psychology; Positive economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.06803064069010002,"score_gpt":0.3730526312118303,"score_spread":0.3050219905217303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150124497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808883,0.00010718123,0.009267208,0.001233349,0.00023948014,0.0013392813,0.000109646804,0.0000808481,0.0067347633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98408806,0.000066118955,0.01121627,0.00069945084,0.00017279106,0.0013842479,0.00008864163,0.000035516707,0.002248884],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.97785246,0.016148502,0.0012479416,0.0019703442,0.0021504618,0.0006302248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7164004,0.2516739,0.010700833,0.015610492,0.002749887,0.0028645506],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036363147,0.000987067,0.0010698859,0.000568133,0.0015458924,0.00207409,0.0012912689,0.003356856,0.012196372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11885625,0.00069447124,0.0006600227,0.0006673895,0.0027903721,0.0024769704,0.0016235652,0.0025791212,0.0009080116],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.23963463,0.17304836,0.07510828,0.0031525113,0.002354675,0.0012733223,0.02800198,0.014833298,0.103738554,0.12201024,0.012833666,0.2240104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.2014851,0.20308779,0.10813649,0.0005988143,0.003299194,0.0017323615,0.0060037505,0.1331183,0.06495983,0.25070432,0.026113307,0.00076074887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005002186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043326008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9636369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000606588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019642473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19230896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150720332","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3762621","title":"Forty Years of Behavioral Economics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Behavioral economics; Prospect theory; Core (optical fiber); Field (mathematics); Positive economics; Behavioural sciences; Research program; Hard core; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.024109630523867893,"score_gpt":0.324987004218132,"score_spread":0.3008773736942641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150720332","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028799055,0.34743106,0.00983427,0.37699765,0.021626564,0.00008266904,0.0007033499,0.00014453557,0.21438093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35186085,0.25674227,0.008825609,0.12152468,0.030109415,0.00031077157,0.0007907485,0.00032053166,0.22951514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974125,0.0012618559,0.00012877915,0.00031500973,0.00061344565,0.00026842032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98601925,0.0072720093,0.0006533717,0.0020776202,0.0021933373,0.0017843869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009310691,0.00072779617,0.00082953786,0.0037655586,0.0018682434,0.0057886927,0.00079108815,0.0020477606,0.021422002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01687699,0.0003633269,0.0004873707,0.003173408,0.008986808,0.0070644678,0.0036499787,0.004227946,0.0039969054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105423715,0.00022411534,0.003430785,0.00030890596,0.00005021741,0.000055745022,0.0016765904,0.00043009548,0.0002735577,0.70691663,0.12288352,0.1636445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016822069,0.00005156117,0.005082791,0.00082619995,0.0000144720325,0.000047835318,0.0012482564,0.00026379473,0.00014330403,0.1942364,0.79804397,0.000024558318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002932221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003382558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021422002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041806553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002844332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07166374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153032579","doi":"10.5817/wp_muni_econ_2019-02","title":"Delegation and Coordination with Multiple Threshold Public Goods: Experimental Evidence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Donation; Earnings; Business; Delegation; Intermediary; Distribution (mathematics); Public economics; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03010280457735818,"score_gpt":0.3086812677507023,"score_spread":0.2785784631733441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153032579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90414846,0.0009455159,0.03130699,0.0026421396,0.00009454902,0.00038414777,0.0002433553,0.00011619384,0.06011874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932286,0.00026327083,0.004363679,0.00024914002,0.000027958497,0.00021635344,0.000047064223,0.000020720357,0.0015832545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880983,0.008154625,0.0004739507,0.0012136273,0.0011559003,0.00090357737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7992304,0.13712677,0.03596864,0.019810712,0.0026161042,0.0052473745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020007536,0.0010243425,0.0013654215,0.0009186298,0.0014642711,0.0032890926,0.0016657822,0.0023663975,0.020161413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07688909,0.00061207224,0.0007221403,0.0010465088,0.0035331121,0.0034721207,0.0031181523,0.0024848897,0.0016516745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023289884,0.027308965,0.10646237,0.0049726986,0.0027070022,0.0021798657,0.006880371,0.09796551,0.027109446,0.5193404,0.013467458,0.16831613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009442564,0.009641331,0.06020932,0.00063518586,0.0012981304,0.00094023877,0.0030463752,0.10765539,0.008925414,0.7820402,0.015925745,0.00024008969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013594035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010814809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020161413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019194438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019363933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10581124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154378624","doi":"","title":"Prize Allocation and Incentives in Team Contests","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Complementarity (molecular biology); Incentive; Convexity; Order (exchange); Function (biology); Microeconomics; Economics; Public good; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02082866758223932,"score_gpt":0.33838339990278904,"score_spread":0.3175547323205497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154378624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7589082,0.0011855757,0.15888608,0.0024670856,0.00019757588,0.00021054882,0.00015946593,0.00009304705,0.07789237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991793,0.00019894286,0.0055595594,0.00006813092,0.000054427797,0.00007925491,0.000024194238,0.000017038608,0.004080591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936799,0.0043286984,0.00018618208,0.00031339243,0.00041782763,0.0010740561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784922,0.014204623,0.0036068805,0.00093374104,0.0008899387,0.0018726281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007135566,0.0006440234,0.0013505535,0.0010799129,0.001616827,0.0034199809,0.0011539888,0.0019101087,0.006855751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02523165,0.000392411,0.00066708843,0.0010503087,0.0031911174,0.0027528035,0.0022441924,0.0012250189,0.0005239717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047124035,0.00025452222,0.0048045455,0.00019520182,0.00007679154,0.0002051635,0.00068951654,0.10051527,0.0013076572,0.8648707,0.0021911787,0.024418155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030584994,0.0002540518,0.0030718788,0.000050589053,0.000033536737,0.00008660063,0.0004999507,0.1621253,0.0003738599,0.8292496,0.0039107217,0.00003806823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013583713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001271571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007135566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023344494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001428592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037736952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157498771","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3817393","title":"Homophily, Peer Effects, and Dishonesty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Dishonesty; Peer effects; Psychology; Peer review; Social psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01025515353490487,"score_gpt":0.2968796256110483,"score_spread":0.28662447207614344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157498771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98305166,0.0005231655,0.00091131247,0.0004806896,0.000021498157,0.000017198625,0.00009886776,0.000006646025,0.014888939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905986,0.00012457081,0.00009947187,0.00004524289,0.000022187409,0.0000056826716,0.00001543404,0.0000018460953,0.0006257721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771464,0.0012453728,0.000095440206,0.00026947694,0.00043377918,0.00024136368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9234193,0.058816344,0.009938069,0.0040895003,0.0009621207,0.002774702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052042995,0.0002759171,0.00062964606,0.0010432712,0.00086101174,0.0019744553,0.0004205658,0.0011375649,0.01018266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026162883,0.00026011377,0.00020286333,0.0007053179,0.002130126,0.0018926024,0.0012819757,0.001346188,0.00046603466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029943264,0.0026047379,0.79447234,0.00038881277,0.00077345007,0.0013543477,0.005939669,0.005474181,0.006552906,0.09017118,0.0029392196,0.08633489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003253966,0.0010993831,0.832903,0.0000961522,0.00053621206,0.00085417775,0.0047131865,0.014200505,0.0018274356,0.14128828,0.0020504813,0.00010582978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011576494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018806905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01018266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004928351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030092662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034064353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157611707","doi":"","title":"Leaning in or Not Leaning Out? Opt-Out Choice Framing Attenuates Gender Differences in the Decision to Compete","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Opt-out; Opt-in email; Choice architecture; Framing (construction); Download; Competition (biology); Nomination; Framing effect; Social psychology; Psychology; Business; Political science; Advertising; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06596097564584713,"score_gpt":0.3563669892025358,"score_spread":0.29040601355668866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157611707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99500954,0.000026323418,0.0008549737,0.00023225496,0.00003722467,0.000027337666,0.000028125061,0.0000098418595,0.0037744567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969388,0.000032406442,0.0011012475,0.00023573726,0.000025314672,0.00006233009,0.00003055834,0.0000104726605,0.0015631403],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847776,0.000849777,0.000057899208,0.00020936065,0.00022855945,0.00017672387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239725,0.0041262466,0.0016396609,0.0009883132,0.00019325665,0.00065520045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032096456,0.00030944418,0.0005366576,0.00019624477,0.00040199765,0.00096567447,0.00034428653,0.0005946513,0.010838021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00884379,0.00026552202,0.00017859695,0.00014420059,0.0009709478,0.0005166484,0.00059715036,0.00093408773,0.0006334441],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05864382,0.057370942,0.27192155,0.0010443139,0.00056261284,0.00076339324,0.019572882,0.0036973155,0.31897852,0.05378622,0.0071798316,0.20647861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039619682,0.036857653,0.77002865,0.00034624146,0.0007414199,0.00048430753,0.011821875,0.02501758,0.05326521,0.07183598,0.025376838,0.00026230788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010036568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010655985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010838021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003361981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041114495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03625685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157835396","doi":"10.7202/1076513ar","title":"DETERRENCE OF THEFT IN A SITUATION OF COMPETITION BETWEEN FORMAL AND INFORMAL INSTITUTIONS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Institution; Production (economics); Deterrence theory; Competition (biology); Deterrence (psychology); Consumption (sociology); Economics; Microeconomics; Balance (ability); Public economics; Business; Industrial organization; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09703785688015829,"score_gpt":0.34237084522168404,"score_spread":0.24533298834152575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157835396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561516,0.00010170562,0.030092532,0.0003312527,0.000015603295,0.00006584952,0.00007013081,0.000027150805,0.0131441625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974105,0.00003485654,0.001216132,0.000011097788,0.0000034428067,0.000018841496,0.00000837522,0.0000021854173,0.0012945621],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982016,0.0009025264,0.000079741265,0.0002000755,0.00013485971,0.00048117345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925195,0.0041608773,0.002047791,0.00050122576,0.00025327178,0.0005172138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024172592,0.00045320106,0.00084881246,0.00069464796,0.00076605624,0.002131867,0.00089031796,0.0015343123,0.005939402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009557526,0.00030206316,0.00055130845,0.00033389925,0.0024618488,0.0020616788,0.0023634613,0.0009324289,0.00030063756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019862317,0.0013191347,0.07470055,0.0005708897,0.0002947361,0.0027168575,0.0021944481,0.43329418,0.008154093,0.4310348,0.0015695282,0.042164646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003946682,0.0018525309,0.039691914,0.00013807212,0.00015681054,0.0010411835,0.0053502796,0.7110152,0.0027795837,0.23273398,0.004678992,0.00016678902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003316285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030865227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005939402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013168249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007640629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019869268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159175968","doi":"10.7202/1076264ar","title":"MÉGADONNÉES ET EXTERNALITÉS INFORMATIONNELLES","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09748092369942866,"score_gpt":0.34513577412499236,"score_spread":0.24765485042556368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159175968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.574049,0.18098712,0.05628006,0.011523534,0.0007929183,0.00020169622,0.0021198732,0.00012085188,0.17392497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88865167,0.07312614,0.010887093,0.0010793534,0.00049074384,0.0001980373,0.0009583452,0.000065858534,0.024542846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686855,0.0013062895,0.00019751608,0.00065688987,0.0007714814,0.00019929392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98426694,0.010415836,0.002732212,0.0009802433,0.0012827351,0.00032202524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033410916,0.00042649562,0.0009117645,0.0015060962,0.0008571959,0.0034687219,0.00067031564,0.0011251331,0.016172336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017670004,0.00034653183,0.00067052466,0.0024600984,0.0024791865,0.0025572134,0.0015077702,0.0012399122,0.0008524814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007133132,0.00022676721,0.08948057,0.0037906563,0.0007649781,0.0010777304,0.0048461733,0.0029715176,0.0035047461,0.5073422,0.0061351354,0.37914622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012823455,0.00062347227,0.2838846,0.0026883036,0.0007461648,0.0030720432,0.005679661,0.0047851535,0.006601182,0.27555826,0.41603968,0.00019317705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00457637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00599681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016172336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023749718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012526936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054101884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159711960","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3815848","title":"Homophily, Peer Effects, and Dishonesty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Dishonesty; Peer review; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01025515353490487,"score_gpt":0.2968796256110483,"score_spread":0.28662447207614344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159711960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98305166,0.0005231655,0.00091131247,0.0004806896,0.000021498157,0.000017198625,0.00009886776,0.000006646025,0.014888939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905986,0.00012457081,0.00009947187,0.00004524289,0.000022187409,0.0000056826716,0.00001543404,0.0000018460953,0.0006257721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771464,0.0012453728,0.000095440206,0.00026947694,0.00043377918,0.00024136368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9234193,0.058816344,0.009938069,0.0040895003,0.0009621207,0.002774702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052042995,0.0002759171,0.00062964606,0.0010432712,0.00086101174,0.0019744553,0.0004205658,0.0011375649,0.01018266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026162883,0.00026011377,0.00020286333,0.0007053179,0.002130126,0.0018926024,0.0012819757,0.001346188,0.00046603466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029943264,0.0026047379,0.79447234,0.00038881277,0.00077345007,0.0013543477,0.005939669,0.005474181,0.006552906,0.09017118,0.0029392196,0.08633489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003253966,0.0010993831,0.832903,0.0000961522,0.00053621206,0.00085417775,0.0047131865,0.014200505,0.0018274356,0.14128828,0.0020504813,0.00010582978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011576494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018806905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01018266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004928351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030092662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034064353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159818630","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.9105","title":"13. Debunking the Ultimatum Game","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Mainstream; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Microeconomics; Maximization; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17179840391315568,"score_gpt":0.43116809796657807,"score_spread":0.25936969405342236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159818630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33953243,0.0012306648,0.29990152,0.011359521,0.0010255266,0.0011764619,0.00052866316,0.0006083214,0.34463692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89193076,0.0010223456,0.07783,0.002230657,0.00012500268,0.000780182,0.00015815267,0.00007426789,0.025848532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916032,0.0062059914,0.00028427748,0.00046311287,0.0011235208,0.00031986542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856332,0.010354337,0.0011180034,0.0016077829,0.0010384741,0.00024826117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010205321,0.0006728484,0.0006391996,0.00055337936,0.0014377575,0.0041751126,0.001246534,0.001993313,0.010264992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030196322,0.00037330383,0.0007387615,0.00070883054,0.0023431245,0.0037361886,0.0017971429,0.002601471,0.001832519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045502814,0.00053531176,0.0064592636,0.00035715164,0.000081674,0.00020765506,0.003621774,0.008080794,0.0027470018,0.8767283,0.0043851403,0.09634094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004018567,0.0014286486,0.0104926955,0.00044008667,0.00020991456,0.0005156882,0.0037358454,0.08909444,0.009013327,0.76977533,0.11467884,0.00021329467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003106048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029095144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010264992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022898484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016649384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05397153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160500323","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3314669","title":"Mitigating the Negative Effects of Causal Models: Encouraging a Hypothesis Testing Mindset and Managers’ Quantitative Knowledge","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Causal model; Psychology; Statistical hypothesis testing; Causality (physics); Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04970193208351044,"score_gpt":0.32422946740818237,"score_spread":0.27452753532467195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160500323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8657858,0.00033998632,0.0828319,0.025439763,0.0002270318,0.0003168362,0.000080101636,0.00030706535,0.024671573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98042136,0.00008204047,0.017758451,0.00088625343,0.0000937205,0.00013849499,0.000029979965,0.000018845514,0.0005708026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800741,0.014646637,0.00066581334,0.001311926,0.0027748405,0.0005266834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49145904,0.44401106,0.02748069,0.02437846,0.008263354,0.00440744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049876377,0.0005905278,0.00072835956,0.0013096075,0.0014140273,0.0042216033,0.0013782923,0.0025604968,0.007570087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.250133,0.0006190508,0.00070027186,0.0005909889,0.0025243028,0.0066630873,0.0037118013,0.0049822954,0.0005121927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031942786,0.01647775,0.29407904,0.0018568654,0.0010012834,0.00062047015,0.021387478,0.030983608,0.03624367,0.13575478,0.00926203,0.44913873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001147741,0.004267465,0.16113833,0.0007498149,0.0008775576,0.00045638985,0.007594777,0.13995476,0.027108166,0.6395536,0.016900927,0.0002504247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005236147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011268858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9501236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011426171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036019185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26377463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162249423","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3431694","title":"Quantifying Mileage Runs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03370892055022889,"score_gpt":0.33958994835158524,"score_spread":0.30588102780135634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162249423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.801082,0.00087861356,0.16118284,0.00027763957,0.00011612368,0.00009132776,0.0019272335,0.00089047814,0.033553697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717064,0.00008508861,0.009867192,0.000016940015,0.00001978065,0.000031024087,0.00047242813,0.00007357432,0.0022633772],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921536,0.00022589177,0.000033662316,0.00026364077,0.0001482783,0.00011305651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996566,0.0018537722,0.00057122204,0.0004358977,0.00027412188,0.00029915327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218491,0.0007407763,0.000666851,0.0024966353,0.00048811088,0.0023331493,0.00079547707,0.0009647516,0.005435956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009600771,0.00029514168,0.0004751006,0.0011616312,0.0007299957,0.0022717826,0.0011030408,0.00072919053,0.0005171884],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067531614,0.00020635065,0.038260363,0.00020250966,0.00037821342,0.0001773995,0.00027945626,0.74241275,0.00870627,0.13739464,0.0026321816,0.06867457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017164984,0.00024334749,0.020950235,0.00007205305,0.00007914091,0.00011831365,0.0001855083,0.89750975,0.0045751864,0.073065534,0.003119307,0.000064443164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001958312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018239026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005435956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097482925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052120484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01818502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162733374","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80117-600-220211004","title":"Routine Shared Hedonism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hedonism; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06638794788719744,"score_gpt":0.3296159022448998,"score_spread":0.26322795435770235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162733374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0913968,0.0006081945,0.026190229,0.0014014385,0.00022965576,0.000046329245,0.00015211027,0.00014865097,0.8798265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74532855,0.000294905,0.0067172954,0.00021930457,0.00012990789,0.000043814594,0.00015015925,0.00006077603,0.2470552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952674,0.00009153261,0.000016004615,0.00010737927,0.00018453086,0.000073855466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999345,0.00012118498,0.000045916906,0.0003365322,0.000074020136,0.00007741495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006402865,0.000363382,0.00034503767,0.00033060374,0.0006613718,0.002079472,0.00068582006,0.0006801102,0.023244783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016264414,0.00018588781,0.00030839804,0.00042626698,0.0019836703,0.002656289,0.001756778,0.0017613448,0.0024948819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082289545,0.000104477396,0.0012232395,0.000038739974,0.000020622754,0.00009035697,0.00083019555,0.0006468998,0.0023887078,0.90776664,0.009101872,0.077706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019176352,0.0001460591,0.010546477,0.00005141425,0.000012291371,0.00048277553,0.00071682665,0.003286452,0.0018761408,0.90557,0.077268325,0.000024070156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042504724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000760209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023244783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008772969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005145454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07776147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163521823","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/r85jv","title":"Dimensions of Altruism: Do Evaluations of Prosocial Behavior Track Social Good or Personal Sacrifice?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Bath","keywords":"Sacrifice; Prosocial behavior; Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Happiness; Value (mathematics); Computer science","score_opus":0.15226168539794274,"score_gpt":0.4301904821671419,"score_spread":0.2779287967691991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163521823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97766554,0.00028257706,0.005509783,0.00041143844,0.000017592749,0.00003749603,0.00012615447,0.00001641356,0.015933007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982644,0.000056357138,0.0012565975,0.000051502462,0.0000062496024,0.000033036064,0.000054998465,0.0000067487817,0.00026997458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758506,0.0014242106,0.000107424654,0.00036472603,0.00040985082,0.00010886833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97375387,0.01216797,0.007372393,0.0036668123,0.0016624031,0.001376578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052566044,0.0004210853,0.00040787182,0.0012619272,0.00053840165,0.0023878305,0.00036841206,0.0009987963,0.0034418653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029950589,0.00031047786,0.00046399827,0.0008640223,0.0025625888,0.0032696815,0.0016488787,0.0010904673,0.0003577568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016671895,0.00068712403,0.8505992,0.00037877823,0.00057458685,0.00011423825,0.008651134,0.003049477,0.008182597,0.02873509,0.0010905396,0.096270055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004391802,0.0003876815,0.9560159,0.00007050885,0.00009044696,0.00011785217,0.0021893112,0.0035138875,0.0010609113,0.035320673,0.0011220108,0.000067013876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010063334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010057938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052566044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009386641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003644957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027799904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165700099","doi":"","title":"Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Heuristics; Ecological rationality; Situational ethics; Bounded rationality; Epistemology; Perception; Psychology; Great Rationality Debate; Argument (complex analysis); Cognition; Cognitive science; Positive economics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.040915089685707916,"score_gpt":0.32568604926369843,"score_spread":0.28477095957799053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165700099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053078765,0.059190184,0.0054924972,0.9007498,0.0027459292,0.000008780409,0.00005080647,0.00002329313,0.026430868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6080613,0.084391885,0.006831949,0.2577441,0.03405567,0.0001328409,0.000114722825,0.00017866153,0.008488903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828395,0.010108237,0.00054114556,0.0020737743,0.0034194014,0.0010178549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93848157,0.05304885,0.0017155274,0.002428616,0.0033291655,0.0009963152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024277883,0.0005973547,0.0017707725,0.0022684669,0.0057623144,0.016185787,0.0035214871,0.015078604,0.0064431736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038455214,0.00058394123,0.00089270325,0.0037680673,0.055382065,0.027073197,0.006690651,0.017291179,0.0012577203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039015515,0.000020210024,0.00021307285,0.00016651613,0.00002514394,0.00005866353,0.004390569,0.00017925173,0.000067743444,0.9594043,0.022405652,0.013029778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016312044,0.000008519406,0.0004112297,0.00038922418,0.000008554446,0.00004927286,0.0038563285,0.00020838279,0.000054823304,0.9273169,0.0676614,0.000019009663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038315551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019963982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024277883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063705603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043731607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12839526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167781930","doi":"","title":"Asset Integration, Risk Taking and Loss Aversion in the Laboratory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary","keywords":"Lottery; Loss aversion; Preference; Risk aversion (psychology); Asset (computer security); Prospect theory; Economics; Experimental economics; Behavioral economics; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Risk-seeking; Microeconomics; Psychology; Computer science; Financial economics; Finance; Computer security","score_opus":0.031033449316714742,"score_gpt":0.3642361810986701,"score_spread":0.33320273178195536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167781930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99278766,0.000060872317,0.004621003,0.000117055955,0.000027374552,0.00016391196,0.0000606372,0.000048309532,0.0021131467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803908,0.00012487487,0.015610743,0.00023832411,0.000027865288,0.0008724611,0.00009345625,0.00001897638,0.0026226293],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977223,0.0010398963,0.00015223198,0.00044144536,0.00047475667,0.0001692492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862459,0.007512925,0.0026707426,0.0022613055,0.00031944914,0.0009897342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035163504,0.000897942,0.0007724329,0.00033615358,0.00050901284,0.0017371187,0.00089095824,0.0010235591,0.004486687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010857068,0.0005374047,0.0004086344,0.00025638944,0.0016130275,0.0011542811,0.0011123732,0.0017658847,0.00045618502],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02513509,0.06824859,0.065230735,0.00093101116,0.00047422852,0.0010116879,0.0038754086,0.010233221,0.7194144,0.026840381,0.0022185433,0.07638672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01259292,0.19562536,0.1788001,0.0005648702,0.0012080614,0.0023016962,0.0026184127,0.074513264,0.43248403,0.07912691,0.019193845,0.00097052776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035652783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003104403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004486687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000376286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059194444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01859641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167858","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-375067-9.00019-x","title":"Contest Models and Environmental Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Set (abstract data type); Resource (disambiguation); Environmental policy; Management science; Computer science; Political science; Operations research; Economics; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.03519719634571571,"score_gpt":0.2847850535011371,"score_spread":0.24958785715542137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060782484,0.010582864,0.029871553,0.009573577,0.0005077656,0.000023781466,0.0002159698,0.00016745416,0.94297886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26595846,0.022143444,0.007894729,0.0015314721,0.0009440193,0.00015103443,0.00042649492,0.00018344104,0.70076704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980575,0.00008590871,0.000005258432,0.000026852824,0.000054168097,0.000022135493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996643,0.00021371304,0.000022875283,0.000045158195,0.000028692197,0.000025173014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045253147,0.00073399453,0.00056250533,0.0005794347,0.00059576356,0.0027073259,0.0007606221,0.0015947965,0.057562612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010403086,0.00030353718,0.0003705524,0.001229855,0.002021674,0.0022899616,0.0007103928,0.0016368234,0.005877103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043353266,0.000032960063,0.000078152254,0.000045994766,0.0000060092207,0.000014182979,0.000057042453,0.0040907734,0.000075119024,0.9347066,0.030703222,0.030185543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048946827,0.0000032356506,0.00012318941,0.000038990987,0.0000031055938,0.000016612688,0.000048342066,0.0036559717,0.000033953744,0.9280921,0.06797569,0.000004023696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053046443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071861125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057562612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019423226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010853326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19256616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168200437","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3811755","title":"Information Regime Changes and Path Dependence - An Experimental Analysis of Public Goods Contributions in Heterogeneous Groups","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Public good; Path dependence; Public goods game; Norm (philosophy); Path (computing); Microeconomics; Path analysis (statistics); Economics; Econometrics; Public economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.027175735235833408,"score_gpt":0.32866499626503437,"score_spread":0.301489261029201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168200437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983076,0.000014316338,0.0010144676,0.000043791195,0.000005350267,0.000023558874,0.000032773518,0.000007071465,0.00055102364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980659,0.000026892716,0.0011539751,0.000018653764,0.000009639119,0.00004213568,0.000055665958,0.0000079250985,0.0006191676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870384,0.00080796884,0.00005238422,0.00018394599,0.00014184251,0.00011011228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307748,0.05850206,0.0044178013,0.004742855,0.00064835337,0.00091416563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060936906,0.00028116608,0.00061372714,0.0005984751,0.00044965735,0.0013071744,0.000737894,0.00093051646,0.005756116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03471089,0.0002731419,0.0004903876,0.00067744753,0.001316191,0.0011915142,0.00086139917,0.0013030035,0.00029735826],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06161061,0.049110584,0.17716502,0.0014164635,0.0019465485,0.0008683683,0.008330275,0.13061297,0.19688796,0.23437464,0.0039152675,0.13376123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059859273,0.01478307,0.17735861,0.000115015595,0.0009979943,0.000479877,0.002388791,0.5788613,0.040580258,0.17560886,0.002543802,0.0002964565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076740724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005064201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060936906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000613714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056587136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03222692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171255933","doi":"10.1017/s1744137421000448","title":"The labor-managed firm, Oliver Williamson, and me","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Institutional Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Economics; Transaction cost; Yield (engineering); Microeconomics; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Psychological intervention; Market failure; Public economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.02251978380062243,"score_gpt":0.29041925930926105,"score_spread":0.26789947550863863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171255933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045414295,0.0149584375,0.0028407085,0.8915888,0.0011685899,0.000024801862,0.00004739886,0.000015684584,0.04394123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86071116,0.018157374,0.002494504,0.08571314,0.0024669592,0.00012728419,0.000026338244,0.00003502907,0.030268345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835265,0.0010581841,0.00003182605,0.00021467276,0.00022351427,0.0001192408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853365,0.011903887,0.0010320771,0.00033766424,0.0007872161,0.0006026371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003997433,0.00021629025,0.0003452634,0.0006156367,0.0025125532,0.004171795,0.0006940891,0.0037271245,0.005581916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013055036,0.00021056681,0.00012060673,0.0007989918,0.009456029,0.005087395,0.0015107428,0.005678078,0.00053404574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066711684,0.00008398443,0.0011540379,0.00006436571,0.000006517392,0.0001444653,0.0014095568,0.0004188279,0.00013022807,0.9193343,0.0640644,0.013122718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006753983,0.00007633483,0.002019915,0.00061934016,0.000015304708,0.00017097268,0.0039966083,0.001874025,0.00061391795,0.7654289,0.22504246,0.00007458061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034059712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027432928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005581916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032016628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016473281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023229778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173333349","doi":"10.2308/jmar-2020-015","title":"The Effect of Advice Valence on the Perceived Credibility of Data Analytics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Advice (programming); Competence (human resources); Source credibility; Analytics; Valence (chemistry); Data analysis; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Data mining; Political science","score_opus":0.18977051604690234,"score_gpt":0.47423480676591134,"score_spread":0.284464290719009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173333349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99630535,0.000051562776,0.00052545645,0.000117605676,0.00001555622,0.000029366081,0.000024225574,0.000016266438,0.0029145668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987626,0.00003546173,0.0008145133,0.000088573586,0.000011320046,0.000023272169,0.000025725474,0.00000871119,0.00022994383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957819,0.0023745354,0.00025142575,0.00036437748,0.0010302616,0.00019748826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828265,0.09670383,0.011957336,0.0026455282,0.0031123164,0.002754538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047459747,0.00033922947,0.0003859028,0.0004877699,0.00042211977,0.0026073446,0.00028647255,0.0013620212,0.003038553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063761234,0.00029016583,0.00023205605,0.0002735813,0.0007253492,0.00092754455,0.0006666817,0.0016678942,0.00024936872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02179661,0.011214659,0.6148949,0.001696523,0.00084658863,0.00086748926,0.030922968,0.0055523524,0.19952211,0.0067023835,0.0023595178,0.10362392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009905315,0.0063834,0.93893385,0.0001844739,0.0004894414,0.00031848694,0.005716981,0.020354943,0.01768974,0.006113643,0.0026154735,0.00020896058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008380617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007551497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047459747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003751835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027517072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025099397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173961635","doi":"","title":"Bidding Frenzy: Speed of Competitor Reaction and Willingness to Pay in Auctions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Common value auction; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; English auction; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Economics; Product (mathematics); Vickrey auction; Auction theory","score_opus":0.020520754117043273,"score_gpt":0.329194001078539,"score_spread":0.30867324696149573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173961635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927194,0.00012621099,0.0017266938,0.0000442617,0.0000066844223,0.000021779484,0.000015731415,0.000010523869,0.00532874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985002,0.000056778827,0.0008348709,0.000031147945,0.000011215901,0.000017944903,0.000027082588,0.000012180007,0.0005086742],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986009,0.0007263842,0.00010151703,0.00019422121,0.00030291002,0.000073984695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501292,0.0340192,0.011022525,0.0023468456,0.0013472361,0.0011349864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037651386,0.00029288683,0.0003575053,0.0009358413,0.0002545643,0.001418549,0.00031303574,0.0006953335,0.0038735708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03414149,0.00031485313,0.000380155,0.00044593157,0.0007816256,0.001561533,0.00054665125,0.0010620073,0.00038074562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063049565,0.0016764384,0.8501536,0.00024409333,0.0006191791,0.00047191195,0.0039819106,0.008763021,0.047896925,0.014400054,0.00061774795,0.06487014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011506856,0.0011925104,0.97865903,0.000023390196,0.00011934353,0.0005078685,0.000680187,0.0075250757,0.0025018388,0.0075849094,0.0009942601,0.00009653385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007791782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006476476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038735708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005015953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020001309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019912183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176917279","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12712","title":"The Effects of Information Acquisition Effort, Psychological Ownership, and Reporting Context on Opportunistic Managerial Reporting*","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Salient; Context (archaeology); Dilemma; Opportunism; Business; Information asymmetry; Cynicism; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.16597117925700242,"score_gpt":0.4414994316913334,"score_spread":0.275528252434331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176917279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99728394,0.000053244952,0.0003020202,0.00009902875,0.000006949184,0.000021095138,0.000020343217,0.000005681086,0.0022076985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990268,0.000028107392,0.0004246205,0.000057534187,0.000010781853,0.000026614032,0.000016273858,0.0000044041253,0.0004048198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960192,0.002593049,0.0002904836,0.00035152893,0.0004856485,0.00026019666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8867532,0.075208195,0.027197704,0.0062246034,0.0015656757,0.0030506859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052210987,0.00039099506,0.00034957856,0.00033839533,0.00047143854,0.0017997923,0.00043034946,0.000653086,0.0054512215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030156167,0.000292591,0.00025780257,0.00024129836,0.00092838664,0.0009074662,0.0012137821,0.0010611012,0.00023065247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020980472,0.02047181,0.6729216,0.00078803033,0.0008405019,0.00061491877,0.0064026075,0.007773172,0.16326036,0.01111373,0.0010911021,0.0937416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038856067,0.0045984667,0.96880126,0.000082595165,0.0002475688,0.00010572267,0.0016431103,0.0068119224,0.012833054,0.0033437507,0.0010628216,0.00008118548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073979393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093468424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054512215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058292696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043938865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181462022","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3490406","title":"A Journal-Based Replication of 'Being Chosen to Lead'","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Lead (geology); Computer science; Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.01647829039393833,"score_gpt":0.32758043479326265,"score_spread":0.3111021443993243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181462022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824522,0.0009005037,0.010204326,0.008017533,0.0029988808,0.0015602318,0.0053874655,0.00027520626,0.08820369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713606,0.00027889496,0.0070537897,0.0047694882,0.00052462093,0.0019141767,0.0017848179,0.0002654206,0.012048183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692169,0.02108597,0.001640628,0.0037185138,0.0036192434,0.000718684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6448758,0.21268737,0.024661446,0.07502909,0.036079004,0.0066672657],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030135745,0.00047018126,0.0012183192,0.0019684695,0.004883125,0.004958776,0.002408127,0.0042594178,0.027191909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25202796,0.000610631,0.0010849512,0.0030800104,0.0032259875,0.0034172856,0.0035184661,0.0030945365,0.0056601176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02484258,0.019954225,0.45559108,0.003979708,0.003177097,0.0020198296,0.10980893,0.0014974948,0.011215543,0.05349824,0.08430844,0.23010682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040888065,0.0062072114,0.7961717,0.00076675834,0.0022862095,0.0010017625,0.03857864,0.0038120796,0.008023824,0.033470854,0.10489056,0.00070151524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010683991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96986425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002098137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035071361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15937501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181529012","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3518766","title":"Insurable Losses, Pre-filled Claims Forms and Honesty in Reporting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Business; Actuarial science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029773674785503038,"score_gpt":0.3204538970896035,"score_spread":0.29068022230410046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181529012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152445,0.0010683227,0.019219793,0.00628715,0.00023305102,0.00022081855,0.000361407,0.00008221491,0.05728275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449867,0.00013961742,0.0016000738,0.00013011813,0.000103879596,0.000040958563,0.00005482785,0.000017234934,0.003414713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782944,0.012925781,0.002233973,0.0016200877,0.0033201755,0.0016055282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53210354,0.35916635,0.0743416,0.02375432,0.0065330635,0.0041010836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032445595,0.0005598219,0.0010163616,0.0012542169,0.0018761561,0.00821993,0.0014536212,0.0037342242,0.014666562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2227096,0.0008957479,0.00076584273,0.001281347,0.00593755,0.010967136,0.0028699478,0.0056966143,0.0010031655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009736325,0.0051750517,0.26615682,0.00043799417,0.0002564162,0.0010250635,0.0110027185,0.009589792,0.0021175805,0.5690976,0.0057395,0.11966509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057391246,0.0020477904,0.28277487,0.0003016812,0.00032325258,0.0008928014,0.00685075,0.032601263,0.0025773137,0.666557,0.0042252843,0.00027405276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001796451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017274069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032445595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017196186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022952515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17159075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181665825","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675319","title":"When and Why Contexts Predict Unethical Behavior: Evidence From a Laboratory Bribery Game","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Context effect; Social psychology; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04046705177793588,"score_gpt":0.3698189387977057,"score_spread":0.32935188701976986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181665825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984327,0.00006173378,0.0003784853,0.00008418122,0.0000055749147,0.00003604858,0.000030094881,0.0000039873817,0.0009671484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840564,0.000100626385,0.00070437015,0.000119365344,0.000007533898,0.000111726564,0.000096656615,0.0000073897013,0.00044677543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962476,0.002345754,0.00022285077,0.00046245934,0.0005093861,0.00021204099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95092654,0.030261809,0.013187118,0.002548478,0.0010347355,0.0020413778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037980713,0.00071009016,0.0006309238,0.0005810094,0.00072575506,0.0017953038,0.00093975314,0.0012253054,0.003526378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03547871,0.000441213,0.000422635,0.00032735826,0.0019740579,0.001190918,0.0011074946,0.0015572915,0.000547232],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013642319,0.066941135,0.8065848,0.001069313,0.001260764,0.0010493268,0.0075058523,0.0057339384,0.028299652,0.008033202,0.0035693431,0.05631042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010269426,0.010075288,0.9530209,0.00014220903,0.00037791842,0.00037811074,0.0034585812,0.015410089,0.005861239,0.007896891,0.0021865442,0.0001653073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028527174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004033631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037980713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005752718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047275802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020086348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182048538","doi":"","title":"The Micro-Empirics of Collective Action: The Case of Business Improvement Districts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Voting; Institution; Pareto principle; Action (physics); Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Common ownership; Industrial organization; Public economics; Market economy; Political science; Operations management; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04867048506230656,"score_gpt":0.32230998893940815,"score_spread":0.27363950387710156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182048538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.605166,0.0027399515,0.100881025,0.026682502,0.00015306646,0.00023441066,0.00020198165,0.00007439877,0.2638666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98964345,0.00045167768,0.0058608344,0.00025470214,0.00003953082,0.00008367382,0.000015632857,0.000014841202,0.003635684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568874,0.002976408,0.000062300875,0.0003344747,0.00030506504,0.0006329576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843327,0.011090789,0.0014697792,0.0015186043,0.00063299143,0.0009551903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047093914,0.0003001484,0.00089972926,0.001258782,0.0044346936,0.005111959,0.00183586,0.0031746302,0.008985657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012951342,0.00058528467,0.0008646165,0.0013099008,0.010206622,0.0050286213,0.0036895687,0.002979817,0.0005716504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006553457,0.00013251547,0.0042684157,0.000072418086,0.00004796441,0.0006684431,0.0017060732,0.04550994,0.00015188873,0.94054794,0.0013224531,0.0055064103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013571813,0.00008757876,0.005887436,0.00007609424,0.0000360497,0.0001899915,0.0041463403,0.122242704,0.00023046308,0.8530984,0.013824113,0.000045128225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015898623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015888577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015898623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004107471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020403622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031612158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182099590","doi":"10.3982/qe1389","title":"Bandits in the lab","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Action (physics); Public good; Microeconomics; Welfare; Free riding; State (computer science); Economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Physics; Algorithm; Market economy","score_opus":0.09790510138708997,"score_gpt":0.3895431244983478,"score_spread":0.29163802311125786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182099590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51902115,0.0012506862,0.3024307,0.007231717,0.00095141435,0.0007170261,0.0021191027,0.005856457,0.1604217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206123,0.00033931,0.058006894,0.0010048181,0.00013801163,0.00088409695,0.00067404826,0.00025009608,0.018090496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975616,0.0012968454,0.00006924788,0.00048862357,0.00028343123,0.00030039833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246454,0.0035043424,0.0007330756,0.0020867314,0.00042193555,0.00078941305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028339226,0.0008749723,0.0010945309,0.00057531236,0.0012672227,0.002707299,0.0013681744,0.0016170447,0.02722176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010273115,0.0005159911,0.00044672826,0.0005884551,0.0015599672,0.0020681678,0.0018615643,0.0018587135,0.004950454],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007155732,0.0045852712,0.010297711,0.000778763,0.00048383712,0.00043255574,0.0008276002,0.17831576,0.04015118,0.5092031,0.055533923,0.19223459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019183609,0.0017666871,0.0033259285,0.0001442357,0.00014601149,0.0001885774,0.00035625967,0.54282546,0.011237701,0.3897663,0.04819467,0.00012980911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022842253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001887943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02722176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009717677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016134261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09106588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186268121","doi":"10.15353/rea.v13i3.3566","title":"Do distributional preferences reverse on a dollar? An experiment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Analysis","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Dayton; Ohio State University","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.07064685322475879,"score_gpt":0.4051612897275868,"score_spread":0.334514436502828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186268121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795074,0.00020422043,0.002194549,0.001821382,0.0004711271,0.0006661004,0.00035206092,0.00005495313,0.014728221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97340953,0.00048206077,0.006008637,0.0032617447,0.0002893103,0.0016868296,0.0003833499,0.000034248835,0.014444216],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818265,0.0009340752,0.000117167605,0.00038061323,0.0002401449,0.00014537008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857584,0.010419112,0.0012973257,0.0015784199,0.00028850156,0.00065822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053599547,0.0007629941,0.0008985295,0.00024820192,0.0009802721,0.0016155796,0.00088067545,0.002253321,0.01808345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010019277,0.00046749692,0.00063142035,0.00042831054,0.0020127199,0.0016799329,0.00077803596,0.0031829206,0.002046424],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.19598418,0.2166733,0.045122445,0.0024993988,0.001877323,0.0014183804,0.0064192684,0.0038968227,0.18890937,0.13809708,0.03167683,0.16742557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.124911405,0.29981717,0.13949434,0.0004955662,0.0021422387,0.001704345,0.0061966456,0.029138194,0.06596338,0.24489562,0.08457228,0.0006687697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047627703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049284595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01808345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034810015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004655693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060495198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186825587","doi":"10.1155/2021/3881254","title":"Simulating the Principal‐Agent Relationship between Enterprise Owners and Professional Managers Using Evolutionary Game Theory and System Dynamics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complexity","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"China Three Gorges University","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Incentive; Standardization; Evolutionary game theory; Principal–agent problem; Business; Game theory; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Computer science; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.13832769110076384,"score_gpt":0.38415804590314445,"score_spread":0.2458303548023806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186825587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8557128,0.00011265725,0.13497116,0.0003633861,0.000039529183,0.00015625241,0.0001318317,0.000041538777,0.008470852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824777,0.00007420834,0.015765259,0.000025231026,0.0000041323588,0.000109904315,0.000046349152,0.0000055592436,0.001491615],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994404,0.0003352381,0.000019939149,0.00006276307,0.000048135378,0.00009363262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980154,0.0014672336,0.00020072979,0.00007075138,0.00013658317,0.00010931426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012095188,0.0005115882,0.0005414702,0.0005620731,0.0006229494,0.0008509208,0.0006854809,0.000947921,0.0024202978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032293566,0.00030041838,0.0006426953,0.0004613648,0.0006448971,0.0012015296,0.0007890249,0.0007626485,0.000106597974],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053752217,0.00011307859,0.0035264897,0.00003299479,0.000037131234,0.00010372381,0.00015665397,0.9685196,0.0007663947,0.02406257,0.00016685575,0.0024607307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018694418,0.00002403022,0.0003978505,0.0000025654094,0.0000069186044,0.0000054741413,0.000046866575,0.99629873,0.000104523475,0.002932258,0.00015712094,0.0000050754243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01783531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011396216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01783531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013783127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015146052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035463035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187036931","doi":"","title":"Emotions in Games: Toward a Unified Process-Level Account","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Homo economicus; Dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Superrationality; Outcome (game theory); Behavioral economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Sample (material); Game theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05607477073256512,"score_gpt":0.30192698594996203,"score_spread":0.24585221521739692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187036931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11337092,0.0035041594,0.65443045,0.022499558,0.000439706,0.00022613931,0.00030808133,0.00022857072,0.20499238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562881,0.0013108425,0.03604406,0.0010051372,0.00038476964,0.00022926595,0.00007408856,0.000058751804,0.0046050265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987588,0.0005281559,0.00006312983,0.00021000474,0.00025313176,0.0001867814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820423,0.00093579,0.0002622869,0.00021981368,0.000207327,0.00017057554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019708027,0.0012492768,0.00088711036,0.0011187817,0.0008966932,0.005358356,0.0017498268,0.0021091006,0.0045076525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044024764,0.00053572335,0.0013923132,0.00058556366,0.0040364764,0.008837818,0.0023258762,0.0033373607,0.000609147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014993358,0.00002556856,0.000607838,0.000038959748,0.000020531403,0.000039554336,0.0004965158,0.007163164,0.00024782502,0.9883773,0.0003524525,0.0026152772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152049415,0.000021486638,0.00066131237,0.0000228752,0.000019429359,0.000022227592,0.00013039909,0.04063852,0.000077496,0.9566752,0.0017047299,0.0000112617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001963908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011264875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005358356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015897827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010767059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0150796175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187153961","doi":"","title":"Errors in Learning from Others' Choices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Decision maker; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Process (computing); Variation (astronomy); Artificial intelligence; Subject (documents); Psychology; Machine learning; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Operations research; Rationality; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11580432400825119,"score_gpt":0.24918388942167935,"score_spread":0.13337956541342816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187153961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642794,0.00011390193,0.026907064,0.0005763647,0.000025306339,0.000098334946,0.00012581682,0.00008151033,0.007792248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935421,0.00006657925,0.005015496,0.00008369214,0.000011293279,0.000050049122,0.000081065,0.000021564323,0.0011282138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98444515,0.008478717,0.0011290846,0.0021968368,0.0032515635,0.00049864245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8617522,0.09390186,0.018427672,0.02187757,0.003207933,0.00083273975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023449639,0.0005032893,0.0008411258,0.0006778703,0.00047510397,0.0023970457,0.0007586035,0.0008912817,0.0021849496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11558612,0.0004650885,0.000550391,0.0006415454,0.0026768567,0.0017070035,0.0022499207,0.0016988355,0.00033447973],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005298123,0.0018693098,0.38924485,0.00069808116,0.0013076284,0.0009171292,0.013362244,0.12345817,0.026069371,0.18033856,0.0023654324,0.25507107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000283136,0.0013703953,0.36987033,0.0002054621,0.00041881678,0.00061049976,0.0022763521,0.20513187,0.026160141,0.3888021,0.0045832573,0.00028761764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021966791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013056956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023449639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010201106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000888899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12401503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188203536","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2021.591312","title":"Angry Women Are More Trusting: The Differential Effects of Perceived Social Distance on Trust Behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Qingdao University; Universität Konstanz","keywords":"Psychology; Anger; Social psychology; Mediation; Differential effects; Moderated mediation; Social distance; Test (biology); Control (management)","score_opus":0.022008527464566833,"score_gpt":0.34459647526715115,"score_spread":0.3225879478025843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188203536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99885464,0.0000722024,0.00011687707,0.00007461778,0.000006561467,0.0000043268874,0.000012433238,0.0000014717774,0.0008568326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995041,0.000047324203,0.00009136963,0.000033329776,0.0000048536804,0.000005530077,0.000010804138,0.0000012979606,0.00030128512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945086,0.00024255949,0.00002866425,0.00009193087,0.00010404364,0.0000819022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967991,0.0014070617,0.0010790128,0.00016781158,0.000096636286,0.0004504687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000852862,0.00021284493,0.0002738608,0.0002662224,0.0003394419,0.00096451817,0.00010046528,0.00028806351,0.0031878082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046197264,0.00019988269,0.0002061819,0.00015748371,0.0004984456,0.00031729334,0.0005172414,0.00060713774,0.00019399644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047097104,0.0013583176,0.9090317,0.00015462734,0.0004119292,0.00061082764,0.014560999,0.00015423352,0.03619664,0.0014350435,0.00042742616,0.030948617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026607919,0.0004478553,0.99539316,0.0000140781185,0.000053561784,0.0001320442,0.0024389108,0.00023911142,0.0006351234,0.0003211743,0.00028712035,0.000011161675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014462342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020423615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031878082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019304008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017150432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010664284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190098842","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3500302","title":"The Value of Delegation in Hiring","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Value (mathematics); Business; Law and economics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.010081455353539067,"score_gpt":0.2993720465666761,"score_spread":0.28929059121313705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190098842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77451533,0.0013925561,0.012471672,0.0072396114,0.00016532242,0.00008190401,0.00013249388,0.00008533149,0.20391579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957699,0.00010228797,0.0004016762,0.00008587241,0.0000608497,0.000011938773,0.000011913137,0.000008106887,0.003547384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364156,0.0036009313,0.0002840705,0.00046282026,0.0008478442,0.0011627907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8861722,0.0826045,0.010371809,0.010232011,0.0037614142,0.006858054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011750463,0.0004069314,0.0012049628,0.0011552706,0.0021991963,0.004658697,0.0012776623,0.0040370594,0.015514066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061572734,0.0004495048,0.00051489845,0.0008260183,0.0042225714,0.0048662904,0.002528232,0.0028215393,0.0010919846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056853592,0.0034311,0.09648827,0.00068998866,0.0003546741,0.001179299,0.0065030255,0.030393595,0.004609212,0.60578495,0.010428544,0.23445211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042623846,0.0009398962,0.08691557,0.00022664086,0.0001786904,0.00065267744,0.006308339,0.02918893,0.0020317119,0.86387795,0.009133501,0.00011985797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012304649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014590571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015514066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020721317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001617198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062143087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31912560","doi":"10.1111/den.13623","title":"Utilitarian Cooperation under Incomplete Information","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","keywords":"Interim; Complete information; Mathematical economics; Bayesian probability; Pareto principle; Axiom; Preference; Private information retrieval; Economics; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.06993073271019015,"score_gpt":0.31209306928235475,"score_spread":0.2421623365721646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31912560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8511217,0.0003380322,0.111479394,0.0019014521,0.00007122572,0.00017627173,0.00023137913,0.00006172767,0.03461885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953394,0.000091035174,0.0029027082,0.00006689909,0.00002485912,0.000072479415,0.00003394001,0.0000036211964,0.0014650155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99082774,0.006453279,0.00031557455,0.00075037533,0.0007536456,0.00089933904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233419,0.05389819,0.011610628,0.0070501044,0.001777591,0.002321542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011456489,0.00087240286,0.0010449183,0.00069421023,0.0004995015,0.0014705746,0.0006230352,0.0011313284,0.00604823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038939863,0.00025367827,0.0004369948,0.00047622868,0.0018611813,0.0017895204,0.0022744904,0.0010195227,0.0004695869],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054435115,0.0019089333,0.036537837,0.001433939,0.00066784845,0.0016836423,0.004800147,0.338712,0.012033675,0.46474075,0.0059847883,0.1260529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005497477,0.0023765403,0.024802042,0.0001292522,0.00010700302,0.000585226,0.0017304643,0.38330665,0.0019857003,0.58070785,0.0036248867,0.000094664545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008766769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054422335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011456489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010087476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013347187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06058842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191284576","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3357586","title":"Correlated Beliefs: Predicting Outcomes in 2×2 Games","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.010785931857697807,"score_gpt":0.29739879804386204,"score_spread":0.2866128661861642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191284576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961461,0.000040858045,0.0024137616,0.00013165087,0.000009872629,0.000029647714,0.00010832765,0.000015360567,0.0011044099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872535,0.000032924443,0.00068324065,0.000019857787,0.000009999979,0.000026718642,0.00012038656,0.0000040473137,0.0003774223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983571,0.00091236195,0.000082302926,0.00024276448,0.00017883933,0.00022645904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91089994,0.07777869,0.006150961,0.0020499968,0.00095473346,0.0021657092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040749474,0.0010121881,0.00082481565,0.0009059716,0.0003760644,0.0022247466,0.00076654874,0.0016634095,0.005372163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059635,0.0005167087,0.0005543623,0.0005693858,0.00061536126,0.0018200307,0.0010810503,0.0016917685,0.00065147685],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062767863,0.0045330534,0.8638191,0.00014804289,0.0008371865,0.0004048219,0.0009059072,0.071014866,0.001382608,0.012775698,0.0017493868,0.036152545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052695064,0.0020753518,0.37483323,0.00006083032,0.0002975233,0.00015727768,0.00060986256,0.576352,0.0008765847,0.04373854,0.00037444325,0.000097372846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051351367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00665419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005372163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006260465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005919185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021550655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194156785","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvab026","title":"Counterproductive Worker Behavior After a Pay Cut","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Business; Loyalty; Productivity; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.013683368385891745,"score_gpt":0.27809883402291175,"score_spread":0.26441546563702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194156785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946886,0.000010938386,0.00005992687,0.000048288573,0.0000031211346,0.000005344576,0.0000064325295,0.0000025498675,0.0003946137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923706,0.000011209501,0.00010117534,0.00007121222,0.000004404574,0.0000066037173,0.000016321927,0.0000012397396,0.00055079866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.00043282995,0.00004303507,0.000085946325,0.00015881158,0.00016284398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951611,0.0015238962,0.0019065805,0.00043295854,0.00034778233,0.0006277026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013240075,0.00020926046,0.00028091797,0.00041314142,0.0009937226,0.0010885602,0.00034857218,0.0009616714,0.0023844345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044592028,0.00018396287,0.00020618172,0.0001503968,0.0006151596,0.00025420875,0.00082061917,0.00091196527,0.00033110465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008920502,0.0025585773,0.9420128,0.00005843937,0.00009912055,0.00048762056,0.014601925,0.00052825466,0.012666668,0.0003845904,0.0006279668,0.025081994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019474854,0.001429036,0.98170394,0.000022650787,0.000017860464,0.00012014305,0.01346037,0.00097128906,0.0009818049,0.00028659002,0.0009632214,0.000023621904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027238035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046034153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027238035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005113271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027231165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007976711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194239761","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3909886","title":"CEO Social Media Presence and Insider Trading","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Insider trading; Business; Social media; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.03324302738235063,"score_gpt":0.31955751555765716,"score_spread":0.2863144881753065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194239761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99032193,0.0003043461,0.00006976867,0.000617762,0.000028109947,0.0000049615164,0.00008878541,0.000005380875,0.008559085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779105,0.000096698874,0.000025914747,0.00006180636,0.00006359133,0.0000029400321,0.00005458138,0.000003791854,0.001899593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915326,0.00033808136,0.0000504247,0.00009804427,0.00017622809,0.00018394332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96264404,0.01985921,0.011288926,0.0010246885,0.000981805,0.004201367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012361188,0.00017145788,0.00025929938,0.0009305071,0.0007282239,0.0035478803,0.00034456103,0.0011480389,0.014819119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01770257,0.00019414241,0.00023928772,0.0007350462,0.00053214026,0.001781936,0.0011489809,0.0011920235,0.0010376687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011896816,0.001662223,0.97203314,0.00004609292,0.00016150592,0.0005040708,0.0016839537,0.00025013092,0.0010726784,0.0019739124,0.0014560833,0.017966617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033963992,0.0002398697,0.992098,0.000029238554,0.00009518254,0.00019661605,0.0038426504,0.00079655624,0.00032159852,0.0011297141,0.0011999273,0.000016814292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024109373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050579873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014819119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045512998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004306353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049574852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196587590","doi":"10.1177/01492063211040555","title":"Competitive Rationales: Beneath the Surface of Competitive Behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rivalry; Competitive advantage; Reputation; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Competition (biology); Business; Forbearance; Consistency (knowledge bases); Marketing; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03410424412115923,"score_gpt":0.3277822866825536,"score_spread":0.2936780425613944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196587590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56928587,0.00178694,0.13610871,0.011014449,0.00016496427,0.00035203973,0.000181625,0.00014809643,0.2809573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895083,0.00017093775,0.008566113,0.00017812401,0.000016291586,0.000050874245,0.00003236871,0.000015066706,0.0014619492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320686,0.0030231613,0.00028862932,0.00072530826,0.0020999953,0.00065603014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860328,0.007162657,0.0025187884,0.0016129,0.0018425756,0.0008302708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065164515,0.00041886917,0.0005063617,0.002226571,0.002333821,0.006826188,0.0009702149,0.0022871625,0.0048590545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020394212,0.00044194327,0.0006452875,0.0015466448,0.013589115,0.006510235,0.0033776895,0.0022549971,0.0003166977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008774831,0.00010820249,0.022525467,0.00024858143,0.000050833474,0.000340001,0.011725718,0.0015668867,0.0021541272,0.91678023,0.0010897862,0.0433224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059732643,0.00022015243,0.05010572,0.00034512562,0.000069880305,0.00077231147,0.019478494,0.01213326,0.0010129397,0.86557555,0.050101623,0.00012508297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033519235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004392962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006826188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002677105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036066554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03446275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197888917","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12540","title":"The whip and the Bible: Punishment versus internalization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Internalization; Punishment (psychology); Economics; Social psychology; Investment (military); Sample (material); Microeconomics; Variety (cybernetics); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Public economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06000725032313764,"score_gpt":0.36052770795817624,"score_spread":0.3005204576350386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197888917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32513902,0.0027975226,0.09735231,0.032712016,0.00046691854,0.00012329036,0.0003512001,0.00013932747,0.54091835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918251,0.0002994084,0.0024693962,0.0006827428,0.00006926035,0.000035357116,0.000019354326,0.000023567794,0.0045758085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954939,0.0027441622,0.0001454309,0.00043241945,0.000829217,0.00035501516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983502,0.010335748,0.0027014466,0.0015534346,0.0013084376,0.00059888064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037176847,0.00030828457,0.00077535777,0.0011266244,0.0016179743,0.004145765,0.0009544907,0.002351043,0.013134937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022258634,0.00034833382,0.0004016175,0.0010090297,0.009785474,0.0038004662,0.0022324275,0.0030270794,0.0007620695],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007366363,0.00007330041,0.0029886453,0.0001078642,0.000019027091,0.00009671384,0.0010663668,0.004070653,0.0002987178,0.97858274,0.002441194,0.010181143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038809594,0.00007845707,0.0071523474,0.0001489359,0.000020914134,0.00014313658,0.0009129175,0.021393048,0.00027141915,0.9606458,0.009148942,0.000045227505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031359938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031846112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013134937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029264325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012885849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043940723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199183472","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3467732","title":"On Violations of the Dominance Postulate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.00927448839647087,"score_gpt":0.28973660968273324,"score_spread":0.28046212128626236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199183472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3538514,0.0014818141,0.13159013,0.033355538,0.0008493553,0.00010027201,0.0007559486,0.00020691362,0.47780868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798132,0.0005076922,0.005055036,0.0018800097,0.00048502578,0.000080943224,0.00017493995,0.00007675166,0.011926445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954651,0.0020551083,0.00022293346,0.0006168451,0.00093327154,0.0007066633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746128,0.016394464,0.0021162455,0.0039587114,0.0019265437,0.0009912741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063098334,0.0005963026,0.0015555071,0.00085324614,0.002128491,0.0036119916,0.0016670529,0.0029155102,0.016023755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02714282,0.00046026334,0.00073355745,0.00092308386,0.0045734625,0.0069527216,0.0027517134,0.0045013083,0.0014227642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007066861,0.00003951946,0.0006322267,0.000031072886,0.000016552682,0.000094731404,0.0002210009,0.0005853755,0.00042074046,0.9887045,0.0031891607,0.0059944936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019187833,0.00000980416,0.0004194345,0.0000055223345,0.00000402322,0.00005810648,0.00008029783,0.0014954087,0.00004953596,0.99681,0.0010422112,0.0000064095093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002106865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018469936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016023755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011139972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001344544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05360478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199741516","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104482","title":"Journal-based replication of experiments: An application to “Being Chosen to Lead”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Austrian Science Fund; Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Computer science; Publishing; Mechanism (biology); Reliability (semiconductor); Data science; Political science; Biology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0745627796491964,"score_gpt":0.38234857605391154,"score_spread":0.30778579640471515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199741516","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005902153,0.00083171047,0.97479296,0.00530373,0.0015228167,0.0041229413,0.00019567485,0.0010215073,0.0063065304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12349605,0.00037869922,0.85677916,0.002489876,0.00085664494,0.014114391,0.000106281674,0.000317203,0.0014616261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.32265747,0.60098916,0.015770242,0.029068198,0.029662937,0.0018519562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13714007,0.60993445,0.04269782,0.17622265,0.030423637,0.0035814256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5143431,0.0028609287,0.0058401544,0.004502379,0.007099638,0.0076704067,0.008541358,0.01392694,0.009630441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.79173625,0.0024303081,0.005947496,0.006476256,0.024731986,0.012814867,0.012224595,0.0125737125,0.0023195283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033859236,0.00045222306,0.010998204,0.0028103536,0.002633989,0.0008595249,0.012938591,0.01261897,0.0037424807,0.71377957,0.011602481,0.22417773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019797413,0.0012278885,0.0033703828,0.0007460429,0.00068503065,0.00078176055,0.00075733586,0.071840085,0.0032731702,0.88229334,0.032602,0.00044322596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032505146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020013351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48565692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062458687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014024705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5989015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199875104","doi":"10.1111/caje.12659","title":"Respecting entitlements in legislative bargaining: A matter of preference or necessity?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Innsbruck","keywords":"Legislature; Dictator; Preference; Bargaining power; Order (exchange); Economics; Power (physics); Dictator game; Microeconomics; Public economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.34245223324577995,"score_gpt":0.2887724590777806,"score_spread":0.05367977416799935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199875104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95898885,0.00016631279,0.01559005,0.0007878997,0.000034419474,0.000035486642,0.000016172935,0.000021129967,0.024359673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985072,0.000013902833,0.0010292573,0.000063676736,0.0000124959215,0.000009654405,0.000005060136,0.000004490075,0.00035428975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98524123,0.009728526,0.0007101337,0.001080483,0.002432984,0.0008066185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9268759,0.049404338,0.011168768,0.0070827934,0.0029741102,0.0024940409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020573331,0.00019167404,0.0005070079,0.0005657867,0.0011283928,0.0027122742,0.0005640897,0.0013048385,0.006705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08974738,0.00021342775,0.0003276477,0.00047741475,0.002894029,0.0025812702,0.0014857952,0.0014570826,0.0004395912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060406365,0.0017668217,0.29839972,0.0008379885,0.00052778976,0.0010143289,0.02571055,0.010775225,0.07845923,0.37437487,0.0017596288,0.20033325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041113494,0.0035741967,0.50461495,0.0002963855,0.00028479137,0.001426502,0.01729788,0.033849683,0.019435406,0.40282077,0.015702229,0.00028608055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044281202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007554196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020573331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007059093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068336003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10880351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201003870","doi":"10.3390/app11188368","title":"Promoting the Emergence of Behavior Norms in a Principal–Agent Problem—An Agent-Based Modeling Approach Using Reinforcement Learning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Seventh Framework Programme; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Action (physics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Baseline (sea); Political science","score_opus":0.1241299684711887,"score_gpt":0.3606135985080906,"score_spread":0.2364836300369019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201003870","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2299523,0.00013663298,0.764742,0.0008992271,0.000043913336,0.00014397118,0.00004617553,0.00012717463,0.0039085182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9122931,0.00010253195,0.08579231,0.00007706697,0.000021901273,0.00017413532,0.000027376202,0.000019110812,0.0014925341],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897826,0.00068643334,0.00003190548,0.00013567106,0.00009634402,0.00007136148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940878,0.0044437577,0.0005820937,0.00027048713,0.00033790615,0.00027794024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028839014,0.0007334184,0.0010030866,0.0005452649,0.00063103775,0.0012204971,0.0015618311,0.001369081,0.0017105564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076428247,0.00043933612,0.0007395814,0.00030780735,0.0018105996,0.0016149991,0.0010143704,0.0016776938,0.0001313538],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027265405,0.00004653593,0.00069444877,0.000019315197,0.000019040184,0.00002370048,0.0000570694,0.9823813,0.00027411056,0.014391468,0.000080347236,0.0019854915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009431319,0.000011823872,0.000034020213,0.0000015759647,0.0000026588332,0.0000022700817,0.000005902987,0.996807,0.00005558318,0.0030085288,0.000059065267,0.0000020593066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071894233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053337277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071894233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001590926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001681305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015251696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201178880","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v23i2.4102","title":"The Competing Impacts of Negative Feedback on Academic Performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negative feedback; Test (biology); Significant difference; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.02747628066389096,"score_gpt":0.2869769225778497,"score_spread":0.2595006419139587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201178880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99693847,0.0000799915,0.00043066047,0.00007090938,0.000031661893,0.000039960847,0.00003955341,0.000017842916,0.0023509362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827087,0.000074180716,0.0005173187,0.000077049066,0.000021640422,0.000082202794,0.00005328224,0.000011423915,0.0008918758],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658406,0.0015286301,0.00019318397,0.00040977495,0.00094447436,0.00033990768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93481666,0.049897455,0.005846558,0.001727165,0.0016762678,0.0060358997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043387017,0.0008916593,0.00087745785,0.0006320375,0.0003899448,0.0016924307,0.00079271285,0.0011674161,0.0046276925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040459484,0.000318845,0.0003688705,0.00039546206,0.00082000974,0.00075539877,0.0009150761,0.0013734893,0.0006675609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11145151,0.06112255,0.24325413,0.0019506695,0.00090775825,0.0010953634,0.0032086703,0.020062113,0.2851802,0.0061051855,0.0022012733,0.2634606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031489457,0.16783656,0.71514726,0.0002786983,0.0007096133,0.00049781136,0.0013253301,0.026475975,0.07038239,0.011973936,0.0018928318,0.00033061666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007451416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064787414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046276925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006893809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080964825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022945523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201322086","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0255531","title":"No effect of ‘watching eyes’: An attempted replication and extension investigating individual differences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Extension (predicate logic); Biology; Computer science; Virology","score_opus":0.12084879801348987,"score_gpt":0.33879826472605623,"score_spread":0.21794946671256638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201322086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97308797,0.0010771203,0.012974714,0.0005400901,0.0003840534,0.0010776422,0.0010185994,0.00018811178,0.009651617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852241,0.00012278839,0.008968893,0.00048977416,0.00006283444,0.0015077405,0.00030196595,0.00017995822,0.0031419606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841181,0.006766531,0.0009290508,0.0054289824,0.002145942,0.00061137567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8634577,0.079088554,0.010615058,0.038801473,0.0064327493,0.0016044602],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019724848,0.0011868938,0.0013864917,0.0006766746,0.0014476025,0.0013640488,0.00283321,0.0015765121,0.0104482705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07890078,0.0008339067,0.0022745652,0.0006008584,0.0028777309,0.0027585274,0.002410466,0.002276162,0.0009782698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03428687,0.010435196,0.5596564,0.005613709,0.007956588,0.00285575,0.040976256,0.001521461,0.18129332,0.0155776935,0.0048457845,0.134981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055087573,0.008790592,0.95473325,0.00019051053,0.003045309,0.00066049263,0.0017747596,0.0018752967,0.015960814,0.0051224018,0.007147597,0.00014818422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042317603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031686453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98027515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005815249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011377198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104316175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202302905","doi":"","title":"Truth, Honesty, and Strategic Interactions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Honesty; Strategic complements; Dominance (genetics); Microeconomics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Strategic interaction; Product (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Mathematical economics; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04846084312158099,"score_gpt":0.2956969285457132,"score_spread":0.24723608542413222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202302905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9547316,0.00022159102,0.02354297,0.0016131457,0.000052182517,0.000116322684,0.000053903805,0.000031606953,0.019636817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961921,0.00004348153,0.0031817153,0.000097171105,0.000008420136,0.000031647487,0.000011333567,0.000004940086,0.00042919395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889492,0.007484247,0.0005147358,0.0010713079,0.0014635797,0.0005169654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9244409,0.05880378,0.010591753,0.0039380505,0.0010622591,0.001163247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009764133,0.000687378,0.000587267,0.00044763618,0.000909063,0.002865702,0.00072601036,0.0019449178,0.0043114135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04654704,0.00044925162,0.00034883848,0.00024195723,0.0033364028,0.0035759879,0.0020785676,0.0019551106,0.00023471001],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007428631,0.004603711,0.09967399,0.0017620836,0.0008460385,0.0018368145,0.024667695,0.029929157,0.12801595,0.6189494,0.002503238,0.07978336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013921685,0.006339603,0.059527166,0.00033430482,0.0006831848,0.0015335797,0.010343104,0.13867001,0.03641344,0.73058426,0.013837039,0.00034212004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005006579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053350336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009764133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009999946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007580337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051638305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202363046","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3264071","title":"Equilibrium Homophily in Networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.017021881916001878,"score_gpt":0.3127283901877742,"score_spread":0.2957065082717723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202363046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9073614,0.0001386017,0.06435381,0.001168369,0.000028337467,0.000062387895,0.0001621279,0.00012045829,0.02660451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514234,0.00006545793,0.0018002143,0.000047322406,0.000014330285,0.00003819813,0.000051703275,0.000010486,0.0028299529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882954,0.0005773423,0.000028176713,0.00023370248,0.00012764115,0.00020351299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896305,0.007653892,0.0007320322,0.00084954273,0.000403625,0.0007304523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020519833,0.00028664822,0.00086944236,0.0012435064,0.0012537009,0.002927947,0.00092580024,0.001868014,0.011951838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015101935,0.00046113264,0.0005772884,0.00062360254,0.0017092127,0.004495315,0.0015446057,0.0011242336,0.00090954674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002655448,0.00022391035,0.008045827,0.00014566122,0.00011840446,0.00026040847,0.0010913654,0.036860976,0.0028720172,0.9308248,0.003120878,0.01617018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010725275,0.00011796149,0.0077899965,0.00003592418,0.000061511295,0.00017685062,0.0010416142,0.14463255,0.00062136946,0.84438306,0.0009940361,0.00003782701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012720943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013353347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011951838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010214234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005397919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039982855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202647661","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4513819","title":"Leaders and Social Norms: On the Emergence of Consensus or Conflict","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Consensus theory; Social psychology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social change; Law","score_opus":0.15341348684570044,"score_gpt":0.3892307137048922,"score_spread":0.23581722685919176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202647661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94241136,0.000431691,0.0149907945,0.0042408565,0.00009650478,0.000037092886,0.00006923483,0.000030019466,0.037692413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984755,0.00010219351,0.00085925544,0.000055257064,0.000029133733,0.000013768548,0.000012187222,0.000007645474,0.0004450726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970023,0.0019594529,0.00009469306,0.00030795904,0.00037604297,0.00025950142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9171502,0.06982308,0.0062759984,0.002619195,0.0022665903,0.0018649284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007395404,0.00027364626,0.0005588532,0.0010406764,0.0008386972,0.0028342176,0.00082298135,0.0014755531,0.005554978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05467442,0.00022174705,0.0003377631,0.0006747189,0.0045884876,0.0033530486,0.0015890236,0.0015314631,0.00033968015],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014761096,0.0006562367,0.050553493,0.000310027,0.00015964097,0.00043549328,0.009651816,0.010437241,0.0033318743,0.8351865,0.00436014,0.08344145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025391058,0.00024379809,0.029580813,0.00006311775,0.00006509128,0.00010080149,0.0050249184,0.034428053,0.001128963,0.9273986,0.0016546672,0.000057189216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009466706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083896134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007395404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007199778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071955426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039111078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203157025","doi":"10.1177/01492063211040557","title":"High Compensation and Unethical Reciprocity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Food and Health Bureau","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Honesty; Social exchange theory; Compensation (psychology); Dishonesty; Norm of reciprocity; Wage; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Organizational behavior; Public relations; Economics; Labour economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04233063207898136,"score_gpt":0.339750767582652,"score_spread":0.29742013550367064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203157025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98048764,0.00022530004,0.0061559426,0.000681585,0.000021867036,0.000055861427,0.000018146398,0.000008885865,0.012344794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990103,0.000056172943,0.00042079075,0.00006422692,0.000008774173,0.000017245526,0.0000066444254,0.000001445179,0.00041434975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921868,0.004825293,0.00055204786,0.0005361173,0.0012889007,0.000610901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91683453,0.035784964,0.035356984,0.006473433,0.0025409968,0.0030090997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008846364,0.0004358958,0.0004349364,0.0010380297,0.0015712844,0.002119381,0.0005686751,0.0011049149,0.004339482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036163304,0.00026411872,0.00032691134,0.00039357183,0.0034364543,0.0020844245,0.0024730335,0.0018094744,0.00022966346],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016927796,0.0053355074,0.69674146,0.00067892007,0.00056368945,0.0016312653,0.022284688,0.005373879,0.014017506,0.15361732,0.001156833,0.096906155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030701194,0.0027180836,0.780832,0.00031679866,0.00023171207,0.002551776,0.016536241,0.017986747,0.00751724,0.16267794,0.008089447,0.0002349394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000663194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008558762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008846364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011060865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082206086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04678458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203745101","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3099053","title":"The Effect of Relative Performance Information Type on Creative Problem-Solving","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Type (biology); Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.011800298867117972,"score_gpt":0.30862795733401727,"score_spread":0.2968276584668993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203745101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947278,0.00014158546,0.0004810324,0.00016342799,0.000022591668,0.000021258296,0.00012187587,0.000033283948,0.0042871474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731714,0.000069915375,0.00069917215,0.00007044894,0.0000470651,0.000028087403,0.00013341654,0.000049437815,0.0015852692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951747,0.0024365275,0.00054723903,0.00050195545,0.0008581318,0.00048147756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64269733,0.3150869,0.018392546,0.012384008,0.0036312914,0.007807897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008406103,0.0005818648,0.00080475013,0.0014905126,0.0005226267,0.0037193312,0.0008865619,0.0019343928,0.015009855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123455666,0.0006193317,0.0005632468,0.0011238974,0.00087905786,0.0026509697,0.0018571961,0.0022047479,0.0016080996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10077159,0.031434506,0.6421184,0.0008634229,0.0015824576,0.0010116211,0.003215652,0.009125353,0.067247376,0.005748308,0.0021875151,0.1346938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014329108,0.010386078,0.95922285,0.000108035034,0.000787322,0.0007059013,0.0010498328,0.008663751,0.009411237,0.007086172,0.0009791482,0.00016674427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005833577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041597764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015009855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052818254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008012314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05021298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204276528","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1647","title":"When minority influence is enough to increase tolerance of fraud: An experimental small‐group study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12350015153824462,"score_gpt":0.37518576676528087,"score_spread":0.25168561522703625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204276528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99975795,0.0000044132375,0.000041876305,0.000014068053,0.0000029002842,0.000015300551,0.0000022092033,5.683115e-7,0.00016081265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996536,0.0000068329346,0.00010913299,0.00001954327,0.0000056271406,0.00003744541,0.0000056418858,7.023981e-7,0.00016157492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974093,0.0015566552,0.00011787552,0.0003035349,0.00037126444,0.00024149515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878351,0.0059111784,0.0026250503,0.0014866634,0.00032902247,0.0018128875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025642079,0.00021558898,0.00051097997,0.00043109714,0.0009121234,0.0010731054,0.00042537352,0.00067722617,0.0023126088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012174987,0.0002788688,0.0002966928,0.00021912155,0.0014762896,0.0005462957,0.001014697,0.0009438826,0.00019197234],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.054158036,0.22227015,0.5265862,0.00024632353,0.00050764374,0.00082824065,0.03259512,0.0013185987,0.095477544,0.004213283,0.0007216025,0.061077394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029848686,0.1334047,0.8234814,0.000053213498,0.0002288458,0.0004077222,0.010820534,0.0044927993,0.018989982,0.0027363815,0.0022965376,0.00010308801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009465331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009115752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025642079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037698002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004293924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01356101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205717120","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2021.101782","title":"The value of bad ratings: An experiment on the impact of distortions in reputation systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Robustness (evolution); Reputation management; Rating system; Value (mathematics); Reputation system; Psychology; Actuarial science; Business; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.04552218681965053,"score_gpt":0.37725666596339025,"score_spread":0.3317344791437397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205717120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99143595,0.00009590986,0.0011285538,0.0007159452,0.00011125314,0.00011362184,0.00014631831,0.000028200835,0.006224221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734145,0.00005448493,0.0009783696,0.00018049238,0.000039087146,0.00008753165,0.00006200208,0.000014680063,0.0012418772],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.996228,0.0018959022,0.00030468815,0.0005163198,0.0007220181,0.0003329753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8652963,0.10809289,0.010802554,0.009980731,0.0014852895,0.0043423004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066429502,0.000898488,0.00090680196,0.00062706583,0.000861748,0.0028821703,0.001277582,0.003355902,0.011365491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04716676,0.0006059842,0.00051537843,0.0005082468,0.0025740822,0.003001438,0.0013577336,0.0036035501,0.0008380741],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1679887,0.17922801,0.07877462,0.0026839462,0.0023463268,0.0020154403,0.0055124345,0.056595527,0.22697096,0.15133029,0.014282518,0.11227118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.069748595,0.1508786,0.19316095,0.0005477386,0.002488412,0.001809936,0.0042387964,0.19931792,0.06807988,0.29571134,0.012858365,0.0011595582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010406738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074546936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011365491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097339076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009217401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038021386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206084316","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1648","title":"Quand une influence minoritaire suffit à rendre plus tolérant à la fraude: Une étude expérimentale au sein de petits groupes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Psychology; Social psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.11281894908472298,"score_gpt":0.36466909746981585,"score_spread":0.2518501483850929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206084316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993487,0.000011720412,0.00014577367,0.000024820347,0.0000063147095,0.000020693962,0.00000382902,0.0000011473463,0.0004369156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985037,0.00002154318,0.00046886454,0.00003306545,0.000012462768,0.00009052544,0.000009484358,0.0000021146038,0.0008582208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646026,0.002092552,0.00014265085,0.00059507164,0.0004958992,0.00021355653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828098,0.011392467,0.0021782876,0.0017638527,0.00048140524,0.0013742506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041416804,0.00025200023,0.00046793942,0.0003078226,0.0010205815,0.0014316828,0.00048453143,0.00096571684,0.0043099727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017815867,0.00031163503,0.00036835394,0.00016809838,0.0017735123,0.00055139756,0.0008724332,0.00091255584,0.00029043373],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.066218324,0.16176566,0.40656206,0.00056482025,0.0007985809,0.0011052339,0.041905604,0.0043037524,0.19550993,0.017307416,0.0009151777,0.10304342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009036188,0.19257538,0.6963016,0.00015888356,0.0008079677,0.00092093815,0.01747009,0.01952813,0.04212817,0.009806786,0.011018009,0.0002479293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029370636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022052536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043099727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062030286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006501442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021903515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207007207","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12738","title":"The Impact of Knowledge Transfer on Investment in Knowledge Creation in Firms†‡","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Business; Organizational learning; Knowledge creation; Investment (military); Unit (ring theory); Congruence (geometry); Strategic business unit; Industrial organization; Marketing; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.15734824228746505,"score_gpt":0.47243645400825734,"score_spread":0.31508821172079227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207007207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99059266,0.0000677592,0.00047303567,0.0004115253,0.0000051579877,0.000021243946,0.000021372374,0.000007529546,0.008399753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956435,0.000016060905,0.00010516783,0.000019175091,0.0000026075274,0.000008553326,0.000006844866,0.0000010059072,0.00027625498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505377,0.003279302,0.00020168493,0.00027658071,0.0006055536,0.00058309286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86775947,0.104178704,0.015403413,0.0041928617,0.0024182147,0.0060473387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005816247,0.00029698087,0.00029697153,0.0007052722,0.00070870324,0.0029674934,0.00048722787,0.0012836654,0.008169096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04851811,0.00021377746,0.00027546866,0.0005914324,0.0013836523,0.0022375197,0.0022218134,0.0015411811,0.00038016695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074235443,0.010733052,0.75644445,0.0003716687,0.00044162766,0.00083911774,0.0036274442,0.03329547,0.011588535,0.05269832,0.001331177,0.12120561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049198454,0.004182122,0.87912214,0.00013896411,0.00033385548,0.00026761598,0.004781698,0.044445727,0.010652234,0.052437183,0.0030273024,0.00011918307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013837868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011460765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008169096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020738847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013701271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030759633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207215146","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2108337118","title":"Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Framing (construction); Competition (biology); Opt-out; Promotion (chess); Social psychology; Psychology; Task (project management); Social comparison theory; Economics; Public relations; Political science; Business; Advertising; Management; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.09378044008778022,"score_gpt":0.3913357327654643,"score_spread":0.2975552926776841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207215146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908807,0.00003244747,0.0005408541,0.00026811755,0.000056311066,0.000025196285,0.00003722946,0.000015343217,0.00814366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462885,0.000033969678,0.0006302904,0.00027263185,0.000028110951,0.00006078605,0.000048894788,0.000020613557,0.0042759827],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985909,0.00069038116,0.000050598246,0.00020682224,0.0002744751,0.00018680556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902076,0.005552471,0.0018418857,0.0010853107,0.0002510112,0.0010617049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025254618,0.00036655008,0.0004944128,0.000248012,0.00048268746,0.0014804637,0.00037937044,0.0007428267,0.020306483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010417478,0.00027866708,0.00015938855,0.00012599873,0.0010542861,0.00048512671,0.0008247957,0.0012572339,0.0011237009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.047462385,0.07877212,0.25501913,0.0008583442,0.00030606927,0.0012026182,0.0204603,0.001582607,0.36805248,0.039550256,0.010962299,0.17577143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022337644,0.022062765,0.8656416,0.00027078876,0.00028659095,0.00046015056,0.010455105,0.009292249,0.03770104,0.030749487,0.020663427,0.0001829959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010984861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012089176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020306483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044470734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004502205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06793201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215326869","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3966838","title":"Implicit Discrimination and the Promotion Gap","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Decision maker; Promotion (chess); Position (finance); Stochastic game; Microeconomics; Economics; Decision analysis; Mathematical economics; Political science; Management science","score_opus":0.026838168797360513,"score_gpt":0.3259231563830327,"score_spread":0.2990849875856722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215326869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8517149,0.0013049766,0.0059263315,0.0042584017,0.00016646147,0.000034565397,0.00010057132,0.00004881401,0.1364451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961926,0.00013050345,0.00030676866,0.00016853197,0.000054260476,0.00000939986,0.000016668046,0.0000073030455,0.0031138794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975683,0.00077853375,0.000120904595,0.00033255346,0.00068939483,0.0005102507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653949,0.02416511,0.0042779567,0.0026676003,0.0012959865,0.002198473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056373947,0.00032466112,0.0009716043,0.0010833076,0.0012140024,0.0045094565,0.0007392175,0.0029356927,0.021834122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02908799,0.0003461508,0.0002978843,0.0008531761,0.002838725,0.0051327473,0.0033538868,0.0036329771,0.0015003777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033437777,0.0050767814,0.052424353,0.0004384041,0.00008526592,0.0004292392,0.0034039316,0.0031947885,0.005692334,0.7859644,0.004318984,0.13562766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043128405,0.00069959596,0.05415162,0.0001444272,0.00007717041,0.00029298675,0.0017878555,0.009583971,0.0016535739,0.9248069,0.0063181138,0.000052470594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058847165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058810296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021834122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083779136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013244364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07304245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215887133","doi":"","title":"Persuasion in Global Games with Application to Stress Testing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Monotone polygon; Persuasion; Adversarial system; Stochastic game; Stress test; Action (physics); Test (biology); Monotonic function; Stress (linguistics); Information asymmetry; Economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Mathematics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.016347921249961424,"score_gpt":0.3193817644431084,"score_spread":0.30303384319314697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215887133","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11372905,0.00043287443,0.8652269,0.0019297941,0.00012511095,0.00029616515,0.00011155139,0.0001845743,0.017963804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93427086,0.00029018262,0.05999072,0.00041599144,0.00013009616,0.00039050519,0.00005156301,0.000055213462,0.004404796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937736,0.0042677615,0.00019130764,0.0007233369,0.00055539876,0.00048861804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508807,0.041492857,0.0038479953,0.0014173045,0.001086629,0.0012744354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066557024,0.002031105,0.0016439399,0.0009158506,0.0006876503,0.001816362,0.0014701455,0.00250502,0.0049953875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03590151,0.0005246776,0.0010674273,0.00051895034,0.004977868,0.002641222,0.0029084603,0.0031527488,0.00032832686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034487428,0.0003093977,0.0023704218,0.0002838471,0.00020241406,0.00050356425,0.0007099952,0.39628446,0.003825335,0.56705153,0.0015310075,0.026583178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000125439,0.00025524257,0.00041242078,0.00003165898,0.0000277934,0.000064135085,0.00009930463,0.56397516,0.0006955915,0.43342873,0.00085335126,0.00003120012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014532005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085695874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066557024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001618797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035199165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217686462","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12746","title":"How Far Will Managers Go to Look Like a Good Steward? An Examination of Preferences for Trustworthiness and Honesty in Managerial Reporting†","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Honesty; Business; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Control (management); Agency cost; Investment (military); Trustworthiness; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Shareholder; Corporate governance; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.13139727727165257,"score_gpt":0.4007255559914783,"score_spread":0.26932827871982573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217686462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955959,0.00015612124,0.0008367649,0.0007768488,0.000008084627,0.00000983227,0.000015458863,0.0000031038437,0.0025979162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957436,0.00003653075,0.00018063202,0.00008909511,0.0000065360064,0.000002918033,0.0000053814247,9.05597e-7,0.00010368641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936237,0.00402784,0.0004866346,0.00043571877,0.00087884587,0.0005473533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9086381,0.039290585,0.042442482,0.0038594431,0.0023085293,0.0034608594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0132279685,0.00021804676,0.0003589388,0.0005870151,0.00080854533,0.0025924882,0.00038234532,0.0011216721,0.0026352121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047915667,0.00033569272,0.00037392857,0.00034449718,0.0016696452,0.0017543129,0.00086149847,0.0016650471,0.00025969648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018876161,0.0006382849,0.91233397,0.00019070366,0.0005272396,0.0005126607,0.014256617,0.0025611033,0.0069379234,0.008176797,0.00125037,0.050726593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111167676,0.0010370493,0.9548233,0.00013515132,0.00017202804,0.00037212032,0.01685301,0.010321702,0.0025558008,0.01086505,0.0026166546,0.00013691591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019645866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003363635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98677206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009201983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004958301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06995702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W370860803","doi":"","title":"\"Shocks\" and Productivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Task (project management); Shock (circulatory); Stress (linguistics); Image (mathematics); Econometrics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Macroeconomics; Management; Medicine","score_opus":0.060932031783423324,"score_gpt":0.3898022015502966,"score_spread":0.3288701697668733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W370860803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791272,0.00069954636,0.0021294376,0.0012699607,0.000050658182,0.000031331092,0.000210811,0.000045680645,0.016435321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847203,0.00021480492,0.00020365912,0.00010350295,0.000022156239,0.000009579777,0.00005346071,0.0000053044596,0.000915592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928087,0.00023024686,0.00006403281,0.00011613479,0.00014953087,0.00015915323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953784,0.004959156,0.003074342,0.0008747463,0.00049548823,0.0010585395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090437656,0.000281057,0.0003140356,0.0005252856,0.0002882377,0.0017870902,0.00027774932,0.0009993503,0.008488369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139219975,0.00019217179,0.00022945506,0.00050684944,0.0008429689,0.00078072824,0.0012970257,0.0008254958,0.00059335376],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050698672,0.0031232762,0.5676792,0.0012015853,0.00065769115,0.0015939588,0.0064232443,0.009390663,0.05009641,0.06468285,0.007145222,0.2829361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013317371,0.0007153947,0.9349796,0.000079985846,0.00009573015,0.0002177943,0.0017656015,0.0018056582,0.0029954931,0.053687032,0.003464193,0.000060322836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007750947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003931764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008488369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007622082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026186404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028396368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205463078","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2021.1773","title":"Third-party punishers do not compete to be chosen as partners in an experimental game","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Royal Society; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Third party; Trustworthiness; Preference; Competition (biology); Dictator game; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.09111144177677592,"score_gpt":0.37765115035881236,"score_spread":0.2865397085820364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205463078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977482,0.000013102892,0.0008047354,0.00006539398,0.000010366209,0.000048694015,0.000022772138,0.0000067548644,0.0012800578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951841,0.000020186597,0.0022998282,0.000081805796,0.000007637383,0.00022953574,0.000040387462,0.000008272231,0.002128292],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832636,0.0007820905,0.00013252665,0.00026469326,0.00027780808,0.00021655657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99045753,0.0049115573,0.0015955038,0.0017756433,0.00021286767,0.0010468069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027252093,0.0007489956,0.00093305594,0.00030734166,0.00062174915,0.0015575271,0.0008319867,0.0012812817,0.005188714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009243242,0.00041189347,0.00038029888,0.00017152884,0.0012210121,0.00086805463,0.0010950435,0.0015171284,0.00047824846],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.047913723,0.03237332,0.17089571,0.0013396472,0.0013874791,0.0027234578,0.006658709,0.025171591,0.57927626,0.074274935,0.0025469381,0.055438235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012252848,0.083595544,0.32983792,0.00030666828,0.0012805392,0.0042479136,0.0059988596,0.31442267,0.12891608,0.09871909,0.019706847,0.0007150527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008962025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018209369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005188714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071584753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000462023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017357945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205669792","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2022.102482","title":"Chess girls don’t cry: Gender composition of games and effort in competitions among the super-elite","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Psychology; Social psychology; Stereotype (UML); Contrast (vision); Intimidation; Stereotype threat; Outcome (game theory); Political science; Economics; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04686956869636666,"score_gpt":0.3658694682787818,"score_spread":0.31899989958241515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205669792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984182,0.000041449926,0.000015580825,0.0001123479,0.000008224342,0.0000021434048,0.000034216107,7.0848216e-7,0.0013671813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926144,0.000014742617,0.0000127098765,0.000043252316,0.000006898309,0.000001819815,0.000038697133,0.0000018145673,0.0006186064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962735,0.00008485312,0.00001459659,0.00005935996,0.00005450575,0.0001594485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752814,0.0005640057,0.00049250794,0.00008382214,0.00015065483,0.0011808653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007384303,0.00020165608,0.00027939095,0.0006159352,0.00073116744,0.0013942894,0.00037940152,0.00079017726,0.007973076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031226077,0.0002742512,0.0002490083,0.0004259668,0.00070665136,0.0007464802,0.0007045812,0.0007908462,0.00083515036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014289429,0.0006917479,0.97882515,0.000018232622,0.000106913976,0.00020230937,0.004436853,0.00013026346,0.0022566442,0.0010997576,0.0011292415,0.009673919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015106489,0.00007233544,0.9962197,0.000004228221,0.0000055600867,0.00003136176,0.0029574013,0.00015201561,0.000048587295,0.00024709207,0.00024189176,0.0000047475737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015395902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032423545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015395902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000390748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003345477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030612588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205680544","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/8wa6v","title":"No effect of ‘watching eyes’: An attempted replication and extension investigating individual differences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Reputation; Dictator game; Psychology; Replicate; Social psychology; Feeling; Altruism (biology); Replication (statistics)","score_opus":0.08057646486581005,"score_gpt":0.3804621998102232,"score_spread":0.2998857349444132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205680544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97708523,0.00087057456,0.008904078,0.0005149591,0.0002466095,0.00076259975,0.00075265026,0.00010795457,0.010755407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98659664,0.00013483733,0.0073370715,0.00048928853,0.000061022896,0.0010734183,0.00024558528,0.00013319147,0.0039288886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867791,0.0060961763,0.00075930206,0.004108635,0.0017792359,0.00047755637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87184566,0.071480274,0.010289549,0.039104924,0.0057942583,0.0014853303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01755052,0.0010435758,0.0012038236,0.00064139714,0.0012993817,0.0013120233,0.0023375044,0.0014085283,0.011135978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06650619,0.0007462206,0.002109428,0.00055708864,0.0024513248,0.0026316515,0.0021183174,0.0020346562,0.0011489262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03698123,0.013224288,0.5680277,0.0037769752,0.007164505,0.002141022,0.027744852,0.0016550445,0.16687003,0.019681495,0.0043622665,0.14837058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054865907,0.007657685,0.95893764,0.00014895151,0.0022424452,0.00050206744,0.0013637616,0.0018142454,0.0149151385,0.0052721174,0.0064724484,0.00012486428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00393188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002660799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005885137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008945833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09281707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206551659","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12519","title":"People prefer to diversify across different types of prosocial behaviour","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Casual; Psychology; Social psychology; Helping behavior; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04119979829542892,"score_gpt":0.3921544987503774,"score_spread":0.3509547004549485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206551659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99901724,0.00004947403,0.00013982602,0.000038460294,0.0000026882265,0.000010778606,0.000022295188,0.0000029276314,0.0007163927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989911,0.00006994789,0.00043635772,0.0000805318,0.00000537179,0.00002333468,0.0000651761,0.0000015471551,0.00032666835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.0001920545,0.000057563015,0.000102000246,0.00015444218,0.00009339624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973833,0.00056914054,0.0010316228,0.00035510515,0.00021972887,0.0004410593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011462185,0.00021753447,0.00037446382,0.00053374574,0.00052133435,0.0010243523,0.00018526743,0.0005738108,0.0016759608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004032512,0.0002037084,0.00031084454,0.0002512524,0.0006241332,0.00064688234,0.00088059786,0.0005614587,0.0002876834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012171178,0.0009014792,0.8893605,0.00026014537,0.0005680938,0.00030905375,0.013630078,0.0004687996,0.021509165,0.0005971546,0.000699869,0.07047867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029192595,0.0005050187,0.9932401,0.000019293986,0.000035566456,0.00022732366,0.003909899,0.00024748573,0.00045921342,0.00058066903,0.0007261015,0.00002020583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006965021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020044826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016759608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019121676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012868227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0060617924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206616847","doi":"10.1093/aler/ahab016","title":"Reputational versus Beckerian Sanctions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Law and Economics Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Normative; Incentive; Enforcement; Intuition; Certainty; Deterrence (psychology); Law and economics; Law enforcement; Economics; Value (mathematics); Business; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05132910233848005,"score_gpt":0.36751225650734665,"score_spread":0.3161831541688666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206616847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2551793,0.04839282,0.058837794,0.03598057,0.001032103,0.00011500459,0.00035488931,0.00021814038,0.59988934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98338646,0.005584956,0.0020472,0.0008710421,0.00028391386,0.000021500475,0.000034762525,0.000011138843,0.0077589806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607843,0.0013057482,0.0001532259,0.00035805456,0.0017156388,0.00038902037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911815,0.002712922,0.0026180719,0.00087834866,0.0020798482,0.00052938855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033918282,0.00024068487,0.0004600039,0.0011285841,0.0007945282,0.0022907918,0.00083286676,0.0013588708,0.005313455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089095775,0.00016989978,0.00032747939,0.00075819914,0.003558914,0.0016541169,0.00090936216,0.0014255049,0.0006653404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006256149,0.000091760834,0.0017098337,0.0004429157,0.0000735134,0.000058776684,0.00009781649,0.006487019,0.00070475374,0.93366903,0.006043073,0.050558984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001259322,0.00030980518,0.017811809,0.0012024749,0.0001208941,0.0004049563,0.0003073318,0.01546928,0.0017440865,0.9058646,0.056549728,0.00008909065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017331154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030069563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005313455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026692434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018233036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0193668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206625668","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-9077-6_2","title":"Attitudinal Hedonism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Library of ethics and applied philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hedonism; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10856632009594247,"score_gpt":0.3135060689875289,"score_spread":0.20493974889158645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206625668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035122044,0.0012261196,0.007813325,0.0021165067,0.00019029333,0.000024463792,0.00011570076,0.000045061763,0.95334655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5795371,0.0018974028,0.0038435473,0.0007365366,0.00018360966,0.00004687624,0.00017907229,0.000026168655,0.4135496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998673,0.00003175358,0.0000035589107,0.000015621397,0.000064181804,0.000017644345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980766,0.00006984122,0.000012077376,0.000029580757,0.000049414255,0.00003145158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046710603,0.00030284634,0.00014154153,0.00044864352,0.00045982437,0.0015178198,0.00020773131,0.0003305839,0.02580837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009725189,0.00010223627,0.00013543527,0.0005152018,0.00064503576,0.0008204252,0.0005079134,0.0011024346,0.0032707774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042136784,0.00022857705,0.0052597513,0.00005687606,0.000013183803,0.000047776564,0.0011823962,0.00040681558,0.0013291338,0.6532974,0.029644923,0.308491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015097338,0.00014654608,0.05729557,0.00019276276,0.000020806805,0.00031827553,0.001870876,0.003317236,0.0026209024,0.65596,0.27821156,0.00003042443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046097508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007489777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02580837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000541455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003794258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08633757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206721657","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2021.4037","title":"Complex Disclosure","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Obfuscation; Private information retrieval; Computer science; Process (computing); Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.06573237943242256,"score_gpt":0.36609680493363445,"score_spread":0.3003644255012119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206721657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6940079,0.006048999,0.12280746,0.014323394,0.0009032347,0.00077882304,0.0018881456,0.0007588928,0.15848313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98289376,0.00083323073,0.009396715,0.0013304574,0.0002741338,0.0001263438,0.00028972115,0.000050249284,0.004805425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789039,0.010291091,0.0021518657,0.0019489512,0.0058329115,0.00087139383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59994763,0.23576601,0.07789442,0.07204237,0.011618378,0.0027312338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01824514,0.00070642575,0.0005453533,0.001097089,0.0013086968,0.004451358,0.0012412664,0.0020412344,0.019753996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17948747,0.00044086968,0.0005553357,0.0012567837,0.0018793823,0.005178676,0.0031713678,0.0029579028,0.0019581693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00313319,0.0017366187,0.12711304,0.001862118,0.0008010619,0.00094761787,0.006680207,0.011822844,0.0140356645,0.33379713,0.023089947,0.47498056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011564979,0.003438996,0.0942831,0.001149299,0.00080271735,0.006560757,0.0028907072,0.053827293,0.037568763,0.59625,0.20155025,0.0005216616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063155906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040840465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019753996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001243227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001145193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09649068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206736296","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1324371","title":"Tournament Incentives, Fairness and Subsequent Performance: What Happens to the Losers?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Incentive; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Public economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01562997981260247,"score_gpt":0.29517813602953746,"score_spread":0.279548156216935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206736296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9242303,0.002025466,0.004706173,0.024389137,0.0004635111,0.000050560528,0.0001240733,0.00004787372,0.043962896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937017,0.00033315175,0.0004099889,0.0010135963,0.00020086535,0.000017849383,0.000027110202,0.000020453337,0.004275235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966845,0.0016755674,0.000086753294,0.00038660498,0.0004371677,0.00072943425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791661,0.009412048,0.0041918545,0.0017568626,0.0012211265,0.004251922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009439539,0.00037130405,0.0012802344,0.0005476163,0.0017764424,0.0050584096,0.0010924137,0.0033447251,0.018804796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034282263,0.00032857392,0.0003562757,0.00078664435,0.0027215455,0.0035276266,0.0017849444,0.0029705807,0.0011347417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007897418,0.00777084,0.29197153,0.00067412446,0.000927293,0.0005837325,0.008773402,0.0065254373,0.004501732,0.35834646,0.028684894,0.2833432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009592723,0.0021868183,0.3252174,0.00020640632,0.00038424335,0.00026182126,0.00736082,0.009996156,0.001026892,0.63863945,0.013585939,0.00017485398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030593637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004015574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018804796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085690845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013971239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06290829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210401180","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0262249","title":"Breaking the bonds of reinforcement: Effects of trial outcome, rule consistency and rule complexity against exploitable and unexploitable opponents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"Osk. Huttusen säätiö; University of Sussex","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Reinforcement; Exploit; Outcome (game theory); Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Game theory; Simple (philosophy); Adversary; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematical economics; Social psychology; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12418233662001256,"score_gpt":0.30718747364317833,"score_spread":0.1830051370231658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210401180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986286,0.00003455584,0.00060832256,0.000033300585,0.000008436376,0.000035691268,0.000027597387,0.000011019922,0.00061254663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975128,0.00003209364,0.0017081565,0.000044372173,0.000010198934,0.00007268771,0.000074995216,0.000017916936,0.0005268228],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973028,0.0008472004,0.00040173362,0.0006449382,0.00058180105,0.00022155009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91138154,0.06506416,0.012411642,0.0065658493,0.0011832454,0.0033936135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054736934,0.0006829896,0.0010331691,0.00050158455,0.0003288024,0.0018133475,0.0010386384,0.0009603391,0.0029013958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057700675,0.0005116272,0.0004244413,0.00023842642,0.0013392237,0.0017501117,0.0013206304,0.001917658,0.00028509606],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.15098692,0.0272955,0.21880342,0.0013656197,0.0031583367,0.0008713962,0.0025036877,0.10482804,0.33505574,0.0073647276,0.0010148657,0.14675173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069240984,0.0872062,0.48503178,0.00020646722,0.0017142757,0.0007504388,0.000979606,0.28238368,0.09595709,0.035945624,0.0024652185,0.00043559098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008172188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010892438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054736934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059269724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005473525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02894795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210728401","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/f463y","title":"Citizens, Madmen and Children: Equality, Uncertainty, Freedom and the Definition of State.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Randomness; Solidarity; Politics; State (computer science); Individualism; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Algorithm; Law","score_opus":0.05077790392267705,"score_gpt":0.3249247352460871,"score_spread":0.27414683132341006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210728401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056806505,0.0915611,0.023691693,0.2985933,0.0019099875,0.000047940714,0.00023398711,0.000042764863,0.52711266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674901,0.008990175,0.002914291,0.008271415,0.0006519819,0.00007957201,0.00006987122,0.000022800024,0.0115098115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620724,0.0028738137,0.00007548865,0.00027058547,0.0003029301,0.00026989478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972644,0.0019048702,0.00032845867,0.00012399323,0.00015362664,0.0002246943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028502268,0.00039018592,0.00035840573,0.0011383769,0.0046229637,0.005713972,0.000877024,0.0036643648,0.0040671467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052713533,0.00023533116,0.00032437957,0.0016319909,0.032047637,0.00891836,0.004551488,0.0040411567,0.0003343828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004583886,0.0000033465817,0.00025022824,0.000011494725,0.0000016784509,0.000027148462,0.003584344,0.000103281884,0.000006444968,0.9909542,0.0023218698,0.0027313046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004705119,0.000008618573,0.00090811774,0.00014506262,0.0000033387842,0.00007263704,0.004906355,0.00034774115,0.000038904993,0.9365842,0.05696811,0.000012199937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071625444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009015949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071625444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051973946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019291047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03770989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210973526","doi":"10.1111/puar.13485","title":"Compassion, Bureaucrat Bashing, and Public Administration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Compassion; Test (biology); Aggression; Public sector; Social psychology; Psychology; Sample (material); Field (mathematics); Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.07929482952903776,"score_gpt":0.3801630970885519,"score_spread":0.3008682675595141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210973526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6972896,0.22345552,0.000866435,0.010881987,0.0002383303,0.00007028066,0.000059685568,0.000012683358,0.06712543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92409307,0.07236627,0.00031402754,0.0011972263,0.00012446585,0.000025621615,0.000020083766,0.000003511643,0.0018558097],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971089,0.0019235214,0.00009107256,0.00012941379,0.0005497231,0.0001973895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820451,0.011179768,0.0049639824,0.00030978973,0.00088450446,0.0006169065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039960737,0.00018591013,0.0003307166,0.0009178,0.00067942514,0.0016529465,0.0004949954,0.0008754519,0.0045378804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009741853,0.00017988197,0.00028315544,0.0011430194,0.0031091636,0.0006227004,0.0007617093,0.0008695323,0.00020069355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066542043,0.0028861053,0.23490833,0.011387254,0.000957818,0.00045562224,0.011925915,0.00091890176,0.0022355393,0.08463544,0.008773482,0.6402501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013566524,0.0008038471,0.9024526,0.00714106,0.00047511453,0.00080799276,0.013176504,0.00059001317,0.0010451578,0.017484732,0.055817652,0.000069645335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058842422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013637912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058842422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001992556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026004221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021133542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214719174","doi":"10.55365/1923.x2020.18.06","title":"The Forensics of the American Mafia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Syndicate; Organizational structure; Task (project management); Organised crime; Business; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03516041992051869,"score_gpt":0.3035553691983284,"score_spread":0.2683949492778097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214719174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39868551,0.04897962,0.0039777705,0.10526133,0.0011447597,0.000052351697,0.0003246822,0.00007035835,0.44150358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447723,0.016253356,0.0014992225,0.005203579,0.000563674,0.00003169229,0.00010529969,0.000023552295,0.03154728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989255,0.000449564,0.000021635478,0.000104960185,0.0002878819,0.00021029856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807966,0.00087620754,0.0003833261,0.00016755638,0.00035701823,0.00013619782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021140883,0.00036421957,0.00025644127,0.0045541613,0.009371509,0.0041260426,0.0008661469,0.0020828964,0.00673748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006460875,0.00021201186,0.00020155324,0.0027164617,0.010582609,0.0039777164,0.0021385613,0.002463935,0.00061643636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056682286,0.000098240365,0.010059928,0.000114866336,0.00002019967,0.0007445025,0.01237197,0.0002422076,0.0002802221,0.80824053,0.046973057,0.12079752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110315705,0.00010324201,0.05499068,0.0010664517,0.00004616767,0.0018568995,0.033991788,0.00120553,0.0008557444,0.16467531,0.74113244,0.000064773405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023282276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03532276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023282276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004550676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022417575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046293557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220813818","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/3u9b7","title":"Deliberately making miskates","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Maximization; Control reconfiguration; Valence (chemistry); Microeconomics; Matching (statistics); Flexibility (engineering); Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Management","score_opus":0.10962430369718562,"score_gpt":0.414240144506782,"score_spread":0.30461584080959636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220813818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7946594,0.0005303185,0.08742685,0.0093063675,0.0005597301,0.00010875261,0.00023425039,0.0007869116,0.10638739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902034,0.00009284027,0.004349032,0.0006363129,0.000041867548,0.00003498698,0.00004783992,0.00010153028,0.004492049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401855,0.0029482408,0.0003047291,0.0008867201,0.0011724463,0.00066930364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730367,0.01032304,0.0053341836,0.0065415106,0.002880768,0.0018838185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006126418,0.0006478834,0.0004766717,0.00063528813,0.0013911097,0.0031469245,0.0008933537,0.0020571474,0.0055772085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04144633,0.00041599295,0.0004495862,0.0003067828,0.004705337,0.005356649,0.003656885,0.0025543093,0.001475993],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022395023,0.00035260568,0.113280855,0.00083632465,0.0005174293,0.004384881,0.040002596,0.0100270035,0.040424347,0.61277956,0.018764755,0.15639007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001413024,0.00083304156,0.043738436,0.0004979573,0.00029244297,0.0037801922,0.02670435,0.026506264,0.019054826,0.75416726,0.12388329,0.00040055902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070672506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010012802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006126418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007876191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009875186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032400012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220825726","doi":"10.1111/caje.12574","title":"Multilateral bargaining with proposer selection contest","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Inefficiency; Economics; Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Reservation; Investment (military); Homogeneous; Public economics","score_opus":0.13206074771364212,"score_gpt":0.22666541623050002,"score_spread":0.09460466851685789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220825726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74451065,0.0001550693,0.16618705,0.0018002436,0.0001273777,0.00066732365,0.0000761359,0.00008622236,0.08638992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98759824,0.00002485855,0.008909621,0.00010061061,0.000034054523,0.00017260027,0.000012833518,0.000008622773,0.0031386071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753735,0.018002143,0.0006096159,0.001341219,0.0031397059,0.001533757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92855215,0.056747645,0.0062502907,0.0046183327,0.0019311691,0.0019004062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019652724,0.0006355779,0.0011788736,0.000581574,0.0014920542,0.0031577502,0.0014952474,0.001910415,0.014035456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050255485,0.00032807686,0.0005250223,0.00056916906,0.00435175,0.0022810379,0.002919125,0.00254002,0.0009029614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019081149,0.0012095305,0.0029253813,0.00027394446,0.000083159786,0.00032613374,0.001975461,0.038791444,0.013138774,0.91058,0.00083388225,0.027954184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013590275,0.0018486987,0.003163156,0.00007946257,0.00006287541,0.00021547616,0.0010239688,0.167131,0.007564362,0.81047153,0.0069753714,0.00010506149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005011406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006694924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019652724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021008283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016978257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103934765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220998008","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2022.02.022","title":"I’m not sure what to think about them: Confronting naive present bias in a dynamic threshold public goods game","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Public goods game; Economics; Sequential game; Microeconomics; Dynamic inconsistency; Mathematical economics; Advertising; Game theory; Business","score_opus":0.07894504905832068,"score_gpt":0.336483296267194,"score_spread":0.2575382472088733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220998008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74911004,0.00033795004,0.11154701,0.06295573,0.00050395966,0.00013237684,0.0000996437,0.000252848,0.07506044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919356,0.000051801817,0.004231071,0.0015800688,0.000056895387,0.000016906628,0.000007533875,0.000026617041,0.0020935615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957598,0.0022636987,0.00018265947,0.0006678405,0.0007229884,0.00040299198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95335555,0.034380995,0.003952624,0.003632442,0.0021970482,0.0024813898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012288666,0.00035993784,0.0012723766,0.000494328,0.0020183548,0.0040499717,0.0019045261,0.0056021204,0.006740091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06944922,0.0005664577,0.0004996022,0.0003384368,0.0047741956,0.005092413,0.0021683935,0.0072135506,0.0006110292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012680561,0.00069420424,0.020528866,0.0002818694,0.0002663672,0.0014892998,0.005673852,0.013171704,0.0063431356,0.8896593,0.013271054,0.047352318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023990858,0.0001262563,0.0037303912,0.00004000952,0.0000772676,0.00027592064,0.0011690243,0.06421248,0.00083058263,0.92658556,0.0026493827,0.00006317883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029825894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035369531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012288666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013498057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015912502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06498945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224006164","doi":"10.1108/jsma-01-2021-0018","title":"What role does generic strategy play in how managers adapt their aspirations in response to performance feedback?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of strategy and management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sample (material); Population; Business; Set (abstract data type); Marketing; Strategic management; Value (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Dynamic capabilities; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Economics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.042044063509276385,"score_gpt":0.2897723245925605,"score_spread":0.24772826108328413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224006164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935627,0.00012412271,0.0017498161,0.00025144697,0.0000073684164,0.00002450353,0.00001645202,0.000016929805,0.0042466754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929595,0.000024364515,0.00048246302,0.00004333155,0.0000020293726,0.0000068113527,0.000008437539,0.0000020477346,0.000134462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794775,0.0010699311,0.00009316898,0.00024847288,0.00037723582,0.00026349898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897899,0.0034457804,0.0039394097,0.0009513456,0.0006991714,0.0011743169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032873221,0.00036653067,0.00032319053,0.00060595124,0.00052713713,0.002676681,0.000407796,0.0008590414,0.0013420051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016298395,0.00024087266,0.00029416967,0.00049584213,0.0014306287,0.0013145987,0.0011853911,0.00059682346,0.0002074465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067351887,0.00068422477,0.85383373,0.00030093745,0.00025341258,0.0003616892,0.02212657,0.003214595,0.023295794,0.006700011,0.00068826793,0.08786713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003126228,0.000982919,0.97045434,0.00008232556,0.000072418385,0.00013948629,0.012229178,0.0057794647,0.0022038158,0.006397855,0.0015628713,0.0000641617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002270714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026862386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032873221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011860535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007219514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017385185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224066054","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.51.292","title":"What is Behavioral in Policy Studies?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Utilitarianism; Positive economics; Economics; Rationality; Action (physics); Currency; Behavioral economics; Subsidy; Public economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.1390645403902671,"score_gpt":0.4635564582267592,"score_spread":0.3244919178364921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224066054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011744897,0.038811054,0.03619374,0.8619524,0.005279803,0.00017982179,0.00038710047,0.000073691255,0.045377534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72203237,0.0653014,0.034843832,0.15862873,0.011306155,0.0020910485,0.00040182375,0.00023629774,0.0051583974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82986903,0.14820063,0.0038921034,0.0063013695,0.008198194,0.003538674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7113606,0.24276853,0.013444625,0.013580352,0.011305494,0.0075403755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12043563,0.0012483293,0.0030817285,0.008593091,0.007474922,0.020677637,0.0037009462,0.01155547,0.00736955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18991402,0.0012870382,0.0016421316,0.014001922,0.06654253,0.031634167,0.00673868,0.013157182,0.0011066387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042627176,0.00011064179,0.005682347,0.0008630768,0.00010575148,0.000058532434,0.0041869143,0.0005184628,0.000036915873,0.96229637,0.005660108,0.020438315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002487285,0.000032682085,0.0022455493,0.0018968013,0.00004144931,0.000054244825,0.004347784,0.0006084552,0.00006130393,0.96448505,0.02616597,0.000035861674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010071947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060523245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12043563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01549632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02041954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63693213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224102618","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12296","title":"Rewards and Fear of Being Labeled as Racist: A Tax Fraud Whistleblowing Investigation*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Cash; Race (biology); Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Business; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.018182758612360014,"score_gpt":0.31198384785468236,"score_spread":0.29380108924232234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224102618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987871,0.000016212089,0.00008629021,0.00007201405,0.000003924235,0.00001800784,0.0000065177237,0.0000011712815,0.001008789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992099,0.000030362371,0.00016641182,0.00007728823,0.000006818708,0.000025599129,0.000009873091,0.0000016277702,0.0004721418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981536,0.00094905135,0.00007457623,0.0001555447,0.0004610584,0.00020603786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987535,0.0050083743,0.0046067527,0.0009744249,0.00096104573,0.00091441465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026056836,0.00027313537,0.0002754101,0.00056019553,0.0019260204,0.0019524512,0.00035768517,0.00077368197,0.0030183524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117848925,0.00024651192,0.00037542052,0.00020521772,0.0015586384,0.00070436904,0.001041374,0.002080725,0.00033903582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019677938,0.014333852,0.8227744,0.00026872425,0.00017217157,0.0008064292,0.09590287,0.00029418684,0.015254375,0.004049599,0.0013186861,0.042856935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006107672,0.003415564,0.91154325,0.0001409197,0.0001424873,0.000635486,0.07225924,0.0019861374,0.0041709193,0.0017583469,0.0037818658,0.00010466912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004495878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047671776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004495878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009475761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008320819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013780296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229030715","doi":"10.2308/jmar-2021-032","title":"The Strength of Performance Incentives, Pay Dispersion, and Lower-Paid Employee Effort","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Generalizability theory; Dispersion (optics); Economics; Robustness (evolution); Microeconomics; Business; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0391161341140013,"score_gpt":0.3661253457906559,"score_spread":0.32700921167665464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229030715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951997,0.000038559952,0.0005382661,0.00010905327,0.0000073956767,0.000020081496,0.00004571105,0.0000060548555,0.0040352196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993981,0.000010108463,0.00026383012,0.000024916062,0.0000043728364,0.000014822742,0.000018779938,0.000001306446,0.00026372247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978344,0.000960773,0.00018160936,0.00021895283,0.0006143197,0.00018997806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95010823,0.03130482,0.01196227,0.0032006905,0.0015690955,0.0018548475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044147344,0.00022881909,0.00031760838,0.00063475344,0.00056666206,0.0017094746,0.00043051646,0.0007763725,0.010400018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029950535,0.00015778988,0.00016667933,0.0004853272,0.0011033519,0.00079446234,0.0010690872,0.000881565,0.00040160315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004237257,0.00665222,0.8385787,0.0005929916,0.0002698232,0.00020765017,0.0047125486,0.005412283,0.04123666,0.019396016,0.0014249983,0.077278905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009969781,0.00087577716,0.9850729,0.00004465115,0.00004408434,0.000039368217,0.0012827296,0.0025855121,0.0030622862,0.0061976323,0.0006596559,0.00003575613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007310957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083870516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010400018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073485926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036135814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03479153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230580568","doi":"10.1093/aler/aht004","title":"On Hatred","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Law and Economics Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Altruism (biology); Preference; Adversary; Political science; Criminology; Subject (documents); Computer security; Social psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Microeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.025000603692894374,"score_gpt":0.3168354546999649,"score_spread":0.2918348510070705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230580568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52878064,0.0030237932,0.01110101,0.010803926,0.00044495251,0.00005552475,0.00021735833,0.000058957336,0.44551387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98128635,0.0008559506,0.00051538745,0.0024195425,0.00012107031,0.000014865419,0.00003432472,0.000014162177,0.014738305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984794,0.0007830732,0.000043879176,0.00016993922,0.00024254915,0.0002810715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929501,0.0029626698,0.0018752642,0.00077289063,0.0007046289,0.00073435984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002097122,0.00047975866,0.00041498968,0.00054015056,0.0016736239,0.0014657519,0.00047192076,0.0014737451,0.020235442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008288948,0.00017553121,0.00035067872,0.00027951645,0.0036000947,0.0020995233,0.0018873814,0.0017271973,0.0012822865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077204726,0.00061736064,0.04636104,0.00041936908,0.00027788265,0.0014734505,0.0060702018,0.004668372,0.0055445265,0.75307655,0.025169233,0.15554996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036330064,0.0016302671,0.11723535,0.0006963844,0.0003734807,0.0024967422,0.011835091,0.011229748,0.0048709605,0.6422609,0.20679735,0.00021045087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024675839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031888704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020235442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011440585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038872092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230617245","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00108.x","title":"Making a difference","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Free riding; Economics; Public good; Wage; Compensation (psychology); Microeconomics; Labour economics; Private good; Outcome (game theory); Incentive compatibility; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.10552001505013398,"score_gpt":0.37101543896404376,"score_spread":0.2654954239139098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230617245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047717113,0.0016939978,0.020285692,0.09117184,0.0036435104,0.000136638,0.00021899778,0.00021580311,0.8349163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74095243,0.0013842263,0.010656366,0.04112184,0.0006884671,0.00012891614,0.00029793245,0.00019769435,0.20457211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924769,0.002679586,0.00028227683,0.0012171605,0.0021584143,0.0011856836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241203,0.0015520336,0.0007571769,0.0018353538,0.0013819074,0.0020615235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055847825,0.00048739393,0.0004187342,0.0006346932,0.004305921,0.0065092323,0.0012031902,0.003659636,0.05224963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01847322,0.00022213387,0.00051202945,0.0004326515,0.0070679267,0.006518857,0.0056016766,0.004386716,0.012253568],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012420696,0.00020290594,0.005235192,0.00012806665,0.00006520152,0.0004510081,0.010372577,0.0002860333,0.0019358494,0.7950764,0.07866549,0.10745721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037296322,0.0001543116,0.002904253,0.00019372498,0.00005006402,0.00061280694,0.0068215206,0.0003559193,0.0010957008,0.24275635,0.74496865,0.00004936278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017109833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002084834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05224963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001840081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00333846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17479241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230682327","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14669100.v1","title":"Gender and Generosity: Does Degree of Anonymity or Group Gender Composition Matter?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Anonymity; Dictator game; Dictator; Composition (language); Psychology; Social psychology; Group (periodic table); Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.13506798123962527,"score_gpt":0.3519981605538151,"score_spread":0.21693017931418984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230682327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760951,0.000531298,0.0028936558,0.0014919318,0.00008831521,0.000053845528,0.0003879928,0.000017183513,0.018440671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997299,0.00011565459,0.0005515421,0.00017307786,0.000028780332,0.000028365064,0.00008022001,0.000016787564,0.001706658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.00086050684,0.00007079264,0.00026923785,0.0002215531,0.00016342284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98049873,0.012859056,0.0036266411,0.0012390143,0.00036481532,0.0014117381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031000536,0.0002495859,0.0006844446,0.00044095394,0.00035657847,0.0014814346,0.0005127689,0.00073453295,0.01665501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01743246,0.0001519158,0.00033771805,0.0003902337,0.001494875,0.0014307764,0.00097071467,0.0007201699,0.00066484476],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025896206,0.0024383236,0.65613645,0.000913352,0.0009900148,0.0012934367,0.0056050913,0.0014353116,0.04911103,0.07123191,0.0063310144,0.17861788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022435068,0.0011526715,0.937435,0.00010757608,0.00031544635,0.0004323066,0.0027277917,0.0032032824,0.006429889,0.04273143,0.005172188,0.00006799312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075221766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080742163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01665501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044972272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047165135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055716515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230816869","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1982145","title":"On Hatred","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03766214186897435,"score_gpt":0.30646044129941985,"score_spread":0.26879829943044553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230816869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035535716,0.0003037624,0.0023226072,0.0034285258,0.0012478291,0.00005851749,0.00031235692,0.00018638615,0.95660436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16547883,0.00020825402,0.0007078168,0.0023815949,0.00019746656,0.00003117993,0.0002782113,0.000101342186,0.83061534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878174,0.00027523143,0.000034233333,0.0001743267,0.00041931795,0.00031506518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964663,0.000565032,0.00028426692,0.000951147,0.0011782175,0.00055500795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013994003,0.00047303815,0.000342898,0.0012423955,0.0029327061,0.0029741204,0.0007646595,0.0014354317,0.18656376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057334914,0.00019724312,0.00039871127,0.0006834643,0.0015085039,0.0021098624,0.0020493788,0.0019538677,0.04229325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033160843,0.00044508884,0.015237775,0.00014958477,0.000061554725,0.0010549122,0.0061247014,0.00040175754,0.0036358112,0.24439009,0.39831477,0.32985225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002456412,0.00022009552,0.018725019,0.0001504844,0.000039745464,0.0007090445,0.005741015,0.00081898645,0.0022465368,0.035186235,0.9360826,0.000055663142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005129196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010310703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18656376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011192497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010039973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230823799","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27355","title":"Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human behavior","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Value (mathematics); Experimental economics; Economics; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12772276078978995,"score_gpt":0.4108483905987132,"score_spread":0.28312562980892325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230823799","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076635756,0.0056868633,0.78279704,0.041992396,0.0008447424,0.00047667927,0.00047056001,0.00009841798,0.090997554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76168054,0.0039018125,0.22575629,0.0029481847,0.0004746454,0.0014654141,0.00015704207,0.000091483096,0.0035245551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755657,0.021203775,0.00050908537,0.001093537,0.0013409607,0.00028700632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9050181,0.08251996,0.0032576637,0.0062854495,0.0016662767,0.0012525705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022514163,0.0015661385,0.0017155103,0.0016263461,0.0021726722,0.0071337554,0.0030843562,0.0030299283,0.005657099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08349031,0.0010052325,0.0014323102,0.0017857383,0.019860279,0.0165992,0.004174417,0.008361186,0.00043469993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039674876,0.0000686162,0.0014991037,0.000197423,0.00007865745,0.00006245807,0.001575946,0.009787092,0.0001578485,0.9762315,0.0008321582,0.009469497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025653935,0.000039039205,0.00048773864,0.00011518807,0.000015981874,0.000027378774,0.00068134756,0.01467761,0.00008115429,0.9777826,0.006042844,0.000023482538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004628062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035640073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97748584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034156037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002257351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11906773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231304215","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1834-1","title":"Social Incentives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06628660600421533,"score_gpt":0.3550955841172543,"score_spread":0.28880897811303896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231304215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063497206,0.0007388702,0.0057907845,0.002160622,0.00023807606,0.00002856666,0.00006550039,0.00004180196,0.9903008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03495296,0.0015768129,0.0031769979,0.0012690969,0.00031514672,0.00013161509,0.0001031103,0.000052187672,0.9584221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942005,0.00022026578,0.000013558428,0.00008307532,0.0002101318,0.000052935826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950397,0.00021572261,0.000026752636,0.000111388756,0.0001003012,0.00004172703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082893216,0.00066150515,0.00035591333,0.0008165093,0.0011172503,0.00285448,0.00076459756,0.0018425742,0.10998365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022486183,0.00025263027,0.00026927624,0.0006696478,0.0023934722,0.0025223515,0.0011085797,0.0018791443,0.019787759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042503157,0.000019235124,0.000024022796,0.000024637644,0.000001347268,0.0000061010833,0.000052163316,0.00016626217,0.00008382757,0.9293418,0.04437337,0.025903055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007182115,0.000009566601,0.00016511338,0.0000834922,0.0000025369477,0.0000355006,0.00008234567,0.0005517627,0.00022153647,0.5598746,0.43896136,0.00000502401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013301559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002730237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10998365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022635497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015809799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36793196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232799388","doi":"10.1145/860722.860726","title":"Coalition formation with non-transferable payoff for group buying","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - AAMAS '03","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic game; Transferable utility; Computer science; Group (periodic table); Group buying; Microeconomics; Game theory; Economics; Chemistry; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05733225020806982,"score_gpt":0.29791911297568746,"score_spread":0.24058686276761765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232799388","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21979266,0.0005255218,0.6996152,0.0017630901,0.0002065544,0.00045398113,0.00026569754,0.00041852187,0.07695876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95191187,0.00027159418,0.026457474,0.00008607699,0.00006391375,0.00026890353,0.0000888663,0.000057662404,0.020793695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988954,0.00051420706,0.000043975222,0.0001979494,0.00016043965,0.00018810481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508154,0.0032186536,0.0005123146,0.0005357466,0.00022013686,0.00043162162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021106286,0.0008226583,0.001517401,0.0006693709,0.0009466539,0.0012102356,0.0020662684,0.0020996581,0.018702885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012860859,0.0005364287,0.00090955885,0.00069564465,0.0019788502,0.003069634,0.0028344805,0.0018496141,0.0016338255],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004412985,0.00025473055,0.0006461853,0.00034795847,0.00009581888,0.00048756605,0.0003717095,0.21371937,0.0043511842,0.73911536,0.0048423894,0.03532643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001285746,0.00013646134,0.00041845953,0.000025592373,0.00002725944,0.000103367194,0.000072813054,0.45973763,0.00051693677,0.53760517,0.0012047923,0.000022988708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011869451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010818369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018702885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013066679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008580707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06256741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233143865","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/hwubj","title":"Promises and perils of experimentation: The mutual internal validity problem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"External validity; Internal validity; Triangulation; Epistemology; Test (biology); Psychology; Management science; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.159344359733532,"score_gpt":0.4009219403315423,"score_spread":0.24157758059801032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233143865","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02191985,0.02752974,0.6139197,0.20103218,0.0056952904,0.0050568255,0.00090038276,0.0010682036,0.12287782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5437679,0.008479786,0.33597752,0.069019996,0.007630793,0.02676333,0.0005403062,0.0009623057,0.0068581416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.17441776,0.6787802,0.020733899,0.028204614,0.09520854,0.0026549972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.050964072,0.80679965,0.021281468,0.10220076,0.01734278,0.0014113167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.68582946,0.0034691358,0.0074727046,0.009339548,0.008434159,0.016289553,0.010426689,0.017138714,0.008577218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8301145,0.003690082,0.0051035187,0.006104158,0.08545662,0.044337954,0.0226797,0.02632189,0.002348756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094681396,0.00031284904,0.0073139425,0.003259365,0.0016691815,0.00034523368,0.010259946,0.0026797464,0.00052174163,0.8951412,0.00887476,0.06867523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005138286,0.000274003,0.0013743117,0.0018931373,0.00021958946,0.0002256128,0.0009965071,0.0036294376,0.00062747614,0.9676725,0.0224291,0.00014447042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027292557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016644131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31417054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013718016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017413499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38742828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233492377","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2016.15356abstract","title":"Preserving a settlement despite ongoing challenges: the case of native Indian gaming","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Settlement (finance); Embeddedness; Human settlement; Power (physics); Institutional theory; Institutional logic; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Business; Geography; Law; Social science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06249622628614589,"score_gpt":0.3439841236567181,"score_spread":0.2814878973705722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233492377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9361191,0.00028285172,0.0076583694,0.004923166,0.00011200489,0.00010184953,0.00004430642,0.000042189557,0.05071615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975083,0.00004742618,0.0008425462,0.00012250688,0.000014257873,0.000020673786,0.000009839776,0.000009057144,0.0014254543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952638,0.0023039752,0.00014317532,0.0006032369,0.00043570608,0.0012500813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931451,0.0026224605,0.0012269616,0.0011354781,0.0005549422,0.0013149964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005956485,0.0003649032,0.0005876491,0.0012649393,0.020643964,0.007907954,0.0024703683,0.004347747,0.004830359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016157262,0.0003652709,0.0006005424,0.0013928947,0.02409275,0.0051140958,0.008132263,0.003609542,0.00042877396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018018187,0.0002798915,0.026433967,0.00018427735,0.000058619233,0.028925383,0.60228723,0.003948884,0.0021846872,0.29558402,0.002588033,0.03734488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000429152,0.00016195995,0.02043806,0.0002460248,0.000050503277,0.0044460455,0.8038809,0.0057446463,0.00097147713,0.095009945,0.06884961,0.00015792958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020862283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037605226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020862283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046693934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004167208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041481674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237053211","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/upb4w","title":"Knowledge Attributions in Iterated Fake Barn Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Barn; Iterated function; Object (grammar); Cognition; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.1950030073717167,"score_gpt":0.42920609575081764,"score_spread":0.23420308837910095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237053211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99508107,0.00004087548,0.0015410372,0.00008796679,0.000013103257,0.00004160098,0.000029040419,0.00001814643,0.0031471264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998588,0.000023088174,0.00087524246,0.00002304488,0.000008126799,0.000021619982,0.000027298205,0.0000064527403,0.00042714612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852169,0.0057076123,0.0015545029,0.0017072833,0.0049632564,0.0008502678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78523237,0.14302777,0.03962521,0.020581862,0.00940859,0.0021241351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010531187,0.00048157375,0.00078543986,0.0021926444,0.0011003568,0.002814803,0.0006740987,0.0021123828,0.004204499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1425998,0.00053665426,0.00047040498,0.0008799332,0.0030962569,0.0029139705,0.0026316151,0.0020734575,0.0003409339],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00756457,0.0034046005,0.63275915,0.0009943752,0.00062303216,0.0024325165,0.086036146,0.009842396,0.073033355,0.029246347,0.0014215052,0.15264197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021625927,0.0015575956,0.85995436,0.00024778006,0.0002824698,0.0019362557,0.020889685,0.04616775,0.033250805,0.03173112,0.0032505332,0.0005154084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013481221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081896264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010531187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013188834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035402505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055694878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237827885","doi":"10.1002/9781118266298.ch7","title":"Agency Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Principal–agent problem; Corporation; Perspective (graphical); Shareholder; Field (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Game theory; Class (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Business; Economics; Corporate governance; Management; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Finance; Social science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02912101613468093,"score_gpt":0.34759880946032007,"score_spread":0.31847779332563914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237827885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024090384,0.0068247397,0.06768401,0.013648047,0.00048812368,0.00017315509,0.00034811397,0.000099349956,0.90832543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58086157,0.031701572,0.065835096,0.011981166,0.0022887301,0.0010140684,0.0009086505,0.00020353154,0.30520558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573743,0.0014338172,0.0002707975,0.00085887127,0.0013308645,0.00036819573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684477,0.0014714344,0.0003004677,0.0005607254,0.0006256495,0.00019702355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003294664,0.00095622323,0.0009044497,0.0019124172,0.0027560021,0.008644256,0.0014780303,0.0039636837,0.025767807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067044543,0.00037029356,0.00084296236,0.0021030838,0.0082479855,0.0059863767,0.0023959796,0.0036687737,0.006364312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018574021,0.0000050532294,0.00006784801,0.000026052352,0.0000044395456,0.000014154047,0.00009785535,0.00020120767,0.000018629611,0.9906081,0.003946554,0.005008252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000676267,0.000009065918,0.00018711005,0.0001251879,0.000008897013,0.00009806881,0.00014667623,0.00055013585,0.000080983926,0.8345678,0.16421063,0.00000864694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026182823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017166409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025767807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049038697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036926933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086201906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238586944","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/rfk6z","title":"Willpower Is Overrated","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09995458547163347,"score_gpt":0.3903469580429053,"score_spread":0.2903923725712718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238586944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37286288,0.0027313977,0.09087886,0.010371852,0.00042613543,0.0001015682,0.00023592263,0.00019684178,0.52219456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895745,0.0003162343,0.0018985337,0.0008806149,0.00009731561,0.00005147635,0.000030594776,0.00003984238,0.00711087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957755,0.001476821,0.00016008795,0.0010867676,0.0007405339,0.0007602738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911301,0.0032538788,0.0016497233,0.0021853803,0.0008083378,0.0009725119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051579685,0.0004941732,0.00068070454,0.0009586867,0.0012643677,0.0034009186,0.0006822769,0.0013743548,0.011561015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015944159,0.0003415784,0.0006353075,0.0005723335,0.009419795,0.0044324184,0.0030832523,0.0018329334,0.0010898893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012227376,0.000047323385,0.004443953,0.00012572108,0.000072173796,0.00012683625,0.0012149699,0.0015115485,0.0024951864,0.96460485,0.0016392923,0.023595717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004481106,0.00018112897,0.0110037895,0.00013620756,0.000064712556,0.0002585569,0.0009946278,0.0030788032,0.002507027,0.9534065,0.028282477,0.000041339797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052657974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031044678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011561015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012854878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010582468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038675427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241898732","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27355v2","title":"Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Value (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.11629104143341726,"score_gpt":0.40134774421167774,"score_spread":0.28505670277826045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241898732","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06996968,0.005552411,0.794117,0.03862579,0.0008409363,0.000469037,0.00045691777,0.000097772165,0.08987048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74081403,0.004170462,0.2458086,0.0029056848,0.00050142256,0.0015835598,0.00016660446,0.00009803207,0.0039514937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756614,0.021145843,0.00050296716,0.001048307,0.0013582432,0.0002832992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90947574,0.07888109,0.0030585618,0.005823581,0.0015724906,0.0011884779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02217154,0.0016079182,0.0017516662,0.0016369293,0.0021244497,0.0071368567,0.0030492784,0.0029934307,0.005576775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0804284,0.0009979564,0.0014755861,0.0018014858,0.019096686,0.016158791,0.0041657356,0.008417035,0.00044514413],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037397673,0.00006653454,0.0013635374,0.00018712037,0.000074907024,0.000057971556,0.0014056618,0.009845776,0.00015138996,0.97683597,0.0008043463,0.0091695115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025560135,0.000038543632,0.0004508378,0.00011233758,0.000015342992,0.000026205407,0.0006321379,0.014863914,0.00007905367,0.9776763,0.0060567083,0.000023063463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047848606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036656726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02217154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003411133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023162796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11725575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244543711","doi":"10.1007/s40881-018-0059-0","title":"Instructions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Reinforcement; Computer science; Reinforcement learning; Task (project management); Stochastic game; Baseline (sea); Comprehension; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02311427047647054,"score_gpt":0.34331008612658653,"score_spread":0.320195815650116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244543711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024090497,0.0014849011,0.06781906,0.007782967,0.0050482135,0.0077735614,0.048164222,0.017565092,0.82027155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09222288,0.0021804997,0.08362521,0.0064897384,0.0010227689,0.011368544,0.04088638,0.00411527,0.75808877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989485,0.00022265468,0.00014919417,0.00013552775,0.00044100767,0.00010316121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99313134,0.0027837264,0.00039550808,0.0011084077,0.0020167914,0.0005641588],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011708997,0.00095764926,0.0004576901,0.0009179732,0.00069625454,0.0012916162,0.0013040737,0.0012028017,0.49094945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011044971,0.00035310298,0.00033303103,0.00068457704,0.0003333528,0.0009842372,0.001276544,0.0014878701,0.2596997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012141252,0.00071809895,0.001814495,0.0010072303,0.000011055072,0.00018366997,0.00055472547,0.00057204487,0.007177791,0.023756986,0.60630935,0.3566803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014403307,0.00033785918,0.0022069227,0.00023718973,0.00001192654,0.000110470115,0.00012937306,0.00062722835,0.0040811393,0.007131923,0.98494536,0.000036498135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009939489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014356675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49094945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059955183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014960741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7260988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244854737","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1024292","title":"Initiating Bargaining","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02605077398789233,"score_gpt":0.33641145351577817,"score_spread":0.3103606795278858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244854737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061712928,0.00014557363,0.11870247,0.0023335873,0.0010596804,0.00047315093,0.00034589268,0.0013116229,0.813915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.652819,0.00023642508,0.031513117,0.0009665079,0.00039646606,0.0005074981,0.00047096243,0.00044547318,0.31264442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822277,0.00036394811,0.000061152474,0.00033958667,0.0004911072,0.0005214728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959196,0.0015489351,0.00023883005,0.0012622084,0.00037011752,0.0006603101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021730824,0.00065987435,0.00067083206,0.00093448884,0.002628453,0.0035555775,0.0016137726,0.0031752337,0.12191695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088870535,0.00053591456,0.0008577315,0.000696302,0.0012723929,0.0039343215,0.0035430775,0.0050220913,0.027154628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019095161,0.00026736982,0.0005944964,0.00006812221,0.000016369455,0.0003340807,0.00070626277,0.0013233526,0.008134063,0.95614195,0.009301098,0.022921905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008893293,0.00026419605,0.000892093,0.000079808575,0.000028107313,0.00033576335,0.00078647875,0.011567719,0.010006315,0.8876738,0.08822732,0.00004952238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021513354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034879558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12191695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061850494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001220107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40785283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245586309","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/82y5e","title":"Switching competitors reduces win-stay but not lose-shift behaviour: The role of outcome-action association strength on reinforcement learning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Outcome (game theory); Association (psychology); Competitor analysis; Reinforcement; Adversary; Action (physics); Competition (biology); Psychology; Reinforcement learning; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Biology; Ecology; Statistics","score_opus":0.06633879253221124,"score_gpt":0.3524437687056734,"score_spread":0.28610497617346214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245586309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992685,0.000021883227,0.00026978418,0.00002957713,0.000003587473,0.0000028962777,0.000009661839,0.000008119234,0.00038611348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988023,0.000021708927,0.0005017395,0.00003311378,0.000003913367,0.000016016154,0.00003379186,0.000015348829,0.0005719497],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952865,0.00012879689,0.000029788558,0.00009578714,0.00012617365,0.00009084031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978625,0.0007768014,0.0003796088,0.00033464533,0.00009160768,0.0005548416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067692547,0.00029452494,0.0005913842,0.00018755926,0.00019224307,0.00052035355,0.0002750682,0.00040691605,0.004493168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003219251,0.00020415253,0.00016384327,0.000100822006,0.0006090509,0.00028405283,0.00068755,0.00083123747,0.00031105144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066814357,0.0036052598,0.046479397,0.00020706699,0.00020716515,0.00013982102,0.0006972547,0.0015498762,0.88740325,0.0007631705,0.00041237017,0.051853962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038673324,0.0099630775,0.87278914,0.000031677137,0.00021821713,0.00030107645,0.0005543075,0.011631395,0.098941386,0.0032579703,0.0018541664,0.00007082338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012173576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023262636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004493168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020780144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033012975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015031159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246291411","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1008943","title":"Understanding Trust","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.08151139872225537,"score_gpt":0.34806188444023195,"score_spread":0.26655048571797657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246291411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33629763,0.0018683599,0.10975498,0.04111668,0.00047815964,0.000076547425,0.0003886824,0.00017660046,0.50984246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99080455,0.00023682679,0.0016818802,0.00025302861,0.000047639387,0.000012891524,0.000051323634,0.000022566499,0.006889267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833906,0.0007310927,0.00009041088,0.00028773048,0.00033098628,0.00022065877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862335,0.007371912,0.0019687586,0.0023305544,0.0014842104,0.00061107136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023350692,0.0003320739,0.0003186472,0.00092982914,0.0015311823,0.0052500707,0.0005046418,0.0020645729,0.0165812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02807851,0.00032213295,0.0003228687,0.00080632605,0.0039486894,0.011948723,0.002013957,0.001988024,0.0014420996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008265589,0.000040966595,0.009548334,0.00007959772,0.000033602184,0.00019028113,0.006067551,0.0011382959,0.00038354978,0.94858235,0.0039738556,0.029878896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015603695,0.00003192755,0.0032658237,0.00005764859,0.000037964433,0.00017801508,0.0033496374,0.0052307197,0.00037414636,0.9684405,0.018999692,0.00001823909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004756775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022398653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0165812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017998617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009842883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05546969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248018565","doi":"10.1142/9789813208155_0006","title":"Game Theoretic Modeling of Environmental NGOs in an International Context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.046975821708310626,"score_gpt":0.2981717823019463,"score_spread":0.2511959605936357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248018565","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1093185,0.0022625315,0.5232672,0.009399816,0.00042174666,0.00013386148,0.00045065663,0.00009364736,0.35465196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90028787,0.0024115671,0.025715835,0.0005068467,0.00020623262,0.00025839626,0.00017315509,0.000111911155,0.07032807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993641,0.00036504804,0.00001371989,0.000064790656,0.00008165692,0.000110734974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911433,0.00057865196,0.000075176096,0.000044866843,0.000062897096,0.00012406932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010656554,0.000826562,0.0007835358,0.00047983666,0.0009417905,0.0031794324,0.00239817,0.0025660635,0.011076448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027607845,0.00048203228,0.0007948061,0.00093858276,0.0024157187,0.0030128877,0.001491957,0.002566675,0.0006245355],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009817058,0.000038888917,0.00022951368,0.000023493256,0.000015576417,0.000055146353,0.0001698705,0.207923,0.00013468436,0.7863904,0.0025044424,0.0025052282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014798514,0.000015436715,0.00017616467,0.000023519016,0.000009559997,0.000021754275,0.00028870636,0.41022554,0.000038760812,0.58373076,0.0054432363,0.000011689474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017732935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015682481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017732935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026435128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021014393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03705442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248420672","doi":"10.1007/s10683-012-9318-8","title":"Multitasking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Magyar Tudományos Akadémia; Universiteit van Amsterdam; York University","keywords":"Human multitasking; Schedule; Computer science; Scheduling (production processes); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Operations management; Engineering; Operating system","score_opus":0.0550810592395452,"score_gpt":0.357825218699927,"score_spread":0.3027441594603818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248420672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938235,0.00007855501,0.0010151819,0.000068609035,0.0000093240005,0.000022921546,0.00005753443,0.000006951645,0.0049173804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845576,0.000041245174,0.00051720877,0.000023700024,0.000005451759,0.000019425306,0.000042519954,0.0000022125162,0.00089250685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995353,0.0001610852,0.00003682092,0.00009112751,0.00010384267,0.000071741044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524826,0.0014098245,0.001516427,0.0008451165,0.00022748868,0.0007530657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079450326,0.0003416748,0.00023322077,0.0002646743,0.0003539793,0.00075208966,0.0002788526,0.00026224807,0.0062234504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032949771,0.00009168475,0.00018213183,0.00016403258,0.0004986055,0.00035966924,0.00062210864,0.00035220367,0.0005308044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008179214,0.0096560195,0.505553,0.00059420435,0.0004814173,0.00046322448,0.0016778166,0.0102157295,0.24023212,0.01629884,0.0020303344,0.20461811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003604343,0.00826636,0.9390457,0.00007529161,0.00010603359,0.00032581162,0.0006715951,0.008420854,0.022873435,0.013728842,0.006074802,0.00005092771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047745073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005443448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062234504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034943208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002682518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020819485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249917361","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdr009","title":"“Initiating Bargaining”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Economics; Context (archaeology); Tournament; Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Affect (linguistics); Outcome (game theory); General partnership; Asset (computer security); Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.23717860178182842,"score_gpt":0.4236072420528082,"score_spread":0.18642864027097977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249917361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08047212,0.002847346,0.20122603,0.003939498,0.0006689158,0.0005674373,0.00017808663,0.00032832235,0.70977217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8542456,0.0030115559,0.06473769,0.0027896122,0.00049295655,0.00077003276,0.000394331,0.00017906052,0.073379144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892771,0.005928706,0.0004205365,0.0014336759,0.0019433112,0.0009967426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983368,0.008348133,0.0027743725,0.002779008,0.0013311324,0.0013993125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01074641,0.0008221235,0.0006309472,0.001292653,0.0028342018,0.0049170363,0.002191471,0.003584423,0.025203796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02790571,0.0005190344,0.001052905,0.0015368595,0.0055898535,0.0065294644,0.0046587214,0.004590703,0.0060372637],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010081799,0.00014288133,0.002910296,0.00021301764,0.00003761556,0.0002833362,0.0042046253,0.0008052396,0.0014510067,0.93557084,0.0035061492,0.050774265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000775012,0.00027763486,0.005476781,0.00057243934,0.000075909105,0.00080677815,0.0042300443,0.0030921071,0.0029631956,0.7279149,0.25443962,0.00007307707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000548313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058801356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025203796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015094646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002069227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08431506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251171495","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-07796","title":"What's best for you isn't what's best for me: the effect of group membership, expectations, and value orientation on experimental dilemma game choice and behaviour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Group (periodic table); Mathematics; Humanities; Philosophy; Statistics; Physics; Geometry","score_opus":0.027349635986105965,"score_gpt":0.37232601501421947,"score_spread":0.3449763790281135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251171495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99572396,0.000036473903,0.00017767717,0.00029447282,0.000010928656,0.00001682187,0.000012438508,0.0000033863435,0.0037238486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819094,0.000064788765,0.0004631942,0.00012023313,0.000008876275,0.000047826667,0.000029334695,0.000009530195,0.0010652548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963147,0.00284766,0.00009713006,0.00022314652,0.00032180172,0.00019566325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9336632,0.052465834,0.006885224,0.002044196,0.0006808507,0.00426073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006905607,0.00031387727,0.00035479807,0.0002816039,0.0005784839,0.0027410437,0.00064740534,0.0010309471,0.006602798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060304023,0.00032041402,0.00021599451,0.00028465822,0.0021862076,0.0011899219,0.000993619,0.0016398826,0.0007015052],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05814268,0.06182025,0.5310279,0.0006881921,0.00080578355,0.00070798036,0.045070864,0.011436731,0.053795125,0.043614965,0.013747987,0.17914157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042541544,0.010338882,0.8388444,0.0002360816,0.00047201355,0.00045067986,0.021874838,0.04281131,0.008108607,0.06422841,0.008036242,0.00034430582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002051295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025271599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006905607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007723406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007636895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03652072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251692303","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/gnr9f","title":"Arbitrary Fairness in Rewards and Punishments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Interchangeability; Unit (ring theory); Distribution (mathematics); Social psychology; Preference; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04409176392959662,"score_gpt":0.35911586286116054,"score_spread":0.3150240989315639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251692303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4161261,0.0018809489,0.27110383,0.007837872,0.00039292112,0.00024042072,0.00025567133,0.00012497939,0.30203718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815059,0.00026183046,0.014787216,0.00039394683,0.00008720672,0.00010132937,0.000027253402,0.000032982276,0.0028023669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773926,0.014277895,0.0008111183,0.0020607507,0.004523043,0.00093444926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747558,0.015577673,0.0032861303,0.004144041,0.0016304068,0.00060595886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013935581,0.0005106377,0.00068016985,0.00080980913,0.0016967584,0.004581165,0.00086567085,0.0016110099,0.005816526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06053934,0.00042379202,0.00057495054,0.0009149566,0.008607312,0.005104882,0.0026406317,0.0024998032,0.00046621411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015801121,0.00006394687,0.002028435,0.00007738988,0.00004483013,0.000060519546,0.0011492043,0.002987715,0.0014250084,0.9753525,0.00063005975,0.016022341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047931495,0.000047682242,0.0041075507,0.00003860012,0.000018897283,0.000054195894,0.00027769778,0.0038310434,0.0008583099,0.9869191,0.003777311,0.000021675472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013440645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010346416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013935581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023083636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012367318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073699296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251875448","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvz008","title":"Sustaining Cooperation: Community Enforcement versus Specialized Enforcement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Punishment (psychology); Incentive; Business; Microeconomics; Cheating; Law and economics; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.036689198953483944,"score_gpt":0.31131726425392753,"score_spread":0.2746280653004436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251875448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6524774,0.00031742905,0.21762756,0.0055840937,0.00007811275,0.00023826418,0.00015277961,0.00019389481,0.12333055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274904,0.000055977605,0.004457127,0.00012457251,0.000027222364,0.000037996608,0.000011375579,0.000007432222,0.0025293822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967604,0.0013776027,0.00012750666,0.000609454,0.0004557766,0.00066922285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98863286,0.0028224788,0.0037716154,0.0027117382,0.000875437,0.0011859752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028190329,0.00046038468,0.00079395075,0.0006973011,0.0013466938,0.0026989807,0.0015615091,0.0024349042,0.0065700356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008434357,0.00032345622,0.000590236,0.0005099591,0.004069005,0.0029566092,0.002457687,0.0014466225,0.00046614258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019837765,0.00057595025,0.006577518,0.00015269849,0.00010139514,0.00063848257,0.0008262867,0.059985936,0.0045190714,0.89859664,0.0026222724,0.02520533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002329203,0.00043289078,0.0050322134,0.00014752347,0.00007913929,0.00046768747,0.0008610014,0.23315284,0.0013653501,0.7513553,0.0068074446,0.000065664106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021562972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021169067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065700356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015027355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015106236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021978974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252132495","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.319300","title":"Informal and Formal Organization in New Institutional Economics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Informal organization; Set (abstract data type); Informal sector; Formal organization; Formal system; Politics; Complement (music); Institutional economics; Business; Institution; Economic system; Public relations; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Microeconomics; Market economy; Neoclassical economics; Social science; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.015397438211268284,"score_gpt":0.25182634659860104,"score_spread":0.23642890838733274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252132495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.770843,0.0024046355,0.041901674,0.01108668,0.00022115125,0.000117221585,0.000084543535,0.00007813505,0.17326291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626935,0.00018990852,0.0010626075,0.00011044913,0.00006145614,0.000030022711,0.000009458199,0.0000067310307,0.0022600896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982052,0.001026595,0.00007555851,0.00017984593,0.00027154371,0.00024128667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740295,0.018490916,0.00289163,0.001731264,0.0008243495,0.0020321773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004914627,0.0002483307,0.00051987515,0.0015146984,0.0021171898,0.0045267898,0.0006410433,0.0013897391,0.00791687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014599157,0.00024156607,0.00026551264,0.0012418855,0.009549134,0.008194519,0.0021063325,0.0013465142,0.00024039841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405552,0.0002200987,0.0052536773,0.00003969641,0.000010168256,0.000046098736,0.0014550383,0.0013348948,0.0001087061,0.98023844,0.00057389546,0.0106451055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005906443,0.0000393992,0.0047151027,0.000027101047,0.000012067294,0.000032068427,0.0021752724,0.0032021108,0.000080026046,0.9865704,0.0030761496,0.000011141494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018391956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025452925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00791687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026383232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019295416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026484549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252164190","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2336218","title":"Prestige Clubs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Political science; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016237365166285846,"score_gpt":0.30166939842114365,"score_spread":0.28543203325485783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252164190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10015591,0.00025760976,0.00091225526,0.0026166604,0.0003639493,0.00009541703,0.00028286397,0.0001348535,0.89518046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7149277,0.00021224887,0.0004763941,0.00069923495,0.00045032738,0.00007388002,0.0003325063,0.000052316944,0.2827754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977859,0.00030621854,0.000058207428,0.00029087486,0.00071118947,0.0008476521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98945683,0.0007880226,0.0008176746,0.0007453871,0.0010286038,0.007163555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013298658,0.00037027732,0.00053661846,0.0038342115,0.0071475888,0.006265997,0.0010572175,0.0014314007,0.15161888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00788555,0.00024577946,0.00034845358,0.0018487577,0.001544741,0.0035328988,0.0050679888,0.0018767713,0.016966267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038288377,0.00077547465,0.026655177,0.00018611531,0.000060585055,0.0012661249,0.008485175,0.00047483513,0.0011522713,0.5779656,0.19107191,0.19152376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012916283,0.00042272016,0.08021159,0.00024260703,0.000053091593,0.001258777,0.013770051,0.0016824886,0.0007296263,0.13590738,0.7655317,0.00006072798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017898618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007216836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15161888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001248157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016862515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5072157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253793772","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/qys7d","title":"Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Statement (logic); Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Mechanism (biology); Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Communication","score_opus":0.08741194376148226,"score_gpt":0.42244517302858137,"score_spread":0.3350332292670991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253793772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98941797,0.00031388865,0.0040076333,0.0003041576,0.000042708536,0.00003295753,0.0000499062,0.000099980985,0.005730821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481493,0.00013703015,0.004083712,0.00012881019,0.00005962667,0.000016775912,0.00008336009,0.000050079703,0.0006257328],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485415,0.0017968708,0.0005308496,0.00062841456,0.0019670457,0.00022274333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8290612,0.13940692,0.020719696,0.0069546206,0.0021894893,0.0016680096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005939186,0.0006978569,0.00062972197,0.0008265195,0.0003340906,0.0021608872,0.00063723983,0.0024606755,0.010109748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086544454,0.00065220706,0.0007417345,0.00034349263,0.0011162083,0.0031891146,0.0014282063,0.0019715652,0.00074506167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031663027,0.0038003784,0.16742583,0.0023896827,0.0022583108,0.0032855864,0.0078686215,0.013227279,0.6043269,0.018885773,0.0017797344,0.14308889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011255076,0.016824191,0.76814365,0.00038102982,0.0014594684,0.0038334012,0.0019331367,0.04572719,0.08661773,0.06852575,0.004932482,0.0004964504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030288676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027301456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010109748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040873434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025395173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03382051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253810207","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4757-5055-3_15","title":"Rent-seeking for pure public goods","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Public good; Extension (predicate logic); Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Public economics; Rent-seeking; Financial economics; Political science; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Law","score_opus":0.11477316524923656,"score_gpt":0.3545148797971157,"score_spread":0.23974171454787915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253810207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06418709,0.011170124,0.079098575,0.005803135,0.00043625824,0.00008483869,0.00032476033,0.00015783194,0.8387374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7610626,0.01023548,0.024524074,0.00085681374,0.00052937795,0.00019040584,0.00021587149,0.0001204646,0.20226498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970526,0.00011653789,0.000009827189,0.000036702255,0.00009371364,0.000037980328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990355,0.0006568578,0.000049045368,0.0001837558,0.000043095268,0.000031805594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084356184,0.00055162515,0.0006788737,0.0005656858,0.00056156574,0.0017209346,0.0007554981,0.0012390947,0.015130394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025361353,0.00040323005,0.000503255,0.0006216715,0.002534428,0.0036734792,0.00073722936,0.0015329068,0.0014303017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011379935,0.000023255241,0.000038219296,0.000060037146,0.0000050712,0.000010037242,0.000050666153,0.00054930337,0.00028196856,0.9860588,0.0038517476,0.00905957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066440757,0.000004518926,0.00015426526,0.000016475044,0.000003693981,0.000023839822,0.00001914128,0.0016540126,0.00016872068,0.9929208,0.005024023,0.00000394153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009201404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012784335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015130394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014580687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079764606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050616205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254787265","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00732.x","title":"MISINFORMATION*","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Misinformation; Politics; Economics; Advertising; Microeconomics; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.04361516671236806,"score_gpt":0.3685297101017962,"score_spread":0.32491454338942816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254787265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1899566,0.01720452,0.065313205,0.039470065,0.0031512005,0.00045819863,0.0048988615,0.0005418074,0.6790055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9194956,0.0065690475,0.0063329935,0.0044976226,0.001372864,0.00014849167,0.0010847801,0.00005332518,0.060445227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967907,0.0013645544,0.00028773746,0.00040565256,0.0009202437,0.00023115988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733709,0.013612192,0.006027133,0.0041156667,0.0022838835,0.00059022295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028489938,0.0006479563,0.0005374708,0.001694751,0.000781467,0.0027594995,0.0007243224,0.0019569993,0.027043268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021304015,0.00029065897,0.000501009,0.0016684209,0.0016279542,0.0034029102,0.0013355847,0.0014595607,0.0044486434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000762211,0.00024385947,0.023604,0.0017473708,0.0004648741,0.00073678803,0.0021177707,0.003422971,0.0015633663,0.6412835,0.06866672,0.2553865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012308705,0.0006334042,0.034574587,0.0014846991,0.0005136013,0.004455129,0.0022428764,0.01044734,0.0062375097,0.483325,0.4557077,0.00025511705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009983487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012033862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027043268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014676074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009406978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090468705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256378697","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1984883","title":"On Hatred","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03766214186897435,"score_gpt":0.30646044129941985,"score_spread":0.26879829943044553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256378697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035535716,0.0003037624,0.0023226072,0.0034285258,0.0012478291,0.00005851749,0.00031235692,0.00018638615,0.95660436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16547883,0.00020825402,0.0007078168,0.0023815949,0.00019746656,0.00003117993,0.0002782113,0.000101342186,0.83061534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878174,0.00027523143,0.000034233333,0.0001743267,0.00041931795,0.00031506518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964663,0.000565032,0.00028426692,0.000951147,0.0011782175,0.00055500795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013994003,0.00047303815,0.000342898,0.0012423955,0.0029327061,0.0029741204,0.0007646595,0.0014354317,0.18656376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057334914,0.00019724312,0.00039871127,0.0006834643,0.0015085039,0.0021098624,0.0020493788,0.0019538677,0.04229325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033160843,0.00044508884,0.015237775,0.00014958477,0.000061554725,0.0010549122,0.0061247014,0.00040175754,0.0036358112,0.24439009,0.39831477,0.32985225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002456412,0.00022009552,0.018725019,0.0001504844,0.000039745464,0.0007090445,0.005741015,0.00081898645,0.0022465368,0.035186235,0.9360826,0.000055663142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005129196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010310703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18656376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011192497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010039973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280591778","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x21000777","title":"The logic of challenging research into bias and social disparity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Macro; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.37973963310228837,"score_gpt":0.4770834689637365,"score_spread":0.09734383586144812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280591778","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031770358,0.00085121964,0.0006034747,0.99218506,0.0038831218,0.0000057533016,0.000013775614,0.000010738071,0.002129257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010296425,0.0007813392,0.0013776043,0.9667645,0.018579543,0.00007935454,0.0000116383435,0.000015799493,0.0020937964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771928,0.009535621,0.0013066136,0.0041589285,0.0069226194,0.0008834942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92177755,0.06134742,0.00238078,0.004149403,0.007905832,0.0024390568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033919163,0.00074610714,0.0017830813,0.0012350202,0.005391278,0.0065183784,0.0041455114,0.041806478,0.0040172474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09083168,0.00046610858,0.0014242912,0.0010209724,0.043565985,0.012948416,0.0051166946,0.07049937,0.0038959568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011485735,0.000063329135,0.00087596633,0.00015896969,0.000058675538,0.00069053983,0.0012798017,0.00023095359,0.00023406353,0.43251577,0.5403218,0.023455167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015606797,0.000046794983,0.0005755676,0.00020492279,0.000020457179,0.00050504185,0.0008475639,0.0006206436,0.00035037182,0.6177458,0.37885696,0.000069758775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004948242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004743302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041806478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005836949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050494876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17938387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281892342","doi":"10.3386/w30091","title":"A Theory of Visionary Disruption","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.4775245433487483,"score_gpt":0.6001815777343238,"score_spread":0.12265703438557551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281892342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018247826,0.002010281,0.1637264,0.0125830285,0.00036943512,0.00012527176,0.00020876068,0.00012730787,0.80260164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.902135,0.0021782613,0.027114365,0.001977657,0.00047295293,0.00035277053,0.00017399753,0.00010075565,0.06549422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979031,0.000739579,0.00006586414,0.0004229372,0.00050364493,0.000364819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706703,0.0013966697,0.00045891543,0.00042090687,0.00038940666,0.0002670626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019950876,0.00071487704,0.00046275306,0.0017284655,0.0027169564,0.0062018386,0.0016137741,0.003040946,0.02013565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065476717,0.00042159302,0.001095379,0.0017142995,0.011570997,0.0073195277,0.0031647047,0.0030657682,0.0025041276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033504107,0.0000070602973,0.00012883179,0.000011236987,0.0000028442591,0.00001804479,0.0002454661,0.00050075323,0.000026165077,0.99587494,0.0008897191,0.0022916547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010617334,0.000011471737,0.000275942,0.000024323004,0.00000423102,0.000069617665,0.00024203249,0.0021070598,0.00004219276,0.976394,0.020811887,0.0000066097327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053946874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025517996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02013565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006034941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029197843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0673604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282036599","doi":"10.3390/g13030043","title":"On the Impact of an Intermediary Agent in the Ultimatum Game","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Delegate; Microeconomics; Intermediary; Ultimatum game; Censoring (clinical trials); Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Finance","score_opus":0.043608423264446076,"score_gpt":0.3744875520996916,"score_spread":0.3308791288352455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282036599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62307477,0.0011109504,0.13247482,0.006818142,0.00024322716,0.00021351961,0.00017921964,0.0001444144,0.23574087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98967767,0.00024816507,0.005568824,0.00030956088,0.000057243295,0.000059454964,0.000020188445,0.000022546983,0.0040363497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99056363,0.00696678,0.00022591511,0.00054366543,0.000721039,0.0009789699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9182432,0.0694562,0.0064218245,0.0024836117,0.0012705473,0.0021245605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117978,0.0011371651,0.0014720185,0.00076259795,0.0024817195,0.0062202313,0.0020316008,0.0037849757,0.021112181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06478584,0.0007086914,0.0009288994,0.0009241218,0.0051447265,0.008334029,0.0039184475,0.006352307,0.0011769078],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006471092,0.000357856,0.003981071,0.00020187844,0.00009246777,0.0005020987,0.0012119258,0.07651551,0.0024153222,0.89934343,0.0015092043,0.013222144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039861398,0.0007886858,0.0046564206,0.0001951666,0.000266966,0.00026626067,0.0020617102,0.32844502,0.0016856478,0.6557626,0.005304668,0.00016815799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040722084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033122418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021112181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031199385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022939087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07062727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282929034","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12590","title":"Vaccine and inclusion","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Veto; Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Dilemma; Inclusion (mineral); Set (abstract data type); Economics; Majority rule; Power (physics); Microeconomics; Law and economics; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Social science; Biology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.026903816619704594,"score_gpt":0.3113936456383105,"score_spread":0.2844898290186059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282929034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119868085,0.0039622025,0.03838102,0.041270196,0.000513518,0.0002735437,0.00030416003,0.00007143536,0.79535586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632828,0.001254263,0.0082657775,0.0047671264,0.0003911838,0.0003710958,0.00010191811,0.000030174728,0.021535564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98968023,0.0058277245,0.00040180286,0.0012147585,0.0016077633,0.0012675903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984391,0.008661701,0.0023098895,0.002296932,0.0011639876,0.0011765485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007904973,0.00054912106,0.0010544116,0.0013450518,0.003538456,0.005016171,0.001278277,0.0033474471,0.019912874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02765927,0.0003378079,0.0006461007,0.0009828653,0.01159733,0.006958396,0.007994394,0.0030166756,0.0012423452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003850832,0.00005070887,0.0009317938,0.00007161033,0.000011730381,0.000046871835,0.0004942402,0.00065289973,0.00021956356,0.98533845,0.0012676204,0.010875955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027776932,0.000074639036,0.0012397286,0.00012154074,0.000016315706,0.00013629494,0.00051351835,0.00061519886,0.00034317194,0.9605392,0.03636318,0.000009351102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085063337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089240377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019912874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025170867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022218756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066615164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282943093","doi":"10.30523/mutefekkir.1130991","title":"God Is Watching: Priming God Consepts Increases Prosocial Behavior in an Anonymous Economic Game","year":2022,"lang":"tr","type":"article","venue":"DergiPark (Istanbul University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03305395913718824,"score_gpt":0.2900025533502509,"score_spread":0.25694859421306265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282943093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99625236,0.00006443947,0.00035964628,0.00009982684,0.000038140366,0.000026248536,0.000051065297,0.000025480726,0.0030828507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925874,0.00011678705,0.0014669957,0.00014762211,0.000024881481,0.00014487305,0.000090995665,0.00003675435,0.005383714],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996834,0.000095697316,0.000015366411,0.000082683706,0.000059757716,0.000063204374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900216,0.00034002154,0.0001922203,0.00007612556,0.000037366164,0.00035209602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029585892,0.00052540854,0.00044550098,0.00019431446,0.00045214797,0.00084043154,0.00028871652,0.0005856976,0.010705245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002119134,0.00029359668,0.00020536414,0.00009563344,0.00046265256,0.0005201773,0.0008211167,0.0010086457,0.000649315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.047243115,0.03507298,0.09363767,0.002176089,0.00049235055,0.0014401051,0.011579954,0.0017705049,0.64447796,0.009617846,0.00888649,0.14360501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018177645,0.025353888,0.8805377,0.00023089573,0.0005988454,0.00060752337,0.0052313386,0.013079395,0.048508924,0.011131107,0.012680768,0.00022185828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012822633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002739997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010705245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032906642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026878147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035812557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283524093","doi":"10.1101/2022.06.21.496956","title":"Blocking D2/D3 dopamine receptors increases volatility of beliefs when we learn to trust others","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre; Vienna Science and Technology Fund; Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sulpiride; Dopamine; Psychology; Dopamine receptor D2; Prosocial behavior; Volatility (finance); Dopamine receptor; Antagonist; Social psychology; Proxy (statistics); Receptor; Internal medicine; Computer science; Medicine; Econometrics; Neuroscience; Economics; Dopaminergic; Machine learning","score_opus":0.02841304860997911,"score_gpt":0.2774546171855416,"score_spread":0.24904156857556248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283524093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99883765,0.000049253078,0.0006543927,0.00008487782,0.0000063752655,0.0000064266032,0.00003870279,0.000015656828,0.00030661147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989157,0.00003942347,0.00044195584,0.000038519043,0.0000023027317,0.000011417195,0.00002211277,0.000005254132,0.00052338676],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997546,0.00007070132,0.000017950782,0.000042221305,0.00006502325,0.00004942191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895006,0.0003060952,0.0003849736,0.00010018081,0.00004538315,0.00021327581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029814086,0.00024125603,0.00030270085,0.00013580499,0.00013035846,0.0004015817,0.00026051383,0.0003545124,0.0036062354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013371914,0.00018440104,0.00021650546,0.00006648553,0.00039339534,0.00023148216,0.00037271177,0.0010399489,0.00021562804],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048084874,0.0016701574,0.011953033,0.00014324638,0.0001825988,0.00019261023,0.00023952515,0.0016065539,0.96479654,0.0008187375,0.00034139171,0.013247082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007462819,0.025414286,0.1713888,0.00007619287,0.0003568594,0.0007811313,0.0007620489,0.041279744,0.74941975,0.007088342,0.0025672738,0.00011945748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011023071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014896414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036062354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003196415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000155215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01206404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284895062","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x21001205","title":"Social groups and the computational conundrums of delays, proximity, and loyalty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Loyalty; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; History; Law","score_opus":0.07584325913697014,"score_gpt":0.3637855526585385,"score_spread":0.28794229352156836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284895062","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055394013,0.00080631184,0.00075742195,0.99289215,0.0015760344,0.0000030474305,0.000029209486,0.000012169523,0.0033697211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061413594,0.0032269799,0.0027008364,0.8941363,0.02778519,0.00008393818,0.000050477516,0.000043381042,0.010559393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969283,0.0015647367,0.00016156542,0.00047636725,0.0006784518,0.00019063878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96552426,0.030406095,0.0006788618,0.0011051703,0.0016226355,0.0006629962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006166589,0.00048564322,0.001011749,0.0006108895,0.0033047835,0.004309134,0.0033388108,0.023950774,0.003973819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026025042,0.0004925426,0.0007336232,0.0006108816,0.012466596,0.009220934,0.002175993,0.025082732,0.0021526304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010576915,0.000031747757,0.00075862394,0.00008183056,0.000029041945,0.0003598259,0.0006912245,0.0009085928,0.00014739536,0.42239633,0.54782337,0.026666338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008156386,0.000018967774,0.00056919496,0.0001238392,0.000014743067,0.00022540164,0.00050422474,0.00381836,0.00021019003,0.7753232,0.21904759,0.00006269459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014532035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02304383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023950774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004690726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033834856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034033716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285072097","doi":"10.32920/14639850.v1","title":"Group Size, Coordination, and the Effectiveness of Punishment in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism: An Experimental Investigation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"Zhejiang University","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Turnover; Context (archaeology); Liberian dollar; Per capita; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Incentive; Public good; Microeconomics; Demography; Population; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.021596646632446197,"score_gpt":0.3245270981019959,"score_spread":0.3029304514695497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285072097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903999,0.000112996575,0.0032364477,0.00027348445,0.0000613563,0.00041408578,0.000083325045,0.000026692114,0.0053917267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914317,0.00009664767,0.004967354,0.0001322975,0.000049512728,0.0012432593,0.00007199142,0.000019968145,0.001987324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001807,0.006470616,0.00053838996,0.0011808882,0.001160595,0.00063144555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85493696,0.107163124,0.019724868,0.013615858,0.0017572563,0.0028019147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01733031,0.0010248955,0.0014468237,0.0009740071,0.00087960373,0.0014809982,0.0020608704,0.0017734229,0.00994349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057062514,0.00044287194,0.0006993118,0.00067640893,0.0037366198,0.0020722048,0.00213317,0.001996764,0.00053463987],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.18335488,0.19621044,0.067998074,0.00459164,0.0032475467,0.001378551,0.0074814274,0.06517463,0.119988255,0.14891458,0.0052200584,0.19643997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06624158,0.294461,0.15328981,0.0008283366,0.0032585014,0.00090951467,0.006090229,0.13514487,0.0714753,0.25201032,0.015721682,0.00056877715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006654746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005295297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01733031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015002142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014904233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09165251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285090456","doi":"10.1145/3490486.3538343","title":"Peer Effects from Friends and Strangers: Evidence from Random Matchmaking in an Online Game","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Peer effects; Product (mathematics); Peer-to-peer; Computer science; Peer influence; Psychology; Internet privacy; Business; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08598168647289438,"score_gpt":0.33528980747468595,"score_spread":0.24930812100179156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285090456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98319906,0.00031519725,0.0080604805,0.00044677497,0.000024525485,0.00013716906,0.0001883082,0.000037629146,0.007590978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687696,0.00011726871,0.0016672873,0.00014661232,0.000020252954,0.000058997128,0.000110255416,0.000016092932,0.0009863237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991597,0.0056429426,0.00032660697,0.0012185089,0.00086972024,0.0003452188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7864543,0.17158508,0.021552328,0.013885614,0.0026188267,0.0039038528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014230839,0.0005865303,0.0013288839,0.0011588334,0.001734246,0.0026363577,0.0020643293,0.0020350679,0.009150334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1008454,0.0006993928,0.0006430985,0.0010418384,0.0023368406,0.003097654,0.0022819303,0.0023406858,0.0013159766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011402657,0.010551579,0.65989345,0.0019664594,0.0038987156,0.002424181,0.012546878,0.05975893,0.0089206025,0.08124237,0.009169272,0.13822496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018368714,0.004765888,0.4430136,0.00021712446,0.001743381,0.0017140999,0.007145122,0.37712568,0.005392174,0.14727429,0.009301,0.00047077748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042082123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050670225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014230839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006405914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005692648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07526076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285245105","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4113694","title":"Fundraising Design in a Competitive Market","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Archetype; Marketing; Business; Raising (metalworking); Conjoint analysis; Public relations; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Preference; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.029329283727837156,"score_gpt":0.3123179884759247,"score_spread":0.2829887047480875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285245105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7719713,0.00033966245,0.19025503,0.0011966864,0.000114621704,0.0005557439,0.000052431467,0.00028972575,0.03522475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696767,0.0000611863,0.024502777,0.000048290265,0.00002599679,0.0001397176,0.000012934372,0.000014750893,0.0055176704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978042,0.0013175833,0.00008478241,0.00034152291,0.00023157198,0.0002202186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866246,0.008860744,0.0014820219,0.0012548547,0.0010437375,0.00073398964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049598888,0.00050651474,0.0005670659,0.00050116447,0.0007257575,0.0021870492,0.001078551,0.0018207835,0.00822614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016887104,0.00027164756,0.00029595598,0.00029935624,0.0011982317,0.0031178186,0.0008452112,0.00071822695,0.0007392629],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00643009,0.004192188,0.010143475,0.0007655477,0.00017238726,0.00062102964,0.0033796832,0.07034365,0.028472241,0.54724073,0.004248847,0.32399014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027689692,0.009985221,0.0088480385,0.0001612521,0.00029941293,0.00059012446,0.0026843105,0.42671147,0.016348561,0.5128345,0.018625818,0.0001422885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050955365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040255007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00822614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006644201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009858058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027519107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285507329","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4153372","title":"Connectors and Influencers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Université de Lyon; Tamkeen; Seoul National University; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Influencer marketing; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.01385473793338438,"score_gpt":0.2975074741855045,"score_spread":0.2836527362521201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285507329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7588969,0.0004263605,0.04488909,0.0014506248,0.00013446949,0.0000884945,0.00018210265,0.00043495963,0.19349699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906715,0.000106638465,0.0028388829,0.0000731627,0.000038696035,0.00003554909,0.000069631205,0.000060399332,0.006105512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972276,0.0010997421,0.000098313474,0.0006723301,0.00051290664,0.00038905544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841376,0.008920377,0.001542439,0.00240587,0.0010592795,0.0019344637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025630018,0.0005145739,0.0006424439,0.002149923,0.0019114309,0.004357859,0.0006986211,0.0013367451,0.02296455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017400587,0.00058590196,0.0006526333,0.0013707249,0.0031931843,0.0052321116,0.0022541883,0.0013067885,0.0019467385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003837456,0.00027017493,0.03201414,0.00009989202,0.0000885499,0.0003118803,0.0050734677,0.0015061641,0.005060462,0.9051645,0.002653115,0.04737398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032908897,0.00049693766,0.054113835,0.00007165627,0.0003251681,0.00089746446,0.007618934,0.01810623,0.006182994,0.8731425,0.038597837,0.000117386175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012440337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014136125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02296455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006431196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056794623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07682401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285605296","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2022/65","title":"Exploring the Benefits of Teams in Multiagent Learning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Incentive; Multi-agent system; Computer science; Knowledge management; Reinforcement learning; Population; Social learning; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Engineering; Sociology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.21384557946082658,"score_gpt":0.33639914380279223,"score_spread":0.12255356434196565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285605296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.407668,0.0021694019,0.5605513,0.0057050074,0.0001432211,0.000115335184,0.000047315676,0.00010398254,0.023496447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736912,0.00035130902,0.024410203,0.00018379728,0.00006658741,0.00008573688,0.000017158727,0.000015547457,0.0011783472],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983365,0.0012184213,0.000035965102,0.00014435199,0.000142283,0.00012246579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923321,0.005943323,0.0004896023,0.0003345915,0.0003423777,0.00055798923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034278524,0.0005830953,0.0006511134,0.0004803462,0.00078588125,0.0014695822,0.0010017549,0.0014244146,0.0018035115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015356594,0.00037009327,0.0005164758,0.0003181348,0.0014290083,0.0028720186,0.0024310169,0.0015470977,0.00016912911],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001891252,0.00023165278,0.0077695195,0.00013263381,0.00015662069,0.00016594933,0.00063498685,0.71444213,0.0009437738,0.24519573,0.0011913654,0.028946474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034135814,0.000082989085,0.00038156813,0.000016671362,0.000013495267,0.000014743509,0.00009114446,0.8528338,0.00011223648,0.1457061,0.0007072158,0.00000586924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016986349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012065684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034278524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007728662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007238653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018128395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286622653","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2022.12996symposium","title":"Person-Environment Fit: New Conceptualizations and the Role in Recruiting and Job Search","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Person–environment fit; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Job satisfaction; Work (physics); Process (computing); Job attitude; Association (psychology); Work environment; Job performance; Applied psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07474147839150436,"score_gpt":0.3247587223117292,"score_spread":0.25001724392022484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286622653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.715924,0.02258707,0.086788855,0.039949667,0.00060483906,0.00019629949,0.00013816307,0.000120673925,0.13369042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890238,0.0021763565,0.006128698,0.00087049813,0.00014880598,0.00011097527,0.00003595103,0.000016338021,0.0014886354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957567,0.0027369913,0.00021702226,0.00035583926,0.000545196,0.00038825045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941857,0.003500386,0.0008276173,0.0003985569,0.00032063085,0.0007671971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006714719,0.0005690997,0.0006128334,0.0034830421,0.0019404377,0.007998971,0.00161102,0.002988129,0.002703077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007840176,0.0003487093,0.00097459106,0.0035332176,0.013367633,0.006668467,0.0050727734,0.00277844,0.00025488026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012544078,0.00040437793,0.07943852,0.0002698425,0.00007128211,0.00062626024,0.07843505,0.001766833,0.0004574522,0.7777174,0.0010895622,0.05959788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045842316,0.00047358373,0.12017003,0.0007181563,0.000096163734,0.0017504836,0.09136104,0.010020511,0.00021379342,0.74189216,0.033095814,0.00016241109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029797675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026304352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007998971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021227258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017006295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035511255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286697215","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12808","title":"The Effects of Openness of Internal Reporting and Shared Interest with an Employee on Managerial Collusion and Subsequent Cooperation*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Business; Openness to experience; Task (project management); Autonomy; Baseline (sea); Affect (linguistics); Accounting; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11702956924502375,"score_gpt":0.4053753317194482,"score_spread":0.28834576247442445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286697215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99783725,0.00005094558,0.00026295372,0.00011165956,0.00000408005,0.000013119904,0.0000075506423,0.0000046281507,0.0017079627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957436,0.00001456585,0.00018611191,0.000022583514,0.0000038046824,0.000012047814,0.0000065922522,0.0000016053154,0.00017838548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98743534,0.008642195,0.0007955453,0.000660952,0.001446517,0.0010194518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.694718,0.2239637,0.053334158,0.011552172,0.0031398584,0.0132921925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009198069,0.00037115978,0.00041780938,0.0007467207,0.0011809871,0.0022657274,0.0007577838,0.0010300374,0.0044349297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0732844,0.0002980522,0.0005544106,0.00026773207,0.0021928686,0.0012079168,0.004406798,0.0019497083,0.00018815607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009979239,0.007234561,0.8468791,0.00024966378,0.0007033053,0.0013323384,0.020312477,0.0052494174,0.022054268,0.004281692,0.0006003888,0.08112339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024298603,0.0042897724,0.9664618,0.00014284847,0.00020641494,0.0003911188,0.010415055,0.007985972,0.0039218576,0.004743444,0.0010705608,0.00012814126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015346806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015939911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009198069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012374076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008858551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048644602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288004652","doi":"10.5817/wp_muni_econ_2019-02","title":"Delegation And Coordination With Multiple Threshold Public Goods: Experimental Evidence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MUNI ECON Working Papers","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Public good; Delegation; Business; Distribution (mathematics); Public economics; Public relations; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.06055160068049356,"score_gpt":0.30483605559537674,"score_spread":0.24428445491488318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288004652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9129123,0.0007990029,0.027197361,0.0022961842,0.00008135172,0.00035983845,0.00024194343,0.00011086711,0.056001212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934075,0.00024450253,0.0040881564,0.00022924159,0.00002437302,0.00021535109,0.00004984192,0.000020553893,0.0017205552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893861,0.007129556,0.0004307719,0.0011145052,0.0010820623,0.00085704273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8315535,0.11336227,0.030397166,0.01762447,0.0024535845,0.004609041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017878277,0.0009393875,0.001256539,0.0008945249,0.0013931195,0.0030855339,0.0015679008,0.0021695679,0.019381013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06671902,0.000593049,0.00070814835,0.0010462153,0.00327162,0.0030954517,0.0029511338,0.0023540973,0.0015971526],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023054786,0.03201369,0.10387932,0.0046358346,0.0026133033,0.0019292874,0.0069880756,0.10145162,0.032378662,0.5042591,0.014053874,0.17274258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0096798595,0.010479798,0.066768534,0.0006528969,0.0013399762,0.00087270414,0.003342392,0.12316979,0.011795058,0.753997,0.01764599,0.00025603277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014868659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011313354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019381013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001974086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019091417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09455049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289341478","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2022.4501","title":"Incentive Effects of Subjective Allocations of Rewards and Penalties","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Incentive; Punishment (psychology); Stochastic game; Ex-ante; Subjectivity; Economics; Microeconomics; Tournament; Psychology; Actuarial science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.012495427460699626,"score_gpt":0.3066389422301213,"score_spread":0.29414351476942163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289341478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96541446,0.00012730398,0.019238662,0.00042702293,0.00004540246,0.00024980187,0.0001481818,0.000036825582,0.014312313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960168,0.000028073317,0.0030081787,0.00009141409,0.000015648282,0.000086949614,0.000039392373,0.0000067901346,0.0007067097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98054254,0.014671978,0.00083781936,0.0013397384,0.0018604754,0.0007474474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68317026,0.24564204,0.047884755,0.014757173,0.00512064,0.0034251332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031856287,0.00066191,0.00067687256,0.000808052,0.0005215292,0.0019510494,0.00075555895,0.0010800569,0.0055651804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1417412,0.0003339317,0.0006562199,0.0004989609,0.0022492122,0.001612516,0.0018065975,0.0020844562,0.00032162384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012011771,0.009845638,0.65090686,0.00069342804,0.0012763919,0.00055788714,0.002886269,0.07876522,0.020499242,0.089579314,0.0016770753,0.13130084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010101354,0.0123674115,0.775473,0.00021197833,0.0005503902,0.00028137374,0.0011925851,0.11397832,0.011323633,0.07938496,0.003943665,0.000282501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086742325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010644408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031856287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001480477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007716012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16847414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291014911","doi":"10.3390/jrfm15080353","title":"Algorithm Aversion as an Obstacle in the Establishment of Robo Advisors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegate; Obstacle; Payment; Diversification (marketing strategy); Heuristic; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Finance; Political science; Law; Machine learning","score_opus":0.012328548422705532,"score_gpt":0.27490765006285406,"score_spread":0.2625791016401485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291014911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942247,0.000064853564,0.0030252656,0.00009948695,0.000022109632,0.00007434179,0.000021729458,0.000025999194,0.0024413515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355763,0.000062241445,0.00449641,0.00015516327,0.000019423424,0.00013982813,0.00004819688,0.000018931367,0.0015021684],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951119,0.0028997941,0.0002908052,0.0006447829,0.00062901626,0.0004238186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608225,0.027084453,0.005291894,0.0038248042,0.0007624179,0.002213892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007275864,0.00065494905,0.00084515725,0.00038236135,0.00049462,0.0021786108,0.00057025976,0.001301274,0.0040382235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023159852,0.00039454777,0.00034605924,0.00022439283,0.0016527143,0.0011057789,0.0014333656,0.0016962304,0.00035096816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03556615,0.043784134,0.29120842,0.0025327252,0.0010634395,0.0016126502,0.013617757,0.03479182,0.41385,0.0370775,0.003489114,0.12140622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003934679,0.12322968,0.5240512,0.00062165136,0.0015306053,0.0016147122,0.01157751,0.13638137,0.12160981,0.05115423,0.023540707,0.0007538527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004443323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004415121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007275864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000422525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006770003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03847891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292466556","doi":"10.1111/caje.12607","title":"Piece‐rate cuts and ratchet effects","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Earnings; Piece work; Economics; Ratchet; Work (physics); Labour economics; Ratchet effect; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.1095149267987611,"score_gpt":0.22354266052110555,"score_spread":0.11402773372234445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292466556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99480766,0.000059141854,0.0017309879,0.000076327655,0.000046435936,0.00014942633,0.00005726171,0.00002165853,0.0030510498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963798,0.000029612842,0.0017009126,0.00012257713,0.000019789304,0.00024350606,0.000043372835,0.000010538202,0.0014499623],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662435,0.0017187085,0.00019313375,0.00048284844,0.0007073803,0.00027351355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670935,0.020841092,0.0058401367,0.004088467,0.0008703483,0.0012664689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046351864,0.00043767056,0.0007478515,0.00027191444,0.0004884474,0.0008301883,0.0006526706,0.0009983387,0.008347316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016619762,0.00041979077,0.00035232946,0.00015380829,0.0012553773,0.00046689727,0.00070223265,0.0013125951,0.00047803792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08088719,0.052075915,0.17274669,0.0016315961,0.0010110629,0.0007698233,0.0036728743,0.012398551,0.5274357,0.017477881,0.0028605124,0.12703225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036616097,0.11276534,0.7946026,0.00017389841,0.00044279394,0.0002625715,0.0017202494,0.021497102,0.044874024,0.013902955,0.005881965,0.00021483215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077810825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009660601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008347316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055339414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037233107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027924538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292878056","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12821","title":"Motivating Employees with Goal‐Based Prosocial Rewards*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Incentive; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Cash; Valuation (finance); Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.12385379307124832,"score_gpt":0.40837935201603626,"score_spread":0.2845255589447879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292878056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99670815,0.000023582717,0.00091806817,0.0001881327,0.000010764127,0.000033287488,0.0000058834066,0.000022738033,0.0020893537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778914,0.000028636192,0.0013474777,0.000088492154,0.000009446565,0.000042771488,0.000009034457,0.0000038006083,0.00068136706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898297,0.00061373255,0.00003846503,0.00006625492,0.00017220524,0.00012634396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323434,0.003157556,0.0014556817,0.00048750048,0.00034953974,0.0013154789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020403175,0.00031639377,0.00021728073,0.0002951726,0.0005207865,0.0011447421,0.00023680858,0.0004921111,0.0031611728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076053077,0.00016687969,0.00018885489,0.00015745129,0.00036369878,0.00037139605,0.00073847856,0.0005591103,0.00065015286],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039463565,0.024742516,0.47757208,0.00091678253,0.00035078553,0.00073724723,0.008153862,0.011435194,0.12554155,0.013727161,0.0076005,0.32527587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080221356,0.013558359,0.85342413,0.00029014683,0.00035244672,0.0005550225,0.009840919,0.037141733,0.038635504,0.023183657,0.02194861,0.0002671979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026104692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045431894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031611728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025138995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000501867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010790348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292975253","doi":"10.1177/09567976221094782","title":"The Games We Play: Prosocial Choices Under Time Pressure Reflect Context-Sensitive Information Priorities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Altruism (biology); Deliberation; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Social decision making; Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04654493960470343,"score_gpt":0.3894608673018605,"score_spread":0.3429159276971571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292975253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99596643,0.000028124578,0.00097462436,0.000117839445,0.000006032317,0.00001581261,0.000020800195,0.0000043671153,0.0028660244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884653,0.000017368939,0.0007656872,0.00005815544,0.0000033468825,0.000020648915,0.000013766572,0.000003003676,0.00027151356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885356,0.00062888575,0.000035422,0.00017928216,0.00018508895,0.00011789286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687034,0.0013775188,0.00078116433,0.00025872135,0.00017736743,0.0005349238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012412635,0.00031540325,0.00023806955,0.00036567225,0.0005604356,0.0016422154,0.00024754446,0.0005051322,0.002086389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008142215,0.00025576,0.0001445977,0.00021340314,0.0013063467,0.0008803352,0.00076001015,0.0008614332,0.0001325716],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008889305,0.0043736775,0.55701816,0.0006293098,0.0006720013,0.0012819457,0.02915474,0.006394309,0.2482949,0.05527461,0.0026842651,0.0853327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000311748,0.0020711499,0.943792,0.00003099901,0.00013862856,0.00027518146,0.0047314754,0.010148949,0.008978203,0.026084214,0.0033241503,0.00011333756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038951258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060932487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038951258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006462963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000602093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0077449083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293173705","doi":"10.1007/s10683-022-09768-5","title":"Risk preferences and contract choices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval; Gouvernement du Québec","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Lottery; Wage; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Expected utility hypothesis; Risk neutral; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Computer science; Financial economics","score_opus":0.03202274745330394,"score_gpt":0.3161309425455882,"score_spread":0.28410819509228424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293173705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99445385,0.00008427095,0.002424195,0.0001279305,0.000008900561,0.000051786483,0.00009244397,0.000011498755,0.002745086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982717,0.00002937884,0.001066717,0.00006450841,0.0000051990037,0.00004473876,0.00006366664,0.0000043907444,0.00044960514],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949885,0.003241617,0.0002507144,0.00060701685,0.0006959472,0.00021617673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8982251,0.07329575,0.0154761,0.009260044,0.0017367129,0.002006231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010054338,0.00048295746,0.00051285274,0.000530306,0.0004879715,0.0018379057,0.0006591399,0.0012847314,0.0055616004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057247218,0.0005428572,0.00037074814,0.00029751367,0.0015426693,0.0010527229,0.000730956,0.0016077957,0.00051903765],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009736484,0.010132137,0.8236891,0.0005153319,0.00065402174,0.00039297235,0.0033132012,0.031670798,0.025571458,0.019582547,0.0017581988,0.07298371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084270467,0.0054535624,0.8583235,0.00013143166,0.00017250632,0.00035562197,0.0011369814,0.078326695,0.009041133,0.042255834,0.0037395703,0.00022038593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012457898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010832172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010054338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007910584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003846982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053173065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293700557","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102822","title":"The anatomy of social capital of a Canadian indigenous community: Implications of social trust field experiments for community-based forest management","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Social capital; Public relations; Population; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Economic growth; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.0553871499295242,"score_gpt":0.3533957706462708,"score_spread":0.2980086207167466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293700557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812599,0.00011508248,0.0012873376,0.0005670174,0.000008016216,0.00008680704,0.000063932275,0.000008462081,0.016603382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749446,0.00006437127,0.0009477351,0.00005714187,0.0000022926347,0.000028688462,0.000014236967,0.0000034262046,0.0013877169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989274,0.00039359188,0.000011732701,0.0001314566,0.00026709944,0.00026864783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961754,0.0017137013,0.00036368464,0.00036945217,0.0006542176,0.0007234423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020825178,0.00023947922,0.00028908948,0.0009439654,0.0060392153,0.001802498,0.00114304,0.00069229124,0.0040324875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073826485,0.00019564989,0.00017037152,0.001154737,0.0070210677,0.0012415692,0.0012922845,0.0007942924,0.00010062107],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026408564,0.0042805998,0.37365785,0.0005575407,0.00030823122,0.0014106466,0.12665708,0.009689839,0.066958256,0.22149566,0.0062071504,0.18613634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008400085,0.00046626036,0.89403623,0.00008830929,0.00009567853,0.00020528451,0.051915966,0.009264015,0.0034122309,0.030234396,0.010089956,0.00010757684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8830407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116959274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022698864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018765166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23529607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294190834","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1444049/v2","title":"Morality in Deceptive Environments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2069258778828033,"score_gpt":0.5129623947885261,"score_spread":0.3060365169057228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294190834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8696451,0.0012506524,0.03595746,0.00822939,0.0002557216,0.00009476438,0.00024311745,0.000039028248,0.08428483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926112,0.00045662458,0.0026338876,0.00021634126,0.00009200265,0.000050050083,0.000042855245,0.000015078653,0.0038818642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306023,0.0054803607,0.00014216031,0.00035355266,0.00071724947,0.00024637283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90968657,0.07559016,0.006441913,0.0051126056,0.0019786733,0.0011901169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011793198,0.0005411351,0.0006361442,0.0006320791,0.00089976744,0.003463478,0.0006721904,0.0017446305,0.009985149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09131462,0.00033276918,0.00021121408,0.00081826065,0.0038412353,0.0043710186,0.0012172671,0.0029694284,0.00042663285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013660301,0.0020887535,0.010988154,0.00051201956,0.00012381942,0.00026315116,0.004408264,0.01817053,0.0029521787,0.8989597,0.0052364883,0.05493088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018467667,0.00033653763,0.018928736,0.00010279834,0.000042555344,0.0001644012,0.0018419411,0.02133929,0.00097384385,0.9533061,0.0027425075,0.00003669277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012154671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071909843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011793198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010533736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086347084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06236911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295362466","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12822","title":"Incentive Contract Design and Employee‐Initiated Innovation: Evidence from the Field*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Scope (computer science); Spillover effect; Task (project management); Compensation (psychology); Business; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Management; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3362957370976114,"score_gpt":0.46429308453356805,"score_spread":0.12799734743595664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295362466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891578,0.0013840493,0.0018245084,0.00061833055,0.000035199708,0.000105235646,0.00011646081,0.000009602374,0.0067488216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793434,0.0003088849,0.00078061817,0.00018898456,0.000035469886,0.000087327295,0.00006208274,0.0000036171518,0.00059864233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97946507,0.013139767,0.0011722258,0.0014901998,0.0037898289,0.0009428458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52397364,0.37113577,0.074850745,0.014740141,0.008596551,0.0067031845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033539698,0.00026348338,0.00061053,0.002377004,0.0017198356,0.0026637388,0.0013091168,0.0016516204,0.0060788183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0964246,0.00039300157,0.00067676225,0.002046835,0.00261491,0.0016412875,0.0019883127,0.0014479362,0.0005622014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018067401,0.0055261552,0.8809713,0.0005886829,0.00029941637,0.00014120541,0.004963021,0.0013259919,0.00081855454,0.0071792146,0.0014380115,0.094941676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033317544,0.0024238406,0.97411436,0.0005443971,0.0001281172,0.00014234395,0.0041604578,0.003187434,0.00085118203,0.0070610037,0.006975304,0.000078481266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003422278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031209546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033539698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018469028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028256788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17737699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295676933","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2021.0505","title":"Evolutionarily stable preferences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Key (lock); Population; Theme (computing); Management science; Evolutionarily stable strategy; Evolutionary game theory; Economics; Game theory; Computer science; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Ecology; Sociology; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.29604741627039094,"score_gpt":0.4073812624657429,"score_spread":0.11133384619535197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295676933","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009889328,0.9054945,0.017679919,0.009312548,0.00047381705,0.000038343496,0.00017531197,0.000048331778,0.056887917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.124314636,0.85872316,0.005097044,0.0029865182,0.00058663037,0.000064216154,0.00021330778,0.00002421331,0.007990321],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996321,0.00013756531,0.000027014616,0.00006873076,0.000093367096,0.00004110345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994972,0.00028469355,0.00006518394,0.00002829079,0.00008975383,0.000034942193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010678789,0.00048166417,0.0007232943,0.0011144031,0.00030894394,0.0014313087,0.00079687877,0.0011328787,0.0025813829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021209852,0.0001755292,0.00038163064,0.0013921374,0.0021148287,0.002250121,0.000853292,0.0013585278,0.0008177333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006339422,0.000052104206,0.001014085,0.0032279047,0.0001175281,0.00018914108,0.00043216714,0.001456309,0.00076717505,0.44531885,0.012661689,0.5346996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003341876,0.00007604099,0.0048829154,0.0032319836,0.000105593695,0.0021529705,0.00043283796,0.0010471698,0.00068256725,0.3880523,0.5992464,0.0000558183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013411313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012128345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025813829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001102577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010657894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008635581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296858316","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104184","title":"Social undermining as a dark side of symbolic awards: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Psychology; Social psychology; Great Rift; Discontinuity (linguistics); Statistics","score_opus":0.08564123287154952,"score_gpt":0.3931062349317414,"score_spread":0.3074650020601919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296858316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97826767,0.00029353326,0.01818647,0.00054068206,0.00007132287,0.0002759379,0.00036779104,0.000065700195,0.0019309043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930663,0.000061506056,0.0043057804,0.00020158313,0.000037157923,0.00048243618,0.0002235151,0.000014923982,0.0016066835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96266204,0.028518433,0.0010854761,0.0035501411,0.0024416486,0.0017422688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.860693,0.09035499,0.028710304,0.015069306,0.0022239313,0.002948604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032292213,0.0007659383,0.0018210835,0.0012911446,0.0015515758,0.0023728837,0.003452775,0.002558739,0.009042778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09449451,0.0005718144,0.0016750451,0.0009885258,0.0029792476,0.0012830268,0.0030285649,0.004134559,0.0010529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022690915,0.012466817,0.83121,0.00062465837,0.0038818244,0.0013665383,0.007875315,0.01016196,0.007806625,0.037530057,0.0031238042,0.061261427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002465512,0.012010859,0.8111705,0.0001818323,0.0019568736,0.0007194721,0.0043579447,0.119416706,0.006298476,0.035804387,0.0052860156,0.00033139475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005059909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023332848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032292213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010314495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082852633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17077959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297360816","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewac017","title":"Effect of mood and worker incentives on workplace productivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Mood; Productivity; Incentive; Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Demographic economics; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.009059723879122966,"score_gpt":0.2621785118427002,"score_spread":0.25311878796357723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297360816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99367565,0.00027121117,0.00083173683,0.00059117697,0.000034734763,0.000018655854,0.0002566434,0.000014025028,0.004306172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927527,0.00004732104,0.00010180971,0.000057594894,0.000018743405,0.0000059231315,0.00004607231,0.0000014659759,0.00044588366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998601,0.00081731216,0.000068113986,0.00017823729,0.00014212809,0.00019324958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96367604,0.020648548,0.010374319,0.0012783005,0.0009622532,0.0030606533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018907342,0.00029320814,0.0004642566,0.00052858365,0.0005299887,0.0017887257,0.0003610286,0.0010218687,0.007448292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017673282,0.0002000499,0.00037407866,0.0004151998,0.0007200262,0.00036747725,0.00092315295,0.0008559773,0.0007453109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001242669,0.0012885669,0.96630734,0.000102025595,0.00029914494,0.00020479444,0.0003723093,0.0025445612,0.0019933365,0.003374769,0.0015346874,0.02073579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084382256,0.00038704666,0.99276346,0.000024959956,0.0001052707,0.00003226376,0.00033977412,0.0027709694,0.0003375189,0.0025803898,0.00055285037,0.000021169586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024691818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023434858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007448292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071591785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035846775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024917006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297951184","doi":"","title":"To vote or to abstain? An experimental study or first past the poste and PR elections","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05103626863641801,"score_gpt":0.3241924977261873,"score_spread":0.2731562290897693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297951184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98952895,0.0000814761,0.0020065955,0.00045206645,0.00021404172,0.00079534116,0.00019927115,0.000021864967,0.006700255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863777,0.000118608696,0.0033859052,0.000507617,0.00027280193,0.0021564006,0.00017595453,0.000020450861,0.0069844024],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537057,0.0026417158,0.0002717821,0.00081894075,0.00045763352,0.00043932692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96781486,0.020571142,0.0052156886,0.00469943,0.0005580094,0.0011408827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066674785,0.0007023876,0.0012651447,0.00034370247,0.0010221716,0.0018325363,0.0009061426,0.002225689,0.01768037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019902889,0.00052346726,0.0007828086,0.00031284807,0.0020229667,0.001299826,0.0010499501,0.002776443,0.0013393665],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.23653479,0.27915803,0.052064322,0.0029675886,0.0014973626,0.0011580087,0.007922385,0.009395127,0.15804753,0.1088827,0.0093976045,0.13297455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05863773,0.5347538,0.13746019,0.00045139925,0.0016900221,0.001213473,0.004229141,0.04479517,0.05138884,0.12664664,0.038119927,0.0006136617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030082394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034277787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01768037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047724726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061916205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059146762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298410635","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2378229","title":"Testing the Theory of Multitasking: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment in Chinese Factories","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human multitasking; Salary; Unobservable; Incentive; Wage; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Layoff; Natural experiment; Empirical evidence; Field (mathematics); Empirical research; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Unemployment; Psychology; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03563038013941222,"score_gpt":0.3324847882382171,"score_spread":0.29685440809880487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298410635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989503,0.000023298708,0.0003581797,0.000039685157,0.0000034519746,0.000031184758,0.000023276432,0.000003540704,0.00056705397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985474,0.000048269365,0.000760876,0.000060672533,0.000007231982,0.00008605897,0.00010955929,0.000006156774,0.00037378605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969351,0.0013600643,0.00024776286,0.0007086401,0.0004361656,0.00031218652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93347627,0.045856886,0.006466364,0.009967321,0.00219512,0.002038108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008981832,0.0009617639,0.00077808934,0.0007499451,0.0012205231,0.001264068,0.0018693836,0.0012482223,0.003256784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025473421,0.0005832215,0.0006961706,0.0005955895,0.0032114584,0.0019321543,0.0012011285,0.0010599999,0.00044834468],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033366054,0.02793933,0.659252,0.001005554,0.0018795836,0.0012400209,0.020826971,0.012364559,0.11020139,0.015700256,0.0019589157,0.11426542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019170523,0.01158134,0.939816,0.00007134009,0.000559593,0.00013125403,0.0026019649,0.023081334,0.012078361,0.0066259364,0.0013554096,0.00018031157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029647503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02132527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029647503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018054285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002133044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058949888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303474159","doi":"","title":"Overcoming Free-Riding in Bandit Games","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Class (philosophy); Component (thermodynamics); Markov perfect equilibrium; Equilibrium selection; Computer science; Diffusion; Sequential equilibrium; Economics; Mathematics; Game theory; Repeated game; Nash equilibrium; Artificial intelligence; Physics","score_opus":0.10832905346274821,"score_gpt":0.2450871599761229,"score_spread":0.1367581065133747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303474159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25195166,0.0004413546,0.72188693,0.0016420458,0.000052509964,0.00024327368,0.000065396096,0.00026966206,0.023447135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96244127,0.000258807,0.033424947,0.00021645757,0.000043366264,0.00027044993,0.000023852095,0.00003481591,0.0032860108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933442,0.0044531794,0.00028874524,0.0006621482,0.0006455585,0.0006062209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97855514,0.015291432,0.0031384837,0.0017052953,0.00055738015,0.0007523896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006966186,0.001529176,0.0021214061,0.0008553227,0.00140183,0.0033473375,0.0021159672,0.0039458303,0.0041246773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032147393,0.00087620044,0.0010933044,0.00066369737,0.0042421655,0.006201701,0.004145994,0.0024344758,0.00065304927],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047902,0.00032777793,0.0017028421,0.00040045724,0.00023215245,0.00036534673,0.0013974287,0.26045385,0.0038743475,0.69541484,0.0012177795,0.03413418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014685147,0.00023131134,0.00037206078,0.000063251,0.0000515391,0.00012683957,0.0002787316,0.37356457,0.0009384102,0.62206584,0.0021209456,0.000039696228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001668397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007806508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006966186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011554005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012031788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036841154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306655083","doi":"10.3758/s13428-022-01988-0","title":"Questions of value, questions of magnitude: An exploration and application of methods for comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Mediation; Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Magnitude (astronomy); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Machine learning; Physics","score_opus":0.48291823368261927,"score_gpt":0.6283255401611992,"score_spread":0.14540730647857997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306655083","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0148902,0.0030693957,0.97360533,0.0039762203,0.0002511769,0.00059753895,0.00016850277,0.00012210348,0.0033194155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.335156,0.0018212922,0.6558126,0.0011118529,0.0005112049,0.0041694967,0.00012978402,0.00029789624,0.000989906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.53451407,0.4366938,0.0061369534,0.008671175,0.013218968,0.0007651099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0736626,0.8839579,0.010101172,0.026613014,0.0050590923,0.00060615584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3571735,0.0024184713,0.0047247354,0.0056526326,0.0031544184,0.010942456,0.008594984,0.0050208615,0.006099013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7681897,0.0020790722,0.004539039,0.006952234,0.022421092,0.021897633,0.009338264,0.011387591,0.00037106994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006455391,0.00037811304,0.012184327,0.0017120923,0.0025729935,0.00014781462,0.0058188294,0.006906825,0.0008413501,0.8544273,0.0013901489,0.11297479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001760968,0.00026886174,0.0031896336,0.00057532976,0.0004286449,0.0001656651,0.0010463458,0.026330737,0.0007813694,0.9635793,0.00333769,0.00012027808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002450573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023363882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3571735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039541223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054470296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79271954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306699559","doi":"10.1287/isre.2022.1163","title":"A Theory of Information Compression: When Judgments Are Costly","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Compression (physics); Value (mathematics); Cluster analysis; Psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.15948813413756044,"score_gpt":0.4186902016414511,"score_spread":0.25920206750389063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306699559","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13540892,0.0054258476,0.688931,0.039290898,0.0008014314,0.0010646052,0.0016107276,0.000454785,0.12701179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90393955,0.002223612,0.08030245,0.0037703582,0.0013584285,0.0011020787,0.0005520011,0.00013512993,0.006616314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9602673,0.018013882,0.0023615363,0.0060222903,0.011399638,0.001935276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6300404,0.3048316,0.023075156,0.026272517,0.013520117,0.0022601902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026880274,0.0017870697,0.002146662,0.006644788,0.002674649,0.0100881765,0.0029816336,0.005075178,0.012260073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2093519,0.001485709,0.0022348366,0.006856455,0.014818424,0.027801465,0.004412302,0.0067650946,0.0011599892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003656774,0.00019720441,0.006192605,0.00047000655,0.00026656932,0.00035282347,0.0014938174,0.020651469,0.0006157383,0.9219053,0.005257666,0.04223118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006610739,0.00009579571,0.002743922,0.000088993285,0.000060471037,0.00025198978,0.0003239945,0.03198807,0.00032408925,0.96099335,0.0029888023,0.000074399155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005471983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017721782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026880274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009571379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003239669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14215821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307516130","doi":"","title":"First-person vicarious experiences as a mechanism for belief change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04908182743638021,"score_gpt":0.2991971939663292,"score_spread":0.250115366529949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307516130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90037435,0.00057800754,0.051774777,0.0043702805,0.00013523063,0.00014798848,0.00028973108,0.000101067126,0.042228438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966073,0.00005709089,0.0018909917,0.00012485396,0.000012332201,0.00002803261,0.000026368327,0.0000072084176,0.0012458409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976133,0.0014398114,0.00007043493,0.0004111214,0.0002446026,0.00022073506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611276,0.027040554,0.0044622556,0.0043921927,0.0010569443,0.0019205178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040400475,0.0002693343,0.00038415418,0.0005273598,0.00062408234,0.0031557428,0.00091312465,0.0026812803,0.019274283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03824806,0.00041805516,0.00049571146,0.000495395,0.001549945,0.0021301666,0.0013760247,0.0018796104,0.0007145937],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003429539,0.0020551553,0.15664816,0.0013391477,0.0010113649,0.0021334211,0.051817745,0.014112831,0.03513936,0.6185252,0.0042249314,0.10956309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006385696,0.0016475044,0.31630805,0.00033254756,0.00057449815,0.0022110918,0.016852196,0.06292069,0.005625356,0.5826052,0.010009449,0.00027485707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009840778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074639625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019274283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091999886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042803684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064478934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308137573","doi":"10.1177/09731741221129350","title":"Experimental Evidence on Group-based Attendance Bonuses in Team Production","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South Asian Development","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Incentive; Production (economics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Test (biology); Factory (object-oriented programming); Economics; Business; Operations management; Marketing; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06100441002834679,"score_gpt":0.33013177638449465,"score_spread":0.26912736635614787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308137573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901596,0.00013563878,0.0009714169,0.0002959497,0.000045063396,0.00008054392,0.000043955828,0.000014736998,0.008253056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974878,0.000084349114,0.0011287039,0.000101514655,0.000020981402,0.00010332521,0.000026439588,0.0000049556666,0.0010420291],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962872,0.0024521109,0.0001269,0.00037673616,0.00049860287,0.00025848646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9429137,0.04004483,0.009331306,0.003667749,0.00089337304,0.003148993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007211993,0.00063531054,0.00045920478,0.0006073256,0.0009789066,0.0010679094,0.0009212563,0.0013615497,0.010424116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02065328,0.0003903857,0.00035957445,0.00032440122,0.0020634446,0.0008749152,0.0014420672,0.0010359634,0.0006760709],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07430429,0.13599779,0.26934123,0.0041445815,0.0015263285,0.0013810464,0.007109703,0.020592678,0.12164912,0.051318843,0.004970172,0.3076641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007787377,0.0767133,0.825787,0.0006442619,0.0006947966,0.00039113034,0.0031673145,0.017667824,0.023549946,0.029045252,0.014322617,0.00022911305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013389011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013800715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010424116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009372004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006292333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03814113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309601690","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v14n12p68","title":"The Absence of a Sunk Cost Effect in a Long Shot Gamble and Scams","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Shot (pellet); Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.024476279166773734,"score_gpt":0.3214637532459946,"score_spread":0.2969874740792208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309601690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915854,0.00009010577,0.0005112323,0.00032669536,0.000048003232,0.000027594604,0.00003245401,0.000015395139,0.0073632225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975684,0.000040347513,0.00059463485,0.00019790637,0.0000253111,0.00002758805,0.000026965326,0.000009514737,0.0015093834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987888,0.00048997666,0.00008735665,0.00017732262,0.0003594182,0.00009714698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765362,0.017528234,0.0025186867,0.0015683381,0.00037934765,0.0014691151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019490859,0.00036497484,0.0008101341,0.00037391146,0.00041323082,0.0011335253,0.00045562393,0.001704234,0.01230493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022072803,0.00031146454,0.00028471794,0.00016936958,0.0013058311,0.0016200336,0.00092344667,0.0022138455,0.0004668592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10615873,0.039238025,0.34055755,0.0024192433,0.0013582857,0.0041928315,0.010338482,0.009767489,0.16643196,0.06588061,0.01042671,0.2432301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004310325,0.026864005,0.84883803,0.000270692,0.00058932486,0.0014301699,0.004799176,0.022727912,0.014463102,0.06606576,0.009305109,0.000336396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081123377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011426188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01230493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036569475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030237317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0411641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309650909","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01268","title":"Who Opts In? Composition Effects and Disappointment from Participation Payments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Incentive; Payment; Composition (language); Database transaction; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.029296491184502692,"score_gpt":0.3410052237677157,"score_spread":0.311708732583213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309650909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537413,0.0016822913,0.005966772,0.012729374,0.00019122951,0.00017034603,0.00050114916,0.000063320054,0.024954204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597245,0.00032762796,0.0004791443,0.0012014068,0.00009881311,0.000049779213,0.00005997606,0.000012342506,0.0017983392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98333734,0.011776526,0.00080529467,0.0010668553,0.0020127003,0.001001275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7837983,0.15002793,0.045514166,0.009849161,0.005679204,0.005131174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028817318,0.000262497,0.0010193387,0.0007737199,0.0014472813,0.00245669,0.00084623107,0.0020627975,0.020329481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11916492,0.00032927227,0.00079483265,0.0008262887,0.003202582,0.002450687,0.0019431416,0.00388451,0.0019558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008419265,0.00495468,0.62988544,0.00077269546,0.00090666773,0.00096752594,0.007357928,0.0033041975,0.0027957764,0.059564434,0.0148057155,0.2662656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011971219,0.0032412538,0.7435433,0.00080346945,0.0012668448,0.0011474558,0.011366034,0.01464937,0.0044108946,0.20032713,0.01779117,0.0002559192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001231682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015352417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012442191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008865977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15240234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310163615","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v24i5.5619","title":"Performance Pay and Multiple Tasks; Inner Motivations and Participation Constraints","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Participation constraint; Task (project management); Dependency (UML); Principal (computer security); Microeconomics; Distribution (mathematics); Incentive; Degree (music); Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Management","score_opus":0.030020402819608896,"score_gpt":0.27010825298415897,"score_spread":0.2400878501645501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310163615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8033424,0.001348224,0.061387897,0.0038445515,0.000067734574,0.00019478957,0.0003959508,0.000047098634,0.12937145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936035,0.00015156987,0.0021773016,0.00007842917,0.00003830415,0.000080958765,0.000048369155,0.000010299114,0.0038114362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960227,0.0021547277,0.00020846837,0.000381056,0.000526705,0.00070626487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97102803,0.016675064,0.006563655,0.0013400561,0.0010770108,0.0033162483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004542568,0.0006520424,0.0006477531,0.0008551898,0.0012931611,0.0034877073,0.00085741654,0.0015557115,0.012462463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0175681,0.0004004608,0.00048464254,0.0008894281,0.0029865892,0.002855266,0.0029225019,0.0017398786,0.0006730487],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010757323,0.0015303907,0.08999488,0.0005204898,0.00023874108,0.0007060044,0.0037669248,0.03044613,0.0023652033,0.80640054,0.0026573124,0.06029767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022162635,0.0006855157,0.14920305,0.00040106973,0.00011287141,0.00070022256,0.0055887336,0.06012194,0.0011929644,0.76184297,0.019774778,0.0001543149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016165546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016457974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012462463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001491322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014949249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041691124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310480946","doi":"10.1101/2022.11.29.518377","title":"Individual Decision-Making Underlying the Tragedy of the Commons","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Group decision-making; Common-pool resource; Valuation (finance); Commons; Resource (disambiguation); Social dilemma; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.05678222786227356,"score_gpt":0.3200488416791694,"score_spread":0.26326661381689587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310480946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989472,0.000022353011,0.008088232,0.000117859454,0.00001022884,0.00006892195,0.000050334485,0.000019413817,0.0021505076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944084,0.000021001199,0.0049148253,0.00003827695,0.0000036163742,0.00008077168,0.00003942768,0.000005409503,0.00048812287],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840146,0.00080699474,0.00006490813,0.0002788403,0.00027343686,0.0001744582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952325,0.002704966,0.00094853586,0.00055834156,0.00015899446,0.00039659007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00225062,0.00031636542,0.00035617707,0.0002457314,0.00069346663,0.0014809332,0.00051101064,0.0006578621,0.0029741812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007623565,0.00022164198,0.00029653497,0.00023565516,0.00082433014,0.00086173863,0.00085906475,0.0010637591,0.00018387169],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060576005,0.0056673787,0.2543248,0.0010060519,0.0005962756,0.0009791558,0.0117355585,0.13900971,0.34382084,0.09741663,0.0039681974,0.13541779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039801848,0.0025996235,0.2295253,0.00019681483,0.00023130045,0.00025162584,0.0045343693,0.57220703,0.05083638,0.1331188,0.005847734,0.00025296092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023403107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021729358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029741812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075288705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007696754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011902571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310711912","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2022.100177","title":"Why, how, and when divergent perceptions become dysfunctional in organizations: A Motivated cognition perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Organizational Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Dysfunctional family; Perception; Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Psychology; Social cognition; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08321103962626215,"score_gpt":0.391612573641648,"score_spread":0.30840153401538584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310711912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96493685,0.00024232076,0.010905663,0.0048334384,0.000030297939,0.000027574775,0.00002246477,0.000028098832,0.018973295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819,0.00003932531,0.0013500776,0.00018266364,0.000009633609,0.000009489284,0.000007856276,0.000006173888,0.00020483635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717003,0.0013859702,0.00007796421,0.0003455162,0.0006450058,0.00037553243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98703617,0.0062993346,0.0026628238,0.0013603227,0.0012818413,0.0013595718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004509876,0.00036647197,0.0003601738,0.0013354238,0.0012145888,0.0052010026,0.00089696195,0.0022441093,0.0018646466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018834222,0.0003674107,0.0004367774,0.00073989865,0.0051053497,0.00378104,0.0020684602,0.0023641752,0.00013301327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009388774,0.0031530557,0.32985184,0.0003446913,0.00040300077,0.0011996841,0.06032147,0.0056676907,0.024227083,0.42424116,0.0018902564,0.1477611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014154143,0.0006261575,0.36645365,0.00016261423,0.00016281984,0.00062965526,0.03335869,0.013665777,0.0039066407,0.5776351,0.003097338,0.00015996615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018294235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016899512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052010026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00144966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015468738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023850799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311844544","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12844","title":"We're in This Together: The Motivational Effects of Tangible Rewards in a Group Setting<sup>*</sup>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Attractiveness; Cash; Group (periodic table); Psychology; Certainty; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0658810455491137,"score_gpt":0.37735663325187624,"score_spread":0.3114755877027625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311844544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685127,0.00012382124,0.0045015286,0.0013561113,0.00015954296,0.00026834785,0.00009663434,0.0000624821,0.02491881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915808,0.000057919136,0.0052807895,0.0004712627,0.00003239511,0.0003070606,0.000031530264,0.000016870483,0.0022214781],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982864,0.0011822805,0.00007768346,0.00011814131,0.00020200871,0.00013341127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821187,0.013499296,0.00173803,0.0011369411,0.00037293977,0.0011340849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002898452,0.00032481653,0.00028582843,0.00025140579,0.00076357025,0.001452252,0.0006492946,0.0007788363,0.025108334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013062108,0.00019469076,0.000308666,0.00020806117,0.0014842595,0.0011490593,0.001252205,0.0010676882,0.0011116125],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03967495,0.044190127,0.104083076,0.003240742,0.00061150093,0.0009636549,0.018059814,0.015699387,0.17639308,0.19519036,0.01951929,0.38237408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0081617655,0.08498611,0.48110795,0.0016409368,0.0015378817,0.00078344124,0.022696527,0.050278757,0.09929608,0.15050033,0.09823943,0.0007707186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066255283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010558375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025108334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005344106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054197956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08399576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311992969","doi":"10.3389/frbhe.2022.1015626","title":"Gender effects of project assessment: Evidence from a market simulation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Behavioral Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Value (mathematics); New Ventures; Business; Closing (real estate); Marketing; Entrepreneurship; Finance","score_opus":0.06501291584973015,"score_gpt":0.37819073484878185,"score_spread":0.3131778189990517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311992969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99773693,0.000040693718,0.00055825786,0.000101104604,0.000008948359,0.000017850738,0.000063470834,0.0000066016937,0.0014661124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893886,0.000034294728,0.00033322576,0.00004093686,0.000007662412,0.00002061501,0.000091848284,0.000006421385,0.0005260968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958047,0.002998181,0.0001265901,0.00036049835,0.000486669,0.00022341633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9008915,0.079538,0.009517741,0.0052487697,0.0019127078,0.0028913117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008054548,0.00034547297,0.00047845,0.0005003356,0.00044859518,0.001548557,0.0006427673,0.0010311847,0.0060609193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058120247,0.0002854164,0.0004343437,0.00035849423,0.00096336234,0.0011261812,0.0013260501,0.00087618496,0.0010560403],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01299214,0.008910682,0.89536756,0.00013984914,0.00047729525,0.0005560051,0.00468331,0.007808029,0.0051833927,0.0036943154,0.0019682995,0.058219235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006576478,0.0074964166,0.9168088,0.000057101344,0.00017558788,0.0003560047,0.003871647,0.057307005,0.0028422961,0.007872996,0.002455286,0.00009929434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014208908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010557058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008054548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002614509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031353542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042597055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312226208","doi":"10.1002/smj.3483","title":"Salary transparency and gender pay inequality: Evidence from Canadian universities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation","keywords":"Salary; Transparency (behavior); Scrutiny; Inequality; Business; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Public economics; Public relations; Accounting; Labour economics; Economics; Wage; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1301843844243236,"score_gpt":0.3379484828885812,"score_spread":0.2077640984642576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312226208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94798005,0.0032104338,0.0003921436,0.009271171,0.00009252501,0.00008431748,0.0033477792,0.000013315668,0.035608303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724764,0.00069178833,0.00009050975,0.00049197243,0.000020915286,0.0000129744285,0.00036819963,0.000004378847,0.0010715772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122494,0.0012758451,0.0003159779,0.0006996364,0.0041233595,0.002360279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9413071,0.014881927,0.016114112,0.0021116894,0.01822088,0.007364401],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006268013,0.000297689,0.0006611894,0.003112976,0.0072645247,0.003319882,0.001730751,0.0009056157,0.0060659023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036559347,0.0002668028,0.0006259645,0.008336342,0.0030855865,0.0010386707,0.002305927,0.0017662168,0.00025184505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033430595,0.00022003643,0.9512404,0.00032380666,0.0001676505,0.00014972832,0.010307803,0.00047261687,0.00015878449,0.00472109,0.008421471,0.023482285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024378103,0.000038616094,0.985386,0.00025878203,0.00008022025,0.000020825384,0.007956114,0.0003519912,0.00014921767,0.0003823812,0.00531518,0.00003625066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99196845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04658932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0800218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3380307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312589922","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4301502","title":"Relational Utility and Social Norms in Games","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Economics","score_opus":0.031863540373438096,"score_gpt":0.30881066411187486,"score_spread":0.2769471237384368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312589922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8988212,0.0003652274,0.053003445,0.0019018135,0.0000413627,0.000085641535,0.0001310371,0.000036964448,0.045613337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653745,0.000083887564,0.0019628364,0.000029747402,0.000015780357,0.000029707173,0.000023552857,0.000006142085,0.0013108958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996071,0.0028107462,0.0001368241,0.00028361537,0.0004272144,0.00027062974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673858,0.026021369,0.0029462236,0.0012165894,0.0009981913,0.001431767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055606253,0.0004758103,0.00065172336,0.00085987995,0.00078554766,0.0037405342,0.0008268798,0.0011492611,0.0056171617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03356729,0.00037725634,0.00036680995,0.00081840175,0.003080715,0.003921754,0.0013305715,0.0011422166,0.00026812547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003654041,0.0004326226,0.0128023755,0.00010498337,0.000087804765,0.00010642368,0.0022358848,0.010702368,0.0007911886,0.9558701,0.00064203364,0.015858835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012969009,0.00015828254,0.011908333,0.000021631718,0.000043830954,0.000061425526,0.0013726557,0.03496678,0.0002404838,0.95011896,0.00094969437,0.000028344632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029174916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028669487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056171617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016002419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094579515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02940774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312969543","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4242137","title":"Sustainable Organizations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Limiting; Business; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Incentive; Social sustainability; Sustainability organizations; Control (management); Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder analysis; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.008546251095934192,"score_gpt":0.2849344169373307,"score_spread":0.27638816584139647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312969543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059165466,0.00054681656,0.0036554856,0.0071494803,0.00030511036,0.00003662,0.00014253397,0.00010646996,0.982141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17992966,0.0020422728,0.0049496014,0.0024258601,0.00022725094,0.00012169018,0.00049825024,0.00008712296,0.8097183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993919,0.00012668314,0.000016890037,0.000083523,0.00029841333,0.00008250019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906534,0.00013551064,0.00006992755,0.00022586473,0.00028374617,0.0002196993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074156804,0.0002921436,0.00014061252,0.0009894854,0.0014195201,0.00319079,0.00046218417,0.0013206148,0.09657703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018393181,0.00012288836,0.00018111944,0.0011914803,0.0011604654,0.0020021095,0.0019143925,0.00084098516,0.022624524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015486827,0.00008750971,0.0013661371,0.00008995204,0.000007113848,0.000065051056,0.00064819603,0.00040145015,0.0006123848,0.67662793,0.13741346,0.18266532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052961477,0.00001801713,0.0010442538,0.000086311426,0.0000032791925,0.000071283735,0.00078102027,0.00022053807,0.00036323184,0.10341242,0.89398944,0.0000047836716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016226023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047197915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09657703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00135857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026399172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3230824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313424431","doi":"10.1038/s41598-022-26187-x","title":"Subtle primes of in-group and out-group affiliation change votes in a large scale field experiment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Identity (music); Football; Scale (ratio); In-group favoritism; Social group; Political science; Politics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.03794093144089629,"score_gpt":0.3225119627320786,"score_spread":0.28457103129118233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313424431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99498785,0.000026166563,0.0010700594,0.00011047634,0.00005449296,0.00024701495,0.000103520375,0.00003272836,0.003367875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99145997,0.000029989942,0.003881524,0.0005090257,0.000060300637,0.0012235966,0.0001435243,0.000035633882,0.0026564652],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980889,0.0010503958,0.000078176985,0.0004356405,0.00019811842,0.00014874115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876116,0.008993848,0.0010839779,0.0011733948,0.00038184412,0.0007553739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028983336,0.00039452504,0.00050694507,0.00018968378,0.0009108819,0.0008844281,0.00053293974,0.000891559,0.008443782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009307189,0.00036942054,0.00024021167,0.00012679567,0.0012685824,0.0007108306,0.00070677866,0.0016289877,0.00084613543],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06180777,0.08927825,0.07176182,0.0017963034,0.0003471062,0.0006483591,0.018094024,0.0019136228,0.65142065,0.0089825895,0.008604124,0.085345395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014511566,0.16487937,0.5983666,0.00028793816,0.00079225603,0.0008122668,0.0077338694,0.0107936505,0.15260077,0.017086,0.031753954,0.00038182075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008351078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011678999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008443782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003656444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034695264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028247237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313573806","doi":"10.1111/jems.12511","title":"Worker autonomy and performance: Evidence from a real‐effort experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università di Bologna; York University; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Autonomy; Flexibility (engineering); Scheduling (production processes); Psychological intervention; Cognition; Limiting; Computer science; Task (project management); Baseline (sea); Psychology; Operations management; Economics; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.07715306027962995,"score_gpt":0.34381305997953904,"score_spread":0.26665999969990906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313573806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989016,0.000017358321,0.00043976863,0.000042569784,0.000004493254,0.000020327054,0.000041244668,0.000005395773,0.0005272339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985757,0.000022331435,0.00064285006,0.000049734666,0.000009329764,0.00006561302,0.00007224739,0.0000042867887,0.00055799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769163,0.0015313057,0.00012686115,0.00024920117,0.00026152094,0.00013939604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623918,0.026661735,0.0056704106,0.0034478132,0.0004993322,0.0013289093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056313383,0.000350772,0.000381734,0.00024951427,0.00031951873,0.00091701414,0.00050105416,0.0009232941,0.003378919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014879611,0.00029720238,0.00023854696,0.00019459926,0.0011831502,0.00061009725,0.00069375226,0.0007163607,0.00046344262],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.100534275,0.10289036,0.5201786,0.0008244151,0.0015683386,0.00062505447,0.007304854,0.018677454,0.15332754,0.009474279,0.0025597003,0.08203519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045466395,0.04891063,0.89982283,0.000066303335,0.0002350864,0.00018307814,0.0010250189,0.017067097,0.017547553,0.007965209,0.002467423,0.00016309136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006156039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048746038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056313383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022066504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024225964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029781759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313681215","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100828","title":"Social influence pressures and the risk preferences of aspiring financial market professionals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Education","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Healthcare Excellence Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Conformity; Obedience; Grading (engineering); Business; Context (archaeology); Peer pressure; Social influence; Financial market; Accounting; Actuarial science; Finance; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.026005961407042515,"score_gpt":0.37897653604916964,"score_spread":0.3529705746421271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313681215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99771714,0.000027881784,0.000018466842,0.00019683767,0.000003665507,0.0000023703833,0.000004126498,4.131568e-7,0.0020290816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995141,0.000027245174,0.000010664063,0.000050602393,0.000005716189,0.0000017036047,0.0000039735073,3.3538097e-7,0.00038567194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929047,0.0003424798,0.000024438361,0.00004149089,0.00013820843,0.00016293477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937397,0.0033048275,0.0012113582,0.00017949325,0.00028471346,0.0012799008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010146159,0.00015096649,0.00017766297,0.0006262858,0.00094550196,0.0019280666,0.00013983261,0.00089499506,0.0057268874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082153175,0.0001470789,0.00015465125,0.00034876468,0.0008763804,0.00041450554,0.0005988174,0.0006872287,0.00035303467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012415306,0.002737283,0.9361683,0.00003964681,0.00010580551,0.0005832079,0.019525936,0.00046562063,0.0032683425,0.004039881,0.0009992052,0.030825272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012206486,0.0006009831,0.9672533,0.00001996508,0.0000580211,0.00020641208,0.024675384,0.0015657044,0.00050843874,0.0033842814,0.0015793303,0.000026145924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041354857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068276273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057268874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039094008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004131156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019158304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315929026","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2023.102602","title":"Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; British Academy","keywords":"Pessimism; Majority rule; Voting; Outcome (game theory); Democracy; Politics; Decision rule; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Social psychology; Social choice theory; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Psychology; Law; Statistics; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11534933117594957,"score_gpt":0.43880715800974845,"score_spread":0.32345782683379887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315929026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917257,0.000034603872,0.003080703,0.00016588648,0.000012853509,0.000026244425,0.000023001367,0.000009501013,0.0049214847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960615,0.000028642826,0.0022651083,0.00015751767,0.000012283591,0.000058418434,0.0000319305,0.000008708335,0.001375899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974661,0.0018802636,0.00005495024,0.00032049426,0.0001608129,0.00011748269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912429,0.0050299224,0.0013846831,0.0013477225,0.00029054916,0.0007042326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053202915,0.00024693157,0.0004236228,0.00018781103,0.0006434001,0.0027658103,0.00035493713,0.0006613841,0.005844669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105290115,0.00023462612,0.00016441105,0.00017069285,0.0019600946,0.0008721036,0.00077951874,0.0009970161,0.000772338],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013714171,0.024956575,0.39174747,0.00054400857,0.0005742128,0.0008491545,0.01993098,0.012209222,0.25507396,0.110461555,0.004520696,0.16541806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025112247,0.030747762,0.510782,0.00022459813,0.00042247673,0.0010802482,0.021013016,0.0646328,0.108624466,0.23044279,0.02905239,0.00046621435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025018246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025007443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005844669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027124124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023919056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02813673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317210754","doi":"10.1111/caje.12635","title":"Morale, performance and disclosure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Task (project management); Pareto principle; Transparency (behavior); Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Pareto optimal; Monotonic function; Economics; Computer science; Computer security; Computer network; Set (abstract data type); Operations management; Mathematics; Management","score_opus":0.16470824756661992,"score_gpt":0.23387897913255415,"score_spread":0.06917073156593423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317210754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70423114,0.0018058995,0.11911335,0.01641038,0.00022915761,0.00022170128,0.00028135936,0.000071698545,0.15763524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949227,0.00022298313,0.0018199717,0.00014311698,0.000044826113,0.000028609724,0.000011269279,0.000007392053,0.0027991394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990697,0.006350499,0.00027873236,0.00059044146,0.0009422675,0.001140984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96274126,0.025245633,0.007342345,0.0017131441,0.0017393872,0.0012181933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010225305,0.00061429833,0.00082043937,0.0006819064,0.0012708385,0.0048611346,0.0009276382,0.0029070862,0.006401822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033643227,0.0003668715,0.0004535725,0.0006348372,0.005224513,0.0043952507,0.0018979821,0.0028746703,0.00048656718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003191547,0.0005000797,0.008392752,0.0001774787,0.00010654284,0.0003108283,0.0012747649,0.063706584,0.0021289422,0.90137804,0.0017591183,0.01994565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016968184,0.0004935479,0.009624621,0.00014484301,0.00005658001,0.00023623077,0.001011489,0.1157643,0.0015278163,0.866542,0.004341091,0.00008785006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001894062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007172532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010225305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004142292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023580773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054077268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317781457","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvad002","title":"Reporting Peers’ Wrongdoing: Evidence on the Effect of Incentives on Morally Controversial Behavior","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; Bruyère Research Institute; American Economic Association","keywords":"Incentive; Wrongdoing; Attendance; Moral hazard; Government (linguistics); Economics; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05515066370756277,"score_gpt":0.34231543450073754,"score_spread":0.28716477079317476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317781457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98554164,0.00043790086,0.0011935935,0.00096364965,0.0000865273,0.000085966356,0.00013071117,0.00001967944,0.011540336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977518,0.00019352233,0.00071467605,0.0003648367,0.000050363964,0.00008233739,0.000049516886,0.000011206404,0.00078184163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.96334004,0.029214237,0.0010834645,0.0023613188,0.0031497253,0.0008511723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53213423,0.33678874,0.09379486,0.0281249,0.0036851945,0.00547211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027709011,0.00063155696,0.0009789547,0.0008407031,0.0009394452,0.0016371016,0.0013405439,0.0026882845,0.014833496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16655333,0.0005816139,0.00090153044,0.0005387353,0.0034009877,0.0013883885,0.0017181507,0.0029241575,0.0009823556],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0783384,0.08022511,0.5506992,0.0027655486,0.0047511747,0.0007932324,0.0068327556,0.006591407,0.022385545,0.024513867,0.0060406835,0.21606308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034472826,0.01952193,0.9404035,0.0005548121,0.0014212863,0.0003494092,0.0013549185,0.0068957685,0.005633524,0.015370473,0.004843118,0.00020398223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014916011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009923758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027709011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064274954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068831287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.146541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318256487","doi":"10.5817/wp_muni_econ_2021-13","title":"The Gates Effect in Public Goods Experiments: How Donations Flow to the Recipients Favored by the Wealthy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MUNI ECON Working Papers","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Endowment; Variety (cybernetics); Donation; Inequality; Preference; Public economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0448493990484737,"score_gpt":0.3219464987969575,"score_spread":0.27709709974848384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318256487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687687,0.00014132567,0.01164754,0.0011959301,0.00013135516,0.00037822334,0.00027341416,0.00009032722,0.017373173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899498,0.00008718945,0.0052638645,0.0006893827,0.00005005332,0.0007711048,0.00008171918,0.00003838918,0.0030685042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467695,0.0035911028,0.00018980127,0.0007453931,0.00042618343,0.00037053195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9439542,0.043225683,0.006189194,0.0041561658,0.000556716,0.001918048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011245521,0.00063497457,0.001058569,0.0006802227,0.0010425692,0.0018484866,0.0008278902,0.0018738635,0.011399999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048359916,0.0004965724,0.00049733603,0.00069294276,0.0032253468,0.0027472458,0.0022639893,0.002162823,0.00090143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06888036,0.032883633,0.1239685,0.0025118096,0.0015214859,0.0011596289,0.009889308,0.04647399,0.19629176,0.32057127,0.015123521,0.18072475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01822049,0.038405325,0.17615104,0.00055217074,0.0015507494,0.0007624925,0.004730468,0.09879552,0.069369085,0.5670037,0.023802329,0.0006566023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088721514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079909345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011399999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010018985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010370496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05947268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318480615","doi":"10.1257/mic.20200422","title":"Contest Design with Stochastic Performance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Moral hazard; Excellence; Optimal design; Function (biology); Computer science; Hazard; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Incentive; Law; Machine learning","score_opus":0.03253889398227873,"score_gpt":0.30264405329652627,"score_spread":0.27010515931424756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318480615","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1532613,0.0009767717,0.8157472,0.0012277884,0.00024863568,0.00035691206,0.0002652874,0.00020446285,0.02771173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95249087,0.00034456898,0.03943133,0.00014940291,0.000120777346,0.00025032522,0.00012227564,0.00005252739,0.007037893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98846173,0.007384341,0.0003838741,0.0012257255,0.0011478451,0.0013964563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804755,0.01217697,0.0033209075,0.0015730744,0.0010878186,0.0013657218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008490962,0.001267545,0.0021587897,0.00086358155,0.0008372603,0.0031724898,0.0015425825,0.0016870341,0.0073677115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027395934,0.0008735271,0.0011577195,0.00073593535,0.0029646,0.0025106703,0.0020671121,0.0018572216,0.0008142615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008921812,0.00025392522,0.0024474678,0.00037393082,0.00017431448,0.00019057645,0.00033660224,0.43382138,0.0027149685,0.5259755,0.002232793,0.030586377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002667855,0.0004296239,0.0010509057,0.000048891045,0.000048502894,0.00008890378,0.00010510019,0.61218643,0.00075606524,0.38156596,0.0033963986,0.000056435983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013870444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011233274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008490962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024315303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016607519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044905066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318590644","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/c3k64","title":"Vicarious learning: model-based or model-free?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Templeton Religion Trust; European Commission","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Control (management); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Observational learning; Value (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Experiential learning; Machine learning; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.15149803365223216,"score_gpt":0.39377105599784795,"score_spread":0.2422730223456158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318590644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86355686,0.0005676491,0.119555354,0.0017288825,0.0000752547,0.00011760083,0.00008917136,0.00014725178,0.014162017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428576,0.00007147555,0.004968058,0.000107512926,0.000009977692,0.000027196229,0.000034741144,0.000016309468,0.00047901695],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975074,0.0011251308,0.000106984044,0.0005563914,0.0004867003,0.00021737748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160856,0.0039605447,0.0014777494,0.001980088,0.00033183643,0.00064120354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004042754,0.00043669975,0.000665657,0.0003405725,0.00022446281,0.0019358333,0.0008992348,0.0008996615,0.0025671169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021250386,0.0002292141,0.00045866013,0.00025071425,0.0018527261,0.0027617167,0.0015729293,0.0010690083,0.00024929288],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037755035,0.0021604453,0.20786576,0.0018860206,0.0015712059,0.00054002425,0.008480217,0.048438247,0.059812117,0.29172125,0.003481291,0.37026787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811483,0.0024604502,0.11493485,0.00032966546,0.00049364916,0.0010030487,0.0025756443,0.30661476,0.030523572,0.5260778,0.014360735,0.00024475984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006590968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006860256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004042754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005343275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047626047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021380424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319303782","doi":"10.1007/s40881-022-00124-0","title":"Show no quarter: combating plausible lies with ex-ante honesty oaths","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Honesty; Ex-ante; Quarter (Canadian coin); Oath; Dishonesty; Exposition (narrative); Witness; Style (visual arts); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.02104813967966988,"score_gpt":0.3080718876441749,"score_spread":0.287023747964505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319303782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98041224,0.00007978527,0.0114448825,0.0012354687,0.00002826782,0.00005606586,0.00011794872,0.00010278874,0.0065225437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982786,0.000013995101,0.001282979,0.000068936184,0.000008350667,0.000014089956,0.000018674706,0.000005289814,0.00030902476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936605,0.004518109,0.00022223477,0.0004241162,0.00071039406,0.00046473273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8948369,0.07174075,0.018135112,0.011834977,0.001777688,0.0016746123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009174338,0.00038762798,0.00056102267,0.00025637625,0.0006876237,0.0018324195,0.00080463703,0.000977132,0.0074396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059395324,0.00030450645,0.00031619414,0.0002817817,0.0014760098,0.0015219555,0.001377892,0.0016791327,0.0007033666],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013995884,0.0068765013,0.5005098,0.0013057841,0.0009334082,0.001431886,0.0090055335,0.07621487,0.049509145,0.079145804,0.009854145,0.25121728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014990629,0.011422506,0.45681426,0.00037411472,0.0004773731,0.00091982726,0.010889796,0.27951652,0.037014436,0.18960622,0.011181731,0.00028430345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077827735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070429756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009174338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058643526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006298072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048519075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319592844","doi":"10.7554/elife.80667.sa1","title":"Decision letter: A unified neural account of contextual and individual differences in altruism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11431353083446119,"score_gpt":0.3724334624492422,"score_spread":0.258119931614781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319592844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7262765,0.0018371727,0.112247705,0.01257241,0.0014538957,0.00015208263,0.00084024743,0.00066846836,0.1439515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98769057,0.00029635645,0.005273432,0.00026848106,0.00013329847,0.000019838346,0.0001270625,0.00006792383,0.0061230958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943024,0.00013268054,0.000026995975,0.00013684764,0.0001990024,0.000074226155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980247,0.00065719656,0.00027338503,0.0002825489,0.00052225013,0.00023990938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091006607,0.00017525895,0.00037762584,0.00035347498,0.00035415211,0.0018601968,0.00060925615,0.0008717332,0.009970147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008367929,0.0002062942,0.00026873918,0.0002761255,0.0007888065,0.0015328293,0.0008129044,0.00083410495,0.0015584129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018440533,0.00026152778,0.029677292,0.000728071,0.00040740773,0.0009947262,0.002182872,0.009726291,0.13257219,0.40445504,0.03514776,0.38200274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023901158,0.0004691736,0.2176357,0.0001429395,0.0001834536,0.0009908262,0.0006264974,0.0694756,0.019751659,0.66164476,0.028696239,0.00014418896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009759296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010169244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009970147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038973257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062599784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033353508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319593929","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12855","title":"The effect of social skills on analyst performance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social skills; Proxy (statistics); Earnings; Skills management; Sample (material); Soft skills; Psychology; Business; Accounting; Marketing; Social psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.07723393228483909,"score_gpt":0.43576668543595826,"score_spread":0.35853275315111915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319593929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99545467,0.00008303686,0.00020294104,0.00022963076,0.000013818217,0.000010273352,0.000120749835,0.000010438319,0.003874502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993969,0.000033538898,0.000105979765,0.000020645755,0.000017941999,0.0000048797533,0.00005028667,0.0000018956192,0.00036780973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764794,0.0011559398,0.00015364029,0.00021148783,0.000615664,0.00021525714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91666144,0.046310794,0.025070237,0.0022226975,0.0033015972,0.006433276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024175476,0.00038125247,0.00019495418,0.0011312616,0.0004231463,0.0012631821,0.00028019227,0.00047336743,0.007805187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035237167,0.00010195821,0.00025644834,0.0005744781,0.000653113,0.0005955694,0.0007049848,0.0005510836,0.00077960675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005933402,0.000856757,0.96637183,0.000056623558,0.00026633465,0.000093972,0.00066714943,0.0009147434,0.0014792213,0.0003865796,0.00091122754,0.027402252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001781797,0.0004985963,0.99555415,0.00002085684,0.000044241864,0.00006790882,0.0005574747,0.0015171847,0.00055836217,0.00071047666,0.00043846254,0.000014460951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001595565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018250133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007805187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003798038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038124048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026111007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319603739","doi":"10.1257/mic.20200290","title":"Ten Isn’t Large! Group Size and Coordination in a Large-Scale Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Simon Fraser University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coordination game; Proxy (statistics); Group (periodic table); Economics; Risk dominance; Stochastic game; Dominance (genetics); Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Stochastic dominance; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Equilibrium selection; Game theory; Mathematics; Repeated game; Statistics; Operations management; Biology","score_opus":0.012493868421894193,"score_gpt":0.3078546772090743,"score_spread":0.2953608087871801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319603739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859686,0.00004492661,0.0044984473,0.00089962553,0.00006653047,0.00018113853,0.00017672677,0.000071447736,0.008092678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906453,0.00003422667,0.005284479,0.00057033624,0.000029119885,0.00052501593,0.00012060928,0.00003687384,0.002754042],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787295,0.0012915977,0.00008705942,0.0003749609,0.00025314448,0.00012032316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788889,0.012101919,0.0032646775,0.0030669789,0.0005350745,0.0021425097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004777813,0.000364843,0.00048238187,0.00022707887,0.0008715733,0.0012471938,0.00080634636,0.0010083892,0.008933508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018259674,0.00027526994,0.0001918695,0.00022423585,0.0015861033,0.0012959137,0.0012740672,0.0013131397,0.00076569454],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06546727,0.043051105,0.17719583,0.0015708006,0.001556598,0.0016241994,0.010856333,0.033733066,0.3093741,0.15260555,0.03651909,0.16644607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015391248,0.06527309,0.3076261,0.00034874608,0.0010759345,0.0011863197,0.0054416233,0.1571393,0.052778058,0.3424334,0.050806746,0.00049941137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006076203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008634745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008933508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005089796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058959867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02988559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319772661","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/xwm3g","title":"Making a positive difference: Criticality in groups","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University","keywords":"Criticality; Attribution; Task (project management); Group (periodic table); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.2006825886692612,"score_gpt":0.455807059770745,"score_spread":0.2551244711014838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319772661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93700534,0.00045252376,0.013392207,0.0035424398,0.00009858765,0.000058312453,0.00002723184,0.0000268108,0.045396578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855703,0.000055024513,0.0009597932,0.00011797943,0.000020278769,0.000011428061,0.0000064976307,0.000005167573,0.00026681053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349666,0.004131334,0.00016195023,0.00071166555,0.0011401006,0.00035843023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664564,0.019981086,0.007188692,0.0020069536,0.0019344154,0.002432403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076638684,0.0004720773,0.0002904141,0.0014304202,0.0019429871,0.003957585,0.00046951819,0.0012295324,0.00338143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04688455,0.00022488396,0.00029553246,0.0005052051,0.009409531,0.004701274,0.0028943676,0.0016370105,0.00017860666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00152745,0.0007425128,0.1782514,0.00070280797,0.0002992495,0.001110894,0.2182995,0.0035943023,0.017908417,0.40852997,0.005349828,0.16368364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012422515,0.0008126286,0.21904278,0.00041016692,0.00013459907,0.0008289914,0.08099262,0.008169392,0.0065125986,0.6540328,0.028716113,0.00022308256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011152257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008073824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076638684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014976527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008116694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04053086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320502514","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4354209","title":"Gender Differences in Prioritizing Rewarding Tasks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.059953286523676895,"score_gpt":0.3435905743813504,"score_spread":0.2836372878576735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320502514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99354,0.0001622705,0.00021306859,0.00016455875,0.000046292855,0.000007631989,0.00021254641,0.000010731795,0.005642822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928791,0.000071757175,0.00015543736,0.00010521211,0.000015469197,0.000008058661,0.00012354786,0.000029523522,0.006611805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997625,0.000041953517,0.000014822519,0.000053199867,0.000055093456,0.00007257945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974408,0.0011635673,0.00047881168,0.00019192281,0.00017632548,0.00054857926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078592834,0.00024302144,0.0003526813,0.00036090234,0.00021262992,0.00082523393,0.00024208092,0.000513051,0.021516418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055064275,0.0002980386,0.00014485174,0.00017126817,0.00024042385,0.00041827324,0.00034082684,0.00052698015,0.0015639181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020203965,0.004304869,0.501761,0.00023349843,0.00023589963,0.0013130637,0.008205569,0.0008624605,0.37253678,0.0068205646,0.0059017786,0.07762054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105524,0.0008865896,0.9918247,0.000030767984,0.00003865955,0.00037949227,0.00075170724,0.0005190162,0.002480298,0.0011899052,0.0017733474,0.000020013738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024679115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042758123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021516418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002636442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033342052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07197958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321479947","doi":"10.1007/s40806-023-00355-2","title":"Levelling as a Female-Biased Competitive Tactic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Psychological Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Levelling; Psychology; CONTEST; Social psychology; Demography; Geography; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.13080009026875908,"score_gpt":0.4487027775804771,"score_spread":0.317902687311718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321479947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618225,0.00018576582,0.0045705363,0.0003971441,0.000039477964,0.0000372154,0.0000384215,0.000038006343,0.032870993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041474,0.00006192279,0.0037508172,0.00026478438,0.000013843589,0.000021167132,0.000037612335,0.000015905756,0.005419253],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946433,0.00019125482,0.000018064822,0.00010182664,0.00016684724,0.00005767907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985594,0.00059804524,0.0003161775,0.00021807668,0.00010759429,0.00020066307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008468485,0.00034349854,0.000287744,0.00039051822,0.0004347349,0.00082748476,0.00040244378,0.0011093477,0.009315992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029608014,0.00012459858,0.0001669666,0.00019910697,0.0004198746,0.00052601885,0.0005265626,0.00076303235,0.0006855717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038475324,0.0022627043,0.076301575,0.00079750206,0.0003152313,0.0013317745,0.0011433718,0.004252077,0.6957322,0.0492724,0.003619296,0.16112429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066222734,0.01378437,0.64159554,0.00033782388,0.00084041344,0.009924591,0.0033289788,0.07553234,0.16076529,0.06512744,0.027820442,0.0002806147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004417885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002045764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009315992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037818335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037511715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031165123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321506239","doi":"10.5751/es-13862-280130","title":"Games for experiential learning: triggering collective changes in commons management","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; FP7 International Cooperation; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit; Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Experiential learning; Commons; Collective action; Knowledge management; Social dilemma; Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03987443860061116,"score_gpt":0.33966631143584464,"score_spread":0.29979187283523345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321506239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75975615,0.0003403016,0.10313115,0.007330176,0.00023332115,0.0008597758,0.000090025576,0.00037328768,0.12788579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836512,0.00007708626,0.01384403,0.0001904086,0.000010373183,0.00020025378,0.000014968028,0.000013798916,0.0019978844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689037,0.0023479864,0.00005981224,0.00015995065,0.0002209231,0.0003209817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939038,0.0043193223,0.00043440564,0.0003399069,0.00016832349,0.0008341718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030078343,0.0006565418,0.00021965138,0.00063322403,0.002230788,0.0032917592,0.0015053493,0.001312757,0.0045203893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008674887,0.00023403874,0.0005150241,0.00036611265,0.0059778416,0.0030363626,0.005278101,0.0014680506,0.00037182862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010665979,0.004175141,0.03514461,0.0015911186,0.00018580165,0.0031362646,0.11386395,0.043618716,0.026276425,0.6007103,0.010380817,0.1598503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058265997,0.0032769204,0.038624953,0.0009853367,0.00023414782,0.0010496494,0.07508671,0.11771599,0.023763154,0.57294035,0.16544434,0.0002958214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019541336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034548335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045203893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022978834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017227492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016672373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322753645","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1444049/v3","title":"Morality in Minimally Deceptive Environments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2773948238247861,"score_gpt":0.5127858714773557,"score_spread":0.23539104765256957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322753645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93022996,0.00034697866,0.026613668,0.0029758725,0.00008164558,0.00006547163,0.0001525365,0.000029958432,0.039503954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945943,0.0001392962,0.0030509438,0.00012150279,0.00004210324,0.000051236584,0.000038463826,0.000012963314,0.0019491675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920529,0.00614824,0.00016759269,0.00050798425,0.0007795118,0.00034384703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91366893,0.06978296,0.006915907,0.0058784112,0.0021244318,0.0016293935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099727595,0.00060081604,0.0006893001,0.0005241433,0.0009032863,0.0038393748,0.0008903426,0.0014609366,0.008124547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088463485,0.0003928978,0.0002116352,0.0005343049,0.0042284364,0.0043113627,0.0017240093,0.0028980647,0.0003498059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026406245,0.0028650616,0.014195059,0.0005205143,0.00012556036,0.00025428625,0.0038461224,0.0196828,0.0061675883,0.9011979,0.0031405466,0.04536389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024196062,0.0005890359,0.018049344,0.000082745544,0.00003845934,0.00014177122,0.0013982342,0.025137305,0.0013420365,0.95157665,0.0013614036,0.000040971623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088564795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006185336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099727595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009506449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000980806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052741647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323342897","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4379914","title":"Gender and Risk Taking: Evidence from a Gender Swapping Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.09841536845301803,"score_gpt":0.36868208862295476,"score_spread":0.27026672016993675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323342897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99668485,0.000079013,0.00031881194,0.00023305036,0.000044917626,0.000023972249,0.00009432174,0.000007819087,0.002513291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577147,0.00017254186,0.0007730342,0.00032291742,0.000055074845,0.00007375243,0.00012292921,0.000018505558,0.002689748],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985689,0.000705401,0.0000660869,0.00024377771,0.00029741472,0.00011852124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98317426,0.01048302,0.0026205138,0.0021179502,0.00023575718,0.0013684084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00471069,0.00083267153,0.0008208175,0.00039121052,0.0007389484,0.0016309764,0.0008718096,0.0016031448,0.015807036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014250109,0.0005146389,0.00026908712,0.00042017366,0.0015390018,0.0014917359,0.0008935925,0.001664727,0.0011419376],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.24051538,0.12816182,0.20002982,0.00064834475,0.0012599123,0.0019329785,0.0088079665,0.0014118183,0.27333197,0.02509518,0.006445087,0.11235974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021156892,0.07928158,0.7751054,0.00019333212,0.0018678015,0.0023823204,0.0055601886,0.010907187,0.037861012,0.053953703,0.011334614,0.0003959196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000747583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073207624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015807036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025080223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049320946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05287981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353084905","doi":"10.1111/beer.12505","title":"Behavioral economics and monetary wisdom: A cross‐level analysis of monetary aspiration, pay (dis)satisfaction, risk perception, and corruption in 32 nations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; Language change; Economics; Prospect theory; Social psychology; Psychology; Public economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09408104754315103,"score_gpt":0.36322216289909787,"score_spread":0.26914111535594687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353084905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994809,0.000017483288,0.00011523783,0.000036748508,0.0000021558908,0.0000032874161,0.000075898686,0.000001872431,0.0002665053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995111,0.000015106456,0.00012194937,0.000012360846,0.0000029141916,0.000011325396,0.00016834632,0.0000015369618,0.00015547856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938154,0.0003079894,0.000031495187,0.00008121488,0.00008543223,0.00011233475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996543,0.0013855102,0.0008633605,0.00028995643,0.000305642,0.00061248406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013317752,0.00024392005,0.00035725167,0.0011057599,0.0008697481,0.0015392951,0.00030565856,0.0006385649,0.003656638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003533943,0.00022213237,0.00072439865,0.0011646637,0.0007022105,0.0008595769,0.0013115073,0.0011144791,0.00031312677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006055257,0.00025432315,0.9940795,0.000011107446,0.00015641718,0.00007136708,0.0013828684,0.0005572757,0.00028867775,0.0004625438,0.000289525,0.0023859837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022437587,0.000074041294,0.99535275,0.000006538294,0.000020819241,0.000021249105,0.0024695704,0.0015976357,0.00006832717,0.00016843245,0.00020995308,0.000008494355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010691841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010607992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010691841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047506572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037012188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021259248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362570192","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_157","title":"Effects of Uncertain Incentive on Customer Engagement in Gamified Social Competition: An Abstract","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Developments in marketing science: proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Moderation; Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Business","score_opus":0.04749121875960916,"score_gpt":0.34517601942242543,"score_spread":0.2976848006628163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362570192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97606486,0.0006725116,0.001695749,0.00044311013,0.000062322346,0.00005637802,0.00011509433,0.000033970722,0.020856041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340993,0.00027246578,0.0005057644,0.00011466355,0.000035091274,0.000037418256,0.0000455734,0.000013476507,0.005565537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926585,0.0003667477,0.00002153513,0.00009600656,0.00008679378,0.00016303598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97888035,0.019093506,0.0005061675,0.00033742245,0.00027217396,0.000910411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014558675,0.00065503025,0.0009794342,0.00021275869,0.0005046485,0.0020100428,0.00085953064,0.0015229029,0.023688339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011501452,0.00036136693,0.0006099322,0.00024393213,0.00074723817,0.0015426772,0.001433711,0.0030879432,0.0007385264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12974155,0.04081007,0.11559646,0.0030471957,0.0014822251,0.0018761382,0.0034289067,0.18582374,0.05690235,0.12908882,0.009838676,0.32236385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036444324,0.024640415,0.40837747,0.0004371557,0.0027371808,0.0004707348,0.0042880788,0.33989638,0.012388697,0.19647239,0.006201434,0.00044561372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029723013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026742343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023688339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074377307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059000624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07924539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367335688","doi":"10.1051/shsconf/202316304002","title":"Reciprocity Among Different Groups in Society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SHS Web of Conferences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Trustworthiness; Social psychology; Psychology; Strong reciprocity; Norm of reciprocity; Game theory; Sociology; Social science; Economics; Microeconomics; Repeated game","score_opus":0.05958433810013977,"score_gpt":0.33632724234046046,"score_spread":0.27674290424032066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367335688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5160622,0.0057688504,0.081577934,0.011641951,0.0007623351,0.0011830158,0.00038575058,0.0001606161,0.3824573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97652847,0.0015145832,0.009259311,0.0006124029,0.00013375658,0.00031317433,0.000066044595,0.00002214378,0.011550116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863994,0.008983542,0.0005133093,0.0012178923,0.0021512469,0.0007345899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849855,0.007514828,0.002759888,0.0023146472,0.0013360796,0.0010889986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009402782,0.00029723893,0.0005692819,0.0013559465,0.0020238832,0.0041384446,0.00053355884,0.0013010182,0.009251928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023626415,0.00021133937,0.0004888689,0.0010845823,0.004198588,0.0041904137,0.00333849,0.0011204915,0.0014075079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032007747,0.00043001483,0.058054414,0.0011384131,0.0004683152,0.00073486014,0.029613398,0.001890699,0.0070807994,0.66639656,0.009201487,0.22467104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021992404,0.0013240785,0.10103948,0.001179214,0.00053750136,0.001747532,0.036018193,0.007005724,0.00483525,0.51827073,0.3275488,0.00027354044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083482056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007964164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009402782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001101967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011897865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04972726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372319621","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12335","title":"When Peer Recognition Backfires: The Impact of Peer Information on Subsequent Helping Behavior*","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Helping behavior; Spillover effect; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Process (computing); Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.0665913856219092,"score_gpt":0.37582995889981907,"score_spread":0.3092385732779099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372319621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99590045,0.000034708806,0.00019864613,0.00023356845,0.000004826887,0.000010131778,0.0000102898,0.0000058900755,0.0036013867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996141,0.000013656099,0.00007723872,0.00003328856,0.0000025916368,0.0000046559817,0.0000039934557,9.585335e-7,0.00024942958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977276,0.0014166178,0.00005591568,0.0001704133,0.00028561946,0.0003439769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975251,0.015291052,0.0058245636,0.0013303397,0.00071282015,0.0015902369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026354701,0.00017289816,0.00026097574,0.0002883523,0.0009816843,0.0012673512,0.00036424215,0.0008540949,0.006844478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01707748,0.00013708745,0.00017708978,0.00017524624,0.0010148813,0.00059413613,0.0010950315,0.0011350429,0.00042230435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048107756,0.010717972,0.7501893,0.00032127966,0.00028925776,0.0014157562,0.018596273,0.004826442,0.052894786,0.014591048,0.0033182784,0.13802889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015602833,0.0029581303,0.95105195,0.00007827213,0.00012545133,0.00028165244,0.017381743,0.0077351676,0.009669532,0.007618205,0.0028848278,0.000059137587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028049895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00342093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006844478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067151553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079147314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022897124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375860848","doi":"10.1037/xge0001385","title":"Computational signatures of inequity aversion in children across seven societies.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Notice; Preference; Variation (astronomy); Psychology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Inequality; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04450530567541782,"score_gpt":0.43353755517061027,"score_spread":0.38903224949519244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375860848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994549,0.000055258766,0.0017240795,0.0002645625,0.000004066822,0.000004996984,0.0005553722,0.000027831364,0.0028149483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981482,0.000022242148,0.0012003934,0.00002579573,0.0000011014866,0.000009408195,0.00025979496,0.000012723716,0.00032035363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996948,0.000100685436,0.000014815551,0.00009844436,0.000040300045,0.00005106403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751425,0.0014291175,0.00049802364,0.00023111113,0.00013223941,0.0001952831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076716923,0.00014991315,0.00031723315,0.0004933077,0.00023597782,0.0013107063,0.0002940875,0.00035673063,0.005874446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068515576,0.00023497759,0.00030282268,0.00043771917,0.00062781,0.00095775136,0.000794836,0.0007378036,0.00033611542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007388082,0.00019384023,0.8769555,0.00013171766,0.00026830356,0.00041179618,0.002410372,0.022759419,0.018067634,0.029667612,0.003196446,0.045198563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048254245,0.00012343311,0.8936885,0.000034533507,0.00007248851,0.00033430173,0.0016181448,0.057303473,0.0028862522,0.04218364,0.0016676842,0.000039247527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003988382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066374736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005874446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005731226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035789819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019652009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377091056","doi":"10.1016/j.jedc.2023.104670","title":"A Gradient-based reinforcement learning model of market equilibration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Stochastic game; Fictitious play; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Reinforcement; Mathematical economics; Economics; Game theory; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.019790591098303476,"score_gpt":0.28465213868730854,"score_spread":0.26486154758900504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377091056","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37009114,0.00057970633,0.59109527,0.0044584516,0.0002431362,0.00015345388,0.0005087069,0.0006255024,0.032244653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98211896,0.000119089826,0.009021281,0.000110132525,0.00003270245,0.000064517735,0.000053779037,0.00003584363,0.008443796],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995888,0.00020116725,0.000014762786,0.000075617434,0.00004136446,0.000078270874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975721,0.001556185,0.00020592078,0.000117151234,0.00027989256,0.00026865434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014346192,0.0005387795,0.0015689064,0.0005628453,0.0006152085,0.0015635974,0.0025075078,0.0027689964,0.0087998845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00713833,0.00060391426,0.00059534295,0.00042715375,0.0015516402,0.002174211,0.0011818885,0.0016670029,0.000602004],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012286083,0.00009616191,0.00074768695,0.000044206663,0.000040170056,0.00010821987,0.00008039227,0.8867778,0.00064955576,0.10448162,0.0015429201,0.0053082993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020729378,0.000015444264,0.000101125006,0.0000024918527,0.0000046798136,0.0000070837905,0.0000056082567,0.984502,0.000025539748,0.015218793,0.00009006544,0.0000063867515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010400394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004949366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010400394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014223238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013011978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029438555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377148478","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12876","title":"Peer effects in subjective performance evaluation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hanyang University","keywords":"Peer effects; Psychology; Social psychology; Quality (philosophy); Similarity (geometry); Priming (agriculture); Applied psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18091618067858092,"score_gpt":0.4675266010588536,"score_spread":0.2866104203802726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377148478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937842,0.00028590547,0.0015456493,0.000079815174,0.000011050356,0.000025254118,0.000037790753,0.000011349406,0.0042190165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962366,0.000029524248,0.00018786086,0.000009129959,0.000009262262,0.0000054893258,0.000011434423,0.0000031056427,0.00012050346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98866117,0.0077871904,0.0003473109,0.0007606719,0.0021464038,0.0002972123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8967078,0.069892265,0.01890481,0.006096719,0.0059875506,0.0024108633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009759358,0.00031270762,0.0004027368,0.0008982645,0.00043392405,0.0011702061,0.00028507947,0.0003139105,0.0018620285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060509283,0.00016539315,0.0003192578,0.0005433151,0.0010850587,0.0006503633,0.0009265393,0.0005468026,0.00016409875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011650847,0.0004071421,0.9112658,0.0001659534,0.00047859873,0.00017274749,0.004698427,0.0028918798,0.008662565,0.0024872413,0.0005180478,0.06708648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015320778,0.00032026262,0.994899,0.000018016963,0.000056519413,0.000043953227,0.0005051207,0.0019369896,0.0012105966,0.0006218372,0.00035116536,0.000021298078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022580686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020088244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009759358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005788088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030306785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051612973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378783670","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2215572120","title":"Competition and moral behavior: A meta-analysis of forty-five crowd-sourced experimental designs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Oesterreichische Nationalbank; Radboud Universiteit; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Marcus Wallenbergs Stiftelse för Internationellt Vetenskapligt Samarbete; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Austrian Science Fund; Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse","keywords":"Competition (biology); Meta-analysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Ecology; Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.26235833041052853,"score_gpt":0.41678791059193016,"score_spread":0.15442958018140163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378783670","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049720276,0.92959505,0.012664923,0.00088274624,0.00081531255,0.002539703,0.0018341609,0.00023686251,0.0017110092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6974138,0.26358312,0.02524117,0.0024391823,0.00040015733,0.007123541,0.0027593942,0.00025436978,0.0007853593],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9260881,0.05187831,0.011483779,0.004660768,0.0052360413,0.0006530312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82670194,0.14252785,0.014522967,0.008967292,0.0061805747,0.0010993747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067424044,0.0026210058,0.010940903,0.007651484,0.0013168468,0.004420682,0.0024057077,0.0024039561,0.0035230468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16386718,0.0018603436,0.03702809,0.0065720123,0.0022758597,0.002404933,0.0025130466,0.0028311173,0.00039309767],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036642447,0.00011221403,0.0061665857,0.09190938,0.8793547,0.000105640145,0.000298053,0.00056815124,0.0003020872,0.0005657687,0.0007151649,0.01623795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020841276,0.00075065484,0.0066438597,0.014574637,0.9709622,0.000095174066,0.00014163756,0.00033867286,0.00030251333,0.001366378,0.0026856181,0.000054437733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059623993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010691815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067424044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044406913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048036827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35657668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380742245","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.06.002","title":"Motives behind cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner's dilemma","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur; Indiana University; Purdue University","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Altruism (biology); Dilemma; Economics; Inequity aversion; Microeconomics; Duty; Social dilemma; Social preferences; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Game theory; Mathematics; Political science; Inequality","score_opus":0.046649300781613626,"score_gpt":0.33352122731834416,"score_spread":0.28687192653673055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380742245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98346543,0.000089483634,0.007465587,0.00041619947,0.000014305685,0.000045605804,0.000022873524,0.000018653433,0.008461902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964994,0.000050047434,0.0020698127,0.000023240857,0.0000050587873,0.000041211104,0.000008438009,0.000004532601,0.0012981099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819994,0.0013182383,0.0000813142,0.00009322026,0.00016753568,0.00013972602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797912,0.016989738,0.0018175219,0.0005061804,0.00036836223,0.0005269699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003872636,0.00044840408,0.00052194664,0.0006753654,0.00061736687,0.0023058085,0.0006369973,0.0015146617,0.0037109496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018288175,0.00041172912,0.00035096667,0.0003232278,0.0022428434,0.0016504178,0.00067612436,0.0011495798,0.0002101921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025401008,0.0016073134,0.030125806,0.00042106092,0.00023271794,0.0005349476,0.006394192,0.040541805,0.013242468,0.87509435,0.0014939178,0.027771344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010566749,0.0010827663,0.036246106,0.000100604,0.00017790997,0.0005330897,0.0044450946,0.19511263,0.00410015,0.7550618,0.0019514762,0.00013168872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073588936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082904036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003872636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008913483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000797115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020480692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380837886","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4479871","title":"Diversification and Decentralization: The Roles of Organizational Inertia and Diversity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Diversification (marketing strategy); Diversity (politics); Inertia; Economic geography; Economic system; Business; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Marketing; Classical mechanics","score_opus":0.029774009920125757,"score_gpt":0.2884239992179971,"score_spread":0.25864998929787136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380837886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692861,0.00056426204,0.0054795113,0.0021782317,0.000026327361,0.000038109687,0.000050117844,0.000012420757,0.02236485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988801,0.0001000181,0.00045241285,0.000048709797,0.000033105305,0.000013191296,0.000010367326,0.000005467387,0.00045661782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973935,0.0014130593,0.00009535564,0.0004015407,0.00025075302,0.00044582607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92135954,0.05722185,0.009911211,0.004293675,0.0015601024,0.0056536556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075563756,0.00034337837,0.0008128626,0.00097273756,0.00091135065,0.0037281266,0.00072014454,0.0015760903,0.008394437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025845183,0.0003063263,0.0004755972,0.0010211894,0.0049357833,0.005318818,0.0024268331,0.001687447,0.00033700984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041262885,0.0020088772,0.30016583,0.00045959608,0.00037757203,0.00053185393,0.012550126,0.01836446,0.006815246,0.55370855,0.0027750516,0.098116525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089211034,0.0006308933,0.42055964,0.0001734987,0.0002913687,0.0003286127,0.008917118,0.022466715,0.0014859781,0.5396765,0.004463203,0.000114437265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016142196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018672826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008394437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012129563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001333081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03996241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381686212","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13164","title":"Exploration versus exploitation: A laboratory test of the single‐agent exponential bandit model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Econometrics; Economics; Exponential function; Test (biology); Psychology; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17052905538818666,"score_gpt":0.3576517087907351,"score_spread":0.18712265340254844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381686212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992739,0.000046921847,0.005394376,0.00021475514,0.000019586683,0.000066915105,0.00007460841,0.000030671104,0.00141303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939268,0.000038172366,0.0045896177,0.00018330007,0.00001619302,0.00019023019,0.000071172144,0.000012033573,0.00097253517],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977545,0.0016403699,0.00008678317,0.0002303343,0.00016061674,0.00012735113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94302034,0.04702757,0.005169365,0.0033260174,0.00066715933,0.00078948884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067802565,0.0005232323,0.00084656087,0.00021623005,0.0002872953,0.0011595478,0.001003971,0.0011396599,0.0040620235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030394629,0.00025855406,0.00043127412,0.00023335447,0.0010332036,0.0009872998,0.0007925523,0.001517778,0.00042094904],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.054544475,0.050493427,0.14006123,0.0016939741,0.002076229,0.0013346719,0.0042186244,0.3838156,0.12315132,0.08487311,0.009054826,0.14468256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036880474,0.028515672,0.037997987,0.00011283837,0.0003389881,0.00020075275,0.0009338929,0.8570853,0.017474381,0.05157887,0.001897382,0.00017588811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007525331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037671294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067802565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040951459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038671907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035857856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381839354","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0287563","title":"Prosocial learning: Model-based or model-free?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council; Templeton Religion Trust; European Commission","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Reinforcement learning; Context (archaeology); Control (management); Psychology; Reinforcement; Cognitive psychology; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Machine learning; Biology","score_opus":0.18992414332900848,"score_gpt":0.34373963832225607,"score_spread":0.1538154949932476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381839354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9472343,0.00031684933,0.04167546,0.0010941381,0.00004574579,0.00008941425,0.00005476255,0.000088600136,0.009400738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669844,0.00006460453,0.0027659303,0.000063931984,0.000008971448,0.000023787832,0.000021403446,0.000009488305,0.0003433857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979626,0.00093734654,0.00008284247,0.00035351142,0.00049448374,0.00016939266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941398,0.002721559,0.0010965534,0.001283915,0.00028656938,0.00047165054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038821504,0.000437657,0.0005810526,0.0003439634,0.00022102155,0.0016948639,0.0006490128,0.0007236142,0.0020484691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01683552,0.0002652872,0.00036709194,0.000169083,0.00145795,0.0021072628,0.0013044446,0.0008067899,0.00018957075],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005107913,0.0029400869,0.23671289,0.001775066,0.0019530251,0.0009273061,0.0066977576,0.034674592,0.09827117,0.15855248,0.0028508978,0.44953677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005296628,0.004712665,0.2811368,0.0004385391,0.00077331153,0.001561145,0.003369641,0.29568192,0.04548597,0.35363302,0.012367908,0.0003094456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050505373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005701888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038821504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039834104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042792954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020531058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382490577","doi":"10.3390/g14030040","title":"First You Get the Money, Then You Get the Power: The Effect of Cheating on Altruism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; University of Calgary","keywords":"Cheating; Tournament; Dictator; Competition (biology); Promotion (chess); Dictator game; Altruism (biology); Microeconomics; Competitor analysis; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0227783959122839,"score_gpt":0.31545875851528793,"score_spread":0.292680362603004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382490577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961069,0.00007383682,0.00013481874,0.00018436766,0.0000043632226,0.000008476772,0.000013546411,0.0000036372014,0.0034700665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985599,0.000064452375,0.0002696101,0.00013668153,0.0000043713358,0.000009139608,0.000011173077,0.000004994908,0.0009397183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983413,0.0012341036,0.000032234882,0.000114312556,0.00013478885,0.00014314712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982547,0.011935145,0.0024279023,0.0011333677,0.00041832615,0.0015382397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018035707,0.00029068196,0.0003347458,0.00034007724,0.00066053245,0.00089039135,0.00032579314,0.00070548325,0.0046564224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008417593,0.00017247879,0.0002385574,0.00021249372,0.0017996912,0.00041903966,0.00053716655,0.0009719807,0.00033559336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019316273,0.014877528,0.70694417,0.00044584295,0.0007048681,0.00096489576,0.0034766041,0.00634258,0.13485374,0.014161724,0.0028755784,0.09503622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034664696,0.003059738,0.9801118,0.0000382431,0.00014915572,0.00018350368,0.0008551327,0.003839796,0.0067385766,0.0036058526,0.0010219861,0.000049557217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007478256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010872462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007478256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011887318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007164239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015577316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383602997","doi":"10.1038/s41467-023-39823-5","title":"Blocking D2/D3 dopamine receptors in male participants increases volatility of beliefs when learning to trust others","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Universität Wien; Vienna Science and Technology Fund; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre; Durham University; National Institute for Health and Care Research; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sulpiride; Prosocial behavior; Dopamine receptor D2; Psychology; Dopamine; Context (archaeology); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Volatility (finance); Moderation; Dictator game; Social psychology; Biology; Econometrics; Neuroscience; Dopaminergic; Economics","score_opus":0.07533416158527428,"score_gpt":0.39050494784140843,"score_spread":0.31517078625613415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383602997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99949574,0.00003496521,0.00030021736,0.000025674211,0.0000034114564,0.000006991774,0.000020442694,0.000004093127,0.00010840495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887747,0.000040617375,0.00035459676,0.000016533293,0.0000026097994,0.000019734953,0.000019030846,0.0000016635789,0.0006676153],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998047,0.00006188255,0.000009557899,0.00004539478,0.00005036945,0.000028114742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999602,0.000088938476,0.00015585078,0.000049560338,0.000020340667,0.0000832841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003599421,0.00020977466,0.00024277941,0.00009553355,0.00017578446,0.00026171305,0.0001622089,0.0002517795,0.0035759485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087043917,0.00015655976,0.00018642563,0.000042945558,0.00032659358,0.0001371574,0.00021322476,0.00042729854,0.0002497685],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014086642,0.0044576647,0.076032296,0.00016397229,0.00027336707,0.00037041365,0.00093451724,0.00051475735,0.8578088,0.0004329926,0.00031636012,0.044608153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011499946,0.0788969,0.5054889,0.000023863005,0.00047799802,0.0017504472,0.0011465505,0.005847327,0.40030462,0.0012214119,0.0036239733,0.00006798703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070606195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009211694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035759485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015027338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012969253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011962771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383737605","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12886","title":"Asymmetric adjustment of control","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Control (management); Psychology; Social psychology; Reinforcement; Test (biology); Principal–agent problem; Principal (computer security); Self-control; Economics; Computer science; Management; Computer security","score_opus":0.15933173649906418,"score_gpt":0.4395659934958322,"score_spread":0.280234256996768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383737605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858175,0.000049258277,0.004197348,0.0001521532,0.0000072909997,0.00001509129,0.000022849928,0.00001613584,0.009722355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933594,0.000011179147,0.0001845412,0.000013912236,0.0000036314811,0.0000023844152,0.000007696267,0.0000016096108,0.00043914994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864787,0.00042128866,0.000084095926,0.00021676827,0.00041951894,0.00021057483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902761,0.0024233088,0.004066577,0.0021389858,0.00055197295,0.0005429895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012304152,0.0001910256,0.00024268801,0.00048024437,0.0003847501,0.0011362182,0.00034547414,0.0004010633,0.005231871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012701899,0.00015697457,0.0002001346,0.00030634238,0.0010230468,0.0010493371,0.00089980045,0.0008995513,0.00023365168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016210016,0.0013072527,0.6035074,0.00016389329,0.00026723006,0.00054407783,0.010019307,0.019278811,0.06130394,0.074288495,0.0017381539,0.22596048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006752593,0.00057859736,0.9223296,0.000030209287,0.000052483225,0.0003804444,0.0025810446,0.024467679,0.00756172,0.03655526,0.005323331,0.000072086514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016348385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012253509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005231871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091900927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029742517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017502308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383738756","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4494693","title":"Preference Aggregation in Social Choice Under Risk","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Social preferences; Economics; Social choice theory; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Microeconomics; Risk aversion (psychology); Dictator; Risk-seeking; Aggregate (composite); Revealed preference; Social psychology; Public economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05401656790607729,"score_gpt":0.34992079230180845,"score_spread":0.29590422439573116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383738756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90300745,0.00020592698,0.081508815,0.0012238843,0.000029094344,0.00008046187,0.00014018807,0.00006106906,0.013743183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961884,0.000091126996,0.008596038,0.000049577648,0.000028344451,0.000042512176,0.00006426111,0.000008874975,0.0015004836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966384,0.002048584,0.00016356958,0.0003666686,0.00048931636,0.000293328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98071253,0.014838533,0.0017484089,0.0014230286,0.0005768673,0.00070069573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005427651,0.00038135715,0.0012968762,0.0012560155,0.00092141965,0.003269099,0.0005531189,0.0011965586,0.0055970647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01700418,0.0004556941,0.00094416464,0.0016095549,0.0018564236,0.0037420664,0.0014238823,0.0011777803,0.0003188052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086152763,0.0005331292,0.028306141,0.00023035884,0.00032743183,0.00040567364,0.003266616,0.027431127,0.0029549773,0.86754775,0.001744998,0.06639021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008509529,0.00013940416,0.013913005,0.000015531079,0.00005397006,0.000119274075,0.0007551963,0.061482962,0.00024165038,0.9225573,0.0006082797,0.000028294891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024581219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021901617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055970647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013705519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059204374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028704464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383879199","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0288400","title":"Charitable giving: The role of framing and information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Endowment; Endowment effect; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Persuasion; Engineering","score_opus":0.05001164448035233,"score_gpt":0.2749246304656523,"score_spread":0.22491298598529996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383879199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808898,0.00020029544,0.003135768,0.00047969125,0.000035965317,0.000056425335,0.000060283153,0.000007338929,0.015134278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869615,0.000060222206,0.00062821904,0.00005146792,0.000015476035,0.00002384895,0.000015794161,0.000003366782,0.0005054457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909271,0.0070860176,0.00017018909,0.0005821697,0.00068522984,0.0005492791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8811091,0.09840871,0.0138169285,0.003341351,0.0016831004,0.0016407844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111936005,0.00055108545,0.0006530872,0.0006666467,0.000711005,0.0033853368,0.00051162497,0.0012585566,0.0071245176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056065585,0.00029385262,0.00040010843,0.0006775199,0.0019557748,0.0014994221,0.0011569114,0.0017005055,0.00042186014],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023956817,0.011780386,0.5061903,0.0020953398,0.0016561352,0.0011473885,0.04338138,0.022328665,0.043992028,0.19777676,0.002847054,0.14284773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026209494,0.0104122665,0.65969926,0.00068660063,0.003506549,0.0006570047,0.024794957,0.054180507,0.017326698,0.21197504,0.013607266,0.0005329113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015314616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011733884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111936005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010499756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006276341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05919814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384076546","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2023.20","title":"Fairness is based on quality, not just quantity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Negotiation; Quality (philosophy); Incentive; Ultimatum game; Social psychology; Inequality; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21753074856517224,"score_gpt":0.46362038467752265,"score_spread":0.2460896361123504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384076546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58582324,0.006862782,0.10411753,0.019751895,0.0011285103,0.00025712213,0.00031735344,0.00010514279,0.28163636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541545,0.00026409468,0.0021606542,0.00063790166,0.00013891168,0.000031982087,0.00002384153,0.000021104868,0.0013060413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694876,0.018550903,0.0014314895,0.0026089696,0.0068334043,0.0010876601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9183039,0.044984188,0.016614351,0.009383654,0.0078080124,0.0029059227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022617519,0.0003382939,0.0008524713,0.0013226274,0.001852621,0.0057036625,0.0008507383,0.0012141174,0.008946745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07770096,0.00030587046,0.0005321874,0.0012528504,0.0093356,0.0052074827,0.0027889395,0.0023253718,0.0006835564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001264199,0.00043931525,0.118824065,0.0011882451,0.00074622856,0.00021361474,0.011016067,0.0039667864,0.0060390667,0.69367635,0.0065363403,0.15608974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014835018,0.0004669375,0.077900514,0.0005610053,0.00023743648,0.00026326222,0.0029015215,0.0051788534,0.0023860263,0.8843211,0.025522342,0.00011269765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013273408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000964856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022617519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022830442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015367834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1196143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385068372","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157828","title":"Perception-reality bias: the differences in government trust across income groups","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Peking University","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Perception; Local government; Psychology; Demographic economics; China; Public economics; Low income; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08445466940732355,"score_gpt":0.3999913115511836,"score_spread":0.31553664214386007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385068372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934341,0.00007749491,0.0016112457,0.00015043854,0.000009077824,0.000015480442,0.00006779911,0.000005191919,0.0046291756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973124,0.000012789212,0.0000853616,0.000013188731,0.0000026465425,0.000004370382,0.000032393367,8.2148546e-7,0.00011711504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980268,0.0006936358,0.00016937092,0.00026683474,0.00057747774,0.00026576023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909244,0.0024590062,0.004247285,0.0008443799,0.00096731755,0.0005576432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025969197,0.00021796217,0.0002764556,0.0011000145,0.00063190615,0.000917825,0.00027912762,0.00025188058,0.0024262227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011367501,0.000109402645,0.00039454494,0.0008988133,0.001015568,0.0009943243,0.0013495538,0.00046894612,0.00016599194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016625911,0.000076233824,0.9772948,0.000038348644,0.0001590065,0.000093671784,0.005121529,0.00022452677,0.0007953366,0.0026823767,0.000254536,0.013093278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005894516,0.00007038157,0.99424744,0.000012623461,0.000026620164,0.00004940268,0.0029375518,0.0007590397,0.00032637254,0.0010762182,0.0004772605,0.000011055612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00739027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064390814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00739027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080249377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042377468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014694512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385196957","doi":"10.2308/jmar-2021-044","title":"Mitigating the Demotivating Effects of Frequent Unfavorable Feedback about Goal Progress","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Life expectancy; Negative feedback; Goal pursuit; Computer science; Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Social psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.05454194839132813,"score_gpt":0.40854202210143964,"score_spread":0.3540000737101115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385196957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98023945,0.00013803327,0.012630344,0.0007157007,0.00007609042,0.00016236214,0.000067033754,0.0004170145,0.0055539287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991778,0.00005823298,0.0071189874,0.00019141975,0.0000499574,0.000116455245,0.000031476742,0.00001952375,0.0006358653],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670583,0.0017342063,0.00024218504,0.00023013896,0.00087040773,0.00021723637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93359333,0.044591844,0.011979601,0.006130933,0.0020345463,0.0016697302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062777386,0.00065490976,0.00045660898,0.0005382544,0.0005100087,0.0010049671,0.00063441833,0.000989452,0.0037182006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04833076,0.0003061234,0.00025240032,0.000267517,0.0004427322,0.000759236,0.0009673698,0.0015032722,0.0005653199],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0106166545,0.02530951,0.18371198,0.0014704292,0.0004130937,0.0006886231,0.005812622,0.024698224,0.1976425,0.014026432,0.0060900217,0.52952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020629277,0.03276778,0.72752833,0.0007639376,0.0009092312,0.0007505412,0.0025059995,0.0896618,0.0988025,0.025272125,0.018553562,0.0004212062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085052114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012241773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062777386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005517808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010652579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033200264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385219020","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.14239abstract","title":"Using Mentorship and Codes of Conduct to Support Individuals’ Internal Motivation to Report Honestly","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deci-; Honesty; Psychology; Autonomy; Set (abstract data type); Leverage (statistics); Social psychology; Mentorship; Self-determination theory; Dishonesty; Context (archaeology); Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.21013906219802386,"score_gpt":0.42194611273258914,"score_spread":0.21180705053456528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385219020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99089724,0.000048206923,0.004841333,0.0006230398,0.00001840237,0.00007622604,0.000017193084,0.000043924603,0.0034343125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953719,0.000027862867,0.0039724754,0.000077932425,0.000013036279,0.00007550193,0.000014633785,0.0000041350954,0.0004424507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938222,0.0045889206,0.00015378046,0.00031079116,0.0007541146,0.00037022674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9396292,0.0259203,0.01680398,0.0073525696,0.002249364,0.008044665],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006423776,0.0003941724,0.0002181189,0.00075269694,0.0011871002,0.0015265784,0.0006125245,0.000596968,0.0016468546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035263445,0.00019490176,0.0002456096,0.00032404604,0.0011231242,0.0009437276,0.0021029257,0.0009124221,0.00022725886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017171956,0.009854173,0.56077397,0.00041721947,0.00029070725,0.00042391868,0.017541189,0.00190329,0.050277658,0.0110101765,0.002111779,0.34367868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005572648,0.010296342,0.9011357,0.0002825697,0.00026580202,0.00055025244,0.009130605,0.014002056,0.030778263,0.016905209,0.015899837,0.0001962327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007501574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017474955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99940306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067644764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018035149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03397256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385444142","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12891","title":"How does depletion interact with auditors' skeptical dispositions to affect auditors' challenging of managers in negotiations?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Audit; Negotiation; Psychology; Accounting; Affect (linguistics); Business; Service (business); Social psychology; Political science; Marketing; Epistemology; Communication; Law","score_opus":0.06420558970159389,"score_gpt":0.39469983182308843,"score_spread":0.33049424212149453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385444142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988708,0.000015781654,0.00029700034,0.000054812153,0.0000015725608,0.000007561094,0.00001615942,0.0000027016793,0.0007335754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994523,0.000009644135,0.00023322768,0.00002425893,0.0000017936499,0.00002023821,0.000019475225,0.0000015993924,0.00023749904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957283,0.0024100346,0.00027079938,0.00044330486,0.0008106148,0.00033692663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585636,0.0177554,0.01650767,0.0030886747,0.0020362898,0.0020483206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004896134,0.00027203167,0.00044214516,0.0008305447,0.0012680872,0.0024386332,0.00052430865,0.00063353946,0.0034477613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023470879,0.00037252813,0.00040276445,0.00041434262,0.0013837045,0.0009529587,0.0020561512,0.0012685233,0.00029347747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018103126,0.0010409966,0.95667005,0.00008112356,0.00021916337,0.0001515618,0.012169724,0.0006789504,0.01175862,0.00097562355,0.000252534,0.014191375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036381196,0.00036096066,0.9899005,0.000024979834,0.000050170012,0.00006066463,0.0054816334,0.0011662235,0.0016321056,0.0008928586,0.00036327442,0.000030332241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022007464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030009786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004896134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008983394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080568204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025893569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385476463","doi":"10.1177/09567976231184887","title":"Are People Generous When the Financial Stakes Are High?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Psychology; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12406591958616364,"score_gpt":0.4042768161239355,"score_spread":0.28021089653777187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385476463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99653244,0.0002501214,0.00023771616,0.00072033587,0.000015267662,0.000009028036,0.000065076296,0.0000017969322,0.0021681997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935454,0.00011839297,0.000098629396,0.00019392547,0.000010474218,0.000010513127,0.000020231599,9.771347e-7,0.00019223511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990871,0.0005298983,0.00004362261,0.00009338607,0.000111532536,0.00013452738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947353,0.0018688925,0.0020380549,0.0003636914,0.00029939643,0.00069463573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020389112,0.00014350569,0.00026262514,0.00060122303,0.0010522488,0.0020321598,0.00020208588,0.00078992697,0.0022700604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012615549,0.00020157322,0.00016110679,0.0003672673,0.0012296968,0.0018362637,0.00099321,0.0008456538,0.00029236428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008055137,0.00034753917,0.8684405,0.00012447358,0.00020856436,0.0009375283,0.060707945,0.00023108903,0.0026815592,0.0039926106,0.0023548868,0.0591677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048076647,0.00036504932,0.89059716,0.00011615707,0.00010543935,0.0013357694,0.08700909,0.00085219234,0.00094170304,0.008764352,0.009788545,0.00007641035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015630644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024449667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022700604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032335817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018679004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0107828975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385783944","doi":"10.1177/00104140231193017","title":"Persecuted Minorities and Defensive Cooperation: Contributions to Public Goods by Hindus and Muslims in Delhi","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Harvard University","keywords":"Public good; Prosocial behavior; Mainstream; Social psychology; Inequality; Political science; Accountability; Norm (philosophy); Normative; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.17836355498916281,"score_gpt":0.4613968479746962,"score_spread":0.28303329298553337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385783944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995938,0.00000933745,0.00000403812,0.00004969477,7.8613283e-7,8.946065e-7,0.0000032381085,1.8939966e-7,0.00033803884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979025,0.000016290209,0.0000084677395,0.000016203967,9.648827e-7,0.0000010547568,0.000003563408,2.4869323e-7,0.00016296045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994174,0.0002917817,0.00001868592,0.000044002067,0.000057977908,0.00017009383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869734,0.00043583335,0.0004098588,0.0000639149,0.000066179535,0.00032680563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007359262,0.0001835156,0.00019116171,0.00057071424,0.0020088437,0.0016572208,0.00041581274,0.00048727824,0.0017362119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014209549,0.0001744267,0.00016250458,0.00046090764,0.0025579042,0.00046391887,0.0017726608,0.00078215386,0.00016580781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040265973,0.00055292924,0.5865259,0.00006694005,0.00006330701,0.0012294999,0.39145553,0.000113902526,0.004227874,0.002573595,0.0004005286,0.012387295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016920787,0.00016596321,0.48770165,0.000022989392,0.00001869388,0.00017819079,0.50959283,0.00016906038,0.0003308705,0.000367107,0.0014164929,0.000019207897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024025902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042951465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024025902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012927523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006024023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04777217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385888883","doi":"10.1017/9781009374712.011","title":"Exchange, Contracts, and Contract Choice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Database transaction; Transaction cost; Business; Contract management; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Economics; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.05444156595612711,"score_gpt":0.27114841203406614,"score_spread":0.21670684607793902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385888883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031590037,0.022035213,0.027632354,0.012300786,0.00025174534,0.000073079864,0.00020779303,0.000042094147,0.90586686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7518342,0.019059371,0.013369974,0.0015183463,0.0003655848,0.00026874035,0.000270719,0.00006923816,0.21324393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845386,0.0009410081,0.000047521644,0.00015139191,0.0002780283,0.00012817782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986272,0.0009447388,0.0001267147,0.00015093651,0.000067980785,0.000082555554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024781346,0.00044128278,0.00038919345,0.000495323,0.0012434544,0.0035085261,0.0006436878,0.0017904498,0.016737536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038694902,0.00023031713,0.00023252048,0.0015448234,0.006848823,0.004533245,0.0012385631,0.0016373035,0.0010245874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010637855,0.000011077486,0.000109065724,0.000022854856,0.0000022274608,0.000014526018,0.00027946185,0.0005474837,0.000030986208,0.9884554,0.0024324218,0.008083865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000847953,0.000009838586,0.00029056412,0.00005192633,0.0000021076364,0.000033145338,0.00020443877,0.000661075,0.000042523912,0.965905,0.03278678,0.0000041515464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018826884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017431994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016737536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025953676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014505534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055992663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386219632","doi":"10.1007/s40505-023-00256-4","title":"Relative performance evaluation in organizations with information networks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory Bulletin","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Compensation (psychology); Order (exchange); Public finance; Function (biology); Network structure; Microeconomics; Computer science; Private information retrieval; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics; Distributed computing; Computer security","score_opus":0.01306568046467069,"score_gpt":0.2717104431695538,"score_spread":0.25864476270488307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386219632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978646,0.00022682243,0.008224234,0.00042307444,0.000022000839,0.000031329255,0.000029496017,0.00002470438,0.012372287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998665,0.00002876873,0.0008191858,0.0000119478655,0.000008838187,0.000010394809,0.000015784122,0.000003376661,0.0004366471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99308634,0.0041942536,0.000253087,0.00057479116,0.001296256,0.0005953189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292888,0.05142417,0.009669378,0.0027346348,0.0044376245,0.002445338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011660965,0.00039091022,0.000504517,0.0017556739,0.0008491664,0.0029838416,0.00058815256,0.00084602466,0.003250436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061154496,0.00016471861,0.00024950548,0.0013244515,0.0015048805,0.0037845497,0.0011651175,0.0005924067,0.00025045167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063446956,0.0031795623,0.33534294,0.00048654305,0.00046997896,0.00045848463,0.0057327226,0.084557414,0.00919477,0.2664163,0.0035571055,0.2842596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026681033,0.0038096325,0.3530531,0.00015845662,0.0002946586,0.00027631398,0.008985294,0.3002612,0.009355455,0.3199435,0.003445971,0.00014964634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022581085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018374614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011660965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002454272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012118539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061669827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386544137","doi":"10.1111/poms.14061","title":"Designing contests for data science competitions: Number of stages and the prize structures","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Production and Operations Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Competition (biology); Rationality; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Industrial organization; Political science","score_opus":0.09180529958736172,"score_gpt":0.40154868936389054,"score_spread":0.3097433897765288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386544137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424396,0.00011871201,0.04000635,0.0006192776,0.000050115243,0.00051622733,0.00010935909,0.000047046153,0.016093384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920042,0.000025338872,0.0064660357,0.000036394144,0.000011756002,0.00013594759,0.000026913143,0.000007377514,0.0012860224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342465,0.003886422,0.00023767962,0.0005502404,0.0006064059,0.0012945847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688037,0.015288484,0.007383456,0.0026128313,0.0011786695,0.0047328197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009564209,0.00054245116,0.00077002344,0.00086897775,0.0018332195,0.004577556,0.001508991,0.0015620855,0.0072038895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024563098,0.00053157954,0.00094401534,0.000581699,0.0024795036,0.0029624652,0.0018841954,0.0014590536,0.00045107774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005781318,0.0049659656,0.15405424,0.0008327932,0.0005116908,0.0009762577,0.0033884249,0.19793859,0.03532946,0.51187855,0.0042356304,0.08010711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001580409,0.0038399347,0.14513619,0.0001641272,0.00024111889,0.0004061707,0.0045498833,0.50999844,0.00635403,0.3148509,0.012510041,0.00036875167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023314662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005276256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009564209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002735178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027886676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05058098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386656246","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-823816-5.00020-5","title":"The performance of different fisheries management systems in relation to Infinity Fish","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Discounting; Sustainability; Fisheries management; Control (management); Process (computing); Business; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Fishery; Computer science; Ecology; Fishing; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.03077411742714223,"score_gpt":0.2711780148804948,"score_spread":0.24040389745335258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386656246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969439,0.0024983678,0.0013814156,0.0003756952,0.000023906377,0.000007910154,0.00032199657,0.00002895476,0.098417774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98179686,0.00076316664,0.0007172074,0.000034995155,0.000015562124,0.000008089386,0.0001631464,0.000017912955,0.01648304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997094,0.00012510805,0.00001689666,0.000043192995,0.000079783546,0.000025600744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972045,0.0020035498,0.00027708255,0.00012257542,0.0002589965,0.00013323086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009531684,0.00020094514,0.00020936722,0.00065821013,0.00043442214,0.0016679482,0.00034310107,0.00030684774,0.009250887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043970537,0.00008321902,0.00022815749,0.0007510032,0.0008568533,0.00087237917,0.0006081081,0.00033736488,0.000836176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003023436,0.0006835781,0.3579986,0.00040504176,0.0002859,0.00068851653,0.0046772035,0.025348319,0.019863907,0.19414909,0.0042786184,0.38859773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025061907,0.0008540769,0.9399522,0.00009282954,0.000097899625,0.00034033082,0.003307445,0.008680129,0.0035976386,0.034457874,0.008549204,0.0000453581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007405664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010036074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009250887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012971128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044697765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030947268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386774928","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.4907","title":"Whether to Apply","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Behavioral economics; Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); Chen; Point (geometry); Field (mathematics); Prospect theory; Psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Marketing; Computer science; Political science; Finance; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04973936956672687,"score_gpt":0.3750585124842493,"score_spread":0.32531914291752245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386774928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7459575,0.0028526788,0.0034001202,0.043656524,0.003540573,0.0008389808,0.004539523,0.00020197785,0.19501208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92209923,0.00087841385,0.0010288646,0.009523709,0.0007062195,0.00021031787,0.0009518947,0.000047655776,0.06455362],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975944,0.0005126678,0.00015940217,0.00022118459,0.0005687176,0.0009436286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318933,0.0010756964,0.0008551552,0.00070568273,0.00075919065,0.0034149266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030048357,0.00017546429,0.00036799084,0.0007962813,0.0014643199,0.0013799828,0.00071809994,0.0014473035,0.082026646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01719479,0.00015731966,0.0004626556,0.0003799501,0.00055383734,0.0012118153,0.0010122837,0.0013580207,0.023908144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015708227,0.0021431148,0.36020887,0.00035652216,0.0001602336,0.0015873591,0.0030670788,0.00058344775,0.003346239,0.012417597,0.17751876,0.43703997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045263898,0.0035031044,0.6615512,0.00077459443,0.00015207818,0.0056919786,0.013883298,0.0023429296,0.0028598583,0.02940823,0.2791858,0.00019429497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015089443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041220714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082026646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003441123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002054417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2744065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386824396","doi":"10.2308/tar-2020-0751","title":"Do Performance-Contingent Incentives Help or Hinder Divergent Thinking?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Divergent thinking; Microeconomics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.08059226128753477,"score_gpt":0.3722799828506425,"score_spread":0.29168772156310774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386824396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87314737,0.0101012895,0.016674334,0.0076959645,0.00041433432,0.00021942421,0.00025982727,0.00012912293,0.09135826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924056,0.0015746237,0.004035119,0.00055072014,0.000075479715,0.00009915813,0.000032211374,0.000020181482,0.0012068793],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365556,0.004344324,0.00034405748,0.00037244064,0.0009817868,0.0003018227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8975426,0.07434698,0.01689023,0.00554788,0.003597427,0.0020749695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0123000685,0.0004009272,0.0005624442,0.0006127339,0.0004209332,0.0014295358,0.00082638836,0.0009870704,0.009213931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074355826,0.00028875782,0.0003246147,0.0006443513,0.0018386733,0.0020001135,0.0014231747,0.0014357243,0.00062337046],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009315792,0.00398991,0.06132455,0.008554107,0.0007896463,0.00041366083,0.0025502518,0.010521566,0.028583711,0.36241934,0.009541358,0.5019961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038558694,0.0063451794,0.29138014,0.003502681,0.0010878344,0.00078292005,0.0026479114,0.019376533,0.023374198,0.5626506,0.08470647,0.00028964106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003622332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045782447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123000685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073133677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010853424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06504977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387953265","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104616","title":"Managers’ risk preferences and firm training investments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Labex Ecodec; New York University Abu Dhabi; Monash University; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; York University","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Training (meteorology); Vignette; Business; Investment (military); Actuarial science; Risk management; Work (physics); Risk neutral; Turnover; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Psychology; Microeconomics; Finance; Social psychology; Financial economics","score_opus":0.13902745866175212,"score_gpt":0.3551752097415642,"score_spread":0.21614775107981207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387953265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99270093,0.0008487805,0.0018753759,0.0004895451,0.000009991951,0.00001464707,0.000035155634,0.00000449516,0.0040210974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991258,0.00020285144,0.00023723925,0.000050797516,0.000009278845,0.000004510338,0.000013883032,5.569388e-7,0.00035519176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839646,0.00097232405,0.00009012502,0.000105994404,0.00024748466,0.00018766387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787275,0.012005865,0.006963175,0.0006300259,0.00046647937,0.001206994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035918837,0.00021704243,0.00021914912,0.00042160763,0.0002305122,0.0010923966,0.00019470153,0.0005211579,0.0019226732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017237639,0.00012724938,0.00025732545,0.00034064671,0.0003600444,0.0005263125,0.00050721987,0.0006102511,0.00019364529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015553768,0.0011271094,0.81812555,0.00027224174,0.00062580203,0.00036818258,0.003606358,0.013246985,0.003340668,0.012749049,0.0011233899,0.14385921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078700505,0.0007250542,0.9607653,0.00015483097,0.00016909941,0.0003933828,0.0028374444,0.008823525,0.0012537919,0.020507604,0.004209824,0.00008141148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005628746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010145381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035918837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004922748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024114379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018995881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387956103","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3341807/v1","title":"Using Information to Improve Global Cooperation: A Climate Change Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Identity (music); Economics; Climate change; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Ecology; Physics","score_opus":0.3604664432860751,"score_gpt":0.5398110475557936,"score_spread":0.1793446042697185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387956103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99005485,0.00008158496,0.0015769443,0.00079092995,0.00014576362,0.00022097185,0.00014490445,0.0000344834,0.006949638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99293834,0.00013363571,0.002788087,0.000422734,0.00009128351,0.00056127895,0.00014087647,0.000032984135,0.0028907382],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981761,0.0010926689,0.00007045249,0.00030373235,0.00019900438,0.00015815267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792554,0.014907115,0.001583422,0.0028938393,0.0003581811,0.0010021119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045523676,0.00094164023,0.0006130981,0.00049841567,0.0011504074,0.0012384068,0.00084703293,0.0021272586,0.009236166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013294333,0.0002886637,0.0005375645,0.0007641849,0.0025159817,0.0015427418,0.0014948302,0.001906052,0.00062657625],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.16912106,0.2787613,0.048657265,0.0034022764,0.0031619496,0.0013874266,0.009584985,0.07054554,0.12213488,0.08542865,0.015487235,0.19232751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11254975,0.24126396,0.1619287,0.00048058107,0.0038733268,0.0007613896,0.008470166,0.11896266,0.08937216,0.221139,0.040495712,0.0007025678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017383503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016178478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009236166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006678588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009359479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030898035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388104027","doi":"10.1007/s00199-023-01534-9","title":"Allocation rules of indivisible prizes in team contests","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Incentive; Aggregate (composite); Homogeneous; Computer science; Order (exchange); Economics; Operations research; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03025956878898238,"score_gpt":0.33283982428383196,"score_spread":0.30258025549484957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388104027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85743606,0.00028154944,0.11099099,0.0012373652,0.00009126174,0.00016137045,0.00015530364,0.000088127046,0.029558005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868237,0.00010574145,0.009711222,0.00005099545,0.000024894545,0.00009893545,0.00003440667,0.000024424662,0.0031256487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945635,0.0032927485,0.00032528723,0.00048141184,0.00070305914,0.0006339649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95774776,0.033179034,0.0033444443,0.0025146252,0.0016255294,0.0015886526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010631956,0.00055583025,0.001953363,0.0013607091,0.0012833745,0.007891697,0.0022928515,0.0019456457,0.006675723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0443071,0.0008839766,0.0008195747,0.0011907909,0.0033485596,0.004556276,0.0014088557,0.002035733,0.0005017656],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050225947,0.00021814111,0.0016313508,0.00010258965,0.00006723715,0.0000789663,0.00054454536,0.043005135,0.0017927018,0.9383154,0.0011303815,0.012611248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001485299,0.00006438713,0.0014597131,0.000019363299,0.00002307007,0.00004070667,0.0002459275,0.1341434,0.00040111723,0.8629759,0.0004445736,0.000033349967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019839713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018082191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010631956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002223954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016909554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056227863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388291127","doi":"10.1007/s00199-023-01532-x","title":"Diversification and information in contests","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; University of Toronto; University of Technology Sydney","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Principal (computer security); Public finance; Economics; Ex-ante; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Value of information; Emerging technologies; Information technology; Marginal value; Business; Econometrics; Industrial organization; Marketing; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Computer security; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.024044235693210427,"score_gpt":0.30096857591066817,"score_spread":0.27692434021745777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388291127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9187193,0.0011135181,0.036734547,0.0023419608,0.00005742578,0.00012191229,0.00020598095,0.000046120073,0.040659323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979074,0.000118779695,0.0011475047,0.00006010238,0.00003193935,0.000018211897,0.000027706124,0.000004620868,0.0006837229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924057,0.0046061557,0.00035950413,0.00062092463,0.00080277177,0.0012048474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91448504,0.059816435,0.016763294,0.0045208116,0.0014897331,0.002924754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010157435,0.0006259454,0.0016721188,0.0012970385,0.0015767524,0.0051633082,0.00086091296,0.0020706484,0.009913472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04251635,0.0005406946,0.0008440868,0.0011896958,0.0043078084,0.0039190915,0.0029024994,0.0018837489,0.0004098137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020412796,0.00083133945,0.02292761,0.00061060087,0.0003838497,0.00079987646,0.002898656,0.08519449,0.006476303,0.8325213,0.0030861683,0.042228434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032646273,0.00037538848,0.012604645,0.00012585215,0.000094774325,0.00030348357,0.0011450138,0.09635122,0.0011249847,0.8837378,0.003732192,0.00007815322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074373937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006209728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010157435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001995513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010015196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05371833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388485322","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2023.102128","title":"Can political gridlock undermine checks and balances? A lab experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación","keywords":"Gridlock; Separation of powers; Legislature; Divided government; Politics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.05001255737909161,"score_gpt":0.35539940288138816,"score_spread":0.30538684550229656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388485322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912149,0.000064203276,0.0010872368,0.0010981382,0.00020320082,0.00023463649,0.00022636545,0.00008221001,0.005789084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940555,0.00006110498,0.0013294645,0.0008565881,0.00010483107,0.00050909875,0.00013478046,0.00003699347,0.002911508],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982316,0.0007060119,0.00011341342,0.00043658604,0.00020703985,0.00030536327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605706,0.025801862,0.0047667352,0.0057551153,0.00060791493,0.002497737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043350505,0.0013161572,0.0010335791,0.0005090585,0.0014052718,0.0024403043,0.0015710522,0.005539726,0.029629134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027493741,0.00092416146,0.00051533786,0.000483702,0.0036510571,0.002809322,0.0016185427,0.0038635472,0.0024225933],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.20532304,0.3339144,0.076321125,0.0017847666,0.0015089272,0.002767781,0.004861577,0.020513711,0.11683316,0.09249771,0.027762208,0.11591165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.21247393,0.25252968,0.101518795,0.0005023494,0.0028343399,0.0018871513,0.0059657446,0.07176071,0.06805393,0.25332755,0.028394986,0.0007509566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000748896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059454824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029629134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058960007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011019853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388510191","doi":"10.1111/caje.12695","title":"An experimental investigation of persuasion through selective disclosure of evidence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Decision maker; Welfare; Decision analysis; Private information retrieval; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Management science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Mathematical economics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.37761645508612757,"score_gpt":0.3068986941765514,"score_spread":0.07071776090957616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388510191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97695595,0.00027595393,0.006401417,0.0009807922,0.00012987344,0.0007299553,0.0001247821,0.000040925774,0.014360381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99130577,0.00014280314,0.005790148,0.00030222835,0.00005929424,0.0009187075,0.000047435165,0.0000107610485,0.0014228359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858767,0.0096791405,0.0009681462,0.0012348897,0.0017246305,0.0005164091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7615819,0.20752484,0.015297836,0.011974394,0.0021114605,0.001509619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013085416,0.00082498905,0.000805773,0.00073735794,0.0010096816,0.0022554637,0.0015568266,0.002519475,0.013834707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07397497,0.0006970592,0.0005699861,0.00053001876,0.002847336,0.0024435588,0.0019830642,0.0026187405,0.0006306045],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.067401476,0.19247667,0.06053448,0.0088371895,0.002501515,0.002070658,0.022338647,0.025620474,0.16159602,0.26022884,0.0067611285,0.18963294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05537825,0.20230377,0.0926905,0.0019187366,0.0027890988,0.002537205,0.011669074,0.11913298,0.13275746,0.33147854,0.046490733,0.0008537491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032634306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023168708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013834707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008601098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009337261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06920308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388544077","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4601267","title":"Symbolic self-completion: The case of sell-side analysts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Completion (oil and gas wells); Business; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02302543663507317,"score_gpt":0.32970546344525603,"score_spread":0.30668002681018286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388544077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95289576,0.000051189512,0.0035976241,0.0029161132,0.000016526941,0.00002524503,0.000022788112,0.000019157369,0.04045566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767405,0.000018797438,0.0003782345,0.000038181683,0.000005583156,0.0000052998816,0.000008612588,0.0000041343274,0.0018671382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982673,0.00093667506,0.000040709256,0.00016404594,0.00022676347,0.0003644617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850979,0.008383002,0.0016240268,0.0017118546,0.00087943976,0.0023038762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004015563,0.0002772226,0.00044989103,0.0007962688,0.004040251,0.004695338,0.0009930516,0.002662176,0.00998588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026940826,0.00023806798,0.00028367285,0.000748638,0.005172656,0.004493181,0.0025540385,0.003225667,0.00058823806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081206136,0.0014484016,0.06764776,0.0000669623,0.00006766213,0.0068333265,0.123899795,0.00508943,0.0015230986,0.7355479,0.0075896066,0.04947406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023804103,0.00017762583,0.018937688,0.000059035316,0.000030496807,0.001994778,0.11600203,0.044573005,0.0008909796,0.8036557,0.013355923,0.00008472823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074344366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067245467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00998588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011947812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002171092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03340614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388768253","doi":"10.1111/jems.12566","title":"Championing and shaming in a credence good market: Which one to use?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Credence; Pooling; Signaling game; Monopoly; Credence good; Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Information asymmetry; Economics; Product (mathematics); Business; Set (abstract data type); Marketing","score_opus":0.08220168903394665,"score_gpt":0.3323987271272753,"score_spread":0.25019703809332866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388768253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88584757,0.0007533473,0.0688166,0.00863535,0.00012224658,0.00023316166,0.000093262664,0.0001713396,0.035326965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942889,0.00010917918,0.003612991,0.0001855736,0.00003682115,0.000032605403,0.000010318404,0.0000110767905,0.0017125198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963457,0.0021067946,0.00010882562,0.00035169933,0.00052114436,0.0005658657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94412506,0.037898608,0.008456345,0.0035165832,0.0019615488,0.00404195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01141073,0.0008333443,0.0015702866,0.0011674067,0.0014448239,0.00545502,0.0017315635,0.005371233,0.011845376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041341554,0.00042334705,0.0009599175,0.0006260077,0.0051333974,0.007967522,0.0020676157,0.0034547497,0.00057662465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040930496,0.0021982542,0.033500455,0.0007355793,0.00044234708,0.0008432393,0.0022362066,0.075942315,0.0148873,0.78782904,0.005144585,0.0721477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005307561,0.0018949705,0.011168462,0.00021136121,0.00026525318,0.0003849062,0.0023233057,0.37561098,0.0041144486,0.59942514,0.0037972217,0.000273215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019449596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012448509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011845376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021050991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017588272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060346425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388947438","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2023.102141","title":"An experimental study of auctioneers’ and bidders’ preferences over corruption in auctions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Common value auction; Vickrey auction; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Auction theory; Generalized second-price auction; Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Proxy bid; Stochastic game; Computer science; English auction; Preference; Economics","score_opus":0.08024432099996254,"score_gpt":0.3828233043573562,"score_spread":0.30257898335739364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388947438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99871886,0.000011071304,0.00017793017,0.000049458176,0.0000067612104,0.000021424386,0.000018110562,0.000002691394,0.0009936251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986014,0.000015648468,0.00041086937,0.00004306989,0.000009719932,0.000056137418,0.000041587893,0.000005553779,0.0008160227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961576,0.0025742433,0.00031305704,0.0003201352,0.00037660723,0.00025848707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9183002,0.06168501,0.009513887,0.007349351,0.0014495535,0.0017019217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006444093,0.0005218775,0.00065549265,0.00038281945,0.0007610755,0.0023438402,0.0007812399,0.0014818712,0.007687997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036344953,0.0006057933,0.00035247422,0.0004002326,0.0019487935,0.001530866,0.00082676206,0.0020088283,0.0005521549],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.117923684,0.22859798,0.33848828,0.0010346267,0.0015374431,0.0011554838,0.01882851,0.017540136,0.13998914,0.06811924,0.0038436062,0.06294192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03216272,0.11217207,0.6242535,0.00021878368,0.0011516755,0.0018908806,0.016882176,0.104096875,0.045525037,0.052879605,0.008059299,0.00070743315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010503803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010344052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007687997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006284862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006506559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03408003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389188885","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4635599","title":"The signals we give: Performance feedback, gender, and competition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negative feedback; Competition (biology); Valence (chemistry); Gender bias; SPARK (programming language); Psychology; Representation (politics); Positive feedback; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.0309511899302453,"score_gpt":0.31220302714008197,"score_spread":0.28125183720983665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389188885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658558,0.00045534092,0.001526203,0.0021616092,0.00014992156,0.000024201003,0.00015652031,0.000027261713,0.029643109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726,0.000073334435,0.00030048224,0.00026940732,0.000045406112,0.000008054846,0.000023140801,0.000016536866,0.0020036171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967115,0.001889857,0.0001091375,0.00030170957,0.00061685545,0.00037082075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620198,0.025171664,0.006920573,0.0015404075,0.0012387265,0.0031088584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006002961,0.0006542884,0.00069367455,0.00059884053,0.0007715428,0.003900554,0.0005300079,0.0024810384,0.015389862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039508395,0.00040342292,0.00019517067,0.00056948,0.0019378683,0.001638818,0.0013382133,0.0014974931,0.0011481505],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024971144,0.009107307,0.47999558,0.0012853052,0.0005926574,0.0012548554,0.01236553,0.014952663,0.14578322,0.093585014,0.013605768,0.20250106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001435576,0.008616743,0.83574706,0.00033202666,0.0004836593,0.00074433844,0.008218269,0.020460868,0.012677386,0.10149091,0.009348912,0.00044428598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017479989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022965644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015389862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094540644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008610324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051484227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389307412","doi":"10.32942/x21s5r","title":"The interplay between satiation and temptation drives cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus foraging behaviour and service quality towards client reef fish","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Neuchâtel","keywords":"Temptation; Foraging; Coral reef fish; Wrasse; Cheating; Mutualism (biology); Business; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08337408249870935,"score_gpt":0.4080416651032403,"score_spread":0.32466758260453094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389307412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993005,0.000018266666,0.00011585068,0.000042065793,6.053766e-7,0.0000023265002,0.000021186492,0.000005644843,0.00049367035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988212,0.00001963023,0.00043037816,0.000052058433,0.0000011241918,0.000011599787,0.000034436296,0.0000046099067,0.0006249928],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986756,0.00002871714,0.000009007194,0.00004656165,0.000023816681,0.000024206576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953604,0.00010984728,0.00016468154,0.000038456677,0.000042629006,0.00010831973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023749415,0.00016756404,0.00022670267,0.00025989165,0.00041241365,0.00036877734,0.00026364872,0.00042006155,0.0022114168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008059603,0.00023403762,0.00020450946,0.00009262883,0.0005934867,0.00028120924,0.00068544724,0.00042403044,0.0002004499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006933761,0.00024211421,0.18687823,0.0002985093,0.00006257679,0.00038131524,0.001785589,0.0012033338,0.793406,0.0010021334,0.0004373515,0.0136094345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028155855,0.0005492071,0.9794576,0.000014568598,0.000047483765,0.00023863738,0.0009564759,0.004122618,0.0130193485,0.0006928903,0.00083974766,0.000033148506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042942367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01144224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042942367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070641603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002859988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008538485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389505461","doi":"10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.12.001","title":"Relational utility and social norms in games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coordination game; Social dilemma; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.18194833104617708,"score_gpt":0.4092279424954562,"score_spread":0.2272796114492791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389505461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8226291,0.0012837028,0.12126212,0.004316238,0.00007338863,0.00010502847,0.00016431104,0.000047283414,0.050118804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939972,0.0002685118,0.0042533996,0.00005589655,0.000032265616,0.000046343674,0.000025606127,0.00000741713,0.0013134388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526936,0.0036238835,0.00012479091,0.0002920832,0.0004436479,0.0002462265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96038306,0.0340124,0.002506514,0.0012440498,0.0009838279,0.0008700751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061338814,0.0005718226,0.0007658409,0.0009196671,0.0008508903,0.0038472833,0.0009659473,0.0011071623,0.0040531904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03806162,0.00039499602,0.00039642927,0.0010866827,0.0045455247,0.005083709,0.0011945621,0.0013109235,0.00019048252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111225905,0.00015452868,0.0032974517,0.00007285613,0.00004447189,0.00004185492,0.0009845779,0.008287824,0.0002774472,0.9779774,0.00038740106,0.008363012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004505602,0.000043758635,0.0026807445,0.0000144335745,0.000016915243,0.00002627939,0.00043437709,0.020210218,0.00010072114,0.97584504,0.000570071,0.000012414428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003612282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026046813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061338814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021618302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011664435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03243947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389737494","doi":"10.1017/psa.2023.169","title":"Landscapes and Bandits: A Unified Model of Functional and Demographic Diversity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute","funders":"Morgan Family Foundation","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Homogeneous; Functional diversity; Epistemology; Computer science; Unified Model; Ecology; Geography; Sociology; Mathematics; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.087516995385354,"score_gpt":0.29746187713485017,"score_spread":0.20994488174949616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389737494","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37268034,0.0010772665,0.5808897,0.006174375,0.0000782407,0.00009454106,0.0004704432,0.00022375253,0.03831126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97483623,0.00042693387,0.016579578,0.000240584,0.000057023564,0.00013352693,0.00007191775,0.00003900402,0.007615061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976864,0.0016651684,0.00004704038,0.00021374408,0.00014009325,0.0002474528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286205,0.005343993,0.0007307675,0.00038610146,0.00028058703,0.0003964662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037196002,0.00071609387,0.001390403,0.0011911829,0.0009340197,0.0042125243,0.0018309889,0.0022807103,0.0063932864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012553069,0.0005180069,0.0010377918,0.0013122307,0.0030837418,0.00461106,0.0019994122,0.0016563098,0.00053099036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007185345,0.000057091638,0.0014309955,0.000031219082,0.000045087716,0.00007516157,0.00025620087,0.3579701,0.0002869177,0.6351989,0.0007494095,0.0038270163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004905746,0.000040517378,0.0006427254,0.000016154321,0.000016805625,0.000030344463,0.00010899984,0.6366837,0.000045314995,0.36155894,0.0007891782,0.000018233846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007610514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044956706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007610514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017947305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008043438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021387637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389750049","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2023.11.027","title":"The age of consequences: Unraveling conflict's impact on social preferences, norm enforcement, and risk-taking","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Genocide; Enforcement; Norm (philosophy); Social psychology; Punishment (psychology); Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08748024324765878,"score_gpt":0.3759234279921635,"score_spread":0.2884431847445047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389750049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950093,0.0001356454,0.0007867883,0.00034333966,0.00000929311,0.0000044635844,0.000024815849,0.0000019312313,0.003684474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995258,0.00005363398,0.00023746169,0.0000291604,0.000007060318,0.0000030631863,0.000011479859,0.0000022284091,0.00013019698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989373,0.0005871885,0.00006194726,0.000118185424,0.00016347849,0.00013195153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98055595,0.010101785,0.004628378,0.0015531485,0.0008702712,0.0022904584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004135584,0.0002449144,0.00033557482,0.0007446777,0.0008809306,0.0029419637,0.0005615965,0.0010679552,0.0033836835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020826485,0.00027909648,0.0002654871,0.00046177264,0.0014813353,0.002437193,0.0015590169,0.002263788,0.0001677962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012648401,0.0021861338,0.926901,0.00005110969,0.00022843665,0.00025664066,0.0074024736,0.002509086,0.0030460125,0.019555168,0.00037386926,0.036225185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059687954,0.0004641472,0.94621867,0.000048476606,0.00016201907,0.00023089343,0.0062164073,0.008032203,0.00062875554,0.036795408,0.0010924976,0.00005085196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033167421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065742354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004135584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005877911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087743613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021871269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390058443","doi":"10.1027/1866-5888/a000346","title":"The Effect of Interviewer Job Expertise and Risk-Related Traits on Opportunity to Fake","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personnel Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vignette; Interview; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Job interview; Job performance; Applied psychology; Test (biology); Job satisfaction","score_opus":0.062310334657644066,"score_gpt":0.40869388378137284,"score_spread":0.34638354912372876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390058443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99817646,0.00003427006,0.00039881116,0.000060239512,0.000004353975,0.000020313033,0.000018784694,0.0000040967707,0.0012827384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999316,0.00001570639,0.0003729195,0.000024634608,0.000005097752,0.000015316791,0.000013782793,0.0000020211717,0.0002345439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326634,0.0046684826,0.00039225735,0.00049378345,0.00079131086,0.0003878344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7186072,0.23379974,0.032501847,0.0067067416,0.0034886291,0.0048958873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075316885,0.0003042337,0.00035021064,0.00077136524,0.0005956951,0.0014703296,0.00028507458,0.00089965854,0.006195118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07019824,0.0002847459,0.0003625201,0.00023996629,0.00087939756,0.0008600722,0.0011565236,0.0012215826,0.00030228327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008222027,0.004270183,0.93052834,0.00023084666,0.0003838654,0.00037616945,0.003368013,0.0011797339,0.026926337,0.0010408703,0.0003091174,0.023164479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050705363,0.0009228667,0.9921876,0.000030722287,0.000073825286,0.00018397687,0.00066006655,0.0022184546,0.0031247088,0.00039054352,0.00013068042,0.000025786863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000592575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000566567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075316885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055918546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003273021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039831877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390356696","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4673696","title":"Finding Value in Value Statements: An Experimental Investigation of Value Statements and Subjective Performance Evaluations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Statistics; Actuarial science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.06279331949363785,"score_gpt":0.4246351298481069,"score_spread":0.36184181035446905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390356696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99095714,0.000110794725,0.0024810124,0.00021620681,0.00008807149,0.00024683657,0.000061148574,0.000021217134,0.0058175325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019134,0.00013673345,0.006195084,0.0002215083,0.000079366444,0.0006154851,0.0001118124,0.000039357717,0.0024093632],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171126,0.004208677,0.0007059155,0.0012696456,0.0018830025,0.00022144182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6793794,0.2798697,0.022054503,0.0121557545,0.0034198074,0.0031208007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012535007,0.0011435907,0.0008263639,0.0010659315,0.0010571228,0.004164122,0.0016621074,0.0019067598,0.011015913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15438363,0.0007952372,0.0004954507,0.00080938597,0.002831665,0.0041479412,0.0021781519,0.0036152608,0.0006929616],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08139008,0.16054417,0.13788554,0.0036059215,0.0017255922,0.001223342,0.060811695,0.00826469,0.23812969,0.10730965,0.004886263,0.19422336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030723855,0.15289502,0.38277224,0.0010859919,0.0026823205,0.002677646,0.024045326,0.10092226,0.0853738,0.20081595,0.014967726,0.0010379257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052822405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038362993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012535007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076493504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009339939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06629223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390619530","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4685232","title":"Diversification and Decentralization: The Roles of Organizational Inertia and Diversity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Diversification (marketing strategy); Diversity (politics); Economic geography; Diversity management; Inertia; Economic system; Business; Political science; Geography; Economics; Market economy; Marketing","score_opus":0.016853822575266787,"score_gpt":0.2771833293051564,"score_spread":0.2603295067298896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390619530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690822,0.0005617403,0.0055755437,0.0021869843,0.000026307269,0.000037781876,0.00005040599,0.000012624304,0.022466369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988763,0.00009806983,0.00045653246,0.000049374252,0.00003272224,0.000013233405,0.000010535709,0.0000055613723,0.000457713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973724,0.0014247559,0.000095044925,0.00040775957,0.00025113946,0.00044901273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9228815,0.055768907,0.009846711,0.004304861,0.0015460219,0.005652042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007517362,0.00034374278,0.000802277,0.0009655172,0.0009149362,0.0037055921,0.00072438037,0.0015878191,0.008323607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025462788,0.0003050507,0.00047741993,0.0010119819,0.0049475916,0.0053751655,0.002445346,0.0016852602,0.00033940177],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041366364,0.0019890773,0.29688954,0.0004605176,0.00037860882,0.00052985817,0.012678718,0.018357769,0.0069414927,0.55614656,0.002804827,0.098686315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089193933,0.0006251907,0.4178399,0.00017268128,0.00028904088,0.00032832084,0.008882934,0.022353232,0.0015148877,0.54242873,0.0045592166,0.00011389386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016151082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001869196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008323607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012088652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013341632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03975612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390987884","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4699054","title":"Employers’ Demand for Personality Traits and Provision of Incentives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Promotion (chess); Business; Marketing; Labour economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.029421956746221965,"score_gpt":0.35007486256002546,"score_spread":0.3206529058138035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390987884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99632555,0.00007319302,0.00013634005,0.0005009543,0.0000056709305,0.000007734576,0.00012466057,0.0000042086826,0.00282149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985915,0.000022287959,0.000052422805,0.000043497974,0.000005343471,0.0000036205904,0.00007382613,0.0000011106007,0.0012063589],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881136,0.00051891396,0.00007973658,0.00011035964,0.0001815287,0.0002980327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94603086,0.0361718,0.009792151,0.0019708653,0.0014948322,0.0045394017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027825532,0.00018086057,0.00034069997,0.0005382449,0.00067156134,0.0022216644,0.0004920937,0.0016213676,0.01320801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016983733,0.0003600746,0.00026933968,0.0005776195,0.0004538554,0.00070986385,0.0007042882,0.001219777,0.0010603176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00169132,0.001652607,0.96233934,0.00010691061,0.00010837912,0.000521462,0.0017092334,0.0024394826,0.0040595285,0.0032832325,0.0010198647,0.021068726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100027035,0.00035444673,0.9906792,0.000018852308,0.00002708221,0.00010345035,0.0024946257,0.002357902,0.00041209615,0.0023606457,0.0010702426,0.00002140627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038808766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007729001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01320801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006791675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066561636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04418516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391079522","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4454279","title":"Strategic Pricing and Investment in Environmental Quality by an Incumbent Facing a Greenwasher Entrant","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Greenwashing; Quality (philosophy); Business; Industrial organization; Investment (military); Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Sustainability","score_opus":0.061272655308112586,"score_gpt":0.34672393426427234,"score_spread":0.28545127895615974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391079522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962159,0.000010406606,0.00019584042,0.00039806825,0.000007996092,0.000008688712,0.000009272472,0.0000031016743,0.0031507697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979504,0.000014496836,0.0000824646,0.000038909853,0.000005633014,0.0000020234013,0.000006417864,9.888978e-7,0.0018988459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995517,0.0001312677,0.000017953953,0.00004372201,0.00006511902,0.0001901626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975204,0.0010170906,0.0005026721,0.00007974479,0.00017416167,0.0007058918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012055048,0.00029076482,0.00047060655,0.00038667984,0.0010965008,0.0031176158,0.00041875217,0.0025087367,0.007981226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003189903,0.00029420163,0.0003949412,0.0002941573,0.00065033627,0.00093010516,0.0011355203,0.0018575134,0.00045043064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009673809,0.011646971,0.7085088,0.00022646258,0.00063174556,0.012598696,0.0063063023,0.0643988,0.06575446,0.06768199,0.0062145446,0.046357457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050810847,0.0032247861,0.6954256,0.000046890036,0.00037946517,0.0010775516,0.02691204,0.23356564,0.005730109,0.029686034,0.00320709,0.00023659568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011127337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018317737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011127337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015423797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011679566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026699781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391131554","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4703298","title":"The Importance of Social Status in a Rent-Seeking Society","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.017006584713411967,"score_gpt":0.33271300661271325,"score_spread":0.31570642189930126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391131554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95883274,0.00009047086,0.0010502223,0.0010944278,0.000010088841,0.000011714639,0.00003347904,0.00000423938,0.03887263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938405,0.000017275242,0.000076131706,0.000021232076,0.00000610697,0.000001305679,0.000003595307,9.793691e-7,0.0004894021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939275,0.0003040524,0.000018722738,0.00005324703,0.000101342535,0.00012984239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374455,0.0025467211,0.0012908789,0.00039422745,0.00046455202,0.0015591009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011649433,0.00014791235,0.0003220927,0.00067581964,0.0014980071,0.0020963307,0.00032132686,0.00085567153,0.0069344533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005648365,0.00014895604,0.00017592128,0.00047439686,0.0029904,0.0015921292,0.00127943,0.0005409067,0.00031164958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013383665,0.0009967468,0.3998841,0.00017754323,0.00017897207,0.001495822,0.012043605,0.0032080475,0.01036219,0.5182057,0.0022626466,0.049846306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015921117,0.00070147106,0.68087,0.000037158177,0.00015903787,0.0006462465,0.013018638,0.0093421,0.0007091911,0.28859782,0.00569192,0.000067138615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032302788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006034323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069344533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007326552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063038856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023198068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391259425","doi":"10.1017/xps.2023.39","title":"Incentivizing Responses in International Organization Elite Surveys: Evidence from the World Bank","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Texas at Austin","keywords":"Incentive; Elite; Voucher; Donation; Population; Control (management); Work (physics); Public economics; Public relations; Business; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Economic growth; Politics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Demography; Management","score_opus":0.07132269725714258,"score_gpt":0.41567675234105034,"score_spread":0.34435405508390776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391259425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527386,0.0016358858,0.002766246,0.005893335,0.00019185535,0.00052284705,0.00053623924,0.00008242008,0.035632536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961856,0.0005882656,0.0008325858,0.0010223845,0.000078579,0.00027240234,0.000113800714,0.000010358881,0.00089601043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.90279746,0.08770126,0.0016905018,0.0015524712,0.0041406336,0.0021176927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5394323,0.36164427,0.059441566,0.021940691,0.011471907,0.0060693217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08627817,0.00044123316,0.0005474542,0.0011427614,0.0012141024,0.0022579774,0.0010105511,0.0020665978,0.007225194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17510232,0.0004083266,0.00042774845,0.0020217337,0.0029536563,0.0017082366,0.0018521133,0.0017038714,0.0011441833],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019405957,0.014058227,0.58146334,0.0023173434,0.0013459701,0.00021816653,0.009991451,0.003479917,0.0011881816,0.014636391,0.023985006,0.32791004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033604926,0.009508505,0.91778517,0.0019006483,0.00083721743,0.0001282775,0.007456571,0.0051821982,0.0027567667,0.0075684027,0.043377288,0.00013853713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004994418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035785576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08627817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015649489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015998161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45628804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391326293","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3504906","title":"Mandatory disclosure of conflicts of interest: Good news or bad news?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Business; News media; Internet privacy; Advertising; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.049469491164050534,"score_gpt":0.3497928193775497,"score_spread":0.30032332821349916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391326293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7533246,0.011511529,0.010882378,0.14955488,0.003381017,0.00022719573,0.001648444,0.000067057044,0.06940293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921714,0.00081749674,0.0008542865,0.004135488,0.00084984885,0.000049169885,0.00011657323,0.0000046046152,0.0010011606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717543,0.019444704,0.0029106205,0.0012598919,0.0029046335,0.0017258577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5328,0.35727158,0.08644958,0.012353769,0.005749012,0.0053760824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03526102,0.0002985257,0.0007507803,0.0011579617,0.00090696884,0.0041818605,0.00080731895,0.0039359513,0.007320023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20428059,0.00043035724,0.00034385078,0.0010868794,0.0021527563,0.004214069,0.0012395161,0.003739543,0.00046952802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011238051,0.0030166088,0.25797862,0.0029960547,0.0013259876,0.0018859757,0.008228469,0.0013101819,0.0028857272,0.29360867,0.08590428,0.3296214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002501264,0.0033093067,0.3903424,0.0043951795,0.0018066951,0.0051513133,0.011875078,0.011319555,0.008896993,0.49001345,0.070111334,0.00027745633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037702316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071590923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99606407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062520336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014607141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18648034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391457071","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7273-9_6","title":"The Need to Include Real-Life Factors in Economic Studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Translational systems sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.18786493410233007,"score_gpt":0.3993360484114218,"score_spread":0.2114711143090917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391457071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077830018,0.1585667,0.27898636,0.16023129,0.018921914,0.00018208119,0.0005104692,0.00035246063,0.3744657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17340831,0.18622799,0.34372577,0.056590993,0.022903964,0.0013267676,0.0006045172,0.0010118479,0.21419992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552095,0.0030846547,0.00020087071,0.000231104,0.00089658494,0.00006577017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91686493,0.07758286,0.0007493995,0.0023725154,0.0017955151,0.000634836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01629293,0.0009835332,0.001364594,0.0017190081,0.0011822308,0.006245084,0.0017152335,0.0027756076,0.014008975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024426157,0.0007557595,0.00055660086,0.0029055772,0.009707078,0.015846834,0.0025590095,0.009015758,0.0030120783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008214466,0.000052980544,0.00020714749,0.00041343714,0.000020046935,0.0000409521,0.00045417363,0.00064101175,0.00008497823,0.939639,0.020242823,0.03819525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069063103,0.000014398902,0.00043316875,0.0004191059,0.000010857383,0.00007770355,0.00029220607,0.001069039,0.00009594505,0.8786782,0.118885994,0.0000165621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002474647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007831713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01629293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00221091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025615639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08616626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391790218","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4706860","title":"Theory-Driven Entrepreneurial Search","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Search theory; Entrepreneurship; Bayesian probability; Management science; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02002269643405156,"score_gpt":0.33618423405423575,"score_spread":0.3161615376201842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391790218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50126946,0.0009250836,0.16832006,0.012981836,0.00035272757,0.00017183456,0.00029468094,0.00029688736,0.31538734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98483753,0.00014530959,0.0052857567,0.00027770072,0.00005276328,0.000034319874,0.000044310327,0.000022531747,0.0092998175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992424,0.00035830116,0.000022966049,0.00009820762,0.0001558372,0.00012226123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915155,0.005714288,0.0006018569,0.0010248432,0.0005971806,0.0005463308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001937199,0.0002487409,0.0005437163,0.0012491501,0.00065435725,0.0023014445,0.00088725943,0.0015537958,0.017221274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01554902,0.0003251716,0.00064312515,0.0005741209,0.0012597187,0.0027557241,0.0013943712,0.0013081259,0.0013022616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049185783,0.00008641846,0.0016524419,0.00006073598,0.000022614553,0.000116060735,0.00019669828,0.008745523,0.00049528386,0.9770761,0.0023737953,0.00912519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025207059,0.000031161755,0.00076963415,0.00001814267,0.000011483192,0.00010215218,0.00017493544,0.07305162,0.00026753396,0.9234678,0.0020722318,0.0000080846685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055795454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006740254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017221274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007625289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010135729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05761087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392016440","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0294124","title":"When are people more open to cheating? Economic inequality makes people expect more everyday unethical behavior","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cheating; Inequality; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Economic inequality; Psychology; Behavioral economics; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.12116057321629117,"score_gpt":0.38108752158106146,"score_spread":0.25992694836477026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392016440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89494467,0.07895333,0.0019707624,0.013905725,0.00027535175,0.000075603755,0.0005081235,0.00001377062,0.009352715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861308,0.011254702,0.00045819112,0.0016993266,0.00010059045,0.0000328392,0.00010009408,0.000004969234,0.00021859347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961979,0.0023380395,0.00031173174,0.00040720345,0.00055664376,0.00018853917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97358173,0.017137505,0.007284939,0.00086165627,0.00071582,0.00041825447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058955355,0.0002216143,0.00066789,0.0008214617,0.0004660004,0.0020563712,0.00040232448,0.0011474316,0.0030527695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030613888,0.0002773228,0.0014494543,0.00087653607,0.0016562508,0.0020696819,0.0007428847,0.0015709677,0.0001689966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004035201,0.0011095353,0.677841,0.015969794,0.02039507,0.0007757352,0.009914129,0.0007507163,0.0022767468,0.008358572,0.003299927,0.25527364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005643247,0.0018157196,0.9406356,0.006881114,0.009775886,0.001054377,0.0071920296,0.00080632215,0.0016694833,0.020440219,0.009043162,0.00012170521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025006307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002807972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058955355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005960975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000616729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031178951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392161940","doi":"10.1177/09516298241233491","title":"Justice, inclusion, and incentives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Incentive; Economics; Distributive justice; Microeconomics; Politics; Economic Justice; Inequality; Public economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02524871525350309,"score_gpt":0.3794239509495444,"score_spread":0.3541752356960413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392161940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35548106,0.0016617799,0.13298821,0.029207148,0.00027745662,0.00018016271,0.00016394141,0.000099906574,0.47994033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98607486,0.00025056786,0.0052181114,0.00057378045,0.00010502738,0.00007099023,0.000016095937,0.000025421718,0.0076651396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991454,0.004258342,0.00030471693,0.0009811701,0.001457417,0.0015443724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98562664,0.007028374,0.0024668018,0.0022621904,0.0013242982,0.0012916897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076455195,0.00038583786,0.00097099587,0.0012138197,0.004212755,0.006964666,0.0010815493,0.0028566876,0.0063544326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020401848,0.00037417267,0.000732131,0.0010340377,0.013763994,0.007396874,0.0053894143,0.0024677718,0.0004957672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019204459,0.000035474823,0.00078786985,0.000020907702,0.000008708748,0.000032919674,0.0003765532,0.0015085947,0.00018894763,0.9923975,0.00042034313,0.0042029326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010797334,0.000017171587,0.0008425139,0.000020500978,0.000007277803,0.000025398685,0.0002048008,0.0020934145,0.00016953681,0.99232715,0.0042742877,0.000007126482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028059126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021946942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076455195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038920157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030823175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040433824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392173409","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4739143","title":"Realized and Elicited Cooperation Under Water Scarcity: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Tanzania","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Scarcity; Water scarcity; Natural resource economics; Field (mathematics); Economics; Business; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Water resources; Microeconomics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.03748283779202802,"score_gpt":0.3520729469336091,"score_spread":0.31459010914158103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392173409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99906427,0.00001707242,0.0002125886,0.00004874485,0.0000022214617,0.00002349001,0.000025375177,0.0000028595111,0.0006033163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987331,0.000026223184,0.00065096165,0.0000633022,0.0000029587611,0.00008540334,0.000040974355,0.0000025852023,0.000394396],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.998381,0.0011466569,0.00006615656,0.0001795179,0.00012723997,0.00009937187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97842693,0.015438256,0.0032031746,0.0016202236,0.0005118597,0.0007995399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046950956,0.00035286558,0.0004500995,0.00029782922,0.00085284206,0.0006083475,0.0005779973,0.00087053457,0.0036264067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011612583,0.00027799915,0.00017953859,0.0002301301,0.0016186114,0.00059247017,0.0007661931,0.0006452666,0.00026924058],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035276566,0.0453816,0.50674826,0.0023163802,0.0010186358,0.0031888431,0.03796581,0.014281914,0.22177653,0.015637431,0.006745906,0.10966224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029093963,0.03442988,0.89765716,0.00022995254,0.00042518062,0.0004625841,0.0121883,0.024370661,0.010393796,0.012902042,0.003857602,0.00017335957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004398803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009222336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046950956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007180817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000503438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024830401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392508402","doi":"10.1111/joie.12387","title":"Coupling Information Disclosure with a Quality Standard in R&amp;D Contests*","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Quality (philosophy); Innovator; Ex-ante; Set (abstract data type); Information quality; Aggregate (composite); Business; Private information retrieval; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Computer security; Information system; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1061210220266812,"score_gpt":0.3729001791955735,"score_spread":0.26677915716889233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392508402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88015103,0.00051216956,0.10455403,0.0010103291,0.000094839015,0.00042122765,0.00014386517,0.00010844641,0.0130040655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503446,0.000082091305,0.0035774582,0.000068113935,0.000021907294,0.00007339715,0.000015165567,0.0000068032687,0.0011205474],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825602,0.011418857,0.0006967696,0.0014529913,0.0014439955,0.0024271756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84435475,0.11287315,0.032438617,0.004539059,0.002096138,0.003698307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023155482,0.0013438598,0.0024257828,0.001109772,0.0008412632,0.005357606,0.0017520272,0.0033534835,0.004929223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0622103,0.0010712516,0.0011075252,0.0009621891,0.0031972362,0.0037547646,0.0029743891,0.0030482218,0.0004398616],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007676761,0.0053370767,0.031129165,0.0012405135,0.0007958522,0.0009780424,0.0016433247,0.5202979,0.02468838,0.34471524,0.0017859619,0.05971189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019731442,0.004236772,0.014702111,0.000113977745,0.00042064744,0.00024389128,0.00082356104,0.72405785,0.0068096197,0.24408676,0.0022350382,0.000296604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016208598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012605614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023155482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031388558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002499331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12245935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392529087","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueae005","title":"What to Blame? Self-Serving Attribution Bias with Multi-Dimensional Uncertainty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Graduate School of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Mannheim; Hamburgische Wissenschaftliche Stiftung; University of Portsmouth; Universität Hamburg; King's College London; King’s College London","keywords":"Blame; Attribution; Distortion (music); Computer science; Social psychology; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06641644284266683,"score_gpt":0.3468311279263591,"score_spread":0.28041468508369227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392529087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658875,0.00033124685,0.020822026,0.0016113075,0.00015428374,0.000047130725,0.00007540236,0.00008267883,0.010988581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968727,0.00006457972,0.0023777604,0.00020440103,0.000023833845,0.00001278845,0.000018338886,0.000011639242,0.0004138932],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996789,0.001973039,0.00015107951,0.00033567767,0.00060399715,0.00014728254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936851,0.046218462,0.007953987,0.0059570484,0.0019788253,0.0010407165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061551146,0.00038067537,0.00042096508,0.00028771054,0.0004178695,0.0016791687,0.0005305371,0.0010893714,0.0056849364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063337654,0.0002421631,0.00025437068,0.0002615766,0.0011155312,0.0015202521,0.00095708144,0.0014925972,0.0003363406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011728375,0.0041264887,0.30495447,0.0021889464,0.0014102337,0.0011419681,0.02042576,0.04412903,0.100148514,0.14594828,0.00975877,0.35403916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013942688,0.004317932,0.3045244,0.00093693496,0.0011814953,0.001220401,0.0088559305,0.1993958,0.04411094,0.41583207,0.017717425,0.0005123054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064074434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058965234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061551146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005315935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038493995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032551765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392550821","doi":"10.1257/jel.62.1.317.r6","title":"Individuality and Entanglement: The Moral and Material Bases of Social Life","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Literature","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social life; Politics; Quantum entanglement; Sociology; EconLit; Human life; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Social science; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Humanity","score_opus":0.0306289324249902,"score_gpt":0.33321193186502857,"score_spread":0.30258299944003836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392550821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04443077,0.16036302,0.0220717,0.15781818,0.003569304,0.00007065009,0.0001096636,0.00008967057,0.61147696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744186,0.0698155,0.00552645,0.014251598,0.005082312,0.00015200456,0.000094935145,0.000089576606,0.03056909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800473,0.0012154601,0.000035410263,0.00012707137,0.0004081821,0.00020909609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967026,0.0023679335,0.00029340538,0.00016980692,0.00020006257,0.0002661952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002304599,0.0005288654,0.0005001125,0.0013535809,0.004374284,0.0076675904,0.0007571201,0.0021286851,0.0040747602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045584887,0.00029003914,0.00039107446,0.0015636255,0.03273506,0.011908,0.004272825,0.003754572,0.00057583593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009046495,0.000015055914,0.0003128989,0.000059676928,0.000006411139,0.000037678667,0.0031903605,0.0001643406,0.000048448193,0.97621506,0.008963866,0.010977156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053930817,0.000013698024,0.0014452237,0.0001867876,0.0000051327734,0.000070853785,0.0026892386,0.0001836434,0.000060307648,0.88963264,0.10569349,0.00001357588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002344344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033882356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076675904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027301281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017974192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01980859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392619012","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107566","title":"Competing Mechanisms in Games Played Through Agents: Theory and Experiment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Collusion; Computer science; Tacit collusion; Mechanism (biology); Set (abstract data type); Principal (computer security); Mechanism design; Path (computing); Schedule; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.03716173793602976,"score_gpt":0.349787114347558,"score_spread":0.3126253764115282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392619012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7771138,0.00052526983,0.20298576,0.0016106953,0.00018024685,0.0015249182,0.00033406497,0.0002705485,0.015454647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304008,0.00024310553,0.065798566,0.00039679962,0.00004980878,0.0013502114,0.00009930279,0.000030783816,0.0016305938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868614,0.009622656,0.00045386306,0.001241253,0.0012360396,0.00058472465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89146274,0.091083154,0.007415675,0.00701424,0.0012984312,0.0017257596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01717757,0.001221606,0.0016564114,0.0007649048,0.0008495711,0.002727385,0.0026907236,0.002543439,0.005186184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06124077,0.0007616309,0.0010937138,0.00083021907,0.0031932464,0.0048612957,0.0020003591,0.0037147384,0.00044292473],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067193704,0.00930015,0.017266478,0.0009965427,0.0006349138,0.00029124023,0.0020459227,0.16810384,0.008661842,0.73087305,0.0030133736,0.052093185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003075795,0.004274772,0.0029996599,0.000117721655,0.0001556002,0.00016680764,0.00038140925,0.53265744,0.0030699212,0.44909135,0.0038482398,0.00016126284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012322342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007303586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01717757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017435255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015009872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09084475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392938477","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.76","title":"Cultural Evolution and Public Policy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Public policy; Field (mathematics); Behavioural sciences; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.047248579737576936,"score_gpt":0.2796448279508674,"score_spread":0.2323962482132905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392938477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019368418,0.025931997,0.005894747,0.12652722,0.0008404698,0.00004853381,0.00009682267,0.000041542913,0.82125026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889884,0.022157283,0.003148944,0.012102766,0.00065173535,0.00013776994,0.00007718876,0.00004880334,0.07179143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570364,0.0032568467,0.000060109418,0.00023799234,0.00044438787,0.00029706064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420035,0.004716388,0.00024264482,0.00032606683,0.00030143085,0.0002132157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046857637,0.00035561045,0.00035252294,0.0011022063,0.0017762606,0.005770784,0.0009356911,0.0029120925,0.009605196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072492165,0.00019856553,0.00032901778,0.0017451263,0.014935014,0.004237221,0.0022684,0.0032470592,0.00058610836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061582027,0.000017191474,0.00019773524,0.000048486454,0.0000054831253,0.00003472061,0.00063823874,0.00083588983,0.000034409237,0.9823872,0.004662546,0.011131978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001372496,0.0000130747585,0.0011019857,0.00042205013,0.00000920283,0.000042888147,0.0014071739,0.0010049577,0.00017248998,0.8704998,0.12530154,0.0000110568435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055306964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004213757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009605196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008181427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004165265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059360683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393091046","doi":"10.1111/jems.12590","title":"Revenue drift, incentives, and effort allocation in social enterprises","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Copenhagen Business School; Yale University","keywords":"Incentive; Revenue; Prosocial behavior; Guard (computer science); Business; Workforce; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Finance; Marketing; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03246858771147932,"score_gpt":0.3308943648115643,"score_spread":0.298425777100085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393091046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958941,0.000042675314,0.0011927738,0.00014228265,0.000012930069,0.000039848575,0.00002484559,0.000010087345,0.0026404723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910444,0.000013659931,0.00041538174,0.000036268768,0.0000054131574,0.000040148545,0.0000106930065,0.0000028008678,0.00037122556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975721,0.001407464,0.00014114649,0.00024800893,0.00028772335,0.00034351356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750577,0.0139870355,0.005157284,0.0017944566,0.0007216531,0.0032817337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061299056,0.00038158227,0.0005185325,0.0005802523,0.0006664501,0.0015415745,0.00051873986,0.00079397456,0.0047739623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02022412,0.00023244756,0.00019979464,0.00030723328,0.0011970943,0.001223898,0.0018735388,0.0009440301,0.0003095079],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03625157,0.04246591,0.46602607,0.00089255057,0.00070608815,0.00085950916,0.0052722623,0.06171671,0.11382819,0.09401106,0.003627907,0.1743422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027534224,0.016999692,0.77929765,0.000206366,0.00024212307,0.00023205562,0.0042822594,0.09059384,0.013244747,0.08600807,0.005930545,0.0002091523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067285507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062892964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061299056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001314048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069545745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03241843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393537273","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102980","title":"The reciprocity set","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reciprocal; Distributive justice; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Distributive property; Computer science; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Economic Justice; Mathematics; Social psychology; Psychology; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06116704158976148,"score_gpt":0.3670777470063868,"score_spread":0.3059107054166253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393537273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1869724,0.001573994,0.3012026,0.012834676,0.0005032232,0.00029759278,0.0015326664,0.00039382515,0.49468902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946783,0.00060856005,0.025827792,0.00067813066,0.00037033964,0.00044859672,0.0005200162,0.00010516874,0.024658326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304575,0.0032625832,0.00039857288,0.0016277328,0.0010841219,0.00058117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743959,0.0151163535,0.0015338544,0.005629064,0.0022188143,0.0011060472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055992897,0.0007589191,0.0019918573,0.002814507,0.0046122554,0.0072877146,0.0019577956,0.003256411,0.019991871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030030254,0.0008316459,0.0015200025,0.0019327722,0.008919393,0.014324488,0.0044603925,0.0046569835,0.002669557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010434294,0.0000062036715,0.00008151202,0.000008527454,0.0000070843353,0.0000119009155,0.00007280218,0.00027106697,0.000042084026,0.99727494,0.00063762546,0.0015757794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010172677,0.000004836376,0.000062710526,0.000006824404,0.0000058739215,0.000041146297,0.000034396955,0.0019537418,0.0000429272,0.9965391,0.0012925538,0.0000058084956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010991079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005610377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019991871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018618354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002218749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06687951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394692754","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13219","title":"A (dynamic) investigation of stereotypes, belief‐updating, and behavior","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; University of Toronto; Dartmouth College; Arizona State University; Harvard Business School","keywords":"Negative feedback; Persistence (discontinuity); Social psychology; Psychology; Dynamic decision-making","score_opus":0.045035832117689176,"score_gpt":0.34732290092097934,"score_spread":0.30228706880329015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394692754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99843425,0.000013916728,0.00028730955,0.00003962511,0.000006034958,0.00001981385,0.000035379926,0.000003391192,0.0011602264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988166,0.000013301978,0.0004899207,0.000034886776,0.0000056005574,0.000044613294,0.000025317431,0.0000026089187,0.0005672712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.00070225826,0.00004329346,0.00019834645,0.00019001731,0.00010950953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781219,0.015597537,0.0034887567,0.001600214,0.00045900446,0.0007325929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002810085,0.00024507815,0.00029341283,0.00031591876,0.0005254281,0.0012884052,0.00032434246,0.0005996101,0.006202941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01278078,0.0002735234,0.00016256767,0.00020840824,0.0008551339,0.0005545269,0.0004733532,0.0008201939,0.00029923065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023780279,0.082445614,0.594335,0.00045613173,0.00037932597,0.0006203885,0.021810448,0.00470333,0.13723867,0.013436755,0.002573167,0.11822084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016571176,0.02647482,0.91261345,0.000083798426,0.00018792284,0.00023750123,0.006542995,0.017309442,0.020531759,0.010152592,0.0040499903,0.00015858107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002099798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017251332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006202941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050549774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045332074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02075088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394863845","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4785923","title":"Hiding a Flaw: A Lab Experiment on Multi-Dimensional Information Disclosure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.021529855557488195,"score_gpt":0.3253515883794298,"score_spread":0.3038217328219416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394863845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941994,0.00004965,0.0028534844,0.00060565217,0.00011348936,0.00034617516,0.00016839958,0.00007172594,0.0015920429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98774827,0.00010332712,0.007917373,0.00058782205,0.00013353617,0.0010114674,0.00023084825,0.000041944113,0.0022254293],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99422836,0.0031328578,0.00047855984,0.0008872879,0.00075984973,0.0005131129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85305923,0.11625867,0.012382516,0.013401524,0.0011809756,0.0037171699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009661321,0.0019332091,0.0015542774,0.00061978074,0.0014416813,0.0030993682,0.0024137625,0.00561545,0.011161473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06286347,0.0011791943,0.00088676973,0.00054388866,0.003255176,0.0040814336,0.0024924513,0.0046113664,0.0011851997],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14273043,0.5167792,0.03759076,0.0022839983,0.0015746164,0.0024971722,0.009517356,0.021205418,0.12657137,0.03760636,0.011274159,0.09036914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11175554,0.43624157,0.055182885,0.00062246574,0.0018890671,0.0030847748,0.0054687127,0.17632316,0.08585921,0.11472497,0.0076695406,0.0011781155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048839825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003397535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011161473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005560242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015362083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051094532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394868955","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvae029","title":"The Impact of NGO-Provided Aid on Government Capacity: Evidence from Uganda","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Crowds; Government (linguistics); Business; Health care; Labour economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.039848302510039846,"score_gpt":0.315827033077005,"score_spread":0.27597873056696515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394868955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97503495,0.0015534831,0.000262868,0.0015801749,0.000026843853,0.000030631127,0.00036070717,0.0000063194393,0.021143947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988524,0.00045515824,0.00004158914,0.00009607351,0.000008886258,0.000017118815,0.000049551567,0.0000016186582,0.00047756505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960549,0.002459263,0.0001241426,0.00018892011,0.0002815304,0.0008912171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638311,0.021567931,0.009215333,0.00097530446,0.0022938077,0.0021164261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029328999,0.00036309162,0.00069343124,0.0017926113,0.0016739499,0.0028465984,0.0009860336,0.00093107077,0.010775984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020377042,0.0003834124,0.0003261188,0.0026499927,0.0041414425,0.0020992984,0.0050815246,0.001313094,0.00070767367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019450824,0.0017436006,0.83832955,0.0028448831,0.0007733839,0.003846655,0.02594582,0.0069178515,0.00072961784,0.02791867,0.0083610015,0.08064385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002923182,0.0007556985,0.87920487,0.0026135226,0.00045730858,0.00056632026,0.07791224,0.0029836993,0.00069262256,0.0120442435,0.022384811,0.000092325194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016647015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021429075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016647015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001906446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016266699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036049247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394986091","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/uhgmd","title":"Information prioritization underpins the flexible expression of social preferences under time constraints.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prioritization; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05086962118783937,"score_gpt":0.3512506892994397,"score_spread":0.3003810681116003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394986091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94243634,0.00042709877,0.024405599,0.0009338909,0.000029328032,0.000050540748,0.00021560669,0.000030297955,0.0314713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953564,0.00008525985,0.0037816877,0.000087441025,0.000010687798,0.000018801582,0.00005673765,0.000010275355,0.00059266057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776375,0.0010875941,0.0000936633,0.00040351006,0.00040667286,0.0002448164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98927724,0.004644291,0.0026162209,0.0014152298,0.0009812907,0.0010657931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032405558,0.00036213011,0.00025569956,0.0008018685,0.00085716246,0.0026693437,0.00038470095,0.0007891611,0.0043395814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016657712,0.00035060634,0.00031681123,0.00062276627,0.0020713657,0.0015358691,0.0013200565,0.00095775136,0.00032171738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020026749,0.00081985793,0.47011644,0.0007859153,0.00066780724,0.0014530978,0.018389571,0.012062038,0.07787145,0.1998111,0.0029004063,0.21311957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011969232,0.0008010547,0.7118193,0.0001678508,0.00023008282,0.00096550025,0.005653607,0.017209236,0.010061914,0.23791736,0.01487312,0.00018131924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036726748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006440586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043395814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010887064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010754573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017137885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395443216","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.14620","title":"Fairness Incentives in Response to Unfair Dynamic Pricing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Compute Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Incentive; Dynamic pricing; Business; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.06750599902701235,"score_gpt":0.2649090522742673,"score_spread":0.19740305324725496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395443216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5677068,0.00027532867,0.3990734,0.002777396,0.00013976223,0.00021606394,0.00026552338,0.00045058742,0.029095102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923264,0.000030924697,0.006491572,0.000087448876,0.000009474853,0.00002920426,0.00001558904,0.0000131483475,0.0009962908],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972938,0.001581528,0.00006201456,0.00028467368,0.00032105893,0.00045689373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904574,0.0061892956,0.0013222315,0.00096291676,0.0005541544,0.00051392993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045521213,0.0005048347,0.0006382032,0.0003675633,0.00064822217,0.0019168942,0.0013598604,0.0012790328,0.004304163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023398688,0.00037707688,0.0003444016,0.0003802369,0.0015908177,0.0019367539,0.0015915479,0.0016357913,0.00026967216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045795078,0.00029021088,0.0041106762,0.0000610259,0.00003933873,0.0002064913,0.00024789735,0.82233137,0.0027899276,0.14809686,0.0020140335,0.019354194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006249043,0.00009291008,0.0011467432,0.000012357638,0.000010140541,0.00003428153,0.0001237917,0.9137367,0.0007629332,0.082706586,0.0012931775,0.00001797765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003301917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030016392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045521213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018350475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014719014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024074256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395471095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4804107","title":"A Practical Public Good Mechanism and Policing Application","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Business; Process management; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029801476429973807,"score_gpt":0.36458881618868666,"score_spread":0.33478733975871283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395471095","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09180301,0.00096632,0.6027967,0.031052807,0.0011119682,0.0009885702,0.0002982758,0.0006733361,0.27030897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8689126,0.0004716915,0.088585936,0.0016551213,0.00058387086,0.0007733184,0.00007133104,0.000083468585,0.038862668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940063,0.003314229,0.0003136051,0.0008915951,0.00092300854,0.00055120984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97933495,0.014188204,0.0008667212,0.00362215,0.0014756718,0.0005123699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075274445,0.0011305269,0.0015444924,0.0017318653,0.0027742893,0.0041428646,0.0039834883,0.011181563,0.024714602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039402056,0.00087846915,0.0014821499,0.0012474195,0.0054882593,0.0066621276,0.004473157,0.0045892736,0.0017884754],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007503889,0.00014364217,0.00024965804,0.000092476075,0.000014706278,0.00010271283,0.00013204585,0.006137038,0.00036630288,0.97432613,0.003599532,0.014760776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096136624,0.00007107651,0.00010991362,0.00003411765,0.000017835935,0.00009880972,0.00008950772,0.021215409,0.00026594978,0.97306055,0.0049263136,0.0000143685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012348572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008264064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024714602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002155294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00371284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08267856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395674371","doi":"10.1111/caje.12713","title":"Public goods and bads with vulnerable individuals: How information and social nudges change behaviour","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Guelph","keywords":"Plea; Public good; Incentive; Public goods game; Nudge theory; Per capita; Economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Homogeneous; Social dilemma; Free riding; Set (abstract data type); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.22294500634404152,"score_gpt":0.2396682162395499,"score_spread":0.01672320989550838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395674371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967834,0.000027258619,0.00056883757,0.0002804819,0.0000064617393,0.000012894407,0.000019553838,0.000007370015,0.0022938063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999146,0.00001731202,0.00030419684,0.000082921884,0.0000029490884,0.000015489562,0.00000970959,0.0000022377828,0.0004192815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746656,0.001790316,0.00006305616,0.0002685501,0.00021446873,0.00019704759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98340523,0.009692956,0.0033559015,0.0018279274,0.00032340077,0.0013945854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039098007,0.0003248212,0.0005437619,0.0006907567,0.00073296175,0.0015626,0.00040258997,0.001410096,0.0053681945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146354465,0.00025119924,0.00029259155,0.0002710233,0.0019247028,0.00093240145,0.0012489352,0.0010161172,0.00034649816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007856429,0.018228734,0.6381856,0.0006267721,0.0011595342,0.0016004287,0.023838894,0.018205587,0.12269111,0.0557039,0.005729197,0.10617383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006965123,0.009399231,0.82256013,0.00016703377,0.00045673182,0.00068837823,0.01599197,0.041664768,0.014184383,0.08657553,0.007340888,0.00027440244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018222695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019390724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053681945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009946114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039858793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020677209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396713448","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4818558","title":"Large Effects of Small Cues: Priming Selfish Economic Decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Homo economicus; Experimental economics; Priming (agriculture); Behavioral economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Social preferences; Norm (philosophy); Heuristics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.017635698638073218,"score_gpt":0.3162212796817899,"score_spread":0.2985855810437167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396713448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98331314,0.0002495458,0.003531906,0.00065467105,0.00019694366,0.0000617764,0.00006161771,0.0000559035,0.011874527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953145,0.0001435593,0.0027559693,0.00024258383,0.00007915821,0.000029700188,0.000025305504,0.00007883562,0.0013303803],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994972,0.00016105692,0.000027788716,0.00012124054,0.00012347272,0.000069308575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852486,0.011921126,0.0009778427,0.0007016709,0.00021142533,0.00093919196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015158802,0.0005364899,0.0005022005,0.00032584436,0.00035617928,0.0015799792,0.00040471036,0.0010671559,0.011708334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019501492,0.0005526635,0.0001623559,0.00023059334,0.0008914584,0.0015360314,0.0015313296,0.001678657,0.00054232887],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025228072,0.00563706,0.024691686,0.0014816173,0.00020841742,0.0009115139,0.0028710265,0.0061805104,0.7538518,0.05003495,0.003548771,0.12535468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005197964,0.012876089,0.38619506,0.00036090898,0.0012521504,0.0013313172,0.00223853,0.06661314,0.22084643,0.29106313,0.01161652,0.0004088338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039901808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005391049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011708334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038225876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043807898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039168358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396813788","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.32166.74566","title":"Large Effects of Small Cues: Priming Selfish Economic Decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Experimental economics; Homo economicus; Behavioral economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Social preferences; Economics; Norm (philosophy); Heuristics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.09248177725870034,"score_gpt":0.251144454535166,"score_spread":0.15866267727646566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396813788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781098,0.00025311628,0.0056092553,0.0005532188,0.00016887554,0.00020028856,0.00005853691,0.000076019656,0.01497098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912861,0.00012654712,0.0070501156,0.00034352165,0.00005767349,0.0001743744,0.000027776694,0.00006392172,0.0008699481],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830735,0.00083216105,0.00008509821,0.0004234151,0.00023917604,0.00011279683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97731584,0.018205604,0.0022504942,0.0011902191,0.00032461603,0.0007131593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023380604,0.000598719,0.00045204215,0.0002726166,0.0004483017,0.0012070041,0.0005588956,0.0009805551,0.007906162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02420183,0.0005572567,0.00019805084,0.00020289136,0.0012626449,0.0011386643,0.0014739282,0.0013801832,0.00047777256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016093746,0.0074970066,0.019572504,0.0021552744,0.00018095237,0.00079585606,0.0078922715,0.002560191,0.82209647,0.03977225,0.0016181994,0.07976543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072639454,0.021086112,0.32061467,0.0006204696,0.0010919604,0.001505215,0.004410684,0.027764115,0.37729016,0.21528012,0.022591135,0.00048145838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033403584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003096109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007906162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041604985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044920624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026448786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397005480","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-15453-9.00019-x","title":"Behavioral economics and Monetary Wisdom: The Enron Effect—Love of money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), and dishonesty across 31 geopolitical entities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; Language change; Index (typography); Perception; Geopolitics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Monetary economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03378339302412304,"score_gpt":0.3256462530103427,"score_spread":0.2918628599862197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397005480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6055542,0.019308483,0.005624074,0.013775054,0.0004590967,0.000059688322,0.0016192268,0.000086152984,0.35351402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404477,0.006117479,0.0024494948,0.0009587657,0.00029967588,0.00007293015,0.00068683847,0.000041181807,0.04892599],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995271,0.00022329563,0.000018864417,0.0000655931,0.00013645609,0.00002872719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941017,0.004452924,0.0006957183,0.0002701606,0.00022233174,0.00025712248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017227198,0.0003610866,0.0005025259,0.00097456505,0.00067506137,0.0025485489,0.000371947,0.000625869,0.020465828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060116653,0.00024149721,0.00033154467,0.0020390344,0.0014194781,0.002522446,0.00095545285,0.0015452463,0.0012763457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040676747,0.00096535217,0.313028,0.00022347103,0.0002706253,0.00021107389,0.0068370365,0.0016174602,0.0011336653,0.2761572,0.045832817,0.3533165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032277345,0.00023171415,0.7492423,0.000379903,0.00012512099,0.00021197785,0.0072688404,0.0027061496,0.0005549926,0.20569804,0.033497736,0.000050927647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026553038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005398488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020465828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006971233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006443187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068464994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397008019","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-15453-9.00004-8","title":"Behavioral economics and monetary wisdom: A cross-level analysis of monetary aspiration, pay (dis)satisfaction, risk perception, and corruption in 32 nations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; Language change; Perception; Prospect theory; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04063945799369405,"score_gpt":0.3257376037780965,"score_spread":0.28509814578440246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397008019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532153,0.005062637,0.0066933804,0.0019816007,0.000090155,0.000029345512,0.00044912167,0.00003956945,0.03243897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895231,0.0016751864,0.0022183007,0.000111789595,0.000057219077,0.00004850131,0.00032862427,0.000010918786,0.0060263337],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995352,0.00029225,0.000017844102,0.000039640403,0.000059201175,0.000055801098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595344,0.0032335334,0.00032055163,0.00014891986,0.00014121358,0.00020241883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013352551,0.00043511696,0.0005515079,0.0012052428,0.00065084256,0.0021540013,0.0004395571,0.00081846607,0.009171858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036153998,0.00034327037,0.0008776451,0.0023173708,0.0012963556,0.0014848411,0.0010127747,0.0014411941,0.00040483137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033825828,0.0010289828,0.65412194,0.0001812953,0.00074460835,0.00036252887,0.006679354,0.0125557,0.00089904154,0.18473132,0.008386289,0.12997071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012545626,0.00025858174,0.90843236,0.00015564692,0.00020236283,0.00013497559,0.005729334,0.015216075,0.00023649294,0.06484927,0.0047262837,0.000046025863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007459097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012434255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009171858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086457655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074435625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030682981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398151900","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4834667","title":"The Importance of Social Status in a Rent-Seeking Society","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rent-seeking; CONTEST; Social status; Constraint (computer-aided design); Property rights; Economics; Social security; Value (mathematics); Participation constraint; Affect (linguistics); Public economics; Microeconomics; Incentive; Politics; Political science; Market economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.021785081055029767,"score_gpt":0.34214596487819005,"score_spread":0.3203608838231603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398151900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609901,0.00010737121,0.0015671796,0.0011892607,0.000011555078,0.000012252363,0.000044393215,0.0000048880365,0.036072962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.000023873108,0.00011112848,0.000024494098,0.000008640242,0.000001683157,0.000004697251,0.0000013378075,0.0005290887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938226,0.0003083117,0.000020095917,0.000063910455,0.000108856744,0.00011642737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278945,0.003363284,0.0014029156,0.0004925951,0.0004904762,0.0014613048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013016013,0.00016165088,0.00036673652,0.000652121,0.0012457352,0.002090389,0.00030918967,0.0009240888,0.0070655514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006904911,0.00016128969,0.0001935198,0.0005385831,0.0028521544,0.0017564746,0.0012234581,0.00057956117,0.0003292575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014157611,0.00082459056,0.3016109,0.00024463367,0.00019386299,0.001269988,0.010231853,0.0038783937,0.012800686,0.61174506,0.0024813232,0.05330303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017049421,0.0006150792,0.55725527,0.0000381307,0.00017108253,0.00059432955,0.008695047,0.011536484,0.00077032705,0.4152907,0.0047970824,0.00006592435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024011312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037695854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070655514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000685171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054141553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02363664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398167017","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111763","title":"Are teams conditionally cooperative? Experimental evidence from a public goods game","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Public goods game; Public good; Microeconomics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.06437234896411086,"score_gpt":0.3368196202129036,"score_spread":0.27244727124879276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398167017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828624,0.00013676424,0.0038376423,0.001373335,0.00004529856,0.000053215816,0.00008461626,0.000023661194,0.011582908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997591,0.00008009868,0.0010416887,0.00017420673,0.00002605197,0.00005377284,0.000060221235,0.000009966137,0.00096306845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668,0.0019235265,0.00020615694,0.00040665444,0.00051852275,0.00026522097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81031495,0.15247081,0.019573677,0.011826119,0.0024999843,0.0033144564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010241808,0.0006762078,0.0008672845,0.0005875637,0.0009935909,0.0019472935,0.0013763779,0.0021672267,0.014966426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060281806,0.00068734033,0.00036725626,0.00042069468,0.0036271287,0.002512031,0.0013357004,0.0019598857,0.0009994988],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04089382,0.020924795,0.22224864,0.0026575734,0.003102618,0.0030045263,0.010751275,0.043771975,0.083098754,0.40930906,0.018194674,0.14204241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016817037,0.011218125,0.21058488,0.00033933116,0.0013447584,0.00208921,0.006493346,0.1369666,0.017891163,0.584083,0.011869865,0.00030266965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011512997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010626718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014966426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006281646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069108495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05416447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398576675","doi":"10.7910/dvn/kpuoac","title":"Replication Data for: Public Leaderboard Feedback in Sampling Competition: An Experimental Investigation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Competition (biology); Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics; Telecommunications; Ecology","score_opus":0.22968596230649924,"score_gpt":0.38926087711468826,"score_spread":0.15957491480818903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398576675","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058156747,0.00014321765,0.0006505075,0.0005127567,0.00010234993,0.000103148726,0.9963445,0.000655571,0.0009062955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028812804,0.00008637594,0.0023178402,0.00028423942,0.000044251396,0.000902583,0.99124545,0.0002242247,0.0020137958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992679,0.003320349,0.0010100615,0.0011590554,0.0014105279,0.00042098618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94228303,0.022060918,0.0036352433,0.022823622,0.007798587,0.0013987045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018390823,0.0019087635,0.0016964879,0.0028634092,0.0015314383,0.0032948002,0.006687414,0.004437296,0.08289147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08486166,0.0011332403,0.0019015165,0.0058933618,0.0010514746,0.0020260264,0.00300589,0.0028256436,0.07325861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021255585,0.00005935745,0.001967789,0.0005689418,0.00006882486,0.000020878635,0.00003198206,0.0003068251,0.000064041364,0.00081892975,0.9918914,0.003988621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00356202,0.00013630632,0.016217494,0.00092446234,0.00020317234,0.0001884604,0.00018042076,0.0019607071,0.0009423146,0.00847856,0.96708137,0.00012462246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022619257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048625093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08289147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020560394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004901034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27729958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398777720","doi":"10.1111/jems.12593","title":"Sticky price for declining risk? Business strategies with “behavioral” customers in the hotel industry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Exploit; Flexibility (engineering); Profit (economics); Marketing; Price setting; Economics; Microeconomics; Variable (mathematics); Business; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.0633126514016468,"score_gpt":0.3675139194520531,"score_spread":0.30420126805040626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398777720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981494,0.000008867657,0.00038037612,0.00013020095,0.0000014905632,0.000004518319,0.000010238051,0.0000034408552,0.00131137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973816,0.000004468391,0.00008455593,0.000033886765,0.0000018762291,0.0000019296622,0.000008643182,5.1897337e-7,0.00012595915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940264,0.0002888606,0.000026467238,0.000079617326,0.000102773396,0.00009961747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905558,0.005564845,0.002210692,0.00063046196,0.00033888858,0.0006992921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001827328,0.00015264792,0.00026437518,0.00038423148,0.0005546644,0.0016862883,0.0004254125,0.0010437752,0.004500488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103902565,0.00018000379,0.0002282972,0.00027856693,0.000907497,0.00075211946,0.0005146901,0.0011719704,0.0004442457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005447458,0.0010827997,0.94817245,0.00004795311,0.00010179429,0.00062719715,0.0027891982,0.0044741333,0.005419374,0.010114296,0.00093093625,0.025695177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008444431,0.0005764352,0.9003191,0.000026352884,0.000061691644,0.000539432,0.009941283,0.06635909,0.002034037,0.018556774,0.0014099275,0.000091425616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026302163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035649764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004500488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049496425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031943803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015055597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399080244","doi":"10.4324/9781003523857-21","title":"Leaders, Chance Agents","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.138296967466908,"score_gpt":0.3761570962434503,"score_spread":0.23786012877654228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399080244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066481684,0.009411338,0.004694886,0.12017937,0.058380373,0.00087311585,0.0010656253,0.000991575,0.79775554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026434982,0.0027729373,0.0012559996,0.026246434,0.0062769526,0.0004767504,0.0003261001,0.00020763023,0.9360022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963521,0.00081056234,0.00014832297,0.00058829377,0.0010055469,0.0010952093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858111,0.00046254398,0.00041760472,0.0003480018,0.0012959024,0.011664836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038998818,0.00095638086,0.0006466472,0.0015102956,0.010214409,0.011289356,0.0013036228,0.0028697294,0.318915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011105986,0.000527404,0.0004361797,0.0008964006,0.0020181022,0.00669268,0.006486293,0.005491232,0.10675749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003610746,0.00009232198,0.0007790919,0.00008212399,0.00000342747,0.000109914785,0.0007391469,0.000043698743,0.00011190985,0.033107203,0.9279743,0.03692071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138431515,0.000025774041,0.00044482553,0.00007541957,0.000002234834,0.00006954666,0.0009893802,0.000044285407,0.00003608525,0.004090879,0.9942008,0.0000069158846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028332842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010003049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.318915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030053027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008017097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399463252","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12961","title":"Can second‐chance provisions increase the effectiveness of penalty contracts? Evidence from a quasi field experiment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Perception; Business; Work (physics); Significant difference; Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology; Engineering; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11978250325205149,"score_gpt":0.44424219218960015,"score_spread":0.3244596889375487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399463252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920465,0.00016656514,0.0020871696,0.000455873,0.000099751356,0.00045936654,0.000071096125,0.000019247162,0.004594568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559104,0.00008630158,0.0021468655,0.00035485838,0.00005269873,0.00054587866,0.000031102365,0.000008454019,0.0011828443],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9723269,0.021812562,0.00086377905,0.0020618276,0.002016429,0.00091857265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76513594,0.17915715,0.037040614,0.011531741,0.0026143424,0.004520186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030341513,0.0005163028,0.0007477703,0.00035063058,0.0013240107,0.0016285309,0.0015368382,0.0023454698,0.010843532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06141895,0.00056375214,0.00067107443,0.00032356047,0.0028483018,0.0020122,0.00090536894,0.0019635546,0.0006470926],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.16488902,0.32351387,0.19282916,0.0032112757,0.0028733346,0.00059329905,0.010125853,0.006715929,0.050487116,0.04418348,0.005996181,0.19458151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027640866,0.24975799,0.6222052,0.00073771266,0.0025085986,0.0002537223,0.0046373312,0.022767391,0.023935268,0.025924433,0.019233609,0.00039783563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013799019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001319166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030341513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001017679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015248168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16046321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399703374","doi":"10.1111/joms.13119","title":"Rating Anticipation and Strategic Downward Selection in Consumer‐Generated Rating Systems: Evidence from a Peer‐to‐Peer Platform Market","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Selection (genetic algorithm); Rating system; Marketing; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15086275044482975,"score_gpt":0.40885816131913527,"score_spread":0.25799541087430555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399703374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98749316,0.000058879697,0.00042756632,0.000129154,0.0000078265175,0.000035795267,0.000020213412,0.00000769547,0.011819742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990515,0.000023453493,0.00010370079,0.000032422107,0.000007948895,0.000006474454,0.00001454054,0.0000048003053,0.0007550925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791235,0.0011101277,0.000061229504,0.00022524377,0.00052083656,0.00017018076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680043,0.019771036,0.0073201377,0.0018054222,0.0013141091,0.0017850046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045933337,0.00023402735,0.00021815051,0.00046039937,0.001005744,0.00293919,0.00049096876,0.00080112414,0.009442826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021743035,0.00025556842,0.00021348333,0.00032316093,0.0014677137,0.0023205103,0.0010944204,0.0010647826,0.0009952514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006057652,0.0075332425,0.8281994,0.00042394115,0.00033219843,0.0016306996,0.019866714,0.0040436103,0.009452783,0.025382321,0.0037659619,0.09331144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046135095,0.0026278514,0.94655097,0.00006230525,0.00011775421,0.00043531347,0.013791534,0.015249007,0.0021908558,0.010218183,0.008140188,0.00015468436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024324905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025310428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009442826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050980627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038650678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03158945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400423237","doi":"10.1007/s11229-024-04676-y","title":"Mandevillian vices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Australian Research Council; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of science; Morality; Virtue; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Character (mathematics); Character traits; Moral character; Virtue ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.035273872359614294,"score_gpt":0.3694084475340311,"score_spread":0.3341345751744168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400423237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029972399,0.0030846216,0.009130908,0.016125519,0.0007266733,0.000030454852,0.000086440086,0.00004825148,0.94079477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982417,0.0012201886,0.003882617,0.0051240185,0.00045097832,0.00007807749,0.000069778616,0.00004340453,0.09088922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977191,0.00085197564,0.00007502382,0.00056102563,0.00045048067,0.00034229786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998793,0.00030790755,0.00020471298,0.00024111813,0.0002662914,0.00018686726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019400758,0.00035309003,0.00028594263,0.00061079575,0.00373308,0.0035115017,0.00044608506,0.0017578749,0.0065926192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004049066,0.00018758142,0.00028990506,0.00043129365,0.009620331,0.0030624762,0.002891997,0.00241895,0.0014827296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071953204,0.00000436823,0.00024812258,0.000008995566,0.0000022330532,0.00002705593,0.0004408099,0.000052019193,0.00006231389,0.9920832,0.0032814355,0.0037823084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011312057,0.00002564982,0.0014338312,0.00007653183,0.00000820844,0.00022722349,0.0004398703,0.00036446782,0.0003390061,0.6117721,0.38528258,0.000019186533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002449044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035241619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065926192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020920876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013211532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022054553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400479292","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.11983symposium","title":"Intuition in Organizations: New Research Directions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Cognitive science; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.0956713669250259,"score_gpt":0.43341837045627246,"score_spread":0.33774700353124654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400479292","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016511135,0.5074022,0.018752998,0.3847158,0.0063714082,0.00004271882,0.00010251456,0.00012561603,0.0659757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49164245,0.41497624,0.022931056,0.041005284,0.016124185,0.00018698076,0.00013397862,0.00013942352,0.012860314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439937,0.0031996737,0.00023575405,0.00060264574,0.0010028585,0.00055963045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663885,0.02680966,0.0009310712,0.0015802193,0.002200862,0.0020896653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015792334,0.00073852,0.0016555476,0.0050357026,0.0030835336,0.011376592,0.0016980028,0.0058887647,0.010134821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012574003,0.0005510337,0.0013073805,0.004553997,0.0313079,0.03127197,0.0061566494,0.009605214,0.00082601554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060030714,0.00010902945,0.0012420784,0.00072239153,0.00003144519,0.00013011464,0.006271744,0.00054091105,0.00012370666,0.88699526,0.017303552,0.08646973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020515574,0.000052235995,0.0011132514,0.0013030648,0.000014261445,0.00013681375,0.007999371,0.00075529,0.00006801562,0.86490697,0.12358233,0.000047913512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026560463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027314436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015792334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061508953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055753365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08351886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400890407","doi":"10.1007/s40881-024-00175-5","title":"Monetary incentives and the contagion of unethical behavior","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Emotional contagion; Monetary economics; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.016915297573258534,"score_gpt":0.33070144836201054,"score_spread":0.313786150788752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400890407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930205,0.00017528726,0.0015183166,0.00036491497,0.000010010849,0.0000196059,0.000034063756,0.000009740656,0.004847565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956685,0.000039365248,0.0001756931,0.0000263984,0.0000056600684,0.0000046709265,0.0000071858585,0.0000013559948,0.00017283336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.996262,0.0024363962,0.00020281877,0.00022010438,0.0005448005,0.00033390726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8685069,0.07966963,0.040909562,0.0059844526,0.002428663,0.002500708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058211875,0.00039430507,0.0006110173,0.00077413075,0.00056797714,0.001777547,0.0004697138,0.0011628396,0.004440396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050970107,0.00034507996,0.00028091233,0.00033242675,0.0015831663,0.0012059658,0.0012121924,0.001732962,0.00024204029],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070847697,0.004370924,0.7331686,0.00075627683,0.0011667669,0.0014205938,0.0039329445,0.04702811,0.049022086,0.06596839,0.0015754844,0.084505074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031648306,0.0021359166,0.83461994,0.00022197491,0.0004032093,0.00053574506,0.0014003942,0.07479656,0.008107698,0.07568554,0.0015684854,0.00020808214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016421839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015072913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058211875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011489274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005321382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03078574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400897918","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.18.604169","title":"Positive and negative selective assortment in pairwise interactions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universidad de Valladolid","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Chemistry; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02064049104484505,"score_gpt":0.29035986372181183,"score_spread":0.2697193726769668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400897918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753566,0.0001723521,0.018872058,0.00030669782,0.000018001323,0.000022509037,0.00005203488,0.000030272528,0.0051694736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998406,0.000055877877,0.0008866571,0.00003364833,0.000011532173,0.000011258265,0.000012650258,0.0000051623833,0.00057723006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831426,0.0009819551,0.000074282136,0.00026061496,0.00019170105,0.00017725713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791804,0.014184564,0.00343498,0.0014666889,0.00071284344,0.0010205809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033534835,0.00054239173,0.00078588905,0.0010259158,0.00070002564,0.0013848435,0.0008045654,0.0010186232,0.0030884966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018269556,0.0003203835,0.00050078344,0.00046366133,0.0027922555,0.0014825093,0.0011074471,0.0006505644,0.00026304612],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012767552,0.00063554145,0.09204399,0.0004833467,0.00089657854,0.0050822403,0.0023672201,0.22021525,0.06292075,0.5709391,0.0028668125,0.040272348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014955226,0.00039490702,0.048472807,0.00006272062,0.00023488293,0.0024956071,0.0009299155,0.47374278,0.0064734705,0.46537852,0.0015136515,0.00015120722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009802941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000665278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033534835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066154357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028938122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017735064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401043220","doi":"10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-short.33","title":"Leveraging Prototypical Representations for Mitigating Social Bias without Demographic Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Open Philanthropy Project","keywords":"Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.10106589472022133,"score_gpt":0.4013680821901165,"score_spread":0.3003021874698952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401043220","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34823623,0.0012098894,0.6239223,0.0031185835,0.0004156402,0.00012844118,0.0023369342,0.001812488,0.0188195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227528,0.0003351364,0.07326839,0.00041924184,0.00013262886,0.00006775796,0.0011620184,0.0001511992,0.0017108059],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872965,0.0005905992,0.00005880322,0.0003378315,0.00018801747,0.000095144685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942555,0.0024374304,0.0004841738,0.001703774,0.0008919649,0.0002271872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018856261,0.0004090417,0.00046540558,0.0009654706,0.0006605718,0.0014834936,0.0008949622,0.00077199575,0.0043495665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017492978,0.00022990245,0.0003779255,0.0010398463,0.0006986031,0.0035770582,0.0017315865,0.0008780341,0.0011628955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013798459,0.00059552403,0.058362287,0.0005843844,0.00041519327,0.00034641597,0.0031046073,0.023812957,0.03022777,0.1619462,0.023966126,0.6952586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001500869,0.0003709026,0.015411073,0.0001257851,0.00030211898,0.0006891955,0.001608049,0.3914336,0.014902344,0.5483377,0.026541492,0.00012771842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018475386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032783349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043495665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045050707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006256817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0145507455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401429639","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/ju7hd","title":"Economic Inequality and Willingness to Pay for Collective Goods: Theory and Experimental Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of British Columbia; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Willingness to pay; Economics; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Public economics; Economic inequality; Positive economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09188498009922642,"score_gpt":0.4250633403241274,"score_spread":0.333178360224901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401429639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96699244,0.0017311895,0.0031087843,0.0020353985,0.000084352854,0.00012313481,0.00021727178,0.00001692959,0.02569056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513716,0.00083644956,0.0015640577,0.00049206766,0.000078726014,0.00013613356,0.00014658496,0.0000142808785,0.0015944862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576855,0.0025126238,0.0002099665,0.00055206683,0.00068494276,0.0002719027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85195684,0.11376358,0.022545626,0.008046583,0.0021530488,0.0015342125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011400811,0.00068897865,0.00083509344,0.0010241205,0.0010759138,0.0023941782,0.0012331929,0.0016690904,0.024256125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047415197,0.00056600163,0.00051478506,0.0012386073,0.003919767,0.0025362545,0.0021748699,0.0022217773,0.0011596809],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01574931,0.042308625,0.52409714,0.002809974,0.0023964772,0.0010640384,0.010925842,0.009679185,0.012808214,0.14683284,0.007531611,0.2237968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022955544,0.0049700597,0.7379555,0.0006100657,0.00090856355,0.0005983878,0.0056986664,0.020700034,0.0066078715,0.20866874,0.010752502,0.00023403265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023486195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018753516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024256125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095317204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043665728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08114487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401441187","doi":"10.1016/j.tics.2024.07.003","title":"Minds and markets as complex systems: an emerging approach to cognitive economics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive science; Behavioral economics; Social cognition; Bridging (networking); Neuroeconomics; Cognitive systems; Field (mathematics); Socio-cognitive; Management science; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4645690192752809,"score_gpt":0.5324446694232271,"score_spread":0.06787565014794622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401441187","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020287822,0.992611,0.0019921944,0.0032369504,0.000227841,0.000003214455,0.000013272868,0.000008017962,0.0017047204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003806992,0.992603,0.0011692932,0.0011800925,0.00084220665,0.00001263528,0.00001748271,0.0000039340725,0.0003643315],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940026,0.00024619602,0.000043465956,0.00009188624,0.00018627355,0.00003181942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996027,0.0032777248,0.00015075743,0.000081411104,0.00036528351,0.00009787499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019852237,0.0009477649,0.0018921889,0.0038250394,0.00039300436,0.003488024,0.0013207777,0.002903369,0.0031687792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003999349,0.0002984301,0.0004968487,0.007462476,0.0036079444,0.006338907,0.0015049888,0.0030480218,0.00074106513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055883545,0.0000951235,0.000658148,0.013115341,0.00018576418,0.00011737652,0.00035560448,0.0014361332,0.00044096427,0.3210613,0.023734622,0.63874364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031111267,0.000054163054,0.0023602555,0.008793959,0.00017334525,0.0005602547,0.00048488774,0.0011601885,0.00021576704,0.37738618,0.60871625,0.0000636683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030635349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004149121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038250394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019715494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034677433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014304638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403391214","doi":"10.1109/tcss.2024.3460653","title":"Altruism in Fuzzy Reinforcement Learning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reinforcement learning; Altruism (biology); Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Reinforcement; Computer science; Machine learning; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0402267218374157,"score_gpt":0.33981156452339734,"score_spread":0.2995848426859816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403391214","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06433233,0.00024695657,0.92873806,0.000526803,0.000041325213,0.000081950515,0.00002287756,0.0001806859,0.0058290395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89383686,0.00009985734,0.10328239,0.00018789525,0.000028920274,0.00014841527,0.000023602914,0.000031303927,0.0023607768],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989649,0.00061817194,0.000031880176,0.00014889898,0.00016401331,0.00007208569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978999,0.0012750903,0.00029337624,0.00014346956,0.0002671035,0.00012111873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027625575,0.0006370428,0.00076029234,0.00046111108,0.00045025442,0.00093605183,0.0012488122,0.0011114347,0.0013920068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00740499,0.0002880089,0.00038139752,0.00026993302,0.0014914541,0.0010009678,0.00089244713,0.001020095,0.00024253374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000652336,0.00007496679,0.0017038322,0.000052052128,0.0000684337,0.000090509086,0.00017202376,0.890449,0.0016332121,0.07333924,0.000636838,0.031714756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019782932,0.000029614015,0.00014649608,0.0000067860337,0.0000060880807,0.0000139890835,0.0000099563185,0.9721497,0.0002756898,0.027010743,0.000323516,0.000007532918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022725877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017332862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027625575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001169454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080033863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0146099925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404095032","doi":"10.1016/j.jedc.2024.104992","title":"An individual evolutionary learning model meets Cournot","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Université Côte d’Azur; Osaka University; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Cournot competition; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.016328178663712646,"score_gpt":0.3136214771101777,"score_spread":0.297293298446465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404095032","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3476456,0.00055965973,0.57908803,0.0056754034,0.00028678292,0.00011814204,0.0002733724,0.00035246956,0.06600051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95947593,0.00027769918,0.016104616,0.00022516533,0.00008021308,0.00007211426,0.000061092884,0.00004310889,0.023660133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937195,0.00028260835,0.000018626677,0.0001225534,0.00007969313,0.00012462173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702007,0.0019692155,0.0003305052,0.0001581664,0.00022571813,0.00029626803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013640573,0.0007632257,0.0016952656,0.000627351,0.0011465542,0.0026816742,0.0019038825,0.003633626,0.009464143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005395025,0.000560865,0.0009599394,0.00073568814,0.0018569971,0.00331824,0.0014658804,0.0022894572,0.0007691027],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006256565,0.00007920904,0.001010662,0.000052366868,0.000062739455,0.00032218368,0.0002362934,0.36006278,0.0005239142,0.6290945,0.0015152328,0.006977639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042143256,0.00005023112,0.00030095843,0.0000074153245,0.000021569032,0.0000793449,0.00004953368,0.760795,0.00006689569,0.23766194,0.0009008331,0.00002415449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062863086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032687322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009464143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012897863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012062008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031660736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405140276","doi":"10.1142/s2382624x2440006x","title":"Ecological Influences on Informal Property Rights: Experimental Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Economics and Policy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Ecology; Natural resource economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05556830796368617,"score_gpt":0.35613760009799067,"score_spread":0.3005692921343045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405140276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98677874,0.00020905906,0.002170466,0.00047863656,0.00002578008,0.00006770894,0.00010011964,0.000014354168,0.010155132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795413,0.00016704584,0.00093158474,0.00016655239,0.000017640737,0.00009187849,0.00006904284,0.000008235209,0.00059388834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967559,0.0019398989,0.00020603937,0.00046884821,0.0004033509,0.00022594236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9361284,0.041341726,0.012375951,0.0080248425,0.0011753128,0.000953876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005496688,0.00033724864,0.0003991075,0.0004331479,0.00077290856,0.0012659613,0.00083420944,0.00092709914,0.009639441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02671009,0.00032539363,0.00033989717,0.00042685008,0.004031534,0.0019504033,0.0014287784,0.0010623063,0.00047380486],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018878864,0.06164094,0.3189945,0.0024172561,0.0015466484,0.0017076887,0.009201771,0.02060469,0.13148952,0.24304953,0.0066363667,0.1838322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005641173,0.016849803,0.5524156,0.0004923391,0.0007671933,0.0013700041,0.007311445,0.030109365,0.06996649,0.2833806,0.031258494,0.00043740837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013270974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016914795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009639441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072283676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004461848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032247126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405418122","doi":"10.1177/01708406241309995","title":"Seal of Approval? Trust signals and cultural distance in a global peer-to-peer platform market","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Reputation; Accreditation; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Social capital; Social psychology; Business; Marketing; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041455361995508734,"score_gpt":0.36862113906188837,"score_spread":0.3271657770663796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405418122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984479,0.00038550192,0.002041722,0.001561244,0.000034387893,0.000020375124,0.00014225168,0.000025879559,0.01130968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931264,0.000056203877,0.00011873739,0.000060948423,0.000017460732,0.0000045387997,0.0000364347,0.0000054898273,0.00038737204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964294,0.0017696846,0.00017051584,0.00056322437,0.0006532297,0.00041399666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95197827,0.026661705,0.013485186,0.002221253,0.002839244,0.0028143534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004403659,0.00026921643,0.00060221145,0.0010467048,0.0012907695,0.0056243525,0.00068947126,0.0012247243,0.008598877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045421958,0.00020884744,0.00033469123,0.0011720994,0.0029914335,0.0061949096,0.002589559,0.0017098059,0.00085676886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020368383,0.0007111621,0.8144123,0.0005190021,0.00048836845,0.00219542,0.018324057,0.008475887,0.00269669,0.07138389,0.006540604,0.07221577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003740219,0.0007962103,0.8223628,0.00026013431,0.00046907307,0.0008612063,0.03591399,0.038069896,0.0027822226,0.079582244,0.018213427,0.0003148493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005335269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037274184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008598877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010142578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075603434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028766096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405782863","doi":"10.1017/ehs.2024.41","title":"Expressed disapproval does not sustain long-term cooperation as effectively as costly punishment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Earnings; Social psychology; Control (management); Public goods game; Psychology; Public good; Term (time); Habituation; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.035499386056943485,"score_gpt":0.3794936286902684,"score_spread":0.34399424263332495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405782863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99651235,0.000053118885,0.0010406121,0.00006252247,0.000013760912,0.000015256699,0.000018376557,0.00001937883,0.0022645076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987429,0.000016709268,0.0004412086,0.000031489235,0.0000037362147,0.000024272942,0.00001566762,0.000007229108,0.0007169764],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988716,0.0003984236,0.00008967404,0.00018829507,0.00029089046,0.00016102582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99329937,0.0022227564,0.0016836148,0.0018790019,0.00023708394,0.0006781879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010821013,0.00030907444,0.00047164058,0.00014592391,0.0003135767,0.0007597274,0.00040884523,0.0005180054,0.0031268157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006831515,0.00021141476,0.00019681818,0.00009294381,0.0007380444,0.00058617035,0.00090427103,0.0009227493,0.00028413575],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066144513,0.002822058,0.041188337,0.0007019762,0.00028790862,0.0006131654,0.0020381727,0.0036253133,0.87271726,0.009020773,0.0009284618,0.059442215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009539214,0.01617089,0.7019393,0.00018882735,0.0004086723,0.0012660808,0.0021830085,0.031097207,0.20991911,0.026143942,0.009496865,0.00023226473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058992667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011147844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031268157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003881347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037831892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010460317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405880337","doi":"10.1111/jori.12502","title":"Do higher insurance premiums provoke larger reported losses? An experimental study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk & Insurance","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Indemnity; Earnings; Actuarial science; Cash; Reservation; Auto insurance risk selection; Receipt; Insurance policy; Dishonesty; Private insurance; Business; Economics; General insurance; Health insurance; Finance; Accounting; Psychology","score_opus":0.046780671819850496,"score_gpt":0.3765178438176172,"score_spread":0.3297371719977667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405880337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979755,0.000029015522,0.00024207027,0.00012247301,0.000030438441,0.00008975394,0.000070627146,0.000010820255,0.001429242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997629,0.000033939952,0.0007307612,0.00025842388,0.0000487103,0.00031405812,0.00007862887,0.000013942964,0.0008925255],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726665,0.001250794,0.00024250509,0.00062456465,0.00037709498,0.00023843459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9457605,0.03638698,0.010118379,0.0052054855,0.00085436786,0.0016742689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044664377,0.00053513056,0.00055956317,0.00037485047,0.00062787347,0.0016409375,0.00084572483,0.001756733,0.015633328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030984685,0.000802548,0.00042986526,0.00020821516,0.0017940139,0.0012351336,0.00096272375,0.001983554,0.0010259838],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10740571,0.26020527,0.1723919,0.00149697,0.0007859188,0.0015307971,0.012662682,0.0014501598,0.38178217,0.010077817,0.004237663,0.045972906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01944232,0.18962923,0.695529,0.00023781427,0.000838898,0.0022502407,0.004436551,0.007910501,0.058707714,0.014059398,0.006580195,0.0003781361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003063158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024434508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015633328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031139387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028006302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052298665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406114024","doi":"10.7554/elife.102800.1","title":"Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion can be taught through vicarious learning of others’ preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eLife","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Inequality; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04945128793946815,"score_gpt":0.37261846581122654,"score_spread":0.3231671778717584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406114024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98050183,0.000044669418,0.011707597,0.00045425273,0.000019147144,0.000024678115,0.000017137238,0.00008798896,0.00714274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99283195,0.000041281663,0.0058772843,0.00013498841,0.000004666461,0.00002940066,0.000014835583,0.00001162246,0.0010539254],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994666,0.00021468755,0.000017774484,0.00013677172,0.00009608109,0.00006822851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754107,0.0007483655,0.0006818736,0.00051160937,0.000109724686,0.00040731952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011021511,0.0003773193,0.0002724407,0.00022337037,0.00033629636,0.00085655047,0.00057504314,0.0005451389,0.00531985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045984276,0.00026004482,0.00022916975,0.00010315435,0.0011707373,0.000705691,0.0012653272,0.0017660687,0.0003172171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021521817,0.008075475,0.09861955,0.00078570005,0.00033750603,0.0009077976,0.0067452113,0.025653418,0.5545593,0.09144092,0.0035615035,0.20716146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006586672,0.0080182385,0.25718784,0.0004172903,0.0004297604,0.0013142895,0.0026779736,0.23853396,0.16635774,0.3007131,0.023395034,0.00029614478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039963768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074333197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00531985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032138138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041269304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017796695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406118125","doi":"10.7554/elife.102800","title":"Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion can be taught through learning of others’ preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Ultimatum game; Social preferences; Social psychology; Punitive damages; Punishment (psychology); Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Inequality; Enforcement; Reinforcement learning; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03699038468014477,"score_gpt":0.36486027104730495,"score_spread":0.3278698863671602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406118125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059967,0.000076781005,0.071274966,0.0013653036,0.000038390852,0.00007112604,0.00007387536,0.00020211477,0.020900736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98066276,0.000119326876,0.016384829,0.00021452982,0.000009185324,0.00006088329,0.000041023155,0.00001448443,0.002492857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996482,0.00011892485,0.000011443583,0.00010558105,0.000068360176,0.00004748991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853647,0.0005425234,0.00031709974,0.0003870088,0.00005772904,0.00015920904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010104307,0.00049734314,0.00027472145,0.0002169214,0.00033614942,0.00087505655,0.00055916916,0.00063848885,0.0045045638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003796872,0.00027392295,0.00040846402,0.00014726442,0.0011822353,0.0012735516,0.0010578124,0.0015821628,0.00032874185],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011787126,0.0040387735,0.11772859,0.00059117004,0.00044136329,0.0010159834,0.0055054124,0.0934927,0.1459196,0.2978357,0.004651403,0.3276006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037498158,0.002759471,0.09812724,0.0001892355,0.00033219502,0.0009664329,0.0012344237,0.3457236,0.038621526,0.4926764,0.018819865,0.00017464794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010177904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014421956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045045638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003811985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005418923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015069246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406158710","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5088222","title":"A Breakdown of Cooperation in Public Goods Games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Public goods game; Public good; Incentive; Free riding; Microeconomics; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02865717664502163,"score_gpt":0.340493008852458,"score_spread":0.3118358322074363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406158710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6175101,0.0010155452,0.15175003,0.008519391,0.00022277038,0.00015282439,0.00086164445,0.000590108,0.21937758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841265,0.00020218435,0.00695204,0.0002592427,0.00006450378,0.00010063215,0.00014973256,0.00008155893,0.008063534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965664,0.001254806,0.00013537177,0.00041193503,0.00076691,0.0008646241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863251,0.0075994823,0.0011501504,0.002081864,0.0010230108,0.001820303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023693712,0.00044283498,0.001324837,0.0017180411,0.0022578451,0.0054982207,0.0013452555,0.002931822,0.019024104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017920392,0.00065797335,0.0010758475,0.00120638,0.004188039,0.0057194196,0.0028479346,0.0045342455,0.0023218843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014197259,0.000054583827,0.00053753756,0.000060632243,0.000013419554,0.00012510744,0.0011674911,0.0015776763,0.0024364628,0.9824332,0.0034010748,0.008050916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060995764,0.000059234306,0.0013281236,0.000039280967,0.000010801347,0.00023826165,0.0005824093,0.013492053,0.0005194805,0.98098296,0.002668414,0.000017949198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018283484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080811366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019024104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017930553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015794158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063641965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406211959","doi":"10.1177/09504222241311125","title":"CEO and academic mismatch","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industry and Higher Education","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Baylor University","keywords":"CONTEST; Value (mathematics); Sample (material); Higher education; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.056891809539595946,"score_gpt":0.41918622412995254,"score_spread":0.3622944145903566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406211959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9251859,0.0029297895,0.0018352293,0.028811194,0.00032517783,0.000058485,0.00015426756,0.00003091056,0.040669043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957491,0.00029652397,0.00016634486,0.0024275791,0.00009661702,0.0000149551115,0.00005395238,0.000011291123,0.0011835258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700954,0.012232876,0.0020422123,0.0020483255,0.00986592,0.0037152902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89019734,0.0411859,0.025834247,0.004486231,0.013216435,0.025079885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023823526,0.00021206646,0.0007953502,0.0043148394,0.0036845221,0.007817387,0.0013884255,0.0020630695,0.0129761025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14884855,0.00027815715,0.00033613658,0.0039780433,0.0043034744,0.0054412307,0.006716694,0.0022397286,0.0009960552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006804332,0.0007377655,0.73692566,0.0003243946,0.00018992377,0.0007862882,0.08821625,0.0005055603,0.0010976755,0.046181384,0.020000389,0.10435434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001816182,0.00037162288,0.5876442,0.00046702186,0.00007325117,0.0015688827,0.29013038,0.0015441898,0.0007266848,0.054232173,0.06291772,0.0001421347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039566886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043406445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023823526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005648413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039989105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12599236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406906236","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/uhgmd_v1","title":"Information prioritization underpins the flexible expression of social preferences under time constraints.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Data science; Process management; Business","score_opus":0.05086962118783937,"score_gpt":0.3512506892994397,"score_spread":0.3003810681116003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406906236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94243634,0.00042709877,0.024405599,0.0009338909,0.000029328032,0.000050540748,0.00021560669,0.000030297955,0.0314713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953564,0.00008525985,0.0037816877,0.000087441025,0.000010687798,0.000018801582,0.00005673765,0.000010275355,0.00059266057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776375,0.0010875941,0.0000936633,0.00040351006,0.00040667286,0.0002448164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98927724,0.004644291,0.0026162209,0.0014152298,0.0009812907,0.0010657931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032405558,0.00036213011,0.00025569956,0.0008018685,0.00085716246,0.0026693437,0.00038470095,0.0007891611,0.0043395814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016657712,0.00035060634,0.00031681123,0.00062276627,0.0020713657,0.0015358691,0.0013200565,0.00095775136,0.00032171738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020026749,0.00081985793,0.47011644,0.0007859153,0.00066780724,0.0014530978,0.018389571,0.012062038,0.07787145,0.1998111,0.0029004063,0.21311957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011969232,0.0008010547,0.7118193,0.0001678508,0.00023008282,0.00096550025,0.005653607,0.017209236,0.010061914,0.23791736,0.01487312,0.00018131924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036726748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006440586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043395814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010887064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010754573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017137885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407081039","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2024.50","title":"Catch me if you can: Using machine learning and behavioral interventions to reduce unethical behavior","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Public Policy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Psychological intervention; Agency (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Blueprint; Perspective (graphical); Behavioral economics; Unemployment; Business; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics; Accounting; Engineering","score_opus":0.13954655100560764,"score_gpt":0.45465376087108617,"score_spread":0.3151072098654785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407081039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97363573,0.00029737322,0.013412491,0.0053751064,0.0001799068,0.000782637,0.0000674399,0.00015755254,0.006091691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858187,0.00014546573,0.011337199,0.001048794,0.00007212354,0.00069220277,0.000021792168,0.000010560056,0.00085322757],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99305505,0.005413322,0.00018865602,0.00045298933,0.000627991,0.0002619969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661758,0.02493113,0.005512411,0.0018079868,0.0005599707,0.0010127012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071280976,0.00057252095,0.0005632304,0.00067258644,0.000757873,0.00085647544,0.00096369465,0.0014208393,0.005657193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03584496,0.0002836618,0.0003716484,0.00026336234,0.0018248222,0.00093530247,0.0008412757,0.0013122938,0.0005191638],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022686029,0.13651645,0.04525412,0.0019745003,0.00094692846,0.00027366998,0.003633408,0.032249283,0.027803164,0.020101506,0.007832332,0.7007286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026526807,0.22615321,0.211654,0.0029962983,0.0016570542,0.00046838887,0.004439567,0.2949211,0.06894418,0.13491562,0.026826918,0.0004968243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011079125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001015822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071280976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007528163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001388136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037697494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407269663","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107029","title":"Is implicit cooperation reasonable for the economy? Corporate environmentalism under Kantian behavior","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Modelling","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Environmentalism; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Keynesian economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08086145572013252,"score_gpt":0.32570583974289,"score_spread":0.2448443840227575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407269663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8779155,0.000180074,0.041367423,0.004178988,0.000030474666,0.00004248322,0.00004978904,0.000033182372,0.07620223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824405,0.000049262784,0.0011329064,0.00007373516,0.0000062668723,0.000015003639,0.000005138536,0.0000025065208,0.0004710891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997614,0.0014301775,0.00007166271,0.00025383726,0.0002504425,0.00037977932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99229115,0.003469934,0.0020001377,0.0014097361,0.00041978896,0.00040925253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031897118,0.00028056197,0.0004196889,0.00031217324,0.0009308218,0.0023306943,0.0005354104,0.0014954617,0.0035029494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091873715,0.00019823787,0.00051536027,0.00024378288,0.0050168494,0.003316966,0.0017812693,0.0014123564,0.0002693615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013668029,0.000096537,0.0033419107,0.00007400908,0.000043161956,0.00012734102,0.0005909712,0.018858002,0.0019622261,0.96903306,0.00040606636,0.0053300853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007334225,0.00013309665,0.0039087995,0.000026349957,0.000030193525,0.00007069843,0.00059727766,0.04113818,0.0006398187,0.9519196,0.0014401765,0.000022384938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010083503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010060325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035029494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001407053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011066361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016869009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407743167","doi":"10.1016/j.mar.2025.100927","title":"How the realized measure of a worker’s performance affects their perception of their compensation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Georgia State University; University of Arizona","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Compensation (psychology); Perception; Accounting; Business; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Data mining; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09673127962736706,"score_gpt":0.3818552045870441,"score_spread":0.28512392495967703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407743167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99121946,0.00006762739,0.0012897077,0.00027440966,0.0000130396165,0.000014680563,0.000042404332,0.0000066512193,0.0070719807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994266,0.000019393583,0.00022863227,0.000028719702,0.0000048313364,0.0000053402287,0.00002102782,0.000001758374,0.00026371257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962536,0.0016572552,0.0002446021,0.0003720592,0.0011511745,0.00032120987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770032,0.013053401,0.0053886482,0.0015239301,0.0020223807,0.0010085698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054441476,0.00027335293,0.00024906007,0.00046288254,0.0006202701,0.0027484049,0.00031970214,0.0007072584,0.0034015586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026252693,0.00019810446,0.00033431174,0.00029123898,0.0012645123,0.0011958367,0.0008471544,0.00092914054,0.000372847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022462087,0.0013779289,0.869226,0.00023841295,0.00061325997,0.0002579096,0.012001586,0.007342635,0.034164958,0.010692792,0.0012229691,0.06061549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045600587,0.0008824932,0.979963,0.000044972378,0.000068992274,0.00006212506,0.0062584914,0.004732707,0.003142386,0.0036171025,0.0010936463,0.00008846643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028361725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034166703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054441476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001146279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005130571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028791785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408671627","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106970","title":"Leaders and social norms: On the emergence of consensus or conflict","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"European University Institute; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Political science; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08053789813639248,"score_gpt":0.3683248004075697,"score_spread":0.2877869022711772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408671627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57389647,0.0012233126,0.22907487,0.019591562,0.0002407589,0.00013597755,0.00016746782,0.0001245837,0.175545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98949414,0.00025525797,0.0071094655,0.00027513347,0.00007368907,0.000060492952,0.000018465627,0.000013392992,0.0026999458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974322,0.0016437888,0.000047793,0.0002538152,0.00032092564,0.0003015076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934025,0.0069441153,0.0016647591,0.00051227235,0.0006596931,0.00087893795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00355503,0.00040629334,0.0006395601,0.0007862872,0.00135972,0.0030629581,0.0011507077,0.0022709009,0.004635998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012438935,0.00026438906,0.000448833,0.0006595681,0.004865951,0.0043149013,0.0019185334,0.0015086412,0.00049482065],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009548749,0.00007187216,0.002232994,0.000048227797,0.000019295689,0.0002146611,0.0011059183,0.02220392,0.00062116765,0.96488136,0.0012372867,0.0072679124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009438874,0.00007365942,0.0008859977,0.000032589836,0.000014463598,0.00007950937,0.0007836995,0.0926949,0.00022213395,0.9016943,0.0034013602,0.000023039083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015686674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012134422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004635998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015039594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010720938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018801033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408673641","doi":"10.1177/23780231251325087","title":"Is Deliberate Control of Behavior Rare? A Test of the Automaticity Dominance Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Automaticity; Dominance (genetics); Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09713466724638853,"score_gpt":0.4815670303926619,"score_spread":0.3844323631462734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408673641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98360586,0.00006679801,0.007681866,0.0006950595,0.000021483647,0.00003592899,0.000048795024,0.000022775133,0.007821474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991142,0.00001162847,0.00063169654,0.00006342402,0.00002191395,0.00001575993,0.000023631712,0.0000048044167,0.00011287991],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97847867,0.011118677,0.0011895688,0.0036319245,0.004094987,0.0014861727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6961577,0.23196067,0.028869849,0.033454265,0.004683298,0.0048742685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021092454,0.00041402434,0.0008471996,0.0013672716,0.0013939928,0.0024018313,0.0010958085,0.001147184,0.0040784073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09599493,0.00043354242,0.00077992294,0.0006623618,0.006500869,0.005399179,0.0035195516,0.001731979,0.00022915183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004503626,0.0021116505,0.82273036,0.00025128145,0.0006747793,0.0011595105,0.01333104,0.004879699,0.01206186,0.06495383,0.0008202515,0.07252218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038398415,0.002424095,0.82217836,0.000061431834,0.00021092067,0.0020412714,0.006253445,0.053588063,0.004293868,0.106149964,0.0022485892,0.00016598607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018854224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088873046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021092454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007207436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000963972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1115489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409036799","doi":"10.1101/2025.03.26.645562","title":"A Context-Free Model of Savings in Motor Learning","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université de Montréal; Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.029026584302687078,"score_gpt":0.27434480575466197,"score_spread":0.2453182214519749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409036799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88311243,0.00017858167,0.10819295,0.0010552988,0.000041894036,0.000021343452,0.00021490686,0.00024882745,0.00693374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581796,0.00004192987,0.0018202036,0.000025453783,0.00000754353,0.00001617128,0.000027833355,0.000017108789,0.002225658],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998281,0.00004971732,0.000009051995,0.00004773823,0.000022793616,0.00004260687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941564,0.00025344273,0.00011102545,0.000073759205,0.00006799873,0.000078109166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005739543,0.00036857434,0.0005403251,0.00034514905,0.0002906778,0.0005653104,0.000928376,0.00074223126,0.0042283777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002342527,0.00037957195,0.0004352209,0.00019685196,0.0009062657,0.0011120442,0.0006795543,0.0008212231,0.00022701068],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017028188,0.00007811963,0.0018729498,0.000039162554,0.000050008955,0.00022100682,0.000096643125,0.9232102,0.0068971533,0.057511564,0.0006614688,0.009191528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074503973,0.000023198723,0.00053430436,0.0000023500843,0.000004926155,0.000017698025,0.0000050210874,0.9812825,0.00025415557,0.0177731,0.000089954745,0.0000053507897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006274137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005450438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006274137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090135826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005269716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014145374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409591450","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123184","title":"Adaptive significance of winner and loser effects: rank-dependent optimal behaviour","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Biology; Mathematics; Zoology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.018395887049344497,"score_gpt":0.31301912154011985,"score_spread":0.2946232344907754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409591450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882973,0.0002663912,0.0038659147,0.00022089071,0.000019303518,0.000034925328,0.000050403196,0.000021557375,0.007223455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979417,0.000036473517,0.0012894263,0.000075491975,0.000008904256,0.000017571123,0.000031576517,0.0000053364706,0.00059357006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868864,0.0004953924,0.00006788338,0.00026758524,0.00034113685,0.00013947987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996933,0.0009721728,0.00080613594,0.00045752802,0.00026714618,0.0005640393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960676,0.00027979692,0.0003927778,0.0002803256,0.00036033572,0.00091893267,0.00039137635,0.00053766294,0.0045381603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00687492,0.00018641354,0.0002928754,0.00009448884,0.0010942536,0.0004013079,0.00066707603,0.0006001244,0.0003360004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026343812,0.0013705435,0.7103797,0.0007714687,0.00071811717,0.0007599106,0.0031868978,0.0031678805,0.13588615,0.010696671,0.0016289005,0.12879933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071586335,0.002178763,0.9782286,0.00003131001,0.00011413637,0.00066583446,0.0006283352,0.004345713,0.0049421852,0.0067880596,0.0019433107,0.00006225646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007683409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013271701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045381603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029426054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028399733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015181601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409707068","doi":"10.1027/2157-3891/a000115","title":"Cooperation and the Mistaken Belief of Human Nature","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Perspectives in Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02526904885610511,"score_gpt":0.45476421569383935,"score_spread":0.42949516683773425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409707068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95593786,0.0013375864,0.002100285,0.009976782,0.00005609719,0.00000822245,0.000023979966,0.000007927462,0.030551275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999225,0.00016809747,0.000101255304,0.00026531838,0.000011110621,0.0000016441988,0.0000032529658,0.0000013590078,0.00022300791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588203,0.0028744678,0.00012359742,0.00026417713,0.00064323033,0.00021252288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505848,0.032570694,0.011373396,0.0018575824,0.0025348742,0.0010785675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008103076,0.00015118357,0.00019462728,0.0009572766,0.0013420805,0.0019879672,0.00052800006,0.0010732572,0.00376866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019154951,0.00014020003,0.00011325316,0.00059677253,0.010220263,0.0016449867,0.0017051031,0.0015972797,0.00020343164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010396495,0.00079662417,0.45417026,0.00059608265,0.00034973616,0.0025159859,0.07503509,0.0018945832,0.0045882273,0.37006235,0.008303082,0.08064833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017401922,0.0004718403,0.60563636,0.00070530846,0.00016430212,0.003237045,0.071739435,0.0064923163,0.0032236744,0.27686512,0.031163905,0.00012662474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021220117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017302897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008103076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012785085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059810304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042853653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409825653","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.13023","title":"Reciprocity over time: Do employees respond more to kind or unkind controls?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.1052311690119982,"score_gpt":0.4608681677826892,"score_spread":0.355636998770691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409825653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99693644,0.0001298229,0.00041023755,0.00041393543,0.000017713619,0.000009671732,0.000027761065,0.000004542787,0.0020499323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994062,0.00005433702,0.000098776065,0.000096628726,0.000013007063,0.0000117227855,0.000020592384,0.0000025718605,0.00029617353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970483,0.0016304484,0.00021330955,0.00040845884,0.0003587551,0.00034078286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95606196,0.019842224,0.015370684,0.00294071,0.0022901911,0.00349437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005997762,0.0001713175,0.00030554697,0.0005088448,0.00063760066,0.0016536053,0.00031112204,0.0008532225,0.003956454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033916347,0.00018368523,0.00023454403,0.00036403106,0.0010137603,0.0011682577,0.0007835899,0.0009754628,0.0004363564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018809991,0.00089870574,0.90144974,0.00023395517,0.0002911605,0.00019557569,0.016057706,0.0008410218,0.0062457314,0.0030223215,0.0015233376,0.06735975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004571835,0.000455347,0.9818324,0.00005683406,0.0000782261,0.000085282394,0.010122891,0.0010610019,0.0007116155,0.0037997987,0.0016994658,0.000051408693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009765648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013806446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005997762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046727326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003269606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031719565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410031814","doi":"10.1080/09638180.2025.2497318","title":"The Effects of Control Systems on Cooperation under Environmental Risk","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Accounting Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Georgia State University","keywords":"Accounting; Business; Control (management); Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Management","score_opus":0.00892919817595741,"score_gpt":0.2824338748732476,"score_spread":0.2735046766972902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410031814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8354574,0.009334246,0.082570106,0.0043619615,0.00019711225,0.00024636378,0.000118418866,0.00009228462,0.067622155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965199,0.00071869814,0.0021831,0.000088982924,0.000028284825,0.000045762572,0.000013499193,0.000004123414,0.00039763685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892508,0.0068962793,0.00053600053,0.00096226664,0.0015592773,0.00079545967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376784,0.04129256,0.011780624,0.0054213824,0.0026163314,0.0012106744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011249529,0.00057181035,0.00042142606,0.00080144603,0.0008220362,0.0022474236,0.0007763814,0.0011028243,0.0044111162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036802243,0.00023885237,0.0007701981,0.0004363764,0.0049280045,0.0024636725,0.0022233212,0.0010929175,0.00014929987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018122761,0.0010233761,0.058596835,0.002208377,0.001300007,0.0004936821,0.0038247905,0.061713777,0.006910652,0.6031696,0.0013339375,0.25761262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008026913,0.0048798136,0.24190684,0.0015826232,0.00168111,0.0006148854,0.0035041547,0.091985315,0.011797416,0.6156099,0.025366584,0.00026865993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019102031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010662687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011249529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019075105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010034972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0594939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410178042","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-08956-5_778-1","title":"Dictatorship Game","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.048605921862135075,"score_gpt":0.335247285034747,"score_spread":0.2866413631726119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410178042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008950573,0.00026922286,0.024991397,0.0016195436,0.00016262056,0.000061393635,0.00024230994,0.00006632653,0.96363664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20294666,0.00061751896,0.009237916,0.0006356725,0.00011592856,0.00020938166,0.00028577461,0.00007377179,0.7858774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974805,0.00009767824,0.000008787622,0.000051188013,0.000057692578,0.000036600257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961334,0.00022701014,0.000018948089,0.000061068306,0.00003708101,0.00004262714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031483933,0.00045832118,0.0003405207,0.00027020287,0.00078415236,0.0015101942,0.0008077895,0.0010579781,0.062644094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015283696,0.00017472266,0.0002880248,0.00025618126,0.00095821416,0.0017249574,0.000732235,0.0015895405,0.009152425],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003598716,0.00003432871,0.00007327678,0.00003508961,0.0000048558163,0.000038589078,0.00008685807,0.0016193112,0.0006441402,0.9570859,0.023778407,0.016563278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004604658,0.00003909183,0.0002927065,0.000041152627,0.000006870824,0.00015056352,0.00008225272,0.011067221,0.00092434924,0.82241917,0.16491552,0.000014991824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011702017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018371247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062644094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010860303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077129103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2095654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410186731","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.13045","title":"The effects of relative performance information on subsequent cooperation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.053700948116878484,"score_gpt":0.39188115625753844,"score_spread":0.33818020814065997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410186731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906793,0.000055124296,0.0011537019,0.00015958444,0.000012621139,0.000026474389,0.000036415793,0.000018547027,0.007858258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989429,0.000022515054,0.0005363185,0.000028589553,0.000006910594,0.000022381679,0.000024862828,0.000005006545,0.00041053904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653435,0.0018232666,0.00015594372,0.00041666644,0.0007467857,0.0003229864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634664,0.021122474,0.0076544825,0.0038951733,0.0012918449,0.0025696452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004952096,0.0004594447,0.00043111914,0.00061157165,0.00075348385,0.0012171117,0.0005495127,0.0006423999,0.0053801183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035043526,0.0002187216,0.00022361435,0.0002905232,0.0009762667,0.0009383556,0.0018813189,0.0013392459,0.00042535653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013603286,0.015095387,0.44718397,0.0009133188,0.00072643143,0.0014761954,0.011555401,0.018259741,0.18009627,0.02810156,0.0030498723,0.27993843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002957166,0.013450565,0.92625344,0.00014557896,0.0002841488,0.0005117147,0.0038935794,0.013900254,0.021518014,0.01612483,0.0034520114,0.00017022276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007696563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071004283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053801183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068841386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004878871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026189566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410360687","doi":"10.1287/msom.2023.0667","title":"Hold Me Accountable: Anonymity and Prosocial Behavior in Services","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Accountability; Anonymity; Business; Reputation; Service provider; Service (business); Context (archaeology); Service delivery framework; Internet privacy; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Computer security; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01493968084504089,"score_gpt":0.30828200145923024,"score_spread":0.29334232061418936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410360687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5759335,0.0041589285,0.07516534,0.24215014,0.0006830621,0.00037936913,0.00075413974,0.0001330338,0.10064251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929947,0.0004365598,0.0019378146,0.0025440305,0.00013838183,0.00011147834,0.000055007233,0.000014268083,0.0017676501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.982701,0.01168363,0.0005105646,0.0022178728,0.0015695086,0.0013174335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9090232,0.059630387,0.019465216,0.0041148798,0.0034032918,0.0043629943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012152293,0.0004980426,0.0006400497,0.0011385623,0.0057466924,0.0047851284,0.0014989168,0.003791423,0.009983005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062409643,0.00035691858,0.0006850855,0.0019224288,0.011207796,0.01005096,0.00569186,0.004987506,0.00064980786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056221633,0.001094582,0.2930085,0.00071190635,0.0003985922,0.0015495772,0.04722378,0.006249223,0.0008309855,0.46903586,0.028715435,0.15061933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015480672,0.0003899918,0.1492035,0.0007380685,0.00020173973,0.0015992004,0.04621588,0.026530024,0.0006861035,0.730874,0.043189213,0.00021740102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012834056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076540406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012834056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049254196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003820333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06426829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410776748","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000435","title":"Punitive but discerning: Reputation can fuel ambiguously deserved punishment, but does not erode sensitivity to nuance.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Punishment (psychology); Reputation; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07255980093789548,"score_gpt":0.4054868470078657,"score_spread":0.3329270460699702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410776748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63475436,0.0016980515,0.014894228,0.015099499,0.00058053364,0.00007485783,0.00039478714,0.00020199052,0.33230168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993654,0.00013937597,0.0013389322,0.0005815265,0.00003958072,0.000010448791,0.000029894709,0.000019516072,0.0041867513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867564,0.00055735384,0.00007024207,0.00028069457,0.00028651755,0.00012945839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98478127,0.0047005774,0.0056820144,0.0023918601,0.0007651919,0.0016791269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022239105,0.0002595158,0.00039279743,0.00033602346,0.0011640437,0.0030814265,0.00044627604,0.0017244426,0.027884219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020481817,0.00018200303,0.00021373507,0.00042397447,0.0033692617,0.0029642829,0.0015901717,0.0015652119,0.001967402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002551914,0.0014476887,0.13010834,0.0011115142,0.00039414433,0.0020336884,0.007435295,0.0023095773,0.032757957,0.5047055,0.03950463,0.27563968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040041367,0.0019228912,0.49074808,0.00082453585,0.0004644193,0.003083423,0.0064540715,0.0073109525,0.012723913,0.405791,0.06998762,0.00028876826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011292149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023386234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027884219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007684303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006957677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093281984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411078709","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdaf041","title":"Complexity and Satisficing: Theory with Evidence from Chess","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Satisficing; Maximization; Blueprint; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Perception; Economics; Bounded rationality; Contrast (vision); Choice set; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.1629066491083325,"score_gpt":0.43027809926617006,"score_spread":0.2673714501578376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411078709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76069456,0.008011837,0.16483371,0.013950908,0.00014669873,0.00012594371,0.0008722955,0.00013580205,0.051228218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98903555,0.0011397267,0.008412642,0.0004924817,0.00008458079,0.0000409856,0.00022915067,0.00002017329,0.0005447801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586856,0.002320445,0.00021545064,0.00056871725,0.0008422444,0.00018458441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8588565,0.119804956,0.009658684,0.0065002763,0.003953097,0.0012264577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008495122,0.00069068006,0.0015239002,0.0025012586,0.0007216051,0.0034033565,0.001987726,0.0018143868,0.011697264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0850313,0.00071443745,0.0010421303,0.0025111013,0.0059150914,0.0068085347,0.0023079924,0.0030555339,0.0005942791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096799975,0.0004848945,0.07707134,0.0011544807,0.00057274307,0.0005982591,0.0014627856,0.08323212,0.0013333913,0.7631093,0.0041729007,0.06583986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010240901,0.00011094903,0.023971409,0.00013022755,0.00006636875,0.00015843699,0.00028310894,0.09355069,0.00028575773,0.87951505,0.001770188,0.00005535753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040234984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002379784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011697264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001887033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006923886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04492706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411090032","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.05.011","title":"Favor exchange with private costs: An experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province; Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Economics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.0261088493348279,"score_gpt":0.3270830712383528,"score_spread":0.3009742219035249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411090032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98790413,0.000080283244,0.0021401036,0.0010223143,0.00025670996,0.0007710385,0.0002751203,0.000054114807,0.0074962606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817784,0.00015218918,0.006093872,0.001024579,0.00024743954,0.0019091994,0.00032042898,0.000059602342,0.008414292],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963965,0.0017387614,0.00026904212,0.0005463523,0.0005718825,0.00047741327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93516004,0.050402682,0.0037037598,0.0070128264,0.0006248187,0.003095838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074625257,0.002276084,0.0021155765,0.00070798775,0.0018805858,0.0031051948,0.0027798992,0.006122004,0.023186777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040135793,0.0012461155,0.0009063887,0.00069398625,0.0036282316,0.004128312,0.0021724955,0.0050521237,0.002028244],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.22096996,0.51246953,0.022328727,0.002117315,0.0016012845,0.0012149948,0.0047112443,0.018187042,0.06531169,0.0830088,0.012561177,0.055518195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.27644318,0.21194516,0.041438304,0.0003531406,0.002128413,0.0014995814,0.003422895,0.1534,0.024496956,0.2677822,0.016326377,0.0007638749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014432158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095104065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023186777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009481568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001853931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07756746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411336324","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2319942121","title":"Humans program artificial delegates to accurately solve collective-risk dilemmas but lack precision","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Service Public de Wallonie; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Vlaamse regering; European Commission; Vlaamse Overheid; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS","keywords":"Delegate; Delegation; Public good; Computer science; Computer security; Dilemma; Test (biology); Order (exchange); Action (physics); Artificial intelligence; Public relations; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.14688977266979059,"score_gpt":0.4337349156709368,"score_spread":0.2868451430011462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411336324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764563,0.00015062065,0.10137712,0.0012121781,0.000069340924,0.000118875054,0.000038099613,0.00037978703,0.020197725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788437,0.000048994265,0.018086145,0.00025184287,0.00001342681,0.00010963573,0.000031482417,0.000052252002,0.0025624577],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643075,0.0019883544,0.00015887921,0.00058001734,0.00056857127,0.000273317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844862,0.0074449354,0.0025712266,0.00416769,0.00052679435,0.00080315367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003955905,0.0007024723,0.00043056204,0.00028755426,0.00059911545,0.001847317,0.0009293185,0.0011692161,0.005227024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02518106,0.00039569248,0.00033726922,0.00020028025,0.002788332,0.002463914,0.0024423446,0.001596093,0.0011131989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027457392,0.0025919988,0.08017798,0.0013149655,0.000710501,0.00066093664,0.014126491,0.18263821,0.2453288,0.21879895,0.0067502726,0.24415524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010993587,0.0041741855,0.05603428,0.00028669296,0.0002265926,0.0010201497,0.00550712,0.42225283,0.08910931,0.36501947,0.054929573,0.00034052355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058129657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041705408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005227024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005581835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069228007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020921052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411374651","doi":"10.1145/3724389.3731280","title":"Fairness in Student Allocation and Group Formation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Group (periodic table); Chemistry","score_opus":0.022755742341085038,"score_gpt":0.37013514819958976,"score_spread":0.34737940585850474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411374651","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09938592,0.0011943264,0.7681869,0.016045338,0.0012827154,0.0065973448,0.00023576627,0.00041280288,0.10665889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7312362,0.000499703,0.22788537,0.002498658,0.0004088356,0.01092925,0.00015055174,0.00017848275,0.02621282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.6824652,0.2741103,0.007850152,0.013516972,0.017317459,0.0047399807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6299501,0.2371042,0.024595883,0.07443578,0.027053116,0.0068608923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20261869,0.0007963615,0.0012349742,0.0018587213,0.0048369784,0.006531918,0.0035054535,0.0024604579,0.012144217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39992708,0.00061981945,0.0008672622,0.001772465,0.009645392,0.00610309,0.008871997,0.0028792105,0.0026632242],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000992237,0.0005136414,0.025411207,0.00048802345,0.00017095232,0.00012345663,0.027203629,0.0057470463,0.0014160915,0.616122,0.010848525,0.31096318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053084886,0.0009815063,0.012852842,0.0008864144,0.00008825701,0.00021123028,0.0069894376,0.025879644,0.0050510033,0.8332309,0.11313776,0.00016013715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022026699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035720717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20261869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005689526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010829548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98331314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411613247","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10022","title":"The value of dignity appeals: evidence from a social media experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Dignity; Value (mathematics); Social media; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.3605461873580664,"score_gpt":0.6342577987349004,"score_spread":0.27371161137683403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411613247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899636,0.0000771541,0.0005762965,0.0006497074,0.000046017863,0.00012943351,0.000074652984,0.000009758165,0.008473382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982502,0.000063234795,0.000427366,0.00027491344,0.000049519753,0.00013100168,0.00002984187,0.000004277866,0.0007696569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915897,0.0064514275,0.0002733379,0.00057971216,0.000851776,0.00025402417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7735854,0.19655696,0.018852117,0.0064509776,0.0014286292,0.0031258862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011370491,0.0003883631,0.00045622216,0.00062518247,0.0011029368,0.0021540462,0.00064360345,0.0014921436,0.009081823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060742028,0.00034649714,0.00050616026,0.00038950972,0.0022889553,0.0016806441,0.001145305,0.0021161947,0.0007652427],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.092792235,0.12437315,0.5354584,0.0017322496,0.001951175,0.0011636324,0.016134467,0.005498721,0.025967892,0.039731417,0.006362097,0.1488346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010675213,0.056321792,0.81402886,0.00053142116,0.0022459694,0.00072234275,0.010754165,0.03418025,0.014805462,0.04346319,0.01197876,0.00029261733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015808368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001129522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011370491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005331239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004379007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060133636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411720560","doi":"10.1007/s11002-025-09782-6","title":"Giving time or money: which altruism feels more effective?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Economics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.009920219426447057,"score_gpt":0.30366599512433196,"score_spread":0.2937457756978849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411720560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91033226,0.0010830228,0.0016727115,0.03820402,0.00059669645,0.00004723912,0.00007144038,0.000033636545,0.04795899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953745,0.0001918464,0.00051631336,0.0019694087,0.000094290306,0.000019205187,0.000011102471,0.000019984733,0.0018033332],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580836,0.0031587332,0.000099657766,0.0001990588,0.00034404415,0.00039007026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644952,0.020111702,0.0066211945,0.0017936141,0.0014223846,0.0055560074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006695521,0.00020022833,0.00046080176,0.00047899832,0.001268202,0.0029384885,0.0005247261,0.0021244485,0.016180836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028539352,0.00020851754,0.00032399758,0.00038599037,0.002774201,0.0019162849,0.0007111426,0.0023102984,0.0009973813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014316081,0.013386171,0.25473177,0.001706136,0.0011192892,0.0008469143,0.01915006,0.0017459481,0.016436035,0.11919286,0.03839364,0.51897514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046109487,0.006573331,0.5755412,0.0014070991,0.0019073167,0.0013787954,0.076590285,0.009101204,0.010350911,0.25314206,0.059015382,0.00038144132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009138541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014890444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016180836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000983062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012251269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054130316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411907836","doi":"10.1002/mar.70001","title":"Charity Without Choice: The Impact of Receiving Prosocial Gifts on Subsequent Donations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology and Marketing","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Donation; Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Business; Psychology; Internet privacy; Advertising; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.046417958829953726,"score_gpt":0.44519199731215914,"score_spread":0.3987740384822054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411907836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977011,0.00009052966,0.00014327021,0.0001950388,0.0000206602,0.0000126024,0.000016355616,0.000008863649,0.0018114664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922764,0.000048257127,0.00017991874,0.000049935385,0.000008667023,0.000023570785,0.0000139847525,0.000003423351,0.00044450848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640465,0.002399597,0.00013353878,0.00021994955,0.00046208274,0.0003802015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96976537,0.017516518,0.0059795436,0.0017788052,0.0008485727,0.004111221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00464987,0.00027448186,0.00049797946,0.00034488426,0.0007556497,0.001121701,0.00041940357,0.0006871697,0.0074569574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032568105,0.00016991064,0.0005119589,0.00025331235,0.001143431,0.0007067898,0.0011699119,0.0019093989,0.000375181],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03613211,0.087339655,0.5254431,0.0010618162,0.0013786157,0.001096401,0.01075115,0.0061965478,0.022382792,0.013367141,0.003549813,0.29130095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009214402,0.0139278695,0.9554232,0.0002582411,0.00055203115,0.00041509717,0.0049171885,0.0041035526,0.0070130844,0.007886223,0.0044728685,0.00010919871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010493885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011044783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074569574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000642627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009208925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024946034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412080656","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/aud8f_v3","title":"Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends, or crowds in independent and interdependent societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Templeton World Charity Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Deliberation; Interdependence; Crowds; Intuition; Computer science; Microeconomics; Management science; Social psychology; Operations research; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Computer security; Cognitive science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.05523990913794385,"score_gpt":0.4018443127589726,"score_spread":0.34660440362102873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412080656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994311,0.000006542758,0.00008447638,0.000010910896,0.0000010175395,0.0000080959035,0.0000050305775,5.085206e-7,0.0004522691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992729,0.000012995385,0.00039446278,0.000020526664,0.0000012164203,0.000019522453,0.000012878327,0.0000012174381,0.00026417393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979249,0.00123131,0.00012804287,0.0003414965,0.00023067088,0.00014357129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888981,0.0075665335,0.0013522673,0.0009913506,0.00041222238,0.0007795022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050897365,0.00028420915,0.00035049554,0.0003895396,0.00080595264,0.0018078905,0.00033590768,0.00056344544,0.002210771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017408725,0.00030461533,0.00032847183,0.00025905645,0.0018872019,0.0011967329,0.0010838659,0.0008738946,0.0002513286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008704564,0.0061659208,0.7200688,0.00040618112,0.00038163623,0.0006457754,0.15470405,0.0055385986,0.025846485,0.007982004,0.0009917024,0.0685643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011277732,0.0077218954,0.8521283,0.000121110206,0.00027311328,0.0005230133,0.09000692,0.016846487,0.008822088,0.01751169,0.00465709,0.0002604274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025328998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053811925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050897365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046360167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003894301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026917398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412104302","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106727","title":"Wealth or generosity? People choose partners based on whichever is more variable","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution and Human Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generosity; Variable (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03886751981084279,"score_gpt":0.38259715038394015,"score_spread":0.34372963057309736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412104302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878336,0.00031196422,0.0014384993,0.0008718984,0.000016617056,0.00000882165,0.000028999322,0.0000041943395,0.00948535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869674,0.000100487494,0.0004653499,0.00019906527,0.0000068567538,0.000005628278,0.000011957626,0.0000014443258,0.0005124131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963856,0.00020802922,0.0000138049645,0.00005300338,0.0000490246,0.000037548052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985909,0.0006159145,0.0003849912,0.00012846713,0.0000770856,0.00020263034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010956231,0.00016886886,0.0001986263,0.00028067647,0.0003143001,0.0011451795,0.0001346856,0.0006158911,0.0050821197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045714225,0.00014156029,0.00012774128,0.00017225,0.0010918992,0.001144632,0.0004911314,0.00035977145,0.00033608946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001879934,0.0005301172,0.7764213,0.0003506117,0.00045095658,0.00066001463,0.0137316,0.0011870037,0.026214125,0.03336638,0.0018738545,0.14333418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022992377,0.00090455357,0.8911752,0.0001692765,0.00020300572,0.0013008218,0.016712636,0.003196189,0.004133871,0.07364793,0.00821422,0.0001123703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037185804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005508179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050821197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014712603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010146086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01700139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412410554","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/aud8f_v4","title":"Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends, or crowds in independent and interdependent societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Templeton World Charity Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Deliberation; Interdependence; Intuition; Crowds; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Social science; Philosophy; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.05523990913794385,"score_gpt":0.4018443127589726,"score_spread":0.34660440362102873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412410554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994311,0.000006542758,0.00008447638,0.000010910896,0.0000010175395,0.0000080959035,0.0000050305775,5.085206e-7,0.0004522691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992729,0.000012995385,0.00039446278,0.000020526664,0.0000012164203,0.000019522453,0.000012878327,0.0000012174381,0.00026417393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979249,0.00123131,0.00012804287,0.0003414965,0.00023067088,0.00014357129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888981,0.0075665335,0.0013522673,0.0009913506,0.00041222238,0.0007795022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050897365,0.00028420915,0.00035049554,0.0003895396,0.00080595264,0.0018078905,0.00033590768,0.00056344544,0.002210771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017408725,0.00030461533,0.00032847183,0.00025905645,0.0018872019,0.0011967329,0.0010838659,0.0008738946,0.0002513286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008704564,0.0061659208,0.7200688,0.00040618112,0.00038163623,0.0006457754,0.15470405,0.0055385986,0.025846485,0.007982004,0.0009917024,0.0685643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011277732,0.0077218954,0.8521283,0.000121110206,0.00027311328,0.0005230133,0.09000692,0.016846487,0.008822088,0.01751169,0.00465709,0.0002604274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025328998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053811925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050897365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046360167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003894301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026917398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412566572","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197754931.013.0003","title":"Reciprocity among Equals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04724669885625556,"score_gpt":0.2743864631000088,"score_spread":0.22713976424375323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412566572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012547019,0.0024835553,0.016695531,0.0066150595,0.0003077283,0.000040953113,0.00006560349,0.000023398246,0.96122116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.855396,0.0038239036,0.006386598,0.002214672,0.00044658512,0.00016129277,0.00012297007,0.000047325568,0.13140069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951159,0.00299904,0.00012335919,0.0005471513,0.00084496464,0.00036959886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693066,0.0018317245,0.00020247855,0.00050238625,0.00039640674,0.00013630166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033679632,0.00027154604,0.00039779555,0.0007739747,0.0022224698,0.004282838,0.0005989222,0.0013297969,0.016877726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061773495,0.00017275265,0.00027738148,0.00069565594,0.008811213,0.0058540055,0.0026856344,0.0018374859,0.0018873321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016812364,0.0000020186944,0.000029088651,0.000008330081,0.0000010152946,0.000007210494,0.00028289235,0.000042416636,0.000016819622,0.99674326,0.0010071516,0.001858161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046899204,0.000009343616,0.00016196945,0.000070540904,0.0000036687366,0.00006112066,0.0004617371,0.00019846276,0.00010091278,0.89116997,0.107752815,0.0000047282997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081183034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062951166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016877726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021071616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011227605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05646169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412615791","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18080408","title":"Social Preference Parameters Impacting Financial Decisions Among Welfare Recipients","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Florida International University","keywords":"Preference; Welfare; Social Welfare; Economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Business; Public economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.037437234931028636,"score_gpt":0.32153172216626025,"score_spread":0.2840944872352316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412615791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99930406,0.000012254958,0.000072855124,0.000054242468,0.0000017210542,0.000006040319,0.000009230259,5.682084e-7,0.0005390491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997212,0.000014748853,0.00007400466,0.000025344469,0.0000016567967,0.00000723072,0.000009573732,3.3194826e-7,0.00014584386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989467,0.0007029911,0.000046793255,0.00005606094,0.00009630616,0.00015113347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586725,0.002119825,0.0011096093,0.00017523074,0.00020857445,0.0005194694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026161713,0.00023818329,0.00021159364,0.00041461998,0.0006675925,0.0010197049,0.00013828019,0.0004807083,0.0035898755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00861802,0.000097221404,0.00029476735,0.00020734189,0.0005442218,0.0004275493,0.00056028896,0.000529841,0.00019868331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028742503,0.0059892153,0.93360305,0.000071942064,0.00023665371,0.00025822927,0.004202776,0.0011573643,0.0076308143,0.002033804,0.0004488126,0.041493054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009535833,0.0021737695,0.97975516,0.000036062804,0.00010739385,0.00015136728,0.009682076,0.003182785,0.0015050549,0.0024562355,0.0008097445,0.000045081597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017822363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026648296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035898755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045071926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037628764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013835788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412640778","doi":"10.1002/hrm.70004","title":"Why Bonuses Promote Deviant Behaviors: A Self‐Determination Theory Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Resource Management","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Curtin University of Technology","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02116686199029308,"score_gpt":0.34562232257775083,"score_spread":0.3244554605874578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412640778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671651,0.00065143796,0.007027667,0.004821409,0.000041712126,0.000055072825,0.000031751624,0.000021124772,0.020184744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987972,0.00011084295,0.0006017574,0.00014515469,0.000008184921,0.000012282009,0.0000040504774,0.0000027568228,0.00031775777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969869,0.0019308412,0.00007656346,0.00023124949,0.00046276214,0.00031168928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780809,0.014339447,0.0037885178,0.0007062722,0.0016799666,0.0014048605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005256794,0.00038685513,0.00031883406,0.001427472,0.00084717333,0.002471406,0.0005870722,0.0010391898,0.0032327962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015970852,0.00026602173,0.0004153207,0.0004108707,0.0033985563,0.0009822915,0.0009264589,0.0013053718,0.00015255465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031531785,0.0024801507,0.7189728,0.00041036506,0.00030112814,0.00065529573,0.014957903,0.0036454604,0.004044285,0.16300984,0.001823883,0.08938363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001011272,0.0011273182,0.77503663,0.0005347747,0.0001839891,0.0006075124,0.016534308,0.020449176,0.0041971263,0.17183937,0.009271139,0.00011750017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001736945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021953438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005256794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013340032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013661204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027800858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412658315","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/aud8f_v5","title":"Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends, or crowds in independent and interdependent societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Templeton World Charity Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Deliberation; Intuition; Interdependence; Crowds; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Cognitive science; Social science; Philosophy; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.05523990913794385,"score_gpt":0.4018443127589726,"score_spread":0.34660440362102873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412658315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994311,0.000006542758,0.00008447638,0.000010910896,0.0000010175395,0.0000080959035,0.0000050305775,5.085206e-7,0.0004522691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992729,0.000012995385,0.00039446278,0.000020526664,0.0000012164203,0.000019522453,0.000012878327,0.0000012174381,0.00026417393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979249,0.00123131,0.00012804287,0.0003414965,0.00023067088,0.00014357129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888981,0.0075665335,0.0013522673,0.0009913506,0.00041222238,0.0007795022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050897365,0.00028420915,0.00035049554,0.0003895396,0.00080595264,0.0018078905,0.00033590768,0.00056344544,0.002210771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017408725,0.00030461533,0.00032847183,0.00025905645,0.0018872019,0.0011967329,0.0010838659,0.0008738946,0.0002513286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008704564,0.0061659208,0.7200688,0.00040618112,0.00038163623,0.0006457754,0.15470405,0.0055385986,0.025846485,0.007982004,0.0009917024,0.0685643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011277732,0.0077218954,0.8521283,0.000121110206,0.00027311328,0.0005230133,0.09000692,0.016846487,0.008822088,0.01751169,0.00465709,0.0002604274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025328998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053811925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050897365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046360167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003894301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026917398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412659037","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107114","title":"When does coordination require centralization? The roles of organizational inertia and diversity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Inertia; Economic geography; Political science; Economics; Physics; Classical mechanics; Law","score_opus":0.013424498466577513,"score_gpt":0.2831569604268989,"score_spread":0.2697324619603214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412659037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77536166,0.0029467344,0.07250035,0.039463103,0.00031410318,0.00029386408,0.00020885128,0.0002631153,0.108648345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995344,0.00022355738,0.0031334835,0.00047812102,0.00010844035,0.00006134422,0.000019101344,0.000026983105,0.0006049252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98771054,0.005755783,0.0007061231,0.002184578,0.0013759242,0.0022669865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9013485,0.05068181,0.02624676,0.008117379,0.0051443432,0.00846112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01720893,0.00052798743,0.001093633,0.0014765532,0.002754058,0.007878045,0.0013660548,0.003054684,0.0063829897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06355309,0.00065927836,0.0006968321,0.0017480613,0.006514026,0.0137009295,0.005029664,0.0024918588,0.0006115597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013115527,0.0005645573,0.0706989,0.00093578006,0.0003810682,0.00084985857,0.004929863,0.027732525,0.006124633,0.78651834,0.008641031,0.09131196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009148495,0.0006872314,0.07774085,0.0005295836,0.0002164149,0.0005329996,0.0072459956,0.028613545,0.0035491737,0.86179614,0.018037174,0.00013607123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018669651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001579379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01720893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041884067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039374563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09101063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412864943","doi":"10.1257/mic.20220362","title":"Asymmetric Players in a Meritocracy: A Case for Affirmative Action","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Affirmative action; Economics; Microeconomics; Subsidy; Welfare; Meritocracy; Population; Action (physics); Labour economics; Infinitesimal; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029464623530957704,"score_gpt":0.38607949353434196,"score_spread":0.35661487000338427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412864943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42911717,0.00060378155,0.17997122,0.04642154,0.0004260013,0.00044974065,0.0006807234,0.00013290519,0.3421969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96776205,0.0001639142,0.010315599,0.0016620081,0.00014278402,0.0001515272,0.0000463715,0.000023299961,0.019732362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645305,0.0016614471,0.00008397667,0.0005375222,0.00046162202,0.000802437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290824,0.0032239002,0.0013317994,0.000781915,0.00032611482,0.0014280772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045354404,0.0007230972,0.0015597764,0.00076321774,0.002848074,0.005700945,0.0024729948,0.005674055,0.01890129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014326091,0.0003831449,0.0011621469,0.0006845353,0.0076579964,0.0049839723,0.003802375,0.005018028,0.0014611343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011183025,0.00008916438,0.0012986914,0.000024636465,0.000021724092,0.00030619887,0.00039654455,0.0076069264,0.00027931994,0.98399943,0.0018403408,0.004025248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016609546,0.000045836354,0.0005917514,0.000031724914,0.000016899474,0.00010757588,0.0003541025,0.031113265,0.000081691025,0.96291465,0.004551144,0.00002535414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005569497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056558414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01890129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002677497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018481419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06323111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413111888","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2025.1355","title":"Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends or crowds in independent and interdependent societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Templeton World Charity Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Deliberation; Interdependence; Intuition; Crowds; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Cognitive science; Computer security; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04492568425113917,"score_gpt":0.3567821424441597,"score_spread":0.3118564581930205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413111888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979013,0.000011788692,0.000019693622,0.0000052870473,5.4361004e-7,0.0000027369942,0.00001763198,3.7115836e-7,0.00015182936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995515,0.000019517991,0.00008075968,0.000012298859,8.366765e-7,0.000008335724,0.000035712976,6.031409e-7,0.00029056065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996019,0.0001842449,0.000035595833,0.00006425589,0.000048856367,0.00006509739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985843,0.00063176284,0.0003407286,0.00009922219,0.00009170079,0.00025239674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010191784,0.00026593296,0.00023576934,0.00042633506,0.0007317108,0.000845846,0.00015419464,0.0002889134,0.0033007322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032917135,0.00023035599,0.00022784097,0.00031649997,0.00073029107,0.00048570416,0.0007111053,0.00047303614,0.0005487078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086381263,0.0004832911,0.95093787,0.000057972207,0.000087863016,0.00025257812,0.02759429,0.00026965866,0.0011154194,0.00033572176,0.00049993733,0.017501622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008692194,0.0009018368,0.9526255,0.000030323305,0.00005504609,0.00056097127,0.04120838,0.0013407542,0.00059457944,0.00087869086,0.0016769012,0.000040092164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004612807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009668051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004612807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002548516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019152643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0110420585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413217522","doi":"10.1287/stsc.2025.0402","title":"Experiments by “Visionaries”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategy Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Resource (disambiguation); Value (mathematics); Business; Face (sociological concept); Industrial organization; Limited resources; Marketing; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03551210239698939,"score_gpt":0.40909963596384813,"score_spread":0.37358753356685875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413217522","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37505215,0.002067714,0.41503966,0.034194537,0.0014574938,0.0036629667,0.0002788976,0.0008947871,0.16735186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8546653,0.0006165931,0.12523502,0.009222935,0.00036987895,0.0026047328,0.000105171726,0.000105713036,0.0070747277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95965344,0.031145593,0.0010974588,0.003555758,0.003631092,0.00091671327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8573841,0.09458787,0.017659951,0.021206113,0.0049620154,0.004199998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04983129,0.0009055021,0.000791839,0.0011495885,0.0013935454,0.004484151,0.0016448739,0.0037194781,0.0078079132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15283053,0.000797757,0.00075024,0.00060816173,0.006989881,0.005613421,0.002468495,0.0031549567,0.0019106278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031840343,0.0025846586,0.031089418,0.0018604447,0.00074541697,0.00033120767,0.0069203787,0.011136193,0.026102543,0.6458203,0.015268734,0.25495672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002607993,0.0034890466,0.016141122,0.0007860768,0.00044042108,0.00044310262,0.0028412044,0.029391902,0.018197024,0.8039474,0.12135654,0.00035826067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042537437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004325787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04983129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019473158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017077032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26353616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413219892","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2025.102834","title":"Trust, risk, and institutions: experimental evidence from a community of firms in Kenya","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit; Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken; Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; International Development Research Centre; Innovations for Poverty Action","keywords":"Business; Public economics; Economics","score_opus":0.12555823554820497,"score_gpt":0.457059125695773,"score_spread":0.331500890147568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413219892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99932885,0.000030366626,0.000039915867,0.00004704939,7.794849e-7,0.000019438716,0.0000138751575,3.9827918e-7,0.0005192294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994204,0.00006190681,0.00014452869,0.00002366803,0.0000011860092,0.000016100546,0.000024528543,6.2859095e-7,0.00030700694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986576,0.000669136,0.000066965404,0.0001733181,0.00017467144,0.0002582639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820263,0.0106548825,0.0038261514,0.000872555,0.001118858,0.0015012152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003388268,0.0003643366,0.0006914512,0.0010542586,0.0072281705,0.0018427899,0.0008896747,0.0016039213,0.005397595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010434249,0.000472991,0.00025761363,0.0012691844,0.0030911623,0.0018906893,0.0017446423,0.0010588282,0.0004587992],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048246314,0.016580988,0.8682098,0.00031861308,0.0003419522,0.0018713425,0.06532199,0.001169737,0.007116013,0.005317095,0.001050931,0.027876943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000827843,0.0029827922,0.9169074,0.00019571379,0.00029007383,0.00049557374,0.06947533,0.0026391922,0.0015380962,0.0019132682,0.00261063,0.00012413588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08451055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19734612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08451055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002201668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002153864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1680373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413860234","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112569","title":"Revisiting kin and ethnic favoritism in the bribery experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Ethnic group; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.034856522635836176,"score_gpt":0.33458403885738036,"score_spread":0.2997275162215442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413860234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811584,0.0001564254,0.003767096,0.0007215163,0.000081176506,0.00009162912,0.0000744267,0.000027694216,0.01392167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512744,0.000051182276,0.0019056427,0.00045906458,0.000023099094,0.00019975724,0.000027007276,0.000018649838,0.0021880632],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961144,0.0026012913,0.00011712192,0.00048843987,0.0004951761,0.00018362975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867929,0.0072513474,0.0023011407,0.0027722397,0.00031445982,0.0005678564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006338639,0.00058684143,0.00074768055,0.00023856059,0.0009556044,0.00126576,0.0010658792,0.0010093494,0.007924502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016140759,0.00034306443,0.00025660024,0.0002089066,0.0027131592,0.0012722518,0.002238215,0.0022954708,0.00072012877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028680691,0.028133294,0.08142554,0.0016001328,0.0009525533,0.0018618047,0.017429171,0.007849454,0.52334315,0.2233715,0.0049159597,0.080436796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009898764,0.038523026,0.3769811,0.00039386816,0.0014215581,0.0019159407,0.0095927315,0.033356894,0.12953016,0.3499561,0.04766528,0.000764599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009472972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010410685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007924502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053970795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046976685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033522367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414612082","doi":"10.1017/s0266267125100515","title":"Fairness and signalling in bargaining games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Signalling; Identity (music); Stability (learning theory); Line (geometry); Social group; Inequity aversion","score_opus":0.0313745409387773,"score_gpt":0.3025353314807412,"score_spread":0.2711607905419639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414612082","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29755306,0.0014502505,0.5085791,0.012397372,0.000405351,0.00019395295,0.00027079895,0.00019323235,0.17895687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97870857,0.00031141692,0.012342878,0.00033736514,0.00014441932,0.000080434525,0.00003645417,0.000023782251,0.00801467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.992916,0.0046672323,0.00030100383,0.00065592094,0.00077053887,0.0006892497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824771,0.0132133495,0.0017016468,0.0010473069,0.0008982395,0.0006623569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007003809,0.00071874965,0.0011345424,0.0010962308,0.0020917093,0.004605677,0.0013805098,0.0036368023,0.009818409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02614883,0.00053949864,0.00093353476,0.0011327221,0.0054188627,0.0056905565,0.0025827498,0.0028595454,0.0007086185],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051568262,0.000021472817,0.0002510871,0.000031579737,0.000010593869,0.00004712471,0.0002507877,0.015036949,0.00033602817,0.9809233,0.0004055017,0.0026338783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023119866,0.000014094449,0.00012425995,0.000011709832,0.000005766219,0.000020996604,0.000065252054,0.036426283,0.00008615884,0.9624263,0.00078574603,0.000010235201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032184524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001432004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009818409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031973014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016411226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037040174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414838905","doi":"10.1111/caje.70011","title":"Contribution to a public good with altruistic preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Public good; Private good; Consumption (sociology); Social planner; Welfare; Nash equilibrium; Altruism (biology); Inequality","score_opus":0.12251310280822575,"score_gpt":0.24256144914678207,"score_spread":0.12004834633855632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414838905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7358204,0.00025555165,0.110147566,0.005179609,0.00007063025,0.00011399195,0.0002552759,0.00012656275,0.14803039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913531,0.00007362811,0.002645859,0.00008783762,0.000017298316,0.000025719488,0.000016978724,0.0000075402436,0.005772064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976592,0.0014178613,0.000042868898,0.00020536197,0.00031038673,0.00036431113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970962,0.0010710927,0.00054885325,0.0005241112,0.000303343,0.00045642024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023925367,0.00063836284,0.00080928416,0.0006245816,0.0011294828,0.0028409678,0.0010750542,0.0014989076,0.006862393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004646471,0.00036569143,0.0007126555,0.0007080457,0.0030563604,0.0020677329,0.0026395167,0.0011973989,0.0006235232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004006852,0.00031202091,0.003543698,0.00011166565,0.00007788518,0.00041248376,0.00066470006,0.14639051,0.0023233148,0.83741623,0.0020686523,0.0062780906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029464002,0.00024844444,0.0023786938,0.00005962194,0.000087280096,0.00026574804,0.00068730244,0.24888448,0.00084462884,0.7387381,0.0074586375,0.000052411997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045119897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027986825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006862393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003329087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017989288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024154305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414854071","doi":"10.7554/elife.102800.2","title":"Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion can be taught through learning of others’ preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Ultimatum game; Punishment (psychology); Punitive damages; Selfishness; Social preferences; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); Reinforcement learning","score_opus":0.03699038468014477,"score_gpt":0.36486027104730495,"score_spread":0.3278698863671602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414854071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96568286,0.000037737813,0.025351223,0.00067513954,0.000024047578,0.000029496545,0.000028203704,0.00010574761,0.008065504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919367,0.000045861932,0.0066148182,0.00011883184,0.0000054864026,0.000024367822,0.000017682058,0.000009091534,0.0012271856],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966466,0.00013628251,0.000011592733,0.00008983386,0.000052802647,0.000044824264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790764,0.00086731254,0.00048093084,0.00043728075,0.00008499781,0.00022179232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010138511,0.00039262374,0.00024377914,0.00018605289,0.00030033418,0.00079290994,0.0004456103,0.0005319856,0.004622687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00467436,0.00025875802,0.00027194712,0.000109123524,0.0009664462,0.0009221116,0.0009878173,0.0015752871,0.00028327692],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020272897,0.006612638,0.14207691,0.0007346331,0.00046156807,0.0010594336,0.005557914,0.11503537,0.25943303,0.1885762,0.0051321513,0.27329293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040456068,0.0032759525,0.093480684,0.00018437911,0.000283663,0.0006509954,0.0011326898,0.4899134,0.053340007,0.345658,0.011514065,0.00016160842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000716901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009747832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004622687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003124144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042401612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015464485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415043486","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107256","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue in Honor of Jasmina Arifovic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01166225532679006,"score_gpt":0.30562917666413925,"score_spread":0.2939669213373492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415043486","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015432747,0.014086569,0.00072664185,0.08859806,0.8890455,0.000033855882,0.00019081905,0.00011082765,0.0070534237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012454432,0.0088680545,0.0003417921,0.030998018,0.9187665,0.00006124315,0.00022364987,0.00021210092,0.039283123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776006,0.00034570415,0.00021573287,0.0005639621,0.00085679075,0.0002577153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881372,0.0028735304,0.0008773385,0.00052675494,0.0043464783,0.0032386126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036456212,0.0025745425,0.0032102542,0.0026696878,0.0022062284,0.0070321797,0.0022411805,0.0062755467,0.06608452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013338949,0.00056224427,0.0014469677,0.0010176876,0.001313834,0.0048135244,0.0036894772,0.008385504,0.05244596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019204019,0.0000147147,0.00004819853,0.000072195544,0.000005206672,0.00003469942,0.000009613825,0.000018249071,0.00008019115,0.0005889876,0.99042714,0.008681654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001592144,0.000036949747,0.00051036675,0.00016586455,0.000015098949,0.00015528957,0.000032520085,0.0001313545,0.00010513834,0.0017661487,0.9970499,0.000015314654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097291317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017664714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06608452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018561622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023095303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22107476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415945942","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.70019","title":"Contingent Prizes in Dynamic Contests","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Reading","keywords":"CONTEST; Government (linguistics); Rent-seeking; Public choice","score_opus":0.022252633155269128,"score_gpt":0.3352301520164767,"score_spread":0.31297751886120756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415945942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81977487,0.0006647002,0.09615556,0.00581332,0.00056857127,0.0009078999,0.00046457464,0.0004003133,0.075250275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466777,0.00006430299,0.0031774163,0.00011858765,0.000050526563,0.00020931676,0.00003155383,0.0000140402235,0.0016665158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718274,0.0218778,0.00072618603,0.0013737616,0.0021889636,0.0020059284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8370375,0.12051607,0.02037381,0.011436745,0.0031013773,0.007534522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025015617,0.00087705406,0.0013717918,0.0012215525,0.002224483,0.0038494146,0.0020511611,0.0026920943,0.024851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09605348,0.00063025573,0.000805677,0.0012965543,0.003987221,0.0041974275,0.0031361768,0.0029715637,0.0014413086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009254481,0.009324027,0.022930222,0.0011754732,0.0004845185,0.0005627263,0.0021091944,0.14847375,0.00415038,0.6779081,0.01012746,0.113499664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037874065,0.0059157046,0.019992454,0.00033553474,0.00020473606,0.00022904611,0.0011930265,0.22467712,0.0023860328,0.72009575,0.020962128,0.00022107607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020879426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021776387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025015617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003030594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002994988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13229686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416001107","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2025.15847symposium","title":"Optimal Distinctiveness at Work","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Incentive; Interpersonal communication; Perspective (graphical); Salary; Interpersonal relationship; Negotiation; Organizational behavior","score_opus":0.02917343643018544,"score_gpt":0.33692740515051467,"score_spread":0.30775396872032923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416001107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85879153,0.00065429765,0.004599794,0.0033546684,0.00020361184,0.000094553754,0.00011365685,0.00009955297,0.13208832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920868,0.00008827614,0.00088968716,0.00017349339,0.000018658273,0.00001875967,0.000049451744,0.00001925865,0.0066555482],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791294,0.0003912445,0.00010106536,0.00036824998,0.000623686,0.0006026667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994666,0.000573245,0.0008359292,0.0005321849,0.00068383996,0.0027087927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018435234,0.000260493,0.00036747148,0.00080244866,0.002357172,0.004003612,0.00062973215,0.00091815816,0.016817227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073477877,0.00019790002,0.00040564052,0.00059800583,0.0019359051,0.0016587024,0.003697498,0.0011615842,0.001833634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010965242,0.001549659,0.3152629,0.0005627967,0.000122129,0.002236551,0.05257685,0.0015029035,0.025130313,0.20921658,0.026087914,0.36465493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016834149,0.0014133935,0.68661463,0.0002976241,0.00012230717,0.0021291322,0.039351385,0.0038510496,0.005974878,0.17752092,0.08241427,0.00014210778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028030241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034611386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016817227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002641188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002301359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056259274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416081875","doi":"10.5751/es-16615-300422","title":"Shifting strategies: exploring cooperation dynamics in fisheries co-management","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Institut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Common-pool resource; Enforcement; Corporate governance; Institution; Norm (philosophy); Fishing; Resource (disambiguation); Experimental economics; Social preferences","score_opus":0.045671051884417474,"score_gpt":0.329515403766543,"score_spread":0.28384435188212553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416081875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947878,0.000073891235,0.0041905274,0.00005831414,0.0000011086516,0.000038620747,0.000022593613,0.000005632959,0.0008215515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975776,0.00003328902,0.0021447523,0.00001359812,0.0000013549466,0.000046196914,0.000015519605,0.0000019866932,0.0001657159],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881494,0.00063046475,0.000032201246,0.00028453313,0.00010266655,0.00013528121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485636,0.0033591804,0.00095614867,0.0003134578,0.00019280161,0.0003220163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019341275,0.00029774065,0.0005278886,0.0012591537,0.0006292864,0.0013851837,0.0009293645,0.0005567781,0.0015003348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008113058,0.00024262117,0.00042731132,0.00076040387,0.00230623,0.0018222079,0.0016774198,0.0006385396,0.00010077654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014651993,0.0034166672,0.68958426,0.00061964104,0.00076579105,0.001637549,0.037612792,0.077949695,0.043837328,0.06434632,0.0006775397,0.078087196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012304843,0.0013876741,0.45283958,0.00008500222,0.00014799365,0.00040025183,0.026150089,0.45937076,0.0026110678,0.055065297,0.001695139,0.00012408379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009232057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064569153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009232057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016552891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072162435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018356621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416184222","doi":"10.1109/acsos-c66519.2025.00042","title":"The Institution Bootstrapping Problem and Some Counter-Intuitive Solutions","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"University of Hertfordshire","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Institution; Perception; Cognition; Term (time); Financial institution","score_opus":0.035407397251097206,"score_gpt":0.3266740824165223,"score_spread":0.2912666851654251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416184222","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06457569,0.0043195644,0.6208703,0.2056081,0.0016137932,0.00043662204,0.00044083913,0.0006066356,0.10152853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8576808,0.0028362814,0.118790574,0.010453135,0.0018223132,0.000690906,0.00013359176,0.00014059879,0.0074518216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902552,0.0050034155,0.00052288856,0.0017257076,0.0018939187,0.0005989512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93756044,0.045139138,0.004944899,0.0073320526,0.0036333248,0.0013902119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01203979,0.0013178983,0.0014439635,0.0017037692,0.0033948356,0.0049594226,0.004549732,0.011092484,0.01061966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069706224,0.0007041023,0.0011903289,0.0015553398,0.014767553,0.013347836,0.006290808,0.009553586,0.0009341687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035689427,0.000046146633,0.00076561683,0.00012513834,0.000026867441,0.00017834864,0.0004848516,0.0026840398,0.00022316107,0.97829866,0.0036136738,0.013517834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031184267,0.000012906003,0.00020609451,0.000034613768,0.00000871368,0.00014444097,0.00020473302,0.008079441,0.00012451946,0.9871235,0.0040090308,0.000020901156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019227316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013067474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01203979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020925335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020986153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06367326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416192328","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.70026","title":"Multivariate Incomplete Information in the Mixture Model of Contests","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Complete information; Comparative statics; Mixture model; Multivariate statistics; Multivariate normal distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Productivity","score_opus":0.04392281408470877,"score_gpt":0.32186953940381696,"score_spread":0.2779467253191082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416192328","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13183111,0.0010309626,0.8445001,0.0034396534,0.00018714443,0.000204616,0.0010543397,0.0003101258,0.017441912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301396,0.0009770682,0.038550064,0.0003537222,0.00040650618,0.00044925895,0.0007717531,0.00015577007,0.028196367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234927,0.003548481,0.00038047467,0.0010857393,0.0013212583,0.0013147976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740856,0.017230572,0.0040077046,0.0016177171,0.0015508424,0.0015075237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01331945,0.0020371326,0.004689513,0.0032403464,0.0012575112,0.006560482,0.0041157263,0.00386125,0.01101926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02307232,0.0017626247,0.0028604497,0.0027420905,0.004833477,0.006930639,0.0031210645,0.003917744,0.0014148678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015035685,0.000064702166,0.0010194652,0.00007998258,0.000083819585,0.00019334485,0.00017334164,0.20507409,0.0004215974,0.78740025,0.0012451079,0.0040939343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055037086,0.00005509895,0.00041272896,0.000033679004,0.000032766726,0.00008357618,0.00004117412,0.6761201,0.00009111378,0.3219678,0.0010450003,0.00006184647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00773549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052395053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01331945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003004674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017507244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07044083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416598531","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2025.10008","title":"Nudging and boosting reasonable use of public products: two experiments from China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Public Policy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Sun Yat-sen University; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences","keywords":"Boosting (machine learning); Replicate; Corporate governance; Nudge theory; Default; Choice architecture","score_opus":0.1371048060686698,"score_gpt":0.3824444522757553,"score_spread":0.2453396462070855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416598531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982728,0.000042348278,0.00043717923,0.00016510644,0.00001309149,0.00014262699,0.00006318957,0.0000105263725,0.0008531389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745804,0.00008001381,0.0008967529,0.0001347076,0.000016053737,0.0002603778,0.0001040907,0.0000039768843,0.0010460693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975483,0.001338267,0.00013931967,0.00037695788,0.0002545876,0.00034250892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98864007,0.0059580356,0.0019513257,0.0018756733,0.00076879753,0.00080607564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007841627,0.00078636326,0.0010812687,0.00064051384,0.0013417508,0.0008010555,0.0013690504,0.0014213502,0.003921648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007213117,0.00031708286,0.000977593,0.0008176114,0.0032219295,0.0011871452,0.0007923575,0.0013475253,0.00030004483],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.041424297,0.22610068,0.3040163,0.0033323325,0.0025586188,0.0026025507,0.012856755,0.059673637,0.077270344,0.043306194,0.014130629,0.2127277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030387273,0.09210675,0.6457253,0.00025982677,0.002486548,0.00022772833,0.009229888,0.10937531,0.062892705,0.02964126,0.016920594,0.00074676436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029714692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027549794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029714692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031315354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031046546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05908346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417125955","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000509","title":"Allocator-recipient asymmetries in resource allocation preferences: A focus on bequests.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Allocator; Bequest; Interpersonal communication; Resource allocation; Context (archaeology); Inequality; Inequity aversion; Interpersonal relationship","score_opus":0.07312762692486115,"score_gpt":0.4129124380373956,"score_spread":0.33978481111253445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417125955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92057407,0.001034323,0.021262081,0.0016774891,0.00006321372,0.0001581342,0.00011327506,0.000034445093,0.05508295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928739,0.0001615913,0.0053291884,0.00037869136,0.000019771305,0.00014081199,0.000038233306,0.000018763778,0.0010391364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99071455,0.0065552327,0.00033751622,0.00097254873,0.0010024122,0.00041762812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701708,0.02077303,0.004279975,0.0029283417,0.0009019088,0.00094602106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011227153,0.0004892115,0.0005455124,0.0004230072,0.0012337433,0.0021650542,0.0006480443,0.0010688457,0.008032417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037627622,0.00035174077,0.0004037865,0.00048178816,0.0023195622,0.004837107,0.0025270875,0.0020537379,0.0004136598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054892865,0.0029888242,0.20501211,0.0024210792,0.0005944914,0.0013522208,0.1038457,0.005670536,0.14440158,0.30250973,0.0043287366,0.22138567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008919458,0.0045259763,0.5658235,0.0008448447,0.00082003005,0.0027899332,0.05427871,0.021781098,0.04104067,0.24506663,0.061740745,0.00039596696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082552334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013057604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011227153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012775486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008220632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059375525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417138589","doi":"10.3386/w34543","title":"Waiting for the Right Offer: Laboratory Evidence on How News Affects Bargaining","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Shanghai University of Finance and Economics; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.464637624954126,"score_gpt":0.5640801060206924,"score_spread":0.09944248106656634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417138589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99179065,0.00015245956,0.0027548303,0.00035916673,0.00005622786,0.000045096844,0.00009927273,0.000035888632,0.0047064084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99448097,0.00017977109,0.0033457754,0.0003552197,0.000028928016,0.000098807875,0.000094281524,0.000017417291,0.0013989322],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987841,0.0006042891,0.00007473914,0.00023461768,0.0001883091,0.0001138947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97645366,0.01678275,0.003877084,0.0017885522,0.00030837624,0.00078954635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032017466,0.0005119421,0.0004582262,0.0003804069,0.00040141618,0.0011038897,0.00091767067,0.0012799199,0.0065144147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016018456,0.00035194456,0.0003469672,0.00028182333,0.0011326926,0.0010216857,0.00062944955,0.0012704247,0.00058482407],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.039962344,0.056960095,0.0968364,0.0016760862,0.0011784661,0.0020354867,0.002218981,0.026492154,0.5655463,0.07618629,0.006160117,0.1247472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014480845,0.10388319,0.17212808,0.00045508132,0.0016759614,0.0021729441,0.0030887004,0.120203614,0.38740766,0.17823745,0.015632296,0.0006342124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004917125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003355116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065144147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033392187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033272608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021792829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417152588","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5883154","title":"Waiting for the Right Offer: Laboratory Evidence on How News Affects Bargaining","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private information retrieval; Download; Complete information; Developing country; Public information; Bargaining power","score_opus":0.04191725184550421,"score_gpt":0.3494135771406167,"score_spread":0.3074963252951125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417152588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877253,0.00024768565,0.0014037146,0.00070384133,0.00015536934,0.000025622583,0.00019238777,0.000051652627,0.009494418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442947,0.00029478158,0.0012255093,0.0005578969,0.000098583936,0.000051203137,0.00018277903,0.00007273693,0.0030870095],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886703,0.000544301,0.000069774316,0.0002255214,0.00018066057,0.00011281013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96721953,0.024030725,0.0042133364,0.0029969146,0.00034534265,0.0011941793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003118745,0.00056054327,0.0006556785,0.00044573308,0.0004922011,0.0022536383,0.0009853228,0.001975054,0.01954463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02147747,0.00054391066,0.00033230442,0.00042092716,0.00127049,0.0013919604,0.00068075286,0.0019243648,0.0020388674],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07009398,0.053517714,0.08240847,0.001624532,0.001540499,0.0014462093,0.0025912013,0.010486201,0.545595,0.07313939,0.014260363,0.14329647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01937606,0.041268326,0.32290834,0.00051341177,0.0031604285,0.002447619,0.0042572324,0.070459574,0.2377561,0.27566975,0.021432467,0.0007505981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064738374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042561366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01954463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034819057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004109071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065383315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417245432","doi":"10.7554/elife.102800.3","title":"Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion can be taught through learning of others’ preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inequity aversion; Ultimatum game; Punishment (psychology); Selfishness; Punitive damages; Social preferences; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); Reinforcement learning","score_opus":0.03699038468014477,"score_gpt":0.36486027104730495,"score_spread":0.3278698863671602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417245432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89367735,0.00008390597,0.08248552,0.0015957734,0.000046245015,0.000076511446,0.000087153356,0.00023572444,0.02171191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796322,0.00011944465,0.017327411,0.00025633004,0.000010704473,0.000062901505,0.000044571825,0.000016979431,0.0025293936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996321,0.00012255154,0.000011781683,0.000112801405,0.00006990225,0.0000507283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984485,0.0005703399,0.0003337146,0.00041506824,0.000060500297,0.00017185856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010393908,0.0005260838,0.00029419718,0.0002213385,0.0003498194,0.00089577906,0.00058585283,0.00067503756,0.004786669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041143172,0.00029731603,0.0004223784,0.00014615941,0.0012119786,0.0013530962,0.0011299558,0.0017430019,0.0003417626],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011858894,0.003638437,0.10625298,0.0006300502,0.0004425926,0.0010357621,0.0052689156,0.0979103,0.14808618,0.32319176,0.0053267824,0.30703035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003605821,0.0023258063,0.0805991,0.00018022615,0.00030791792,0.00088005135,0.0010396244,0.35170296,0.033458076,0.5115684,0.01740557,0.00017164841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001048303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014861433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004786669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003833223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056357996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016013026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417302734","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-99739-6_14","title":"Economic Experiments in Recreational Fishing Studies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Fish & fisheries series/Fish and fisheries series (Print)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Fishing; Recreational fishing; Sketch; Economic impact analysis; Natural (archaeology); Commercial fishing","score_opus":0.048364301291935904,"score_gpt":0.3048979676205098,"score_spread":0.2565336663285739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417302734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16149625,0.033648126,0.26753038,0.018792886,0.002368374,0.005209829,0.0013447523,0.00030994441,0.50929946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69809085,0.01946588,0.22308892,0.005614195,0.00076881365,0.014094661,0.0005236389,0.00013963206,0.038213477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98501784,0.012804132,0.00037281343,0.0006080158,0.001054682,0.00014252907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9193812,0.0727378,0.002978701,0.0032308092,0.0013025329,0.00036894288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01720227,0.0005246071,0.0006551725,0.000851915,0.00082787045,0.0020530224,0.0011946242,0.0012106092,0.011840108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029655537,0.00037161884,0.00044930514,0.0011942845,0.0063629914,0.0021889335,0.0019082451,0.0021618817,0.00069660397],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054176484,0.0011748386,0.0030239993,0.0029565045,0.00014448696,0.00020307292,0.0013547642,0.008545927,0.0022836926,0.8735225,0.01238943,0.093859054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042023853,0.0013643005,0.0067414357,0.0028542406,0.0001190832,0.00015527837,0.0011982847,0.0112747485,0.00313141,0.84613305,0.12652189,0.00008604351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009573131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013889697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01720227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018763972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001462133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090975404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417536655","doi":"10.1080/01402382.2025.2591535","title":"Blame games, problem denial, and relational distance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"West European Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Research England; John Fell Fund, University of Oxford","keywords":"Blame; Politics","score_opus":0.023304361124158502,"score_gpt":0.30231210520846064,"score_spread":0.2790077440843021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417536655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79589194,0.00068628386,0.027448837,0.008752026,0.000059491413,0.00015052929,0.00007671321,0.0000608046,0.16687335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777406,0.000057984234,0.000846425,0.00012704951,0.0000051827024,0.000021758484,0.000009800492,0.000006525585,0.0011511836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870955,0.008746285,0.0003942233,0.0009938766,0.0017649642,0.00100514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96630335,0.021223372,0.0065429723,0.0021615431,0.0013480629,0.0024206506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068560527,0.00038809015,0.00044885546,0.0012791674,0.0036065164,0.005220056,0.0010938279,0.0018679713,0.008769471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036925595,0.00032917433,0.00030944534,0.0010273781,0.014419423,0.009638193,0.006349418,0.0034575532,0.0002885883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019217888,0.00048776096,0.02604778,0.00017834698,0.0000717608,0.0003095803,0.06414568,0.0018339377,0.0010730517,0.8802906,0.0015874245,0.02378189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013578915,0.00024250937,0.036619876,0.00015191892,0.000048076672,0.00056987774,0.07442376,0.009382641,0.0007520945,0.8511639,0.026415609,0.000093890354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043515656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040112515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008769471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004504196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019167007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036258698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W617455929","doi":"","title":"Competitive Hotel Pricing in Uncertain Times","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration (Cornell University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Revenue; Business; Occupancy; Market share; Marketing; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04187331031947075,"score_gpt":0.26591262803371263,"score_spread":0.22403931771424188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W617455929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99610704,0.000059042595,0.0004411888,0.00012505746,0.0000048401002,0.0000032093724,0.00006638269,0.0000024639612,0.0031908175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972206,0.000021246955,0.000046190115,0.000007028004,0.0000050577096,0.0000018564373,0.000033525725,7.378597e-7,0.0001622814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957687,0.00013332919,0.0000148925465,0.000038381088,0.00012927972,0.00010726225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975073,0.0009407908,0.0007807278,0.000098599674,0.0002982656,0.0003743728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007018225,0.0001238248,0.00018731796,0.00051973766,0.00046055828,0.0015406171,0.00027356227,0.00029604093,0.002435225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005024541,0.00012246246,0.00025678403,0.000708601,0.00054305594,0.0011273952,0.00056946644,0.0005786833,0.0001946878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011381377,0.0005191472,0.8777156,0.00006815313,0.00014464623,0.00087378797,0.0031601205,0.032754693,0.0015308082,0.033978496,0.0031516529,0.044964876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030870684,0.0002827443,0.88180757,0.000019086105,0.000041995623,0.0003639359,0.00587836,0.0893571,0.0004218619,0.018126303,0.0035905486,0.00007959077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014061512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015012907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014061512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012717303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033486832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027959347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903593337","doi":"10.1093/icc/dtaa055/35056305/dtaa055.pdf","title":"Can trust induce vertical integration?: an experimental study of buyer–seller exchanges with distinct competencies and specific investments","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Government (linguistics); Investment (military); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06672764105877048,"score_gpt":0.2915223717317506,"score_spread":0.22479473067298011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903593337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976063,0.000029893125,0.0004051392,0.00012841316,0.000011578145,0.00007147119,0.000030241717,0.000004883429,0.0017121193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762243,0.00004749285,0.00076242915,0.00008912718,0.000016961556,0.000109194756,0.000047967795,0.0000054219167,0.0012988641],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980755,0.0010949268,0.00013400965,0.00029764703,0.00019046049,0.00020750277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95157903,0.034150396,0.007746241,0.0041927793,0.0005610526,0.0017703939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052826717,0.00065044634,0.00076904375,0.00037904058,0.0011374799,0.0028363855,0.001006448,0.0025376447,0.014616754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026839038,0.00066675217,0.00046782097,0.00045196502,0.0020685615,0.0032975322,0.0017078308,0.0023971242,0.00071686745],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11186203,0.35332695,0.16120926,0.0023135177,0.0017809719,0.0037355435,0.018364495,0.012728318,0.1207524,0.12401218,0.0033036491,0.08661066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.077522635,0.19698793,0.27828333,0.0006461776,0.0027624858,0.0029649301,0.025730358,0.1398162,0.062980324,0.19826809,0.013272703,0.0007649102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011497248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091362203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014616754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008571228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000918692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048897922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6922063089","doi":"10.11575/prism/35853","title":"Preparation Of A Brief To The Alberta Provincial Government Examining The Feasibility Of A Mandatory Energy Disclosure Policy In Alberta","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Nucleofection; Subpoena; Work (physics); Filter (signal processing); Hyporeflexia","score_opus":0.02467268791742354,"score_gpt":0.2730667403532956,"score_spread":0.24839405243587204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6922063089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13179977,0.006387295,0.0054677688,0.36963695,0.010614324,0.012265797,0.004347766,0.00087540667,0.4586049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30902252,0.0087323515,0.018412272,0.08648162,0.00116905,0.0029464168,0.0026156139,0.00011565087,0.5705045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940813,0.0013268384,0.00035599546,0.00026873974,0.0023431794,0.0016239106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97517085,0.009913453,0.0007328009,0.00060486235,0.010675723,0.0029021837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010876129,0.00032142337,0.00029321093,0.0015453714,0.012580387,0.0051940894,0.0021254525,0.004325035,0.015967188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016820332,0.0008082692,0.00035593097,0.001565613,0.0017094925,0.001478447,0.0012812769,0.0042667915,0.0017598094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027692312,0.00054001255,0.01270209,0.00073590054,0.0000145359245,0.0035668951,0.013322789,0.0014642823,0.004840168,0.027121797,0.84237766,0.093036935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005397832,0.00016275594,0.026251627,0.0003113047,0.000015576581,0.00013667754,0.028081654,0.0007300652,0.0013068961,0.001639362,0.94121575,0.00009436872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8593334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92379415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1406666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07147402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13235661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51858276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6926378253","doi":"10.25316/ir-12850","title":"Nanaimo Free Press [Wednesday, October 25, 1893]","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"VIURRSpace (Vancouver Island University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.017968179036114328,"score_gpt":0.24763553224421692,"score_spread":0.22966735320810258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6926378253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009571181,0.0033886363,0.00010904139,0.0013091877,0.0014647483,0.000027514348,0.004740503,0.00019614484,0.9878071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011802169,0.0006073585,0.000042061445,0.00006662298,0.000053165884,0.000009390154,0.0004245008,0.00006660424,0.9975501],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997563,0.00001859734,0.000008942371,0.000047746005,0.00011493873,0.0000535406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971896,0.000040700626,0.000017013097,0.000028871362,0.00012659715,0.000067796514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030014096,0.0008541242,0.00055399205,0.0016142343,0.0033403407,0.004231678,0.0007726151,0.001504508,0.51823467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012349031,0.00041762716,0.0003309617,0.0025224918,0.00052761467,0.0016717154,0.0011628512,0.001791842,0.21589155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000494562,0.000019887817,0.0002912405,0.00008436614,0.0000041923627,0.00007591587,0.00008085666,0.00007495977,0.00012698564,0.009611807,0.9436315,0.045948792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003583739,0.000004622641,0.0009680306,0.00006051282,0.000001197867,0.000016866868,0.00004547679,0.000030495325,0.00007171451,0.00043474138,0.9983589,0.0000037860998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090677865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3851611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90932214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029785521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002051385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6871798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929911256","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10376475","title":"FIGURES 106–109 in Taxonomic revision of Orcevia Thorell, 1890, with description of fifteen new species (Araneae, Salticidae, Euophryini)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Lobe; Sauria; Black male; Arrow","score_opus":0.0842164832680563,"score_gpt":0.2953536715055414,"score_spread":0.21113718823748512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929911256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044137944,0.026959678,0.025601298,0.0023073684,0.0127117,0.002568281,0.023901286,0.0028227658,0.85898966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41327152,0.023835164,0.0634593,0.0022712753,0.00660946,0.0037960312,0.05490238,0.0025316854,0.4293232],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997414,0.00003285535,0.000031355932,0.00007825804,0.00008153279,0.000034695546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997794,0.000044234217,0.000042638574,0.000032125517,0.00007900144,0.000022591574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024215385,0.00087166415,0.00044959434,0.0029101062,0.0012536956,0.00067890016,0.0009792355,0.000853486,0.07375723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097508094,0.00026455396,0.00043129755,0.0021095413,0.0009787822,0.0014865516,0.0008286857,0.0011100898,0.017854406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034992662,0.00009338539,0.0038504782,0.0011605966,0.000049428458,0.00074706774,0.001518343,0.0005207459,0.00489314,0.014378191,0.25147054,0.7209682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023286251,0.000031797434,0.010206085,0.0001756047,0.000021747295,0.00064996834,0.00024394791,0.00016318797,0.00026480726,0.0009714628,0.9872343,0.00001367369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010630381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016296508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07375723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073570566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090726605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24674255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930644401","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14392057","title":"Dane Williams Archive: Gwendolyn Williams and Adolf Koldofsky Material","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); German; Queen (butterfly); Piano; Metadata","score_opus":0.0340510135184664,"score_gpt":0.2926962198881723,"score_spread":0.2586452063697059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930644401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000752963,0.0050596735,0.000497783,0.006950652,0.003237918,0.00006300196,0.004415275,0.00041372603,0.978609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002127016,0.002204061,0.00028142112,0.0004515654,0.00031311464,0.00004885928,0.0011335082,0.00033158914,0.99310875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994966,0.000055575947,0.000021107813,0.00007777192,0.00027084895,0.00007812644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992238,0.00011906293,0.000040740375,0.00013467096,0.00029827293,0.00018339648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074624975,0.00078414945,0.00041351866,0.0033832719,0.0041853073,0.006543234,0.00094062963,0.0011467678,0.5211103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029045385,0.00033735827,0.00023603631,0.003832538,0.0012723234,0.0037508423,0.0038295956,0.0012616622,0.25723672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069308558,0.000006042589,0.000037494447,0.000026807294,4.416354e-7,0.000039657734,0.00020382626,0.0000097813845,0.000052893247,0.008138303,0.971116,0.020361705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.5184046e-7,3.4306484e-7,0.0000718773,0.00002741942,1.5337952e-7,0.00001119328,0.00006831717,0.0000022070785,0.000016757207,0.00033129868,0.9994691,9.538353e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029668156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07587312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5211103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004146035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038187907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68307805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6943206215","doi":"10.1525/collabra.130886","title":"Effort Expenditure Decreases Risk Aversion When Dealing With Gains but Not Losses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collabra Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Feeling; Value (mathematics); Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Risk aversion (psychology); Investment (military); Dynamic inconsistency; Association (psychology); Chose","score_opus":0.036447696621165065,"score_gpt":0.3791773468631784,"score_spread":0.3427296502420133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6943206215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960406,0.00020933557,0.0008699495,0.0001741584,0.000020060204,0.00001353528,0.000013150085,0.000018213434,0.0026410485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976059,0.0001499044,0.0010420869,0.00013915682,0.0000118876205,0.000022026124,0.000020528061,0.0000109548355,0.0009975045],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999337,0.0003034862,0.0000366147,0.00012259834,0.000120614786,0.000079795434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965407,0.0015389554,0.00083225145,0.00057278347,0.00008186171,0.0004333256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014667651,0.00044868584,0.00044344054,0.00027394778,0.00021807253,0.0011238593,0.00028057562,0.0006846048,0.0063501704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006667747,0.00034756807,0.00031065667,0.0001500593,0.0007088252,0.000527004,0.0008344742,0.0010808016,0.000310506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021858338,0.021423627,0.20024708,0.001565624,0.0014483426,0.00084142573,0.0061646793,0.0022128187,0.5028657,0.012642516,0.0032294695,0.22550036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090522884,0.012182563,0.93662256,0.00019168253,0.0005217117,0.0005245082,0.0010597914,0.0042880718,0.025872983,0.013086378,0.004652763,0.000091806156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044432658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007921635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063501704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001723029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017275166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021243393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6946585899","doi":"10.34989/swp-2023-58","title":"Testing Collusion and Cooperation in Binary Choice Games","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Hyporeflexia; TSG101; Articular cartilage damage; Pretext; Liquation; Diafiltration","score_opus":0.043723800822884615,"score_gpt":0.31903791467775044,"score_spread":0.2753141138548658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6946585899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528283,0.00007476202,0.041074667,0.0007976228,0.0000186105,0.00013763488,0.00014807795,0.000029534664,0.004890808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440926,0.0000432352,0.004960269,0.00008130493,0.000013129824,0.00010165918,0.00008698688,0.0000035562555,0.00030064458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651477,0.026411092,0.001354734,0.002598358,0.0030724802,0.0014155591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6339391,0.3124603,0.03703434,0.010118015,0.0035835218,0.002864724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030638535,0.0011207296,0.0017400698,0.0012455265,0.0012727057,0.0026559997,0.0024719588,0.0020718775,0.004535602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17851861,0.00066030555,0.0010953502,0.0012382972,0.004652488,0.005654978,0.0039284714,0.0029112315,0.00038973647],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046785,0.0038174503,0.31106797,0.0008290515,0.0014972164,0.0010146829,0.007515442,0.06844259,0.0044121384,0.5434013,0.0013169713,0.05200664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012141844,0.0024351776,0.058742844,0.00018111517,0.0002690321,0.0003307129,0.0031896373,0.4141997,0.003939749,0.51352936,0.0018185119,0.00015005498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030556298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015217331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030638535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00153265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014284627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16203398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969400878","doi":"10.5683/sp2/gh6ess","title":"De l’enseignement régulier à la formation continue, du silo à l’électro : La révolution numérique prend place pour rendre plus perméable les secteurs d’enseignement, les programmes et l’adéquation emploi-formation-famille-ruralité.","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep regional de Lanaudiere","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Economic shortage; Medium term; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.031607332146570286,"score_gpt":0.30252193653263315,"score_spread":0.27091460438606285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969400878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1940074,0.00986199,0.024848087,0.107301176,0.002507851,0.00031302564,0.00021018794,0.00027679926,0.6606735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71143,0.006870498,0.008523512,0.0060425824,0.00065549865,0.00023167307,0.0001810444,0.00016801935,0.2658972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972007,0.00088139257,0.00012899775,0.00037134596,0.00079831184,0.00061915314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967961,0.0008332351,0.00045340197,0.00027062974,0.0009184468,0.0007282682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005018399,0.00043847127,0.0002793736,0.0010079704,0.0056953393,0.011385225,0.0009403864,0.0022409887,0.013553439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00563441,0.00027667207,0.00035900384,0.0012795958,0.007092804,0.0057446165,0.0065409695,0.0036290851,0.0016351248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002676495,0.00012178532,0.012274979,0.00074979087,0.000032117863,0.001363509,0.12406582,0.001581051,0.0061321408,0.6348897,0.040008705,0.17851274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023138264,0.00011321478,0.014133028,0.0006980497,0.000016612867,0.00023819548,0.04675604,0.0005426461,0.0014813532,0.023061052,0.9128978,0.000038861286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030540481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05408966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030540481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01230843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019380542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08930433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977310448","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6685801","title":"Update of dialysis initiation timing in end stage kidney disease patients: is it a resolved question? A systematic literature review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialysis; Peritoneal dialysis; Kt/V; Diabetes mellitus; Hemodialysis; Systematic review; Renal function; Kidney disease; Dialysis adequacy","score_opus":0.05339511268426586,"score_gpt":0.36360260922814847,"score_spread":0.3102074965438826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977310448","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060564233,0.9982728,0.00011816257,0.00041308368,0.00014127408,0.00010472667,0.00023464116,0.000005115146,0.00010462665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012042811,0.98558134,0.0006297882,0.0009082128,0.00024572687,0.00027725287,0.0002529822,0.0000060708453,0.00005573799],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897126,0.003448692,0.004488213,0.00079763023,0.0013503454,0.00020252632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320575,0.050188456,0.011178408,0.0007771209,0.005324669,0.00047378303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014432977,0.0014276358,0.009805135,0.014955105,0.0005157728,0.0030047214,0.0022826903,0.0024525065,0.0038446686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055842195,0.0012273549,0.007785659,0.010849875,0.00092688145,0.0034968741,0.0016191162,0.0014619986,0.00029497483],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021485324,0.0000208361,0.0010743134,0.940282,0.0074906196,0.000064316155,0.00016175711,0.00009321685,0.00008413598,0.00024878222,0.0016901363,0.048575044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002461899,0.00020391378,0.004782122,0.90675735,0.06814446,0.00032913167,0.00027790622,0.00012135904,0.00010231851,0.0004216376,0.018564494,0.00004910794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007530601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017197112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014955105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038757701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011412484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07632983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977421473","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.20113954","title":"Additional file 1 of Gaps in knowledge and practices of malaria prevention in Francophone African immigrants in Metropolitan Edmonton","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Metropolitan area; Table (database); Census; Pie chart; French; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.03972654366702051,"score_gpt":0.34770246563729007,"score_spread":0.3079759219702696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977421473","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010620144,0.000018310777,0.000097214564,0.00020411659,0.000022768167,0.00025181464,0.99646086,0.000052203904,0.0018307767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036793835,0.0003389096,0.0043183374,0.0009806094,0.00014463328,0.016187744,0.9044381,0.00030037324,0.036497544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995684,0.00008553038,0.000074514326,0.00007923631,0.00008967277,0.00010259907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98932135,0.007014234,0.0007719422,0.00041909714,0.002048972,0.00042444214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013221955,0.0007016269,0.0008254184,0.0019128397,0.0015230392,0.0008832205,0.001567432,0.0008767738,0.83055615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018438565,0.0003221839,0.0005021646,0.0031100698,0.00020067021,0.0014936151,0.00096665946,0.0006847509,0.07002129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001991739,0.00012211292,0.0035554785,0.0014222924,0.000013958766,0.000039132912,0.00022715112,0.00012300226,0.000025781592,0.00055181223,0.98596364,0.007756442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008936059,0.00074770657,0.22547542,0.015733464,0.00024862768,0.0006338488,0.00895891,0.0027474565,0.00067135296,0.0094828885,0.7261152,0.00024902134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055894457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07873331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94410557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016558731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031345217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.241691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980110365","doi":"","title":"Automatic Generation of Real-Time Aircraft Simulation System Configurations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Consortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec","keywords":"Heuristics; Scheduling (production processes); Partition (number theory); Binary tree; Branch and bound; Domain (mathematical analysis)","score_opus":0.04937195784624115,"score_gpt":0.3394199380499184,"score_spread":0.2900479802036772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980110365","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15824823,0.00037121432,0.76706254,0.00032221284,0.0001505851,0.0009306375,0.0018565707,0.0581423,0.01291575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48240006,0.00017703783,0.510486,0.0000689752,0.000019716885,0.00037840792,0.0029799049,0.002057222,0.0014326411],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864286,0.00046848602,0.000089603156,0.00027514147,0.0004294025,0.000094409384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920392,0.0046961,0.0005722968,0.0013950922,0.0011147313,0.00018268554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015021662,0.0013224643,0.00079236546,0.0016247496,0.00063396257,0.0012397345,0.0015795204,0.000831365,0.0056364597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128785,0.0010768187,0.0007899751,0.0008289772,0.0007588801,0.0012535744,0.0012163306,0.00088632666,0.0015555085],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070659776,0.00033264933,0.008309892,0.0007773302,0.00018063595,0.0008964811,0.0010646912,0.48480147,0.029277103,0.013056342,0.020422053,0.44017473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009225638,0.000096176955,0.0010729637,0.00006241474,0.0000388427,0.00016015825,0.00025864912,0.96175325,0.024074333,0.0046697627,0.0076852133,0.000036070556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024581254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005165807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056364597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010185878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015981345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01885581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987274354","doi":"","title":"Solving the 'Tragedy of the Commons': An Alternative to Privatization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Incentive; Outcome (game theory); Punishment (psychology); Rational agent; Incentive compatibility; Multi-agent system","score_opus":0.016175340158854353,"score_gpt":0.22779807904522084,"score_spread":0.21162273888636648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987274354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06637051,0.0008094357,0.7041967,0.028713243,0.00041243795,0.00030881577,0.00013397193,0.00049996225,0.19855483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90552384,0.00039238617,0.06464945,0.0019140927,0.00015481147,0.0002924608,0.000036715963,0.00012940644,0.026906844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969458,0.001634074,0.00007231557,0.00046176946,0.00048669032,0.00039946334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525636,0.0021206806,0.00051248574,0.0014982492,0.00029277435,0.0003193156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044408916,0.0004600754,0.00083490845,0.00056898355,0.0026948778,0.003627346,0.0025966268,0.0043224813,0.01136638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007806332,0.00047141223,0.0010621485,0.0006520048,0.009347461,0.009385068,0.005456254,0.0042207716,0.00075979077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016364102,0.000025472675,0.00007885615,0.000019126974,0.000007670701,0.000037433583,0.00022791776,0.0056318,0.00015158812,0.98866594,0.0009949097,0.0041428627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003257237,0.000028271234,0.00009864102,0.000028884011,0.000008458769,0.00004112307,0.00015308245,0.024522295,0.00023945404,0.96356577,0.011266244,0.0000151898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037217403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038837092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030472917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074703707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038024306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987970832","doi":"","title":"The Voluntary Provision of Public Goods under Varying Endowment Distributions: Experimental Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Endowment; Incentive; Common-pool resource; Distribution (mathematics); Public good; Resource (disambiguation); Property (philosophy); Stakeholder","score_opus":0.03540058836533334,"score_gpt":0.256107551726514,"score_spread":0.22070696336118067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987970832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858838,0.0006917693,0.0033134688,0.0005052458,0.000027590666,0.00013829951,0.00012526616,0.000025735484,0.009288812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944338,0.00090106105,0.0027039952,0.00019136594,0.000030846215,0.00034939294,0.00011472219,0.000015782947,0.0012591275],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926133,0.005103951,0.00045120198,0.0007300036,0.00079021574,0.0003113316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82979995,0.13342202,0.020230372,0.013003888,0.00217162,0.0013721782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011994793,0.0006688706,0.0007806519,0.00063562306,0.00078554393,0.0017393586,0.0013532843,0.0013157148,0.0061256224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05934558,0.0005485974,0.0004408363,0.0006551232,0.004474737,0.0023665528,0.0016683358,0.0015720056,0.00067321904],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.094109446,0.12079546,0.1193384,0.0061108316,0.0033862211,0.0011212426,0.01048695,0.038907718,0.058114033,0.21854885,0.007880935,0.32119992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03097407,0.09814307,0.29488382,0.0021583675,0.0033288007,0.0020809034,0.00677141,0.08260862,0.07355958,0.36539215,0.0392618,0.00083746715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020622676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010644792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011994793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001047165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064377487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063435316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000392015","doi":"","title":"Exploring Heterogeneity in Common Pool Resource Experiments with Intelligent Agent Based Simulations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Intelligent agent; Agent-based model; Multi-agent system; Work (physics); Group (periodic table); Foundation (evidence); Investment (military)","score_opus":0.06430151997633063,"score_gpt":0.2544129062835063,"score_spread":0.1901113863071757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000392015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8207297,0.00016603337,0.16749994,0.0008380882,0.00004454601,0.0003875887,0.0001151838,0.0001721236,0.010046821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655557,0.00006250025,0.033593245,0.000081448394,0.00001214121,0.00032949503,0.00003989969,0.000015654952,0.00030998862],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933426,0.00549072,0.0001511904,0.00037643654,0.00037189075,0.0002670944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9208767,0.0725535,0.002893083,0.0021805253,0.000758554,0.00073769497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01022215,0.000659284,0.0010962235,0.0012361978,0.00089195964,0.002628947,0.002121191,0.0013297728,0.001770722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04863451,0.00049279287,0.00076841924,0.00096736284,0.0027790836,0.0031836242,0.0028027722,0.0017397866,0.00009424596],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022675704,0.00036493776,0.0064007114,0.00007751267,0.000114452894,0.00012547673,0.00067733985,0.9223374,0.00059067114,0.063938476,0.00023892461,0.004907329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058823516,0.0001282532,0.0006098682,0.000014508403,0.000017735327,0.000008527318,0.0002310421,0.9712697,0.0003457822,0.02692025,0.00037732988,0.000018167824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058799842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003738477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01022215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028136375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013281134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05406058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009114778","doi":"","title":"Dirty Money: Is there a Wage Premium for Working in a Pollution Intensive Industry?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Compensating differential; Quarter (Canadian coin); Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Differential (mechanical device); Risk premium","score_opus":0.32709788204383866,"score_gpt":0.4756553795123014,"score_spread":0.14855749746846275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009114778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952917,0.00023150866,0.000075287484,0.0017829897,0.000030476851,0.0000069861576,0.000053267308,0.0000029702271,0.002524864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988532,0.00006831616,0.00002676838,0.0001405577,0.000039238155,0.0000024233582,0.000030149044,0.0000015149463,0.0008377515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994276,0.0001454888,0.00003062732,0.000070870425,0.00010470085,0.00022068902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198205,0.006459777,0.0050462172,0.0006189653,0.00043163134,0.0054613994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012261845,0.00021228353,0.0006385113,0.0008638877,0.00087885314,0.001884635,0.0007180134,0.0022855971,0.014251463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010745624,0.00028040554,0.00039094844,0.000520825,0.0014294431,0.0010007294,0.00092512433,0.0020131404,0.0006342929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004453207,0.0036021268,0.9378774,0.0001780926,0.00020990362,0.0013738091,0.0025500385,0.0004087498,0.0037865276,0.005604443,0.0022264335,0.037729263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011378921,0.0003370666,0.9897189,0.00003684635,0.00007768665,0.00018667062,0.0038336443,0.00046519667,0.00017768718,0.004413686,0.0006163131,0.000022481252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008858137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012341242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014251463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005812883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006434884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047675908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018052283","doi":"","title":"Choices in an Interdependent Economic Environment: Inequity Averson and Bargaining Games","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Inequity aversion; Preference; Interdependence; Dictator game; Experimental economics; Game theory; Economic model","score_opus":0.035653884135616466,"score_gpt":0.29072124986142245,"score_spread":0.25506736572580596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018052283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8419152,0.0008178588,0.09922672,0.0059318095,0.000114989365,0.00019000044,0.000086931985,0.000034295303,0.051682066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98547065,0.00035154205,0.011562892,0.00023509806,0.00003927849,0.00010284896,0.000016396272,0.0000073366164,0.002213932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533796,0.0037948983,0.00006494203,0.00024753518,0.0003089074,0.00024587553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929125,0.0055783745,0.0006557347,0.00024305703,0.00013960386,0.00047077186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006816497,0.0005508712,0.0008054916,0.00053839956,0.0013925743,0.0029829964,0.0008893357,0.0018311414,0.0030577993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012737546,0.0004831225,0.00042201902,0.00064964255,0.0044340203,0.0032775078,0.0017952943,0.0025219796,0.0001906495],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053934765,0.0005351024,0.004955959,0.00011995686,0.000111453526,0.0004530037,0.0018932548,0.07414574,0.0017815778,0.89666706,0.0012051304,0.017592363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022276952,0.00022015297,0.003700988,0.000030403991,0.000046932626,0.00012702229,0.0010106794,0.17582434,0.00022224197,0.81606454,0.0024840634,0.00004593165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016983893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020762684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006816497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014105117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007991571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036049485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027331402","doi":"","title":"Coalition Formation in the Presence of Continuing Conflict","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Balance (ability); Core (optical fiber); Distribution (mathematics); Order (exchange); Multi-party system","score_opus":0.014514856074615232,"score_gpt":0.2520581214097097,"score_spread":0.23754326533509446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027331402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87393,0.0007281821,0.09127164,0.0013009731,0.000048861384,0.00008699284,0.000072528615,0.000052607968,0.032508265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314684,0.00018005166,0.0048453324,0.00004866946,0.000017595234,0.00003084457,0.000028226288,0.0000069038897,0.0016954707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607664,0.0023837218,0.00011144946,0.00042202423,0.00038540686,0.00062068395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840487,0.009653997,0.0031274192,0.0013710401,0.00060396054,0.0011948126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040213456,0.0004037534,0.00080231973,0.00082700513,0.0018922042,0.0027518182,0.0014733747,0.0013438117,0.003038472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014056468,0.0004627105,0.0005658255,0.00078862614,0.0037592994,0.0038479213,0.003092197,0.0014027635,0.00030889828],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003031564,0.00020179302,0.009005459,0.000137071,0.0001546034,0.0013555931,0.004003776,0.09074621,0.0025194678,0.875052,0.0010397093,0.015481219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024571118,0.00031209533,0.0058604614,0.00005798399,0.000082099585,0.0006705954,0.0038707014,0.32842985,0.00130714,0.6479017,0.011184256,0.00007744375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030904233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022417787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040213456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019130963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013034603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021267176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027613236","doi":"","title":"Coping with Crises: Christian – Jewish Relations in Catalonia and Aragon, 1380‐1391","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Judaism; Coping (psychology); Debt; Spanish Civil War; Poor relief","score_opus":0.02207555462388603,"score_gpt":0.2948595349938879,"score_spread":0.27278398037000184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027613236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9623251,0.0067257206,0.000054908905,0.0060280142,0.00020861723,0.00001993703,0.00004297041,0.0000063720445,0.024588298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857901,0.0030957034,0.000104209066,0.0011987216,0.000058813137,0.000010415765,0.000057656558,0.000007704928,0.009676764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953616,0.00016724413,0.000011177667,0.00003318102,0.0000467567,0.00020556612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996927,0.000067983136,0.000050816212,0.000009317488,0.000042541782,0.00013675087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012050122,0.00025127205,0.00024960612,0.00054794364,0.005954861,0.004236002,0.0009110989,0.0019346505,0.0019244949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006673351,0.00018794055,0.00014793477,0.0005652202,0.0037071223,0.00096071797,0.003175294,0.0018903958,0.00030374737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041636324,0.00023382872,0.03627753,0.00048379146,0.000041813615,0.004993563,0.8599521,0.00039246128,0.0023281819,0.03481223,0.016041467,0.044026766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003597896,0.00011243537,0.08385869,0.00033452097,0.000011541435,0.00055298046,0.73128855,0.00012477263,0.00028463136,0.0011546445,0.18221155,0.000029814093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11070007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18631938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11070007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010834821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039810333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22011143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034791924","doi":"","title":"Verbal memory improvement in first-episode psychosis APOE-&amp;amp;epsilon;4 carriers: a pleiotropic effect?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"California Verbal Learning Test; Verbal memory; Recall; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Verbal learning; Test (biology); Association (psychology); Neuropsychology; Episodic memory","score_opus":0.027364902267757087,"score_gpt":0.32934080574172314,"score_spread":0.3019759034739661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034791924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996327,0.00013248094,0.000023214472,0.00001590133,0.0000027420494,0.00000482978,0.000031633885,0.0000013157363,0.00015518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996482,0.00007063765,0.000050247294,0.0000133422345,0.000004460139,0.0000042612996,0.00004173946,9.544603e-7,0.00016627506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981135,0.00006124466,0.000020450048,0.000031946438,0.000038172577,0.00003689802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943763,0.00016942897,0.0002389712,0.000030737534,0.000051126168,0.000072116505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005182447,0.00034661277,0.00031577903,0.00037068967,0.0003325995,0.00041863165,0.00022582013,0.00036657468,0.0021184909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016692717,0.00017388337,0.00025585637,0.0002262009,0.00021083662,0.00031120275,0.0002916577,0.00025669395,0.00013728996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056158016,0.00036242898,0.96380323,0.0000802846,0.00012834069,0.0028453525,0.00064482755,0.00007842167,0.0055091362,0.00007262377,0.0002006075,0.02065896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059834132,0.00090994674,0.99608326,0.00002107179,0.000042941952,0.001887716,0.00025772912,0.00010103854,0.00041593806,0.000084499065,0.0001270141,0.00000903449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001150363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024078693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021184909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020867864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013525847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0070871115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036684392","doi":"","title":"Canadian Solar Announces Commercial Operation of Three Solar Projects in Japan Totaling 42 MWp","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solar energy; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Production (economics)","score_opus":0.06109499804166727,"score_gpt":0.3294761075993081,"score_spread":0.26838110955764083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036684392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14016476,0.0011921109,0.0010757655,0.019129612,0.0010777612,0.00030671054,0.025020594,0.00067871105,0.811354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14503339,0.0006902399,0.00091843784,0.0014665381,0.00013352944,0.000042376578,0.0061250157,0.00010721249,0.84548324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994431,0.00001589983,0.000005550356,0.000028489716,0.00035569805,0.00015129657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986064,0.00013529605,0.000031321535,0.000051102797,0.0009102273,0.00026578625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005798001,0.0003186341,0.00016083372,0.0007574643,0.0034160127,0.0017068336,0.00065669074,0.0012547683,0.031700358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011165034,0.00018917641,0.0002772033,0.0012504231,0.0005270721,0.0002960618,0.00043343456,0.000975199,0.0019568317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003911884,0.00023979461,0.024749035,0.00009563318,0.00003535857,0.000515423,0.00051966676,0.00092516217,0.0018876656,0.012980561,0.90259016,0.05507025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007061117,0.000075271215,0.14938627,0.000034179506,0.000023940323,0.000065152555,0.0017905169,0.0016941567,0.0018425742,0.0007678426,0.844203,0.0000464851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97644097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97644097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015512559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02032808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11255199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037927224","doi":"","title":"Generation Flux: Understanding the Seismic Shifts That Are Shaking Canada's Youth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Issue Lab (Candid)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Phase (matter); Positive Youth Development","score_opus":0.2601203417002972,"score_gpt":0.35543222410555614,"score_spread":0.09531188240525895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037927224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7082221,0.012072679,0.0039304546,0.05191345,0.00027526543,0.00014148839,0.0040944247,0.0000899892,0.21926028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96756816,0.010087969,0.0018082213,0.0014603523,0.000057855792,0.00006976498,0.00078553194,0.000031387448,0.018130792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995166,0.000077180164,0.000005980877,0.00003112083,0.0001244483,0.00024478894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915564,0.00018344956,0.0001052161,0.0000317456,0.0003229271,0.00020103139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010950889,0.00046200954,0.00017645652,0.0025799861,0.0059784143,0.004947732,0.0008604758,0.0007609501,0.00526613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025860548,0.00019076005,0.00024869273,0.0028607477,0.0030730125,0.0023585798,0.0016386205,0.0010039964,0.00020483066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013607244,0.00011686584,0.2750933,0.00037929864,0.00005756227,0.0005671248,0.19523105,0.0023450288,0.0005417884,0.21245481,0.10228513,0.21079202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001502551,0.000040150724,0.35136807,0.00081646844,0.00006756584,0.0001543069,0.39231268,0.0021287703,0.00040867395,0.029944858,0.22268166,0.000061755345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99225205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039965846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039965846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047165625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28997386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066345380","doi":"","title":"Investment Management Corp of Ontario Invests $980,000 in Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENPH) | Daily Political","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Investment (military); Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.037175635827905035,"score_gpt":0.3194677266220136,"score_spread":0.28229209079410855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066345380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00231815,0.00031625226,0.00023899971,0.0026836388,0.0002174891,0.000117187126,0.0138061745,0.00053916714,0.979763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041536246,0.00020846017,0.0001444934,0.00021390388,0.000022606318,0.000018439077,0.0022743496,0.0000884572,0.9928757],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992982,0.000024286137,0.000012489825,0.000047505935,0.00045097317,0.00016640479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980983,0.00009061841,0.000046353365,0.00010266276,0.0011981376,0.0004638266],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053196785,0.0006418035,0.0003592676,0.0013833059,0.00443418,0.0025687816,0.00060338725,0.0013800799,0.446508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00164417,0.00055190787,0.0003818366,0.0015262621,0.0008479765,0.0006880846,0.00089787564,0.0010690612,0.14452197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046587422,0.000032079584,0.0009647728,0.000045432123,0.0000028469615,0.000025773745,0.000060340084,0.000046599376,0.00022150604,0.0032112952,0.9744897,0.020853156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016124633,0.000013257959,0.0054082978,0.000023214448,0.00000280933,0.000011449901,0.000121785895,0.00011155098,0.00017923678,0.00024713922,0.9938579,0.0000072609314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8759735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9748182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.446508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015464358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019511957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78948915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095723221","doi":"","title":"Future University-Hakodate","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Variable (mathematics); Public good","score_opus":0.02687568871557459,"score_gpt":0.2991787389577023,"score_spread":0.2723030502421277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095723221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09114327,0.005086262,0.0014476973,0.027250703,0.0033290687,0.00009287785,0.006342624,0.0004428665,0.8648646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14038673,0.0026445203,0.0015176631,0.0015191605,0.00027658898,0.000052403913,0.0035620201,0.00009811501,0.8499428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947387,0.000063359905,0.00001518241,0.000070816546,0.00014802653,0.00022887824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977151,0.00007778411,0.000082222236,0.00010372397,0.00066720526,0.0013539528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056760124,0.00028950485,0.00024477456,0.0007207852,0.0035681603,0.0030143447,0.0005315099,0.0010524788,0.20811534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012109845,0.00013710078,0.0002423264,0.0012913476,0.00040934788,0.0012561997,0.0016023681,0.00077164354,0.03816663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005553043,0.0002941905,0.044507913,0.0004143417,0.000023916993,0.0008164126,0.0023281218,0.00068094686,0.0029773526,0.05787397,0.52435184,0.3651757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012610819,0.00004230774,0.026051693,0.00006441274,0.0000073108777,0.00011092479,0.0015427453,0.00022621277,0.0004268676,0.0011963631,0.97030324,0.000015200182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096841194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2652599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79188466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004354732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011260365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69621515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096561414","doi":"","title":"Charitable giving and charitable gambling: an empirical investigation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Donation; Government (linguistics); Empirical research","score_opus":0.1352537332162012,"score_gpt":0.4002655167945383,"score_spread":0.2650117835783371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096561414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944107,0.000488353,0.000286155,0.0006432752,0.000013116213,0.00008354887,0.0007458527,0.000013829141,0.0033150795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971835,0.0003390373,0.0002319518,0.00008504051,0.000015220369,0.000028600967,0.00067888113,0.000005314505,0.0014324848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967085,0.0013234395,0.00015141827,0.0002835007,0.0007263873,0.00080675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91879565,0.05270541,0.014104079,0.0023662467,0.0062744822,0.0057541295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066577243,0.00053064304,0.0010482905,0.0026439226,0.0034327998,0.002863566,0.002643123,0.0011926424,0.0129472455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036698297,0.0004182423,0.00085917034,0.004345331,0.0029942305,0.0013771147,0.0018252261,0.0032228625,0.0008899956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035798887,0.001227085,0.9824259,0.00011949366,0.0002291972,0.0002449497,0.0013497794,0.00095409085,0.00007393113,0.003062333,0.0021631473,0.0077921744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012804724,0.00022907645,0.97589624,0.00015219436,0.00026095044,0.00017936811,0.010627144,0.007589393,0.00013487763,0.0016250793,0.0031269963,0.00005059064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7615146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7915043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7615146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009344729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011462831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47977972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097442834","doi":"","title":"PRACTICES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Debt; Professional services; Ceiling (cloud); Goodwill; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.09453081645845016,"score_gpt":0.4433470219267944,"score_spread":0.34881620546834424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097442834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22008668,0.0025960302,0.043175872,0.017067898,0.0002017951,0.0005865562,0.0071027796,0.0002997431,0.70888263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8608014,0.0022143023,0.008974362,0.0011725499,0.00011616534,0.000484014,0.0018418472,0.00003998763,0.12435537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864227,0.00033498986,0.0000640226,0.00032703363,0.0002206635,0.00041094757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757963,0.00053719134,0.0010110505,0.00030023739,0.00023918365,0.0003327628],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007648975,0.0005233004,0.0007843041,0.0012106283,0.0021486988,0.0051876083,0.0014521298,0.0029178816,0.07404261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031694751,0.0003593435,0.0009059897,0.0021391606,0.00155989,0.0039999816,0.0017125795,0.0014706685,0.0074526775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017145654,0.0004054593,0.0187413,0.00025783613,0.000060134982,0.00054082746,0.0012010471,0.009340522,0.00046369646,0.89864206,0.021303304,0.048872318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002723257,0.00034117218,0.026145037,0.00047860923,0.00014251623,0.0008632287,0.0073276283,0.025016725,0.00064636563,0.5229143,0.41576755,0.00008452887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021600278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022798955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9259574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039055266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025306984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097514067","doi":"","title":"Viewpoint: On the Generalizability of Lab Behaviour to the Field.” Canadian","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Class (philosophy); Chose; Conceptualization; Reputation","score_opus":0.04299611922201423,"score_gpt":0.3587549511540996,"score_spread":0.31575883193208537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097514067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2228037,0.0048529035,0.045777407,0.11947875,0.0007283672,0.0004488864,0.0020414817,0.00052491296,0.60334355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603735,0.001465756,0.0087254355,0.009504243,0.00014411248,0.00028127193,0.000365806,0.00010657548,0.01903324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99149734,0.0034168651,0.0002760067,0.0018032034,0.0024537323,0.0005528658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97630936,0.009747695,0.003084161,0.0059134657,0.004253247,0.0006919748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150259305,0.000565283,0.0008009211,0.0017505635,0.0044688764,0.004195222,0.0027563612,0.0027257307,0.022716874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051968876,0.0005085454,0.0009546112,0.0014948046,0.013103223,0.0036381707,0.002718237,0.0026917707,0.0013804454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076897483,0.00029933377,0.04823066,0.0005154024,0.00030135698,0.00047727203,0.00680065,0.006316433,0.0034268028,0.7916658,0.053146217,0.0880511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046996953,0.0004041122,0.14448331,0.00049098814,0.00022285317,0.0003262753,0.0062785232,0.018621113,0.0038387217,0.6919681,0.1326461,0.00024994576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38167393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29170325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38167393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015392663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009354157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7589047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7110215026","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5877022","title":"Pricing Persistent Retrials","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Purchasing; Loss aversion; Outcome (game theory); Relevance (law); Mental accounting; Regret; Dynamic inconsistency; Pricing strategies","score_opus":0.03605925528862726,"score_gpt":0.33727927915788575,"score_spread":0.3012200238692585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7110215026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62971234,0.0009714367,0.2860829,0.008656281,0.00096783764,0.00016130951,0.00028509297,0.001341314,0.07182148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96649,0.00025144257,0.0067542777,0.00025937526,0.00031279167,0.000033134587,0.00005223058,0.00012296056,0.025723876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982918,0.00054058846,0.00010714018,0.00030666846,0.00041275012,0.0003411486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833335,0.00952071,0.0017008852,0.003298787,0.0011071039,0.0010390067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154594,0.0007061262,0.0012395422,0.0008082049,0.0008219691,0.005262722,0.0018095649,0.004223564,0.02769998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04244319,0.00060981704,0.0008514832,0.0009038597,0.0018043417,0.009111708,0.0018652235,0.0063068504,0.0027951526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007390265,0.0003156301,0.0020546475,0.00013290932,0.0000612659,0.0003909402,0.00042950732,0.015917908,0.0039275074,0.9115624,0.0076995227,0.05676865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001032795,0.0003051628,0.0019036749,0.000035236564,0.00004568656,0.00040437642,0.00023840604,0.15811722,0.0013741687,0.8341471,0.00328419,0.000041362557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035468562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021566279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02769998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009825962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09266567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113189572","doi":"","title":"Unrest, layoffs, and productivity at a Bangladeshi sweater factory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Factory (object-oriented programming); Quarter (Canadian coin); Productivity; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.06887534594788451,"score_gpt":0.4066424132076483,"score_spread":0.3377670672597638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113189572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99920136,0.00001959159,0.000018609402,0.000089407025,0.0000013903485,0.0000036475994,0.00007014801,7.377708e-7,0.00059507793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991085,0.0000875557,0.000037474994,0.000042876796,0.0000039358847,0.000007603885,0.00005466627,0.0000016018917,0.0006557585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957937,0.00015092836,0.000017998182,0.000052554045,0.000052667994,0.00014642882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980756,0.0004922186,0.0006153725,0.00007561956,0.00018054996,0.00056068413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005786396,0.00024573543,0.00025046768,0.0007751229,0.0045332992,0.0016046582,0.000656594,0.00080996996,0.0048072767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015012916,0.00034762174,0.00014786482,0.0011135606,0.0014762756,0.00065291417,0.0012835616,0.0012950901,0.0010558873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015547228,0.0005686186,0.92070997,0.000039388236,0.0000345446,0.0018759869,0.06528064,0.0001948009,0.001961764,0.00019746102,0.0012095008,0.007771817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058241303,0.00023882407,0.8564263,0.00003168659,0.000009957457,0.00022181172,0.14168926,0.0001455455,0.00012562324,0.000098805,0.0009836328,0.0000227446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06697594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16330752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06697594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015903346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065661845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13317221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114766081","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5897118","title":"Workplace Hostility","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hostility; Counterfactual thinking; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Risk aversion (psychology); Work (physics); Economic rent; Work behavior; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.02239475267774546,"score_gpt":0.34511234924029915,"score_spread":0.3227175965625537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114766081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92536587,0.00033126867,0.00062917755,0.0013372502,0.00011300812,0.00003004062,0.00058878836,0.000046468223,0.07155819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917452,0.00007641761,0.000067676294,0.00010319845,0.000059332684,0.0000184033,0.00015724244,0.0000042975084,0.0077683292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902403,0.00032401356,0.00004261676,0.00010759848,0.00024171779,0.0002599622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161315,0.0024569975,0.0022419582,0.0006428082,0.00057113095,0.0024738652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063717394,0.00021422941,0.00022818227,0.0011129492,0.00079891225,0.0016857408,0.00025458616,0.00062205916,0.037558634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005930454,0.00009799226,0.00020808616,0.0006152775,0.0002665419,0.00045073387,0.001141047,0.00093150727,0.004194732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006070517,0.0015509068,0.82187665,0.00015098238,0.00013998627,0.00040660065,0.0039379345,0.00056830124,0.003367838,0.006578678,0.014041836,0.14677332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003547156,0.00054456474,0.98070437,0.00007013444,0.000040430405,0.00027095314,0.0044457377,0.000739781,0.0006753088,0.0026953195,0.009758407,0.00001952253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007914289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012345379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037558634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003116879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002959241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12564617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114919646","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5847362","title":"Screening Precommitment, Candidate Quality, and Time-to-Hire: An Experimental Investigation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Precommitment; Satisficing; Earnings; Quality (philosophy); Control (management)","score_opus":0.05727614806434175,"score_gpt":0.38748640878308815,"score_spread":0.3302102607187464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114919646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99456394,0.00021744432,0.0019491675,0.00032511185,0.000052374548,0.0004706298,0.00025262404,0.00003204448,0.0021366228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99089783,0.00011880207,0.0024431099,0.00025049096,0.00008617611,0.00072837964,0.00027212096,0.000021230719,0.005181879],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876952,0.0076041883,0.0007628819,0.0017962373,0.0011803448,0.00096120033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51409715,0.4265798,0.026711982,0.02332317,0.002599538,0.006688383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033198047,0.0011263099,0.002408914,0.00096329255,0.0020188696,0.004373109,0.0034904627,0.0041506425,0.027255699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14728647,0.0012175083,0.0012890686,0.0011545654,0.0035121725,0.003941144,0.0027570808,0.0041673365,0.0022318708],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.3236811,0.22207874,0.29654992,0.0015028225,0.002480147,0.0010313998,0.0059271026,0.01068524,0.02207658,0.02155842,0.004177169,0.08825142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.061138347,0.30689853,0.43875116,0.00033919336,0.005532126,0.0011718526,0.0063080457,0.085692175,0.014675131,0.071334526,0.007344321,0.00081467803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024388768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026474444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033198047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013027163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033342566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17557013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115567649","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5908870","title":"Big Hassle on the Decarbonization Frontier","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Transaction cost; Government (linguistics); Measure (data warehouse); Wage; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.03036971765720722,"score_gpt":0.31868734049769476,"score_spread":0.28831762284048756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115567649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36667874,0.0102834115,0.038483787,0.105020076,0.0020151373,0.000045199286,0.00075783086,0.00036441447,0.47635144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768381,0.0016510399,0.0014090923,0.0025092966,0.00049652555,0.00002227479,0.00006716187,0.000097457116,0.016909108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992441,0.00021311003,0.000028097906,0.00017309835,0.00018415964,0.00015744618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947625,0.0027072271,0.00040922413,0.0011613314,0.0004476292,0.0005121018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001971554,0.00045066967,0.0011199072,0.00073447835,0.0017317653,0.0029069919,0.000661746,0.002222525,0.02586273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009869627,0.00022725691,0.00043845415,0.0008766079,0.0045556226,0.010827218,0.003099579,0.004316212,0.0012480452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023327778,0.00008176716,0.0008625946,0.00010577603,0.00003711452,0.00020352245,0.0004821351,0.002415626,0.00064383214,0.9524462,0.012826755,0.029661365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013691714,0.000022645492,0.0006880925,0.000026706282,0.0000045612655,0.000027685282,0.00028407836,0.0008175642,0.00012733687,0.9940851,0.0038936094,0.000008812863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001477096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008871336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02586273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087322865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009410039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08651942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115579424","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5921362","title":"&lt;p&gt;Experience and Advice in a Deferred Acceptance Matching Experiment&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Matching (statistics); Preference; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.019008223670676398,"score_gpt":0.3261712178271476,"score_spread":0.3071629941564712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115579424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98728484,0.00006955404,0.0015749697,0.0010704488,0.00017071312,0.00013385223,0.00014767848,0.00008931665,0.009458718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852394,0.000040432053,0.0017851661,0.0005656871,0.000082878156,0.0001502958,0.00009239891,0.000054478194,0.011989206],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970427,0.0015852737,0.00016482186,0.0004346138,0.00047829817,0.0002942114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96066487,0.026540492,0.003173936,0.0050831544,0.0005675338,0.0039700237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00734584,0.00039980988,0.0012573927,0.00039800853,0.00078035303,0.0026106827,0.001125625,0.003999457,0.028653465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036826186,0.0006700672,0.00035572235,0.00048303293,0.0014011019,0.0019285806,0.0013131145,0.0030896154,0.002558739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.25453097,0.14781693,0.063941084,0.0011582942,0.0006355602,0.0018008861,0.007121464,0.013185709,0.12821718,0.08989558,0.020262985,0.27143344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05586803,0.1349572,0.2830544,0.00025450566,0.001371089,0.00092532416,0.0038655407,0.16969362,0.03222203,0.29645258,0.02053832,0.00079730316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002841457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023137168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028653465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005620286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017585752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095855415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116791635","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5946069","title":"Feeling Rich or Looking Rich? Quantifying Self-Image and Social-Image Motives","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Value (mathematics); Preference; Perception; Consumption (sociology); Population","score_opus":0.03670555214695602,"score_gpt":0.3518369647470192,"score_spread":0.31513141260006317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116791635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967489,0.000064041524,0.0006365593,0.00006173344,0.0000034820848,0.000015632704,0.000064838154,0.0000049207274,0.002399965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990288,0.000022598542,0.0005021745,0.000013010561,0.000003254778,0.000014224017,0.000038780032,0.000003094989,0.0003741466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999509,0.0002576156,0.000019916648,0.000068523084,0.00008420433,0.000060760387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918258,0.0044221627,0.0020525905,0.00050067337,0.00040971398,0.000789124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016635497,0.00037930068,0.00034354636,0.0009166866,0.0003158257,0.0017025911,0.00028495825,0.0008833425,0.0052869385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011879886,0.000227023,0.00043991336,0.00043801134,0.000668314,0.0012379333,0.00079654856,0.00068356097,0.00042295235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001069269,0.0012695815,0.9523688,0.000140001,0.0003122628,0.00007045751,0.0019397696,0.0012544404,0.0046291715,0.006279495,0.00036354526,0.030303197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002739004,0.00038803575,0.98473686,0.000026343609,0.00013521433,0.00007244504,0.0020149115,0.0062744166,0.0010502521,0.004797579,0.0004431457,0.000033367058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010747669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015209703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052869385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003311236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023514747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017686546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124154969","doi":"10.65109/kkkc6776","title":"Behavioral game theoretic models: a Bayesian framework for parameter analysis","year":2012,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Bayesian probability; Experimental economics; Behavioral modeling; Bayesian inference","score_opus":0.08456327514209812,"score_gpt":0.3870149694892856,"score_spread":0.3024516943471875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124154969","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017528266,0.00025826148,0.9943461,0.0006730087,0.000027488657,0.00007539046,0.0002894922,0.00011514281,0.0024622635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23077156,0.0026980564,0.7542838,0.0010090865,0.00054114603,0.0020368428,0.0012666405,0.0003925774,0.0070003485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085873,0.0065056593,0.00029213828,0.00084916013,0.001164617,0.00032972347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97251576,0.021607893,0.0017627734,0.0023396446,0.0013482689,0.00042560213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018881174,0.003147876,0.003056808,0.0045240573,0.0013002242,0.006204484,0.0068539395,0.003728313,0.009309837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056171767,0.001886937,0.0027645456,0.0040420857,0.003565415,0.008168099,0.003175228,0.0073796515,0.0023091435],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022128621,0.000056868543,0.0007077284,0.0000944118,0.00009492379,0.0000624212,0.0001694976,0.1610853,0.0002003035,0.823993,0.002476475,0.011037017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016054362,0.000013901684,0.00015574593,0.00003741033,0.0000193243,0.000035648845,0.00003354499,0.38995478,0.000057573536,0.6067782,0.0028728435,0.000024935676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010278149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018881174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00355083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029838374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09985435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127090811","doi":"10.1017/eec.2025.8","title":"Rationally inattentive and strategically (Un)sophisticated","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Experimental Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Sophistication; Task (project management); Incentive; Function (biology); Adversary; Cognition; Fictitious play; Game theory; Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.021294345315643334,"score_gpt":0.32581196240073224,"score_spread":0.3045176170850889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127090811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99453676,0.000031074585,0.0013247518,0.00009787162,0.0000038963535,0.000016914886,0.00001380953,0.000010436614,0.003964572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868494,0.000016483336,0.0005291309,0.000048378424,0.0000035383457,0.0000093919125,0.000014015639,0.000002108121,0.0006920277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992181,0.00025006226,0.000091490045,0.00014901599,0.00017760045,0.00011367241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876035,0.004474732,0.0036601892,0.0018249488,0.0005290269,0.0007507704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019844614,0.00033067373,0.00030410232,0.0004003576,0.00025880686,0.0022284237,0.000276454,0.00070369744,0.0035436295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010216718,0.0002590713,0.00014856992,0.00015364676,0.0013705923,0.0012060049,0.00078448205,0.000757175,0.00041916416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007264997,0.0057879305,0.4300516,0.0006767425,0.00052043406,0.0021314316,0.008465254,0.01895572,0.35162768,0.080336586,0.0015186433,0.09266301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087804167,0.0051732156,0.688521,0.00011583017,0.0002906061,0.0019492386,0.0033986734,0.09536082,0.04960839,0.14824289,0.0062343967,0.0002268978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070426037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005224262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035436295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027991485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002675341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011854589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132916545","doi":"","title":"Social Norms and Ethical Entanglements: The Canadian Lawyer’s Risk of Automatic Self-Interest in Ethical Decision Making","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Strength and Conditioning Association","keywords":"Sanctions; Unconscious mind; Ethical decision; Order (exchange); Focus (optics); Ethical code; Ethical issues; Legal norm","score_opus":0.07462695163948613,"score_gpt":0.45247871466394424,"score_spread":0.3778517630244581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132916545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7794157,0.0017988364,0.0034466716,0.05678354,0.00013995657,0.00013954927,0.00013000019,0.00001811455,0.1581276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948926,0.00048675312,0.0005592981,0.0013312439,0.000021432357,0.00001964661,0.000015520536,0.0000069255293,0.0026664608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98560554,0.0046117716,0.00025868125,0.0010706902,0.0068527213,0.0016005882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563102,0.02362417,0.0076570283,0.0019546621,0.0076606586,0.00279333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011002255,0.00028201847,0.0003641536,0.0022848046,0.018222405,0.009813861,0.0016437959,0.0022702785,0.00440565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05055769,0.0003798246,0.00030755857,0.0026949584,0.03191659,0.003514064,0.0045264526,0.0042503993,0.0001408264],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017894476,0.00020023182,0.11425138,0.00018393868,0.000087076405,0.0006680408,0.32050568,0.0008130432,0.00090667367,0.48186365,0.014283414,0.06605796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108781656,0.0001376038,0.35414824,0.0008561695,0.00019283968,0.0004997003,0.3458399,0.004341285,0.0013075584,0.1783739,0.113801025,0.0003930805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9397218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96069586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06788471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06788471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07638487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49254036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132944316","doi":"","title":"The Hopeless and the Free-riders: Group size and Group Goals Shape Efficacy and Contributions to Collective Tasks","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Collective efficacy; Perception; Social dilemma; Outcome (game theory); Voting; Dilemma; Collective action; Group (periodic table)","score_opus":0.017716740303284594,"score_gpt":0.37321286511739854,"score_spread":0.35549612481411397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132944316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887931,0.00020773707,0.0014870516,0.00056127005,0.000010847514,0.000016568982,0.000018957231,0.000005580186,0.008898806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836427,0.000090808506,0.00061075384,0.000080501304,0.0000048869997,0.000016835509,0.0000108209615,0.000004208825,0.0008169084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917656,0.00045951724,0.000021153077,0.00011748958,0.00013053956,0.00009461915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447244,0.0027342876,0.0014436791,0.00045549843,0.00023733496,0.00065664534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021397623,0.0001718825,0.00022490046,0.00039598494,0.0007397139,0.001970301,0.00038762225,0.0006893191,0.0036621424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0096345525,0.00024264661,0.00029571794,0.0002466304,0.0022582235,0.0013147759,0.0012843889,0.0010941102,0.00028659985],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018262495,0.0031563067,0.68831205,0.00043210818,0.00042667156,0.0006503542,0.061554145,0.0030191038,0.026090333,0.08393401,0.003549454,0.12704928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006859606,0.0007184929,0.93479633,0.000116013296,0.00010086631,0.000175628,0.014118488,0.0020778072,0.0016035476,0.039839245,0.006329863,0.00005522803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010204313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001886084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036621424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000423604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038588146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012251079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133088297","doi":"","title":"Experimental Investigations of Strategic Interactions","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Paternalism; Quality (philosophy); Control (management); Selection (genetic algorithm); Focus (optics); Outcome (game theory)","score_opus":0.12915196838273382,"score_gpt":0.4612435172424589,"score_spread":0.332091548859725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133088297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8701612,0.0005820044,0.0115857115,0.0022516265,0.00043159508,0.0016890283,0.00088529364,0.00014058728,0.112273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964874,0.00042248424,0.012718165,0.0015872824,0.00014818137,0.004202586,0.00050776714,0.000057059253,0.0154825235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949202,0.0025669236,0.00034715622,0.0010305719,0.0008119306,0.00032320243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684507,0.021645287,0.0032727458,0.0043029315,0.001251383,0.0010769616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004784214,0.0006725602,0.00043782225,0.00050328113,0.0013932588,0.0019658213,0.0011505191,0.0021214422,0.027656041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030469375,0.0005985356,0.00044015772,0.0004763785,0.0022552684,0.0021006654,0.0017316658,0.0027571137,0.0024952688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015860334,0.09424913,0.12358193,0.004493418,0.0009202172,0.0023616878,0.069537275,0.008199529,0.12268911,0.26962325,0.03720424,0.25127992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009833217,0.07564778,0.18680002,0.0016396346,0.000993571,0.002975781,0.042384185,0.031484697,0.064543955,0.27211952,0.31083453,0.0007432389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006954458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008885568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027656041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008048218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008798112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09251869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133102787","doi":"","title":"Biased or Motivated? Starting Point Biases May Erroneously Capture Motivated Attentional Dynamics","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Generosity; Prosocial behavior; Mechanism (biology); Point (geometry); Perspective (graphical); Domain (mathematical analysis); Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.06597900007072081,"score_gpt":0.3960200620319364,"score_spread":0.3300410619612156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133102787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7402802,0.00041877312,0.22859028,0.0015461174,0.00011767508,0.00012869286,0.00039895182,0.00034204262,0.02817736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810807,0.00013365223,0.017434172,0.00026783382,0.0000212346,0.00008323758,0.000073971285,0.00008889091,0.0008162684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985662,0.0005776471,0.00009784641,0.0003193242,0.00027799013,0.00016105766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861974,0.008134208,0.001997478,0.002765604,0.0005777665,0.000327552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004083644,0.00053143216,0.00072119845,0.00055702834,0.00041888372,0.0023729154,0.00097179133,0.0011050876,0.0034585886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0355706,0.00039207973,0.00068170007,0.0005653056,0.0015310599,0.004462945,0.0014508242,0.001743885,0.0005812936],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096580345,0.00032300994,0.118107654,0.0005518607,0.0004436772,0.00041548436,0.0026065977,0.07054458,0.038848057,0.6730482,0.0028024113,0.09134277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010234241,0.00017493493,0.06095427,0.00011805553,0.000108725384,0.0003115464,0.0007013786,0.1831587,0.010253508,0.7398367,0.0041666958,0.0001132756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013228662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001100764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004083644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009944689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006091644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02159667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W880244751","doi":"","title":"Explorations in Information Integration Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Politics; Regional science; International psychology; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Geography; Critical psychology; Asian psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.023054646702602957,"score_gpt":0.27547304842336656,"score_spread":0.25241840172076363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W880244751","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019274896,0.19959727,0.37937227,0.19552408,0.00811825,0.00018620945,0.00065135024,0.0004549669,0.19682074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62089336,0.14457215,0.16743582,0.015637362,0.022220436,0.0010632944,0.0014721666,0.0005412876,0.026164096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98584485,0.009532062,0.0006519134,0.0009724909,0.002594217,0.00040452176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337968,0.060204033,0.001034777,0.0020377932,0.0023021894,0.00062435196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016649488,0.0010346851,0.0016524319,0.0068497863,0.0031163606,0.013051816,0.00169531,0.0030462327,0.015206163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038432784,0.000671052,0.002135461,0.01075348,0.010092139,0.029287899,0.005238563,0.0054326653,0.0014194289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016433314,0.00002234498,0.00032143018,0.0002864126,0.000045696055,0.000049641498,0.0012103949,0.00053356716,0.000048083457,0.9531546,0.011749475,0.032561895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047868307,0.0000075058615,0.00015607013,0.00018035246,0.0000070994975,0.0000465254,0.00037822683,0.0011248271,0.000025651656,0.9771029,0.020958167,0.000007954875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093974825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060076854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016649488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004705969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032033022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088051915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97004453","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2188645","title":"The Effect of Income on the Importance of Money: Survey and Experimental Evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.030341229679004003,"score_gpt":0.3477077167256219,"score_spread":0.3173664870466179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97004453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99370027,0.00051072356,0.00053218845,0.0002489837,0.000011716595,0.000017160699,0.00010663622,0.000003726551,0.0048685595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983512,0.00046668993,0.0003565812,0.00007985063,0.000026636139,0.000013901868,0.00008343205,0.0000035513156,0.00061819324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736905,0.0020156268,0.00009550309,0.00018040273,0.00023208237,0.00010728653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78367954,0.18831602,0.017023005,0.0071136206,0.0023217548,0.0015460817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066019446,0.00034736568,0.0004282417,0.0006550096,0.000427146,0.0010173963,0.00049480953,0.00088143564,0.009515166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051296033,0.00030318205,0.00031684595,0.0005561612,0.0015264722,0.00095698977,0.0005677041,0.0010174734,0.00084469345],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02465913,0.013789884,0.8469346,0.00063744193,0.001080547,0.00033054664,0.0017292371,0.002446063,0.0067553488,0.009943839,0.001758298,0.08993502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048923003,0.0028596753,0.9814357,0.000073563206,0.0003805156,0.00023932647,0.0007977991,0.0020115369,0.00266059,0.007234644,0.0017747055,0.000042636308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001344619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012253183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009515166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026170182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020893868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03491485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}