{"meta":{"query_hash":"0a14903aff8f","filters":{"topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law"},"cohort_total":82,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":82,"exported":82,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0a14903aff8f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Family+and+Matrimonial+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1505315499","doi":"","title":"Grandparents Raising Grandchildren and the Implications for Inheritance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grandparent; Raising (metalworking); Mandate; Estate planning; Estate; Kinship; Kinship care; Statute; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Political science; Probate; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.025857531745126706,"score_gpt":0.2985590290388685,"score_spread":0.27270149729374177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505315499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8844345,0.023759045,0.03960375,0.037395608,0.0005824801,0.0012467518,0.000016949736,0.00008790129,0.01287301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811508,0.017687034,0.00006692432,0.00018142135,0.00030509828,0.000016018717,0.0000012119436,0.000006801622,0.0005847026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986586,0.000107364816,0.00013411825,0.0000955714,0.000108985434,0.00089534913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956995,0.0001631101,0.00007885912,0.00006989933,0.00006459647,0.00005359497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015642728,0.00006110574,0.000105792285,0.000023154713,0.0026202335,0.000050591058,0.00019075378,0.000040213123,0.0000018096252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014980376,0.00004242081,0.000074789954,0.00011069133,0.0004137604,0.00014614641,0.000011553885,0.00036959074,0.0000015704869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008916998,0.000012187448,0.003763312,8.410639e-7,0.000029669583,1.0207327e-7,0.0018545968,0.0000011962788,0.000018114655,0.9833237,0.00024094919,0.010666146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021110515,0.0000454576,0.009258683,0.000006831337,0.000026794849,0.00009775984,0.0009780505,0.000003101558,0.0000032651267,0.9630821,0.024299948,0.00008699064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048820634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041604186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096716285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013754904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088759454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873287667","doi":"10.20318/cdt.2016.1913","title":"Reflexiones sobre los regímenes especiales en Derecho internacional privado sucesorio según el Reglamento europeo 650/2012 de 4 de julio de 2012","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022593879976455893,"score_gpt":0.316546741220505,"score_spread":0.2939528612440491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873287667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8114228,0.0056136195,0.044677142,0.044600382,0.0033144662,0.0020039242,0.0007189374,0.0010440664,0.086604655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704419,0.004881491,0.007488572,0.0031805045,0.0053616357,0.00014435171,0.00011488,0.00021379533,0.008172911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901059,0.0031098428,0.0012207268,0.001349665,0.0015638714,0.0026499522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545497,0.0016388481,0.00051494763,0.0007450599,0.0003201447,0.0013260302],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004070734,0.001054318,0.0010035486,0.0004172272,0.0013527481,0.0007031768,0.002071782,0.0014475362,0.0013686712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005791092,0.0011255112,0.00076539203,0.00068350503,0.0011286443,0.0013260162,0.00022505716,0.0013685852,0.0005209691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020220987,0.0018526436,0.030114016,0.0010469048,0.0006324538,0.00025714675,0.025166202,0.00040653755,0.029894395,0.83576006,0.034209806,0.038637765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028258318,0.00042045195,0.039182026,0.0008920794,0.00054810505,0.0002720005,0.0021734228,0.00047396254,0.007865721,0.053158533,0.8903799,0.0018079763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007587271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002502038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85617006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016584382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023266624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19671244","doi":"10.1093/jat/33.5.253","title":"Criterios para entender y valorar los peritajes psicologicos y psiquiátricos en las Causas de nulidad matrimonial","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Apollinaris","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041860811298788825,"score_gpt":0.36373404027439843,"score_spread":0.3218732289756096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19671244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382887,0.0023954392,0.0008013206,0.0050789006,0.0019830847,0.00089388393,0.000075954704,0.0004799159,0.050002806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989263,0.000516519,0.0031795418,0.0012551352,0.0019839206,0.00009299639,0.000011468559,0.00003783736,0.0036595967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678063,0.0006724222,0.0003755915,0.00035649817,0.0005227478,0.0012920898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984974,0.00043132884,0.00014727631,0.0003197237,0.000105677886,0.000498551],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012976283,0.00029324822,0.0003798974,0.00013078409,0.0009255937,0.00018811612,0.0005143305,0.00047785311,0.0007572263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044545718,0.00028017085,0.00022779779,0.0004426001,0.00039971079,0.0006766367,0.000153458,0.0003847768,0.0006832715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063154014,0.0031778056,0.22901864,0.00022937011,0.00036065883,0.0002721348,0.12726226,0.000033133063,0.010957847,0.47541618,0.12979451,0.022845924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008341396,0.00029451516,0.03606476,0.000036602858,0.00016756641,0.000023036833,0.009572452,0.000040847448,0.0014635391,0.005866508,0.9448613,0.0007747542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065334137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060277595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81506675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034036222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031560377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019717928","doi":"10.7202/043844ar","title":"Le nouveau Code civil brésilien : changements culturels et permanence dans la protection des relations familiales","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016185425540669103,"score_gpt":0.25835815058193357,"score_spread":0.24217272504126447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019717928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5918049,0.0019859832,0.019696718,0.011554475,0.000646669,0.0007990809,0.00015369427,0.00021979045,0.37313864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8923828,0.0013162993,0.0023089317,0.00059425185,0.0003894033,0.00008927764,0.000019954954,0.000027409627,0.10287165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979451,0.0005197238,0.0002625674,0.00036009526,0.00034850778,0.0005640477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992651,0.00012246508,0.00013867038,0.00019567803,0.00008382789,0.0001942689],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007704073,0.00021020156,0.00019868166,0.00007135398,0.0016118387,0.00012390403,0.00031094594,0.00055947265,0.00011888176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018085347,0.00024923793,0.0001399791,0.00047939684,0.0023436986,0.000726708,0.00004651406,0.00058655866,0.00022285993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023293722,0.00022634666,0.00062250084,0.000079121244,0.000052255236,0.000014657725,0.13639095,0.0009562589,0.0038152747,0.83976936,0.0019724085,0.016077558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061284134,0.00011866622,0.009279291,0.00023879872,0.00012118506,0.00002870139,0.029895213,0.0011953793,0.0014915107,0.042915516,0.9135547,0.0005481679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011538012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.103699565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9115823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013506683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035932666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035225081","doi":"10.4067/s0718-09502008000200003","title":"EL CONCEPTO DE LEGADO EN EL DERECHO CIVIL CHILENO","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02027919783857243,"score_gpt":0.3190286610315359,"score_spread":0.29874946319296347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035225081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6777506,0.016327955,0.0017001497,0.0037631611,0.0009687474,0.001194395,0.0001525014,0.00050675194,0.29763576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96653795,0.024446014,0.0010479265,0.0018289626,0.0015569739,0.00003967757,0.00001734226,0.00007523317,0.0044499105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953921,0.0012352761,0.00063091575,0.000699336,0.0006920558,0.001350306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756664,0.000735203,0.00030646875,0.00060917076,0.00015706515,0.00062544586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016286654,0.00048078338,0.0007277264,0.00012236925,0.0013594695,0.00043459,0.00097400474,0.00070110796,0.00063678314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010061796,0.000507568,0.00041606041,0.00070267817,0.00082014065,0.00043145943,0.00016800308,0.0007876708,0.00082223705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024277002,0.00089698355,0.07733833,0.00079091196,0.00040453477,0.00063557905,0.037595157,0.000044208897,0.0029221722,0.7295867,0.10473038,0.044812273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084109296,0.00012825165,0.023198782,0.00047778554,0.00015176702,0.00008369473,0.0015521017,0.00006496447,0.00053584634,0.0027434002,0.9694531,0.000769231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051826085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035458096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8647227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075251004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016035127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249236794","doi":"10.15581/011.32473","title":"La laicidad en la Constitución española","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Persona y Derecho","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01540552565342831,"score_gpt":0.3240452092192647,"score_spread":0.30863968356583643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249236794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15664235,0.00087338185,0.00010482899,0.003422711,0.001266898,0.00026384994,0.00005092003,0.00020061602,0.8371744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885657,0.0015257137,0.0006715894,0.0008149196,0.0016603267,0.000013412162,0.000004192917,0.000030817588,0.0067133163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714386,0.0010721196,0.00023929562,0.00046864446,0.0004843622,0.00059170084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822754,0.001013453,0.00011497082,0.0002746668,0.00013382704,0.00023554968],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014731046,0.0002729862,0.00032456667,0.00009447668,0.00079620344,0.0003872895,0.0005047025,0.0005984328,0.0007967785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000530356,0.00026962152,0.00017854098,0.0004203946,0.0023011703,0.00027961485,0.00012375516,0.00044883694,0.0026908945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012180356,0.00030678677,0.0053626546,0.000112642105,0.00014498229,0.00010380739,0.048675448,4.4067306e-7,0.0015579831,0.8134924,0.04492083,0.085200176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052557077,0.00012221072,0.0030136234,0.0001416407,0.000080832055,0.000014291767,0.006442773,0.00003163058,0.0005055003,0.0020010152,0.98674273,0.00037816243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043279175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013067143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94182193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121903126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048793503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260229043","doi":"","title":"Cruce de fronteras en aula: un experimento de derecho comparado en derecho de familia (Crossing Borders in the Classroom: A Comparative Law Experiment in Family Law)","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Family law; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036140263141834106,"score_gpt":0.349032910247024,"score_spread":0.3128926471051899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260229043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446778,0.016929334,0.0018388156,0.0008901536,0.0003497037,0.0007037001,0.0000061859378,0.000049509174,0.03455478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908955,0.0052969563,0.0015574996,0.0015529791,0.00038550582,0.00008619104,0.000002813697,0.000048974314,0.0001735852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888764,0.004192539,0.00091560377,0.0005594317,0.00069322204,0.0047628195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983734,0.00052882364,0.00038452694,0.0003476189,0.000073212635,0.00029243677],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065058125,0.000559946,0.0007523047,0.00021443883,0.0016300314,0.00089387747,0.0014673941,0.00047159972,0.000045794513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005450438,0.00050864153,0.00029381982,0.0005469311,0.001017394,0.0006538158,0.00012937121,0.0037196523,0.000034272234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005715411,0.00094742805,0.005535272,0.000014824625,0.00021178238,0.00007439695,0.3429949,0.00009549556,0.006422065,0.6412186,0.00016888854,0.001744817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051808185,0.00108723,0.016093923,0.0005118895,0.00014899443,0.0002161633,0.7362452,0.00060045585,0.0071733203,0.20767075,0.023862178,0.0012090451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19430853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20252179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43354782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008734757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066348854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267988218","doi":"","title":"Concubines Under Mexican Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil code; Wife; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Section (typography); Supreme court; State (computer science); Common law; Sociology; Commercial law; Business","score_opus":0.01219626188631375,"score_gpt":0.2898342074788773,"score_spread":0.27763794559256355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267988218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19960167,0.0077897394,0.0023691044,0.059393123,0.0010910684,0.00026298777,0.0000032200273,0.0002252766,0.72926384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833004,0.0030190705,0.00009325141,0.0014300882,0.0015896449,0.0000017291237,6.7625865e-7,0.000011036123,0.010554124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997453,0.00013571742,0.00016676393,0.000115057985,0.00030235428,0.0018271492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995936,0.000055216973,0.000076392964,0.00008165523,0.00006492251,0.00012817186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001621561,0.0000886361,0.00011744121,0.00003579297,0.00087398756,0.0000890798,0.00027438963,0.00008231999,0.00014349364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035536275,0.00007851621,0.00009185912,0.00013460583,0.00024470495,0.00031719726,0.000017274098,0.00083183695,0.00013984264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105275185,0.00002263228,0.00005805244,4.4603456e-7,0.000028259494,7.6693914e-7,0.0004485661,0.000019827172,0.0000845747,0.9908468,0.0004145056,0.008065029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002839422,0.00006717614,0.000054432556,0.000004570949,0.00001638277,0.00002506928,0.005165738,0.0000039908246,0.00006458376,0.42686334,0.56733465,0.00011614925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032700268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11571229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78369874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077130273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002110013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90042365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277600879","doi":"","title":"Consideraciones relativas al derecho de familia en la provincia British Columbia Canadiense","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derecho de Familia: doctrina, jurisprudencia, legislación","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0070449028965705145,"score_gpt":0.27306357309450274,"score_spread":0.26601867019793224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277600879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9088143,0.008130898,0.0015952674,0.0024534685,0.0012222574,0.0028668426,0.0005161412,0.0008685282,0.07353228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96393317,0.012765787,0.0034449424,0.0037491505,0.0015628272,0.00030894927,0.000061021594,0.00026063542,0.013913531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98210365,0.0074522393,0.0020990546,0.002320676,0.0018554364,0.004168928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98871696,0.0055591785,0.0011448389,0.0016997069,0.00075328274,0.002126016],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009941431,0.0012804607,0.0021970116,0.00038536557,0.0029406191,0.0051479354,0.0021943906,0.0024095236,0.00042232123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009848215,0.0019314147,0.0010408956,0.001804472,0.0017527576,0.0013107216,0.00053712353,0.0031429632,0.00046634767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037737115,0.0013033596,0.3766763,0.0018963602,0.00081620464,0.004032062,0.013940058,0.000075376105,0.0016171805,0.12970224,0.28869838,0.18086512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002076854,0.00045946112,0.1212226,0.0018094539,0.000679978,0.0007331043,0.0021011545,0.0005050253,0.0001323953,0.0074479496,0.86067575,0.0021562485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4823708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44421673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5719774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004506496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00859232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284734465","doi":"","title":"\"Elder Law\" and Conflicts of Interest in the United States and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Salience (neuroscience); Political science; International law; Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Municipal law; Sociology; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.030232762156393745,"score_gpt":0.2603377149034968,"score_spread":0.23010495274710302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284734465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96158653,0.0001945135,7.4703314e-7,0.0014133495,0.000076125674,0.00019019035,0.000009358803,0.000008863722,0.03652034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952552,0.00017541385,0.000034410303,0.004205328,0.000028763267,0.000009657899,0.0000046478585,0.000004047617,0.0002825776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993295,0.00015143445,0.00013129241,0.000105275685,0.00010395765,0.00017856022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995032,0.00020385876,0.000041789284,0.000099796795,0.000050699535,0.00010064236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027898254,0.000066226836,0.00010466017,0.00002021357,0.00016504953,0.00006951357,0.00014721545,0.00004951696,0.000104851664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006480972,0.000048754435,0.000009718701,0.000115909956,0.00040059382,0.00015353582,0.000036316138,0.00011969118,0.000004848105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008035383,0.00002030289,0.006726382,0.000020516525,0.000009297485,0.0000061076107,0.0067371456,0.0000016317623,0.000083167935,0.98268735,0.00352905,0.00017101355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005685207,0.00007528926,0.03321373,0.00007464052,0.00001457282,0.0000018244466,0.02069886,0.000018821185,0.00036040705,0.024198128,0.92055464,0.00022057691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99742776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95848924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020415146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071552764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19881481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339200572","doi":"10.7202/1035645ar","title":"Le pluralisme de l’ordonnancement civil en Espagne et le droit civil en vigueur en Catalogne","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011014364211201489,"score_gpt":0.24495934768221972,"score_spread":0.23394498347101822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339200572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.529402,0.0075450363,0.00569451,0.18708974,0.003929015,0.0015725021,0.0008490113,0.00048615012,0.26343203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9149765,0.0064769518,0.0008810599,0.001436421,0.0019572051,0.000116710515,0.000058272846,0.00008804072,0.07400888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951543,0.0011475295,0.00069230335,0.0008448189,0.00051587267,0.0016451624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973748,0.00092339324,0.00032876278,0.0006941599,0.00011951298,0.0005594015],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026402904,0.00039096765,0.0006959863,0.00013189674,0.00054718443,0.00014811284,0.0011223454,0.0006879453,0.00058615964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057114667,0.00050736504,0.00039512277,0.0005613836,0.0006744902,0.0008918465,0.000335475,0.00049636245,0.000927011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007070018,0.00048972346,0.00197372,0.00030142828,0.000120820725,0.00023964573,0.013652075,0.00007565025,0.007877996,0.94943696,0.011259706,0.014501565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024408503,0.0003815818,0.009121356,0.0012722792,0.00019106557,0.00010848706,0.00233041,0.00012553977,0.0028233184,0.17379059,0.80616677,0.0012477355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030796835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08737829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7949071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001365741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015633353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343141446","doi":"","title":"Riflessioni in tema di arbitrato e questioni di diritto di famiglia","year":2009,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Aisberg (University of Bergamo)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Arbitration; Law; Art","score_opus":0.012697408558198042,"score_gpt":0.23978760434621432,"score_spread":0.22709019578801629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343141446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87196213,0.000958749,0.00027517017,0.010057723,0.000857025,0.00055735407,0.00006430881,0.00015330316,0.11511423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98568326,0.00167526,0.000244964,0.00022932739,0.00016291166,3.8687386e-7,0.000018804742,0.00001706996,0.011968012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689466,0.0004660902,0.00039519917,0.0006706878,0.00076246087,0.00081093365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983523,0.00019340594,0.00036910057,0.00047771318,0.00022667118,0.00038083125],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006951566,0.0003603389,0.0006906726,0.00028646892,0.0010255474,0.00008168682,0.00093199237,0.00058372575,0.0003715614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011800138,0.0004512169,0.00033803214,0.0014092218,0.00081971195,0.0010351307,0.00020398425,0.00055289885,0.00024338537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096095185,0.0035567007,0.11759147,0.00031839983,0.0002736938,0.0011436598,0.07514179,0.00048646418,0.004865733,0.7345769,0.02250967,0.038574588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029414857,0.00073077384,0.83019817,0.0013329083,0.00031870976,0.000005511354,0.03593272,0.0004524523,0.00028059536,0.013771427,0.1126026,0.001432624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04130516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020683775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72080547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003545107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000471195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495271188","doi":"10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.09.003","title":"CHALLENGING THE CENTRALIST DOCTRINE IN MEXICAN FAMILY LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION OF STATE AUTHORITY OVER CIVIL LAW MATTERS AND ITS IMPACT ON THE REGULATION OF COHABITATION AND DIVORCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad de Sonora; McGill University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Cohabitation; Federalism; Federalist; Law; Doctrine; Sovereignty; Political science; Family law; Decentralization; Comparative law; State (computer science); Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Public law; Legal doctrine; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02098485832848245,"score_gpt":0.31394238301590893,"score_spread":0.2929575246874265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495271188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98384154,0.0060426616,0.000016193671,0.0065973005,0.00004409106,0.0006100978,0.00007919464,0.000008208,0.0027607277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937463,0.0057832007,0.0000037354719,0.0004232576,0.000011782718,0.000007172218,0.0000022348129,0.0000042244055,0.000018117698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981912,0.0008343735,0.00034622874,0.0001532577,0.00032001102,0.00015496007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900407,0.00031437367,0.00032399694,0.00023800634,0.00007492502,0.000044605647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019101609,0.000097343676,0.00033149667,0.000031954674,0.00021710394,0.000013015038,0.00017342996,0.00003439835,0.0000198951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074871765,0.000042865056,0.00011216945,0.0004940088,0.000653473,0.00018405661,0.00003342951,0.00006224552,2.1278558e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021362088,0.000027010754,0.0030047956,0.00017936443,0.000058181948,5.5655825e-8,0.00095860695,0.000036073016,0.0016365275,0.9933943,0.000027138989,0.0006565624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004049534,0.00014791651,0.9781111,0.002784858,0.0007354687,2.4160946e-7,0.0006778044,0.000365634,0.00067127484,0.009833691,0.006063014,0.00020406378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052610885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061402652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100834724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000350202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9557243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528139057","doi":"","title":"Aportes de la auditoría forense a los sistemas de control fiscal aplicados por la contraloría general de Medellín en este municipio","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Trabajos de Grado Contaduría UdeA","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.007318591913074365,"score_gpt":0.29395705415658213,"score_spread":0.28663846224350775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528139057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447954,0.0020455485,0.0042063007,0.008161091,0.00069784315,0.0020754158,0.00044516654,0.000585341,0.036987863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98811734,0.0012143912,0.0017752207,0.003534458,0.002652647,0.00017821658,0.000035269743,0.00011207033,0.002380364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904676,0.003728035,0.0011931924,0.00097167754,0.0009573371,0.0026821317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941426,0.002962161,0.0005827332,0.0007767813,0.00016020113,0.0013755431],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00448224,0.0009424834,0.0014570665,0.00022602138,0.00095903245,0.00076858484,0.0013784282,0.0015477726,0.00009677088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008493991,0.00095159933,0.0009800018,0.0005124846,0.0013545168,0.0004673777,0.00008037024,0.0013710288,0.000061841616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030884775,0.003453041,0.051351566,0.00057866564,0.001450741,0.0033450592,0.029095398,0.0007261191,0.041917443,0.8162552,0.023349341,0.025388949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.033520903,0.004225821,0.39548418,0.0019863632,0.0053186305,0.0015498442,0.007946319,0.022397583,0.006010244,0.073170915,0.44217303,0.0062161665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009638953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024229109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7430843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011149367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018505751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787585447","doi":"10.7202/1045931ar","title":"LES DROITS PATRIMONIAUX DU CONJOINT SURVIVANT ET LA MASSE SUCCESSORALE","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.027315869777972446,"score_gpt":0.29565867154554626,"score_spread":0.2683428017675738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787585447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59003496,0.00572087,0.0006405504,0.024284985,0.008232995,0.00065315067,0.00015113664,0.0001798267,0.37010148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658228,0.0056730094,0.0010428148,0.000538973,0.0009206545,0.000021717453,0.000018990124,0.000056857003,0.025904167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953652,0.0021884632,0.0005893153,0.0006088873,0.00042719577,0.0008209112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976448,0.0010706476,0.00031321353,0.00042110324,0.00020367246,0.00034655147],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002844075,0.0003965215,0.0006219667,0.00008395306,0.00072744867,0.0002743267,0.00045089345,0.0004760928,0.0011954914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009943463,0.00043315146,0.000323846,0.0006079495,0.0006123155,0.0005356851,0.000112398695,0.00052071526,0.00096855714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026708556,0.00030016823,0.027737282,0.00015277263,0.000055214587,0.00022953557,0.003362786,0.00013011486,0.00009790812,0.962663,0.002876643,0.0023678557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080274,0.000108923894,0.009154572,0.00020897161,0.00013960787,0.000046690726,0.0011781458,0.00013396192,0.00014701895,0.011173385,0.97630006,0.00060592673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04321149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010731331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027249198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047349144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28520426","doi":"10.7203/cefd.23.711","title":"Derechos e integración: el acomodo razonable como instrumento para la igualdad material","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.31242927950972504,"score_gpt":0.5647656014134723,"score_spread":0.2523363219037473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28520426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8298642,0.0048023467,0.00008239217,0.00037614524,0.0038389324,0.0010958133,0.00024337386,0.000111544934,0.15958524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669933,0.029796163,0.00044673032,0.0004554777,0.00066837174,0.00007207702,0.000021173044,0.000105115505,0.0014416268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99305654,0.0017574348,0.0016263018,0.000862295,0.0014759365,0.0012214786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579144,0.00047821202,0.0016971502,0.00080274796,0.00047233075,0.00075812626],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042698765,0.00075771543,0.0015567068,0.0007446256,0.0012121669,0.004595509,0.006332736,0.00063811924,0.030920122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004656076,0.00070458424,0.00048850937,0.0014834654,0.0011363372,0.005634529,0.0020822706,0.00094186136,0.00023298117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056097857,0.0054376586,0.49977756,0.0011543978,0.0021562104,0.0006230405,0.025084523,0.000021445347,0.107154,0.09292604,0.1291575,0.13089785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002674238,0.00013467493,0.3753229,0.0026772039,0.00065506325,0.000036052716,0.005366952,0.000026091559,0.07600606,0.087257944,0.4474802,0.0023626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043011293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076786964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31832272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028424594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007253238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28528578","doi":"10.1186/s12916-017-0859-8","title":"El IAJD y los documentos notariales extranjeros: a propósito de la Sentencia de 2 de marzo de 2006 del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 6 de Santa Cruz de Tenerife","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Tribuna Fiscal: Revista Tributaria y Financiera","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007840335499619953,"score_gpt":0.28932758523995683,"score_spread":0.2814872497403369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28528578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92627525,0.010825673,0.047511857,0.0029876078,0.00050097733,0.0028025776,0.0022250044,0.0006408387,0.006230187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96631455,0.005385594,0.019643638,0.0021148052,0.0026837136,0.0004482413,0.00032474508,0.000279863,0.0028048258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845281,0.0038959673,0.0022606796,0.0017844676,0.0014411557,0.0060895765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407303,0.001512801,0.001164945,0.001311677,0.00040287158,0.0015346872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010305773,0.0015938935,0.0020750428,0.00040531612,0.0024103213,0.0020406228,0.002214789,0.002274523,0.00017369253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003076116,0.0016965768,0.0012081587,0.002109185,0.0016181292,0.000949511,0.00041662244,0.002181785,0.00010648461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043847384,0.0049971626,0.46499795,0.0023810286,0.00067807676,0.002908992,0.009961136,0.0011620831,0.11512049,0.23345782,0.14556953,0.014380992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063039195,0.00058534666,0.26055434,0.0017285582,0.001445171,0.00043529877,0.00071472157,0.0027390392,0.008524653,0.021774564,0.6924762,0.0027181576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05299173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039537232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5469067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008597601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015513791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885693140","doi":"10.22199/s07189753.2002.0001.00014","title":"La atribución preferente de la vivienda familiar al cónyuge supérstite en el derecho de Québec","year":2002,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho (Coquimbo)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01870626863921996,"score_gpt":0.3204875382537406,"score_spread":0.3017812696145206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885693140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7939639,0.019427145,0.0032296707,0.005148628,0.0006900998,0.0014839512,0.0004175477,0.00080572,0.17483333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94845855,0.042528763,0.0016678526,0.0018796155,0.0008116665,0.00007391062,0.000022166381,0.0001523061,0.004405137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901702,0.0048062787,0.0009484241,0.0011003473,0.00089198275,0.0020828063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438477,0.003092742,0.00043825098,0.00091955357,0.00018514653,0.0009795158],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004478897,0.0008270986,0.0010339124,0.00024279345,0.0010765569,0.0012087434,0.0014973114,0.0013351876,0.00079174235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002264059,0.0008729002,0.0006944824,0.00093361834,0.0011029079,0.00054024527,0.00034823973,0.0016746813,0.00080917374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005499153,0.0029571808,0.0911658,0.0024919678,0.0011431549,0.0011617487,0.045617234,0.00018182558,0.008700173,0.4594304,0.19960475,0.18699585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011634256,0.00014927368,0.01081549,0.0007064523,0.00040283112,0.000091455564,0.0012966568,0.0005964246,0.00030743214,0.0018158368,0.9816259,0.0010288139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049677726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00574492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78202116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021107614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017518032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919395100","doi":"","title":"LA COMPETENCE DES TRIBUNAUX EN MATIERE DE FAILLITE","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Debtor; Bankruptcy; Law; Supreme court; Creditor; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Confusion; Jurisprudence; Original jurisdiction; Business; Psychology; Debt","score_opus":0.02810567432508452,"score_gpt":0.29722359107335655,"score_spread":0.269117916748272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919395100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028969604,0.69757444,0.00002891146,0.16376717,0.00043552998,0.00061580044,0.000109437475,0.000028043283,0.13454373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27604112,0.6912244,0.0011331167,0.02151159,0.00037429304,0.000031960946,0.000010304725,0.000029011355,0.009644217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975793,0.0011040646,0.00025821716,0.00017431716,0.00020244556,0.000681696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987099,0.00020881621,0.00008146051,0.00029145327,0.000073684205,0.0006346498],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023275907,0.00016568312,0.00031644606,0.000026498783,0.0009813051,0.000109030196,0.0006449741,0.00016033454,0.0008189228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041920025,0.00013187519,0.00015228256,0.0005155834,0.0013407908,0.0001914454,0.000029091587,0.00032407313,0.0014262713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.9281265e-7,0.000007773124,0.000060414997,0.0009454096,0.000016962927,0.000046359717,0.0035779702,0.00000943771,0.0000010113764,0.9104658,0.0055304053,0.07933779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088266075,0.000018995936,0.0010162806,0.0054604076,0.00011008578,0.000030508607,0.00032163647,0.0000012458212,0.0000020916802,0.036531605,0.9562536,0.00016531012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.744071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91141814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015143204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003329375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919420367","doi":"10.32997/2256-2796-vol.5-num.10-2013-2007","title":"Formalidades del matrimonio en el código general del proceso","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D´Filippo","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009886192335855146,"score_gpt":0.28427326824475374,"score_spread":0.2743870759088986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919420367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8588127,0.009290002,0.00030059973,0.0071443873,0.0015460915,0.0040967115,0.00021307736,0.000568038,0.11802837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94033223,0.008887081,0.0047087586,0.0019651821,0.0026022315,0.00038145014,0.00017274733,0.00023776328,0.04071254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99121577,0.001015013,0.0018303867,0.001572422,0.001885657,0.002480752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953187,0.0005554136,0.00091572775,0.0013524131,0.0006360341,0.0012217166],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023527874,0.0012035837,0.0015435516,0.0003797833,0.0018967822,0.0031966218,0.0022439165,0.0013570733,0.0023844335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081985554,0.0011484578,0.0008747327,0.0013981255,0.0011501806,0.0017875633,0.0008626097,0.0013975318,0.0041186027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003171305,0.0014612474,0.10969796,0.0031556298,0.00082188286,0.00015179938,0.011047438,0.000042326992,0.003157865,0.68061817,0.075717315,0.11381125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012715199,0.00037293142,0.05043959,0.00047468045,0.00047754202,0.000030058007,0.0010916502,0.0006440797,0.00016004694,0.0026606966,0.9406882,0.0016889824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001044387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8649709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077320944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022681411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927850905","doi":"","title":"La vulneración del derecho al matrimonio igualitario de personas del mismo sexo en la legislación Ecuatoriana","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persona; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014059369934047796,"score_gpt":0.33226385795054786,"score_spread":0.3182044880165001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927850905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5111378,0.0007131762,0.00040650676,0.0012961975,0.002885678,0.00081837084,0.00012878266,0.00039801555,0.4822155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8639316,0.0031428144,0.010345897,0.001697498,0.0033195633,0.00015108667,0.00065824727,0.00025018884,0.116503105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917266,0.0027931808,0.0010124238,0.0013774169,0.0015451062,0.0015452781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955394,0.0019248361,0.0006024915,0.0006815034,0.0005394836,0.00071227516],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004560419,0.0010673113,0.0010577228,0.00035216063,0.0017456604,0.0008134869,0.0014271912,0.0028417502,0.0009895815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010419907,0.0010694554,0.00070456945,0.00079160975,0.00082135596,0.0007862933,0.00014139255,0.0015649268,0.0011615821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008391322,0.0009000703,0.0035458277,0.0007625968,0.0009036441,0.0003205423,0.21575482,0.000016855212,0.0020383662,0.6012544,0.14323539,0.03042833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001375737,0.00028666906,0.00393366,0.00043811285,0.00060986757,0.000031391945,0.11254182,0.00026711306,0.0011179277,0.008858692,0.86858124,0.0019577702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16257685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058382057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72534585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081503735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003841564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944649245","doi":"","title":"El matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo, un nuevo proyecto de vida.","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02342019606738822,"score_gpt":0.27180174268331087,"score_spread":0.24838154661592265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944649245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3650747,0.0008783655,0.00016617286,0.0016142875,0.0007519861,0.000616866,0.000030700332,0.0002709598,0.630596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97108966,0.0009079953,0.0031944923,0.001120194,0.0005680603,0.00002741583,0.000004620226,0.00004363863,0.023043947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970455,0.00034056464,0.00038071032,0.0005772607,0.00058602955,0.0010698929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998707,0.00014161093,0.00017275536,0.00037830754,0.00012735715,0.00047294368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075216475,0.0003678328,0.00037496927,0.000094057534,0.0008197144,0.00020556553,0.00070867344,0.00045871036,0.004224595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012862099,0.00033102595,0.00027850905,0.00047868962,0.00049266964,0.00036775685,0.00015190255,0.00032637845,0.0015009196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027671905,0.0011049876,0.04542907,0.00023388641,0.0002465919,0.00016199108,0.09393559,0.00000209151,0.0013064231,0.81191826,0.024870617,0.020513782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029013588,0.00085440656,0.06375798,0.00031271882,0.00070294715,0.000033237593,0.07948022,0.00029854517,0.016135788,0.042348966,0.79064894,0.00252492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03582521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015096631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7695693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021465792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066619413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979011158","doi":"","title":"LE CODE CIVIL QUEBECOIS ET LE CODE CIVIL CATALAN","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Law; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Legislature; Catalan; Civil procedure; Politics; Code (set theory); Property (philosophy); Realm; Sociology; Public law; Humanities; Computer science","score_opus":0.02405099371041299,"score_gpt":0.2894886555173142,"score_spread":0.2654376618069012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979011158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024377876,0.024916468,0.000003261064,0.2789273,0.00073382107,0.00077597966,0.00019269745,0.00008007731,0.6919326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490393,0.020440118,0.00004249194,0.024986789,0.00026959486,0.000043670534,0.000033973818,0.000028154729,0.0051159333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985572,0.00032718084,0.00020774905,0.00020733682,0.0002223511,0.00047817756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987496,0.00010582876,0.00008113818,0.00047976468,0.00007136054,0.00051232206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00192407,0.0001294317,0.00026366717,0.000032532425,0.0011678132,0.00010792423,0.0007069163,0.00011043963,0.0010346771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038560052,0.0001053063,0.000112680704,0.00025411227,0.0004124718,0.00015259345,0.0000350259,0.0003633765,0.0006716041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.9855184e-7,0.000008890004,0.0000786729,0.00011988955,0.00001007011,0.000009393184,0.0012498284,1.16980466e-7,0.00004832469,0.85947394,0.1363809,0.0026192619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007418882,0.000005702949,0.00022000023,0.00023825634,0.000026032236,0.0000036755096,0.00019162562,9.1098025e-7,0.000029176119,0.0013226592,0.99773526,0.00015248728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9375563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010256942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054337224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31120290","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000166","title":"Ejecución de testamentos de extranjeros en España","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation; James S. McDonnell Foundation","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008408680624661158,"score_gpt":0.2656276255168764,"score_spread":0.25721894489221525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31120290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58131045,0.000067200315,0.004782207,0.001725678,0.00019992176,0.00020607685,0.000012342962,0.00022515812,0.41147095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908849,0.0001245776,0.00275309,0.0007431572,0.00036873858,0.0000052139594,0.0000047131343,0.000019940771,0.00509568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978853,0.00087109004,0.00010074246,0.00023564993,0.00027105006,0.0006362011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859136,0.0007767712,0.00006752819,0.0002065784,0.000038147162,0.0003196127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015632154,0.00013574607,0.00017280594,0.00011165494,0.0005174213,0.00014071925,0.0004600279,0.00029039223,0.0003456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038307463,0.00016136692,0.000110499655,0.0002983587,0.0003603966,0.00026908366,0.000058915848,0.00023507536,0.00013375608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009394868,0.00018450936,0.025753625,0.000037570164,0.00005675664,0.00012389827,0.052801147,0.00011428151,0.010623371,0.8603066,0.02519236,0.024711886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001062215,0.00011075568,0.054527827,0.000042682346,0.0000776327,0.000006606088,0.0073850392,0.00055466435,0.0006311785,0.023404006,0.91177636,0.00042104372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010479928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032164177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.886584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004000401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004924189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99610937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121899373","doi":"","title":"Protecting Your Personality Rights in Canada: A Matter of Property or Privacy?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Statute; Legislature; Political science; Law; Reservation of rights; The Right to Privacy; Fundamental rights; Property rights; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Human rights; Right to property; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1482857491968177,"score_gpt":0.3303184931663984,"score_spread":0.1820327439695807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121899373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945114,0.000031102,0.000013904897,0.00040217835,0.00026402043,0.0005405811,0.000016600801,0.000038073973,0.0041821413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98900455,0.000005525193,0.000052696727,0.0001801092,0.00011741296,0.0000021862436,0.0000022004049,0.00001300353,0.010622285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974719,0.0007481493,0.0002643727,0.00029987394,0.0005240844,0.00069159677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.00012153989,0.0002006113,0.00027227777,0.00011068444,0.00029038254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010054349,0.00019422872,0.0003111288,0.00017931905,0.00045832375,0.00006078671,0.00063204067,0.00015160326,0.00015587635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009574959,0.00015366325,0.00007469297,0.0005628079,0.0001636845,0.001676827,0.00020346609,0.0004992139,0.000054476237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013231934,0.00008281272,0.99366933,0.00006312709,0.000018437133,0.000055610737,0.0054323436,9.631476e-7,0.00016105841,0.0002740597,0.00000206626,0.00010786278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005092185,0.000029576393,0.96521,0.00015529044,0.000027000948,0.0000049704477,0.00287489,6.653037e-8,0.0005730116,0.000042532596,0.030303372,0.00027003593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61154675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37364444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011067896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013339467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62662053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123757030","doi":"10.25058/1794600x.1792","title":"El lugar de los abuelos en el seno de las familias: reflexiones sobre el Derecho argentino","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Misión Jurídica","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Persona; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028940232437284514,"score_gpt":0.34798340403240763,"score_spread":0.31904317159512313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123757030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5631497,0.001708933,0.002848038,0.03673079,0.0011111189,0.0010025691,0.0001759158,0.001107185,0.39216575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98165786,0.0011092852,0.0032541994,0.008908953,0.0016934524,0.00003793698,0.000020147274,0.00005685653,0.0032612996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972057,0.00046396026,0.00036489053,0.0004909645,0.0005851769,0.00088931766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985771,0.00026291105,0.0001304515,0.00028336077,0.000095276075,0.00065091014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008126015,0.00025571324,0.00033555055,0.000063662475,0.00075356563,0.00011259075,0.000687727,0.0003826387,0.00035330298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007443193,0.00026010245,0.00020548786,0.0004628351,0.0002839951,0.00021122514,0.00013295868,0.0004151287,0.0006070023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007171811,0.0009049784,0.023582479,0.00074058975,0.00041221702,0.0005847509,0.1233759,0.0001696086,0.04279176,0.4614572,0.30810297,0.037160393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006706712,0.00012915998,0.0053099054,0.00008977647,0.00010165869,0.0000060328402,0.0050536552,0.00029024397,0.0028504236,0.026537292,0.9584087,0.000552451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002321495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096154935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65030575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020091512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080943806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160771878","doi":"10.7202/1076906ar","title":"Lines Drawn in Blood: A Comparative Perspective on the Accommodation of Blended Families in Succession Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Family law; Spouse; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Law; Sociology; Sibling; Birth certificate; Nuclear family; Estate; Genealogy; Political science; History; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.04915868878168021,"score_gpt":0.34692650563327665,"score_spread":0.2977678168515964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160771878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5386751,0.00013870372,0.0000017462942,0.00445266,0.00020039534,0.00012183899,0.000012758386,0.000008501574,0.45638826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919957,0.00022664806,0.00011540431,0.00028968355,0.00009357936,0.0000047781077,0.0000014853127,0.0000045899715,0.0000642427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983493,0.0006856806,0.00028805604,0.00013761723,0.00033949397,0.00019983796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999065,0.00039641256,0.00015071429,0.00009833298,0.00024236135,0.000047168327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077951,0.00009055392,0.00021464034,0.00006578417,0.0016988261,0.000082293824,0.00020006702,0.00007617788,0.00008257282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015050411,0.000064561,0.00006803302,0.0004079802,0.00039083188,0.0003007307,0.000042733755,0.00036991696,0.0000052683104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057643767,0.0002054442,0.00049609,0.000003203581,0.00001315794,0.00002801089,0.008638919,0.00014283214,0.0008886251,0.9893688,0.000027594759,0.0001296575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042043957,0.00043614217,0.017513994,0.001155455,0.000083354964,0.000035183904,0.49858332,0.0001349475,0.11497247,0.1869288,0.17529905,0.0006528934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036494665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5366867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80244005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014858841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008951006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188647044","doi":"","title":"Disposición unilateral de la vivienda familiar: Peculiaridades de la ineficacia y remedios alternativos. Análisis comparado del Derecho anglosajón canadiense (Unilateral Disposition of Rights on the Matrimonial Home: Peculiarities of the Contract Avoidance and Alternative Remedies (Comparative Analysis of Canadian Anglo-Saxon Law))","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Legislator; Humanities; Political science; Authorization; Law; Cartography; Geography; Philosophy; Legislation","score_opus":0.01046603230292811,"score_gpt":0.27637411400098066,"score_spread":0.2659080816980526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188647044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99307126,0.0010020584,0.00008977394,0.0012939968,0.00026613742,0.0004050988,0.0003093698,0.00001120456,0.0035510892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551266,0.0037763733,0.00006971976,0.00015233972,0.00038094606,0.000009567663,0.000008192188,0.00002011782,0.000070104616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934891,0.0028404165,0.0008062984,0.00038179295,0.0007610354,0.0017213812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965794,0.001218538,0.0010774474,0.00033634622,0.00049069844,0.00029753172],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003667625,0.00043035336,0.0009565921,0.0006845492,0.0013680892,0.00020240534,0.0008988923,0.00029121837,0.000012856607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016749876,0.0002960275,0.00042895484,0.0016145117,0.004438188,0.0003675772,0.000077883844,0.0015814757,6.880418e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062525016,0.00019206948,0.03420239,0.000031221014,0.0023917793,0.000018516243,0.032910757,0.00025582395,0.0034880443,0.92558247,0.00007362425,0.00022808641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037313611,0.0026132762,0.67871946,0.0016398284,0.0053503667,0.00019811213,0.0343969,0.007908323,0.026751738,0.23395343,0.003344012,0.0013931672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72970194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8885711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.691629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014657285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024611917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196038688","doi":"10.22199/issn.0718-9753-2167","title":"La atribución preferente de la vivienda familiar al cónyuge supérstite en el derecho de Québec","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho (Coquimbo)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.024756672862104395,"score_gpt":0.34958387231107474,"score_spread":0.3248271994489703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196038688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8478453,0.012221262,0.0045539993,0.0040075667,0.000837922,0.0013484776,0.00036551052,0.00070306053,0.12811688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97817117,0.013837751,0.0023597837,0.0017097237,0.00094897486,0.00007514424,0.000038338934,0.00015369801,0.0027053945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98954177,0.0055378517,0.00091034896,0.0010377794,0.0010219617,0.0019502835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943273,0.0025501712,0.00044506672,0.0009029243,0.00031112268,0.0014634299],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007761488,0.00079180347,0.0010393237,0.00022893916,0.00073347264,0.0012089831,0.0015239335,0.0013108922,0.00014763666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036960824,0.0008196807,0.0005712116,0.0008701582,0.0010881443,0.00057435984,0.00043400502,0.0015498115,0.0005358891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012323387,0.0020988195,0.12268836,0.0018112898,0.0009938786,0.000980029,0.05160892,0.00026193963,0.0052120164,0.5265899,0.19659342,0.08992914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001496263,0.00018884178,0.009286583,0.0006239514,0.0003933904,0.00008658269,0.0029018025,0.00024639952,0.00032627562,0.004364025,0.9791104,0.000975441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08673701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008514634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.782517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028461535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006919875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202201822","doi":"","title":"Irremediable nullity of a sentence trial without a petition, Canon 1620,4°, Decree coram Erlebach, 2.07.2009 (Kolumbien)","year":2012,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Studia canonica","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Canon; Sentence; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.030322331849537393,"score_gpt":0.3021229412053934,"score_spread":0.27180060935585604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202201822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52352375,0.0272339,0.00008431264,0.0019349693,0.023220198,0.0044799587,0.0007845274,0.00025745024,0.41848096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894258,0.002659884,0.00055537734,0.00035060575,0.003693135,0.0001343611,0.00004043613,0.000048061287,0.0030923504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940734,0.0009093007,0.0010944984,0.0007293701,0.0014698724,0.0017235636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964846,0.00053953705,0.00075924065,0.00082293875,0.00056131504,0.0008323625],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028500324,0.0004925416,0.0011328697,0.000117536976,0.0009597956,0.0001161775,0.0008424085,0.0004456158,0.0009400207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010443007,0.0005141303,0.00041187028,0.001056779,0.0015636551,0.0006379712,0.0003148811,0.00055629597,0.0008268497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05271492,0.014715054,0.19556871,0.0012236299,0.0030238025,0.00008426953,0.07389507,0.000026468746,0.001990751,0.49375302,0.1553214,0.007682904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016147388,0.0014178071,0.015317593,0.00031907743,0.000890403,0.0000031648915,0.004847511,0.0000037588668,0.00020029108,0.0006244269,0.95926017,0.0009683907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031137483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01919302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8039388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049514684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011370998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38572372","doi":"10.1017/jns.2024.10","title":"La familia como asunto de Estado, el matrimonio como derecho del ciudadano: Lectura sintomal de la separación sistemática entre matrimonio y familia en la Constitución española de 1978","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Granada","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006687669040717801,"score_gpt":0.2973540632828953,"score_spread":0.2906663942421775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38572372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6925012,0.003397271,0.023706766,0.0010651514,0.00017848858,0.0012257638,0.00040183627,0.0009647291,0.27655882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731882,0.0058316165,0.016201463,0.0012524877,0.00029716818,0.000048674385,0.00008756606,0.00015477864,0.0029380359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832712,0.010266247,0.0010006531,0.001227807,0.001190571,0.0030435466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98801404,0.0085319895,0.0005643637,0.00086157507,0.00034882862,0.0016791973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065768175,0.0011620672,0.0013344362,0.0005263958,0.0021651932,0.001782733,0.002050207,0.0024173835,0.00019742438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019951086,0.0013163972,0.00078830053,0.0017631818,0.0027890461,0.0007069718,0.00033280134,0.0024336642,0.00007779859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017764373,0.0012476497,0.24426334,0.0013109319,0.0011111349,0.0190367,0.022071734,0.0039276844,0.012895619,0.63407,0.04213729,0.01615152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004163346,0.00013037112,0.030588152,0.00085168105,0.0010882574,0.0026048478,0.014798024,0.0019358044,0.00095763966,0.012214576,0.9285991,0.00206821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116595164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020867553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8864618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007040423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008458807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392606984","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101571","title":"P666: Kagami-Ogata syndrome due to uniparental isodisomy 14 and a small supernumerary marker chromosome","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genetics in Medicine Open","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Uniparental disomy; Small supernumerary marker chromosome; Supernumerary; Genetics; Marker chromosome; Chromosome; Biology; Karyotype; Anatomy; Gene","score_opus":0.045100523122832935,"score_gpt":0.34312540553974424,"score_spread":0.29802488241691133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392606984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88109624,0.006315702,0.000057930534,0.010131924,0.0014636873,0.0011222129,0.000035812292,0.000058180576,0.09971829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911022,0.0010504689,0.0012573865,0.0012900594,0.00032359618,0.000053417873,0.00002274909,0.000027148852,0.0048729726],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983441,0.00018457508,0.0002913953,0.0004463619,0.00033612506,0.00039743917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992173,0.00018714873,0.000022249456,0.00026105248,0.00003051357,0.0002817557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011420932,0.00016436669,0.00032936115,0.00014983183,0.00019645611,0.00019125163,0.00074133417,0.00011771278,0.0006538872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013213017,0.00014525447,0.000025313258,0.000549108,0.00035194366,0.00014979065,0.00058613636,0.00021870653,0.00011182041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005079801,0.000671087,0.09824804,0.0012469281,0.0004977235,0.019102566,0.20122454,0.00009235517,0.0048495578,0.22713749,0.20173635,0.24468538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013412655,0.0006308153,0.068800814,0.0013850982,0.00008160628,0.00020599103,0.00985653,0.00020037011,0.000080686084,0.008386264,0.9084018,0.00062878936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008171211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008963007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7066654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087855966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022746321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400935137","doi":"10.18566/rfdcp.v54n141.a5","title":"La contradicción en la improcedencia de la adopción homoparental","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.011065650659266625,"score_gpt":0.35401176815341645,"score_spread":0.3429461174941498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400935137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6466523,0.0065777376,0.005241574,0.0014142311,0.0003020124,0.00075350987,0.00020865015,0.0011429399,0.33770704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435556,0.0010906958,0.0020100067,0.0006206905,0.00044163116,0.00006510931,0.000011339322,0.0000586724,0.001346282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943169,0.0027974737,0.00044562804,0.00061642844,0.00067462126,0.0011489575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946827,0.004203125,0.00009855992,0.000282342,0.000090299,0.000642929],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063720676,0.00036858226,0.00043979954,0.00018766502,0.0006647777,0.0018841418,0.0008248536,0.0007882669,0.00016542502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032670025,0.00035179517,0.00032777298,0.00092275406,0.0013206917,0.0004407838,0.00013140606,0.001043503,0.0001847458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035746096,0.00020084817,0.0028162547,0.00023425446,0.00009012394,0.0012768982,0.020927189,0.000010869629,0.008726143,0.9243129,0.010678303,0.030690458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006007748,0.000084239924,0.011895916,0.0004437542,0.000264851,0.000721214,0.0072164177,0.00051470206,0.0011230721,0.014558912,0.9618118,0.000764367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024789278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021867195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011059523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025977097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416405028","doi":"10.36151/rcdi.2025.810.06","title":"Economic crisis, attribution of the use of the family home and compensatory pension","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario/Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Pension; Event (particle physics); Causality (physics); Home management; Nursing homes","score_opus":0.03086637433842971,"score_gpt":0.28328124618322775,"score_spread":0.25241487184479805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416405028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96682215,0.012001571,0.0027092772,0.005726159,0.0027397783,0.006650878,0.00083098956,0.00018945275,0.0023297663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858048,0.007960371,0.0015519239,0.0030051528,0.00023110033,0.00017194948,0.00002501376,0.00014813834,0.0011015744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835171,0.006014772,0.0043063383,0.0023088218,0.0014555878,0.0023973626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863416,0.0046664537,0.0024224608,0.0044566225,0.0013253215,0.00078753685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069900546,0.0015891183,0.0029997616,0.0005179868,0.0025870872,0.0016318569,0.0035869693,0.0020186903,0.00033121314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004645639,0.0012848014,0.0018431359,0.0026308522,0.0063378112,0.0010417023,0.0023916946,0.0029429295,0.000053166124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010234921,0.0017530693,0.13485411,0.005877715,0.001114643,0.000022985812,0.0054199346,0.0005502919,0.015015115,0.7819146,0.042780716,0.009673319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031281733,0.00040174316,0.27627122,0.006604524,0.0042374106,0.00006358418,0.0055795573,0.0028788573,0.005272603,0.0102830855,0.68287367,0.002405546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010830512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023738204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77163154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037377968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008441678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416405680","doi":"10.36151/rcdi.2025.807.10","title":"Repudiación de la herencia e imputación de donaciones","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario/Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Function (biology); Value (mathematics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.008740128491244852,"score_gpt":0.3242234784637408,"score_spread":0.31548334997249594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416405680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56333315,0.047600288,0.090049595,0.017525917,0.004920745,0.016811784,0.0011490962,0.0042640013,0.25434545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94092804,0.018484818,0.019298224,0.007679339,0.0016193785,0.0015592987,0.00011624024,0.0005698755,0.009744808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96434283,0.013701858,0.0057725487,0.005184302,0.0025498858,0.008448582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97424173,0.012360029,0.0020200126,0.005460048,0.0019884203,0.003929753],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025735153,0.0036462918,0.0049221693,0.0016399575,0.0049767294,0.0083353035,0.0061465558,0.006169552,0.003092811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024310911,0.0041256184,0.0030706343,0.006808217,0.0066288514,0.0017610457,0.0020378744,0.00781638,0.0008433684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001454508,0.0041251243,0.045061912,0.0064990055,0.0017630338,0.0012132977,0.014573407,0.00025576632,0.0076123923,0.8105436,0.05919505,0.047702894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039715027,0.0006778293,0.017407462,0.005833237,0.0042101005,0.0005324837,0.008415627,0.002976518,0.0026405088,0.068529226,0.8797844,0.0050211116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010076386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019818926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82058936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014361294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027284855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416405748","doi":"10.36151/rcdi.2025.807.07","title":"El sistema de vivienda nido: ventajas, inconvenientes y la improcedencia de su imposición sin acuerdo de las partes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario/Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Tribunal; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.010721214614238906,"score_gpt":0.31569411832670896,"score_spread":0.30497290371247004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416405748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81476074,0.04102614,0.036745224,0.012078848,0.0032267221,0.013505157,0.0010944286,0.0027013808,0.07486133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963068,0.0097576305,0.010477847,0.008206544,0.0012633875,0.0017356196,0.00012900025,0.00059008686,0.004771869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96747875,0.01007992,0.005902604,0.004882779,0.0025153153,0.009140636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97616893,0.010992478,0.0022751894,0.004512817,0.001934385,0.004116174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021434302,0.0037125046,0.0049087964,0.0014305467,0.004697494,0.008475789,0.0063389186,0.004898187,0.0014618806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020667117,0.004173856,0.0030325525,0.0056593684,0.005500585,0.0018119162,0.0019661,0.006671404,0.0005219477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002240006,0.007462106,0.13169894,0.015873015,0.0028325962,0.0015514493,0.024662878,0.0003383198,0.03477198,0.69844115,0.046058394,0.034069184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067708804,0.0015864841,0.023123253,0.014261262,0.008152244,0.0009346734,0.022039756,0.0072363,0.013239144,0.0650869,0.829744,0.007825144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012181605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038466267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78368556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0140316235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027375424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416405833","doi":"10.36151/rcdi.2024.805.06","title":"La ausencia de contacto del progenitor con el menor como causa de privación total de la patria potestad","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario/Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Indian ocean; Period (music); Progenitor","score_opus":0.013743365161511036,"score_gpt":0.32500655123724603,"score_spread":0.311263186075735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416405833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8919602,0.030184511,0.02518253,0.0040008635,0.0025366768,0.012101729,0.0017250424,0.0031999622,0.0291085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96590096,0.009617657,0.013963899,0.0024262925,0.0024739755,0.001669168,0.00016379786,0.0009072174,0.0028770096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629459,0.015622248,0.0051947543,0.0048704115,0.0028727765,0.00849395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971652,0.016718103,0.0014619606,0.003899564,0.001460647,0.004807775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026232015,0.0037360806,0.0044126906,0.0012087537,0.0033045404,0.012253695,0.004609856,0.006271253,0.0021065718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018986711,0.0040891413,0.002783837,0.0044047367,0.005538845,0.0020492438,0.001572165,0.009222447,0.00093235914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003002086,0.006736588,0.055421352,0.017531876,0.004343512,0.010875062,0.051644113,0.00031039692,0.05536774,0.6901659,0.04385065,0.06075074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054930164,0.0018585906,0.013773267,0.009300637,0.008238233,0.004483975,0.011704535,0.012509845,0.0059851245,0.025002778,0.89365685,0.007993157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012546732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017372391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8498062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018253762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03169418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416406111","doi":"10.36151/rcdi.2024.804.06","title":"La nulidad matrimonial civil por la incapacidad de prestar consentimiento","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario/Revista crítica de derecho inmobiliario","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Primary health care; Civil servants","score_opus":0.015496539212772432,"score_gpt":0.30996239805236053,"score_spread":0.2944658588395881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416406111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5494035,0.06545613,0.029803611,0.01283776,0.0067478595,0.016985415,0.0027703666,0.006621648,0.30937374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96013343,0.014088366,0.009395211,0.0026591884,0.0023955086,0.0012303549,0.00018703032,0.000998076,0.008912812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96297956,0.014069223,0.005804084,0.0058215074,0.0036345748,0.007691081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729157,0.014687221,0.0014924865,0.004658384,0.0014227132,0.004823459],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024011195,0.0039881812,0.004580576,0.001745149,0.0033404685,0.01803798,0.0054636355,0.0061308094,0.00543846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013794574,0.0043741125,0.0034134535,0.0058441698,0.008181689,0.0024866797,0.0019102832,0.009427335,0.0026330173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016811197,0.0042529055,0.008206801,0.014210307,0.0025046805,0.006839179,0.036617856,0.00020409227,0.0068426705,0.77846545,0.10202775,0.038147185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026282426,0.0007300676,0.0023524016,0.0073285988,0.004477991,0.0016841277,0.008590761,0.0055758846,0.000967298,0.018288754,0.94237995,0.004995902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009059372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002484889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84035224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009765583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025602225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893821325","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4716275","title":"+27788889342 POWERFUL TRADITIONAL HEALER CLASSIFIEDS/ ADS LOST LOVE SPELL CASTER IN USA, CANADA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Jealousy; Relation (database); Promotion (chess); Anecdote","score_opus":0.06677243381962049,"score_gpt":0.2608499144520783,"score_spread":0.19407748063245778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893821325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04809216,0.00007048914,0.000082057435,0.0044866973,0.0003254699,0.0001888152,0.00025666077,0.000025234782,0.9464724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784699,0.00010900605,0.00009446815,0.0011967586,0.00037496636,2.5520202e-9,0.00034037593,0.0003878998,0.11902663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787873,0.000509298,0.0002304306,0.00033766503,0.0005958288,0.00044804404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999051,0.000058230107,0.000060832313,0.00022270148,0.00036786566,0.00023940303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052541477,0.00010976266,0.00013706845,0.0000942914,0.0005062383,0.00040914107,0.00048768386,0.00008139089,0.20368709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036089073,0.0001277551,0.000041178013,0.0005420932,0.00022125995,0.00025385738,0.00026216393,0.00028794943,0.10243767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005769149,0.00019431904,0.000111008405,0.000034012486,0.000022129032,0.00028671944,0.0037672038,0.000043684475,0.0009076058,0.06996777,0.92111564,0.003492214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033768133,0.00004330262,0.0033399363,0.00002047992,0.0000046723667,0.000028795896,0.0021308947,0.000023691826,0.00015549846,0.00030894676,0.9934547,0.00015139372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037196822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066568755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83037776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005396257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014569992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96921456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980973427","doi":"","title":"Derechos e integración: el acomodo razonable como instrumento para la igualdad material","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Hispana","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Homogeneous; State (computer science); Legal culture; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04671894377838315,"score_gpt":0.30976337594781356,"score_spread":0.2630444321694304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980973427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6895544,0.00027305578,0.00006124606,0.00064803247,0.0029148946,0.00047120708,0.00010294934,0.00020861432,0.30576563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302083,0.001113605,0.0007518857,0.00042879517,0.00052175927,0.00003677567,0.000021268583,0.00004668026,0.0040583806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971042,0.0005307309,0.00046381768,0.00051394635,0.0005185202,0.000868769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987611,0.00012044965,0.00023857062,0.00045543484,0.000094907664,0.00032954235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008761223,0.00037380334,0.00048371885,0.00012013244,0.00067197735,0.0003186498,0.000773556,0.000498288,0.0026216311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010062394,0.00035903673,0.00019942579,0.0003836296,0.0007211473,0.0005632551,0.00023105333,0.00035038483,0.0012579989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060919765,0.00087967026,0.005644986,0.0002159206,0.00019187981,0.00012960848,0.030102331,8.1789324e-7,0.002450032,0.90938807,0.01749909,0.032888424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012019594,0.00034803574,0.011045903,0.0002831469,0.00018728359,0.00000919808,0.0071448223,0.000025633328,0.006666242,0.017337266,0.95488656,0.0008639504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03486754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017325148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93738747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000184358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030925826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991018510","doi":"","title":"Experiencia de involucramiento paterno de hombres separados y/o divorciados","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Intellectum (Universidad de La Sabana)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.006767754963719966,"score_gpt":0.3157025045299335,"score_spread":0.30893474956621353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991018510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7576211,0.0013097719,0.0054417504,0.0026350378,0.0007140199,0.0003837515,0.000025625439,0.00026265718,0.2316063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769101,0.0016202574,0.00047045908,0.0014678208,0.00019767533,0.00002048262,0.0000059175054,0.000038284135,0.019268986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597657,0.0012119242,0.0003179562,0.0006506684,0.0004950257,0.001347869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754786,0.0012108192,0.00017224284,0.00047609076,0.000150217,0.00044274543],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010506077,0.00043022167,0.00049205363,0.0005398522,0.0012482975,0.00055333925,0.0012127615,0.0007279082,0.0005921475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078744494,0.0005148608,0.00039013685,0.0016623207,0.0014660304,0.00045504567,0.00039346216,0.0006623528,0.0001908102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009868265,0.0010209023,0.06936825,0.0004756321,0.0007324886,0.0011796645,0.24579291,0.0002484739,0.013167725,0.4811573,0.15392192,0.0319479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019289029,0.0004074101,0.027354239,0.00090699986,0.00045819374,0.00003192126,0.088122495,0.0047592996,0.008072533,0.030686166,0.83586544,0.0014063893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02903438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022131118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68194354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018179188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019939393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996101902","doi":"","title":"Recensione di Francesca Brunetta d'Usseaux 
\\nN. Palazzo, Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe, Hart, Milano, 2021, pp. 1-207","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Work (physics); Legislation; Common law","score_opus":0.02825399433932506,"score_gpt":0.25421400123838994,"score_spread":0.22596000689906487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996101902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80735636,0.00083381636,0.0017052038,0.0016462965,0.0009209681,0.001037265,0.00024771385,0.000020248617,0.1862321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966617,0.0022587106,0.0004974049,0.00015882209,0.00008780451,0.0000016598156,0.00009536013,0.0000049206997,0.00023356573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971043,0.0006327837,0.00044067614,0.00021942558,0.0011843767,0.00041842242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982501,0.00017360522,0.0001981071,0.0002716564,0.00093175226,0.00017474893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021136904,0.00013031795,0.00036300882,0.0002906161,0.00068539474,0.00008813355,0.0004784383,0.0001622847,0.000028624527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041292649,0.00013607228,0.00004343887,0.0019160974,0.00064211385,0.0015445463,0.00015513091,0.00039507492,0.000018494093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004272231,0.00045159133,0.07604237,0.004102365,0.00037213718,0.0015345216,0.1529641,0.0027206214,0.004790034,0.08273672,0.54616636,0.12384693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023072788,0.00011390773,0.066841565,0.0005969868,0.000021256237,0.0000071379804,0.16364723,0.0008094505,0.00016864667,0.000043404954,0.7651834,0.000259703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91503125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8806233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21901706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033163524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004332241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76852095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997588086","doi":"","title":"Право подружжя на утримання (аліменти): порівняльно-правовий аспект","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific periodicals of Ukraine","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Subpoena; Payment","score_opus":0.012515080697412183,"score_gpt":0.34809850508594087,"score_spread":0.3355834243885287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997588086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4842289,0.0033572302,0.0007091956,0.015573323,0.007901145,0.0009590866,0.00018971499,0.00042200933,0.48665938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477096,0.00013110193,0.000862244,0.00069259224,0.00020302334,0.000024773424,0.000026704516,0.000013210252,0.050336752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645007,0.0003070738,0.00065123284,0.0007042269,0.00108756,0.00079981337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980845,0.00029569736,0.00019150983,0.00071004656,0.00038111035,0.0003371787],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034359777,0.00022896203,0.00048227375,0.00036826657,0.0019997205,0.00050141657,0.0010855868,0.00025930896,0.0014804577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017832902,0.00021419235,0.0002787468,0.0018606603,0.004835727,0.0003332284,0.0002632162,0.00026587327,0.00025262413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014076434,0.000770839,0.0014465908,0.00024769164,0.000119760734,0.00003086657,0.013979771,0.000018337414,0.04127072,0.62650293,0.2507354,0.064736344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049499964,0.000042261752,0.0014215871,0.00011931675,0.000036865167,6.297555e-7,0.0014235288,0.0000406876,0.0037770942,0.0057309824,0.98667055,0.00024149971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017436855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015012451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73593515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011449334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013006972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999624216","doi":"","title":"Deeming a predatory spouse unworthy to inherit under Canadian Common Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Common law; Legislation; Injustice; German; Contributory negligence","score_opus":0.02537674416503384,"score_gpt":0.278466100376954,"score_spread":0.2530893562119202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999624216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57994187,0.00040230723,4.4256378e-8,0.00008072116,0.0024293207,0.00081038935,0.0008224154,0.00025011075,0.41526285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97529364,0.00012693208,0.00023929238,0.0032048482,0.00027643325,0.00015606126,0.00056051597,0.00022034046,0.019921929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460334,0.0006943273,0.00078590796,0.0009672049,0.0011340743,0.0018151407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959992,0.0002705844,0.00036446654,0.00080668717,0.000368595,0.0021904248],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018079532,0.0007410378,0.0007853989,0.0004812668,0.004592219,0.0002609339,0.0012110366,0.0015728408,0.0007223348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030903798,0.00089159806,0.00034167623,0.0008929724,0.0001926009,0.0012219674,0.00012143624,0.0016234681,0.001291717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099443336,0.00010887309,0.00010420614,0.00011852502,0.000120344346,0.000051095954,0.00027698954,0.000026650197,0.002101005,0.97869843,0.000080461694,0.018213993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003329187,0.00007030718,0.0037421524,0.0003639188,0.00018809603,0.000003972328,0.00385512,3.8266202e-7,0.0020930574,0.022512827,0.9655014,0.0013358366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6746334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98555636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96542096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026131205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006126796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000087545","doi":"","title":"Entrevista a Frank Iacobucci, exjuez de la Corte Suprema de Canadá","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Economic Justice; Center (category theory); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.00597951052426095,"score_gpt":0.25752251083719546,"score_spread":0.25154300031293453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000087545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6516858,0.0008222429,0.0010245995,0.0027009884,0.00070142373,0.0006366949,0.00043651817,0.00056486257,0.3414269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979068,0.0003635199,0.0005925648,0.00060692447,0.0006606738,0.00002320656,0.00007914827,0.000087878,0.018518128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409443,0.001353724,0.0004502463,0.00094476127,0.0013831548,0.0017736891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960506,0.0013888462,0.00039877387,0.00062853354,0.00024389074,0.0012893333],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012572244,0.00056527567,0.00061018305,0.00084926357,0.0044793067,0.0019732562,0.0016843636,0.0006330232,0.0003724418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049783534,0.000783428,0.0005921562,0.0014543917,0.001467555,0.001545045,0.00069585326,0.0012213875,0.0000469139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013874718,0.0010482566,0.030318052,0.00015866068,0.00066344347,0.020188328,0.020985646,0.008288875,0.00391526,0.8040465,0.10409326,0.004906246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019274309,0.00028120767,0.014513052,0.00015616791,0.00026300058,0.0008824073,0.013878816,0.00046463392,0.00016501949,0.0032841717,0.9632055,0.0009785885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13495025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096908035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85911226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010480336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01024539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001622821","doi":"","title":"La poligamia y la pluriparentalidad en los distintos ordenamientos jurídicos: un análisis comparado para incentivar la discusión sobre la familia plural.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Latin Americans; Legislation; Subject (documents); Common law","score_opus":0.010588046658741673,"score_gpt":0.28224248036920707,"score_spread":0.2716544337104654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001622821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66108656,0.00019025563,0.00023268219,0.0012125137,0.0004270585,0.00058878626,0.00060191186,0.00037318506,0.33528703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947256,0.0004511432,0.0003563957,0.00029338346,0.00022325334,0.00005735213,0.00016962535,0.00006528341,0.0036579792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913135,0.005563447,0.00036561704,0.0007272679,0.0010794037,0.0009507625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966088,0.0020515036,0.00029089884,0.0004872686,0.000070817834,0.00049070135],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017601791,0.00045045855,0.0005732716,0.0003514312,0.0019305211,0.0004575634,0.0013772388,0.00044394852,0.00065188523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021924797,0.00049659045,0.00036367684,0.0012863755,0.0015402874,0.0006044003,0.0008080557,0.0010327962,0.00008689199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045206252,0.0012539786,0.017694555,0.000111452326,0.0003224305,0.0016800613,0.063504405,0.00039950985,0.0013906525,0.8711095,0.027808929,0.0142724905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021521086,0.00009512015,0.04665102,0.00008112667,0.00020284203,0.000043845757,0.042655632,0.00026642787,0.000088640176,0.0065605235,0.90039766,0.0008050267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013381176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021169113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87258875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008122188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066000124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008518753","doi":"","title":"Cargas, deudas y recompensas: Del derecho vigente (sistema individualista) al derecho sancionado (sistema solidarista)","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital de la UNC (National University of Cordoba)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Derecho; Civil law (Civil law); Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.02340753946978439,"score_gpt":0.28344990531519293,"score_spread":0.2600423658454085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008518753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4303246,0.00080624636,0.0014177469,0.001955777,0.0023062897,0.0006830825,0.00080826203,0.00021896545,0.56147903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916064,0.00012234892,0.001476461,0.00017213565,0.000500647,0.0000014201711,0.000166499,0.00003898454,0.005915096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948609,0.0007022477,0.00064953597,0.0007035576,0.0024163548,0.0006674032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952621,0.0009809635,0.0008215888,0.00037094342,0.0018427813,0.0007216375],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015265583,0.00044230733,0.00069862144,0.00026654635,0.0009417399,0.0010514682,0.0009711055,0.00061246846,0.000024804656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084075786,0.0005572905,0.00046861282,0.000752101,0.00097622554,0.0013989651,0.0003428435,0.00045983124,0.00007876542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017691952,0.0021019108,0.1576596,0.0005517981,0.0012589977,0.0008916049,0.009625804,0.0005027645,0.00055563636,0.7157776,0.10578077,0.0035243267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002217741,0.00037624966,0.021411858,0.0004832997,0.00029828245,0.00011254425,0.009506395,0.0001173109,0.00022391872,0.011875721,0.95247513,0.0009015472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045444416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008098504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84669435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002110655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003773084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009746391","doi":"","title":"En Mexico se alteran las garantias y derechos establecidos por su constitucion federal para el hombre y el ciudadano, en los tratados de libre comercio firmados con Canada, Estados Unidos de Norteamerica (T.L.C.), y los paises en la Union Europea","year":2003,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Population; Latin Americans","score_opus":0.016882902250489086,"score_gpt":0.27281411978448494,"score_spread":0.25593121753399584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009746391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8196162,0.002486736,0.0063337404,0.016938906,0.0060682464,0.00695311,0.0030393205,0.0014891345,0.13707459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98550117,0.0032705641,0.0016150352,0.0012501699,0.0012291651,0.0005779721,0.003203528,0.00035927191,0.0029931325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797897,0.009335781,0.002518391,0.0024833651,0.00286385,0.0030089177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900162,0.0030683787,0.00225691,0.0013651662,0.0011944826,0.0020988397],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032130787,0.0022530768,0.00228188,0.0009413667,0.0035123138,0.0015960502,0.0024462142,0.0028804257,0.00013751147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024432815,0.0024451378,0.0008434251,0.002032009,0.000269345,0.001568993,0.00034191692,0.0034262734,0.00003613618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036692475,0.00508365,0.022681475,0.0032206122,0.002411187,0.005745951,0.038448963,0.0018971807,0.020439675,0.8722774,0.012927963,0.011196698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043053003,0.00039445498,0.022871215,0.001888111,0.00092524255,0.0014548048,0.010168621,0.00088878535,0.0037228034,0.00030268694,0.9499253,0.0031526543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015438683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18348446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93699735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042599314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018369138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010988383","doi":"","title":"La règle prétorienne en droit civil français et dans la Common law canadienne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.007434588711120383,"score_gpt":0.25106564051880975,"score_spread":0.24363105180768937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010988383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2285439,0.0008977047,0.0001009256,0.011863565,0.0010881794,0.00018881734,0.00006715394,0.00012340097,0.75712633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90368605,0.000435745,0.00072568737,0.0024221654,0.0007283874,0.0000148414065,0.000011052276,0.000031414933,0.091944665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711186,0.00092545064,0.00034306658,0.00038831474,0.0003184378,0.0009128928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981148,0.0008971299,0.00008629866,0.00031988972,0.00006250351,0.0005193363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018918968,0.0002581449,0.00034471232,0.000042621534,0.0006297618,0.00014303505,0.0005037688,0.00052694324,0.0021356537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007133182,0.00027322545,0.00015159306,0.00043470558,0.0013109858,0.0006252718,0.00011449666,0.00048301264,0.00069678423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010130771,0.00019494092,0.0005377732,0.000022833914,0.00003084051,0.000047522113,0.05586794,0.00004373315,0.00008257285,0.9244631,0.009734154,0.008964493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037129637,0.00008110039,0.0018263347,0.0000539526,0.000054376356,0.000013693342,0.00798816,0.000087572844,0.00016890423,0.0155742625,0.97342485,0.0003555171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7700303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98922205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9636907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047239507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030204232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014644077","doi":"","title":"Quebec's Filiation Regime, The <i>Roy Report</i>'s Recommendations, and the 'Interest of the Child'","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Conversation; Common law; Legislature; Family law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.01675484002104071,"score_gpt":0.2691424708950629,"score_spread":0.25238763087402216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014644077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32508555,0.0023078301,0.00012688471,0.19191895,0.0041357535,0.0019777678,0.00006243662,0.00017656338,0.47420827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792938,0.0003821227,0.00013151173,0.002015219,0.0008926339,0.000038000162,0.000009792581,0.0000144690575,0.017222416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782413,0.000789971,0.0004275436,0.00028095124,0.00039108284,0.00028632386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801785,0.0004891736,0.0004949608,0.0007056552,0.000201293,0.00009106087],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024126037,0.0001433665,0.0001983472,0.00002473412,0.0021812827,0.00020169362,0.0006433898,0.00012745785,0.00033850846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013742096,0.00007638581,0.00013470398,0.00034052468,0.002069058,0.00031421817,0.00018249969,0.0002561285,0.00007581561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000459335,0.000029216399,0.0003090202,0.000006228781,0.000030112993,0.000001270236,0.00211312,9.952848e-7,0.00032817826,0.9351561,0.060242992,0.0017368151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046210975,0.000026546983,0.008930528,0.00008416763,0.000048453105,0.000007672574,0.0006798124,0.000012269556,0.0004731234,0.010130711,0.97902423,0.00012035871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023302998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3581605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9250254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072691844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019150165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015003322","doi":"","title":"Requisitos para la adquisición de la nacionalidad española por residencia. Análisis especial de los conceptos jurídicos indeterminados","year":2014,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Council for Canadian Studies","keywords":"Spanish Civil War; Politics; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.006413263659421088,"score_gpt":0.2891103686736836,"score_spread":0.28269710501426254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015003322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7648167,0.0004115151,0.0016503563,0.0012692958,0.00031430132,0.00072115863,0.00046689896,0.00031229676,0.23003745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853904,0.00023253002,0.0016497346,0.00148371,0.0008541292,0.000039583963,0.00011560165,0.00014791897,0.010086345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903547,0.003334064,0.00072439207,0.0013209615,0.0015334389,0.002732452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931225,0.0035127096,0.0006211788,0.00079452357,0.0002559057,0.0016931725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003154458,0.0009938333,0.001031127,0.0006138685,0.0016336619,0.0029076806,0.0021885664,0.0016887633,0.0008601342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011676161,0.0012553105,0.00078928884,0.0011687329,0.0026022044,0.003307443,0.0008427904,0.0013868331,0.00038439437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002892076,0.0019417312,0.14941092,0.00058423466,0.0013620632,0.010877309,0.05777612,0.00024443504,0.0058016996,0.66339123,0.057935145,0.047783032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008896799,0.0012878331,0.19244845,0.0012187382,0.0012656546,0.00072689384,0.030328957,0.0013364775,0.0016820213,0.10213386,0.65473044,0.0039438936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013540795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002526324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59679526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033633756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027560527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023916259","doi":"","title":"Post-Separation Increases in Payor Income and Spousal Support","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Respondent; Appeal; Disadvantage; Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Child support","score_opus":0.017293556618518585,"score_gpt":0.2872538805126974,"score_spread":0.2699603238941788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023916259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96040404,0.00018218324,0.0000075009348,0.0029901997,0.00011548412,0.0002476279,0.00002950427,0.00010324045,0.03592022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526525,0.00008634938,0.00024130441,0.0035463865,0.00034020585,0.000012622359,0.00001655328,0.0000100981715,0.00048123565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988491,0.00017192385,0.00021051252,0.00024388968,0.0002534878,0.000271099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993748,0.000107178916,0.00005325794,0.00009673254,0.000047821202,0.00032022415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039209216,0.00010454802,0.00017573185,0.000031722724,0.00026094314,0.00012047534,0.00016190636,0.00010975117,0.00040605705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037692024,0.00010518125,0.00003661638,0.00023975693,0.00019500148,0.0004919248,0.0000668099,0.00016504062,0.00028594874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003345749,0.00015265282,0.21462241,0.00007181556,0.000020945197,0.00015947118,0.0060177958,0.000011980329,0.0034936229,0.7702109,0.0028974102,0.0020064106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002276682,0.00072179106,0.2698969,0.00007312549,0.00004756684,0.00000713799,0.0049000713,0.00006889885,0.00086702046,0.008698761,0.7115838,0.0008582712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04166414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037060395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76151216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046171623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019569689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024199335","doi":"","title":"Responsabilitat de l¿hereu pel pagament de la llegítima. Comentari a la STSJC 25/2002, de 12 de setembre","year":2003,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Vanguard; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.007194469094712559,"score_gpt":0.2509561800410422,"score_spread":0.24376171094632965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024199335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5559399,0.0011184694,0.003805733,0.0022454024,0.00023626229,0.00095704,0.00097009796,0.00042361513,0.4343035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936897,0.0012090901,0.009199778,0.0016259393,0.00015416808,0.000023372506,0.00013707251,0.00023114037,0.050522443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829206,0.008452701,0.0007129296,0.0017646874,0.0016332868,0.004515829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872517,0.007854314,0.00050615816,0.0011015907,0.00029545158,0.0029908114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006278924,0.0013955993,0.0012719317,0.0010499664,0.0032346896,0.0016560571,0.0026924342,0.0015938575,0.002136824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00119412,0.001898708,0.0012575785,0.0019166907,0.003799642,0.0033483554,0.0010593657,0.0023240272,0.00022569233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058222394,0.0038943386,0.13215664,0.00086435623,0.002469063,0.025187362,0.17003867,0.0039138445,0.006071095,0.5475961,0.09712614,0.004860141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007658615,0.0011652167,0.044196956,0.0004275038,0.0012649569,0.0011441505,0.2406601,0.0011150995,0.0002596495,0.032245263,0.66695565,0.0029068214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006035338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011476622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5698295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018997164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008704008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024297823","doi":"","title":"Reforming personal property security law in Mexico","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Legislation; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.018692483827545264,"score_gpt":0.2692609748728076,"score_spread":0.25056849104526235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024297823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47580335,0.00020639872,1.6607373e-9,0.0000406085,0.00083951,0.0005647002,0.0002922395,0.00017889206,0.52207434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96465373,0.0006843264,0.000072314055,0.00061803224,0.00015343171,0.0001358865,0.00044679624,0.00012300057,0.03311246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465907,0.0007879398,0.0008792703,0.0011048849,0.001359252,0.0012095656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983804,0.00013818276,0.00037107756,0.00043144354,0.00023733279,0.00044151998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051137,0.00066386774,0.000815833,0.00031750955,0.0029623439,0.0001601832,0.00083075283,0.0014211626,0.00092628587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045085367,0.00058421644,0.00041059716,0.00080256077,0.00027081298,0.0014258191,0.00007926868,0.0021353038,0.0005035945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007328544,0.00050104555,0.000055986085,0.0004074427,0.00010888716,0.00023831453,0.0015607282,0.0000048610054,0.0028553756,0.87588334,0.000031483665,0.11761965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008317133,0.000110143934,0.00035231403,0.000753067,0.000093277864,0.00000622989,0.0061039696,0.0000073621727,0.005996009,0.05459488,0.9298007,0.0013503126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046862092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28351223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016019178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030778855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025507701","doi":"","title":"Xavier University 170th Commencement Program, May 17, 2008","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Exhibit - A Showcase of Scholarship, Creativity and Preservation Provided by Xavier University Library (Xavier University)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Webster University; Grinnell College; Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations; John Carroll University; Saint Louis University; Kent State University; University of Southern Maine; Northern Kentucky University; Florida State University; West Virginia University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Chaminade University of Honolulu; University of Dayton; Western Carolina University; Ball State University; University of Notre Dame; University of Cincinnati; Biola University; University of Denver; Georgetown University; University of Akron; Indiana State University; Arizona State University; York University; University of Miami; University of Missouri; Pennsylvania State University; Dartmouth College; Western Michigan University; Purdue University; Battelle; Albright College; Ohio State University; Eastern Kentucky University; U.S. Air Force Academy; Bowling Green State University; Clemson University","keywords":"Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Data collection; Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.03411272409230974,"score_gpt":0.2456028309053663,"score_spread":0.21149010681305658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025507701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8433233,0.00037100795,0.00027334088,0.0068786875,0.00014225066,0.0020503374,0.0006521054,0.00046710353,0.14584188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78024346,0.0034281013,0.0033233825,0.00033009655,0.00007954198,0.0000013089254,0.00036095525,0.000038799804,0.21219437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953474,0.0017723469,0.00035166994,0.00092978566,0.00083399506,0.0007648399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740034,0.0004882178,0.00047589676,0.0005940133,0.00031054713,0.0007309546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073972257,0.00047421915,0.00064660504,0.00066862826,0.0028813747,0.00015671397,0.001134005,0.00051643536,0.0009988236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000145322,0.0005970008,0.0002838414,0.002240731,0.0016094043,0.01327218,0.00075180747,0.0008008452,0.00002153294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043398445,0.0041651675,0.62350875,0.00057064585,0.0007578346,0.0023420227,0.018961575,0.000037521088,0.0013520201,0.2150439,0.11090831,0.018012397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024555756,0.00036872443,0.014838962,0.00016310277,0.0002091683,0.0000074787863,0.008159188,0.000029479148,0.0007149805,0.0003963407,0.9719712,0.0006857702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034329542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012520639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86106294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003192394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009351778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027546787","doi":"","title":"Convention de rupture et parenté","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Derogation; Legislation; Liability","score_opus":0.038129007303857765,"score_gpt":0.26842959542504247,"score_spread":0.2303005881211847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027546787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67667973,0.011672471,0.0041462798,0.11642094,0.0049570934,0.0016907053,0.0008310575,0.0017944133,0.18180728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6558154,0.029707113,0.0029041003,0.002419726,0.0013627855,0.000027389904,0.00041917534,0.0001278883,0.30721638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457,0.0013273858,0.0005470857,0.0010758725,0.0009508245,0.0015288244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596363,0.00036237988,0.0005374782,0.001207047,0.0008140632,0.001115406],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009904112,0.0006051921,0.00065256626,0.0006844017,0.0032145348,0.0002535047,0.0015516884,0.0010615479,0.0021792762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025468506,0.00083090516,0.00060032704,0.0026700085,0.0021721867,0.0027710614,0.00036659735,0.0010716717,0.0020150181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053633117,0.0009682251,0.0024821179,0.00008303272,0.00017111837,0.00016085677,0.027264105,0.000108662854,0.00009154605,0.6516645,0.31465667,0.0022955236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012779234,0.00012226477,0.00946191,0.00009041707,0.0002941396,0.00014304148,0.01743519,0.00029791825,0.000072005554,0.003434004,0.96646833,0.0009028695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024724567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00849729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65181166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015799608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025414422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028411328","doi":"","title":"Environmentální otázky v současném kanadském románu","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Digitální knihovna Univerzity Pardubice (Univerzity Pardubice)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Depiction; Dystopia; Ecocriticism; Anthropocentrism; Bachelor","score_opus":0.008235087986994344,"score_gpt":0.2502266749648711,"score_spread":0.24199158697787676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028411328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056988886,0.0016495803,0.0010435563,0.0023018625,0.002867005,0.0023444225,0.0015615461,0.0022942335,0.9853679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01944782,0.00632512,0.0008514052,0.0011044748,0.0017434495,0.00004222341,0.0006677355,0.00078839366,0.96902937],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897006,0.0014023419,0.0009901347,0.0027008457,0.0024281575,0.0027779073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936205,0.00068664673,0.00132503,0.002622671,0.00029077037,0.0014543483],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013328929,0.0018594811,0.0023476235,0.0016494235,0.0021051783,0.0006687178,0.0034008382,0.0027300534,0.01348957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005175658,0.002276718,0.0012511497,0.0020533437,0.0025449311,0.0013315463,0.0011055421,0.0019093532,0.0044727125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013548916,0.0006002249,0.00041878488,0.00028866416,0.0007822948,0.00038917403,0.0015983481,0.000020528923,0.000038339425,0.25936854,0.72348726,0.0128723625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016311662,0.00011705076,0.0007402139,0.00064938754,0.0006779724,0.000005356673,0.003668816,0.000022809603,0.000033341064,0.00177657,0.9883752,0.002302154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068148986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044182427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2648879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018224807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030000024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029811288","doi":"","title":"LA PROFESSIO IURIS IN MATERIA SUCCESSORIA: UN CONFRONTO TRA LE NORMATIVE APPLICABILI IN ITALIA ED IN CANADA.","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Consumer law","score_opus":0.0026615258875086287,"score_gpt":0.19580305048011282,"score_spread":0.1931415245926042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029811288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97897923,0.00034784086,0.0000040294876,0.00036931445,0.00013934168,0.0004975433,0.000012714882,0.00000826997,0.019641725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769574,0.00016120792,0.000020416835,0.000008149459,0.000008780351,0.0000033066922,0.000008673483,0.00000745897,0.0020862825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848545,0.0004248235,0.0002381578,0.0002809778,0.00017189726,0.0003986958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993361,0.00023197451,0.00017016132,0.00014301477,0.000042702537,0.00007602568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002830315,0.00014425699,0.00033019748,0.0000961047,0.00025952756,0.0000311386,0.00026055425,0.00014441804,0.000075915144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014724571,0.00017223183,0.000041733227,0.00038267378,0.00016913757,0.0004335081,0.000039474362,0.0002539174,0.000003478619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012255072,0.0010021387,0.38790616,0.00047785172,0.00014067495,0.00011975699,0.21556343,0.0003237408,0.018024847,0.3734955,0.00015906511,0.0015613338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015672785,0.00012105419,0.50898826,0.00020897927,0.000030698084,0.0000022067723,0.4847265,0.0003034892,0.0009532673,0.0013389358,0.001441303,0.00031801214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95335436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37215653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006837847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027087708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70234096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038377376","doi":"","title":"Il giudice specializzato della famiglia nel diritto comparato","year":2021,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Constitutionality; High resolution","score_opus":0.012740305103309636,"score_gpt":0.2408101375629414,"score_spread":0.22806983245963175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038377376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8674397,0.0044620764,0.0002550993,0.00095320947,0.00038623952,0.00019802348,0.000030179519,0.000051239225,0.12622428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606832,0.0018771935,0.00015597921,0.000039499286,0.00012708118,4.907084e-7,0.00002102863,0.00001338328,0.037082095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819386,0.00031708094,0.00022404538,0.00044349904,0.0003084191,0.000513107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987377,0.0002539432,0.00021524081,0.00028433575,0.00027869598,0.00023008844],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017187155,0.00020551434,0.00037772302,0.00006532129,0.001938666,0.000120962606,0.00030820424,0.00017950046,0.00022133107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046020992,0.00026503802,0.00019842654,0.0005766567,0.00053668686,0.00037032244,0.00008301809,0.00023802517,0.00003439678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025321436,0.00054998824,0.0040169973,0.00011841456,0.00036435385,0.00013331296,0.04075201,0.00008120559,0.016244372,0.933728,0.0024376619,0.0013205018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018372027,0.0005225292,0.050611127,0.00032786737,0.0010946635,0.0000561419,0.52206767,0.0006642859,0.006355904,0.009837689,0.4053958,0.0012290968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009865861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013997412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9238903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012339091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010895834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066592413","doi":"","title":"Institución Del Derecho Anglosajón-DE161-200701","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"report","venue":"Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Commonwealth; Context (archaeology); Derecho","score_opus":0.019805655391069994,"score_gpt":0.29102405538660947,"score_spread":0.2712183999955395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066592413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4328068,0.0041626357,0.0057628625,0.005176243,0.003231913,0.0036321774,0.00074975233,0.0020669128,0.54241073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935591,0.023449248,0.005862755,0.0029232695,0.0074508726,0.000120043514,0.0002496738,0.0007048033,0.023648355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731508,0.0034402981,0.0027918844,0.0064203497,0.006880495,0.007316192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813492,0.0026078136,0.0034730672,0.003690281,0.0023221925,0.0065575046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007123877,0.0038257325,0.0042313733,0.0030360124,0.008342227,0.0026254505,0.009518318,0.008056333,0.0007295556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030081212,0.0047111562,0.0033554945,0.01200436,0.005667234,0.0036345746,0.0029023327,0.008301379,0.0005812935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033360987,0.0059842877,0.075198986,0.0029072366,0.0050292076,0.031937364,0.11351605,0.0031126917,0.10899556,0.4095554,0.20274006,0.03768707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003326576,0.0010095118,0.02621848,0.0013592872,0.0029161754,0.00200138,0.051999506,0.0021122915,0.0017347387,0.0011962346,0.9003574,0.005768405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041334853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028405031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69761735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023988793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03020373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067141384","doi":"","title":"La ejecución de sentencias dinerarias en las partidas = Enforcement of monetary judgments in VII partidas","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Espacio Tiempo y Forma Serie I Prehistoria y Arqueología","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Hasta; Good faith; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.012270330157419159,"score_gpt":0.2897436392889197,"score_spread":0.27747330913150053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067141384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85252005,0.0017982898,0.0000873553,0.0007415913,0.00612626,0.0011371598,0.00009713313,0.00015025483,0.1373419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923643,0.0015139843,0.0005587655,0.0002633261,0.0015234632,0.00016962834,0.000065519656,0.000065096305,0.00347591],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343246,0.0016592422,0.0013724553,0.0006030472,0.0009983523,0.0019344361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971349,0.0005705415,0.0007594984,0.0007421631,0.00011602662,0.00067686895],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003537635,0.0006880871,0.0010096759,0.00034393175,0.00044930592,0.00007860033,0.0008129656,0.0009888491,0.00063954573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045698564,0.0007088852,0.00038800263,0.0006956361,0.0009039916,0.0018060751,0.00042752567,0.0008610925,0.000196506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017921681,0.0024037363,0.43169436,0.0007345034,0.00046990113,0.000104780265,0.16864474,0.0004522125,0.003043068,0.3714142,0.015228283,0.004018015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023944317,0.0007175739,0.047879167,0.00037007892,0.0002524657,0.000017505747,0.007007391,0.00016189058,0.0042783823,0.003008144,0.93284047,0.0010724952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013959668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022323406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9176122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014168002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050386414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067644883","doi":"","title":"Le style attributionnel chez les enfants de six ans et ses liens avec les symptômes psychopathologiques","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Archipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Life style; Maturity (psychological)","score_opus":0.01427676174959313,"score_gpt":0.2423217379278326,"score_spread":0.22804497617823946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067644883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69334185,0.0006041431,0.0012854736,0.0019452457,0.00025433826,0.00038999016,0.00025100948,0.000106635234,0.30182132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8305046,0.003129703,0.0026188823,0.00009927321,0.00020846509,0.000001579663,0.000055761557,0.00005348038,0.16332823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962901,0.0015891538,0.00030523582,0.00066799676,0.0003749861,0.0007725202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827147,0.00050943764,0.00045505157,0.00041237008,0.00012156429,0.00023012624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010623574,0.00041971728,0.0007358506,0.0003513643,0.0008044111,0.000041228184,0.0009642778,0.00086515,0.0015970065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016068213,0.00052215444,0.0003285406,0.00045429554,0.0034710884,0.0003245263,0.00026333067,0.0005031142,0.00019997988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033509475,0.0010355344,0.04251697,0.00027048204,0.00020016594,0.00029077547,0.3714892,0.00007494523,0.0003044472,0.38766775,0.008608895,0.18720575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022908407,0.00053483824,0.56388724,0.0016850353,0.00027244285,0.000014436811,0.2499323,0.00022671155,0.00007823016,0.05265606,0.12704961,0.001372246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9060844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5213703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025656773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083428924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100035987","doi":"","title":"Hidden Actors, Muted Voices: The Employment of Rural Women in Saskatchewan Forestry and Agri-Food Industries by","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rural development; Agriculture; Work (physics); Productivity; Rural area; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.011240126281919359,"score_gpt":0.23903649860535162,"score_spread":0.22779637232343225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100035987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879563,0.00017223938,0.0000014646068,0.0010447036,0.00006853761,0.00019685081,0.000023659753,0.00003079076,0.010505458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517035,0.000026522946,0.000017772934,0.000091459886,0.000071621456,0.000016242146,0.0000070482793,0.0000048412994,0.0045941076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990792,0.00009628532,0.00018825433,0.00009022095,0.00022664225,0.00031936553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958056,0.00017350435,0.00006709158,0.00009422811,0.000022901142,0.000061728126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038753863,0.00008412105,0.00013864046,0.000028694381,0.00016081477,0.000051684463,0.00017869654,0.00012354534,0.000057675436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040530336,0.000056028122,0.000019804691,0.00024581345,0.00034948968,0.00015679431,0.000049105685,0.00010976695,0.0000016508192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013845145,0.0004953113,0.6846333,0.000049703827,0.00009909994,0.000004131976,0.14358807,0.0000066991033,0.0038201453,0.097501986,0.05182484,0.01783824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011204035,0.00032243493,0.2337965,0.000052633877,0.000019252528,5.4045245e-7,0.63827616,0.0000020707212,0.004680046,0.014939164,0.10642599,0.00036479527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102318235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11255853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4946881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079790276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001755281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9036595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100687977","doi":"","title":"RESEARCH ARTICLE Engelmann Spruce Site Index Models: A Comparison of Model Functions and Parameterizations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Picea engelmannii; Site index; Abies lasiocarpa; Variable (mathematics); Variance (accounting); Regression analysis; Index (typography)","score_opus":0.17374157946356017,"score_gpt":0.4058484400216873,"score_spread":0.23210686055812713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100687977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7990108,0.00007083008,0.102170795,0.0015941083,0.00004746088,0.00018913893,0.000018464127,0.000058669244,0.09683973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926059,0.00006574923,0.0010628054,0.000027203956,0.000027195058,0.000014034268,6.9140714e-7,0.000005071006,0.0061913095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898595,0.0001549124,0.0001609736,0.00015010062,0.0003113773,0.00023668629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.00032229806,0.000030603973,0.00013860803,0.00018255871,0.00010841271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060765713,0.000046791432,0.00010420224,0.00008457138,0.00044123785,0.000033569515,0.000094368785,0.00007212658,0.00005883659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014122853,0.00003386234,0.000023910436,0.0003115925,0.0005115457,0.00034858423,0.00006131924,0.000072853094,0.00003145062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041035702,0.00016942761,0.011450944,0.000008357127,0.000013010531,2.6301373e-7,0.008459106,0.0041727917,0.010790839,0.9560959,0.0022776902,0.0065206317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001196156,0.0002528467,0.00559761,0.00008585915,0.00004113456,4.399794e-7,0.024254229,0.6997493,0.002844893,0.25161082,0.013962722,0.00040396623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024933878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044928542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70448506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028562661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010986667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37692732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100974129","doi":"","title":"Indicator: Hexachlorobenzene Levels in Herring Gull Eggs from the Great Lakes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hexachlorobenzene; Herring gull; Herring; Pollution; Water quality; Pollutant; Agriculture","score_opus":0.07689639192476656,"score_gpt":0.3265664316251759,"score_spread":0.24967003970040935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100974129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74908054,0.00037007342,0.000051254337,0.0034807394,0.00038771692,0.00015641945,0.000010419678,0.000090344234,0.24637248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961136,0.000025049529,0.0002676436,0.0010529741,0.0003053724,0.000007221603,0.0000020807101,0.0000070068036,0.0022190446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894494,0.00016583409,0.00014421935,0.0001690004,0.00031141154,0.0002645688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943656,0.00020247263,0.00003910329,0.00017272904,0.000022110613,0.00012702904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083070336,0.00007928147,0.00011653,0.000026335401,0.000203672,0.00008189389,0.00037294193,0.00009485796,0.00039579428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016976266,0.000053688196,0.000035498673,0.00017842586,0.00014878067,0.00020704944,0.00007225138,0.000121933044,0.00027162154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062509105,0.00015066727,0.3744471,0.0000061263586,0.00004962302,0.000041077226,0.102336824,0.00007678248,0.0005886559,0.44569644,0.055535447,0.021008743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008565145,0.000037960737,0.09980409,0.000033873755,0.000016258748,4.806192e-7,0.02798804,0.000029941008,0.00069032004,0.034735583,0.83548164,0.00032528385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08279209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14461981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7799462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008949052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001893306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9233157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104258485","doi":"10.71781/2120","title":"Les dispositions spéciales de la lex situs en droit international privé des successions","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Penal code; Closure (psychology); Legislature","score_opus":0.008132575992316015,"score_gpt":0.23191981228576003,"score_spread":0.22378723629344402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104258485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6577933,0.004647337,0.0015195988,0.00064510555,0.0024718726,0.00030238525,0.00014993068,0.00016025726,0.33231023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91857517,0.0019385802,0.0016469491,0.000088063745,0.0008703783,0.000035615303,0.00051425636,0.00003714783,0.07629385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657494,0.0008451532,0.00046438954,0.0006262819,0.00085861556,0.0006306055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977287,0.0006968047,0.0004332118,0.00028203992,0.00035306095,0.0005061507],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006117065,0.00046265786,0.00042128767,0.0003209995,0.017268095,0.00020605451,0.00093293056,0.0009586716,0.00025034705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000298302,0.0005603503,0.0004759556,0.0004429791,0.0019589216,0.00069504045,0.00020303529,0.00067916274,0.000116460986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036079675,0.0004148917,0.034179617,0.00013770319,0.0003787398,0.0006811746,0.07487732,0.0016332881,0.0087518515,0.8660585,0.000613582,0.011912478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013949064,0.00014992499,0.35049826,0.0011980687,0.00093079545,0.00039150825,0.08040531,0.0011375747,0.0026180728,0.018262543,0.54166377,0.0013493053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2369869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10656462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.847796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009880934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025553897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104284462","doi":"10.71781/2377","title":"L’étranger avec qui je partage ma vie : l’enrichissement injustifié entre conjoints de fait québécois","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Paid work; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.006206829926807129,"score_gpt":0.19773478817028936,"score_spread":0.19152795824348223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104284462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73770255,0.022099823,0.000059354858,0.002109688,0.0047750473,0.0009190884,0.00032596427,0.00020837066,0.23180014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84132963,0.0026453622,0.00032234954,0.00047884116,0.000472156,0.00009434273,0.00072338403,0.00005509903,0.15387881],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494684,0.0006737234,0.0007104003,0.0010247604,0.0015328379,0.0011114321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974987,0.0002694234,0.0006970075,0.00048572567,0.00029029945,0.00075885764],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062383973,0.00071578595,0.000696512,0.0003359519,0.016617639,0.00013082202,0.0009406009,0.0007192923,0.002229353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012390864,0.00090038066,0.0006664964,0.000777193,0.00079160044,0.0005741625,0.00028738868,0.0009422104,0.0002632397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012314592,0.0008620847,0.0072686267,0.00043889025,0.00082298624,0.004975008,0.5245736,0.0014039769,0.009889522,0.43428612,0.0064213453,0.007826334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009638607,0.00017858428,0.0148522835,0.00022525278,0.0008036004,0.000140815,0.27581066,0.00026967915,0.0013819222,0.0007756106,0.70364714,0.00095063064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5339883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4013394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69722575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0143607855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065322523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105912358","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5764686","title":"\"And Two Cows to my Wife… so Long as she Remains my Widow.\" Public Policy and Testamentary Marriage Clauses in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Public policy; Marriage law; Legislative history; Probate; Public use","score_opus":0.011614744626926006,"score_gpt":0.296265245659827,"score_spread":0.28465050103290096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105912358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431013,0.0076416363,0.00010900349,0.031196594,0.0009170966,0.00080256414,0.00007069774,0.00003616246,0.016124958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97432023,0.018193755,0.000090395246,0.0030783603,0.0008447578,0.000024439592,0.000011624997,0.000023222581,0.003413196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950135,0.00050410227,0.0005090737,0.00052756787,0.00063041836,0.0028153849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986056,0.00031609437,0.00023538536,0.0002532166,0.00010814643,0.00048155145],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027090975,0.00034201145,0.0004971221,0.00044103418,0.00088363246,0.00052897504,0.0006522382,0.00022083323,0.000040273764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007263717,0.00034750768,0.00008372188,0.0005123471,0.0002512092,0.0002421073,0.0005772999,0.0032540374,0.0000035853313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012827382,0.00009634559,0.13782084,0.000116122545,0.00038336247,0.00016279201,0.0043211607,0.00012740605,0.000041152787,0.8115127,0.002498427,0.04279138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025483512,0.00037178278,0.032149196,0.0009281736,0.0002089605,0.00018898344,0.036112454,0.000034412664,0.000028822258,0.78400254,0.14180861,0.0016177018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13931018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009851646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115860395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116519197","doi":"10.5287/ora-5rky090qk","title":"The contractualisation of care: the emergence of family agreements in an ageing world","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population ageing; Government (linguistics); Older people; Position (finance); Health care; Population; Family life; Public policy","score_opus":0.04270084096815387,"score_gpt":0.3183947438347216,"score_spread":0.27569390286656775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116519197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81363237,0.00043381317,0.00010258246,0.00041640768,0.00027381472,0.00090295903,0.00023103155,0.000015497724,0.18399154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799942,0.008160212,0.00032648642,0.000006841932,0.000036279554,3.812795e-7,0.0003903692,0.000013478317,0.011071754],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566746,0.00172393,0.00027332138,0.0003976146,0.0013776384,0.00056002906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664515,0.0011013232,0.00048595198,0.00050823716,0.0011048121,0.00015454915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016694264,0.00018251051,0.00043012758,0.00066111697,0.0019131547,0.000035436005,0.0020176182,0.00018210715,0.00010749017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002600193,0.00018546272,0.0002546703,0.001694632,0.0017785014,0.00053983525,0.0003244437,0.0007674153,0.0000011188108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006579498,0.0007226779,0.02380788,0.0011466474,0.000571628,0.00032775407,0.48229203,0.00025262547,0.008396467,0.40418264,0.0043943953,0.067325756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068942277,0.00023962637,0.07668888,0.0003356947,0.00007563619,1.0178013e-7,0.7864736,0.00007714128,0.00012126646,0.0020283815,0.13306871,0.00020157408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049435254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64587367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5964384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022031149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014791428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117753961","doi":"10.3917/nrt.353.0481a","title":"Amenta P., Administrative Procedures in canonical Marriage cases : History, Legislation and Praxis , trad. M. Francis, C. Hancock, coll. Gratianus - Monographs, Montréal, Wilson et Lafleur, 2011, 16x24, 258 p., rel. ISBN 978-289127-981-9","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Nouvelle revue théologique","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Praxis; Action (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03345192135937518,"score_gpt":0.273836069104724,"score_spread":0.24038414774534883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117753961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8365963,0.0786374,0.00023737457,0.03747936,0.003290476,0.010425683,0.0005338576,0.00061012845,0.032189388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91780645,0.07291889,0.0015039342,0.0010503622,0.00036304418,0.0009041059,0.00005915437,0.000096719625,0.005297365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992416,0.0023585043,0.0016243878,0.0015761727,0.00065490935,0.0013700001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958021,0.0015378611,0.0010289415,0.00070255646,0.00029136182,0.0006371655],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00187883,0.00097225566,0.0014343845,0.00037601235,0.0008526417,0.00029786295,0.0007180791,0.0015427012,0.0010258844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011209666,0.0009761207,0.00033616228,0.0006771588,0.0016201683,0.0014126113,0.00022339581,0.0013882207,0.00015707931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019798344,0.0033922957,0.015035903,0.0016264662,0.00040194351,0.0012285437,0.11240751,0.0001962147,0.0017306642,0.029580925,0.82170504,0.010714651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006977947,0.009397239,0.051073905,0.0021605736,0.0005598202,0.00041669136,0.08078252,0.0019495842,0.0010218091,0.0065931575,0.83400875,0.0050579994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13184509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27447125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14262617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011327822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038558347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128192433","doi":"10.69592/3045-6673-n2-primer-semestre-2025-art-6","title":"La ley aplicable a los derechos del cónyuge supérstite. La unidad de ley aplicable a la sucesión a debate a propósito de la STS nº 1633/2024 (civil) de 5 de diciembre de 2024","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Subject (documents); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.009292462143848115,"score_gpt":0.30756025741280324,"score_spread":0.29826779526895514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128192433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31209168,0.0039469744,0.02850421,0.0037174823,0.00052761217,0.0023393808,0.00016806171,0.000733443,0.64797115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84948516,0.0040200003,0.011358957,0.003395392,0.00050437724,0.0007851897,0.0000126415935,0.00018250814,0.13025577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855056,0.0057821795,0.0013140921,0.0019449819,0.0011054067,0.0043477667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902908,0.005763762,0.00039942787,0.0014445023,0.000352629,0.0017488811],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010240121,0.001296197,0.0014300111,0.00063389976,0.0022218146,0.0023297032,0.0029619518,0.0026397472,0.0010475541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002751302,0.0013020483,0.0007906638,0.0037689009,0.0024762184,0.000924567,0.0013280332,0.002637089,0.00023215458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00174078,0.0048123873,0.06453317,0.0039465567,0.001511729,0.0027905102,0.0289371,0.0022569115,0.03666979,0.6016514,0.23133339,0.019816283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040152175,0.00049714075,0.0041182255,0.0028925813,0.0014706956,0.0004819722,0.011311367,0.02578771,0.008531191,0.100758776,0.8375692,0.0025659485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10123915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04608057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6062358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027261695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016169768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128287365","doi":"","title":"Alimony and compensation in the post-divorce consequences between spouses - comparative law study of French and Canadian Laws","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Comparative law; Decree; Nationality; Clientelism; Alimony","score_opus":0.1449223961372216,"score_gpt":0.3432094742359123,"score_spread":0.1982870780986907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128287365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059256,0.0022248381,5.76462e-7,0.003640632,0.00021374098,0.00075006497,0.000113451686,0.000011938996,0.087119214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990911,0.00011997417,0.000052999676,0.0004830879,0.00012414843,0.000010380424,0.000008238381,0.000007616134,0.00010247378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972558,0.001335589,0.0003476275,0.0002749915,0.00040748503,0.00037848877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826515,0.0009562282,0.00015691081,0.00019206172,0.00016295939,0.00026669458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016099609,0.0001951882,0.0004411448,0.00008512301,0.00035944968,0.00012144572,0.00032571575,0.00013678371,0.000030060653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009435675,0.00015419045,0.000026039375,0.00036874975,0.002552021,0.0003564197,0.00005716915,0.00021051614,0.000019846359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001554899,0.00014715432,0.14928898,0.000024016623,0.000051395546,0.000019749756,0.37663302,0.000015397762,0.000025468855,0.47324237,0.00015006802,0.00038683927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012032265,0.0011419889,0.24767211,0.0001519106,0.0001806277,0.000007758717,0.69430935,0.000026998348,0.00009828131,0.019938862,0.03488898,0.0003799268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98323554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45330352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010010222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003615888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9403027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135797794","doi":"","title":"Legal Position of the forced Heir","year":2015,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Subject (documents); Position (finance); Theme (computing); Quarter (Canadian coin); Czech","score_opus":0.009986920687746726,"score_gpt":0.26922084293284065,"score_spread":0.25923392224509395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135797794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43614063,0.0029642798,0.0000057745333,0.000117347925,0.008711139,0.0009603428,0.00049731584,0.00006556283,0.5505376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91512185,0.00003498291,0.000050942064,0.00006626671,0.0013852494,0.000036351215,0.0008372341,0.00006385528,0.08240327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920966,0.00050716184,0.001922294,0.00085666607,0.0041013663,0.0005158991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98930293,0.00044336508,0.002591016,0.0006655677,0.006679278,0.00031782102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006046889,0.0007000787,0.00090312934,0.00031607714,0.0011584216,0.0011249156,0.0012292347,0.0011486664,0.000005801659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093592843,0.0005904983,0.0010968554,0.0011212114,0.0009777165,0.00248492,0.00015047086,0.0008104119,0.000009108854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00456454,0.0031404665,0.011716075,0.0033046117,0.0021703904,0.00031658466,0.059700605,0.00070410507,0.17150237,0.70788896,0.032734208,0.002257107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064182747,0.0034733436,0.09186621,0.021629235,0.0022813627,0.0012459746,0.020979013,0.0004947923,0.34721434,0.051409468,0.44638512,0.006602852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005884249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074326585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6564795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006715155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003609689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147261974","doi":"10.70675/8400a874z348dz4f9ez884cz50b9b29b910e","title":"L'alimentaire et l'indemnitaire dans les règlements pécuniaires entre époux consécutifs au divorce - étude comparée de droit français et de droit canadien","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Clientelism; Decree; Poor relief; Child care","score_opus":0.019848785068717602,"score_gpt":0.33186207725402184,"score_spread":0.3120132921853042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147261974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71640927,0.0004872176,0.00023548047,0.00097044243,0.0012884006,0.0015163057,0.00047799002,0.0002556696,0.27835923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737858,0.0005232236,0.00042193427,0.0021803775,0.000379584,0.00019353506,0.0018819104,0.00016801672,0.0204656],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98977655,0.0016523905,0.0016508256,0.0016390609,0.002304769,0.0029763817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946247,0.000683501,0.001029417,0.00084662926,0.0006924291,0.002123345],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003293465,0.0013847663,0.0015741924,0.0003922088,0.0034312997,0.00067299866,0.0022196856,0.0016189922,0.0015624358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038242817,0.0016348906,0.000632015,0.00092591177,0.0013286788,0.0009631818,0.00031333612,0.0014442189,0.00027873492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039394724,0.0008756746,0.294233,0.00039427794,0.0010572047,0.0002485999,0.45581543,0.0003109631,0.00069728907,0.23215975,0.010314301,0.0034995521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038537222,0.0007890027,0.28199214,0.0014517311,0.0018363307,0.000034815017,0.6438362,0.0005878285,0.0016263897,0.02386874,0.036381967,0.003741143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8702229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9704865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25789365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006372598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015180181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155124054","doi":"","title":"Prácticas profesionales en el área jurídica del Consulado General de México en Montreal, Canadá","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"ITESO Institutional Repository (ReI) (Western Institute of Technology and Higher Education)","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Term (time)","score_opus":0.013168616393444799,"score_gpt":0.33191312905885045,"score_spread":0.31874451266540565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155124054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8856081,0.005788231,0.00002187974,0.0043777865,0.008935957,0.0009520079,0.00013453944,0.0001858243,0.0939957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93509424,0.0019729494,0.0011667964,0.0002540221,0.0015270934,0.00037283322,0.0004780526,0.00004094059,0.059093088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963772,0.00022687708,0.0010135262,0.0009767569,0.0007445773,0.000661055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967526,0.00021933966,0.0011008959,0.00080951204,0.0007604403,0.0003571717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044943657,0.0006579244,0.0008293949,0.00090693467,0.0035352723,0.00021357318,0.0012588714,0.0020502703,0.000043458487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004517004,0.0006859769,0.00022270529,0.0004380471,0.0040687444,0.0010046057,0.00017444571,0.0009783934,0.000040083185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020254325,0.00088168285,0.08860593,0.0005564668,0.0003712122,0.00012426949,0.0013221592,0.00005654871,0.0020302546,0.8984654,0.00068618165,0.0066973683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085736514,0.00018004408,0.58155173,0.0015653088,0.00060842885,0.0002906898,0.0010259696,0.000007643382,0.0017491266,0.01327112,0.39801076,0.00088183035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031224016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011109704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88519424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007303492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144010885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161852605","doi":"10.82308/41999","title":"Judicial reliance on the \"Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines\": Spousal support and soft law across Canadian jurisdictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; European court of justice; Pension plan; Common law","score_opus":0.03618059982758095,"score_gpt":0.3500152386152878,"score_spread":0.3138346387877069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161852605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047720533,0.00013159703,0.000006143591,0.007550096,0.006440366,0.0010371559,0.00056964776,0.00020137345,0.9363431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72624654,0.00067759125,0.00008125716,0.012202349,0.0016145272,0.00007401801,0.0008728689,0.00008600667,0.2581449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969169,0.00013853877,0.0005958623,0.0006354345,0.00074681453,0.0009664849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981834,0.0002507735,0.00023492092,0.00044097926,0.00043429725,0.00045558758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013448464,0.00038952313,0.000435533,0.00011354609,0.0025455435,0.0002826113,0.0005745812,0.000782457,0.0013140136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003229591,0.00031729322,0.00018444867,0.00031450577,0.00046114722,0.00024671058,0.00003290623,0.0006586785,0.0008713525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001510269,0.00005706367,0.00055716484,0.00004726031,0.000077293014,0.00005662228,0.015776467,0.00001165183,0.00003216585,0.6279535,0.3496542,0.0056255655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002211508,0.00014319357,0.0021727295,0.00006309873,0.00006336576,0.000002825103,0.017729066,0.000008553191,0.000026936385,0.0010523478,0.9780611,0.00045566005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7335129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97111076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.678526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024139503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004053984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161936353","doi":"10.82308/39569","title":"Reforming personal property security law in Mexico","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Security interest; Civil code; Code (set theory); Property law","score_opus":0.016635027943760983,"score_gpt":0.2990443258761882,"score_spread":0.2824092979324272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161936353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13981894,0.00015088297,6.895846e-8,0.00021946277,0.00040649666,0.00026060914,0.000006023302,0.00007021892,0.8590673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82186633,0.00026416473,0.000030902433,0.00036455086,0.00020962651,0.000025169886,0.00014201461,0.000015048364,0.1770822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987196,0.00010048293,0.00021419967,0.0002558055,0.0003878563,0.00032205821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997138,0.000021237158,0.00005872012,0.000082982246,0.00004230012,0.00008097959],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041717637,0.00014342263,0.00021838733,0.00006488857,0.0003815474,0.000060595827,0.00018245469,0.0003988384,0.001518942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030407922,0.00009947012,0.000091061214,0.0001849935,0.00009543516,0.00023873468,0.0000076901415,0.00032109575,0.00013330935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042493863,0.00027785014,0.0003289189,0.0002506926,0.000033222983,0.000056719236,0.26907703,0.0000010635022,0.00013415694,0.6951375,0.0067976085,0.027480302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025252195,0.000033622477,0.0005387264,0.00020554641,0.00001726506,4.3799346e-7,0.049957503,0.000016161783,0.00036113505,0.008982034,0.93918896,0.00044607813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12839605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59547085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93239135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018263671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004214221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161963094","doi":"10.82308/1646","title":"Prestation compensatoire et union de fait en droit québécois : étude critique d'un discours judiciaire binaire","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Institution; Free access; Private law","score_opus":0.008557134185561754,"score_gpt":0.3042544689973512,"score_spread":0.29569733481178945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161963094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8475879,0.00090089283,0.0039767264,0.018171916,0.003249171,0.0012564856,0.00011038488,0.00036952095,0.12437699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96895725,0.0019797564,0.0024639852,0.0011845696,0.000672673,0.000098093195,0.0010461296,0.000092291295,0.023505252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949177,0.0019249832,0.00068778073,0.0007866026,0.0008243716,0.00085854967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980169,0.0003570597,0.0004499241,0.00036365105,0.00044628675,0.0003661852],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001885946,0.00058220525,0.0006114307,0.0001794203,0.0014380012,0.00023613822,0.0006955222,0.0011153783,0.00068528915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035258688,0.00063192815,0.0003084875,0.0006404275,0.00069700734,0.0009071959,0.000069664,0.0006449158,0.00027806495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006055707,0.0002878182,0.0012816419,0.000282739,0.000100449404,0.000030738982,0.09754617,0.000030006051,0.00052901474,0.8678078,0.0030710073,0.028972028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015673373,0.0011353405,0.26590246,0.0030009395,0.0009864433,0.00001868607,0.4017764,0.0012064631,0.0049317568,0.19192028,0.1244466,0.0031072723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4541994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8102523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6758875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068857014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020042215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162011934","doi":"10.82308/8394","title":"The struggle between public and private ordering in family law. A study of marital agreement regimes in existing conjugal relationships in the Republic of Columbia and the provinces of Quebec and Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immutability; Cohabitation; Order (exchange); Interdependence; Power (physics); Remarriage; Creditor; Dyad; Spillover effect; Community property","score_opus":0.054369260482757045,"score_gpt":0.287460861774099,"score_spread":0.233091601291342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162011934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97358984,0.00036065676,2.4364775e-7,0.00047882908,0.000035086705,0.0015306848,0.0000048359793,0.0000048443735,0.023994982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893445,0.00006133166,0.000038728103,0.000011208493,0.000012228959,0.000048120393,0.00001383646,0.00000554208,0.00087453483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976722,0.0008607006,0.00066956074,0.0002378001,0.00038762658,0.0001721137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779975,0.0015102573,0.00044143668,0.00014489227,0.000075453245,0.000028214063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003284735,0.00011456587,0.00038222357,0.00007441567,0.00034548293,0.00021781665,0.00027663907,0.00011479277,0.0000025597974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007112715,0.000076491364,0.000023365417,0.00039687371,0.0005347955,0.00022887862,0.00009137703,0.00037986986,2.7097293e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104404586,0.00007087003,0.7077201,0.00009878903,0.00003037484,0.0000012371927,0.15608858,5.8909734e-7,0.0000058025526,0.1340926,0.000015763151,0.0017708883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008022265,0.00009778773,0.7252059,0.00009263295,0.000021996546,7.679438e-8,0.27048764,0.0000069501966,0.000001856287,0.002703887,0.00051136507,0.00006766179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9285774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13138871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006634609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004642948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31192273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162021214","doi":"10.82308/23693","title":"Deeming a predatory spouse unworthy to inherit under Canadian Common Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Spouse; Doctrine; Common law; Common sense; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.025487497292094572,"score_gpt":0.3200427537443461,"score_spread":0.2945552564522515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162021214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22985896,0.0003708564,0.000004258372,0.0004644083,0.0016993826,0.00044798382,0.000033910914,0.00011730997,0.76700294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91455376,0.000033777033,0.00015720828,0.003252551,0.00043519496,0.000035848756,0.00022238762,0.000040308594,0.081268966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998391,0.00010792794,0.00022815235,0.00026254496,0.00035597742,0.0006544224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872243,0.00006838846,0.00007457053,0.00023728443,0.00009145915,0.00080583955],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041270858,0.00020451822,0.00025243455,0.00013808165,0.00081148813,0.00013322856,0.00036449707,0.0005393098,0.0011053061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024610394,0.0002195221,0.00008691302,0.00025766017,0.000074513686,0.0002372371,0.000018077548,0.00027376955,0.00050562836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025617977,0.000031481282,0.00058092445,0.00004191989,0.000034378296,0.0000073458637,0.014112088,0.000009543164,0.00008050666,0.9694659,0.013644094,0.0019661859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008062892,0.00001915347,0.01033632,0.0000817007,0.00004749242,2.8488697e-7,0.021029018,3.4106787e-7,0.0000924289,0.0027667414,0.9651016,0.0004443158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95305663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004414112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011196795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162027269","doi":"10.82308/11049","title":"Le sort du conjoint survivant en France et en Ontario : un exercice de droit comparé","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; General partnership; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Estate; Wife; Civil code; Alimony","score_opus":0.01107535440386963,"score_gpt":0.2504129348935328,"score_spread":0.23933758048966314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162027269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5180503,0.0004542731,0.00057217607,0.0013822501,0.0019308977,0.00045790503,0.000024713538,0.000101129765,0.47702634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8116399,0.0011108748,0.001362582,0.0007856701,0.00029644443,0.00003601773,0.00021502112,0.00003687857,0.18451661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674726,0.0006865456,0.0006067429,0.0006004781,0.00062100485,0.00073800253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998268,0.00068373367,0.0002967233,0.00028208244,0.0001824857,0.00028695303],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014133087,0.00042281387,0.00073844433,0.00007208967,0.0007886247,0.00014847622,0.0006494263,0.0007425366,0.0036259717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118231,0.0004838241,0.00029391015,0.00029871243,0.00027016122,0.00035865666,0.000053443746,0.0007913471,0.00078222447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045912584,0.00037172192,0.012688053,0.000095698604,0.000087032444,0.00003687941,0.14098755,0.00013518702,0.0002178774,0.8414576,0.0014079462,0.0024685382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010838287,0.00017127929,0.24965805,0.00034911997,0.00023083137,0.0000081506305,0.04779189,0.00043786492,0.0012119592,0.012104941,0.68553954,0.0014125447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9075298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9463773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007397776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022514549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95248366","doi":"10.59991/rvam/2013/n.29/234","title":"La constitucionalidad del matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en España","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Asamblea Revista parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid","topic":"Family and Matrimonial Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00819831740772739,"score_gpt":0.2784534910843875,"score_spread":0.2702551736766601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95248366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6138419,0.007145389,0.0008381143,0.013580805,0.0015807044,0.0035621603,0.00049007137,0.0007359268,0.35822493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734964,0.0055394126,0.0052348194,0.0034815937,0.0013638244,0.0003515543,0.00016107291,0.00020075547,0.010170595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898537,0.0029860442,0.0014604321,0.0015942289,0.0015612164,0.0025443882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927987,0.003589652,0.00081274344,0.0011133807,0.00034350125,0.0013420363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045341845,0.0012934511,0.001459327,0.00035323738,0.0014615136,0.003692402,0.0018192333,0.001555566,0.0048487387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008498817,0.0013605378,0.0008624105,0.00096997403,0.0019376958,0.0010816695,0.0005960991,0.0017752782,0.0029321038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040649774,0.0013351932,0.07909978,0.0010219964,0.0010920772,0.0007239596,0.01166182,0.00011986047,0.004921922,0.6802594,0.19813175,0.021225713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028375143,0.00023603732,0.022101687,0.00082121225,0.00085670024,0.00023155799,0.011487061,0.0003477682,0.0005364932,0.0043818867,0.9543915,0.0017706073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04635084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053275016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75625974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021830164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027305977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}