{"meta":{"query_hash":"3ec04f66859f","filters":{"topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods"},"cohort_total":310,"direct_labels_cover":9,"predictions_cover":310,"exported":310,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3ec04f66859f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Focus+Groups+and+Qualitative+Methods"},"results":[{"id":"W111108992","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-0074-4.ch023","title":"Ethical Considerations in Online Research Methods","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Online research methods; Anonymity; Ethical issues; Data collection; Online discussion; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Data science; Internet privacy; Sociology; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.3914381170896912,"score_gpt":0.5824541722531352,"score_spread":0.19101605516344405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W111108992","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054730303,0.023234671,0.496612,0.11839084,0.00933728,0.007791916,0.00035553367,0.00048628607,0.33831847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106441975,0.023515003,0.62627286,0.07518918,0.006914928,0.035460338,0.00045607958,0.0008163908,0.124933235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7545422,0.19959998,0.009274947,0.005017964,0.029734673,0.0018303068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75794524,0.19882676,0.004659549,0.022386855,0.013654531,0.0025271357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14972347,0.001214896,0.0010901345,0.0022248768,0.006971275,0.0117749395,0.0032572914,0.00952621,0.01250484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14966469,0.0010901957,0.0007052073,0.0029105132,0.023092765,0.012346137,0.008269509,0.012562032,0.0066098296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003807785,0.00008836597,0.00027499953,0.0009424867,0.000014042407,0.00044809934,0.03341063,0.00030786372,0.0006864536,0.81289107,0.046350714,0.104547195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002342518,0.000053460648,0.00017321613,0.0030653074,0.000009647557,0.00076329266,0.0052625523,0.00036331647,0.0007874689,0.26082513,0.728642,0.00003117806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070476823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013904235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8502765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030846375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108383065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79182285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1151365709","doi":"10.4000/communiquer.1085","title":"Enjeux éthiques de la recherche sur les forums Internet portant sur l’utilisation des médicaments à des fins non médicales","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de communication sociale et publique","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.49809422623558514,"score_gpt":0.4959555526892522,"score_spread":0.0021386735463329587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1151365709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6940801,0.017067049,0.031365566,0.07222866,0.001543909,0.0012647473,0.0004812922,0.00022248017,0.18174616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709691,0.004655087,0.0070225927,0.00417146,0.00039668588,0.0011861158,0.000088398614,0.000049677725,0.011460882],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92878914,0.059860367,0.0018026846,0.001949747,0.0060206708,0.0015774316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8152701,0.14816196,0.012112702,0.008599093,0.010847443,0.005008636],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052948948,0.0004421704,0.0005614213,0.002029193,0.0062412713,0.007988943,0.0010966558,0.00295071,0.010329771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092369184,0.000414309,0.00058412773,0.0012602307,0.009019235,0.006490609,0.0063858754,0.0026650678,0.0012244742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065383024,0.00041670946,0.033431053,0.0027295304,0.00013727754,0.0010308471,0.61590433,0.00035753436,0.004659831,0.09435687,0.011241846,0.23508032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024313979,0.0013462342,0.050053354,0.0065707057,0.00021303455,0.0018632301,0.46789458,0.0011094281,0.0035476887,0.051838927,0.41506127,0.0002584134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029659844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030160304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033541417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006796154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28002417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135150818","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1212","title":"New Emerging Technologies in Qualitative Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Emerging technologies; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4722096159575111,"score_gpt":0.6799356263671988,"score_spread":0.20772601040968774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135150818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009408664,0.06482426,0.7324524,0.10500653,0.0106119765,0.011670965,0.0010092482,0.00066303543,0.06435294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11108128,0.02986435,0.77353686,0.018959336,0.0024112884,0.05633467,0.0004618816,0.0005739549,0.006776445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4011903,0.5574848,0.015461449,0.00900487,0.014816,0.0020426346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30711132,0.6290029,0.010866443,0.030493202,0.019579688,0.0029465691],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4434854,0.001989384,0.0031661792,0.015146205,0.009932689,0.026149783,0.005891013,0.007120296,0.0123761585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36349854,0.0028161807,0.002123253,0.018913487,0.062048517,0.034677636,0.025702009,0.013136185,0.0027106083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011018637,0.00007291228,0.00079512945,0.00886971,0.00010739665,0.0003403882,0.23528765,0.00037363192,0.00052131515,0.6485943,0.012119622,0.09280773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001362115,0.00013623033,0.00062566943,0.018204201,0.00007113925,0.0008796195,0.10471826,0.0015624375,0.0007962046,0.45977026,0.41297114,0.00012852439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027729284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041012536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5565146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019441688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0199647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68628156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487766404","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2013v38n1a2631","title":"Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Netnography; Ethnography; Sociology; Anthropology; Computer science; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2533710882545106,"score_gpt":0.49815811997922343,"score_spread":0.24478703172471283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487766404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08262774,0.0054341545,0.066325255,0.0053694183,0.0027568792,0.005706082,0.024543975,0.0037577823,0.80347884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39413887,0.008979322,0.17626686,0.007277242,0.00094520353,0.020065024,0.010552315,0.001942951,0.3798323],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958145,0.0030726013,0.00018035721,0.00018048557,0.0006249179,0.00012721885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824614,0.013387855,0.00041282413,0.0018267321,0.0011178198,0.00079343497],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050434563,0.00036487225,0.00032434586,0.0039230604,0.0023395736,0.0020390267,0.0008982855,0.000511804,0.098413356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014351721,0.00024910163,0.00018366825,0.003150485,0.0013328907,0.0030308503,0.0036784566,0.00074441126,0.014479493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012286376,0.00038660484,0.004831782,0.0018826628,0.000018694605,0.0003647763,0.10501749,0.00014642147,0.0019506988,0.015248838,0.19626832,0.67376083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000449487,0.000087338245,0.005504812,0.0016951874,0.000014989154,0.0003696193,0.05054883,0.00028148614,0.00073879777,0.009070826,0.93161386,0.00002938534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033381726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016915856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99495655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008140536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002409454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32922542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488070775","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v44i1.2594","title":"Internet research ethics and the policy gap for ethical practice in online research settings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Situational ethics; Anonymity; Internet research; Public relations; Information ethics; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.41169019353082065,"score_gpt":0.636313732464289,"score_spread":0.22462353893346837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488070775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017334469,0.01776396,0.031872597,0.8486876,0.0019563502,0.00052532123,0.00007898748,0.00009884468,0.08168188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72160006,0.02117196,0.06977711,0.17304315,0.0016487126,0.0019656196,0.00012272476,0.00025275606,0.010418008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5846511,0.3141737,0.012536758,0.012238314,0.06184077,0.01455932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26984188,0.5956778,0.018411443,0.023412535,0.06336306,0.029293314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3662676,0.0006992492,0.0019996178,0.0063888715,0.03859298,0.0423948,0.0063384078,0.015584086,0.0053063626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37880632,0.0012737208,0.00095424516,0.009404381,0.14863834,0.02504548,0.022220729,0.02178287,0.0008222187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034510307,0.00006413963,0.0018604508,0.00076755136,0.000021637621,0.0003660119,0.10621993,0.00026440082,0.00021274055,0.8243119,0.020498412,0.045378234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060630413,0.00005302085,0.0030484272,0.006587448,0.00003880476,0.00046776436,0.1545469,0.0009650706,0.0004181803,0.5764193,0.2572548,0.0001397521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50610524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5598831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12231447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42495438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490732339","doi":"","title":"Social Matching for Health Researchers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3723195271192515,"score_gpt":0.4866517060421233,"score_spread":0.11433217892287184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490732339","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05971799,0.01771014,0.4096293,0.25933027,0.0064814393,0.002341928,0.0026236952,0.0011095374,0.24105567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7931678,0.0036601995,0.13205753,0.01757965,0.005062649,0.005755321,0.0012300948,0.00033303682,0.041153718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9266586,0.06431424,0.0013207187,0.0037713544,0.0028846432,0.0010505468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78811896,0.16906495,0.0060621165,0.023878854,0.009372277,0.0035028805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059784643,0.00069046154,0.0016997133,0.006627223,0.0064929924,0.005135945,0.0019840563,0.0048116087,0.041732863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20642915,0.00078917906,0.001175139,0.006619869,0.008640367,0.008910946,0.007055913,0.0030656164,0.0033678832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021492645,0.00023576705,0.007642682,0.0004370214,0.00015811014,0.00011302026,0.0043110834,0.0010954619,0.00012890712,0.785576,0.03378464,0.16630234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006204519,0.00006879819,0.002099042,0.00022497667,0.000042097505,0.00007216819,0.0020883277,0.0047749537,0.0001477245,0.9537622,0.03663927,0.000018397666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004773761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032604034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059784643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042763785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070955786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31617516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499501510","doi":"","title":"Tapping twitter: A meta-method of the qualitative health literature using social media as a data collection tool","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Data collection; Tapping; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.1316802376235014,"score_gpt":0.4182472401161961,"score_spread":0.2865670024926947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499501510","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024251148,0.038048293,0.34602696,0.0041331034,0.0013454666,0.56750405,0.012521452,0.0013092122,0.0048602517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036798727,0.003909901,0.34596118,0.0008316462,0.000053863514,0.6108359,0.0007624282,0.00017998015,0.0006662932],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.76029444,0.1816862,0.033918455,0.011796986,0.010341599,0.0019623223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61339176,0.32772645,0.015563191,0.01883622,0.023616206,0.0008661109],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23141427,0.0041977908,0.010450148,0.031868286,0.00395275,0.0064188084,0.0062211948,0.0035420388,0.015908012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32560176,0.0030113468,0.019226322,0.024287133,0.005446562,0.005319078,0.00822369,0.0033385423,0.0014758558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037563033,0.00048273004,0.0058302153,0.5644551,0.030061554,0.00096538273,0.10374124,0.004534481,0.0039130175,0.025002869,0.014085923,0.24317111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012668674,0.0037269688,0.011861176,0.40244535,0.1269576,0.0011356228,0.09624442,0.022499425,0.014341468,0.112718545,0.19379333,0.0016075259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007306287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011270462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76858574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015238586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024568144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.947803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501915192","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05843.x","title":"Email interviewing: generating data with a vulnerable population","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Thematic analysis; Data collection; Inclusion (mineral); Population; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.2569110454893016,"score_gpt":0.4668566484340169,"score_spread":0.20994560294471531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501915192","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2691765,0.002304941,0.5965725,0.010843441,0.001245792,0.055503182,0.0033279057,0.0012021875,0.059823565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30878538,0.0023721186,0.584894,0.0039152186,0.00060583296,0.0897515,0.00130296,0.00025404815,0.008118965],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92123044,0.06957092,0.0028362456,0.002036392,0.0034737552,0.00085234945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88389003,0.09336827,0.0061781122,0.007506378,0.007905076,0.0011520783],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059190705,0.0011498174,0.00083473034,0.004999369,0.0042174617,0.0036372705,0.002061674,0.0022187023,0.008355252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08996615,0.00070753886,0.00079414714,0.004007078,0.0030497874,0.005037337,0.006483854,0.0015306096,0.003388028],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057726476,0.0005240819,0.015256364,0.0061664665,0.00010397352,0.001470612,0.52340746,0.0009028316,0.011912481,0.024101906,0.018013505,0.39756307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006139879,0.0021946148,0.01900504,0.011004613,0.00024715817,0.002483132,0.44912165,0.0064017405,0.016758762,0.10616222,0.38573486,0.00027225746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061682664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081291137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017815204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004264003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31303412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503808599","doi":"10.1177/160940691000900104","title":"Exploring Ethical and Methodological Issues in Internet-Based Research with Adolescents","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; The Internet; Ethical issues; Informed consent; Data collection; Research ethics; Internet research; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Social science; Alternative medicine; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.9388730344812117,"score_gpt":0.7404821074722382,"score_spread":0.19839092700897354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503808599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41478494,0.017872361,0.3321835,0.16575707,0.0034937318,0.02140607,0.00016762619,0.0002231038,0.04411166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66509604,0.008174889,0.2669255,0.02195404,0.00071460474,0.03317578,0.00006646001,0.00019964899,0.0036930821],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.26185015,0.708186,0.013667763,0.002738429,0.010829423,0.0027282878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2561607,0.6830876,0.017678816,0.014881663,0.024123335,0.0040679737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5663681,0.0010117139,0.0012066305,0.006411766,0.016454665,0.018465903,0.0044421,0.0068846643,0.0020486738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52442074,0.0017966477,0.0011279908,0.0067620636,0.040116563,0.012694838,0.01159152,0.010257476,0.00048466862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006186015,0.00017818822,0.0056961807,0.00086228386,0.00005077391,0.0007969705,0.9187369,0.00021105034,0.00069031736,0.04108452,0.0014605965,0.03017042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001107333,0.00035657812,0.0028428603,0.0076851095,0.00008592909,0.0012132752,0.8751952,0.0015502879,0.0025329958,0.054081477,0.054268066,0.00007751817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002518374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005927598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4336319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010914629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025401885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53474534},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1519196938","doi":"10.1177/147078530404600303","title":"Comparison of the Quality of Qualitative Data Obtained through Telephone, Postal and Email Surveys","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Market Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Data collection; Data quality; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Marketing; Information quality; Business; Telephone interview; Telephone survey; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Advertising; Information system; Sociology; Statistics; Engineering; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.6620896328828171,"score_gpt":0.6899098371780265,"score_spread":0.027820204295209372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519196938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7988084,0.0032079038,0.15437834,0.0034735845,0.00049885915,0.007624739,0.0064795106,0.00046585922,0.025062779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388701,0.0016369568,0.044752337,0.0008392744,0.00012526367,0.009165107,0.0020520499,0.00021880964,0.0023401922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7078705,0.22182277,0.022954738,0.004874222,0.039156083,0.0033216253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2760082,0.57919365,0.025822997,0.020859372,0.09676854,0.0013472267],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1936441,0.0008632117,0.0017640835,0.016065264,0.0020483988,0.0070192134,0.0020710386,0.0011411329,0.003021439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5483568,0.0011971091,0.0014739844,0.013087472,0.004557881,0.004752042,0.0054552145,0.0010638726,0.00066116604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014859634,0.00028815068,0.11811809,0.010978821,0.0008218307,0.00072026474,0.6275621,0.0015914991,0.00510253,0.0054438086,0.002686888,0.22519998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003658721,0.0015869293,0.21107006,0.012037708,0.00065564114,0.0009946389,0.69466573,0.0068856915,0.013170282,0.010034888,0.048075777,0.0004567317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053885197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007891555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8063559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058080503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047194553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99438035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537520495","doi":"10.7202/1003966ar","title":"Uploading selves: Inuit digital storytelling on YouTube","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Études/Inuit/Studies","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; The Internet; Storytelling; Representation (politics); Sociology; Social media; Futures contract; Media studies; Gender studies; Narrative; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Art; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.29733174300968584,"score_gpt":0.43485775128421894,"score_spread":0.1375260082745331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537520495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797094,0.00047156727,0.0006684404,0.0013825294,0.00006691558,0.000091932,0.00038133856,0.00002719807,0.017200673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99069655,0.00066794467,0.00059693924,0.0002688296,0.00001787734,0.0000943462,0.000233836,0.000045085,0.0073786713],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846774,0.00078796933,0.00005040539,0.00015386306,0.00020076236,0.00033924056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807334,0.0009852451,0.00013673329,0.00007222,0.00030144604,0.00043102022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017525486,0.0006048921,0.00043765243,0.002199323,0.012453347,0.0042459355,0.0011662407,0.00089904625,0.004679699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004336733,0.00031297278,0.00023202752,0.0018284172,0.004684294,0.0027857346,0.00422836,0.001183379,0.00044828592],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020862264,0.000020990126,0.0030408397,0.000049500763,0.0000046478763,0.00043624532,0.98924017,0.000015762507,0.0005247622,0.0006430855,0.001269516,0.0047337543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015794947,0.000022709646,0.0033142257,0.000059615337,0.000005678608,0.00019706815,0.97917295,0.00006227736,0.00036320084,0.0001189476,0.016669432,0.000012208585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24694288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53607905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24694288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058973185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031034017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49101102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541083764","doi":"10.1177/160940691000900102","title":"Contrasting Internet and Face-to-Face Focus Groups for Children with Chronic Health Conditions: Outcomes and Participant Experiences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; McGill University; Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; SickKids Foundation; University of British Columbia; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; The Internet; Psychology; Asynchronous communication; Face-to-face; Qualitative research; Cerebral palsy; Medical education; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.3756489991506828,"score_gpt":0.6100456326258258,"score_spread":0.234396633475143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541083764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988922,0.0003276757,0.004687484,0.00040369906,0.000044995442,0.0007531077,0.00013689655,0.000019882204,0.0047041946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98326266,0.0005448992,0.009699082,0.0003248796,0.000041951287,0.003786089,0.00012330063,0.000037380487,0.0021797006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98534876,0.01174022,0.0004261017,0.00071857916,0.00084100675,0.00092526496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95151967,0.042109217,0.0023900778,0.0010002408,0.0022535205,0.00072722754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019719325,0.0007053122,0.0007520413,0.002064968,0.0046273936,0.0023990087,0.0013207606,0.0012811219,0.004310822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036420383,0.0005705076,0.0005266008,0.0015828762,0.004095922,0.003236249,0.005063411,0.0011652135,0.0005014579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034757185,0.00023178528,0.012050762,0.00045766408,0.000017009465,0.00043473108,0.9632404,0.000050897437,0.0033748995,0.0006760506,0.00026549769,0.018852774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007830106,0.000638993,0.017844964,0.0003272477,0.000032706204,0.0004294464,0.969482,0.00011464979,0.003939865,0.00070820964,0.006369111,0.000034489796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026460309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006419268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019719325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002772554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021076158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10428697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542239159","doi":"10.7202/018429ar","title":"Carte méthodologique d’un groupe témoin","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de géographie du Québec","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04697196090684399,"score_gpt":0.30562221374047654,"score_spread":0.2586502528336326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542239159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027261982,0.001133942,0.9001118,0.0048062573,0.000668244,0.011161309,0.0038075014,0.0007724778,0.050276544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10619398,0.0008903137,0.84871787,0.00064745644,0.000069201116,0.02137575,0.0014371217,0.00040087852,0.020267438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9409004,0.04681595,0.0021262164,0.0045873686,0.004798156,0.00077197416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9207341,0.060433112,0.00216363,0.006064961,0.0101632355,0.00044096183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043436766,0.001244528,0.0013393079,0.0104622515,0.0054592513,0.009583144,0.0026849767,0.002030183,0.026578115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06231223,0.0010759368,0.0017755115,0.010464854,0.009124685,0.0052465233,0.0036559533,0.0027738302,0.0029598905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026581527,0.00011410647,0.0038029724,0.0041388352,0.00018154518,0.00043240862,0.21587762,0.0029739635,0.0024558483,0.5822134,0.01905483,0.1684887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031093447,0.00018349665,0.008145315,0.004246859,0.00019372869,0.00046688278,0.09052947,0.015494326,0.0041178456,0.20156918,0.6745498,0.00019210746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045024734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046632852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95497525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011742238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018343251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22971833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553235586","doi":"10.1177/160940690700600209","title":"“Just Chatting”: Research Ethics and Cyberspace","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Confidentiality; Flexibility (engineering); Qualitative research; The Internet; Research ethics; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Internet privacy; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Medicine; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Management; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.9093497367131598,"score_gpt":0.7938797614486554,"score_spread":0.11546997526450442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553235586","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05647602,0.025766395,0.15420952,0.6437163,0.0048210872,0.00049545156,0.000039307495,0.00021699115,0.11425891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88764936,0.006934525,0.04527438,0.051661707,0.0021540397,0.0010033479,0.00001942384,0.00010955349,0.0051936596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.71928346,0.26213932,0.003918,0.003825271,0.0089579625,0.0018760281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6707034,0.2900533,0.009304381,0.014495166,0.009484949,0.005958757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13436134,0.00064409274,0.0010102157,0.0021542811,0.013382961,0.01971029,0.0018550431,0.011867735,0.002108344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14286444,0.00063646806,0.00042583872,0.0029236944,0.15145458,0.023928473,0.009687415,0.01381651,0.00042372316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023761748,0.000039997674,0.0008697192,0.0003404169,0.000012804633,0.00026766455,0.1327454,0.0001702644,0.00027480812,0.8388085,0.005496228,0.020950494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031379335,0.000087993845,0.00080641377,0.002165277,0.000012474125,0.0008754299,0.10742135,0.00079223764,0.0006054731,0.7854683,0.101657,0.000076742275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002303882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019131647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98813224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005156721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017534217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71057916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559139218","doi":"10.1177/160940690400300106","title":"Tech Tips: Using Video Management/ Analysis Technology in Qualitative Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CLIPS; Computer science; Multimedia; Qualitative research; Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Software; Video editing; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Operating system; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.7845517402826568,"score_gpt":0.7667290898641408,"score_spread":0.01782265041851605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559139218","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054039676,0.001408481,0.92131287,0.0136521235,0.0023534948,0.0058483505,0.0015444931,0.010131927,0.038344234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009353997,0.0012499132,0.9713752,0.0018263758,0.00033525977,0.0069820676,0.00035409862,0.0016332277,0.0068898974],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97037137,0.024515508,0.0016574367,0.00061238516,0.0024543111,0.00038906664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88015723,0.098889574,0.0027287586,0.0065437914,0.010353728,0.00132693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026187187,0.001257295,0.0007208507,0.0044896095,0.0019319593,0.0023537064,0.001541374,0.0019909125,0.029192897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10410112,0.0011264912,0.00088266353,0.0040651946,0.0020714733,0.004394089,0.0031476934,0.0042513884,0.011224703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002844022,0.00033205826,0.0009302334,0.004944432,0.000058916776,0.0007347546,0.019270374,0.00063111883,0.016328106,0.020221902,0.25490615,0.6813576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005247865,0.0010027639,0.004694957,0.007160449,0.00015750698,0.0042940825,0.016613126,0.010454832,0.028937187,0.07144907,0.8543278,0.0003834085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000775694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022184828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029192897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085683906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020762535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1384927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570034326","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00257.x","title":"Is E‐mail Communication a Feasible Method to Interview Young People With Mental Health Problems?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Mental health; Data collection; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Value (mathematics); Medical education; Motivational interviewing; Applied psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03561173607322177,"score_gpt":0.4094638157287727,"score_spread":0.37385207965555095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570034326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6946881,0.0033609031,0.1242634,0.09071121,0.0039131707,0.014467861,0.0025876027,0.001861282,0.06414652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8184875,0.003360011,0.13726956,0.007385376,0.0016998046,0.026889585,0.00052343815,0.00018752075,0.0041971086],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9293213,0.06112644,0.0028501505,0.0013381477,0.0040135165,0.0013505479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6903251,0.24503374,0.021583565,0.015097243,0.02381502,0.004145346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07952393,0.00042178272,0.0010043125,0.0015322675,0.0016548133,0.0038775583,0.0015686502,0.0036959366,0.024468532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24001916,0.00058742677,0.00057986146,0.0022865303,0.0017274085,0.009851432,0.0014442798,0.0011712215,0.006619521],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028541177,0.002025783,0.08198776,0.0063651763,0.00013890392,0.00060631783,0.029199252,0.00033007475,0.006365189,0.0030785545,0.024508929,0.84254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050307186,0.026944544,0.3557038,0.03326428,0.0010595452,0.0044291085,0.22648983,0.010316686,0.029661344,0.024863986,0.2812894,0.00094685087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001509213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015551109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000919378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038254303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42056775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576703122","doi":"10.1177/160940690400300205","title":"Mini-Disc Recorders: A New Approach for Qualitative Interviewing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fidelity; Interview; High fidelity; Compact disc; Digital audio; Index (typography); Computer science; Multimedia; Engineering; Telecommunications; Computer hardware; Sociology; World Wide Web; Acoustics; Electrical engineering; Digital signal processing; Audio signal","score_opus":0.7553551430729768,"score_gpt":0.6898426162264046,"score_spread":0.06551252684657216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576703122","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011277441,0.00079618604,0.95432335,0.002454158,0.0007916134,0.011380968,0.0007212157,0.0008555668,0.017399518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014216241,0.00045429476,0.96268964,0.00036606748,0.000086376436,0.016411686,0.00015670792,0.00019394244,0.005425004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91789675,0.067330495,0.0036525507,0.0037580351,0.006758032,0.00060423627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88925695,0.084008716,0.0040285457,0.012978689,0.008521703,0.001205366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063900575,0.0017318513,0.0012856245,0.005250883,0.00537227,0.0063530444,0.004648286,0.001824823,0.013482437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06514617,0.0016845457,0.0010602004,0.006242569,0.0097567355,0.0061199525,0.010147482,0.0051384387,0.0038020245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053114095,0.00043646738,0.00076341507,0.0057966863,0.0001134482,0.0005513399,0.35108232,0.0012371205,0.029818373,0.07751574,0.02023575,0.5119182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007982705,0.001145619,0.003359952,0.0043369583,0.00019244815,0.002935188,0.16755334,0.014065375,0.033711955,0.117441125,0.65358603,0.0008737438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018507721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007770812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038096155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065455413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3379426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581905769","doi":"10.1002/meet.2014.14505101145","title":"Privacy and control in online social profiles: Toward a typology of users","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Internet privacy; Control (management); Social network (sociolinguistics); Psychology; Frame (networking); Computer science; User-generated content; Personally identifiable information; Social control; Social psychology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social media; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030988658202386558,"score_gpt":0.3639949144788421,"score_spread":0.3330062562764555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581905769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8504948,0.00061439705,0.08533777,0.0050776857,0.00008914688,0.00045317228,0.00016516303,0.00006556112,0.05770232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947495,0.00013380173,0.0039601256,0.00017679844,0.000015382891,0.00019174257,0.000034199333,0.000015019013,0.0007233398],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96890175,0.023186611,0.0013361617,0.0015293086,0.0037419626,0.0013042815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681598,0.021556022,0.0035371801,0.0026312778,0.0027896455,0.001325984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018246084,0.0005577392,0.00047440614,0.0056683356,0.005270568,0.011322099,0.0011843342,0.0017555701,0.002013336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031013511,0.00046229898,0.000532893,0.0036700724,0.015434446,0.014602134,0.0073272064,0.0020638215,0.00020428727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009617746,0.00007942457,0.037630938,0.00013588778,0.000019341353,0.00021179036,0.7952433,0.0003017204,0.0014544746,0.1458059,0.0006102408,0.018410861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033536864,0.00013158932,0.016156726,0.00034133528,0.00002105913,0.00053377915,0.8546855,0.0046207313,0.0010625336,0.09444169,0.027889324,0.00008233652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003095515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014701554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018246084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028651322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019294268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09649569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W158446331","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-29262-0_17","title":"Evaluation of a Web-Based Patient Portal for Chronic Disease Management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Patient portal; Usability; Medicine; Health care; Chronic disease; Web application; Disease management; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Family medicine; Health management system; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.07157164537727909,"score_gpt":0.34330640558463993,"score_spread":0.27173476020736087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W158446331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879864,0.00022095225,0.0035454493,0.00062503,0.000094340314,0.003637681,0.00067696645,0.00045592053,0.0027573397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624577,0.00047738798,0.027271783,0.0005803556,0.000088706765,0.005324297,0.0014411312,0.00013555505,0.0022231177],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98707134,0.010344426,0.0007591323,0.00034624516,0.0011484707,0.00033044856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94899255,0.040472697,0.00139408,0.0017253188,0.0032436817,0.0041717957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017778683,0.00067031634,0.000766624,0.0012271672,0.00088725524,0.002153828,0.0012370321,0.0014064026,0.008891772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045029044,0.00038589197,0.0008012006,0.0008814785,0.0006366434,0.002027809,0.002612645,0.0011268186,0.0010200785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08329206,0.18506187,0.05201888,0.005741742,0.001259261,0.000690685,0.0119847115,0.0041953754,0.0063053365,0.001259882,0.008473041,0.6397172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.10402903,0.46537977,0.28375578,0.004620656,0.005138233,0.0012542271,0.021227233,0.05719749,0.01795327,0.0033924289,0.03538583,0.0006660985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026375405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00294843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017778683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012125081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003463325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094023764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593386902","doi":"10.1177/160940691201100404","title":"Qualitative Research in the Digital Era: Obstacles and Opportunities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; The Internet; Qualitative research; Cloud computing; Process (computing); Computer science; Software; Data science; Internet privacy; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9045321294077043,"score_gpt":0.7473714466525677,"score_spread":0.15716068275513662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593386902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10518877,0.042207964,0.17333914,0.621186,0.0071466835,0.010955965,0.00077158574,0.00019972313,0.03900412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6423152,0.028945157,0.22823979,0.058423784,0.0021655478,0.03450125,0.000250097,0.0002701113,0.0048890836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3210668,0.63753444,0.014002673,0.005400701,0.016210524,0.005784877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18237282,0.7593468,0.010991159,0.015127017,0.021800889,0.010361297],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5532263,0.0012274361,0.0026432525,0.007600487,0.027585749,0.023818934,0.007663053,0.009476626,0.009552503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46372223,0.0026559075,0.0014845309,0.011397909,0.05194159,0.033917286,0.03668672,0.009773579,0.0014332284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021582266,0.00045582725,0.0061682747,0.010012843,0.0000852816,0.0010827212,0.7322298,0.00064079533,0.0007616733,0.16641712,0.007494818,0.07443496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001172135,0.00024496816,0.0010756896,0.016272577,0.000038056267,0.0006505186,0.7935997,0.0011563451,0.00053794484,0.10403415,0.08216813,0.000104663675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00908017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012975362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4467737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018936431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04417875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5509516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593770955","doi":"10.29173/cjs891","title":"Cultural Centrality and Information and Communication Technology among Canadian Youth","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Information and Communications Technology; Sociology; Cohort; Survey data collection; Gender studies; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.07277196053718557,"score_gpt":0.34037704634499455,"score_spread":0.26760508580780895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593770955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943334,0.0004157395,0.000051801697,0.0003095022,0.000007961256,0.000016180484,0.00017570409,0.0000030711824,0.0046867584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998606,0.00040224573,0.000058293674,0.0000379237,0.0000025743193,0.0000064136098,0.00006249223,0.0000021007638,0.00082190917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986154,0.00015750686,0.00003998312,0.00012867319,0.0004803759,0.00057810434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977144,0.00041144353,0.00034457186,0.000054044118,0.00081325625,0.0006622689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014218823,0.0003165923,0.0003473367,0.003968836,0.00883842,0.0046559516,0.0007178854,0.00042451703,0.0023987452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043978053,0.00023707675,0.00023360914,0.0057187662,0.00293631,0.0009191305,0.002340807,0.0006800198,0.00011786569],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109388246,0.000071643255,0.49301958,0.00014608659,0.00002489197,0.00055566954,0.46829304,0.00012374997,0.000923349,0.0038531884,0.0013299396,0.031549465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007233443,0.000041892574,0.41667482,0.00015962777,0.000031983698,0.00018058706,0.5700755,0.0002162206,0.00033015356,0.00035371733,0.011886835,0.000041505165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98478645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98497665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025104405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025104405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030050555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18214607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596315909","doi":"10.1177/160940691101000303","title":"Email as a Data Collection Tool when Interviewing Older Adults","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Psychosocial; Interview; Context (archaeology); Exploratory research; Psychology; Internet privacy; Data collection; Applied psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Sociology","score_opus":0.7491994995173686,"score_gpt":0.652552675900478,"score_spread":0.09664682361689059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596315909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56376845,0.0054040067,0.29479843,0.0047283694,0.001320951,0.08532466,0.0061057094,0.0005857499,0.037963618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44385466,0.0034549092,0.40878087,0.001949565,0.00047987362,0.13540524,0.0013863797,0.00011873555,0.004569827],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9273895,0.058749385,0.007233469,0.0014219536,0.0044423873,0.00076329906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91696656,0.057598554,0.0062594926,0.004829093,0.013352245,0.0009941532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05787893,0.0006178377,0.0007242617,0.0052217823,0.0028220543,0.001978852,0.0010044876,0.0010456803,0.0037070238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07896336,0.00050212775,0.00035629168,0.0051637148,0.0012716947,0.0025210944,0.0026922813,0.0010767217,0.0014158107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086705346,0.0005048453,0.03288448,0.009030808,0.00007299418,0.0018413592,0.43585104,0.0007244427,0.028990818,0.008057539,0.0104632685,0.47071144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003928336,0.004874894,0.06865861,0.011284288,0.00021969,0.002881724,0.46514127,0.0037481799,0.026831832,0.015223768,0.4004849,0.00025800473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093915884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002084458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9421211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012691566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025473214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30609667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160623409","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v46i4.54834","title":"Design and Development of a Process for Web-based Survey Research","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Web survey; Survey research; Process (computing); Educational research; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.5847638098472623,"score_gpt":0.6181923390653793,"score_spread":0.03342852921811701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160623409","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011683021,0.00009151403,0.26020363,0.00033331045,0.00016247066,0.721946,0.0009997265,0.0007760487,0.003804295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005933513,0.000048437505,0.3684164,0.00014766344,0.000016265461,0.6245379,0.00019603706,0.000071710216,0.0006319636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7514651,0.20536226,0.016346458,0.009497319,0.013213958,0.0041149366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7438607,0.17373875,0.007944837,0.024089195,0.046670232,0.003696208],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19977115,0.0032949771,0.0030905688,0.012320208,0.0068533877,0.00766334,0.0052960063,0.0041215583,0.023928307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21238329,0.0058050933,0.0038512873,0.009030502,0.0050388644,0.004758297,0.008085802,0.0062521165,0.008366457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035224676,0.010238254,0.013974951,0.010466754,0.00030984488,0.0006573619,0.05523211,0.0096381465,0.010765904,0.04451049,0.01393203,0.8267517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.037894,0.035576187,0.049491946,0.0135295605,0.0018738019,0.0008096191,0.10851493,0.114479974,0.074545905,0.11509328,0.4464727,0.0017180713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057459897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008399472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19977115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009789148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032592766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98682463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855907784","doi":"10.15353/joci.v11i3.2699","title":"Focus Groups as a Tool to Collect Data in a Community Informatics Project Involving Elderly Rural Women","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Sociology; Data collection; Transparency (behavior); Normative; Openness to experience; Communication in small groups; Library science; Public relations; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.18794914447117655,"score_gpt":0.43251310660307685,"score_spread":0.2445639621319003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855907784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645555,0.00040373162,0.019243462,0.0018541216,0.00008804381,0.007140209,0.000200952,0.00011738732,0.006396616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90805995,0.0009998784,0.062159557,0.0011760477,0.000095874006,0.019593123,0.00021487841,0.00007319143,0.007627508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96687394,0.029777193,0.00061711844,0.00051087776,0.0010859378,0.001134924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92053914,0.06827255,0.0023083086,0.0019890554,0.0045008035,0.0023901341],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05400039,0.0008094118,0.0004824658,0.0033057232,0.009323639,0.0022036834,0.0020591503,0.0018801687,0.0044347923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04555659,0.0008560842,0.00043945003,0.0018654364,0.0040025166,0.0028780634,0.005740533,0.0012596792,0.0006939486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002339718,0.00066573336,0.0052700527,0.0004785805,0.000013155952,0.001365778,0.9398932,0.00013387497,0.0036252835,0.0013822075,0.0012938643,0.04564428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019543998,0.0026358883,0.014613015,0.00077147107,0.000046056077,0.00066561025,0.93609184,0.0005149187,0.004542147,0.0019499046,0.037899207,0.000074536205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039881924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065146494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023217902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004285226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2855848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906710109","doi":"10.1177/160940690800700303","title":"Not Alone in the Field: Distance Collaboration via the Internet in a Focused Ethnography","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; The Internet; Reflexivity; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Trustworthiness; Space (punctuation); Process (computing); Media studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science; Anthropology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.40035596654511085,"score_gpt":0.6033535436689265,"score_spread":0.2029975771238156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906710109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685047,0.002558009,0.08662071,0.0071303984,0.0002822044,0.0014758868,0.000096425574,0.00012575966,0.03320587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96655834,0.001305944,0.02788252,0.0010851658,0.00007116887,0.0007025107,0.00003912547,0.00003213638,0.0023229774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95421565,0.042677447,0.00061933964,0.0008560983,0.0010098453,0.0006215837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640036,0.031535096,0.0011085654,0.0017166948,0.0007880113,0.0008480383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024990907,0.0005315897,0.00053684507,0.0027034753,0.0068005715,0.0063003898,0.0011250189,0.0016551316,0.0009826921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020486286,0.0005611815,0.00035174546,0.0016848344,0.012667531,0.010861325,0.0058313347,0.001567644,0.00020911844],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007064895,0.00014089039,0.0046553286,0.0002871197,0.000017906943,0.0013059198,0.9486326,0.00027074193,0.0019889984,0.012979463,0.0010715965,0.02857889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056662797,0.0003925937,0.0053421343,0.0011942715,0.000065382075,0.0027608448,0.9036678,0.0012360764,0.0020235272,0.023729142,0.05944909,0.00008244954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015553057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028490683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017567489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018391144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13216609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1922195387","doi":"10.7202/1026106ar","title":"Les technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) et la promotion de la santé sexuelle chez les jeunes autochtones du Québec","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches amérindiennes au Québec","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"First Nations of Quebec and Labrador Health and Social Services Commission; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09586478616328466,"score_gpt":0.42872818213819974,"score_spread":0.3328633959749151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1922195387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98766464,0.0031545414,0.00034013044,0.00093066914,0.000025463383,0.00012110861,0.00021062158,0.0000062344316,0.0075465487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883359,0.0036005313,0.0005794049,0.00029613404,0.000011117302,0.00011215867,0.000098881465,0.000002982057,0.006962882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987588,0.000514486,0.00004696326,0.00009801099,0.00032326436,0.00025849757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439245,0.0026203159,0.0006162724,0.00013034043,0.0016972118,0.0005433546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002267199,0.00026110368,0.0003002709,0.0010743897,0.002789169,0.00201425,0.00048927986,0.0006197513,0.0046213316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068066036,0.0002336978,0.00022660565,0.0013215849,0.0012327796,0.00072645216,0.00071334344,0.00066639297,0.00023450579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030444117,0.0004430715,0.5843622,0.0013965624,0.00011017942,0.0008384067,0.24884672,0.00033029105,0.0033345202,0.0020794198,0.0020113923,0.15594281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022429896,0.00054110464,0.8187883,0.00097339123,0.00014374196,0.00027162637,0.15642749,0.00033784952,0.00088614755,0.00017065743,0.0213873,0.00005003328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.865507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91977394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.134493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008908706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017611714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27057004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939959248","doi":"10.1177/160940691000900101","title":"Public Selves, Inequality, and Interruptions: The Creation of Meaning in Focus Groups with Teens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.49363902327669673,"score_gpt":0.5955661037556637,"score_spread":0.10192708047896692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1939959248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601885,0.002056469,0.014417235,0.0075595924,0.00020284836,0.00027224424,0.000039893603,0.00004567251,0.015217582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99528825,0.0006723184,0.0022595495,0.00036316208,0.00006272505,0.0002755589,0.000018632833,0.00002846125,0.0010312732],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95408636,0.040840697,0.0007394312,0.0011941066,0.0017856059,0.001353821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9106711,0.07893091,0.004652765,0.0020220578,0.0021247333,0.0015983558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05152535,0.00076290505,0.00090671907,0.004433938,0.011776955,0.0077535925,0.0020755108,0.0019324918,0.0020484389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06927512,0.0009540266,0.00055839313,0.0020961901,0.030577669,0.011755309,0.014181355,0.0026493098,0.00019622868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011439642,0.00000897093,0.0009183192,0.000025942729,0.0000032427406,0.00009042803,0.99444205,0.000007061302,0.00012460587,0.0021250236,0.00008092538,0.0021620258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011662617,0.000047119003,0.0022606633,0.00018491926,0.000010867012,0.00019908973,0.9847494,0.000076274104,0.0003288218,0.0046240245,0.007490184,0.000016971062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028908385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031263805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05152535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039317883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025789985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2724954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959998900","doi":"10.1177/160940690900800101","title":"The Use of Videoconferencing as a Medium for the Qualitative Interview","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Videoconferencing; Interview; Qualitative research; Experiential learning; Qualitative property; Ethnography; Psychology; Data collection; Face-to-face; Medical education; Medicine; Pedagogy; Sociology; Multimedia; Computer science","score_opus":0.8240242543576962,"score_gpt":0.705833949228755,"score_spread":0.11819030512894124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959998900","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1573334,0.0010560252,0.6925065,0.005144862,0.0007091975,0.09110537,0.0029381993,0.00078842527,0.048418008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29099652,0.000884891,0.5786105,0.0015362282,0.00021059267,0.120683834,0.0005918072,0.00029778588,0.0061878744],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8700048,0.11329124,0.00498057,0.003345951,0.006625619,0.001751876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79410887,0.16537228,0.006474229,0.012009246,0.0186659,0.003369482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10493832,0.0011072535,0.0012581337,0.0043354193,0.0061411443,0.005060392,0.0029653725,0.0017002084,0.009293847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106853716,0.0011586894,0.0005910393,0.00458759,0.007847067,0.0042889817,0.005950674,0.0026078308,0.0021550602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096708396,0.000618079,0.004091671,0.0062947366,0.000073591094,0.0013862082,0.6622155,0.0016902046,0.034012727,0.03798735,0.011265372,0.2393975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010756896,0.0029186418,0.0056582936,0.008000027,0.00010406803,0.0018172675,0.5327161,0.0099167125,0.047155555,0.05393916,0.33620107,0.00049744576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003628647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006097507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8950617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005137086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009718801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5549735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967049484","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002","title":"Conducting a Research Interview","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Cornerstone; Active listening; Confidentiality; Interview; Qualitative research; Informed consent; Focus group; Presentation (obstetrics); Semi-structured interview; Protocol (science); Medical education; Telephone interview; Psychology; Reading (process); Data collection; Process (computing); Computer science; Medicine; Sociology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5073153066952594,"score_gpt":0.6080585469585754,"score_spread":0.10074324026331605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967049484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46508494,0.0008482147,0.09359174,0.018977143,0.0032778936,0.31468794,0.0068022856,0.0016223175,0.09510755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3739731,0.0011803951,0.14049554,0.011738128,0.00075027405,0.40211615,0.0028163989,0.00045210347,0.06647796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97715557,0.014451444,0.001799829,0.00252301,0.0012529471,0.002817215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92422694,0.036006887,0.0025193254,0.008110331,0.017975375,0.011161153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03008763,0.0013629509,0.0018549565,0.0035391103,0.015713029,0.004473854,0.002687928,0.0049043885,0.061221544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06918426,0.0017011678,0.0011904899,0.0020766982,0.0037138031,0.003845712,0.0055536,0.0093882205,0.016171008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010204257,0.0027994146,0.0069991476,0.0026169547,0.000025422174,0.0030006825,0.8263585,0.00038513212,0.035767585,0.0062385076,0.035407998,0.07938024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006199669,0.0019906373,0.01290891,0.0014200266,0.00005344446,0.0009585921,0.65829414,0.0011898852,0.009521492,0.0064527644,0.3063573,0.00023289256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042239875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009827889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061221544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005670723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028072992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20480645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968916202","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.00361","title":"Media activism and Internet use by people with HIV/AIDS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Health & Illness","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Dissent; Public sphere; Sociology; Representation (politics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Promotion (chess); Public relations; Media studies; Public health; Gender studies; Political science; Medicine; Law; Politics; Nursing; Family medicine","score_opus":0.05424946014409231,"score_gpt":0.38619647651689865,"score_spread":0.3319470163728063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968916202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856306,0.0015363223,0.000097369695,0.001482876,0.00001983643,0.000015898622,0.000022585704,0.0000030327517,0.011191568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972339,0.0012789699,0.000064838714,0.0003065188,0.00003498844,0.00002187154,0.000009439669,0.0000016782618,0.0010477661],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985183,0.0010710809,0.00003800907,0.0000557581,0.00014916889,0.00016770644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938074,0.0049497485,0.0007650384,0.00008612807,0.00015297747,0.00023865719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014397558,0.00020372085,0.00021838922,0.0015474742,0.002901426,0.0026270186,0.0002581026,0.0010281213,0.004038062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055272384,0.00016411096,0.00012486524,0.0008526995,0.0037450092,0.0019206118,0.0020508734,0.0010548462,0.00017562966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006661183,0.00013687387,0.032865863,0.00023980773,0.000012230246,0.0005075614,0.93971896,0.000024446977,0.00084517925,0.002557348,0.00069667207,0.02232854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001344735,0.00016190024,0.040767148,0.0002822866,0.000021466827,0.00092255505,0.9385917,0.000072447576,0.00046748845,0.0012767991,0.017410275,0.000012556778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016902182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024771872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004038062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061725447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004507388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0135086775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970365581","doi":"10.1108/13522750610640530","title":"Methodology or “methodolatry”? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Market Research An International Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":330,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"AXYS Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Originality; Relevance (law); Qualitative research; Data collection; Psychology; Preference; Quality (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Qualitative property; Market research; Outcome (game theory); Marketing; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.7358778416591036,"score_gpt":0.6828760694498885,"score_spread":0.05300177220921509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970365581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36962694,0.023049602,0.3667403,0.019261608,0.0029377034,0.091621086,0.0013932103,0.00086873706,0.12450083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62614703,0.010150916,0.28980228,0.0053269104,0.00042201867,0.06042578,0.00041961792,0.0003774871,0.0069279373],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.34483227,0.60803187,0.012482821,0.00309536,0.028523542,0.0030340576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33047342,0.57144016,0.019006182,0.019071246,0.0564218,0.0035872045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.47504365,0.001788478,0.0012395338,0.008630773,0.0036217715,0.0059659053,0.0032246658,0.0022301641,0.008485981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44667107,0.001038911,0.0013560732,0.005111903,0.006526171,0.009931814,0.008894705,0.0014357353,0.0012022422],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023582634,0.0006088898,0.010730498,0.0212004,0.00016639107,0.0004228194,0.3856479,0.0005088535,0.0034631896,0.022493986,0.005224542,0.5471743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015281404,0.010819916,0.032983962,0.044405796,0.00072219217,0.0024789786,0.5536594,0.003304133,0.011851895,0.021886438,0.31605968,0.0002994748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017760686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017478815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52495635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009614663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010830074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6473647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974029383","doi":"10.1177/1049732315580556","title":"Opportunities and Constraints in Disseminating Qualitative Research in Web 2.0 Virtual Environments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement","keywords":"Dissemination; Social media; Qualitative research; Information Dissemination; Knowledge management; Internet privacy; Web 2.0; Public relations; Digital media; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet; Business; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.8857985276696367,"score_gpt":0.7284157913795919,"score_spread":0.15738273629004484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974029383","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1720881,0.012090732,0.39359698,0.3420907,0.003722588,0.036795586,0.0013656144,0.0005226233,0.037727114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55839556,0.0050723907,0.30273923,0.024665657,0.0008594861,0.104918346,0.00034369592,0.00031442667,0.0026911967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.17579418,0.7764919,0.024941709,0.005770672,0.012412682,0.0045887963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.099553734,0.8318739,0.016815124,0.025827784,0.019570123,0.006359411],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.69549096,0.0013182246,0.0034297914,0.009821784,0.017383466,0.023886817,0.00752795,0.007857417,0.009598721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7140702,0.003669152,0.0017315397,0.010877725,0.032792155,0.023896307,0.026967078,0.0067732567,0.0013721876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006169876,0.0004748181,0.009699984,0.013511959,0.00018613288,0.0018576528,0.7307814,0.0018776286,0.0021164387,0.13578726,0.008339272,0.09475054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054034236,0.00053362007,0.0034825248,0.025955344,0.00017092809,0.0011949758,0.573098,0.0067453934,0.0026034145,0.27440688,0.11094396,0.00032461903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068018534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009296231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017929489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0558689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3755139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978941343","doi":"10.1108/qrj-12-2012-0034","title":"The Googled ethnographer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney; Australian Catholic University","keywords":"Sociology; Originality; Ethnography; Scrutiny; Agency (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Publishing; Work (physics); The Internet; Participant observation; Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Project commissioning; Social science; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.48441806485682065,"score_gpt":0.679198817157069,"score_spread":0.19478075230024833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978941343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34215912,0.0024983126,0.12994766,0.014314222,0.0024707455,0.010317562,0.020665588,0.0021930884,0.47543374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6317761,0.0017898184,0.16029373,0.0034781583,0.00024202804,0.0134976385,0.0048339916,0.0009488984,0.18313959],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964232,0.0021914637,0.00016916718,0.0005232911,0.00046162997,0.00023127461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541795,0.00192413,0.00014411802,0.0013237689,0.000928123,0.0002618695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004511015,0.00044315553,0.00035999305,0.0032175712,0.0038905647,0.0020815192,0.0008037182,0.0009363569,0.031109741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074024117,0.00041421762,0.00035544438,0.0031308092,0.00376835,0.0025317231,0.004455303,0.0010961791,0.0048184698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002866926,0.00009645124,0.009223532,0.0010669283,0.0000151789945,0.00178371,0.59146214,0.00052320136,0.011673226,0.08113554,0.09676768,0.2059657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004001968,0.00006238607,0.0040367693,0.00045406033,0.00001164759,0.00061893876,0.1368187,0.000450314,0.0019489848,0.0061790347,0.8493363,0.000042778556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013807508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025221044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023910643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033554765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10407251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983863178","doi":"10.5663/aps.v3i1&amp;2.20022","title":"Pandemic H1N1 Targeted Messaging for Manitoba Metis: An Evaluation of a Risk Communication Intervention","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; H1n1 pandemic; Pandemic; Intervention (counseling); Risk communication; Geography; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Environmental health; Computer science; Nursing; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5666179546703084,"score_gpt":0.6784952956081047,"score_spread":0.11187734093779633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983863178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598773,0.0004526921,0.00071665953,0.0017480212,0.0001828621,0.03111436,0.000383577,0.00009260075,0.005431976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89795715,0.0020788717,0.01964024,0.0021700792,0.00013103643,0.07122215,0.0004537301,0.000035833615,0.0063109584],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914556,0.0055275396,0.0003296513,0.00039426656,0.00079198554,0.0015008792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912094,0.0036168983,0.0006781316,0.00032468681,0.0017735854,0.0023973244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011174795,0.0015126338,0.0010461764,0.0009763806,0.004907685,0.0016926015,0.003062125,0.00217847,0.005792478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014722353,0.00073762855,0.001373229,0.0012269492,0.0014970105,0.0009042783,0.002288253,0.0020931251,0.00041521227],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.052166805,0.35292223,0.024508357,0.015173298,0.0012776136,0.0018382045,0.066941895,0.0035241947,0.009753312,0.0027362248,0.0050715213,0.4640864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.118696034,0.5542392,0.18626943,0.0070278575,0.0050031384,0.00026504562,0.07166996,0.007901617,0.009976609,0.0021339129,0.03640417,0.00041296403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23731863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37669206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76268137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015796166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050600875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4718746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984588065","doi":"10.1186/1479-5868-6-89","title":"ParticipACTION: the future challenges for physical activity promotion in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Baseline (sea); Political science; Physical activity; Public relations; Computer science; Geography; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.10805382188657811,"score_gpt":0.46621520546619394,"score_spread":0.3581613835796158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984588065","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012742424,0.035423376,0.00016330667,0.3760002,0.5863185,0.000029528705,0.000087640736,0.000039043443,0.0018109904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003984792,0.079159915,0.00095228327,0.24634667,0.64758295,0.00011814844,0.00013202515,0.00014087524,0.021582363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98529863,0.0018555579,0.0014067227,0.0010080588,0.009208856,0.0012220647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475639,0.014782461,0.0010895844,0.00070223084,0.030220369,0.0056414236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014701189,0.0017766242,0.0029375092,0.0024390055,0.011323113,0.012760027,0.006026031,0.027657516,0.0041522533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03318073,0.0008394643,0.0023888373,0.0035411722,0.0077548143,0.005122801,0.0024097278,0.027343104,0.0019494096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020319107,0.000008401391,0.000044759006,0.00029622475,0.000010551473,0.00007392114,0.00016543841,0.000031363707,0.000030611754,0.00088025,0.9906792,0.0077589285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031202824,0.000012823113,0.00049727707,0.0009144083,0.000041044845,0.000076831784,0.0006397476,0.000098204604,0.000063745974,0.0013112542,0.99627626,0.000037167596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5783742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7941054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4216258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036101826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10700086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84821767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985830835","doi":"10.1145/1940761.1940854","title":"Online synchronous interviewing of the info-savvy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the 2011 iConference","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interview; Sample (material); Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Chat room; Multimedia; Sociology","score_opus":0.16645034591545285,"score_gpt":0.36375824285950087,"score_spread":0.19730789694404802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985830835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171461,0.00009335036,0.024358006,0.0015474124,0.00013058427,0.0010762225,0.0004970185,0.00026180357,0.054889496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545253,0.000107232154,0.0152042,0.0005059218,0.00003885277,0.0008759027,0.00023506644,0.00012670559,0.028380806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974025,0.0019249686,0.000074617536,0.00019907347,0.00020184467,0.00019689722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99214137,0.0051744813,0.0003423953,0.00058835594,0.0008178267,0.00093556364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042375047,0.00033277491,0.00024707097,0.0010140568,0.0033048403,0.0019638313,0.0004778753,0.00090005767,0.008337576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010343399,0.00020504951,0.00018697606,0.0007568633,0.0014564778,0.001499807,0.0022804597,0.0011452324,0.0017611729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015249479,0.00029794764,0.007340053,0.00013272573,0.0000042484876,0.001314882,0.9252101,0.00010775656,0.0145718325,0.003440153,0.0042392258,0.043188546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053689677,0.0008698416,0.02086967,0.0002724589,0.000014947068,0.0012426098,0.7032222,0.002500016,0.010182775,0.0033844511,0.2573142,0.00007313761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015241505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048907613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008337576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008749819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014143357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027891994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998162533","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-8-53","title":"The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto; University Health Network; York University; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Cancer Care Ontario","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University Health Network","keywords":"Respondent; Citizen journalism; Data collection; Computer science; Photo elicitation; Infographic; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Preference elicitation; Psychology; Applied psychology; Thematic analysis; Management science; Knowledge management; Data science; Data mining; Preference; Engineering","score_opus":0.7473274238471572,"score_gpt":0.6773810916793676,"score_spread":0.06994633216778967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998162533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6815314,0.0035977475,0.27390066,0.0021667255,0.00025420147,0.020316655,0.00035070835,0.0007316001,0.01715014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6406337,0.0028113942,0.33879444,0.00053985947,0.000097717195,0.015567342,0.00025209106,0.00028867618,0.0010147166],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.36225092,0.5525965,0.032037403,0.0074981153,0.042480495,0.0031366504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11946427,0.7929573,0.029897537,0.022228982,0.033884663,0.0015672517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37038144,0.0016447196,0.0014247795,0.010716725,0.0038451767,0.0069622397,0.0039340076,0.0023255078,0.001825977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.64195347,0.0015005977,0.0018620153,0.0064656516,0.006600197,0.0074992864,0.008220731,0.0020310935,0.00064429967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021227105,0.001132509,0.04122712,0.01235796,0.0005489664,0.0007137858,0.40625596,0.0035955484,0.009591744,0.0042077773,0.0016025405,0.51664335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023824538,0.018411495,0.16267805,0.03407549,0.0030695393,0.008477319,0.48308742,0.04818993,0.072625436,0.033471588,0.13150361,0.0020277197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016029495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023352413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6296185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005373682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008101286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7764318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200303199","doi":"","title":"Focus Groups with Children: Do They Work?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030537521803505864,"score_gpt":0.3285281922778449,"score_spread":0.297990670474339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200303199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42946196,0.07565568,0.099915706,0.16062345,0.0065213083,0.028102662,0.0020885286,0.0019335502,0.19569717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8123674,0.022812169,0.07426765,0.034330726,0.0011050423,0.03442909,0.00055263995,0.00045894922,0.019676264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.79772407,0.18158112,0.0037809457,0.0050325063,0.0072782775,0.004603028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76238143,0.19610345,0.012545017,0.0095934095,0.011141155,0.008235551],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14285572,0.0013608381,0.001903617,0.0035457804,0.006744776,0.0081426315,0.004856938,0.0051680966,0.020234762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21291557,0.001759761,0.0012209261,0.0031897072,0.008766777,0.0153324725,0.011337381,0.0040215156,0.006933656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044009625,0.00031538584,0.01772826,0.005234311,0.0001620454,0.00034194172,0.7552879,0.000075054726,0.0011819061,0.008421361,0.017531281,0.1932805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051981653,0.0010350102,0.022989882,0.012452948,0.00022895345,0.0008756517,0.71370304,0.00017721078,0.00147107,0.011974711,0.23439458,0.00017710669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008439464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012537734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8571443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008134675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010164428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7555023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006461705","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.997","title":"Les enjeux éthiques de l’utilisation d’internet en recherche : principales questions et pistes de solutions","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3331216021175584,"score_gpt":0.4808477039929951,"score_spread":0.14772610187543667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006461705","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14809941,0.018282037,0.46842253,0.17680055,0.0016635669,0.0051844544,0.0007584645,0.0006671204,0.1801219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7812981,0.009178492,0.17512767,0.008306344,0.00037925734,0.009379707,0.00026632403,0.00034491654,0.015719151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.60349613,0.3334816,0.014408564,0.010549175,0.033729766,0.00433476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5440697,0.36818886,0.0187805,0.024865823,0.039827988,0.004267121],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2362037,0.0012788811,0.0016687735,0.00617258,0.0091203265,0.029513642,0.0044816355,0.006005625,0.007473606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21724689,0.0014848476,0.0015525763,0.0070853727,0.03460574,0.022019975,0.01529636,0.006536236,0.0013613993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021828516,0.00021537347,0.010917983,0.0075248717,0.00020254927,0.0005297058,0.4137475,0.0012136521,0.003152147,0.38714626,0.0066532753,0.16847831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017117643,0.00037583726,0.010104602,0.013219237,0.000218086,0.0007875554,0.43762058,0.004409569,0.0055625113,0.28820917,0.23905532,0.00026634042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008925984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00793894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7637963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021376986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042637058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9418968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006735264","doi":"10.1783/147118906775275299","title":"Focus group research in family planning and reproductive health care","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Coalition for Research in Women's Health","funders":"","keywords":"Reproductive health; Focus group; Medicine; Family planning; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Health care; Family medicine; Economic growth; Environmental health; Research methodology; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.19382980224453522,"score_gpt":0.5106844083266685,"score_spread":0.3168546060821333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006735264","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057805292,0.28556553,0.2825894,0.12272165,0.011001816,0.012156326,0.0007536032,0.00047298957,0.22693338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32965153,0.16594455,0.3860464,0.03556831,0.0029013967,0.04432555,0.00047447142,0.00029180516,0.03479597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8565499,0.13498595,0.0015532323,0.0016342908,0.0044164713,0.0008600568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88051707,0.11263104,0.0015678665,0.0021027345,0.0020812508,0.0010999897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11196286,0.0008886047,0.0013417265,0.0051340912,0.006587906,0.003652306,0.0028422596,0.0062703597,0.011103101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072666116,0.0008363924,0.0006573059,0.0070966305,0.016748173,0.009036363,0.006525707,0.003328807,0.0018758579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001660861,0.00029184556,0.0017289736,0.0073909946,0.00006818572,0.0010426393,0.3554819,0.0005934474,0.0010744521,0.25726476,0.0383573,0.33653948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024706035,0.0010982198,0.0057421974,0.017554771,0.000066085726,0.0030216256,0.19401443,0.00073070225,0.0018185071,0.19863665,0.5769336,0.00013622425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028606905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033204183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11196286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004115496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049827523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59212327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012214242","doi":"10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.187_2.x","title":"Methodological issues in focus group data analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing and Health Sciences","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Data presentation; Data collection; Group (periodic table); Presentation (obstetrics); Group analysis; Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.6967589269156403,"score_gpt":0.6463594727148185,"score_spread":0.050399454200821814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012214242","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021892685,0.011575438,0.80789405,0.049885478,0.009757973,0.07913272,0.0014156504,0.00073004985,0.017715884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08001037,0.0020634579,0.69895756,0.017473103,0.001587192,0.1968161,0.00029802608,0.00035052813,0.002443591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.14499371,0.74127734,0.05364337,0.011803582,0.045419767,0.0028623214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14565796,0.7271447,0.023172108,0.04216268,0.05993541,0.001927176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7493414,0.0031337752,0.0047458527,0.0151232835,0.011476753,0.012625358,0.0140286805,0.00983781,0.006056801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.82718784,0.0039955084,0.004066044,0.01847294,0.023754798,0.013739453,0.013131877,0.009791122,0.0018254556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016218914,0.0010088009,0.016576398,0.027174747,0.0015973906,0.0015124317,0.29593658,0.003112514,0.0025784525,0.35053748,0.04774382,0.2505995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018680359,0.0025119365,0.015959868,0.047459975,0.0012591277,0.0021841072,0.09226275,0.01992999,0.0101120025,0.4698527,0.33601856,0.0005809437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067349724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008320132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25065857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01245299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019698603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3091067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020225838","doi":"10.1177/0886109903257550","title":"Focus-Group Methodology in Research with Incarcerated Women: Race, Power, and Collective Experience","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Affilia","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Focus group; Gender studies; Sociology; Race (biology); Individualism; Human sexuality; Power (physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.3222868700090743,"score_gpt":0.5151489567032572,"score_spread":0.19286208669418292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020225838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7309032,0.014928016,0.16642389,0.007211034,0.0007055403,0.015402359,0.0007346688,0.0003140589,0.063377224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81316155,0.0060351044,0.13300964,0.002333411,0.00023525342,0.032721393,0.0002617655,0.00007350268,0.012168462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96138895,0.035286203,0.0005575265,0.00096432766,0.0012075751,0.0005953721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96094966,0.03360737,0.0015047498,0.001694256,0.0015062903,0.00073770026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05626509,0.00094979204,0.00089866354,0.004076235,0.008677446,0.0027567137,0.0024687874,0.0022649395,0.007222585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030954806,0.00064118294,0.0004320238,0.0041983826,0.011191252,0.0029402536,0.0047305953,0.0013874558,0.0008391012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018580409,0.0002880904,0.005998422,0.0012730798,0.000036558988,0.000569145,0.8964599,0.00015426193,0.0051561086,0.01768257,0.0021251878,0.07007088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021527329,0.0013917519,0.019066893,0.0018556267,0.00008748924,0.0010766982,0.84861815,0.00082433963,0.008626512,0.033926573,0.08423126,0.00007954303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007220158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016198782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05626509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031407168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041743396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29756176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027371808","doi":"10.1177/1090198107303309","title":"Are We There Yet? An Examination of Online Tailored Health Communication","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Education & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Health communication; The Internet; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Health information; Health promotion; Public health; Computer science; Health care; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing","score_opus":0.2904685975813699,"score_gpt":0.5663890553894735,"score_spread":0.2759204578081036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027371808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96029437,0.0011406967,0.001418187,0.003422706,0.0000359137,0.00013303483,0.00009948523,0.00001868338,0.03343685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608386,0.0009394806,0.0010027587,0.00060314004,0.000025237978,0.000093673756,0.000051114832,0.000012610611,0.0011881427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992804,0.0049917265,0.00037742697,0.0002612105,0.0011367575,0.0004288906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93654174,0.054655995,0.004279854,0.0012195105,0.0024268585,0.00087603636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008961576,0.0001473206,0.0002473425,0.0036810401,0.0023164856,0.002880403,0.0005983322,0.0008791911,0.004208016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046056625,0.00025718415,0.00026964518,0.0030398907,0.0026573061,0.0051038046,0.002655343,0.001120396,0.00020570651],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017495238,0.00034880097,0.112852916,0.00088349293,0.000045676676,0.00053187646,0.6664833,0.0000890872,0.0010917748,0.010718846,0.0015485723,0.20523073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024842651,0.00028300748,0.23514947,0.0011637328,0.00005500325,0.00095688226,0.7240752,0.00065348484,0.0007661558,0.0053347424,0.03149088,0.000046646564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003629644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042409874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008961576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019690813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020940707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047393918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040525340","doi":"10.1109/istas.2013.6613130","title":"&amp;#x201C;I'll be watching you&amp;#x201D;: Awareness, consent, compliance and accountability in video surveillance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Accountability; Citizen journalism; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Participatory action research; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.29626989304122014,"score_gpt":0.4785433143198686,"score_spread":0.18227342127864843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040525340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74740237,0.0019297994,0.049388602,0.04351296,0.0005044669,0.00060828216,0.00013922754,0.00022382275,0.1562904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98442245,0.00055692333,0.0038786356,0.0012694069,0.000068021494,0.0001922819,0.00003554721,0.000029184313,0.0095475055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784575,0.018108698,0.0004338099,0.00063861994,0.0016668789,0.000694415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540735,0.036747437,0.0031054234,0.0020662681,0.0029746178,0.0010328371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019649437,0.00016881074,0.00013622131,0.00055594,0.0038229197,0.0038574573,0.00062258705,0.0016402815,0.002873468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043973334,0.00014806786,0.00011121763,0.00054893293,0.008495937,0.004993807,0.002321768,0.0014160082,0.00043920128],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024528123,0.0003283855,0.02121529,0.00052347523,0.000011026844,0.0007519275,0.61256844,0.0003261869,0.007521007,0.09138658,0.017514972,0.24760737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004496524,0.00063136505,0.038219236,0.0012394682,0.000031348856,0.0015682607,0.5880771,0.002719815,0.017446458,0.046206396,0.30367547,0.0001400394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008654592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007397287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019649437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002278989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003972457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10391736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045612295","doi":"10.1177/1468794111433089","title":"Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participant observation; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Social psychology; Qualitative research; Distancing; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.7126574550515453,"score_gpt":0.634758587860571,"score_spread":0.07789886719097427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045612295","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029872123,0.0073617427,0.86354274,0.07404167,0.001993467,0.0063225445,0.00010847542,0.0006636729,0.016093472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17219871,0.0037287553,0.7878979,0.009503811,0.0004533891,0.024111671,0.000056358633,0.00034798123,0.00170143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.21521287,0.7482675,0.013392315,0.00774,0.013460305,0.0019270637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36916927,0.55627185,0.015756937,0.031785745,0.02282943,0.0041867397],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.58943427,0.0027503541,0.0031240259,0.0067034983,0.012428226,0.019533165,0.01161318,0.014636211,0.0051760823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.509804,0.0039864825,0.00300794,0.00442805,0.05386046,0.043428052,0.020145467,0.011789015,0.002209544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003706826,0.00016910274,0.0023471424,0.007035353,0.00021296297,0.00066959806,0.71723044,0.0007558673,0.0040075188,0.107403256,0.005388793,0.15440938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076994114,0.0011924064,0.0023788686,0.019423038,0.0004968602,0.002858752,0.29250255,0.0058304295,0.011874233,0.407385,0.254628,0.00065992895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022843056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036986978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41056573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010179752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014719835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5063007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053279737","doi":"10.1177/1468794110394068","title":"Communication technologies for focus groups with remote communities: a case study of research with First Nations in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Citizen journalism; Videoconferencing; Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Political science; Multimedia; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6043639673826666,"score_gpt":0.600795378554305,"score_spread":0.0035685888283616407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053279737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.967659,0.0019072521,0.0033195475,0.0056072525,0.00012558122,0.0025311543,0.00022738129,0.000045361947,0.01857737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787556,0.0019432834,0.0068361154,0.0014408302,0.000027182736,0.0009360259,0.00010403764,0.00004483035,0.009912059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864827,0.007231587,0.00032273904,0.00090501196,0.0015708008,0.0034872226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828215,0.008785522,0.00075612956,0.00057557406,0.0026652527,0.00439591],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012138166,0.0010457354,0.0009971287,0.0022348992,0.06067302,0.0051295683,0.004538802,0.0045426795,0.0035755392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016192371,0.0009128251,0.00087852776,0.004432096,0.011853232,0.0019776216,0.005985046,0.003108475,0.00035369172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011904288,0.00029048187,0.006118886,0.0004097252,0.000016744652,0.010008603,0.9653545,0.00021212017,0.0014686831,0.0021669928,0.0014173533,0.012416917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024095732,0.00014053167,0.0055912333,0.00031423118,0.000021529784,0.0009744898,0.9727285,0.00022032984,0.0006763828,0.0003527707,0.018909711,0.00004630616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9384571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97889143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0767818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.117811516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55709356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063922189","doi":"10.1177/1098214007304536","title":"Analysis of Thin Online Interview Data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Qualitative property; Perception; Data collection; Semantics (computer science); Data science; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.34668716451748016,"score_gpt":0.5830954045773991,"score_spread":0.2364082400599189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063922189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4821796,0.0008030158,0.3841838,0.0035135187,0.00057841657,0.040375248,0.030376881,0.0012956039,0.05669388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50665534,0.0008213947,0.37467813,0.0016951107,0.00016065671,0.08352979,0.015958978,0.0008277086,0.015672907],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94344413,0.035499245,0.006111395,0.0031965538,0.010337129,0.0014115623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7354707,0.16419882,0.017293362,0.024998879,0.05621768,0.0018205493],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04955923,0.0008848597,0.0010414147,0.006723556,0.0031451883,0.0024813404,0.0019061799,0.00090340077,0.012136119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16789438,0.0007579456,0.00046858506,0.0070974636,0.0024539405,0.0027945084,0.0049520843,0.0018120575,0.0027261802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012240498,0.0007026765,0.035118043,0.007702193,0.00014079553,0.002539048,0.3773907,0.0022647032,0.02557844,0.04228316,0.032464568,0.4725916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022902452,0.0010997177,0.065472096,0.0076311626,0.00013318968,0.0017593075,0.41277647,0.015509209,0.028645348,0.069920674,0.39653727,0.00028651473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002268156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036238492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95044076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031785031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005330491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26209742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065477583","doi":"10.2196/jmir.3881","title":"Knowledge Translation in Men’s Health Research: Development and Delivery of Content for Use Online","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Research Programme; Economic and Social Research Council; Public Health Agency; Health Service Executive","keywords":"Knowledge translation; Curriculum; Reproductive health; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Public relations; Computer science; Knowledge management; Political science; Pedagogy; Population","score_opus":0.8882536062566133,"score_gpt":0.6565157881805924,"score_spread":0.2317378180760209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065477583","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15171832,0.008914982,0.53417337,0.066192776,0.004251213,0.07872657,0.0022323863,0.009275146,0.1445153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15557191,0.0063329577,0.7940026,0.0042811125,0.00065919064,0.027658766,0.0007943709,0.0010753159,0.009623854],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94326717,0.043759447,0.0040313317,0.0017701958,0.005701,0.0014708422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8648824,0.09363943,0.0057691457,0.015768036,0.014894504,0.005046353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.098442875,0.00091522996,0.0008903527,0.0043612616,0.0035205467,0.0085037295,0.0028847875,0.0025175798,0.013218499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17024723,0.00081696926,0.0017304898,0.0035467665,0.0038435971,0.009022052,0.011439442,0.0037095149,0.0058887065],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013651849,0.0009408315,0.0021641508,0.004233461,0.000037162106,0.0005587324,0.058971416,0.0002541551,0.0023005179,0.0059626293,0.017298868,0.9071416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009163806,0.0034533415,0.021077009,0.036822338,0.00048241945,0.0033762446,0.10166278,0.004751391,0.019262,0.055108704,0.75261366,0.00047367503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016437953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002045139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098442875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035897968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020942857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5206219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067581768","doi":"10.5172/conu.12.1.92","title":"A feminist analysis of the menopause discourse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Contemporary Nurse","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Menopause; Project commissioning; Nursing; Sociology; Gender studies; Publishing; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.2268167829602149,"score_gpt":0.4964427830957033,"score_spread":0.2696260001354884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067581768","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009111152,0.8749877,0.0017543448,0.02202153,0.00069327705,0.00004765871,0.00007772739,0.000010555254,0.091296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19547999,0.76881176,0.0023873467,0.0052833227,0.00047222833,0.00023201536,0.00008422616,0.000023141198,0.027225876],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976266,0.0018268699,0.00005647259,0.000089961264,0.00032491007,0.00007522842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985489,0.0011195972,0.00011414599,0.000021621405,0.00015982988,0.00003581884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023534826,0.00051504694,0.00058694405,0.0032577405,0.0019563548,0.0029685504,0.0005714589,0.0012938005,0.0028766433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027502417,0.00020465806,0.00022491482,0.004674551,0.0037910775,0.0027257719,0.0013242168,0.0009284918,0.0005069171],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008784288,0.000056778288,0.0010087735,0.013791047,0.000073622745,0.0033707155,0.25215578,0.0005707174,0.0018271485,0.3152405,0.044711087,0.36710605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000559668,0.000029912462,0.0016359446,0.0047827386,0.000017211734,0.00088103244,0.051473234,0.000055759483,0.00034013795,0.0093715,0.931398,0.000008939776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008147412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015880497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99804366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044663143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038137168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032405496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067652191","doi":"10.1188/14.onf.545-547","title":"The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oncology nursing forum","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3763,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Qualitative research; Medicine; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science; Geometry","score_opus":0.5618799333509763,"score_gpt":0.6581985558682605,"score_spread":0.09631862251728418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067652191","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065944763,0.008655026,0.8828035,0.008969941,0.0029992994,0.033393793,0.001025279,0.00072316173,0.054835606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055550817,0.0047537405,0.87719446,0.0031522352,0.00043007988,0.054840535,0.00042765288,0.00040211703,0.0032483519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3220999,0.60023963,0.033186603,0.014224216,0.0284343,0.0018153716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40736496,0.44820374,0.023107128,0.055117525,0.06316872,0.0030379486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3159831,0.0018847748,0.00383701,0.016233312,0.010049399,0.012742746,0.004489872,0.004948535,0.012057573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44716528,0.0022198374,0.0037115158,0.021254672,0.022178866,0.01267765,0.020879649,0.008239939,0.002259487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028198844,0.00016560101,0.0024947235,0.016310336,0.0006024302,0.0006528856,0.2111778,0.0017244916,0.0015058708,0.42916524,0.023051487,0.31286713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003435683,0.000503278,0.00250908,0.03057754,0.0003605778,0.0014297086,0.06656271,0.0040513566,0.0028519807,0.39626896,0.49399614,0.0005451605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057451646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068147797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68401694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011783816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032612454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8435146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070846952","doi":"10.1109/hicss.2010.317","title":"Research 2.0: A Framework for Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Web 2.0 Environments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Web application; Data science; Key (lock); Web intelligence; Qualitative research; Web modeling; Web 2.0; World Wide Web; Face (sociological concept); Knowledge management; Management science; The Internet; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.5720781164143096,"score_gpt":0.679269647467166,"score_spread":0.10719153105285639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070846952","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019639824,0.0013834564,0.8456502,0.013979373,0.0007252776,0.08049077,0.0019505183,0.00051671,0.035663877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056370426,0.00082502386,0.7647166,0.00232433,0.00006909428,0.17257732,0.00044239638,0.00014499195,0.002529726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6852824,0.29344082,0.006385402,0.0038865914,0.0083879465,0.0026168013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7457515,0.21852258,0.00850489,0.01155418,0.012612532,0.0030543527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23866631,0.0016687735,0.002193625,0.010824054,0.00924243,0.011307734,0.0041000284,0.0042579053,0.0073548895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1381089,0.0015786707,0.0017242802,0.01269821,0.023878792,0.01046279,0.010701211,0.005919329,0.0016338581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002377173,0.0005003766,0.0027805872,0.0046136635,0.000068782494,0.0006703117,0.31955776,0.0039407937,0.0031921528,0.5630744,0.011323537,0.09003988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004949367,0.00067191,0.0026555911,0.0074232407,0.00005691302,0.0006149503,0.27059424,0.009317629,0.0033984224,0.46283078,0.24161784,0.00032358372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004607665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062606544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7613337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012136325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028066723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071719641","doi":"10.1080/0966369x.2013.879108","title":"Feminist research in online spaces","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender Place & Culture","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Guelph","funders":"Mount Allison University","keywords":"Sociology; Reflexivity; Subjectivity; The Internet; Research ethics; Popularity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Engineering ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2878658713910475,"score_gpt":0.5184388865815213,"score_spread":0.23057301519047374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071719641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34364638,0.018211082,0.029502412,0.08182882,0.0021521815,0.00043128972,0.0005392299,0.0000803459,0.52360827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435407,0.0056867814,0.0058310796,0.004724206,0.00062958064,0.0005012205,0.00009237733,0.00010484238,0.038889244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97635955,0.020802885,0.0001906561,0.0007228778,0.0010932302,0.00083077134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796468,0.017454423,0.00083707954,0.00074643135,0.0006648164,0.0006504104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015176835,0.0005520181,0.00046225204,0.0018293738,0.014468371,0.009400295,0.0012683952,0.0022034193,0.0115931425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012185623,0.0003556252,0.0002973849,0.0025648358,0.03161903,0.010193397,0.007503195,0.003002501,0.00091025507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003498469,0.000082793944,0.0014407992,0.00022228959,0.0000075010794,0.000509654,0.65284014,0.00016435517,0.00075686467,0.315651,0.008342533,0.019947102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013202584,0.000056419118,0.0012769053,0.0007062826,0.0000057429943,0.00044185348,0.55724347,0.00022552049,0.0011624602,0.05189877,0.38695526,0.000014117159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025290584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047293836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048450693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003293992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080263734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083530182","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2014.06.007","title":"Introducing video recording in primary care midwifery for research purposes: Procedure, dataset, and use","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Midwifery","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"Academie Verloskunde Amsterdam Groningen","keywords":"Intrusiveness; Data collection; Coding (social sciences); Video recording; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Computer science; Multimedia; Social psychology","score_opus":0.18393333326655545,"score_gpt":0.47012936223016555,"score_spread":0.28619602896361007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083530182","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26925245,0.00069815427,0.08479703,0.0025183987,0.0007711821,0.39764372,0.20548983,0.0019507029,0.036878623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10018534,0.00041447842,0.11550972,0.0010352064,0.00019072134,0.7271945,0.04833861,0.00035359262,0.0067778383],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665119,0.016876604,0.004760889,0.0033104497,0.006516126,0.0020240454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87861663,0.047201224,0.009231562,0.020619474,0.041518807,0.002812334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031547245,0.0008240039,0.0007835545,0.005835804,0.004012595,0.0021216422,0.0029871217,0.0020574636,0.017180718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.141629,0.0011320518,0.0010857825,0.0047096685,0.0019084185,0.0012208197,0.0031023058,0.0022962159,0.0044568344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050850622,0.005475052,0.19421077,0.012205034,0.00028304642,0.0012669375,0.0800906,0.002493379,0.027841438,0.019338554,0.1987274,0.45298278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025744303,0.0022245515,0.39935616,0.0061628316,0.00036285314,0.00057253713,0.026141476,0.0044613224,0.023207007,0.007774106,0.5267071,0.00045553988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044789195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071264856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044789195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069344146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016764326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16683978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089819430","doi":"10.1080/10572250802100360","title":"Communicating Values, Valuing Community through Health-Care Websites: Midwifery's Online Ethos and Public Communication in Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technical Communication Quarterly","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Sociology; Public relations; Nursing; Health care; Health communication; Obstetrics; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.20075847178531925,"score_gpt":0.43507683296857896,"score_spread":0.23431836118325972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089819430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501195,0.00041030144,0.0006102843,0.0072959177,0.00002586082,0.00006343825,0.0000824743,0.000016039749,0.04137627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941697,0.00029071255,0.00035544974,0.00021640482,0.000005601974,0.00003138929,0.000015818727,0.000011117327,0.0049038194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619305,0.0018989969,0.00010680202,0.0002100556,0.00086057605,0.00073046447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922585,0.004222045,0.0008944222,0.00025666135,0.0010310068,0.0013374642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038894853,0.00016475975,0.0003399638,0.0012130926,0.026299933,0.006305404,0.0007755554,0.0010454586,0.0032338134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009100147,0.00040558752,0.00016080351,0.002415866,0.013522637,0.0031147462,0.0044439156,0.0010967003,0.00016318532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007472627,0.000051133313,0.025048597,0.000103742204,0.0000060275256,0.00068777904,0.9469062,0.000088377834,0.00076563464,0.010151187,0.0024602355,0.01365638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020053232,0.00004086157,0.040111415,0.0001449503,0.000013802549,0.00010653833,0.9059988,0.0002484903,0.0003852619,0.0018781674,0.05101879,0.000032828746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94225353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98028255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07083525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07083525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09152876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5139481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098829995","doi":"10.1177/160940690700600204","title":"Ethical Issues in Qualitative E-Learning Research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Anonymity; Confusion; The Internet; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.8073852356067956,"score_gpt":0.7902294656579059,"score_spread":0.017155769948889787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098829995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038545318,0.015146135,0.65864944,0.18574761,0.008711871,0.049868435,0.00050878734,0.00039302206,0.042429376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23125589,0.006213829,0.57571906,0.046078,0.0016315957,0.13202216,0.00025957494,0.00029751097,0.0065224133],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.17415246,0.77241874,0.023337783,0.0074736117,0.020143613,0.002473811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19831292,0.71356523,0.019258635,0.0361246,0.028947467,0.0037910822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.63333046,0.0018583252,0.00391545,0.0061174906,0.016050294,0.014592408,0.0064523593,0.012763225,0.0048400783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6131175,0.0028834173,0.0016585381,0.009441572,0.06221827,0.015242745,0.014606373,0.015576092,0.0015809656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003012408,0.00022083406,0.0017550611,0.0042926315,0.00008709948,0.0014238947,0.5839235,0.00084771175,0.0012971739,0.3528376,0.009943098,0.043070067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042610703,0.0003937356,0.0010203184,0.015438861,0.000067005014,0.0024682279,0.24044493,0.003647272,0.0027645817,0.5214377,0.21168964,0.00020162298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027740465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004343547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36666954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011637156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031518437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45216888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098958409","doi":"10.1177/1049732304273916","title":"What About Focus Group Interaction Data?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.78521742435664,"score_gpt":0.7287189550196569,"score_spread":0.056498469336983104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098958409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03317482,0.045556735,0.34653828,0.49470583,0.019409785,0.0062577114,0.0038726295,0.0021479027,0.048336312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2780436,0.032355495,0.5032825,0.13393116,0.012746787,0.029563785,0.0036828495,0.0017656357,0.0046281847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.33505404,0.55052227,0.046803825,0.010450766,0.054982767,0.0021863598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13242821,0.7442865,0.03032826,0.040974755,0.049127303,0.0028550043],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45855826,0.0016712156,0.0041732155,0.022077408,0.012020882,0.024704857,0.008037502,0.011220279,0.004333911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7983521,0.0023788263,0.0022991202,0.024407728,0.035624232,0.044206586,0.011880435,0.010534881,0.0032872064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003602,0.0002092687,0.018472396,0.02028405,0.0005476771,0.0010896929,0.3077159,0.000715571,0.0016092802,0.12685002,0.11394354,0.40820238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017451469,0.00033933372,0.009737692,0.033253852,0.00038816762,0.004055936,0.1840411,0.0018530695,0.0032364104,0.18826509,0.5742155,0.0004394635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00815361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068302434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54144174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013345507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011576031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6676941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107045659","doi":"10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103","title":"Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":965,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science; Data science; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.8262844622074722,"score_gpt":0.7560266830774748,"score_spread":0.07025777912999742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107045659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01632376,0.2413485,0.2982488,0.3443844,0.021313708,0.04282368,0.0007319099,0.00038102263,0.03444425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2591813,0.056053437,0.4128373,0.06820274,0.0037217238,0.19247092,0.00034741563,0.0004432162,0.0067419508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.07348825,0.885024,0.020471513,0.004237774,0.015452323,0.001326209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09738403,0.82166594,0.020364566,0.036623932,0.021572387,0.002389096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.74633044,0.0022244249,0.005802172,0.011336525,0.0146816205,0.014799619,0.008036034,0.015743019,0.005104185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.754762,0.0037385323,0.003067506,0.015181996,0.069482036,0.018591974,0.017333575,0.014409466,0.0014820717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005558927,0.00022343427,0.0023796265,0.04663256,0.0007980394,0.0011685055,0.3666801,0.0011542402,0.00076844916,0.3437176,0.055898618,0.180023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070245366,0.0004032808,0.0021653045,0.12233093,0.00039369336,0.001636443,0.1364829,0.002289006,0.0017598192,0.43709165,0.29445386,0.0002906191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057559935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010450026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01802934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0459322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31281978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109775997","doi":"10.3138/jvme.29.2.101","title":"Using Focus Groups for Continuing Veterinary Medical Education Needs Assessment and Program Planning","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Needs assessment; Medical education; Focus (optics); Process (computing); Continuing education; Qualitative research; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.27377379774207294,"score_gpt":0.5617457927437817,"score_spread":0.2879719950017087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109775997","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14364412,0.004615719,0.67726314,0.019508598,0.0020245048,0.0972755,0.0015143952,0.0021248946,0.05202918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121558234,0.0023778921,0.78980803,0.0021244423,0.00032790026,0.077945165,0.00042479642,0.00013112638,0.0053023426],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91346306,0.07560768,0.0021037746,0.0014714999,0.0060502794,0.0013035747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.830252,0.14198829,0.0062022875,0.0068969396,0.012114294,0.0025462222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.107975826,0.001763568,0.001074556,0.007757365,0.0063244794,0.0024425653,0.003579826,0.0032022535,0.019273128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11412436,0.0010695527,0.000864539,0.003685651,0.0020990067,0.007383016,0.0052461997,0.002202105,0.0036563913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063664763,0.0024941445,0.005599863,0.004580817,0.00010340873,0.0007433808,0.13310517,0.0010395619,0.010112597,0.012320387,0.029511387,0.79975265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002448631,0.010890684,0.041009355,0.012185565,0.00040118286,0.0036058663,0.24313663,0.009395966,0.04512858,0.07724968,0.55348384,0.0010640639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021588411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004269949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107975826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034424623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056816493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57103753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111704829","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016","title":"Focus group research and “the patient's view”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Qualitative research; Construct (python library); Focus (optics); Health care; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.12490067587692878,"score_gpt":0.49246697649375404,"score_spread":0.36756630061682527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111704829","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2371283,0.014427695,0.23601764,0.2568835,0.0045566238,0.002776995,0.0009299352,0.00031167452,0.24696767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096884,0.0031860848,0.040882338,0.028090822,0.00082457904,0.0035877775,0.00019180715,0.00012191527,0.0134263],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8894652,0.10252317,0.001149603,0.0015823444,0.004552428,0.0007272193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93841565,0.05412278,0.0017692498,0.0027033093,0.0021995574,0.00078943034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050539084,0.0007559583,0.0008112608,0.0025706873,0.005390933,0.005131963,0.0023559972,0.0045699426,0.007154807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050643314,0.00046887549,0.000556525,0.0014661856,0.027120816,0.009470202,0.0062173754,0.0049135685,0.0007285491],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112151574,0.00009829409,0.0012261729,0.0008845507,0.00004948225,0.00046260474,0.6574505,0.00009242333,0.0021506127,0.29698458,0.008323814,0.032164782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014198007,0.00037627577,0.002779481,0.002241217,0.00010437741,0.0034124192,0.49854773,0.00065196975,0.0052900137,0.29282787,0.19351599,0.00011065067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080008624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010280879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031329647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003046288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26727945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113866902","doi":"10.1177/1049732303259842","title":"Ethical Dilemmas in Research on Internet Communities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; The Internet; Autonomy; Harm; Economic Justice; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Internet research; Public relations; Psychology; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.937739584532181,"score_gpt":0.7846211578711447,"score_spread":0.15311842666103626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113866902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07142733,0.02053354,0.22608112,0.592956,0.0066462713,0.0051067537,0.00009674299,0.0002081741,0.07694401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5904473,0.00925219,0.26977235,0.10352357,0.0036382831,0.015994012,0.000064957,0.0001784173,0.007128833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.17826772,0.781514,0.010699371,0.007508531,0.018967096,0.0030433093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.185203,0.7545873,0.015313775,0.022378936,0.015284242,0.0072327433],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5979444,0.0013322751,0.0025747202,0.005080384,0.029563827,0.025984982,0.006584196,0.021467397,0.0034110732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5093916,0.0019937844,0.0020679012,0.0048469203,0.15050688,0.026131315,0.025478836,0.020614533,0.00082430185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087646986,0.0001367172,0.0014587479,0.0008078606,0.00011399729,0.0011405052,0.37750036,0.0005368773,0.00033836183,0.56624466,0.009755566,0.041878697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016998503,0.00015497327,0.00043186496,0.0035042956,0.000052000712,0.0010665412,0.16581401,0.0009775244,0.00055880717,0.7444328,0.08274739,0.000089866306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019059296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029194665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010240344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04076384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49580622},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2116148538","doi":"10.4054/demres.2013.28.33","title":"The more you learn the less you know? Interpretive ambiguity across three modes of qualitative data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demographic Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Ambiguity; Need to know; Qualitative research; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4843333589223961,"score_gpt":0.6056153879323637,"score_spread":0.1212820290099676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116148538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5091555,0.010017001,0.37867638,0.053828202,0.0009879846,0.005815198,0.0010405255,0.00032586954,0.0401533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91951996,0.0016465097,0.06807339,0.0037789093,0.00012133518,0.0055777337,0.00014973123,0.000121570294,0.0010107134],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.44897184,0.47898194,0.026497135,0.010652806,0.030439952,0.0044563347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35245433,0.5712699,0.027156051,0.023357509,0.023841022,0.0019211135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36654246,0.0012253654,0.0023871786,0.011181663,0.008714704,0.022178723,0.0038586634,0.0030719098,0.0020856208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43553084,0.0015806848,0.0017292793,0.009855852,0.044060003,0.020980846,0.01551253,0.003655259,0.00036336813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010881917,0.000025966447,0.009159793,0.0014917428,0.0000895303,0.00036439396,0.9133447,0.00018647389,0.00072996865,0.047895078,0.0007034103,0.02590013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004250934,0.00008650709,0.0051245135,0.0058440706,0.00010218011,0.00063375494,0.8648748,0.0013392885,0.0014414178,0.09749297,0.0229278,0.00009025992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003751393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003569756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63345754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014632085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0128875235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78116596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116918702","doi":"10.1177/1468794107076023","title":"Learning in focus groups","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Focus (optics); Data collection; Empirical research; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.4244514128753006,"score_gpt":0.6660440278786938,"score_spread":0.24159261500339319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116918702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048009813,0.0017354165,0.8488237,0.0048488397,0.0012737035,0.017614296,0.0006935032,0.0010089526,0.07599175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24369001,0.0015806528,0.67159724,0.0040736683,0.0007292597,0.044259183,0.00084602257,0.00034757654,0.032876454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8956745,0.09086377,0.0020297884,0.0051895007,0.0047270935,0.0015154327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88197833,0.09756936,0.0041594924,0.008888507,0.0052551837,0.0021490874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.071147434,0.0014233285,0.0012281014,0.003970276,0.0056835245,0.0057649426,0.0034929449,0.0041502207,0.023612648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103866756,0.0012523255,0.0010898536,0.0027888797,0.007017811,0.0084883,0.013235495,0.0029270102,0.0065043587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095575914,0.00082027994,0.0033598924,0.003122994,0.00012684679,0.00088224706,0.35506573,0.0023085983,0.010109674,0.19023621,0.028536705,0.40447518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093178166,0.001502032,0.0028457534,0.002337529,0.00013393792,0.0017584641,0.063351944,0.005593618,0.014528195,0.27990106,0.6268614,0.00025431233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006305333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088402664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071147434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028371396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033135172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3762681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118209815","doi":"10.1177/0017896912444181","title":"Evaluation of <i>Harsh Reality</i> : A sexual health print-based resource for street-involved youth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Education Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Resource (disambiguation); Resource distribution; Population; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Psychology; Medicine; Applied psychology; Environmental health; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Resource allocation; Marketing; Social science","score_opus":0.43847040568169154,"score_gpt":0.5523114068038141,"score_spread":0.11384100112212253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118209815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573062,0.00065350527,0.0020512592,0.0023378076,0.000088296016,0.0023834596,0.0006412352,0.00019705873,0.034341186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756069,0.0013051507,0.013315545,0.00086785207,0.000055965265,0.001327332,0.00045900815,0.000051296163,0.007011044],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702924,0.0017373553,0.00010621135,0.00008449532,0.00076271006,0.00028002454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370193,0.0028746321,0.00055517757,0.00031123045,0.0012636115,0.0012934612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067300396,0.0004539711,0.00036111206,0.0007431354,0.0018193905,0.0021328635,0.001323838,0.0005905812,0.0067498633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010838358,0.00017728237,0.00029460693,0.000594733,0.001077421,0.0011474529,0.0026515573,0.0006574352,0.0005989065],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014809932,0.007676246,0.06102995,0.0077394512,0.000107424996,0.005125163,0.17931111,0.0008139845,0.007831899,0.00209377,0.023828533,0.7029615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010458541,0.03084204,0.3125754,0.0114799915,0.0008974037,0.004558185,0.3535273,0.002701953,0.01904014,0.00232462,0.26068848,0.00031855662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024838673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07068308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024838673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026243974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072846585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04938823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122798256","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1002","title":"Using Forums and Message Boards to Recruit Study Participants in Qualitative Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; The Internet; Focus group; Discussion board; Seekers; Psychology; Internet research; Online discussion; Netnography; Public relations; Medical education; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social media; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.7972018131196523,"score_gpt":0.7364521854460597,"score_spread":0.0607496276735926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122798256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69167846,0.0010323836,0.2520464,0.010354037,0.00093230116,0.024470394,0.00035570085,0.00055827136,0.01857209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.774566,0.00091792387,0.17846176,0.0020854634,0.0001950124,0.038250256,0.00014014078,0.00021220483,0.0051712384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.85199755,0.13503098,0.003182607,0.0029255997,0.0038216098,0.003041588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7275967,0.24064349,0.007833068,0.009988942,0.008426668,0.0055111153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17542931,0.0012154805,0.0008621784,0.003689858,0.012015136,0.0063409493,0.0027685857,0.0028728694,0.0039776596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16428016,0.0013667574,0.00077961676,0.0019818735,0.015442485,0.008102838,0.010087281,0.003286905,0.0011836117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019775353,0.00028962432,0.00224059,0.0005936713,0.000009010657,0.00062580453,0.956896,0.00025099222,0.0038171324,0.005360315,0.0014705749,0.028248498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038422729,0.0013307424,0.0026096473,0.001853032,0.000033879474,0.00080932357,0.91309875,0.0017148174,0.00696125,0.014130134,0.056947127,0.00012710712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010145367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028667646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82457066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034778041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075563253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92776996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124276993","doi":"10.3109/0142159x.2014.917165","title":"Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Teacher","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":597,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Qualitative research; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Publication; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.2564004922215638,"score_gpt":0.5615465850613159,"score_spread":0.30514609283975214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124276993","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004855106,0.021235837,0.5953318,0.024741415,0.0060836077,0.2039115,0.02123108,0.006993314,0.115616426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031162144,0.014086661,0.7734251,0.005986505,0.00033679666,0.1545563,0.006647258,0.001071559,0.0407737],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97021455,0.021163817,0.003494241,0.00078243774,0.003683077,0.00066190166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466102,0.036976233,0.0024135825,0.0030970173,0.009864379,0.0010384689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039604183,0.0028467258,0.002187271,0.0056770584,0.003283604,0.0039496236,0.005178251,0.004419337,0.03184624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059943,0.004130028,0.0016364814,0.006821086,0.003865906,0.004990006,0.004969273,0.007712196,0.026298307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028595733,0.00060875615,0.0006020378,0.0094388295,0.0000393416,0.0005861622,0.017442849,0.0012333397,0.0040688594,0.0272701,0.5551613,0.3832625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008583854,0.00012567214,0.00074594637,0.0030723698,0.000011845769,0.0004766564,0.0019043832,0.00039195508,0.0006161103,0.010321737,0.98219275,0.000054749893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050181895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012607989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039604183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040096175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114646675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20944947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124914723","doi":"10.1177/10432302012006009","title":"Focus Groups in Rural Gujarat, India: A Modified Approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Sociocultural evolution; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Focus (optics); Data collection; Rural area; Politics; Population; Sociology; Economic growth; Social science; Political science; Geography; Anthropology","score_opus":0.6285578108604389,"score_gpt":0.6184708920373914,"score_spread":0.010086918823047575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124914723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77057946,0.0035305675,0.14242248,0.014228795,0.0012485445,0.029930566,0.00068162463,0.0005446716,0.036833268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7516156,0.0027376455,0.19283165,0.0040103975,0.0002057064,0.035025343,0.0002550736,0.00008357756,0.013235052],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802536,0.01754238,0.00052744086,0.0006090309,0.0005026003,0.0005649481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98279494,0.012735495,0.0008652162,0.0015215009,0.0012406646,0.00084213377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018174443,0.0006998956,0.0005205897,0.0027400649,0.005487364,0.0017802422,0.0033507484,0.002593735,0.004718414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014919842,0.0010427024,0.0008618745,0.0019682823,0.004116639,0.0020992495,0.005944827,0.00177009,0.0006661215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009777569,0.001381139,0.010089069,0.0032700973,0.000137541,0.0028187274,0.7125729,0.0008833542,0.019904543,0.024235284,0.007838256,0.21589147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013189287,0.0051977425,0.08175785,0.0034291577,0.0007051671,0.0038230948,0.6200509,0.0033555373,0.015931783,0.027552756,0.23632716,0.0005499625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011130035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017523065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018174443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035262774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036192997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09611678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129617985","doi":"10.1093/fampra/19.3.278","title":"Group interviews in primary care research: advancing the state of the art or ritualized research?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Family Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Primary care; State (computer science); Primary health care; Group (periodic table); Family medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Environmental health","score_opus":0.6494114730576235,"score_gpt":0.6145495947469699,"score_spread":0.03486187831065357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129617985","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005704106,0.8851991,0.02530277,0.06816317,0.0035096898,0.0007479676,0.00005068501,0.0000733552,0.011249117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.095588215,0.8064753,0.080358796,0.010380367,0.0024259964,0.0037124262,0.00004667551,0.0000623308,0.00094998593],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.63601,0.3346063,0.0072703008,0.004453843,0.015781367,0.0018782262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47332272,0.48719335,0.012048952,0.01295072,0.012257777,0.002226425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.263366,0.0014025051,0.004358952,0.011980939,0.0059599276,0.020201523,0.0053494023,0.009807803,0.0037928033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23072289,0.0017242243,0.0011822731,0.019928038,0.03913418,0.03600546,0.009692302,0.0064041726,0.0013013701],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016744138,0.00023623303,0.0025257915,0.0760799,0.00026441546,0.00039250645,0.1777374,0.00030694297,0.0004492834,0.15699254,0.011090414,0.5737571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022122213,0.0007310101,0.0043486506,0.19985282,0.00032441792,0.001300148,0.20456567,0.0007708174,0.0008140818,0.23067866,0.35615638,0.00023612815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003634586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005360026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.736634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009704562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023717945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90840083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133166779","doi":"10.18438/b8bs3x","title":"User Studies Differ Across Some Disciplines and May Not Be Very Effective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Computer science; Focus group; Bridging (networking); Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Social science","score_opus":0.06495108908447848,"score_gpt":0.44708305549678234,"score_spread":0.38213196641230385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133166779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2645461,0.025170311,0.09845929,0.10043116,0.0042517656,0.005515786,0.0012668534,0.0017642678,0.4985945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8418539,0.008929688,0.063278936,0.05287042,0.0012542561,0.0069638616,0.00034315986,0.0009007116,0.023605037],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.680642,0.27018508,0.012474485,0.008972109,0.024038682,0.0036876549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53091687,0.33363158,0.019105643,0.062718995,0.044881884,0.008745028],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19597492,0.00074314565,0.0017911453,0.0052017304,0.008865755,0.020037856,0.0026915248,0.0045171585,0.014049446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2341907,0.0013334996,0.0012787245,0.0052906987,0.012926731,0.024913736,0.015134082,0.0043772757,0.0063389754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006517073,0.00085119274,0.062364247,0.0089405235,0.000580612,0.0010464719,0.2849423,0.0006323685,0.0049343165,0.06565188,0.034589596,0.5348148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020348391,0.0009144812,0.032121424,0.012145047,0.0002604369,0.0018307773,0.36472508,0.0006938562,0.004647246,0.053259354,0.5288999,0.00029892856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020441476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040190103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80402505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005602596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007760804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134336309","doi":"10.2196/jmir.2829","title":"The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Bruyère; Public Health Ontario; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Calgary; Trillium Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Incentive; The Internet; Focus group; Protocol (science); Social media; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Medical education; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Business; Marketing; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.43625979858111247,"score_gpt":0.6028910685183995,"score_spread":0.166631269937287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134336309","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17444181,0.02061894,0.26787356,0.47395253,0.00872354,0.008589875,0.00055404677,0.0028072842,0.04243849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4101217,0.01714147,0.48683128,0.05372342,0.004741531,0.012048806,0.00041197237,0.00115131,0.013828461],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8865849,0.097339675,0.0029021173,0.0023269528,0.008261787,0.0025845207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67324245,0.27613702,0.0068487586,0.012621627,0.022593277,0.008556786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18395273,0.0015963682,0.0009797955,0.0016165992,0.005051213,0.0066264104,0.0069532976,0.004372704,0.0056222114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24755415,0.0011637099,0.0011648152,0.0012701282,0.0069196504,0.010960254,0.0062129577,0.004594518,0.0017612677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005581683,0.0016358282,0.023158336,0.003633314,0.00012009993,0.002043872,0.14441556,0.0012570679,0.002207025,0.004577425,0.058007963,0.75838536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011645413,0.0063338145,0.060644276,0.019004544,0.00044524527,0.0069385874,0.36059704,0.010321137,0.009622988,0.056682188,0.4674128,0.00083286676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020794522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04399127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81604725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006752498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009438928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9728467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137629367","doi":"10.1080/17457823.2014.956229","title":"Ethnographies across virtual and physical spaces: a reflexive commentary on a live Canadian/UK ethnography of distributed medical education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnography & Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Capital District Health Authority; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Reflexivity; Sociology; Curriculum; Pluralism (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.038744449492435135,"score_gpt":0.43036910690023916,"score_spread":0.39162465740780406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137629367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5079729,0.050849255,0.023723803,0.25465193,0.008967023,0.0012595687,0.0012433887,0.0003207183,0.15101142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93995,0.011966618,0.0038067517,0.022720046,0.00093422714,0.0004859777,0.00014701921,0.00027243988,0.019716742],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734735,0.016487114,0.0007120592,0.0014585691,0.0033095565,0.0045592375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92967826,0.055823956,0.0022403556,0.0019202885,0.006310023,0.004027079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019375095,0.0016205126,0.0012765159,0.006062927,0.052920047,0.017328832,0.005916765,0.0068372986,0.004980521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038532663,0.0010922581,0.000858195,0.008198585,0.07121419,0.007336007,0.017057369,0.01100516,0.0004259642],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020911355,0.000006464224,0.00031586003,0.00016450549,0.000004807278,0.0009847248,0.98325306,0.000052209307,0.00018089911,0.006940086,0.0042718486,0.0038046164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028321158,0.0000057506954,0.0006276873,0.0005482728,0.000006844096,0.00026075673,0.9467991,0.00003904004,0.000119298005,0.0008010195,0.05076752,0.00002180241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88840634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9413237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11159366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07954458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06853037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.577139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140676391","doi":"10.4067/s0718-18762012000200005","title":"Augmented Focus Groups: On Leveraging the Peculiarities of Online Virtual Worlds when Conducting In-World Focus Groups","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Focus group; Metaverse; Computer science; World Wide Web; Virtual world; Internet privacy; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Virtual reality; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12343981726754345,"score_gpt":0.43690455693188274,"score_spread":0.3134647396643393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140676391","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22901116,0.0012611272,0.70426357,0.0058471356,0.00058557634,0.020432893,0.00034706274,0.0009785352,0.037273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40311405,0.0008742823,0.57007605,0.0012636324,0.00015710518,0.02121593,0.00014508903,0.00019172001,0.002962212],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80663705,0.17751175,0.0030909686,0.0039755492,0.0069931485,0.0017916369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64792377,0.29956594,0.010460494,0.027942387,0.012008438,0.0020989685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1623831,0.001971088,0.0008407916,0.0056748167,0.0062727197,0.0072497902,0.004821734,0.0026740297,0.007068831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20827754,0.0016522753,0.00093161064,0.0032218609,0.011248612,0.018300125,0.017063791,0.0020694851,0.00140365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005298774,0.00046051873,0.008244576,0.0034418479,0.00011303258,0.00044793764,0.7050562,0.001119155,0.008760667,0.031517465,0.0029906882,0.237318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001171733,0.0051836935,0.03559587,0.010598917,0.00073672814,0.003059794,0.4535965,0.016317999,0.028154422,0.19161683,0.25310844,0.00085910456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001633848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003106584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1623831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029617841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040109865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8587742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143893491","doi":"10.7202/1006367ar","title":"Pour en finir avec l'ethnographie du virtuel !","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologie et Sociétés","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.44133697524673055,"score_gpt":0.6104656921101468,"score_spread":0.16912871686341624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143893491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16222121,0.014429448,0.13115391,0.11592522,0.004802173,0.000588167,0.00095189724,0.0005546035,0.5693734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78482085,0.008163238,0.026488231,0.016338747,0.0010552692,0.001106754,0.0003596872,0.0006517891,0.16101548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359906,0.004902949,0.00013823489,0.00037001408,0.00071752985,0.00027224232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950121,0.0034588126,0.00020433673,0.0005909052,0.0005451732,0.00018866043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004569993,0.00045628916,0.00045039522,0.0018848439,0.0054807225,0.008037453,0.00075382035,0.0021539703,0.016384887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007974124,0.00023596633,0.0004496715,0.0020579689,0.011643448,0.011803278,0.004168152,0.0038536093,0.0023206507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007688499,0.00006797175,0.0026605306,0.0005043759,0.000017258875,0.0007248115,0.4373868,0.00020045301,0.002018787,0.46255216,0.03544707,0.058342904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011038249,0.000042289645,0.0023144037,0.00060062186,0.00000715449,0.00058928516,0.21948455,0.0002921647,0.00087785267,0.055785358,0.71996146,0.000033909724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064887423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01090852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016384887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030508225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022787233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054812968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146163237","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1501_3","title":"How Informed Is Online Informed Consent?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Recall; Reading (process); Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.34050175538961064,"score_gpt":0.5363866975708118,"score_spread":0.19588494218120117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146163237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14388569,0.024609158,0.16208418,0.54368246,0.005040901,0.003011623,0.0005292564,0.0003022672,0.11685447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89602876,0.012592414,0.05301383,0.030809687,0.0013700612,0.002247917,0.0002350784,0.00018222103,0.003519999],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.4013652,0.54866123,0.020218335,0.005492904,0.020830212,0.0034320913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27182767,0.62980646,0.03568157,0.03277396,0.025522621,0.0043875985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3376509,0.00073785,0.0012114495,0.0030966452,0.004564729,0.01380656,0.0026870205,0.0071362015,0.0058480753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6252727,0.00083617435,0.0009349483,0.0035705888,0.02997655,0.03299121,0.0058902446,0.0060617635,0.0014532537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048588586,0.0004671422,0.019871965,0.003681782,0.00031382625,0.0015261268,0.24501884,0.0009694336,0.001808291,0.27916196,0.018669236,0.42802557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017571851,0.0004203606,0.009339004,0.00829007,0.0002050179,0.00255603,0.15798484,0.0018477787,0.004128647,0.6193512,0.19534902,0.00035235134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029849682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002098206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6623491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050466205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014700181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8167944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149510966","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00295.x","title":"Reply to Ezzy 1: Yes, qualitative methods are often misunderstood","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Public health; Community health; Media studies; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing; Computer science","score_opus":0.4935427148235191,"score_gpt":0.5628024210186194,"score_spread":0.06925970619510036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149510966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026872577,0.0008023056,0.00033510508,0.97203696,0.026218303,0.000017523422,0.000053676617,0.000049267943,0.00021817289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011124405,0.00044730413,0.0003340783,0.98633367,0.0101968665,0.0000585495,0.000019570578,0.000031608863,0.0014658882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98498845,0.006063949,0.0024407108,0.0019370763,0.0033298074,0.0012399723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92614454,0.044881843,0.0070203952,0.0020807844,0.016092725,0.00377959],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020842282,0.0016254003,0.0029614712,0.0019702099,0.0077325227,0.0063636154,0.003072231,0.049320035,0.0081100315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.124282815,0.001858847,0.0021403427,0.0018599454,0.007882802,0.008574278,0.0060358793,0.059519123,0.0068674264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008703582,0.00001859141,0.00044773944,0.00026449503,0.000042615047,0.00041078794,0.0014239515,0.000074687676,0.00038418802,0.002306707,0.9907013,0.003837872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012480876,0.00012158273,0.003430399,0.0012915403,0.00013090791,0.0019359865,0.01003354,0.00061876955,0.00091786,0.010118805,0.97092235,0.00035342135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012281885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011621218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97915775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077241748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010360879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11022586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150260089","doi":"10.1177/160940690700600207","title":"Moral Geography of Focus Groups with Participants Who Have Preexisting Relationships in the Workplace","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Confidentiality; Space (punctuation); Data collection; Session (web analytics); Qualitative research; Focus (optics); Dynamics (music); Qualitative property; Power (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6031439924750165,"score_gpt":0.6103885054057031,"score_spread":0.00724451293068662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150260089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54502875,0.0024849842,0.28463343,0.009221999,0.0013230172,0.005645834,0.0005514225,0.00042640834,0.15068412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277009,0.0005785856,0.05999225,0.0009553949,0.000104155886,0.0037302256,0.00016456775,0.00011260916,0.0066613215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9394391,0.053468056,0.0013040673,0.0022407547,0.002438085,0.001109857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91426796,0.06098881,0.006708702,0.009989404,0.0063947667,0.001650349],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04478636,0.0006320176,0.0005668044,0.0029733132,0.0073779263,0.005148535,0.0018628822,0.0021199528,0.009255718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09553035,0.00072464795,0.00064398046,0.0015151305,0.014081716,0.008250865,0.010751111,0.0018034462,0.0013845982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040831577,0.00023063857,0.010438752,0.0012202421,0.00003829103,0.0006993862,0.85016495,0.0003559699,0.009442516,0.061662186,0.0028014414,0.06253744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019523106,0.0006818024,0.027980741,0.0014678458,0.00009513097,0.0015370458,0.6960542,0.0009822388,0.0146252625,0.08041023,0.17583424,0.00013604366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001406067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002137356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95521367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028115113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002493795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23685575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150622787","doi":"10.18438/b8bs5p","title":"Ethnographic Methods are Becoming More Popular in LIS Research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Library science; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.1881887454226039,"score_gpt":0.5124016669603857,"score_spread":0.3242129215377818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150622787","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023051495,0.16967024,0.5589001,0.040089957,0.011025607,0.01148773,0.003752256,0.0015075707,0.18051496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12786917,0.16327831,0.6272471,0.019172518,0.0055285376,0.026821585,0.0025992875,0.0012934966,0.02619004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.72725785,0.23725627,0.0088456925,0.0071716933,0.018150385,0.0013181532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5665915,0.35459322,0.016090699,0.034079134,0.02607869,0.0025668053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15448065,0.0025040265,0.0034067354,0.02664568,0.0066276877,0.011882187,0.0044294777,0.00491296,0.02224511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16456603,0.0019903176,0.0021319056,0.035857543,0.015466224,0.018344235,0.012823549,0.0062723057,0.005846936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016409572,0.0003921367,0.0077641667,0.020501986,0.00043255012,0.0005906903,0.12352056,0.0010847514,0.001297129,0.15820976,0.04327645,0.64276576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104300016,0.00022621616,0.0059956443,0.017624611,0.00011313154,0.0006038365,0.06371958,0.0006928561,0.0014019958,0.08864595,0.820674,0.00019787851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009895798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016784113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84551936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008835504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010449883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81698155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150871143","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1866","title":"Joint Stories and Layered Tales: Support, Contradiction and Me aning Construction in Focus Group Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Contradiction; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Group (periodic table); Sociology; Joint (building); Qualitative research; Psychology; Epistemology; Social science; Engineering; Anthropology; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4674519346912837,"score_gpt":0.5794504983789767,"score_spread":0.11199856368769295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150871143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85971373,0.0024522548,0.07797093,0.012028448,0.00023552457,0.00072358316,0.00010074101,0.00013256296,0.04664225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98633885,0.0004499227,0.010836334,0.00047612487,0.0000410624,0.0005260079,0.000033812976,0.00004580357,0.0012521588],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8281707,0.14823261,0.0036305944,0.0041209054,0.012771504,0.0030736248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7574189,0.21333459,0.010626036,0.011036775,0.0057014683,0.0018823092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.113219716,0.0010876621,0.0010901947,0.008732071,0.015967473,0.015833365,0.0039141728,0.0030461228,0.0025430345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15893838,0.0016939782,0.00064541394,0.004629391,0.056957677,0.017573144,0.021797298,0.003458667,0.00029843525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024333665,0.000013409894,0.0018224014,0.00012334767,0.000014081084,0.00023789311,0.9782306,0.000054633867,0.0004036752,0.012298378,0.00016209569,0.006615129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027221524,0.00006569331,0.003059682,0.00058799755,0.000044580644,0.00080871297,0.9396897,0.00063071225,0.0013032563,0.033884265,0.019846644,0.000051550775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065035634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008752898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88678026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068457844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00613289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59877026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152167487","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.038","title":"Designing for Diffusion of a Biomedical Intervention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Dissemination; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Social marketing; Information Dissemination; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.16835119553294453,"score_gpt":0.5267239449878588,"score_spread":0.35837274945491426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152167487","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054148994,0.95869565,0.016620316,0.00777836,0.0015126504,0.00356776,0.00011250018,0.00013085756,0.0061669718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058317944,0.86166114,0.06804804,0.0034951149,0.00042364615,0.0065772827,0.00014131932,0.000047045043,0.0012885623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96013594,0.025841175,0.004640678,0.001955516,0.006462093,0.0009646045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89718854,0.089780726,0.00492176,0.0024343831,0.004659991,0.0010146393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05953443,0.0020508822,0.004512821,0.0045693703,0.001448014,0.0036599191,0.0028000134,0.0041232575,0.004810401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1111714,0.0011247927,0.003111239,0.003039443,0.0016483254,0.0052983197,0.0053001526,0.0039074337,0.0007524305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020157576,0.00031583244,0.00056104496,0.0984131,0.00068311347,0.00006268733,0.002020021,0.00013584089,0.00038443643,0.0042488053,0.002444897,0.89052844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028858199,0.0025888756,0.01141883,0.5857705,0.013833295,0.0010011817,0.00924697,0.0010661056,0.0074565276,0.028019609,0.33648625,0.00022601342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037954901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047510113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05953443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033545117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019276176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31485194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157320760","doi":"10.1177/104973202129119991","title":"Seeking Emirati Women’s Voices: The Use of Focus Groups with an Arab Population","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Facilitator; Focus group; Data collection; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Population; Psychology; Medical education; Gender studies; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Social science; Demography; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.7126386587382332,"score_gpt":0.6014154610589906,"score_spread":0.1112231976792426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157320760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96540195,0.0018581022,0.011844216,0.0053379927,0.00018075925,0.0019090862,0.000078971185,0.000062286104,0.0133267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95098025,0.0040442813,0.033252183,0.002892275,0.00014210727,0.0045266016,0.00007870116,0.000024445697,0.004059206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793401,0.018723471,0.0002939448,0.00033663012,0.00059461384,0.00071124354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726034,0.023915954,0.00085857924,0.00044320046,0.0015738917,0.0006049057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0323397,0.00080209004,0.00048646936,0.001907267,0.0085303895,0.0031785409,0.0017749512,0.0023147594,0.0025270262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025456823,0.0006873757,0.0004285635,0.0011669747,0.0039691394,0.0043400573,0.0056288023,0.0013343304,0.0006834161],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089876354,0.0001814313,0.0022685176,0.00042560694,0.000008730281,0.0006401956,0.9512938,0.000038255486,0.0029424478,0.0008599075,0.00073809497,0.04051313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090480156,0.00061384175,0.005531946,0.0008146923,0.000033076965,0.0008207074,0.9681746,0.0002632102,0.0038211546,0.0018356224,0.01794864,0.000052090705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003694257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008176011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0323397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017992159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023445229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17103076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157937764","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x","title":"Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Phenomenon; Focus group; Triangulation; Qualitative research; Identification (biology); Focus (optics); Qualitative property; Psychology; Process (computing); Presentation (obstetrics); Computer science; Data science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics; Medicine; Social science; Machine learning; Ecology","score_opus":0.15688653558136817,"score_gpt":0.482583915867999,"score_spread":0.3256973802866308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157937764","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06841052,0.0023240664,0.87812805,0.0035860843,0.00086696463,0.025365615,0.0009178856,0.0010026636,0.019398194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13396628,0.001257126,0.8214953,0.0013543578,0.0003209925,0.037733633,0.00041142505,0.0002568883,0.0032040363],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.71544164,0.2482005,0.010284914,0.009604264,0.013960726,0.0025078866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6562661,0.28295588,0.009461791,0.0286439,0.021468488,0.0012038292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17372718,0.002215093,0.0024057534,0.013196233,0.0054227444,0.0061612143,0.0038292152,0.0029467049,0.010210283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19724096,0.0018385488,0.0019731468,0.008457047,0.0055954703,0.011033153,0.014295929,0.0025869308,0.0025705257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007855356,0.00032643194,0.0044807475,0.008405574,0.0003073712,0.0013103544,0.57803434,0.0012392424,0.022143604,0.020803574,0.006119377,0.35604393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012497208,0.002456361,0.013486988,0.012123013,0.000727938,0.003344908,0.37666288,0.0106267,0.04956309,0.1866706,0.34236622,0.00072148006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00099074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019791063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17372718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029217892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048522176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91876817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158021437","doi":"10.1177/1049732308327883","title":"Court Reporters: A Viable Solution for the Challenges of Focus Group Data Collection?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Jargon; Confidentiality; Data collection; Qualitative research; Diligence; Terminology; Due diligence; Qualitative property; Public relations; Receipt; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Business; World Wide Web; Computer security; Marketing","score_opus":0.8331526808634093,"score_gpt":0.666229364384388,"score_spread":0.16692331647902137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158021437","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044218507,0.0051363213,0.6304633,0.25968176,0.011485005,0.013491845,0.0012525769,0.0019422902,0.03232834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20013334,0.0032555498,0.64929044,0.046759672,0.0032201018,0.07861996,0.00088600995,0.00086299353,0.016971929],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5176776,0.43287155,0.012586152,0.01073836,0.023074713,0.0030515997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47586238,0.3821725,0.034826122,0.055759512,0.041733194,0.009646198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38094312,0.002462959,0.0027651004,0.006539364,0.0105368635,0.011215181,0.010760533,0.015254875,0.02342453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42297179,0.004015685,0.0015885949,0.0075534834,0.012240595,0.027894722,0.019311165,0.010732059,0.008781935],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019709596,0.0007706095,0.0063395537,0.0074431174,0.00032176013,0.0029470024,0.38970134,0.0005550492,0.009264626,0.15215345,0.13693775,0.29159483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002574261,0.0022389195,0.0029927294,0.01733424,0.00038008828,0.0037149289,0.23758256,0.005842389,0.006934436,0.16503778,0.55471635,0.00065121194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027823693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004718685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6190569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005686786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019381484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76340735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165228904","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720100606.021","title":"Roles of the FGD Team Members: An Overview","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Focus group; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09344862789953451,"score_gpt":0.4325410513729546,"score_spread":0.3390924234734201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165228904","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11134366,0.0821516,0.37492943,0.057895944,0.0074413256,0.022190953,0.0033858223,0.002046188,0.3386151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30522823,0.06026576,0.4850379,0.010120265,0.0013710232,0.028018571,0.0027280152,0.0006928241,0.10653751],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96183664,0.029853832,0.0014991219,0.0014390945,0.0040436573,0.0013276185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856953,0.008784815,0.0009590359,0.00068650936,0.0029222693,0.0009519874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029811775,0.0014745207,0.0005924541,0.005382936,0.0072762948,0.0042946,0.003159704,0.0038133182,0.010352801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02368148,0.0008101503,0.00089430413,0.003647378,0.0039720167,0.003935596,0.004396968,0.002537256,0.0061278613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004140966,0.00039231687,0.0069401,0.007334741,0.000034382974,0.0021077988,0.30327654,0.00042049092,0.0047504785,0.058578238,0.049653083,0.5660978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036740817,0.0002561174,0.007145161,0.005492062,0.00004228725,0.0039880257,0.12263455,0.000609036,0.0037918014,0.013157104,0.8427521,0.00009487883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052740644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003737046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029811775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057661207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0082469685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15766162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184444384","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.19.007","title":"The Analysis of Focus Groups in Published Research Articles","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; sort; Inter-rater reliability; Coding (social sciences); Focus (optics); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Applied psychology; Information retrieval; Social science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.39882849553213817,"score_gpt":0.5595611463391841,"score_spread":0.1607326508070459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184444384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77924883,0.037534293,0.100344695,0.007323374,0.0039267926,0.014156173,0.0050632725,0.00056431687,0.05183832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8809252,0.018335916,0.06725807,0.0020312893,0.0014425911,0.021179276,0.0026763943,0.00035547995,0.005795806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7910122,0.13352998,0.020626578,0.0053284178,0.04665621,0.0028465276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19918922,0.7060473,0.02664297,0.009988546,0.05711108,0.0010208731],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15460995,0.0011983847,0.0018669065,0.052102458,0.0053211725,0.0073962654,0.0031368556,0.0024273505,0.006362868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46140274,0.0011666535,0.0016177277,0.032389853,0.004650881,0.0075843083,0.005936365,0.0012917903,0.0011997283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081362604,0.00026832407,0.028319517,0.030078655,0.00075292255,0.00200264,0.65807164,0.00043343444,0.0047604213,0.009635782,0.008815827,0.25604722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031871334,0.0011588072,0.09458847,0.04913208,0.0014324925,0.003004535,0.67345464,0.0020413133,0.018064331,0.017187262,0.13927552,0.00034183933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017808225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019403804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8453901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077333935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069218758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81766534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204405986","doi":"","title":"The Use of Focus Group Methodology in Education: Some Theoretical and Practical Considerations, 5(3)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Engineering ethics; Action (physics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Action research; Sociology; Management science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3526624125502763,"score_gpt":0.5210688473540591,"score_spread":0.1684064348037828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204405986","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016710777,0.036403336,0.7329337,0.16251078,0.0029157226,0.007783128,0.0002578802,0.0007330178,0.03975156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13073649,0.020697879,0.8111104,0.010947623,0.0013618815,0.019537436,0.00009132177,0.00017223488,0.005344837],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7030695,0.27020624,0.0057086986,0.0022945777,0.017768146,0.00095280673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51756585,0.44761595,0.0070173787,0.009260415,0.016726527,0.0018139347],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.32647112,0.0018891547,0.0017342791,0.006067225,0.007732416,0.0108311055,0.008647496,0.009749947,0.009677635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21149519,0.0019316017,0.0010589426,0.0056877052,0.022663796,0.016014377,0.007523263,0.005063262,0.0038017572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042654775,0.0006850871,0.014075362,0.01646519,0.00017886519,0.00277591,0.13203649,0.0018505469,0.0040018954,0.32965523,0.040473517,0.45737535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037266818,0.0023667468,0.014996197,0.025342965,0.00026382695,0.01164173,0.0910543,0.010646923,0.01026615,0.44245934,0.38985002,0.00073904934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005480917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0099347625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32647112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005317035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073986175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.830581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215466256","doi":"","title":"Ensuring Privacy of Participants In Social Media Based Research: an Australian perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Anonymity; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Content analysis; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering ethics; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.3338007952104253,"score_gpt":0.4231291060573463,"score_spread":0.089328310846921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215466256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11060123,0.02054182,0.051920176,0.6953676,0.002551538,0.0009941856,0.0001568093,0.000114564515,0.117752105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89307624,0.0153028,0.032987513,0.03979818,0.00074486947,0.0012948003,0.00006238554,0.00009524695,0.01663777],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.752719,0.21399027,0.005738914,0.00526564,0.01687375,0.0054124556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78030324,0.15720274,0.0110270865,0.014913509,0.019818569,0.016734922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14399035,0.0007209054,0.0011276256,0.0032985446,0.022896668,0.02090172,0.0044883955,0.0113854455,0.003795835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15545689,0.0014096173,0.00079669047,0.003966989,0.05258918,0.02344528,0.021651207,0.0166579,0.0009917303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005607408,0.00010829476,0.0030512004,0.0013123809,0.000025256784,0.0016813515,0.7620994,0.00028260186,0.0010778777,0.17172588,0.007927417,0.050652213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002907571,0.00037841874,0.009859178,0.0077949343,0.00006945925,0.002189035,0.45917046,0.0016795826,0.0017216902,0.20843668,0.3084784,0.00019303312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040899374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032173954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98861456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015080515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04217964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76150286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222600326","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2455","title":"Anonymity as a Double-Edge Sword: Reflecting on the Implications of Online Qualitative Research in Studying Sensitive Topics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Anonymity; Psychology; Data collection; SWORD; Participant observation; Qualitative property; Narrative; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Applied psychology; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science; Computer security","score_opus":0.7625029096015378,"score_gpt":0.7159038670242647,"score_spread":0.0465990425772731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222600326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36370915,0.009972154,0.19050105,0.39286238,0.0059076943,0.00240544,0.00018374363,0.00025321534,0.034205187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075231,0.006658914,0.040311992,0.037591647,0.0009822545,0.0023726113,0.000041935007,0.00029206267,0.004225547],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5413333,0.42778,0.0058355005,0.005101769,0.012210056,0.007739361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58877945,0.35792008,0.016755488,0.010023906,0.01732473,0.009196379],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3016604,0.0016930867,0.0017185016,0.0035157928,0.035728607,0.027370675,0.0073169437,0.013013513,0.0019117913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2654968,0.0025834339,0.0023399743,0.003753038,0.08536829,0.03412653,0.032313395,0.023217484,0.0006913056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002956294,0.000027892047,0.0009902443,0.00024807928,0.000016118802,0.0009316357,0.97301596,0.00015506159,0.0005602866,0.018538442,0.0012990127,0.004187791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015847447,0.000063207,0.00027545064,0.000930156,0.000020480913,0.0012731026,0.9466831,0.0004894132,0.00097066176,0.015386476,0.033821058,0.00007109076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065761977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011336419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6983396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011773558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015214782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8611771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244252531","doi":"10.11575/prism/29727","title":"University of Calgary Library Website Redesign Project: Focus Groups Report","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Library science; World Wide Web; Focus group; Computer science; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.08360930017561377,"score_gpt":0.37081490811592327,"score_spread":0.28720560794030947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244252531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97526157,0.00017860746,0.0039470335,0.0012342087,0.00010548227,0.009352715,0.0011257931,0.00013622902,0.008658427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90724844,0.0005827177,0.017941242,0.003468562,0.00011112055,0.01852464,0.0018020163,0.00014588547,0.05017542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99027526,0.0039374777,0.0006401811,0.00093206274,0.0025274386,0.0016875818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95769525,0.013068773,0.0020402553,0.0026384583,0.017275443,0.0072818557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017164404,0.0006413079,0.0008202033,0.0035556685,0.011195105,0.0026121195,0.0022630577,0.0024837342,0.0057424577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021822749,0.0010153048,0.0005145457,0.0021424845,0.002264199,0.001652314,0.0057805916,0.0036215442,0.0016458208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022317853,0.021031281,0.07465763,0.0012471615,0.000080064885,0.0017001786,0.6781419,0.00060451136,0.050258227,0.0013955529,0.017049106,0.15160264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065103994,0.0056817406,0.2643487,0.00028611574,0.00017750445,0.00024529756,0.6495591,0.00063130417,0.03885369,0.0005671287,0.03881548,0.00018295262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1188479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16802375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1188479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010972454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025457356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23631227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253765482","doi":"","title":"Advice giving in a health emergency: a case study of the SARs website","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Penerbit UTM eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Popularity; Medical advice; Public health; Medicine; Health information; Health care; Public relations; Internet privacy; Business; Advertising; Psychology; Nursing; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.1233566007076244,"score_gpt":0.4107205832599359,"score_spread":0.2873639825523115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253765482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349597,0.0035209102,0.00315642,0.029678486,0.0006892924,0.00048122197,0.00018167944,0.00009112653,0.027241128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669748,0.0054706205,0.006173329,0.007948854,0.00062259403,0.00017346666,0.00012720196,0.00014395258,0.012365164],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948388,0.003099652,0.00024847055,0.00029256722,0.0006357983,0.0008847295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133027,0.004116364,0.0008538284,0.00023558205,0.000523898,0.0029400755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032983378,0.0011890805,0.0009241474,0.0022387304,0.015351684,0.0040587937,0.0029454387,0.009842911,0.004458447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014869794,0.0011199233,0.0014109906,0.0023397093,0.0052138176,0.0030706981,0.0047760042,0.009548768,0.00090443384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011524444,0.0013538803,0.015695548,0.00065405836,0.000053198382,0.637394,0.30991566,0.00049218815,0.00095553533,0.0061689257,0.010393631,0.016808126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004661555,0.0006168562,0.013192879,0.00093136105,0.000053122723,0.35739708,0.5627443,0.0020008797,0.00088052434,0.0031080623,0.058894426,0.00013394197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013696433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04943559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015351684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051167235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038164277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037124574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259161000","doi":"10.1177/2333393615607840","title":"Advancing Telephone Focus Groups Method Through the Use of Webinar","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Barrie Urology Group; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Public health; Telephone interview; Telephone number; Medical education; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Business; Nursing; Marketing; Social science","score_opus":0.5377975146645205,"score_gpt":0.6381213747007817,"score_spread":0.10032386003626115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259161000","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05667764,0.0012256003,0.86182386,0.00377337,0.0008305382,0.041413493,0.0007251759,0.0013285493,0.032201704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10081212,0.0012358007,0.81084687,0.0018437019,0.00025627392,0.07919373,0.00023444108,0.000341909,0.005235248],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8448906,0.13987522,0.0030730802,0.0038001544,0.0071085463,0.0012524854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8104174,0.14875211,0.0066771335,0.015345193,0.01690451,0.0019036537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1284195,0.0014872326,0.00079503795,0.0039293575,0.0029723805,0.0028441173,0.003438383,0.001587315,0.0197652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1270064,0.0012450462,0.0007206492,0.0028308872,0.0035035086,0.004992386,0.008110568,0.0022724334,0.0044647986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094925455,0.002055525,0.0057703666,0.0065869642,0.00013825796,0.00066417956,0.21279308,0.0011004364,0.02339164,0.020261146,0.019875636,0.70641345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031855034,0.005538273,0.029299684,0.012796764,0.0003763451,0.0019925428,0.15344617,0.012779824,0.05209276,0.093925305,0.6338252,0.0007415528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027005072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066667143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8715805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026506595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005904032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67915535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262732958","doi":"","title":"Focusing on the Focus Group","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Focus (optics); Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.39262565553922507,"score_gpt":0.4667390368788032,"score_spread":0.07411338133957812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262732958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013935025,0.026257992,0.3622248,0.042629514,0.008085532,0.003129457,0.00025465497,0.00056169106,0.5429214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24901906,0.03498869,0.34918377,0.05674658,0.003262737,0.012694602,0.0004717481,0.0007439242,0.2928889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98674834,0.009325448,0.00025453823,0.0013644586,0.0019028496,0.00040434374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987649,0.009534109,0.00043365924,0.0009434598,0.001035928,0.00040380954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014726739,0.0012128853,0.0006812756,0.0014675215,0.0037427226,0.005022658,0.0024248057,0.0050378554,0.018188147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014805731,0.00080076774,0.00062283984,0.001439102,0.011074098,0.011033674,0.0083262175,0.0049008317,0.009514896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055003013,0.00014386093,0.0008679698,0.0025343585,0.000020258998,0.0005195368,0.18224466,0.000259866,0.0051244665,0.49942127,0.067450225,0.24135858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020334826,0.00008857889,0.00049929565,0.0014489607,0.000011140132,0.0011027212,0.016902419,0.0001784384,0.0013404894,0.08657579,0.89180297,0.000028871367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021982642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033376827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98527324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033068154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032014104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07788336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282787636","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010076","title":"Toward an information management system for handling parenting information users' comments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lucie and André Chagnon Foundation; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Computer science; General partnership; Qualitative research; Knowledge management; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.06266634969784579,"score_gpt":0.357799686690481,"score_spread":0.2951333369926352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282787636","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11726654,0.0007346673,0.6742224,0.02088742,0.0018112682,0.03253147,0.006343731,0.11382773,0.032374833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09594971,0.00039716926,0.86762375,0.0016994239,0.0005580638,0.019888205,0.0030245793,0.0022307867,0.00862832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8818531,0.08068944,0.015697373,0.00615509,0.014051027,0.0015540377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5810918,0.25033036,0.029671254,0.04615316,0.08494566,0.007807622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17156097,0.0017357863,0.001644283,0.016676312,0.004667508,0.010674731,0.0038425913,0.0027866447,0.011175122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.281334,0.0021549752,0.0009790559,0.0089015635,0.0025253622,0.018676495,0.008732558,0.0037590743,0.0101604555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010834729,0.0014230062,0.024019869,0.0026610636,0.00011087918,0.00061619555,0.064621925,0.000845998,0.016003998,0.0074714553,0.0679605,0.81318164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015955119,0.004409849,0.07103126,0.011812181,0.00063846895,0.0016018291,0.07579944,0.08641255,0.066694714,0.035989843,0.64176524,0.0022490756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019594184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021572763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17156097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042263446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010084425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.907312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285724616","doi":"10.1177/1609406915621419","title":"Different Approaches to Cross-Lingual Focus Groups","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions","keywords":"Focus group; First language; Participatory action research; Context (archaeology); Interpreter; Community-based participatory research; Moderation; Focus (optics); Psychology; Computer science; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.8739956509517269,"score_gpt":0.674801705779231,"score_spread":0.1991939451724959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285724616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05135477,0.008844239,0.8289369,0.0109555395,0.0022936042,0.029934894,0.0009938692,0.00077551644,0.06591074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14054833,0.004837206,0.727882,0.005565029,0.00022315857,0.10892114,0.0005718435,0.0005285597,0.01092278],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.75427544,0.21010076,0.011385037,0.010315505,0.011057279,0.0028659492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7890789,0.16233976,0.005898553,0.018312998,0.022066016,0.002303797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17363314,0.0023019526,0.001434264,0.007250322,0.009282135,0.006679718,0.0060352925,0.0050269538,0.012846623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1742215,0.00242525,0.0032411567,0.0069104815,0.013734819,0.009746241,0.014021203,0.005687908,0.0034768772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006182883,0.00036034008,0.003642584,0.008512924,0.00030290897,0.00040358966,0.68673885,0.0007513758,0.007120182,0.074395776,0.006330746,0.21082237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001137611,0.0013976957,0.016995404,0.015700992,0.0006604776,0.0017841571,0.35644668,0.003871605,0.016835202,0.135679,0.44834766,0.0011435311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007749103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016504623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17363314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008685431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073412345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9182708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297688399","doi":"","title":"Opportunities and challenges for social policy : engaging youth online.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Political science; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.7001082213500545,"score_gpt":0.4859723185304831,"score_spread":0.21413590281957134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297688399","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13251185,0.024644945,0.008844225,0.61258185,0.0030520908,0.00030359792,0.000120901306,0.00020808629,0.21773241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9012757,0.020412525,0.00695498,0.033547077,0.00097294134,0.0007205928,0.00007841911,0.00015141432,0.035886403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97921556,0.01655944,0.0002870421,0.0004551571,0.0013054854,0.0021772038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893132,0.0055689155,0.00075200974,0.0003325881,0.0006663584,0.0033670294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017183682,0.00066293526,0.0005941636,0.0017263357,0.024728267,0.025888078,0.0013676389,0.007912758,0.009326093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013611966,0.0005017325,0.00070990814,0.001997761,0.020644099,0.023634907,0.018176945,0.006433248,0.001906396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003571376,0.00020856281,0.0063182507,0.00061186746,0.000022393542,0.0012680909,0.6187115,0.00011642421,0.0004820149,0.16025083,0.06477841,0.14719602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009786931,0.00004454306,0.0013200362,0.00069642597,0.000009803269,0.0005038414,0.6877144,0.0001661911,0.00020895549,0.038540687,0.27075958,0.000025721221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00445609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009873876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025888078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00420308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011091616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090877056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324360301","doi":"10.1097/00012272-200407000-00003","title":"Bridging Distance and Culture With a Cyberspace Method of Qualitative Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Nursing Science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wind Energy Institute of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Bridging (networking); Meaning (existential); Qualitative research; Face (sociological concept); Health care; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Political science; Computer security; Social science","score_opus":0.03102865846380092,"score_gpt":0.5217357536103153,"score_spread":0.4907070951465144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324360301","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06034886,0.0012487532,0.88284224,0.006056628,0.0006532789,0.017772812,0.0009115004,0.00027334242,0.029892523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18212198,0.0009198028,0.7657868,0.0017589962,0.00007492488,0.04481306,0.00024663756,0.00013582458,0.004141944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9082454,0.08379325,0.002014325,0.0019636066,0.0030468863,0.00093664275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9253003,0.06419438,0.0018300399,0.0041904957,0.003927563,0.0005571792],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06470362,0.0009289489,0.0011155619,0.006739079,0.005050307,0.006585575,0.002065082,0.0013836233,0.0047746147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049677756,0.00070494926,0.0009794445,0.0062904656,0.012664722,0.006036351,0.00791481,0.0027670483,0.000715046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001853526,0.0002043048,0.0020589512,0.002311729,0.0000581148,0.00048224672,0.63166595,0.0014472198,0.0037072275,0.2134602,0.004158228,0.14026056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037102183,0.0005013734,0.0026233096,0.0039266087,0.000079059246,0.0007859275,0.5425125,0.0088545745,0.0063474746,0.21595532,0.21780501,0.0002379285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031072309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055203023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93529636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044670333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34218955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398546274","doi":"","title":"EXPERIENCES OF A NOVICE RESEARCHER CONDUCTING FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEWS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Set (abstract data type); Medical education; Qualitative research; Focus (optics); Psychology; Qualitative property; Computer science; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.37384313536445335,"score_gpt":0.555240586765978,"score_spread":0.18139745140152463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398546274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8267188,0.004001204,0.12607516,0.015984347,0.0014456058,0.0019296677,0.00022460865,0.0008288102,0.02279186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390848,0.0026124124,0.034285765,0.0077082156,0.0003729976,0.0015577225,0.0002457596,0.00047073985,0.013661594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9004398,0.08307851,0.0026202514,0.0034649041,0.0054384284,0.004958115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8728135,0.085192904,0.005467967,0.0067459783,0.018269485,0.011510067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07176309,0.0017655098,0.0016540949,0.0033776718,0.013527892,0.007919694,0.0054001855,0.006556806,0.004836019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11940595,0.001838696,0.001697046,0.001523589,0.011915145,0.0114973495,0.012618786,0.0064264066,0.0033028587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013141765,0.00017954921,0.0024833241,0.00045726486,0.000020960853,0.004264208,0.9691074,0.00017628004,0.00337763,0.0011913266,0.00263316,0.015977504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051605755,0.0009929078,0.0016805553,0.0009729161,0.00004203737,0.009031959,0.9174735,0.0011547519,0.0033890877,0.002737791,0.062296618,0.00017624418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019610529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033304414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041030105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041910927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37952405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415812786","doi":"","title":"The Internet: an effective tool for nursing research with women.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Anonymity; Population; Medical education; Psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.13373755957118402,"score_gpt":0.46478222037532413,"score_spread":0.3310446608041401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415812786","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044780664,0.07149661,0.398136,0.057620004,0.009522743,0.02052782,0.0035127716,0.009979898,0.38442352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07849948,0.03275748,0.8200969,0.011850194,0.0027179455,0.025273569,0.0009991595,0.0007071102,0.027098188],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97580296,0.019290168,0.0009115628,0.00040835337,0.0033360964,0.00025095712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94082326,0.04925092,0.0018168362,0.003584822,0.0023208144,0.0022033926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025791066,0.0009311457,0.0009964809,0.006842511,0.0024314714,0.0040686363,0.001538881,0.0017603348,0.018318651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03881885,0.0006597058,0.0005862883,0.003720381,0.0019996844,0.0077307597,0.007723645,0.0018567983,0.008458947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008090569,0.00027130125,0.0020966665,0.0022060862,0.000043742682,0.0005667749,0.007672374,0.0000580595,0.0016994501,0.0038642637,0.07270342,0.9087368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023287462,0.0007852258,0.012537205,0.011698978,0.00012272799,0.005777598,0.020019585,0.0004284263,0.0014891848,0.01915455,0.92761266,0.00014092482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028687294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011261366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025791066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006508119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025514744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13639784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476170425","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-867-3.ch009","title":"Ethical Conflicts in Research on Networked Education Contexts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Relation (database); Informed consent; Political science; Research ethics; Public relations; Knowledge management; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.2662411215459008,"score_gpt":0.5284845594318528,"score_spread":0.262243437885952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476170425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09842051,0.06492443,0.13360547,0.18887861,0.0038009903,0.0016598925,0.00018122273,0.00015520949,0.50837374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8282879,0.03377918,0.070855804,0.025588414,0.0009319491,0.0040145447,0.000120966295,0.00016729957,0.036253978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.83440274,0.15205628,0.0020199593,0.0037014526,0.006296167,0.0015233471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80410606,0.18064782,0.004389637,0.005848779,0.0030107049,0.0019969828],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10079817,0.0005838973,0.0011727901,0.0019728802,0.014650432,0.019814245,0.0025243328,0.0064471522,0.0047920914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079280116,0.0007954426,0.00051058363,0.0032375848,0.0752492,0.020268148,0.012609974,0.009443147,0.00068873836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076272963,0.000027024485,0.0004183274,0.0003583172,0.000010634011,0.00036304278,0.3912871,0.00020407664,0.00016871213,0.58143497,0.004660779,0.021059314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020402907,0.00003564862,0.0005290782,0.0034621938,0.000011213443,0.0007116498,0.3176956,0.00038945855,0.00045819965,0.47469056,0.20196734,0.000028668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012668015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002731419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99355286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008449261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014402831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5330781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477158349","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-152-0.ch012","title":"Co-Construction and Field Creation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Online and offline; Perspective (graphical); Argument (complex analysis); Action research; Sociology; Action (physics); Bridging (networking); Field (mathematics); Field research; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041076911040481306,"score_gpt":0.3747538711457709,"score_spread":0.3336769601052896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477158349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023071205,0.0031107292,0.36901268,0.00816277,0.0012274506,0.0022060194,0.00045039435,0.0006216313,0.59213704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46903005,0.0024503812,0.30989137,0.0014358237,0.0003773529,0.0054465225,0.0009105707,0.00068890786,0.20976897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807794,0.013430251,0.0004868948,0.0027415561,0.0019457691,0.00061618665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799098,0.010362457,0.00053678406,0.006614387,0.0015733314,0.0010032518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016915992,0.00074411655,0.00077595457,0.0045778044,0.0058724773,0.011404734,0.0032847577,0.0023861069,0.022264047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020015774,0.0007982011,0.00073509145,0.0036829978,0.022398978,0.011609054,0.013421554,0.0028643652,0.004476114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020907028,0.000054251046,0.0005865772,0.00019561705,0.000009219103,0.00022353657,0.04456431,0.00025497464,0.00046505124,0.88774717,0.008310466,0.057567853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027391636,0.00004092657,0.0005817202,0.0006415628,0.000010718333,0.0005634575,0.028654031,0.0010169336,0.0009396244,0.3882516,0.57924986,0.00002233982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017192143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024657839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022264047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047676344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063931323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089461386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477634630","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-152-0.ch018","title":"User-Centered Internet Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); The Internet; Politics; Engineering ethics; Internet research; Resistance (ecology); Research ethics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.19081394322511866,"score_gpt":0.4603591848083469,"score_spread":0.26954524158322823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477634630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018606955,0.008163974,0.26019013,0.010054782,0.0006116199,0.0012111483,0.00027562125,0.0009782726,0.6999076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43288,0.015599151,0.2694905,0.0077721975,0.001047395,0.005183348,0.00058794714,0.0010702745,0.2663692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9676581,0.027175546,0.00046382265,0.0014361262,0.002944245,0.00032210382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97179914,0.019923273,0.00068592606,0.004601815,0.0019775915,0.0010122331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025196893,0.00059488666,0.00063166535,0.0027962695,0.0028676358,0.0120437555,0.0024722714,0.002516202,0.01899165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014769551,0.00059894216,0.00044813254,0.003085905,0.007625243,0.009884418,0.0058236993,0.0024841453,0.006029795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031343447,0.00016430767,0.00091874046,0.00094291486,0.000022231685,0.00014054328,0.07054959,0.00032410322,0.00096856186,0.7419834,0.021421706,0.16253254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036984893,0.00018437661,0.0010662178,0.0013214891,0.00002181861,0.0008780243,0.016242383,0.0014700214,0.0016656938,0.28346297,0.6936164,0.000033575012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004408878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071694364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025196893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025576232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034826777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13325548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485992882","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-152-0.ch004","title":"Conducting Congruent, Ethical Qualitative Research on Internet-Mediated Research Environments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Qualitative research; Participant observation; Data collection; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science","score_opus":0.556192181942767,"score_gpt":0.5849272867096282,"score_spread":0.028735104766861252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485992882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04954994,0.0106572285,0.35121495,0.02254799,0.0016088005,0.009819959,0.0004444195,0.00026813586,0.55388856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3525469,0.01761177,0.4446715,0.008730989,0.00039519544,0.024572797,0.0005142149,0.00037859767,0.15057805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597413,0.034735773,0.0006387858,0.0010896673,0.0031841784,0.0006104298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608541,0.03480011,0.00066262,0.0018939554,0.0011557103,0.0006334166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043868225,0.0005189221,0.0006647701,0.0011875253,0.00596666,0.008684377,0.0018698358,0.002259961,0.004963962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024303796,0.00065482425,0.0003652192,0.0018399284,0.02090969,0.007037676,0.006828879,0.003178358,0.0013145711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018555058,0.00009585037,0.0005620818,0.0008380442,0.000008729203,0.0005299882,0.4127964,0.0004911676,0.0013181866,0.49888602,0.011407563,0.07304732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036261703,0.000101964266,0.00095906167,0.00383576,0.000010744475,0.0012821773,0.16827059,0.0006240085,0.0022498341,0.20785955,0.6147237,0.00004640739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012608658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043735863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99774003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004139087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007959939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23200011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504521261","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-0074-4.ch017","title":"Using Digital Tools in Qualitative Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Computer science; Software; Qualitative research; Data science; Work (physics); Qualitative property; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web; Engineering; Sociology; Database","score_opus":0.5313639862142903,"score_gpt":0.5736536992568761,"score_spread":0.042289713042585886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504521261","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053427895,0.024493512,0.6562068,0.028910497,0.003646636,0.0045949374,0.00097331806,0.0011180798,0.2747134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042095937,0.028130004,0.8393609,0.0066906465,0.000559094,0.016570222,0.0007195208,0.00090101076,0.064972736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95372796,0.040242348,0.0015037183,0.0011902474,0.0029321872,0.000403566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88844454,0.10228788,0.0013205433,0.004889745,0.0023254557,0.0007318721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05029814,0.0012450988,0.00084061624,0.006070248,0.0054382305,0.011267746,0.0022023837,0.0030473669,0.023058249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051326446,0.0012925639,0.00084241875,0.008938272,0.015588952,0.01481266,0.011836044,0.005940258,0.0068129343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003394584,0.000076784505,0.00024021845,0.0035048292,0.000020636333,0.00038342856,0.13315144,0.000526,0.001179545,0.5605228,0.04573587,0.25462455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024363995,0.0000351564,0.00018600342,0.0044642696,0.000009100661,0.00047619647,0.020977147,0.00038825677,0.0007628409,0.17035037,0.8022876,0.000038808295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014918745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041982867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05029814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060757543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006382195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26600516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541770929","doi":"10.1177/1609406916674965","title":"An Innovative Sequential Focus Group Method for Investigating Diabetes Care Experiences With Indigenous Peoples in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia; University of Calgary; NOSM University; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Focus group; Facilitator; Debriefing; Health care; Nursing; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24156533888501658,"score_gpt":0.5569418456670933,"score_spread":0.3153765067820767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541770929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90105444,0.0011945519,0.027055442,0.0031999408,0.0003177098,0.026503583,0.0014247235,0.00018619104,0.039063364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749882,0.0014096623,0.063670605,0.0019188885,0.00007528997,0.037790563,0.00049893203,0.00006259767,0.019585276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929675,0.003383257,0.0002712012,0.00080079236,0.0012047128,0.0013726694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467385,0.001947299,0.0003449156,0.0002792743,0.001985579,0.00076911005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008583895,0.0009461445,0.000585355,0.003552251,0.0139165,0.0020288215,0.0026571432,0.0010046284,0.0067416043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009320909,0.00056614325,0.000617856,0.0031944138,0.004032204,0.0011649883,0.0046465406,0.0011533007,0.0003792627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028206912,0.00040491018,0.009188013,0.0007860288,0.000027294982,0.00092161255,0.8995633,0.0002764673,0.0070706643,0.0030799434,0.0032209572,0.07517872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024626552,0.00059300807,0.036086053,0.00071816414,0.00006147831,0.00028812152,0.8799195,0.00087121996,0.003727935,0.0031685634,0.07417846,0.00014113668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7319413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.839022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26805872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024840226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5392747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552965278","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2016.1251613","title":"Chasing the rainbow: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth and pride semiotics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture Health & Sexuality","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Queer; Pride; Transgender; Lesbian; Gender studies; Feeling; Symbol (formal); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.3008511063715429,"score_gpt":0.4910253303752061,"score_spread":0.19017422400366324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552965278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98093927,0.0018565906,0.0010518929,0.0020451653,0.00006316637,0.000028567925,0.000020043883,0.0000116696365,0.013983635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706453,0.00052731624,0.00030287262,0.00024895402,0.000010529105,0.000025686293,0.000007998319,0.000008210788,0.001803915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968901,0.0024431574,0.00005425628,0.000117871255,0.00018795022,0.0003066043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998357,0.00084601145,0.000216461,0.00007816742,0.00015959874,0.00034276242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037760949,0.00038050849,0.00038041762,0.0011896379,0.011773649,0.0058547324,0.0004988449,0.0009226345,0.0014939744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028206555,0.00033248917,0.00021926699,0.0009524784,0.022401432,0.002703181,0.005597513,0.0019986085,0.00013451977],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007743211,0.0000060244583,0.0014533206,0.000019231293,9.1691817e-7,0.0002147964,0.99315417,0.0000054245284,0.0002622658,0.003529017,0.00012242419,0.0012247679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011744797,0.000013514034,0.0021242008,0.0000614293,0.000002561222,0.00020695628,0.9902165,0.000016905646,0.0001574439,0.0007355709,0.0064569754,0.000006827555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031542003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056119908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031542003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035598304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029212239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06271684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593602390","doi":"10.18357/ijcyfs81201716739","title":"ADOLESCENTS NEGOTIATING ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS IN A CULTURALLY DIVERSE, URBAN COMMUNITY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Negotiation; Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.21820608470854122,"score_gpt":0.43410802698498896,"score_spread":0.21590194227644774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593602390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99837023,0.00004499723,0.00013970467,0.00005819066,0.0000040862806,0.000013632565,0.0000037562743,0.0000018059517,0.0013637156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913234,0.00007378044,0.00013607518,0.000049504608,0.0000048494235,0.000012465977,0.000008165741,0.0000022126521,0.0005806317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986463,0.00091297703,0.000033309243,0.00009498734,0.00014175916,0.00017059658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989047,0.00034479809,0.00021805392,0.00005557636,0.00013021176,0.00034676414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002266496,0.0003000328,0.00040642024,0.0009402959,0.005992727,0.0032354495,0.0005975005,0.00040994538,0.0027984853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019302515,0.00039454177,0.0001861599,0.0006184926,0.002811729,0.0012522164,0.0033330922,0.0010359145,0.00028549967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005883304,0.00060179795,0.12522562,0.00006401205,0.000015770465,0.002070601,0.85034955,0.000054231543,0.002027931,0.0031562615,0.0004220941,0.015953338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009380381,0.00015025679,0.025210366,0.000026268166,0.000009870404,0.000637139,0.96905285,0.000121461846,0.00027147963,0.00040608778,0.004095994,0.000008793465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039708004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129171945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005992727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060782186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009314301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011986494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599222526","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005373","title":"Ten simple rules for short and swift presentations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Swift; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Computational biology; Biology; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11811498226766075,"score_gpt":0.4817494059453741,"score_spread":0.3636344236777133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599222526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065885517,0.0031187956,0.22641768,0.085463524,0.036275294,0.007920545,0.0015271471,0.018203488,0.614485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14028114,0.0031250727,0.33753058,0.055532124,0.017614916,0.019586684,0.001551142,0.012026091,0.41275227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92274356,0.03502501,0.0083802445,0.0064804954,0.022862641,0.0045080977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86403614,0.06343139,0.009527379,0.015730867,0.03556523,0.011708973],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05928201,0.0027170263,0.0010513079,0.0058122613,0.009453496,0.027985409,0.0057427706,0.012611493,0.09658793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22727199,0.0026466239,0.0018244651,0.0029388682,0.008377015,0.030570248,0.013698991,0.011652072,0.10301487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004840486,0.00016783921,0.0009876667,0.00070616807,0.000035968365,0.0005457351,0.0071314527,0.00049350853,0.0016788141,0.3727055,0.50030094,0.114762396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010064413,0.00010824489,0.00039619984,0.00071201735,0.000026731646,0.00036614307,0.0025981378,0.00126673,0.0009330586,0.07265072,0.92070717,0.00013412761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030312552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030357246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00584629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058257403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3231188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604403244","doi":"10.7202/1039173ar","title":"Les usages santé d’Internet par les personnes trans au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Nouvelles pratiques sociales","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14465006958692883,"score_gpt":0.42126922758312924,"score_spread":0.2766191579962004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604403244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887304,0.00085178006,0.00020292611,0.0017837448,0.000028528812,0.000060097074,0.0011509793,0.000009128327,0.0071824207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98766756,0.0017675767,0.0003150535,0.0007045379,0.000009931915,0.000059460468,0.00027056344,0.0000116124365,0.009193724],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988129,0.00020142004,0.000052240466,0.00012703863,0.00038785205,0.00041851425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974268,0.00051678123,0.00030434667,0.000056104338,0.0010354039,0.00066043995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008763958,0.00024398098,0.00041656912,0.0013869954,0.0050029918,0.0028442484,0.00052093994,0.0006230224,0.0051259827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002634171,0.0003080839,0.00033980695,0.0031493127,0.0016273949,0.0009435285,0.0013025544,0.0011227545,0.0003250306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024384221,0.0001681468,0.45992064,0.000379698,0.00006359336,0.0010608066,0.46366096,0.00021682419,0.002196624,0.0026983602,0.0074614016,0.06192914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015773261,0.00014308355,0.5008447,0.00031444174,0.000049268114,0.00029817875,0.4676569,0.00036692948,0.00048611974,0.00022072773,0.029506287,0.00009761722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98804617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020373145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020373145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03714566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14781821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613266707","doi":"","title":"The contextual name generator : a good tool for the study of sociability and socialization","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Generator (circuit theory); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.04019385512695834,"score_gpt":0.3472887523509119,"score_spread":0.30709489722395356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613266707","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019863287,0.0013114628,0.91344386,0.0064204657,0.00056485843,0.00088785414,0.0037034343,0.0036833833,0.05012143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27431256,0.0012807712,0.70012724,0.0016766363,0.0003702791,0.0061008194,0.002169023,0.002134628,0.011828022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98722583,0.010329552,0.00044176457,0.0008616481,0.00095514016,0.0001860222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96682054,0.02545282,0.0013739454,0.0045105927,0.001126878,0.0007152186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011979122,0.0008828031,0.0009537293,0.0069122124,0.0021149525,0.0049190833,0.0015664815,0.0016129621,0.015679669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026517222,0.00056207716,0.0008045323,0.007239762,0.008497865,0.010035371,0.004791314,0.0021728415,0.0018788592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014910618,0.000056158082,0.0038479185,0.00077533675,0.000049153216,0.0002268746,0.04075126,0.00094020227,0.0022699637,0.81200266,0.019759532,0.11917185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009582281,0.00016730324,0.0059932033,0.00075108366,0.000044512264,0.0003572025,0.017402867,0.0057195066,0.0029926645,0.38201907,0.5842831,0.0001735304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028226704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037286582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015679669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022326345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021300705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063352406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742194300","doi":"10.1177/1356389017715719","title":"Using online mining techniques to inform formative evaluations: An analysis of YouTube video comments about chronic pain","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; McGill University","keywords":"Judgement; Formative assessment; Social media; Psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.3269929441657317,"score_gpt":0.5957748917242113,"score_spread":0.26878194755847956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742194300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97251093,0.00040130096,0.016989917,0.0010489393,0.000076150594,0.0014194428,0.0016576176,0.00008473221,0.0058109662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95734966,0.00046269127,0.03492519,0.00024027812,0.00009138456,0.0022457754,0.0017670366,0.00009768965,0.0028202084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816097,0.01277817,0.0012832519,0.0008004969,0.0028717066,0.0006566485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8739744,0.10025244,0.008609301,0.0025211056,0.014009177,0.0006336645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018383125,0.0006639748,0.0005330215,0.0084111085,0.002040406,0.0025949257,0.00091681414,0.00080415374,0.0013876165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08031431,0.00022627252,0.0003552875,0.0062126457,0.0016495513,0.0032108282,0.002036926,0.0006845522,0.0004433678],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064601714,0.0005156174,0.1186904,0.0018215617,0.00011643227,0.0017353016,0.5573323,0.0006258583,0.010510095,0.0034956394,0.0051918984,0.29931885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049975384,0.00069439656,0.29061246,0.0019092273,0.000110706285,0.0010477839,0.6464072,0.011756958,0.010103253,0.006255869,0.030860296,0.00019199023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005431764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0119616445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018383125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00221206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019352086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09722042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742522189","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2017-053264.89","title":"O15.6 Differences in reported testing barriers between clients of an online sti testing service (getcheckedonline.com) and a provincial sti clinic in vancouver, canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health; Fraser Health; University of British Columbia; BC Centre for Disease Control","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Family medicine; Service (business); Test (biology); Service provider","score_opus":0.29037674838114347,"score_gpt":0.4324452866004898,"score_spread":0.14206853821934634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742522189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936674,0.00019206024,0.00007800127,0.00040872628,0.000012533459,0.00009251801,0.0021692077,0.000013707932,0.0033657304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977882,0.00012417565,0.00012594015,0.00014417972,0.000003880102,0.00004809579,0.00059692,0.000008355667,0.0011602333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974661,0.00022634046,0.0001879317,0.00027625382,0.00060380134,0.0012396888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957684,0.0004807652,0.0010291832,0.0000894554,0.0011832357,0.0014489524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008855505,0.00031737625,0.0005276994,0.0012512881,0.0027744398,0.0021909187,0.0016710358,0.00064480276,0.0076687513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004423925,0.00047478592,0.0006864609,0.0026697018,0.0011558298,0.00074203254,0.0013751928,0.0010788589,0.0006071418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006635135,0.000092545284,0.9905605,0.000053630465,0.000026898742,0.00007013936,0.003063833,0.00004125967,0.00015743056,0.00005589438,0.0011488848,0.0046626604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009382998,0.00004695048,0.9852726,0.000059926097,0.000014395518,0.000082664024,0.013699813,0.00020083325,0.000053661744,0.000017008215,0.0005315886,0.000011183733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9706857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97866315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02931428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012424453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019472737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090146124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743035829","doi":"","title":"Internet-based health promotion programs for sexual minorities in Canada: A study of the components, objectives and future developments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Promotion (chess); Computer science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.06415491168995592,"score_gpt":0.3260487385634035,"score_spread":0.2618938268734476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743035829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913919,0.0019697158,0.0001344174,0.0018677016,0.000029858697,0.0006886221,0.000393474,0.000010782128,0.0035134533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99214536,0.003043098,0.0011853644,0.0007052348,0.000013158355,0.00030748197,0.00022566899,0.000006439922,0.002368337],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705887,0.00064177654,0.00013233771,0.00016954618,0.0009400796,0.0010575402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925338,0.0011083854,0.0007119821,0.0001064893,0.0022613886,0.0032779812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032194422,0.00040306424,0.0005480413,0.0021977518,0.0071344613,0.0033032026,0.0015806908,0.00079895183,0.0029971958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008003486,0.00045478932,0.00043867744,0.0051674442,0.0017030258,0.0010418573,0.0025633678,0.0015800949,0.00015503293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011265293,0.005924897,0.58858186,0.0019244552,0.00011268951,0.00059949746,0.1278267,0.0002572931,0.001938517,0.0021773,0.003244664,0.26628563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000212062,0.00087667385,0.81455475,0.000990897,0.00018873582,0.000104742394,0.17180203,0.000569338,0.0006905916,0.00021319819,0.009722954,0.00007407443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99389255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07167019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07167019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2377283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52000606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748679506","doi":"10.29173/cjs29343","title":"Salmons, Janet E., Doing Qualitative Research Online.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Qualitative research; Media studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.5209077578966099,"score_gpt":0.6301779747490572,"score_spread":0.10927021685244731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748679506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020039152,0.05872824,0.21469638,0.53360337,0.028733324,0.02178313,0.0042428747,0.0020529418,0.116120555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12554543,0.057628553,0.50864553,0.14677587,0.0017174972,0.06260051,0.0015058425,0.0020027205,0.093578056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96730477,0.02753334,0.0011163723,0.00095349376,0.0025866043,0.0005055569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9325131,0.050733734,0.0018085107,0.0026354697,0.009232716,0.0030764567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044720493,0.0012491256,0.0010236611,0.0033596968,0.011302873,0.0055782455,0.002351156,0.0035082062,0.008670881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08023435,0.0017852877,0.0009228214,0.0061257184,0.012207816,0.008584069,0.0065674996,0.01144952,0.003317792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066495406,0.00014016434,0.00078708905,0.0032182992,0.00002943481,0.00066195906,0.29925242,0.00027736355,0.0014713638,0.037439372,0.5271897,0.12946633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005162572,0.00009529915,0.0008741219,0.005142278,0.000023318362,0.00059610954,0.13433953,0.00039135225,0.0006094096,0.03462566,0.823163,0.00008824378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010156624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028913712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019690445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23650736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753671867","doi":"","title":"Mapping the sexuality-health-technology nexus : an arts based exploration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Human sexuality; The arts; Computer science; Sociology; Visual arts; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.2439911754714813,"score_gpt":0.4671478077833031,"score_spread":0.2231566323118218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753671867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86183643,0.0016466625,0.02278782,0.0072047305,0.000108944856,0.0003972633,0.00047865525,0.00007059162,0.10546899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98177826,0.0013341038,0.006492633,0.00040581956,0.000024272893,0.000179875,0.0000814634,0.00005148878,0.009652154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971379,0.0021444939,0.000035956233,0.00016294266,0.00028229353,0.00023650702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541026,0.0039053692,0.00016611992,0.00021412275,0.000121151264,0.0001829525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043114647,0.0003917726,0.00028686144,0.0026765703,0.0072543733,0.00614684,0.00094545516,0.001049528,0.00626551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047300723,0.00032565495,0.00036318426,0.0024369946,0.018519646,0.0059543927,0.0070297993,0.0017949098,0.0003712175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029615638,0.000032474745,0.0020017955,0.00015061018,0.000004744136,0.00053127855,0.9466501,0.00018329441,0.0010529057,0.030565286,0.0010380227,0.01775989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000488786,0.000023082024,0.0022678208,0.00020407351,0.0000050098124,0.00026738987,0.9554962,0.0002504203,0.0006026085,0.007118187,0.033751138,0.000009264319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009808169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019102933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009808169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003150211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030559886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022856474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W275598541","doi":"10.1177/070674370705201110","title":"Book Review: Mental Health Research, Choosing Methods in Mental Health Research: Mental Health Research from Theory to Practice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.41226064671363954,"score_gpt":0.6478442132560607,"score_spread":0.23558356654242113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W275598541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024291057,0.76321363,0.0026394248,0.05157266,0.12784624,0.00095354434,0.0017892518,0.0005958507,0.051146414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020273759,0.7308685,0.005076833,0.04173565,0.06008008,0.0014298285,0.0030210235,0.00063050207,0.15513018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957104,0.0008973185,0.00046990777,0.00040009772,0.002357247,0.00016506252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980368,0.009760927,0.001594634,0.00045498234,0.0068515614,0.0009698979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030220784,0.002463607,0.003962434,0.0065202657,0.0014861666,0.00950731,0.0027448456,0.003416391,0.065283686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024633579,0.0013407819,0.0016013271,0.014118724,0.0018913148,0.0069919564,0.0019671426,0.005982122,0.053038366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064245805,0.0000072834487,0.000020386806,0.0016838078,0.00000953025,0.000017102471,0.000045426405,0.000040083996,0.00003186654,0.00058382284,0.97526973,0.022284627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018932056,0.000020344749,0.0002934729,0.0057890923,0.000022511747,0.0002569612,0.000087563996,0.000058938353,0.000034523586,0.001821227,0.99157375,0.000022517908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043491595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008053785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065283686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031182393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008753949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21839571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757742546","doi":"10.1177/1468794117731510","title":"Using internet data sources to achieve qualitative interviewing purposes: a research note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Toronto","funders":"School for Public Health Research","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; The Internet; Social media; Qualitative property; Face (sociological concept); Internet research; Psychology; Medical education; Semi-structured interview; Applied psychology; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.948765234674034,"score_gpt":0.8017038590496283,"score_spread":0.1470613756244057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757742546","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06766891,0.00443057,0.83362323,0.04147008,0.00147474,0.026429694,0.0006003843,0.00042966826,0.023872664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15663649,0.004065426,0.803063,0.0046782484,0.00030272725,0.02862271,0.00026830635,0.00036337093,0.0019997726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6216946,0.33079123,0.018173099,0.006580313,0.020428473,0.0023322129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3992311,0.49093187,0.011325456,0.045059778,0.050086327,0.0033654734],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33216938,0.0013451383,0.0009870566,0.005691339,0.011701731,0.012770046,0.0036153588,0.0037954615,0.0030260852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29903328,0.0019477024,0.0010953404,0.00886669,0.016421005,0.022732506,0.013349928,0.005607042,0.0017159415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035961336,0.0009823798,0.01234713,0.007933802,0.000081261416,0.0026242605,0.54228306,0.00100095,0.018799728,0.10266168,0.009215427,0.30171075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016989082,0.0010561651,0.0054882867,0.016997404,0.00010547382,0.0038745576,0.5733409,0.0066512916,0.022161126,0.05571163,0.3141086,0.00033462787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003821596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006342124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6678306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006709349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016596057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82355404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767125809","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2017.25253","title":"Social Media Technology and Public Health in Ontario: Findings from a Planning Meeting Exploring Current Practices and Future Research Directions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fanshawe College; London Health Sciences Centre; Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Social media; Health promotion; Public health; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Business; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.8602958349278383,"score_gpt":0.5701161104781505,"score_spread":0.29017972444968787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767125809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340648,0.0039718286,0.00086080644,0.027118215,0.00008821999,0.0014563818,0.00082639896,0.000050090366,0.031563394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98091745,0.0056992276,0.002217978,0.0012822552,0.00003154274,0.0010186788,0.0002518009,0.000024583624,0.008556439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947635,0.0018511103,0.00025129295,0.00031370993,0.0011562849,0.0016640841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98243815,0.0083760945,0.0017557573,0.0003800642,0.0036551515,0.0033947132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008640746,0.0004223096,0.00045691352,0.0027787786,0.017894186,0.0059572696,0.001777828,0.0015825884,0.003568201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014428467,0.00073729013,0.0004892302,0.007847494,0.0048629637,0.003166524,0.0053604688,0.0018699444,0.0002486854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082926425,0.00014545965,0.042684168,0.0010365457,0.000011573405,0.0012151441,0.90617,0.0001359872,0.00088404835,0.001535315,0.003387878,0.04271083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009423275,0.00006123489,0.044389457,0.00040992495,0.0000119066835,0.000064561435,0.93497884,0.00009511,0.0001332394,0.00021331065,0.019606195,0.000026800364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93574846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9698178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077720866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077720866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20161352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.563907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783812639","doi":"10.1177/1609406917750781","title":"Two Approaches to Focus Group Data Collection for Qualitative Health Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Data collection; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Focus (optics); Health care; Psychology; Medical education; Public relations; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.9661504552524623,"score_gpt":0.7756787073041846,"score_spread":0.1904717479482777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783812639","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042618173,0.0011519511,0.89675486,0.005639848,0.0013227586,0.07550444,0.0010678413,0.0004482871,0.013848195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009476967,0.0004100577,0.819426,0.0016783985,0.00011892119,0.16635321,0.00024833714,0.00020440089,0.0020838215],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5687711,0.3694707,0.01637602,0.017808637,0.024191542,0.0033819894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66999644,0.20194045,0.017378958,0.049038973,0.057238378,0.0044068606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25470498,0.0033877431,0.0028376724,0.013637207,0.010783209,0.009191765,0.007660682,0.0077848746,0.02506704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34292963,0.004262649,0.0033282738,0.011310986,0.019623939,0.010139807,0.020730047,0.011861311,0.0064349156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007850014,0.00092289137,0.00201065,0.0109829735,0.00024620214,0.00036694313,0.28785527,0.0012735258,0.0070598195,0.30260605,0.028931653,0.35695907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024283945,0.0015835233,0.0038237325,0.014214275,0.00030525977,0.0012938424,0.11497014,0.0053863088,0.010991664,0.21055695,0.63349557,0.00095038634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068977014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010709524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74529505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01229104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026214786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91908145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783852736","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.010","title":"Proposal to Expand UWALK’s Reach in Rural Alberta Communities ( poster )","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport & Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Health promotion; Community engagement; Context (archaeology); Promotion (chess); Work (physics); eHealth; Community health; Rural area; Business; Public health; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Health care; Geography; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.09668499551991487,"score_gpt":0.45832274106423565,"score_spread":0.36163774554432077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783852736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18140472,0.0022494395,0.009072429,0.54660636,0.028981024,0.015369667,0.002103901,0.0012434237,0.2129691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27984902,0.0010651408,0.01782199,0.23296857,0.0018292712,0.011417936,0.001191901,0.00015500464,0.45370123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649626,0.00058552186,0.000058383263,0.00023896036,0.00065845996,0.0019624408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950666,0.0011808979,0.000115712166,0.0002163112,0.0012899168,0.0076905144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006206669,0.00047374074,0.00021851128,0.0005957346,0.010784903,0.0035139453,0.0034274533,0.014464763,0.032218497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008526765,0.0004966529,0.00078272016,0.000502973,0.0023485527,0.0018437471,0.007049819,0.00754034,0.0029094962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065471005,0.0014690047,0.010343702,0.00069412077,0.000034574296,0.0032322712,0.018833278,0.0013457782,0.008071235,0.019319,0.8076157,0.12838669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005995059,0.00091148185,0.05133451,0.0005817963,0.00007611395,0.00040221104,0.062243324,0.0007548776,0.0023414965,0.0040303874,0.8765879,0.00013629475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42063957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6510776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5793604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089769745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08400406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8363824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784605118","doi":"10.36510/learnland.v11i1.933","title":"Journeys to Teaching Qualitative Research Methods Online","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LEARNing Landscapes","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Qualitative research; Online teaching; Graduate students; Narrative inquiry; Online community; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2969986823202509,"score_gpt":0.6468285375625493,"score_spread":0.3498298552422984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784605118","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18091221,0.011378464,0.42403018,0.14656875,0.0034444877,0.013912507,0.003351192,0.0011505757,0.21525162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40200377,0.010859902,0.48013633,0.010305522,0.00040485503,0.02799321,0.0011815146,0.0006661726,0.06644869],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.955691,0.038336337,0.0009990489,0.0012490302,0.0024813106,0.0012433334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9216872,0.06282768,0.0016907203,0.0041743033,0.005129819,0.0044902526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073747076,0.00057857955,0.00061247434,0.0020101,0.010786511,0.010925439,0.0022402038,0.002168803,0.025759337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065654635,0.0009368177,0.00076689944,0.0019876994,0.0078562945,0.0051868577,0.008613817,0.004959783,0.003613746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016702495,0.00036743438,0.0021468312,0.001260653,0.000030833104,0.0010178671,0.6248235,0.00071132823,0.0026526137,0.11988069,0.02146899,0.22547218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064636544,0.00028863203,0.0013287949,0.0022502206,0.000020779513,0.0011140583,0.38442048,0.0009878734,0.0017287023,0.10367072,0.5040308,0.00009433989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038807916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009743468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073747076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061002267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01617604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3900165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790099260","doi":"10.5072/prism/10532","title":"Using Case Study Methodology to Evaluate E-Health","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.8711351363418186,"score_gpt":0.6760701345595459,"score_spread":0.1950650017822727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790099260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7025742,0.011379882,0.13456793,0.021583408,0.0018173184,0.019819612,0.000909691,0.00019695479,0.107151054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.744824,0.0075213527,0.22317533,0.0023807124,0.00018415801,0.007437215,0.0004316895,0.00009716002,0.013948321],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9561613,0.03730004,0.0011943406,0.00070572965,0.0038387994,0.0007996972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500941,0.037292074,0.0022823378,0.001652569,0.007582775,0.0010962192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043675803,0.00094335224,0.00050319574,0.0037859448,0.0043110163,0.0046262937,0.0018509738,0.0023434055,0.0057519944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044237085,0.00048492604,0.0005948594,0.002935824,0.00283566,0.0044483356,0.00503885,0.0013620703,0.00081444974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001222894,0.005288212,0.026482902,0.0076306844,0.0003499769,0.010047957,0.26858643,0.00444208,0.014609926,0.054882273,0.029567229,0.57688934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000688107,0.0062118205,0.018402094,0.011126543,0.00044957804,0.0056078355,0.6081139,0.010246396,0.025596969,0.031723395,0.28149456,0.00033883913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030767007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008750495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044212486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035260043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23098242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794181429","doi":"10.1002/asi.24012","title":"Information triangulation: A complex and agentic everyday information practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Children's Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Agency (philosophy); Information seeking; Everyday life; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Information system; Sociology; Data science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Social science; Information retrieval; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040186331511434005,"score_gpt":0.39771132655834696,"score_spread":0.35752499504691293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794181429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48240998,0.008050044,0.37864366,0.053169966,0.0007945237,0.002299605,0.0001957913,0.0005352501,0.07390113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9153802,0.0021441446,0.0766544,0.00229917,0.00014250734,0.00077143946,0.0000867081,0.00012165387,0.0023998457],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.66330886,0.28093147,0.011408445,0.010350233,0.029826757,0.0041742558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69094616,0.241534,0.022801366,0.026627548,0.013799509,0.004291475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13496283,0.0008376681,0.0017760321,0.008978095,0.026168631,0.019323586,0.005087038,0.005797899,0.0025362691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18160497,0.002135526,0.0015119769,0.0077353003,0.06010331,0.023485903,0.022833556,0.0064275237,0.0004966006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052426618,0.00007014567,0.01129894,0.00087892526,0.00009816772,0.0013328287,0.8615815,0.00044511846,0.0009918684,0.07031985,0.0018884548,0.05104186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055981654,0.00019689315,0.005842186,0.002752407,0.00008435158,0.002357197,0.67182106,0.0020540375,0.0011633731,0.19882138,0.11460221,0.00024888865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083773555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00964215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13496283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012242705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018493043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71376014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800827494","doi":"10.1177/2050157918764215","title":"Mobile methods: Explorations, innovations, and reflections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mobile Media & Communication","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Data science; Mobile device; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17577769074885935,"score_gpt":0.5298227091944333,"score_spread":0.35404501844557396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800827494","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06513545,0.20587513,0.25403666,0.22575444,0.02880444,0.005220811,0.0007021244,0.0007815396,0.21368937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3696255,0.24164835,0.25259483,0.04617882,0.0115560405,0.012617583,0.00049528136,0.0016595768,0.06362404],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95866716,0.033077903,0.0011623991,0.0012241167,0.00458019,0.0012882588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92262906,0.06640661,0.0012299549,0.0031314562,0.004848254,0.0017546556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0594942,0.0013587213,0.0008516321,0.00525034,0.0069881305,0.014415059,0.0027520629,0.0037809648,0.005984306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061282076,0.00083063694,0.0008611813,0.0048420653,0.016881064,0.018864593,0.009750537,0.00728994,0.0020589072],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121765865,0.0002042361,0.001160739,0.004852423,0.000031215088,0.00090696354,0.40166077,0.00021443663,0.0014414013,0.25488007,0.04777706,0.28674892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002000851,0.00014958203,0.00056647137,0.00815702,0.000020137075,0.00093595474,0.17734364,0.0002670958,0.0012614637,0.043700326,0.7675243,0.00005393485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011337396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001851195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0594942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060945717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00761212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31463915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883405865","doi":"10.1177/1609406918788203","title":"Ethical, Practical, and Methodological Considerations for Unobtrusive Qualitative Research About Personal Narratives Shared on the Internet","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Popularity; The Internet; Ethical issues; Narrative; Diligence; Due diligence; Psychology; Informed consent; Research ethics; Internet research; Internet privacy; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.9160692370572425,"score_gpt":0.7703199511312407,"score_spread":0.14574928592600178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883405865","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055846352,0.00663665,0.59919184,0.16372518,0.0076723206,0.1307537,0.0009026466,0.0005253492,0.034745943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15628795,0.0025635478,0.53301245,0.019296452,0.0007845564,0.28304958,0.00024383415,0.00026316353,0.004498523],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.29784796,0.6554812,0.018205427,0.0064634923,0.017946802,0.004055105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34872603,0.55086184,0.014133384,0.05506804,0.024557315,0.006653421],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52007145,0.0024278827,0.0028365015,0.006299455,0.019323757,0.018321933,0.007445983,0.010673039,0.008931638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53769356,0.003108237,0.0017092485,0.007923546,0.0569647,0.013261378,0.013862261,0.0122455135,0.002993959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083035167,0.0005695826,0.0022333176,0.005186032,0.000065580345,0.0020775597,0.62265164,0.001298855,0.0039712456,0.28387156,0.020141475,0.057102866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005474645,0.0005115157,0.0012657281,0.019726137,0.00011027922,0.0028012225,0.2948856,0.0046694055,0.0058542583,0.39174554,0.27761784,0.00026497713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039089597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011034261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47992855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009464831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040302724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5918374},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2889284558","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2018.05.009","title":"Using a Marketing Evaluation Tool to Optimize a Social Marketing Campaign: Insights From a Copy Test of a You're the Mom Campaign Ad","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social marketing; Test (biology); Marketing; Advertising; Business; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.12375208429768268,"score_gpt":0.45953106571735264,"score_spread":0.33577898141966994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889284558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657431,0.00009044592,0.006594861,0.0020252224,0.00009796049,0.0015687811,0.0001720543,0.0002579055,0.023449523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95657164,0.000098002754,0.030807309,0.0006249392,0.000035285502,0.0012421906,0.00017525782,0.00016966982,0.010275819],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830687,0.012021294,0.0006155419,0.00045918845,0.0030865052,0.00074887153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9086313,0.071739055,0.003152706,0.0026930443,0.0107223345,0.0030614978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027573721,0.0006422367,0.00052346976,0.0018853247,0.0034714064,0.004725027,0.0012213826,0.0013523033,0.006004981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071083486,0.00049689744,0.00033684922,0.0008435899,0.0015241106,0.0032595277,0.0017724009,0.0018448822,0.0009927172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017362036,0.02039797,0.07820782,0.0010433606,0.00011009736,0.0008985418,0.21046883,0.0013694424,0.017472245,0.005069847,0.023529015,0.63969666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009377475,0.02237294,0.30018818,0.0020537837,0.00060741964,0.0013281298,0.4228697,0.022588447,0.04766305,0.0085995775,0.17003068,0.00076030596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030507674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010109667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027573721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003974612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054204925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1458255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902193267","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-95300-7_4","title":"Online Qualitative Methods: Confronting New Possibilities and Challenges Within a Social Justice Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Online and offline; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.43296103891490256,"score_gpt":0.5505926665934496,"score_spread":0.11763162767854707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902193267","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045742537,0.051191945,0.4991975,0.31552085,0.013501472,0.001189379,0.0006798599,0.0007834384,0.113361254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09389262,0.05989149,0.66135657,0.08263153,0.010454409,0.014675209,0.00071688136,0.0023696998,0.07401161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8588977,0.12543987,0.0020721154,0.0018472133,0.010619116,0.001124011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46223372,0.5116912,0.0030015307,0.01005181,0.010177273,0.002844491],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19467151,0.0013466104,0.0018145803,0.004380417,0.007638754,0.020041274,0.007965838,0.008220175,0.021361202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14307895,0.0011290094,0.00077389803,0.0048994296,0.035089966,0.032629117,0.017775686,0.010812618,0.0040668203],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032836528,0.00011390986,0.0003609461,0.0023132814,0.000019773452,0.00016818111,0.06981541,0.00023802879,0.0005059675,0.6599807,0.07072972,0.19572122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018991155,0.000028805736,0.00023550939,0.004717221,0.000014164861,0.0003010564,0.034484405,0.00082046294,0.00063497724,0.55174345,0.40695813,0.000042809967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002815008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01175095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19467151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008255447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019772511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903367551","doi":"10.1177/1473325018811479","title":"How Twitter is changing the meaning of scholarly impact and engagement: Implications for qualitative social work research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Social Work","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Sociology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Meaning (existential); Realm; Social science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.5199327728369224,"score_gpt":0.6084142894964955,"score_spread":0.08848151665957305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903367551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64220196,0.010909895,0.0986434,0.18063846,0.0020739695,0.006570439,0.0014102722,0.00018958817,0.05736207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945961,0.004441604,0.025921095,0.009990204,0.000206811,0.009748963,0.00015368992,0.00015354811,0.0034231804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7525379,0.22837852,0.0061502433,0.0031167723,0.005657703,0.0041588545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67478454,0.29962116,0.007462964,0.0067548016,0.008767783,0.0026088164],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19992664,0.0007800266,0.0012072956,0.0061970064,0.019169493,0.021383042,0.0034659542,0.0043790634,0.005266905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21987167,0.0011133983,0.0011159201,0.008978994,0.03916509,0.022857012,0.016856954,0.0043732356,0.0005098819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006560936,0.000051343988,0.0033831627,0.00091656216,0.000019742893,0.00029346815,0.9518446,0.00011100196,0.00036552077,0.029927902,0.0009866976,0.0120343575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017220329,0.0000359308,0.0009883967,0.0013953119,0.00002106694,0.00009316337,0.9656255,0.00027490692,0.00043392202,0.017962925,0.013122076,0.000029582856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009766143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016108768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99380296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141312145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017876009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912911520","doi":"10.1177/1077800418806599","title":"Situating Ethics in Online Mourning Research: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Qualitative Inquiry","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Performative utterance; Social media; Research ethics; Relation (database); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.9687688704303841,"score_gpt":0.8167911176812904,"score_spread":0.15197775274909364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912911520","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007630758,0.9955538,0.00095283333,0.001021455,0.00019685735,0.00010685703,0.000035584566,0.00000711316,0.0013624199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00778702,0.98961264,0.0016091836,0.0004174884,0.00008952861,0.0002606307,0.000066865636,0.000012586191,0.00014399366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745105,0.012385014,0.0065539125,0.0016300735,0.0043766377,0.0005439214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80108255,0.17735232,0.007616088,0.0029841228,0.010286632,0.0006782854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037645034,0.001250671,0.0033056808,0.02164805,0.0021010393,0.007018505,0.0020834247,0.003264691,0.0030440832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12682562,0.0014034617,0.0021753989,0.025955923,0.0060846033,0.008942121,0.004435689,0.003160422,0.00069506455],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008002037,0.00008649542,0.0012338209,0.4129767,0.0004931903,0.00029545807,0.010418404,0.00040168158,0.00046412804,0.017435016,0.006227528,0.5498876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012800774,0.000054277076,0.0015752228,0.8342786,0.0008528073,0.00045963976,0.008294297,0.00011558048,0.00035144502,0.0059914575,0.14797525,0.00003872155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006591764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010091273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99673533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004994994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02358833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19908834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914049131","doi":"","title":"Normalizing Masculinity: Explaining Processes, Factors, and Contexts That Influence How Rural Male Farmers Seek Health Information in Southwest Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Geography","score_opus":0.13074926541885987,"score_gpt":0.3707915966362659,"score_spread":0.240042331217406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914049131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666963,0.0012046751,0.000661111,0.0034142728,0.000021064894,0.0000989264,0.000114684415,0.000008971229,0.02777985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950552,0.0013068167,0.00042840416,0.00016979066,0.000004957178,0.000031889576,0.00003739265,0.000005688481,0.0029598281],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984682,0.00052604504,0.000053120253,0.0001632525,0.0004502616,0.00033903474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688476,0.0013191595,0.00085163745,0.000103900486,0.000538977,0.00030168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025920207,0.00037003367,0.00025339157,0.0013480476,0.007636451,0.0038275442,0.0008771206,0.00046835016,0.0027746959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056553106,0.00030855305,0.00028228882,0.0018378936,0.007162283,0.0015410725,0.0020617945,0.00058701937,0.00014127752],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050332907,0.00007799246,0.25307345,0.00033660672,0.000034252742,0.00072096125,0.6866081,0.000340046,0.0010194349,0.023660555,0.0024632348,0.031615064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013183251,0.000056550307,0.36813587,0.0005243813,0.00005840392,0.00014314974,0.5785853,0.0011486013,0.00047880542,0.0048035025,0.04601307,0.00003918336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82724863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9162156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17275137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03295262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049143262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34753746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920142151","doi":"10.1075/sar.17017.dre","title":"The methodological affordances and challenges of using Facebook to research study abroad","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Social media; Context (archaeology); Download; Data collection; Identity (music); Observational study; Focus (optics); Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science; Human–computer interaction; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.47921426295454495,"score_gpt":0.6414298851509322,"score_spread":0.1622156221963873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920142151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6977062,0.008828688,0.1564642,0.06282042,0.0017376423,0.004719025,0.0008083007,0.00028125843,0.0666342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94959444,0.001871854,0.035284694,0.0029012049,0.00028158657,0.008246548,0.00009245059,0.00013941382,0.0015877351],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.57145387,0.39717135,0.011288949,0.0059119524,0.010783195,0.0033907117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48151457,0.4309502,0.020650003,0.04054132,0.020448681,0.005895176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2643184,0.0008910788,0.0014108751,0.00608876,0.017177539,0.020040367,0.0038972301,0.002745825,0.0061751013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32100382,0.0016076067,0.0008059154,0.005592574,0.028607488,0.017487308,0.017199995,0.0034162756,0.00085887074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001922465,0.00018176224,0.0243801,0.0024466845,0.000094562136,0.00083272834,0.8661521,0.0004056844,0.0022477396,0.040006198,0.0026444185,0.060415726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049621143,0.00020415414,0.008944772,0.004330678,0.00007404458,0.0007825043,0.90680605,0.0008381758,0.0016588152,0.025020575,0.051177442,0.00011319939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074370373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012394695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2643184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006611433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008445851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9072264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922107846","doi":"10.5539/jms.v9n1p55","title":"The Challenges of Implementing e-Health Technology for Sustainability in Brazil","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management and Sustainability","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal da Paraíba; McMaster University","keywords":"Sustainability; Social sustainability; Sustainability organizations; Sustainability science; Health care; Engineering ethics; Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Engineering; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.03473083954992382,"score_gpt":0.43468270749670124,"score_spread":0.3999518679467774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922107846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29468238,0.016896991,0.030258298,0.5148264,0.0005843204,0.001193309,0.00024361163,0.00017940436,0.14113536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97101676,0.0051136515,0.0130981775,0.0075493217,0.00005607018,0.00028408607,0.00003917407,0.000029871087,0.002812786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738496,0.019783933,0.0010581984,0.0007536126,0.0028060295,0.0017485654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781854,0.013688982,0.0015597426,0.0012285085,0.0038528054,0.0014845588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028975813,0.00031044235,0.00038402583,0.0007984275,0.0033616263,0.007093002,0.0017151388,0.0029274917,0.0024244045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03973715,0.00031609708,0.0006263106,0.0012810663,0.00477143,0.0055959425,0.006868838,0.0021769395,0.0002580635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000872382,0.00043576362,0.033825908,0.0040447554,0.00009999973,0.0021532718,0.1091245,0.00413548,0.0058542546,0.45461866,0.012838475,0.37278166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079042205,0.00060038595,0.038368728,0.010282203,0.00014204088,0.00157613,0.23825625,0.008251973,0.0038918534,0.16361429,0.5347805,0.0001565818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027987447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025880165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028975813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008402868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031347923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15324056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922113906","doi":"10.1177/1609406919833482","title":"Connecting With Clinicians: Developing the 5-Min Digital Download to Advance Interpretive Description in Health-Care Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Digital health; Software deployment; Health care; Task (project management); Qualitative research; Medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Data collection; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5356129399833572,"score_gpt":0.6807458931631312,"score_spread":0.14513295317977393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922113906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14770722,0.0017640685,0.7471222,0.019504707,0.0017774347,0.03334129,0.0028566208,0.00403968,0.041886687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10716686,0.00093893125,0.8533994,0.0017325395,0.0001450062,0.03252191,0.00049212575,0.0004301523,0.0031731494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91012275,0.07992047,0.0037140152,0.0020811546,0.0031321917,0.0010294247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74337596,0.22397241,0.0058608623,0.013518426,0.009795563,0.003476719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102356,0.0012396212,0.00078646926,0.004329483,0.00372416,0.006331486,0.0027400572,0.0024423376,0.011739957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19939266,0.0014513107,0.0011641136,0.0029261755,0.0061232974,0.011391356,0.015264619,0.0027099266,0.0035930222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042667205,0.00051565253,0.006173495,0.005676859,0.000043959164,0.00084592775,0.46987927,0.0006598785,0.0061516208,0.01647101,0.024295792,0.4688598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006638754,0.0014667354,0.011440318,0.011852366,0.00012239165,0.002331759,0.4109727,0.0042855497,0.009040785,0.057099946,0.4902668,0.0004567721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000857682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003008705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035719802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008612168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54131675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2928492842","doi":"10.1080/1743727x.2019.1594183","title":"Extending the online focus group method using web-based conferencing to explore older adults online learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Focus group; Online discussion; Bridging (networking); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Moderation; World Wide Web; Exploratory research; Data collection; Computer-mediated communication; The Internet; Multimedia; Sociology","score_opus":0.22327453331824995,"score_gpt":0.5989652625985435,"score_spread":0.37569072928029357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2928492842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52225983,0.0009116162,0.39326972,0.002892311,0.00063286576,0.02932607,0.00057283323,0.00041635378,0.04971839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5967893,0.0010289613,0.34562477,0.0016260988,0.00024349136,0.043595918,0.00019919188,0.000082968094,0.010809306],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98829824,0.0089540845,0.00035080937,0.0007428285,0.0011734192,0.00048058043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781758,0.016754182,0.00087385834,0.0015500983,0.0020847148,0.0005612922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023439163,0.0007394074,0.00042741912,0.0034487364,0.0035412281,0.0020433043,0.0016405947,0.0012036883,0.0064186654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022730608,0.00039774436,0.0005603488,0.0013945198,0.0027876548,0.0034005225,0.0042657265,0.0010813402,0.0009585964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039098764,0.001709716,0.009560056,0.0015376832,0.000054281212,0.00082794274,0.52352107,0.0004714689,0.014288518,0.02077871,0.003069998,0.42378965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013801679,0.0057804133,0.04702697,0.003990338,0.00027238936,0.0027984153,0.5123127,0.0050629335,0.041486792,0.07678731,0.30266088,0.00044067993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00348789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007457794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023439163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016069639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004513697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12395966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929139003","doi":"10.1177/1525822x19838237","title":"A Team-based Approach to Open Coding: Considerations for Creating Intercoder Consensus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Field Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":461,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Central Michigan University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Computer science; Coding (social sciences); Thematic analysis; Qualitative research; Dependability; Iterative and incremental development; Focus group; Data science; Qualitative property; Variety (cybernetics); Axial coding; Knowledge management; Management science; Grounded theory; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.30536693910515106,"score_gpt":0.5467882379020462,"score_spread":0.24142129879689517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929139003","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008388423,0.0008777668,0.9495333,0.013632309,0.0020078442,0.01283684,0.00013112518,0.00048278924,0.0121097285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06218125,0.00056248764,0.8865279,0.0027365503,0.00039738577,0.04517781,0.00020869545,0.00050218,0.0017057733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.102799475,0.7643957,0.058042035,0.015835628,0.055334415,0.0035927142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1250225,0.5158402,0.03083812,0.0848164,0.23494875,0.008534038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.70348895,0.003330106,0.0043566944,0.02155676,0.023911472,0.023863258,0.014293974,0.009750988,0.0054639187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.78758305,0.0039798273,0.0037920177,0.01686564,0.03447567,0.025939714,0.040430043,0.01691133,0.0033547238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045067052,0.00026849692,0.004646435,0.0047132904,0.00044078406,0.00096388947,0.37918183,0.003024191,0.0037981567,0.3059198,0.019750092,0.27684236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005760201,0.0007236869,0.0035430372,0.02133907,0.00024463912,0.0016832411,0.14682627,0.036141746,0.0059395,0.5898891,0.19217397,0.0009196387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009560365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011209968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29651105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022680957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07113817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36565095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941853769","doi":"10.1177/1461444819837715","title":"Pics, Dicks, Tits, and Tats: negotiating ethics working with images of bodies in social media research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Media & Society","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Negotiation; Research ethics; Ethics of care; Informed consent; Information ethics; Sociology; Digital media; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Political science; Social science; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.3381640453559026,"score_gpt":0.4859006517324127,"score_spread":0.1477366063765101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941853769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45070234,0.013529381,0.11230697,0.23924088,0.0022796337,0.0007816921,0.000056718214,0.00017537655,0.18092702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736298,0.0019886645,0.0136377355,0.0052799974,0.00015070394,0.00038451265,0.000009718925,0.00008737119,0.004831604],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80053437,0.18596959,0.0020536415,0.0021635327,0.006537594,0.0027412674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86415416,0.119223475,0.004346684,0.003936964,0.004432733,0.0039059499],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10230572,0.0006391329,0.0006748012,0.0035161749,0.028935203,0.019701613,0.002179151,0.0056999503,0.0027991775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12373378,0.0012325998,0.0006055999,0.0023231194,0.10525449,0.025325801,0.019814098,0.008134791,0.00042193354],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002015465,0.000020131463,0.0010688305,0.00011985635,0.00001116948,0.00041080426,0.8573684,0.000073628355,0.00021869209,0.1266119,0.0026539143,0.011422565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023551138,0.000043014727,0.0008599721,0.00065823295,0.000022965594,0.00070229225,0.81806165,0.000402662,0.00062453485,0.101122394,0.07743098,0.000047764726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005798413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007338469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99430007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008518484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016284999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5410508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945654368","doi":"10.22148/16.038","title":"Towards A Queer Futurity of Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Queer; Sociology; Public relations; Focus (optics); Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2116111665954851,"score_gpt":0.48081158512408123,"score_spread":0.2692004185285961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945654368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001384251,0.0030516481,0.028325481,0.93173885,0.005688352,0.000088616434,0.00024362166,0.00022358263,0.029255671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15726475,0.006255421,0.050327633,0.6960661,0.012890193,0.0012351279,0.00069043605,0.0011980355,0.07407228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.77473414,0.1592292,0.0064967303,0.019754563,0.032725625,0.0070597674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4302169,0.44216305,0.009899144,0.06530564,0.040202614,0.01221259],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.30990985,0.0009884646,0.002212323,0.005723784,0.026821714,0.047660865,0.008621716,0.0316979,0.024284333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43269295,0.0019295306,0.0022635541,0.005348596,0.11213197,0.087850355,0.028793374,0.07744313,0.008477548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061159175,0.0000248359,0.00035163946,0.00011958957,0.000024536534,0.00020296866,0.012654542,0.00008234797,0.0001282906,0.87110794,0.10245406,0.012788115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004865607,0.000031632015,0.0001386208,0.00092348945,0.00001716213,0.00023703703,0.008248232,0.0003940614,0.00046973772,0.5075893,0.48184106,0.00006110362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011019666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011479181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97317827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015922343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030295094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.851004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951103683","doi":"10.1177/1359105319855120","title":"Strengthening behavioral clinical trials with online qualitative research methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Psychology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Affordance; Clinical trial; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Psychology; Translational research; Behavioural sciences; Applied psychology; Research design; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.9139382028970182,"score_gpt":0.8565507380226676,"score_spread":0.05738746487435065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951103683","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013039326,0.0054379767,0.7331552,0.0396041,0.0032487642,0.18236901,0.0011846885,0.0010486693,0.020912312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040060986,0.0026045083,0.721641,0.008581061,0.0005813722,0.22484988,0.00025099114,0.0002109876,0.001219285],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.25506634,0.7066665,0.017113296,0.006850134,0.011774101,0.0025296272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1789367,0.6977386,0.02302933,0.058110856,0.03682905,0.0053555197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.6783587,0.0028942905,0.003655087,0.010272994,0.008045733,0.010670305,0.008221742,0.005753751,0.025817309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6187041,0.00323232,0.0037655374,0.009101175,0.013013096,0.019106008,0.022717081,0.009791705,0.006606894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002012468,0.0028344088,0.005617206,0.041917402,0.0008450232,0.00063698314,0.22253057,0.0041774795,0.0032608386,0.13023403,0.043969925,0.5419637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006244631,0.002671655,0.0050395075,0.08678921,0.0010669451,0.00067574024,0.0819845,0.009759647,0.006244783,0.40654343,0.39223698,0.000743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029606223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007656732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6783587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010889351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057555247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39664108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965977938","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.1106","title":"Notches on the dial: a call to action to develop plain language communication with the public about users and uses of health data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Population Data Science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Call to action; Action (physics); Dial; Computer science; Plain language; Psychology; Linguistics; Engineering; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.3586367229366417,"score_gpt":0.5420807147469173,"score_spread":0.1834439918102756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965977938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009380218,0.0017998788,0.0037142069,0.9855355,0.004586116,0.00008769153,0.000046346693,0.00014218477,0.0031501448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03724505,0.0037914356,0.017080784,0.9296761,0.0035964337,0.00083300454,0.00011963499,0.00040635536,0.0072511616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8161937,0.1395994,0.0061724265,0.007347938,0.023537494,0.0071490044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53792024,0.3504557,0.0130223865,0.019839281,0.034548804,0.044213578],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18581747,0.0015875568,0.0026436977,0.0039438256,0.027091358,0.025897853,0.01113132,0.056360606,0.03149606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24360807,0.0019935046,0.0023162796,0.0022757081,0.052111994,0.06698343,0.04576507,0.0862958,0.009432306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000166224,0.00024012463,0.0014649052,0.0013771908,0.00004572769,0.00081931584,0.21008009,0.00009812053,0.0016301618,0.10443687,0.5941298,0.08551154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057581474,0.000111579364,0.0008019778,0.0047189547,0.000022216558,0.0007288591,0.1571751,0.000284002,0.0004364611,0.08746821,0.7480577,0.00013739477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010520565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010161156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97410214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014853926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056812763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98270845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973065356","doi":"10.1177/1609406919874596","title":"Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council","keywords":"Zoom; Data collection; Qualitative research; Videoconferencing; Context (archaeology); Interview; Qualitative property; Computer science; Medical education; Psychology; Multimedia; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9208258371883167,"score_gpt":0.7542458929981097,"score_spread":0.16657994419020694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973065356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9314326,0.001574748,0.04731237,0.005128488,0.0002708764,0.0036560693,0.00035924683,0.00021316897,0.010052393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94862056,0.0015269748,0.037646063,0.0016963652,0.0000661403,0.007405788,0.00011138756,0.000118089345,0.0028086358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93216604,0.05945097,0.0017912935,0.0017443915,0.002407693,0.0024395557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8862802,0.09214209,0.0043625915,0.0040742466,0.008930975,0.00420994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08313354,0.00078673917,0.0011660873,0.00195737,0.008482267,0.0056522195,0.0023026306,0.0021920684,0.0035031906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094617635,0.0010157229,0.00079051056,0.0018296605,0.011599477,0.0063372036,0.0072528287,0.0029427037,0.00092111895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008289721,0.00006483183,0.0017449602,0.0003671539,0.0000070405263,0.00037772208,0.98315585,0.00008242785,0.0018333002,0.00073408097,0.00063333835,0.010916423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050176866,0.00032808227,0.00096652005,0.00056350866,0.000013205711,0.00038901716,0.9796948,0.00047039066,0.0017659705,0.0013544215,0.01434631,0.000057586025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038129399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005063521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9168665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004590991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071774763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43965745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979001819","doi":"10.2196/14191","title":"Use of Web Conferencing Technology for Conducting Online Focus Groups Among Young People With Lived Experience of Suicidal Thoughts: Mixed Methods Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Mental Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fogarty International Center","keywords":"Focus group; Attendance; Psychology; Social media; Population; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.3115056836207876,"score_gpt":0.553601415451234,"score_spread":0.24209573183044636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979001819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9217112,0.0088670105,0.0210497,0.0007390334,0.00019081547,0.040211987,0.0005637373,0.00012683477,0.00653962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8205767,0.010150002,0.07184887,0.0014426537,0.00018761754,0.093922205,0.00041213297,0.000059381997,0.0014004513],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9427936,0.04565395,0.004672283,0.002180101,0.003771442,0.00092863594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8830729,0.09502668,0.0074847634,0.004042805,0.00868001,0.0016929507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069709845,0.001130283,0.0010944814,0.0037403656,0.0027995633,0.003200286,0.0025413225,0.0017845393,0.0031721324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0881399,0.0013127865,0.0017426361,0.0025345024,0.0015038111,0.0029771647,0.002956026,0.000978599,0.0005244611],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018263757,0.009596778,0.07138333,0.029071966,0.0017666372,0.0009654872,0.33220345,0.0005890007,0.0049897777,0.0015999946,0.0020204475,0.5439868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040294672,0.056542996,0.220567,0.05659526,0.004981877,0.0041983146,0.5690367,0.005551122,0.016677307,0.0054656696,0.055654343,0.00069995096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022128925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005878619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069709845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023160602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048988205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36866528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012817502","doi":"10.28984/drhj.v3i0.299","title":"The Outdoor Guided Walk as a Culturally Sensitive Research Method","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity of Research in Health Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Walk-in; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology; Applied psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.6654084432483583,"score_gpt":0.6561554273006314,"score_spread":0.009253015947726984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012817502","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09397877,0.002491828,0.7425252,0.0049773203,0.0014654634,0.06883084,0.0010642527,0.00071055815,0.08395581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16632365,0.0013935091,0.6841487,0.0030354513,0.00019129759,0.12954956,0.00025887907,0.0003003359,0.014798652],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9528191,0.042364817,0.00081937993,0.0018118301,0.0014363371,0.0007485526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860053,0.0087803975,0.0006954659,0.0022373225,0.00147765,0.0008038124],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02903893,0.0011266228,0.0007837755,0.002399584,0.0053391596,0.0045382613,0.0026897613,0.002000443,0.0102402475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017218731,0.0009603209,0.0010622628,0.002263621,0.006350691,0.002653029,0.008030775,0.0027619347,0.0026021593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008212537,0.0013914424,0.004666639,0.0046713166,0.00010223581,0.0025174897,0.5127076,0.0013538459,0.01740401,0.09070807,0.019496907,0.3441592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009750203,0.0019497849,0.0057525183,0.005148878,0.00014458245,0.00287703,0.29362664,0.002501039,0.010214399,0.070168935,0.60631716,0.00032404932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017163098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059621027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020843558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005091046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1535744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024682157","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212","title":"Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":618,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Zoom; Videoconferencing; Interview; Qualitative research; Computer science; Teleconference; Multimedia; Phone; Qualitative property; Face-to-face; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.7835566246234399,"score_gpt":0.7143031370830593,"score_spread":0.06925348754038063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024682157","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11197822,0.0016956693,0.78731483,0.009523021,0.0006159693,0.040614758,0.00086946477,0.0012539311,0.046134155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26132366,0.0013844488,0.6743589,0.0026558556,0.00017414073,0.05463484,0.00022399683,0.00023067214,0.005013476],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8811413,0.1095536,0.001984093,0.002656213,0.0031760067,0.0014887704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8616421,0.11420898,0.0047624526,0.0073389574,0.010302645,0.0017449841],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08440509,0.00143327,0.00082527444,0.0046863332,0.0045071687,0.0046304893,0.0030981663,0.002373998,0.008712072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0758419,0.0012559379,0.0010332813,0.004255971,0.007271154,0.007632647,0.010706412,0.0029192052,0.0021949585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003052374,0.00027155527,0.0015135405,0.0035628062,0.000039051385,0.0007194499,0.75297946,0.0010121362,0.014293299,0.02691349,0.0061434526,0.1922466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007669578,0.0012143467,0.00389484,0.0075112176,0.00013684481,0.0016938441,0.61319107,0.012315988,0.016141146,0.07163663,0.27117825,0.0003189101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018885586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042098192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91559494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043784683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00794452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4463821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025469274","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2017.25253\"&gt;10.12927/cjnl.2017.25253&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt","title":"Social Media Technology and Public Health in Ontario: Findings from a Planning Meeting Exploring Current Practices and Future Research Directions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fanshawe College; London Health Sciences Centre; Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Social media; Public health; Government (linguistics); Health promotion; Political science; Corporate governance; Business; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.6680739512417033,"score_gpt":0.5320645282367887,"score_spread":0.1360094230049146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025469274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9319541,0.0039033971,0.00089021295,0.027672224,0.000088787674,0.0014716922,0.0008344812,0.000048084636,0.03313704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981249,0.005178158,0.0022148695,0.0012611907,0.000027353115,0.0010229017,0.00024119583,0.000024617206,0.008780676],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945582,0.0019359356,0.00026459552,0.00034140315,0.0011690388,0.0017308079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982733,0.008122015,0.0016516017,0.0004015345,0.0036860954,0.0034057372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009018904,0.0004284236,0.0004850691,0.0027257018,0.019746855,0.006139078,0.0018794673,0.0016645351,0.0036027043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0143769225,0.0007764898,0.00048957026,0.008116923,0.005426539,0.0032855086,0.0055451556,0.0019236249,0.0002453372],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076246986,0.00012497143,0.035784964,0.0009206865,0.000011020882,0.0010843255,0.9196205,0.00012803292,0.00086338574,0.0017332307,0.003043564,0.036609054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009431464,0.00005331769,0.036228836,0.00037820326,0.000011376516,0.0000570063,0.94300675,0.00009129627,0.00012929567,0.00023958468,0.019768959,0.000025970869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.945527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97489625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08598872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08598872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21499439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6238948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025952062","doi":"10.33137/jaste.v5i1.34277","title":"Coltan Mining and Internet Privacy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Action (physics); Information privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07574475604767436,"score_gpt":0.4511725248381734,"score_spread":0.375427768790499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025952062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5109958,0.002210749,0.0025858292,0.040694855,0.00036886442,0.00044221454,0.00015599202,0.00004509401,0.44250062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94996125,0.0013064089,0.0015681663,0.0051751384,0.00004095902,0.00024545594,0.00004811598,0.00003520284,0.041619256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927174,0.005205466,0.00011767747,0.00039880167,0.0008831823,0.00067753525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863132,0.0090188915,0.0014501243,0.00103877,0.00096655736,0.0012123819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047029145,0.00028336202,0.00019679022,0.0012934351,0.010913224,0.005978757,0.00088349025,0.0016260325,0.010939263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01028969,0.00019650164,0.00019079408,0.002075086,0.01253673,0.0048874416,0.006307233,0.0031525237,0.00048526822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008335935,0.00042408204,0.019427251,0.00047229594,0.000014660741,0.0015004376,0.66991353,0.0001825966,0.0012699363,0.19929859,0.030301234,0.07711205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131154675,0.00010483677,0.007360757,0.00081354956,0.000010625364,0.0005698994,0.5831314,0.0002455326,0.0014365823,0.008151844,0.39813268,0.000029259752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011434665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04252434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011434665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065267314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009058444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047354996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031158659","doi":"10.1145/3334480.3381066","title":"Transparency in Qualitative Research: Increasing Fairness in the CHI Review Process","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Workaround; Scrutiny; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Computer science; Work (physics); Process management; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.6840428643641143,"score_gpt":0.6713005307277847,"score_spread":0.012742333636329595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031158659","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050668728,0.00461743,0.71186143,0.12939332,0.0089303,0.057648715,0.0006992106,0.0030481592,0.033132657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28224432,0.0023946431,0.5849605,0.022724487,0.0029622507,0.09785397,0.00037504054,0.0014238118,0.0050609377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.093886524,0.8258702,0.03651948,0.010779032,0.029198,0.0037467927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06929589,0.70588446,0.03796341,0.066844605,0.11355099,0.0064606615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6998295,0.0017162093,0.0029721118,0.0099405665,0.018001704,0.021151057,0.0058735046,0.008229347,0.006475875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8463095,0.003508513,0.0028477046,0.008392866,0.021413302,0.018183263,0.02602488,0.015147442,0.003431593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010680396,0.0002963879,0.0041129594,0.00853771,0.00033515415,0.0010530144,0.7280054,0.0011165265,0.007725487,0.046913356,0.032682545,0.16815345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016732722,0.0012411091,0.010493426,0.029459313,0.0005491503,0.0022083507,0.1681183,0.013357221,0.019106526,0.30255592,0.4494565,0.0017808864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003934994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006995238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30017048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01331229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06858264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37016368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045095890","doi":"","title":"Education, networking, and fun: A preview of student activities at the 2008 AFS annual meeting in Ottawa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Medical education; Psychology; Environmental science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0693609430940844,"score_gpt":0.42235578721338296,"score_spread":0.35299484411929855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045095890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89290226,0.021008424,0.0020058565,0.03377516,0.0036033166,0.000811507,0.006220266,0.00021646131,0.039456706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733205,0.025970023,0.0037543045,0.007332567,0.00089332013,0.0013518533,0.002812905,0.00027691905,0.08428756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982039,0.00063771417,0.0000988356,0.00010255912,0.0003194937,0.00063747703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953302,0.0015419082,0.00027130547,0.000105894236,0.0010086246,0.001741961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045201164,0.00075889635,0.0006921141,0.0030461706,0.013611889,0.003997866,0.0013861293,0.001799424,0.004846426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038270825,0.0007505181,0.00038687393,0.0052196556,0.0020132354,0.002781626,0.004018108,0.0029763454,0.0008242853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024820675,0.00028475397,0.026283612,0.0014444067,0.000025368881,0.00080526905,0.8134233,0.00011667693,0.0021003361,0.00049374095,0.060020346,0.094753996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009680654,0.00017119471,0.06445093,0.0012424471,0.00003250361,0.00021239856,0.813893,0.00004174589,0.0008425024,0.00010661091,0.11891954,0.00007751805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39199388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8647148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6080061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012887286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020434774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7794244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048381478","doi":"10.22215/datapower.v2017i0.84","title":"Surveillance medicine, crowdsourced public health, and data-driven epidemiology: the privacy implications of digitally tracking and visualizing contagious disease outbreaks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Monetization; Public health; Computer science; Analytics; Crowdsourcing; World Wide Web; Data science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4433658589983952,"score_gpt":0.5403608917366545,"score_spread":0.09699503273825927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048381478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56804526,0.01142075,0.2811981,0.075802535,0.0012449627,0.0011420237,0.0023604585,0.0014212754,0.057364594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084933,0.0020257975,0.08020881,0.003314968,0.00033936076,0.00086268125,0.0004265392,0.00019072994,0.0041377787],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98405933,0.0130614,0.00033939193,0.0008975649,0.0013125543,0.00032968406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90338564,0.08563658,0.0036001457,0.0046950635,0.0018285761,0.0008538998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015222803,0.00081865443,0.0004561741,0.0035279233,0.0031552147,0.010094494,0.0015557434,0.0024627398,0.002463096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053510882,0.0007231372,0.0008192722,0.0023514244,0.00985014,0.008680908,0.008534484,0.0020986882,0.00043129528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009900375,0.00033284718,0.09870772,0.0035652958,0.00034720654,0.0021657532,0.37581766,0.007246629,0.004229763,0.17498146,0.022232978,0.30938268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017303952,0.0005340675,0.061802574,0.0045177224,0.000264767,0.003618732,0.19918711,0.036386237,0.010489554,0.38389844,0.29874098,0.0003867184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037673353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042507527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015222803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001570084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001916292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08050686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081363283","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0237875","title":"Exploring the ethical issues in research using digital data collection strategies with minors: A scoping review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Scrutiny; Harm; Data collection; Research ethics; Informed consent; Social research; Engineering ethics; Social media; Psychology; Public relations; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.9439772789083111,"score_gpt":0.6428719519843116,"score_spread":0.3011053269239995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081363283","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00597272,0.95046645,0.010274066,0.017868478,0.0020470493,0.0061199157,0.00017519403,0.000035901106,0.0070402157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03306383,0.93754834,0.017838357,0.0038468423,0.00061803305,0.006078517,0.00018267239,0.00003266065,0.00079080777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7988915,0.12683429,0.046717796,0.0036966982,0.022006849,0.0018529512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45925957,0.46350992,0.027143039,0.0075620883,0.04034476,0.002180763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18774651,0.0016478013,0.0037475063,0.029038189,0.0061385403,0.013167978,0.0034737713,0.007347002,0.0022445067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38920635,0.0018969082,0.0050228033,0.022225631,0.0098637985,0.014123025,0.009059146,0.0055147996,0.0006883502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018366656,0.00011768691,0.0039363364,0.37305102,0.000992895,0.0017516622,0.054743182,0.00066726026,0.0010178672,0.027445504,0.010137639,0.52595526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003246252,0.00014457392,0.0013748892,0.84138614,0.0010709174,0.0011350958,0.022173142,0.00025493553,0.00059324957,0.008220689,0.1235394,0.00007448333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006412033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011879264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0109471595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061637353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929103},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3091731986","doi":"10.24095/hpcdp.31.3.09","title":"Book review - Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chronic diseases and injuries in Canada","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mixed mode; The Internet; Mode (computer interface); Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Materials science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.052642443278329835,"score_gpt":0.36539472246458093,"score_spread":0.3127522791862511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091731986","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.175845,0.15285495,0.115714826,0.061517682,0.02139894,0.3258301,0.024567667,0.0027042136,0.11956666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33713973,0.07874777,0.1615439,0.028071137,0.004647011,0.27503946,0.005429014,0.000798217,0.1085838],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597979,0.030839147,0.002017069,0.0010020081,0.0058617517,0.00048206787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.865668,0.09753517,0.004619819,0.00488375,0.026163602,0.001129558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029209146,0.0006184307,0.0016863524,0.004010499,0.0011602853,0.002191711,0.0018997154,0.0014128812,0.021085974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10927699,0.00070218917,0.00080516667,0.0058254115,0.0007990953,0.0011383541,0.0007836112,0.00080821605,0.0026075642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001133078,0.00093179394,0.0045196954,0.028835312,0.0006912022,0.00015108644,0.0022628787,0.00095573935,0.001350361,0.003616008,0.22488225,0.7306705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047731427,0.007656605,0.095009506,0.02650051,0.0034961812,0.0004288595,0.005145036,0.0041551692,0.006337931,0.0069244853,0.8393097,0.0002629453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043715984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12037788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043715984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008328194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01762936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15447462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099206088","doi":"10.29173/cais1151","title":"There for the Reaping: The Ethics of Harvesting Online Data for Research Purposes","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5572222472289129,"score_gpt":0.495910418686661,"score_spread":0.06131182854225187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099206088","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04307663,0.00571463,0.34368238,0.3425795,0.008007378,0.0107320715,0.001377943,0.00072870776,0.24410076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4276238,0.008978019,0.32396922,0.09557161,0.0040353304,0.02480532,0.0014945227,0.0013841729,0.11213806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6020661,0.31717953,0.01688405,0.014401417,0.045077804,0.0043910793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5069531,0.28061742,0.018549277,0.12726863,0.054697983,0.011913665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24030282,0.0007384658,0.0011482085,0.0020284536,0.012837555,0.028609086,0.0035346549,0.0085497005,0.00728447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34968397,0.00132142,0.0010129967,0.0040113884,0.034253117,0.017692696,0.012505918,0.01657914,0.00649964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026510426,0.0002976753,0.005819907,0.0011026214,0.000084213294,0.0005522072,0.15598682,0.00046437615,0.0037071311,0.56764895,0.106265046,0.15780593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000710086,0.00019808422,0.00336735,0.0038053324,0.000050516366,0.00065682404,0.03458707,0.0009929516,0.0036729614,0.14530644,0.8071478,0.00014358283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006594481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072759055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064730654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051400047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9368419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118927379","doi":"10.2196/22980","title":"Conducting Virtual, Synchronous Focus Groups Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Qualitative Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health; Fordham University","keywords":"Focus group; Men who have sex with men; Qualitative research; Informed consent; Incentive; Family medicine; Psychology; Medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Alternative medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.15228319254837108,"score_gpt":0.4489864446137224,"score_spread":0.2967032520653513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118927379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921216,0.000566696,0.0025155728,0.0012805847,0.000040518058,0.0008471824,0.00011660463,0.00001912985,0.0024920425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223715,0.00082192715,0.002993423,0.00091016974,0.000027562884,0.001522083,0.000070559574,0.000017267339,0.0013997562],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936534,0.008493213,0.00025895928,0.0003982494,0.00064660475,0.00083766173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779874,0.015431754,0.001825951,0.0005684651,0.0020560932,0.0021303133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02236402,0.00053617446,0.00068961026,0.0016420401,0.007953334,0.0019712134,0.0018143109,0.0013446753,0.0029817414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022979587,0.0006128828,0.00037389665,0.0012075158,0.004797489,0.00317908,0.004096605,0.0013920008,0.00042445346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006076603,0.00023877827,0.008421367,0.0003584991,0.000007431536,0.00036732995,0.9780919,0.00003549183,0.0013008629,0.00077121257,0.0005766156,0.009769791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016130874,0.00022646565,0.0045087496,0.00039343565,0.0000075356556,0.00017290322,0.9883548,0.00014465093,0.00047271387,0.00042339324,0.0052628415,0.000016391901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005039175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008399682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02236402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028796801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046356614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118273675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119035199","doi":"10.29173/eureka28754","title":"Featured Research Images","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eureka","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.5554677036281155,"score_gpt":0.5915469626773869,"score_spread":0.03607925904927145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119035199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020018045,0.0035795611,0.023476517,0.006516053,0.003310791,0.0013380735,0.3397361,0.0076335757,0.5943913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14878497,0.009407298,0.15176025,0.0040638326,0.0013439974,0.0033924766,0.2347725,0.006011195,0.44046345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997416,0.000022119279,0.000009530729,0.000057375946,0.0001243413,0.00004505792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948704,0.00017368088,0.000028214601,0.000058271307,0.00017790307,0.000074804724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037872978,0.00055921316,0.00047147067,0.0025518383,0.00087117887,0.0010122485,0.00080591114,0.0010287032,0.29040354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010070436,0.00034204096,0.00046174802,0.003609261,0.0003075404,0.0006665956,0.00066923664,0.0010004506,0.06524965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006508186,0.00017137769,0.0009026179,0.0020800005,0.000018703155,0.0013231351,0.0005664538,0.0009081732,0.04138877,0.0077472767,0.8391213,0.10512144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008951169,0.00007597107,0.005848795,0.00025350024,0.000021851056,0.0011623923,0.00059859053,0.0009296615,0.009008368,0.0020902336,0.97987956,0.000041483818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053650006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011082801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70959646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089715724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011316518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97149664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128484755","doi":"10.29173/iasl7569","title":"Getting Past \"Shsssh\": Online Focus Groups as Empowering Professional Development for Teacher Librarians","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IASL Annual Conference Proceedings","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Professional development; Empowerment; Online community; Qualitative research; Sociology; Focus (optics); Community of practice; Faculty development; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07273105053143004,"score_gpt":0.39993196878664034,"score_spread":0.3272009182552103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128484755","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19692717,0.30327275,0.34360662,0.027464915,0.0040546157,0.019779265,0.0007495816,0.0006976219,0.10344742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42908758,0.122903176,0.3935201,0.008452131,0.0008872976,0.032818202,0.0003167472,0.00024803478,0.011766799],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9115084,0.07773313,0.0035752836,0.001150622,0.005430095,0.0006025276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83305013,0.14968926,0.0053765853,0.0043812073,0.006838133,0.0006646957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07850555,0.0006069888,0.0008815683,0.0064941244,0.0027039202,0.0047023543,0.0017685806,0.0019584163,0.0050538466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088317506,0.00060560106,0.0011788814,0.004541108,0.0031564974,0.008620518,0.0043885806,0.0010338244,0.0010168896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004448389,0.0003457654,0.002772615,0.02451085,0.00020586235,0.00015667442,0.1188124,0.00018370329,0.0028835516,0.013102134,0.00515077,0.831431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064796343,0.0035457336,0.011473927,0.11593964,0.0021025473,0.0014512385,0.18386184,0.0013764445,0.01717409,0.031338967,0.63081336,0.00027426664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012018587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037425999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07850555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023071703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005158441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.415182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136925596","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4639","title":"YouTube for Transcribing and Google Drive for Collaborative Coding: Cost-Effective Tools for Collecting and Analyzing Interview Data","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cloud computing; Computer science; Data sharing; Qualitative research; Coding (social sciences); World Wide Web; Data science; Data collection; Knowledge management; Sociology","score_opus":0.5618181083390276,"score_gpt":0.5864365700391426,"score_spread":0.024618461700115057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136925596","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050614018,0.00086099474,0.8146261,0.0070451805,0.0017794322,0.056537513,0.01536544,0.012702581,0.04046877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046345808,0.0005532721,0.85030556,0.00059467263,0.00021360088,0.082226135,0.0027912697,0.0034479352,0.0135218045],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9112047,0.06590978,0.006545908,0.0033382473,0.011485792,0.0015155491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80791056,0.11369003,0.01025527,0.027170766,0.037189964,0.0037834363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07410894,0.0024048735,0.0014582985,0.014098023,0.007426513,0.004527701,0.0030268158,0.001305447,0.038546104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16600385,0.0017477293,0.0012071041,0.018106917,0.003942614,0.0065990244,0.009178343,0.0024126654,0.019167049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000751068,0.000330524,0.0032484238,0.004017267,0.00008336084,0.0015050921,0.18537375,0.0013927437,0.035952915,0.012732233,0.16901794,0.5855947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080197403,0.00071338,0.023132728,0.004986261,0.0001451248,0.0017670885,0.20198262,0.029123727,0.02915137,0.041633423,0.66531444,0.0012478231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013573211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036842823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92589104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038846908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0146561405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39193022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150215658","doi":"10.4192/1577-8517-v6_3","title":"The World Wide Web and Its Potential for Corporate Environmental Communication: A Study into Present Practices in the Australian Minerals Industry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; BHP Billiton; University of New England; Newmont Corporation; Newcrest Mining; Barrick Gold Corporation","keywords":"Business; Environmental communication; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.23427075716516668,"score_gpt":0.505318220895554,"score_spread":0.27104746373038735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150215658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923584,0.00035591773,0.0002529512,0.001346128,0.0000066560233,0.000023364675,0.000004362114,0.000002814113,0.0056494595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974669,0.0006376908,0.00025359177,0.00017997755,0.000007689306,0.000020920823,0.0000029896344,0.0000035128946,0.0014266212],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185693,0.0056665353,0.00026365195,0.00028818482,0.0013645986,0.0005601087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97353584,0.020291224,0.0024726123,0.00062217243,0.0015573793,0.0015207665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007684225,0.00022358685,0.0004269744,0.002480925,0.0077225883,0.0072172866,0.000897203,0.0018707303,0.002456086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019563554,0.00059552793,0.00024081364,0.0027912494,0.0068552704,0.0074426923,0.0054294583,0.002155217,0.00030682876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114733075,0.00007885794,0.0071705966,0.00007490147,0.0000032610174,0.00044760847,0.9815576,0.000016821157,0.0003853713,0.0012147203,0.00012348621,0.008915321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002957553,0.00007843705,0.011160562,0.00010834713,0.000006657034,0.00023804871,0.98188376,0.00010917524,0.00013900123,0.0003218935,0.005940988,0.000010200265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020124158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026905818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020124158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034015889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039894315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040638566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157870926","doi":"10.1177/16094069211013659","title":"Engaging the Senses in Qualitative Research via Multimodal Coding: Triangulating Transcript, Audio, and Video Data in a Study With Sexual and Gender Minority Youth","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario HIV Treatment Network","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Modalities; Qualitative research; Distress; Grounded theory; Psychology; Computer science; Qualitative property; Sexual orientation; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.8358132916543443,"score_gpt":0.6984151962855772,"score_spread":0.13739809536876701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157870926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6135425,0.0027753096,0.33532602,0.0074361153,0.00047042556,0.0090959165,0.001423302,0.00024258932,0.029687786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80072284,0.0023266387,0.17698996,0.0011561442,0.000087378394,0.014822402,0.00047485268,0.00023453463,0.0031853102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91786796,0.071944185,0.0024171667,0.0022513685,0.003858012,0.0016614163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8978303,0.08276569,0.0050017214,0.0054923156,0.0075606,0.0013493685],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08046863,0.00094174524,0.00091649574,0.006642289,0.009556339,0.0081039,0.0024873351,0.0014337425,0.0022927173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11104369,0.00093250093,0.0008492849,0.0070337784,0.012988897,0.0075290296,0.012134622,0.0020396023,0.00043835636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005103771,0.000026345853,0.0017917614,0.00037618945,0.000011820567,0.0005389924,0.96499366,0.00017123664,0.0011070052,0.0071642743,0.0006696214,0.023097914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021367166,0.0000677235,0.0018774241,0.0016096776,0.000030789997,0.00042636308,0.9609402,0.0008562437,0.0015607632,0.014018485,0.018547164,0.00004386738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006386045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012706108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91953135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065029846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009350898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42556387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158871795","doi":"10.4000/terminal.7019","title":"Enquêter avec Facebook : examen de l’identité numérique de l’ethnographe au cours d’un séjour de terrain hors ligne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Terminal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ligne; Art","score_opus":0.037634805380207005,"score_gpt":0.37132973539860104,"score_spread":0.333694930018394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158871795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9575483,0.0006626631,0.0069459984,0.001773896,0.00005307555,0.00028598175,0.00023884876,0.000036629477,0.032454524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98191065,0.000710804,0.0032307252,0.0002297007,0.000022807673,0.00042867457,0.00014363052,0.000047754285,0.013275155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.987357,0.008060931,0.00041553064,0.0009033787,0.0022974287,0.0009658061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792718,0.012952641,0.001892086,0.0010479208,0.0040524667,0.0007830427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016620442,0.00043599552,0.0005571375,0.005448499,0.010886024,0.008072115,0.0011210894,0.00085234415,0.004620538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02402323,0.0005258321,0.0002884901,0.003817231,0.009128294,0.0051749484,0.005330577,0.0010449671,0.00067200145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033325807,0.000018644285,0.01984025,0.000117448784,0.0000071984327,0.0001456417,0.9626109,0.00004849464,0.00083506346,0.0033065695,0.0005580019,0.012478523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000573706,0.00003462758,0.055697035,0.0003599899,0.000011416145,0.00016621192,0.90525293,0.00034817276,0.0008548463,0.0012550002,0.03597145,0.0000426496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1986996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33202282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1986996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012207488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078421645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39508605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159449821","doi":"10.1017/s0008423921000226","title":"Harnessing Technologies in Focus Group Research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Field (mathematics); Data science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.19200966339938294,"score_gpt":0.49368710938029864,"score_spread":0.3016774459809157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159449821","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04139399,0.0038226051,0.8814649,0.01598108,0.0009417614,0.0067133876,0.00036887906,0.0009198604,0.048393574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24849142,0.003845644,0.71484244,0.003402845,0.00054562546,0.022655657,0.00025837534,0.00042646023,0.0055314964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.67527854,0.29370388,0.005296264,0.006623715,0.01660062,0.002496925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52980024,0.41485402,0.007933993,0.033519674,0.011342561,0.0025494988],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21571337,0.0013907724,0.0012204377,0.008257618,0.006222592,0.012427652,0.0050482466,0.0033870765,0.0116835255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22830935,0.0013345897,0.001426154,0.0056416327,0.015635816,0.01818815,0.024575641,0.003217359,0.0039877985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024597056,0.00037097506,0.0036885785,0.0044007287,0.00014523367,0.0010577836,0.36180988,0.0013395953,0.0072095073,0.16958663,0.010126387,0.4400188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040537928,0.0010460648,0.0037538128,0.01111313,0.000178874,0.0020050828,0.15206283,0.0048423363,0.012794642,0.35056672,0.46092048,0.00031064768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007247505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008539541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21571337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047662384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057484205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96716505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166412400","doi":"10.20944/preprints202106.0273.v1","title":"&lt;strong&gt;Co-creation of HIVST Delivery Approaches for Improving Urban Men’s Engagement with HIV Services in eThekwini District, KwaZulu-Natal: Nominal Group Technique&lt;/strong&gt;","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Impact; HIV Legal Network","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Service delivery framework; Medicine; Nonprobability sampling; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Business; Family medicine; Nursing; Environmental health; Marketing; Service (business); Population","score_opus":0.1481424905451999,"score_gpt":0.3936864002014293,"score_spread":0.2455439096562294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166412400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681952,0.00018816676,0.011041281,0.002909309,0.000073860734,0.0068047396,0.00019137656,0.00008706707,0.010508901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9480627,0.00017882051,0.037799325,0.00042862666,0.00002010423,0.007765402,0.0001082585,0.000022833581,0.0056139575],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954541,0.0032950917,0.00013380178,0.0002361626,0.00031905447,0.0005617499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430877,0.002807287,0.0006218448,0.00039485606,0.00046061238,0.0014066392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009742436,0.00035101353,0.0002790026,0.0006170012,0.004465026,0.0012140688,0.001576158,0.00060853333,0.009004267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008957007,0.00037827872,0.0003593238,0.0004949145,0.0021393185,0.0010093148,0.004893756,0.00097618706,0.0005112031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001543588,0.0051681395,0.08372436,0.003580019,0.00006621719,0.0038151431,0.46739104,0.0019033339,0.019794933,0.009200859,0.013358527,0.3904539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009868436,0.0071533904,0.14428978,0.0009562554,0.00014825744,0.0007913925,0.7146014,0.005251115,0.011877145,0.00637669,0.107379556,0.00018817112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065368055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01633275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009742436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034814286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010592754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051523566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168145137","doi":"10.2196/20970","title":"WhatsApp-Based Focus Groups Among Mexican-Origin Women in Zika Risk Area: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Data Quality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Psychological intervention; Zika virus; Population; Social media; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Medicine; Medical education; The Internet; Psychology; Internet privacy; Environmental health; Nursing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.30657208063642605,"score_gpt":0.5573182565505677,"score_spread":0.2507461759141416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168145137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8023907,0.001513193,0.04185212,0.007719194,0.00036711723,0.12993008,0.0038957582,0.0004280963,0.011903751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5683256,0.0013516651,0.0961467,0.0022983437,0.000118736134,0.32848656,0.0011042812,0.00008745932,0.0020806184],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89526767,0.085813254,0.0056310743,0.0028760096,0.007429748,0.0029822818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8014585,0.13942184,0.009469125,0.011337395,0.035325833,0.0029873888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18741359,0.0008201833,0.0011210536,0.0022877369,0.0037688427,0.0028180706,0.0036823696,0.002187533,0.009041719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20744742,0.0013894235,0.0014890529,0.0017062065,0.0025962489,0.003971634,0.004427365,0.0018299451,0.0010075364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043000258,0.004032766,0.10394257,0.011973729,0.00037775555,0.001658322,0.5552926,0.00072452845,0.0097936,0.0033620566,0.010672075,0.29386988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044911024,0.015749417,0.3016235,0.020800332,0.00066722353,0.0009617283,0.5095939,0.0055352487,0.01331951,0.007862179,0.11890509,0.0004908197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007911419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012204257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18741359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034482484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011307105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99114966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175747495","doi":"10.29173/irie215","title":"Auto-biography: On the Immanent Commodification of Personal Information","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Information Ethics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Brantford Energy (Canada)","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Commodification; Biography; Internet privacy; Politics; Personally identifiable information; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Law; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.14629938461823508,"score_gpt":0.44717305183035333,"score_spread":0.3008736672121183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175747495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6552407,0.017911088,0.046156105,0.06277782,0.0005775195,0.00038201167,0.00021632665,0.000089609806,0.21664876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98256636,0.003777614,0.002755524,0.0024072612,0.00011660231,0.00012832029,0.000036075988,0.000050992654,0.008161358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9558162,0.038112327,0.0005682951,0.0012927486,0.003416466,0.0007939424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9189602,0.06986996,0.003046909,0.0047634845,0.0024505635,0.0009088743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03076908,0.00039863866,0.0005727264,0.0030910228,0.006810244,0.007590696,0.001144276,0.0021445642,0.0035906532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036210384,0.00041864222,0.00024406053,0.0025287732,0.052128285,0.017174408,0.009075049,0.0032797486,0.0003848528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026573254,0.000020591659,0.0013184055,0.00024639667,0.0000059126824,0.00021361346,0.730175,0.00007207787,0.0005111206,0.24711691,0.0013488316,0.018944507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012065445,0.00006584001,0.002478768,0.001525024,0.000011281227,0.0007997994,0.69311047,0.00044819224,0.0019332604,0.109372266,0.19020964,0.000033317254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026969304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022886002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03076908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047163498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004384301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16272438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185469533","doi":"","title":"mhealth technologies and doctor-patient relationships in the context of consumer culture in Winnipeg, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"mHealth; Context (archaeology); Medicine; Sociology; Gerontology; Psychology; Nursing; History; Psychological intervention","score_opus":0.04869408902145209,"score_gpt":0.3032719555768138,"score_spread":0.2545778665553617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185469533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97102046,0.0033722415,0.0004398018,0.008617999,0.000087533415,0.00015575065,0.00025840316,0.000012573661,0.01603522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921868,0.002022183,0.0006475529,0.00094477175,0.000008830966,0.00004238504,0.00006671474,0.000012805382,0.0040679243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981103,0.00049949356,0.00007841896,0.00017578593,0.00053965865,0.0005962515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579066,0.0010197887,0.0003428772,0.000061212464,0.0012349979,0.0015505183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017664589,0.00021840233,0.00038360414,0.0011147106,0.01325983,0.0049873805,0.0010115745,0.0005578737,0.0044459603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004456369,0.0004288549,0.00021879545,0.002735335,0.003525914,0.0008881501,0.0026434062,0.0011067115,0.00016466285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034400483,0.00018702004,0.22231089,0.0007816681,0.000060449594,0.004315297,0.6799436,0.0002797534,0.002108791,0.009914527,0.008670436,0.07108363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032068572,0.00009800161,0.2257205,0.00067565613,0.000042025098,0.00076228473,0.71693784,0.00037684658,0.00036702605,0.0004978563,0.05440394,0.00008599134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99617887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07067564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07067564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11491235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5127901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186219371","doi":"10.29173/cjen131","title":"The patient journey map: Improving the emergency department communication experience for patients and their family and friends","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; Interior Health; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Emergency department; General partnership; PDCA; Focus group; Patient experience; Medicine; Medical education; Psychology; Medical emergency; Nursing; Health care; Engineering; Quality management; Operations management; Business; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.06609240605245438,"score_gpt":0.373737424163493,"score_spread":0.3076450181110386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186219371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72144073,0.0061220806,0.043521427,0.11411158,0.0029780406,0.0028218848,0.002231295,0.005769516,0.101003475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8111777,0.0066169584,0.14512269,0.009261717,0.0004558787,0.002809698,0.001401142,0.00059449853,0.02255976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660885,0.0023620094,0.00012350823,0.00011832357,0.00052674615,0.0002605549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99082255,0.0031562815,0.0006885421,0.0005976891,0.0014669271,0.003268104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052813413,0.0005108236,0.0003228878,0.000755878,0.0028591268,0.0032607226,0.0012545204,0.0008999496,0.012839597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016818693,0.0002832764,0.00064963073,0.00057096424,0.00094149937,0.0038609747,0.005992233,0.0019786968,0.0018913894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052184105,0.0013754424,0.01758837,0.0020776764,0.000094268406,0.00088134984,0.07754227,0.00056392513,0.00265824,0.002596476,0.24197002,0.65213007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049723784,0.004827313,0.073880054,0.003244809,0.00034997164,0.0029175251,0.22752556,0.0024033617,0.004745269,0.00817572,0.6710878,0.00034537254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024905293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006736906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012839597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012011359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046138098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042952716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198945804","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046086","title":"How do general practices respond to a pandemic? Protocol for a prospective qualitative study of six Australian practices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Data collection; Research ethics; Best practice; Citizen journalism; Health care; Public relations; Qualitative research; Participatory action research; Medical education; Protocol (science); Medicine; Sociology; Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Alternative medicine; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.6236637934006726,"score_gpt":0.6984426165354926,"score_spread":0.07477882313481998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198945804","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038902266,0.00015604493,0.0027587826,0.00048947573,0.00020042282,0.99025273,0.0010160437,0.0000430843,0.0011931917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019119284,0.00008250988,0.0028671364,0.00021988203,0.000015844782,0.9943922,0.00012794587,0.000004267295,0.00037829316],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95646137,0.028255569,0.00523404,0.0026459526,0.003240813,0.0041622785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9378233,0.027855301,0.0046437676,0.0069038793,0.016317172,0.0064566135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.099987514,0.003596057,0.0046637366,0.006106455,0.01271881,0.007288025,0.0064220997,0.008060142,0.0550432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069959246,0.004946606,0.0033750355,0.005196963,0.007892933,0.006824769,0.006897166,0.013526428,0.011508144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020904671,0.023383815,0.008973285,0.0761265,0.00033061169,0.008078764,0.47776422,0.006108698,0.010848686,0.030613188,0.12754038,0.20932718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026617462,0.014081737,0.020393616,0.035696637,0.00022513175,0.0010642146,0.43042812,0.0030615332,0.0054646274,0.019951195,0.4422193,0.0007964961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011943687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027577437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099987514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013764182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047008105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52879083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199996782","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4906","title":"Challenges in Conducting Online Videoconferencing Qualitative Interviews with Adolescents on Sensitive Topics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Nova Southeastern University","keywords":"Rigour; Data collection; Interview; Confidentiality; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Psychology; Distancing; Social distance; Qualitative property; Sociology; Computer science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.6488245843527112,"score_gpt":0.5974438563722932,"score_spread":0.05138072798041793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199996782","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32909817,0.013620455,0.4266612,0.11229676,0.0045072283,0.04748309,0.00252447,0.0006727487,0.063135855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45761877,0.006784077,0.39782405,0.013075091,0.0012333777,0.11500765,0.0006106513,0.0005223967,0.0073239557],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.36631328,0.5850573,0.017840559,0.007621559,0.01906967,0.0040976442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3721461,0.5308913,0.020036543,0.026200296,0.042885747,0.00783996],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4697995,0.0014105197,0.0016298743,0.0039681196,0.014617532,0.014517545,0.009545265,0.004886627,0.007228389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40663883,0.0022406166,0.0014690161,0.004939471,0.014545965,0.012693668,0.010547403,0.0056477487,0.0032745947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031119373,0.0002773953,0.003650163,0.0044783615,0.000086225795,0.0011962352,0.8855272,0.00057213655,0.0037584056,0.014988684,0.0044240956,0.08072993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113522074,0.00039037754,0.0029964573,0.008432192,0.00006148395,0.000991753,0.8818139,0.0012807545,0.002497774,0.016824473,0.08448126,0.00011601984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009462336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021370076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5302005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010838526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026013851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6538316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201574503","doi":"10.2196/30293","title":"Adapting a Mental Health Intervention for Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Web-Based Synchronous Focus Group Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Focus group; Facilitator; Pandemic; Mental health; Medical education; Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Social distance; Internet privacy; Public relations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Nursing; Business; Social psychology","score_opus":0.21508104239344575,"score_gpt":0.549055849778746,"score_spread":0.3339748073853003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201574503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933918,0.00015979249,0.0009445355,0.00042646978,0.000038597384,0.0033100282,0.00014150403,0.0000144198175,0.0015727635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98596686,0.0006482202,0.0036781132,0.00083617994,0.0000601031,0.007477559,0.00013692943,0.00001132129,0.0011847198],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980591,0.0011377978,0.0001024592,0.00016274159,0.00013326877,0.0004046532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964579,0.0015925589,0.0003500774,0.00013944706,0.00050573226,0.0009543746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061588497,0.00051251525,0.0005228504,0.0011437093,0.0033664734,0.0012137614,0.0011352991,0.0010552795,0.003345116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007252942,0.00051596086,0.00040060782,0.00050835416,0.0011530678,0.0015267332,0.00258691,0.0011044388,0.0004433019],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066512084,0.0069539635,0.057171877,0.0020097347,0.000034917008,0.002923288,0.8586362,0.0001223897,0.0056894305,0.00073675835,0.0029531103,0.06210319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005240752,0.0041820533,0.06333516,0.0011559192,0.000079431986,0.00059026445,0.9104041,0.00036413866,0.0015837672,0.00042181445,0.017300226,0.000059032438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036263308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010189193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061588497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020679503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044189026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032571495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203873529","doi":"10.1177/16094069211040302","title":"Methodological and Practical Considerations in Rapid Qualitative Research: Lessons Learned From a Team-Based Global Study During COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; McMaster University","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"CLARITY; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Management science; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering; Social science; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.9673016450998352,"score_gpt":0.7991634600505446,"score_spread":0.16813818504929057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203873529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21523114,0.022020819,0.2496196,0.4518264,0.006842821,0.031836115,0.0012009165,0.00053009077,0.020892078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5586474,0.007944963,0.3045737,0.06605593,0.0010773273,0.057917092,0.00028796835,0.0006893583,0.0028063026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.4097757,0.55808455,0.011573499,0.0052787606,0.0091555305,0.0061319396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2653643,0.65976715,0.00877975,0.018883562,0.038140096,0.009065147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5567888,0.0016532055,0.0029248858,0.0043288604,0.016932048,0.01798274,0.009465998,0.009262774,0.0060922704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44256896,0.0020446049,0.0023111326,0.0039169104,0.033671297,0.022597477,0.020102063,0.012267854,0.001470749],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015365685,0.00018454109,0.003025517,0.0047609205,0.00006686038,0.0013219124,0.9410161,0.0003891348,0.000570709,0.013796954,0.0065626684,0.028151121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017135666,0.00029608142,0.0016023613,0.016456226,0.00010971574,0.00091027276,0.870737,0.0010067656,0.0007632986,0.04085651,0.06692007,0.00017047956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015459945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044826493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4432112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016600829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039642014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5465584},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3204082631","doi":"10.1177/16094069211047823","title":"Ethical Considerations for Qualitative Research Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Emergency Situations: Navigating the Virtual Field","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Netnography; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Pandemic; Participatory action research; Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Citizen journalism; Research ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social media; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.8355572675998658,"score_gpt":0.7688195838625806,"score_spread":0.06673768373728517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204082631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0311838,0.006960469,0.4550023,0.40127406,0.01236576,0.05286224,0.0011583972,0.00063543,0.038557556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19879971,0.0037497848,0.4619658,0.08082838,0.0027523611,0.24259558,0.00048421187,0.0004893457,0.008334755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.20887494,0.7498682,0.014823125,0.0068518007,0.015419558,0.00416229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2758084,0.59085405,0.017121099,0.06901985,0.035800613,0.011396098],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.57802075,0.0022877129,0.003432025,0.0043272553,0.017553309,0.020480039,0.008630002,0.0152838975,0.008629802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5389617,0.0031915666,0.0020658653,0.005406649,0.060921926,0.016643673,0.01637033,0.018310098,0.0042807525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007764381,0.00027752706,0.0014450467,0.0032155681,0.00009008136,0.0013844668,0.5500151,0.00086581224,0.002009567,0.3556838,0.040172186,0.04406447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006362345,0.00033360854,0.0007307056,0.01617695,0.00007447164,0.001700136,0.22159563,0.0035626623,0.002646906,0.3404538,0.41183752,0.00025145014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053141783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008702351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42197925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011920682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056154102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5203756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205359208","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.72911","title":"Trena M. Paulus and Jessica N. Lester. (2021). <i>Doing Qualitative Research in a Digital World</i> .","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.45690969009530114,"score_gpt":0.6064682169151608,"score_spread":0.1495585268198597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205359208","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017729906,0.4932942,0.04706949,0.37960124,0.026609719,0.0022398515,0.002327376,0.0015861867,0.045498922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024474269,0.56308544,0.147013,0.10097572,0.005042425,0.010915073,0.0026472965,0.0018925717,0.14395417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904103,0.005875141,0.00075939676,0.0006102726,0.0034326715,0.0002814926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9388618,0.039352164,0.0031449243,0.0010239474,0.013706088,0.0039111758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03453895,0.0016148237,0.0011168098,0.0042733443,0.0056321607,0.0047116675,0.0022464797,0.00425589,0.025493884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059459317,0.0028043666,0.00070879684,0.0042056134,0.0036374624,0.009230919,0.0055736657,0.008583043,0.022680702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003808889,0.000021679887,0.00037301512,0.0020790126,0.000009170462,0.00010993913,0.0068373717,0.000047823673,0.00048272798,0.0026587746,0.7890073,0.19833504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004239312,0.00005347148,0.0020574878,0.012164165,0.000030912084,0.00049518805,0.008113693,0.00012209968,0.00048114196,0.011641961,0.9647338,0.000063725725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024016175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059682842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039012288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017830541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18266165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205606861","doi":"10.1177/10497323211043823","title":"Using Videoconferencing Focus Groups in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research With Chinese Im/Migrants in Australia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Videoconferencing; Reproductive health; Qualitative research; Psychology; Troubleshooting; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; Multimedia; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.8267515766628872,"score_gpt":0.7080122210141803,"score_spread":0.11873935564870697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205606861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882988,0.00088231964,0.0036166825,0.0018278583,0.00006332208,0.0014512432,0.000037748614,0.000017265425,0.0038048637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98356193,0.0010616705,0.009697529,0.0010726919,0.00004775565,0.0029190897,0.00003267746,0.000012794166,0.0015938556],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97751313,0.01934256,0.00064758543,0.0006922023,0.00081285386,0.000991673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97666794,0.01666387,0.0017200308,0.00092688843,0.0027844456,0.0012367549],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04514917,0.00055860827,0.00045982632,0.0013870549,0.007508847,0.001622413,0.0019640976,0.0012404167,0.0031677943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032422636,0.0005417348,0.00034917038,0.0011996152,0.00498541,0.0025217875,0.003929563,0.0011704932,0.0002695804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016332688,0.00029375576,0.01138859,0.0008366384,0.000021449583,0.00080846966,0.93600786,0.00009779181,0.004580919,0.0009889309,0.0006413111,0.04417093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104341634,0.0014107807,0.034027055,0.0014680043,0.000070324895,0.0005219879,0.9386277,0.0005708529,0.0051111733,0.0019050871,0.016088238,0.00009451983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029778711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042079665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95485085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004651168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007960462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23877442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208012737","doi":"10.1177/16094069211053522","title":"Zoom Interviews: Benefits and Concessions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":338,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Movember Foundation","keywords":"Zoom; Interview; Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Service provider; Participant observation; Qualitative property; Data collection; Public relations; Control (management); Service (business); Psychology; Business; Marketing; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Management; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.6958955976060798,"score_gpt":0.6838784631155861,"score_spread":0.012017134490493686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208012737","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24466385,0.01648724,0.37060574,0.21197894,0.0050278245,0.0064339642,0.0013640538,0.0030092925,0.14042911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6800435,0.005930431,0.25398213,0.022104044,0.0013485143,0.018899636,0.00034359234,0.00073568197,0.016612507],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7764863,0.19824131,0.0049189483,0.004311048,0.013139299,0.0029030847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5978151,0.3349301,0.0112657985,0.030970003,0.019497028,0.005522037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16891868,0.0013432743,0.00094726885,0.0024790508,0.0144940065,0.007655293,0.004214803,0.004564198,0.016016314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24553837,0.0018103584,0.0008217151,0.002937272,0.01906514,0.020348616,0.02047311,0.0057955054,0.002883944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037940723,0.00014694438,0.0021594237,0.0028483507,0.000032248874,0.0015771169,0.7946236,0.0002768288,0.0044529065,0.05090734,0.021465221,0.12113055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010923159,0.00034768178,0.0034988392,0.006998646,0.00004525993,0.00223206,0.612534,0.0010282886,0.001826663,0.048401404,0.32282987,0.00014807715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041796905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012132244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83108133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049096155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008132702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8933381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210542627","doi":"10.1177/16094069211042227","title":"A Scoping Review of Virtual Focus Group Methods Used in Rehabilitation Sciences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Data collection; Asynchronous communication; Computer science; Protocol (science); Telemedicine; Medical education; Medicine; Health care","score_opus":0.6864819796126935,"score_gpt":0.726030991036444,"score_spread":0.039549011423750446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210542627","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005008919,0.9951062,0.0010657486,0.00055165146,0.00039128316,0.00090031564,0.00015700128,0.000016331522,0.0013105181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031681969,0.99196327,0.0022639113,0.00038745583,0.00009796007,0.0017057345,0.00017169704,0.000012830805,0.00022889936],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599831,0.01663359,0.014239871,0.0019329384,0.0065364805,0.00067401706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.903039,0.07382509,0.008038622,0.0018203695,0.012688374,0.0005886666],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037623532,0.002506995,0.0064623076,0.031903125,0.0027523087,0.0066084615,0.003295829,0.004382676,0.0049587055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115206435,0.0022062915,0.006608831,0.030013382,0.002424288,0.0056908317,0.0037218092,0.0026931586,0.001226545],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115201794,0.000056321955,0.0004912622,0.74199224,0.0011338575,0.0003355332,0.0025679858,0.00033924155,0.00055961893,0.002888309,0.0070048566,0.24251558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023941684,0.00008621904,0.00096599245,0.9263762,0.002279385,0.0003197157,0.00081215124,0.00008484948,0.00024003106,0.00077211036,0.06801244,0.000026988175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009570937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019471705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007536655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030099347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19897467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211274958","doi":"10.29173/pathways20","title":"Assessing Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Anthropological Research Methods","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pathways","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Ethnography; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Anthropology; Medicine; Engineering; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.7500050729796792,"score_gpt":0.6785177558117655,"score_spread":0.07148731716791368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211274958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7997389,0.006265523,0.070994616,0.026152115,0.00052600476,0.011721736,0.000514707,0.00016168498,0.083924875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.918565,0.003681971,0.058021054,0.0032305617,0.000093171766,0.0123128565,0.00012084028,0.00013374946,0.003840844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6013637,0.3613194,0.0073209857,0.0046197106,0.017406946,0.007969213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6420778,0.2924441,0.01636971,0.01561681,0.029232036,0.004259518],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33502156,0.0015740516,0.0010940941,0.0070842523,0.026267093,0.020507194,0.006099426,0.0026892154,0.007443692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23121409,0.002465566,0.00074720045,0.0072451993,0.033898808,0.013493629,0.034793235,0.003832953,0.000983871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013088291,0.0002032303,0.02389602,0.001289478,0.00003352592,0.00073186815,0.90607065,0.0004893249,0.00096781336,0.013244789,0.0013704905,0.051571995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004153047,0.00023453856,0.012459178,0.0030922326,0.000035428602,0.00033703056,0.9395194,0.0005619901,0.0009801767,0.0068900185,0.035774067,0.00007444126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032396704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09931293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66497844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03270021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036672212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8200368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216038955","doi":"","title":"Coded semistructured interviews in social psychological research.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Computer science; Applied psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.45336183147571435,"score_gpt":0.6155349502592069,"score_spread":0.16217311878349255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216038955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39567286,0.001295246,0.36703202,0.0019246109,0.0012959163,0.071335874,0.025157968,0.0011143395,0.13517112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5062344,0.0008647196,0.31054392,0.0008222736,0.00012249287,0.12863797,0.0075856475,0.00037518583,0.044813313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97243047,0.022068024,0.0010892464,0.0018981753,0.0018209897,0.00069312553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90983415,0.06579637,0.0034578452,0.0057836818,0.013894284,0.0012336996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02316039,0.0009282854,0.0005657314,0.0032384128,0.0032219207,0.0019469358,0.0019069567,0.0010943641,0.014804703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05612445,0.00056094973,0.00029261666,0.0041095624,0.0041921493,0.0017086993,0.0032622046,0.0015769731,0.0028419069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030902973,0.00082450575,0.003743124,0.005443126,0.000044701123,0.001243331,0.63724756,0.0019661381,0.042836215,0.04034854,0.035124008,0.22808853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015324537,0.0010695307,0.015258559,0.0050290464,0.000095266834,0.0012026221,0.4856613,0.0074309953,0.048441254,0.07420162,0.35969067,0.00038672754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004272701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010634279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02316039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044187033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007384893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12248528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W355573979","doi":"","title":"Roles of the FGD Team Members: An Overview/RÔLES DES MEMBRES DE GROUPE DE DISCUSSION: UN APERÇU","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06632992720680786,"score_gpt":0.3891889197382654,"score_spread":0.32285899253145756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W355573979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40577734,0.085192114,0.19282468,0.06977965,0.012339413,0.0065443087,0.0015664971,0.0011365142,0.22483954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.763514,0.041051995,0.08455581,0.005843045,0.001844662,0.0055451756,0.0011443412,0.00053187937,0.095969155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.980659,0.014516639,0.0009007794,0.0007618374,0.00235475,0.0008070096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864616,0.008487301,0.0011532072,0.0005179929,0.0026466292,0.00073329854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02039378,0.0012084628,0.00054577086,0.00446984,0.0061876746,0.0052314517,0.001366872,0.0028176769,0.008715041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018745657,0.0004959955,0.00066370843,0.0030021716,0.0035780969,0.0045976983,0.0038470821,0.0019570896,0.0026350117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043426018,0.00034025338,0.018206509,0.004559816,0.000048249913,0.0035531241,0.47000605,0.00044842294,0.005706395,0.04536857,0.048903707,0.40242472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025115145,0.00032010756,0.017763775,0.006543657,0.00007287191,0.006385861,0.3965277,0.0012322213,0.0053936127,0.013547407,0.5520606,0.00012709887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023565846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001699778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02039378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003707827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049226787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10785389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206499720","doi":"10.3138/9781442683204-fm","title":"Frontmatter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.07883228639272308,"score_gpt":0.3016618610550468,"score_spread":0.2228295746623237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206499720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045176418,0.0013203956,0.00056462956,0.0010600839,0.00095532736,0.000023338607,0.0006323584,0.00070162275,0.9942905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008027936,0.00027699716,0.0001473279,0.00023430109,0.000057410558,0.0000064289875,0.00017740892,0.00014639957,0.998151],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960834,0.000037330366,0.000016814132,0.00010767374,0.00017646683,0.000053394146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999559,0.00007611084,0.000024705212,0.00007495393,0.00013805571,0.00012712771],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002851265,0.00073169125,0.00051863433,0.0012065587,0.001600443,0.004117394,0.00089781877,0.0018638656,0.8749943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012339273,0.00033804355,0.0003424134,0.0012371193,0.000527056,0.003097053,0.0029490187,0.0014507303,0.7635457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041394393,0.000028101449,0.00022048928,0.00014308747,0.0000024299454,0.0001356187,0.00024685203,0.000046846133,0.00049356703,0.014279055,0.72614735,0.25821522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021625708,0.0000053470667,0.00013460852,0.000034097517,5.6734564e-7,0.000066196284,0.000045225366,0.000017978207,0.000059033788,0.0006473587,0.99898535,0.0000020281052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021339385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073092654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12500572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095219805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006146084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17830539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213061905","doi":"10.4000/sociologies.18221","title":"L’entretien de groupe en ligne, exemplification d’une méthode qualitative d’analyse de la réflexivité","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SociologieS","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ligne; Art","score_opus":0.1206302996652863,"score_gpt":0.466325935055702,"score_spread":0.3456956353904157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213061905","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17861697,0.005399098,0.68504256,0.024875652,0.0017593707,0.012573487,0.002394385,0.0005952337,0.08874324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56447196,0.0026445214,0.3676204,0.0054887813,0.00020537048,0.021803254,0.0008158675,0.0005353338,0.03641448],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90122473,0.08148904,0.0030326818,0.0047029806,0.008321376,0.0012292678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.867062,0.106263496,0.0046540364,0.009126455,0.011979897,0.0009140372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07230397,0.000873381,0.00095876714,0.003885296,0.0049336925,0.0069411495,0.0023767087,0.0020851297,0.009423084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08503453,0.0007291527,0.0011388849,0.0040689027,0.011074411,0.008005944,0.005600205,0.0027294764,0.0012470203],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029256818,0.00016637665,0.0042502703,0.005344536,0.00016093007,0.00039437765,0.72388375,0.00063348503,0.009398856,0.11722017,0.008493912,0.12976079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020193012,0.00040082383,0.010336091,0.0066955993,0.00022541685,0.0006329739,0.44968966,0.002689989,0.015039998,0.1313903,0.38248086,0.00021644517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008284512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012331186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07230397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007140034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011112231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38238454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213433559","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8057-7.ch032","title":"Ethical Considerations in Online Research Methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Online research methods; Anonymity; Ethical issues; Data collection; Research ethics; Online discussion; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Data science; Sociology; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.34460118344638035,"score_gpt":0.5761562686397025,"score_spread":0.23155508519332213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213433559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041787885,0.023896338,0.39560863,0.11907953,0.010372955,0.0062006414,0.00035150402,0.00048731276,0.4398243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09705891,0.027842265,0.55289394,0.091189004,0.008022409,0.031284194,0.0005415237,0.000964625,0.19020319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80081975,0.15931402,0.007355231,0.004303941,0.026533378,0.0016736299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7877389,0.1776576,0.0036271268,0.017169278,0.011578862,0.002228294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12639222,0.0010955554,0.0009784624,0.0021606414,0.0069382703,0.012183065,0.003133136,0.009295686,0.014757913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12538409,0.0009962636,0.00062693015,0.0028052924,0.02164084,0.012192382,0.008443802,0.012586122,0.008166164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026853204,0.000070756054,0.00021064031,0.0008270538,0.000009948459,0.00037147882,0.025184982,0.0002444547,0.0005477069,0.8204264,0.053524017,0.09855585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014726635,0.000038390954,0.00012551803,0.002553731,0.0000064084834,0.0006101294,0.0040190374,0.0002519793,0.00057412306,0.21883273,0.7729493,0.000023933431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007631199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015216745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87360775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003073023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010468819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6684339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214702426","doi":"10.1177/16094069221075862","title":"Collaborative Zoom Coding—A Novel Approach to Qualitative Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Women's College Hospital","keywords":"Zoom; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Data collection; Social media; World Wide Web; Multimedia; Internet privacy; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.5153550183839968,"score_gpt":0.6590967154551285,"score_spread":0.1437416970711317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214702426","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039760314,0.00044391956,0.9116013,0.006345215,0.00059239165,0.012350118,0.0014458619,0.00086298084,0.026597898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14504315,0.00030893376,0.82212704,0.0010872965,0.00009857811,0.025102202,0.00044710352,0.00038537438,0.0054003648],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82913315,0.14736967,0.004946279,0.0070516844,0.009458067,0.0020411848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7532374,0.1913988,0.007274855,0.020423375,0.025710106,0.0019554256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.121461004,0.0014618441,0.0015010216,0.008356426,0.010004281,0.010453286,0.0045898836,0.0024896967,0.009920987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16326837,0.0012148428,0.001378251,0.010008093,0.015254816,0.007906524,0.0125292055,0.0043332297,0.0015755174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020150373,0.00013584612,0.0011331337,0.0017279678,0.00005298044,0.0004405101,0.75808823,0.0013739298,0.004323287,0.11251092,0.008936201,0.111075506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026852326,0.0002325905,0.0017770847,0.0032431106,0.00006734691,0.0006773316,0.47977155,0.020477561,0.0072533377,0.25607556,0.22987045,0.00028560936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00585915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013827619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87853897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009582891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017847668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64235485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220840018","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v3i1.37639","title":"Blended Learning as a Transformative Educational Approach for Qualitative Health Research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blended learning; Context (archaeology); Transformative learning; Modalities; Qualitative research; Creativity; Health care; Synchronous learning; Psychology; Medical education; Computer science; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Multimedia; Educational technology; Cooperative learning; Teaching method; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.39656333924580667,"score_gpt":0.5387460549273185,"score_spread":0.14218271568151186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220840018","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007946759,0.00038213254,0.9362054,0.004307421,0.0011441896,0.019875474,0.001142722,0.0022109947,0.026784897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016768293,0.00014712836,0.9449124,0.00052374735,0.000062745145,0.034469478,0.00019591475,0.00028861474,0.0026317982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8477423,0.13649505,0.0039723553,0.0046513705,0.0058392934,0.0012996469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7789724,0.18059625,0.0039488664,0.023971828,0.009366465,0.003144139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14049232,0.0022042224,0.00191586,0.005888726,0.0056763664,0.011305906,0.0075637065,0.0035760608,0.034944814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15333025,0.0023078346,0.0030254032,0.0058596497,0.011296964,0.005651003,0.023540346,0.0075214515,0.0053655757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011388,0.0014658378,0.0014595719,0.0071370048,0.0002994524,0.00077940134,0.19689271,0.01158015,0.007407727,0.21223105,0.03364369,0.52596456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020283167,0.0011137199,0.0018786271,0.007360744,0.0001793735,0.0005574997,0.04577212,0.046077386,0.0076145274,0.43365073,0.45333663,0.00043029775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017523794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005799251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8595077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006204252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011235187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74300325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220896057","doi":"10.31124/advance.19383656.v1","title":"It's Inappropriate Because You Can See It- Regulating, Pruning, and Understanding Revealed Thinking in Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Administration (probate law); Pruning; Psychology; Internet privacy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.1547093409204226,"score_gpt":0.429731779982359,"score_spread":0.2750224390619364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220896057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429225,0.00086999097,0.012232616,0.0155736655,0.00012355512,0.00011141279,0.00006194259,0.000047440608,0.028056972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961951,0.00017232003,0.001122383,0.0007054032,0.0000056671656,0.000059183458,0.000008877972,0.000018548564,0.0017124852],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729585,0.021829937,0.0006919939,0.0008679727,0.002030966,0.001620682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416577,0.047600415,0.0037872442,0.0019821553,0.002807633,0.002164939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026745256,0.0003440308,0.00047234917,0.0016605471,0.009017629,0.008121884,0.0013160914,0.0016357484,0.0026566111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045561343,0.00042984658,0.0003898723,0.0012904283,0.031383503,0.009118831,0.005826991,0.0048078857,0.00026917513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008921881,0.000019285844,0.002276738,0.00004878297,0.0000018020951,0.00015353604,0.9870564,0.00002751878,0.00022031102,0.007841521,0.00026778053,0.002077511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033524807,0.000014907283,0.0014062152,0.00017059456,0.0000035716014,0.000120723504,0.9872684,0.000071124974,0.00022770805,0.0049610594,0.00574068,0.000011624051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009815873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010216077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026745256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065914327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008717913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14144415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220905164","doi":"10.31124/advance.19383656","title":"It’s Inappropriate Because You Can See It- Regulating, Pruning, and Understanding Revealed Thinking in Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Administration (probate law); Internet privacy; Psychology; Qualitative research; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.16747668674478478,"score_gpt":0.43232429741034906,"score_spread":0.2648476106655643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220905164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7914223,0.0033069064,0.021849737,0.06532537,0.00044792047,0.0000921658,0.00007678206,0.00014200146,0.11733678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932806,0.00037226302,0.0015533118,0.001404792,0.00001393873,0.000037945807,0.000010198746,0.000031823747,0.0032951485],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97352445,0.02109489,0.0006534001,0.0010581942,0.0021281852,0.0015408754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9534986,0.035140622,0.0037862246,0.0025744545,0.0025305997,0.0024695878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02047345,0.00033665227,0.000390846,0.0018473284,0.009179328,0.0119014215,0.0011538689,0.002156914,0.0048915367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040134404,0.0004564623,0.0005312959,0.0014442069,0.040147953,0.013496866,0.0069294544,0.0064618145,0.00053098303],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020061396,0.000045538694,0.0068986244,0.000090358226,0.0000059216595,0.00030076184,0.9286458,0.00007092001,0.00030058663,0.05204519,0.0018091977,0.009767004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011683788,0.00003113137,0.0056388658,0.0005551014,0.0000129126365,0.00030246293,0.91408545,0.0002512238,0.0005062824,0.04901626,0.029547818,0.000040750725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010925181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011705051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02047345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007538538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009253973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108275235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223503760","doi":"10.1007/s10459-022-10101-1","title":"Disruption in the space–time continuum: why digital ethnography matters","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Field (mathematics); Digital culture; Qualitative research; Digital health; Computer science; Social science; Media studies; Health care; Anthropology; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.1206520258069884,"score_gpt":0.5405819406695263,"score_spread":0.41992991486253783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223503760","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18778808,0.09779088,0.28341407,0.338007,0.0061420943,0.004708512,0.0006522805,0.0004096581,0.081087396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8664981,0.022801792,0.063979596,0.034021974,0.0012168029,0.007604108,0.00020528116,0.0003042554,0.0033680287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.63001007,0.33833545,0.008049901,0.00668227,0.013600761,0.0033214346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5017241,0.4591941,0.010656665,0.014875456,0.010882675,0.0026668888],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20903602,0.00092828186,0.0013644828,0.007248133,0.011741479,0.017639661,0.0036445893,0.007745357,0.0047626575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2864999,0.0013418461,0.0009545039,0.009507992,0.05491447,0.04033392,0.015169694,0.006618985,0.001111844],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013615642,0.00007068709,0.009248426,0.0033634712,0.000076290926,0.001014567,0.7570533,0.0005851803,0.00075661903,0.1587644,0.0073865615,0.061544236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060299,0.00011499461,0.0038572776,0.009670615,0.00005049584,0.0013273943,0.7131156,0.001157605,0.00077408506,0.123404376,0.1463542,0.00011310796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009832321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009702349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20903602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010589012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077224826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9753994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223981292","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054635","title":"Challenges and recommendations for COVID-19 public health messaging: a Canada-wide qualitative study using virtual focus groups","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Medicine; Public health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Qualitative research; Focus group; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Focus (optics); Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Health informatics; Health services research; Family medicine; MEDLINE; Medical education; Nursing; Virology; Pathology; Disease","score_opus":0.6476574363777374,"score_gpt":0.6081950215121936,"score_spread":0.039462414865543805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223981292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703048,0.0014000604,0.004081741,0.009085344,0.0001228617,0.0016648421,0.0014741373,0.00007229124,0.011793987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827692,0.0012557239,0.004160034,0.0020652914,0.000019584351,0.0011385371,0.00034375658,0.000047112688,0.008200899],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929301,0.0032472806,0.00023821241,0.0005826936,0.0010600352,0.0019417285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98425335,0.008021348,0.0009935846,0.00031484416,0.0039153392,0.0025015213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015025428,0.00058617786,0.00056795514,0.0017136805,0.018392846,0.0043466166,0.0023180468,0.0013712575,0.0034445517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016807493,0.00059570704,0.0005158748,0.0029105353,0.00626342,0.0018279378,0.0039818007,0.0021320262,0.00029668852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006730537,0.000050594674,0.0075823828,0.00039336132,0.0000054192824,0.00065943855,0.97666764,0.00008134271,0.0010165381,0.0013869248,0.0022973663,0.009791707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011132477,0.00004330524,0.0072393278,0.00035090698,0.00001028832,0.000105303174,0.97264785,0.0001735924,0.00041105173,0.0002345171,0.01874128,0.000031467847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9038779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9225416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096122086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06805324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10610713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4937631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224443306","doi":"10.1177/16094069221093138","title":"Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Qualitative research; Context (archaeology); Pandemic; Journaling file system; Psychology; Medical education; Set (abstract data type); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Computer science; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.9204746320327312,"score_gpt":0.7890104824960789,"score_spread":0.1314641495366523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224443306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89813703,0.0017406596,0.048111852,0.0074157375,0.000752742,0.010719675,0.002783227,0.0002442104,0.030094838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9207203,0.0017349996,0.043991975,0.0030714872,0.00031705704,0.021303656,0.000650597,0.00018438871,0.008025573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9455154,0.048083294,0.0014893304,0.0014151444,0.001707038,0.0017897942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8353999,0.13758945,0.0068884185,0.005725106,0.010566986,0.0038300902],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047386486,0.00069348415,0.00088402076,0.0027878443,0.0074315416,0.006447919,0.0020024888,0.0021097772,0.0063876733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09092887,0.000771616,0.00064852065,0.0032008628,0.006481197,0.0052603856,0.00532276,0.0024199535,0.0011954216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050149055,0.0006159856,0.0070095267,0.0019465856,0.000029192171,0.0012081001,0.92478395,0.00035278848,0.0031582317,0.0052668904,0.0041409764,0.050986238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001437742,0.00080812816,0.005580521,0.0026451906,0.000036658592,0.00050927774,0.9192166,0.0006217609,0.0031880473,0.006544244,0.060586575,0.000119247576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024259791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005122215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95261353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034789315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006767007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25060666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225736902","doi":"10.1177/16094069221090063","title":"An Alternative Method of Interviewing: Critical Reflections on Videoconference Interviews for Qualitative Data Collection","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Videoconferencing; Data collection; Face-to-face; Qualitative property; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Multimedia; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.8823424053717918,"score_gpt":0.7646091000864593,"score_spread":0.11773330528533243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225736902","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021054147,0.0040895473,0.81742847,0.014139238,0.0053743655,0.020268643,0.0014100202,0.0008624345,0.11537306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07772979,0.002749637,0.8660737,0.0042139296,0.0006144495,0.028497916,0.0004132596,0.00088738126,0.01881997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.85248184,0.13110729,0.0029768173,0.005100143,0.0070167584,0.0013171294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86151564,0.10600664,0.003334088,0.011763669,0.01596619,0.001413824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.080271445,0.0027844566,0.0010806107,0.0060589286,0.009603237,0.012177103,0.004209359,0.004585222,0.020169374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11230045,0.001366738,0.0019484839,0.006170059,0.018779166,0.010365564,0.010509065,0.0087517565,0.0050797863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001937702,0.00017091355,0.00041494166,0.0038266324,0.000060939597,0.0007039331,0.64467275,0.00045510105,0.0072439513,0.13181683,0.033585925,0.17685436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018389914,0.0003152425,0.0006817874,0.0070153777,0.000076832206,0.0011172891,0.1674266,0.0013833101,0.006054575,0.06435844,0.7511341,0.0002524771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031363426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007420758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065699704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011324789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42452103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226026765","doi":"10.36367/ntqr.10.2021-e514","title":"Investigação Qualitativa e o Desafio Digital // Qualitative Research and the Digital Challenge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"New Trends in Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Francophone University Association; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Democratization; Internationalization; Qualitative research; Public relations; Political science; Narrative; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Social science; Geography; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.655718227954455,"score_gpt":0.655915537480356,"score_spread":0.0001973095259010238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226026765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04329093,0.045515146,0.26249507,0.43236226,0.007560567,0.010505958,0.0016108056,0.00036957272,0.19628978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6415272,0.029250117,0.23107931,0.04780922,0.0014765462,0.023249721,0.0007713268,0.00042418102,0.024412412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7565496,0.22195332,0.0049203755,0.00415795,0.010372709,0.0020461658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76092553,0.19857585,0.008215307,0.016984647,0.012625031,0.0026736555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20962787,0.0008220573,0.0013751731,0.0060992413,0.008407561,0.02192715,0.0033029465,0.0033104648,0.0069796904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11393507,0.000771852,0.0011025964,0.0076069706,0.043891437,0.016010491,0.013248325,0.0055561867,0.0012536168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033283748,0.00007785442,0.0017216195,0.0035307906,0.00004287013,0.00021186755,0.1677024,0.00040606337,0.00057963276,0.7578133,0.011679066,0.05620128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000351324,0.00011578407,0.0013689767,0.015721884,0.000047530237,0.000564993,0.25450432,0.0011610788,0.0012691555,0.30008477,0.4250649,0.000061487066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003883803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004812748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79037213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015212075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03667649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9746696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226172810","doi":"10.1177/16094069221090062","title":"Virtual Qualitative Research Using Transnational Feminist Queer Methodology: The Challenges and Opportunities of Zoom-Based Research During Moments of Crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Queer; Sociology; Autoethnography; Accountability; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Zoom; Geopolitics; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Politics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.9479411888022489,"score_gpt":0.7353248816474791,"score_spread":0.21261630715476976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226172810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43288437,0.009205176,0.3900835,0.044798825,0.0015618941,0.005820353,0.0010729004,0.00070519384,0.11386784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884935,0.0015812626,0.09290416,0.004336723,0.0001366792,0.006554167,0.0001522375,0.00027723308,0.0055640754],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8584687,0.13301042,0.0010951225,0.0028682954,0.002781201,0.0017761429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91367644,0.07002507,0.003233296,0.0071488637,0.003829037,0.002087319],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.114612125,0.0012744191,0.0013191283,0.004455267,0.01722069,0.015167623,0.0041570473,0.0024662802,0.0077989856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06771491,0.0011361522,0.0009581782,0.003682053,0.04783177,0.015815215,0.01786795,0.0044319555,0.0010051505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059488902,0.00004609849,0.0010250427,0.00048430022,0.000016783777,0.0005154241,0.92717534,0.00035483547,0.0009636568,0.05368388,0.0017235533,0.013951526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048618807,0.00010949763,0.0010791355,0.0014157392,0.00002088745,0.0005228206,0.86522526,0.0011326508,0.0011079223,0.04793022,0.081335455,0.000071799346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068642492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014417223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8853879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009946627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009028979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60613406},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4226486887","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1828","title":"Perspectives on reporting non-verbal interactions from the contemporary research focus group","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nurse Researcher","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Moderation; Psychology; Qualitative research; Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Synchronicity; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.4612834860424937,"score_gpt":0.5780628605711765,"score_spread":0.11677937452868281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226486887","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06837542,0.063084014,0.22519715,0.45546585,0.012664141,0.0014641616,0.00042581558,0.00055754936,0.17276587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8214399,0.03172492,0.06058404,0.059767712,0.007117262,0.006560316,0.00034355704,0.0007022181,0.011760131],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.2759547,0.6797792,0.01239652,0.0064842645,0.021156209,0.004229197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30317718,0.620741,0.024576033,0.0151579995,0.032764338,0.00358343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3968788,0.0026773673,0.0016365943,0.009596436,0.02197434,0.0394172,0.010931181,0.01706835,0.0048029353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42455056,0.0021329517,0.0023080935,0.007912238,0.10914439,0.03650017,0.024233265,0.017092548,0.0019207771],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004903117,0.000015036732,0.00073508994,0.0010580997,0.00002477987,0.0008663649,0.88843966,0.00009984945,0.00039996082,0.091884114,0.003499887,0.01292823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034338125,0.00009820767,0.0009450657,0.0062416885,0.000040224895,0.0022972196,0.7527655,0.0003605291,0.000920733,0.05152961,0.18466051,0.00010636893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008625132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060663507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60312116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021637676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014715825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7437558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230364688","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-102295-5.10805-4","title":"Content Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content analysis; Content (measure theory); Representation (politics); Politics; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Term (time); Positivism; Confusion; Social science; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.13660723991340595,"score_gpt":0.3828731604154355,"score_spread":0.24626592050202956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230364688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065435834,0.00065210485,0.19127955,0.0024367855,0.001798561,0.08229575,0.11480812,0.009739098,0.5315541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.099711366,0.00139386,0.34986174,0.0013260972,0.00048646494,0.14924218,0.06360492,0.006856256,0.32751712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848074,0.0050095026,0.0018403428,0.0026188532,0.0050173895,0.00070658413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623251,0.012170271,0.0011141371,0.0037877897,0.020195449,0.0004072456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01183524,0.0014466398,0.0014699615,0.01619756,0.003204775,0.00431256,0.0017305252,0.00070319034,0.113502614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043289665,0.0007382326,0.0013255014,0.013049127,0.0018183541,0.002703078,0.003888438,0.0014346753,0.038887646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005227063,0.00033046407,0.0032519056,0.0059318934,0.000079878475,0.00019312876,0.03884253,0.00036182403,0.012137544,0.030757772,0.17208007,0.7355103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014560581,0.00022570827,0.009407803,0.0025022565,0.00021345349,0.00021052493,0.028342327,0.0023410183,0.015014314,0.014967316,0.9265259,0.000103693346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004435199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006131181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113502614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004239016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011969712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37970412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233518352","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_100707","title":"Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.14608531311976214,"score_gpt":0.40447278707104106,"score_spread":0.2583874739512789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233518352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035560265,0.003676784,0.44181898,0.001485164,0.0010955186,0.023754105,0.009707515,0.0029921306,0.47990957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07584629,0.0056080697,0.53799236,0.0012662427,0.0001557338,0.0514456,0.0067714583,0.00072387623,0.3201904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956318,0.0028786075,0.0001808487,0.00052109937,0.00064901233,0.00013860821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264306,0.005496039,0.00020757584,0.0006754556,0.00083826843,0.00013963148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065536113,0.0009353791,0.0005027288,0.0016789152,0.0018952109,0.0015104242,0.0017858496,0.00089929556,0.05242342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009095474,0.00059187785,0.00029075347,0.003137525,0.0008702231,0.0015720745,0.0027628818,0.001327567,0.017252548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022584219,0.00032952262,0.00047433027,0.0021874872,0.000012171049,0.00014702113,0.031811383,0.0005364133,0.020208057,0.023675954,0.075306766,0.845085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012291859,0.00044723548,0.004101334,0.0019555253,0.000026820284,0.0006340859,0.020970944,0.002454414,0.018000633,0.027908541,0.9232749,0.00010258025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002097092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007400702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05242342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013027149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031392826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1753738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235749817","doi":"10.4018/9781591401520.ch004","title":"Conducting Congruent, Ethical Qualitative Research on Internet-Mediated Research Environments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Qualitative research; Participant observation; Data collection; Internet research; Psychology; Knowledge management; Internet privacy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.6430882358349211,"score_gpt":0.5835883366209923,"score_spread":0.05949989921392884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235749817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06884999,0.013639853,0.26740494,0.034614716,0.0019726935,0.011355867,0.0008302213,0.00029393297,0.60103774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38366082,0.029477209,0.36519772,0.012686472,0.0005426795,0.030523114,0.00097532076,0.0005097803,0.1764268],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96232575,0.031744808,0.0006620637,0.0011331475,0.0034718534,0.00066240825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95353067,0.04199151,0.0007763523,0.0017807118,0.0011980865,0.00072270265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044013936,0.0006083408,0.00085212325,0.0013403505,0.0065659448,0.010444431,0.00194416,0.0024901147,0.0074658254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027111022,0.00073100824,0.00041691915,0.0025430033,0.01797007,0.008024153,0.0073966077,0.0039154557,0.0021823563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024523551,0.00011899991,0.00061461504,0.001118506,0.000009262575,0.00056671957,0.5242915,0.00041860496,0.0013109667,0.38190144,0.014586697,0.07503819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037546964,0.00010371598,0.0010103903,0.005471566,0.000011293519,0.0011081897,0.20646816,0.00050776533,0.0017074519,0.137328,0.6461916,0.000054265787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012610524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038933335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045728073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009984626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23277068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236697958","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101209","title":"Social Tagging","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.19367054082342963,"score_gpt":0.46772585202439604,"score_spread":0.2740553112009664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236697958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052228267,0.0010784102,0.31693453,0.0025966086,0.0019564675,0.0010684542,0.008053741,0.007338289,0.6557507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054393332,0.002227124,0.19958635,0.0017012673,0.0008432782,0.0013668645,0.020517806,0.003384991,0.71597904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967064,0.0011022516,0.0001829758,0.00074147544,0.0011040926,0.00016288241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946523,0.0017703575,0.0001880213,0.0020502778,0.0011470073,0.00019197505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037913118,0.0010752856,0.00064469775,0.005968878,0.0031244904,0.005236079,0.0017128976,0.0016792797,0.09517587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008706551,0.0005623199,0.0008549572,0.0063210134,0.0013045657,0.0065904027,0.00435914,0.0013049403,0.09735168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007166506,0.00008380453,0.0007494708,0.00041657002,0.000029151915,0.00009034655,0.0017137268,0.00047392704,0.004745241,0.11763106,0.1858587,0.68813634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006780738,0.000023849767,0.00079960126,0.00020650543,0.000021211168,0.00022407617,0.00077462546,0.002039369,0.0043991306,0.043360032,0.9481073,0.000037469315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028758966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042542964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09517587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013475368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023958953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31839496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236698384","doi":"10.1037/a0020663","title":"On the Cover.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06977807229599534,"score_gpt":0.4783189476006552,"score_spread":0.4085408753046599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236698384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006777302,0.0019913546,0.00020200989,0.0042991713,0.005122716,0.00006920582,0.0012136817,0.00071964343,0.9857044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00096811255,0.00037859008,0.00009176623,0.000732921,0.0002564208,0.0000103906805,0.00030292143,0.00011538959,0.99714357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997788,0.0000226866,0.0000070101014,0.000030485564,0.000114124196,0.000046771263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995023,0.00005681034,0.000017945875,0.000035728182,0.00020207334,0.00018512776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020259636,0.0006968693,0.00045406242,0.0009829281,0.0022739917,0.002748734,0.00062924146,0.0011185243,0.81820244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011511435,0.0003219788,0.00040520413,0.00074747,0.00044915316,0.0017254518,0.0019975784,0.0019665884,0.6778271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018214092,0.00001423677,0.00005922271,0.000027197886,6.706071e-7,0.00003749176,0.000043301035,0.00000913566,0.00013650216,0.0009320875,0.96804696,0.030674936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035994417,0.0000073354136,0.00043179817,0.000039080758,7.718311e-7,0.000040365867,0.00013189668,0.000013836799,0.000040888845,0.00030829405,0.9989793,0.0000027445487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076469486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036585104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18179756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067520165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074528536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25931215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238145293","doi":"10.1037/0003-066x.59.9.961","title":"On the Cover.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09641769673331389,"score_gpt":0.4779663108471737,"score_spread":0.3815486141138598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238145293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037668238,0.006613971,0.00033199397,0.0036813698,0.0067501343,0.00007471549,0.0021591429,0.00065998663,0.9793521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006482404,0.0016259978,0.0001359229,0.0007353191,0.00054348423,0.000016116795,0.00059664797,0.0001480999,0.9955503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997737,0.000022428958,0.000010565428,0.000046353263,0.00011156513,0.00003537843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956876,0.00007147178,0.000021214139,0.00004188208,0.00017425904,0.00012250463],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002484972,0.0010324386,0.0006537514,0.0012219178,0.0014554745,0.0028384605,0.0008532794,0.0011452273,0.8120737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010857597,0.00031726793,0.00045841053,0.0012473922,0.0003764073,0.0025315618,0.0020056397,0.001650795,0.77142745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018407089,0.0000136917,0.00005371361,0.000046846402,8.449168e-7,0.00001834369,0.000024418525,0.0000120327,0.000109217704,0.0015304437,0.9472075,0.050964467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028076004,0.000004476916,0.00019698347,0.000049796578,6.42444e-7,0.00002287118,0.000041243533,0.00001014679,0.000024351493,0.00036566242,0.9992792,0.0000018901467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038398288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01493303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18792629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068442273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006974755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26805395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239598263","doi":"10.7202/1085324ar","title":"Analyse des données des entretiens de groupe","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches qualitatives","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5201156997509795,"score_gpt":0.5163541847683157,"score_spread":0.0037615149826637495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239598263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5016155,0.013421571,0.3796211,0.0108954795,0.0015780162,0.00818042,0.016134141,0.0009994641,0.06755429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6921281,0.0067020874,0.25081205,0.0023556636,0.00032966372,0.011919134,0.0071196198,0.00055457803,0.028079025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9398404,0.030813985,0.0065292525,0.0055736764,0.015814215,0.0014285488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7811314,0.16932227,0.009214128,0.012903131,0.026479915,0.00094921706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042971727,0.000984768,0.0017636301,0.009744714,0.0035846839,0.0053981883,0.002386167,0.0018814829,0.011356231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17359564,0.00070685305,0.0018883295,0.009179158,0.0025764732,0.006174625,0.004138413,0.0019670639,0.0023417003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008567403,0.00034500286,0.07405686,0.013861273,0.0012403266,0.0015339406,0.37581918,0.001453288,0.014671186,0.028253606,0.012828961,0.47507966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015411514,0.0011853348,0.18190998,0.009447717,0.0013089352,0.0028202997,0.3190134,0.003940337,0.028933093,0.043806676,0.4069467,0.0005333449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010555997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011993675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042971727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003952303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065677916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22725892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243117424","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/auhpd","title":"Transparency in Qualitative Research: Increasing Fairness in the CHI Review Process","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Workaround; Scrutiny; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Work (physics); Public relations; Focus group; Computer science; Process management; Political science; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Computer security; Marketing","score_opus":0.7061017980809354,"score_gpt":0.6830691601370834,"score_spread":0.02303263794385202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243117424","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044546697,0.004351278,0.72929543,0.12591825,0.009206417,0.050377198,0.0008020026,0.003193213,0.032309536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26561618,0.002361725,0.6034505,0.02306224,0.0032087099,0.09457587,0.00044907254,0.0017859432,0.0054897196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.0957457,0.81985885,0.037247963,0.011658756,0.031879272,0.0036094275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06544975,0.7085521,0.037029233,0.07318016,0.109476976,0.00631179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6904562,0.001731496,0.0029311155,0.009647031,0.017745465,0.021794038,0.00571014,0.008461851,0.007197791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.85564303,0.003597523,0.0028208245,0.008657939,0.022299936,0.018284075,0.026929231,0.015666045,0.003997217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010808429,0.000271192,0.0039055778,0.008582122,0.00036300797,0.0010337211,0.71120924,0.0011432433,0.008263549,0.056339048,0.037850626,0.16995782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015972345,0.0010419042,0.0097093405,0.025433056,0.00054237107,0.0019527314,0.1309354,0.012135058,0.019128107,0.33891958,0.45695126,0.0016539703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036102058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060943323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3095438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013073424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06607348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38172263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243356204","doi":"10.20935/al2170","title":"The Complementary Role of Focus Group Research in Political Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academia Letters","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Ignorance; Politics; Sociology; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.15081049969459828,"score_gpt":0.5073926577613326,"score_spread":0.3565821580667343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243356204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038657077,0.074869506,0.28930488,0.23403306,0.015761012,0.005810455,0.0010174182,0.0007993865,0.33974722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45272595,0.03641027,0.3896906,0.049679697,0.01598344,0.035126686,0.00031345768,0.0012041959,0.018865608],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.41245654,0.5466675,0.0051820576,0.010657496,0.023562964,0.0014734417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.104915805,0.83529335,0.006169742,0.036403548,0.014069418,0.003148144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4406824,0.0020438596,0.0038866522,0.023355586,0.011368085,0.026234077,0.0052298163,0.008669156,0.029751725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44830847,0.0028095213,0.0014036434,0.013078988,0.05685559,0.038267575,0.03492844,0.009972755,0.0047316463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050228945,0.0003775675,0.0039306646,0.0064518466,0.00036150237,0.00023277506,0.22147669,0.0005209557,0.0012126504,0.31599095,0.023527425,0.42541462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006889548,0.00081974344,0.0068887235,0.01345028,0.00022242841,0.000648349,0.08685896,0.002417388,0.0015879006,0.59455127,0.2915925,0.0002734977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025011422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029959963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5593176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012122665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014494212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68973815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244606300","doi":"10.18192/aporia.v4i4.2903","title":"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing research; Mainstream; Limiting; The Internet; Trustworthiness; Nursing science; Sociology; Normative; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Data science; Online research methods; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Nursing; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Medicine; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.1687420034647142,"score_gpt":0.4743499393688745,"score_spread":0.30560793590416024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244606300","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019169865,0.07755355,0.49054116,0.025465403,0.008552215,0.013738626,0.0020396595,0.0010880146,0.36185154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19589564,0.06112527,0.5952022,0.018261962,0.0065215738,0.05419422,0.0017902749,0.0009540204,0.06605478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.843305,0.13286065,0.0059453645,0.004552355,0.012427276,0.00090932514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62226725,0.31009007,0.011986635,0.034438156,0.017657531,0.0035604262],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.088286676,0.00077717897,0.0015560086,0.008352674,0.0039055229,0.012093793,0.0023243176,0.003559049,0.04896556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16012414,0.0005478593,0.00097450375,0.009211619,0.0074356645,0.01426323,0.0074615437,0.0035715762,0.0145871835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027090788,0.00046167686,0.0044155405,0.0077226525,0.00012538588,0.00023268463,0.0126188155,0.0002606941,0.0012203959,0.19130327,0.020781344,0.7605866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017407238,0.0007416786,0.007490621,0.014929863,0.0001364142,0.0010801059,0.014174663,0.00077683304,0.0018923738,0.15832168,0.8001541,0.00012757543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009850097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013499368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9510344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030730315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006145308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245032768","doi":"10.5663/aps.v3i1-2.20022","title":"Pandemic H1N1 Targeted Messaging for Manitoba Metis: An Evaluation of a Risk Communication Intervention","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Metis; Intervention (counseling); Pandemic; Focus group; Medicine; Public relations; Psychology; Nursing; Environmental health; Business; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science","score_opus":0.19410251956132965,"score_gpt":0.5655666457073176,"score_spread":0.371464126145988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245032768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96569407,0.00045683738,0.0007474825,0.0015067427,0.00018021451,0.025945188,0.00031934085,0.0000916102,0.0050585354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135731,0.002103413,0.01848293,0.0017389547,0.00012382491,0.05769825,0.00039369325,0.000031822467,0.005854014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99188304,0.005279342,0.00032721195,0.00038700594,0.0007321987,0.0013912497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920853,0.0033034927,0.00064621837,0.0003070379,0.0015244844,0.0021334758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010743789,0.0015662839,0.0010448277,0.0009177134,0.0047272,0.0015401798,0.0028471872,0.0020573637,0.005757336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013464311,0.00070797047,0.0014861178,0.0011257677,0.0014773133,0.00084904337,0.002120635,0.0019656722,0.00042487003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05887093,0.35392463,0.024565116,0.015724938,0.0015494542,0.0018964884,0.06565122,0.004311868,0.010077226,0.0027571213,0.0041591744,0.45651186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11673903,0.58189154,0.17708836,0.006301283,0.0058002714,0.0002677123,0.059596766,0.008067968,0.010346457,0.00213744,0.03136157,0.00040161976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24935775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38259563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75064224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0143615175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045709983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49581265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247554370","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-937-3.ch177","title":"Conducting Congruent, Ethical Qualitative Research on Internet-Mediated Research Environments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Qualitative research; Participant observation; Data collection; Psychology; Internet research; Sociology; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web; Social science","score_opus":0.5978590184420555,"score_gpt":0.5835746797203246,"score_spread":0.01428433872173085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247554370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050419383,0.010333625,0.333009,0.024364864,0.0017780043,0.00987993,0.00047529137,0.0002740548,0.56946576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3548722,0.017360028,0.43226352,0.00959904,0.00046274174,0.024594164,0.0005587312,0.00040948074,0.15988015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96487004,0.029893119,0.00057795487,0.0010684618,0.0030192295,0.00057119207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630224,0.032984655,0.00062154,0.0017031683,0.0010773581,0.00059080345],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04376021,0.00052011135,0.00065488537,0.001091228,0.005670997,0.008320912,0.0017679041,0.002270364,0.0053148665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022943018,0.00060027227,0.00036541335,0.0016310464,0.020356061,0.0068029747,0.0067748735,0.0032958745,0.0014608281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019184388,0.00009317195,0.0005254919,0.0008360985,0.000008155962,0.0005354068,0.4047949,0.00045318596,0.001363091,0.5061442,0.012364207,0.07286282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003438761,0.00009540398,0.000890245,0.0037487275,0.000009523993,0.00130223,0.15489613,0.00058756483,0.002082114,0.19814876,0.63816106,0.0000438173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010816832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038323214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003869222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074405507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23142886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248042616","doi":"10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067","title":"Netnography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":584,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Netnography; Ethnography; Sociology; The Internet; Participant observation; Qualitative research; Social media; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0481467446247528,"score_gpt":0.3701220706080331,"score_spread":0.32197532598328027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248042616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034526403,0.00095553405,0.003705432,0.0034977642,0.0031992635,0.00022248391,0.0048269792,0.0011352226,0.9790046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019889545,0.00092565693,0.0020223914,0.0015131889,0.00057928544,0.0002662939,0.002900623,0.000892047,0.97101104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989737,0.0003501325,0.000056915887,0.00014756047,0.0003748597,0.00009680887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956417,0.0013548868,0.0002244008,0.00076993956,0.001053781,0.00095526135],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012176856,0.00041562848,0.00030607553,0.0023133822,0.002363649,0.004120404,0.0010708602,0.0009178109,0.50060135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007210573,0.00017261929,0.00022259096,0.0024632916,0.00081821496,0.002929075,0.003454671,0.0010764042,0.13732761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080318794,0.000040645555,0.0008414866,0.00048483678,0.000004558996,0.0002505396,0.0036511559,0.00009302263,0.0003578708,0.043855432,0.76677155,0.18356855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015761572,0.000004898044,0.00019764728,0.000092435446,6.639031e-7,0.00005544046,0.0005594844,0.000027877719,0.000068468384,0.00092877226,0.99806076,0.000002010347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017982877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040124403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50060135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011967539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019331301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71233153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249773961","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100337","title":"e-Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.43137848420973557,"score_gpt":0.5705342232653219,"score_spread":0.1391557390555863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249773961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004741312,0.0047568358,0.018724972,0.0030814342,0.001181714,0.00012667093,0.0005471107,0.00066501653,0.9704422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062433076,0.00790281,0.01199873,0.0020980581,0.0008418536,0.0001914753,0.0012562113,0.0005447691,0.9689229],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982912,0.0006024474,0.00009097157,0.00027053236,0.0006437806,0.00010103312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712723,0.0012477087,0.00007796354,0.00085262686,0.0004596957,0.00023484624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025498364,0.00091209344,0.00062998885,0.0027748013,0.0013313479,0.005968072,0.0017393718,0.002819419,0.34492785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005949371,0.00042720177,0.00054686854,0.0040855273,0.0016359729,0.010464839,0.0054403353,0.0023399133,0.23437098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027238408,0.000059089063,0.00013174705,0.0005631066,0.0000061862797,0.00007141681,0.00057475717,0.00014286107,0.00091459166,0.2415986,0.3125755,0.44333485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027179126,0.000008049469,0.00007930598,0.0002666892,0.0000017390942,0.000120051125,0.00015167535,0.000068560264,0.00039290078,0.029036842,0.9698674,0.000004072478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042432905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006950625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34492785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011486805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017002814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250604073","doi":"10.1891/1058-1243.11.3.1","title":"Focus Groups to Reveal Parents’ Needs for Prenatal Education","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Perinatal Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Feeling; Empowerment; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Christian ministry; Qualitative research; Medical education; Medicine; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.061087119953141165,"score_gpt":0.4048271564652038,"score_spread":0.34374003651206264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250604073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635991,0.00032914768,0.014120638,0.0034273842,0.0002679667,0.0066659306,0.0006919374,0.00018200175,0.010715915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200115,0.0005756952,0.040187035,0.002601181,0.00010528806,0.024764115,0.00038809315,0.000060136765,0.011306954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389946,0.0044842195,0.0002612225,0.0003913795,0.00037212815,0.00059157296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96519256,0.030224739,0.0007546022,0.0010711522,0.0017722842,0.0009847224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010950924,0.00084071467,0.0005980446,0.0016688163,0.0054716687,0.00083168154,0.0014786526,0.0019449901,0.01363454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027167568,0.00073078397,0.00037557766,0.0008322384,0.0011362621,0.001849748,0.0039899126,0.0018734202,0.0010222836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011223556,0.0025556367,0.009178146,0.001254934,0.000036159006,0.0016728073,0.874966,0.00018027525,0.024240362,0.002690738,0.0066237077,0.07547885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016506199,0.005814553,0.038976006,0.0011866522,0.00027428017,0.0021072526,0.8408602,0.001537249,0.037675686,0.008008952,0.061725453,0.0001831374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016736463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042614266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01363454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017779134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025987197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057914734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252501860","doi":"10.24124/2005/bpgub363","title":"Spinning a northern web: Women using information and communication technology to network for health and wellness.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Information and Communications Technology; The Internet; Focus group; Public relations; Action (physics); Work (physics); Promotion (chess); Health promotion; Action research; Knowledge management; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Public health; World Wide Web; Business; Nursing; Computer science; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.043207604389584785,"score_gpt":0.44576572584574425,"score_spread":0.4025581214561595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252501860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7862151,0.004013805,0.0023835637,0.026963905,0.0005594867,0.00018435545,0.00016788316,0.00016699263,0.17934482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331664,0.002830063,0.0012341288,0.002868171,0.00006907666,0.00011341301,0.00008130485,0.00006716077,0.059570305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875605,0.00064747006,0.000024216082,0.00008161502,0.00019896301,0.00029172158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984825,0.0006564839,0.00021683886,0.00008057489,0.000109985674,0.00045357953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012992987,0.0003934966,0.00022151205,0.0009348823,0.015461295,0.005158069,0.0007375076,0.0014486016,0.0067364625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030776204,0.0004316788,0.00016630514,0.0012987872,0.004545978,0.0032104861,0.003962562,0.0013053593,0.0009934211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004651214,0.00007941775,0.016506335,0.00020162514,0.000008439198,0.0058784527,0.88679254,0.00006177921,0.00092533627,0.005707955,0.01798787,0.06580372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003798949,0.000043323525,0.005821193,0.00011618627,0.0000087067265,0.0016142009,0.8760856,0.000073787785,0.00022872053,0.00048604273,0.11550364,0.000014738584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10609438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3046708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10609438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040090783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004835026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21095371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253596683","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11236","title":"The Marginalization of Child Care: A Pilot Atlas of Child Care in Ottawa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Focus group; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Political science; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine; Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.020815860798815092,"score_gpt":0.37063213981400395,"score_spread":0.34981627901518886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253596683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9473779,0.0007191248,0.00087122474,0.0030339905,0.00007311362,0.00024447258,0.0024695497,0.00007277929,0.045137893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817461,0.0010718328,0.0020361948,0.00025405653,0.000008433886,0.00028477955,0.00058282877,0.00004685772,0.013968987],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988242,0.00046023304,0.000047749007,0.00013779328,0.00018490602,0.00034507588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971777,0.0013323715,0.00017931983,0.00041227572,0.00032363908,0.0005745298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013702726,0.0003237567,0.00026909352,0.0015675289,0.01495696,0.0038883863,0.0013413574,0.00075049454,0.0067508323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025206616,0.0004464277,0.00040030965,0.0035547903,0.0075700837,0.002008401,0.0052843783,0.001420514,0.00028622957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027381352,0.000090732974,0.04171015,0.00056032796,0.00004108815,0.0026340038,0.8880046,0.00075228093,0.002951475,0.015047406,0.008649429,0.039284714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009144146,0.00010044457,0.08986064,0.00023783176,0.00004077694,0.00045909884,0.78158313,0.0002223552,0.0013065169,0.0014833133,0.124635294,0.00006152174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8275499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9537941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17245013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043146744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03612634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3469314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256560939","doi":"10.1037/0003-066x.60.9.1044","title":"On the Cover.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09617476079146371,"score_gpt":0.48550904859565525,"score_spread":0.38933428780419155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256560939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004106101,0.016587663,0.00047215185,0.014068535,0.019622315,0.00008646229,0.0017736809,0.0007505318,0.9462281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010269955,0.0033878302,0.0001535122,0.0028631783,0.0018205311,0.000021165306,0.0005539512,0.00016639232,0.9900064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965346,0.000048022473,0.00001874889,0.000063068626,0.00016670336,0.000050035003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939644,0.000114561015,0.00003133424,0.00005853928,0.00022836584,0.00017069053],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033230695,0.0009451809,0.00063377776,0.0014497594,0.0017112162,0.0046588783,0.0010443829,0.0021051343,0.724562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016301832,0.00035920067,0.0005509518,0.0013107568,0.00065127347,0.0034347696,0.0025387227,0.002311611,0.60119766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010370008,0.000009928896,0.00006013058,0.000055460965,9.701461e-7,0.000024586609,0.000031007232,0.000011639626,0.00006388579,0.0020611887,0.9598236,0.0378472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021391936,0.000003154882,0.00019868294,0.00007963467,7.2993987e-7,0.000033136253,0.000074002695,0.000011641319,0.000018766319,0.00064860104,0.99892753,0.0000020696536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048272563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018559169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.275438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011720429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010485796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3928789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283213931","doi":"10.1177/16094069221107144","title":"Methodological Insights From a Virtual, Team-Based Rapid Qualitative Method Applied to a Study of Providers’ Perspectives of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Hospital-To-Home Transitions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trillium Health Centre; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto; Bridgepoint Active Healthcare; University Health Network","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; March of Dimes Canada","keywords":"Rigour; Qualitative research; Pandemic; Health care; Data collection; Telemedicine; Computer science; Qualitative property; Nursing; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.5732578309891969,"score_gpt":0.6381512085933999,"score_spread":0.064893377604203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283213931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.467351,0.0041386723,0.4325493,0.03285295,0.0014147024,0.023932358,0.0014436239,0.00035872406,0.035958692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6817172,0.0018417626,0.27210137,0.005148389,0.00016156684,0.03409389,0.00029721763,0.00026485263,0.0043736915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7732409,0.21245621,0.0035922977,0.0032061264,0.0047619115,0.002742463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7728419,0.20205514,0.0050375597,0.005743042,0.011401803,0.002920603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17563464,0.0014442435,0.0013833684,0.006844083,0.012569937,0.012706152,0.004397133,0.0033908163,0.0048430767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15319343,0.0012877482,0.0016629971,0.0062361476,0.01954807,0.008515594,0.01557858,0.004676124,0.0007474323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007585867,0.00007812618,0.0015228965,0.0013520026,0.000027381957,0.0006644187,0.9635859,0.0005218194,0.00075276877,0.014101109,0.0014362899,0.015881328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011190563,0.00017689916,0.001206965,0.0027148866,0.000054644137,0.00036198692,0.947717,0.0018840572,0.001149072,0.019907357,0.024650436,0.00006480476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007085698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013010781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8243654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013535611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017486343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92885584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285729098","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2022.2091258","title":"Expanding opportunities to maximise research recruitment and data collection using digital tools","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Thematic analysis; Social media; Data science; Photovoice; Digital data; Computer science; Sample (material); Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9792196628014184,"score_gpt":0.7528446808008868,"score_spread":0.22637498200053152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285729098","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06240617,0.004778964,0.5710477,0.07645721,0.0039284,0.11145673,0.0019051348,0.0035928388,0.16442682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108562365,0.0028697434,0.6729684,0.012485814,0.0017862163,0.18296725,0.0006726689,0.00070293766,0.01698459],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6947889,0.2522217,0.013905682,0.008804913,0.02277234,0.007506485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6479528,0.24260417,0.014148938,0.04702643,0.030865699,0.01740198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26849306,0.0016487554,0.0017647889,0.00866069,0.0062601236,0.010094855,0.005220772,0.0051227957,0.053244196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3311602,0.0023567404,0.0026167226,0.005836114,0.0051879333,0.02243096,0.027793879,0.0054933685,0.025369307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011974614,0.002124019,0.010290861,0.0076485146,0.00014360645,0.0011134048,0.076745786,0.0008158811,0.0063095884,0.04546616,0.053078327,0.7950665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019348339,0.002339051,0.01362679,0.013902906,0.0002476802,0.0016166626,0.04558133,0.0026547196,0.0065168133,0.12155329,0.7896762,0.00034975188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059586065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015673148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73150694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033122008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01703895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9020783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301880765","doi":"10.5121/csit.2018.8070","title":"TOWARDS AN ASSESSMENT OF CLOUD E-HEALTH PROJECT RISK: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cloud computing; Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.2078105538466973,"score_gpt":0.5212210241676297,"score_spread":0.3134104703209324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301880765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931639,0.00010482378,0.0026868142,0.0003958586,0.000005226001,0.0007065724,0.00011102642,0.0000063242396,0.0028194732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955401,0.00019948477,0.0029071239,0.00010376261,0.000004935003,0.0006989001,0.0000988834,0.000007281431,0.00043944572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97732496,0.014662767,0.0018120904,0.00095639966,0.0039250525,0.0013186664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8311713,0.12361663,0.023010843,0.004044609,0.014599394,0.0035571624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04488673,0.000440104,0.0005844705,0.005356298,0.0029855315,0.004459711,0.0015135824,0.0015658141,0.0034204244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10845991,0.00058028026,0.0006901895,0.004509645,0.0038076204,0.0055054715,0.0056769312,0.002780905,0.0005424284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041919353,0.0048933243,0.574272,0.0012404355,0.00013737573,0.0011165399,0.35018665,0.0017028044,0.0010923992,0.013323488,0.0015155863,0.050100207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005774371,0.0012266864,0.27820083,0.0009392499,0.00009979948,0.0005781581,0.69610715,0.010009148,0.0010229998,0.004343497,0.007319422,0.00009529602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041388157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032005142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04488673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054312404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005229695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23738652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306711190","doi":"10.2196/43413","title":"Correction: Culturally Safe eHealth Interventions With Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Protocol for a Best Practice Framework","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"eHealth; Psychological intervention; Protocol (science); Pacific islanders; Culturally appropriate; Medicine; Medical education; Best practice; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Psychology; Nursing; Population; Health care; Political science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.34587038200119025,"score_gpt":0.6852379256310954,"score_spread":0.3393675436299052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306711190","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003132666,0.0008227793,0.003490137,0.09934457,0.87237924,0.002090946,0.011651133,0.0012790251,0.008628897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023158764,0.010145144,0.058103777,0.28043225,0.16618265,0.0344282,0.013983397,0.0057182084,0.4078477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726093,0.0087153865,0.006541831,0.0015884737,0.008838904,0.0017062271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87772846,0.042132244,0.006112491,0.008196103,0.062467042,0.0033636945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021604676,0.0030479594,0.0025284546,0.0038151825,0.0056189545,0.00435049,0.0049692784,0.01005881,0.12067928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23339021,0.0016644574,0.0031628457,0.002954291,0.0035727592,0.0033651106,0.0043418934,0.01681662,0.0378072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008127376,0.000014932211,0.000046999085,0.00071290607,0.0000158121,0.000111417285,0.00012420668,0.00003964421,0.000027471795,0.00072370324,0.99148315,0.0066183954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036848776,0.00006645604,0.00088919746,0.0046419357,0.00010458813,0.00028489818,0.00043986764,0.00026060911,0.00037121034,0.0019984394,0.9904861,0.000088281005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04610967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06229264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12067928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007134397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0247752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40371245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309376405","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.11084-x","title":"Thinking qualitatively in the context of mixed methods research: implications for study design","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Multimethodology; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Research design; Management science; Data science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics education; Social science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.49359164553536117,"score_gpt":0.5644381462159314,"score_spread":0.07084650068057019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309376405","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02447344,0.030151818,0.8014285,0.048703935,0.0037868891,0.010557287,0.00047794107,0.0004145705,0.080005616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10537468,0.010900648,0.846833,0.006932115,0.0004912522,0.020787068,0.00014600401,0.00021848718,0.008316773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.73404807,0.25031,0.0034131908,0.0021728193,0.009310078,0.00074587594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47167695,0.5120833,0.0032754638,0.00477603,0.0066704443,0.0015178784],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20518596,0.0013786007,0.0025106764,0.003583352,0.0054493574,0.019829815,0.00491182,0.003008721,0.006411581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23365399,0.0012639397,0.0013144448,0.0039867153,0.02338819,0.013479748,0.007381339,0.0049352166,0.00089271093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016720624,0.00044087862,0.0027153525,0.009979093,0.00022336144,0.00042744464,0.14846508,0.0015873001,0.0017757389,0.5170772,0.015301347,0.30184004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017966142,0.0004550619,0.0020270196,0.012223869,0.00015729983,0.0006545496,0.101721324,0.0045022615,0.0031135303,0.8020878,0.07272392,0.00015365277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022111076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006951932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79481405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075837737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016532604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310459162","doi":"10.2196/40041","title":"Using Semistructured Telephone Interviews to Collect Qualitative Data From People With HIV Who Are Not in Medical Care: Implementation Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Data collection; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Nonprobability sampling; Medicine; Family medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Psychology; Population; Sociology; Computer science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.6927539013029166,"score_gpt":0.7227957595490015,"score_spread":0.030041858246084963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310459162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92381555,0.0006429156,0.029636651,0.00388849,0.00026732145,0.030132988,0.0007640154,0.00017625515,0.010675847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730308,0.0011343443,0.044825822,0.0022442269,0.00009040672,0.07571926,0.0005311202,0.000066155335,0.0023579157],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9028611,0.08366608,0.0036356351,0.0021576271,0.004186842,0.0034927102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8709774,0.087391846,0.007755898,0.005838825,0.020733904,0.007302088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12863173,0.00096118636,0.0009956757,0.0028772124,0.008128568,0.0038947263,0.003353044,0.0018334752,0.003935121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11473969,0.0016964928,0.0010406371,0.003077606,0.00628885,0.0052046305,0.009525423,0.0034137832,0.00095779885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018615442,0.0008175179,0.011583099,0.0011764086,0.000024189982,0.0007763301,0.94587845,0.00012516769,0.0008724761,0.00090937986,0.002263073,0.03538783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027604963,0.0011467233,0.0068079783,0.0014832168,0.000031862524,0.00032962998,0.9753068,0.0005836713,0.00068281963,0.0012046049,0.012094032,0.00005263261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049405843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012276368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12863173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008674665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026700882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6802777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312441025","doi":"10.1177/21582440221140098","title":"A Comparative Analysis of Data Quality in Online Zoom Versus Phone Interviews: An Example of Youth With and Without Disabilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Zoom; Data collection; Phone; Psychology; Camera phone; Semi-structured interview; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Applied psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.583658783867614,"score_gpt":0.5501067635815161,"score_spread":0.03355202028609794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312441025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829927,0.0014519307,0.0075127785,0.0014449847,0.000064345346,0.00093025574,0.00037034263,0.000031122494,0.0052014706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921969,0.00056202285,0.0051496117,0.0002949037,0.000022933866,0.0011751833,0.0001111233,0.00003382311,0.000453425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8452478,0.13481312,0.006093092,0.0026160413,0.007439634,0.0037903215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.648325,0.30126297,0.017192686,0.0065752137,0.023616597,0.0030275418],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11422352,0.00040586543,0.0009922354,0.005319161,0.0047836457,0.0049301935,0.0013362532,0.0011994776,0.0027036734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2684479,0.0007666533,0.0009673689,0.0061192564,0.0067196595,0.0070891385,0.008025531,0.0014281397,0.00027108172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004338173,0.000064697604,0.018300282,0.000940655,0.000050406925,0.000247881,0.95930994,0.000045048684,0.0009517667,0.0008469929,0.00023178563,0.018576715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042351214,0.0004981209,0.042224526,0.0012148039,0.00005398783,0.00033020944,0.94964206,0.00018694253,0.0009173088,0.0006258453,0.004227969,0.000035944857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00664878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010626871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88577646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00770208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005424121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6040789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313444920","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_31","title":"Focus Groups","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer texts in education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Sociology; Focus (optics); Product (mathematics); Element (criminal law); Social group; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07116834041858798,"score_gpt":0.4012457224585474,"score_spread":0.3300773820399594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313444920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020701109,0.002350357,0.3284746,0.0026156115,0.0027750896,0.029114256,0.0065155886,0.0040288786,0.60342455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06739045,0.0019505474,0.20559002,0.0049097454,0.00043612116,0.08761551,0.006112978,0.0018387425,0.62415594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908343,0.0044604084,0.00040347013,0.0016159997,0.0021521393,0.0005337824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343103,0.0036213475,0.00016437397,0.0013622892,0.0011169864,0.00030393503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010364199,0.0015931034,0.001131405,0.0028149234,0.003075013,0.0021914055,0.0036056496,0.002725781,0.21304657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01606886,0.0011658852,0.0010692867,0.001658639,0.0014175834,0.0031214575,0.008922681,0.0023613372,0.09503525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013484401,0.00093353033,0.0006092229,0.004015866,0.00005905244,0.00035066463,0.027200714,0.00044565534,0.054179456,0.110137545,0.24401842,0.55670154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029911287,0.00059098256,0.00072155707,0.0005691619,0.000045486227,0.0003666622,0.0043405048,0.0005026603,0.027773302,0.026693681,0.9380285,0.00006833777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005286217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21304657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010655046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018675544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71271175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313445878","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_55","title":"Online Focus Groups","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer texts in education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Face (sociological concept); Qualitative research; Focus (optics); Psychology; Participant observation; Perception; Face-to-face; Medical education; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.0808039494841572,"score_gpt":0.41219513171707284,"score_spread":0.33139118223291564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313445878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009654667,0.0010468445,0.0882003,0.0015704847,0.0015047932,0.0041507026,0.004007993,0.0030180938,0.88684607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029570868,0.0011003881,0.059994623,0.0018939355,0.000416635,0.009690593,0.0032462256,0.0010828298,0.8930039],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698323,0.0013231549,0.00012588415,0.0004186765,0.00091607874,0.00023297835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950159,0.002749367,0.00015837229,0.0010533547,0.00065710064,0.00036588896],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004525795,0.001117772,0.00061593193,0.0024097266,0.002086843,0.002427011,0.0024833055,0.001656996,0.3860809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007897377,0.00056806183,0.00066313747,0.0021028756,0.0007603441,0.003808937,0.006934391,0.0014829272,0.16861196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035050474,0.00080806244,0.00036657267,0.0010012111,0.000013205977,0.00016945954,0.0070589124,0.00020080608,0.0070264353,0.041620906,0.31790197,0.62348187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008182846,0.0001727272,0.00074450154,0.0003231542,0.000011736569,0.00022937478,0.0019767536,0.00024880737,0.0048682005,0.015340364,0.9759797,0.000022863584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053350924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014822764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3860809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010285312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015071133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8756811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313446077","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_34","title":"Harnessing Insights with NVivo","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer texts in education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Qualitative research; Categorization; Thematic analysis; Software; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06392122655156686,"score_gpt":0.38435554680775247,"score_spread":0.3204343202561856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313446077","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005156565,0.0007382277,0.8541326,0.005044931,0.0008778249,0.00085529365,0.0027262352,0.0030616785,0.12740657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.078148946,0.0018193466,0.84798974,0.0017062882,0.0003140666,0.0064849616,0.0028445541,0.0066888193,0.054003324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894029,0.0070582763,0.00030725554,0.00048956403,0.0025143092,0.00022777724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9519442,0.04243641,0.0005013924,0.0028142363,0.0018728734,0.00043099307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017082147,0.00083562837,0.0005311025,0.0025841172,0.0016810227,0.008677474,0.0017184297,0.00093450974,0.02397753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038709845,0.00053489394,0.00056376506,0.0025754538,0.004767372,0.0056995316,0.007359605,0.0030008145,0.004947737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004311394,0.00006617589,0.00059528486,0.0018907078,0.00004908108,0.00021296501,0.060696296,0.0026923716,0.005327259,0.38101262,0.08268506,0.464729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027053153,0.000020469106,0.00042088173,0.0016631994,0.00001836185,0.00012969413,0.013238052,0.0049716816,0.0030060508,0.35771114,0.61876124,0.000032157895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001153604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003610393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02397753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015504705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038659389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09034008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316174261","doi":"10.1186/s13063-023-07067-9","title":"Knowledge mobilization activities to support decision-making by youth, parents, and adults using a systematic and living map of evidence and recommendations on COVID-19: protocol for three randomized controlled trials and qualitative user-experience studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trials","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance; University of Toronto; Western University; University of Alberta; Glycemic Index Laboratories; SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; McMaster University; Public Health Agency of Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Impact; Cochrane","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Sickkids Research Institute; Hospital for Sick Children; Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation; Children's Hospital Foundation; McMaster University","keywords":"Usability; Randomized controlled trial; Medical education; Medicine; Thematic analysis; Population; Protocol (science); Plain language; Stakeholder; Psychological intervention; Applied psychology; Family medicine; Nursing; Psychology; Qualitative research; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Public relations","score_opus":0.7192928345553323,"score_gpt":0.6690917372699475,"score_spread":0.0502010972853848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316174261","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005682761,0.00020652289,0.0012228268,0.00012335986,0.00008332152,0.9969164,0.00046339538,0.000042388943,0.00037348794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00046673015,0.00008977333,0.0015931661,0.000037442263,0.0000050407502,0.9977181,0.000037540303,0.000001911524,0.000050300197],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9170706,0.053077158,0.015738426,0.0035905035,0.0061232354,0.004400129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410481,0.024189832,0.011987164,0.0067059733,0.012381573,0.0036873394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.101202615,0.0052031097,0.008929457,0.005997046,0.0041826293,0.0058864793,0.004180862,0.007117522,0.046796937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10583916,0.003249296,0.011850216,0.005410037,0.004275394,0.004575949,0.0056346343,0.00783491,0.008132182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.24876277,0.022091381,0.0026388485,0.34064233,0.009017207,0.0007878574,0.010587054,0.0048205517,0.0032023415,0.017755564,0.052410424,0.2872836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.56347424,0.03981862,0.006436746,0.17849207,0.009117015,0.00025961816,0.0036711046,0.0048377845,0.00545826,0.01782078,0.16991015,0.00070362934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003792034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006090772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8987974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107729295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035041526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.535217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317894144","doi":"10.32920/21948269.v1","title":"Conducting international online surveys: Trials, tribulations, and suggestions for success","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Invention for Innovation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Democratization; Public relations; Internationalization; Political science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.7322222279191554,"score_gpt":0.5962840345381925,"score_spread":0.1359381933809629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317894144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061843783,0.08295991,0.23056643,0.29365498,0.029522698,0.22755809,0.0014133779,0.0031101743,0.069370486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21438463,0.021920636,0.4195146,0.053963218,0.0030856442,0.27959973,0.0009052595,0.0014936499,0.0051326617],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.07384287,0.8535986,0.040978335,0.0051363334,0.02368551,0.0027583377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05793678,0.76605874,0.02495749,0.069111645,0.07749717,0.004438199],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8634779,0.004445186,0.006252837,0.009620004,0.012552613,0.028647367,0.011487588,0.011368781,0.010795806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8888712,0.003574318,0.006210782,0.020490257,0.027699286,0.040312987,0.021167979,0.012799879,0.0036495205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003999523,0.002534222,0.0143421255,0.028793817,0.0027518037,0.00023451103,0.053186968,0.0010627102,0.00039911267,0.08509071,0.0633614,0.744243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012242298,0.019194655,0.016209802,0.26828644,0.004748824,0.00068382645,0.114910334,0.011485855,0.005138613,0.16068321,0.38505012,0.0013660059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003148732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004362589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13652211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01633674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054876313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16835612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317894151","doi":"10.32920/21948269","title":"Conducting international online surveys: Trials, tribulations, and suggestions for success","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Invention for Innovation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Democratization; Internationalization; Public relations; Political science; Knowledge management; Business; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.7322222279191554,"score_gpt":0.5962840345381925,"score_spread":0.1359381933809629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317894151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061843783,0.08295991,0.23056643,0.29365498,0.029522698,0.22755809,0.0014133779,0.0031101743,0.069370486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21438463,0.021920636,0.4195146,0.053963218,0.0030856442,0.27959973,0.0009052595,0.0014936499,0.0051326617],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.07384287,0.8535986,0.040978335,0.0051363334,0.02368551,0.0027583377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05793678,0.76605874,0.02495749,0.069111645,0.07749717,0.004438199],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8634779,0.004445186,0.006252837,0.009620004,0.012552613,0.028647367,0.011487588,0.011368781,0.010795806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8888712,0.003574318,0.006210782,0.020490257,0.027699286,0.040312987,0.021167979,0.012799879,0.0036495205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003999523,0.002534222,0.0143421255,0.028793817,0.0027518037,0.00023451103,0.053186968,0.0010627102,0.00039911267,0.08509071,0.0633614,0.744243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012242298,0.019194655,0.016209802,0.26828644,0.004748824,0.00068382645,0.114910334,0.011485855,0.005138613,0.16068321,0.38505012,0.0013660059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003148732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004362589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13652211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01633674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054876313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16835612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323363531","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2023.2185985","title":"Considerations for conducting online focus groups on sensitive topics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Online research methods; Data collection; Online community; Online discussion; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.8791719862406588,"score_gpt":0.6973427693186016,"score_spread":0.18182921692205722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323363531","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08443182,0.0051794667,0.50781375,0.22169666,0.009637938,0.10012431,0.0013418124,0.0023250047,0.067449324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14501208,0.0025843843,0.58487165,0.02515917,0.0017134494,0.22959441,0.00043540235,0.00061764405,0.010011877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.35798612,0.5874391,0.017322628,0.008028053,0.02417335,0.0050508087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24377397,0.6202578,0.017139312,0.055768628,0.050211385,0.012848939],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.51472193,0.002133582,0.0019825452,0.0055055968,0.015978169,0.0146259805,0.008750664,0.010267759,0.021605875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5548212,0.002561398,0.0021835463,0.003892579,0.016738322,0.02181417,0.01353143,0.009558342,0.010692714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024768906,0.002130239,0.009798297,0.0102447085,0.00015462477,0.0036310358,0.5459821,0.001814616,0.016609177,0.091049075,0.060088336,0.2560209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010421553,0.0030175063,0.0098249875,0.017026525,0.00015486134,0.0028806403,0.34194654,0.003909553,0.010046842,0.10110185,0.50863814,0.00041037318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006316564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012763844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48527807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007349478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021794654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5984343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366450241","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.024.007","title":"Richard A. Krueger and Mary Anne Casey. (2009). <i>Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research</i> (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 205 pages, plus preface, acknowledgements, references, and indices.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAGE; Psychology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Library science; Gerontology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.19416003882541363,"score_gpt":0.4936611830970598,"score_spread":0.2995011442716462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366450241","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040996824,0.40563124,0.1092291,0.33314008,0.026787335,0.0018462782,0.0029814448,0.002410341,0.11387459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033875205,0.51545024,0.1866544,0.0627459,0.0038957044,0.0021106245,0.0016568858,0.0015393863,0.19207166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652594,0.0012243171,0.0002868778,0.00024716923,0.0016085964,0.0001070524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97890466,0.009948602,0.00092289335,0.00051568635,0.008809623,0.00089850614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008913502,0.0008998857,0.0006525559,0.003058212,0.0029124664,0.0026505587,0.0019153084,0.002661467,0.031834584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038477592,0.0013129677,0.0005610997,0.0024139085,0.001853803,0.006993175,0.0020362264,0.0070320666,0.024202097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043413598,0.000039259914,0.0003938139,0.0009708312,0.0000066135767,0.0000932122,0.001712683,0.000056178586,0.00035364213,0.0036235824,0.76495993,0.22774683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039616236,0.00009415314,0.0036533452,0.004560464,0.000034399363,0.000681225,0.0037682955,0.00016687889,0.0011608375,0.014994736,0.97074205,0.00010404126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02449945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07457152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031834584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014796555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054067457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10649723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375955451","doi":"10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2022-0277en","title":"Five tips for conducting remote qualitative data collection in COVID times: theoretical and pragmatic considerations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Alberta Health; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; Data collection; Scopus; Qualitative research; Context (archaeology); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Portuguese; Qualitative property; Psychology; Computer science; MEDLINE; Data science; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing; Political science; Pathology; Social science; Psychological intervention; Geography; Disease","score_opus":0.2984676810944034,"score_gpt":0.5264711328553469,"score_spread":0.22800345176094344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375955451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011404215,0.011284078,0.33101138,0.56566644,0.008843466,0.057950933,0.0006418853,0.000957223,0.012240314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03488668,0.0054106098,0.83167744,0.04665714,0.0012581573,0.07870424,0.00017271846,0.000184202,0.0010487866],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.30593252,0.62326115,0.042965207,0.004025776,0.018198235,0.0056170714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2225768,0.6729598,0.018365948,0.02385768,0.049243495,0.012996304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5427089,0.0035391708,0.0047873636,0.009675013,0.015573534,0.021217491,0.009341401,0.027370969,0.0070328494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.600358,0.003890232,0.0055369553,0.0057884017,0.027749943,0.03429551,0.029571615,0.036268644,0.0029883392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015448907,0.0012090368,0.0028898658,0.054758728,0.0004208955,0.004029523,0.42661095,0.001813173,0.006075669,0.17430072,0.080753475,0.24559313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012585149,0.0017076996,0.00280486,0.095874876,0.00049223844,0.0038430905,0.29465163,0.0036101635,0.0048495117,0.25085804,0.33913347,0.00091593707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033541326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066258702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45729113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014030495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059065614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56392145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377096773","doi":"10.1177/00169862231166093","title":"Conducting Collaborative Qualitative Analysis Remotely","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gifted Child Quarterly","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Qualitative research; Collegiality; Coding (social sciences); Qualitative property; Data collection; Affordance; Psychology; Focus group; Trustworthiness; Computer science; Pedagogy; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1263394496806298,"score_gpt":0.46499181782309273,"score_spread":0.3386523681424629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377096773","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1793645,0.0010136719,0.60881084,0.012231626,0.0023304971,0.09690141,0.0064931666,0.0031151704,0.089739114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30667704,0.00061599654,0.4887043,0.0041381717,0.00035855145,0.16993429,0.0017682865,0.001238827,0.026564458],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8302723,0.13724612,0.0054704733,0.013194741,0.008674895,0.0051414366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7371031,0.16811043,0.0066410387,0.04536691,0.03593765,0.006840843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12256973,0.0018347899,0.0027568934,0.0050009224,0.010322325,0.00866621,0.003693437,0.0035232443,0.03486888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22224389,0.0014682519,0.0022323849,0.0038091112,0.008737435,0.006731331,0.013279892,0.0054650176,0.008321828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011552222,0.0009906983,0.0040690475,0.0030091316,0.000100480975,0.0013733539,0.7478096,0.0020412258,0.013402985,0.041393887,0.02643347,0.1582209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008122188,0.001199615,0.0035455797,0.0050971676,0.00012646247,0.0005372147,0.43138584,0.006225488,0.016023306,0.08679508,0.4479038,0.0003481848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035251116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005757511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87743026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005062407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022000236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64821845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377722532","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-25259-4_7","title":"Pivoting Online in a Pandemic: Facilitating Object Elicitation Interviews with Canadian Craft Vendors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Social visualities","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Pandemic; Object (grammar); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Visual arts; Computer science; Art; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.23201738639917033,"score_gpt":0.45175775751795755,"score_spread":0.21974037111878722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377722532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7586951,0.0009062555,0.014369718,0.009252409,0.0002752846,0.0019425859,0.00083433616,0.00022513201,0.21349911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142261,0.0010162354,0.01580209,0.0019670434,0.00004316097,0.00094659254,0.00035574712,0.00019458545,0.06544845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945235,0.0025531729,0.00013079497,0.0003636265,0.0010523346,0.0013765693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98784304,0.00791686,0.00050421245,0.00038741503,0.0020388353,0.0013096012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009565392,0.00083635206,0.00036225872,0.0027864792,0.029282242,0.008593708,0.0026694261,0.0029590984,0.009141077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014268964,0.0008242163,0.00027867215,0.0046235714,0.010106665,0.0040697204,0.006750995,0.0031646925,0.0008755674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045717577,0.000064676075,0.0028944388,0.00011307367,0.000002553192,0.0009372558,0.9563102,0.00016750759,0.0022118436,0.005557065,0.009164205,0.022531455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011179073,0.00004443856,0.004721113,0.00023927959,0.000007535339,0.00015267025,0.89850086,0.00016349429,0.0008857078,0.0009884182,0.09424614,0.000039121263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7834463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9372072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21655369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037951395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088386536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43565798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378652588","doi":"10.1177/14687941231176931","title":"Off track or on point? Side comments in focus groups with teens","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Focus group; Great Rift; Focus (optics); Psychology; Dynamics (music); Social psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.5136757521572586,"score_gpt":0.6439928010743068,"score_spread":0.1303170489170482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378652588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8446274,0.0012174202,0.09376987,0.015231213,0.0020120065,0.0033520781,0.0005961819,0.0006082389,0.03858557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94170886,0.000763644,0.033849437,0.005375495,0.0004858268,0.006179603,0.0002544782,0.00039788548,0.010984713],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.86619526,0.11692979,0.0042846655,0.0040745726,0.0059661055,0.0025496562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.710067,0.24248901,0.0174493,0.008953994,0.017627487,0.0034132116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081166066,0.0014235685,0.0010559774,0.0020156442,0.0067601427,0.0035348749,0.002043428,0.0034395077,0.0073724184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19978185,0.001037686,0.0007479196,0.0012355838,0.007426281,0.007231692,0.008096889,0.003019172,0.0021283356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051092956,0.000079425474,0.0067152483,0.0007752701,0.00003340984,0.0011669658,0.93854237,0.000117768745,0.008777106,0.00391513,0.0037241597,0.03564227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014784743,0.0009258116,0.008069255,0.002301368,0.00008654365,0.0015862056,0.84159845,0.0011463307,0.014119198,0.014362393,0.115467854,0.00018878478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008914324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016854866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018249082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002358277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42925233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383815028","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6470","title":"“Not your typical book about qualitative research”: A Review of Camargo-Borges and McNamee’s Design Thinking and Social Construction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.7373396603920606,"score_gpt":0.6891688045162456,"score_spread":0.04817085587581493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383815028","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000861904,0.9646041,0.004798829,0.017870925,0.007377415,0.00012377612,0.000077792465,0.00003821267,0.005022805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016627677,0.9618707,0.0083013605,0.020177757,0.0029389046,0.00070946204,0.00011905957,0.000102848295,0.004117154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97125566,0.018816888,0.0022282258,0.0009737415,0.0064079333,0.00031757014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92729384,0.060619272,0.0022973982,0.0012372938,0.007960837,0.0005913981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030661752,0.0013281616,0.0027397145,0.009635462,0.0022281616,0.005309986,0.0021887138,0.0027818615,0.00605435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062829725,0.0013058678,0.0016987313,0.01628292,0.007162636,0.00869557,0.003727551,0.00522312,0.0035460198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004596429,0.000047384565,0.0001982835,0.05775641,0.00019357816,0.00011969325,0.0053981273,0.00020794541,0.00050466566,0.051637527,0.45974383,0.4241466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012669692,0.00003566431,0.00027645656,0.0449411,0.000062226485,0.00025810764,0.0012226327,0.000036689296,0.00011851937,0.008839298,0.94416684,0.00002982586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063057714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017031701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030661752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056971814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012069007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16215676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387408123","doi":"10.1186/s12874-023-02051-y","title":"Asynchronous online focus groups for research with people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and family caregivers: usefulness, acceptability and lessons learned","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami; Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Moderation; Online discussion; Confidentiality; Medical education; Online research methods; Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Asynchronous communication; Data collection; Applied psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6998250111289526,"score_gpt":0.5809055774301132,"score_spread":0.1189194336988394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387408123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97393256,0.00078293605,0.012866132,0.001958454,0.00014992656,0.0038857555,0.00030640134,0.00021658531,0.005901267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94905126,0.001040223,0.03285714,0.0009745485,0.0002953556,0.013188263,0.00021018863,0.00007169978,0.0023113089],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95534813,0.038985,0.0012446974,0.0014251805,0.0018659898,0.001131002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80182225,0.1753803,0.0066075264,0.004585555,0.008127129,0.0034774186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.070266515,0.0012216315,0.00063462,0.0021312046,0.0037707568,0.0027162214,0.0023425682,0.0017738104,0.0080074705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097457215,0.00064817246,0.00069100823,0.000943903,0.002502987,0.0054749968,0.005237808,0.0011259286,0.0009791888],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019614615,0.0022787002,0.034232665,0.002858363,0.00009164128,0.0011479494,0.69525075,0.00024638808,0.010758218,0.0011392045,0.0036905897,0.24634406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014996065,0.022445654,0.13298525,0.00643455,0.00034872984,0.0028322916,0.7290196,0.0022063253,0.01720355,0.0079825055,0.076613404,0.00042862588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006590632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014090979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070266515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013531981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015945657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37160927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388464191","doi":"10.2196/50208","title":"Experiences and Priorities in Youth and Family Mental Health: Protocol for an Arts-Based Priority-Setting Focus Group Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Mental health; Protocol (science); The arts; Psychology; Medical education; Applied psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.6209029728760211,"score_gpt":0.6814379055270027,"score_spread":0.06053493265098153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388464191","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013962326,0.000058545364,0.0022786276,0.000129647,0.000098048775,0.9943909,0.0007823648,0.000029311972,0.00083625084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005000907,0.000052788197,0.0023374455,0.000054328328,0.00000808959,0.99677545,0.00008402002,0.0000021034461,0.00018574484],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717767,0.018564485,0.0033158474,0.001577474,0.0018823124,0.002883083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96662706,0.012924312,0.0024513933,0.004328518,0.010520772,0.0031478493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074535266,0.0037987025,0.0037500726,0.0047596972,0.008344171,0.0038709883,0.004781626,0.0051939366,0.061298158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04391667,0.0037027663,0.0035651217,0.00358459,0.0038259935,0.0038134558,0.0055842954,0.008126315,0.012458754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04531108,0.036175422,0.0101298215,0.07878371,0.00062037306,0.0069062402,0.16206937,0.009439423,0.023673587,0.02733669,0.17899565,0.42055866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06689779,0.017388724,0.029815838,0.028972538,0.00057277846,0.0011786318,0.10793369,0.00425761,0.012012549,0.020199966,0.7097395,0.0010303397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007703144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01621338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074535266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008697092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027996728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3941849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388529544","doi":"10.1177/16094069231214679","title":"Virtual Synchronous Qualitative Data Collection Methods Used in Health and Social Sciences: A Scoping Review of Benefits, Challenges and Practical Insights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine; University of Ottawa; Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"Réseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation","keywords":"Data collection; Data science; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Management science; Work (physics); Engineering; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9041022143407212,"score_gpt":0.7577200251243497,"score_spread":0.14638218921637158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388529544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046536323,0.99121314,0.0029541764,0.0024812426,0.0006256073,0.00081197603,0.00014389584,0.000021091464,0.0012834669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006519097,0.9820234,0.006942121,0.0009338785,0.00019022063,0.0029461652,0.00016219246,0.000025013676,0.00025788276],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9014158,0.06368161,0.018611781,0.0030380203,0.012082388,0.0011704299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62662446,0.32079417,0.014213004,0.005934194,0.031255446,0.0011786966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13056278,0.0018813072,0.0058973776,0.025937984,0.0035060463,0.00909716,0.0032431134,0.0039779902,0.003955454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27432925,0.0019030808,0.004523503,0.027322708,0.004538074,0.009893078,0.0057905237,0.003098879,0.0010704125],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012495123,0.000054720316,0.0007554163,0.5457097,0.0008245555,0.00019197531,0.0056878026,0.0003348604,0.0004202294,0.011480687,0.0099097565,0.42450535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003042903,0.00009024461,0.001008749,0.86144966,0.0016347751,0.00025396844,0.0038826074,0.00019692128,0.00033021884,0.004733359,0.1263391,0.000049974307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009896176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020505346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8694372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008971012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040714886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69049025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388759097","doi":"10.22582/ta.v12i2.674","title":"Multi-Course and Faculty-Student Collaboration: Reflections on Implementing a Qualitative Research Project with Undergraduate Students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching Anthropology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Work (physics); Medical education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.5094679104235442,"score_gpt":0.7216916528058195,"score_spread":0.21222374238227526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388759097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92760134,0.0005582868,0.03520412,0.024987487,0.0007272151,0.0024529668,0.00013496002,0.00038292442,0.007950725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96952605,0.00043514746,0.016277598,0.005122848,0.00018521071,0.0026198763,0.00006505371,0.0002423936,0.0055259466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7758857,0.19469085,0.0034445643,0.005423212,0.00761484,0.01294084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75543195,0.17736897,0.008406998,0.008720952,0.022425303,0.027645787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15347633,0.0017033436,0.0017354649,0.0024532648,0.036638256,0.015158543,0.009162049,0.009680926,0.004034313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19694285,0.0021868225,0.0017408902,0.0019455318,0.024733892,0.008947151,0.023115017,0.012744169,0.0012987191],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009053917,0.00042503042,0.0019039189,0.000147005,0.00001681756,0.0009927056,0.9801784,0.00017830644,0.0016652354,0.0015115335,0.00091831,0.011972236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041870582,0.0006069561,0.0010824972,0.00020980823,0.000015203923,0.00038478934,0.98096126,0.0003966351,0.0014280872,0.0011561986,0.01365805,0.000058587313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006176717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008451695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84652364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010926424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01885771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81167006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389947626","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2023-0111","title":"Using Zoom Annotate to Facilitate Online Focus Groups in Veterinary Medicine Education Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Zoom; Medical education; Veterinary education; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; World Wide Web; Psychology; Computer science; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.6405615995118646,"score_gpt":0.6199158563894499,"score_spread":0.02064574312241474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389947626","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055161834,0.0012587802,0.856125,0.0042984844,0.0012307153,0.011828017,0.0036690899,0.009593416,0.056834683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09293732,0.00063615513,0.8570366,0.0016596229,0.00025165113,0.034827117,0.00088269525,0.002133834,0.0096349735],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95253253,0.03918496,0.0015272119,0.0027862785,0.003134251,0.00083473086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8293754,0.13221206,0.0073553175,0.019592082,0.009910332,0.0015548221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056493033,0.001782681,0.0008290163,0.004959543,0.0049220854,0.0040747733,0.002512963,0.0023193418,0.024913417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10883478,0.0013942987,0.0011999295,0.0037635665,0.004813831,0.008488108,0.009507327,0.0021236017,0.008429457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013013349,0.00064751995,0.00688738,0.008207879,0.00010472457,0.0013429375,0.36624116,0.0016441246,0.07143432,0.02637303,0.0555006,0.46031493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039920368,0.0010001936,0.015885437,0.006804099,0.00015934429,0.0014913526,0.0823048,0.008760615,0.057980318,0.042154305,0.78232974,0.00073059794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015451743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004818173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056493033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017306654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030006375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29876727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390431452","doi":"10.1002/cyo2.41","title":"Liz Przybylski. 2020. <i>Hybrid Ethnography: Online, Offline, and In Between</i>. SAGE Publications, Inc.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CyberOrient","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Representation (politics); Online and offline; Modular design; Population; Key (lock); Media studies; Computer science; Anthropology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08289254930141411,"score_gpt":0.41704031159423055,"score_spread":0.33414776229281645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390431452","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019209528,0.39037865,0.05037746,0.27212542,0.032658953,0.0010513333,0.0026185617,0.0037778448,0.24509081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012458554,0.21947655,0.06529355,0.05391634,0.0055239038,0.0023913956,0.0020956679,0.002745078,0.636099],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856395,0.00047629996,0.000067249406,0.00015395436,0.0006717214,0.00006683025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684024,0.0020419634,0.00014451552,0.000120052915,0.0005514345,0.00030180407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035752384,0.0010371612,0.0006904221,0.0026607038,0.002169598,0.004921004,0.0014747651,0.0034367137,0.021184763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004868875,0.0013813127,0.00038843695,0.0034637281,0.0044699605,0.009379888,0.0027522263,0.0066817338,0.017372636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008096494,0.00000919486,0.000081958045,0.00034108682,0.0000028124693,0.000051304476,0.0023252228,0.00004917912,0.00017579016,0.01947071,0.89457417,0.08291038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055347036,0.000010653811,0.0002643802,0.0009161672,0.000003189052,0.00020452977,0.0017284203,0.00008907889,0.00017659181,0.012184005,0.98440325,0.000014226046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005590238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007919619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021184763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021921385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024250422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0708701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390727249","doi":"10.1177/16094069231224610","title":"Dealing With Scam in Online Qualitative Research: Strategies and Ethical Considerations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Qualitative research; Narrative; Data collection; Internet privacy; Online forum; Qualitative property; Public relations; Psychology; Ethical issues; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.8360600166292907,"score_gpt":0.7621853258437825,"score_spread":0.07387469078550823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390727249","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08965913,0.006060193,0.5854107,0.14754097,0.0054939985,0.14102899,0.00073402334,0.00078227866,0.023289807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13282879,0.0018008,0.45259035,0.024412598,0.00084425224,0.38166657,0.00014009746,0.000276206,0.0054403623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.30478033,0.6509776,0.014908249,0.006921545,0.017615555,0.004796726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29923806,0.5812201,0.018113274,0.055785216,0.0371524,0.008490933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5797639,0.0032529319,0.0036904395,0.008333847,0.02016803,0.016918665,0.010183366,0.015468438,0.007815818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51543206,0.003997858,0.0016500439,0.00748623,0.04256684,0.0133213485,0.020885201,0.019174434,0.002925744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042524215,0.00037365657,0.0014430585,0.0025942472,0.00004571598,0.0023708558,0.8478173,0.0005096325,0.0016801587,0.096277975,0.00860466,0.037857465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005186472,0.00040144718,0.00093072205,0.018318241,0.000102248814,0.003005578,0.6221254,0.0060479976,0.005648006,0.17789066,0.16475146,0.00025957596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029658983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009346304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4202361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01237758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03364099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.518226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390733942","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2024.2302305","title":"A scoping review on the operationalization of intersectional health research methods in studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Lethbridge; University of Alberta","funders":"Worldwide Universities Network","keywords":"Operationalization; Oppression; Rigour; Intersectionality; Sociology; Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Public health; Thematic analysis; Mental health; Public relations; Political science; Qualitative research; Gender studies; Criminology; Psychology; Social science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Epistemology; Politics; Geography; Nursing","score_opus":0.789061829997935,"score_gpt":0.7655844072625705,"score_spread":0.02347742273536446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390733942","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008629226,0.990217,0.0018348,0.0022255105,0.0007604462,0.0010318112,0.00015704073,0.000017344366,0.002893247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009421321,0.9817837,0.0039650523,0.001026199,0.00016802576,0.0030858384,0.00018770172,0.000019263265,0.00034294077],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9124603,0.050261743,0.022027927,0.0030112565,0.010890454,0.0013483943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6710239,0.27972633,0.01504681,0.005823332,0.027050626,0.0013290232],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08617977,0.0020278676,0.0049803387,0.029885137,0.0042563975,0.012059731,0.0035932646,0.005673947,0.0050358125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24199848,0.0021500795,0.0052051046,0.032924905,0.0054789186,0.01065628,0.0069935555,0.0038338562,0.0010444759],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012931704,0.000053583473,0.000986297,0.63524765,0.0010654563,0.0002859218,0.01042967,0.0003479497,0.0004611554,0.012759312,0.010280001,0.32795364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018562507,0.000041205236,0.00086776586,0.92896336,0.0012248068,0.00018228851,0.0026995817,0.00007780142,0.00019444541,0.001969974,0.06373316,0.000027010195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013175626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022585802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9138202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013026705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051599212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45576763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098482","doi":"10.4337/9781839109652.00021","title":"Gentrification, resistance, and the reconceptualization of community through place-based social media: the future will not be Instagrammed","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gentrification; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Civil engineering; Engineering; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.08892524120397675,"score_gpt":0.33185744086532126,"score_spread":0.2429321996613445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1350921,0.018604055,0.008666181,0.026475193,0.0008140021,0.000084308245,0.00006384772,0.00011823403,0.81008214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628312,0.00446266,0.0017444241,0.0013541054,0.00011502828,0.00006864284,0.000032490178,0.000078155805,0.12931333],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987902,0.0007825285,0.000013860644,0.00007416377,0.00020608082,0.00013318831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920386,0.0004932909,0.00004306502,0.00008725055,0.00006580555,0.000106749816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014801028,0.00029127396,0.00020353252,0.00082193315,0.00634167,0.008745144,0.0009146006,0.0013808294,0.0035882401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014814071,0.00018815644,0.00014968788,0.0009699488,0.032537304,0.005922658,0.0049088635,0.0014650904,0.00040255353],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015412352,0.0000123070195,0.0005880241,0.00013178289,0.000003968973,0.00031633626,0.5209514,0.000075285745,0.00054297317,0.43128273,0.010714435,0.03536533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005704554,0.00002790395,0.0018430937,0.0003901727,0.000006466376,0.0003943219,0.30272648,0.00017742302,0.0004964659,0.05257488,0.6413391,0.00001800874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030892745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08341523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030892745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007298168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003827355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061425805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391224240","doi":"10.3233/shti231127","title":"Interpreting Laboratory Results with Complementary Health Information: A Human Factors Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in health technology and informatics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Health information; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Internet privacy; Telemedicine; Quality (philosophy); Information quality; Psychology; Computer science; Information system; Health care; Engineering; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10760648072311525,"score_gpt":0.5080739685845983,"score_spread":0.40046748786148306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391224240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6438809,0.0054322835,0.06338181,0.077894725,0.0006293515,0.0008363975,0.0003414888,0.00023787777,0.2073651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839033,0.001549458,0.007370609,0.003306275,0.00006219808,0.00012949725,0.000030502662,0.000032186676,0.003615953],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631312,0.030765703,0.00042997708,0.0009824489,0.0025810183,0.0021096305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512805,0.041316986,0.0016515221,0.00083410164,0.0036452306,0.001271827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023983356,0.0007776342,0.00044627496,0.0028699164,0.010879567,0.015034634,0.0016009763,0.0023653836,0.003641856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021798644,0.0004855817,0.00044446575,0.0027995063,0.031353656,0.004624601,0.00509829,0.0023508875,0.00044849428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017142129,0.000045892833,0.0068393364,0.00022882345,0.000013743947,0.0005440128,0.9643476,0.00016113318,0.0008206323,0.013899535,0.0015158248,0.011566366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062187255,0.000057799596,0.00299159,0.00034706228,0.000014580282,0.0002723863,0.9537855,0.00030290632,0.0005835994,0.006099582,0.035514705,0.000024153353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10597797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062128898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10597797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011916251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018153204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21072221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391449817","doi":"10.2196/52096","title":"The Development and Use of a New Visual Tool (REVISIT) to Support Participant Recall: Web-Based Interview Study Among Older Adults","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Rural Health; Rehabilitation Research and Development Service; Health Services Research and Development; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Interview; Recall; Focus group; Qualitative research; Psychology; Medical education; Applied psychology; Participant observation; Health care; Telemedicine; Nursing; Medicine; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.33328209194611286,"score_gpt":0.5570668033810856,"score_spread":0.22378471143497275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391449817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767765,0.0003552049,0.015628442,0.0006110129,0.0000401429,0.0040065954,0.00027555617,0.00007953565,0.0022269976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248967,0.0008499271,0.056604937,0.00057236524,0.000039682378,0.015183282,0.00023862506,0.00006456892,0.0015499431],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98721725,0.010336025,0.0007695959,0.0005801873,0.0005700724,0.0005269799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95670485,0.033242602,0.0027763953,0.0018593064,0.0038056842,0.0016111562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03257599,0.00056904514,0.00058956945,0.002008556,0.0024326225,0.0026074962,0.0013654889,0.0012070868,0.0017157233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052301817,0.0007878803,0.000540976,0.0013282488,0.0022340203,0.002920423,0.004310118,0.0013927786,0.00036946175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020865072,0.00059569377,0.012965392,0.0008470889,0.000013765196,0.000778792,0.9267823,0.00013756752,0.0032750757,0.0004833527,0.0007095166,0.053202786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023176894,0.0026125843,0.022466946,0.0013913406,0.00006630527,0.000939939,0.9438353,0.0011342857,0.0042272178,0.0009580407,0.022011016,0.00012517076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021554662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005285261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03257599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016621533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00367464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17228037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391820577","doi":"10.1080/22423982.2024.2313822","title":"Communicating and complying with COVID-19 actions in northernmost Finland","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Circumpolar Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Public health; Public relations; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Health communication; Everyday life; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Business; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.19864289258809764,"score_gpt":0.5395490691931756,"score_spread":0.34090617660507794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391820577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976331,0.0002562985,0.00008868054,0.00036813703,0.0000068877775,0.000023650344,0.000018076473,0.0000023565678,0.0016027947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998852,0.00028264857,0.00018736815,0.0001405408,0.000004903714,0.000058045658,0.000019789293,0.0000025958475,0.00045210557],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545836,0.0027093485,0.0002304576,0.000296006,0.0003556848,0.0009501605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993515,0.004061676,0.0010409985,0.00016151795,0.00036013706,0.00086054014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007820083,0.00036484023,0.0006529469,0.0009514191,0.011281285,0.003070107,0.0008960885,0.0012848433,0.0018579572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007700244,0.0005167511,0.00033487123,0.00128021,0.0060355985,0.0020476426,0.0045595514,0.0010822038,0.00014888603],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040609422,0.000060821087,0.022464907,0.00018738519,0.0000061792634,0.0013481799,0.97077155,0.000043828346,0.0005360556,0.00049427815,0.00018386303,0.003862329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004760695,0.00005956186,0.018190347,0.00013100954,0.00000800476,0.00014219392,0.9786184,0.000039510196,0.00013349771,0.00014099617,0.002518063,0.000013676827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061530747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07974115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061530747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066281026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010806626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12234521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391975760","doi":"10.2196/53790","title":"Best Practices and Recommendations for Research Using Virtual Real-Time Data Collection: Protocol for Virtual Data Collection Studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Data collection; Protocol (science); Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Statistics","score_opus":0.9398957950216159,"score_gpt":0.7919581339167134,"score_spread":0.14793766110490247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391975760","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092065317,0.0009800808,0.017240293,0.0045687,0.0011303328,0.9699762,0.0021029,0.00048465835,0.002596169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00069216255,0.0004662263,0.04015619,0.0006251117,0.000052053183,0.9573628,0.0002871366,0.00004445149,0.00031385262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.43009844,0.39939672,0.13040552,0.008751151,0.022924038,0.008424161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36287776,0.30614173,0.07163529,0.07861669,0.16812588,0.012602635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5452416,0.007060739,0.0103371,0.025822675,0.012265693,0.019227492,0.010747455,0.020876778,0.032707844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58606756,0.010214857,0.012115117,0.024562437,0.015408449,0.019806111,0.011385092,0.025488084,0.02997243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0073242364,0.003544618,0.0033415642,0.23816963,0.00097272283,0.0021024963,0.08533233,0.0037259483,0.0065577407,0.039678715,0.31921318,0.29003683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016704606,0.0026263478,0.0067815543,0.28915802,0.0009296806,0.0009568391,0.03440498,0.004334648,0.009289144,0.050524633,0.5829921,0.0012974913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045045638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008545905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4547584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022933468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096574984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5607981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392135489","doi":"10.1177/16094069241236268","title":"Remote and Equitable Inductive Analysis for Global Health Teams: Using Digital Tools to Foster Equity and Collaboration in Qualitative Global Health Research via the R-EIGHT Method","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Rigour; Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Coding (social sciences); Thematic analysis; Knowledge management; Computer science; Equity (law); Data science; Process management; Management science; Engineering; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.7166983548439992,"score_gpt":0.7555245277030183,"score_spread":0.038826172859019015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392135489","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034020625,0.0003777109,0.92723745,0.004998939,0.00029256073,0.0091683585,0.00039777215,0.00100136,0.022505168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062132545,0.00021421637,0.92149067,0.0005753728,0.00003449406,0.013336646,0.00017561522,0.00027712938,0.0017632904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.79682547,0.17875628,0.00634485,0.0058914917,0.010330206,0.0018516242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75468475,0.17964849,0.011162423,0.034420393,0.017598258,0.0024857111],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13247277,0.0013556638,0.0011059127,0.0058070836,0.0053688977,0.00673682,0.0042722467,0.0017945863,0.007563939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20757021,0.0011652963,0.0018860991,0.005170551,0.014663551,0.009836068,0.02352106,0.0038355594,0.0021214534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032428798,0.00029047954,0.003623009,0.0031309011,0.0000918847,0.00072575925,0.37386876,0.002487479,0.0056432076,0.16459793,0.01029028,0.43492603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065039593,0.000687714,0.0049435715,0.006272466,0.00025803767,0.0016907136,0.20563136,0.018914193,0.018304791,0.4507966,0.2913731,0.00047712855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016580059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033527934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86752725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005426809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013377812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7005913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392443773","doi":"","title":"Digital health technologies and social and geographic inequalities : a comparative sociology of public action","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Inequality; Sociology; Public health; Social inequality; Social science; Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4175847256671435,"score_gpt":0.468524744684921,"score_spread":0.050940019017777505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392443773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.350747,0.054385353,0.01107007,0.09214745,0.00047917035,0.00011592673,0.0006245932,0.000030233623,0.49040014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98294777,0.011085123,0.0008171494,0.0009750038,0.00016191388,0.00007225509,0.000052790005,0.000014007663,0.0038740241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941598,0.0041072005,0.00012577858,0.00033931664,0.00070188724,0.00056606217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983943,0.013626576,0.0009141343,0.0005862828,0.00052432297,0.00040570172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051674293,0.00026769686,0.0004735651,0.005846412,0.004120404,0.01041106,0.0008307754,0.002260389,0.008893272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011065287,0.00025650486,0.0003588854,0.0064916303,0.021024762,0.010335705,0.0050961375,0.0017270081,0.00026652412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042670308,0.000064776184,0.010004942,0.0004514176,0.000033543965,0.00018681328,0.11160862,0.00037811155,0.00013671945,0.83364236,0.0026807366,0.040769238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048352587,0.0001491833,0.04633799,0.0035746028,0.00008633601,0.0005042659,0.33652246,0.0014228778,0.00033872976,0.29140878,0.3195352,0.000071118586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025986852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020210259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025986852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009040591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049463194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065594435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020356","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2330892","title":"Participant Fraud in Virtual Qualitative Substance Use Research: Recommendations and Considerations for Detection and Prevention Based on a Case Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Substance Use & Misuse","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Deception; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Psychology; Participant observation; Research ethics; Applied psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Sociology","score_opus":0.6639107463225234,"score_gpt":0.583887359500869,"score_spread":0.08002338682165444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020356","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04089054,0.028830593,0.14357075,0.7312299,0.00933474,0.023514302,0.00025280146,0.0006082437,0.021768125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30369186,0.029526666,0.52166104,0.07646072,0.0018049263,0.059378617,0.00021010087,0.00021291408,0.007053167],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.405722,0.55474186,0.01573009,0.0041183983,0.014586187,0.0051014978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32963768,0.5728027,0.021320341,0.025601296,0.037316196,0.013321751],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.49712667,0.002923589,0.0034131082,0.005633296,0.027521873,0.02087986,0.016234972,0.023427684,0.007268749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46128237,0.0026298887,0.004103591,0.0055389665,0.03263254,0.04098597,0.026971016,0.016001066,0.0022649588],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000548881,0.0021760932,0.022895452,0.016607028,0.00020850288,0.01241701,0.55957556,0.0009413089,0.0009868366,0.068788655,0.065341316,0.24951334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027188312,0.00074939756,0.002649467,0.046019606,0.00033943396,0.0076872124,0.70874894,0.002386733,0.0013047532,0.06585684,0.16361974,0.00036598695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009930997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031265322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97657233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018837068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065220594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6201323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393238613","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106759","title":"The remote work of child protection professionals during COVID-19: A scoping review and thematic analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Child Abuse & Neglect","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Work (physics); Child protection; Pandemic; Thematic map; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing; Qualitative research; Engineering; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.12202183790727845,"score_gpt":0.48159679343985223,"score_spread":0.3595749555325738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393238613","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006660826,0.9847552,0.0009241324,0.0019510064,0.0003300151,0.0023220167,0.0005918337,0.000012556727,0.002452306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049980637,0.9363594,0.0049586482,0.0015896822,0.00009838429,0.0057316166,0.00049403944,0.0000322724,0.00075529556],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.956015,0.027335068,0.008646665,0.0017410556,0.0047928393,0.0014693303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8843703,0.09661304,0.0084089795,0.0022191775,0.0074013765,0.000987078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058740105,0.00131738,0.005475667,0.025750909,0.0037195804,0.008501012,0.0027429485,0.0039969683,0.0043379744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11994349,0.0018964001,0.004095895,0.033037327,0.0036620118,0.007319192,0.008426612,0.0027549958,0.00053364347],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017263481,0.000067491834,0.0017565964,0.7658441,0.0014249493,0.00052505184,0.058964495,0.00012144396,0.00039834107,0.0038008108,0.006162615,0.16076155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024124365,0.000050000814,0.0019787967,0.93625927,0.0018725494,0.00019162118,0.023484614,0.000026686894,0.00013225157,0.00043766876,0.035517015,0.000025438014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021173354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07355264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058740105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011419766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056815688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31065112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393325696","doi":"10.1177/16094069241244859","title":"Navigating the Virtual Landscape: Methodological Considerations for Qualitative Research in Long-Term Care","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Qualitative research; Data science; Management science; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.8541399600641203,"score_gpt":0.7682738880534571,"score_spread":0.08586607201066321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393325696","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039241623,0.034145508,0.572887,0.14368518,0.008629265,0.18520279,0.001355409,0.0005380186,0.014315188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.113788836,0.0046811267,0.47893047,0.023015415,0.0006540333,0.37737057,0.00025058488,0.00027597518,0.0010329277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.18671282,0.7693847,0.023243984,0.005394977,0.011709336,0.003554278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24310787,0.6619013,0.017066399,0.037993353,0.032756347,0.007174729],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.68014085,0.0026073323,0.005843888,0.015960582,0.019635499,0.024621056,0.012458855,0.009418919,0.006964828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.65450776,0.0038947987,0.003719248,0.012931843,0.03854751,0.020651055,0.021689638,0.012519381,0.0018582809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007963208,0.0008966447,0.009082451,0.038048565,0.0006397855,0.0019024812,0.63856465,0.002675608,0.0016419678,0.16705988,0.016552666,0.122138895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013783341,0.0013445264,0.0032643806,0.08852047,0.0006793274,0.0012334756,0.5314122,0.007918278,0.002130573,0.22897264,0.13257547,0.0005704012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01495899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68014085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026267415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07032128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39444333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393901926","doi":"10.1017/s096318012400015x","title":"Ethical and Equitable Digital Health Research: Ensuring Self-Determination in Data Governance for Racialized Communities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Health equity; Indigenous; Data governance; Public relations; Equity (law); Digital health; Corporate governance; Stewardship (theology); Sociology; Scholarship; Political science; Health care; Business; Law; Data quality; Politics","score_opus":0.5298484946468839,"score_gpt":0.5837452778986664,"score_spread":0.05389678325178249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393901926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13243549,0.005052043,0.28370884,0.46780932,0.0014778927,0.0017252762,0.00017113595,0.00020272896,0.1074173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8900264,0.0015808517,0.07791564,0.024233544,0.0004532271,0.0019529756,0.00007937481,0.00009006275,0.0036678063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6111165,0.34677213,0.008406306,0.0102890665,0.017440474,0.0059755403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5627564,0.3180191,0.020631261,0.05856472,0.023772538,0.01625602],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.33948714,0.00053322734,0.001054243,0.0034146234,0.021288434,0.021285664,0.003573678,0.0063709617,0.0035259207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28483805,0.00094010145,0.0008066618,0.002962126,0.09031993,0.025560902,0.03515967,0.010506665,0.00065954105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000430375,0.00010835715,0.0053967666,0.000407798,0.00003781695,0.00027180678,0.36246338,0.00029695875,0.0007351412,0.56764024,0.0055052605,0.05709336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004997508,0.00011986867,0.002754765,0.0023415145,0.000038555634,0.0004982646,0.16393179,0.0008820596,0.0015656523,0.68652153,0.14121443,0.000081603284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041282987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042538843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99642634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00907869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058719575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81452996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394460065","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14531631","title":"BetterHomesTO, research instruments, codes, and final report","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.44574547665341724,"score_gpt":0.5411468670882027,"score_spread":0.09540139043478546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394460065","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014022477,0.00012499568,0.009673739,0.0014238817,0.00045680252,0.010412063,0.9599305,0.0014046122,0.015171215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007846652,0.0004281369,0.0937747,0.001611318,0.00011766548,0.2728783,0.5906344,0.0032385516,0.029470336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770258,0.009042466,0.006045084,0.0022047586,0.0046757874,0.0010060796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8762691,0.04797363,0.006844184,0.027367508,0.039069295,0.0024763206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034257084,0.0011945759,0.0012957014,0.009548705,0.0035375012,0.0060563562,0.0023446633,0.0016909102,0.29161704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17249301,0.0015728762,0.0010764494,0.013986926,0.0021068298,0.0052475734,0.0049204486,0.003479667,0.11824077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001337123,0.000062938554,0.0010200404,0.0027363223,0.000013757492,0.000029820625,0.0022764434,0.0001275478,0.0003605075,0.008413665,0.96085894,0.023966335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011435798,0.000019961348,0.0029529505,0.0019019654,0.000009728867,0.000034165947,0.0022745456,0.0001005809,0.00037190868,0.0048168167,0.9873603,0.00004267438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008631847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01834394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29161704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00516047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021506818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9755562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395471022","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-52022-8_23","title":"An Unanticipated Methodological Crisis: (Forced) Adaptations to Online Qualitative Methodological Encounters, Disruptions and Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic for Researching Marginalized Individuals on Gendered Islamophobia in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Sociology; Criminology; Gender studies; Medicine; Law; Politics; Virology","score_opus":0.7660704206293358,"score_gpt":0.5853174296974366,"score_spread":0.18075299093189923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395471022","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02711987,0.008833187,0.050909616,0.7958081,0.0090687405,0.00080650544,0.00020614715,0.00046139117,0.10678646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4008771,0.011800097,0.1705889,0.23459437,0.0038182999,0.003021846,0.00027730584,0.0034839795,0.17153811],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8904654,0.082180575,0.003144286,0.0031720765,0.016969396,0.0040681395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7485587,0.20278764,0.0034827078,0.009553606,0.028760506,0.006856852],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16966447,0.00054466265,0.0006110001,0.0020371664,0.023178337,0.023900842,0.006208187,0.008613303,0.005922529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16188316,0.0009580143,0.00056152424,0.00354635,0.05778629,0.01493171,0.012661574,0.01641915,0.0011931122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023729233,0.000056592424,0.0007040539,0.00038972247,0.000008770437,0.0004594037,0.5553183,0.00021474174,0.0012322958,0.22973725,0.11713256,0.09472253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019727768,0.000024343379,0.0010123182,0.0020517195,0.000016893922,0.00048582978,0.24473655,0.00073778816,0.0011660582,0.06124557,0.6884198,0.000083422325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38365272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69830024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8303355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059167847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1489543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89728224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395954995","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2024.2347581","title":"Zooming into qualitative research: online adaptation of the action-project method research design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Action research; Qualitative research; Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Action (physics); Research design; Zoom; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.9286874652290065,"score_gpt":0.8139077335379284,"score_spread":0.11477973169107802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395954995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021922898,0.0003914505,0.74291605,0.003155189,0.0013542658,0.19556217,0.0015815389,0.0027942099,0.03032231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021357672,0.00014847028,0.67296684,0.0013161318,0.00010497701,0.3003232,0.00020242512,0.00036224996,0.003218055],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8621976,0.12456928,0.003795768,0.0049226657,0.003235094,0.0012796638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8436499,0.11451617,0.0034561015,0.023922682,0.011653037,0.00280206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11442352,0.0019640622,0.0011846145,0.0036729209,0.0042036306,0.003667416,0.0047207032,0.002575597,0.03829658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10834004,0.0017986352,0.0016284061,0.003835966,0.0065986025,0.0039845267,0.009131254,0.005124227,0.00716189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022552058,0.003053861,0.0023080457,0.011553336,0.00013452001,0.00091865263,0.23375231,0.0036337608,0.015108883,0.06663875,0.038250007,0.62239265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072824233,0.0032506487,0.005449513,0.0073810075,0.00026786578,0.0009878324,0.07109978,0.016542125,0.014216769,0.17530464,0.69767845,0.0005389613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009218604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027969528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8855765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025217792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009229214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60513663},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4396218338","doi":"10.1186/s13034-024-00738-8","title":"Pathways and identity: toward qualitative research careers in child and adolescent psychiatry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Institute of Mental Health; Yale University","keywords":"Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Conceptualization; Mental health; Feeling; Interpersonal communication; Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Child and adolescent psychiatry; Identity (music); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Applied psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.11026841116727996,"score_gpt":0.48993641309110414,"score_spread":0.37966800192382416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396218338","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15259178,0.015453627,0.52105975,0.21919045,0.0028129711,0.026311276,0.001171227,0.0006446715,0.060764175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47405055,0.009477364,0.4598297,0.016646242,0.00032740875,0.030472508,0.00041033962,0.00039198223,0.0083939],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.77228105,0.21115555,0.003979181,0.0038788475,0.0056674513,0.0030378993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7876419,0.16867936,0.009599976,0.009767502,0.013637278,0.010674104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23354514,0.0008082892,0.0011366273,0.004564601,0.017695697,0.020087129,0.00552373,0.0052307765,0.0052975235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13055868,0.0016933639,0.0011601273,0.0047056004,0.049355663,0.015297087,0.02681317,0.01041419,0.0011377193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043795273,0.00008784357,0.0010983279,0.00092362834,0.000011059228,0.0003627539,0.92276394,0.00018955707,0.00052120996,0.051950783,0.0025886141,0.019458435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048071764,0.00007215092,0.0006963585,0.0038861246,0.000011947375,0.00047824546,0.84812933,0.0006974069,0.00045329097,0.066181205,0.07930993,0.00003592013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073132245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011186498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23354514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014550039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05635204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396665242","doi":"10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.1.10777","title":"Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of the Benefits and Drawbacks of Using a Twitter-based Assignment in an Undergraduate Public Health Nutrition Course","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.16170712868598014,"score_gpt":0.4575366370858882,"score_spread":0.29582950839990807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396665242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99766004,0.000050411272,0.00034175115,0.00041570608,0.00001904572,0.000030805833,0.000009834452,0.0000051693114,0.0014672931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997815,0.00010863432,0.00070808356,0.00020446123,0.000011413038,0.0000588841,0.000013531776,0.0000053017375,0.0010745269],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934174,0.0026087146,0.0004722103,0.00050248794,0.0019735284,0.0010256668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839738,0.007273011,0.0024620842,0.0003067655,0.0028081732,0.0031761196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007822093,0.0003041797,0.00040906822,0.00074623444,0.0027237092,0.0045999927,0.00079609285,0.0013527767,0.0024247481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025653454,0.00033292218,0.0004603307,0.00047149244,0.0019064168,0.0016834963,0.0028036465,0.0017520672,0.00041024797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005916561,0.002118917,0.31113014,0.00040662917,0.000069758506,0.0019918561,0.57285345,0.0005683938,0.012102157,0.0009952496,0.0022150115,0.09495677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059474052,0.0019715943,0.2099114,0.0002486895,0.00007156828,0.00069296773,0.7680048,0.001662207,0.0035250403,0.0005268639,0.013095634,0.00022984997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008137138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019197363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008137138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025177093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003568603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04136771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396856568","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2347658","title":"Fraudulent participation in psychological research using virtual synchronous interviews: ethical challenges and potential solutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster Children's Hospital; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.6571028878007732,"score_gpt":0.6432007040709535,"score_spread":0.013902183729819662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396856568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2750305,0.008412153,0.43828154,0.22708462,0.0022447992,0.008470128,0.00020182059,0.0004763836,0.039798036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86197627,0.0025463325,0.09756419,0.017169308,0.00074437493,0.017270954,0.000091347385,0.00016402749,0.0024732444],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.20739052,0.7471064,0.012661152,0.006821846,0.021385478,0.004634601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24659458,0.61579007,0.050093677,0.055293854,0.022832831,0.009395024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.48463273,0.0012799558,0.0014774343,0.0038485462,0.020781888,0.020105043,0.0070385323,0.008837258,0.0036076545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5271271,0.0019928103,0.0013534313,0.0042925896,0.045655753,0.021624058,0.024791522,0.009194598,0.0011258632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025196018,0.0003563849,0.014477532,0.0021626942,0.000099745215,0.0013672727,0.76157016,0.0006384159,0.0016574393,0.11144889,0.006219302,0.09975022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016219344,0.00034342278,0.0039990363,0.008522567,0.00008091706,0.0027074397,0.6192282,0.0053370926,0.0026100639,0.26526785,0.091553405,0.00018782301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022330063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004662163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009566454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026875418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63553965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399161832","doi":"10.1101/2024.05.29.24308062","title":"More Than Words: An Integrative Review of Innovative Elicitation Techniques for Qualitative Interviews","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Western University; McMaster University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Photo elicitation; Qualitative research; Psychology; Knowledge management; Sociology; Management science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.17621844480021234,"score_gpt":0.5485415619292252,"score_spread":0.3723231171290129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399161832","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026094322,0.9529191,0.023583628,0.007743276,0.0014749346,0.004209725,0.0004931687,0.000102751124,0.006864004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021133222,0.899246,0.06334526,0.0023965635,0.00040294405,0.01201043,0.00048072104,0.00013955659,0.00084536814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.86187965,0.1011096,0.0201465,0.0032339552,0.012438306,0.001192039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6055133,0.3475943,0.01259718,0.007902233,0.025316697,0.0010762841],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14770797,0.0024389487,0.0052246787,0.034814853,0.0044820826,0.010683387,0.0059091076,0.0032871284,0.0060366257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2377332,0.0019535006,0.005566725,0.034610793,0.0070713446,0.013408409,0.0107166795,0.003893154,0.0011944678],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014426625,0.00008546172,0.00055624294,0.3783345,0.00072063203,0.00021912383,0.05119234,0.0003397148,0.000771263,0.020289592,0.00844304,0.53890383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077547746,0.00014452347,0.0012135565,0.7031305,0.0013642859,0.0003488494,0.02333177,0.0002873099,0.00065776805,0.011003174,0.25832185,0.00011888006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005070618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012178927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85229206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012460516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030327342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78116375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400160557","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2022-0261en","title":"DATA COLLECTION VIA PHONE IN MULTICENTRIC RESEARCH ON NURSING CARE IN THE FACE OF COVID-19","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Operationalization; Phone; Interview; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Psychology; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.8209878754424246,"score_gpt":0.6761043018129564,"score_spread":0.14488357362946813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400160557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95253736,0.0014484315,0.019035153,0.0012536607,0.00013438948,0.017949369,0.0012248965,0.000041344985,0.006375358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94136816,0.0008465964,0.0239341,0.0008284185,0.00008501137,0.03158772,0.00039707677,0.000023509254,0.00092940836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8623021,0.12526903,0.0045957784,0.0023945204,0.0033349525,0.0021036793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8911633,0.07287063,0.013279058,0.007855017,0.013286171,0.0015458972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08247541,0.00055763446,0.00067012024,0.0023326932,0.003231878,0.0018226581,0.0011177144,0.0012254758,0.0029662398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09114293,0.0006103986,0.0006122718,0.0030694618,0.0022041365,0.0023245676,0.003388941,0.0007473967,0.0005150116],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003220703,0.0026068967,0.24937703,0.009795583,0.00036019168,0.0014448877,0.44683793,0.0006960544,0.008876535,0.0033271138,0.0059850677,0.2674721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008207252,0.010796398,0.3552671,0.008193755,0.000374691,0.001153097,0.57475895,0.0013303976,0.010014508,0.0025307462,0.03458579,0.0001738227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028259486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043709436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9175246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026335157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006872703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43617684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400160635","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2022-0261pt","title":"COLETA DE DADOS VIA TELEFONE EM PESQUISA MULTICÊNTRICA SOBRE CUIDADO DE ENFERMAGEM FRENTE À COVID-19","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.5359641132802695,"score_gpt":0.5648808339455357,"score_spread":0.028916720665266182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400160635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661224,0.0053980765,0.012574146,0.0024675725,0.00012598974,0.0031927826,0.0022977996,0.0001044669,0.0077167256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722115,0.003123711,0.016543606,0.00067089614,0.00009333975,0.004003847,0.00067795854,0.000032136715,0.0026431226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98564297,0.009295833,0.0017578944,0.0010449002,0.0014903719,0.00076811406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614391,0.014457546,0.007607792,0.003584233,0.011242037,0.0016694053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024527106,0.00063684763,0.0011693003,0.004223819,0.0024378202,0.002596964,0.0009999302,0.00084087974,0.005726458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035410404,0.000675053,0.0012328611,0.004126658,0.0012851959,0.0018985405,0.003995311,0.0006589207,0.00058413774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013211746,0.0006292785,0.5745142,0.005596892,0.0006590824,0.00088411814,0.120288275,0.0008567059,0.0056679235,0.0019879192,0.003999302,0.2835951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020133457,0.0030581905,0.8063671,0.004609577,0.0009120641,0.001069722,0.12787911,0.00084170845,0.0035996062,0.0015970756,0.04967157,0.00019292852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017469931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027505139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97547287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003054738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007099473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1297133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401025036","doi":"10.1177/16094069241266200","title":"Observing Neurodiversity, Observing Methodology: Ethnography in Pandemic Times","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Anthropology; Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.8298936466745425,"score_gpt":0.6808698344548898,"score_spread":0.14902381221965266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401025036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577644,0.0012531781,0.02247973,0.0038342644,0.00016204381,0.0017286438,0.00022822135,0.00006633745,0.012483218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860335,0.0009233917,0.009705491,0.00062553707,0.00004490314,0.0013611243,0.000056273642,0.00004469333,0.0012050645],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96465963,0.031937905,0.0006416021,0.0008474755,0.0007193515,0.001194126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691749,0.024807105,0.0015005827,0.0018269093,0.00132931,0.0013611601],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026509842,0.0006155669,0.0006527366,0.0025456438,0.01010161,0.0042879474,0.0018256111,0.0018847416,0.0020131422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028394248,0.0005883362,0.00037964212,0.002185067,0.017499298,0.0067452257,0.007098001,0.0025945283,0.00029299967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030121824,0.000053396256,0.003052,0.00013129899,0.000004797613,0.0004122898,0.9881449,0.000081808816,0.0007331519,0.0020457294,0.000424621,0.004885964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009672864,0.00006397211,0.0016952485,0.00024411298,0.0000046551954,0.00019475269,0.9852632,0.00012978622,0.00047064488,0.0018085695,0.010096177,0.000019227286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072247116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014116362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040829284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003784217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14019907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401248407","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4886664","title":"Carrying out Experiential Surveys/Questionnaires: Tips and Traps","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Psychology; Survey research; Applied psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.05582184580691219,"score_gpt":0.40916947934683773,"score_spread":0.35334763353992554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401248407","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07985073,0.0006468614,0.7666444,0.010667831,0.0010034965,0.09790009,0.00578494,0.0033643374,0.03413729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18343131,0.0007021309,0.5761723,0.004426011,0.00051303103,0.21284728,0.0017149784,0.0008792479,0.019313732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8224165,0.14568773,0.011277113,0.0037547755,0.013206711,0.0036571398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58431554,0.30036333,0.012518506,0.062441316,0.03349827,0.006863016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.158808,0.0019691666,0.0014538794,0.0037039255,0.004779929,0.003643452,0.004054825,0.0038739648,0.019633148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27349895,0.0020903433,0.00091432,0.0040480215,0.0042820084,0.0070360135,0.006606734,0.0058042794,0.010829231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018864139,0.002639195,0.015674671,0.0037823874,0.00006837369,0.00038953754,0.100124925,0.0016085481,0.027049363,0.043390427,0.083042115,0.720344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025637986,0.0057443865,0.06116261,0.0061247246,0.00022469634,0.0008169213,0.15896286,0.023353428,0.0697068,0.23226628,0.43823612,0.00083734543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013447624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029894258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.158808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024935969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008427446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.839867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401870414","doi":"10.1017/s1049096524000210","title":"Research Adaptivity in Times of Disruption: Zig-Zagging Your Way through the Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Field (mathematics); Ethnography; Perception; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Field research; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Engineering; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Virology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31382452102144826,"score_gpt":0.5732654678323371,"score_spread":0.25944094681088886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401870414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090918,0.0023820018,0.026616896,0.037572995,0.00080254715,0.0006211104,0.00012069815,0.00016995247,0.02262207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99040705,0.00053551816,0.00462296,0.002569568,0.000070648726,0.00032748186,0.000024531078,0.00005024578,0.0013920055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92447263,0.06622817,0.0011728636,0.0023472356,0.0025617993,0.0032173647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9187108,0.058822945,0.0066316733,0.00721877,0.0040811966,0.0045345738],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061810832,0.000575507,0.0009176036,0.0021774552,0.01819316,0.012520973,0.002896767,0.0039527197,0.0030556298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083714396,0.0010221676,0.00071713596,0.0018272375,0.03528011,0.01094861,0.016352158,0.0074305176,0.0005102684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004262638,0.00004128229,0.0031872082,0.00016325485,0.000011138657,0.0004376654,0.9818511,0.00008505448,0.00053847313,0.0050701536,0.0011483456,0.007423588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008504895,0.000072005365,0.0018363917,0.00029343454,0.000007740649,0.00023437629,0.97684336,0.00009198496,0.0002905153,0.0033909823,0.016901894,0.000028945127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044144974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007285762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93818915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069417506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064369035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32689083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401873763","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0309361","title":"From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Cancer Council Queensland","keywords":"Qualitative research; Medical education; Population; Relevance (law); Psychology; Empathy; Test (biology); Research design; Focus group; Medicine; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.5867364525865977,"score_gpt":0.5818518886707317,"score_spread":0.004884563915866003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401873763","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.283055,0.0018836311,0.35128435,0.011104391,0.0015747277,0.3161706,0.0024076574,0.0010392285,0.031480394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31518862,0.0007012071,0.31673372,0.0033451905,0.00011926437,0.35641256,0.0005029391,0.00020946248,0.0067870663],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90813005,0.08032774,0.0025175794,0.0038468526,0.0032199975,0.0019577695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93611336,0.04250093,0.002340609,0.0039354092,0.0113601275,0.003749688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083874665,0.00088190276,0.0010896672,0.0030276855,0.005639812,0.0039914763,0.002744864,0.0019059305,0.009909706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08306251,0.0011762892,0.0012645778,0.0019201356,0.004779523,0.0030059102,0.00695584,0.002408441,0.0019584396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015875418,0.0014952768,0.006417061,0.0072082486,0.00009773009,0.0014886485,0.70713645,0.0014090249,0.008210744,0.017395806,0.0121009005,0.23545256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022719193,0.004067904,0.0071524573,0.006097324,0.00021597631,0.000878255,0.69729763,0.0051954286,0.0068447934,0.02646549,0.24328834,0.00022438247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029029218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005091302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083874665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005239545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018297482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44357693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402093165","doi":"10.1353/vcr.2024.a936087","title":"Taking Talk Seriously: Large-Scale Methodologies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian review","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Computer science; History; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.15674822717521616,"score_gpt":0.4966661023975008,"score_spread":0.33991787522228467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402093165","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07136051,0.055955835,0.6414497,0.021314416,0.0022942042,0.17199212,0.002470578,0.00091398053,0.032248672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23161145,0.011634507,0.54757184,0.006519272,0.00033662398,0.19787699,0.0006839971,0.00037253948,0.00339269],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.48604792,0.46136457,0.01488921,0.009890674,0.025474569,0.0023330485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26628137,0.6505507,0.017121045,0.03277663,0.030033212,0.0032369802],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.37976497,0.0018360941,0.003890755,0.008944386,0.0068702428,0.0106376605,0.00808225,0.0031729254,0.009812587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5553794,0.0021668505,0.002044596,0.00846448,0.00703595,0.009614205,0.016539784,0.003674851,0.0012082683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007975348,0.0008831359,0.0126372725,0.07772463,0.002892597,0.0004717565,0.1379291,0.0020710859,0.0045991945,0.034449253,0.015118684,0.71042585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002886,0.0029334656,0.050922833,0.122507036,0.0057308874,0.00071606616,0.26124078,0.008560229,0.011555384,0.2629979,0.26922682,0.0007225742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008579882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03154715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37976497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01350607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046988625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7648602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402599511","doi":"10.4324/9781003333326-18","title":"Data-driven campaigning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.26652945140325623,"score_gpt":0.4649254644424504,"score_spread":0.19839601303919419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402599511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014580276,0.013407067,0.17332706,0.030968962,0.0017484637,0.0010371641,0.0015819292,0.00079335406,0.7625558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46985322,0.029014196,0.19395189,0.02327453,0.0016087745,0.0032477689,0.004229017,0.0018465847,0.2729741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881719,0.006970602,0.00042806688,0.0011085166,0.0028582232,0.00046260227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97136015,0.022445722,0.000897299,0.0031304313,0.0016464983,0.0005199442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013778574,0.0006245075,0.0005078362,0.0031458954,0.0021783984,0.010425179,0.0016627343,0.0019599325,0.014462913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0191985,0.000494868,0.0006750662,0.0045102015,0.0065573994,0.010154032,0.005045895,0.0031627377,0.0038101533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000309077,0.00005888701,0.0013798138,0.0013391123,0.00003709016,0.0001283067,0.014471619,0.0009506493,0.0009493338,0.76960796,0.036457676,0.17458862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115290995,0.000028962188,0.0009591032,0.0013593226,0.000014653181,0.00020150865,0.004686316,0.0009663592,0.0011356769,0.1321041,0.8585037,0.00002861224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027179385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034675093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014462913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038266461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004189628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07286888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402899756","doi":"10.4103/pmrr.pmrr_197_24","title":"Feasibility and Ethical Considerations for Conducting Online versus In-person Interviews for a Qualitative Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Preventive Medicine Research & Reviews","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Psychology; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Applied psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.8980548647894877,"score_gpt":0.7283124397031733,"score_spread":0.16974242508631443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402899756","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058431204,0.0034882396,0.23916717,0.06438007,0.008338214,0.5732838,0.0026431137,0.0005763632,0.04969193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083160505,0.0010094668,0.22505464,0.012750429,0.00076910306,0.6738614,0.0003659252,0.00025268944,0.0027759122],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.36656275,0.56810397,0.023506578,0.008103822,0.025251266,0.008471652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48117462,0.39667407,0.014882786,0.044104453,0.04836611,0.014797884],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4964292,0.0020259945,0.0027959119,0.0050901426,0.013165964,0.015786525,0.006736268,0.009480436,0.043013494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49364564,0.003036003,0.0022672336,0.0048127435,0.016185567,0.014696016,0.013026172,0.011021947,0.008954337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066335388,0.00376982,0.005917928,0.016041437,0.00019560962,0.0036615226,0.5697652,0.002084292,0.0069154343,0.15998954,0.04610768,0.17891791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004053938,0.0034621626,0.004135147,0.039086062,0.00019510431,0.0020870643,0.31567636,0.005332988,0.00649153,0.13413517,0.4847885,0.0005559839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033948033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008554582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5035708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009405363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040528886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6209925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403017813","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65735-1_1","title":"Digital Tools and Techniques in Qualitative Research: Digital Skills and Research Optimisation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in networks and systems","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.20330694356295864,"score_gpt":0.49445544929877816,"score_spread":0.2911485057358195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403017813","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00367126,0.016216086,0.8705546,0.020940116,0.0011290716,0.0021121898,0.00055152044,0.0003487362,0.084476374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09615442,0.014983793,0.8458621,0.0030531287,0.00038297588,0.012696137,0.00034827512,0.0005537784,0.025965344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87902033,0.10875848,0.0031736179,0.0020925803,0.006409998,0.00054504286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66745687,0.31031677,0.002757716,0.012472894,0.0058337715,0.0011619679],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.109406255,0.0009517505,0.0013047949,0.0041421326,0.0031190237,0.009407696,0.0025053131,0.002118529,0.016491616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13419372,0.0013868931,0.0006803851,0.0060471036,0.026128778,0.012778759,0.00959902,0.0041949013,0.0029648382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039734874,0.00007771012,0.0003881732,0.00450306,0.000032266136,0.00009427331,0.049100053,0.00092619995,0.00069654617,0.69891953,0.017206239,0.2280162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041534106,0.00004762917,0.00035769382,0.0049454714,0.000024778805,0.0002521227,0.022432975,0.0020776533,0.001376076,0.8112403,0.15715624,0.00004746113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012500522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031634022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89059377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005528457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010622305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5786025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403102433","doi":"10.36368/jcsh.v1i1.1041","title":"Fertility concerns and COVID-19 Vaccines: Community-informed infographic design in urban Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of community systems for health /","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Infographic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Fertility; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Geography; Environmental health; Medicine; Outbreak; Virology; Computer science; Population; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.22398293996508548,"score_gpt":0.45544978360655036,"score_spread":0.2314668436414649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403102433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9612783,0.00060046895,0.0043826946,0.0029491808,0.00008610549,0.006097287,0.0018329351,0.00017319764,0.022599714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95984197,0.00075110246,0.015315726,0.0008915408,0.000027600558,0.0060693785,0.0008785604,0.00007320735,0.01615091],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658054,0.001792998,0.00012741449,0.00032194806,0.00054089044,0.00063627947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877257,0.0051102657,0.00069869374,0.0004074974,0.0033891958,0.0026686182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007495607,0.00043680967,0.00043108832,0.0013057117,0.010014308,0.003748678,0.00148859,0.0007428087,0.009713942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012818003,0.00041826506,0.0004609674,0.0020585703,0.003977563,0.0012335835,0.0029557731,0.0009192449,0.00051369006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011962431,0.0019236712,0.05696267,0.0021483263,0.000043271993,0.0015826087,0.76523,0.0010342404,0.0030238642,0.0041241706,0.022600142,0.14013079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005797532,0.0018423287,0.109988794,0.0012908621,0.000121775076,0.00018212444,0.70912546,0.0019324387,0.0020948795,0.002058115,0.17057584,0.00020758601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86663157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94199485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13336843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057439763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.094976276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41675657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404289001","doi":"10.1080/2373566x.2024.2415657","title":"“I’ll Be Here:” Reflections on Representation and Research Communication Through Zine Work","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GeoHumanities","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Representation (politics); Telecommunications; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.6572118298064255,"score_gpt":0.617543451769324,"score_spread":0.03966837803710144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404289001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75327426,0.004256478,0.034818057,0.076143846,0.0010755003,0.000532622,0.0001110671,0.00019817532,0.12959008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98634386,0.000885185,0.0027650178,0.0014970955,0.000072068215,0.00014345386,0.000021432154,0.000075534415,0.008196373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.942741,0.047021676,0.0009183024,0.0018014809,0.0039913,0.003526291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963836,0.029738825,0.0016869826,0.0016812208,0.0016618376,0.0013951022],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041152287,0.0009865519,0.00081869814,0.0031913286,0.029230969,0.017410984,0.0030777184,0.0046944874,0.004132131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05807185,0.0010839357,0.0007958816,0.0017078943,0.06592969,0.0155622065,0.02182136,0.011556418,0.0005680987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014958638,0.000010226229,0.00016581509,0.000036855225,0.0000024580709,0.00025394312,0.9797069,0.000023892575,0.00036093884,0.017251268,0.00036133785,0.0018113094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012131351,0.000025289573,0.00041715323,0.00020554778,0.000006974532,0.0002543723,0.9248841,0.00014345403,0.0008358041,0.005912357,0.067274466,0.00002841483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016161354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023969738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.982589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014782254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007227408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2176367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404808998","doi":"10.1370/afm.22.s1.6158","title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure via a Patient Portal in HIV care","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patient care; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Measure (data warehouse); Patient portal; Medicine; Patient-reported outcome; Computer science; Health care; Nursing; Family medicine; Data mining; Quality of life (healthcare)","score_opus":0.11933234784483095,"score_gpt":0.4301940743974113,"score_spread":0.3108617265525804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404808998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771666,0.000121106175,0.0022194586,0.0011157308,0.00010013701,0.011707365,0.001764909,0.0001289765,0.0056756805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782639,0.00014089792,0.009435478,0.0004094008,0.00005529494,0.010439113,0.0005794269,0.000014232817,0.000662303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97252727,0.019995185,0.0022648491,0.0009924383,0.0027306636,0.0014894614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727611,0.0153483795,0.005016981,0.0016807264,0.002911264,0.00228163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033758137,0.00044871194,0.0004566551,0.0005610844,0.0008062868,0.0014403358,0.0007241812,0.0010046064,0.0058776042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054935075,0.00031765774,0.0017229043,0.0005948106,0.0006021569,0.0016919305,0.0017217416,0.0011030004,0.0007063336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018314866,0.022423161,0.50700885,0.0014392185,0.0003872243,0.00014972486,0.0062222704,0.0010677351,0.0014027186,0.000488873,0.008793222,0.43230218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044442858,0.059929293,0.9127318,0.00070149184,0.00035809018,0.0001804049,0.0051391665,0.0046294928,0.0028324323,0.00038316372,0.00846174,0.00020857835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005077524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033758137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014751675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004102235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17853218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406354046","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02464-x","title":"Recruiting participants for focus groups in health research: a meta-research study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg; Universität Regensburg; Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Focus group; MEDLINE; Medicine; Mental health; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Psychiatry; Sociology","score_opus":0.9765873219534961,"score_gpt":0.7863944746839577,"score_spread":0.19019284726953833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406354046","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051133785,0.91465807,0.01146549,0.0018499679,0.0010041557,0.01628857,0.0014613816,0.00015247737,0.0019862053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5372032,0.35544255,0.0413905,0.005436376,0.00072088616,0.05727394,0.0017283524,0.00016813561,0.0006361034],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8208421,0.11980061,0.03885721,0.0077136527,0.011129661,0.0016567133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52854383,0.4123178,0.026951758,0.012495742,0.018085102,0.0016056966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18872948,0.0028734049,0.012015142,0.020182297,0.0022775582,0.0072272434,0.004180866,0.0038230326,0.004982428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35125187,0.002436911,0.022472357,0.017036667,0.0027152605,0.011863468,0.0047649764,0.0025832816,0.0005962387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025141018,0.00036540406,0.0143314,0.762271,0.14793345,0.00030917727,0.010880658,0.00029366993,0.00031314083,0.0011069224,0.0013329176,0.0583481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026801378,0.0019454238,0.010403885,0.52822256,0.4358525,0.00051482057,0.008326916,0.00047215924,0.00070156483,0.0021117365,0.008593088,0.00017518812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004202374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009496287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81127053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008827065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013207009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407197788","doi":"10.7202/1115902ar","title":"Let’s Hear from Service Providers: Technology and the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social work review","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Service provider; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Service (business); Business; Internet privacy; Virology; Computer science; Marketing; Medicine","score_opus":0.1458315562197415,"score_gpt":0.4351190383354312,"score_spread":0.28928748211568966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407197788","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3074638,0.06296409,0.001809005,0.55323607,0.0033030377,0.0002590472,0.0003241285,0.000076883734,0.070563965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87350196,0.035918407,0.0010155914,0.07988263,0.00041454233,0.00016881838,0.0000861505,0.00005433781,0.008957655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929798,0.0037643097,0.00010840359,0.00016581644,0.0013361268,0.0016455617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994093,0.0032624763,0.00032383858,0.00012605026,0.0011717483,0.001022854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057036406,0.0002767528,0.000489627,0.0011513771,0.014014348,0.007270156,0.0012308682,0.0043199556,0.0033328482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01390132,0.00029552035,0.00030905206,0.002448039,0.013056774,0.0047438215,0.003559856,0.004861275,0.00035142168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028178903,0.000029454874,0.0073171696,0.00089075597,0.000017377646,0.0015972324,0.8833014,0.00007443492,0.00046249555,0.013214867,0.060429532,0.03263711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056684744,0.000027374339,0.0033115486,0.0010677767,0.000015109201,0.00024284435,0.8904902,0.000023197364,0.000081802966,0.00091004954,0.10379656,0.000027915661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7344516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7860154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7344516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023818757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05175399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5342245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407278041","doi":"10.62787/mhm.v2i3.87","title":"Exploring New Frontiers in Health Communication in the Digital Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine Humanity and Media","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Health communication; Digital health; Telecommunications; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Communication; Health care","score_opus":0.39938023568754116,"score_gpt":0.4477743319263966,"score_spread":0.04839409623885543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407278041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34169227,0.11740689,0.040329494,0.2768055,0.0035923366,0.00052634266,0.00031611117,0.0001327593,0.2191983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237125,0.03750024,0.013579965,0.014661663,0.0013100127,0.0005809328,0.00006929947,0.00005029604,0.008535002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900227,0.008234886,0.00019538801,0.0002841212,0.00068715937,0.000575759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635969,0.03359515,0.0006674843,0.00074467337,0.0007064385,0.00068934704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014063746,0.00041910922,0.00059653947,0.004512157,0.006549384,0.0156674,0.00114603,0.0026854428,0.0070420695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010791203,0.00031157353,0.0005479162,0.0045118504,0.029193979,0.024936602,0.010039551,0.0031208259,0.00029883668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000593779,0.00008459042,0.0027466659,0.0016063438,0.000023052455,0.00039384604,0.44928086,0.0001612791,0.0012884884,0.46786082,0.0048442525,0.071650326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021514401,0.000096320124,0.0040068454,0.0019534035,0.000021253369,0.0003710919,0.6529404,0.00042318864,0.0007365897,0.17618242,0.16321132,0.00003566099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020624325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038470144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0156674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00547942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071462016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07437706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407778604","doi":"10.1007/s44206-025-00164-z","title":"Talking to Dog: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Research and Public Reporting on Digital Technology for Human-Animal Communication","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Society","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Critical discourse analysis; Human animal; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.2295233828356308,"score_gpt":0.5997446563522946,"score_spread":0.3702212735166638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407778604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84833944,0.004241917,0.03500544,0.059049305,0.001183712,0.0030411563,0.0011464448,0.00020492538,0.047787502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756266,0.001404206,0.012313953,0.0035752421,0.00019107558,0.0020024949,0.00023333367,0.000260378,0.0043926477],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.84134704,0.1382532,0.003951694,0.004067716,0.007916298,0.004464058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46924528,0.4935769,0.011968204,0.006429385,0.015239346,0.0035408607],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13448481,0.0016736239,0.0017483258,0.016065318,0.03454517,0.022459863,0.0062806336,0.0078535965,0.004741508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23407997,0.0014290138,0.0009212444,0.013364213,0.044771492,0.022750322,0.022423774,0.009594089,0.0005514165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002519793,0.000015346268,0.00033778875,0.00019574404,0.0000044940502,0.00012904104,0.99072343,0.000014990728,0.0002260742,0.005380765,0.00046854967,0.0024785283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000812563,0.000015360016,0.00041073738,0.0005622808,0.0000130501685,0.00006856083,0.9839909,0.00009203669,0.0005236497,0.0026170588,0.011684623,0.000013594704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014381991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01500991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028230626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031655822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7112322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408056192","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5157794","title":"Taking Singularity and Social Relations into Account in Prevention: An Analysis of Social Mediation Activity and its Occupational Health Issues Through the Prism of Intersectionality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique","keywords":"Intersectionality; Mediation; Prism; Sociology; Singularity; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Physics; Social science; Mathematics; Optics; Geometry","score_opus":0.0824118209763161,"score_gpt":0.4893560103834474,"score_spread":0.4069441894071313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408056192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9063157,0.0036915906,0.025411127,0.011781132,0.0000803429,0.0003346239,0.000084574465,0.000035408928,0.052265532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969785,0.0003219544,0.002044288,0.00008415159,0.000007232839,0.00008110232,0.000008843623,0.00000916527,0.0004646822],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821514,0.014229916,0.00034166747,0.0007191447,0.0010899603,0.0014680118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97290945,0.022365345,0.0015992821,0.0011833921,0.0009839908,0.0009586212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016320756,0.00055095943,0.0011818542,0.0040284926,0.011284286,0.010345865,0.002490732,0.0019003167,0.0032023783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025043607,0.0006333107,0.0010038194,0.0044818674,0.023358667,0.010341662,0.018228168,0.003509545,0.000118274715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010182973,0.00019956127,0.03236057,0.0003559716,0.000053299813,0.00047783705,0.7869514,0.0002602097,0.00028846186,0.14771776,0.00030931656,0.030923625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021370728,0.00012208495,0.031915504,0.000588978,0.0001351348,0.00037817354,0.85441935,0.0011359248,0.0005387056,0.10079069,0.0099169295,0.000037087582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012690243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014535067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016320756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006239742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0182635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08631343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408324182","doi":"10.21307/connections-2019.036","title":"Making Personal Networks with a Computer: Lessons from the Field using Vennmaker","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Connections","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Documentation; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Software; Data science; Human–computer interaction; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.1956377198240313,"score_gpt":0.4740518272516665,"score_spread":0.27841410742763517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408324182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7800862,0.0025631308,0.043682814,0.024082886,0.0007981342,0.0010398122,0.00013294004,0.0003949143,0.14721912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9211949,0.0023739624,0.028777149,0.0032765525,0.00010419974,0.00044963916,0.00009182844,0.00032012328,0.043411735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98396784,0.01361438,0.00016192882,0.0006585842,0.00072284497,0.00087460375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671483,0.027125085,0.00047599163,0.0011020236,0.0013106564,0.0028378663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021657782,0.00073476473,0.0005633914,0.0014422827,0.016003026,0.00681549,0.0032721644,0.0026221867,0.008215395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022352977,0.0006884817,0.00039556125,0.0010100863,0.012835375,0.009819494,0.008205703,0.0040477854,0.0012992573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063039086,0.00042995546,0.001438218,0.0002612504,0.0000065189042,0.0014745713,0.9170561,0.0002631011,0.0009790066,0.012642904,0.0068165055,0.05856879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003208259,0.0002363875,0.0010655065,0.0006125762,0.000008193557,0.00086527056,0.8243976,0.0004670276,0.0011544573,0.008496076,0.16261306,0.000051663766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007851783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023654882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021657782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044427514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051918034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11453867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410952755","doi":"10.3390/world6020073","title":"Strategies for Increasing Youth Participation in Longitudinal Survey Research: Lessons from a Pilot Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Fondation Rideau Hall; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Survey research; Psychology; Political science; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.7078590157179222,"score_gpt":0.6161494982845369,"score_spread":0.09170951743338529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410952755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52077985,0.0056614247,0.26860437,0.11574034,0.002041156,0.061300855,0.00077393866,0.002478918,0.022619247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43644223,0.003326696,0.5180129,0.0059672883,0.00035133827,0.03274039,0.00028481302,0.00029013245,0.0025842327],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.78171146,0.20207827,0.0051885224,0.0018073585,0.0057357242,0.0034787531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72484785,0.18966565,0.0064077005,0.02596346,0.036737297,0.016377984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.32404178,0.0012658644,0.0010301116,0.0019967337,0.0043632044,0.004203028,0.004218123,0.0023562808,0.002935485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2283443,0.0011427918,0.0015037053,0.0017004157,0.0030751007,0.0065907612,0.0073846374,0.003906424,0.0008784516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010817285,0.007972604,0.06425778,0.003701336,0.00021318076,0.001770362,0.13796769,0.0011393591,0.004048905,0.0070195715,0.020362588,0.7504648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060673254,0.05250017,0.11457287,0.02058899,0.0010977531,0.004191254,0.36938095,0.011860538,0.019660337,0.054663118,0.3443667,0.0010500588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009591416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023451341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6759582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049602063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032205403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8335768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411985803","doi":"10.2196/65288","title":"Understanding Intimate Health in Online Spaces Among Women in Aotearoa New Zealand: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preprint; Aotearoa; Protocol (science); Psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Gender studies; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.633611937137281,"score_gpt":0.709551203447027,"score_spread":0.07593926630974601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411985803","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011665665,0.00006472404,0.001723794,0.00015202674,0.00009797993,0.9955651,0.00056977477,0.000028632727,0.0006313758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051590643,0.000058586575,0.002434556,0.00007598148,0.000009852674,0.99663323,0.000062753534,0.000002762201,0.0002063109],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715205,0.017627563,0.0042951764,0.0018275751,0.0023660166,0.0023632294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96614957,0.012677559,0.0032720338,0.0047309007,0.0100981295,0.0030719086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08130216,0.0036494683,0.004654984,0.0040177624,0.0061737997,0.0047451435,0.0041507315,0.0065763537,0.064510666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055968396,0.0037612678,0.003536214,0.0035608455,0.0037521522,0.0045683617,0.0036680659,0.007545273,0.013440838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.060136233,0.037078775,0.0075734225,0.10091684,0.00074971124,0.007323683,0.11266275,0.0080243535,0.02016023,0.03409052,0.16903114,0.44225234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07093199,0.031288866,0.03251636,0.04916236,0.0005680989,0.001045476,0.06859424,0.0050967108,0.00829041,0.026114985,0.7055023,0.00088825886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008307368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018893452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08130216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078527415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03001251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42997205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412164283","doi":"10.1109/wsese66602.2025.00017","title":"Methodological and Practical Challenges in Longitudinal, Large-Scale, Collaborative Questionnaire Survey Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Computer science; Data science; Survey research; Management science; Psychology; Applied psychology; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.7467314884658095,"score_gpt":0.6482083765566234,"score_spread":0.09852311190918606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412164283","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05697553,0.0062871696,0.8375818,0.030483348,0.0024288811,0.047809232,0.0019039016,0.00080220297,0.015728006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25799498,0.0014530456,0.58236516,0.008815302,0.00094498915,0.14572626,0.0006457506,0.00026184105,0.001792675],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.15586741,0.7936346,0.021812854,0.0067720627,0.019937608,0.0019754071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11759251,0.74265754,0.022524236,0.06310818,0.050436016,0.0036815188],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.70677406,0.0017916553,0.0025064645,0.008240852,0.008281942,0.010192704,0.0075157117,0.004220092,0.004627159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7414324,0.0022923138,0.0016996461,0.012224819,0.012833055,0.009086316,0.011378346,0.0045360927,0.0017017145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001902157,0.0029888311,0.10766997,0.023437532,0.001635833,0.0012191045,0.251988,0.007894095,0.0036077139,0.17597868,0.036614634,0.38506347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019950115,0.005775384,0.07179441,0.025096217,0.0009617996,0.0022955632,0.2814766,0.033970818,0.006193979,0.3417025,0.22791143,0.0008263236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009379981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010969852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29322594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008685563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026338583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36159986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412560531","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325948","title":"Participant engagement in a national longitudinal study of COVID-19: Insights from the INSPIRE study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; Abbott Diagnostics; Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Institutes of Health; Stryker; Institute of Translational Health Sciences; California Department of Public Health; University of Ottawa; University of Washington","keywords":"Focus group; Longitudinal study; Qualitative research; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Relevance (law); Perception; Participatory action research; Medical education; Applied psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.525842003332704,"score_gpt":0.4902904549478484,"score_spread":0.035551548384855636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412560531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990862,0.00033818977,0.0019448373,0.0034272477,0.00004699598,0.00036767262,0.0002945516,0.00001647763,0.0027020283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99289274,0.0003523166,0.002525082,0.0015331443,0.000033132055,0.0013008598,0.00023839889,0.000017799815,0.0011064407],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822015,0.014525772,0.00040198938,0.0006620382,0.00090475,0.0013039375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715432,0.01725969,0.002861663,0.0012694799,0.003771055,0.003295012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037630785,0.00027036856,0.00047717494,0.0011020656,0.0059472336,0.0026063183,0.0012068575,0.0013667672,0.0022765386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047218274,0.0004544253,0.0003953722,0.0009912763,0.002871706,0.0029642053,0.005948421,0.002277065,0.00037520583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020398272,0.00037801376,0.069365926,0.00016964438,0.000017411854,0.0005825879,0.9102382,0.0000464012,0.0005881808,0.0010502004,0.002384105,0.014975328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003160658,0.00037739106,0.041841354,0.000445241,0.000013076429,0.00028786535,0.94177884,0.00022691033,0.00029528743,0.0007641135,0.013897252,0.00004104239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012465223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031734634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037630785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027291726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062469314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.199013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413395645","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9752-6_2","title":"Research Methodology and Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International perspectives on migration","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.3353134724163592,"score_gpt":0.5390737539090354,"score_spread":0.20376028149267622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413395645","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063982927,0.0024169022,0.587199,0.009334189,0.0026232412,0.14192618,0.0051046265,0.0006596576,0.24433784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035050724,0.002799115,0.53145236,0.00789025,0.00066674873,0.32703757,0.0018935044,0.000558679,0.092651084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92858946,0.0531582,0.0034678353,0.0051440126,0.008256359,0.0013841015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94510156,0.029561793,0.0013039693,0.010274474,0.012403702,0.0013544286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07375983,0.0013770733,0.0018566948,0.007433954,0.0054003345,0.010042873,0.004215726,0.0035017177,0.052214574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08264082,0.0013948062,0.0010574673,0.004935699,0.0067421696,0.00507835,0.006944131,0.0055984026,0.020650309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001691839,0.00037088423,0.00086188683,0.004215566,0.000045756333,0.00024646064,0.028345099,0.00079389376,0.0015299952,0.6633678,0.041958824,0.25809467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000159672,0.00034608427,0.0007077794,0.0039562983,0.000057900226,0.00030613682,0.015441228,0.0012213236,0.0019135029,0.2502472,0.72559613,0.000046703684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002152703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026725752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07375983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005037184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02488719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3900839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414115824","doi":"10.1177/16094069251378860","title":"Combining Text Mining and Manual Thematic Analysis to Understand Participant Experiences With Surveys","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Thematic map; Thematic structure; Sample (material); Qualitative analysis; Data collection; Topic model; Content analysis","score_opus":0.6103462605885962,"score_gpt":0.6591304427915096,"score_spread":0.04878418220291336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414115824","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3941962,0.0006392672,0.56290066,0.0041510337,0.00029276148,0.01670404,0.0051760827,0.00100443,0.01493558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46912268,0.00054607814,0.48298717,0.0011284811,0.00012549495,0.040009357,0.0027051168,0.0004667312,0.0029089525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91697043,0.06543675,0.004981655,0.004090212,0.007192648,0.0013282164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7282974,0.22172119,0.014941332,0.013892356,0.020426504,0.0007211622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08180929,0.0013773266,0.0013242093,0.011193849,0.0031620313,0.0052184346,0.0028731208,0.001286113,0.0044236523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17306945,0.000825105,0.0013624149,0.010110029,0.0036413267,0.0067865755,0.0059291637,0.0017091077,0.0014340524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044738557,0.00038785697,0.020204814,0.005539317,0.00017657987,0.0007370796,0.6427983,0.0025929448,0.014034823,0.01886509,0.008978616,0.2852372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029507853,0.0006615852,0.03925293,0.00574249,0.00021706773,0.00088185427,0.66334015,0.04699505,0.021339944,0.108645216,0.112166815,0.0004618332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026893038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048719854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9181907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038096847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050243502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43265402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414398495","doi":"10.1080/01609513.2025.2550134","title":"From the guest editor: my tribute to Charles Garvin, Alex Gitterman, and Andy Malekoff by Barbara Muskat","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Work With Groups","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Problem solver","score_opus":0.01762740444271021,"score_gpt":0.3315310963598136,"score_spread":0.3139036919171034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414398495","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057201014,0.0038132814,0.0001516634,0.2187277,0.77631456,0.000016044372,0.00004211428,0.00004300495,0.00083450123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013244498,0.0057535702,0.00028970608,0.22644177,0.75007623,0.000072914416,0.000043814933,0.00008869162,0.01590883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964091,0.0008240759,0.00042764278,0.0006521586,0.0014793958,0.00020763141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96266145,0.013861033,0.0017613153,0.00077370636,0.017014772,0.003927727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006362883,0.0019838004,0.0018544606,0.0013888666,0.0031564867,0.0071803173,0.0027884806,0.007944237,0.01679938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051331945,0.0008227101,0.0012481373,0.00091176067,0.0024875565,0.0043547195,0.0020793176,0.021594565,0.013840596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010609883,0.0000040523955,0.000022522749,0.000054173783,0.0000027800702,0.000042814998,0.000022425249,0.000005292079,0.000019337047,0.00012715897,0.9973117,0.0023772186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023983574,0.000026009182,0.00027851178,0.00042955056,0.000015909955,0.0004128734,0.00021416647,0.000090037225,0.00012741449,0.00075437414,0.9976047,0.000022403126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021234117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039783358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01679938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016108236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004013273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05619955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415008717","doi":"10.2196/70986","title":"Exploring the Acceptability and Suitability of Synchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research With Métis Nation of Ontario Citizens: An Internet-Based Survey","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Métis National Council; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); The Internet; Work (physics); Affect (linguistics); Online research methods; Selection (genetic algorithm); Internet research","score_opus":0.4927701323605893,"score_gpt":0.5543305561243532,"score_spread":0.061560423763763916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415008717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98727334,0.00018228273,0.0014881322,0.0018229266,0.000030666248,0.0032773255,0.00038367158,0.000038853042,0.005502827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854864,0.0004959423,0.003999352,0.001127428,0.00003951439,0.0069391597,0.00026181422,0.000022753917,0.0016276434],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766351,0.015109586,0.0012932025,0.0009058954,0.0038900257,0.0021660826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410147,0.0321813,0.0069799004,0.0023501997,0.012469699,0.005004167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04325581,0.00036668498,0.0003917539,0.0013047061,0.0051181633,0.0029055895,0.0016670219,0.00085899024,0.0037506872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0693354,0.0005617729,0.00053364324,0.001290198,0.0030041158,0.001879987,0.0029129346,0.0008401353,0.00042418146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041901408,0.0007299927,0.19038105,0.0009785108,0.00004067757,0.0007295396,0.7481338,0.00013159298,0.0047874595,0.00035090797,0.0031699399,0.05014744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001794638,0.001725643,0.27395576,0.0009411844,0.000048942245,0.00024040368,0.68832237,0.0006848516,0.001190693,0.00024096236,0.03238082,0.000088899505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32793853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49568692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013490451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020822959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65205944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415693289","doi":"10.2196/77937","title":"Implementation of Virtual Focus Groups as an Effective Strategy in Qualitative Research to Engage With Undersupported Communities: Protocol for Virtual Focus Groups","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities","keywords":"Focus group; Qualitative research; Protocol (science); Focus (optics); Health care; Qualitative property; Research design","score_opus":0.4982307097590462,"score_gpt":0.714355094313961,"score_spread":0.21612438455491484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415693289","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003542456,0.00014275171,0.041020215,0.001155427,0.0006041532,0.9492744,0.0014549993,0.0005120807,0.002293469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012030521,0.000042945463,0.022170568,0.00021184431,0.000023127428,0.9758729,0.00009515808,0.00002947275,0.0003510702],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8733554,0.10307922,0.009795304,0.0047635403,0.004945208,0.0040613897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8367077,0.084326714,0.009977193,0.031845607,0.032036863,0.0051058894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17386174,0.0042324252,0.0028393462,0.004366238,0.008307336,0.004538992,0.004706024,0.0071953987,0.056003846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20551579,0.005602628,0.0026293609,0.004121566,0.006919657,0.005344323,0.0063307066,0.012240946,0.019129751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02052908,0.008607226,0.0036896144,0.037904605,0.00037134098,0.0035945503,0.18935673,0.0065602898,0.026701013,0.06463517,0.21061198,0.42743847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026570693,0.0056168577,0.009610878,0.021744657,0.0003193529,0.00088555773,0.040207427,0.008412224,0.020815749,0.07280793,0.7919847,0.0010240868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028934004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048890025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17386174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060677314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0257085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9194798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416137585","doi":"10.1177/16094069251397351","title":"360-Degree Video for Whole Scene Capture: From Immersive Realism to Immersive Holism in Place-Based Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Data collection; Holism; Field (mathematics); Immersion (mathematics); Coding (social sciences); Ethnography; Immersive technology","score_opus":0.7484686296615181,"score_gpt":0.6940454563431593,"score_spread":0.054423173318358775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416137585","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12801076,0.0036051203,0.76529336,0.010613079,0.0007273,0.0033112385,0.0009469457,0.0003732757,0.087118834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62945294,0.0040659853,0.35132727,0.001498972,0.00019457343,0.00584984,0.0003479233,0.00042884343,0.006833627],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869819,0.010272176,0.0003638409,0.00070424326,0.0013292613,0.000348625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980838,0.015196984,0.0007228218,0.001479277,0.0013502337,0.00041267078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014653977,0.0005738329,0.00034012846,0.002289381,0.0028740843,0.006013948,0.0015640158,0.0011061335,0.00684548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029576316,0.00055475504,0.00057214097,0.002353908,0.014084821,0.007191728,0.0074387235,0.001845778,0.0006393431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014690652,0.00005478267,0.0027049752,0.0017981838,0.000020082181,0.00045348116,0.5834073,0.0009020476,0.011260007,0.24778177,0.0051051187,0.14636534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009564457,0.0004603241,0.008414116,0.0043833735,0.000073583185,0.0014608771,0.44628003,0.0036471875,0.015381721,0.1576938,0.36190945,0.00019986846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035425979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047064354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002533178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021785134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077498555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417340301","doi":"10.18438/eblip30826","title":"Plotting Your Job Hunt: The Use of Visual Timeline for Investigating the Job Search Process","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Worksheet; Thematic analysis; Process (computing); Recall; Artifact (error); Citation; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.1546743502685097,"score_gpt":0.45844478112088477,"score_spread":0.3037704308523751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417340301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50641525,0.0032958533,0.37772843,0.008207217,0.0009784247,0.003214216,0.002678831,0.0013085828,0.096173175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81193006,0.00128223,0.17211473,0.0008897254,0.00013375028,0.0053756908,0.0005979438,0.00048433585,0.007191552],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97320515,0.023768377,0.0005103258,0.000727382,0.0012638426,0.00052492484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9207206,0.06643063,0.0048557953,0.0029928456,0.0041017258,0.0008984065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021549942,0.0008197684,0.00041873462,0.006103677,0.0036241622,0.005892708,0.0013913984,0.0012777306,0.005908514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055043343,0.00052507286,0.00062574673,0.005918771,0.007274214,0.0074059083,0.005029158,0.0014652313,0.0010774025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019257444,0.000058311693,0.004760324,0.0010934476,0.000018954248,0.00034474122,0.9076297,0.0003847944,0.0035836818,0.018741127,0.004646436,0.058545846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006923639,0.00026690422,0.009898162,0.0026993314,0.000035504178,0.0005572821,0.80983007,0.002249653,0.0048945844,0.013373757,0.15601179,0.000113696704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027667037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004131819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021549942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029035346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031065352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11396831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6901881218","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14880648.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Meta-consent for the secondary use of health data within a learning health system: a qualitative study of the public’s perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Focus group; Focus (optics); Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Table of contents","score_opus":0.6531949265530963,"score_gpt":0.5213429758822749,"score_spread":0.13185195067082145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6901881218","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006763106,0.00014982207,0.0049684974,0.0012925703,0.0002607099,0.018352738,0.9688364,0.000640024,0.004823078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01448493,0.00050167384,0.043226633,0.002757097,0.00020405847,0.70942456,0.20815298,0.0013140859,0.019933976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97988224,0.012196278,0.0036626344,0.0014000387,0.0020947026,0.00076425856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6765548,0.27640858,0.009035292,0.015793486,0.020360472,0.0018473051],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049723584,0.0017925118,0.0016517972,0.0068101436,0.0028333755,0.003875494,0.0031538864,0.0029987795,0.80331415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29075915,0.0017828548,0.0022006952,0.01010429,0.0011927856,0.005816672,0.0029851103,0.0023265788,0.07502639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009459948,0.000120724406,0.0011822595,0.03536065,0.00016570139,0.00010250683,0.0038054266,0.0006403049,0.0001467385,0.008787009,0.9219332,0.026809614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009047142,0.00033608888,0.00929773,0.03661997,0.00047288538,0.00021941189,0.0069600465,0.001374118,0.00093574886,0.035223074,0.8991784,0.00033533954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009466897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014895815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80331415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074958485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01566059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2805485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902068658","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.25963046","title":"Additional file 1 of The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Interview; Government (linguistics); Table (database)","score_opus":0.3877440801303068,"score_gpt":0.5169222328460839,"score_spread":0.12917815271577704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902068658","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091731816,0.000093196155,0.0008045869,0.0018492849,0.00008820766,0.0025974934,0.98252547,0.00022249056,0.010901972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058802366,0.0023516489,0.039559044,0.005148331,0.0003767636,0.09523934,0.6731836,0.001267152,0.12407178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965823,0.0014586906,0.00062600034,0.00024713983,0.0007406277,0.0003453079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7842666,0.18664195,0.004248291,0.0030774618,0.019114858,0.0026508933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010967618,0.00053688756,0.0009750354,0.0050752168,0.0029197952,0.00270979,0.0020519735,0.0012959767,0.8243095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10184267,0.000507798,0.00061075645,0.009327881,0.00066986424,0.0024943477,0.001828399,0.0010582645,0.05282322],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017059455,0.000067607965,0.0013924232,0.0056931702,0.000012673623,0.0001441371,0.0027400665,0.00026368658,0.0000527598,0.0023568003,0.9677546,0.019351445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001962458,0.0001407533,0.014920136,0.015783869,0.000072298215,0.0002798354,0.014716365,0.0009810784,0.00033047845,0.008497451,0.942161,0.00015427075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14071614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25009605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009666956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024322504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27979416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904477707","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0201437.s001","title":"Quantitative survey measures for a qualitatively-driven mixed methods analysis of the mental health service experiences of LGBTQ people living in poverty in Ontario, Canada.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Poverty; Multimethodology; Mental health service; Service (business); Health services; Scale (ratio)","score_opus":0.22453607602572062,"score_gpt":0.4758829059185542,"score_spread":0.2513468298928336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904477707","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1660518,0.0010261527,0.1741322,0.003497793,0.00064989977,0.30459893,0.2917698,0.0012343139,0.0570391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14192607,0.00055998017,0.23524061,0.0013498842,0.000053648753,0.58123213,0.021936445,0.00035405072,0.01734718],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98082,0.010778754,0.0014520267,0.0009984298,0.0048000286,0.0011507978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9559381,0.013599951,0.0027821371,0.0035424056,0.022848075,0.0012893365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039724544,0.00076485815,0.000734834,0.004325203,0.0055381553,0.0025549692,0.002663233,0.00066079403,0.0277193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05110529,0.0008761863,0.001284529,0.0085370345,0.00224046,0.0009626614,0.0026729424,0.0013157004,0.001961164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016556944,0.0016654737,0.09013319,0.012319511,0.00037120684,0.00027243732,0.12409436,0.003536449,0.008976369,0.028906265,0.24195878,0.48611024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018276277,0.0016632511,0.44495234,0.0074794465,0.0004223631,0.00013286671,0.10267779,0.0046586194,0.0075198533,0.009173266,0.41902974,0.00046276074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.903897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24278003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03427243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08644116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4884196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904545761","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0293643.s001","title":"Focus groups interview guides.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vaccination; Focus group; Receipt; Government (linguistics); Booster (rocketry); Pandemic; Public health","score_opus":0.2487293258613232,"score_gpt":0.46333145041092405,"score_spread":0.21460212454960084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904545761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07610177,0.00499931,0.09503897,0.00701874,0.0047162008,0.2943099,0.103520215,0.005054599,0.40924028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06351829,0.0030087119,0.2068117,0.0046950146,0.00031537813,0.42759,0.020259349,0.0006885303,0.27311307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511,0.0030842593,0.00038315775,0.00056150754,0.00041312663,0.00044796534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98973083,0.0068739853,0.0003068873,0.0006816635,0.0018100851,0.0005965329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014706052,0.0023748938,0.0010711964,0.0018832351,0.0029824618,0.0014037056,0.0025691178,0.001733834,0.21732688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013149192,0.0015841888,0.00041491888,0.0022787082,0.0013884036,0.0013663456,0.003094597,0.002430069,0.05080266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014396643,0.0011905304,0.0010589237,0.008258074,0.000016709191,0.0008298768,0.10400888,0.00046447298,0.011663738,0.01518032,0.5467366,0.30915213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065820303,0.00048053544,0.0023798454,0.000825226,0.000016903656,0.00018041593,0.027821237,0.00040123792,0.0018381481,0.004005284,0.96134156,0.000051470142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036119523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013368053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21732688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026144288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006220494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7270309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920698313","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.19669970.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Internet access is a necessity: a latent class analysis of COVID-19 related challenges and the role of technology use among rural community residents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Latent class model; Rural community; Internet access; Class (philosophy); Rural area; Digital divide","score_opus":0.14669890623432705,"score_gpt":0.39315908440490394,"score_spread":0.2464601781705769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920698313","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053169373,0.000014867138,0.0004951931,0.0003936249,0.00002953972,0.00087158644,0.98914796,0.0001063891,0.0036238795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08135391,0.00025891638,0.008569118,0.00095831597,0.0001302692,0.03698971,0.83071184,0.00046394148,0.040564034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993247,0.00018614938,0.00011165421,0.00008472458,0.00016855217,0.0001242469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97636616,0.015043651,0.002208504,0.00091142685,0.0047877813,0.0006824384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019998974,0.0005439112,0.0006175598,0.0020540524,0.001626872,0.001032412,0.0012356739,0.00067685836,0.6771338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031876672,0.00038438223,0.00053343934,0.004486981,0.00029365966,0.0019262835,0.0010372832,0.0010703503,0.06148144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023488433,0.00026067125,0.020732442,0.0013572493,0.000023604265,0.0000732561,0.0013939986,0.00029510245,0.000062921,0.0013368998,0.95879525,0.015433838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002977601,0.00074865797,0.40973386,0.005513458,0.00018696836,0.00045921764,0.03594952,0.0033138501,0.0010093264,0.009827634,0.5299843,0.00029559273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031528246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045997992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6771338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015039336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002637913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46052945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930171086","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12062204","title":"pdf histoire de la philosophie","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; French; Christology","score_opus":0.06682649670035398,"score_gpt":0.345326769285627,"score_spread":0.278500272585273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930171086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003804454,0.004426853,0.0021155437,0.007791647,0.0059608403,0.000054213026,0.0009525418,0.00048691363,0.977831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00497467,0.0026723703,0.0011725463,0.0012845465,0.001253833,0.00003808093,0.00032617556,0.00036389253,0.9879139],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989819,0.00021374013,0.00003672431,0.000143942,0.00052309857,0.00010061967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990069,0.00017476805,0.000041142743,0.00018119009,0.00040865125,0.00018749194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011639328,0.0008244106,0.00047987918,0.002236299,0.0030939924,0.006827343,0.0008116976,0.0017751871,0.41479707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003165162,0.00043437764,0.0005881803,0.0016850205,0.003126131,0.003698378,0.0029476814,0.004600255,0.21905077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027274556,0.0000134301235,0.00009555621,0.00014979478,0.000004019918,0.000060246086,0.0005260476,0.00009911638,0.0004349311,0.12401601,0.82147664,0.053096913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012541026,0.000001918679,0.0000814068,0.000038747752,4.873317e-7,0.000019226913,0.00007326105,0.00001104924,0.000047885344,0.0020887533,0.99763393,0.0000020627003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008015944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011377676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58520293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056493664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037653886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83472097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939539789","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14880648","title":"Additional file 1 of Meta-consent for the secondary use of health data within a learning health system: a qualitative study of the public’s perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Focus group; Focus (optics); Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Table of contents","score_opus":0.6531949265530963,"score_gpt":0.5213429758822749,"score_spread":0.13185195067082145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939539789","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006763106,0.00014982207,0.0049684974,0.0012925703,0.0002607099,0.018352738,0.9688364,0.000640024,0.004823078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01448493,0.00050167384,0.043226633,0.002757097,0.00020405847,0.70942456,0.20815298,0.0013140859,0.019933976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97988224,0.012196278,0.0036626344,0.0014000387,0.0020947026,0.00076425856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6765548,0.27640858,0.009035292,0.015793486,0.020360472,0.0018473051],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049723584,0.0017925118,0.0016517972,0.0068101436,0.0028333755,0.003875494,0.0031538864,0.0029987795,0.80331415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29075915,0.0017828548,0.0022006952,0.01010429,0.0011927856,0.005816672,0.0029851103,0.0023265788,0.07502639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009459948,0.000120724406,0.0011822595,0.03536065,0.00016570139,0.00010250683,0.0038054266,0.0006403049,0.0001467385,0.008787009,0.9219332,0.026809614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009047142,0.00033608888,0.00929773,0.03661997,0.00047288538,0.00021941189,0.0069600465,0.001374118,0.00093574886,0.035223074,0.8991784,0.00033533954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009466897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014895815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80331415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074958485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01566059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2805485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6957905368","doi":"10.60692/586ye-yet37","title":"\"Thought provoking\", \"interactive\", and \"more like a peer talk\": Testing the deliberative interview style in Germany","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Interview; Style (visual arts); Qualitative research; Semi-structured interview; Acquiescence; Discourse analysis","score_opus":0.12045228738477262,"score_gpt":0.3462683996317248,"score_spread":0.22581611224695217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6957905368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802536,0.00011337008,0.011482488,0.000663626,0.00004534057,0.0016247415,0.00006491882,0.00003116818,0.0057207868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835782,0.000103885846,0.012692493,0.0003148158,0.000015354775,0.002561841,0.000048455968,0.000023019227,0.00066197925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8003874,0.18051228,0.0062088897,0.0035152163,0.005348637,0.0040276484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7838133,0.18595707,0.011470989,0.010486799,0.0063399747,0.0019319433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15113486,0.0006683319,0.00044449986,0.001406633,0.0036058433,0.004395927,0.0018168282,0.0014185423,0.0021149998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15017805,0.00081200677,0.000813893,0.0015684345,0.01112271,0.004871893,0.009523358,0.0014560784,0.00035133056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030195448,0.0015150962,0.047945306,0.0017518126,0.00016807066,0.000604535,0.8047971,0.0024272597,0.008269837,0.029273005,0.0007828257,0.099445574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023448758,0.014148871,0.17209397,0.0035555975,0.00060549495,0.0012573572,0.6606755,0.016016036,0.041383192,0.039158184,0.04803912,0.0007217379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036798967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039043892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15113486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057485215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006039124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7992871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958146188","doi":"10.60692/a156m-vvp22","title":"\"Thought provoking\", \"interactive\", and \"more like a peer talk\": Testing the deliberative interview style in Germany","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Interview; Style (visual arts); Qualitative research; Semi-structured interview; Acquiescence; Discourse analysis","score_opus":0.12045228738477262,"score_gpt":0.3462683996317248,"score_spread":0.22581611224695217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958146188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802536,0.00011337008,0.011482488,0.000663626,0.00004534057,0.0016247415,0.00006491882,0.00003116818,0.0057207868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835782,0.000103885846,0.012692493,0.0003148158,0.000015354775,0.002561841,0.000048455968,0.000023019227,0.00066197925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8003874,0.18051228,0.0062088897,0.0035152163,0.005348637,0.0040276484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7838133,0.18595707,0.011470989,0.010486799,0.0063399747,0.0019319433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15113486,0.0006683319,0.00044449986,0.001406633,0.0036058433,0.004395927,0.0018168282,0.0014185423,0.0021149998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15017805,0.00081200677,0.000813893,0.0015684345,0.01112271,0.004871893,0.009523358,0.0014560784,0.00035133056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030195448,0.0015150962,0.047945306,0.0017518126,0.00016807066,0.000604535,0.8047971,0.0024272597,0.008269837,0.029273005,0.0007828257,0.099445574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023448758,0.014148871,0.17209397,0.0035555975,0.00060549495,0.0012573572,0.6606755,0.016016036,0.041383192,0.039158184,0.04803912,0.0007217379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036798967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039043892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15113486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057485215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006039124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7992871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958496256","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.19669970","title":"Additional file 1 of Internet access is a necessity: a latent class analysis of COVID-19 related challenges and the role of technology use among rural community residents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Latent class model; Rural community; Internet access; Class (philosophy); Rural area; Digital divide","score_opus":0.14669890623432705,"score_gpt":0.39315908440490394,"score_spread":0.2464601781705769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958496256","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005316919,0.000014867109,0.0004951919,0.00039362375,0.000029539608,0.00087158347,0.98914796,0.0001063889,0.003623869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08135391,0.00025891614,0.008569118,0.0009583145,0.00013026907,0.03698963,0.83071184,0.00046394105,0.040563982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993247,0.00018614919,0.00011165421,0.00008472458,0.00016855185,0.00012424677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97636616,0.015043643,0.002208502,0.0009114259,0.0047877748,0.00068243773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019998974,0.0005439112,0.0006175593,0.0020540506,0.0016268704,0.0010324115,0.0012356739,0.00067685836,0.677134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031876627,0.00038438165,0.00053343934,0.0044869767,0.0002936591,0.0019262816,0.0010372828,0.0010703492,0.061481424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023488411,0.00026067125,0.020732427,0.0013572488,0.000023604265,0.00007325603,0.0013939945,0.00029510274,0.000062920946,0.0013368973,0.95879525,0.015433816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029776068,0.00074865913,0.40973395,0.005513466,0.00018696862,0.0004592185,0.03594947,0.0033138548,0.0010093264,0.009827646,0.5299843,0.00029559273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031528234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04599797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.677134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015039322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026379104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46052915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958919649","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.25963046.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Interview; Government (linguistics); Table (database)","score_opus":0.3966945068061189,"score_gpt":0.48504399993147307,"score_spread":0.08834949312535417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958919649","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009585271,0.00009827765,0.0009944421,0.0020290306,0.00009693187,0.0028802156,0.9796587,0.00027001198,0.01301392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06428234,0.0023683682,0.0465642,0.005303408,0.00037221532,0.1057069,0.6316559,0.0015318438,0.14221488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964567,0.0016051945,0.00058193813,0.00025378857,0.00073946477,0.00036287756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7793029,0.1919377,0.003919124,0.0033279005,0.018837513,0.002674908],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011596766,0.00054306886,0.00092948315,0.005103439,0.0030030152,0.002836027,0.0021158222,0.0013070195,0.8291948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102179885,0.00051744137,0.0006130712,0.009197625,0.0007210232,0.0026372694,0.0019495052,0.0010873724,0.05565023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015509792,0.000061572486,0.0012663451,0.00524757,0.000011965811,0.00013262674,0.0031651426,0.00026463353,0.000050579172,0.0025751453,0.9668892,0.020180123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016752549,0.00012442915,0.013468018,0.014547414,0.000064360895,0.00024742907,0.015786912,0.00093652174,0.00030090482,0.009356198,0.94334215,0.00015042753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13744947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2515714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8625505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009738942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023731131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27329886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981172297","doi":"","title":"Disaggregating student resistances: Analyzing what students pursue with challenging agency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Dialogical self; Resistance (ecology); Qualitative research; Sign (mathematics); Dysfunctional family","score_opus":0.2157829256887507,"score_gpt":0.4353792861405985,"score_spread":0.2195963604518478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981172297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99145985,0.00010996354,0.0023350108,0.0006724831,0.000014417696,0.000037237507,0.000013366706,0.000020104073,0.0053376905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980914,0.00010773553,0.0005536758,0.000100361,0.0000050134145,0.00004211884,0.00001733612,0.000014457518,0.0010679797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98646325,0.008267561,0.0005667447,0.0010773414,0.0020993939,0.0015257024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98532873,0.008122111,0.0027028131,0.0011404783,0.0011157811,0.0015901972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077496786,0.0005012457,0.00088034023,0.0020012304,0.005280084,0.0117626125,0.0015572595,0.0023450572,0.0026712194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028238928,0.0004500051,0.00067124586,0.0015410123,0.008409943,0.0057766605,0.009952789,0.0039025669,0.0005227261],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056365392,0.00019809838,0.034754448,0.000097402,0.00002499001,0.00036527583,0.9408172,0.00013267645,0.0019224605,0.0051159533,0.00038070075,0.016134404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046751456,0.00011452656,0.016446356,0.00006414422,0.000012565387,0.00026196794,0.97086,0.0003378292,0.0009959929,0.0031197274,0.0077441647,0.000038098395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014997693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002055389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117626125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020998318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019681202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04098469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981199286","doi":"","title":"[Documentation d'art mural à Montréal entre 2013 et 2017]","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"E-Artexte (Artexte)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mural; Context (archaeology); Shadow (psychology); Space (punctuation)","score_opus":0.06769482449879975,"score_gpt":0.39754179770388487,"score_spread":0.3298469732050851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981199286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034235385,0.05218051,0.0031441904,0.012939431,0.010995685,0.00022152512,0.014344927,0.0021541072,0.900596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018809978,0.01099199,0.0014487732,0.00092239626,0.00092231086,0.00009908516,0.004115038,0.0008554486,0.96183485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993468,0.00006527427,0.00001647621,0.00006340045,0.00041340565,0.00009466903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915814,0.0001101712,0.00005114893,0.00007111302,0.0004659331,0.00014350258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071494794,0.00074239966,0.0002809825,0.003312029,0.0035082344,0.0037963775,0.0012426232,0.00068845286,0.13142517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021321238,0.00043253644,0.0003577544,0.0045786775,0.0016833176,0.0013260683,0.0016375537,0.0014135634,0.019837053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014037788,0.000003972998,0.00016233316,0.00016875083,0.000003155818,0.00009074327,0.0014623952,0.000060607366,0.00018767921,0.011607193,0.941158,0.045081213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012158835,0.0000014367039,0.0007022469,0.00006257495,7.768907e-7,0.000029545461,0.00015572921,0.000009466245,0.000045637047,0.00010813528,0.9988795,0.0000037645536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.756063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89794415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24393702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011029204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012662898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4907472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992582669","doi":"","title":"Lo scambio interpersonale sull'AIDS e il medium dello scambio","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"dissertation","venue":"DocTA - Doctoral Theses Archive","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Studio; 3d printer; Large group","score_opus":0.09273215266726113,"score_gpt":0.4307910313063079,"score_spread":0.33805887863904677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992582669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4407934,0.112792894,0.018239066,0.07579743,0.0030297362,0.002112755,0.0011021935,0.00025085208,0.34588158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88965964,0.047854103,0.010003217,0.009010242,0.0009521184,0.0018870202,0.00026341694,0.000082472914,0.04028771],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941141,0.0038892804,0.00019931495,0.0004560864,0.0008503557,0.00049078744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98355377,0.011966622,0.0013907847,0.0010356164,0.0010950725,0.0009581476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008241899,0.0006238442,0.0007131589,0.0014649419,0.002588915,0.015212189,0.0012683668,0.0015325565,0.019311888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012515173,0.00040930772,0.0006364186,0.0015606195,0.0046776044,0.008717204,0.006770386,0.0025981104,0.0013664438],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005757512,0.00082436344,0.05232291,0.008958965,0.00024541875,0.0007595562,0.19494931,0.0003170881,0.0034814538,0.20108312,0.026247466,0.5102346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017472576,0.0012288952,0.12932113,0.01550248,0.00055988814,0.0013328393,0.18327235,0.00050742086,0.0042314217,0.049144156,0.61451334,0.00021133284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008642642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020059913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019311888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037000142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008564482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06460464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997270681","doi":"","title":"Waarom doen jonge mannen (niet) mee met vragenlijstonderzoek over seksualiteit?:Gendernormen, barrières en motivaties volgens lager opgeleide jonge mannen","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athena Sustainable Materials Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychological intervention; Human sexuality; Masculinity; Autonomy","score_opus":0.2349181204027014,"score_gpt":0.5351864305467583,"score_spread":0.30026831014405686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997270681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49668816,0.066621244,0.014970315,0.11073414,0.0044871494,0.00019337104,0.00107166,0.0001931753,0.30504078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92183256,0.012778758,0.0059431195,0.0047748205,0.00025260338,0.00018866544,0.00020683138,0.0002124241,0.05381019],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688965,0.0016542223,0.00014470764,0.00038480054,0.00062034285,0.00030625056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967231,0.001986604,0.00051003386,0.000101051686,0.00034467448,0.00033443954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023720867,0.00034304857,0.0002935628,0.00049248105,0.0016835757,0.005337554,0.0004705577,0.0011867412,0.015355058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011236145,0.0003440744,0.0002402827,0.00063773675,0.0034333004,0.0037531077,0.0018081624,0.0015916048,0.0022191775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028111698,0.00032929156,0.02933076,0.0029167274,0.00016857934,0.004088489,0.35084382,0.0007356571,0.007271698,0.24476002,0.09393195,0.26534188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021835976,0.000065225075,0.018867513,0.0024165187,0.00005403492,0.0015978819,0.16302061,0.0005286174,0.002072142,0.029341418,0.7819169,0.00009728272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010165204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013100571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014365681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00229066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05136776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000624679","doi":"","title":"Focussing on the focus group","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Focus group; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Identity (music); Social group","score_opus":0.3331016074418522,"score_gpt":0.4166129899556896,"score_spread":0.08351138251383744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000624679","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13487609,0.0066897296,0.49146622,0.029103305,0.0073156133,0.054763272,0.0020060884,0.000992487,0.2727872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42783636,0.007227781,0.35335746,0.023866575,0.0019612063,0.08009546,0.0012349365,0.0005284466,0.103891775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96913254,0.023370618,0.00093766715,0.00223006,0.0033568968,0.00097220385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636862,0.026399698,0.0012369615,0.002636919,0.005016052,0.0010241971],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03361126,0.0012899904,0.0010507131,0.0023802423,0.006204708,0.0038633582,0.0027770689,0.004437265,0.017988093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048098385,0.00095939485,0.0009126502,0.0017130214,0.0072986484,0.006851191,0.011191241,0.0035925696,0.006692449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041946027,0.0004068851,0.002521538,0.00350072,0.000035384048,0.0011585752,0.6405514,0.00031053784,0.028043745,0.08021605,0.043444604,0.1993911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020928838,0.000816254,0.003675007,0.0026927905,0.00005699254,0.0018399761,0.2134892,0.0007472377,0.011544634,0.043822285,0.72096884,0.00013758229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002449544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031457623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96638876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025929715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035842753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17775542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009767692","doi":"","title":"Focus groups : a model for change for community organizations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Focus group; Public policy","score_opus":0.12996887172418228,"score_gpt":0.4120747138999425,"score_spread":0.2821058421757602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009767692","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024177356,0.0016938961,0.73465705,0.05999503,0.00088325667,0.010766633,0.0005449963,0.0011518141,0.16612999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34118006,0.0014665661,0.60231197,0.0040486758,0.000145408,0.030091487,0.0004430481,0.00026119218,0.020051718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91273326,0.077415705,0.0011309909,0.0035480836,0.0034491583,0.001722775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472239,0.040220812,0.0018598813,0.0035241977,0.0032942467,0.0038769767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0634439,0.002375852,0.0012166215,0.0056284764,0.012562948,0.011813143,0.008368712,0.0074608056,0.020218696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05778445,0.0016618139,0.0026359053,0.0035114083,0.027386267,0.016025057,0.010884448,0.0052388813,0.0040260847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026552487,0.00072088843,0.0038617451,0.0014259797,0.00015846461,0.00032215862,0.11125065,0.0054187635,0.00034347383,0.78879595,0.0111966245,0.07623989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005914815,0.0005969421,0.0013416609,0.0014064435,0.00013054768,0.00028081465,0.047947235,0.017071374,0.00039809002,0.7820677,0.14803407,0.00013358798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01503471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015544079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0634439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021743003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027956625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33552742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043760838","doi":"","title":"2022-08-27 Thornsmoke at Fuzzfest live at 123 Pleasant Street","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"West virginia; Quarter (Canadian coin); Clothing","score_opus":0.01910349565190917,"score_gpt":0.26815760536863603,"score_spread":0.24905410971672687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043760838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024299172,0.00016207692,0.00047526468,0.00048451903,0.00027197629,0.00025656118,0.004681691,0.0013248842,0.9899131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012481047,0.00004453203,0.00021407686,0.00004076629,0.000010101475,0.000040970284,0.0010010729,0.0001778243,0.99722254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978596,0.00001373228,0.0000036898898,0.0000419114,0.00010008504,0.00005456891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994306,0.000050376493,0.000012622175,0.000043973323,0.0002010106,0.00026144268],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032491997,0.0006602454,0.0003208998,0.00072560675,0.0020114703,0.0014819143,0.00061552523,0.00081320887,0.85697967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087505986,0.00050175097,0.00022280925,0.00060719333,0.00025214683,0.00085996196,0.0013800451,0.0011195409,0.58052266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086122396,0.000052044532,0.00029320805,0.000050867926,0.0000015737054,0.00006305435,0.00007674435,0.000046878446,0.00057142734,0.0005928908,0.9445653,0.053599745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002708024,0.000040970506,0.0037799815,0.00006111694,0.0000018110319,0.00004152214,0.00024564355,0.00010344706,0.00034389124,0.00017696313,0.9951702,0.000007356319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0318431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1987651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85697967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010775559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018745885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20400113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7074024218","doi":"","title":"Advancing Telephone Focus Groups Method Through the Use of Webinar: Methodological Reflections on Evaluating Ontario, Canada's Healthy Babies Healthy Children Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Public health; Telephone number; Telephone interview","score_opus":0.39294238630325234,"score_gpt":0.4775547377656746,"score_spread":0.08461235146242224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7074024218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88883173,0.0021878846,0.046665523,0.01859043,0.0002982042,0.02352028,0.00051627745,0.00016999299,0.019219767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90407974,0.0018103031,0.066406034,0.0044904435,0.00006705235,0.017830422,0.00015860237,0.00017791681,0.004979435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.76270276,0.20057377,0.0067786677,0.004073932,0.014963775,0.010907075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73784465,0.18884838,0.008583952,0.0072296564,0.051826872,0.005666527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2487438,0.0013556095,0.001096354,0.0029532195,0.02477581,0.007086178,0.00574359,0.0023131797,0.0026359016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19623297,0.0016218114,0.0007860995,0.003950087,0.013900772,0.004888316,0.011227074,0.003317226,0.0003699552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014323203,0.00022497422,0.0039627766,0.0007706489,0.00002548734,0.0003975561,0.95856375,0.00026058842,0.0017042414,0.001262749,0.0013070654,0.03137679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015468248,0.0006615227,0.011554755,0.0014905625,0.0001016562,0.00011460326,0.95334756,0.00076263095,0.0030343453,0.0013068927,0.027358219,0.000112613765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69627696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84487635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7512562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09294522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12662633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9264326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7092186927","doi":"10.1002/pra2.1384","title":"A Critical Dialogue on Ethics and Practices for Digital Research with “Difficult” to Reach Populations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Research ethics; Discussion board; Qualitative research; Ethical issues","score_opus":0.2021773793999195,"score_gpt":0.5352618885974244,"score_spread":0.3330845091975049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7092186927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066611855,0.003019193,0.031160269,0.9369769,0.006424078,0.0007109629,0.000034940545,0.000080204496,0.014932198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51004034,0.0100713,0.081634365,0.36230877,0.006329419,0.0053491895,0.000109921224,0.0005706814,0.023585986],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6733666,0.29048312,0.0067854067,0.008330468,0.014531558,0.0065027867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6048983,0.34449062,0.005812663,0.010619677,0.020900486,0.013278323],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.28049424,0.0011684496,0.0016525147,0.0031806687,0.03550803,0.041222375,0.0078810565,0.027796617,0.00487524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19715153,0.0016224224,0.0018895441,0.002569912,0.07545473,0.03347782,0.034477502,0.04775423,0.0012629613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000381549,0.000088576184,0.0004777582,0.00059467554,0.00002554473,0.0012522172,0.6018534,0.0004651411,0.0012181934,0.27771294,0.089224115,0.027049378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019984882,0.000038278413,0.00024686783,0.0023599004,0.00001194741,0.00056582916,0.2903663,0.00049285236,0.0006952394,0.115306005,0.5897988,0.000097925935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044920123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035360544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28049424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0189187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045876022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8872787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100073983","doi":"","title":"ETHICS AND ONLINE INTERACTION RESEARCH: A STRATEGY FOR ACCESSING THE DATA ethics.doc","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Work (physics); Research ethics; Position (finance); Position paper; Face (sociological concept); Information ethics","score_opus":0.9521541008530199,"score_gpt":0.7158429614802142,"score_spread":0.23631113937280568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100073983","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030887196,0.0010816298,0.42412916,0.08038056,0.003653893,0.035816398,0.008395783,0.011553244,0.40410206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11145644,0.0011463426,0.5394835,0.014147007,0.0010267707,0.074326634,0.0019505821,0.0036304034,0.25283238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770529,0.019134395,0.001125069,0.0003797477,0.0016456121,0.00066229684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92925376,0.048362236,0.0023336448,0.00989525,0.0062357336,0.00391933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04220878,0.0005189711,0.0005140503,0.0025585114,0.005846833,0.0064362995,0.001413149,0.0022969446,0.078421906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06337625,0.0010912535,0.00028879114,0.0028115418,0.005487234,0.0057868515,0.008561896,0.0036748704,0.02264646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015988258,0.0002524208,0.0016747372,0.001030036,0.0000140279335,0.0009009995,0.12881309,0.00012937732,0.004935076,0.09493737,0.45187694,0.31527612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110703266,0.00008375222,0.0031937547,0.00072842045,0.000013472984,0.0004683769,0.050714165,0.0008053343,0.0022265266,0.022462152,0.9191219,0.000071425115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035889922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018759167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029671534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011584044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2623474},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7112798134","doi":"","title":"Bridging the Gap: Exploring the Potential of Virtual Reality for Supporting Autistic Individuals in Interview and Recruitment Processes Autism, Sage impact factor 6.3","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pure (Coventry University)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Virtual reality; Dyad; Autistic spectrum disorder; Autism","score_opus":0.2618036241959805,"score_gpt":0.41905722300796633,"score_spread":0.1572535988119858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112798134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8192448,0.004294728,0.06043616,0.04592151,0.00061135,0.0028828986,0.00031809625,0.0002493769,0.06604106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96206796,0.001124504,0.029331962,0.0023181434,0.000037947724,0.0017975207,0.000042099025,0.000065992994,0.0032138517],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94759965,0.048403587,0.00055404165,0.0005267804,0.0014370553,0.0014787241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9246104,0.06790131,0.0015267459,0.0018315063,0.002102369,0.0020276387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04788072,0.0003474003,0.00038386698,0.0017255897,0.0062524723,0.007051759,0.0020646378,0.0019244921,0.0056303055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06249185,0.00042984064,0.00055913243,0.0007606547,0.0067559336,0.0059029963,0.015481553,0.0021782294,0.00054196076],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027539447,0.00032094668,0.0056202956,0.0016070722,0.000029462666,0.0010069729,0.82601744,0.0002712392,0.0022898463,0.019581951,0.0046435324,0.13833587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072118164,0.0005088629,0.005628985,0.003197633,0.00006479376,0.0006901112,0.93506664,0.00071694335,0.0016407492,0.014612428,0.037753716,0.000046999045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003717224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008489353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04788072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026611632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013599058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2532205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113102441","doi":"","title":"I am in their groupchat, but am I in their group? Moving from outside to inside digital spacesand why it is different (and the same) to analog spaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; University of Oxford; Regione Piemonte; Queen's University; McGill University","keywords":"Ethnography; Affordance; Queer; Space (punctuation); Social group; Phenomenon; Field (mathematics); Social relation","score_opus":0.032753132496025995,"score_gpt":0.28766589023980255,"score_spread":0.25491275774377653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113102441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6494997,0.011806116,0.008703292,0.17203097,0.0026386657,0.00014887369,0.00017130011,0.00015247114,0.15484855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726051,0.0034848978,0.0013097649,0.008342226,0.00048084548,0.000111247224,0.00006076442,0.000107490734,0.013497682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929496,0.004737284,0.00009093464,0.0007141055,0.00057532015,0.0009327901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463946,0.0021926938,0.000822956,0.0004352505,0.00057180907,0.0013377947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005656871,0.00053987623,0.000574408,0.0013663195,0.011056112,0.0137708,0.0017007452,0.002409988,0.00873118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01171154,0.00044610436,0.00039448196,0.001268414,0.026468454,0.017501807,0.0053613223,0.0046750857,0.0018828202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035394605,0.000056921017,0.009864558,0.00014210204,0.000013347107,0.0006412005,0.930896,0.000025046073,0.0004229682,0.02988253,0.008906846,0.01911316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055399937,0.000025162439,0.0049686003,0.0004021196,0.000009259145,0.00025825427,0.93319154,0.000042543274,0.00014347119,0.006857273,0.054074362,0.000021806036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011656795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020242482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037759512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020430535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029916763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113640193","doi":"","title":"Do You Know Who You’re Talking To? Methodological Reflections on Maintaining Inclusivity and Research Integrity When Responding to Inauthentic Encounters in Online Qualitative Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. George's, University of London; La Trobe University; University of Leeds; McMaster University; University of Otago","keywords":"Qualitative research; Harm; Context (archaeology); Suspect; Research integrity; Inclusion (mineral); Quality (philosophy); Scientific integrity; Research ethics; Reactionary","score_opus":0.34667918493348027,"score_gpt":0.5389135994867567,"score_spread":0.1922344145532764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113640193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24171558,0.009939445,0.29689184,0.39681458,0.004600895,0.019858425,0.00039177618,0.00060820783,0.029179307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64660233,0.0036235799,0.25114536,0.044262018,0.00068270776,0.048183516,0.0001251782,0.00060213706,0.004773208],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.10776128,0.8532424,0.01616124,0.0057273437,0.012087794,0.0050200084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14777167,0.7388422,0.022362553,0.05098488,0.034068428,0.005970327],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.753535,0.0024160473,0.0031259537,0.0072386484,0.03576664,0.03514685,0.014694187,0.013925991,0.006186601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.69539106,0.0047289706,0.0027788854,0.006528243,0.11522889,0.034309726,0.036153622,0.023795512,0.0020606313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008738274,0.00004094433,0.0006648039,0.0007106454,0.000020454203,0.00024799618,0.9746689,0.00010039953,0.00052833295,0.01640226,0.0009368905,0.005590978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012446736,0.00017671056,0.0005970372,0.0065857805,0.000068621404,0.0005577958,0.912706,0.00084060634,0.0019572428,0.037248176,0.03901875,0.000118684366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0089361975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015199559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98607403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024327474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059820306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3039353},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7115563230","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100289","title":"Who participates in research, and why? A response to K. M. Kim &amp; E. Chen’s “Toward research inclusivity in applied linguistics: A reflection and methodological guideline for inclusive online experimentation”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Habitus; Field (mathematics); Conversation; Social media; Crowdsourcing; Dialectic; Social research; Outreach; Field research","score_opus":0.7445037095071237,"score_gpt":0.7413400588743285,"score_spread":0.003163650632795223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115563230","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005011402,0.0011763797,0.0012715452,0.98697597,0.009238311,0.00004302244,0.000040316023,0.000042942058,0.0007103569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008264512,0.00093838316,0.0022118406,0.9809739,0.0041969735,0.0003047757,0.000021993439,0.00010195358,0.002985613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8944326,0.06769038,0.006832174,0.012436489,0.013081906,0.005526448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78747195,0.14984299,0.015382804,0.008753898,0.025227234,0.013321064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0606286,0.0023791476,0.0019331651,0.0012680866,0.01841348,0.016704163,0.00650794,0.054239426,0.007823381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1752891,0.0019326186,0.0022851112,0.0017537929,0.03295948,0.031594496,0.019906742,0.07675456,0.0050321035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060707138,0.000053092655,0.000749126,0.00055950205,0.000035011137,0.0004777883,0.060825188,0.00010595886,0.00085182453,0.046441715,0.87981254,0.010027526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032789078,0.000055562894,0.0006689885,0.001931598,0.00002560649,0.00082285417,0.055567693,0.00035001946,0.00068051275,0.023922777,0.91570884,0.00023284482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009290163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016750034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99349207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010278818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019899096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32063854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124294557","doi":"10.20472/iac.2025.068.003","title":"BECOMING AN ETHNOGRAPHER IN A DIGITAL WORLD: ASSEMBLAGES, ETHICS &amp; RHIZOMATIC PRACTICES","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Key (lock); Participant observation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.3030448837520841,"score_gpt":0.5527500700845462,"score_spread":0.24970518633246214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124294557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7109293,0.0077620354,0.11024099,0.024281694,0.000496195,0.0009770313,0.00016771145,0.00014523466,0.14499983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695254,0.0022838567,0.018669607,0.00085209304,0.00006882599,0.0004909652,0.000034929246,0.0000572183,0.008017108],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660271,0.030990781,0.00045595053,0.0008458354,0.0010664768,0.00061396236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781859,0.01807868,0.00090029434,0.0014860695,0.0006503956,0.0006986509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021491414,0.00043516592,0.00037382485,0.0037354697,0.011409865,0.010869519,0.0009319604,0.001479068,0.0029616316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018098203,0.00047869977,0.0002580015,0.002637489,0.037498713,0.012343504,0.009776954,0.0017924827,0.00039919198],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018145858,0.000021442142,0.0014358669,0.00011602926,0.000003974,0.00032358378,0.9302166,0.00007623665,0.0005400147,0.05296332,0.0008140126,0.013470789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009911979,0.00003062313,0.0011577121,0.00039500932,0.0000068856557,0.0005930341,0.91469675,0.00024359177,0.0005793959,0.025721844,0.05654617,0.000019002262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033106757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007486248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021491414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003321389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030422793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113658786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148199252","doi":"","title":"Du service à la communauté au discours haineux : l’expression du mécontentement sur les sites Internet d’évaluation de professionnels","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Service (business); Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07599563705179223,"score_gpt":0.3195207123861146,"score_spread":0.24352507533432238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148199252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12908296,0.031591017,0.01616015,0.2565981,0.004817349,0.00026246553,0.0002540749,0.00021580966,0.56101805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7623083,0.013414846,0.007775874,0.014817427,0.0012302966,0.0007040056,0.00011693792,0.00048303802,0.19914933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753891,0.017939249,0.0003689361,0.00062970317,0.0045225876,0.0011504333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640571,0.02992612,0.0009210538,0.0005843446,0.0030328976,0.0014785829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01426006,0.00055653264,0.00043318176,0.0019263183,0.008200713,0.0138401855,0.0012493143,0.005653718,0.010258019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027396508,0.00046645573,0.00039254947,0.0036509528,0.013094106,0.010321993,0.0051827384,0.006623542,0.0014257779],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001143767,0.00009167691,0.0016857978,0.00057475315,0.000012793131,0.00050294516,0.612604,0.00014872233,0.0008462073,0.20000836,0.065824434,0.11758589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021598964,0.000068740286,0.0039650328,0.001495355,0.000011975315,0.00044186757,0.31073737,0.00033856137,0.0007357731,0.015234492,0.6669099,0.000039395924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057968777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07767956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057968777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012263527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019300874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11526269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W795468015","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-04767-5_4","title":"Who’s Who: Support Strategies, Interests and Influence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Federal state; Computer science","score_opus":0.09713948357062047,"score_gpt":0.39816857540897715,"score_spread":0.3010290918383567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W795468015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016216433,0.06998127,0.050123945,0.109775595,0.0031357165,0.00021727028,0.00015203044,0.00016217113,0.75023556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5131878,0.056067508,0.04563209,0.021268973,0.0013654709,0.0010645346,0.00023080391,0.00044883796,0.36073405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975062,0.0016651694,0.000058247966,0.00011715455,0.0005301694,0.00012296453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997928,0.0016869046,0.00005944947,0.00007436991,0.00012589847,0.00012534163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049992027,0.00046042944,0.0004317928,0.0010782584,0.0023152605,0.0061603766,0.0009806607,0.0018179587,0.007588745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005731958,0.00035039015,0.00015175769,0.0016005368,0.0080753,0.009893368,0.0021530308,0.0023714404,0.0015399475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001805411,0.000043495907,0.0005617594,0.00039013338,0.000010430598,0.00014484138,0.089461625,0.00007278034,0.00067849644,0.62173134,0.05953843,0.22734867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008663273,0.000023127388,0.00084906485,0.0008141815,0.0000106006955,0.0003340378,0.049250823,0.00017507095,0.0007716551,0.3695553,0.5781923,0.000015135118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018994658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040757875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007588745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019536186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026311097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026438653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W941899258","doi":"10.2196/resprot.4404","title":"Lessons Learned From Using Focus Groups to Refine Digital Interventions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stollery Children's Hospital; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"eHealth; Psychological intervention; Focus group; Digital health; Qualitative research; Implementation research; Intervention (counseling); Knowledge management; Computer science; Process management; Medicine; Medical education; Health care; Nursing; Business; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.9076930669977159,"score_gpt":0.7293060649067175,"score_spread":0.17838700209099845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W941899258","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19534135,0.019391939,0.4542521,0.24626693,0.005782003,0.0372112,0.00080181204,0.0026243723,0.038328294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2783989,0.013282935,0.6467815,0.025924949,0.00068803213,0.029389014,0.00029137224,0.00059620873,0.0046470636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7288483,0.24021736,0.009996357,0.005171742,0.010998002,0.004768252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59608823,0.3505706,0.005712743,0.019821882,0.023184635,0.004621886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25019565,0.0031925542,0.0018591896,0.0038450216,0.0073595485,0.0065795537,0.008832941,0.005351197,0.00529922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30834436,0.002119592,0.0023988683,0.0018384438,0.012221606,0.02006438,0.013619523,0.009189351,0.0016514937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023246215,0.0013196304,0.0029719917,0.008981728,0.00009394017,0.0014024529,0.5347877,0.0008741786,0.0019047812,0.013205082,0.0159413,0.4182848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010835069,0.0040014833,0.0070845615,0.043339808,0.00043181723,0.0028427513,0.52849066,0.0031099604,0.010248281,0.100103185,0.29870993,0.0005539646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009046966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0188278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7498044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007996311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017756797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92464226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}