{"meta":{"query_hash":"3ec04f66859f","filters":{"topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods"},"cohort_total":310,"direct_labels_cover":9,"predictions_cover":310,"exported":310,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3ec04f66859f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Focus+Groups+and+Qualitative+Methods"},"results":[{"id":"W111108992","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-0074-4.ch023","title":"Ethical Considerations in Online Research Methods","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Online research methods; Anonymity; Ethical issues; Data collection; Online discussion; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Data science; Internet privacy; Sociology; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.3914381170896912,"score_gpt":0.5824541722531352,"score_spread":0.19101605516344405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W111108992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003667083,0.0018368033,0.0011772644,0.0035060034,0.0005353757,0.0005146861,0.00014588665,0.00007022439,0.99217707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04009786,0.0001346583,0.5270455,0.003869544,0.003640383,0.00009889346,0.00001865953,0.0001269235,0.4249676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915145,0.005565769,0.00058572926,0.0004927646,0.0010435599,0.00079770037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944004,0.004209426,0.00014018934,0.00037562952,0.0005180796,0.00035629843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017793776,0.00027863315,0.0005664902,0.00019613489,0.00061504426,0.00012695417,0.00031232924,0.0016060678,0.00070337404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036172532,0.0002734654,0.00018928613,0.00008186529,0.0017230072,0.000056167548,0.0001903981,0.0027131934,0.00016276904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009686973,0.00002217391,0.000016780321,0.000012583393,0.00002583735,0.000021072592,0.0054219947,2.4203607e-7,0.000012865149,0.96377134,0.0024070744,0.028278317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011424804,0.000034173336,0.000052031606,0.00007351471,0.000013884441,0.0000021664182,0.0008364198,0.0000013772252,0.0000060495695,0.6746479,0.32401556,0.00020267382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004059021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020689966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5672095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007081312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010929254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1151365709","doi":"10.4000/communiquer.1085","title":"Enjeux éthiques de la recherche sur les forums Internet portant sur l’utilisation des médicaments à des fins non médicales","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de communication sociale et publique","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.49809422623558514,"score_gpt":0.4959555526892522,"score_spread":0.0021386735463329587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1151365709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76539,0.03504469,0.09300381,0.052611187,0.00049297366,0.0005754313,0.000112933696,0.00017270258,0.05259631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83287036,0.03667452,0.104739286,0.0011577619,0.0004840993,0.00022093997,0.00018548897,0.00006316953,0.023604361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794803,0.01807562,0.00086966314,0.00033010647,0.0004993699,0.000744909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98327935,0.013230534,0.00078136526,0.0004966594,0.0018604703,0.00035160303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029852312,0.0003291676,0.00042016842,0.00022159603,0.00061909144,0.00043765802,0.0012548084,0.0010025284,0.0006689357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027433148,0.00038234747,0.0003156471,0.000626668,0.0028229502,0.0023147194,0.00038220733,0.0014297479,0.000031537635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023778148,0.0007555656,0.123583734,0.00016086735,0.00016303855,0.0000012677511,0.100222506,0.00001119495,0.00025921015,0.6086415,0.0029530004,0.16322432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059301034,0.000086588814,0.24887438,0.0014256989,0.00008760521,0.000027119031,0.014223706,0.001266035,0.0008990199,0.3120647,0.41988066,0.00057146203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02930767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014947515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41692767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036676377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013265879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135150818","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1212","title":"New Emerging Technologies in Qualitative Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Emerging technologies; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4722096159575111,"score_gpt":0.6799356263671988,"score_spread":0.20772601040968774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135150818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20813575,0.0017712121,0.15290374,0.12571368,0.00086627377,0.0017914445,0.000008828539,0.00077746797,0.5080316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93885475,0.000094994226,0.03846505,0.000094298484,0.00027455727,0.00013723713,0.000005031452,0.000034728753,0.022039343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593306,0.036750257,0.0008645464,0.0005869726,0.0015424329,0.0009251918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97839874,0.01986092,0.00035836882,0.00064464257,0.00061262125,0.00012470447],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13053806,0.00020121661,0.00042939727,0.00040910134,0.0010377951,0.000101531325,0.0007159674,0.00016840303,0.00012568684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04212926,0.00014247146,0.00011994344,0.0023051216,0.0022648047,0.00029519844,0.00018330301,0.0008575697,0.00011029731],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019762592,0.000018157154,0.00006863321,0.000006525936,0.000014025995,0.000012368029,0.52631265,0.0000016704436,0.0000794121,0.4534757,0.002015729,0.017975364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011902459,0.000075797056,0.0001154616,0.00003228507,0.0000030300728,0.0000021304336,0.5254955,0.0000074518816,0.0001701745,0.38646278,0.08739267,0.00012364588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016487902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038602275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73071903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028508855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044943093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487766404","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2013v38n1a2631","title":"Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Netnography; Ethnography; Sociology; Anthropology; Computer science; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2533710882545106,"score_gpt":0.49815811997922343,"score_spread":0.24478703172471283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487766404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616824,0.013810093,0.001357716,0.043802053,0.0003447381,0.00035673336,0.000006250687,0.000014598945,0.078625426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97131157,0.00072985556,0.027467536,0.00016036656,0.000118395255,0.0000038853586,0.0000026447321,0.000007224268,0.00019854466],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555093,0.0034620513,0.00030181638,0.000054547905,0.0003153639,0.00031526122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685806,0.0008417372,0.00017077696,0.00029732505,0.0013252244,0.00050689385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007694693,0.000051013358,0.000118907854,0.0007235769,0.001132633,0.00017042331,0.0007726214,0.00007683987,0.00035142238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008682934,0.00004767725,0.000084982086,0.0010781446,0.00092533004,0.000429073,0.000017024358,0.0006159619,0.00001673829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009261344,0.00008203031,0.03237717,0.000013883643,0.00008769144,0.0000071656673,0.18713433,0.000032633692,0.00038929068,0.287716,0.031125145,0.4610254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002017725,0.00010984099,0.05622451,0.00014314862,0.000009456113,0.0000037263267,0.078290135,0.000032686137,0.000019279472,0.060768716,0.80406964,0.0001270696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18889694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3864966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7729445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113246475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008838294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8711412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488070775","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v44i1.2594","title":"Internet research ethics and the policy gap for ethical practice in online research settings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Situational ethics; Anonymity; Internet research; Public relations; Information ethics; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.41169019353082065,"score_gpt":0.636313732464289,"score_spread":0.22462353893346837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488070775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03560344,0.0021713697,0.00019530287,0.9474633,0.00066537305,0.00030269782,0.0000034481482,0.000001636263,0.013593467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97211635,0.00012435937,0.0077511217,0.007976293,0.0024565766,0.000016592496,0.0000018498579,0.000010972947,0.009545859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816288,0.017073324,0.00027241936,0.00011233223,0.0005242363,0.00038888663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643712,0.032001358,0.00015723267,0.00012138887,0.0028870197,0.00046179237],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09777146,0.000047307876,0.00012360177,0.0005561527,0.00068963185,0.00019280807,0.00029612004,0.00022631753,0.00004219538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101259,0.000034591216,0.00003138181,0.0006897098,0.0014821477,0.00016776288,0.0000142486315,0.0031215143,0.0000024920507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004866779,0.000021198772,0.00036611033,0.000014407746,0.0000056505974,5.67064e-7,0.15076451,5.117515e-7,0.000004650005,0.8005025,0.03873597,0.009535304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026317657,0.00008816808,0.0029613622,0.00007351785,0.0000037591276,0.0000031711947,0.04024066,0.0000076157626,0.0000030379217,0.15817733,0.7981438,0.000034399658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21425764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1704182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.939487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045261582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010209412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490732339","doi":"","title":"Social Matching for Health Researchers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3723195271192515,"score_gpt":0.4866517060421233,"score_spread":0.11433217892287184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490732339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21257545,0.0042900504,0.001487341,0.48711163,0.005189074,0.0040483163,0.0000673387,0.00040522052,0.28482556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245076,0.0004954938,0.0030963793,0.0024464608,0.0010184328,0.00022970422,0.000030271465,0.000041623687,0.068133995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942332,0.0028133402,0.00051770505,0.00050174067,0.00089303317,0.0010410001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771535,0.0006515404,0.0007574765,0.00016374927,0.00019683117,0.0005150225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066001457,0.00025468337,0.0004090973,0.00018999496,0.0015788407,0.00022761563,0.00022585777,0.0001579852,0.00034403315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002936005,0.0002691545,0.000069614456,0.0006879519,0.00028710303,0.00044518852,0.000051892777,0.0008661251,0.000029886947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015327534,0.00024750928,0.034246046,0.00017080439,0.000012617438,2.429079e-7,0.031372428,0.0000021350936,0.000023831484,0.84208935,0.004062284,0.08761946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007225448,0.000476403,0.2602901,0.00032208668,0.000010232107,4.9472277e-7,0.047943953,0.000025695412,0.0000124117305,0.05482438,0.63484216,0.00052958424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064440593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036711642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.787265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001296511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001418566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499501510","doi":"","title":"Tapping twitter: A meta-method of the qualitative health literature using social media as a data collection tool","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Data collection; Tapping; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.1316802376235014,"score_gpt":0.4182472401161961,"score_spread":0.2865670024926947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499501510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6784592,0.0006101933,0.30950165,0.009292035,0.00094398047,0.000454418,0.000120750425,0.000010728272,0.00060702604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482319,0.0003975948,0.049657423,0.00014449118,0.0007483289,2.0351952e-7,0.000020133715,0.000013977137,0.00078598305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870233,0.010967696,0.0006351783,0.00018884004,0.0009289276,0.00025604278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99358815,0.0027041733,0.00231258,0.00037065032,0.00093546155,0.00008898971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138029205,0.0001636924,0.0010061099,0.0003538572,0.0011778992,0.00006341146,0.0012843778,0.00011459127,0.00028473313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011240754,0.000103927945,0.0007467481,0.002739939,0.0006771021,0.00055088795,0.00023586654,0.0004164627,0.0000012738175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008180233,0.00014737798,0.00040046583,0.00005497086,0.0127973175,0.0000040815044,0.97321296,0.0011924213,0.0013179713,0.0050551244,0.0018767853,0.0031225095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003414225,0.00045466798,0.009777759,0.00019240227,0.029854447,0.000032178934,0.89053357,0.024984365,0.00001926407,0.03550234,0.004643556,0.0005912159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05677162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023524355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26977265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038159848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006943649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501915192","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05843.x","title":"Email interviewing: generating data with a vulnerable population","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Thematic analysis; Data collection; Inclusion (mineral); Population; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.2569110454893016,"score_gpt":0.4668566484340169,"score_spread":0.20994560294471531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501915192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63791364,0.0023070213,0.33585602,0.00091550616,0.00153235,0.00017348703,0.0000034535487,0.000032350534,0.021266146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51957244,0.000030836305,0.4798877,0.00004696654,0.00032733742,4.037702e-7,0.0000014625222,0.00000901348,0.00012383814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983252,0.00071126083,0.00034117437,0.0001231935,0.00030578848,0.00019336033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893516,0.00014722349,0.00046370432,0.00016472336,0.00019809458,0.00009107558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003324044,0.00007639989,0.00019754875,0.00008447673,0.0004237732,0.00004479369,0.00028625276,0.00003216198,0.000055493718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005991554,0.000057729267,0.00003628595,0.00022805505,0.00010664265,0.0012247899,0.000017265742,0.00023057681,8.834652e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018243647,0.00012412039,0.0013753566,0.0000151788745,0.000034440207,0.000017619761,0.11688214,0.00035223534,0.0021624193,0.00836335,0.0002788965,0.8702118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055180606,0.0041043414,0.024194606,0.008867868,0.00052896544,0.00028585093,0.77040356,0.0051900037,0.0077142967,0.10101242,0.07040461,0.0017754055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001975115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016734062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117345946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064653825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32593638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503808599","doi":"10.1177/160940691000900104","title":"Exploring Ethical and Methodological Issues in Internet-Based Research with Adolescents","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; The Internet; Ethical issues; Informed consent; Data collection; Research ethics; Internet research; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Social science; Alternative medicine; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.9388730344812117,"score_gpt":0.7404821074722382,"score_spread":0.19839092700897354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503808599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5307782,0.00022038957,0.43096358,0.034558572,0.001363642,0.00018931834,0.0000032494725,0.000016123597,0.0019068675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40303776,0.00008316186,0.5961816,0.00026343108,0.00030499697,0.000013230259,4.2869942e-7,0.0000105403615,0.00010487917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.942435,0.05449328,0.0007605717,0.00029604268,0.0016364317,0.000378633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747671,0.022360578,0.00036791817,0.00011082933,0.00216337,0.00023024045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13065669,0.0001582465,0.00045955356,0.0007696229,0.00013537306,0.00015587044,0.00066873,0.00020957434,0.0001658281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03762274,0.00011477485,0.00010424178,0.00051683886,0.0018933679,0.00046226082,0.00010088394,0.0029939895,0.0000026422347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015963535,0.00031110944,0.0051027485,0.000030258523,0.00013781837,0.00018857192,0.43987152,0.00000923624,0.009272316,0.34899947,0.00021921139,0.19426139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056727408,0.00256615,0.045116626,0.0018736875,0.000051523573,0.00009880504,0.41541344,0.0005279373,0.023725769,0.324926,0.17904449,0.0009828527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012370317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005977733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19327852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014801977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026448516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930614},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1519196938","doi":"10.1177/147078530404600303","title":"Comparison of the Quality of Qualitative Data Obtained through Telephone, Postal and Email Surveys","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Market Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Data collection; Data quality; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Marketing; Information quality; Business; Telephone interview; Telephone survey; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Advertising; Information system; Sociology; Statistics; Engineering; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.6620896328828171,"score_gpt":0.6899098371780265,"score_spread":0.027820204295209372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519196938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96739054,0.00066521013,0.0069445516,0.009579081,0.00047524893,0.00018930892,0.0002094141,0.0000029152156,0.014543714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909245,0.00018845306,0.008348212,0.000020441235,0.00015207076,9.879313e-7,0.0000040827563,0.000006131067,0.00035513687],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97363335,0.02170778,0.001019968,0.00018136564,0.0032181612,0.0002393621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873963,0.008216395,0.0007631693,0.0002582348,0.0032885666,0.000077349396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.084814385,0.000079532016,0.00035155294,0.00015591475,0.00018732107,0.00005585873,0.0015980043,0.00006692891,0.00017258058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019969683,0.000054287033,0.00010148394,0.00043031032,0.0017203892,0.00045740136,0.00047655427,0.00047210307,8.14448e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021592986,0.0015470998,0.1079816,0.00014307328,0.000991586,0.000016183709,0.56882125,0.00003776663,0.0078033134,0.26963282,0.007649967,0.03321602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002813919,0.00056911225,0.4443835,0.00042274388,0.00002236332,0.000009875708,0.3717798,0.0000490864,0.0050413394,0.16551243,0.009179029,0.00021681988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011013945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032659983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33640188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015765929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073686644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537520495","doi":"10.7202/1003966ar","title":"Uploading selves: Inuit digital storytelling on YouTube","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Études/Inuit/Studies","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; The Internet; Storytelling; Representation (politics); Sociology; Social media; Futures contract; Media studies; Gender studies; Narrative; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Art; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.29733174300968584,"score_gpt":0.43485775128421894,"score_spread":0.1375260082745331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537520495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98137134,0.0021315685,0.000016708595,0.00016578031,0.0010431089,0.00035063457,0.00004312018,0.00030184744,0.014575879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99197423,0.0005193891,0.004089496,0.00028906966,0.0005963883,0.000042749205,0.0000012752714,0.00004435539,0.0024430181],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970207,0.00054645486,0.00048198047,0.0005742986,0.00067310233,0.00070344337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977377,0.0011770423,0.00022217218,0.0003082871,0.0003508138,0.00020399003],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002307484,0.000361293,0.00060601154,0.00018405064,0.00090006815,0.00012756405,0.00045601328,0.00014336834,0.00021312402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00188881,0.00030316724,0.00022605747,0.0004894715,0.0010006976,0.0006377399,0.00016751041,0.0003181473,0.00021957506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030375772,0.00007867179,0.00034587266,0.000037725888,0.0003206697,0.000015280984,0.8488794,0.0000034183658,0.00004735034,0.14538826,0.00024877355,0.0046041734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025494516,0.00028612796,0.00021069421,0.00022595708,0.0000749647,0.0000010925428,0.96711886,0.000008223805,0.00028616402,0.028813904,0.0022021937,0.00051688147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001187616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07463995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118239425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019044622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006155237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541083764","doi":"10.1177/160940691000900102","title":"Contrasting Internet and Face-to-Face Focus Groups for Children with Chronic Health Conditions: Outcomes and Participant Experiences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; McGill University; Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; SickKids Foundation; University of British Columbia; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; The Internet; Psychology; Asynchronous communication; Face-to-face; Qualitative research; Cerebral palsy; Medical education; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.3756489991506828,"score_gpt":0.6100456326258258,"score_spread":0.234396633475143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541083764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5247884,0.0006501071,0.46555856,0.008067037,0.00051203877,0.00032897934,0.000039345705,0.000010317686,0.000045229102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6771378,0.00003757635,0.3221207,0.00032605176,0.00022631355,0.00005880226,0.0000022641166,0.000011433959,0.00007904363],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943466,0.0038075414,0.00073945004,0.00025778436,0.00051641243,0.0003322118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166393,0.0065252692,0.00076793367,0.00007220851,0.00064934004,0.00032133263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017617488,0.00018366157,0.0005246214,0.0002208425,0.0002819247,0.00018738498,0.00033425406,0.000060280985,0.000048868107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005907712,0.00013275762,0.00009257835,0.00014064304,0.0008758376,0.00043158646,0.000060329843,0.000308883,7.1236224e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001585642,0.00006838247,0.0040199026,0.000010998885,0.00049217785,0.0000020798295,0.7848155,0.0000060384064,0.0010397602,0.13133197,0.00015206792,0.07790256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003765997,0.0030674487,0.06945118,0.00031156576,0.00011208181,0.0000795426,0.85045123,0.00025014934,0.0029752844,0.061695874,0.007240512,0.0005991228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007256649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076736027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15234943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010379608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028165246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70725095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542239159","doi":"10.7202/018429ar","title":"Carte méthodologique d’un groupe témoin","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de géographie du Québec","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04697196090684399,"score_gpt":0.30562221374047654,"score_spread":0.2586502528336326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542239159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86980283,0.029010009,0.0309895,0.01997037,0.0027239488,0.00046153326,0.000033951063,0.0002673914,0.046740472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497311,0.015087861,0.06344374,0.0050682994,0.0022392566,0.00013272205,0.00001109322,0.00012475021,0.0641612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98812795,0.008596182,0.0006415918,0.0007429543,0.0005333391,0.0013579808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948347,0.0033678815,0.0003054247,0.00049818854,0.00025721607,0.0007365799],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006731868,0.000510814,0.00071869383,0.0003728108,0.002095516,0.00006342675,0.0006320329,0.0010106936,0.0008653058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024629247,0.0005313738,0.00075998995,0.002688428,0.035593446,0.00039737474,0.000071397306,0.0012782639,0.00025657137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006887006,0.00021772481,0.039947886,0.00006689484,0.00024420535,0.00043661342,0.100637466,0.000013257891,0.00025880663,0.7595462,0.02126862,0.07729343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001072327,0.0005450012,0.08775355,0.000086987646,0.00022803684,0.0002617764,0.014535705,0.000050301744,0.00031406365,0.08451997,0.8093792,0.0012530611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13536246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08216897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7881106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077638525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013076353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553235586","doi":"10.1177/160940690700600209","title":"“Just Chatting”: Research Ethics and Cyberspace","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Confidentiality; Flexibility (engineering); Qualitative research; The Internet; Research ethics; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Internet privacy; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Medicine; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Management; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.9093497367131598,"score_gpt":0.7938797614486554,"score_spread":0.11546997526450442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553235586","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054441985,0.0020129997,0.8652579,0.0378069,0.0023679624,0.00015943557,0.0000079022675,0.000019142906,0.037925728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13667546,0.00046619368,0.85901093,0.0005506682,0.0012557051,0.0000021704277,7.4427885e-7,0.00001875903,0.0020193695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93456274,0.060750984,0.001001529,0.00028037254,0.0028391932,0.00056519033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298514,0.063644074,0.000606961,0.00010091598,0.0055037476,0.00029286463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3663163,0.00013265952,0.0003190747,0.00071083993,0.0006372251,0.00016152176,0.0006118259,0.00019843437,0.00012561421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0733599,0.00011435243,0.00014148954,0.0005520479,0.0018897508,0.00044150164,0.00012249271,0.0019403312,0.0000070037204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114406146,0.000043169595,0.00011930788,0.0000066091734,0.00010462606,0.000026967658,0.5367285,7.5524076e-7,0.0013996307,0.38420847,0.0003823558,0.07686518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045083178,0.00019965385,0.0010033291,0.00010616199,0.0000135118025,0.00001997527,0.66456616,0.0000063779244,0.002087072,0.14104864,0.19035383,0.00014443073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080891664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002973345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29295638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003412934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042860713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93444556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559139218","doi":"10.1177/160940690400300106","title":"Tech Tips: Using Video Management/ Analysis Technology in Qualitative Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CLIPS; Computer science; Multimedia; Qualitative research; Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Software; Video editing; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Operating system; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.7845517402826568,"score_gpt":0.7667290898641408,"score_spread":0.01782265041851605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559139218","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10899716,0.0009151549,0.8693512,0.011580339,0.00072834344,0.0002844781,0.000017812754,0.000026213716,0.008099269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30827665,0.00015481848,0.690943,0.000096912234,0.00018258483,0.000016112966,0.0000020177158,0.000017768389,0.00031012917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9547307,0.04031979,0.0015684231,0.0004340762,0.0023126309,0.0006343739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98723686,0.007890575,0.00090077386,0.00022493726,0.0035761276,0.00017070673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12624598,0.00022452835,0.00074357784,0.006741352,0.00033322556,0.00014570204,0.0013469686,0.00021639222,0.00015934782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011175175,0.00020657567,0.00039903025,0.006999781,0.00177183,0.0006799972,0.00020951891,0.001026737,0.000012914896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014909578,0.0002045255,0.00017377133,0.000009643945,0.0013853748,0.00010465475,0.43584573,0.00041315117,0.0011936157,0.54113626,0.00003306961,0.019351074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008110529,0.00012490495,0.00018682468,0.000120366974,0.000092909344,0.0000069827215,0.47971088,0.000030707328,0.0010549618,0.5128994,0.00480333,0.00015766433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021091604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048106172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1992795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017433697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043416425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570034326","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00257.x","title":"Is E‐mail Communication a Feasible Method to Interview Young People With Mental Health Problems?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Mental health; Data collection; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Value (mathematics); Medical education; Motivational interviewing; Applied psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03561173607322177,"score_gpt":0.4094638157287727,"score_spread":0.37385207965555095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570034326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047020227,0.017030893,0.14586772,0.76660335,0.002586742,0.0012737275,0.000013334556,0.000042048294,0.019561937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5459487,0.0028460836,0.44440007,0.0057624034,0.0007843251,0.0000029689131,0.0000018608914,0.000029054727,0.00022456658],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976028,0.0011034661,0.0004588138,0.00015699785,0.0004048456,0.0002730839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879324,0.000053598094,0.0005293734,0.00014887036,0.00015367026,0.00032124866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004972212,0.00012953136,0.0003221545,0.00020422117,0.00082256645,0.00013475744,0.0002499689,0.00005031945,0.000027810593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036499187,0.000096771524,0.000097959986,0.0005439274,0.00010555408,0.00028234484,0.000020552436,0.0005437588,0.0000012999286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028916716,0.0014853874,0.029857459,0.00036211484,0.000089266265,5.5931525e-7,0.29437396,0.00000667506,0.00021818969,0.02456733,0.061768696,0.5869812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054427907,0.0030517813,0.23819816,0.015275286,0.00025563635,0.00061965437,0.104201935,0.00012330912,0.00012536389,0.022793954,0.6087875,0.0011246534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010790438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006552108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76084095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009189447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015946243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6326599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576703122","doi":"10.1177/160940690400300205","title":"Mini-Disc Recorders: A New Approach for Qualitative Interviewing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fidelity; Interview; High fidelity; Compact disc; Digital audio; Index (typography); Computer science; Multimedia; Engineering; Telecommunications; Computer hardware; Sociology; World Wide Web; Acoustics; Electrical engineering; Digital signal processing; Audio signal","score_opus":0.7553551430729768,"score_gpt":0.6898426162264046,"score_spread":0.06551252684657216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576703122","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002255052,0.0010068908,0.97052854,0.012447744,0.0022524782,0.00040177826,0.000039844028,0.000027805394,0.01103987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009407334,0.00012682908,0.9858126,0.00074205245,0.0014885578,0.000033541884,0.000012368592,0.000037834296,0.0023388953],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97828424,0.018213985,0.0015019468,0.00038780185,0.0011525445,0.0004594993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848164,0.010596129,0.0014760615,0.00016359892,0.0025984857,0.0003493631],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.058998533,0.00028838794,0.00072827254,0.00054359523,0.000290013,0.00020416082,0.0011355438,0.00015607418,0.00022852363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022009367,0.000249214,0.0007049062,0.00049209275,0.00065840175,0.000931971,0.00008492874,0.00045137943,0.000010894694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032104852,0.00017549841,0.000003605145,0.000020679268,0.00049025874,0.000004481326,0.67177856,0.00007742867,0.00048950955,0.23440798,0.001640117,0.090590864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019355231,0.00034242423,0.000011981919,0.00014896493,0.00005594021,0.000010002588,0.54384375,0.000025601652,0.00091540127,0.3740525,0.07840406,0.0002538323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011688768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009503549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13964452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006871524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000980093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581905769","doi":"10.1002/meet.2014.14505101145","title":"Privacy and control in online social profiles: Toward a typology of users","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Internet privacy; Control (management); Social network (sociolinguistics); Psychology; Frame (networking); Computer science; User-generated content; Personally identifiable information; Social control; Social psychology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social media; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030988658202386558,"score_gpt":0.3639949144788421,"score_spread":0.3330062562764555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581905769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848102,0.000011861715,0.0006292853,0.013500589,0.000023615838,0.000313326,0.000011088837,0.000019328181,0.00068073004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872434,0.000042332096,0.012166761,0.0005049672,0.000012843467,0.000022495935,2.3890235e-7,0.0000017947433,0.0000051337615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991883,0.000012016479,0.00025073715,0.00009995853,0.0002292136,0.00021979942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867386,0.0001264924,0.0004934559,0.00003708289,0.000643539,0.000025594081],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029003683,0.000057514448,0.00021890904,0.00016500632,0.00028567456,0.000020886613,0.00033615535,0.000058832957,4.714682e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020974844,0.00004277097,0.000047939666,0.001640768,0.008087873,0.0006017032,0.000101700214,0.000090447946,8.0403844e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035365112,0.000029062094,0.04057121,0.00010823149,0.0000146241055,1.7905324e-9,0.077688806,1.608725e-7,0.012486431,0.767192,0.00025655067,0.10161754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020073699,0.00087886513,0.061233338,0.000053779426,0.000043546912,0.0000021614062,0.81100285,0.0020681983,0.0077014114,0.0657833,0.04891617,0.0003090409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015638459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065640734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73331404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040717237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118580654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W158446331","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-29262-0_17","title":"Evaluation of a Web-Based Patient Portal for Chronic Disease Management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Patient portal; Usability; Medicine; Health care; Chronic disease; Web application; Disease management; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Family medicine; Health management system; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.07157164537727909,"score_gpt":0.34330640558463993,"score_spread":0.27173476020736087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W158446331","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055417547,0.0024216147,0.98576254,0.0006901113,0.00067377265,0.0021391495,0.000232755,0.000030031006,0.0074958354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10463924,0.00013641977,0.8947183,0.000063115054,0.00018967947,0.00014107896,0.000060668186,0.000015513868,0.000035982448],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860156,0.000055540524,0.0004993762,0.00009386367,0.0005524908,0.00019716224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983465,0.00038253574,0.00051502226,0.0002772772,0.00042155437,0.000057081925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024519158,0.00016323295,0.0002489679,0.00014956859,0.0008043186,0.00005016424,0.00058253005,0.00010741203,0.0000046855002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015557192,0.00013440246,0.0002161681,0.00013501401,0.0006157041,0.00016072755,0.00015235554,0.00012831438,1.3670113e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047216768,0.000029556932,0.000002899843,0.00047809846,0.00012344186,1.3605398e-8,0.0050451574,0.5318121,0.0000029614555,0.26619345,0.00005489082,0.19625275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071497716,0.00013935663,0.00008393539,0.00048520952,0.00064951635,2.7261524e-7,0.00008096292,0.82587916,0.00004707145,0.0067492938,0.1647779,0.00039231122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003015304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019266875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2940671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005279575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6186249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593386902","doi":"10.1177/160940691201100404","title":"Qualitative Research in the Digital Era: Obstacles and Opportunities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; The Internet; Qualitative research; Cloud computing; Process (computing); Computer science; Software; Data science; Internet privacy; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9045321294077043,"score_gpt":0.7473714466525677,"score_spread":0.15716068275513662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593386902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5525221,0.018063879,0.20049629,0.099374704,0.003916009,0.0007167361,0.00014185229,0.000030474841,0.124737956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547273,0.00064839516,0.14269283,0.00047284825,0.0008756818,0.00001650113,0.0000031358156,0.000014579208,0.0005486795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9184823,0.07793513,0.0009152802,0.0001652305,0.001980842,0.00052119355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9517003,0.04595169,0.00047964486,0.00010960754,0.0015623515,0.00019638258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16829608,0.00014948791,0.00033674904,0.00063325284,0.00030819097,0.00033000493,0.0007416733,0.00008649554,0.00006948054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012796162,0.00010161961,0.00013842668,0.00042323404,0.0019231853,0.0014796692,0.00010044348,0.00078591524,0.000005333126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055739994,0.0000875766,0.00012626247,0.0000042734196,0.000060120765,0.000009634778,0.5239491,2.7041284e-7,0.000041914533,0.37123853,0.00031022765,0.1041164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028618376,0.000116266056,0.0011711752,0.000057451987,0.0000071588674,0.000015419522,0.72973394,0.0000024608935,0.00005445942,0.15974484,0.10870919,0.00010144515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035183586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039181417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30220523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022366461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024321323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99551946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593770955","doi":"10.29173/cjs891","title":"Cultural Centrality and Information and Communication Technology among Canadian Youth","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Information and Communications Technology; Sociology; Cohort; Survey data collection; Gender studies; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.07277196053718557,"score_gpt":0.34037704634499455,"score_spread":0.26760508580780895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593770955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721515,0.0011921594,0.000023782808,0.023098312,0.00009897988,0.00006925912,0.000012076957,0.0000032364426,0.0033506972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849963,0.00047699414,0.0004652139,0.00047890056,0.000039609375,7.700066e-7,0.0000026393604,0.0000017742726,0.00003446911],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987915,0.00069044356,0.00018983278,0.000035306093,0.000058346686,0.00023453822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991042,0.00012342924,0.0001608309,0.00006932981,0.000208651,0.00033357454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017414822,0.000049270006,0.0001192451,0.00014693875,0.0016417146,0.000029620633,0.0001840681,0.00014708782,0.00001975046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056030124,0.000035171823,0.000020797403,0.00010993437,0.00441527,0.0003907026,0.000008633677,0.00029249684,0.000001362713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035057244,0.0000011407485,0.21311565,0.0000020513992,0.000023705747,0.0000040721598,0.55398124,0.0000015692083,0.000001883068,0.22885674,0.00044937196,0.0035590543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003366557,0.00008262262,0.58550906,0.000016698341,0.000027589964,0.00007781641,0.312725,0.0000075865773,0.000005673104,0.0379152,0.06316046,0.00013562119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8104206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.955323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37239343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021954115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010627498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596315909","doi":"10.1177/160940691101000303","title":"Email as a Data Collection Tool when Interviewing Older Adults","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Psychosocial; Interview; Context (archaeology); Exploratory research; Psychology; Internet privacy; Data collection; Applied psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Sociology","score_opus":0.7491994995173686,"score_gpt":0.652552675900478,"score_spread":0.09664682361689059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596315909","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035512064,0.0010546625,0.927251,0.0029410697,0.0042175543,0.00026323315,0.000031047384,0.000033190816,0.028696215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058356874,0.00020171625,0.9380156,0.0006479069,0.0007330201,0.000011399894,0.000009371562,0.000025999494,0.0019981083],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97739595,0.019656187,0.0011702863,0.0003372563,0.0011438068,0.00029649946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991965,0.0041056424,0.00115448,0.00029508045,0.0023097666,0.00017002696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046774667,0.00019892726,0.0004484,0.0004373159,0.00024651035,0.00012374383,0.0017654782,0.00011596503,0.0021897964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0155535815,0.00017033197,0.00024203511,0.0003571768,0.0004528767,0.0014219405,0.00027169375,0.00042910557,0.00003351618],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004386127,0.00018549619,0.00013072799,0.000012396669,0.00038705155,0.000028830043,0.69864565,2.4310359e-7,0.00013605114,0.051825613,0.0024992272,0.24571009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023706434,0.0006774051,0.002573288,0.00082856714,0.0001350553,0.000075849995,0.60434276,0.000198656,0.0021636712,0.27441356,0.11166572,0.0005548333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030669505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022931876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24515526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028710446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003920363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160623409","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v46i4.54834","title":"Design and Development of a Process for Web-based Survey Research","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Web survey; Survey research; Process (computing); Educational research; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.5847638098472623,"score_gpt":0.6181923390653793,"score_spread":0.03342852921811701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160623409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97767496,0.0005662261,0.0006478214,0.0090854885,0.00007710978,0.00057210017,0.0000041505446,3.8902493e-7,0.011371733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470352,0.00007657483,0.03953275,0.000025793022,0.00018980454,0.00007202958,0.0000043467567,0.000013187269,0.0130503485],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925842,0.005132123,0.00042937265,0.00014684023,0.0013082777,0.00039915176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90032643,0.09580186,0.00009939272,0.00007486617,0.0034942115,0.00020324248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04103545,0.000060779726,0.00017236752,0.00038093133,0.0007672881,0.000058438098,0.00036211946,0.00006125166,0.0045125852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031563222,0.00005051922,0.00003230093,0.0007635774,0.0007369148,0.00015854885,0.000013429507,0.00029185615,0.000019137937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009561631,0.005355992,0.14816585,0.0009974896,0.0005408762,0.0000013914482,0.4076296,0.00064961973,0.0044078897,0.10124074,0.0757476,0.2457013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004445018,0.002631163,0.2648186,0.0007832862,0.000025807713,0.000008673569,0.031918786,0.0007068687,0.008489444,0.042871844,0.6426713,0.0006292048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015080826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002749329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5669237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014506717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010248725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99639744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855907784","doi":"10.15353/joci.v11i3.2699","title":"Focus Groups as a Tool to Collect Data in a Community Informatics Project Involving Elderly Rural Women","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Sociology; Data collection; Transparency (behavior); Normative; Openness to experience; Communication in small groups; Library science; Public relations; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.18794914447117655,"score_gpt":0.43251310660307685,"score_spread":0.2445639621319003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855907784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812783,0.00008843229,0.0035610609,0.00086424116,0.00018905141,0.0005571416,0.000027033946,0.000026424885,0.0134082865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883811,0.0001610474,0.010070328,0.0011827626,0.00008369511,0.000009345486,0.000010073163,0.000014557674,0.00008709513],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848768,0.011564387,0.0018193709,0.000011756547,0.0011422237,0.0005854775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991892,0.004564236,0.0011612645,0.0013370439,0.0007550429,0.0002904261],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07148596,0.00022126979,0.0005727874,0.00043773346,0.0016861771,0.00034736842,0.004348459,0.00012726875,0.00001624515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012365704,0.00015666378,0.000069282694,0.0015173043,0.0004508984,0.002588142,0.0014110663,0.002783132,0.000025783025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023253483,0.00016277158,0.00021349594,0.00006546628,0.000050554787,4.0188868e-7,0.97721887,0.00010332092,0.0000044408043,0.0017123816,0.0041544717,0.01608127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010956589,0.0014999502,0.00039642115,0.0001863041,0.000028041226,0.00003385981,0.96279275,0.00033341764,0.000012105579,0.014647182,0.018762922,0.0002113791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016433505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008042117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059120253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000751128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014763541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906710109","doi":"10.1177/160940690800700303","title":"Not Alone in the Field: Distance Collaboration via the Internet in a Focused Ethnography","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; The Internet; Reflexivity; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Trustworthiness; Space (punctuation); Process (computing); Media studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science; Anthropology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.40035596654511085,"score_gpt":0.6033535436689265,"score_spread":0.2029975771238156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906710109","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16159867,0.0008368863,0.7658235,0.06595058,0.0013505925,0.000320262,0.000010868657,0.000008082316,0.004100601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83748955,0.00018796773,0.15883815,0.0029434173,0.00030600582,0.000027202497,0.0000015774926,0.000009173807,0.00019694329],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96903825,0.02849548,0.00094571547,0.00017045478,0.0011148017,0.00023531872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788774,0.019429777,0.0006612952,0.00013287723,0.0008477525,0.000050899635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039607402,0.00014148768,0.00031585977,0.00040401917,0.0001684994,0.00009181772,0.001068876,0.000087343156,0.000067987705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093214065,0.00008535986,0.00018327073,0.0011896522,0.00068354735,0.00047748003,0.000040692146,0.00061860494,0.0000028085753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004323911,0.00015222476,0.0015119727,0.000003398869,0.00007903849,0.000060290316,0.8690895,0.000024163573,0.00031728347,0.08983705,0.0014383853,0.03705434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032381704,0.0007028133,0.028836865,0.00022891776,0.000032607284,0.000045093868,0.58504134,0.00042642702,0.0030531124,0.20148751,0.17644969,0.00045744784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001971691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003539394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6758909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018929446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019089735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1922195387","doi":"10.7202/1026106ar","title":"Les technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) et la promotion de la santé sexuelle chez les jeunes autochtones du Québec","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches amérindiennes au Québec","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"First Nations of Quebec and Labrador Health and Social Services Commission; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09586478616328466,"score_gpt":0.42872818213819974,"score_spread":0.3328633959749151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1922195387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8195099,0.003144027,0.060905147,0.028339004,0.00010760941,0.00044563413,0.000017798797,0.00063844013,0.08689244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93306357,0.0035653,0.061334074,0.00011900983,0.000098280696,0.00018193251,0.000014843689,0.000048816553,0.0015741701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96814764,0.029845016,0.0006010118,0.00034252938,0.0002997385,0.0007640658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807251,0.017909784,0.0005231621,0.00048393302,0.00020794339,0.00015004167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036623795,0.0004185001,0.0004707342,0.00021429261,0.0010646143,0.0003564752,0.0007989003,0.0012448262,0.0000665076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014484506,0.00040053995,0.00022041291,0.0005426846,0.0036927722,0.0009926973,0.00027921345,0.0012576372,0.000044381784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022908276,0.0002853824,0.06370463,0.00027041548,0.00006507966,0.0000014066866,0.23209299,0.0001597432,0.00056815497,0.35637718,0.00015684751,0.34629527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008954655,0.00042768338,0.19988513,0.0007833038,0.00019592869,0.000078052806,0.44334546,0.0071527623,0.0038038406,0.056847654,0.28550607,0.00107866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8365568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72292453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3452166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030072986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032013687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939959248","doi":"10.1177/160940691000900101","title":"Public Selves, Inequality, and Interruptions: The Creation of Meaning in Focus Groups with Teens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.49363902327669673,"score_gpt":0.5955661037556637,"score_spread":0.10192708047896692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1939959248","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42884052,0.00042869904,0.5351768,0.02132259,0.0009322514,0.0002543679,0.00001990105,0.000012908873,0.013011982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.696975,0.0000724929,0.30257437,0.0000907418,0.00020510487,0.0000076284377,0.000001267727,0.000009492619,0.00006388613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850501,0.01273702,0.0009477449,0.00017349205,0.00088136474,0.0002103045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98800385,0.0088915825,0.0010594528,0.0001228899,0.0018159129,0.00010630587],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04366382,0.00014220846,0.00036388444,0.00046575122,0.0001537993,0.00012688323,0.0005567708,0.00008904422,0.00009581086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011731892,0.000091272086,0.000109197405,0.0004883766,0.0012230988,0.000688436,0.00008072517,0.0006365159,6.6061966e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011157792,0.000094056064,0.0035018695,0.0000066511734,0.00013579497,0.0000041613303,0.28924215,0.0000034600312,0.0030076585,0.62360543,0.000018925362,0.0802683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016905243,0.0005502394,0.020104036,0.00023225999,0.00005814517,0.00005097555,0.36916205,0.00013568073,0.0020872382,0.5918659,0.013768237,0.00029471473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012836382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040648547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2681345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010634384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023461696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959998900","doi":"10.1177/160940690900800101","title":"The Use of Videoconferencing as a Medium for the Qualitative Interview","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Videoconferencing; Interview; Qualitative research; Experiential learning; Qualitative property; Ethnography; Psychology; Data collection; Face-to-face; Medical education; Medicine; Pedagogy; Sociology; Multimedia; Computer science","score_opus":0.8240242543576962,"score_gpt":0.705833949228755,"score_spread":0.11819030512894124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959998900","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030254265,0.0023916224,0.9226025,0.06842671,0.0020162584,0.00043322702,0.000033534587,0.000010254341,0.001060476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11706995,0.0014309642,0.8759304,0.0025145109,0.0010501466,0.000044398435,0.000002974512,0.000025645082,0.001930972],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9602962,0.036346156,0.0015446342,0.00019470903,0.0012855862,0.0003326902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89414746,0.09900979,0.001885567,0.00018952595,0.004643681,0.00012398584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08801335,0.0001981979,0.0005090704,0.00019720329,0.0005294301,0.00024135862,0.0012986506,0.000086788146,0.00007796066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057950005,0.000108123684,0.0005792928,0.00034550365,0.0011628142,0.0006185045,0.00006183515,0.0003992721,0.000002558111],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030958126,0.000046970592,0.0000018587994,0.0000052575233,0.00035152456,0.0000014341778,0.41936392,0.0000122715255,0.00061401125,0.37329677,0.0010642374,0.20493217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049506687,0.00063787703,0.00013253409,0.00015467672,0.000070827686,0.0000054823035,0.38606122,0.000092272916,0.0018226441,0.33043134,0.2799716,0.00012445285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005095159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016396202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27890736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002044127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054247363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94998527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967049484","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002","title":"Conducting a Research Interview","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Cornerstone; Active listening; Confidentiality; Interview; Qualitative research; Informed consent; Focus group; Presentation (obstetrics); Semi-structured interview; Protocol (science); Medical education; Telephone interview; Psychology; Reading (process); Data collection; Process (computing); Computer science; Medicine; Sociology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5073153066952594,"score_gpt":0.6080585469585754,"score_spread":0.10074324026331605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967049484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5676836,0.10750681,0.015905984,0.28123856,0.005006139,0.00012274575,6.4048186e-7,0.0000209012,0.022514652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914439,0.0029639106,0.0034503862,0.00044560505,0.0016118743,5.771391e-7,3.5382595e-8,0.0000018731754,0.00008188813],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949794,0.002593701,0.00027204116,0.00006591213,0.0018116732,0.00027726524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972082,0.002042555,0.00016618447,0.000026974098,0.00020999885,0.00034608645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08999674,0.00003522225,0.00011404425,0.00019933208,0.0007149538,0.0001352921,0.00025186464,0.00003266522,0.00019135607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01144614,0.000022900136,0.000033972974,0.00050841615,0.0016033091,0.00076647487,0.000034958342,0.00030253272,0.000003649038],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015930569,0.000034754772,0.016553612,0.000009364708,0.0000057822863,0.0000028714228,0.058387745,3.0786813e-7,0.000055674827,0.046200097,0.0064245197,0.8723237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033427056,0.00007628579,0.006943173,0.0002423493,0.00001060682,0.00007447328,0.34731564,0.00053971796,0.00009254413,0.0070984364,0.63716614,0.00010639651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018189181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007890647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003426836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028173244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968916202","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.00361","title":"Media activism and Internet use by people with HIV/AIDS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Health & Illness","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Dissent; Public sphere; Sociology; Representation (politics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Promotion (chess); Public relations; Media studies; Public health; Gender studies; Political science; Medicine; Law; Politics; Nursing; Family medicine","score_opus":0.05424946014409231,"score_gpt":0.38619647651689865,"score_spread":0.3319470163728063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968916202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878305,0.001432657,0.0057800133,0.003194873,0.00029465326,0.00020965852,0.000019351839,0.000027474603,0.0012107948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921848,0.00023996113,0.00622127,0.00049453607,0.000028376258,0.000020265028,0.000008335302,0.000011492246,0.0007909311],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961056,0.002847063,0.00025198518,0.00024261858,0.00016393102,0.00038878375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979288,0.0015274291,0.00021747341,0.000105235886,0.00008570702,0.00013535353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039439765,0.000112676185,0.00043349064,0.000045191002,0.0003996759,0.000009710005,0.00010570512,0.00015000126,0.000096021315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069602503,0.00008911586,0.000032921595,0.00013130008,0.0022080976,0.00014009992,0.000018481043,0.0002014621,0.00000336253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003480676,0.00006452454,0.0531215,0.00004913474,0.000034312412,6.3420856e-7,0.6095169,2.5107926e-7,0.000021661923,0.326853,0.003614089,0.0066891275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020812522,0.0011951448,0.06274107,0.00008905215,0.00003445753,0.0000060669668,0.6096391,0.0000070434685,0.000327151,0.037222274,0.2860055,0.0006519201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004589066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014401645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28963074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063582454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002577952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8135828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970365581","doi":"10.1108/13522750610640530","title":"Methodology or “methodolatry”? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Market Research An International Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":330,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"AXYS Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Originality; Relevance (law); Qualitative research; Data collection; Psychology; Preference; Quality (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Qualitative property; Market research; Outcome (game theory); Marketing; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.7358778416591036,"score_gpt":0.6828760694498885,"score_spread":0.05300177220921509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970365581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74202687,0.0015260177,0.17816056,0.0033209305,0.0010226856,0.0008097498,0.00007653934,0.000038219427,0.073018424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73418725,0.00045318392,0.2626306,0.00006318246,0.0012468665,0.000058312336,0.000019133946,0.000029635296,0.0013118002],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8287911,0.16550401,0.00094687904,0.00046026503,0.0037093356,0.0005884358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97775984,0.014747711,0.0005054022,0.0002257581,0.0064097997,0.00035148027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25129092,0.00019460422,0.00043002027,0.00087408954,0.00065299304,0.00036746572,0.00092895835,0.00015861547,0.0029070463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02595664,0.00015277865,0.0001344896,0.0005804938,0.0015847248,0.0014500748,0.00015397307,0.00078190456,0.000005465777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016654306,0.00039139672,0.0011311496,0.000018007815,0.00019074314,0.000022063115,0.21531029,0.000007549861,0.0014943903,0.2662359,0.0016401028,0.511893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014178643,0.0011827842,0.024245908,0.00008186745,0.0000378179,0.000042931846,0.28595325,0.0010685191,0.00039513913,0.67626584,0.009062785,0.00024528013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006597153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013647772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5116477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005197438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008044013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974029383","doi":"10.1177/1049732315580556","title":"Opportunities and Constraints in Disseminating Qualitative Research in Web 2.0 Virtual Environments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement","keywords":"Dissemination; Social media; Qualitative research; Information Dissemination; Knowledge management; Internet privacy; Web 2.0; Public relations; Digital media; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet; Business; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.8857985276696367,"score_gpt":0.7284157913795919,"score_spread":0.15738273629004484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974029383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8738592,0.0033909609,0.00058206834,0.055504546,0.00019333087,0.0024480862,0.000142218,0.0000417277,0.063837826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98822033,0.0015322473,0.0044482835,0.00019798694,0.00010296678,0.00035079263,0.00001951284,0.000035509038,0.0050923717],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.837402,0.15506685,0.0010820098,0.00080034125,0.003513062,0.002135766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602752,0.03753602,0.00018554316,0.00027028171,0.00063052686,0.001102478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30362207,0.00022903857,0.0006240399,0.0017411906,0.0010379029,0.00015509779,0.00043870116,0.00020900558,0.00010143147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023318375,0.00022958672,0.000041016272,0.002257577,0.009931711,0.0005786081,0.00030251005,0.0019669095,0.000059892776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008359496,0.00014401574,0.00030776058,0.000050851246,0.0000059954655,0.000024399069,0.608754,7.7361005e-7,0.000029434681,0.3590087,0.00078083936,0.030809643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009965387,0.0008412694,0.0006880707,0.00033215006,5.2903573e-7,6.729421e-7,0.9030068,0.000054537235,0.000013752927,0.0737653,0.020099482,0.00020088533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016074106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012350694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2942528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019825406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030520938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978941343","doi":"10.1108/qrj-12-2012-0034","title":"The Googled ethnographer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney; Australian Catholic University","keywords":"Sociology; Originality; Ethnography; Scrutiny; Agency (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Publishing; Work (physics); The Internet; Participant observation; Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Project commissioning; Social science; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.48441806485682065,"score_gpt":0.679198817157069,"score_spread":0.19478075230024833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978941343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21455416,0.0074888756,0.013892678,0.15801892,0.001355916,0.0017463677,0.000008169862,0.000110034634,0.60282487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86338985,0.0030013993,0.031156799,0.00050818204,0.0018724498,0.00033527453,0.0000020100751,0.00006589394,0.09966814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9500379,0.046131365,0.0004160637,0.00019057919,0.002100362,0.0011237544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793585,0.017054232,0.00015348611,0.00020911152,0.0027039452,0.00052075356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08704797,0.00011560907,0.00017652911,0.00021972075,0.007370038,0.0011523479,0.000762327,0.00009364821,0.002460532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011873074,0.00006766201,0.00017305133,0.0012699619,0.0039044092,0.00059377827,0.0000818892,0.0015340563,0.00081860565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020436482,0.00003704893,0.00008444523,0.0000024536469,0.000057737827,0.0000037212208,0.40348676,2.4904674e-7,0.00032557987,0.41443714,0.106189154,0.075355284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334311,0.00009828375,0.0006075582,0.000010874847,0.0000013981838,0.000001305143,0.43449914,0.0000052587834,0.000020107942,0.29137796,0.27317744,0.00006722877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027000906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005289966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64883566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020355148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044458968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983863178","doi":"10.5663/aps.v3i1&amp;2.20022","title":"Pandemic H1N1 Targeted Messaging for Manitoba Metis: An Evaluation of a Risk Communication Intervention","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; H1n1 pandemic; Pandemic; Intervention (counseling); Risk communication; Geography; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Environmental health; Computer science; Nursing; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5666179546703084,"score_gpt":0.6784952956081047,"score_spread":0.11187734093779633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983863178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9405521,0.010694283,0.042781346,0.000104022154,0.00034265942,0.0010231344,0.000044662695,0.000035640576,0.004422161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895156,0.002616457,0.007500956,0.000035243178,0.00011213357,0.00011537914,0.000034950306,0.000025293633,0.000044000397],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98684907,0.010675731,0.0009248784,0.0002894518,0.0010021309,0.00025874545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99427974,0.001918084,0.0018180142,0.000436096,0.0014110926,0.0001369433],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046637967,0.00016808936,0.0005370164,0.00046138102,0.0006420011,0.0004922572,0.0018347434,0.000114527735,0.0015316687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005712821,0.00015924951,0.00022639545,0.000665285,0.00027301777,0.0023886333,0.0002500621,0.0002578909,0.00000189633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026740727,0.0004739291,0.30425853,0.00011413196,0.0002705225,1.4384263e-7,0.015694479,0.00032791297,0.017662644,0.008818655,0.0018725088,0.6502391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016666758,0.00004842592,0.67496175,0.0006157985,0.0005237125,5.2442743e-7,0.014532989,0.0046450654,0.0066682897,0.28971213,0.006215196,0.00040946898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018361418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076122233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6498297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019807486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011456955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984588065","doi":"10.1186/1479-5868-6-89","title":"ParticipACTION: the future challenges for physical activity promotion in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Baseline (sea); Political science; Physical activity; Public relations; Computer science; Geography; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.10805382188657811,"score_gpt":0.46621520546619394,"score_spread":0.3581613835796158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984588065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8049752,0.00023277916,0.000119391654,0.018963737,0.17494056,0.0004449361,0.00024153714,0.00000840152,0.000073437724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6867821,0.00062880974,0.000058718593,0.000009524978,0.31244332,0.00003285482,0.000009331768,0.0000086942255,0.00002663142],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972571,0.00082291604,0.00019468639,0.00022128406,0.0012773942,0.00022659979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972853,0.0012303458,0.00052184565,0.000079515936,0.00076163746,0.00012137508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082406396,0.00019701259,0.00045280062,0.00008031462,0.00018115841,0.00010071563,0.00029841592,0.00018057377,0.00000584824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017411879,0.00014800919,0.00022857322,0.000105089224,0.00014991508,0.00048698747,0.000025558655,0.00093466503,3.017081e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013948311,0.0072404873,0.00003940049,0.00007618008,0.000092258124,0.000028961473,0.0069785756,0.0000045213123,0.00043829245,0.0023630275,0.07659273,0.9047507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024865165,0.0013300406,0.010192885,0.00038929135,0.00019068213,0.000004790768,0.005543519,0.00020191506,0.00080018654,0.013210451,0.9651734,0.0004763133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09013838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37481037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9042744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092300994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008998245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9159205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985830835","doi":"10.1145/1940761.1940854","title":"Online synchronous interviewing of the info-savvy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the 2011 iConference","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interview; Sample (material); Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Chat room; Multimedia; Sociology","score_opus":0.16645034591545285,"score_gpt":0.36375824285950087,"score_spread":0.19730789694404802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985830835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88648653,0.00021846547,0.00013503406,0.0007786846,0.00038186097,0.00027581948,0.000010447354,0.000021919119,0.11169127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942523,0.000057805304,0.0042801695,0.00008309818,0.00005536902,0.0000068300174,9.562277e-8,0.0000074446884,0.0012568672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988997,0.00009007832,0.00032762418,0.00015083876,0.0003148693,0.00021688703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877286,0.00010562541,0.00045281556,0.00014221961,0.0004798818,0.00004657479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015411085,0.00010680458,0.00021826498,0.000036433972,0.00020697618,0.000017862227,0.0012330156,0.000069360765,0.0003342683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009160872,0.000059541806,0.00014480052,0.00023593754,0.000878483,0.0002134929,0.00031032323,0.0001800371,0.0000068189493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031499436,0.00030619602,0.05882269,0.00023630357,0.00006141533,6.727644e-8,0.26352784,1.5249377e-7,0.011785076,0.63257223,0.00078958186,0.031866957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080399454,0.00048250202,0.44788677,0.0018107727,0.00022278242,0.0000035918342,0.12283327,0.00013199996,0.1856397,0.21843922,0.020963924,0.00078149786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030896568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025838826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.414133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033932127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011655719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46706575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998162533","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-8-53","title":"The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto; University Health Network; York University; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Cancer Care Ontario","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University Health Network","keywords":"Respondent; Citizen journalism; Data collection; Computer science; Photo elicitation; Infographic; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Preference elicitation; Psychology; Applied psychology; Thematic analysis; Management science; Knowledge management; Data science; Data mining; Preference; Engineering","score_opus":0.7473274238471572,"score_gpt":0.6773810916793676,"score_spread":0.06994633216778967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998162533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86814773,0.002186014,0.1288408,0.00013590991,0.00008078538,0.0003254968,6.262155e-7,0.0000056039885,0.00027701684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719847,0.0030670427,0.02481049,0.000009385954,0.00002736718,0.000090693844,6.3589357e-7,0.0000057871907,0.0000039090028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.85840905,0.1389505,0.00056248764,0.0003291029,0.0012100735,0.00053875556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.856562,0.14273246,0.00010519598,0.00014790715,0.00023013017,0.00022230422],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19632758,0.00007976833,0.00041447303,0.00023601447,0.00042628226,0.000011057355,0.00026415792,0.0001469077,0.000012641143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101963274,0.00005395707,0.00004397312,0.00071768835,0.005770031,0.000090453264,0.00013750928,0.00042984556,1.4171083e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001676052,0.00021873166,0.32806423,0.0004806191,0.000019335444,0.000009521923,0.054386966,0.0000030839497,0.0025101511,0.3559996,0.0000023649368,0.25813782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007636564,0.0009243025,0.8918201,0.0003145031,0.0000088472025,0.000003133526,0.05970454,0.002715467,0.0007818592,0.04260113,0.00025159804,0.00011087371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035494762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009044226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56375587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000415864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056510716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99693567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200303199","doi":"","title":"Focus Groups with Children: Do They Work?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030537521803505864,"score_gpt":0.3285281922778449,"score_spread":0.297990670474339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200303199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7847639,0.00019434452,0.019359179,0.0040055416,0.0005514102,0.00019006334,0.0000061014653,0.000012247812,0.19091724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939138,0.000027933762,0.0055523743,0.00032129118,0.00011159516,9.162599e-7,3.0535432e-7,0.0000023339608,0.00006944993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984162,0.00012817381,0.00033216554,0.0000608033,0.00067424943,0.00038840712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979185,0.00008361974,0.00033749198,0.00010643411,0.0007996759,0.00075428677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055238525,0.00007137785,0.0001140214,0.0006041006,0.0009832989,0.0005312916,0.0005799945,0.00003547645,0.0001479549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090989406,0.000051482195,0.000039927694,0.0016285011,0.0010075426,0.0046391813,0.000007954283,0.00016503572,0.000035508354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004262329,0.000009500696,0.14084493,0.0000026236885,0.000017155573,0.000019816314,0.22222102,0.00027868425,0.000009167473,0.34242928,0.0013579737,0.29276723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013754191,0.0005939871,0.53059405,0.00024274025,0.000028816123,0.00036637305,0.095967494,0.000029444851,0.00014455384,0.022792697,0.347156,0.0007084041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010333922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0276677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38974914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002731801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032777367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99625635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006461705","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.997","title":"Les enjeux éthiques de l’utilisation d’internet en recherche : principales questions et pistes de solutions","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3331216021175584,"score_gpt":0.4808477039929951,"score_spread":0.14772610187543667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006461705","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07855348,0.024069043,0.43361288,0.3264218,0.0016227494,0.0009207924,0.00012316118,0.0005775162,0.13409859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77882814,0.0034352401,0.19824752,0.0057538757,0.0013408769,0.00030714466,0.000045181725,0.00006398551,0.011978019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608423,0.03634726,0.00060243864,0.0004180696,0.0003633939,0.0014265165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902913,0.0075547937,0.00032814118,0.00035440054,0.0008478808,0.0006234606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044471942,0.00037512186,0.00038072848,0.00021524457,0.0005358309,0.00027508748,0.00050313456,0.00158296,0.00088706467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028935714,0.0003987488,0.00026359392,0.0006782676,0.0010178295,0.0017763431,0.00017929127,0.0019941537,0.00007343279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012651931,0.00033953297,0.011246924,0.00011559009,0.000063987856,0.0000016759095,0.12385228,0.00001752665,0.0004217384,0.84493136,0.002631065,0.016365636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016243591,0.000122063415,0.03292272,0.00033338022,0.000088491106,0.000025660518,0.011374992,0.000667696,0.0010254178,0.49757645,0.45518726,0.0005134198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05158658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015573793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70027465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004060554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002421806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006735264","doi":"10.1783/147118906775275299","title":"Focus group research in family planning and reproductive health care","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Coalition for Research in Women's Health","funders":"","keywords":"Reproductive health; Focus group; Medicine; Family planning; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Health care; Family medicine; Economic growth; Environmental health; Research methodology; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.19382980224453522,"score_gpt":0.5106844083266685,"score_spread":0.3168546060821333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006735264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5774914,0.40460145,0.00039354348,0.011453385,0.00093901885,0.0007238615,0.00003266988,0.000035909456,0.0043287273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824076,0.00159448,0.012218831,0.00047043117,0.0030906408,0.000017605405,0.000013050582,0.00004360825,0.00014371076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903669,0.005128486,0.0011767522,0.0010841578,0.0011801297,0.0010635696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996182,0.0008594254,0.00090482074,0.00037596776,0.0012792691,0.00039846695],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018319294,0.000294185,0.00093354576,0.0008426876,0.0018346378,0.00014503777,0.00024784685,0.00018394398,0.0000011679209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001092768,0.000255386,0.00010009382,0.0010830407,0.0008718696,0.00046677375,0.00010843664,0.0015804095,8.666358e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008165536,0.00015184523,0.055091523,0.00066851097,0.00006417074,0.0002064571,0.82654315,0.0002531333,0.00032920422,0.005148959,0.014865325,0.09586117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089680625,0.001586734,0.26050404,0.0010278516,0.000008695049,0.000040062492,0.6771664,0.0000024900344,0.000033481207,0.0028970295,0.05555882,0.00027756408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019269185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005478777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40491623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001078826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012794982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012214242","doi":"10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.187_2.x","title":"Methodological issues in focus group data analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing and Health Sciences","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Data presentation; Data collection; Group (periodic table); Presentation (obstetrics); Group analysis; Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.6967589269156403,"score_gpt":0.6463594727148185,"score_spread":0.050399454200821814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012214242","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12867758,0.035973944,0.2331908,0.57040596,0.00095480686,0.00063536974,0.000026370179,0.00019332087,0.029941859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6515475,0.0013409968,0.3464669,0.00045339658,0.0001254155,0.0000031368118,0.0000039607658,0.0000024774456,0.000056234523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965534,0.0017751453,0.0002698365,0.0005188593,0.0004051803,0.00047757966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989287,0.00058687537,0.00010228937,0.00018225326,0.000022412494,0.00017744159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022897305,0.000083160594,0.00033946967,0.000280977,0.0012023877,0.00012854858,0.00042958686,0.00006199405,0.000030009425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052813254,0.000063890984,0.000032946005,0.002143082,0.0017903816,0.00033306706,0.00004118203,0.00013482664,0.0000019781423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000878127,0.0001308182,0.020928284,0.000010938416,0.000011870778,0.0000027417263,0.06059433,0.00004906077,0.000007469072,0.5443113,0.00029785524,0.37364653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050673395,0.00063072605,0.23802887,0.00024248131,0.00005295647,0.0000024118303,0.07512707,0.00089278654,0.0000129095715,0.6666286,0.01752569,0.00034878377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042263262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024318164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56995255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012038719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023655847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020225838","doi":"10.1177/0886109903257550","title":"Focus-Group Methodology in Research with Incarcerated Women: Race, Power, and Collective Experience","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Affilia","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Focus group; Gender studies; Sociology; Race (biology); Individualism; Human sexuality; Power (physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.3222868700090743,"score_gpt":0.5151489567032572,"score_spread":0.19286208669418292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020225838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256984,0.00049851945,0.002083128,0.00048750252,0.00008883604,0.0004114791,0.0000022775846,0.000028783665,0.07070107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957736,0.000071962284,0.036743406,0.000083211096,0.00001885496,0.00020415465,4.4748637e-7,0.000013866446,0.0051281075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851938,0.013095755,0.00019109574,0.00042289728,0.00041049666,0.0006859641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995907,0.0034774945,0.000051252224,0.00015984077,0.00022941487,0.00017500373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146971475,0.000120767436,0.000289982,0.00024914317,0.0005649088,0.00006476138,0.0001624749,0.00012638002,0.00041593457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004554501,0.00010039615,0.000017105112,0.0021143497,0.0015138922,0.00019448249,0.00004481497,0.00035094903,0.000008610338],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027242827,0.00011511989,0.007925048,0.0000062431177,0.000019274525,0.0000332836,0.7326567,0.0000016330151,0.0016197433,0.25310424,0.000667813,0.0035784668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001652651,0.0014640205,0.017835619,0.000035466368,0.0000036631088,0.0000062349914,0.8258236,0.000019430143,0.002206011,0.07918506,0.0713447,0.000423544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019046792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045378725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1739192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036052783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032680447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5577999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027371808","doi":"10.1177/1090198107303309","title":"Are We There Yet? An Examination of Online Tailored Health Communication","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Education & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Health communication; The Internet; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Health information; Health promotion; Public health; Computer science; Health care; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing","score_opus":0.2904685975813699,"score_gpt":0.5663890553894735,"score_spread":0.2759204578081036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027371808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611962,0.0040196204,0.0015853145,0.03034059,0.00067759294,0.001153924,0.000037805225,0.00007922018,0.00090976176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968541,0.0011210403,0.027907483,0.0011618261,0.00016173524,0.00007254468,0.00019648077,0.00001885532,0.0008190167],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995825,0.0025973814,0.00063984154,0.00021344695,0.00038984374,0.0003345176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974552,0.00030869088,0.0010997683,0.00038834428,0.0004385368,0.00030945934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00802891,0.000105611565,0.00024568217,0.0001819391,0.00065865676,0.000024604113,0.00024772118,0.000090318594,0.0001411252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026240433,0.00010927376,0.000042486823,0.00052408245,0.00021936334,0.0002738886,0.000017031145,0.00018484438,0.0000054776265],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009661613,0.0016167418,0.009033315,0.000059201673,0.0000019395873,8.339648e-8,0.093920566,4.2828003e-7,0.000037295016,0.025327954,0.00089610997,0.8690967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013782612,0.00016158281,0.76539755,0.00011594569,0.000006031647,3.572298e-7,0.1972452,0.0000031298043,0.000032862932,0.00041763397,0.03638767,0.0000941894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010889376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026144309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8690025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053067383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015796253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040525340","doi":"10.1109/istas.2013.6613130","title":"&amp;#x201C;I'll be watching you&amp;#x201D;: Awareness, consent, compliance and accountability in video surveillance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Accountability; Citizen journalism; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Participatory action research; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.29626989304122014,"score_gpt":0.4785433143198686,"score_spread":0.18227342127864843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040525340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9543002,0.00047647336,0.012945567,0.008216228,0.00036563646,0.00057331123,0.000027309366,0.00011415794,0.022981066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445928,0.00029456598,0.047991704,0.0009257644,0.00014005942,0.00007155498,0.000014117212,0.000020895957,0.005948559],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602264,0.0018889165,0.0004716767,0.00058180006,0.00041763682,0.0006173239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963064,0.0027158312,0.00014151561,0.0003786155,0.00024940164,0.00020820239],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051591885,0.00023200693,0.00044592458,0.000070708375,0.00053897634,0.00024300258,0.00031958809,0.00014925921,0.0015027706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018923031,0.0001992478,0.00006901079,0.0003982613,0.0009781464,0.00061718083,0.00012877454,0.00026046325,0.00017227179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038288832,0.00015652276,0.92012215,0.00010873441,0.000020887383,4.6770668e-7,0.037654635,0.0000072692474,0.0021565726,0.0252529,0.0040124506,0.010469099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005929096,0.000024890758,0.54723513,0.00007741215,0.0000051091442,0.0000017850554,0.0146754095,0.00005065601,0.000034538385,0.035243798,0.40142483,0.0006335585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20639585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29059476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39741236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000142701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018274052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045612295","doi":"10.1177/1468794111433089","title":"Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participant observation; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Social psychology; Qualitative research; Distancing; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.7126574550515453,"score_gpt":0.634758587860571,"score_spread":0.07789886719097427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045612295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56516755,0.00040260056,0.41018397,0.019462243,0.00019596338,0.0024544445,0.000013757107,0.0000731487,0.0020463688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968732,0.000030261861,0.1010139,0.000087253924,0.00017746014,0.00064261205,0.0000015956545,0.000030153631,0.0011435847],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754547,0.021045774,0.00029344196,0.00043741814,0.0013136416,0.0014550431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859338,0.012499382,0.000068351466,0.00024335962,0.0005478175,0.00070729054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04366878,0.00017893413,0.00032652018,0.0006222053,0.0005747258,0.0003031202,0.00029290587,0.00009200845,0.00010612802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006617971,0.00014554086,0.000050446917,0.0025531985,0.00042406027,0.0010834772,0.000108133645,0.0005577023,0.00017164441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049003965,0.00021425376,0.0024073347,0.000024840723,0.000033662916,0.0000056369104,0.85111374,0.000034388184,0.0016094757,0.13036714,0.002014347,0.011685118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004050762,0.001194419,0.0047388305,0.00025328528,0.000008757544,4.6313696e-7,0.9241933,0.000036889887,0.0010194558,0.0060514915,0.06172177,0.00037621422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012961767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015984267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33170566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047202967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013062112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053279737","doi":"10.1177/1468794110394068","title":"Communication technologies for focus groups with remote communities: a case study of research with First Nations in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Citizen journalism; Videoconferencing; Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Political science; Multimedia; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6043639673826666,"score_gpt":0.600795378554305,"score_spread":0.0035685888283616407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053279737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791074,0.0003512565,0.0020281489,0.0017943484,0.000012675607,0.0031369964,0.000049873142,0.000042576987,0.013476736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97105736,0.00013867259,0.027911508,0.0000028535653,0.0000074518452,0.0006807255,0.000004433758,0.000023276903,0.0001737221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97489184,0.022045687,0.00044709753,0.00028077015,0.0015921353,0.00074246695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481035,0.04770751,0.00014350936,0.0007263033,0.0032319846,0.00008721074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036413997,0.00014057703,0.00035102584,0.0010801407,0.002839693,0.00004782519,0.00091280055,0.00008432964,0.00002899184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006187272,0.00010872034,0.00002099799,0.0040796613,0.0034921297,0.0002563364,0.0002274358,0.0009482064,0.0000011559108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003488682,0.00045961665,0.0027285062,0.00011134513,0.000059474376,0.000073651136,0.8874434,0.000004712708,0.0000020122864,0.10616885,0.00009425903,0.0025052729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010270023,0.0026876216,0.000490778,0.00028204164,0.0000057246225,0.000005923831,0.9698704,0.000060448216,0.00007384265,0.024875693,0.00047445772,0.00014610344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08242693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011206844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026961183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063922189","doi":"10.1177/1098214007304536","title":"Analysis of Thin Online Interview Data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Qualitative property; Perception; Data collection; Semantics (computer science); Data science; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.34668716451748016,"score_gpt":0.5830954045773991,"score_spread":0.2364082400599189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063922189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404301,0.0008390259,0.1549185,0.0016661023,0.00020415863,0.00008444699,0.00002256175,0.0000035344376,0.0018315527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96197635,0.0001388582,0.037544668,0.00014629321,0.00014442783,1.6045122e-7,0.000019472285,0.00000319298,0.000026603662],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581903,0.0025121411,0.000583844,0.00009028961,0.00088517653,0.000109493114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968578,0.000854468,0.0011457263,0.00019894406,0.0008732802,0.00006975556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047295433,0.000047185502,0.00032166232,0.00035137078,0.00005708563,0.000011518928,0.00031583678,0.000016271682,0.00029714397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031136665,0.000037683294,0.00011732063,0.0017252839,0.00032679117,0.00023867446,0.00003201472,0.00009599188,9.4024074e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029204723,0.00008836927,0.00443787,0.0000023150312,0.0004575696,9.978604e-7,0.01716785,0.00017854829,0.00014319303,0.00096971926,0.00010883227,0.9764155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096150645,0.001807382,0.64805734,0.00018075638,0.00835973,0.0000043704763,0.27467299,0.03169628,0.0001824466,0.0053745485,0.028350923,0.00035175806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095286925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023492528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008049388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001971631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98100984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065477583","doi":"10.2196/jmir.3881","title":"Knowledge Translation in Men’s Health Research: Development and Delivery of Content for Use Online","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Research Programme; Economic and Social Research Council; Public Health Agency; Health Service Executive","keywords":"Knowledge translation; Curriculum; Reproductive health; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Public relations; Computer science; Knowledge management; Political science; Pedagogy; Population","score_opus":0.8882536062566133,"score_gpt":0.6565157881805924,"score_spread":0.2317378180760209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065477583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97040564,0.005276927,0.005232454,0.017928107,0.00016105211,0.00038835773,0.000004568544,0.0000024310168,0.0006004626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679429,0.001358672,0.029193114,0.0000593759,0.00029430242,0.000012219858,0.0000026057078,0.000009575724,0.001127227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98987883,0.005962561,0.00076839584,0.00012784368,0.0028415613,0.00042078292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893657,0.007472703,0.00014123185,0.00005993048,0.0022763924,0.00068402657],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10851798,0.000054266333,0.00029017543,0.0005422097,0.00008228062,0.000047249523,0.00035486705,0.00011837948,0.000041480154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016619531,0.00003978961,0.000043816875,0.0003850442,0.00077322015,0.00018461214,0.00008332683,0.00082931045,0.0000012889633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008518701,0.0007149698,0.0025890132,0.00013535545,0.00004804267,0.000020148154,0.30964836,5.691091e-7,0.00005503341,0.014457634,0.019971639,0.6515073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055453936,0.0036882171,0.0085978815,0.0020618662,0.0000049830815,0.000010618486,0.3177143,0.003195889,0.00067210995,0.0055585653,0.6527954,0.00015476732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062044547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01865603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6513526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004811259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003187042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067581768","doi":"10.5172/conu.12.1.92","title":"A feminist analysis of the menopause discourse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Contemporary Nurse","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Menopause; Project commissioning; Nursing; Sociology; Gender studies; Publishing; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.2268167829602149,"score_gpt":0.4964427830957033,"score_spread":0.2696260001354884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067581768","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000489027,0.8188472,0.00002439607,0.00020813731,0.00053896167,0.0006538316,0.00019530699,0.000027981136,0.17949931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008819061,0.97397786,0.00016871258,0.000050390983,0.00019205363,0.000078478246,0.000030427038,0.000036687794,0.024583451],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932895,0.004495138,0.0008893499,0.00043144627,0.00059102476,0.000303551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967388,0.001091841,0.0010946859,0.0008384888,0.00008320285,0.00015300537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025844807,0.0003509662,0.002259002,0.00034683605,0.00040388823,0.000060891984,0.0010810787,0.00028505723,0.00040843937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055572105,0.00021277093,0.0015281471,0.0032432927,0.0016192492,0.00009548776,0.00007251814,0.00036571056,0.000024668008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060565853,0.0002644771,0.00016797667,0.0015108918,0.003277532,0.000014870167,0.032219652,3.1375228e-7,1.10022256e-7,0.07371713,0.0168438,0.8719772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007175554,0.000027817194,0.000013403626,0.0016171398,0.004540209,3.0955272e-7,0.0053535867,0.0000026230084,9.510917e-8,0.0001001286,0.98802,0.00025291124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007787302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020932988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011592911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006157695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8676547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067652191","doi":"10.1188/14.onf.545-547","title":"The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oncology nursing forum","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3763,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Qualitative research; Medicine; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science; Geometry","score_opus":0.5618799333509763,"score_gpt":0.6581985558682605,"score_spread":0.09631862251728418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067652191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5060721,0.00075476477,0.04710508,0.23353525,0.002720628,0.0013939213,0.000007754089,0.00006348775,0.208347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799763,0.00003209305,0.017148038,0.00009205929,0.00010571241,0.00002198817,0.0000016095627,0.000007801611,0.0026144055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98126805,0.017657766,0.00025463948,0.00012913474,0.00030328167,0.00038711302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829212,0.016596442,0.000106574276,0.00011849697,0.00021525852,0.000042058466],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023244977,0.000044824075,0.0001548114,0.00012180143,0.00065721624,0.000027391343,0.00014313635,0.00011683889,0.000012796985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008671167,0.000033341752,0.00003771637,0.00051337737,0.0019801587,0.00013318035,0.000014797131,0.00021672613,0.0000063658977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071668306,0.000052234896,0.00026224132,0.0000010904876,0.0000025917736,1.6298951e-7,0.18530042,0.0000068171803,0.00009682902,0.5580203,0.0031103208,0.2530753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003478714,0.00035716486,0.0024797458,0.000045488214,0.0000027937635,1.2207028e-7,0.19804679,0.0003565915,0.000080322585,0.23977491,0.5584579,0.00005027871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017170999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005713238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5553476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042892146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020266765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070846952","doi":"10.1109/hicss.2010.317","title":"Research 2.0: A Framework for Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Web 2.0 Environments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Web application; Data science; Key (lock); Web intelligence; Qualitative research; Web modeling; Web 2.0; World Wide Web; Face (sociological concept); Knowledge management; Management science; The Internet; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.5720781164143096,"score_gpt":0.679269647467166,"score_spread":0.10719153105285639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070846952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8729466,0.00036324863,0.027948264,0.01757382,0.00033629485,0.0020463432,0.000038827726,0.000034236706,0.07871234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64475226,0.00012439977,0.35110924,0.00005580493,0.00012266099,0.00029561974,0.0000018490605,0.000016681543,0.0035214832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874723,0.009880139,0.00027478245,0.00048090293,0.0010367556,0.0008551507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606699,0.038631912,0.000042273765,0.00020574879,0.00024380213,0.00020637434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.069035806,0.00010363263,0.00021745548,0.00048087654,0.0010533726,0.00012916616,0.00030213824,0.00024977405,0.00026570787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013298956,0.000090805624,0.000041348932,0.0010865867,0.0033000365,0.00024924264,0.0001258584,0.001396737,0.00006179579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006014883,0.000070347,0.00031843924,0.000009344449,0.0000066022944,0.0000010729908,0.24240774,9.7486236e-8,0.0016422735,0.75152224,0.00034044284,0.003621234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022285516,0.00020225676,0.0007066866,0.000021664051,9.199979e-7,6.248471e-8,0.3837764,0.0000550418,0.00018255558,0.5584742,0.05626672,0.000090654634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034528745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015587262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32316098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010217196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021176715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071719641","doi":"10.1080/0966369x.2013.879108","title":"Feminist research in online spaces","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender Place & Culture","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Guelph","funders":"Mount Allison University","keywords":"Sociology; Reflexivity; Subjectivity; The Internet; Research ethics; Popularity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Engineering ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2878658713910475,"score_gpt":0.5184388865815213,"score_spread":0.23057301519047374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071719641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20256796,0.0014198016,0.0007796282,0.010279976,0.00059714366,0.00047170965,0.00003533094,0.00011660388,0.7837318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559172,0.00010418881,0.014656677,0.00053186505,0.0011502978,0.000018388664,0.000015691237,0.000015172456,0.027590547],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956347,0.0028347974,0.00015204611,0.00029442212,0.00059252133,0.0004915374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905103,0.00049205736,0.000039731523,0.00016959687,0.00011503682,0.00013255322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006969614,0.00010027087,0.00016141012,0.00008758335,0.00047559905,0.00011464995,0.00029060183,0.00016995624,0.00014267841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008730909,0.00007883716,0.000044918554,0.0006698238,0.00039085952,0.00008181909,0.00005714853,0.00048655283,0.00008102444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043078246,0.00019842129,0.007530978,0.000043261756,0.000014605812,0.000009277112,0.49394274,0.000024124507,0.00061859895,0.41827106,0.06821041,0.011093461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019738951,0.00004431058,0.001722182,0.000016281689,0.0000020355892,4.9107626e-7,0.16614324,0.000032292046,0.000040113075,0.012241045,0.8194472,0.00011342984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012072378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006217196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7561413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010120162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009986391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36579713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083530182","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2014.06.007","title":"Introducing video recording in primary care midwifery for research purposes: Procedure, dataset, and use","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Midwifery","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"Academie Verloskunde Amsterdam Groningen","keywords":"Intrusiveness; Data collection; Coding (social sciences); Video recording; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Computer science; Multimedia; Social psychology","score_opus":0.18393333326655545,"score_gpt":0.47012936223016555,"score_spread":0.28619602896361007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083530182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743144,0.0033562442,0.0064099524,0.0037614747,0.0009846211,0.0026692748,0.00048859994,0.00013320116,0.007882224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8770427,0.00068859407,0.11388885,0.0014953247,0.0027167704,0.0007366227,0.00091802404,0.00011382866,0.0023992932],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545133,0.002292867,0.00037558834,0.00067232724,0.00046512103,0.00074274384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451554,0.004610864,0.000082165345,0.0003462331,0.00026974778,0.0001754658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122347195,0.00016549451,0.00034426383,0.00033832924,0.00084123586,0.00028802094,0.00030597477,0.00016117204,0.000018693783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008911283,0.00015997264,0.000051631254,0.00061194284,0.00049055676,0.0007479256,0.00017529671,0.00039722878,0.000007958536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010455338,0.00035427383,0.11364573,0.003668636,0.00008867065,0.000022412465,0.1827129,0.00005433914,0.0068969103,0.10883678,0.09815232,0.4845215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014014776,0.0004074295,0.02414988,0.00063062157,0.00002794891,0.0000030216563,0.042652905,0.0002446225,0.0007233009,0.015498013,0.9135527,0.00070807966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034495536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004581799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81540036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031351115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025301505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089819430","doi":"10.1080/10572250802100360","title":"Communicating Values, Valuing Community through Health-Care Websites: Midwifery's Online Ethos and Public Communication in Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technical Communication Quarterly","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Sociology; Public relations; Nursing; Health care; Health communication; Obstetrics; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.20075847178531925,"score_gpt":0.43507683296857896,"score_spread":0.23431836118325972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089819430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90311784,0.018904608,0.0039496915,0.033751003,0.00007468407,0.0018298662,0.000031666972,0.0008552902,0.037485365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.815941,0.0021932072,0.18010448,0.001128479,0.000018702942,0.00012155079,0.00029334225,0.00003607062,0.00016317378],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97581214,0.021134026,0.0013372283,0.00037597664,0.00061903097,0.00072160194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902741,0.0049859425,0.00065298507,0.003384037,0.00044080068,0.0002621434],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008847587,0.00034375142,0.00071660284,0.0002335434,0.0053779995,0.00018025341,0.0028178073,0.00037371836,0.000107902204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011284476,0.00037701914,0.0001464697,0.000920965,0.002612383,0.0011230159,0.00062532397,0.003526888,0.00001994821],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004545282,0.0011043269,0.01931458,0.000061652245,0.00003045458,0.0000013874253,0.8418991,0.0000030460171,0.00010924684,0.10313714,0.0007574254,0.03353617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002272514,0.0011431067,0.20871404,0.00084972545,0.000033316788,0.00002701513,0.60081774,0.00013887901,0.000013008734,0.053077206,0.13175002,0.0011634511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45246047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79174584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33928534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001367728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072332774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098829995","doi":"10.1177/160940690700600204","title":"Ethical Issues in Qualitative E-Learning Research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Anonymity; Confusion; The Internet; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.8073852356067956,"score_gpt":0.7902294656579059,"score_spread":0.017155769948889787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098829995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10024924,0.0021146517,0.8035166,0.04349718,0.002622842,0.0002961155,0.000007802912,0.000034926663,0.047660615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28944606,0.00031347256,0.70629525,0.0004196668,0.0011634909,0.000006694425,0.0000022490271,0.000027031721,0.0023260876],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80991715,0.18210088,0.0023067924,0.0004366532,0.004267835,0.0009706654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9247324,0.06853051,0.0008033567,0.000120580924,0.005519678,0.00029351338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45156774,0.00019248264,0.0005804818,0.0015942242,0.0003510166,0.00015452152,0.0010142425,0.0003603248,0.00036273064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09796917,0.00017095903,0.00026286725,0.0013163938,0.0017926382,0.0005186298,0.00013088698,0.0035243488,0.000026325833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030782598,0.00009397652,0.00014983348,0.000005559896,0.000091140835,0.000067891306,0.5905856,0.00000988437,0.0012077953,0.36058533,0.0003705677,0.04652461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005468434,0.0002785059,0.0006585412,0.00012509557,0.0000056509325,0.0000059931735,0.62651527,0.000011753855,0.0014054386,0.23391701,0.13637932,0.00015059307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022026245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007040049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35359856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008070215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045232283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098958409","doi":"10.1177/1049732304273916","title":"What About Focus Group Interaction Data?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.78521742435664,"score_gpt":0.7287189550196569,"score_spread":0.056498469336983104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098958409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042696226,0.04462574,0.06077697,0.7216277,0.0046610367,0.0052259318,0.0003304042,0.00057688385,0.11947907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76686704,0.028933914,0.15896565,0.0064385105,0.0069291503,0.00059057906,0.00045318576,0.00016669511,0.0306553],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95117056,0.04386346,0.0007084602,0.0007781128,0.0020679121,0.0014114637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860459,0.011580943,0.00022202267,0.0007219697,0.00080879533,0.00062037184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10089662,0.00017152145,0.00037656006,0.00041996554,0.0022802092,0.00052845496,0.0009514511,0.00013386067,0.0009283734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006932691,0.0001590918,0.000068818954,0.001346417,0.0013335762,0.0034178211,0.00030357036,0.0011253952,0.0008314797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054145323,0.00011281042,0.000009397736,0.000037687947,0.000013639218,0.0000010016682,0.38154316,5.504319e-7,0.00001269953,0.2380659,0.023487048,0.35666198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021084382,0.00022316979,0.00013201496,0.00010529773,0.0000011869134,3.149219e-7,0.42111048,0.000095171825,0.000013851897,0.01636039,0.5616368,0.000110479734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019277653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035243057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7241708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010672221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008556713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107045659","doi":"10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103","title":"Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":965,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science; Data science; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.8262844622074722,"score_gpt":0.7560266830774748,"score_spread":0.07025777912999742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107045659","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000068780305,0.82921654,0.000033278877,0.0049399543,0.000236521,0.0008148277,0.000019168161,0.00003148988,0.16470134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000020271122,0.9712005,0.0015539114,0.0001764993,0.00058064697,0.00021618586,0.000028748113,0.000031414907,0.026191814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89968884,0.09773688,0.00070450816,0.00027173638,0.0010455428,0.0005524965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733654,0.025705062,0.00019637334,0.0003849974,0.00023702304,0.00011109442],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.070435666,0.00025220218,0.0013134385,0.00057059905,0.0003243819,0.00014103181,0.0008684145,0.00090653286,0.00069861306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059577213,0.00019939012,0.00025522418,0.0013110139,0.0017657276,0.00006514226,0.0001936569,0.004094613,0.0005199471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007008519,0.000041667132,8.3674666e-7,0.00078829075,0.000020979447,0.000012289656,0.27007803,3.7180886e-8,1.2004305e-9,0.32606408,0.021544712,0.38144207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051415893,0.000102986785,0.0000011520314,0.008891119,0.000010411137,5.6045326e-7,0.20610891,5.231883e-7,3.552529e-8,0.012270548,0.7723742,0.00018811796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040854305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01529895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7508295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043911117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046378432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109775997","doi":"10.3138/jvme.29.2.101","title":"Using Focus Groups for Continuing Veterinary Medical Education Needs Assessment and Program Planning","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Needs assessment; Medical education; Focus (optics); Process (computing); Continuing education; Qualitative research; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.27377379774207294,"score_gpt":0.5617457927437817,"score_spread":0.2879719950017087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109775997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96997285,0.0038646802,0.013880653,0.0075470856,0.002890038,0.0004234001,0.0000010585745,0.000026776135,0.0013934595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144717,0.00042979623,0.08221204,0.00043874577,0.0022307876,0.000055696375,0.000003135812,0.000019512605,0.00013858073],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967155,0.0009905896,0.0006915372,0.00017204895,0.0011116244,0.00031871052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976923,0.00065732904,0.000508598,0.0000984784,0.00036795597,0.0006753389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005310463,0.00015119265,0.0003287037,0.00027325508,0.00034750148,0.000109275876,0.0002671325,0.00022616025,0.0004733108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037720276,0.00013384262,0.00011765659,0.00030586662,0.00034674013,0.00049433816,0.000051618917,0.00041571795,8.3121245e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007973987,0.0010521994,0.001156942,0.00008957382,0.000033748383,0.000018994704,0.026092349,7.300477e-7,0.0002776057,0.0042064902,0.0018069173,0.9651847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040708845,0.0147054205,0.018351149,0.0073013017,0.0003120548,0.003555467,0.15057981,0.015975375,0.000028665725,0.011576299,0.7724183,0.0011252397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009652098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043261366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027256465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001869062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54579437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111704829","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016","title":"Focus group research and “the patient's view”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Qualitative research; Construct (python library); Focus (optics); Health care; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.12490067587692878,"score_gpt":0.49246697649375404,"score_spread":0.36756630061682527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111704829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27833715,0.0032057993,0.0011151738,0.07314471,0.00094418984,0.0008629342,0.000002989738,0.000078171106,0.6423089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967895,0.00007854316,0.00021531788,0.00032023492,0.0014931859,0.000033703207,7.897103e-7,0.0000064012456,0.001062309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949664,0.0017009616,0.00026845344,0.0003480883,0.0020085012,0.0007075871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979459,0.0012474713,0.00009152535,0.00013192948,0.00043582235,0.00014736722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026763316,0.00009658443,0.00023497906,0.00015268098,0.00503861,0.000112290516,0.00047790149,0.000063705986,0.00015807917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022789645,0.000056944344,0.00003505388,0.0025012784,0.034866698,0.00026766176,0.00009706994,0.00029093414,0.000007890945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020933718,0.000021704027,0.0004087971,0.0000023542696,0.0000013973925,0.0000016402311,0.093865596,2.1785365e-8,0.0003175722,0.8247381,0.003955718,0.076666206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001203462,0.0002490004,0.0050052768,0.000031491887,0.000008633817,9.254313e-7,0.07199404,0.000012763519,0.0000617551,0.5790117,0.34226608,0.00015486636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03068204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002766137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7184524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015923666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016498915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113866902","doi":"10.1177/1049732303259842","title":"Ethical Dilemmas in Research on Internet Communities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; The Internet; Autonomy; Harm; Economic Justice; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Internet research; Public relations; Psychology; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.937739584532181,"score_gpt":0.7846211578711447,"score_spread":0.15311842666103626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113866902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5256313,0.0010040867,0.0020951885,0.3299152,0.0003370107,0.0022194416,0.000047217804,0.00011524586,0.1386353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888693,0.00045401076,0.0052849613,0.0019621004,0.00020679194,0.00021245821,0.000014291047,0.000032657812,0.0029634358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.81703,0.17533362,0.0007801901,0.0004952658,0.004111363,0.002249557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95402354,0.043368544,0.00009267224,0.00046106448,0.0014588223,0.00059535366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26865745,0.00017235149,0.00046742155,0.0014412958,0.002149611,0.00018979328,0.000914363,0.00039660785,0.00037465428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014562979,0.0001573273,0.000078540405,0.003221313,0.005848081,0.00018365533,0.00027183443,0.007988679,0.0005839396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107130414,0.00016393058,0.000053808275,0.00005419323,0.0000046561922,0.000006027364,0.47488984,0.0000051401425,0.0000028371148,0.51892,0.0023524878,0.0034399237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055449066,0.0013397838,0.00078416354,0.0003625378,2.3044531e-7,2.0414402e-7,0.6337432,0.0000069918524,0.00003818686,0.29040125,0.07265185,0.00011706405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25733158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10092834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46323797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027331738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026960312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914944},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2116148538","doi":"10.4054/demres.2013.28.33","title":"The more you learn the less you know? Interpretive ambiguity across three modes of qualitative data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demographic Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Ambiguity; Need to know; Qualitative research; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4843333589223961,"score_gpt":0.6056153879323637,"score_spread":0.1212820290099676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116148538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94371176,0.0040964964,0.0050473013,0.029412435,0.00023943224,0.0017626161,0.000289456,0.000057855617,0.015382629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543107,0.0011060468,0.0008841889,0.000057158115,0.00015144722,0.00020164187,0.000012471457,0.000023740924,0.0021322258],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805079,0.015216161,0.00051083666,0.00060876255,0.0020376542,0.0011186465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809256,0.015356826,0.00020426174,0.001591148,0.0017262258,0.00019589861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057663046,0.00019105853,0.00032754082,0.0001485266,0.0035767418,0.00048445878,0.0037999577,0.00016478659,0.00008133229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011033924,0.00010330091,0.00017335705,0.0023763338,0.013622793,0.0005691817,0.0013791756,0.0011831607,0.000035095338],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011125314,0.00012002665,0.007427087,0.000035008794,0.00020733615,0.0000015673885,0.58841634,0.0000035373346,0.00036264793,0.2282342,0.006727533,0.16835345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015777341,0.00013732564,0.019258201,0.00007276431,0.000009608902,3.017744e-7,0.8423131,0.001075001,0.00008788795,0.11499573,0.021725899,0.00016639821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054356944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025638936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25389674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006498052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025436457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116918702","doi":"10.1177/1468794107076023","title":"Learning in focus groups","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Focus (optics); Data collection; Empirical research; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.4244514128753006,"score_gpt":0.6660440278786938,"score_spread":0.24159261500339319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116918702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54499036,0.0007815948,0.016746566,0.0050315643,0.00014905725,0.0005404454,0.0000028554043,0.00010029341,0.43165725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831396,0.00008228755,0.0073124724,0.000035673118,0.00023963279,0.000032335687,0.0000021714768,0.000020173276,0.009135689],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709051,0.025268618,0.00044453662,0.00041001945,0.0016454203,0.0013262886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97920144,0.019745652,0.000067579014,0.00014979829,0.00058185734,0.0002536584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15123793,0.00011637029,0.00024329528,0.00071229215,0.00090616045,0.00008712774,0.00034918266,0.00014580695,0.00036231815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016038543,0.000111338675,0.00007337406,0.0025593662,0.0014821951,0.00027212963,0.000094647796,0.0012149259,0.00027146793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005169028,0.00005306108,0.0012521107,0.000008259426,0.000005830789,0.000018851595,0.48840457,9.62598e-7,0.00029812564,0.45889473,0.00021899595,0.050792813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032957667,0.00026163727,0.00527251,0.000034710825,8.8833366e-7,2.0635397e-7,0.7708715,0.00000937456,0.0003791419,0.16391627,0.058765646,0.00015851833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011951803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012717333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43814918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004895473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002521773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118209815","doi":"10.1177/0017896912444181","title":"Evaluation of <i>Harsh Reality</i> : A sexual health print-based resource for street-involved youth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Education Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Resource (disambiguation); Resource distribution; Population; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Psychology; Medicine; Applied psychology; Environmental health; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Resource allocation; Marketing; Social science","score_opus":0.43847040568169154,"score_gpt":0.5523114068038141,"score_spread":0.11384100112212253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118209815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67685664,0.017831918,0.11216838,0.17640287,0.006338129,0.0061456477,0.0002554079,0.00012049742,0.003880486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964705,0.00006361035,0.029599262,0.0037674021,0.0015791088,0.00008478792,0.000073918076,0.000020598089,0.00010629228],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941374,0.0077667674,0.0008157693,0.00017170633,0.0012205985,0.0006114133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960081,0.00048301375,0.0011931054,0.0001861801,0.0012518426,0.0008777491],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065666616,0.000113233444,0.00028291676,0.0001671048,0.0010441018,0.00004361868,0.00016487547,0.000068244575,0.00010850508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033098701,0.000107505024,0.00008254719,0.00033500366,0.00013340024,0.00025173003,0.000008918916,0.00022746844,0.000001939651],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075604206,0.0010454722,0.013043621,0.00027462502,0.000031437303,1.0745421e-8,0.23777719,0.00006345869,0.000011431089,0.019572012,0.03130555,0.6967996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015395476,0.00074036676,0.02034632,0.00023185744,0.00008194441,5.648639e-7,0.6979227,0.00027215766,0.0000537688,0.0038068541,0.27475092,0.00025298464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030868948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002287694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6965466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011130788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018359287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122798256","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1002","title":"Using Forums and Message Boards to Recruit Study Participants in Qualitative Research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; The Internet; Focus group; Discussion board; Seekers; Psychology; Internet research; Online discussion; Netnography; Public relations; Medical education; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social media; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.7972018131196523,"score_gpt":0.7364521854460597,"score_spread":0.0607496276735926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122798256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644333,0.00012145438,0.007976947,0.0045827124,0.00017705641,0.0017958801,0.0000076046013,0.000041968073,0.020863092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98840076,0.000009218711,0.008340399,0.00015845234,0.00013980856,0.0002677037,0.0000014831838,0.000030017538,0.002652153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9173188,0.07767355,0.0011153418,0.0008084523,0.0018323516,0.0012514909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98300964,0.015126226,0.00030121292,0.0005461328,0.00068802666,0.00032877753],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19824874,0.00022901053,0.00058454945,0.00031701886,0.0012564654,0.00015121076,0.0003906292,0.00009782049,0.000050272964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031060787,0.0001665218,0.000072829665,0.0016625837,0.0014576274,0.0002862425,0.00025040194,0.0005280256,0.000026315724],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010231893,0.00016784969,0.001760696,0.000012251252,0.000044837972,0.000034361416,0.90143114,0.000007728014,0.00018116337,0.09346112,0.00018319886,0.0026133389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037222193,0.00057320093,0.0042092046,0.00006152751,0.0000184947,0.0000022670267,0.88892686,0.00006954151,0.00007930752,0.09887259,0.006574899,0.00023988626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021997984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013924184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16718796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003112825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027381303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124276993","doi":"10.3109/0142159x.2014.917165","title":"Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Teacher","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":597,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Qualitative research; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Publication; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.2564004922215638,"score_gpt":0.5615465850613159,"score_spread":0.30514609283975214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124276993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30922163,0.0005877605,0.016988626,0.032606497,0.0017067118,0.00039145196,5.3923026e-7,0.00010283433,0.63839394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467231,0.00015475135,0.01776601,0.002306814,0.007263231,0.00009322636,0.000006588441,0.0000563503,0.025629938],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98635644,0.009015145,0.00045289996,0.00036608017,0.0031484654,0.0006609574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750495,0.0011268912,0.000065224034,0.000249053,0.0002590733,0.0007947893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046099458,0.00011819478,0.00026447795,0.00019247635,0.00034278564,0.000051686446,0.0005930471,0.00042273628,0.009948778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08498004,0.00009829381,0.00006990503,0.000686802,0.0013469743,0.00014073092,0.00013636255,0.0010798057,0.000282985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026750058,0.000801812,0.019043993,0.000030885945,0.000015968068,0.000020761661,0.035503715,3.873262e-7,0.00003602714,0.25108188,0.055758577,0.6376792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054368214,0.000082613726,0.0014824035,0.00024540335,0.0000055796986,0.0000025173265,0.010152684,0.005931801,0.000008630138,0.04942469,0.93189025,0.00022975597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016107844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005445876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87613165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032628607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018012915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99095625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124914723","doi":"10.1177/10432302012006009","title":"Focus Groups in Rural Gujarat, India: A Modified Approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Sociocultural evolution; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Focus (optics); Data collection; Rural area; Politics; Population; Sociology; Economic growth; Social science; Political science; Geography; Anthropology","score_opus":0.6285578108604389,"score_gpt":0.6184708920373914,"score_spread":0.010086918823047575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124914723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2560603,0.013614998,0.020902645,0.07281023,0.0005333982,0.005858851,0.00011941518,0.0002965261,0.62980366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771827,0.0008227325,0.014980274,0.00047758018,0.0003087059,0.00053059176,0.000011297009,0.00003939459,0.0056467247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94151604,0.052719034,0.0008493729,0.00061605504,0.0022072964,0.0020921994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073815,0.007507781,0.00018571562,0.00036448584,0.00053525966,0.0006685946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066818975,0.00023238674,0.0006151473,0.0008855196,0.0016030221,0.00015145382,0.0006219016,0.00023375812,0.00041577392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005426807,0.00021578721,0.000116760755,0.0035362428,0.0018311094,0.0004286139,0.00012773236,0.0015718613,0.00028024425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039669518,0.00027701582,0.00018212029,0.00006886851,0.00000964828,0.000004870296,0.53215003,0.0000020973334,0.000005752299,0.4322222,0.004325456,0.0307123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001299662,0.00068848254,0.0023076418,0.00009969329,0.0000016314075,0.0000010158708,0.85191184,0.00083199685,0.000011399151,0.12634745,0.016133407,0.00036574499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027089024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029849228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7211224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011167561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004839932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129617985","doi":"10.1093/fampra/19.3.278","title":"Group interviews in primary care research: advancing the state of the art or ritualized research?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Family Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Primary care; State (computer science); Primary health care; Group (periodic table); Family medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Environmental health","score_opus":0.6494114730576235,"score_gpt":0.6145495947469699,"score_spread":0.03486187831065357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129617985","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008620223,0.85452145,0.00005178716,0.0008897594,0.00047981148,0.0025601056,0.00004794278,0.000017885382,0.14142264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000005294425,0.9837446,0.00384281,0.00030970297,0.00023215495,0.00040100128,0.000011957364,0.000056946534,0.011395481],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87813944,0.11620327,0.001217728,0.0006306411,0.0027451331,0.0010638012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94406545,0.05274632,0.0008315594,0.0010742547,0.0011513758,0.00013106668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09243917,0.0003201885,0.0013510648,0.000438087,0.0011760341,0.00021925222,0.0022274116,0.00025635268,0.00010286619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046546664,0.00015932771,0.00042575842,0.004583947,0.0019817802,0.0006687143,0.00092614454,0.003956724,0.0001796143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006421994,0.000114582566,6.102328e-7,0.004715372,0.000049019254,0.000021289203,0.07603943,2.2532747e-7,0.000001362972,0.0035032183,0.011415669,0.904075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018699894,0.00012052614,0.000009094585,0.0088820765,0.00007845667,0.00000282768,0.07996289,6.795336e-7,2.3279279e-7,0.0007768229,0.9098012,0.00017822138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005971835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071603134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90389675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013163772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016205594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133166779","doi":"10.18438/b8bs3x","title":"User Studies Differ Across Some Disciplines and May Not Be Very Effective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Computer science; Focus group; Bridging (networking); Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Social science","score_opus":0.06495108908447848,"score_gpt":0.44708305549678234,"score_spread":0.38213196641230385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133166779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63011366,0.005639415,0.0089086,0.34898946,0.0008548703,0.0010994482,0.00004920874,0.00022928417,0.004116038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90623486,0.0068978067,0.014890709,0.0703186,0.0004421068,0.00005929896,0.000014302237,0.00001307913,0.0011292455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785274,0.0010576813,0.0003307585,0.00015245263,0.00033796302,0.0002684043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98181,0.017595848,0.00025681115,0.00011110602,0.00009630263,0.0001299621],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006214153,0.00013266891,0.0001771315,0.00008472576,0.00085838424,0.00041706822,0.00010704034,0.00008311293,0.000030617583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009013989,0.0001041825,0.000033649383,0.0003146716,0.0005334302,0.17005886,0.00013327718,0.00018505877,0.000010612472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009831076,0.000042484302,0.004142749,0.0002196339,0.000058594287,0.000005389267,0.06475763,0.000006624157,0.00008714257,0.8545615,0.001396795,0.07373837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043136158,0.00019436138,0.103133656,0.0002198636,0.0000366071,0.000002478147,0.09038122,0.00007940076,0.0025430925,0.0009394369,0.8017752,0.00026331158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034067783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016777698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.853622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018694289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058787435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134336309","doi":"10.2196/jmir.2829","title":"The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Bruyère; Public Health Ontario; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Calgary; Trillium Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Incentive; The Internet; Focus group; Protocol (science); Social media; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Medical education; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Business; Marketing; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.43625979858111247,"score_gpt":0.6028910685183995,"score_spread":0.166631269937287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134336309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68325675,0.007711039,0.0027350348,0.30365092,0.00048514883,0.001099636,0.000020128395,0.000005449144,0.0010358877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907803,0.0052447272,0.002004266,0.000072982606,0.00020602877,0.000028959807,0.0000014183343,0.000010864596,0.0016504701],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921466,0.0038638203,0.001041208,0.00013606108,0.0023733524,0.00043895718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918171,0.006000035,0.0005529618,0.00012438995,0.0010441615,0.00046133174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03533847,0.00007895189,0.00040866795,0.00014790839,0.00019659285,0.000052237287,0.00072223676,0.00015195306,0.00027310726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010882257,0.000045230136,0.00013458995,0.0002887052,0.0014382539,0.00010963143,0.00015685348,0.0007895787,0.0000025384704],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003031412,0.0004860309,0.0010863438,0.00009453686,0.00021972555,0.000005385885,0.025219431,4.356176e-7,0.00018091206,0.123761594,0.014476427,0.83416605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00844711,0.015101668,0.024292424,0.0037274985,0.000067634704,0.000039225244,0.21117137,0.0029428992,0.0016634275,0.3172298,0.414911,0.00040594328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074450043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00210365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8337601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012037023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063967373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137629367","doi":"10.1080/17457823.2014.956229","title":"Ethnographies across virtual and physical spaces: a reflexive commentary on a live Canadian/UK ethnography of distributed medical education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnography & Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Capital District Health Authority; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Reflexivity; Sociology; Curriculum; Pluralism (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.038744449492435135,"score_gpt":0.43036910690023916,"score_spread":0.39162465740780406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137629367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709209,0.0006759027,0.00048602498,0.022092305,0.0011353425,0.0005346813,0.00011857846,0.00006889192,0.0039673583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932403,0.00032191654,0.0015860086,0.003745875,0.0007014543,0.00013117687,0.00020210104,0.000022510869,0.000048630613],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579334,0.0019031286,0.0004032257,0.00049508014,0.00082010106,0.00058514456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969689,0.001177114,0.00029362252,0.00036055685,0.00042788024,0.00077190064],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003252142,0.0002851978,0.0004007077,0.00072570535,0.0011134427,0.00010388737,0.0003717622,0.00030327565,0.000080209364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010993751,0.00027515992,0.00028105348,0.0022018931,0.0025169123,0.0002728399,0.000036335674,0.00051699445,0.000006203649],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108042645,0.0013629564,0.03836204,0.00007561793,0.00016722015,4.3678037e-7,0.5655128,0.0000027752103,0.00006603254,0.12113744,0.035586488,0.23761816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008130383,0.0012748718,0.05841123,0.00067348266,0.00013998283,0.0000013542677,0.6853359,0.00007883012,0.00026146852,0.04234641,0.2097916,0.0008718847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23650266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19702683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23674628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096926764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012550859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140676391","doi":"10.4067/s0718-18762012000200005","title":"Augmented Focus Groups: On Leveraging the Peculiarities of Online Virtual Worlds when Conducting In-World Focus Groups","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Focus group; Metaverse; Computer science; World Wide Web; Virtual world; Internet privacy; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Virtual reality; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12343981726754345,"score_gpt":0.43690455693188274,"score_spread":0.3134647396643393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140676391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483057,0.002867608,0.0017626688,0.027275207,0.00011738179,0.00037393687,0.000004579927,0.000010942914,0.019281922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981673,0.00042964902,0.00042761987,0.0001566464,0.0005567977,0.000010350339,8.328948e-7,0.00001891695,0.00023188714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374455,0.0030420504,0.00064949796,0.00018383194,0.0011892123,0.001190834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992653,0.006504485,0.00021862186,0.00018212071,0.00019871413,0.00024302478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021642352,0.000174837,0.0004765283,0.000377673,0.0005741858,0.000085906555,0.00055353285,0.000091448215,0.00025956886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009164096,0.00011334816,0.00012724058,0.0007539884,0.0025088943,0.00016751418,0.00019530927,0.0021598958,0.000002456473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042805984,0.00032173115,0.00043230355,0.000014127267,0.00005434961,0.0000015976282,0.018352557,0.0000041546673,0.00096156995,0.9267078,0.0002359456,0.052485812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015753753,0.0010182926,0.0016588963,0.00023118226,0.000045580666,0.000013309256,0.10397633,0.000083968436,0.003547492,0.8777844,0.009785631,0.00027956383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026194056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046390417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08562378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003389601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002195466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9383792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143893491","doi":"10.7202/1006367ar","title":"Pour en finir avec l'ethnographie du virtuel !","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologie et Sociétés","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.44133697524673055,"score_gpt":0.6104656921101468,"score_spread":0.16912871686341624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143893491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06696643,0.011686541,0.025959661,0.22991118,0.05462922,0.00073885254,0.00014989899,0.0005302864,0.6094279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85396403,0.034076557,0.060421336,0.0036427751,0.0016837751,0.00007402386,0.000014533261,0.000105326064,0.046017636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99069357,0.006392372,0.00061086065,0.00070120854,0.0004949768,0.0011070245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541956,0.0033550062,0.0002387612,0.0004604435,0.00023099408,0.00029524782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005938052,0.0004709279,0.00066689454,0.00014526413,0.0012751421,0.000066022236,0.00083064195,0.00079618784,0.07676064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024529248,0.0004448621,0.0005743392,0.0009126288,0.009883271,0.00060319185,0.00029599076,0.0008201534,0.0008553977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004564468,0.00079448445,0.004824005,0.000053788383,0.00022783413,0.00011056071,0.1709389,7.8764975e-7,0.00007093854,0.52584624,0.105368465,0.19171837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000916342,0.0008273966,0.013322998,0.00009032836,0.00018980335,0.000008746651,0.38016048,0.00007512426,0.00095170335,0.2875148,0.31494394,0.0009983265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013629631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009264067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7869976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021943224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039203587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146163237","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1501_3","title":"How Informed Is Online Informed Consent?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Recall; Reading (process); Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.34050175538961064,"score_gpt":0.5363866975708118,"score_spread":0.19588494218120117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146163237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8008624,0.00042478862,0.0009138927,0.16493113,0.0010206891,0.0008517563,0.00018567251,0.00029569404,0.030513985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76318645,0.0013623768,0.12863778,0.016536005,0.0015429073,0.00014857086,0.00008777228,0.000055680786,0.08844245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763674,0.0005428318,0.00031249257,0.00020737505,0.0008137673,0.0004868119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959547,0.0030528603,0.00016232095,0.00023997761,0.0003525794,0.00023754766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023663093,0.00016816826,0.00022405706,0.00010228298,0.0007014501,0.00022296714,0.00032301503,0.00042974864,0.0005537914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064005447,0.00015408991,0.0001313228,0.0003400298,0.00091506896,0.00055276015,0.00006428198,0.00093260664,0.00010254878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316049,0.00039056427,0.0068735513,0.000051675805,0.000027291448,0.00001369406,0.60170496,6.4316225e-7,0.00039072294,0.1510546,0.016870832,0.22258987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000418669,0.000065460736,0.008622694,0.00003846256,0.000040950097,0.0000015887714,0.045782212,0.0000038655458,0.00052029727,0.00068002485,0.9435522,0.00027357702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019368938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92668134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020849214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002057117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97365624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149510966","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00295.x","title":"Reply to Ezzy 1: Yes, qualitative methods are often misunderstood","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Public health; Community health; Media studies; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing; Computer science","score_opus":0.4935427148235191,"score_gpt":0.5628024210186194,"score_spread":0.06925970619510036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149510966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04310362,0.001131206,0.03105041,0.92098105,0.00064202084,0.00031629452,0.000013600866,0.000032753647,0.0027290334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12450696,0.006690863,0.6204299,0.064211175,0.0039252327,0.000010269846,0.00000909788,0.000091503134,0.180125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901532,0.0074671553,0.00084688445,0.00025000877,0.00052500813,0.00075775816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956947,0.00096887903,0.00075596804,0.0001516491,0.00031600168,0.0021128042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028391352,0.000174226,0.0005949022,0.0003095531,0.00042967033,0.00019757818,0.0002736579,0.00009924992,0.00022206604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022160772,0.0001389424,0.00013107224,0.0007399611,0.00021490698,0.00045440515,0.000028454857,0.00038354515,0.000008690435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006274857,0.00013013375,0.0026674988,0.000026590746,0.00009406664,0.000024831192,0.31323338,7.180497e-7,0.00002303358,0.017437961,0.3805874,0.28571165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006097368,0.00070230954,0.007897339,0.00006639685,0.000009513872,0.000037472717,0.12841304,4.0459457e-7,0.000005870493,0.009961532,0.8521509,0.00014547682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011259692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013261397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85676986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002288406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011734363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99532443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150260089","doi":"10.1177/160940690700600207","title":"Moral Geography of Focus Groups with Participants Who Have Preexisting Relationships in the Workplace","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Confidentiality; Space (punctuation); Data collection; Session (web analytics); Qualitative research; Focus (optics); Dynamics (music); Qualitative property; Power (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6031439924750165,"score_gpt":0.6103885054057031,"score_spread":0.00724451293068662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150260089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34824416,0.0007027838,0.6288023,0.0033190637,0.00036459253,0.0002391862,0.000011250418,0.00000782618,0.01830882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67438805,0.000020527867,0.3252027,0.00007756315,0.0002073486,0.000005171925,8.5178266e-7,0.000009430899,0.00008835218],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97215825,0.024458963,0.0012906062,0.00019042195,0.0014897763,0.00041197843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96846634,0.02861861,0.0013178427,0.00012967997,0.001348135,0.00011937599],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11433104,0.00015863373,0.00040636226,0.0005513544,0.00021414267,0.000071488685,0.0007451532,0.00009239785,0.000036770267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01373946,0.00010502612,0.0001976631,0.00074316503,0.00091643084,0.00047136954,0.000038587183,0.0006761484,8.9448184e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072835456,0.00018484051,0.10082372,0.000009301577,0.00023335184,0.00006226593,0.5555825,0.000075436976,0.0000828872,0.3139404,0.000066249435,0.02821068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012032648,0.0005474734,0.17663307,0.00035888137,0.000065047796,0.00002563969,0.5827098,0.00006144338,0.00079916423,0.23526767,0.0020969517,0.00023159105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008138397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014289907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3261439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014439684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015560586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150622787","doi":"10.18438/b8bs5p","title":"Ethnographic Methods are Becoming More Popular in LIS Research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Library science; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.1881887454226039,"score_gpt":0.5124016669603857,"score_spread":0.3242129215377818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150622787","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098394744,0.005758899,0.027614992,0.82506615,0.00048252882,0.0020389059,0.000009142885,0.0002870981,0.04034755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22566465,0.006336886,0.6920305,0.07414565,0.00028140127,0.00042130076,0.000025628831,0.000027651842,0.0010663668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041504,0.008096582,0.00044686193,0.00016771481,0.00051969383,0.0003541071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98858243,0.010560246,0.00027661808,0.00020580132,0.00020035135,0.00017452895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014410789,0.000105428015,0.00016183991,0.0005967858,0.00064832123,0.0007725204,0.00027559252,0.00013899757,0.00053794583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019734737,0.00009647982,0.00004086626,0.0019004692,0.00038104533,0.21541676,0.000101138845,0.0005918568,0.00005697835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012625803,0.00007618546,0.012891359,0.00018736541,0.000014279753,0.000004815884,0.054504935,0.00003929518,0.00008619957,0.7100445,0.0045092544,0.21751556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024288688,0.00008663805,0.045091394,0.00039994906,0.000007911702,0.000001017644,0.15887439,0.001875804,0.0002983693,0.005649451,0.7872608,0.00021144727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012500384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033632036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7827515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002341436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001844707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98852247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150871143","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1866","title":"Joint Stories and Layered Tales: Support, Contradiction and Me aning Construction in Focus Group Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Contradiction; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Group (periodic table); Sociology; Joint (building); Qualitative research; Psychology; Epistemology; Social science; Engineering; Anthropology; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4674519346912837,"score_gpt":0.5794504983789767,"score_spread":0.11199856368769295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150871143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96344006,0.0012429757,0.006789387,0.00411799,0.00036507635,0.0006116467,0.000011131823,0.000056884885,0.02336484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931784,0.0001181402,0.0057854066,0.000023948209,0.00014885694,0.00005059692,0.0000053117847,0.000011637977,0.0006776807],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895683,0.008556136,0.0004905987,0.00033022527,0.0007002521,0.0003544933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693006,0.002124552,0.00024007584,0.0001576362,0.00037620385,0.00017149701],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046500895,0.00012023716,0.00028866983,0.0001534199,0.00060057826,0.000108363376,0.00007664778,0.00009212921,0.000017025191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055777295,0.00009016354,0.000030485553,0.00047100437,0.0028331557,0.00036971734,0.000057710586,0.0003356096,0.0000025910676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007139777,0.000019730296,0.0013404762,0.000010609468,0.000020701364,0.000041631716,0.6224288,4.770131e-7,0.0004026681,0.37031642,0.0002565109,0.005090629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042463734,0.00029363623,0.002718836,0.000030501036,0.000007080845,0.000072334566,0.7905445,0.000020542428,0.00014755214,0.19682747,0.00878398,0.0001289324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012008361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038108274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17348893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022322613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023195655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152167487","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.038","title":"Designing for Diffusion of a Biomedical Intervention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Dissemination; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Social marketing; Information Dissemination; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.16835119553294453,"score_gpt":0.5267239449878588,"score_spread":0.35837274945491426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152167487","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029119748,0.755926,0.24255362,0.00013048196,0.000735988,0.00040304946,0.000010194911,0.0000039961033,0.00020752354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00044953398,0.9655771,0.031836104,0.000013672893,0.0016978248,0.000021682428,0.000011736778,0.000028751683,0.00036354404],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928126,0.0044637574,0.0015660389,0.000157147,0.00068901957,0.00031148156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915424,0.003056824,0.004544694,0.00011671458,0.0004752038,0.00026417532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013631699,0.00023049505,0.002455224,0.0005118511,0.00011557971,0.0000063232055,0.00040998065,0.000102184786,0.00022306647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029062321,0.0001456988,0.00094642496,0.00072009646,0.0022148872,0.00012100706,0.000045436012,0.00035395764,0.000001642066],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032916192,0.00016080974,0.000006560193,0.0019603132,0.0002823922,0.000002108578,0.010168688,6.617231e-9,0.000011930645,0.0010910776,0.00025777248,0.98602545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004945186,0.0026136208,0.000010186057,0.024655702,0.0019403466,0.000012061873,0.015007442,3.1284756e-7,0.00000227255,0.0007969792,0.95432925,0.00013730288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025854557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010886315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017371855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027788084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8160844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157320760","doi":"10.1177/104973202129119991","title":"Seeking Emirati Women’s Voices: The Use of Focus Groups with an Arab Population","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Facilitator; Focus group; Data collection; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Population; Psychology; Medical education; Gender studies; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Social science; Demography; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.7126386587382332,"score_gpt":0.6014154610589906,"score_spread":0.1112231976792426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157320760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606367,0.0010148148,0.013026181,0.020309562,0.00012477243,0.0018556792,0.00006305772,0.000084664505,0.0028846008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812626,0.00021776225,0.01591763,0.00044085123,0.00018725716,0.00024512844,0.000009154214,0.00003144255,0.0016881484],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9520685,0.04364172,0.00063552626,0.00044337843,0.002075027,0.0011358232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865228,0.011295965,0.00036156183,0.00042368955,0.0009857272,0.00041024445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04202028,0.00016616097,0.00040654937,0.00029884023,0.0022436022,0.0001875304,0.00041007902,0.00010120978,0.00033273982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004273089,0.00010904516,0.000052887703,0.001854051,0.0015757763,0.0008682833,0.000054998563,0.0006879156,0.000024965037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105708736,0.00014534767,0.0007881348,0.00008319486,0.000021233376,0.0000012325667,0.7812509,0.00001252063,0.000012774256,0.1847411,0.000646869,0.032191023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056606036,0.0030025512,0.006241958,0.00016225071,0.0000039185616,6.9441006e-7,0.90755194,0.0012706191,0.000013878889,0.03976953,0.041157436,0.00025914918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051788643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018263806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14497156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073890295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026611998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157937764","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x","title":"Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Phenomenon; Focus group; Triangulation; Qualitative research; Identification (biology); Focus (optics); Qualitative property; Psychology; Process (computing); Presentation (obstetrics); Computer science; Data science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics; Medicine; Social science; Machine learning; Ecology","score_opus":0.15688653558136817,"score_gpt":0.482583915867999,"score_spread":0.3256973802866308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157937764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8691876,0.0057109413,0.11543924,0.004564286,0.0014640046,0.0001821044,0.000010878168,0.00002061688,0.0034203369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8657572,0.00040889648,0.13316774,0.00017143557,0.00039054753,0.0000010928279,0.0000011017814,0.000012469577,0.00008946691],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796396,0.0006266117,0.00046203306,0.00019923419,0.0004676436,0.00028052984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985373,0.00047975022,0.0003926544,0.00019425986,0.00017312745,0.00022290694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003244829,0.000111328816,0.00033383208,0.00015314712,0.0005053631,0.000055319582,0.0005375064,0.000048200553,0.000013387372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010594532,0.00009822343,0.000046322933,0.00039610767,0.00033692145,0.0009741158,0.00009085717,0.00027416725,0.0000022114382],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009349562,0.000091079535,0.00034953913,0.000007918483,0.000022026503,0.000027401058,0.1568711,0.000019665078,0.001619671,0.0030162705,0.0010157524,0.8368661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040066703,0.0038982807,0.034567986,0.0056757987,0.0003054167,0.00071970234,0.49554497,0.00014420808,0.01454277,0.09641407,0.34223554,0.001944588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029907902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042969747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8349215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009456473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008663175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4005435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158021437","doi":"10.1177/1049732308327883","title":"Court Reporters: A Viable Solution for the Challenges of Focus Group Data Collection?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Jargon; Confidentiality; Data collection; Qualitative research; Diligence; Terminology; Due diligence; Qualitative property; Public relations; Receipt; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Business; World Wide Web; Computer security; Marketing","score_opus":0.8331526808634093,"score_gpt":0.666229364384388,"score_spread":0.16692331647902137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158021437","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004690079,0.051266532,0.514122,0.39598995,0.0010366017,0.008106976,0.00043794035,0.00014737598,0.02420251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7940935,0.031760782,0.16402246,0.00049007026,0.0011720867,0.0017373144,0.00009273478,0.00008797197,0.0065430542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783934,0.017850865,0.00072275364,0.0005516768,0.0015704704,0.0009108561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97388595,0.023418624,0.00037031143,0.00070020853,0.0014075537,0.00021733668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1012417,0.00011913072,0.00038381104,0.00022480793,0.0041217487,0.000029596233,0.00070186995,0.00010188933,0.00005565489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012937889,0.00008960563,0.00008107356,0.0010968847,0.0023190586,0.00033357373,0.0001624997,0.00041550543,0.000009376518],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019554773,0.00020187025,0.000039351457,0.00017934002,0.00006465955,0.0000014108799,0.48832995,3.8901416e-7,0.00002805075,0.42185107,0.05795279,0.031155568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006452706,0.0013913413,0.0009328249,0.000084907195,0.000007151042,0.0000027904805,0.6969023,0.00093165744,0.000027024515,0.069533736,0.2293927,0.00014831865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051621728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018637631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78940344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052483374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016876236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165228904","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720100606.021","title":"Roles of the FGD Team Members: An Overview","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Focus group; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09344862789953451,"score_gpt":0.4325410513729546,"score_spread":0.3390924234734201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165228904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3740553,0.000115440875,0.000009778517,0.0028709185,0.0011040979,0.00020320062,0.00002792268,0.000019066318,0.6215943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770623,0.000008759817,0.0007587104,0.0006142944,0.00030670804,0.0000045907013,2.773029e-7,0.0000048066577,0.000595613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998264,0.0003724817,0.00013293629,0.00020687083,0.0005542903,0.00046940823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989817,0.00008380962,0.0000850615,0.00019509484,0.0002113883,0.00044295113],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044168583,0.00006869447,0.00011454921,0.00007510996,0.0021486375,0.000099682766,0.0010442394,0.0000822198,0.0003718199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010061554,0.00005264069,0.00006744135,0.0013092369,0.0044018216,0.00036941,0.00003952222,0.000194878,0.000007011592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.309118e-7,0.000008795023,0.0045049777,0.000002598612,0.0000014758676,2.7577718e-7,0.04963596,8.073906e-8,0.0027046816,0.91155124,0.00059752085,0.030991856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009134941,0.000024155755,0.032904916,0.000012249294,0.000009681402,4.0105763e-7,0.06577301,0.00001829005,0.00092846906,0.01925911,0.88075155,0.00022684214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19711937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8541964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89229214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017446587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021465495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184444384","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.19.007","title":"The Analysis of Focus Groups in Published Research Articles","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; sort; Inter-rater reliability; Coding (social sciences); Focus (optics); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Applied psychology; Information retrieval; Social science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.39882849553213817,"score_gpt":0.5595611463391841,"score_spread":0.1607326508070459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184444384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98340523,0.0016748252,0.00054448424,0.010876206,0.00018154195,0.0006005813,0.0000022978406,0.00000307473,0.0027117436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968807,0.00002447903,0.0029546341,0.0000100150955,0.00007656041,0.0000275536,0.0000011849113,0.0000037801353,0.000021102416],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948072,0.0032099735,0.00047579856,0.00009172693,0.0010582822,0.00035700848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966793,0.0006464465,0.00023927362,0.00012346804,0.002035583,0.0002759416],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052810956,0.000047136597,0.00017117924,0.0010217971,0.00044715105,0.00023841031,0.00030248106,0.000058347952,0.000111808804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009379963,0.000034169785,0.00011786731,0.0041216207,0.00060430286,0.0003212023,0.000006195813,0.00024827608,0.0000014468899],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001779868,0.00005748451,0.01387128,0.0000025163745,0.00015537809,0.0000055521587,0.047796287,0.0008837333,0.000039582843,0.101061136,0.00011029131,0.83599895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012823356,0.0006269204,0.35922277,0.000075344964,0.00044374875,0.0000014161703,0.08757886,0.0016369425,0.00026206125,0.5331162,0.015593033,0.0001603496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08972934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8353028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8358386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073416624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034538012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204405986","doi":"","title":"The Use of Focus Group Methodology in Education: Some Theoretical and Practical Considerations, 5(3)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Group (periodic table); Engineering ethics; Action (physics); Domain (mathematical analysis); Action research; Sociology; Management science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3526624125502763,"score_gpt":0.5210688473540591,"score_spread":0.1684064348037828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204405986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27760854,0.0042150887,0.15294915,0.4834828,0.0014309663,0.0014759693,0.000005323696,0.0000888302,0.0787433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48873723,0.0014889659,0.50722927,0.0014921903,0.00016297701,0.00003753668,6.8218526e-7,0.0000066982857,0.00084445236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941124,0.005206905,0.0002366241,0.00013144236,0.0001444255,0.00016823357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783987,0.021291392,0.000055982262,0.00010376782,0.00008785921,0.00006230313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053449706,0.00005367621,0.00013161084,0.00004209675,0.00027738124,0.000069835514,0.000030227704,0.00007129494,0.0003497099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01309161,0.00003458616,0.00002431697,0.00015096819,0.0017900219,0.00026639068,0.000027886012,0.00011874058,0.0000025698462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020243975,0.00005986162,0.0008477094,9.566377e-7,0.00000565238,0.0000022287184,0.0037785063,1.6614023e-7,0.000034149532,0.97521245,0.0012224484,0.018815637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102704864,0.000046722264,0.00225307,0.0000032268333,0.000006972038,0.000012231726,0.010712868,0.000036682373,0.000039234397,0.88221365,0.10451867,0.000053955115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017091047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037527266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48199064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022501328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020857838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99522156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215466256","doi":"","title":"Ensuring Privacy of Participants In Social Media Based Research: an Australian perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Anonymity; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Content analysis; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering ethics; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.3338007952104253,"score_gpt":0.4231291060573463,"score_spread":0.089328310846921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215466256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94635814,0.000008908672,0.00018404375,0.00030218967,0.00010330494,0.000114019924,0.000018342444,0.000022057007,0.052889016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763435,0.0000013615208,0.0010790474,0.0000032176351,0.00011379482,3.1466573e-7,0.0000031399736,0.0000075212347,0.0011572661],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972568,0.0012620158,0.00017893229,0.00027824714,0.00064095226,0.0003830528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830276,0.0007968819,0.00016342399,0.00017639458,0.00039563715,0.00016487743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019045019,0.00008862594,0.00025818567,0.0002237603,0.00049900863,0.00005523314,0.0004214333,0.00010305546,0.00003456533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011418094,0.000112069196,0.00010368985,0.0005110827,0.0011604301,0.0007488701,0.000087498665,0.00019530657,0.0000057804523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005691521,0.0010617784,0.07106763,0.0000947765,0.00008338872,0.00009721794,0.72902924,0.000060586528,0.0067468677,0.17616263,0.0010566914,0.0139700435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014548763,0.00038508448,0.3429403,0.00013463225,0.00003140249,5.098068e-7,0.6239012,0.00046066148,0.0023539762,0.01713724,0.010772511,0.0004276501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002712555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00169933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27187267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022660186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015202299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4570049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222600326","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2455","title":"Anonymity as a Double-Edge Sword: Reflecting on the Implications of Online Qualitative Research in Studying Sensitive Topics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Anonymity; Psychology; Data collection; SWORD; Participant observation; Qualitative property; Narrative; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Applied psychology; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science; Computer security","score_opus":0.7625029096015378,"score_gpt":0.7159038670242647,"score_spread":0.0465990425772731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222600326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81975794,0.000069690665,0.0021346735,0.09667122,0.00013873546,0.0012423298,0.000044167977,0.000038115013,0.07990314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918082,0.000050427894,0.0020623477,0.00023215008,0.00022860203,0.00016609066,0.000004653658,0.000022378275,0.0054251784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621122,0.03442563,0.001041517,0.00056160934,0.001208643,0.0006504289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9484747,0.04844914,0.0006899197,0.0007269728,0.0015538972,0.00010536115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08272181,0.00020681656,0.00044370352,0.0002337004,0.001271497,0.000045013578,0.0005116216,0.000113897644,0.000059014783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018669868,0.000103934384,0.0001532236,0.0018905456,0.0025558495,0.0001982199,0.00016860144,0.0006338972,0.000028290231],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016038216,0.00013808944,0.00016685773,0.0000076003303,0.000049440576,0.000012802756,0.5247236,6.4235013e-7,0.0010447557,0.46898234,0.00014403265,0.0045694658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038623088,0.00026504032,0.0028768973,0.00017664056,0.000011005586,0.000004881975,0.7497553,0.000001045852,0.0017284218,0.24114515,0.0034982818,0.00015105488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008719472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051371637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22783719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004795542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006384668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244252531","doi":"10.11575/prism/29727","title":"University of Calgary Library Website Redesign Project: Focus Groups Report","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Library science; World Wide Web; Focus group; Computer science; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.08360930017561377,"score_gpt":0.37081490811592327,"score_spread":0.28720560794030947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244252531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10883192,0.00011815689,0.004461893,0.0005392791,0.00007861929,0.0005060805,0.000014781614,0.0000061808882,0.8854431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27309322,0.000043289503,0.4869313,0.000027548336,0.00026203596,0.000003376446,0.00005095803,0.00002613129,0.23956215],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834126,0.0007693523,0.00020163944,0.00026550217,0.00022379038,0.00019845652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993192,0.00019340197,0.00019053732,0.00019403528,0.00005012585,0.000052696905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017692413,0.000079838974,0.00020341865,0.00005664765,0.0003050717,0.00008129005,0.00043962573,0.00008487403,0.0024172852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000784124,0.00008036176,0.00006598007,0.00040032735,0.0003286979,0.0006275087,0.00016223967,0.000085052685,0.000053907905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056736235,0.00080737495,0.039164074,0.00003490667,0.00011897701,0.0020922066,0.06190274,0.000004458526,0.004104881,0.16222678,0.07448935,0.6544869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003705593,0.00008572553,0.0064170263,0.0000313787,0.000025975485,0.0000052991054,0.010619028,0.000017322916,0.0022911844,0.009952028,0.9699746,0.00020990125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024798807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002506928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8954852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035430032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003756985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253765482","doi":"","title":"Advice giving in a health emergency: a case study of the SARs website","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Penerbit UTM eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Popularity; Medical advice; Public health; Medicine; Health information; Health care; Public relations; Internet privacy; Business; Advertising; Psychology; Nursing; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.1233566007076244,"score_gpt":0.4107205832599359,"score_spread":0.2873639825523115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253765482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06604986,0.0012984824,0.000020055812,0.00033905258,0.0007146426,0.0015623166,0.000030642605,0.00005728416,0.92992765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.262839,0.0002914991,0.0006236094,0.00018923041,0.00021722884,0.000049021215,0.0000010959083,0.000067964735,0.73572135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958818,0.0014835676,0.00095551927,0.0004900068,0.0007430162,0.00044610674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980949,0.00030863172,0.0007997089,0.000511449,0.00014978142,0.00013549802],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031346655,0.00032656803,0.0006882774,0.00020686927,0.000736811,0.00001819569,0.00048013698,0.00020822012,0.00027905198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016667655,0.00026203349,0.00024009708,0.00009738874,0.00036582586,0.000050615134,0.00019665295,0.00060505007,0.000011234726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042878582,0.00026322552,0.001139752,0.00031244915,0.00017193124,0.0016563351,0.8160771,0.000013830183,0.000023714418,0.14349832,0.0035257153,0.033274718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001250481,0.00071097695,0.0007365028,0.0008049561,0.000085624015,0.00024605208,0.07541752,0.000032895514,0.000009510122,0.018750317,0.9008338,0.00112137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11181772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30377042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89730805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024976546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006447455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259161000","doi":"10.1177/2333393615607840","title":"Advancing Telephone Focus Groups Method Through the Use of Webinar","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Barrie Urology Group; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Public health; Telephone interview; Telephone number; Medical education; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Business; Nursing; Marketing; Social science","score_opus":0.5377975146645205,"score_gpt":0.6381213747007817,"score_spread":0.10032386003626115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259161000","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076517045,0.0052131065,0.7158521,0.048798203,0.0015277268,0.0020843872,0.0002368282,0.00019272936,0.14957789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37820587,0.0001050882,0.61928177,0.00020473404,0.00045956895,0.00007542253,0.000008416941,0.000039716764,0.0016194407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95345443,0.041419923,0.0006014961,0.00053365977,0.0027454812,0.0012449786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822087,0.01425804,0.00024118726,0.00049600017,0.0024230457,0.0003729707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042823806,0.00022546243,0.00049037725,0.00012283924,0.0012111561,0.0001960826,0.0007357442,0.00017416442,0.000049008533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025504023,0.00016616085,0.00017087233,0.0031608213,0.0045148646,0.00087582035,0.00013782772,0.000634661,0.000055923007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018899681,0.00015184679,0.00006146847,0.000011747515,0.00003066286,0.000004015234,0.44519043,0.00003946679,0.00015275615,0.48190776,0.030231822,0.042029053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034782395,0.00034782046,0.00011286631,0.00014816585,0.000012585334,0.0000017966919,0.479653,0.000052174215,0.00027481164,0.45280018,0.06609925,0.00014951642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024774045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011553194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30168882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001533494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089964154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262732958","doi":"","title":"Focusing on the Focus Group","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Focus (optics); Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.39262565553922507,"score_gpt":0.4667390368788032,"score_spread":0.07411338133957812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262732958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00815343,0.00061845494,0.00028948928,0.05159299,0.0009199225,0.002885133,0.0017247697,0.00039188692,0.93342394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014889889,0.0024199933,0.0030978252,0.00025108058,0.0045702425,0.0000063366715,0.00024010177,0.00017157965,0.97435296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98785096,0.003762955,0.0006938097,0.0015292896,0.0039777234,0.0021852565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916207,0.0043723485,0.00050700334,0.0012922476,0.0013187458,0.00088896323],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008804709,0.000931999,0.0010648111,0.0013301739,0.003635922,0.00039499998,0.002525417,0.0014130436,0.0046155388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086155545,0.00076104735,0.0006847416,0.000837359,0.0038957335,0.00041979842,0.0007088302,0.0052994904,0.0010610761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003831872,0.00024381712,0.00011363316,0.000051002033,0.00027597748,0.00037301698,0.0033560386,0.0000129667815,0.000018965506,0.9068127,0.07036124,0.017997425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095204375,0.0006065497,0.0008194444,0.00057327765,0.00012093809,0.0000062763806,0.005809625,0.000009838371,0.000013116553,0.0227224,0.9674109,0.00095558865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011275444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06776601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89704967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015531699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087196945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282787636","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010076","title":"Toward an information management system for handling parenting information users' comments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lucie and André Chagnon Foundation; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Computer science; General partnership; Qualitative research; Knowledge management; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.06266634969784579,"score_gpt":0.357799686690481,"score_spread":0.2951333369926352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282787636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7100684,0.000046308232,0.111399,0.027546423,0.0041276263,0.011398432,0.0002759542,0.0011514163,0.13398646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824779,0.000008426297,0.017042715,0.00019489904,0.00002501435,0.00019639183,0.000014403241,0.000002387715,0.000037883874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828917,0.0000148462495,0.0005349777,0.000077340184,0.00079089607,0.00029277953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942689,0.000081261685,0.0011478317,0.00006592475,0.004366886,0.00006917741],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009634163,0.0000837325,0.00014618527,0.00061301247,0.0009718565,0.00044606836,0.00047376417,0.0001285698,2.7149807e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045140707,0.000069289716,0.00003476731,0.0014112209,0.00023559493,0.0139687015,0.00012271777,0.000071233626,0.000003127793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026622938,0.0000096458425,0.0073420787,0.00022401354,0.000016932958,1.1917451e-9,0.038307782,0.000008384508,0.00003511152,0.9033292,0.0007822082,0.049918048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021404994,0.00022494572,0.0018276378,0.00011736829,0.000064752916,9.0936044e-7,0.48602617,0.0053667077,0.004701659,0.025297936,0.4739628,0.00026859113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051313076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042243782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87803125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061404094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014086936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285724616","doi":"10.1177/1609406915621419","title":"Different Approaches to Cross-Lingual Focus Groups","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions","keywords":"Focus group; First language; Participatory action research; Context (archaeology); Interpreter; Community-based participatory research; Moderation; Focus (optics); Psychology; Computer science; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.8739956509517269,"score_gpt":0.674801705779231,"score_spread":0.1991939451724959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285724616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20098929,0.0007062328,0.7691851,0.010420704,0.0038939188,0.00019560501,0.000022977023,0.000026912136,0.014559235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41994795,0.000023375645,0.5768125,0.00035898745,0.00168109,0.000012774184,0.0000022107395,0.000023767452,0.0011373452],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97908044,0.017439235,0.0010570706,0.00027243662,0.0017752035,0.00037562416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912304,0.005023238,0.00075237505,0.00014496082,0.0022167447,0.0006322359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044507116,0.0002286655,0.0005289605,0.00046330888,0.0001750106,0.0002728974,0.001049506,0.00011640897,0.00013124813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018419629,0.000180104,0.00031939632,0.00037386693,0.0005788267,0.0005296404,0.00015080291,0.00041112438,0.000025817484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000394436,0.00018418263,0.0005274678,0.000003942048,0.00026305756,0.000023565372,0.5245081,0.00006505966,0.00028819955,0.32399568,0.0006812791,0.14906497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018880027,0.000889686,0.0019157971,0.00009661834,0.00005039044,0.000026297794,0.3252571,0.00004872435,0.0073453127,0.5438913,0.11809212,0.00049866986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028014928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011079026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2198956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005705649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037284617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297688399","doi":"","title":"Opportunities and challenges for social policy : engaging youth online.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Political science; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.7001082213500545,"score_gpt":0.4859723185304831,"score_spread":0.21413590281957134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297688399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3998601,0.0056280973,0.006032899,0.21776348,0.00035330292,0.00062977173,0.00019128324,0.00033750743,0.36920354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400105,0.017086033,0.025637764,0.0011458088,0.003177262,0.000023332408,0.00001260442,0.000022252636,0.012884471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990086,0.000392027,0.00010697946,0.00012744394,0.00013456319,0.00023037376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994548,0.00031580863,0.000037170415,0.000038432885,0.00007564151,0.00007817679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011187405,0.00007010269,0.0001300499,0.00006860795,0.0011748752,0.000018742703,0.00007190205,0.000052698033,0.000024740917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037663037,0.00006147524,0.000046387016,0.00006247803,0.00047902492,0.00011666504,0.000022515134,0.000054497934,6.654079e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004256991,0.000017447204,0.00002890538,0.0000106880125,0.0000070054048,5.7009623e-7,0.3330171,2.2140945e-8,0.0000035783803,0.5499637,0.00015137556,0.11679535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022891084,0.000046079113,0.0020227025,0.000004456858,0.000007145789,5.555264e-7,0.7523355,0.000009154263,0.000012405569,0.011579543,0.23362017,0.00013341133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023340194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007535309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54015034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025476073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015623128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90363085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324360301","doi":"10.1097/00012272-200407000-00003","title":"Bridging Distance and Culture With a Cyberspace Method of Qualitative Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Nursing Science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wind Energy Institute of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Bridging (networking); Meaning (existential); Qualitative research; Face (sociological concept); Health care; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Political science; Computer security; Social science","score_opus":0.03102865846380092,"score_gpt":0.5217357536103153,"score_spread":0.4907070951465144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324360301","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026764965,0.002658161,0.9475847,0.0012212421,0.000074839445,0.00012723931,0.000004243689,0.000019113884,0.02154548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5823637,0.00010879324,0.41740462,0.000021653717,0.000010240108,0.0000034205077,2.1216933e-7,0.000002563001,0.00008475821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979004,0.0005765644,0.00018459097,0.00040727394,0.00058693637,0.00034418594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990136,0.00038282239,0.00018142295,0.0001401821,0.00018572347,0.000096223215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004966371,0.000102961516,0.000273571,0.00027521836,0.00044049113,0.000052787833,0.00025159962,0.000028361645,0.0000024458825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007060631,0.00008111038,0.000035774203,0.005059128,0.004820385,0.001093435,0.000011668298,0.00011621747,2.0915957e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019938308,0.000032641932,0.000794475,0.000007678257,0.000007079671,0.0000011218496,0.46922654,0.0032137823,0.00037413577,0.4903766,7.357259e-7,0.035945293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081292994,0.00029762098,0.0042666798,0.0008894904,0.00013229183,0.0000031258598,0.5696058,0.0010789145,0.0036469148,0.4172995,0.0014646411,0.0005020447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008383449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024752177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55559874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024605356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016589549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398546274","doi":"","title":"EXPERIENCES OF A NOVICE RESEARCHER CONDUCTING FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEWS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Set (abstract data type); Medical education; Qualitative research; Focus (optics); Psychology; Qualitative property; Computer science; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.37384313536445335,"score_gpt":0.555240586765978,"score_spread":0.18139745140152463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398546274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040876,0.0010137534,0.057546332,0.015207141,0.003024569,0.00008092481,0.000003649447,0.000009403731,0.019026646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818517,0.000063449996,0.0108385105,0.00004008437,0.00065989315,0.0000016797666,1.171802e-7,0.000006022065,0.00020505536],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975544,0.0008459689,0.0004905142,0.000092633345,0.0008521606,0.00016430345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977089,0.0007448208,0.000516011,0.000056661956,0.00088860147,0.000084999556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042667007,0.000062473104,0.00017009642,0.0002001019,0.00008675258,0.00004773953,0.0005303563,0.00004109108,0.0004520057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020242296,0.000040137096,0.00012581117,0.00014823591,0.00057778246,0.000567075,0.0000273112,0.00011520092,0.0000034003958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010569341,0.00011396323,0.00019458617,0.0000021817216,0.00005206708,0.000011239124,0.35915944,2.8618433e-7,0.018808551,0.027621796,0.0004974829,0.5934327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013165136,0.00048790776,0.0006752789,0.0028108328,0.00002252836,0.00006185995,0.8888257,0.000012755411,0.020035828,0.05038749,0.03514716,0.00021614961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015538605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005124231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59321654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023719105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010476453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49491456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415812786","doi":"","title":"The Internet: an effective tool for nursing research with women.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Anonymity; Population; Medical education; Psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.13373755957118402,"score_gpt":0.46478222037532413,"score_spread":0.3310446608041401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415812786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028443,0.0001312587,0.001261594,0.0018260402,0.00012895484,0.002349018,0.0000030678952,0.00004043866,0.0914153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973236,0.000012692055,0.0009194882,0.00004891941,0.00026909445,0.007447821,5.717456e-7,0.000011184574,0.018054202],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966216,0.0021247338,0.00008433785,0.00018152174,0.0003220631,0.0006657516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736947,0.0022443442,0.000020418733,0.00012283304,0.00012916475,0.00011376016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012919721,0.000055887667,0.00008411832,0.00003213157,0.00086991215,0.00018607819,0.00022238804,0.00003648606,0.0000451303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000687849,0.00003335804,0.00002445863,0.00028098855,0.0008180509,0.00016689846,0.000006444905,0.00013091169,0.0000065967056],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025282684,0.000033236913,0.0001421921,0.0000020210512,0.000009577933,3.0266995e-7,0.06284171,5.9613467e-7,0.0000012233629,0.043985184,0.0004957984,0.89223534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090421137,0.0006861023,0.18424112,0.00003150694,0.000009620949,6.820244e-7,0.07001306,0.000053129545,0.0002354956,0.13709332,0.6064642,0.00026757194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030377335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033409294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8919678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003235663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003165839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6690749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476170425","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-867-3.ch009","title":"Ethical Conflicts in Research on Networked Education Contexts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Relation (database); Informed consent; Political science; Research ethics; Public relations; Knowledge management; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.2662411215459008,"score_gpt":0.5284845594318528,"score_spread":0.262243437885952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476170425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022168792,0.00060849614,0.000022610622,0.002652988,0.00067697855,0.00069900573,0.000017046088,0.000055273027,0.9950459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21348488,0.00005933919,0.001075556,0.006029224,0.0021955953,0.000055629596,0.000008034916,0.000046083067,0.77704567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951692,0.0019639423,0.00043857828,0.00056370464,0.0012328392,0.00063169043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977218,0.0010535521,0.00015192019,0.00033268344,0.0004576497,0.0002823974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006993496,0.00027314812,0.0004666395,0.00017640546,0.00038466847,0.00013438427,0.00044034663,0.0014598421,0.00010383209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071814377,0.0002693479,0.0001430385,0.00008971456,0.00088562706,0.000030452316,0.00005806383,0.0021062621,0.00024192693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007221105,0.000023957455,0.0000042055935,0.0000073919746,0.000009798951,0.000012182725,0.0028453297,9.655613e-7,9.719929e-7,0.83058506,0.006906536,0.15953137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013728121,0.00013089282,0.0000890497,0.00028899556,0.0000045494535,4.52991e-7,0.0003069176,0.0000010426177,0.0000013443006,0.5386192,0.46025315,0.00016707975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00303857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006749201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4533466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009315337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014008918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477158349","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-152-0.ch012","title":"Co-Construction and Field Creation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Online and offline; Perspective (graphical); Argument (complex analysis); Action research; Sociology; Action (physics); Bridging (networking); Field (mathematics); Field research; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041076911040481306,"score_gpt":0.3747538711457709,"score_spread":0.3336769601052896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477158349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019410018,0.00023719129,0.0017717719,0.00030842915,0.00036972892,0.00021772846,0.00003622237,0.00006845699,0.99679637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20223588,0.00026475484,0.060120534,0.0023928145,0.0035790869,0.00004500973,0.00002057171,0.00010084771,0.7312405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989888,0.00009299178,0.00019555629,0.00026101051,0.00028385018,0.0001777563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994257,0.00012601865,0.00014203636,0.000116538184,0.00008019537,0.00010952433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042371918,0.00016907023,0.00022605935,0.000037932037,0.00031729578,0.0000842891,0.00008945187,0.00038205952,0.00020726932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001010987,0.00017078932,0.00008374777,0.000012350236,0.0004552541,0.00005101604,0.000015857806,0.00016617143,0.000035643476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013119187,0.0000015731084,0.000030542982,0.000010678568,0.000019184443,0.0000037695481,0.0013116135,1.0452957e-7,0.0000050961826,0.91507834,0.00028912362,0.08323685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014340345,0.00006622683,0.000022789325,0.00007613772,0.000028981342,0.0000033097758,0.00038870348,1.854847e-7,0.00004814456,0.85419035,0.1448563,0.00017546964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001979041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082208554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26555586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002394996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020725383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69645864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477634630","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-152-0.ch018","title":"User-Centered Internet Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); The Internet; Politics; Engineering ethics; Internet research; Resistance (ecology); Research ethics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.19081394322511866,"score_gpt":0.4603591848083469,"score_spread":0.26954524158322823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477634630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014293069,0.00046243958,0.00032508175,0.00042866205,0.00085163757,0.00052464113,0.00010958352,0.00012937532,0.99702567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089728974,0.000024212728,0.0027854024,0.0003119127,0.0009609702,0.00002147405,0.000004877459,0.00005613285,0.90610605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615496,0.0007034353,0.0004230797,0.00062456506,0.001330405,0.00076357956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983309,0.00028344878,0.00016787232,0.0004322384,0.00044768493,0.00033785385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032076146,0.00032967035,0.00046955838,0.00012857623,0.00040396463,0.00023867754,0.00081754214,0.0006224866,0.0008404378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003120524,0.00032152724,0.00028167435,0.00005235757,0.001329613,0.00006479281,0.0002796508,0.00078430935,0.0009304374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003788766,0.000013134483,0.000012118431,0.000021289836,0.000060835548,0.000052391104,0.004139529,1.2169987e-7,0.0000028575382,0.9760908,0.009411908,0.010157118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017793567,0.0000831476,0.000010351756,0.0001958185,0.000011448294,0.0000010598401,0.0004110595,1.8992455e-7,0.000008504337,0.54551923,0.45338154,0.00019967898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008483139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005942483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44396964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014327029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008235641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485992882","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-152-0.ch004","title":"Conducting Congruent, Ethical Qualitative Research on Internet-Mediated Research Environments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Qualitative research; Participant observation; Data collection; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science","score_opus":0.556192181942767,"score_gpt":0.5849272867096282,"score_spread":0.028735104766861252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485992882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015166975,0.00026081502,0.000113184076,0.0020169748,0.00066713546,0.00114475,0.0002063971,0.000088417866,0.99398565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5127913,0.000047922582,0.0014599429,0.00087775325,0.0010116232,0.000079318714,0.000026565793,0.000119128585,0.4835865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797866,0.011778751,0.0008179925,0.0012798866,0.004773629,0.0015631913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98908013,0.008672593,0.000294835,0.00058855227,0.00070908555,0.0006548211],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036154132,0.00050990353,0.0007657123,0.00039447815,0.0012833277,0.00029165365,0.0010805483,0.0020720914,0.0008411919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00587384,0.0004918171,0.00027963342,0.00017135472,0.0069157267,0.00008009311,0.0004946394,0.0066584647,0.0024839437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014023577,0.00003858114,0.000002551805,0.000028773631,0.00012495837,0.000077024604,0.06667788,6.755819e-7,0.00005873881,0.92703736,0.0040226723,0.001790517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049278524,0.0005522829,0.000004924438,0.00053125917,0.000014277864,0.00000115802,0.028765306,9.765588e-7,0.000117714866,0.73642653,0.23267218,0.00042061185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011385952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023805387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5112746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040121293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013728122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504521261","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-0074-4.ch017","title":"Using Digital Tools in Qualitative Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Computer science; Software; Qualitative research; Data science; Work (physics); Qualitative property; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web; Engineering; Sociology; Database","score_opus":0.5313639862142903,"score_gpt":0.5736536992568761,"score_spread":0.042289713042585886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504521261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093284063,0.0010986346,0.00038442327,0.000116592506,0.00036802958,0.00056733383,0.00030705536,0.00005242659,0.99617267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51922685,0.000035295237,0.012895792,0.00023562094,0.0024321768,0.000051980358,0.0000151960785,0.0001432854,0.4649638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949268,0.0017074918,0.00053364795,0.00050034316,0.0013615245,0.0009701648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703693,0.0017430182,0.00019936149,0.00030945358,0.00040741518,0.00030382446],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083947405,0.00032456336,0.00055837503,0.00020033086,0.00044186012,0.00039185173,0.0004655031,0.0005874508,0.00015962707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012449864,0.00032451638,0.00020933767,0.00010773526,0.0014680312,0.0003566915,0.00021776152,0.00079542125,0.0002801831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028596281,0.000014017277,0.000021020365,0.000016710039,0.000029853232,0.0000187038,0.051504567,2.6758602e-7,0.000005005116,0.9167439,0.0003023679,0.031315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016145725,0.000050758554,0.000015913993,0.00019587527,0.000011174634,0.000001327198,0.016682446,0.000001111505,0.0000036147133,0.8009706,0.1815476,0.00035811734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032644654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001908044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5312089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013993667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006991764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541770929","doi":"10.1177/1609406916674965","title":"An Innovative Sequential Focus Group Method for Investigating Diabetes Care Experiences With Indigenous Peoples in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia; University of Calgary; NOSM University; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Focus group; Facilitator; Debriefing; Health care; Nursing; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24156533888501658,"score_gpt":0.5569418456670933,"score_spread":0.3153765067820767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541770929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52291536,0.00026229897,0.47472265,0.0010465046,0.0005983989,0.00022258611,0.00007209138,0.0000074799814,0.00015266002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47639418,0.000010001782,0.5230867,0.00015080324,0.0002610356,0.00006705537,0.0000035691312,0.000015752099,0.000010890112],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98168916,0.015391003,0.0010169074,0.0003298735,0.0011035536,0.0004694775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804864,0.014814972,0.0011945503,0.000116852505,0.0031711962,0.00021601141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01888632,0.00024257415,0.00055949,0.0004184796,0.00025780484,0.00010409787,0.00083704444,0.00007959164,0.00006989646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007868539,0.00015756534,0.000104575,0.0006540343,0.0005765399,0.0009476519,0.000043184078,0.00023136003,5.141188e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014856108,0.000051316114,0.004866175,0.000012348008,0.00016263835,0.000011102694,0.81333905,0.000013355434,0.0052200463,0.013800918,0.000019865744,0.16235462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012079226,0.00082917756,0.0014675475,0.00026931922,0.000018122291,0.0000035615728,0.9651976,0.000025735204,0.017241646,0.011718209,0.0017239457,0.00029720966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28819114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6858698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39767864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015988349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004099132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9419944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552965278","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2016.1251613","title":"Chasing the rainbow: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth and pride semiotics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture Health & Sexuality","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Queer; Pride; Transgender; Lesbian; Gender studies; Feeling; Symbol (formal); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.3008511063715429,"score_gpt":0.4910253303752061,"score_spread":0.19017422400366324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552965278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6502614,0.020867927,0.050639953,0.26647687,0.001510252,0.002469603,0.00044118564,0.00038188978,0.006950891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817279,0.0018589788,0.0041935677,0.006304565,0.0007028053,0.000015808784,0.0000070654232,0.000027998654,0.0051613315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506104,0.0031190321,0.00040446705,0.00044022343,0.00039527362,0.0005799546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845105,0.00061439443,0.00018898798,0.0002451558,0.00012522859,0.00037515617],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077390713,0.00020312784,0.00033764975,0.000027343269,0.001501343,0.000108307766,0.00016714432,0.00016206497,0.000027767355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006755641,0.0001041042,0.000040943138,0.0002235724,0.0011055281,0.00020602003,0.000045155248,0.00025147037,0.0000032617106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031253025,0.00005098967,0.0025878032,0.0001415398,0.00003271829,9.2738946e-7,0.8695398,1.4909027e-7,0.00031366316,0.04073373,0.0027154398,0.08385198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001117891,0.00022803522,0.014164112,0.00013742108,0.000045563218,0.0000054922266,0.33451104,0.0000060410475,0.00009410854,0.013120872,0.636078,0.00049140677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024388959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019563786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6333626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012060275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023590705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593602390","doi":"10.18357/ijcyfs81201716739","title":"ADOLESCENTS NEGOTIATING ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS IN A CULTURALLY DIVERSE, URBAN COMMUNITY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Negotiation; Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.21820608470854122,"score_gpt":0.43410802698498896,"score_spread":0.21590194227644774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593602390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98786014,0.0025813612,0.00012751498,0.003357979,0.0010832747,0.00006243248,0.000011218099,0.0000049924547,0.004911089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763,0.0012167221,0.00049576553,0.00026811674,0.00033858858,5.8533413e-7,8.679075e-7,0.0000033511592,0.0000460032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983404,0.0007739869,0.0003170124,0.0000653998,0.00038048104,0.00012268915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986227,0.00027747708,0.00048060925,0.00007685458,0.0004832595,0.000059108446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024688495,0.000079642436,0.0001919041,0.000104177336,0.0015984187,0.00019486512,0.0004290671,0.00003709289,7.726861e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003747256,0.00006217818,0.000059802336,0.00003918214,0.00040730502,0.0004858473,0.0001425398,0.0004838553,8.3881366e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056439025,0.000068629684,0.71062076,0.0000072942757,0.00014931484,0.000013641207,0.28146997,0.000011068056,0.0000066663274,0.0046264245,0.00028046334,0.0026893143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055916485,0.00003245647,0.75449604,0.00038104772,0.000018619967,0.0000019645115,0.24240494,0.0000072089624,9.564445e-7,0.0013610604,0.0006740964,0.00006242593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012765187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006807043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043875296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007036378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002286933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599222526","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005373","title":"Ten simple rules for short and swift presentations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Swift; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Computational biology; Biology; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11811498226766075,"score_gpt":0.4817494059453741,"score_spread":0.3636344236777133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599222526","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024182661,0.0021832169,0.09936242,0.0040277825,0.86101013,0.002762064,0.01003138,0.00024459424,0.017960155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034363084,0.00021021356,0.08298299,0.00013230531,0.8994315,0.00045324088,0.01067855,0.00005389774,0.0026209974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981053,0.00062461145,0.00027233618,0.00041567007,0.00029180208,0.00029030125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887578,0.010222624,0.00018753122,0.00012551741,0.00060925813,0.00009725441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010376817,0.00017287229,0.00037335078,0.00010165403,0.0011435484,0.00012462107,0.00032453638,0.0005066346,0.00005838692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058875503,0.00016011356,0.000094849085,0.000039964405,0.0008332934,0.00009975472,0.0000839139,0.00022439206,0.00001136381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002932946,0.00005202911,0.000430533,0.00005117769,0.00016228676,6.614505e-7,0.0017628481,0.000018470522,0.00000906945,0.14833036,0.8427389,0.006414306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017643384,0.000081537146,0.00031742884,0.000009813588,0.000042141903,7.9691e-8,0.00020035538,0.00027842954,0.0000013682453,0.22350913,0.7752226,0.00016070645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044043476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005029267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075178765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003997278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004935321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8795365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604403244","doi":"10.7202/1039173ar","title":"Les usages santé d’Internet par les personnes trans au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Nouvelles pratiques sociales","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14465006958692883,"score_gpt":0.42126922758312924,"score_spread":0.2766191579962004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604403244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7874604,0.012574573,0.0025599771,0.04287996,0.0036584036,0.0005520963,0.0004577537,0.00010722684,0.14974962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95067036,0.0027193353,0.0065904856,0.0002612472,0.0039485972,0.000041530955,0.000016452163,0.00006434898,0.03568765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933259,0.0034425019,0.00066207396,0.00069692923,0.000808234,0.0010643865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965015,0.0016233268,0.0007622462,0.00048639168,0.00031792672,0.00030859435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025438291,0.00058144063,0.00080008345,0.00005986989,0.006293304,0.0005512336,0.001263367,0.00064505864,0.0018303685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014785612,0.0005711051,0.00035501109,0.00013923609,0.006451742,0.0006539637,0.00015000848,0.00062298327,0.000026091739],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000302696,0.0001454538,0.014213811,0.00021685565,0.00023296046,0.0000328049,0.419349,0.0000024352819,0.00013357378,0.42018625,0.016558597,0.12889796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004243658,0.00019521714,0.06401339,0.00038375676,0.00016961836,0.0000026860973,0.2815225,0.000057977744,0.0015617898,0.0039438615,0.6467847,0.00094008143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98901635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63022614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013787035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009976398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613266707","doi":"","title":"The contextual name generator : a good tool for the study of sociability and socialization","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Generator (circuit theory); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.04019385512695834,"score_gpt":0.3472887523509119,"score_spread":0.30709489722395356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613266707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71690804,0.0009184157,0.26464048,0.009331048,0.00014894395,0.0012412781,0.000015570919,0.00004326349,0.006752953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919948,0.000110074,0.005585919,0.000049832008,0.00003557139,0.000053193733,0.0000043632854,0.000009081055,0.0021571615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99049,0.008393517,0.00034404927,0.00021586154,0.00032679757,0.00022975427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834942,0.014233733,0.0002570067,0.00039660162,0.0015654996,0.00005291527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0398317,0.00008619469,0.00014050622,0.000022993578,0.002138056,0.0001582224,0.00038920026,0.00006334212,0.000016407292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007311625,0.000059044585,0.00006925928,0.0002745974,0.000756548,0.00009053068,0.00009696015,0.00009857687,7.6237217e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018392137,0.0002716859,0.007507624,0.0000080084055,0.00003688069,6.050386e-8,0.19052692,9.964028e-7,0.00028016636,0.66699904,0.00016593632,0.13418427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003998439,0.000017132028,0.20222737,0.00015979736,0.00021280505,8.3531e-7,0.37943846,0.0045849727,0.011457501,0.053664424,0.34349462,0.0007436539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024737061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028622031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61333466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058533515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012723492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742194300","doi":"10.1177/1356389017715719","title":"Using online mining techniques to inform formative evaluations: An analysis of YouTube video comments about chronic pain","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; McGill University","keywords":"Judgement; Formative assessment; Social media; Psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.3269929441657317,"score_gpt":0.5957748917242113,"score_spread":0.26878194755847956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742194300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8785248,0.000083311555,0.11489079,0.0010659625,0.00014147097,0.0010381807,0.000060043858,0.00004193442,0.0041535357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9171794,0.000011910149,0.082224905,0.00021364586,0.00012820587,0.00006440662,0.00011875843,0.00000779746,0.000050947794],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953574,0.0026773268,0.0004804406,0.00018735508,0.0010839287,0.00021356212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973332,0.00041996897,0.00059920235,0.0004095848,0.0011488955,0.00008909162],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030545456,0.00010853819,0.0002789803,0.00039919943,0.00135189,0.0001425155,0.00033531754,0.000079434736,0.00027186156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076190853,0.000103238875,0.00010166556,0.00063823245,0.00018060558,0.0012353122,0.000060795064,0.000068544534,0.0000025410554],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022130325,0.00010938614,0.0081911,0.000016006086,0.00026788478,7.9386126e-8,0.18451492,0.0027044113,0.0010541042,0.0034175136,0.00007792812,0.7996245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053826807,0.00054122874,0.19237867,0.00019681353,0.0014224243,5.684851e-8,0.056936007,0.73941845,0.0013931422,0.0036000821,0.0032326246,0.00034223936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032440159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008981107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7992823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070742826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035880806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742522189","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2017-053264.89","title":"O15.6 Differences in reported testing barriers between clients of an online sti testing service (getcheckedonline.com) and a provincial sti clinic in vancouver, canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health; Fraser Health; University of British Columbia; BC Centre for Disease Control","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Family medicine; Service (business); Test (biology); Service provider","score_opus":0.29037674838114347,"score_gpt":0.4324452866004898,"score_spread":0.14206853821934634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742522189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965429,0.000017398295,0.0000379905,0.00025008412,0.00033437114,0.00038238167,0.00007260959,0.000027543318,0.0023347328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758113,0.0000028347806,0.023602521,0.00007956462,0.00016564481,0.0000075953158,0.0000082133865,0.00001359787,0.0003087187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965873,0.00089730823,0.0009916762,0.0004928432,0.0005473299,0.00048356358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577093,0.0023340492,0.00088736595,0.0003327517,0.00035946604,0.00031541009],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00450965,0.00020256398,0.0006010242,0.00008685491,0.000575532,0.00007831786,0.0005203792,0.00014751246,0.000026990348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026096784,0.0001806839,0.000024483734,0.00052243564,0.00046592497,0.00044901334,0.0001741079,0.00035630225,1.5264818e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016047374,0.000060363793,0.96806127,0.000043265813,0.000009784147,0.000025028066,0.003154308,0.0000029047544,0.000034171102,0.000027008215,0.0000123017935,0.028553547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006804079,0.00013819731,0.98140275,0.00018571371,0.000018243383,2.8246097e-7,0.014126935,0.0022199997,0.000022538417,0.00089183735,0.0000743336,0.00023877338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98372006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028314775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016395512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018780022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743035829","doi":"","title":"Internet-based health promotion programs for sexual minorities in Canada: A study of the components, objectives and future developments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Promotion (chess); Computer science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.06415491168995592,"score_gpt":0.3260487385634035,"score_spread":0.2618938268734476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743035829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98487484,0.0003401394,0.00413359,0.0071033784,0.00042527326,0.0022001166,0.00004226541,0.000023598916,0.0008567714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97510844,0.000027078875,0.023657737,0.000029362569,0.000024703664,0.0002453113,0.00008542877,0.000014712851,0.0008071928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873934,0.011005,0.00046275064,0.00042896206,0.00044109646,0.00026880088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705046,0.000910287,0.00055224396,0.0004791082,0.0009142093,0.000093684816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008539249,0.00018213206,0.00034216017,0.00011082975,0.0003808775,0.00011316695,0.0006404824,0.00012707533,0.000006494724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005849855,0.00015587882,0.000047472782,0.00030586167,0.00031333824,0.00005651641,0.00037059854,0.00045996148,8.918152e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003684579,0.0023690176,0.22872478,0.0006315802,0.000083130355,5.4369264e-7,0.46551743,0.0000044755284,0.00011669489,0.03292845,0.0001081601,0.2694789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028201817,0.00001551036,0.80840766,0.0029276218,0.000052202344,8.5807255e-7,0.15521614,0.0035010772,0.0022311893,0.0040674936,0.019928787,0.0008312661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88067865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99231154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5796829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043418593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026747377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6356554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748679506","doi":"10.29173/cjs29343","title":"Salmons, Janet E., Doing Qualitative Research Online.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Qualitative research; Media studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.5209077578966099,"score_gpt":0.6301779747490572,"score_spread":0.10927021685244731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748679506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77294564,0.0046832063,0.00029338582,0.15426435,0.0016670354,0.0002080494,0.00004775673,0.0000060129805,0.06588456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388134,0.0001554176,0.0032816494,0.00038937034,0.0010222851,0.0000016205454,9.537295e-7,0.000008961369,0.0012583772],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.989104,0.009615872,0.00029296693,0.00010032108,0.00031385335,0.0005729954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947919,0.0034157638,0.00039368428,0.000247415,0.0007279608,0.00042327523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030806253,0.00007388903,0.0002378276,0.0001576745,0.006330763,0.00016091391,0.0011666146,0.00015890741,0.00022958193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008191217,0.000050533985,0.000101909536,0.00007711947,0.008300441,0.00017326666,0.00003228011,0.0009658774,0.000028931321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118879825,0.000006811704,0.0018118081,0.0000024584306,0.00004687659,0.000042385207,0.5751897,0.0000017788255,0.000018543187,0.4056487,0.0087538585,0.0084652025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019622664,0.00016379236,0.011974791,0.000029921988,0.000011892034,0.000009695916,0.37710395,0.0000019856031,0.0000063113885,0.2517715,0.3586377,0.00009220085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21098348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.623986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4130025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003513792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003138086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753671867","doi":"","title":"Mapping the sexuality-health-technology nexus : an arts based exploration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Human sexuality; The arts; Computer science; Sociology; Visual arts; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.2439911754714813,"score_gpt":0.4671478077833031,"score_spread":0.2231566323118218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753671867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18938327,0.0064256527,0.31505486,0.41736123,0.0057206308,0.0045449943,0.00015791034,0.0012710991,0.060080357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634883,0.00015888149,0.028610868,0.0021155067,0.0009423091,0.00024346674,0.000006535531,0.00005642891,0.0043777223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993912,0.003006638,0.0006003303,0.00068310264,0.00081057736,0.0009873823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963418,0.0005651985,0.00075683097,0.0015580574,0.00042945633,0.00034863848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014822263,0.00030084874,0.00046773854,0.0002892138,0.011850066,0.0009995071,0.0015610604,0.00038173702,0.0001300479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002662412,0.00023870898,0.000119640004,0.00088777253,0.0012913618,0.0021473453,0.00019705211,0.0010719897,0.000056520177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017283186,0.0004906171,0.025837077,0.00012166939,0.00011773724,0.000046593028,0.074388504,0.00025669043,0.000082293,0.6439088,0.011952728,0.24262445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016438619,0.00048044435,0.048197605,0.00037043198,0.000029413068,0.000003465118,0.19484277,0.002821154,0.0001560121,0.071859255,0.6787233,0.0008722994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012882028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002938456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.774105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028272517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011766789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W275598541","doi":"10.1177/070674370705201110","title":"Book Review: Mental Health Research, Choosing Methods in Mental Health Research: Mental Health Research from Theory to Practice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.41226064671363954,"score_gpt":0.6478442132560607,"score_spread":0.23558356654242113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W275598541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038051608,0.35304528,0.00088691764,0.63809943,0.002446986,0.0016764648,0.000102234786,0.000007997356,0.0033541622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017458504,0.11492229,0.61439556,0.2582426,0.005148259,0.00004598322,0.00004590473,0.00018318379,0.005270346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84221166,0.14476539,0.002520477,0.00077233167,0.005160625,0.0045695063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859195,0.007278275,0.00080302166,0.0006121587,0.0010715139,0.004315578],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.47675762,0.00026367552,0.00079854095,0.0018816214,0.008913728,0.00034588462,0.0016674032,0.00013347871,0.0007892187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008726984,0.00021407606,0.00020885946,0.0037676864,0.00206778,0.0006633139,0.00015978384,0.004749871,0.000057499274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002827223,0.0001144265,0.00023887423,0.00008409106,0.00004978677,0.000009348687,0.14356145,5.902558e-7,0.000010669745,0.030113993,0.75305825,0.07247579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046577008,0.0010015359,0.0008280442,0.00229042,0.0000031100558,0.000025454,0.17734835,0.0000016062382,0.000006206827,0.020372054,0.79751164,0.00014579795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4440914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8174289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61350864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010134776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03533077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757742546","doi":"10.1177/1468794117731510","title":"Using internet data sources to achieve qualitative interviewing purposes: a research note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Toronto","funders":"School for Public Health Research","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; The Internet; Social media; Qualitative property; Face (sociological concept); Internet research; Psychology; Medical education; Semi-structured interview; Applied psychology; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.948765234674034,"score_gpt":0.8017038590496283,"score_spread":0.1470613756244057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757742546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5913018,0.0025909608,0.14795415,0.05837028,0.0014416813,0.005589183,0.0008915313,0.00025378837,0.19160661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86629105,0.00017584903,0.11331229,0.00018923836,0.0012185958,0.00025211874,0.000049493683,0.00012269628,0.018388646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88308376,0.10691466,0.00097083976,0.0017699978,0.004757008,0.002503738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95995086,0.031432886,0.00040209334,0.003123739,0.004115022,0.00097539206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26606685,0.00038309785,0.00080531917,0.0012422588,0.007773208,0.0024722381,0.007316285,0.00029217193,0.00048906414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10235959,0.00035020514,0.00017500974,0.0017529621,0.0077338526,0.0021853356,0.0057481527,0.0023780088,0.00085875357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002800671,0.00013889211,0.000058975787,0.00008922015,0.00009898603,0.000020980491,0.8233307,0.0000015784864,0.0010296314,0.14306433,0.005564225,0.026322395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038265536,0.0006555109,0.0001347159,0.000544236,0.000010687923,8.1506784e-7,0.77584255,0.00034380023,0.0004192279,0.09057681,0.1306685,0.0004204899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07400872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019492516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27498925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010383916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011991841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767125809","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2017.25253","title":"Social Media Technology and Public Health in Ontario: Findings from a Planning Meeting Exploring Current Practices and Future Research Directions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fanshawe College; London Health Sciences Centre; Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Social media; Health promotion; Public health; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Business; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.8602958349278383,"score_gpt":0.5701161104781505,"score_spread":0.29017972444968787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767125809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78871727,0.0076843384,0.000023065597,0.19989346,0.00084526476,0.0001499139,0.0000019593394,0.000055429064,0.002629274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955217,0.00037755276,0.003088206,0.000032560336,0.0008884771,0.00003151036,0.0000026653431,0.000012995817,0.000044313463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969695,0.0013964723,0.00019533487,0.00038209572,0.0003471312,0.00070945424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978161,0.0015561603,0.00026456531,0.00012959156,0.00008436599,0.0001492525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069521614,0.000105821724,0.00022885283,0.0004966903,0.004443152,0.0005480796,0.00022970645,0.00015318255,0.000010278244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005608863,0.00011106784,0.000020341713,0.00036231676,0.0014884379,0.00080257823,0.000049288305,0.001155612,0.0000010634343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012694308,0.000037836715,0.06969673,0.00001254589,0.0000057040293,0.0000015957461,0.592128,1.43111105e-8,0.000024818897,0.021720987,0.0000960351,0.31626305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024665886,0.000030427269,0.24169189,0.00044199885,0.0000045390325,7.0649094e-7,0.6704781,0.0000035691332,0.000008513792,0.014801486,0.0721679,0.00012418091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05858005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2761154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31613886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054672675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035414178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99685293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783812639","doi":"10.1177/1609406917750781","title":"Two Approaches to Focus Group Data Collection for Qualitative Health Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Data collection; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Focus (optics); Health care; Psychology; Medical education; Public relations; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.9661504552524623,"score_gpt":0.7756787073041846,"score_spread":0.1904717479482777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783812639","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018527725,0.00062207266,0.93593806,0.051830765,0.0025615417,0.0007984231,0.00017293624,0.000022911621,0.0062005124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03430881,0.0000609363,0.96076524,0.000656906,0.0029716785,0.00006748727,0.000027639924,0.000036586396,0.0011046835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91460025,0.080414325,0.0014622009,0.0005907068,0.0022261397,0.00070638745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96084356,0.031568095,0.0010885644,0.00038635667,0.0056303735,0.00048304955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26856455,0.00022397,0.00064373726,0.0011014772,0.0010812643,0.00026345,0.0021101986,0.00010416989,0.00013494877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044540532,0.00019686442,0.00021629749,0.0013831892,0.0015612756,0.0009098801,0.0003406339,0.0005538811,0.000019584271],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058785576,0.00014164769,0.000005382744,0.000009238785,0.00024053614,0.0000012357863,0.5054549,0.0000014949917,0.0002240057,0.34479803,0.011687272,0.13684839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009841197,0.001765875,0.000042540934,0.00010217499,0.000015589721,0.000004895315,0.4801544,0.00017443328,0.0005947128,0.30595157,0.21002239,0.00018729767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032177283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027395748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22402403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009960281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011002098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9635077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783852736","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.010","title":"Proposal to Expand UWALK’s Reach in Rural Alberta Communities ( poster )","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport & Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Health promotion; Community engagement; Context (archaeology); Promotion (chess); Work (physics); eHealth; Community health; Rural area; Business; Public health; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Health care; Geography; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.09668499551991487,"score_gpt":0.45832274106423565,"score_spread":0.36163774554432077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783852736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93125045,0.0002525329,0.00034301862,0.059318725,0.00053125364,0.00025003855,0.00001016447,0.0000048204183,0.008038962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924207,0.0002484821,0.0051536444,0.0009173688,0.0002551683,0.000002867113,0.0000016921664,0.000011286498,0.0009888333],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762464,0.0008405505,0.0006478341,0.00006938998,0.00043568914,0.000381895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985797,0.00020859175,0.000507094,0.00023126174,0.00015557636,0.00031777727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062205335,0.000106289415,0.0004267347,0.00013951509,0.0008233821,0.0000733557,0.00056069274,0.00006426102,0.000082743165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012585534,0.00008472886,0.000113866794,0.00008196672,0.0002543749,0.00046614007,0.000013637159,0.0003955924,0.000003498927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003981481,0.0002303964,0.34470075,0.00008500579,0.000029791201,0.000036847036,0.602946,0.000004993705,0.00005682791,0.012512971,0.00093869725,0.038059577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011679867,0.0010572226,0.83529425,0.0005946659,0.000014438605,0.000015314718,0.09662661,0.000001938122,0.000043161803,0.003426556,0.061526123,0.00023175233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13205832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28065962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5063194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016673526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077754346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87372136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784605118","doi":"10.36510/learnland.v11i1.933","title":"Journeys to Teaching Qualitative Research Methods Online","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LEARNing Landscapes","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Qualitative research; Online teaching; Graduate students; Narrative inquiry; Online community; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2969986823202509,"score_gpt":0.6468285375625493,"score_spread":0.3498298552422984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784605118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235214,0.00038530742,0.19547218,0.01765239,0.0007570231,0.0004418845,0.000007937513,0.00035282297,0.26140904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47773072,0.000019612831,0.5014893,0.00029447948,0.0019006875,0.00001767716,0.0000054432985,0.00002943491,0.018512672],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96145785,0.036440283,0.00028298594,0.00038483256,0.0007177271,0.00071633584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153507,0.0073372256,0.00009248145,0.00017297076,0.00056347955,0.00029880245],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055077463,0.00013443209,0.0002674316,0.0003331452,0.0027822985,0.00020357117,0.00040048113,0.00011689121,0.0006367806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026668543,0.00011307327,0.000078887875,0.0008106595,0.0004200787,0.00018827236,0.00014127663,0.0011628532,0.0002970359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038737977,0.000055115135,0.0007649239,0.000007235525,0.000025864965,0.0000021150918,0.763734,0.000014710302,0.0013026131,0.079466306,0.003543718,0.1510447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013302837,0.00041136102,0.0007220541,0.000047640693,0.0000054155225,4.7609927e-7,0.31753942,0.00017580946,0.00019563077,0.009065141,0.6715427,0.00016130271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027396127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021971143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66799897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012341126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790099260","doi":"10.5072/prism/10532","title":"Using Case Study Methodology to Evaluate E-Health","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.8711351363418186,"score_gpt":0.6760701345595459,"score_spread":0.1950650017822727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790099260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522024,0.00012546011,0.009444609,0.0025965383,0.00031562304,0.001333928,0.0000055309947,0.0000023565788,0.03397359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3529062,0.0000033639167,0.64231384,0.0002985282,0.000108258515,0.000015795134,2.0420002e-7,0.000008880026,0.004344915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888549,0.009987962,0.00025513646,0.0003217197,0.00023801421,0.00034230613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865705,0.0007473525,0.00009748291,0.00019282268,0.00008459379,0.000220707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018773504,0.00008628213,0.0002716578,0.00006925006,0.0007554969,0.00013840428,0.0003162908,0.00003932925,0.006746146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010749192,0.000077552024,0.00003122152,0.00042131604,0.00009477146,0.00015682774,0.00015635643,0.0000960255,0.0003159954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007429121,0.00014341559,0.00034697773,0.0000010099309,0.000017030052,0.00019910648,0.3922142,0.000024317653,0.000052163046,0.00033779372,0.00029403303,0.6063625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009792858,0.0010944322,0.00025132086,0.000018898834,0.00005403249,0.00011412168,0.7766319,0.00075344,0.00009854978,0.0009693495,0.21865079,0.00038389125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037051342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01995186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63286924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012383901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010896067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794181429","doi":"10.1002/asi.24012","title":"Information triangulation: A complex and agentic everyday information practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Children's Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Agency (philosophy); Information seeking; Everyday life; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Information system; Sociology; Data science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Social science; Information retrieval; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040186331511434005,"score_gpt":0.39771132655834696,"score_spread":0.35752499504691293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794181429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37810487,0.00018818934,0.14657308,0.35027033,0.007084934,0.003959139,0.00010533848,0.00026391845,0.11345021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98894536,0.00006297571,0.008732545,0.0020503467,0.00011620205,0.000008624969,0.0000027965207,0.0000015528169,0.00007956349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980953,0.00014517964,0.00063771097,0.00003659812,0.00088691607,0.00019830375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915634,0.0004303802,0.0019506166,0.00009256378,0.005904744,0.000058311787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012251346,0.00006579235,0.00013554901,0.00072643155,0.0013361062,0.0004644993,0.00029094305,0.00012718634,0.00000851429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029659972,0.00004834519,0.00003656853,0.001765915,0.00069889514,0.020852212,0.00007311946,0.00013423235,0.000012255313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000904353,0.000017110708,0.0025437695,0.000025974696,0.000042543645,2.8000795e-8,0.068712056,0.0000065594318,0.0001363795,0.64908034,0.0073760017,0.2719688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076434703,0.00016762177,0.013180585,0.000014743402,0.0000328788,0.00001030334,0.027975935,0.0005034051,0.00023503696,0.009681752,0.94735426,0.000079134676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029206802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009292332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93997824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036418275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004217327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800827494","doi":"10.1177/2050157918764215","title":"Mobile methods: Explorations, innovations, and reflections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mobile Media & Communication","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Data science; Mobile device; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17577769074885935,"score_gpt":0.5298227091944333,"score_spread":0.35404501844557396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800827494","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21726596,0.020226482,0.58311015,0.007878281,0.002195511,0.004087751,0.000050174436,0.0011137384,0.16407192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43268362,0.0035622532,0.56054455,0.00031302965,0.00034508517,0.001532057,0.00006506069,0.00002075738,0.0009335642],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578595,0.003222729,0.00034606323,0.00021711136,0.00021722891,0.00021091303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969964,0.0015586022,0.00015935925,0.00062952563,0.00056148914,0.00009462163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050953897,0.00010772801,0.00016269568,0.00018149662,0.0017335674,0.000110602894,0.00033924557,0.00010703384,0.0002415111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001616873,0.00010894612,0.000033389057,0.0010865987,0.0011644915,0.00046995594,0.00012081714,0.00020805359,0.000048250327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012282267,0.00013928671,0.00042574827,0.00000799098,0.00002427533,1.1461593e-7,0.271073,0.0000034371826,0.003299562,0.28091815,0.0034481345,0.440648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017340295,0.00015106988,0.00055267464,0.000021563057,0.000017707787,6.4790305e-7,0.06718237,0.00013131116,0.0012430877,0.040031705,0.8903241,0.0001703262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084158534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028236383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.886876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104323386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011863201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883405865","doi":"10.1177/1609406918788203","title":"Ethical, Practical, and Methodological Considerations for Unobtrusive Qualitative Research About Personal Narratives Shared on the Internet","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Popularity; The Internet; Ethical issues; Narrative; Diligence; Due diligence; Psychology; Informed consent; Research ethics; Internet research; Internet privacy; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.9160692370572425,"score_gpt":0.7703199511312407,"score_spread":0.14574928592600178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883405865","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03198739,0.00031928916,0.6766323,0.28149402,0.0014320958,0.00068871083,0.00012169096,0.000020470165,0.007304007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13227034,0.00009043547,0.8612159,0.0040881657,0.0014258581,0.00009691079,0.0000035043086,0.000024351604,0.0007845469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8531577,0.14316013,0.0010659624,0.00043652512,0.0017126647,0.00046699334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6989594,0.2894471,0.0009941151,0.00015524318,0.010171127,0.00027304253],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20287064,0.00026625695,0.0006177432,0.0004695307,0.0012997442,0.0005183916,0.000576086,0.00033103355,0.0012751888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2785402,0.00017180659,0.00031298766,0.00044012387,0.0078103794,0.00047766225,0.00015805474,0.0019484883,0.000016090102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005086416,0.000076838995,0.0000032327493,0.0000046815467,0.0002985417,0.00000595459,0.48363698,2.1825801e-7,0.0008657399,0.5016402,0.010808172,0.0021507614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043241627,0.0011877662,0.000058516827,0.00009501144,0.000018833305,0.000015009167,0.45312527,0.00005466014,0.001275246,0.49665374,0.046951532,0.00013199258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001898817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013549392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27740586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000313098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009307466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996713},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2889284558","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2018.05.009","title":"Using a Marketing Evaluation Tool to Optimize a Social Marketing Campaign: Insights From a Copy Test of a You're the Mom Campaign Ad","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social marketing; Test (biology); Marketing; Advertising; Business; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.12375208429768268,"score_gpt":0.45953106571735264,"score_spread":0.33577898141966994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889284558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943131,0.0005604104,0.0015219557,0.0019821953,0.0006966159,0.00058390363,0.000018360275,0.0000066418647,0.0003167692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92795813,0.000053766624,0.070111476,0.00023402761,0.0015080625,0.00006384631,0.0000042692677,0.00001025473,0.000056195233],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959124,0.002591313,0.0005699177,0.00015159551,0.00062166905,0.00015311257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959346,0.0011861428,0.0006861162,0.000082800994,0.0020076565,0.000102704515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00710968,0.000108440836,0.00023090989,0.00017559623,0.0007526227,0.00012399835,0.00014333,0.000093455434,0.00034167792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038410176,0.00008487672,0.00010221299,0.00044359083,0.00023664704,0.00030034754,0.000021443784,0.0001591654,0.0000013659248],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011687354,0.010752639,0.014926922,0.00016151679,0.000102846214,0.0000045647093,0.423564,0.000006760989,0.09380062,0.0004944955,0.009739198,0.44527772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025848974,0.0006040389,0.32972112,0.0013835175,0.0010039507,0.000024558462,0.641128,0.00052459794,0.0018456378,0.0022289837,0.018452112,0.00049857417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025769486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001298176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44477913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022016143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056708814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57886416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902193267","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-95300-7_4","title":"Online Qualitative Methods: Confronting New Possibilities and Challenges Within a Social Justice Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Online and offline; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.43296103891490256,"score_gpt":0.5505926665934496,"score_spread":0.11763162767854707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902193267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006062566,0.016379312,0.011059168,0.011381887,0.00071749074,0.0005090781,0.00010609659,0.00017309558,0.95961326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000039281458,0.0018836418,0.32206082,0.0003304492,0.0028932341,0.0000061656337,0.000008138045,0.00006094443,0.67271733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937761,0.0035416405,0.00064809935,0.0009341397,0.00061051286,0.0004895521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932126,0.0046803243,0.00062578457,0.00020888695,0.0009997386,0.00027268796],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010069793,0.0005254775,0.000982895,0.00019295893,0.0010708696,0.00015863909,0.00030416506,0.000644272,0.0019530745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035180666,0.00046824594,0.00023175779,0.00006179082,0.0030666778,0.00027268642,0.00016596432,0.0006246647,0.000033700097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002497997,0.000013271359,4.058677e-8,0.00006308987,0.00012058999,0.0000013250357,0.47051933,1.2179831e-8,0.000002058123,0.517641,0.0012678471,0.010346422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015027095,0.00012053664,0.0000026360212,0.00006904178,0.0001531594,5.4920474e-7,0.45553926,0.0000034504765,0.0000029254927,0.41434398,0.12930052,0.0003136582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051903715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103917485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31100163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036884914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064866786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903367551","doi":"10.1177/1473325018811479","title":"How Twitter is changing the meaning of scholarly impact and engagement: Implications for qualitative social work research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Social Work","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Sociology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Meaning (existential); Realm; Social science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.5199327728369224,"score_gpt":0.6084142894964955,"score_spread":0.08848151665957305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903367551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.571699,0.001319599,0.06381515,0.33127722,0.00055809476,0.003938385,0.00053066,0.00015636286,0.026705507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793424,0.000013965393,0.013410261,0.00052690104,0.0017540592,0.00037433824,0.000013643899,0.000050237257,0.004514207],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758739,0.021063345,0.0004983859,0.00055112795,0.00093369454,0.0010795678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98262817,0.014028864,0.0004652723,0.00021181843,0.0025216416,0.00014423246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046483025,0.00027569916,0.00052141486,0.00032190123,0.012796956,0.000794712,0.0005511085,0.0002451032,0.00012800991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007147847,0.00021694397,0.00033496006,0.0048900843,0.0050151106,0.0008229203,0.00020327573,0.00073958305,0.000014477234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000947894,0.000029915318,0.00014829892,0.00001536028,0.00014199103,5.7353834e-8,0.59501565,1.7932402e-8,0.00013970435,0.39161447,0.0062054037,0.006594329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003345263,0.00018824507,0.002950527,0.000040678497,0.000035633868,3.3661784e-8,0.6976819,5.3505767e-7,0.00008615728,0.27169314,0.02677836,0.00021025559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021011534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006428986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40764335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032031254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023088635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99769264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912911520","doi":"10.1177/1077800418806599","title":"Situating Ethics in Online Mourning Research: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Qualitative Inquiry","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Performative utterance; Social media; Research ethics; Relation (database); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.9687688704303841,"score_gpt":0.8167911176812904,"score_spread":0.15197775274909364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912911520","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022033906,0.9935439,0.00032734638,0.0014315894,0.00057746476,0.0027265465,0.00005225417,0.000033898225,0.0012849589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000015937745,0.9851536,0.013156562,0.00042405163,0.000509028,0.00022706496,0.000049099755,0.00006281523,0.0004161412],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8700042,0.12299129,0.0029224267,0.00088971114,0.0022557855,0.0009365924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87722605,0.11855606,0.001618974,0.00049040077,0.00195671,0.0001518202],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14487593,0.00049978774,0.004785501,0.00084444694,0.00052443723,0.000042839376,0.0007948066,0.0006758003,0.00008666056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17038022,0.0004072387,0.0006682602,0.0034383882,0.0035237267,0.0002764023,0.00044267272,0.003861511,0.00006471765],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002868313,0.000058994712,0.0000013622224,0.33320585,0.000095034506,0.0000049593896,0.48209122,1.9379277e-7,7.8455514e-8,0.0075764554,0.00038278112,0.1765802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077271085,0.000100049445,3.048835e-7,0.539537,0.00009319137,4.0321098e-7,0.3131519,4.4187684e-7,1.0960683e-7,0.0019498044,0.14483112,0.00025838357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004482108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008501531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2063312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008188497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042561446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914049131","doi":"","title":"Normalizing Masculinity: Explaining Processes, Factors, and Contexts That Influence How Rural Male Farmers Seek Health Information in Southwest Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Geography","score_opus":0.13074926541885987,"score_gpt":0.3707915966362659,"score_spread":0.240042331217406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914049131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99713504,0.00008771751,0.0010759032,0.0005570762,0.00019041573,0.0004194619,0.000024362602,0.00008937415,0.00042064182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982547,0.00009164082,0.00025681226,0.00040727344,0.000042341024,0.0000019787728,0.00002448875,0.000015249681,0.0009055194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970382,0.0010259402,0.00029558412,0.00034079672,0.0005941015,0.0007053758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984098,0.0003120326,0.00039399375,0.00020854031,0.00030978076,0.00036585942],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019949677,0.00029786507,0.00039780964,0.00049607473,0.001051874,0.00065694423,0.00045300118,0.00019271078,0.000046481135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000329244,0.00031214915,0.00006321464,0.00068519026,0.00059665955,0.0077747214,0.0001983167,0.00055654556,0.000025834324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005836745,0.000018679415,0.82612455,0.00006600496,0.000016274596,0.000010714827,0.17244047,0.0000018489482,0.000011442421,0.0002496353,2.8613226e-7,0.0010017494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008113824,0.00017539065,0.86268777,0.0002539308,0.000014079234,0.0000047737144,0.12786278,9.8319106e-8,0.00010024618,0.000067721696,0.0076919193,0.0003298759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013595628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69151264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67791706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065690477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007800028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920142151","doi":"10.1075/sar.17017.dre","title":"The methodological affordances and challenges of using Facebook to research study abroad","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Social media; Context (archaeology); Download; Data collection; Identity (music); Observational study; Focus (optics); Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science; Human–computer interaction; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.47921426295454495,"score_gpt":0.6414298851509322,"score_spread":0.1622156221963873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920142151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648557,0.0041721403,0.000019973675,0.0024069024,0.0003645225,0.0020427168,0.0000058131827,0.000007050825,0.026125213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350405,0.000620043,0.0010617637,0.000053401724,0.00017885456,0.00022434157,0.0000023704772,0.000007173429,0.0043480215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908417,0.0071971766,0.00030871463,0.00038772283,0.0009427406,0.00032193994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587256,0.0030197154,0.00007004238,0.00018735211,0.0007452593,0.000105100095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02799973,0.00008768838,0.00017712083,0.000496067,0.0005243623,0.00016477036,0.0003312342,0.00005475951,0.0010649918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015790246,0.00006482008,0.00002275358,0.00046528486,0.0004080472,0.00023989401,0.00020943384,0.0003429063,0.000012924568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003649897,0.0016652748,0.03956079,0.000063576066,0.00008077689,0.0000037534792,0.6207059,0.0000053539634,0.0025372456,0.06323459,0.0004215223,0.27135623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039744857,0.00063408,0.12203464,0.000050012764,0.0000023944576,8.733878e-7,0.8569357,0.00003426047,0.000073127434,0.004767229,0.014990371,0.00007990871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004715807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005334215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2712763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015464328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020460642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922107846","doi":"10.5539/jms.v9n1p55","title":"The Challenges of Implementing e-Health Technology for Sustainability in Brazil","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management and Sustainability","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal da Paraíba; McMaster University","keywords":"Sustainability; Social sustainability; Sustainability organizations; Sustainability science; Health care; Engineering ethics; Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Engineering; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.03473083954992382,"score_gpt":0.43468270749670124,"score_spread":0.3999518679467774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922107846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8420577,0.009186366,0.0027181762,0.13797502,0.00020139897,0.0025565536,0.0000018736891,0.000012264929,0.005290629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966963,0.0013706072,0.001449938,0.000027470234,0.000030080797,0.000017074863,9.1358835e-8,0.0000045666125,0.00040390692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756217,0.0009017944,0.0006750284,0.00016101924,0.00026135924,0.0004386223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973935,0.0010036275,0.0005167183,0.00018351902,0.0008505029,0.000052135154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026434282,0.00008320765,0.00032238965,0.0002067143,0.0003164857,0.000028143104,0.0002653226,0.000056976467,0.0000059009344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020009005,0.000058632362,0.00009699311,0.0003247948,0.00038745478,0.00015020013,0.00012267265,0.00016269216,5.6148085e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009121806,0.00006802362,0.0736226,0.00075951795,0.000024722585,9.339154e-7,0.007340105,0.0000035306832,2.3657681e-7,0.68218905,0.000064465836,0.23583561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005166372,0.00028942345,0.044038527,0.000017892295,0.0000072709868,2.20565e-7,0.3852686,0.000015548196,0.0000029485634,0.5004523,0.06934271,0.00004794829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019520138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076369493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3779285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049777766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038219403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91616476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922113906","doi":"10.1177/1609406919833482","title":"Connecting With Clinicians: Developing the 5-Min Digital Download to Advance Interpretive Description in Health-Care Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Digital health; Software deployment; Health care; Task (project management); Qualitative research; Medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Data collection; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5356129399833572,"score_gpt":0.6807458931631312,"score_spread":0.14513295317977393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922113906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1603834,0.0011442112,0.792722,0.03799212,0.0016308547,0.00068062794,0.0000378581,0.000014840265,0.005394081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5118424,0.00006951453,0.48655748,0.0010416687,0.00022653777,0.00001718905,0.0000025114457,0.000014522987,0.0002281222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97214204,0.024523998,0.0011554118,0.0003079123,0.0014226825,0.00044794678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756093,0.020116935,0.0007808924,0.00013621252,0.0032194417,0.00013722132],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059040062,0.00015654087,0.00042426382,0.0005873161,0.00027696046,0.00029937184,0.00085095846,0.00006569009,0.00006699126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020955253,0.00009716081,0.00012247215,0.0009143873,0.00035211944,0.00094100076,0.00012606829,0.0008090089,0.000029944158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005565605,0.000034269822,0.0006153594,0.000017153425,0.000083239436,0.000007400452,0.75143147,0.00011329782,0.00016381405,0.055852056,0.00008722456,0.19103813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005046528,0.0007425363,0.0007053886,0.0011049624,0.0000030138826,0.000006050343,0.8971295,0.000016328782,0.00025109298,0.022816008,0.0765561,0.00016436713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059499836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000830789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35145906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014192102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000780993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98729163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2928492842","doi":"10.1080/1743727x.2019.1594183","title":"Extending the online focus group method using web-based conferencing to explore older adults online learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Focus group; Online discussion; Bridging (networking); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Moderation; World Wide Web; Exploratory research; Data collection; Computer-mediated communication; The Internet; Multimedia; Sociology","score_opus":0.22327453331824995,"score_gpt":0.5989652625985435,"score_spread":0.37569072928029357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2928492842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78064996,0.00057259836,0.20547596,0.010146126,0.0020823018,0.00046811946,0.000006324933,0.000011101343,0.0005875174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50720763,0.00011571742,0.49096987,0.00020413942,0.001145584,0.000010902577,0.0000084276,0.00001964792,0.0003181103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854262,0.011005531,0.00073433545,0.00030443008,0.0020807812,0.0004487142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890412,0.0070475177,0.0004587712,0.00016944931,0.0030766514,0.00020637989],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032643132,0.00014546896,0.0003000729,0.0013497964,0.0002724994,0.0002318037,0.0009805616,0.00010298705,0.0004078205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010593693,0.00011248442,0.00015094661,0.0011068013,0.00012267585,0.00049527315,0.00011693193,0.0012934661,0.000012581725],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004505421,0.00082871795,0.015652742,0.000033727432,0.00007680039,0.000011514338,0.0731418,0.003896693,0.009798464,0.011713415,0.00021809051,0.8841775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033018638,0.0008579575,0.068299524,0.004478422,0.000041571595,0.00005014182,0.76549256,0.05561183,0.002567309,0.01799788,0.0807111,0.0005898398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037919374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010104394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88358766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010724473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929139003","doi":"10.1177/1525822x19838237","title":"A Team-based Approach to Open Coding: Considerations for Creating Intercoder Consensus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Field Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":461,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Central Michigan University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Computer science; Coding (social sciences); Thematic analysis; Qualitative research; Dependability; Iterative and incremental development; Focus group; Data science; Qualitative property; Variety (cybernetics); Axial coding; Knowledge management; Management science; Grounded theory; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.30536693910515106,"score_gpt":0.5467882379020462,"score_spread":0.24142129879689517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929139003","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011434084,0.000016961327,0.6626844,0.0035373042,0.0003137106,0.0012470782,0.000008131803,0.00003587312,0.33101314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08468441,6.039528e-7,0.9041332,0.004125906,0.00011164133,0.00022643874,0.0000026127416,0.000013518985,0.00670167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664885,0.0022867427,0.0002758723,0.00034375986,0.00013646265,0.00030832735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843611,0.01497158,0.00008887966,0.00024040403,0.0001973216,0.00014070258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882225,0.00011673583,0.00031033173,0.000076248805,0.00048287207,0.00023324443,0.00027089263,0.00012245511,0.0004930339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012597347,0.00010752288,0.00010178943,0.00019951808,0.00007454105,0.00007726923,0.00009186569,0.00015000184,0.000014472637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009214224,0.00010519388,0.00039954056,0.00005543129,0.000038517963,3.894824e-7,0.03752773,0.00011811366,0.00376609,0.91843504,0.017594108,0.02186771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027773646,0.000994364,0.00021493674,0.00015988754,0.00009621025,0.0000028170925,0.07621298,0.016270557,0.035956524,0.17152722,0.69475126,0.0010359102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001167199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000146586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74690783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004937853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024746833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99571997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941853769","doi":"10.1177/1461444819837715","title":"Pics, Dicks, Tits, and Tats: negotiating ethics working with images of bodies in social media research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Media & Society","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Negotiation; Research ethics; Ethics of care; Informed consent; Information ethics; Sociology; Digital media; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Political science; Social science; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.3381640453559026,"score_gpt":0.4859006517324127,"score_spread":0.1477366063765101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941853769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604768,0.00770783,0.0006500526,0.010569409,0.0009418784,0.0006661319,0.000021848682,0.000080802965,0.018885246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660794,0.0022626754,0.029919103,0.00015976274,0.0010431245,0.00001046787,0.0000063539514,0.000025621792,0.0004934728],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996058,0.0016538389,0.00028223582,0.0003032228,0.001182404,0.00052031805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98946416,0.009874266,0.00014259262,0.00011253216,0.00027612463,0.0001303292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010742093,0.00012720212,0.0003363218,0.000058264737,0.0005127694,0.00008651415,0.00022477547,0.00027584715,0.000056562138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038412728,0.00010742168,0.00007108296,0.000567075,0.0014854129,0.00019443664,0.00011225936,0.0011598275,0.0000048389625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017543854,0.000022912767,0.031599138,0.00006278014,0.000022206443,0.0000010882316,0.93277574,0.0000025475583,0.0003133074,0.019273123,0.0038561602,0.012053464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010290743,0.00007339508,0.045377463,0.0002707081,0.000016676773,2.3493031e-7,0.9198454,0.000056236553,0.00016689286,0.013796498,0.019103743,0.00026365777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037557315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00668856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029269049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011972809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064613513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5677568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945654368","doi":"10.22148/16.038","title":"Towards A Queer Futurity of Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Queer; Sociology; Public relations; Focus (optics); Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2116111665954851,"score_gpt":0.48081158512408123,"score_spread":0.2692004185285961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945654368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94030565,0.0012612136,0.0032411164,0.0072788447,0.0010523925,0.00013221712,0.00004466343,0.000009419452,0.046674497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96911716,0.00034821304,0.026846237,0.00010947264,0.000569104,7.8472326e-8,0.0000026164548,0.0000043324726,0.0030027512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839836,0.00037350057,0.0004227604,0.000084912324,0.0005790156,0.00014143331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984264,0.00014468325,0.00048393544,0.00018034366,0.00066730386,0.00009736091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003117963,0.000068520676,0.00030166446,0.000048073434,0.000065752276,0.00003869478,0.00057729956,0.00005944255,0.00023035299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000622872,0.00004162372,0.00013654589,0.0002669188,0.0001351012,0.0006505598,0.00006909769,0.00018960482,0.000010128789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034868505,0.0005103324,0.030027805,0.00025359908,0.0011219824,0.000042118896,0.17110789,0.00021623734,0.006269716,0.62189996,0.051248245,0.116953395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010911067,0.0005507858,0.016169276,0.000169296,0.00029585065,0.00001839657,0.09741191,0.0008332473,0.0008484924,0.018746806,0.86349547,0.00036937252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039167106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000162289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8122472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049034814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017132351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25222036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951103683","doi":"10.1177/1359105319855120","title":"Strengthening behavioral clinical trials with online qualitative research methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Psychology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Affordance; Clinical trial; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Psychology; Translational research; Behavioural sciences; Applied psychology; Research design; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.9139382028970182,"score_gpt":0.8565507380226676,"score_spread":0.05738746487435065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951103683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8531295,0.0023067498,0.057375327,0.0777815,0.0037582885,0.0008092509,0.000018632838,0.000021291558,0.0047994517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16334397,0.0010630075,0.8290828,0.003730686,0.0015072249,0.0000073891697,0.0000032725477,0.000035093588,0.0012265878],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7506044,0.2440471,0.0033069935,0.00033595803,0.0009547023,0.0007508459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685233,0.027174866,0.0025008426,0.00025636115,0.0011478682,0.0003967229],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43748817,0.00013208906,0.001488756,0.00041612962,0.00038115197,0.00003439728,0.0004511347,0.00023265478,0.0004988485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011358024,0.00008836207,0.00027194532,0.00068001676,0.00089341897,0.00019438472,0.000032311364,0.0018450104,0.000024143606],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017456864,0.001358277,0.007148263,0.00003879071,0.00016916511,0.000018403762,0.2591327,0.0000028512231,0.00014202065,0.018858742,0.013658713,0.69772637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055525973,0.020592134,0.017298488,0.0002911293,0.000050606763,0.000039885133,0.36357167,0.000008744278,0.000011385575,0.030129552,0.5621559,0.00029794613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037330991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023333933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7717075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015536822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012596285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965977938","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.1106","title":"Notches on the dial: a call to action to develop plain language communication with the public about users and uses of health data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Population Data Science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Call to action; Action (physics); Dial; Computer science; Plain language; Psychology; Linguistics; Engineering; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.3586367229366417,"score_gpt":0.5420807147469173,"score_spread":0.1834439918102756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965977938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7973341,0.000090485075,0.03351772,0.16697954,0.00066669297,0.00075266365,0.00039983663,0.000013186213,0.00024578007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977978,0.00005527664,0.020210706,0.0014248346,0.000083297644,0.0000071296804,0.000109017135,0.0000050428957,0.00012671262],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801445,0.0005106765,0.0002474895,0.00022447926,0.000843425,0.00015947093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751437,0.00101776,0.00030179086,0.0005628866,0.00051485596,0.000088351335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012879281,0.000060097824,0.00009044789,0.00014511112,0.00083208777,0.0004207846,0.002607404,0.000015712638,0.000011430781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041158623,0.00003379396,0.00000900626,0.00056483893,0.00022812867,0.0014363752,0.00042521502,0.00010748853,0.0000034850943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028505796,0.00010805394,0.035890047,0.000015920898,0.00008058005,5.7430105e-7,0.07106634,0.0003146612,0.0010106278,0.36544478,0.017254334,0.508529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007503546,0.00043455046,0.40644994,0.0003795767,0.000018227514,0.000017887243,0.076069295,0.006533591,0.00021041319,0.0021015187,0.50665283,0.00038177782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003281179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010128062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50814724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013309137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035676008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63998306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973065356","doi":"10.1177/1609406919874596","title":"Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council","keywords":"Zoom; Data collection; Qualitative research; Videoconferencing; Context (archaeology); Interview; Qualitative property; Computer science; Medical education; Psychology; Multimedia; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9208258371883167,"score_gpt":0.7542458929981097,"score_spread":0.16657994419020694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973065356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5939814,0.0005386115,0.40320697,0.0009791048,0.0005401468,0.00023746445,0.000037891816,0.000003951318,0.00047446653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44977766,0.00009809795,0.54974484,0.000036746307,0.00011455467,0.0000099841845,0.000002521302,0.000007945166,0.00020761428],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98364234,0.014344906,0.00078335404,0.00026792983,0.00071084674,0.00025060127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982015,0.015197189,0.0007439811,0.00013720161,0.0017424315,0.00016419964],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046684533,0.00012403233,0.00043207334,0.00032098318,0.00024011005,0.00010276195,0.00047813138,0.00007405061,0.00017310667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013609099,0.00010637417,0.00008428929,0.00025289535,0.0010675166,0.0008521483,0.00015085243,0.00019769817,5.025814e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023961613,0.00004391651,0.0002840692,0.0000309969,0.00023139024,7.867526e-7,0.95167696,0.0000045416814,0.004492839,0.032321706,0.00006487657,0.010608304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006880302,0.00032969433,0.00031595893,0.00012721984,0.000038275564,0.000004527571,0.9634143,0.0016088567,0.00070556725,0.031072285,0.0015719335,0.0001233156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070211204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007600353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14653789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013239821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043294166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979001819","doi":"10.2196/14191","title":"Use of Web Conferencing Technology for Conducting Online Focus Groups Among Young People With Lived Experience of Suicidal Thoughts: Mixed Methods Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Mental Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fogarty International Center","keywords":"Focus group; Attendance; Psychology; Social media; Population; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.3115056836207876,"score_gpt":0.553601415451234,"score_spread":0.24209573183044636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979001819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99184877,0.00021696657,0.0041034087,0.0009889129,0.00029358664,0.0022213084,0.00007469925,0.000047674846,0.00020465173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8201547,0.000042760665,0.17925468,0.000018020271,0.000058187074,0.00015046612,0.0000124506605,0.000020159454,0.000288547],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453205,0.003105354,0.0006259996,0.0004352299,0.00058960106,0.0007117462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963944,0.0021493165,0.0005109132,0.00029196002,0.00047059072,0.00018279898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077222562,0.00016211688,0.0006271769,0.00033162057,0.00055860024,0.000030235798,0.00033044172,0.00015346354,0.000038901788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007965932,0.00013341033,0.00007677921,0.0011413464,0.0011174844,0.00034054965,0.00013021326,0.00033964572,8.5970186e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005998997,0.0006085182,0.2155301,0.0006969827,0.00006745289,9.0092817e-7,0.61980975,0.0000039994816,0.06550174,0.060176995,0.00015878232,0.03684488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012169675,0.0020721492,0.017981518,0.00030035232,0.0000065086238,0.000002780337,0.94598204,0.00051061664,0.029144617,0.0015606177,0.0009827749,0.00023905303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025318818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049596302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3261723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032818646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006917641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98117167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012817502","doi":"10.28984/drhj.v3i0.299","title":"The Outdoor Guided Walk as a Culturally Sensitive Research Method","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity of Research in Health Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Walk-in; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology; Applied psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.6654084432483583,"score_gpt":0.6561554273006314,"score_spread":0.009253015947726984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012817502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14880766,0.0020215588,0.0024631002,0.8167273,0.00042944448,0.0014778078,0.000025291429,0.000031825435,0.028016018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9003859,0.013041972,0.077092685,0.0028612562,0.0014379559,0.000011632552,0.0000027875674,0.000028379749,0.0051374165],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95293343,0.04119367,0.0005204642,0.00028980902,0.0037660066,0.0012966476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851915,0.01026519,0.00022744811,0.00015859128,0.0031322367,0.0010250326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13722196,0.00008806299,0.0003029445,0.00030665455,0.008437259,0.00018664144,0.0009746814,0.00009566922,0.000096386146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018338503,0.00006275944,0.00012216135,0.0019607085,0.0017412633,0.00026564652,0.0008372325,0.0024669692,0.00005263837],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007780551,0.00010381024,0.0050712,0.00017435421,0.00006680093,0.00022524677,0.7449971,0.000025390818,0.00016209473,0.10757985,0.054778416,0.08603768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010205606,0.0012679914,0.008336972,0.0002504359,0.0000029767848,0.000015769117,0.7187647,0.00027244037,0.0001509368,0.047133703,0.2226325,0.00015098986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042778518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002040283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.813866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070504966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002034604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024682157","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212","title":"Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":618,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Zoom; Videoconferencing; Interview; Qualitative research; Computer science; Teleconference; Multimedia; Phone; Qualitative property; Face-to-face; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.7835566246234399,"score_gpt":0.7143031370830593,"score_spread":0.06925348754038063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024682157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088323936,0.004284377,0.1680157,0.22769919,0.0005272748,0.0021892698,0.000063524676,0.0004891367,0.5084076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97500354,0.0002626345,0.020999415,0.0007888289,0.00038377382,0.00023107785,0.000024523313,0.000040666586,0.0022655337],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.937005,0.059002295,0.0011134002,0.0005883025,0.0015240171,0.0007670038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717327,0.025003048,0.00055640703,0.0010516067,0.0013164598,0.00033977733],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08013193,0.00023928167,0.0004957087,0.00013505355,0.002934691,0.000367234,0.0015349182,0.0001185761,0.00028247034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020850146,0.00017825232,0.00022907216,0.0018794287,0.0041354755,0.000746914,0.00050194043,0.0010629856,0.00018894805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002688396,0.00002970273,0.000009138628,0.000023616338,0.000063750165,0.000014529165,0.62832755,0.0000014030747,0.00032468457,0.36819416,0.0017413525,0.0012432367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013728476,0.00015957357,0.00002750921,0.00007423019,0.000016718806,0.0000029783027,0.77775574,0.00003432598,0.00010744229,0.13258265,0.08890476,0.00019676547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051936586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007353049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8866796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028051765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072100636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025469274","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2017.25253\"&gt;10.12927/cjnl.2017.25253&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt","title":"Social Media Technology and Public Health in Ontario: Findings from a Planning Meeting Exploring Current Practices and Future Research Directions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fanshawe College; London Health Sciences Centre; Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Social media; Public health; Government (linguistics); Health promotion; Political science; Corporate governance; Business; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.6680739512417033,"score_gpt":0.5320645282367887,"score_spread":0.1360094230049146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025469274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98576987,0.0012734049,0.00002104947,0.011812205,0.00042284204,0.00020252072,0.00000923789,0.00006784755,0.00042100484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978674,0.0012154094,0.00031943573,0.000024477258,0.00032436335,0.0000052305545,0.000004995928,0.0000161291,0.00022254356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623716,0.0018737596,0.00021166564,0.00056586904,0.00042214722,0.0006893887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793357,0.000994388,0.00040406152,0.00023268098,0.00016721812,0.0002681082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005184003,0.00016669357,0.0003161955,0.0011003049,0.0045022285,0.0010037419,0.0005851126,0.00020409946,0.000008888771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018212821,0.00019044497,0.000035645717,0.00058396097,0.0008366352,0.0033289404,0.0005725222,0.0015417916,0.0000037651978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022327318,0.000037450627,0.87648493,0.000012646776,0.000016091679,0.00002380665,0.09747082,2.37315e-8,0.000024631441,0.0034695251,3.8748155e-7,0.022437355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041947485,0.000034384844,0.8439869,0.00016760579,0.000008534079,0.0000011556905,0.07386724,4.3138154e-8,0.000011569385,0.0017099186,0.07962833,0.00016481386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01129083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75296986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7416791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061536167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042379074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99679375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025952062","doi":"10.33137/jaste.v5i1.34277","title":"Coltan Mining and Internet Privacy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Action (physics); Information privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07574475604767436,"score_gpt":0.4511725248381734,"score_spread":0.375427768790499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025952062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93337893,0.00016867406,0.004528857,0.059698816,0.0003612321,0.00015248095,6.129268e-7,0.00002821061,0.0016821618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828969,0.0000701028,0.01627578,0.00033887892,0.00015126402,0.000011995229,1.6119998e-7,0.0000031985142,0.0002516892],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993295,0.000047124682,0.000108746586,0.000170846,0.00016766343,0.00017609796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928325,0.00012133259,0.00011372251,0.000041991312,0.00030088512,0.00013882738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017026942,0.000051163082,0.000088159875,0.00019302094,0.00091412873,0.00020690977,0.00018985609,0.000051501494,0.0000058494975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033635208,0.000044380264,0.000011233924,0.0006749187,0.0012596385,0.0004804124,0.000043229342,0.000114965675,5.516273e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001716247,0.000045882876,0.012052155,0.000013863678,0.0000069645935,4.0862372e-7,0.037612624,3.3862435e-8,0.010099199,0.18584837,0.0029769095,0.75132644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004454362,0.00092140946,0.008545552,0.00007224551,0.00003107237,0.000055017776,0.15538427,0.00043045988,0.006488196,0.07848796,0.7488372,0.0003011952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024335051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009038282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75102526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007325299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067905145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70308316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031158659","doi":"10.1145/3334480.3381066","title":"Transparency in Qualitative Research: Increasing Fairness in the CHI Review Process","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Workaround; Scrutiny; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Computer science; Work (physics); Process management; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.6840428643641143,"score_gpt":0.6713005307277847,"score_spread":0.012742333636329595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031158659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30978763,0.017986424,0.0045918683,0.27818033,0.00007911666,0.002869652,0.000012196331,0.00008511707,0.38640764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933137,0.001931868,0.0016973624,0.0027890827,0.0000713597,0.00011578179,0.0000021159535,0.0000072688085,0.00007143622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697447,0.028238138,0.00041811258,0.00030421937,0.00087421964,0.00042061045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960725,0.0035187018,0.000052431322,0.000110238645,0.00015554443,0.000090589274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04542487,0.00009264699,0.00026671297,0.000077727906,0.00025041206,0.00005034542,0.0005235017,0.000050831586,0.00024576136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009248981,0.00006001069,0.000046794747,0.0027960513,0.000454602,0.00025731983,0.000018860193,0.0004781475,0.000022344273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021337446,0.000047143785,0.00083523744,0.0003656998,0.000002104501,0.000005993281,0.831152,7.474592e-7,0.000008312985,0.16233225,0.00027157512,0.004957552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002770471,0.00009839108,0.0043085874,0.0009407823,0.000004629626,2.7373153e-7,0.9304626,0.000030893254,0.000021121865,0.049344815,0.0143335005,0.00017736206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012083537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012464812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6835261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054213204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002033885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045095890","doi":"","title":"Education, networking, and fun: A preview of student activities at the 2008 AFS annual meeting in Ottawa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Medical education; Psychology; Environmental science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0693609430940844,"score_gpt":0.42235578721338296,"score_spread":0.35299484411929855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045095890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8549232,0.026382321,0.000056700603,0.0015373848,0.0002328526,0.00034983474,0.0000021770256,0.000013208862,0.116502345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97065765,0.0072490894,0.0028696717,0.00027846548,0.00028911742,0.00004966078,8.0495016e-7,0.0000073949905,0.018598137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804085,0.0012103566,0.00022494096,0.00012875575,0.00023080467,0.00016430151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989966,0.00070095586,0.00011529991,0.00008879757,0.00006039629,0.00003795503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027510133,0.00006733489,0.00016488426,0.000030040092,0.00037586936,0.000012540152,0.00011577678,0.000030690484,0.0001302878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015682104,0.000044063916,0.00003333168,0.0002420349,0.00047337695,0.00011468418,0.000060300266,0.000064289394,0.0000016966769],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010380132,0.00021860714,0.32843775,0.000064632746,0.000027441314,0.0000010197714,0.5027036,0.000006256163,0.000027034435,0.047196697,0.024331892,0.09697469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018166876,0.00007065213,0.17438531,0.00016441186,0.000013870352,0.0000026523044,0.18513058,0.000005063667,0.00006128866,0.0012555956,0.6385523,0.0001765893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036011739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010949112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61422044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049547845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013849731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6109861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048381478","doi":"10.22215/datapower.v2017i0.84","title":"Surveillance medicine, crowdsourced public health, and data-driven epidemiology: the privacy implications of digitally tracking and visualizing contagious disease outbreaks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Monetization; Public health; Computer science; Analytics; Crowdsourcing; World Wide Web; Data science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4433658589983952,"score_gpt":0.5403608917366545,"score_spread":0.09699503273825927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048381478","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34052718,0.007072612,0.05989632,0.5733542,0.00023272877,0.0011344029,0.00023863048,0.00011912852,0.0174248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957143,0.0006984576,0.0018779028,0.0014133363,0.00011330758,0.00001100094,0.0000242769,0.000008500399,0.00013888144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696237,0.0017515221,0.00043680018,0.00036753924,0.00014734158,0.00033443945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937901,0.0042657317,0.00055721117,0.0008585996,0.00013229523,0.00039605284],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009396397,0.00010570349,0.00038121024,0.000037725706,0.0017774004,0.0001411494,0.00077251345,0.00004366841,0.0000111135705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024467167,0.00006843014,0.000028097224,0.000072666604,0.002537041,0.00046814763,0.0003278732,0.00010376363,5.020966e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117590835,0.000025225563,0.5479118,0.000036180245,0.00003578308,3.935178e-7,0.02536769,3.4465134e-7,0.000021592226,0.31037804,0.0010169195,0.11519427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030416466,0.00005366455,0.9338423,0.000030168123,0.00000816734,9.640161e-7,0.008086519,0.00020189368,3.6885868e-7,0.018438825,0.03892229,0.000110680085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056662876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030112755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6551872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023081882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001810506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081363283","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0237875","title":"Exploring the ethical issues in research using digital data collection strategies with minors: A scoping review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Scrutiny; Harm; Data collection; Research ethics; Informed consent; Social research; Engineering ethics; Social media; Psychology; Public relations; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.9439772789083111,"score_gpt":0.6428719519843116,"score_spread":0.3011053269239995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081363283","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002523977,0.9931391,0.00008495745,0.0022939972,0.000036703746,0.0024017268,0.000019971661,0.000037719183,0.001960611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000003920351,0.9938037,0.0052528307,0.00003636317,0.00043783395,0.00028574088,0.000029927254,0.000033596738,0.000116119176],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.98965913,0.00729348,0.0005856164,0.0006026993,0.0014085484,0.00045054124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995269,0.0036681634,0.00020741404,0.000536835,0.00022014322,0.000098427976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011039035,0.00022803302,0.0014422034,0.00015530012,0.0006626025,0.0006521321,0.0009584909,0.00017409808,0.000031306376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006589953,0.00014493022,0.0000777622,0.0027491138,0.0006572053,0.00094742293,0.00038614534,0.001970867,0.000021006044],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019795289,0.0003038839,0.0000065546437,0.25041696,0.00036412803,0.00004410913,0.021913195,1.9345383e-7,7.360489e-7,0.006038484,0.00022724485,0.7206647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048165726,0.0000877656,4.391869e-7,0.72399575,0.00027894805,0.0000011493795,0.007788213,0.000012978357,5.440345e-7,0.00023893952,0.26730585,0.00024121818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018141152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018725487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72042346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025140037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002151625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8562546},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3091731986","doi":"10.24095/hpcdp.31.3.09","title":"Book review - Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chronic diseases and injuries in Canada","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mixed mode; The Internet; Mode (computer interface); Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Materials science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.052642443278329835,"score_gpt":0.36539472246458093,"score_spread":0.3127522791862511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091731986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021113825,0.9820401,0.0086297365,0.0023151173,0.0004470963,0.00061445695,0.00007404242,0.000018537174,0.003749543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44497088,0.5019964,0.010848579,0.0307046,0.0006100692,0.0005629966,0.00003057822,0.00009611698,0.010179783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957517,0.003225802,0.00024822302,0.0002453374,0.00021978316,0.00030917302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986676,0.0008510651,0.00008815188,0.00017339157,0.000043734126,0.00017608517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024246252,0.00013650101,0.00026786997,0.00002329978,0.00021994169,0.000040482933,0.00022576695,0.000029357725,0.00076326786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046012836,0.00009474972,0.000035549463,0.00015727944,0.00057966914,0.0001751945,0.00008708319,0.000109551,8.393259e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062848565,0.000045175973,0.004692951,0.0009087587,0.00009417556,0.00002091565,0.009617849,0.0000017636455,0.0000027385777,0.02767057,0.6745354,0.28234684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030536376,0.00014879601,0.029603954,0.0005876527,0.00009894147,0.0000011123655,0.0054491432,0.00013627036,0.00006498387,0.006686272,0.95655704,0.0003604889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9075088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8885989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4800437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003825066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018911918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8357248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099206088","doi":"10.29173/cais1151","title":"There for the Reaping: The Ethics of Harvesting Online Data for Research Purposes","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5572222472289129,"score_gpt":0.495910418686661,"score_spread":0.06131182854225187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099206088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31189173,0.01307701,0.003024459,0.65304404,0.0008649627,0.0044157207,0.0078054145,0.00004555999,0.0058310693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98030853,0.0018334027,0.012716606,0.0009672104,0.001034248,0.00011198884,0.000021437494,0.000054098266,0.0029524623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572664,0.0007795394,0.00093723595,0.00057581457,0.0011938586,0.00078689907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74338526,0.049170267,0.003918666,0.001378923,0.2016707,0.0004761522],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020640494,0.00030795817,0.000692671,0.00006659687,0.0013233298,0.0017595965,0.0066768704,0.00034980892,0.000025662965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35381877,0.00017683652,0.0003066357,0.0011629559,0.0059892153,0.004935505,0.001750755,0.0012150308,8.410647e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044655162,0.00021216048,0.0031083894,0.002453141,0.0003250096,2.117016e-7,0.40913454,0.000008677046,0.005426897,0.5079711,0.014539912,0.056373388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005389222,0.0009293535,0.0025717493,0.00094399345,0.00028611955,0.0000021790058,0.19159564,0.004835282,0.0055857985,0.040745273,0.751701,0.00026466974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029495815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043486356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7371611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052266114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012109893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118927379","doi":"10.2196/22980","title":"Conducting Virtual, Synchronous Focus Groups Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Qualitative Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health; Fordham University","keywords":"Focus group; Men who have sex with men; Qualitative research; Informed consent; Incentive; Family medicine; Psychology; Medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Alternative medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.15228319254837108,"score_gpt":0.4489864446137224,"score_spread":0.2967032520653513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118927379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97171396,0.0012663915,0.0012741905,0.0097310245,0.00029228133,0.0009320764,0.00003740391,0.00013521925,0.01461748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957336,0.000117589014,0.00065015163,0.0005304584,0.00041872874,0.00010783202,0.000022958735,0.00001978996,0.0023988646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817077,0.015059767,0.00069363636,0.0007772003,0.0006927219,0.0010689978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953877,0.0024175646,0.00035343942,0.0003351236,0.0004986187,0.001007573],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016835032,0.00026534498,0.00068933395,0.000103245446,0.0014076987,0.00033705062,0.00023057453,0.00014012694,0.00013334307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034151035,0.00025749285,0.00006448324,0.0009265034,0.0009236335,0.0005153416,0.00012878209,0.0004286008,0.000015210573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021138625,0.00051519333,0.14470397,0.00009607153,0.00006803496,0.000022728324,0.7798889,4.0611684e-7,0.000009709284,0.026726354,0.0032803942,0.044667076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008047077,0.00070259237,0.034138512,0.000006687571,0.0000010986067,0.0000020611399,0.9445995,0.00008107932,0.0000011400728,0.0006292361,0.018684182,0.00034918895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010858443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019151764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1647106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027519837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016101649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119035199","doi":"10.29173/eureka28754","title":"Featured Research Images","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eureka","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.5554677036281155,"score_gpt":0.5915469626773869,"score_spread":0.03607925904927145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119035199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0099660475,0.0017519904,0.0022474471,0.16688703,0.00030531173,0.00026709845,0.000010420492,0.0001592815,0.8184054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94119376,0.000119775345,0.021845357,0.0024479812,0.0018705688,0.000016025917,0.0000026312125,0.0000201334,0.03248376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970754,0.0019494141,0.00007497801,0.00017090111,0.00045295808,0.0002763462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910563,0.0004934332,0.000017245482,0.000078483456,0.00013688195,0.00016834616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031377708,0.00004554439,0.0000838665,0.000028299275,0.00044418787,0.00007406005,0.00021623557,0.000047452006,0.00088586845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027044185,0.000039340655,0.00003911238,0.00054890296,0.00033485057,0.0000884779,0.00004495819,0.000266693,0.00057769346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028984361,0.000024934783,0.00059516414,0.000013842447,0.000011106027,0.000018906132,0.13852175,7.0891946e-7,0.0043225326,0.22250395,0.60513854,0.028819589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086783795,0.000053155432,0.0017806754,0.0000037068962,0.0000015053547,6.279912e-8,0.011229154,0.0000041483377,0.0009626682,0.0048697023,0.9809453,0.00006312156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035437843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006497978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93122774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022155125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069329704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96996385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128484755","doi":"10.29173/iasl7569","title":"Getting Past \"Shsssh\": Online Focus Groups as Empowering Professional Development for Teacher Librarians","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IASL Annual Conference Proceedings","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Professional development; Empowerment; Online community; Qualitative research; Sociology; Focus (optics); Community of practice; Faculty development; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07273105053143004,"score_gpt":0.39993196878664034,"score_spread":0.3272009182552103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128484755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95198035,0.0002743058,0.012831981,0.014767638,0.00092890026,0.000703424,0.00005468568,0.00028538588,0.018173331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8785377,0.000017026317,0.09843028,0.00063191116,0.0010646672,0.00018205684,0.000039827617,0.00004475604,0.02105175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737984,0.00014170421,0.0005023834,0.0006277697,0.00060733134,0.0007409443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764,0.00030947215,0.0002314046,0.00008556861,0.0014514565,0.00028206405],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001909027,0.00027637207,0.0003641159,0.000094247975,0.0010870534,0.00038817115,0.0004010618,0.00022785012,0.00046145965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018518438,0.0002583565,0.00011664519,0.00042913738,0.000254138,0.0009076864,0.00022986213,0.00038862447,0.000029375991],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007122765,0.00033252494,0.003971842,0.00011355342,0.000059193975,0.000008683391,0.8148473,2.4769648e-7,0.0015485894,0.096114196,0.0032406722,0.07969198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059915544,0.00012832206,0.006177357,0.00030714585,0.000022626311,0.0000062703866,0.67686516,0.00009560064,0.0034331412,0.022544136,0.2892076,0.0006134704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012294525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016996272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28596693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011785865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012139203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136925596","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4639","title":"YouTube for Transcribing and Google Drive for Collaborative Coding: Cost-Effective Tools for Collecting and Analyzing Interview Data","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cloud computing; Computer science; Data sharing; Qualitative research; Coding (social sciences); World Wide Web; Data science; Data collection; Knowledge management; Sociology","score_opus":0.5618181083390276,"score_gpt":0.5864365700391426,"score_spread":0.024618461700115057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136925596","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02471698,0.004223557,0.94636905,0.008947471,0.00039578203,0.011109246,0.001911755,0.000060466624,0.002265705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5737715,0.0010826184,0.40386182,0.0010126147,0.001096343,0.01184862,0.0010958416,0.00016480911,0.0060658306],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396336,0.003912324,0.00065326906,0.0007770656,0.00023843149,0.00045552128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96212244,0.035367902,0.00050323753,0.0003478944,0.0015348203,0.00012371154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026424283,0.00023643495,0.00065000076,0.00006367516,0.0019184541,0.0003750326,0.00023989483,0.00009860778,0.0000074205095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031063993,0.00018677054,0.00013912554,0.0005995391,0.00068509905,0.0006670929,0.00011616878,0.00014387423,2.0489743e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030045316,0.000059344606,0.000066428925,0.00037057587,0.0005633046,0.00000847035,0.7203528,0.0000022432712,0.001629255,0.18273583,0.0010922943,0.09281895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014170454,0.00046291843,0.00009758577,0.00025172546,0.00034172347,0.00001386445,0.8252902,0.00061671546,0.002138261,0.036966015,0.13202392,0.0003800099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018800709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013087061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5490545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001429835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004382493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150215658","doi":"10.4192/1577-8517-v6_3","title":"The World Wide Web and Its Potential for Corporate Environmental Communication: A Study into Present Practices in the Australian Minerals Industry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; BHP Billiton; University of New England; Newmont Corporation; Newcrest Mining; Barrick Gold Corporation","keywords":"Business; Environmental communication; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.23427075716516668,"score_gpt":0.505318220895554,"score_spread":0.27104746373038735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150215658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92635053,0.00040850227,0.0000051838474,0.06994195,0.00011717348,0.0004274641,0.000009896135,0.0000023286143,0.0027369594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466217,0.00005521939,0.000106315754,0.000052840696,0.00064703345,0.000025712625,0.000002506165,0.0000064897777,0.0044417125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962935,0.0013816513,0.00042861782,0.00010618842,0.0015575108,0.00023253115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99184656,0.00682927,0.00074402156,0.0001284713,0.00041927904,0.000032419823],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01795525,0.000074842224,0.000098611745,0.00013781438,0.000855044,0.001841958,0.001524758,0.000040176983,0.000015277808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025229724,0.0000387091,0.000053793345,0.0002559419,0.00054788956,0.0009336378,0.00023762588,0.0007588225,0.000002703695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030318517,0.004886567,0.62064177,0.000041003634,0.0010494469,0.00020952654,0.10163704,0.000792143,0.005508531,0.124624155,0.091575526,0.04600245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025475218,0.0005583907,0.13144527,0.00016906815,0.00005183404,0.000056452445,0.3789985,0.00086166745,0.00027097086,0.1743208,0.310411,0.00030852327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080530916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028556762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48919648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001259018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013784478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157870926","doi":"10.1177/16094069211013659","title":"Engaging the Senses in Qualitative Research via Multimodal Coding: Triangulating Transcript, Audio, and Video Data in a Study With Sexual and Gender Minority Youth","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario HIV Treatment Network","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Modalities; Qualitative research; Distress; Grounded theory; Psychology; Computer science; Qualitative property; Sexual orientation; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.8358132916543443,"score_gpt":0.6984151962855772,"score_spread":0.13739809536876701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157870926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86183745,0.0014088649,0.13208683,0.003388389,0.00025380647,0.00037370456,0.000060229322,0.0000062064605,0.0005845064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7903515,0.000054555538,0.2092096,0.000079712096,0.00020323026,0.000008982993,0.0000051031293,0.0000128058255,0.00007452417],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88569343,0.110740766,0.0010594059,0.00052204536,0.0015820345,0.00040229692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963573,0.034017462,0.00046010324,0.00022835749,0.0015831534,0.00013793583],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14773312,0.00020213184,0.0005480972,0.0005068602,0.0003883458,0.00024116845,0.0005980175,0.00007734445,0.000023520355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021713275,0.00014469643,0.000047996844,0.00084187015,0.00114342,0.0007609331,0.0002449644,0.0011629235,2.5500094e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005512863,0.00028304063,0.0056503457,0.000027914013,0.0002575946,0.00014382378,0.94927806,0.000012382912,0.0013634603,0.008216523,0.000009045792,0.03420654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024884306,0.0003317868,0.015727382,0.00008490308,0.00005363263,0.000024901636,0.9623313,0.0005320684,0.000121165256,0.018010722,0.00011479282,0.00017894171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005146555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006115597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12601985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002395383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041420103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98652726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158871795","doi":"10.4000/terminal.7019","title":"Enquêter avec Facebook : examen de l’identité numérique de l’ethnographe au cours d’un séjour de terrain hors ligne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Terminal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ligne; Art","score_opus":0.037634805380207005,"score_gpt":0.37132973539860104,"score_spread":0.333694930018394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158871795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289587,0.0027251905,0.026953198,0.008516614,0.00092898885,0.0004083213,0.000052983854,0.00008383037,0.031372163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8568068,0.0006486774,0.056070667,0.0019648755,0.0017735265,0.00017224999,0.000011068163,0.00007883988,0.08247329],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915807,0.00520657,0.00052652654,0.0005841334,0.0005220106,0.0015800422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781626,0.0007579964,0.00025510805,0.000380469,0.00015925217,0.00063093344],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068317424,0.00038930748,0.00050356914,0.00013186189,0.0007806949,0.00026232796,0.0005695735,0.0004532324,0.0034113724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005213496,0.00042309047,0.00040665988,0.00058441603,0.0013675861,0.0003317904,0.00017411255,0.00067538983,0.00014296717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006679794,0.00044615575,0.051719297,0.00020595326,0.00022374334,0.0027156016,0.66981494,0.000013891816,0.01008208,0.01431819,0.0042917044,0.24610165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019580731,0.00077214104,0.102052726,0.001069681,0.00037898315,0.0014321433,0.36683515,0.001495247,0.035979386,0.094728276,0.39123622,0.0020619659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061798887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058165104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38694453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008237982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015051854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159449821","doi":"10.1017/s0008423921000226","title":"Harnessing Technologies in Focus Group Research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Field (mathematics); Data science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.19200966339938294,"score_gpt":0.49368710938029864,"score_spread":0.3016774459809157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159449821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.817323,0.0025402107,0.0022146483,0.07824253,0.0010485135,0.00012507892,0.0000068969366,0.000021356967,0.09847772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99286336,0.00001044518,0.0067695603,0.00008422378,0.00011319603,9.983012e-7,5.2809565e-8,0.000003417981,0.00015475895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963933,0.0008893807,0.00027796277,0.00017775586,0.0007588394,0.0015027212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970748,0.00077537156,0.000048365946,0.00012727172,0.0008747689,0.0010994506],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015517503,0.000055598484,0.00015626497,0.0007232226,0.0009040708,0.0003188649,0.000666717,0.00007996463,0.00012897937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0249563,0.00004876855,0.000045382894,0.0030260524,0.006149127,0.0004699258,0.000044477707,0.000550389,0.000008468267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.68317e-7,0.0000089479845,0.0038677775,0.0000021436613,8.246126e-7,0.0002808901,0.0028665492,3.3531376e-7,0.0005474048,0.9727542,0.00009234549,0.01957774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021051567,0.00010564293,0.081278294,0.00017454794,0.0000027430583,0.000054140877,0.1735671,0.000017728593,0.0038561174,0.6988411,0.041713826,0.00017823235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122266516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4240758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3018093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012655081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01019139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99655557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166412400","doi":"10.20944/preprints202106.0273.v1","title":"&lt;strong&gt;Co-creation of HIVST Delivery Approaches for Improving Urban Men’s Engagement with HIV Services in eThekwini District, KwaZulu-Natal: Nominal Group Technique&lt;/strong&gt;","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Impact; HIV Legal Network","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Service delivery framework; Medicine; Nonprobability sampling; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Business; Family medicine; Nursing; Environmental health; Marketing; Service (business); Population","score_opus":0.1481424905451999,"score_gpt":0.3936864002014293,"score_spread":0.2455439096562294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166412400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86736095,0.00056558294,0.09839029,0.00035906202,0.0003044782,0.0050732456,0.0003689737,0.00023645812,0.027340962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95130324,0.00010367141,0.044398088,0.000020717847,0.00030704413,0.002548168,0.0006378334,0.000089697394,0.0005915474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99219173,0.002753293,0.0012824454,0.00182622,0.0010578089,0.00088849745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960272,0.0008656837,0.0013147984,0.0011713097,0.0003831544,0.00023789426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010165962,0.0007250668,0.0011416449,0.00043346352,0.00050440186,0.00015428312,0.0013212684,0.00061619625,0.00017443842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050140504,0.00071406824,0.0004205599,0.00050538726,0.00065976736,0.0005168075,0.001375325,0.0011419572,0.000014698155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020170049,0.0031227705,0.55904424,0.010007252,0.0014000372,0.000055348653,0.22726116,0.0020061948,0.05755665,0.080782674,0.0001434617,0.0566032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061794743,0.00096046267,0.6248553,0.0042784843,0.0015619448,0.000010820852,0.20742698,0.009437712,0.09023099,0.004700776,0.044851005,0.005506076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006631571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031237325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08394229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009808218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073217665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168145137","doi":"10.2196/20970","title":"WhatsApp-Based Focus Groups Among Mexican-Origin Women in Zika Risk Area: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Data Quality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Psychological intervention; Zika virus; Population; Social media; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Medicine; Medical education; The Internet; Psychology; Internet privacy; Environmental health; Nursing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.30657208063642605,"score_gpt":0.5573182565505677,"score_spread":0.2507461759141416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168145137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97923034,0.00039719415,0.001148194,0.0019991442,0.00010059982,0.0010682788,0.00035295764,0.000045238074,0.015658064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703705,0.00026963674,0.0018108503,0.00003375376,0.00011095623,0.00030995146,0.00006058242,0.00001908016,0.00034813228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729495,0.021772109,0.00077004934,0.0010126599,0.0019604745,0.0015352104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99028105,0.006732031,0.00021320168,0.0013669032,0.00080752105,0.0005993048],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0670745,0.00025257978,0.00067634636,0.00033981306,0.0011562795,0.00051674293,0.0011474239,0.00023426059,0.0012840396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009755027,0.00022547557,0.00009273681,0.0024099404,0.0029197019,0.0019990087,0.0013400166,0.0013571329,0.00003319003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023192442,0.0011584073,0.6843573,0.00021717125,0.0000590795,0.000020529815,0.21910189,0.000002857781,0.00007223194,0.02033858,0.00073468714,0.07370533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012765472,0.00022233825,0.7268762,0.000066715045,0.000005442793,3.2178627e-7,0.18393588,0.0006898155,0.00030666796,0.08072176,0.0055414434,0.00035685152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013928873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04255662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07334848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012763565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011367099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175747495","doi":"10.29173/irie215","title":"Auto-biography: On the Immanent Commodification of Personal Information","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Information Ethics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Brantford Energy (Canada)","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Commodification; Biography; Internet privacy; Politics; Personally identifiable information; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Law; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.14629938461823508,"score_gpt":0.44717305183035333,"score_spread":0.3008736672121183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175747495","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026768077,0.0080813505,0.052677814,0.46900475,0.0032218827,0.0028716219,0.00034946745,0.0000965067,0.43692854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679659,0.015693616,0.001134663,0.014835259,0.00013900992,0.000038848764,0.000121108314,0.0000036452673,0.00006797193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972226,0.00074752246,0.0006630407,0.000029619285,0.0012170502,0.00012016864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593854,0.002076568,0.0008382115,0.00015964049,0.00095246546,0.000034562145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015149527,0.000076284596,0.00012754735,0.000102151316,0.0002762983,0.000033250395,0.0004891902,0.00006872745,0.00029195295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050972793,0.000042913056,0.00014055606,0.00030515023,0.00038147476,0.0013609013,0.000038913084,0.00033571725,0.000073437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011293882,0.000020096366,0.0001118081,0.00033429737,0.000026958249,2.1256947e-9,0.05787231,0.00000538083,0.0000070123892,0.92161995,0.0028266343,0.017164275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013138042,0.00004320084,0.006103094,0.0015465904,0.000031594544,7.821772e-7,0.017509744,0.000494685,0.00031919073,0.0051819505,0.96852833,0.000109464956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003265332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007670604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9657017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006934817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012706502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6102288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185469533","doi":"","title":"mhealth technologies and doctor-patient relationships in the context of consumer culture in Winnipeg, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"mHealth; Context (archaeology); Medicine; Sociology; Gerontology; Psychology; Nursing; History; Psychological intervention","score_opus":0.04869408902145209,"score_gpt":0.3032719555768138,"score_spread":0.2545778665553617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185469533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889285,0.0034328217,0.000009701313,0.0019393716,0.00013630986,0.00030032048,0.00004565629,0.000009525891,0.005197788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730617,0.0013846126,0.0007888756,0.00001941997,0.0000051740585,7.828433e-7,0.0000578337,0.000004153735,0.00043300705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981669,0.0010439919,0.00013501183,0.00017978641,0.000323545,0.00015074531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888915,0.0005431945,0.0002561943,0.00013154183,0.00015668491,0.000023260325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008170159,0.00009964924,0.00028200363,0.00014111446,0.0002642826,0.000009757623,0.00023078095,0.0002228678,0.000004595551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005468359,0.00009807811,0.0000363179,0.00051150576,0.0002490773,0.00008575321,0.000028108367,0.00043158064,3.9629845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015133966,0.00015249326,0.32244226,0.00057904783,0.000073425355,0.000090663496,0.5285774,0.000007439272,0.00010649495,0.11300226,0.010062462,0.024754683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014555354,0.000027387121,0.12518966,0.00015167253,0.000016644199,1.9460067e-7,0.85140336,0.000002859207,0.000026440097,0.00043810197,0.02251574,0.00008236816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89012015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32282597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021642682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005993488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39995092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186219371","doi":"10.29173/cjen131","title":"The patient journey map: Improving the emergency department communication experience for patients and their family and friends","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; Interior Health; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Emergency department; General partnership; PDCA; Focus group; Patient experience; Medicine; Medical education; Psychology; Medical emergency; Nursing; Health care; Engineering; Quality management; Operations management; Business; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.06609240605245438,"score_gpt":0.373737424163493,"score_spread":0.3076450181110386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186219371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522613,0.032481022,0.0021740878,0.008094115,0.0035117401,0.0002736566,0.00002525711,0.0000031795446,0.0011755878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957759,0.0025363786,0.0013937553,0.0000667899,0.000118667864,0.000012166214,0.0000025333288,0.000010196081,0.000083636325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981721,0.00072497345,0.0004657381,0.00012106062,0.00017597052,0.00034013815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829495,0.0002570893,0.00032749426,0.00015861832,0.0006219319,0.00033990084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014279421,0.0001057334,0.00013203181,0.00004796628,0.0028248169,0.00009988876,0.00023943005,0.000043433938,0.00004044502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076988357,0.00006582708,0.000083534745,0.00019063854,0.00032312132,0.00022505755,0.000016854056,0.00015822018,1.9201617e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002287794,0.00004564122,0.012709091,0.00001229544,0.0000580471,0.0000021040255,0.49082175,0.0000034608108,0.00022026538,0.014737613,0.006485054,0.4748818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043453157,0.0003948145,0.03498165,0.00016547157,0.00007337403,0.0000054573047,0.6279281,0.000168251,0.00025425968,0.032147188,0.30312157,0.00032537032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01651664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47455642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015015464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004136163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198945804","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046086","title":"How do general practices respond to a pandemic? Protocol for a prospective qualitative study of six Australian practices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Data collection; Research ethics; Best practice; Citizen journalism; Health care; Public relations; Qualitative research; Participatory action research; Medical education; Protocol (science); Medicine; Sociology; Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Alternative medicine; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.6236637934006726,"score_gpt":0.6984426165354926,"score_spread":0.07477882313481998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198945804","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1718082,0.0000060443567,0.0005697415,0.021169461,0.00016582385,0.7895682,0.00008753835,0.00004152744,0.016583499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04180715,4.0520123e-7,0.10022758,0.00016726581,0.0003571189,0.79015374,0.0000035819896,0.000027864484,0.06725529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881806,0.009440774,0.00051914743,0.00068659236,0.0007639791,0.0004089344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185324,0.003803082,0.0024590415,0.00042326632,0.0012729096,0.00018844038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018566614,0.00019991651,0.00053990714,0.00009194214,0.0005209287,0.0009871938,0.0007142282,0.0001041149,0.00017241036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039434932,0.00016895897,0.00009314585,0.00087856996,0.00017196784,0.0015182163,0.00036093933,0.00019105576,0.0000055311352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042449287,0.0013913804,0.007788288,0.00013947442,0.00024439357,0.000018701376,0.9463301,0.0000029513628,0.0015519694,0.029094549,0.00698261,0.0022106983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023699868,0.0019912764,0.0023740982,0.000092737486,0.00004403075,0.0000015207223,0.77285486,0.0000023016282,0.0008555013,0.004993608,0.21415755,0.00026252697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007629968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02696677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20717494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001491314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011577887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199996782","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4906","title":"Challenges in Conducting Online Videoconferencing Qualitative Interviews with Adolescents on Sensitive Topics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Nova Southeastern University","keywords":"Rigour; Data collection; Interview; Confidentiality; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Psychology; Distancing; Social distance; Qualitative property; Sociology; Computer science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.6488245843527112,"score_gpt":0.5974438563722932,"score_spread":0.05138072798041793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199996782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88361424,0.0013361172,0.0037926452,0.032727547,0.00047492344,0.00085211155,0.000032765623,0.000096373435,0.07707327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895004,0.0003312946,0.006796678,0.00058748305,0.00030567482,0.000048109818,0.000025567057,0.000031399744,0.0023733773],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97540694,0.021836372,0.0008133032,0.0006714283,0.0007630599,0.00050889445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99386054,0.004068282,0.00060155237,0.00046612907,0.00087775756,0.00012572727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01853387,0.00028128645,0.0006212199,0.00011579996,0.00041236627,0.00006444147,0.00021634801,0.0001137308,0.000044348886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007143062,0.00019910642,0.00013360739,0.0006070881,0.00075053226,0.0002387621,0.00008931909,0.00063051825,0.000015934686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008807246,0.00019173091,0.00005825577,0.000056339453,0.000072343915,0.00041594976,0.85797375,0.0000066941207,0.00015460642,0.117027394,0.000024522325,0.023930354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004321037,0.0002264434,0.0013474716,0.00087500276,0.000022314776,0.00003675097,0.97509426,0.000009236093,0.0011674246,0.015493831,0.004985622,0.000309523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018524666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019425567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11712054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003020747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004937696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201574503","doi":"10.2196/30293","title":"Adapting a Mental Health Intervention for Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Web-Based Synchronous Focus Group Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Focus group; Facilitator; Pandemic; Mental health; Medical education; Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Social distance; Internet privacy; Public relations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Nursing; Business; Social psychology","score_opus":0.21508104239344575,"score_gpt":0.549055849778746,"score_spread":0.3339748073853003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201574503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530907,0.0009065592,0.029435672,0.009115971,0.00040126397,0.0058045653,0.00015432961,0.00014973566,0.00094115123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774635,0.00004197791,0.0006626961,0.00019629896,0.0001478212,0.0008653466,0.000021081829,0.000019117644,0.0002993291],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859002,0.011157332,0.0004991663,0.00036263454,0.0011924119,0.0008882488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732226,0.0015031531,0.00021042366,0.00024405004,0.00039572778,0.00032436204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022421675,0.00015061928,0.00027391894,0.00018554216,0.0041768304,0.0002403976,0.00041179344,0.00006850793,0.000119895696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015565511,0.00011438205,0.00019733688,0.0008694264,0.0004769812,0.00034731097,0.00022494879,0.0005541422,0.00001633674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00103481,0.003766435,0.059266403,0.0015461481,0.00015998105,0.000016684962,0.8188471,0.000019907566,0.0005319394,0.011334989,0.0039676353,0.09950796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010255789,0.0028079073,0.03438832,0.00053467957,0.00001077728,0.000007051419,0.88408786,0.0019387755,0.00012925842,0.0032142294,0.06220453,0.00042084442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026887674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124579305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09908711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019508613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090412993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203873529","doi":"10.1177/16094069211040302","title":"Methodological and Practical Considerations in Rapid Qualitative Research: Lessons Learned From a Team-Based Global Study During COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; McMaster University","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"CLARITY; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Management science; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering; Social science; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.9673016450998352,"score_gpt":0.7991634600505446,"score_spread":0.16813818504929057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203873529","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40398616,0.0013685512,0.4940406,0.09737811,0.0008711273,0.0004542897,0.00017713018,0.00003452677,0.001689497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43422264,0.00017963268,0.5644275,0.00074899534,0.00028859038,0.000031720232,0.000006102138,0.000012470627,0.00008232579],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7116425,0.28395367,0.0014246484,0.00060490577,0.0018998068,0.00047446796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83874846,0.15657109,0.0008128816,0.00020328221,0.0031190717,0.0005452043],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17282754,0.0002585239,0.0008934441,0.0005068375,0.00068368134,0.0003285221,0.00030061035,0.00021698997,0.0006976005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3343358,0.00022936978,0.00024063875,0.000968778,0.0018219597,0.0005686707,0.00022262965,0.0013652671,0.0000047433887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008812104,0.0010206832,0.0042951913,0.00001295859,0.0005287999,0.0007714263,0.7459184,0.00006404581,0.0025687825,0.23713787,0.00024875195,0.0065519116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021387879,0.00023500095,0.004235682,0.00005163517,0.000034702913,0.000057128087,0.560751,0.000029296085,0.0002088167,0.42977652,0.0023099207,0.00017149898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002856865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003819713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19263865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001392649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031443243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9353428},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3204082631","doi":"10.1177/16094069211047823","title":"Ethical Considerations for Qualitative Research Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Emergency Situations: Navigating the Virtual Field","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Netnography; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Pandemic; Participatory action research; Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Citizen journalism; Research ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social media; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.8355572675998658,"score_gpt":0.7688195838625806,"score_spread":0.06673768373728517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204082631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016532717,0.0017762001,0.7896223,0.18947512,0.0012323328,0.00039104267,0.00006714096,0.000017033684,0.00088608224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067762256,0.0006302061,0.921546,0.007469998,0.0011952706,0.00015128985,0.0000033189028,0.00003201515,0.0012096517],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.854684,0.14186414,0.0013251113,0.00034934457,0.0013738233,0.00040357362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6329016,0.35896057,0.0010823996,0.00028095907,0.006448104,0.00032638747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19434482,0.00019407069,0.000411415,0.00017651997,0.0024251803,0.00028163675,0.0006029296,0.0002356873,0.00061443896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3502666,0.00012550312,0.00031728958,0.000606015,0.0016158547,0.00029748012,0.00018399877,0.0021645245,0.000002245046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091165944,0.000035784007,0.00009501085,0.000012642173,0.00025114953,0.0000049390665,0.5546274,0.000022444588,0.0037929197,0.4264528,0.0009493845,0.013664357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004345121,0.00011432864,0.000053307063,0.000040821244,0.000031315947,0.000049861013,0.46827036,0.000049416438,0.0011153686,0.49254704,0.03718179,0.00011188988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078607816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086065533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22178242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003663335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012137825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205359208","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.72911","title":"Trena M. Paulus and Jessica N. Lester. (2021). <i>Doing Qualitative Research in a Digital World</i> .","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.45690969009530114,"score_gpt":0.6064682169151608,"score_spread":0.1495585268198597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205359208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91842085,0.012421424,0.0008195146,0.017980773,0.0007309025,0.00131257,0.000021833426,0.000017911563,0.04827423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873939,0.00005289306,0.011728769,0.000043914202,0.00025052746,0.000037882943,0.000006180313,0.000013467533,0.0004724633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932875,0.0048417016,0.00041842277,0.00017896727,0.0008342746,0.00043914645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965021,0.001108363,0.00016831297,0.00008679798,0.001641224,0.00049319485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021786865,0.0000812939,0.0002030023,0.00050585286,0.00033032472,0.0005287662,0.00012509519,0.00006068437,0.00012452631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004204241,0.00007853891,0.000058094953,0.0015043542,0.00049708487,0.00059899327,0.0000138955775,0.0003869279,0.0000038828625],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010604119,0.000038179125,0.0017639803,0.000011009037,0.000016034655,0.0000744021,0.12962918,0.0000069317116,0.000014540105,0.011146893,0.0004577743,0.8568305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017153433,0.00054521294,0.0074777333,0.00065810484,0.0000496999,0.000024983257,0.3682438,0.00045947914,0.000079925725,0.11683097,0.50357634,0.00033842784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005355317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3501594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85649204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058128353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049458225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8773677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205606861","doi":"10.1177/10497323211043823","title":"Using Videoconferencing Focus Groups in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research With Chinese Im/Migrants in Australia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Videoconferencing; Reproductive health; Qualitative research; Psychology; Troubleshooting; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; Multimedia; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.8267515766628872,"score_gpt":0.7080122210141803,"score_spread":0.11873935564870697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205606861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9623189,0.0033390643,0.0009889964,0.030307489,0.00009641869,0.0017920419,0.00004180537,0.00002743739,0.0010878342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742207,0.00045582597,0.023541238,0.0001627929,0.00026745722,0.0001744727,0.000012662555,0.00004526812,0.0011195781],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88549787,0.105973385,0.0011386899,0.0016279654,0.0029300095,0.002832091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98404807,0.012188412,0.0002513523,0.00056342466,0.0021283184,0.00082044594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17010102,0.00029457608,0.0009610096,0.0014354411,0.0020258015,0.0002326657,0.000350517,0.00018880068,0.00009431211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01739853,0.00025789195,0.00004164023,0.0074674054,0.002796113,0.0006128375,0.00026993302,0.002823607,0.000014918705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003540776,0.0003285073,0.019755384,0.00048303403,0.000023708846,0.00009548884,0.88749903,0.000009868214,0.00023371159,0.06448858,0.0002483904,0.026480189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012659463,0.0011523925,0.05285605,0.0005725859,0.0000010943719,0.000006428822,0.86528516,0.000094125855,0.00006065741,0.07779209,0.00062925316,0.00028418037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39801365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4430251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1527025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024733057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066694077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208012737","doi":"10.1177/16094069211053522","title":"Zoom Interviews: Benefits and Concessions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":338,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Movember Foundation","keywords":"Zoom; Interview; Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Service provider; Participant observation; Qualitative property; Data collection; Public relations; Control (management); Service (business); Psychology; Business; Marketing; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Management; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.6958955976060798,"score_gpt":0.6838784631155861,"score_spread":0.012017134490493686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208012737","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05167058,0.025095265,0.86082476,0.031719767,0.006850583,0.00012908972,0.000056219556,0.000025152834,0.023628559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040666193,0.0024648018,0.9532104,0.0011303808,0.0007145584,0.0000049042565,0.0000034085224,0.000015312822,0.0017900289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97936106,0.018791556,0.00074856344,0.0001857731,0.00071926945,0.00019377514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892221,0.0072480654,0.0006190561,0.00008936618,0.002619584,0.00020179342],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022811648,0.00012842765,0.00037711652,0.00018719486,0.00019781802,0.00014251845,0.0003945072,0.00007935945,0.00053691433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012201674,0.00010707516,0.00019911394,0.0002852234,0.00055680296,0.00046097726,0.000116624484,0.0003093272,0.0000052674777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038646365,0.000067068504,0.00014179797,0.0000059348217,0.00020463578,0.00003550324,0.27469632,0.0000035814242,0.0013394795,0.37300366,0.00062785734,0.34983552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091387716,0.00016707109,0.0008672448,0.00037674748,0.0000548493,0.000067330824,0.42215377,0.000025098332,0.0049346713,0.15222119,0.41796052,0.0002576294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012382487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010306789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41733268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011827049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003344254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99611896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210542627","doi":"10.1177/16094069211042227","title":"A Scoping Review of Virtual Focus Group Methods Used in Rehabilitation Sciences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Data collection; Asynchronous communication; Computer science; Protocol (science); Telemedicine; Medical education; Medicine; Health care","score_opus":0.6864819796126935,"score_gpt":0.726030991036444,"score_spread":0.039549011423750446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210542627","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000023279567,0.715643,0.27984276,0.0008469716,0.0017135094,0.0007928001,0.000030560084,0.000008985514,0.0011190795],"genre_scores_gemma":[5.8764977e-7,0.5240633,0.47549972,0.000070505914,0.00024360415,0.000048412192,0.000007613337,0.000024114617,0.00004213373],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.83007085,0.16164516,0.004949381,0.00061020453,0.0022618955,0.00046251135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9053014,0.085433275,0.005955025,0.00027484665,0.0028376894,0.00019777435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21500371,0.0005303405,0.004669617,0.0017858427,0.00018827243,0.00013496139,0.0018183512,0.00035966685,0.00044399616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09745573,0.0004345257,0.0019474092,0.0026963153,0.0020197711,0.00081028277,0.0002395951,0.0010437262,0.0000033827937],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590576,0.0001691996,0.0000024402593,0.018078893,0.0003482643,0.000017936654,0.04814556,0.0000013576998,0.0000077881205,0.10948545,0.00009246095,0.82363474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043832304,0.0006421282,0.0000018127847,0.62532425,0.00036805516,0.00002489556,0.039999604,0.0000028344737,0.000020226405,0.017067142,0.31563693,0.00047379948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039857108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016901949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82316095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086671667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035025915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211274958","doi":"10.29173/pathways20","title":"Assessing Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Anthropological Research Methods","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pathways","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Ethnography; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Anthropology; Medicine; Engineering; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.7500050729796792,"score_gpt":0.6785177558117655,"score_spread":0.07148731716791368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211274958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81126374,0.0016055674,0.044250317,0.013419806,0.0010123749,0.00036374436,0.00002473936,0.000102477126,0.12795724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96151567,0.000175405,0.03714798,0.0007455905,0.00015362259,0.000008933115,0.0000010653773,0.000008084097,0.00024364836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97790027,0.020566376,0.00021758962,0.00025845048,0.00065644336,0.00040084933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99039215,0.008763671,0.00009601475,0.00028837242,0.00025415112,0.00020561536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02421446,0.00007985388,0.0002071639,0.000055472075,0.0012189716,0.00009363899,0.00031583032,0.0001335541,0.0005067906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036178775,0.00004972074,0.000119804216,0.0009451738,0.001733239,0.000101913276,0.00015107375,0.0004373526,0.00000945208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024235746,0.00021765032,0.0271077,0.00005150828,0.000023954342,0.000024578156,0.060268264,0.000009162377,0.08444493,0.7512491,0.0014670732,0.07511186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006836218,0.00034058455,0.034816112,0.00011659156,0.000023781073,0.000012975975,0.24045701,0.000068709,0.053748187,0.3978539,0.27149373,0.00038478788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016707545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000699509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3533952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025582232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011446743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9719399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216038955","doi":"","title":"Coded semistructured interviews in social psychological research.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Computer science; Applied psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.45336183147571435,"score_gpt":0.6155349502592069,"score_spread":0.16217311878349255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216038955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4173135,0.00006612621,0.00012065033,0.0038516982,0.000052089777,0.00013314855,0.0000019936554,0.000037110553,0.5784237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586203,0.00005404007,0.0051780194,0.00043373083,0.0003272581,0.000021185286,0.0000018679547,0.0000061035603,0.0353575],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471194,0.004076101,0.00020638685,0.00024359474,0.00036903238,0.00039295055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994276,0.0003266427,0.000017951616,0.00009421803,0.000058346042,0.00007520269],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006821694,0.00006575011,0.0001536883,0.000061015024,0.00043164426,0.00005402772,0.00027668054,0.00013086695,0.019695386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034881773,0.000050336927,0.000048480353,0.000610623,0.0006570944,0.000073964526,0.00002160771,0.0003158579,0.00017561756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008243372,0.00012682608,0.00041265244,0.0000057520847,0.0000047898307,0.000009521562,0.09209288,6.313938e-7,0.000565045,0.23763143,0.03770163,0.63136643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006427427,0.00013489787,0.020476993,0.000011307677,0.0000018370471,7.147801e-7,0.031993397,0.000026850348,0.00010159075,0.20637414,0.74000394,0.00023156642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020276066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00389245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70230234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008087883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024956898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98120075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W355573979","doi":"","title":"Roles of the FGD Team Members: An Overview/RÔLES DES MEMBRES DE GROUPE DE DISCUSSION: UN APERÇU","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06632992720680786,"score_gpt":0.3891889197382654,"score_spread":0.32285899253145756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W355573979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.847476,0.003219151,0.00014932336,0.017552754,0.0026306503,0.00037749478,0.00017586446,0.000033676242,0.1283851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887607,0.00017482329,0.0068607,0.0010553646,0.0009706973,0.000014482402,0.0000011425535,0.000020015057,0.0021420636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950891,0.0018456528,0.00033669188,0.00048266439,0.0008045108,0.0014413809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975832,0.0002684753,0.0002142239,0.00034678154,0.0002882716,0.0012990475],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008755092,0.00023726956,0.0003082158,0.00012497618,0.0045229495,0.00025293333,0.0018726882,0.00030209677,0.0008482176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016682781,0.00016051166,0.00021190172,0.0024261165,0.017810326,0.0009003524,0.0001356725,0.00052521465,0.000009571552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032109342,0.000054743363,0.013322467,0.000030502391,0.000010463924,0.0000029958176,0.14074238,0.0000018836755,0.007498295,0.6812175,0.0005191166,0.15659647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029739575,0.00014096002,0.12973222,0.00017895109,0.00009983515,0.000011416296,0.23749545,0.0003523321,0.0047342735,0.21186925,0.4142981,0.00078983465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29275477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8148642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52210945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009588576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045360113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206499720","doi":"10.3138/9781442683204-fm","title":"Frontmatter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.07883228639272308,"score_gpt":0.3016618610550468,"score_spread":0.2228295746623237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206499720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025015513,0.0016505313,0.00053233554,0.00004971556,0.00020476196,0.00020956682,0.000058733687,0.000050085913,0.9972418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000044881996,0.00027120145,0.0035622476,0.000034080203,0.00013695637,1.15527705e-7,0.0000032754035,0.000018214068,0.995929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988488,0.00018303127,0.00013650826,0.00026267333,0.00036320282,0.00020581007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909884,0.00013976706,0.0002347391,0.00026350937,0.00014106809,0.00012206614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035907343,0.00017725014,0.00035332862,0.000017327018,0.00027615443,0.000015746462,0.0004392336,0.00032452116,0.018318688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014726253,0.00021318438,0.00022220865,4.856879e-7,0.0006859631,0.00010997781,0.000116419294,0.0001555409,0.00008414244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002611074,0.00001004639,0.0000014756454,0.00003310156,0.00010924129,0.000015759373,0.06044882,2.0033892e-7,0.0000047122567,0.8137141,0.09924102,0.02639543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018922902,0.000039461207,0.000007577312,0.00007182729,0.000078268764,1.4261676e-7,0.000512345,0.0000025124493,0.0000059885137,0.0023431804,0.99652314,0.0002263395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23920159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05584314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002713623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047581627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213061905","doi":"10.4000/sociologies.18221","title":"L’entretien de groupe en ligne, exemplification d’une méthode qualitative d’analyse de la réflexivité","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SociologieS","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ligne; Art","score_opus":0.1206302996652863,"score_gpt":0.466325935055702,"score_spread":0.3456956353904157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213061905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75842947,0.023924662,0.09019859,0.07839858,0.0016416535,0.00072401133,0.00039541442,0.00043142925,0.045856208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92321694,0.0015641917,0.06387825,0.000800303,0.0004248992,0.0003165883,0.000041982203,0.00003792216,0.0097189],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94381034,0.0537221,0.0005008569,0.00055223703,0.0005021132,0.00091234053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98349893,0.0154989585,0.00040649794,0.00031377806,0.0001195479,0.00016227682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02592286,0.00031127708,0.0005198418,0.00012344969,0.001769823,0.00009573339,0.0007359344,0.000379326,0.00094409205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004361677,0.00032541368,0.00035507427,0.0009831078,0.0037625802,0.0002758758,0.00033642515,0.0009499599,0.000059606387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000319143,0.00013273973,0.0012147126,0.000027599699,0.000106998705,0.000008817417,0.5055421,0.00021057694,0.00067284907,0.48131043,0.0026453023,0.008095996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017035805,0.00019358033,0.0049933414,0.000010678884,0.00007644091,0.0000028776778,0.5243115,0.00013891095,0.00011582304,0.43534902,0.03438842,0.00024907495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009901476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016481955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16478752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017304941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059139443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213433559","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8057-7.ch032","title":"Ethical Considerations in Online Research Methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Online research methods; Anonymity; Ethical issues; Data collection; Research ethics; Online discussion; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Data science; Sociology; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.34460118344638035,"score_gpt":0.5761562686397025,"score_spread":0.23155508519332213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213433559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048958416,0.00060180924,0.0010666791,0.0041356534,0.0006237117,0.00068166526,0.00017166724,0.00006367637,0.99260616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014226127,0.000050606268,0.25878263,0.0032880844,0.0012582615,0.000038621543,0.000013581257,0.00008514077,0.72225696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920027,0.0050499137,0.00058856106,0.00062323303,0.0010863411,0.00064925343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937033,0.004904131,0.00014339708,0.0004382113,0.0005800612,0.00023088134],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01440404,0.00027815983,0.00062560284,0.00020819459,0.00046407586,0.00015447465,0.00035307743,0.0016132239,0.00053688086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037036235,0.00027387013,0.00020230855,0.000083247105,0.0014156695,0.00004269526,0.00019729105,0.0027664904,0.0002611556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012461576,0.000015579408,0.000013935947,0.000017436054,0.000027116486,0.000030897816,0.0035374763,0.0000010016936,0.000012944741,0.9825819,0.003349086,0.010400143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015950082,0.0000601976,0.000039698076,0.000110503985,0.000010766252,0.000001753712,0.00093074987,0.0000048924608,0.0000047854746,0.71032697,0.28813422,0.00021598297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004043608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023879848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28478512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071007345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021473842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214702426","doi":"10.1177/16094069221075862","title":"Collaborative Zoom Coding—A Novel Approach to Qualitative Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Women's College Hospital","keywords":"Zoom; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Data collection; Social media; World Wide Web; Multimedia; Internet privacy; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.5153550183839968,"score_gpt":0.6590967154551285,"score_spread":0.1437416970711317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214702426","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010234384,0.00032868396,0.95264214,0.0068644346,0.0018206016,0.00035921767,0.00042631754,0.000028189812,0.027296007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14850663,0.00002838751,0.84762615,0.0011576794,0.00044877353,0.00009245688,0.000024505725,0.000028589622,0.0020868347],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94141525,0.053220194,0.0015126683,0.00047832733,0.0029018568,0.00047169183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98072815,0.012651136,0.0016791362,0.00021329167,0.0043261927,0.0004021063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08514316,0.0002990728,0.00097879,0.00189108,0.0008876432,0.00020153653,0.0016198612,0.00008033239,0.0007210462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012157179,0.00028284817,0.0006925618,0.0046251374,0.00061827694,0.00053334323,0.00032839028,0.00076114415,0.00000778472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034789494,0.0004150679,0.000029726707,0.0000036884644,0.0021537913,0.000006999836,0.6605313,0.0014049525,0.0012189726,0.328232,0.0012190498,0.0044365865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080147985,0.00041958172,0.00021292674,0.00001234638,0.00028431872,0.0000070482542,0.8390205,0.00022999173,0.00033494364,0.026470382,0.13186224,0.0003442461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077459187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006548574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30176163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001179272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000731666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220840018","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v3i1.37639","title":"Blended Learning as a Transformative Educational Approach for Qualitative Health Research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blended learning; Context (archaeology); Transformative learning; Modalities; Qualitative research; Creativity; Health care; Synchronous learning; Psychology; Medical education; Computer science; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Multimedia; Educational technology; Cooperative learning; Teaching method; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.39656333924580667,"score_gpt":0.5387460549273185,"score_spread":0.14218271568151186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220840018","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016206665,0.0073405383,0.44815287,0.4455391,0.0005527046,0.0018087487,0.00018878648,0.000028409075,0.08018219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7328846,0.0020046039,0.25190175,0.0007576683,0.0004752365,0.0000065335266,0.000057079786,0.000025738193,0.011886828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761718,0.021353934,0.00045984238,0.00015819239,0.0012833879,0.00057287025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995156,0.0021621836,0.00084223977,0.00007370941,0.0012527384,0.0005131609],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066377126,0.00007798283,0.00038479292,0.00021217637,0.0032835894,0.000026325873,0.000491606,0.000036200894,0.0010702738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001508711,0.00008671392,0.00017734262,0.00031018918,0.0004488639,0.000729379,0.000054592932,0.00055279257,6.762949e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009809855,0.00022416661,0.000024112296,0.00006332199,0.000054228432,2.74593e-7,0.7280361,0.000036656278,0.0000023377113,0.2275277,0.0059892917,0.03794368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005757267,0.0015857449,0.00017333111,0.000010718509,0.0000025268776,0.0000017274923,0.7042499,0.00005610137,3.896008e-7,0.0042484947,0.28904358,0.000051723913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060429856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005515387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7166779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037847634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015562435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220896057","doi":"10.31124/advance.19383656.v1","title":"It's Inappropriate Because You Can See It- Regulating, Pruning, and Understanding Revealed Thinking in Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Administration (probate law); Pruning; Psychology; Internet privacy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.1547093409204226,"score_gpt":0.429731779982359,"score_spread":0.2750224390619364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220896057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2994658,0.0014328359,0.013247399,0.06605815,0.003936666,0.0031528221,0.00003138535,0.00035584837,0.6123191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85296524,0.00086209754,0.09241836,0.0019387539,0.00062294456,0.00032670257,0.00010670791,0.00009019722,0.050669003],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451494,0.0030982734,0.0005597423,0.00071476045,0.0006730626,0.0004392343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998389,0.0005594539,0.00048267533,0.00034113537,0.000088748435,0.00013898728],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010091899,0.00027633528,0.00044239094,0.00034866374,0.0011967017,0.00034248058,0.0004163192,0.00028399556,0.00074967585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012425602,0.0002826623,0.000083913794,0.0004980648,0.0002924789,0.00017010025,0.00078384683,0.0009915158,0.0000012517044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016329395,0.00007139746,0.009146278,0.00019408423,0.000037671765,0.0000030009107,0.5488394,0.00013462077,0.000023957122,0.43341866,0.0028289913,0.005285611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029341536,0.000046661036,0.0026101652,0.0005274288,0.00003899721,8.796442e-7,0.52519876,0.00027033023,0.000008916831,0.43697947,0.03346184,0.00056313607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04421293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04909436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5616501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017794388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012726922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220905164","doi":"10.31124/advance.19383656","title":"It’s Inappropriate Because You Can See It- Regulating, Pruning, and Understanding Revealed Thinking in Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Administration (probate law); Internet privacy; Psychology; Qualitative research; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.16747668674478478,"score_gpt":0.43232429741034906,"score_spread":0.2648476106655643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220905164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2598324,0.0012985457,0.013018542,0.08054365,0.004299503,0.0032495183,0.00003357345,0.00036613178,0.6373581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84076154,0.0008982549,0.09439063,0.0023976034,0.000641716,0.00034920734,0.00011174583,0.00009481161,0.06035446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450624,0.0030904638,0.0005653056,0.00071466615,0.00068413577,0.00043918344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984005,0.00054711127,0.00048301287,0.00034156037,0.00008857397,0.00013923348],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010196658,0.00027629602,0.00044239956,0.0003495724,0.0011873883,0.00033254296,0.00042331644,0.00028443287,0.00075064343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012299803,0.00028266193,0.000083889565,0.00048651855,0.0002889743,0.0001625986,0.00079289445,0.0009920347,0.0000012916413],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015612037,0.00006977312,0.009150369,0.00018538782,0.00003629307,0.0000028241518,0.5533215,0.00012580186,0.000021104179,0.42897803,0.0034600266,0.0046332697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029315453,0.00004607709,0.0027025403,0.00052899093,0.000038393948,8.76158e-7,0.5239093,0.00026298896,0.000008577487,0.43320805,0.038438275,0.0005627844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045307804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052657682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58092916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001837035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013052021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223503760","doi":"10.1007/s10459-022-10101-1","title":"Disruption in the space–time continuum: why digital ethnography matters","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Field (mathematics); Digital culture; Qualitative research; Digital health; Computer science; Social science; Media studies; Health care; Anthropology; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.1206520258069884,"score_gpt":0.5405819406695263,"score_spread":0.41992991486253783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223503760","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002091596,0.9767953,0.000107255655,0.0075805276,0.002373971,0.0015250162,0.000019264055,0.000025672081,0.011552047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000021584558,0.99543476,0.0015056966,0.001769715,0.0002599783,0.00064301956,0.00005622501,0.000013233382,0.0002957624],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920693,0.0048724543,0.00089918537,0.0006228664,0.0008808635,0.00065533124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565095,0.0031344926,0.00082336063,0.00025379946,0.000032741365,0.00010468773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0141749745,0.00025584892,0.00072639756,0.0007594525,0.0011065986,0.0002935144,0.001034255,0.00009672199,0.00019070112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007131693,0.00018641939,0.00018911382,0.004965762,0.0011949312,0.0014335017,0.000055088247,0.0005553166,0.0000223407],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012973348,0.00010376349,0.00020683529,0.0011543598,0.0000014589764,3.4320107e-7,0.01936306,0.0000034426698,3.767821e-9,0.011391642,0.001564772,0.966209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003757774,0.00008861057,0.000040680003,0.0016384431,0.0000067257542,0.0000017347838,0.029313434,0.0000023786824,4.236456e-9,0.0072991727,0.96137077,0.0002004967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029145158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032836348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96600854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058683875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002079087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8511174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223981292","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054635","title":"Challenges and recommendations for COVID-19 public health messaging: a Canada-wide qualitative study using virtual focus groups","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Medicine; Public health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Qualitative research; Focus group; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Focus (optics); Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Health informatics; Health services research; Family medicine; MEDLINE; Medical education; Nursing; Virology; Pathology; Disease","score_opus":0.6476574363777374,"score_gpt":0.6081950215121936,"score_spread":0.039462414865543805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223981292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026431464,0.0014900024,0.019372871,0.91718894,0.00074056286,0.02314429,0.0005275036,0.000076537166,0.0110278055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692767,0.000070610266,0.015221426,0.008165021,0.00011994805,0.0056339623,0.000040090214,0.000038670212,0.0014335496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848848,0.013162611,0.00044479413,0.0004700948,0.00055865967,0.00047904562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469507,0.0041768244,0.00035928332,0.00022298335,0.000109384535,0.0004364492],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03357558,0.0001393143,0.00038924723,0.00010780771,0.003699921,0.00020441879,0.0005617192,0.00002317617,0.0001709827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003794951,0.0001441818,0.000039316783,0.00034453368,0.0001445893,0.00037494302,0.00061849493,0.00016424658,3.2460773e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004414591,0.00014596432,0.00012141614,0.000018009725,0.000056908953,0.0000022676056,0.7103311,0.000004993722,4.2799581e-7,0.26115954,0.007975114,0.020140138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068511534,0.00037752028,0.00019031248,0.000005614705,0.0000073242836,9.446674e-7,0.6953637,0.000033216573,1.7430648e-7,0.010767482,0.29241553,0.00015307158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76923805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9333556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9428453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013653374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062532234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224443306","doi":"10.1177/16094069221093138","title":"Qualitative Research Studies Online: Using Prompted Weekly Journal Entries During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Qualitative research; Context (archaeology); Pandemic; Journaling file system; Psychology; Medical education; Set (abstract data type); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Computer science; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.9204746320327312,"score_gpt":0.7890104824960789,"score_spread":0.1314641495366523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224443306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7045458,0.011856074,0.19907631,0.0768234,0.006207582,0.0006962017,0.00025008118,0.00005036259,0.00049419544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33247885,0.002157802,0.6554885,0.0022189498,0.0032471963,0.0000549366,0.000009461623,0.00008458567,0.004259707],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.78493035,0.20744683,0.001900575,0.00036314948,0.0046468037,0.0007122815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92952967,0.05972052,0.0025035595,0.00022713646,0.007537288,0.00048182625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23667727,0.0002782976,0.00071873853,0.0011393863,0.004722285,0.0003200629,0.0020166398,0.00008369595,0.0006603076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08289424,0.00019964631,0.00047744947,0.0014244157,0.0030859585,0.0007414391,0.0006123014,0.0026774886,0.00000289315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079018495,0.00022438279,0.00030773913,0.000027643853,0.001354634,0.00012301686,0.9474462,0.00059335807,0.00196554,0.038716264,0.0019500986,0.0065009077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095336256,0.0003169399,0.00013629445,0.000046520043,0.00004443871,0.0003536387,0.73201895,0.0000332721,0.00009553986,0.15158033,0.11423418,0.00018651735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009160914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017838528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4564122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004423081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024203681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225736902","doi":"10.1177/16094069221090063","title":"An Alternative Method of Interviewing: Critical Reflections on Videoconference Interviews for Qualitative Data Collection","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Videoconferencing; Data collection; Face-to-face; Qualitative property; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Multimedia; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.8823424053717918,"score_gpt":0.7646091000864593,"score_spread":0.11773330528533243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225736902","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012281548,0.00031247857,0.9816712,0.007920098,0.004230585,0.00047445623,0.00064169476,0.000022047918,0.0034992867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09385561,0.00007511062,0.90423316,0.00067606877,0.0005885409,0.0001344566,0.00005297681,0.00003621126,0.0003478782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9072176,0.08840908,0.0018482086,0.00056380517,0.0016070988,0.00035416332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538376,0.039189436,0.0020211102,0.00046449545,0.0042543644,0.00023299237],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.108964,0.00028234205,0.00086167123,0.0009568691,0.00073828036,0.00012165663,0.0026451808,0.00008941417,0.0006496364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03282507,0.00026420635,0.00043469152,0.0007970991,0.00076674204,0.0011231444,0.00036606303,0.0007927605,0.0000017502639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009114445,0.00056515314,0.0000028558632,0.000022742797,0.00043367431,0.0000041917706,0.5502086,0.00011656895,0.002765143,0.3780621,0.0009360393,0.065971464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092994765,0.0030838496,0.0000152400835,0.00012573665,0.00010149156,0.000019270317,0.6116365,0.0019497144,0.0030341716,0.29906702,0.07977014,0.00026691295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010742357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018414031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09262746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007465992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068486383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226026765","doi":"10.36367/ntqr.10.2021-e514","title":"Investigação Qualitativa e o Desafio Digital // Qualitative Research and the Digital Challenge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"New Trends in Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Francophone University Association; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Democratization; Internationalization; Qualitative research; Public relations; Political science; Narrative; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Social science; Geography; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.655718227954455,"score_gpt":0.655915537480356,"score_spread":0.0001973095259010238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226026765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069743185,0.010933369,0.0001733326,0.035292048,0.0003896611,0.0021204723,0.0013239783,0.00014369443,0.94892603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01822057,0.0017965724,0.0013970421,0.00012389683,0.001150984,0.0010161266,0.0006268916,0.00028202185,0.9753859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8432663,0.13343948,0.0027813842,0.0032517384,0.013007433,0.004253659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8283327,0.16621263,0.00067755056,0.0013789833,0.0021106284,0.0012874663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16609475,0.0011095837,0.0022452339,0.0049959966,0.004394902,0.0023078748,0.0030493366,0.0010060207,0.0031513239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04394835,0.0008984094,0.00059284165,0.0063482653,0.03348393,0.0015995008,0.002472715,0.010562277,0.0003449737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052266166,0.00016006493,0.0000033182355,0.000077089266,0.00014490474,0.000035250217,0.44439125,5.0065364e-7,4.318312e-7,0.43604907,0.06837862,0.050236832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014003644,0.00062563375,0.0000064403034,0.00015763803,0.000008176477,0.000001223652,0.33623472,0.000003731657,5.4171755e-7,0.36158583,0.29955456,0.00042117122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008205397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049383626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23117593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038765038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005642063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226172810","doi":"10.1177/16094069221090062","title":"Virtual Qualitative Research Using Transnational Feminist Queer Methodology: The Challenges and Opportunities of Zoom-Based Research During Moments of Crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Queer; Sociology; Autoethnography; Accountability; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Zoom; Geopolitics; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Politics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.9479411888022489,"score_gpt":0.7353248816474791,"score_spread":0.21261630715476976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226172810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.668788,0.0094698835,0.23230086,0.08230277,0.0016429317,0.00074543606,0.00047435175,0.000015496564,0.004260238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.731137,0.0004063757,0.2678509,0.000109208675,0.0001710913,0.00004128206,0.000002878322,0.000023828707,0.0002574383],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.76686114,0.22566475,0.0016457466,0.000355012,0.00498936,0.00048398992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9265851,0.06596314,0.0011714825,0.00018202158,0.005947392,0.00015087675],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2917308,0.0001829003,0.000659465,0.0015738843,0.0010271801,0.000052175492,0.0011719239,0.00009695739,0.00029749793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012671197,0.00014841692,0.00027121423,0.00068771816,0.004050334,0.00031718865,0.0003012616,0.0012208443,1.6622478e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056463777,0.00014290515,0.000012665857,0.000027268028,0.00032602414,0.000008375678,0.51688963,0.00012000438,0.004087361,0.47199652,0.000047706944,0.005776891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073079224,0.0006905706,0.000228954,0.000055073026,0.000028878512,0.000010325826,0.8009324,0.00009568196,0.004267254,0.18860629,0.00423526,0.000118521995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006201867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042449414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28404275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005292759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010676256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986601},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4226486887","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1828","title":"Perspectives on reporting non-verbal interactions from the contemporary research focus group","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nurse Researcher","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Moderation; Psychology; Qualitative research; Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Synchronicity; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.4612834860424937,"score_gpt":0.5780628605711765,"score_spread":0.11677937452868281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226486887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25075075,0.0015801655,0.00034414232,0.060174976,0.0007738247,0.0011089698,0.000085904176,0.000097584554,0.6850837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983077,0.000028872702,0.0006049679,0.000109336295,0.0008280412,0.0003267582,0.000012034242,0.000027164926,0.014985809],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98341787,0.012665394,0.0004574251,0.00052561815,0.0022869678,0.0006467263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991218,0.0073893815,0.00027275083,0.00051604846,0.00041169804,0.0001921493],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032189786,0.00011402347,0.00019960939,0.00016761772,0.0048664566,0.00021883666,0.00069976534,0.000053008494,0.003904752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110137835,0.00008583718,0.0001554761,0.0011697799,0.0012379277,0.00022939523,0.00026065388,0.0021774634,0.00009533223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046246557,0.0006475785,0.002959255,0.000003909217,0.00011545042,0.00014119706,0.58849055,0.00000612931,0.001220196,0.18390568,0.18295424,0.039093368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019839153,0.00020097387,0.0049435375,0.000017974022,0.000002455084,6.730722e-7,0.62489676,0.000052984215,0.000044321474,0.015620193,0.3539279,0.00009383728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056153864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022893592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73232627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008429719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006025615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230364688","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-102295-5.10805-4","title":"Content Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content analysis; Content (measure theory); Representation (politics); Politics; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Term (time); Positivism; Confusion; Social science; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.13660723991340595,"score_gpt":0.3828731604154355,"score_spread":0.24626592050202956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230364688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028603428,0.0011791239,0.000086734624,0.00022786,0.0005412115,0.00045798783,0.000042471627,0.00006130374,0.9973747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051070575,0.00012798139,0.0013458284,0.00039651446,0.00038853695,0.000011214983,0.000016480697,0.000040696155,0.99716204],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977786,0.00035944761,0.00042164963,0.00045949768,0.0006350685,0.00034575895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841046,0.00040057767,0.00032566366,0.0004628501,0.00023067924,0.00016978013],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002144345,0.00029295584,0.00080248195,0.0002939567,0.0002725005,0.00008239001,0.00036717692,0.000370636,0.0022215177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010938095,0.0002595337,0.0007889188,0.00005159925,0.00047182673,0.00003992296,0.00007464644,0.00037564992,0.0007116285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004377972,0.000002662175,0.000018303232,0.000013459546,0.00059237314,0.0000062411373,0.005171707,2.1124505e-7,0.000002306453,0.348133,0.000087663364,0.64596766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096928656,0.000032440126,0.000040609768,0.000056960398,0.00072308996,1.7715043e-7,0.00060344697,0.00000109899,0.0000029431505,0.020558538,0.97754264,0.0003411196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014479469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97745496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016578284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025832374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233518352","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_100707","title":"Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.14608531311976214,"score_gpt":0.40447278707104106,"score_spread":0.2583874739512789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233518352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005251719,0.00037089098,0.12736289,0.0009834237,0.0010240851,0.00027193813,0.000009429603,0.00014665388,0.8698254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00025334532,0.00022291849,0.06503293,0.00087581394,0.0013608338,0.000009487003,0.000021662709,0.000047041154,0.932176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976389,0.0006247877,0.0005052165,0.0004476026,0.00046639115,0.00031714948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982619,0.0006531606,0.00032158408,0.0003728158,0.00019480153,0.00019572639],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028065613,0.00031537347,0.0006444716,0.00013504576,0.00031343978,0.00010613945,0.00048672655,0.00040146743,0.007657985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009085149,0.0002622965,0.00031854646,0.00005499025,0.0005491723,0.000053174816,0.00012584835,0.00034843502,0.0013286755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026164348,0.000008412242,0.0000010428776,0.000020254887,0.00003343037,0.0000018201134,0.0036791756,8.5109285e-8,0.0000022860756,0.6423055,0.027709745,0.32623565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118894735,0.000099139565,0.000023743176,0.00012143188,0.000026478028,7.6098235e-7,0.00028211204,0.00002288333,0.0000034828502,0.030442549,0.9685003,0.00035823823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011467397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003724807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94079053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013565748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010483287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235749817","doi":"10.4018/9781591401520.ch004","title":"Conducting Congruent, Ethical Qualitative Research on Internet-Mediated Research Environments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Qualitative research; Participant observation; Data collection; Internet research; Psychology; Knowledge management; Internet privacy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.6430882358349211,"score_gpt":0.5835883366209923,"score_spread":0.05949989921392884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235749817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011663513,0.00026416525,0.00013138677,0.00085274334,0.000714703,0.0010460026,0.00018659202,0.000082588565,0.99555546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3300115,0.00005231979,0.00105513,0.00065354165,0.0008298081,0.00007769131,0.000018917095,0.000109143475,0.667192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778945,0.014584001,0.0008002784,0.0012429538,0.0039619757,0.0015163069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988979,0.008668807,0.0003145726,0.000630477,0.0007489414,0.00065821107],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039729975,0.00049824594,0.000757758,0.0003887195,0.0011631608,0.00021701171,0.0011669338,0.0020699373,0.001156497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005496126,0.00047238055,0.0002691065,0.000143123,0.0069835,0.00008082244,0.000564508,0.006283365,0.0032690016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017054162,0.00003657289,0.0000041430617,0.000022344644,0.000132871,0.000054547865,0.08798887,5.186729e-8,0.00004548135,0.8998903,0.008705146,0.0029491212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029511083,0.0005181608,0.000005948467,0.00031264493,0.000014291367,0.000001001105,0.021839071,7.219332e-7,0.000111718386,0.6224327,0.35409284,0.000375768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012084621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002547238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3453877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019056463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007814109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236697958","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101209","title":"Social Tagging","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.19367054082342963,"score_gpt":0.46772585202439604,"score_spread":0.2740553112009664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236697958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000046211103,0.000089876434,0.0013168782,0.0021923191,0.0003838404,0.00011277354,0.0000060814114,0.00011105943,0.99578255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00016042376,0.00003622157,0.005229911,0.0005977757,0.0031707494,0.0000024191256,0.000004134454,0.000027627819,0.99077076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881727,0.00015221092,0.00017389836,0.00023248431,0.00038438267,0.00023973153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993823,0.00019738516,0.00011901627,0.00009063555,0.00013746525,0.00007319321],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001638064,0.00014921612,0.00023696844,0.00006566291,0.00072950486,0.000062414416,0.00019718861,0.0003189468,0.030148573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009316974,0.00013563107,0.00016030388,0.000024104675,0.00084393774,0.0000613604,0.00004806256,0.00018837061,0.0012415654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017987218,0.0000017525398,4.1996725e-7,0.000003822072,0.000016639595,0.0000013648075,0.015903486,1.6161045e-9,0.0000011058034,0.8788262,0.090912804,0.014330619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029091609,0.000012762659,0.0000014243678,0.000010581766,0.000010251432,5.4204467e-8,0.0009652982,2.6473077e-7,0.0000019629445,0.30603513,0.6927928,0.00014043403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031534676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007657983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60187995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094498675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001221333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236698384","doi":"10.1037/a0020663","title":"On the Cover.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06977807229599534,"score_gpt":0.4783189476006552,"score_spread":0.4085408753046599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236698384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3622583,0.0000072923644,0.001257562,0.029155023,0.0007280368,0.000104408275,0.000004662296,0.000058283862,0.6064264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853727,0.0000144704845,0.002819577,0.007925866,0.00021190254,0.000018043085,5.178887e-7,0.0000066213634,0.0036302528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866575,0.0006476817,0.00008917585,0.00017723582,0.00019677346,0.00022337887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814993,0.0013750534,0.00008826939,0.00028751694,0.00003372437,0.00006552728],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018934297,0.00006749755,0.000094376934,0.000021041928,0.00044378877,0.00004638027,0.0003399147,0.000030246312,0.0010395669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014912679,0.000040689134,0.000053513526,0.00034008344,0.0036673017,0.000030233972,0.000013346736,0.00030048296,0.000435292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013227588,0.00004444309,0.0008787944,1.8330422e-7,0.0000053902945,0.0000012904869,0.003377715,2.3081907e-7,0.00039546491,0.8883079,0.049811102,0.0571642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008214721,0.00018532491,0.016700516,0.0000016558469,0.0000028453378,4.6633704e-7,0.007893692,0.0000021092574,0.000047478465,0.03568666,0.939277,0.00012009842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027443548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006518445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8894659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012237514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024905992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238145293","doi":"10.1037/0003-066x.59.9.961","title":"On the Cover.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09641769673331389,"score_gpt":0.4779663108471737,"score_spread":0.3815486141138598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238145293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22359177,0.00004377868,0.01092898,0.06790985,0.0003939786,0.00016904977,0.0000060206926,0.00009132664,0.69686526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98389006,0.00004277064,0.0029577017,0.011406832,0.00011910621,0.0000174591,5.355647e-7,0.0000065520708,0.0015589903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868405,0.00060198177,0.00009357284,0.00017817366,0.00021076795,0.00023146214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989353,0.00066982006,0.00008426479,0.00022492948,0.000027339505,0.000058343572],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013041792,0.000069622096,0.00009952627,0.000021524,0.00043223138,0.00003826782,0.00028132045,0.00002160763,0.0002703041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078766677,0.00004280621,0.000057013316,0.00042027835,0.0028641832,0.000032225184,0.000011627786,0.00013588667,0.00045292717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015954694,0.000058338956,0.00018639854,2.3032578e-7,0.0000068791155,0.0000026104194,0.005881197,0.000012179402,0.000031128253,0.95983166,0.01110236,0.022871053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037755104,0.00071203616,0.015331284,0.000012175266,0.000006654528,9.598162e-7,0.031495623,7.1883164e-7,0.00007973841,0.2739753,0.677753,0.00025494976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052116676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024767654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76029825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006506911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038527352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239598263","doi":"10.7202/1085324ar","title":"Analyse des données des entretiens de groupe","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches qualitatives","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5201156997509795,"score_gpt":0.5163541847683157,"score_spread":0.0037615149826637495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239598263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68379986,0.11424272,0.12445124,0.022577792,0.00068610243,0.00039684356,0.00005428446,0.00020147995,0.053589657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29601458,0.011203709,0.6591191,0.0012473137,0.0009537223,0.000018370114,0.000008438408,0.00005142327,0.03138331],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587457,0.03781205,0.00087429676,0.0006222163,0.000594026,0.0013516754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838527,0.0141849425,0.0004244738,0.00032788797,0.00059262064,0.00061739166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029101912,0.0005399925,0.00082503114,0.0002563834,0.000794115,0.0002483906,0.00063487963,0.0005891638,0.0004909721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016766518,0.0005078162,0.0005536148,0.0021798078,0.005997668,0.0012704931,0.00005241315,0.0007387189,0.00020314405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006319757,0.00033427856,0.00067977526,0.00011082672,0.00012990594,0.000016880911,0.4903528,0.0000094351135,0.0008248235,0.2846511,0.00044570377,0.22238126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037448996,0.0009541111,0.01521672,0.00044778016,0.00016430278,0.0000051695324,0.24756591,0.00006190936,0.0012124059,0.7107443,0.022686712,0.0005661418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004114981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015179408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021047154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005838736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243117424","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/auhpd","title":"Transparency in Qualitative Research: Increasing Fairness in the CHI Review Process","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Workaround; Scrutiny; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Work (physics); Public relations; Focus group; Computer science; Process management; Political science; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Computer security; Marketing","score_opus":0.7061017980809354,"score_gpt":0.6830691601370834,"score_spread":0.02303263794385202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243117424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10938069,0.058991157,0.00915181,0.24308656,0.0005394854,0.00993477,0.000098038574,0.00018745323,0.56863004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784213,0.013384804,0.005319011,0.0015333855,0.00021971516,0.0008655412,0.00002904285,0.000027302245,0.00019990778],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9242147,0.07141626,0.0009780363,0.0008588325,0.0018216841,0.0007104435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270076,0.006248804,0.000198652,0.00037055963,0.0003593614,0.00012183894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.094906144,0.00026263195,0.0007649725,0.00024679487,0.00032699687,0.00015009723,0.0014896683,0.0002547226,0.00024359193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014141012,0.00018085747,0.00014889159,0.0024624495,0.0008551141,0.00018236093,0.00018248432,0.0024914697,0.000022468947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028949344,0.00009552114,0.00035343945,0.0027702025,0.000009621262,0.00001628613,0.8257406,0.0000035510323,0.0000020091413,0.16577476,0.000358022,0.004847083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019732199,0.000051409304,0.0029331415,0.0066352454,0.000015057053,3.5310123e-7,0.56702363,0.000027819637,0.0000063732055,0.41597492,0.0067756185,0.0003591297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055004865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04003587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8690406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022565316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009695599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243356204","doi":"10.20935/al2170","title":"The Complementary Role of Focus Group Research in Political Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academia Letters","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Ignorance; Politics; Sociology; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.15081049969459828,"score_gpt":0.5073926577613326,"score_spread":0.3565821580667343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243356204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75396246,0.00062684005,0.00018451082,0.22471845,0.00015867274,0.00018259586,0.000005832374,0.000012615723,0.020148031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565935,0.00004528477,0.0022736387,0.001814489,0.00015239551,0.000012681182,8.8427765e-7,0.0000049362543,0.00003632019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950937,0.002348733,0.00025725018,0.00024714103,0.0010678931,0.0009852998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966937,0.0028196413,0.000038302,0.00016997205,0.00012211705,0.00015629866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016929789,0.000056945828,0.000115803596,0.00011552604,0.0008381115,0.00005316568,0.0005984094,0.00008447887,0.000050979164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013867746,0.000044622633,0.00003941597,0.0014521052,0.003920183,0.00017560554,0.00020845943,0.00089912134,0.000008231617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000669369,0.000015596961,0.008057053,0.0000030560736,0.0000034603831,0.0000050039735,0.007678212,3.77202e-7,0.034377877,0.93191284,0.000886693,0.017053131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051865337,0.000063710206,0.08701617,0.000071062605,0.000005585569,0.0000014859629,0.20084761,0.000051953477,0.040132932,0.34080786,0.33023784,0.00024513464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00843263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018099961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.591105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032017444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028652028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244606300","doi":"10.18192/aporia.v4i4.2903","title":"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing research; Mainstream; Limiting; The Internet; Trustworthiness; Nursing science; Sociology; Normative; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Data science; Online research methods; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Nursing; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Medicine; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.1687420034647142,"score_gpt":0.4743499393688745,"score_spread":0.30560793590416024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244606300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7315169,0.10004245,0.010632902,0.06323347,0.04733434,0.00047604274,0.000028195827,0.00012073046,0.04661497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89111406,0.0010487878,0.055853527,0.001630472,0.013493463,0.000043392243,0.0000049559326,0.00004038781,0.03677096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878601,0.0078116073,0.00067135383,0.00041719712,0.00084942684,0.0023903085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952608,0.0025651846,0.00034015698,0.0004047425,0.00020670595,0.0012224528],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018057836,0.0003854819,0.0005496604,0.000077806835,0.0012574262,0.00010254579,0.00047411985,0.00042936302,0.0012939741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017712634,0.0003914916,0.000330825,0.0014742125,0.0024312795,0.0028277307,0.00013557002,0.00048587154,0.00050023926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018324874,0.00034913476,0.030732598,0.00003254323,0.000059802984,0.0000026550035,0.2260881,8.3644494e-7,0.0001906344,0.6329498,0.003130995,0.10644451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004762551,0.00015508803,0.04362218,0.000055559103,0.000109878085,0.0000044198982,0.059441812,0.000010147346,0.00037973974,0.063715935,0.83150285,0.0005261215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020132937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8283719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034955703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014498999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245032768","doi":"10.5663/aps.v3i1-2.20022","title":"Pandemic H1N1 Targeted Messaging for Manitoba Metis: An Evaluation of a Risk Communication Intervention","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Metis; Intervention (counseling); Pandemic; Focus group; Medicine; Public relations; Psychology; Nursing; Environmental health; Business; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science","score_opus":0.19410251956132965,"score_gpt":0.5655666457073176,"score_spread":0.371464126145988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245032768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97098696,0.0052843075,0.017000252,0.0012099057,0.0002174452,0.0006915883,0.000039046736,0.00008215893,0.004488328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98348397,0.0011035836,0.014861892,0.00004638779,0.00027039676,0.00014939198,0.000013865635,0.000009771566,0.000060746792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947032,0.0041871085,0.00032103443,0.00017183462,0.0004088271,0.00020803256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972553,0.0011344192,0.0003667634,0.00021262655,0.000986017,0.000044876495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01567394,0.00010349478,0.00025273603,0.0001460616,0.0005938819,0.000025432208,0.00020404177,0.00004660302,0.000006222578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046344125,0.00009320696,0.00009610036,0.00032097744,0.0003699816,0.00027560635,0.000024622814,0.00008729267,0.0000020266252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006613096,0.000118056785,0.013342852,0.000070991664,0.00024449834,2.1119268e-8,0.121602915,0.00005428997,0.00019510812,0.5565319,0.0004285753,0.30734465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020092959,0.00041305518,0.060632,0.00019976379,0.0006402964,2.5696676e-7,0.21726014,0.0026510218,0.0005407083,0.65390116,0.06139561,0.0003566707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031188887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028946266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30698797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023397362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096864766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247554370","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-937-3.ch177","title":"Conducting Congruent, Ethical Qualitative Research on Internet-Mediated Research Environments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Qualitative research; Participant observation; Data collection; Psychology; Internet research; Sociology; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web; Social science","score_opus":0.5978590184420555,"score_gpt":0.5835746797203246,"score_spread":0.01428433872173085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247554370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002046949,0.00041945995,0.00007495531,0.0014608034,0.0006408015,0.0010633209,0.00020325159,0.000087298286,0.9940032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29522958,0.00017054759,0.001255984,0.0008824697,0.001129988,0.000080736354,0.000027715114,0.00012191902,0.70110106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768165,0.014585992,0.0008282828,0.001269959,0.004950187,0.0015491046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865193,0.011169212,0.00029926604,0.0006003893,0.00075621513,0.00065565115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02992421,0.0005082544,0.00079777034,0.00040473285,0.0015907051,0.00020468587,0.0010764672,0.002048755,0.00053005165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006260264,0.00049039104,0.00028818587,0.00017206013,0.008129903,0.000078394434,0.0005019714,0.006645052,0.0025267801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014249972,0.000034927194,0.000003750212,0.00001871421,0.0001214229,0.000110058325,0.08293098,2.328916e-7,0.000043021042,0.8876665,0.026722942,0.0022048966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043998598,0.0005848929,0.000007565585,0.0003615427,0.000012663536,0.0000033396577,0.028046487,0.0000022973404,0.00010081912,0.34269112,0.6272643,0.0004849573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077103875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017708278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60054135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024428267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000982349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248042616","doi":"10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067","title":"Netnography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":584,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Netnography; Ethnography; Sociology; The Internet; Participant observation; Qualitative research; Social media; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0481467446247528,"score_gpt":0.3701220706080331,"score_spread":0.32197532598328027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248042616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004734677,0.0025700426,0.00009840733,0.0023196368,0.00018732922,0.00013579012,0.00013758683,0.000051339845,0.99445254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052070413,0.026587145,0.0035636565,0.00025224788,0.0002827016,0.000015811283,0.00017182367,0.00007169586,0.9638479],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999027,0.00018706564,0.0001805891,0.00010264833,0.00041135488,0.00009130585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998932,0.00034039136,0.00023415376,0.00028053785,0.00015784174,0.000055057284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009769064,0.000097920965,0.00014303286,0.00003908055,0.00012739483,0.00008560488,0.00073507306,0.00011646509,0.00028873942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002384452,0.00007343855,0.000115103685,0.00013812011,0.0009223403,0.00012251742,0.00018989453,0.00016815422,0.000010319274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026501912,0.000030056615,0.00010742906,0.000006533071,0.00009490115,3.5217642e-8,0.018066375,1.44151e-7,2.9492404e-7,0.08803793,0.88643825,0.0072154105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010378032,0.000009019381,0.00005852156,0.000035430374,0.000011766857,1.7170537e-7,0.010380488,0.000008232895,1.7629566e-7,0.011860543,0.9774491,0.00008276678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008824169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003226691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09101087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027602788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010288368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33984014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249773961","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100337","title":"e-Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.43137848420973557,"score_gpt":0.5705342232653219,"score_spread":0.1391557390555863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249773961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000043725163,0.0002674377,0.0005304532,0.0009975618,0.00036258282,0.00017468828,0.0000057347866,0.000058637674,0.9975985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000074354815,0.00016071061,0.005825111,0.0001180378,0.0016348648,0.0000045093084,0.0000024316741,0.00002330754,0.9921567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790186,0.0004949648,0.00014869776,0.00026124495,0.00086088537,0.0003323242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982316,0.00086765847,0.000043827076,0.00020536977,0.0005158823,0.00013567791],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008154945,0.00010748438,0.00017805383,0.00015500939,0.00060355046,0.00007451842,0.0003139422,0.00032362348,0.09060334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028457303,0.000089399095,0.00009496549,0.000050998682,0.0019093866,0.000050647443,0.00008269413,0.00039380437,0.0073206527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018174626,0.0000023876157,3.3999964e-7,0.0000032985076,0.000010140147,0.0000017083273,0.006093157,1.8362313e-9,8.9478704e-7,0.8419568,0.13920073,0.01272872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001651821,0.000032457185,9.3061493e-7,0.000014597236,0.000002232049,4.1562416e-8,0.0013761091,1.6134122e-7,0.0000031699142,0.40310884,0.59536844,0.000076522614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011253215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023436558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45616767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113370734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023633095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99345225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250604073","doi":"10.1891/1058-1243.11.3.1","title":"Focus Groups to Reveal Parents’ Needs for Prenatal Education","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Perinatal Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Feeling; Empowerment; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Christian ministry; Qualitative research; Medical education; Medicine; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.061087119953141165,"score_gpt":0.4048271564652038,"score_spread":0.34374003651206264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250604073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96135336,0.0023585993,0.0065491395,0.017579589,0.0036552264,0.00058760477,0.0000103250795,0.000013507747,0.007892625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835488,0.00008977497,0.008257978,0.00031444593,0.0017427953,0.000033762954,0.0000019089616,0.000012034834,0.005998463],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857104,0.0004990703,0.00032480023,0.00007614783,0.0003297914,0.00019913026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985485,0.00035681477,0.00028081628,0.00013273966,0.000518711,0.00016241512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024760826,0.00009128213,0.00013795748,0.00017623813,0.00042682502,0.00006806051,0.00035892564,0.000048206475,0.00017720048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011987776,0.00006688104,0.00009244515,0.0004022672,0.00010778552,0.00039190368,0.000022097536,0.00014209948,0.000020188969],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011316024,0.0004382245,0.00035218394,0.00004651483,0.000026879818,1.5328953e-7,0.22320165,0.000007661812,0.00045580202,0.05047954,0.02988278,0.69499546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052461325,0.001072094,0.007446386,0.00023937668,0.0001109037,0.000056086385,0.3128508,0.00003285481,0.0016025142,0.026125113,0.6495762,0.00036305797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048844365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070109534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6946324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021450943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004072669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3282836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252501860","doi":"10.24124/2005/bpgub363","title":"Spinning a northern web: Women using information and communication technology to network for health and wellness.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Information and Communications Technology; The Internet; Focus group; Public relations; Action (physics); Work (physics); Promotion (chess); Health promotion; Action research; Knowledge management; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Public health; World Wide Web; Business; Nursing; Computer science; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.043207604389584785,"score_gpt":0.44576572584574425,"score_spread":0.4025581214561595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252501860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95610505,0.0037869874,0.018972935,0.008661827,0.0002866707,0.00200299,0.000022489596,0.00016596814,0.009995107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3030635,0.003673347,0.682275,0.003914376,0.00063920877,0.0008048317,0.00084723486,0.000081667145,0.0047008595],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988056,0.00025682795,0.00034360003,0.00014296947,0.00013053228,0.00032051405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991104,0.00018290202,0.00030138966,0.00012407333,0.00015331428,0.00012794013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002427187,0.0001260312,0.00026803592,0.00021136343,0.0010065293,0.0001089971,0.0001250575,0.00021735141,0.000011617584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032564244,0.00012541527,0.000019078258,0.00038497074,0.00009085831,0.00028661572,0.00002901468,0.00014125327,0.0000018410434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007896353,0.0000102639915,0.0010357327,0.00018097644,0.000023867677,2.4202796e-8,0.22648083,0.000052676853,0.000009811893,0.10409173,0.00037870693,0.6676564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004069941,0.00024421234,0.000728771,0.00030893195,0.00001409005,5.041667e-7,0.4556135,0.0010066014,0.000008251262,0.015584597,0.52570105,0.00038248228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014514746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03205616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66727394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022525738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033128954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253596683","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11236","title":"The Marginalization of Child Care: A Pilot Atlas of Child Care in Ottawa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Focus group; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Political science; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine; Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.020815860798815092,"score_gpt":0.37063213981400395,"score_spread":0.34981627901518886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253596683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02874501,0.008086642,0.00020252744,0.0011833052,0.00081656,0.00086160423,0.000067791516,0.000026537487,0.96001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791542,0.0014091416,0.00061962736,0.0000617883,0.00025404833,0.00006783391,0.00031274772,0.000039491184,0.018081078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973913,0.001054686,0.00052367576,0.0002483185,0.0005426048,0.00023942953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824977,0.00046472272,0.00047755663,0.00021489323,0.0005483557,0.000044716166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012159625,0.00017462757,0.0003542875,0.00014223086,0.0004050577,0.000024458388,0.00035456676,0.00018513696,0.00016677217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006079501,0.0001088009,0.00012546829,0.0004431285,0.00024352332,0.00008794685,0.000015960268,0.00016474968,0.0000050082995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026784898,0.00008283103,0.0038338208,0.0005966381,0.00006184961,7.591423e-7,0.2985748,0.0000030525716,0.00011605246,0.63677716,0.0009606572,0.058724534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012004066,0.00075353874,0.051163916,0.0017962999,0.00009086474,2.3718017e-7,0.63499933,0.0000022805953,0.00580927,0.005252905,0.2983121,0.000618832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013963652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18097837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95040923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012146215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020627669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99260247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256560939","doi":"10.1037/0003-066x.60.9.1044","title":"On the Cover.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09617476079146371,"score_gpt":0.48550904859565525,"score_spread":0.38933428780419155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256560939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11764004,0.000055601373,0.003359844,0.088809125,0.00021637924,0.0001261191,0.0000049951204,0.0000751688,0.7897127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97123784,0.00005350026,0.0040059118,0.017727815,0.0002957639,0.000017591374,5.08369e-7,0.0000066351217,0.006654408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983682,0.00091313495,0.00010168368,0.00017435367,0.0002074429,0.00023520127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850655,0.0010930332,0.00008763901,0.00022761908,0.000027003265,0.000058188063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015822148,0.00006891093,0.00009871499,0.000021687547,0.00040084874,0.00003847076,0.00028860985,0.000021152226,0.0008530931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071045663,0.000042457887,0.00005562722,0.00034406304,0.0023615053,0.000041292027,0.0000119974975,0.00013535621,0.0007890935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018134477,0.00006107622,0.0003552771,1.8472399e-7,0.0000075308617,8.24949e-7,0.005615752,0.0000054299285,0.000026365222,0.67546445,0.1156906,0.20275435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074121854,0.00015095365,0.00478618,0.0000022959891,0.0000023333535,2.3680879e-7,0.0074933455,0.0000051539178,0.000019202924,0.007537429,0.9798384,0.00009040455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014370328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027625295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8641477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047757145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002045781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283213931","doi":"10.1177/16094069221107144","title":"Methodological Insights From a Virtual, Team-Based Rapid Qualitative Method Applied to a Study of Providers’ Perspectives of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Hospital-To-Home Transitions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trillium Health Centre; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto; Bridgepoint Active Healthcare; University Health Network","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; March of Dimes Canada","keywords":"Rigour; Qualitative research; Pandemic; Health care; Data collection; Telemedicine; Computer science; Qualitative property; Nursing; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.5732578309891969,"score_gpt":0.6381512085933999,"score_spread":0.064893377604203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283213931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42355874,0.00013061834,0.5672744,0.0067586843,0.0005335142,0.0010621275,0.0003644072,0.000017431854,0.00030009047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6208677,0.0000048387506,0.3777874,0.0010202419,0.0001203463,0.00014779865,0.0000038169205,0.00002240454,0.000025404488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8544118,0.14025724,0.001739446,0.0005953643,0.0026565483,0.0003396448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9377967,0.057545945,0.0020786491,0.00036387943,0.0017410385,0.00047380084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.058226828,0.00040122675,0.0013498585,0.0010599428,0.00064488186,0.00005827545,0.0017807642,0.00011020581,0.000602543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026497057,0.00027121312,0.00085035164,0.0017282836,0.0007572636,0.00021169167,0.0002459496,0.0009291175,0.0000016917744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032993746,0.0023579788,0.00010722821,0.000007386547,0.0013021477,0.0000069466532,0.90349185,0.01169492,0.0108052585,0.05891753,0.00020801101,0.007801377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024030155,0.0073348116,0.0016820378,0.00003616928,0.00013864815,0.0000028335699,0.8949586,0.000050634524,0.0013273706,0.09058221,0.0011699797,0.00031370507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023369938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012807707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.197309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014407051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011801221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285729098","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2022.2091258","title":"Expanding opportunities to maximise research recruitment and data collection using digital tools","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Thematic analysis; Social media; Data science; Photovoice; Digital data; Computer science; Sample (material); Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9792196628014184,"score_gpt":0.7528446808008868,"score_spread":0.22637498200053152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285729098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.860963,0.0007446864,0.045631886,0.068680555,0.0037582356,0.0011303542,0.00030579837,0.000022652224,0.018762842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82106674,0.0009982679,0.16384296,0.0005238975,0.004530139,0.00013323496,0.00004412492,0.0000564877,0.008804179],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684791,0.026955094,0.00051056565,0.0002888044,0.003241439,0.0005249808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98482287,0.012283088,0.00020674556,0.00013046557,0.002327194,0.0002296579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1048941,0.000078233374,0.0002660156,0.0012365101,0.0023606666,0.000471131,0.0013507659,0.00006949192,0.0004675865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028125918,0.00007963333,0.00006343626,0.00062948285,0.00090719707,0.00073834375,0.0017353933,0.0010207159,0.0000021146955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020316099,0.00025467016,0.0006699641,0.000012787465,0.00037251104,0.00036318635,0.20784664,0.000043881184,0.005884326,0.14197059,0.019096486,0.62145334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052814663,0.00061672216,0.00054053875,0.000023623963,0.000009390505,0.00007758621,0.33650988,0.00008128687,0.00013494962,0.04883622,0.61251515,0.00012651776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012610288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012802609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62132686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014126501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013757588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301880765","doi":"10.5121/csit.2018.8070","title":"TOWARDS AN ASSESSMENT OF CLOUD E-HEALTH PROJECT RISK: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cloud computing; Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.2078105538466973,"score_gpt":0.5212210241676297,"score_spread":0.3134104703209324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301880765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04173548,0.00021930959,0.018290114,0.00079505675,0.0016229781,0.0040795463,0.002465647,0.0006378333,0.930154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.711638,0.00503574,0.06913802,0.0012978081,0.019609032,0.00000325463,0.029541885,0.017791245,0.14594506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97617805,0.020320328,0.0006746593,0.0008632647,0.0013117391,0.00065195427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635005,0.000094159244,0.0007242903,0.0008134391,0.001590951,0.00042709638],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014164783,0.00029405474,0.00059723895,0.00043194153,0.0050638714,0.00083395705,0.001985891,0.00021697301,0.030682884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013626054,0.000281221,0.000108255954,0.0011570678,0.00085464073,0.00037413568,0.00089761923,0.0007802504,0.0032339145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082037004,0.0017845503,0.00003460333,0.00012957638,0.0001297584,0.0000033648196,0.11906056,0.0000076266383,0.000021173351,0.0025561322,0.75570375,0.12048685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043682655,0.005078651,0.0016960189,0.000040689218,0.000030241565,0.0000022084084,0.030413084,0.000086337444,0.0000063584253,0.00017979996,0.9617379,0.00029189722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004196806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008009766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78420895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005917753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021638202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306711190","doi":"10.2196/43413","title":"Correction: Culturally Safe eHealth Interventions With Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Protocol for a Best Practice Framework","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"eHealth; Psychological intervention; Protocol (science); Pacific islanders; Culturally appropriate; Medicine; Medical education; Best practice; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Psychology; Nursing; Population; Health care; Political science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.34587038200119025,"score_gpt":0.6852379256310954,"score_spread":0.3393675436299052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306711190","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.18954e-7,0.000016533944,0.0029286891,0.0046843737,0.00066546164,0.9001479,0.00014551908,0.000089324276,0.091321886],"genre_scores_gemma":[3.917152e-7,0.000008975737,0.012802512,0.000068030524,0.0020900054,0.71951747,0.00005396829,0.00006165245,0.26539698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859902,0.008279926,0.00072878523,0.0010580539,0.002655865,0.0012871725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127764,0.0048084836,0.000685134,0.0005162758,0.0022378168,0.00047467652],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012649899,0.0004447144,0.0006928045,0.0003676662,0.0041477815,0.0011695911,0.0008571968,0.00061427517,0.003433128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051080477,0.00034733917,0.0002535695,0.001549978,0.0010270753,0.0007642544,0.000224996,0.0049735536,0.000020331103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021099157,0.0011826673,0.00007791441,0.0040706205,0.000089891946,0.000013413896,0.022696028,9.898095e-7,6.5926133e-7,0.03563463,0.92524195,0.008881311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013263827,0.008127459,0.00018834027,0.008724364,0.00001511791,0.000012253239,0.03076879,0.000011169623,7.371342e-7,0.0030036613,0.9473893,0.0004323948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027042239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009516931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18063042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083884405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005077812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309376405","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.11084-x","title":"Thinking qualitatively in the context of mixed methods research: implications for study design","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Multimethodology; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Research design; Management science; Data science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics education; Social science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.49359164553536117,"score_gpt":0.5644381462159314,"score_spread":0.07084650068057019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309376405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040723462,0.0012954457,0.0068907184,0.0020245654,0.0002542639,0.006544393,0.000121542216,0.000026838266,0.9828015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053946287,0.00012171727,0.19752765,0.00042059433,0.00027833367,0.0040884907,0.000019237577,0.000119686396,0.7920297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654239,0.031197518,0.0009933903,0.0006286486,0.001208969,0.0005475893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96576697,0.032526515,0.00048931345,0.0005684247,0.00057842524,0.00007032896],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11293775,0.0002633901,0.00070592144,0.0004006573,0.0014875387,0.00008945093,0.0014383366,0.00018029445,0.00013528156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033403158,0.00020570525,0.00028218163,0.00016166357,0.0010594613,0.00006921885,0.0002188274,0.00093318627,0.000003506232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021531145,0.00003244309,0.000003393292,0.000014794966,0.000044732187,5.3929455e-7,0.2086192,1.8623491e-7,0.000008582363,0.40863997,0.0001338135,0.3824808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019596374,0.00031513962,0.00007350595,0.000035273664,0.00003628202,1.5777303e-7,0.10580107,4.645263e-7,0.000005047856,0.39519927,0.49820516,0.00013267824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001632736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015612427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49807134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027611904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005626652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310459162","doi":"10.2196/40041","title":"Using Semistructured Telephone Interviews to Collect Qualitative Data From People With HIV Who Are Not in Medical Care: Implementation Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Data collection; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Nonprobability sampling; Medicine; Family medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Psychology; Population; Sociology; Computer science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.6927539013029166,"score_gpt":0.7227957595490015,"score_spread":0.030041858246084963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310459162","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3431626,0.000013744608,0.0010874046,0.0039225314,0.000026126985,0.6498473,0.0011945887,0.000049186234,0.0006965085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14919728,6.119127e-7,0.0046309265,0.00012897555,0.0001476711,0.84549165,0.00011457986,0.00003094039,0.00025734244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680437,0.026433937,0.00052556023,0.00081118284,0.003508317,0.00067731226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968193,0.0017139554,0.00017533073,0.0006651143,0.00032944253,0.00029684842],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020574888,0.00017210773,0.00045041146,0.00030375065,0.0013388967,0.00020427059,0.0015629829,0.000059350903,0.0032869575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013269109,0.00014847888,0.000034567343,0.002736652,0.00024401634,0.0002758338,0.0015546506,0.00085366407,0.000009560574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010223393,0.00053133664,0.01786336,0.00008077239,0.000035793524,0.00003271634,0.96181536,0.000012157415,0.00022110535,0.0002170636,0.009735503,0.008432519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025526646,0.001304558,0.015054707,0.0002822016,0.0000025165198,3.7648982e-7,0.897072,0.00010082637,0.00010217281,0.000516418,0.08279108,0.00022045214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032714974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24967092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21695594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001027491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012712029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312441025","doi":"10.1177/21582440221140098","title":"A Comparative Analysis of Data Quality in Online Zoom Versus Phone Interviews: An Example of Youth With and Without Disabilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Zoom; Data collection; Phone; Psychology; Camera phone; Semi-structured interview; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Applied psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.583658783867614,"score_gpt":0.5501067635815161,"score_spread":0.03355202028609794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312441025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944502,0.00024010034,0.0005250898,0.00007858274,0.000025847854,0.00035645167,0.0016138759,0.000004421807,0.0027054278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989819,0.000012615528,0.009643981,0.000014360308,0.0000081611815,0.000016286358,0.00031982243,0.0000037087732,0.0001620927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994779,0.0040833857,0.00037867823,0.00032770535,0.00030276112,0.00012845019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844545,0.00071475026,0.0002469269,0.0004918209,0.000050803326,0.000050226798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006779496,0.00008276092,0.0006527081,0.00010030792,0.00014729956,0.00003382976,0.0007956166,0.000016124557,0.00042906764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018941349,0.00006746562,0.00003159232,0.0010509017,0.00061461324,0.0004572029,0.00078410853,0.000102283215,1.3371732e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001152909,0.00053733384,0.06790643,0.000025450414,0.00039761607,2.916247e-7,0.9181706,0.000056128745,0.00006561315,0.005358062,0.000005979313,0.006323604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010166117,0.00039178328,0.046182778,0.000019013469,0.00018976438,2.25659e-8,0.95087034,0.0003327564,0.000023601771,0.00028825543,0.00057142955,0.00011362463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29425627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4399858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14572956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004865311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009325436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7104434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313444920","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_31","title":"Focus Groups","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer texts in education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Sociology; Focus (optics); Product (mathematics); Element (criminal law); Social group; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07116834041858798,"score_gpt":0.4012457224585474,"score_spread":0.3300773820399594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313444920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044444003,0.0013168388,0.000103418555,0.0015851858,0.004141419,0.00038983725,0.000006192536,0.00012703013,0.99188566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007222461,0.0008623973,0.0028585705,0.0001124464,0.0017595323,0.00006674749,0.000016138587,0.00007762968,0.98702407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983465,0.00019826605,0.00033901833,0.00040355398,0.00041180928,0.00030087336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989376,0.00036577898,0.00019334308,0.00028297346,0.00011847855,0.0001018294],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020672078,0.00020337912,0.00026316367,0.00038547552,0.00020103624,0.00006854768,0.0002814438,0.0003447647,0.000751072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041131227,0.00022304697,0.00010795131,0.00015005439,0.00024098875,0.00012825207,0.000056189052,0.00040660333,0.0009828039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023541338,0.000024037772,0.00007560866,0.000017731045,0.000006956327,0.0000012131517,0.01088127,3.1805467e-7,0.0000032959317,0.7446674,0.0023189283,0.24200088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042058684,0.000011459327,0.0010345812,0.00015291486,0.000009672499,1.2176113e-7,0.0014140708,4.5568996e-7,0.000004999035,0.46648732,0.5306386,0.00020376156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015552898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005119686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52831966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045521252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006880238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313445878","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_55","title":"Online Focus Groups","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer texts in education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Face (sociological concept); Qualitative research; Focus (optics); Psychology; Participant observation; Perception; Face-to-face; Medical education; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.0808039494841572,"score_gpt":0.41219513171707284,"score_spread":0.33139118223291564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313445878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014751045,0.0017358259,0.00010732317,0.0026353616,0.0047268346,0.0004799579,0.0000247266,0.00016085558,0.988654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005457929,0.0012179845,0.0053211087,0.00016078759,0.002451483,0.000045408302,0.00005786807,0.000089347355,0.9851981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982545,0.00020158183,0.00038451207,0.0004252415,0.00042557466,0.00030860942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988658,0.00037416705,0.00021588063,0.00029713224,0.00013850952,0.000108545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017021064,0.00022084606,0.00029155423,0.00040475326,0.00018620236,0.000058875314,0.0003008628,0.00035548978,0.0006456044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046506693,0.00023918887,0.00011349307,0.00016567377,0.0002451085,0.0001246705,0.000063515065,0.00046810217,0.0005371452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027381525,0.000073555726,0.00007472749,0.000020735804,0.000008555742,0.0000014778802,0.009102964,5.20306e-7,0.0000035814758,0.71334934,0.0017663945,0.27559543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005948649,0.00001702008,0.0021396545,0.00021091432,0.000013420512,1.6644016e-7,0.0021251177,0.0000010829087,0.000003730955,0.42768186,0.56749797,0.00024956613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017670086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011001214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5657316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004582179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9753839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313446077","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_34","title":"Harnessing Insights with NVivo","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer texts in education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Qualitative research; Categorization; Thematic analysis; Software; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06392122655156686,"score_gpt":0.38435554680775247,"score_spread":0.3204343202561856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313446077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024803474,0.001139893,0.00016626372,0.00072284543,0.0021036651,0.00034895432,0.0000018772423,0.00010625671,0.9929299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014759876,0.00041398325,0.006041215,0.00012920261,0.001121712,0.000052551528,0.00001563405,0.000083149665,0.97738266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855167,0.0001698564,0.00025723237,0.00038368898,0.00040137663,0.00023618781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908006,0.00025563434,0.00020562204,0.00023694233,0.00013632805,0.00008539996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093990343,0.00019886404,0.00024576468,0.00036608297,0.00026994458,0.00009912406,0.00020086454,0.00024550417,0.0002590365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015797441,0.00018117804,0.00005239787,0.00016991992,0.00030129598,0.00018224817,0.000033712946,0.00035637818,0.00024408069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005995646,0.000030503566,0.00013877529,0.000036551668,0.000010844135,0.0000027511433,0.03045172,0.0000019851575,0.000007944081,0.8147856,0.0005543564,0.15397295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008348306,0.000023868317,0.0018843882,0.0007004184,0.000019100054,2.9254025e-7,0.0038428432,0.0000014553934,0.00001535849,0.21811903,0.7749701,0.00033964711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090018276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051969965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7744158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034660829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009483987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7388226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316174261","doi":"10.1186/s13063-023-07067-9","title":"Knowledge mobilization activities to support decision-making by youth, parents, and adults using a systematic and living map of evidence and recommendations on COVID-19: protocol for three randomized controlled trials and qualitative user-experience studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trials","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance; University of Toronto; Western University; University of Alberta; Glycemic Index Laboratories; SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; McMaster University; Public Health Agency of Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Impact; Cochrane","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Sickkids Research Institute; Hospital for Sick Children; Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation; Children's Hospital Foundation; McMaster University","keywords":"Usability; Randomized controlled trial; Medical education; Medicine; Thematic analysis; Population; Protocol (science); Plain language; Stakeholder; Psychological intervention; Applied psychology; Family medicine; Nursing; Psychology; Qualitative research; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Public relations","score_opus":0.7192928345553323,"score_gpt":0.6690917372699475,"score_spread":0.0502010972853848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316174261","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40356243,0.0025864637,0.11811569,0.0012277124,0.0004259347,0.4736469,0.00031135062,0.0001026022,0.000020905723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6928055,0.00051391154,0.0142216645,0.000095837255,0.00012530878,0.29205564,0.000004258766,0.00003034524,0.00014748135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97142726,0.025293557,0.0022197736,0.00045698267,0.00035786285,0.000244533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67376673,0.32417747,0.0015021145,0.00011446297,0.00029368274,0.0001455315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12073957,0.00022936054,0.0038605726,0.00028945867,0.0007309545,0.00019333382,0.00009170783,0.000083793464,0.000014713325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48632544,0.00014084035,0.00016316617,0.00031213852,0.000548533,0.00038619418,0.000101096,0.000049716484,3.237456e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.043185815,0.000063954954,0.0001280494,0.005601475,0.000363377,2.2851751e-7,0.9422321,0.000009960534,0.00020817113,0.0036662896,0.00021414271,0.0043264567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07298247,0.0006283133,0.0000119187625,0.022090126,0.0005510241,3.2171013e-7,0.89047104,0.0011311442,0.00008605919,0.011659032,0.000089071225,0.00029948432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002324944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005556145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36558586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008575256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017148147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90538365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317894144","doi":"10.32920/21948269.v1","title":"Conducting international online surveys: Trials, tribulations, and suggestions for success","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Invention for Innovation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Democratization; Public relations; Internationalization; Political science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.7322222279191554,"score_gpt":0.5962840345381925,"score_spread":0.1359381933809629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317894144","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07221788,0.00055812806,0.85829014,0.048168916,0.00945661,0.0023530838,0.0046566087,0.00050613505,0.0037925157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4279735,0.0019106092,0.49232003,0.0002621267,0.0069992887,0.00081485347,0.006435725,0.0001189598,0.06316488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930491,0.0052757724,0.0006823354,0.0004350687,0.00032676096,0.00023098156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986931,0.011857764,0.00038596886,0.00014465748,0.00058080215,0.00009976216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037419528,0.00015842298,0.0004989938,0.00019372685,0.0005223699,0.00027738046,0.00028725294,0.00025580265,0.00021840614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032824017,0.00014295916,0.00017346862,0.00017932235,0.00023802037,0.00012694267,0.00024128122,0.00028766214,0.0000039966208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057291625,0.00028057606,0.015712528,0.00022450591,0.00071220397,0.0000023815528,0.024901867,0.0006554818,0.000072350085,0.8068431,0.013661804,0.13687593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033369386,0.00012316818,0.07017803,0.0005548392,0.0004494772,0.0000012162044,0.07531683,0.01048103,0.00013354252,0.62935954,0.20823854,0.0018268517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011963872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014990289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36597008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098090386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002820083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317894151","doi":"10.32920/21948269","title":"Conducting international online surveys: Trials, tribulations, and suggestions for success","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Invention for Innovation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Democratization; Internationalization; Public relations; Political science; Knowledge management; Business; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.7322222279191554,"score_gpt":0.5962840345381925,"score_spread":0.1359381933809629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317894151","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07221788,0.00055812806,0.85829014,0.048168916,0.00945661,0.0023530838,0.0046566087,0.00050613505,0.0037925157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4279735,0.0019106092,0.49232003,0.0002621267,0.0069992887,0.00081485347,0.006435725,0.0001189598,0.06316488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930491,0.0052757724,0.0006823354,0.0004350687,0.00032676096,0.00023098156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986931,0.011857764,0.00038596886,0.00014465748,0.00058080215,0.00009976216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037419528,0.00015842298,0.0004989938,0.00019372685,0.0005223699,0.00027738046,0.00028725294,0.00025580265,0.00021840614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032824017,0.00014295916,0.00017346862,0.00017932235,0.00023802037,0.00012694267,0.00024128122,0.00028766214,0.0000039966208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057291625,0.00028057606,0.015712528,0.00022450591,0.00071220397,0.0000023815528,0.024901867,0.0006554818,0.000072350085,0.8068431,0.013661804,0.13687593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033369386,0.00012316818,0.07017803,0.0005548392,0.0004494772,0.0000012162044,0.07531683,0.01048103,0.00013354252,0.62935954,0.20823854,0.0018268517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011963872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014990289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36597008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098090386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002820083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323363531","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2023.2185985","title":"Considerations for conducting online focus groups on sensitive topics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Online research methods; Data collection; Online community; Online discussion; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.8791719862406588,"score_gpt":0.6973427693186016,"score_spread":0.18182921692205722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323363531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5296463,0.00010521165,0.072787315,0.37458238,0.007929453,0.0007790412,0.00026005125,0.00008117538,0.013829119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7456939,0.00021571631,0.2358408,0.001011717,0.013784574,0.000028726952,0.000017852784,0.00003440566,0.0033722958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872278,0.010615534,0.00047626617,0.0001663916,0.0011108499,0.00040316978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95464176,0.04077697,0.00027325962,0.00005215207,0.0041481773,0.00010769948],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0348055,0.00008147695,0.00029713247,0.0006178917,0.0008087985,0.00009158229,0.00031019573,0.0001510489,0.00012056748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08819343,0.00007506897,0.00020069008,0.00039974225,0.00072795845,0.00016475187,0.0000771216,0.00061782385,0.000014406647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024045269,0.000076005985,0.00003843169,0.000004134221,0.00018766576,0.00008316569,0.05836925,0.000017935727,0.0031128563,0.8763734,0.008479033,0.05301768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009983482,0.00051899505,0.0012450924,0.00003290153,0.000016369377,0.00001893794,0.13316235,0.00007107348,0.0025382063,0.7731917,0.088072196,0.00013384224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031807067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057024887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37357065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002945566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005604742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99387085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366450241","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.024.007","title":"Richard A. Krueger and Mary Anne Casey. (2009). <i>Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research</i> (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 205 pages, plus preface, acknowledgements, references, and indices.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAGE; Psychology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Library science; Gerontology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.19416003882541363,"score_gpt":0.4936611830970598,"score_spread":0.2995011442716462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366450241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4127546,0.32957703,0.033963095,0.06405917,0.0059587043,0.04025992,0.00071539404,0.00023399718,0.1124781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7794095,0.0063201287,0.20562732,0.0007771636,0.0032409944,0.00075533683,0.00012620704,0.00008474042,0.0036585568],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949156,0.002246515,0.00064048375,0.00037645063,0.0010468083,0.0007741559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995626,0.00078330236,0.00043346864,0.00016385937,0.0019831886,0.0010101818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025780512,0.00020424313,0.0003853199,0.00044869588,0.0010770948,0.00049457524,0.00021945273,0.00021469916,0.00028401645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005268101,0.00017990427,0.00006363603,0.0005861354,0.0006147248,0.00057282863,0.000022794868,0.00051682314,0.000007874624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012840504,0.00008053198,0.00033960718,0.000038168862,0.0000692561,0.000026033445,0.008677612,0.00000443073,0.000039357106,0.0033956745,0.15304874,0.83415216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023403123,0.0014121444,0.009409009,0.00016698039,0.00023865355,0.000029841665,0.011315818,0.00037093976,0.000032710075,0.02310292,0.95124125,0.0003394423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035238443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09069684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8338128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064214674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003958883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9258956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375955451","doi":"10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2022-0277en","title":"Five tips for conducting remote qualitative data collection in COVID times: theoretical and pragmatic considerations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Alberta Health; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; Data collection; Scopus; Qualitative research; Context (archaeology); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Portuguese; Qualitative property; Psychology; Computer science; MEDLINE; Data science; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing; Political science; Pathology; Social science; Psychological intervention; Geography; Disease","score_opus":0.2984676810944034,"score_gpt":0.5264711328553469,"score_spread":0.22800345176094344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375955451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57951105,0.0021900288,0.33117157,0.04239992,0.0009124205,0.010999823,0.0015028268,0.00096638827,0.030346008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85636336,0.0004041894,0.13928126,0.0007396986,0.00026265765,0.0001637144,0.00044792192,0.000058724912,0.0022784963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928716,0.0053937514,0.00050125783,0.0004992977,0.00028160418,0.00045250225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98696893,0.012156149,0.00017699103,0.00035510788,0.00016839833,0.0001744338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015327292,0.00017068771,0.0003858331,0.00019492889,0.00089189975,0.00064039335,0.00022826981,0.00012579837,0.0002070171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029207697,0.000168352,0.000050755752,0.0008546949,0.0009077401,0.00055335916,0.00016058028,0.00025531623,0.00002237235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003290346,0.000026304617,0.00006308713,0.00020069277,0.00003340637,0.000013840589,0.14281808,0.0000071505374,0.0002704774,0.8451094,0.008902256,0.0025223913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022236817,0.0002532105,0.00032351885,0.0007081383,0.00016512793,0.000022322844,0.38517013,0.060117163,0.00008419091,0.4847985,0.06531398,0.0008200703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000769889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048782857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36031094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002118824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000548246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9789697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377096773","doi":"10.1177/00169862231166093","title":"Conducting Collaborative Qualitative Analysis Remotely","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gifted Child Quarterly","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Qualitative research; Collegiality; Coding (social sciences); Qualitative property; Data collection; Affordance; Psychology; Focus group; Trustworthiness; Computer science; Pedagogy; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1263394496806298,"score_gpt":0.46499181782309273,"score_spread":0.3386523681424629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377096773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7938643,0.00040946619,0.009307095,0.017905217,0.00094002456,0.00086650247,0.00024174407,0.0012031444,0.17526248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871569,0.00003258469,0.007095878,0.00037871773,0.00040651235,0.00003599653,0.0001008542,0.000029922876,0.004762578],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930062,0.004756067,0.00046252878,0.00050540856,0.00063577265,0.00063397083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970945,0.00170309,0.00026114233,0.00029113627,0.00043527057,0.0002148428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004723932,0.00021548395,0.00048811748,0.00062174513,0.0012816554,0.00016682385,0.0003003445,0.00014663298,0.00034391313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009260306,0.00020697035,0.00025265128,0.009459852,0.0005655897,0.00036525234,0.00001772217,0.0002887429,0.00037122908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002577791,0.000035109784,0.0001325162,0.000008171258,0.00059886795,0.000012937817,0.8999957,0.000014798905,0.0001679679,0.07988086,0.0031782207,0.015949093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004010394,0.00029258427,0.002936802,0.000024257506,0.00022815805,3.9546228e-7,0.94691575,0.00018369367,0.000097074764,0.019133514,0.029389938,0.00039680247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014053781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001980221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19329263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009631764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013870696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98575866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377722532","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-25259-4_7","title":"Pivoting Online in a Pandemic: Facilitating Object Elicitation Interviews with Canadian Craft Vendors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Social visualities","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Pandemic; Object (grammar); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Visual arts; Computer science; Art; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.23201738639917033,"score_gpt":0.45175775751795755,"score_spread":0.21974037111878722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377722532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04446893,0.0013307241,0.00040876222,0.0055982266,0.0014461552,0.0022335479,0.0024959487,0.0007143149,0.9413034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047982037,0.00036820935,0.0022452755,0.0006814697,0.0018175954,0.000114783834,0.0005771037,0.0002192374,0.9459943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961842,0.0011818146,0.0007227735,0.00047794226,0.0006935217,0.000739761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973255,0.001718056,0.00038602125,0.00011853335,0.0002659416,0.00018596661],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043212716,0.00039338504,0.0007475985,0.00057393784,0.00094214117,0.0001400108,0.00027778198,0.00046793083,0.00027758646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011542272,0.00039327383,0.00021120875,0.00027597003,0.00073395105,0.0001996755,0.000050906267,0.00072430767,0.00007568775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021363046,0.000015243442,0.00047876392,0.00019105701,0.00009664617,0.000024315174,0.564628,0.0000019907502,0.0000046186456,0.3996845,0.0005923101,0.034261197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005101868,0.00020858472,0.000858284,0.0013368727,0.00007276426,7.005436e-7,0.631477,0.000024651137,0.0000021359083,0.105549276,0.25892398,0.0010355511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43484616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9630253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5281791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010381354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00114425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378652588","doi":"10.1177/14687941231176931","title":"Off track or on point? Side comments in focus groups with teens","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Focus group; Great Rift; Focus (optics); Psychology; Dynamics (music); Social psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.5136757521572586,"score_gpt":0.6439928010743068,"score_spread":0.1303170489170482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378652588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7933144,0.0001641439,0.00054514664,0.04347616,0.00014608615,0.00164691,0.00008966233,0.00021713009,0.16040036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97628874,0.00024811894,0.0034827713,0.0002886256,0.00017977922,0.0003206886,0.000017267173,0.000056233635,0.019117795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97151446,0.02414028,0.00041644322,0.0005707667,0.0021059602,0.0012520856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756574,0.023202095,0.00008525788,0.0003143158,0.00046298947,0.00027794286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04141534,0.0002001507,0.0003942793,0.00082270755,0.0008277026,0.00012965003,0.0004951098,0.00013112678,0.00038396174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007723988,0.00014202655,0.000073261115,0.004542209,0.0015621735,0.0003017461,0.00011153005,0.00087510835,0.0008709949],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008671619,0.00029007162,0.0006808215,0.000040021754,0.000045313584,0.00014786681,0.6607556,0.0000065691484,0.00013010688,0.29524648,0.010543258,0.031246766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014671988,0.0020367343,0.006277556,0.00022107204,0.000003751552,5.477019e-7,0.85318124,0.000047719666,0.00041879338,0.09792877,0.03808188,0.00033474853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006675435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016651567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1973177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045365194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037444755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383815028","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6470","title":"“Not your typical book about qualitative research”: A Review of Camargo-Borges and McNamee’s Design Thinking and Social Construction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.7373396603920606,"score_gpt":0.6891688045162456,"score_spread":0.04817085587581493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383815028","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019751325,0.9891455,0.0020755385,0.0033216742,0.00030819417,0.0026352229,0.00014302199,0.000090234455,0.0022608682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000060959537,0.9869613,0.008679082,0.00018579798,0.00038190887,0.000395369,0.000044296936,0.00008101158,0.0032651115],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91021293,0.083661266,0.0023317977,0.0009466643,0.0020802044,0.0007671032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628572,0.03280956,0.0023495506,0.0004382758,0.0013647921,0.00018061044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13583335,0.0005493051,0.0029627369,0.00036129082,0.0019392587,0.00013931267,0.00051213155,0.00046379984,0.000079587226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022316614,0.00037419327,0.00048445998,0.0014372189,0.0077259378,0.000279687,0.00033385502,0.0013749946,0.00002337039],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043061194,0.000023430744,3.352015e-7,0.03348655,0.00041417507,0.000048320846,0.5469953,1.0295041e-8,4.9272586e-7,0.2836607,0.0032703236,0.13205731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115221774,0.00014790265,0.0000062522186,0.033221953,0.0004920055,0.000045366025,0.2569005,3.5992733e-7,8.9986275e-7,0.057988517,0.6506753,0.00040571447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012817206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007387283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64740497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031206576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001589339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387408123","doi":"10.1186/s12874-023-02051-y","title":"Asynchronous online focus groups for research with people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and family caregivers: usefulness, acceptability and lessons learned","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami; Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Moderation; Online discussion; Confidentiality; Medical education; Online research methods; Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Asynchronous communication; Data collection; Applied psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6998250111289526,"score_gpt":0.5809055774301132,"score_spread":0.1189194336988394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387408123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9023096,0.0006758064,0.08363567,0.011789463,0.00009819018,0.0010158923,0.00004369745,0.000111330206,0.00032036353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85002506,0.0025578937,0.14601779,0.000052956057,0.0004331465,0.00048225195,0.000013573095,0.000054011514,0.00036334104],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9410208,0.05284076,0.00039682994,0.0011456669,0.0026938294,0.0019021325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85353696,0.14389783,0.00008546906,0.00041570558,0.0011050553,0.00095894985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12223987,0.00023821963,0.0007911122,0.0006166328,0.002122931,0.0001988,0.0006443189,0.00045254224,0.00025919196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1160651,0.0001708859,0.00007451869,0.0023772372,0.0073527903,0.00026259338,0.00069910625,0.0015269319,0.000008419333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028300819,0.00046453995,0.11776189,0.0013544591,0.00022786364,0.0000723931,0.15922298,0.000013488947,0.00086596067,0.11430657,0.0010633968,0.60181636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030705058,0.0038139964,0.6631083,0.0005335671,0.000047437563,0.000013349952,0.2714968,0.0011992578,0.000078370926,0.05148137,0.004599238,0.0005578321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02185599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12407453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6012586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022686964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023429943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388464191","doi":"10.2196/50208","title":"Experiences and Priorities in Youth and Family Mental Health: Protocol for an Arts-Based Priority-Setting Focus Group Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Mental health; Protocol (science); The arts; Psychology; Medical education; Applied psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.6209029728760211,"score_gpt":0.6814379055270027,"score_spread":0.06053493265098153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388464191","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085349225,0.0000041127837,0.000065666165,0.0008870367,0.000008533065,0.91325027,0.0000274974,0.000108724045,0.00029893292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014985296,4.6339804e-7,0.0026447945,0.00003793643,0.00013071968,0.9820629,0.000004087197,0.000024596566,0.000109220215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915218,0.0050667375,0.00048452456,0.0006660474,0.0011321292,0.0011288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806106,0.0010843443,0.00011966496,0.00022630389,0.00017991806,0.0003286901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02608771,0.00018615738,0.00034291722,0.00041140302,0.0020108847,0.00053407793,0.00032494296,0.000095141484,0.000010994982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071985077,0.00016203726,0.00003720994,0.0009910314,0.000955314,0.00052902685,0.00019880632,0.00037528013,0.0000018363564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007866863,0.00079258694,0.025327537,0.0005042232,0.000006298545,0.0000051669444,0.8929342,2.3498602e-7,0.0002066292,0.0037935642,0.00065643765,0.07498644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048737857,0.009360263,0.02053817,0.00078687904,4.9523874e-7,1.6954974e-7,0.879647,0.00017221014,0.00007477785,0.0030036697,0.08125452,0.00028803872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002880032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037676867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080598086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001673384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005327246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388529544","doi":"10.1177/16094069231214679","title":"Virtual Synchronous Qualitative Data Collection Methods Used in Health and Social Sciences: A Scoping Review of Benefits, Challenges and Practical Insights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine; University of Ottawa; Université Laval; Université de Montréal; Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"Réseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation","keywords":"Data collection; Data science; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Management science; Work (physics); Engineering; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9041022143407212,"score_gpt":0.7577200251243497,"score_spread":0.14638218921637158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388529544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008273736,0.9186758,0.07440151,0.0047464045,0.00083229237,0.0010153872,0.00008804971,0.000016012931,0.00021629661],"genre_scores_gemma":[8.2696613e-7,0.6255955,0.37394062,0.00014129964,0.00021843516,0.000030262403,0.000018781568,0.000029135485,0.000025138486],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8420213,0.15108825,0.0039032742,0.0008227318,0.0017011376,0.00046334823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9243762,0.06835072,0.005608102,0.00022301509,0.0012237949,0.00021818078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1826208,0.00048243706,0.0037985647,0.0014763919,0.00041980285,0.00012284658,0.00095233147,0.00031724692,0.00002197005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048940644,0.00039431726,0.00035675635,0.0012974358,0.0021839358,0.0010128055,0.0005427651,0.0009930127,0.0000013455816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002850823,0.00007508045,1.2732984e-7,0.02476701,0.00037143752,0.000007647579,0.31568292,1.5759825e-7,4.110534e-7,0.09868208,0.000057635953,0.560327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007198949,0.0010841654,0.000002938143,0.41804442,0.00032350945,0.00007081104,0.4145122,0.000029363868,0.0000018687778,0.021197798,0.14343794,0.00057513174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047332427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042447602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55975187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060146186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051641925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388759097","doi":"10.22582/ta.v12i2.674","title":"Multi-Course and Faculty-Student Collaboration: Reflections on Implementing a Qualitative Research Project with Undergraduate Students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching Anthropology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Work (physics); Medical education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.5094679104235442,"score_gpt":0.7216916528058195,"score_spread":0.21222374238227526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388759097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95658827,0.00008253684,0.004849446,0.02725302,0.00038498075,0.0011073488,0.00005240947,0.00036278856,0.009319217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806574,0.00009313241,0.0134157,0.00009198526,0.000147818,0.00014536093,0.000025796344,0.000024143892,0.005398677],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856804,0.0120381685,0.00026154463,0.00047544978,0.0008291391,0.000715289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747247,0.0018673938,0.000121126395,0.00016255747,0.00028393776,0.000092517985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01752449,0.00014989349,0.0002417593,0.00033749794,0.0053140195,0.00020348099,0.00023347163,0.0000860005,0.000026848771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011800706,0.000121151985,0.00002952124,0.0012141616,0.0019336935,0.0001582964,0.00015460142,0.0006266526,0.000037213627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044309858,0.00029490713,0.005550903,0.000011683068,0.00011134371,0.000016588207,0.813501,0.000005955708,0.00017027506,0.17517594,0.0033934498,0.0017236446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007359087,0.0008697353,0.005725113,0.000037294194,0.000019274907,0.0000014919627,0.948249,0.00003459665,0.000023475828,0.0020931289,0.042044982,0.00016600334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01697014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03734892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1730828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020473442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030751462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389947626","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2023-0111","title":"Using Zoom Annotate to Facilitate Online Focus Groups in Veterinary Medicine Education Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Zoom; Medical education; Veterinary education; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; World Wide Web; Psychology; Computer science; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.6405615995118646,"score_gpt":0.6199158563894499,"score_spread":0.02064574312241474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389947626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95910144,0.0007792607,0.00066127756,0.03464623,0.0031783748,0.00028055545,0.000004088369,0.000021366808,0.0013273957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844292,0.0007862633,0.010328609,0.00064595556,0.0026558295,0.000027503116,0.000014499112,0.000024741748,0.0010874239],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924903,0.0040160487,0.0009162348,0.0002598802,0.0018083384,0.0005091871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679226,0.001257925,0.00025553245,0.00018873137,0.00080215593,0.0007034251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01886024,0.00014474356,0.00036798077,0.0013977557,0.00031499963,0.000037540365,0.0005011247,0.00015422398,0.00039139227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012243834,0.00012479052,0.00007939812,0.0024309608,0.0004928102,0.00042976523,0.00011417091,0.00070922705,0.000036577334],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006488449,0.0015084441,0.0011508799,0.00018567285,0.00003111186,0.00021875094,0.16925931,0.00003083257,0.010143581,0.003956604,0.021845516,0.79102045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012180705,0.0071283025,0.06563904,0.0030044715,0.000027297645,0.00034461613,0.25296292,0.000518013,0.00002243743,0.031661518,0.6370265,0.00044682727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040788213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002138296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7905736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006140181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041309865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99607646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390431452","doi":"10.1002/cyo2.41","title":"Liz Przybylski. 2020. <i>Hybrid Ethnography: Online, Offline, and In Between</i>. SAGE Publications, Inc.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CyberOrient","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Representation (politics); Online and offline; Modular design; Population; Key (lock); Media studies; Computer science; Anthropology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08289254930141411,"score_gpt":0.41704031159423055,"score_spread":0.33414776229281645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390431452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828014,0.0008340573,0.0006338309,0.008396426,0.00037275942,0.00045569267,0.00018673629,0.00024981162,0.0060693077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849908,0.0016403884,0.007840194,0.0004908283,0.0006705219,0.00013031845,0.00032099476,0.000035416404,0.0038805874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756986,0.000752621,0.00038664654,0.00040009475,0.0004119633,0.00047878938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985668,0.0007382617,0.000109341374,0.00024321832,0.00011551847,0.00022684086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003104447,0.0001493417,0.0002550995,0.00029390486,0.00039077265,0.00009206135,0.0002472142,0.000095259384,0.00007540676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090877694,0.00014501998,0.00006442077,0.0022541005,0.0004340887,0.00024826796,0.00012332089,0.00027619046,0.000048730602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032991484,0.0004071513,0.49182767,0.000071876006,0.00008092167,0.0000307826,0.07171552,0.000014949054,0.00018470103,0.093712464,0.041075017,0.30084598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003751424,0.000048132464,0.40426433,0.000037659604,0.000013549965,3.4900324e-7,0.010891729,0.00005973787,0.000061843304,0.0080839405,0.57590425,0.0002593479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019401666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00307829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5348292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061963874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011336334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5913743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390727249","doi":"10.1177/16094069231224610","title":"Dealing With Scam in Online Qualitative Research: Strategies and Ethical Considerations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Qualitative research; Narrative; Data collection; Internet privacy; Online forum; Qualitative property; Public relations; Psychology; Ethical issues; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.8360600166292907,"score_gpt":0.7621853258437825,"score_spread":0.07387469078550823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390727249","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19067878,0.0067800963,0.7006972,0.08922662,0.0012847448,0.00036356613,0.00008004701,0.000049958715,0.010838987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49071085,0.00026852082,0.50836253,0.00022371001,0.00029176474,0.0000072579683,0.000002361775,0.000015015686,0.000117968906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9507359,0.0461622,0.0009610044,0.0003021851,0.0015045368,0.00033415458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94591886,0.05098952,0.00025818154,0.00007971019,0.0025780343,0.00017567686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09503872,0.00016535113,0.00040212597,0.00100457,0.0002660358,0.00067072595,0.00027431425,0.00017726305,0.00016620773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015746491,0.00012629529,0.00010394533,0.0006095679,0.0020936367,0.0008032402,0.00006194219,0.0017907566,0.0000031001607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007915528,0.00003336635,0.000009515645,0.000014016676,0.00012676483,0.00008940258,0.44289398,0.000026463767,0.00043114644,0.54594946,0.00007568724,0.010271019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707115,0.0002174456,0.00011765304,0.00033235393,0.000011684862,0.000025661966,0.5340339,0.000107984495,0.00012469421,0.45950508,0.0051502683,0.0001025325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001217842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018722645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30003208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027589902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00110972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390733942","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2024.2302305","title":"A scoping review on the operationalization of intersectional health research methods in studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Lethbridge; University of Alberta","funders":"Worldwide Universities Network","keywords":"Operationalization; Oppression; Rigour; Intersectionality; Sociology; Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Public health; Thematic analysis; Mental health; Public relations; Political science; Qualitative research; Gender studies; Criminology; Psychology; Social science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Epistemology; Politics; Geography; Nursing","score_opus":0.789061829997935,"score_gpt":0.7655844072625705,"score_spread":0.02347742273536446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390733942","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017397373,0.86162376,0.00081301265,0.13389349,0.0015447186,0.0017711438,0.00001783535,0.00000828193,0.00031037486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000053476644,0.9847185,0.0016338674,0.01284579,0.0003357237,0.00019636082,0.000007720184,0.000022709475,0.00018585818],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9522556,0.042089272,0.0031029182,0.0004180636,0.0017421655,0.00039197123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466774,0.04893496,0.001961931,0.00015588576,0.0019897753,0.00028005143],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.116766684,0.00030852965,0.001877133,0.00096717174,0.0009657186,0.00007625937,0.0005912796,0.00008907599,0.000021149011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059317984,0.00016125795,0.0003378612,0.0014394366,0.00084981445,0.00012555884,0.00021203121,0.0013600948,0.000009777453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006062247,0.000047134694,0.0000055762425,0.025009379,0.00097486126,0.0000055020528,0.51131517,0.000030264833,4.6278203e-8,0.30997688,0.009184897,0.14338969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018569722,0.0007690552,7.868784e-7,0.32545307,0.00006198729,0.000018965939,0.28215995,0.0000033631632,1.5155e-7,0.043249052,0.3479499,0.00014802933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038281412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011361713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.338765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025194746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9486058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391098482","doi":"10.4337/9781839109652.00021","title":"Gentrification, resistance, and the reconceptualization of community through place-based social media: the future will not be Instagrammed","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gentrification; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Civil engineering; Engineering; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.08892524120397675,"score_gpt":0.33185744086532126,"score_spread":0.2429321996613445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391098482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014172657,0.0025524898,0.0013656237,0.081080526,0.0021149195,0.0009691839,0.00033021485,0.0001580607,0.91128725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06987553,0.0011711495,0.004887428,0.011495964,0.011580839,0.00030889775,0.00082571886,0.0003473918,0.8995071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944381,0.0031044553,0.000691542,0.0003228334,0.0011117691,0.00033126547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261445,0.00538691,0.0007520114,0.0005227635,0.00064525544,0.00007861182],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011724486,0.0003330775,0.00056689925,0.000113382615,0.0022905048,0.0011557708,0.0010338131,0.00066846964,0.000091498725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024492114,0.00021125065,0.00026229848,0.00014331048,0.0039591016,0.0005246844,0.00015844379,0.0018376892,0.0000026737564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009363451,0.0000059872264,4.946675e-7,0.00007213891,0.00007612945,4.68596e-7,0.22373508,4.3854018e-7,0.0000016483135,0.73376155,0.03623304,0.0060193846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047059494,0.0000099822955,0.000012201292,0.00008583214,0.000107058826,1.7203486e-7,0.029330695,0.000002771981,0.000015414571,0.2422545,0.72752917,0.00018161534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009141471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013335613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6912961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019848628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057128345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391224240","doi":"10.3233/shti231127","title":"Interpreting Laboratory Results with Complementary Health Information: A Human Factors Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in health technology and informatics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Health information; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Internet privacy; Telemedicine; Quality (philosophy); Information quality; Psychology; Computer science; Information system; Health care; Engineering; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10760648072311525,"score_gpt":0.5080739685845983,"score_spread":0.40046748786148306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391224240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5094706,0.079280905,0.010463943,0.32734123,0.0028234613,0.004875752,0.00083356875,0.0025130315,0.06239756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97690266,0.0033462085,0.017296389,0.002307153,0.000037281738,0.000046896843,0.000017671404,0.000007848776,0.0000378783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981961,0.0002848808,0.0008366009,0.0001037838,0.00018452236,0.00039410355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895906,0.00042481694,0.00026339386,0.000114021284,0.00017379988,0.00006490215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037624848,0.00013251713,0.00032666465,0.0006193432,0.0010605121,0.00004506812,0.0001253067,0.0000782392,0.0000046960995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062409043,0.000101178586,0.000016052087,0.0011981365,0.0012719833,0.0006899409,0.00011301004,0.00044489346,0.0000029465234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010234525,0.000006537928,0.0015160001,0.0004497246,0.00003581115,6.5639875e-7,0.5372569,0.000001527503,3.5731066e-8,0.45232648,0.0015503375,0.006845793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024140775,0.00051471114,0.0003615553,0.0006239341,0.0000022915303,0.0000010859222,0.84474605,0.00006174776,0.000002072662,0.010254315,0.14308886,0.00010198391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012421716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022460152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006533125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037296576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81567097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391449817","doi":"10.2196/52096","title":"The Development and Use of a New Visual Tool (REVISIT) to Support Participant Recall: Web-Based Interview Study Among Older Adults","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Rural Health; Rehabilitation Research and Development Service; Health Services Research and Development; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Interview; Recall; Focus group; Qualitative research; Psychology; Medical education; Applied psychology; Participant observation; Health care; Telemedicine; Nursing; Medicine; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.33328209194611286,"score_gpt":0.5570668033810856,"score_spread":0.22378471143497275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391449817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944807,0.00031927825,0.0013248482,0.0012320854,0.00009967713,0.0019797424,0.0000061814444,0.000038318434,0.0005191358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962692,0.00004715018,0.0012099647,0.000040048322,0.000043646625,0.00044787282,0.0000019272843,0.000013948773,0.0019262033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361247,0.0037868542,0.0005713858,0.00028086954,0.0011426917,0.0006057066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963027,0.0028143788,0.00006060528,0.00017233226,0.00037726754,0.0002727038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016898511,0.00013352235,0.00025674672,0.00021550115,0.00062020245,0.00040156586,0.00027840617,0.00005178752,0.00013696862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009954796,0.00008266015,0.00006413709,0.0010455719,0.0004452058,0.00047411924,0.0002515848,0.00034235808,0.0000757021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008892888,0.00018992086,0.002130212,0.00018186473,0.000062478444,0.000006700608,0.5453125,5.386231e-7,0.000009249899,0.002131597,0.006332813,0.4435532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012416493,0.0033227876,0.22595777,0.0020167879,0.000025894617,4.5034716e-7,0.3175321,0.0016199932,0.0006535574,0.0003567473,0.44684452,0.00042772733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000524335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003154032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44312546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014724706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008624909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5856721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391820577","doi":"10.1080/22423982.2024.2313822","title":"Communicating and complying with COVID-19 actions in northernmost Finland","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Circumpolar Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Public health; Public relations; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Health communication; Everyday life; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Business; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.19864289258809764,"score_gpt":0.5395490691931756,"score_spread":0.34090617660507794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391820577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63736355,0.020178314,0.12069236,0.21169168,0.0016145653,0.00036140886,0.000064473265,0.00005126615,0.007982387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906277,0.0010952619,0.0063908114,0.0016321712,0.0001981547,0.0000016748916,0.0000016744924,0.00000744113,0.00004512754],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819577,0.0008103145,0.00034920932,0.000086429245,0.00041767038,0.00014061714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817324,0.001224935,0.00019826113,0.000055978442,0.00014053116,0.0002070514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003995754,0.000059037746,0.00015012657,0.0002329977,0.0003148979,0.00014058953,0.00023809484,0.00002920652,0.000050084698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006973421,0.00004843473,0.000034692384,0.00019291868,0.00016453076,0.00026927827,0.000024961742,0.0003617637,0.0000022217343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014393576,0.00015543755,0.18419027,0.0001655929,0.00020265965,0.00020280787,0.3836867,0.0002201036,0.00018082779,0.24162437,0.00082192686,0.18840538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013649481,0.00034061098,0.043749005,0.0011280304,0.000016510528,0.0004110608,0.06629096,0.0007118074,0.000007709716,0.019848531,0.865877,0.000253834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072704065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010388013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8650551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047701143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012412609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391975760","doi":"10.2196/53790","title":"Best Practices and Recommendations for Research Using Virtual Real-Time Data Collection: Protocol for Virtual Data Collection Studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Data collection; Protocol (science); Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Statistics","score_opus":0.9398957950216159,"score_gpt":0.7919581339167134,"score_spread":0.14793766110490247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391975760","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003925041,0.000018255058,0.0037129545,0.011625779,0.000071366034,0.9812704,0.00054182706,0.0001367206,0.0025834881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000006956121,0.000026699769,0.047136918,0.000012425091,0.0011207236,0.9248479,0.00013871884,0.00005827754,0.026651356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98629117,0.008843534,0.0006503923,0.0015027793,0.0015965571,0.0011155427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97384787,0.021911846,0.00024443545,0.0011925836,0.0025409036,0.00026236434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06856109,0.00022826313,0.00039598328,0.00076210115,0.006739863,0.0018591052,0.0015039311,0.00023451062,0.0001734807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028387023,0.00020195212,0.00005462729,0.0030953826,0.0016972082,0.0028575351,0.00176018,0.00085729663,0.000029900015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024067105,0.000766049,0.00003788146,0.00170033,0.00023559036,0.000005186699,0.018099649,0.0000012146527,0.0023052364,0.04723479,0.86226004,0.06494732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013004788,0.00351951,0.000004835282,0.0017864889,0.000011124867,0.000002922838,0.03565231,0.013510259,0.0001820809,0.0060708383,0.9377282,0.00023092241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024124077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020965652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07546819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007981625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031448258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392135489","doi":"10.1177/16094069241236268","title":"Remote and Equitable Inductive Analysis for Global Health Teams: Using Digital Tools to Foster Equity and Collaboration in Qualitative Global Health Research via the R-EIGHT Method","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Rigour; Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Coding (social sciences); Thematic analysis; Knowledge management; Computer science; Equity (law); Data science; Process management; Management science; Engineering; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.7166983548439992,"score_gpt":0.7555245277030183,"score_spread":0.038826172859019015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392135489","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010192666,0.0039483723,0.9133557,0.06943626,0.000747819,0.00082269026,0.00065730035,0.000012048308,0.0008271539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13549466,0.00014004877,0.86248463,0.0013186394,0.0004126061,0.000020578065,0.00001344207,0.000016556243,0.00009885407],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9468263,0.048301905,0.0015955323,0.00061345,0.0018697669,0.00079304917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747442,0.021206362,0.00071714306,0.00014717721,0.0027862613,0.0003988825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15937956,0.00025145058,0.0008433689,0.0007034109,0.00063407293,0.0013934999,0.0005610168,0.00011955837,0.0000131404795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015241963,0.0001886639,0.00022628775,0.0037605576,0.00074958795,0.001595967,0.0004793809,0.00049580116,9.2224866e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028833788,0.00004569702,0.00009138885,0.000036173646,0.00071738905,0.000004115524,0.4432899,0.00009522579,0.000057192596,0.15464748,0.00023855874,0.40048856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042661166,0.00060219073,0.00042341903,0.00019858601,0.000053449177,0.000010889179,0.46524417,0.0026293574,0.000025747402,0.52233976,0.007885242,0.00016057881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051540565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004630679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40032798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045118094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025654964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392443773","doi":"","title":"Digital health technologies and social and geographic inequalities : a comparative sociology of public action","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Inequality; Sociology; Public health; Social inequality; Social science; Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4175847256671435,"score_gpt":0.468524744684921,"score_spread":0.050940019017777505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392443773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91095877,0.014407505,0.0033115617,0.054551184,0.00050735666,0.00085617154,0.00060210354,0.00029740148,0.014507947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942379,0.0034354017,0.001724449,0.00016623932,0.0001750743,0.000070169604,0.00005219217,0.000024048837,0.000114546136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935602,0.00374068,0.00081893185,0.00076143123,0.00043487112,0.0006838797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623823,0.0021698957,0.0010132884,0.00020804588,0.0002434431,0.00012710047],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030998637,0.00047749604,0.0015423261,0.00025621688,0.00083163107,0.00018278806,0.00041401948,0.0006850156,0.00005137704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074141216,0.00044166317,0.00022165671,0.00044356508,0.013624471,0.00046052042,0.00084124133,0.0010247133,0.000007906849],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026389142,0.00007554474,0.0035939268,0.00041049885,0.00020179257,7.722023e-7,0.28870723,4.6232512e-7,0.0000408348,0.6148193,0.000034357206,0.09208891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030899956,0.00041205206,0.009088357,0.0001016552,0.00004279028,0.0000022145014,0.6872647,0.00004374111,0.000045062876,0.2622666,0.040055476,0.00036833776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007115554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014131939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39855748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001505761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032610996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020356","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2330892","title":"Participant Fraud in Virtual Qualitative Substance Use Research: Recommendations and Considerations for Detection and Prevention Based on a Case Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Substance Use & Misuse","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Deception; Qualitative research; Internet privacy; Psychology; Participant observation; Research ethics; Applied psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Sociology","score_opus":0.6639107463225234,"score_gpt":0.583887359500869,"score_spread":0.08002338682165444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785993,0.0003901701,0.017481888,0.0013925855,0.00020990909,0.0017411206,0.00009116911,0.00006867667,0.00002514197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150777,0.0001284264,0.0071997885,0.000057701454,0.00005127727,0.0006270015,0.0000051005354,0.00002302267,0.00039991678],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927198,0.0055613653,0.00041760714,0.00054960995,0.0003439682,0.00040761573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815641,0.017728351,0.000072029776,0.00018941717,0.00030358168,0.00014250413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008866587,0.00015644122,0.0002288532,0.00035102427,0.001117242,0.00053708383,0.000046733192,0.000087587556,0.000032491716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047386745,0.00015385344,0.000046764682,0.0007929311,0.00044118406,0.000947428,0.000010805546,0.0003298615,0.0000026698713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025811166,0.00043099563,0.0010445146,0.000042785035,0.000048473627,0.00022277252,0.93285406,0.00006545583,0.0005511052,0.055068303,0.00032849415,0.00908495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019166335,0.0014989589,0.0019992574,0.000501091,0.00007655202,0.000009946235,0.9371481,0.0063848784,0.00029244574,0.046818085,0.0029312528,0.00042280523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036909797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27480406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27111307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019816526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016203769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85930353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393238613","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106759","title":"The remote work of child protection professionals during COVID-19: A scoping review and thematic analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Child Abuse & Neglect","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Work (physics); Child protection; Pandemic; Thematic map; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing; Qualitative research; Engineering; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.12202183790727845,"score_gpt":0.48159679343985223,"score_spread":0.3595749555325738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393238613","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007698511,0.99036086,0.00065719173,0.0028353813,0.00017412042,0.0049123457,0.000010860004,0.00008203941,0.00095948274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000009783412,0.99802446,0.00034499372,0.00028386418,0.00022921502,0.00025952933,0.000008238364,0.00004149032,0.00079842116],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926492,0.004690036,0.0011074931,0.00061513484,0.0005346075,0.00040353523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674845,0.0014847775,0.0009471372,0.0005180298,0.000089132045,0.00021248526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050045415,0.00041153372,0.0022769815,0.00035356393,0.0021199894,0.00019057997,0.0004446802,0.00022773142,0.00006657407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039661545,0.00022971175,0.00095034164,0.0045081032,0.00044121256,0.00012786068,0.00011077964,0.0007783999,0.000011900968],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001020156,0.000046721914,0.0000010909154,0.43601745,0.0022210272,0.000006013853,0.015915677,0.00000118974,1.1124161e-7,0.0021025133,0.0003044278,0.5433736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007134402,0.000021423604,0.0000041178887,0.6797802,0.00872217,0.0000093686795,0.00044093325,0.0000017403836,4.7851535e-7,0.0005482932,0.31006244,0.00033752545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015301863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003870167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54303604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020659155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004928552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393325696","doi":"10.1177/16094069241244859","title":"Navigating the Virtual Landscape: Methodological Considerations for Qualitative Research in Long-Term Care","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Qualitative research; Data science; Management science; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.8541399600641203,"score_gpt":0.7682738880534571,"score_spread":0.08586607201066321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393325696","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06954457,0.010049705,0.86994374,0.04306601,0.0041121845,0.00079780765,0.00012758578,0.00003926194,0.0023191345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44452247,0.0001856972,0.5533783,0.00028431232,0.0012867921,0.000103257,0.000010357747,0.00002640955,0.00020242897],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8931909,0.10319094,0.0012706275,0.00036756013,0.0015083472,0.00047157047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8096346,0.1862244,0.00037713037,0.00013077195,0.003499717,0.00013334176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1761368,0.00020435982,0.0005117449,0.00039973526,0.0006032047,0.0005105486,0.0007232663,0.00016917779,0.00023301627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050334405,0.0001369048,0.00040087546,0.00081914116,0.0014612849,0.00056440587,0.00011300823,0.0017697021,0.000007694177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010344746,0.00003694186,0.000046265814,0.000026663352,0.00016640422,0.000039394912,0.56002647,0.00002542398,0.00032698983,0.34431925,0.0003210101,0.09456173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004695844,0.00035873972,0.00028853692,0.00049243163,0.000025625806,0.000022598553,0.6631732,0.000080944614,0.00057734066,0.32961446,0.004744404,0.0001521336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032147445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003994032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37497792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005115125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079265435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.957665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393901926","doi":"10.1017/s096318012400015x","title":"Ethical and Equitable Digital Health Research: Ensuring Self-Determination in Data Governance for Racialized Communities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Health equity; Indigenous; Data governance; Public relations; Equity (law); Digital health; Corporate governance; Stewardship (theology); Sociology; Scholarship; Political science; Health care; Business; Law; Data quality; Politics","score_opus":0.5298484946468839,"score_gpt":0.5837452778986664,"score_spread":0.05389678325178249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393901926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1928951,0.03820138,0.028942643,0.726348,0.0023439317,0.0039572176,0.0038475231,0.0004713258,0.002992866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888326,0.0016683851,0.008323296,0.00048872054,0.00022595537,0.000055642195,0.000107253945,0.000028167855,0.00026997106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908219,0.0063915043,0.00066440104,0.00039849605,0.00095748046,0.0007662122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825062,0.016192246,0.00014519204,0.00043370246,0.000535633,0.00018702728],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047421508,0.00013475149,0.00039433246,0.00017819376,0.0010081652,0.00032046228,0.0004971545,0.00045295962,0.0000023560974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002973856,0.00014045842,0.000047157442,0.00050268153,0.00093085045,0.00069241563,0.00012614264,0.002512674,0.0000019385545],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040741485,0.00003456269,0.00008285639,0.002706467,0.000008657777,0.0000034263012,0.2852812,1.2663516e-7,0.000005155671,0.52416426,0.0011996657,0.18647286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013738184,0.0037301804,0.001800335,0.00482416,0.000016980108,0.000011781288,0.4856223,0.008783076,0.000025968282,0.06397664,0.42916468,0.00067008066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024355166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028032277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7959375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033488113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021183756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394460065","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14531631","title":"BetterHomesTO, research instruments, codes, and final report","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.44574547665341724,"score_gpt":0.5411468670882027,"score_spread":0.09540139043478546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394460065","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017160624,0.001088447,9.517943e-8,0.00075428555,0.00015945242,0.0002648315,0.9928454,0.000020446558,0.004849889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000023443247,0.0001417185,0.00040180833,0.0002742059,0.000585804,0.00018378472,0.9933194,0.000013238787,0.0050776843],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953723,0.0021564323,0.000295152,0.00056867965,0.0011010447,0.00050639774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976291,0.0010636683,0.00017193316,0.00047535365,0.0004350425,0.00022489262],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023865544,0.0001840688,0.00033575587,0.00015980269,0.00077227864,0.00034750198,0.00043930058,0.00039189798,0.28410298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017331766,0.00018234768,0.00007399032,0.00037720124,0.00014304213,0.00012436134,0.00044682657,0.0008951846,0.0011780439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033224867,0.000024494995,0.0000037602836,0.00018566592,0.000020903843,0.0006768419,0.00060644385,6.658028e-9,2.8241237e-7,0.000062973035,0.9934547,0.004960603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000893809,0.000043921606,0.00007432566,0.0011758521,0.00000819481,0.00003025715,0.0010342876,1.17858285e-7,0.0000045979928,0.0007841138,0.99654305,0.00021192186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047825775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025740163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28292492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013910157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010032189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395471022","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-52022-8_23","title":"An Unanticipated Methodological Crisis: (Forced) Adaptations to Online Qualitative Methodological Encounters, Disruptions and Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic for Researching Marginalized Individuals on Gendered Islamophobia in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Sociology; Criminology; Gender studies; Medicine; Law; Politics; Virology","score_opus":0.7660704206293358,"score_gpt":0.5853174296974366,"score_spread":0.18075299093189923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395471022","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22963011,0.026642747,0.24127102,0.34070763,0.0025538234,0.023473805,0.019978857,0.0013324365,0.11440958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3112966,0.030984642,0.5074917,0.011539988,0.0012390498,0.0027514547,0.00071943476,0.00040237446,0.13357472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98250455,0.0135205705,0.0009461298,0.0012149564,0.0009772416,0.00083653437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613177,0.03720885,0.00026517498,0.0003889773,0.00022280066,0.0005964598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029044013,0.00053117285,0.0010904649,0.000527147,0.0011270646,0.00018333875,0.00065533235,0.00043733112,0.00037223194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010461954,0.00035279704,0.00020692749,0.0002822495,0.00058657763,0.00014159793,0.00020417741,0.0011386042,0.0000044375524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032149014,0.00004131541,0.000040816238,0.00020164004,0.00020268056,0.00002881515,0.21624751,0.00019350053,0.0000919353,0.7800922,0.00033976338,0.002198338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065870903,0.0005033813,0.001293681,0.00018375159,0.0001382583,0.0000065169897,0.53207415,0.00014708066,0.000004067777,0.4017603,0.06255396,0.00067615963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49670112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95040715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45370606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001623168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016041085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395954995","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2024.2347581","title":"Zooming into qualitative research: online adaptation of the action-project method research design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Action research; Qualitative research; Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Action (physics); Research design; Zoom; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.9286874652290065,"score_gpt":0.8139077335379284,"score_spread":0.11477973169107802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395954995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10740692,0.016736265,0.660078,0.1400065,0.0035773753,0.009901977,0.00026989667,0.0002824133,0.061740655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4894878,0.002557089,0.49908856,0.00017265849,0.00093688833,0.0014453003,0.000027704737,0.00014420222,0.0061398237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5603908,0.43009558,0.0012603594,0.0013993544,0.0048115766,0.0020423671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84155613,0.15333715,0.00016531357,0.0007861871,0.0039280704,0.00022715294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.41226718,0.00027698613,0.00062694674,0.0040804306,0.002010299,0.0002143398,0.0016184486,0.0004889342,0.00021899396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048008822,0.0002132463,0.00022830967,0.016171955,0.009425784,0.0005986776,0.00041588317,0.0050961827,0.00012903225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031764584,0.00026107495,0.000009556673,0.00015945538,0.00006720424,0.000014464249,0.61479443,0.000013931572,0.0031378653,0.30862126,0.0054841805,0.06711892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028696875,0.00060186273,0.00008672118,0.00030931438,0.0000035901485,0.0000011772371,0.5503409,0.0008809102,0.0002586132,0.40550604,0.041589912,0.00013396605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04587523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012852947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38208085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012334338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002760465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999289},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4396218338","doi":"10.1186/s13034-024-00738-8","title":"Pathways and identity: toward qualitative research careers in child and adolescent psychiatry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Institute of Mental Health; Yale University","keywords":"Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Conceptualization; Mental health; Feeling; Interpersonal communication; Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Child and adolescent psychiatry; Identity (music); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Applied psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.11026841116727996,"score_gpt":0.48993641309110414,"score_spread":0.37966800192382416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396218338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3764797,0.3614575,0.00023234833,0.24950312,0.003627359,0.0019064494,0.00025739337,0.00012643689,0.006409704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93058836,0.061653372,0.0015341262,0.0052828146,0.0007305424,0.000020013049,0.000024544695,0.000033261083,0.00013296542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527234,0.0020651203,0.00049547694,0.00082322006,0.00057633716,0.00076751795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989841,0.000114964816,0.00008545852,0.00014259288,0.00003986739,0.00063299335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006111268,0.0002856752,0.00041544405,0.0003229562,0.001620867,0.00033573026,0.00013616786,0.00015081902,0.000011035839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050466202,0.00025666715,0.000065055225,0.0005492201,0.0009940392,0.00046976822,0.00015916566,0.0009368946,0.0000028454006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024940065,0.00076370704,0.041015908,0.008927961,0.000059312133,0.0000058980822,0.26659074,1.5443132e-7,0.0000124262815,0.61207163,0.014046568,0.056256246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023890142,0.0009378806,0.12755787,0.014573187,0.000026550135,0.000052835087,0.71056795,0.00004904541,0.0000063576913,0.05279328,0.090267144,0.00077886577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054056436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002316703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55927837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015271468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034217403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396665242","doi":"10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.1.10777","title":"Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of the Benefits and Drawbacks of Using a Twitter-based Assignment in an Undergraduate Public Health Nutrition Course","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.16170712868598014,"score_gpt":0.4575366370858882,"score_spread":0.29582950839990807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396665242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858758,0.0027679843,0.0007850841,0.010226439,0.00012096236,0.00019758186,0.00000879799,0.0000027133296,0.000014625842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987629,0.00007804174,0.001001233,0.00007013954,0.00004922338,0.0000024125823,5.985824e-7,0.000007916422,0.000027537182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951999,0.004047591,0.00022893722,0.000092946204,0.00023048832,0.00020012139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998775,0.0007516789,0.00017099472,0.00007025165,0.000060305036,0.00017177394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01674619,0.000068384965,0.00013912535,0.00012707255,0.0028015724,0.0003360664,0.00018582623,0.000039955034,0.0000036770593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007048013,0.000040209237,0.000046409365,0.00014921589,0.0004702828,0.00021651208,0.000016081309,0.00097235176,1.6145144e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022901479,0.000057176767,0.5317164,0.00020410212,0.000090194844,8.8797094e-7,0.2802802,0.0013485629,0.0006002465,0.033508033,0.000011368931,0.15215993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011668791,0.0005734742,0.65362465,0.0027755897,0.00013759444,0.000032393793,0.31695232,0.004143874,0.000022300248,0.017685069,0.0026522544,0.00023356713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02032695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049604107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15192637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012684146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005432155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396856568","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2347658","title":"Fraudulent participation in psychological research using virtual synchronous interviews: ethical challenges and potential solutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster Children's Hospital; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.6571028878007732,"score_gpt":0.6432007040709535,"score_spread":0.013902183729819662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396856568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95868653,0.009447233,0.0069927024,0.022376163,0.00088373886,0.00040818716,0.000008455912,0.00008053862,0.001116444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444145,0.0022606107,0.0027080013,0.000106141946,0.00025121166,0.00011828571,0.0000023522618,0.000013906622,0.00009806783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98931134,0.008561015,0.0003378717,0.0004631288,0.00078877155,0.00053786015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736077,0.0021180338,0.000030171392,0.00014905061,0.000191727,0.00015025445],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02644902,0.00011306818,0.00018777006,0.00021209022,0.0006851833,0.0001640938,0.00016823428,0.0008240193,0.00017252087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021098698,0.00010178938,0.00006758974,0.00036271274,0.0014294063,0.00015784017,0.00014010673,0.0035911247,0.000027424747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016652528,0.00033326747,0.0000833083,0.000035005076,0.0000072734974,0.000103122584,0.25715485,0.000008950161,0.0009761865,0.4684533,0.000035108187,0.272793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020531903,0.0044545433,0.28518364,0.003259531,0.00044984787,0.000092608985,0.39255518,0.01177019,0.00030130544,0.24379058,0.053673316,0.00241606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010409411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002178308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28510034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021330423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017326212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399161832","doi":"10.1101/2024.05.29.24308062","title":"More Than Words: An Integrative Review of Innovative Elicitation Techniques for Qualitative Interviews","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Western University; McMaster University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Photo elicitation; Qualitative research; Psychology; Knowledge management; Sociology; Management science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.17621844480021234,"score_gpt":0.5485415619292252,"score_spread":0.3723231171290129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399161832","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17130995,0.19763146,0.4687823,0.04334957,0.005939937,0.025243696,0.0040159696,0.0015462424,0.08218086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27774647,0.0548659,0.6424268,0.004193713,0.0021239526,0.010976542,0.0014263917,0.0003673173,0.0058729444],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024373,0.0066185445,0.0013168937,0.00081480964,0.0006425501,0.00036348362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937947,0.0020866056,0.0010880368,0.0004971354,0.002417465,0.000116067604],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018606966,0.00047714365,0.0012482359,0.00041791188,0.00017483773,0.000082071885,0.0007732528,0.00035786832,0.000091608636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074479273,0.00036650975,0.00043910393,0.0014307507,0.0010385792,0.00021048084,0.00039663806,0.000909244,0.0000075320677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038028316,0.00009344719,0.000031503,0.010265507,0.00017274705,0.0000012315769,0.67153525,1.3196568e-7,0.00031896055,0.21894011,0.0019511313,0.09665197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012794741,0.0006053565,0.00011589935,0.056063313,0.00016215493,2.8237457e-7,0.38932702,0.000044298988,0.0053151366,0.49454716,0.052937306,0.00075412885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015047244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010715567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2822082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026914472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005925039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400160557","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2022-0261en","title":"DATA COLLECTION VIA PHONE IN MULTICENTRIC RESEARCH ON NURSING CARE IN THE FACE OF COVID-19","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Operationalization; Phone; Interview; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Psychology; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.8209878754424246,"score_gpt":0.6761043018129564,"score_spread":0.14488357362946813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400160557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5583934,0.040031813,0.06696805,0.04667796,0.003501147,0.0088309115,0.0005672782,0.0004941036,0.2745353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977668,0.00016195227,0.0006268078,0.00026602615,0.00011695222,0.000042344534,0.00003455722,0.000016990767,0.0009675587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913313,0.0063801366,0.00041683187,0.0005106667,0.0008634299,0.0004976461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461883,0.004553344,0.000059962582,0.0005243704,0.00013348417,0.000109977846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01232089,0.00013923545,0.0002512564,0.0006109878,0.0004183244,0.00015813597,0.00084920705,0.0001205933,0.0002494567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026895853,0.000110164096,0.000052579744,0.003262513,0.0006296817,0.0003203962,0.00010413389,0.00066042837,0.00006899572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021577321,0.00026858583,0.00042643887,0.0001677122,0.00001604222,0.00008811878,0.69863415,0.00008726577,0.00060761324,0.033235863,0.013398998,0.25285342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012419992,0.00026491185,0.0052637854,0.00045258398,0.000022572696,0.0000029923424,0.63914764,0.0062319185,0.00016822727,0.0048028613,0.34209168,0.00030881085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018689414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021743659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43937337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095731026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006528484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400160635","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2022-0261pt","title":"COLETA DE DADOS VIA TELEFONE EM PESQUISA MULTICÊNTRICA SOBRE CUIDADO DE ENFERMAGEM FRENTE À COVID-19","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.5359641132802695,"score_gpt":0.5648808339455357,"score_spread":0.028916720665266182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400160635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031392924,0.031545103,0.79471636,0.028211866,0.005916664,0.0056341337,0.0016545282,0.0034426446,0.09748579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89855677,0.0011812358,0.005233556,0.007743588,0.0019083873,0.0003243809,0.000118528274,0.0003295708,0.084603995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98207885,0.007931562,0.0021344707,0.0024164629,0.0018760426,0.0035626395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895037,0.005019881,0.000600614,0.0014511269,0.00048231755,0.0029423954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011679751,0.0015786148,0.0018566179,0.00089296635,0.0022079537,0.0021547067,0.0022705467,0.0011249738,0.009263347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041890508,0.0015822678,0.0012962001,0.0029130848,0.0019101073,0.0010962329,0.0008365246,0.0024130493,0.0032722563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045916857,0.0010191667,0.0011046774,0.0017346172,0.0011729337,0.002801265,0.3236927,0.00015050094,0.0081278905,0.062055632,0.23997849,0.35770294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002566282,0.0005139497,0.0017706138,0.00050773466,0.0008785474,0.00012834775,0.046728484,0.03900174,0.0005789307,0.006622125,0.8984012,0.0023020233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011027368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029421372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86716384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031980332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037156835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401025036","doi":"10.1177/16094069241266200","title":"Observing Neurodiversity, Observing Methodology: Ethnography in Pandemic Times","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Anthropology; Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.8298936466745425,"score_gpt":0.6808698344548898,"score_spread":0.14902381221965266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401025036","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11832808,0.008250709,0.8441523,0.011298094,0.007979121,0.00020122922,0.000029493798,0.00009679435,0.009664225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114248194,0.00081416784,0.8829298,0.0005844657,0.0007187623,0.0000055519713,0.0000027453775,0.000026224723,0.0006701128],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9570761,0.040180136,0.0010246279,0.00033196306,0.0010082873,0.00037889805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974124,0.024187386,0.0004657712,0.00012291574,0.0009398005,0.00016008933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07653605,0.00021187795,0.00053357217,0.0012149661,0.0001712519,0.00022544338,0.0011219069,0.00016521943,0.00039793213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012476223,0.00018910985,0.00045015357,0.0011051925,0.0005907824,0.0011894653,0.0002057252,0.0008975242,0.000012839069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014109764,0.00007873802,0.0048017325,0.00004342049,0.00045682708,0.00021067279,0.58264637,0.00005755742,0.004092038,0.21364184,0.0007262999,0.19310339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078790134,0.00024981884,0.006576924,0.00066056265,0.00010409298,0.00004545445,0.3081154,0.00050094916,0.0007706505,0.57019526,0.111518145,0.0004748281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010705818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025350676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35655344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034576107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033937197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401248407","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4886664","title":"Carrying out Experiential Surveys/Questionnaires: Tips and Traps","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Psychology; Survey research; Applied psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.05582184580691219,"score_gpt":0.40916947934683773,"score_spread":0.35334763353992554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401248407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5496297,0.16209763,0.23516798,0.009632627,0.018114258,0.001030552,0.00006194125,0.000438443,0.02382686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97789735,0.012370005,0.00078599836,0.00003530577,0.0019757636,0.000027301989,0.0000073927226,0.000051534917,0.006849327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167234,0.004534611,0.00047037672,0.00050925126,0.0006302807,0.0021831281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998878,0.0003042758,0.00023858668,0.00017740969,0.00018661251,0.00021512355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025757644,0.00030405604,0.00041192942,0.00023037428,0.00089142274,0.00059085875,0.00039581396,0.0003716711,0.00006049614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007351228,0.0002774478,0.00026021153,0.00016894666,0.0004510342,0.00013073048,0.00029772948,0.0055687805,0.000023815775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023220342,0.000038199665,0.0002993209,0.00007195549,0.00035166988,0.000014936046,0.12626612,0.0000046242135,0.000076203556,0.5758227,0.0004093471,0.29662168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021081055,0.00012092481,0.00018395566,0.00024563016,0.000093530325,0.00004613034,0.054398093,0.00003378694,0.000014388427,0.920036,0.024219424,0.0003972807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031503076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023156833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42826766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013975592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005592334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401870414","doi":"10.1017/s1049096524000210","title":"Research Adaptivity in Times of Disruption: Zig-Zagging Your Way through the Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Field (mathematics); Ethnography; Perception; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Field research; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Engineering; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Virology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31382452102144826,"score_gpt":0.5732654678323371,"score_spread":0.25944094681088886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401870414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65881026,0.0008630005,0.0037939132,0.15521394,0.0007334958,0.0006309905,0.0000495416,0.00014067788,0.1797642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551564,0.00005055682,0.00044493578,0.001614713,0.00049897167,0.00002466137,3.56183e-7,0.000009249358,0.001840917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935897,0.0021615243,0.0003868204,0.00042885213,0.0015253645,0.0019077299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867144,0.0121877575,0.000039970753,0.00037833865,0.000194587,0.00048489607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017460555,0.00013371512,0.00020045668,0.0001761979,0.0019994834,0.0003167887,0.0010159692,0.00010284537,0.00024340174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015553444,0.00007751809,0.00010364187,0.0018367253,0.0087777795,0.00045107657,0.00031962647,0.0007789102,0.000027847958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041713447,0.000027115175,0.0038259458,0.000045862773,0.000003782036,0.000006872629,0.03458974,0.000009294712,0.00013892206,0.9607447,0.000116718606,0.00048687772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011571117,0.00008295005,0.010748438,0.00008174304,0.000011920493,0.000011294908,0.07859597,0.0006242182,0.00056942547,0.855552,0.053418167,0.00018812095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041515265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017815629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3367054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011604909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017029882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401873763","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0309361","title":"From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Cancer Council Queensland","keywords":"Qualitative research; Medical education; Population; Relevance (law); Psychology; Empathy; Test (biology); Research design; Focus group; Medicine; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.5867364525865977,"score_gpt":0.5818518886707317,"score_spread":0.004884563915866003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401873763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873628,0.0011157136,0.006025926,0.0023565001,0.000084573076,0.0011571031,0.00020837913,0.000119791264,0.0015692282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779487,0.00003862803,0.020577878,0.00003380492,0.0002648385,0.00022674017,0.000039525625,0.000020226356,0.000849641],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629861,0.034628164,0.00037118635,0.0002530346,0.0014838512,0.00027764504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851547,0.013774686,0.000094276875,0.00029688116,0.0005763534,0.000103118255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022750352,0.00011434567,0.00036810443,0.00020352122,0.0007755881,0.00011013786,0.00033461372,0.00008976769,0.0006531546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024791344,0.00011068227,0.00004850944,0.0009170035,0.0004536758,0.00019347161,0.000043123542,0.0006697765,0.00004193979],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019686845,0.0077404967,0.007348356,0.0002826442,0.0006686683,0.0000044236235,0.9444833,0.000042262,0.0040665264,0.03292198,0.000419291,0.0018251768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012226173,0.002539392,0.04548888,0.002768246,0.00041764756,1.8153045e-8,0.77614456,0.0026831084,0.005237373,0.16235924,0.00051526993,0.0006236473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40450838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016543057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38796532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035340167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036222476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9231414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402093165","doi":"10.1353/vcr.2024.a936087","title":"Taking Talk Seriously: Large-Scale Methodologies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian review","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Computer science; History; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.15674822717521616,"score_gpt":0.4966661023975008,"score_spread":0.33991787522228467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402093165","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026254682,0.75251675,0.07666886,0.016775293,0.006652086,0.0008089483,0.000031695068,0.00077669293,0.1455071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014120323,0.5600127,0.39190406,0.006879099,0.0064159976,0.00032461257,0.000026296593,0.00013815111,0.020178765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995759,0.0028410018,0.00031814448,0.0003442759,0.00033352288,0.0004040296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984037,0.0010806045,0.00009435143,0.00023236111,0.00007738419,0.000111557856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010411774,0.00014899817,0.00040713104,0.00005917026,0.00032950845,0.00014925045,0.00028184667,0.00009038617,0.002104367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024214804,0.000115638344,0.00021599616,0.00084884616,0.00014044787,0.000231304,0.000065964734,0.00021123166,0.00026426188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002359334,0.000016890073,0.000079450394,0.0031350863,0.000056556637,0.000037342284,0.027731908,1.8749569e-7,0.00010376641,0.5697894,0.011617775,0.38742927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003269387,0.000021121132,0.00009270321,0.002094037,0.000052030133,0.000001627052,0.0011394735,0.0000048467427,0.000019178793,0.008126095,0.9882537,0.00016249185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028336977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050558255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97663593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009497512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013148604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402599511","doi":"10.4324/9781003333326-18","title":"Data-driven campaigning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.26652945140325623,"score_gpt":0.4649254644424504,"score_spread":0.19839601303919419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402599511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.396989e-7,0.0013121886,0.0017483442,0.0010545088,0.00089789246,0.00015844473,0.00023400573,0.00020262129,0.99439114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006838765,0.00025688112,0.013873489,0.00018854515,0.0010807455,0.000002625432,0.00009841162,0.000043014126,0.9843879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985312,0.00010574803,0.0002247382,0.00048101717,0.00042908205,0.00022821446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988345,0.00044581603,0.00007507254,0.0004666434,0.00006508316,0.000112893926],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019653428,0.00018223366,0.00027071522,0.000094081304,0.00024316032,0.0001430896,0.0006225377,0.0002549529,0.0070048203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013104065,0.00015092664,0.000096821655,0.00003945356,0.00035971124,0.0001340824,0.00030891306,0.00037231063,0.0021394184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6355885e-7,0.00000159221,5.938371e-7,0.000018182558,0.000048604543,0.000014247147,0.003956492,2.1878549e-7,0.0000013741299,0.94316876,0.043783918,0.0090051815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016686765,0.000010678395,2.7185652e-7,0.00007273649,0.000041158997,2.3057746e-7,0.001148497,0.00002123055,7.00527e-7,0.24248806,0.7560292,0.00017056047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067282247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032439635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7122453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008420936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017718293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402899756","doi":"10.4103/pmrr.pmrr_197_24","title":"Feasibility and Ethical Considerations for Conducting Online versus In-person Interviews for a Qualitative Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Preventive Medicine Research & Reviews","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Psychology; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Applied psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.8980548647894877,"score_gpt":0.7283124397031733,"score_spread":0.16974242508631443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402899756","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30944124,0.42433187,0.04228595,0.15052986,0.0028642127,0.06484437,0.00036543712,0.00017377264,0.005163292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404448,0.010471161,0.039207414,0.0003392382,0.0014156814,0.005867721,0.00004832619,0.000054253393,0.0021513845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97071475,0.026572466,0.0008402023,0.0007269931,0.00059923995,0.0005463409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94947153,0.049158227,0.00013229896,0.00024394106,0.0007722878,0.00022170924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1193178,0.0001855961,0.00079863484,0.0003013167,0.0006111638,0.00009234569,0.00017069986,0.00011742576,0.00018261994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109324865,0.00013094807,0.00016456103,0.00078687974,0.0013692726,0.00016155894,0.00007300662,0.0009984308,0.0000052180208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017343875,0.0002324605,0.00006853999,0.0010217229,0.000073086194,0.0000036888086,0.81313384,4.0243155e-8,0.00011810492,0.095273264,0.0059309783,0.083970815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021793311,0.002249225,0.00010526516,0.001555716,0.00007691462,5.234213e-7,0.79204214,0.0001263758,0.000010879278,0.0697709,0.13171612,0.00016661815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001491662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014761692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63100356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034394857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032529095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90684766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403017813","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65735-1_1","title":"Digital Tools and Techniques in Qualitative Research: Digital Skills and Research Optimisation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in networks and systems","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.20330694356295864,"score_gpt":0.49445544929877816,"score_spread":0.2911485057358195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403017813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006506346,0.09898841,0.019432904,0.0026974753,0.00083347247,0.0050661755,0.0004323397,0.0001882713,0.8658546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94059026,0.0056163827,0.0006565124,0.000030031455,0.0013231864,0.00015100506,0.00007910939,0.00009379254,0.051459745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956504,0.0015517224,0.0005690562,0.0007495826,0.0008569282,0.000622301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863871,0.012890056,0.000100029625,0.00018233647,0.0002831003,0.00015737969],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014191619,0.00029648302,0.0006021641,0.000678377,0.00034836464,0.0026337146,0.00016367891,0.00081378437,0.00000821222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022777033,0.00024632932,0.000050128092,0.00038409908,0.0017473804,0.00046638027,0.0002285885,0.0018147257,0.0000028986137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048198897,0.000030401197,0.00032311314,0.0003683177,0.000051399496,0.00006635559,0.11864846,0.00013511097,0.0000029752782,0.5575636,0.00032240342,0.3224397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003201392,0.0005473438,0.00007039879,0.0054386044,0.000013688636,0.000013815826,0.016079126,0.0015825651,0.000003887099,0.7304914,0.24460644,0.0008326143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006637843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085263705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024406902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097879034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403102433","doi":"10.36368/jcsh.v1i1.1041","title":"Fertility concerns and COVID-19 Vaccines: Community-informed infographic design in urban Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of community systems for health /","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Infographic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Fertility; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Geography; Environmental health; Medicine; Outbreak; Virology; Computer science; Population; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.22398293996508548,"score_gpt":0.45544978360655036,"score_spread":0.2314668436414649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403102433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93962073,0.010594217,0.025229855,0.019934136,0.0019979866,0.0019243117,0.000044915872,0.000056336678,0.0005975223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997054,0.00033683496,0.00048317004,0.0015293647,0.00010991263,0.00002816461,0.000006616325,0.000014620143,0.0004373101],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806018,0.017130326,0.0012957802,0.00007391216,0.00043116396,0.00046700123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877624,0.010341659,0.00056674297,0.0003340246,0.00035105075,0.0006441214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03160562,0.00017911848,0.00068833766,0.0003235818,0.002164661,0.00019707874,0.00057993433,0.0001252134,0.000009032022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002485198,0.00014682511,0.00010647609,0.00050817814,0.00024202628,0.00041361392,0.000060116246,0.0017818381,1.9987277e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036365396,0.000114590206,0.03133869,0.0032988184,0.000110543246,0.000014372098,0.88609606,0.00013395537,0.0000014002097,0.005533783,0.071099,0.0018951511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013098235,0.0010473857,0.02294471,0.00091748737,0.000026673782,0.000032604803,0.314357,0.00019440487,0.0000014158885,0.004615833,0.65431446,0.00023816961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5832155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034556247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015078958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404289001","doi":"10.1080/2373566x.2024.2415657","title":"“I’ll Be Here:” Reflections on Representation and Research Communication Through Zine Work","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GeoHumanities","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Representation (politics); Telecommunications; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.6572118298064255,"score_gpt":0.617543451769324,"score_spread":0.03966837803710144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404289001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14710934,0.0058166413,0.000774839,0.021139024,0.00055271026,0.0003749188,0.000012834359,0.00027575556,0.8239439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949429,0.0016573628,0.0049512284,0.00032423102,0.0004576677,0.000099593744,0.00002166415,0.000019785211,0.043039512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970146,0.0020168193,0.00014435784,0.00020658565,0.00039358885,0.0002240904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975628,0.0019798006,0.000023104525,0.00022165298,0.00017987653,0.00003272657],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029650358,0.000068853835,0.000091642185,0.00013170516,0.0016993524,0.0004365705,0.00014083584,0.000060177692,0.0002716459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051404367,0.000064325635,0.000033676162,0.00056415884,0.0008810883,0.00037023754,0.000062784115,0.0003208784,0.00006421144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009581011,0.000015125223,0.00006490148,0.000014103354,0.000012305665,0.0000014833545,0.18953755,0.0000016199691,0.000023407796,0.7976681,0.007987107,0.004664717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056181143,0.000080889455,0.0008515849,0.00010018071,0.000007651642,5.665633e-7,0.17668399,0.0000065720724,0.00007286367,0.2814014,0.54065144,0.00008666027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067191403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005339668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8023196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010952079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005246659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404808998","doi":"10.1370/afm.22.s1.6158","title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure via a Patient Portal in HIV care","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patient care; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Measure (data warehouse); Patient portal; Medicine; Patient-reported outcome; Computer science; Health care; Nursing; Family medicine; Data mining; Quality of life (healthcare)","score_opus":0.11933234784483095,"score_gpt":0.4301940743974113,"score_spread":0.3108617265525804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404808998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992913,0.0012785995,0.002024835,0.00007498982,0.0001432805,0.0005025799,0.000013917577,0.000056270266,0.00299254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961867,0.0000053014146,0.003735168,0.000019486517,0.000017734606,0.00000859661,0.0000048550382,0.0000098348255,0.000012354064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699354,0.0011958011,0.00059493067,0.0004400217,0.00042568406,0.00035002021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921256,0.00016397047,0.00010650226,0.00021998506,0.00018301712,0.00011393278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022676208,0.00013356005,0.0002866129,0.00009224185,0.00012500641,0.000046389054,0.000085180014,0.00009989759,0.00038650638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045964116,0.00010984742,0.000092088005,0.0004782524,0.00029448146,0.00032860303,0.000044959812,0.00020069942,6.081606e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037924972,0.00017481607,0.77916473,0.000098463745,0.000021790813,0.000009834434,0.12170938,0.000009801552,0.00036137117,0.006660001,0.0000033471724,0.091748565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092089927,0.0009079289,0.58457905,0.000074256444,0.00012637457,0.0000081777525,0.38556322,0.0021991087,0.0017190691,0.020669164,0.0023319698,0.00090076437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008896649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019154796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26385385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037292918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003259875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406354046","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02464-x","title":"Recruiting participants for focus groups in health research: a meta-research study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg; Universität Regensburg; Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Focus group; MEDLINE; Medicine; Mental health; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Psychiatry; Sociology","score_opus":0.9765873219534961,"score_gpt":0.7863944746839577,"score_spread":0.19019284726953833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406354046","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21441104,0.019345995,0.55655885,0.15327264,0.0018524053,0.022089908,0.00004107814,0.00025381058,0.03217427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70277846,0.001552379,0.26897234,0.0006620023,0.0012737603,0.01337472,0.0000072905505,0.00008551647,0.011293569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.2608766,0.7159688,0.002413805,0.0021105653,0.010864982,0.0077652796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42746127,0.5666,0.00015728857,0.00092040905,0.003183928,0.0016770925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8254348,0.00025895433,0.001716923,0.0032105476,0.003447927,0.0001949034,0.0022348843,0.0005855591,0.0011589039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7853708,0.00020765868,0.00031403085,0.008207334,0.0061519095,0.00018603461,0.0012767405,0.004857832,0.000049098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008643725,0.001335057,0.0048354147,0.0004609168,0.00035242084,0.0000580835,0.0939836,0.000003411071,0.000072427625,0.6761994,0.00818303,0.21365187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024147988,0.002402593,0.0032476736,0.00030274797,0.000038355483,9.199768e-7,0.38805944,0.0005968462,0.00013465057,0.51215136,0.09041509,0.00023551875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067319356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24715126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4883674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011622858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01334577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407197788","doi":"10.7202/1115902ar","title":"Let’s Hear from Service Providers: Technology and the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social work review","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Service provider; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Service (business); Business; Internet privacy; Virology; Computer science; Marketing; Medicine","score_opus":0.1458315562197415,"score_gpt":0.4351190383354312,"score_spread":0.28928748211568966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407197788","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064646883,0.44482788,0.0001178925,0.54586715,0.00028579563,0.00065356557,0.00003800963,0.000108816464,0.007454449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19757147,0.27353927,0.0034348168,0.5099894,0.0037308347,0.001037734,0.00006716316,0.00014223422,0.01048707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736166,0.0015962926,0.00022104596,0.00028085196,0.00016973785,0.0003704405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841684,0.0009690476,0.00005017523,0.00013332845,0.00005958117,0.0003710461],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036432398,0.00012156252,0.00034649533,0.000096021955,0.0013155977,0.00015263769,0.00028366235,0.00017111858,0.0006075647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016249946,0.000088479086,0.00009315889,0.0025388303,0.0009937993,0.0000881545,0.000033081327,0.00032856746,0.00012749633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004787323,0.0000021100118,0.00063891493,0.0006273968,0.000057307574,0.000018309514,0.038558643,2.555826e-8,7.141594e-7,0.5606378,0.08835291,0.3111011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098780794,0.0000035703952,0.000043360607,0.00044205485,0.00006387609,0.0000012224134,0.0066118515,8.510352e-7,3.559163e-8,0.04205662,0.9505641,0.00011368088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2480922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5155034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86221117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047569297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015527137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407278041","doi":"10.62787/mhm.v2i3.87","title":"Exploring New Frontiers in Health Communication in the Digital Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine Humanity and Media","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Health communication; Digital health; Telecommunications; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Communication; Health care","score_opus":0.39938023568754116,"score_gpt":0.4477743319263966,"score_spread":0.04839409623885543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407278041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6367537,0.09604533,0.003995914,0.24106367,0.002139562,0.00037430227,0.0000018519659,0.000018109906,0.019607613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980942,0.0174309,0.00042582213,0.00051517284,0.00056754996,9.721192e-7,6.786807e-7,0.0000034059065,0.00011349675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775857,0.0014896651,0.0002930711,0.000036867445,0.000305461,0.000116393414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802977,0.0017161551,0.00009412308,0.00007550295,0.000018127903,0.000066345005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014750464,0.000046076595,0.00015839539,0.00012300737,0.00016149659,0.00004483253,0.00025467906,0.000015730851,0.000013087924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011872988,0.00002240656,0.000019068235,0.00024513042,0.00046410164,0.0002852726,0.000016392838,0.00044371537,4.7631394e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019129939,0.000012447457,0.00015154165,0.000020326072,0.0000059950476,0.000010622712,0.8101192,0.0000011267875,0.000003301762,0.038206458,0.0058347764,0.14561503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005758233,0.00021158704,0.016695704,0.0008985915,0.000015125432,0.000011337359,0.68158215,0.000016157093,0.0000010196077,0.08475756,0.21518375,0.000051211628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027544552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004971619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34418836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000583633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012028643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51122457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407778604","doi":"10.1007/s44206-025-00164-z","title":"Talking to Dog: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Research and Public Reporting on Digital Technology for Human-Animal Communication","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Society","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Critical discourse analysis; Human animal; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.2295233828356308,"score_gpt":0.5997446563522946,"score_spread":0.3702212735166638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407778604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95442206,0.000106649066,0.008748335,0.013649568,0.000022292701,0.00030596388,0.0000690076,0.000055478056,0.022620646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635166,0.0000045185297,0.0030392692,0.000053558717,0.00002087273,0.000053391963,0.00002359791,0.0000063648426,0.00044673754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841815,0.00011450754,0.0004907876,0.00028676548,0.00033338624,0.0003563838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968035,0.0021064072,0.00016593015,0.00026090094,0.0005814601,0.00008179895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034275893,0.00007978825,0.00028403543,0.00029141933,0.00090318866,0.00049310975,0.00025696875,0.000119698205,0.00000490379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014021311,0.00007509195,0.00020672995,0.002530582,0.0017342218,0.00041043462,0.00023923269,0.00019291327,5.7192784e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011026847,0.00018026517,0.04258064,0.000026864273,0.0002219467,3.6858134e-7,0.009875259,7.898717e-7,0.00026046435,0.92563933,0.00031445522,0.020888614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004853098,0.00089735194,0.028487451,0.0002343133,0.00020199656,4.1214216e-7,0.55783486,0.00044712445,0.0005503321,0.3906688,0.019751817,0.00044021782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013925185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000111943395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54795957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110020716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008291111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99428403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408056192","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5157794","title":"Taking Singularity and Social Relations into Account in Prevention: An Analysis of Social Mediation Activity and its Occupational Health Issues Through the Prism of Intersectionality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique","keywords":"Intersectionality; Mediation; Prism; Sociology; Singularity; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Physics; Social science; Mathematics; Optics; Geometry","score_opus":0.0824118209763161,"score_gpt":0.4893560103834474,"score_spread":0.4069441894071313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408056192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290443,0.0024155704,0.05903646,0.0087612895,0.00017663492,0.00032301605,0.000039725004,0.000008971379,0.00019401987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973973,0.0010292522,0.0011958124,0.00002872294,0.00021173646,0.000011289441,0.000034478613,0.0000045589354,0.00008686629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943054,0.0037896233,0.00059000426,0.00026849046,0.00054799207,0.0004984908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780786,0.00037918956,0.0014118374,0.00007485908,0.00029994268,0.000026337939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013581559,0.00013950588,0.00049924024,0.0002866283,0.0011232679,0.00006133458,0.0001875234,0.0002353313,0.000024386747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049539655,0.00012606688,0.00018747989,0.00059467496,0.00032600146,0.00036112973,0.0001348926,0.0015834941,4.293206e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010525104,0.00018199837,0.014823214,0.00007575926,0.0008415372,6.8474506e-8,0.20102522,0.00008997984,0.000024753539,0.7533159,0.0000045299366,0.029511759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020700117,0.000071042225,0.39868808,0.000035486828,0.00023770201,4.528264e-7,0.030084763,0.0006183138,0.000006011947,0.56984246,0.000104895866,0.000103776205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017756693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123372875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38386488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00145956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044148713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98878413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408324182","doi":"10.21307/connections-2019.036","title":"Making Personal Networks with a Computer: Lessons from the Field using Vennmaker","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Connections","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Documentation; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Software; Data science; Human–computer interaction; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.1956377198240313,"score_gpt":0.4740518272516665,"score_spread":0.27841410742763517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408324182","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025902933,0.0014209816,0.9458235,0.021292238,0.0013689898,0.000110085675,0.000012060468,0.00011649402,0.0039527207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98380923,0.00001910079,0.012882341,0.0012784381,0.0017287764,0.000010706019,0.000001968936,0.000010599786,0.0002588414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910116,0.00037245257,0.00007423711,0.00016595033,0.00011877717,0.0001674304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996933,0.002899756,0.00002036181,0.000076384065,0.000037910493,0.000032631673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005272185,0.000063554864,0.00007481948,0.000023307997,0.0010560001,0.00022463777,0.000087506196,0.000049738166,0.00028140808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009958556,0.000042454452,0.00005835722,0.00034534212,0.00016330587,0.000090034104,0.000022948358,0.00020928093,0.000008370874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026123802,0.000042308257,0.0021127658,0.000010217728,0.00027226305,0.000034493623,0.14987567,0.0031023817,0.00004091516,0.65691775,0.021254538,0.16631056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013774059,0.00009078271,0.001767682,0.00033562316,0.00011498496,0.000007643404,0.030563869,0.22146538,0.000008630714,0.0056841886,0.7395655,0.0002580094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033280207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039033173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9579063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048156257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009357735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8122006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410952755","doi":"10.3390/world6020073","title":"Strategies for Increasing Youth Participation in Longitudinal Survey Research: Lessons from a Pilot Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Fondation Rideau Hall; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Survey research; Psychology; Political science; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.7078590157179222,"score_gpt":0.6161494982845369,"score_spread":0.09170951743338529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410952755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777839,0.00013989437,0.0028814857,0.00093125564,0.00017486035,0.00064625434,0.000054222477,0.000026819545,0.017361263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975076,0.0000036370109,0.0013762256,0.00002306768,0.00007187599,0.00011347605,0.000015400583,0.0000058355213,0.000882939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911663,0.007672455,0.00023370961,0.0002713253,0.00030132008,0.0003548946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935494,0.0060257516,0.000043709166,0.00013396498,0.00019849303,0.00004867264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020086374,0.00007232184,0.00017645361,0.00028188783,0.00053203263,0.00020407232,0.00017521092,0.000020139772,0.000032318458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030394038,0.00006925339,0.00002133485,0.0013867519,0.0002245687,0.00018286442,0.000048675814,0.00017537524,0.0000037965178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059293315,0.00086638547,0.694508,0.0000107488095,0.00003329915,0.0000016450887,0.10624538,0.0000224839,0.000047410642,0.19353503,0.00033198838,0.0038046513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004246027,0.00020887547,0.818982,0.000042080697,0.000010780292,1.8378525e-9,0.13846233,0.000049832455,0.000008804002,0.04116233,0.000575848,0.000072482886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3109948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84086657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52987176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013750828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030283435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6961577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411985803","doi":"10.2196/65288","title":"Understanding Intimate Health in Online Spaces Among Women in Aotearoa New Zealand: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preprint; Aotearoa; Protocol (science); Psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Gender studies; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.633611937137281,"score_gpt":0.709551203447027,"score_spread":0.07593926630974601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411985803","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017951857,7.816883e-7,0.004554955,0.0061428193,0.000013081279,0.9860835,0.000008163374,0.00006245896,0.0013390465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00018474707,2.840235e-7,0.030906392,0.000052801086,0.00008229659,0.9547849,0.0000018812425,0.000024995572,0.013961671],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97718215,0.018716779,0.0008161433,0.00068094896,0.00077800977,0.0018259695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958407,0.00305674,0.00018751693,0.00035526187,0.00017750039,0.00038222747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0640627,0.00021705231,0.00066237187,0.0011894407,0.000551853,0.0003854336,0.00065969396,0.00015810199,0.000087894034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032738396,0.0001895806,0.000074194155,0.003196161,0.00046135543,0.00034389948,0.00029066176,0.0008850731,0.0000025975141],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046405005,0.008139931,0.11312466,0.002228359,0.000088899746,0.000018056426,0.57932305,0.000039963645,0.00017496277,0.046619356,0.07180233,0.1737999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010455337,0.0034678732,0.030030327,0.002892228,7.2663585e-7,7.388874e-8,0.21769422,0.00029436787,0.00006167501,0.30220965,0.4325666,0.00032690115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012568013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03187555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36162886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029049707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024043915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412164283","doi":"10.1109/wsese66602.2025.00017","title":"Methodological and Practical Challenges in Longitudinal, Large-Scale, Collaborative Questionnaire Survey Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Computer science; Data science; Survey research; Management science; Psychology; Applied psychology; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.7467314884658095,"score_gpt":0.6482083765566234,"score_spread":0.09852311190918606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412164283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21764974,0.02652743,0.09762043,0.21039468,0.00071354775,0.0018194753,0.00003440169,0.0002058496,0.44503444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8747492,0.008434751,0.1126968,0.00018296945,0.000081459875,0.000091186266,0.0000024745873,0.000007757925,0.0037534246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95864856,0.03981613,0.00023729212,0.00043975463,0.00040957902,0.00044865816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98129505,0.017767292,0.00003631438,0.00013361442,0.0006598935,0.00010784087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07500186,0.000096131305,0.00029765753,0.0002165125,0.00052839326,0.00009023223,0.00010340713,0.0001998727,0.00009858402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04165305,0.00007527386,0.000022701237,0.0015492424,0.0009569978,0.00020938649,0.00013733059,0.00045884436,0.000008521737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097261494,0.00016520564,0.08055232,0.000019972003,0.000012796693,0.000011687205,0.017438259,2.8776134e-7,0.0000074579534,0.8918473,0.0015008413,0.008346616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030462682,0.00013044688,0.8069814,0.00005947783,0.000003923409,4.821579e-7,0.08544812,0.000044776414,0.000029893647,0.079679534,0.027196461,0.00012089332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035342206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1402441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81216776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110332265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037299804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9664195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412560531","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325948","title":"Participant engagement in a national longitudinal study of COVID-19: Insights from the INSPIRE study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; Abbott Diagnostics; Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Institutes of Health; Stryker; Institute of Translational Health Sciences; California Department of Public Health; University of Ottawa; University of Washington","keywords":"Focus group; Longitudinal study; Qualitative research; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Relevance (law); Perception; Participatory action research; Medical education; Applied psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.525842003332704,"score_gpt":0.4902904549478484,"score_spread":0.035551548384855636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412560531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946938,0.00019532227,0.000113149894,0.0020067594,0.000048239104,0.0011553,0.000008338601,0.00001850528,0.0017605822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879766,0.000008327513,0.0004590229,0.00030439885,0.000054615604,0.00021352891,0.0000015016623,0.0000034640589,0.00015750824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994335,0.0040235203,0.0003571138,0.00023944491,0.0008895499,0.00015535839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971024,0.0024288634,0.00009621888,0.00015715531,0.00015419487,0.00006119442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003807207,0.00008147437,0.00025344183,0.000092212926,0.00042960973,0.0000329293,0.00027406454,0.00002820753,0.00010589347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004421193,0.00005824934,0.000026305936,0.0006550137,0.00015789742,0.00007564029,0.0001085648,0.00017008385,0.00000443806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005431844,0.013935854,0.47521943,0.000013086039,0.00038433383,0.0000051240163,0.47711653,0.000018863064,0.00010963027,0.032937422,0.00006469289,0.00014069607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012678567,0.0004588048,0.5914786,0.000044635442,0.00014122477,2.853743e-9,0.39115232,0.000050086303,0.000057945217,0.014796721,0.0004662848,0.00008553779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020708175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081227414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11625913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001542145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003620592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413395645","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9752-6_2","title":"Research Methodology and Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International perspectives on migration","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.3353134724163592,"score_gpt":0.5390737539090354,"score_spread":0.20376028149267622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413395645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000101778234,0.0012947309,0.011739827,0.0068429406,0.0004064424,0.00031452824,0.000039417035,0.000039036426,0.9792213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054759826,0.0028913154,0.031338684,0.00013459039,0.00093460357,0.000037803624,0.00004942514,0.000020030348,0.9591176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688405,0.0013690375,0.00022171845,0.0005586199,0.0007825766,0.00018400405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962212,0.0025569613,0.00011779801,0.00015076503,0.000890841,0.00006244035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005221828,0.00016585132,0.00023416772,0.0006789909,0.00040716783,0.00012520213,0.0002735016,0.0003238242,0.00040384688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017875194,0.000161982,0.00009845173,0.00008115468,0.0008518619,0.0001198635,0.000070394715,0.00065488927,0.000035240606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005505358,0.000030186671,0.0000063626094,0.0000068517315,0.00008746159,0.0000014492473,0.045344345,0.0000027828899,0.000018209907,0.93101436,0.006587639,0.016845271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013252204,0.00009759429,0.00009181084,0.000067955225,0.000014421271,7.312388e-7,0.05689371,0.000086614935,0.000011456263,0.29291666,0.6495174,0.00016910212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012450739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011503164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6429298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051629957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018370787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6605434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414115824","doi":"10.1177/16094069251378860","title":"Combining Text Mining and Manual Thematic Analysis to Understand Participant Experiences With Surveys","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Thematic map; Thematic structure; Sample (material); Qualitative analysis; Data collection; Topic model; Content analysis","score_opus":0.6103462605885962,"score_gpt":0.6591304427915096,"score_spread":0.04878418220291336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414115824","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39553028,0.00026225808,0.5986826,0.0025198343,0.0002884137,0.00007769658,0.0000036824238,0.000006682249,0.0026285497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6111586,0.0000142455665,0.38803732,0.00021848503,0.000047000543,0.000008022455,5.5348414e-7,0.000005042511,0.00051072135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97788846,0.020065004,0.00076115853,0.00022397169,0.00080628117,0.00025509758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859794,0.012227027,0.0005257699,0.00009285419,0.0010015727,0.00017338972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047837656,0.00015430425,0.0005633197,0.00081436377,0.00026744447,0.00020813975,0.0004188147,0.000050102048,0.000111467285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060455026,0.000112506576,0.00014404993,0.0012112225,0.0006671344,0.0003194023,0.00007214151,0.00014904888,7.074146e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001199873,0.000057929792,0.00087778835,0.0000073107853,0.0020645482,0.000010876489,0.8993636,0.0000521486,0.00012409092,0.06317488,0.0000752767,0.034071557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043739646,0.00025464108,0.0022663495,0.00014615156,0.00030656962,0.0000024736155,0.98196775,0.00013692823,0.00041470103,0.013314826,0.0006052441,0.00014698303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002942183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004695006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2156283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014276893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021626675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414398495","doi":"10.1080/01609513.2025.2550134","title":"From the guest editor: my tribute to Charles Garvin, Alex Gitterman, and Andy Malekoff by Barbara Muskat","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Work With Groups","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Problem solver","score_opus":0.01762740444271021,"score_gpt":0.3315310963598136,"score_spread":0.3139036919171034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414398495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71306133,0.0046975003,0.007960228,0.23429531,0.012144467,0.002069293,0.00060483936,0.00037437933,0.02479263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91340333,0.0002687768,0.00396431,0.0095679015,0.04194458,0.0003376432,0.00013850543,0.00008171153,0.030293263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720126,0.0010808653,0.00026092137,0.00045627015,0.00047478313,0.0005258748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836093,0.0010385622,0.000108814565,0.00020448306,0.00012425423,0.00016297225],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015967521,0.00024097196,0.00035946383,0.00004622882,0.0021264162,0.0003084909,0.00043507005,0.00018795185,0.0001708866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024719877,0.00017082173,0.00008573727,0.0010092183,0.00079594867,0.00018498112,0.00013850599,0.00029891668,0.000037077367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000974387,0.000048706377,0.017379768,0.000008631003,0.000094608295,0.0000030488488,0.061442845,1.2938669e-7,0.00006806458,0.0076778163,0.9020438,0.0111351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053234637,0.000065136264,0.03732405,0.00007467985,0.00006673722,9.361087e-8,0.031794727,8.715906e-7,0.000039824605,0.0031696032,0.9266414,0.0002905079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019430764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017949177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2247274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008765856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009288102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415008717","doi":"10.2196/70986","title":"Exploring the Acceptability and Suitability of Synchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research With Métis Nation of Ontario Citizens: An Internet-Based Survey","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Métis National Council; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); The Internet; Work (physics); Affect (linguistics); Online research methods; Selection (genetic algorithm); Internet research","score_opus":0.4927701323605893,"score_gpt":0.5543305561243532,"score_spread":0.061560423763763916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415008717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98276615,0.00009957921,0.011691675,0.0019696644,0.000062241685,0.0022330307,0.00016956778,0.000014822577,0.0009932771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961694,0.000020458207,0.0030806311,0.000014788539,0.000025220885,0.0004908904,0.000034641285,0.000009526942,0.00015447488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98236424,0.014556013,0.0006201331,0.00037685328,0.0013236812,0.00075910916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837259,0.0124970125,0.00017830159,0.00040152777,0.0030542775,0.00014295147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07520114,0.00012771894,0.0004184246,0.00041880328,0.0009754262,0.00008642963,0.0005146647,0.00006933339,0.000058554273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040104734,0.00008677666,0.000066654655,0.0016135956,0.0030136625,0.00063956354,0.0001998029,0.0007007555,3.4138088e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020040532,0.0012076133,0.07849356,0.00097455207,0.00008095854,2.5238046e-7,0.58142805,0.0000101454825,0.000038184106,0.059508547,0.00020214263,0.27605194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085296185,0.0028021687,0.9103047,0.00014291241,0.0000033506112,9.415951e-8,0.07261339,0.0005271879,0.0013298679,0.00999886,0.0013205113,0.000103946346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33816788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72783685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00202284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043898528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415693289","doi":"10.2196/77937","title":"Implementation of Virtual Focus Groups as an Effective Strategy in Qualitative Research to Engage With Undersupported Communities: Protocol for Virtual Focus Groups","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities","keywords":"Focus group; Qualitative research; Protocol (science); Focus (optics); Health care; Qualitative property; Research design","score_opus":0.4982307097590462,"score_gpt":0.714355094313961,"score_spread":0.21612438455491484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415693289","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024898514,9.4369886e-7,0.009427389,0.0010712259,0.000008132762,0.9564095,0.0001046047,0.000072151954,0.008007505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2128033,1.6867149e-7,0.0017631345,0.000029637496,0.000068900066,0.7847223,0.000018504363,0.00004724631,0.00054674485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94197816,0.051919315,0.0010063183,0.00079682533,0.002571984,0.0017273931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97903144,0.016561253,0.00025284704,0.0007421575,0.0029839247,0.00042839893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06414697,0.00037591776,0.00072156335,0.0018114011,0.0019193668,0.0004243406,0.0013343634,0.00030615996,0.00034543735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022866656,0.0003272533,0.00012731797,0.00444369,0.002438774,0.0009936446,0.00040794417,0.0018381608,0.00001810452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0073003117,0.001271362,0.0006070997,0.00042667062,0.00007663529,0.000008200196,0.35482475,0.0000135757755,0.0010482573,0.58220744,0.001124665,0.05109099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007915128,0.03340015,0.0021066575,0.00141306,0.0000032727917,3.3515266e-7,0.8218967,0.000041361793,0.0068432325,0.11339587,0.012629072,0.00035517607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03822564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10341388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4688116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011749903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025673911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416137585","doi":"10.1177/16094069251397351","title":"360-Degree Video for Whole Scene Capture: From Immersive Realism to Immersive Holism in Place-Based Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Data collection; Holism; Field (mathematics); Immersion (mathematics); Coding (social sciences); Ethnography; Immersive technology","score_opus":0.7484686296615181,"score_gpt":0.6940454563431593,"score_spread":0.054423173318358775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416137585","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019888034,0.0015027061,0.8853699,0.08251067,0.0029317546,0.0007445807,0.00034557394,0.000008440014,0.0066983523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.103857994,0.00007547143,0.88799393,0.0034582168,0.00089788786,0.00011794175,0.000033438824,0.0000351856,0.0035299074],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9637292,0.03231634,0.001245625,0.00048909057,0.0016078277,0.00061189884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505989,0.04312735,0.000618412,0.00021081333,0.0051704147,0.00027414173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0706448,0.00025170774,0.0007203056,0.0017480109,0.00039585994,0.00017517837,0.0013452736,0.00022072147,0.0001322005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036345817,0.00023204957,0.00038629203,0.0013291627,0.000764222,0.00041333746,0.00014231751,0.0009712979,0.000009762681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033017802,0.0003495898,0.00019188251,0.000028131222,0.0006810133,0.000059607948,0.71093994,0.00031947915,0.022669423,0.16525038,0.027507892,0.06870087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003519271,0.0003932376,0.0016618769,0.00069553376,0.000054984965,0.0000011447598,0.49210823,0.00022199826,0.0153921,0.27562347,0.20996502,0.00036311778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010575667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016055208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21883172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013177528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013082405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417340301","doi":"10.18438/eblip30826","title":"Plotting Your Job Hunt: The Use of Visual Timeline for Investigating the Job Search Process","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Worksheet; Thematic analysis; Process (computing); Recall; Artifact (error); Citation; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.1546743502685097,"score_gpt":0.45844478112088477,"score_spread":0.3037704308523751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417340301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1296702,0.0012825403,0.11599807,0.7401012,0.00033701272,0.0024744088,0.00003361365,0.00016209838,0.009940823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7042985,0.0009911237,0.1366433,0.15497787,0.00045517785,0.00028750006,0.000031352003,0.000022847893,0.0022923106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973832,0.001604899,0.00042417247,0.00009504784,0.0003211809,0.00017150448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97941464,0.019837186,0.0003348004,0.00012384745,0.00024199662,0.00004752555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056393333,0.00008131787,0.000106909065,0.000082336715,0.0010833332,0.00054957333,0.00024881525,0.000053539734,0.000031299234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026577054,0.00004971196,0.000038948656,0.00076974416,0.00038351578,0.07628878,0.00006848816,0.00021993028,0.0000026096764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028256953,0.00002684331,0.0029474464,0.00043500346,0.00003472095,1.3551818e-7,0.040969785,0.00096901285,0.00009168316,0.89056915,0.0022820716,0.06139155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043281243,0.00021667872,0.0066100527,0.0008980335,0.00008521033,8.623086e-7,0.106548615,0.07227634,0.0038866485,0.0024420666,0.8064017,0.00020093124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001308748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.165798e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8881271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000083317755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005374603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9816225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6901881218","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14880648.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Meta-consent for the secondary use of health data within a learning health system: a qualitative study of the public’s perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Focus group; Focus (optics); Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Table of contents","score_opus":0.6531949265530963,"score_gpt":0.5213429758822749,"score_spread":0.13185195067082145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6901881218","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049041693,0.0009011273,0.0000314081,0.0028715425,0.000043127304,0.00097329926,0.9946779,0.000011717843,0.00044083627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1301369,0.000010397707,0.016913041,0.0007580114,0.00021220853,0.004058903,0.8433725,0.0000589793,0.0044790255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98774207,0.010592729,0.00059985556,0.0003000684,0.0005575186,0.00020774243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96189374,0.034779105,0.0014927884,0.00047973907,0.0012901786,0.000064448104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034086716,0.00010747636,0.00052952365,0.00004216433,0.0006802204,0.000038646078,0.0004702791,0.00003551859,0.50734466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060504127,0.00006510417,0.0001815392,0.00053419574,0.00012438445,0.00021957254,0.00025822633,0.00022054036,0.000004722046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733695,0.00012764566,6.687595e-7,0.0002583402,0.00042302714,1.8967816e-7,0.28113765,0.0000063317507,2.300766e-7,0.004880488,0.7127688,0.0003888851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013821074,0.00018060379,0.0001938324,0.0005568999,0.000032601278,5.4053015e-7,0.6999903,0.000079492245,0.0000022700124,0.000121363424,0.29865542,0.000048482834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003967876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143787665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50733995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015139162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004208379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94740963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902068658","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.25963046","title":"Additional file 1 of The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Interview; Government (linguistics); Table (database)","score_opus":0.3877440801303068,"score_gpt":0.5169222328460839,"score_spread":0.12917815271577704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902068658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8749317,0.00013440003,0.00005394668,0.0002753303,0.000091802365,0.0008055521,0.12355145,0.0000011738114,0.00015463523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802416,0.000007641165,0.015469279,0.00010617352,0.000049856666,0.00022646051,0.00004090916,0.000008468727,0.0038496295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581766,0.0027484545,0.00037259937,0.00033416538,0.0005685144,0.00015862517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95615065,0.04329517,0.00012721113,0.0001810909,0.0001649349,0.000080940634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022330284,0.000066371074,0.00019728065,0.000027119762,0.0005089903,0.0003610112,0.00050934916,0.000028363373,0.27897352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03434226,0.00005659296,0.000057668232,0.00062024023,0.0002793846,0.00027994343,0.000392148,0.00013163536,0.000003896742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020520185,0.00007186079,0.007510783,0.000006704951,0.0000601269,0.00038522566,0.6790653,0.00007603766,0.000006426006,0.000009520253,0.2893224,0.023465114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007979488,0.00003243194,0.022089334,0.0007213468,0.000012596269,0.000013518662,0.75422907,0.000017826867,7.296687e-7,0.00030421425,0.22240818,0.00009093963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27896962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007145737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021885294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9737919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904477707","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0201437.s001","title":"Quantitative survey measures for a qualitatively-driven mixed methods analysis of the mental health service experiences of LGBTQ people living in poverty in Ontario, Canada.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Poverty; Multimethodology; Mental health service; Service (business); Health services; Scale (ratio)","score_opus":0.22453607602572062,"score_gpt":0.4758829059185542,"score_spread":0.2513468298928336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904477707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9355756,0.0002766348,0.00041491113,0.0008622651,0.00029467972,0.0011871763,0.060657006,0.000010381206,0.0007213462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817577,0.0000018221693,0.01649442,0.00029026036,0.000010757286,0.00020244971,0.001125496,0.000009876312,0.0001072292],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98987335,0.008447862,0.00056880777,0.00028263923,0.0004959437,0.0003313723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989709,0.008919853,0.0005195856,0.00017472435,0.0006028664,0.00007395093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005819135,0.00013421489,0.0006052866,0.00018896806,0.00025448523,0.000017327793,0.00044861296,0.00006126288,0.006137391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017913688,0.00010436864,0.00012517415,0.0027259258,0.00008506157,0.00014497119,0.00009668282,0.00011595972,7.293035e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057652942,0.000056529854,0.024689319,0.000056338326,0.00010970075,4.7427058e-8,0.96807635,0.000028091463,0.00003107373,0.0003367682,0.0061502256,0.0004079278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014092516,0.0000914007,0.53444767,0.00036663495,0.000011291432,1.7273463e-8,0.46268702,0.000555995,0.00017118226,0.00006112106,0.001357908,0.00010884623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99402755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50975835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006322917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027847097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904545761","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0293643.s001","title":"Focus groups interview guides.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vaccination; Focus group; Receipt; Government (linguistics); Booster (rocketry); Pandemic; Public health","score_opus":0.2487293258613232,"score_gpt":0.46333145041092405,"score_spread":0.21460212454960084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904545761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014310393,0.05104871,0.00063778344,0.0095036095,0.0012312353,0.0006095182,0.09083284,0.0013277452,0.84466547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7892228,0.0005727659,0.016084423,0.005018294,0.009991539,0.0018783292,0.042168703,0.00032074694,0.13474242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986802,0.00048473885,0.00015185308,0.00021178128,0.00022898638,0.00024248459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917746,0.0005057778,0.000024574394,0.00012039367,0.00007454915,0.000097232085],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078855886,0.00008823101,0.00011512593,0.000055976867,0.0001784976,0.00021960177,0.0002473281,0.00007114215,0.37308574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018654221,0.00007490358,0.000119585064,0.00038587654,0.000024429182,0.00021894746,0.000071529066,0.00013465178,0.008279723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.780195e-7,0.000005685727,0.0000010482592,0.0001051518,0.0000106515745,0.000018762485,0.007887998,1.3510017e-7,0.0000054579255,0.030991616,0.7402746,0.22069843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026442709,0.000018890443,0.000064159096,0.0012158934,0.000004167562,7.5794685e-7,0.00091483176,0.00003785983,0.00006348929,0.008862135,0.9886788,0.00011254946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001687178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029632475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78907967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007328578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009922409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99249244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920698313","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.19669970.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Internet access is a necessity: a latent class analysis of COVID-19 related challenges and the role of technology use among rural community residents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Latent class model; Rural community; Internet access; Class (philosophy); Rural area; Digital divide","score_opus":0.14669890623432705,"score_gpt":0.39315908440490394,"score_spread":0.2464601781705769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920698313","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03448193,0.00053132366,2.6823156e-7,0.0006184803,0.000005961818,0.00015410296,0.9629838,0.000016483129,0.0012076608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8445197,0.00003536014,0.00008492806,0.00008921216,0.0000048752695,0.00040197422,0.15445517,0.000006323668,0.00040246276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681187,0.0023690632,0.00027745383,0.00010672655,0.0003228216,0.00011208829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930245,0.0060667885,0.000503743,0.00021029102,0.00014863607,0.000045991063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067938305,0.00007028407,0.00031899367,0.00027828154,0.0002946966,0.000017486795,0.00056649937,0.00007865188,0.81911486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008821474,0.0000566178,0.0001254137,0.000930871,0.00037224372,0.00015231495,0.0006936226,0.0002936985,0.0000022940387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014166479,0.00018411262,0.003587749,0.00014897175,0.0010724254,0.0000022769882,0.12787454,0.00005031766,0.000004408576,0.0045827106,0.85770434,0.0046464754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010864582,0.00024735843,0.31787625,0.00087649334,0.0003272302,0.0000013048519,0.240872,0.002331466,0.000098259225,0.025408221,0.41057113,0.0003038371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068175164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048846244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81911254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052351046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009521384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930171086","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12062204","title":"pdf histoire de la philosophie","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; French; Christology","score_opus":0.06682649670035398,"score_gpt":0.345326769285627,"score_spread":0.278500272585273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930171086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008991215,0.0032344179,0.0031506978,0.0062178615,0.0007989324,0.00037064363,0.00020407117,0.000707971,0.9852255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008274557,0.0007321932,0.0024561035,0.0003088157,0.0020478382,8.424428e-8,0.0003234618,0.006936299,0.97892064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923411,0.0054320637,0.00033569027,0.00068538,0.00057890394,0.0006268753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985603,0.00017594619,0.00018089746,0.00041608737,0.00031033877,0.00035640653],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004048405,0.00030953749,0.00032425555,0.00035091015,0.0031692511,0.0010531427,0.0013014838,0.000374872,0.40941295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018422921,0.00032943295,0.00017909588,0.0010244543,0.0025372354,0.0001515599,0.00089133455,0.00085084146,0.21791597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012235806,0.00008740244,2.534976e-7,0.0001830169,0.00007124971,0.00003894573,0.008690664,0.0000024160597,0.00021290356,0.38508523,0.4252896,0.18032609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000206502,0.00016768122,0.00002208409,0.00023216606,0.00006632023,0.000042016327,0.0017161274,0.00005171855,0.000015695823,0.032109406,0.965024,0.00034628215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023852556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024293251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5397344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097020314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018038412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939539789","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14880648","title":"Additional file 1 of Meta-consent for the secondary use of health data within a learning health system: a qualitative study of the public’s perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Focus group; Focus (optics); Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Table of contents","score_opus":0.6531949265530963,"score_gpt":0.5213429758822749,"score_spread":0.13185195067082145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939539789","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049041693,0.0009011273,0.0000314081,0.0028715425,0.000043127304,0.00097329926,0.9946779,0.000011717843,0.00044083627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1301369,0.000010397707,0.016913041,0.0007580114,0.00021220853,0.004058903,0.8433725,0.0000589793,0.0044790255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98774207,0.010592729,0.00059985556,0.0003000684,0.0005575186,0.00020774243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96189374,0.034779105,0.0014927884,0.00047973907,0.0012901786,0.000064448104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034086716,0.00010747636,0.00052952365,0.00004216433,0.0006802204,0.000038646078,0.0004702791,0.00003551859,0.50734466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060504127,0.00006510417,0.0001815392,0.00053419574,0.00012438445,0.00021957254,0.00025822633,0.00022054036,0.000004722046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733695,0.00012764566,6.687595e-7,0.0002583402,0.00042302714,1.8967816e-7,0.28113765,0.0000063317507,2.300766e-7,0.004880488,0.7127688,0.0003888851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013821074,0.00018060379,0.0001938324,0.0005568999,0.000032601278,5.4053015e-7,0.6999903,0.000079492245,0.0000022700124,0.000121363424,0.29865542,0.000048482834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003967876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143787665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50733995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015139162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004208379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94740963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6957905368","doi":"10.60692/586ye-yet37","title":"\"Thought provoking\", \"interactive\", and \"more like a peer talk\": Testing the deliberative interview style in Germany","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Interview; Style (visual arts); Qualitative research; Semi-structured interview; Acquiescence; Discourse analysis","score_opus":0.12045228738477262,"score_gpt":0.3462683996317248,"score_spread":0.22581611224695217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6957905368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93985814,0.00009431092,0.019364834,0.0035336684,0.0006516231,0.000953006,0.000062670195,0.00016119477,0.035320573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951703,5.483257e-7,0.0027839695,0.00064926635,0.00008829429,0.000092771785,0.0000045741863,0.000007680724,0.001202612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728554,0.0013941153,0.0005026167,0.0001649006,0.0003971838,0.00025561886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868125,0.00017822212,0.0002722864,0.00017481079,0.00062627404,0.000067135916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00315397,0.00014419216,0.00022799439,0.00010256057,0.0004122906,0.00046136018,0.00014827395,0.00007376169,0.000028243354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058265956,0.00009885311,0.000052658932,0.00053028815,0.00013609567,0.0010686457,0.00011031837,0.00019664946,0.000045206605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012491471,0.0000029567857,0.009135355,0.00016213037,0.000023987941,0.000009719035,0.9819661,0.0000054524253,0.0000054088246,0.0025286544,0.00008676677,0.0060609975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007154142,0.00004071037,0.06863091,0.0007483759,0.000025065705,0.000044599106,0.89403176,0.0019455819,0.00019134284,0.000025534733,0.033293054,0.0003076482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013361208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003663105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087934315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015367205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010235782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44489068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958146188","doi":"10.60692/a156m-vvp22","title":"\"Thought provoking\", \"interactive\", and \"more like a peer talk\": Testing the deliberative interview style in Germany","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Interview; Style (visual arts); Qualitative research; Semi-structured interview; Acquiescence; Discourse analysis","score_opus":0.12045228738477262,"score_gpt":0.3462683996317248,"score_spread":0.22581611224695217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958146188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93985814,0.00009431092,0.019364834,0.0035336684,0.0006516231,0.000953006,0.000062670195,0.00016119477,0.035320573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951703,5.483257e-7,0.0027839695,0.00064926635,0.00008829429,0.000092771785,0.0000045741863,0.000007680724,0.001202612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728554,0.0013941153,0.0005026167,0.0001649006,0.0003971838,0.00025561886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868125,0.00017822212,0.0002722864,0.00017481079,0.00062627404,0.000067135916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00315397,0.00014419216,0.00022799439,0.00010256057,0.0004122906,0.00046136018,0.00014827395,0.00007376169,0.000028243354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058265956,0.00009885311,0.000052658932,0.00053028815,0.00013609567,0.0010686457,0.00011031837,0.00019664946,0.000045206605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012491471,0.0000029567857,0.009135355,0.00016213037,0.000023987941,0.000009719035,0.9819661,0.0000054524253,0.0000054088246,0.0025286544,0.00008676677,0.0060609975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007154142,0.00004071037,0.06863091,0.0007483759,0.000025065705,0.000044599106,0.89403176,0.0019455819,0.00019134284,0.000025534733,0.033293054,0.0003076482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013361208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003663105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087934315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015367205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010235782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44489068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958496256","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.19669970","title":"Additional file 1 of Internet access is a necessity: a latent class analysis of COVID-19 related challenges and the role of technology use among rural community residents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Latent class model; Rural community; Internet access; Class (philosophy); Rural area; Digital divide","score_opus":0.14669890623432705,"score_gpt":0.39315908440490394,"score_spread":0.2464601781705769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958496256","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03448193,0.00053132366,2.6823156e-7,0.0006184803,0.000005961818,0.00015410296,0.9629838,0.000016483129,0.0012076608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8445197,0.00003536014,0.00008492806,0.00008921216,0.0000048752695,0.00040197422,0.15445517,0.000006323668,0.00040246276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681187,0.0023690632,0.00027745383,0.00010672655,0.0003228216,0.00011208829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930245,0.0060667885,0.000503743,0.00021029102,0.00014863607,0.000045991063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067938305,0.00007028407,0.00031899367,0.00027828154,0.0002946966,0.000017486795,0.00056649937,0.00007865188,0.81911486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008821474,0.0000566178,0.0001254137,0.000930871,0.00037224372,0.00015231495,0.0006936226,0.0002936985,0.0000022940387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014166479,0.00018411262,0.003587749,0.00014897175,0.0010724254,0.0000022769882,0.12787454,0.00005031766,0.000004408576,0.0045827106,0.85770434,0.0046464754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010864582,0.00024735843,0.31787625,0.00087649334,0.0003272302,0.0000013048519,0.240872,0.002331466,0.000098259225,0.025408221,0.41057113,0.0003038371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068175164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048846244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81911254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052351046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009521384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958919649","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.25963046.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Interview; Government (linguistics); Table (database)","score_opus":0.3966945068061189,"score_gpt":0.48504399993147307,"score_spread":0.08834949312535417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958919649","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14118762,0.00027600754,0.000004454122,0.0001307204,0.000049282946,0.0004934794,0.85780925,0.000011348166,0.000037827893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864859,0.0000058131786,0.0024108493,0.00035637835,0.00013957499,0.0011844847,0.007392949,0.000019337016,0.0020047436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964834,0.0020690951,0.00033102802,0.00029778742,0.00064644846,0.00017222723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94039047,0.05897506,0.0001264,0.00017192579,0.00025195806,0.00008420477],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062624906,0.000072535164,0.00017371535,0.0000313724,0.00046650713,0.0001757214,0.0003284009,0.000035092722,0.8239185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12529686,0.00006330863,0.00008176508,0.0006850947,0.00007648161,0.00019434444,0.00024075925,0.00015816533,0.0000090390595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004496728,0.00002406209,0.00093799084,0.000025173773,0.00002512346,0.0002293928,0.20953715,0.000044787666,6.6448393e-7,0.0000029364094,0.7875692,0.0015990195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059861668,0.000027847049,0.03772078,0.0048171855,0.0000073914953,0.000015012079,0.5617487,0.000026213756,2.7275559e-7,0.00023890685,0.39522398,0.00011387986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97401375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8504163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007761155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018191076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88207114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981172297","doi":"","title":"Disaggregating student resistances: Analyzing what students pursue with challenging agency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Dialogical self; Resistance (ecology); Qualitative research; Sign (mathematics); Dysfunctional family","score_opus":0.2157829256887507,"score_gpt":0.4353792861405985,"score_spread":0.2195963604518478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981172297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46068507,0.047911584,0.001100294,0.0012372697,0.0016852998,0.004740595,0.017399667,0.0015407827,0.46369943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907638,0.000262447,0.0054258127,0.000112257134,0.00035184133,0.00027787514,0.0009658659,0.00004606873,0.0017940494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774474,0.0005320999,0.00022583661,0.00034118342,0.00072370545,0.00043240734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989997,0.00028244586,0.00019544813,0.00021414961,0.00015655858,0.00015167479],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008356343,0.00016009517,0.00020599007,0.00007004184,0.0007367992,0.0003566116,0.0005935981,0.00006350277,0.032455795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006707793,0.00013164018,0.000069628666,0.00040249445,0.00004522851,0.0009216792,0.00011646297,0.00016304062,0.00019303733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047676243,0.00031395457,0.014444562,0.00023439528,0.00021566212,0.00012043074,0.8808775,0.000008364906,0.000014462678,0.007550114,0.0031261884,0.09304671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012673652,0.0005128772,0.1778969,0.019000107,0.00009746756,0.0000018455369,0.6777209,0.000024418137,0.00038726736,0.0028383834,0.118611515,0.0016409608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018024357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011488461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5300787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010090829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056602566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9684287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981199286","doi":"","title":"[Documentation d'art mural à Montréal entre 2013 et 2017]","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"E-Artexte (Artexte)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mural; Context (archaeology); Shadow (psychology); Space (punctuation)","score_opus":0.06769482449879975,"score_gpt":0.39754179770388487,"score_spread":0.3298469732050851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981199286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023169327,0.016148627,0.005670378,0.026409095,0.010808275,0.0021464473,0.0005333656,0.00027468047,0.9356922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055133365,0.0067956285,0.009944851,0.0016046636,0.0031447448,0.00017290452,0.0006664915,0.00020155714,0.97195584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873266,0.0051702666,0.001596748,0.0018706035,0.002079804,0.0019559308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930434,0.0017227702,0.0020551218,0.0016014864,0.0006174676,0.0009597522],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006324645,0.0014839853,0.0017952243,0.00032952224,0.003386688,0.0012248033,0.0017151178,0.0013161065,0.020105151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068184565,0.0015018119,0.0011523525,0.00032361058,0.0034635214,0.0029412473,0.00039157824,0.0017144609,0.038591374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008801856,0.00024752616,0.00011659483,0.00014031229,0.0003120538,0.00009952105,0.025731051,0.000022979244,0.00011308232,0.2524317,0.6122261,0.10847103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014668677,0.00044983887,0.0032058363,0.00059042824,0.00037412648,0.000020760646,0.0042379443,0.00020980148,0.000030081432,0.048270334,0.93953574,0.0016082658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012790663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024773119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32730955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010533594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012088345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992582669","doi":"","title":"Lo scambio interpersonale sull'AIDS e il medium dello scambio","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"dissertation","venue":"DocTA - Doctoral Theses Archive","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Studio; 3d printer; Large group","score_opus":0.09273215266726113,"score_gpt":0.4307910313063079,"score_spread":0.33805887863904677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992582669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8040223,0.0028279407,0.0047971974,0.001053637,0.010873335,0.0025494925,0.002268037,0.00040831047,0.17119971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.852395,0.0022906098,0.033995587,0.0012750842,0.0075754416,0.00026838787,0.0041138623,0.0004671277,0.09761892],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98619294,0.004632776,0.0019408873,0.0021396885,0.0025701313,0.0025235482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915226,0.0042398754,0.0014016797,0.0009696856,0.0007103374,0.0011558338],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006282566,0.0016632928,0.0020274178,0.00100125,0.0020617337,0.001067878,0.0024338828,0.0009945701,0.0036336642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021632074,0.0015159067,0.0015425,0.0017178993,0.003108428,0.00083011045,0.0004123788,0.002148444,0.0012845119],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038443562,0.0015767083,0.005127594,0.001145939,0.0018227472,0.0003255167,0.6703277,0.000012953306,0.011395312,0.17661291,0.01305551,0.11475272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020600453,0.003083548,0.011949194,0.002499325,0.0009049645,0.000021682383,0.37955603,0.0002781342,0.006970602,0.03741565,0.5507501,0.004510733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026289454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010087879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5376946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005278547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008969689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997270681","doi":"","title":"Waarom doen jonge mannen (niet) mee met vragenlijstonderzoek over seksualiteit?:Gendernormen, barrières en motivaties volgens lager opgeleide jonge mannen","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athena Sustainable Materials Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychological intervention; Human sexuality; Masculinity; Autonomy","score_opus":0.2349181204027014,"score_gpt":0.5351864305467583,"score_spread":0.30026831014405686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997270681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85298145,0.00085878186,0.00017212528,0.0029330242,0.0007106282,0.0013029876,0.0004094835,0.0005284193,0.14010309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87137616,0.00069665496,0.0021607932,0.0002545665,0.0014939999,0.00031905112,0.00021328003,0.00015248822,0.123333015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98436344,0.007018094,0.00088004064,0.0011743727,0.003950954,0.0026130911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936026,0.003802179,0.00020890778,0.0008459672,0.0006765957,0.0008637758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021960009,0.000501797,0.00072345795,0.0010444686,0.0019781108,0.000534735,0.0014091542,0.00044116017,0.006038901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046733255,0.00044610194,0.0003965948,0.002785655,0.0015357705,0.000989159,0.0007976594,0.0011769414,0.0011842961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019199894,0.0004165862,0.03530005,0.000319882,0.0009300534,0.0014491384,0.26214725,0.00004229441,0.009004517,0.20956926,0.46805817,0.012570826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012804769,0.0006512509,0.14775881,0.00012923812,0.0000673634,0.000007810933,0.22483,0.0002255571,0.0018764758,0.04105827,0.5808291,0.0012856697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069020493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.168511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029583808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065935776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000624679","doi":"","title":"Focussing on the focus group","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Focus group; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Identity (music); Social group","score_opus":0.3331016074418522,"score_gpt":0.4166129899556896,"score_spread":0.08351138251383744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000624679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065051834,0.00010289259,0.0021426287,0.007026458,0.0004015847,0.0003272926,0.000071077375,0.00010031127,0.9891772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0127257975,0.00007486575,0.009752537,0.0000694274,0.0005645348,2.5943882e-7,0.0000070040805,0.00008921734,0.97671634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980387,0.00063028344,0.000116138195,0.00032203193,0.000528177,0.00036465432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988862,0.0002969291,0.00031260314,0.00033984348,0.00005241458,0.00011200939],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009546703,0.0002066449,0.000336946,0.00021494637,0.00039085647,0.000031295967,0.0006271114,0.0003547568,0.044172794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007887098,0.00018945892,0.00021689574,0.00041573297,0.00093465723,0.00009348336,0.000071147784,0.00035402065,0.00055480347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026089556,0.000083659535,0.000028628952,0.000020289026,0.00009701441,0.000019521924,0.007323506,0.0000010033499,0.000053478005,0.18106562,0.74676096,0.0645202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024211245,0.0000795098,0.00026433886,0.00014427486,0.000047866113,4.962629e-7,0.010999011,0.0000016511256,0.00001044637,0.00075721345,0.9872246,0.00022849924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042267393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04083972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24046358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011534853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068354464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97666246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009767692","doi":"","title":"Focus groups : a model for change for community organizations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Focus group; Public policy","score_opus":0.12996887172418228,"score_gpt":0.4120747138999425,"score_spread":0.2821058421757602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009767692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63777715,0.00185472,0.008858404,0.0007196164,0.0083301645,0.022975784,0.030177614,0.002053748,0.2872528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8669067,0.00031819046,0.085770115,0.0009133112,0.00059477304,0.0034349808,0.004956269,0.0005934843,0.03651215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426746,0.0019256818,0.0010326689,0.00077907613,0.00080695224,0.0011881408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923118,0.0032986612,0.00079186854,0.0006958883,0.0024359163,0.00046587718],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010658549,0.00069073297,0.00089841336,0.00049914245,0.008945264,0.00015904715,0.0011427773,0.0012610746,0.00010426853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009630497,0.00076686416,0.0005262992,0.0013418685,0.0002217039,0.0009103754,0.00009878254,0.0014603899,0.00003418723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022515054,0.0003293365,0.0000051254024,0.00039310177,0.00013719007,0.0000013249164,0.0036322735,0.0000115676285,0.0012452534,0.8464585,0.000038081915,0.14752309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020295074,0.00049047294,0.00019773578,0.00037802203,0.00057216367,0.0000014421154,0.03047313,0.0010625134,0.0063527436,0.74218863,0.21418466,0.0020689582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048162974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09097487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25074068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010577051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021194387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043760838","doi":"","title":"2022-08-27 Thornsmoke at Fuzzfest live at 123 Pleasant Street","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"West virginia; Quarter (Canadian coin); Clothing","score_opus":0.01910349565190917,"score_gpt":0.26815760536863603,"score_spread":0.24905410971672687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043760838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000111644855,0.0009644992,4.403438e-7,0.0016816588,0.0007954719,0.0007064769,0.0006193987,0.00022198664,0.99489844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00009778282,0.00081986625,0.001305504,0.0015986396,0.00048590385,0.000045429486,0.00040033113,0.00014996338,0.99509656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957179,0.0012413216,0.0007690424,0.00038286153,0.0012599857,0.00062888593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974605,0.0006976622,0.0009739114,0.0004769147,0.00016438935,0.00022665787],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016172676,0.0004441453,0.00062516524,0.00011404587,0.0006447647,0.000068144276,0.0006713995,0.0005510093,0.92257386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005504072,0.00044279417,0.0003229012,0.000024526644,0.0005895817,4.953148e-7,0.00045364661,0.000545375,0.031997107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080298465,0.000043388143,0.00003475352,0.00020531703,0.000087861896,0.000042560663,0.0047604786,0.000029446128,1.9997488e-7,0.00047231454,0.99320596,0.0010373866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003909778,0.0001877829,0.000015736732,0.00007747752,0.000061516934,0.000011710749,0.0050123795,0.0000028949155,0.000002046138,0.000053097374,0.99367136,0.0005130038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027672367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04804138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8905768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054260914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009672529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7074024218","doi":"","title":"Advancing Telephone Focus Groups Method Through the Use of Webinar: Methodological Reflections on Evaluating Ontario, Canada's Healthy Babies Healthy Children Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Focus (optics); Public health; Telephone number; Telephone interview","score_opus":0.39294238630325234,"score_gpt":0.4775547377656746,"score_spread":0.08461235146242224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7074024218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52294415,0.0007135798,0.26488736,0.13323951,0.0031054404,0.0064801974,0.00027185804,0.00096957287,0.06738832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2636695,0.00007706713,0.72530675,0.0020563307,0.00030104976,0.000040996765,0.00012756043,0.000062687424,0.008358074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877184,0.008255447,0.00059026293,0.00083587825,0.00156579,0.0010342266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99296564,0.0037743472,0.0007367696,0.00070945185,0.0012282233,0.00058557204],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062362733,0.00042151043,0.0006881956,0.00045485873,0.003233111,0.00020208447,0.00097008573,0.00028897525,0.00053896924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002088458,0.0003764069,0.00028554472,0.0030227248,0.00065024325,0.004733632,0.00031908994,0.0008928522,0.000009933423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014987173,0.0010478664,0.0056711384,0.000041198393,0.00069567777,0.000036196274,0.11910612,0.007831077,0.00003992149,0.7879545,0.037344422,0.038733143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003836321,0.0037990978,0.0249091,0.000098805875,0.00050247414,0.000021392263,0.204018,0.000751774,0.000051454354,0.020061674,0.7407632,0.0011866946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9336938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9665415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76789284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004202593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064765215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7092186927","doi":"10.1002/pra2.1384","title":"A Critical Dialogue on Ethics and Practices for Digital Research with “Difficult” to Reach Populations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Research ethics; Discussion board; Qualitative research; Ethical issues","score_opus":0.2021773793999195,"score_gpt":0.5352618885974244,"score_spread":0.3330845091975049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7092186927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.521322,0.000021276554,0.0027920203,0.41832754,0.0002586899,0.0025264975,0.000086518754,0.00010037522,0.054565076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925885,0.000007214595,0.006702569,0.00021753708,0.000014930909,0.00014574536,0.0000011850927,0.0000015912318,0.00032067913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988655,0.000024076253,0.00018423448,0.00012378975,0.0005822125,0.00022019226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909458,0.0022691751,0.00027731934,0.000045713095,0.0064258142,0.00003614957],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01147512,0.000045634984,0.00009205336,0.00052624213,0.001929075,0.00037888947,0.00024216241,0.00013671395,1.5842579e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19775257,0.000031555515,0.000012129036,0.002595514,0.0008863318,0.0017988697,0.00008660476,0.00021852662,4.7204068e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023353758,0.000012306789,0.005437296,0.000031751115,0.0000035109917,9.237725e-10,0.008943403,2.8939513e-7,0.00020009092,0.97712666,0.0005932623,0.0076280795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076530356,0.0008359723,0.01599596,0.00019606206,0.000037245154,6.3742215e-7,0.13076025,0.00032033215,0.0047638947,0.4967984,0.34931928,0.00020664539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057048394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054947126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48032826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016689567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029139526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100073983","doi":"","title":"ETHICS AND ONLINE INTERACTION RESEARCH: A STRATEGY FOR ACCESSING THE DATA ethics.doc","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Work (physics); Research ethics; Position (finance); Position paper; Face (sociological concept); Information ethics","score_opus":0.9521541008530199,"score_gpt":0.7158429614802142,"score_spread":0.23631113937280568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100073983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07547843,0.0030536896,0.099963196,0.64979863,0.0012618017,0.0018314312,0.00022487715,0.00020346204,0.1681845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93577653,0.0016796001,0.049398977,0.00215688,0.00097615557,0.000023572138,0.000028964883,0.000018889275,0.009940418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307865,0.0057551223,0.00016214617,0.00025542217,0.00048272623,0.00026593896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785754,0.020682348,0.00005246794,0.00027636392,0.00034883348,0.000064549364],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032898124,0.00005924229,0.00008682503,0.000048870374,0.0024296204,0.0004043912,0.00047232388,0.00016950369,0.0003508833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016802331,0.000037373604,0.000019079673,0.0002799217,0.0008263464,0.000560587,0.00018052822,0.0016956768,0.0000053901263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019525229,0.0000841237,0.00005659118,0.000042734584,0.000018130333,6.9441637e-7,0.19275333,0.0000028072518,0.00013555921,0.39882666,0.010267142,0.39779273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019018824,0.00011309623,0.0004128886,0.000046565056,0.0000110632045,7.4636415e-7,0.2958004,0.020536864,0.00003369292,0.055711333,0.6270202,0.00012297617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004233999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016116688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8602981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000326487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011089118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886906},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7112798134","doi":"","title":"Bridging the Gap: Exploring the Potential of Virtual Reality for Supporting Autistic Individuals in Interview and Recruitment Processes Autism, Sage impact factor 6.3","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pure (Coventry University)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Virtual reality; Dyad; Autistic spectrum disorder; Autism","score_opus":0.2618036241959805,"score_gpt":0.41905722300796633,"score_spread":0.1572535988119858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112798134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81844157,0.0020098325,0.16595447,0.009416031,0.0005573661,0.001924858,0.00045266945,0.000097053286,0.0011461708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988992,0.00036608338,0.00020516396,0.000024093466,0.00006813806,0.000010333669,0.0000052653136,0.000008948935,0.00041276225],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981554,0.0008729576,0.0002211338,0.00023257926,0.00021887977,0.00029904698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875194,0.00091909344,0.00013094758,0.000104599036,0.00003847466,0.000054971333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025585992,0.0001164253,0.00019574343,0.00012325527,0.00038424082,0.000113488444,0.0002628489,0.000045852048,0.00004970587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042599541,0.000077773795,0.00010955432,0.0006259091,0.0002555176,0.00030149828,0.00012289658,0.00017360886,6.270986e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006521762,0.00008987314,0.0038999906,0.0009204512,0.00027697056,0.000067937166,0.15013415,0.00017546592,0.0002654656,0.24658354,0.00021056882,0.59731036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023760733,0.0010696552,0.21879488,0.004478521,0.00096502696,0.000019825171,0.3530794,0.006712157,0.000710047,0.053742517,0.3565692,0.0014827038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007248932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005888459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59582764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017564706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024053184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31715235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113102441","doi":"","title":"I am in their groupchat, but am I in their group? Moving from outside to inside digital spacesand why it is different (and the same) to analog spaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; University of Oxford; Regione Piemonte; Queen's University; McGill University","keywords":"Ethnography; Affordance; Queer; Space (punctuation); Social group; Phenomenon; Field (mathematics); Social relation","score_opus":0.032753132496025995,"score_gpt":0.28766589023980255,"score_spread":0.25491275774377653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113102441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507772,0.000419224,0.004211958,0.032289404,0.00014037738,0.0005552512,0.0001657819,0.000030866773,0.011409942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513614,0.00022901037,0.0012121287,0.0017518785,0.000045765715,0.0000026672597,0.000008779985,0.000010953334,0.0016026875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976684,0.00079416187,0.00024770366,0.0005241182,0.00031983046,0.00044580395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997703,0.00159601,0.00013178606,0.00031344412,0.00007303016,0.00018271428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011931005,0.00026028356,0.00064267876,0.00042824566,0.00039298626,0.0001475419,0.0006160232,0.00014739121,0.00007926398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032836208,0.00021116722,0.00016135859,0.0008232703,0.0006022518,0.0003885082,0.0004872616,0.00026306213,0.000006958637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010825186,0.00032988455,0.25861773,0.00006389073,0.00022424936,0.00003784729,0.66404164,0.000043078766,0.0024751485,0.033891622,0.0074696755,0.03172271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002358072,0.00015256663,0.37545916,0.00036858232,0.00003815942,3.0824282e-7,0.5528217,0.00023545032,0.00023004178,0.025118,0.0427634,0.00045457893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058836777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20991628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15107949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018824816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064851876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9474305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113640193","doi":"","title":"Do You Know Who You’re Talking To? Methodological Reflections on Maintaining Inclusivity and Research Integrity When Responding to Inauthentic Encounters in Online Qualitative Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. George's, University of London; La Trobe University; University of Leeds; McMaster University; University of Otago","keywords":"Qualitative research; Harm; Context (archaeology); Suspect; Research integrity; Inclusion (mineral); Quality (philosophy); Scientific integrity; Research ethics; Reactionary","score_opus":0.34667918493348027,"score_gpt":0.5389135994867567,"score_spread":0.1922344145532764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113640193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241185,0.00010242715,0.012452911,0.008012509,0.00020198234,0.00085449556,0.00009789136,0.0000388542,0.054120384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97148687,0.00012607586,0.024732845,0.000040582996,0.000057834106,8.5017984e-7,0.0000055191495,0.000007668163,0.0035417732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855491,0.010905508,0.00040200914,0.000922858,0.0015083312,0.0007121781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924755,0.0051133162,0.00021263688,0.00049496006,0.0013822684,0.00032131255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024141232,0.00025977317,0.0005693731,0.0020596103,0.004997011,0.000104406834,0.0013349623,0.0003666486,0.0000696839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034242938,0.00028066937,0.0001850083,0.0037486206,0.0052361973,0.00056321605,0.00087610696,0.0020714393,0.0000070308038],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012364747,0.00036847917,0.0009373571,0.00006579992,0.00009797598,0.0001294258,0.32016623,0.0002958208,0.0064247777,0.66664636,0.00017393104,0.0034573555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063934,0.0007451274,0.024054866,0.0011699762,0.00003762276,0.0000045980332,0.9272132,0.00008415739,0.00038077228,0.03862059,0.006775305,0.0002744696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01754859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016003642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62802577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015567911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017416527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996454},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7115563230","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100289","title":"Who participates in research, and why? A response to K. M. Kim &amp; E. Chen’s “Toward research inclusivity in applied linguistics: A reflection and methodological guideline for inclusive online experimentation”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Habitus; Field (mathematics); Conversation; Social media; Crowdsourcing; Dialectic; Social research; Outreach; Field research","score_opus":0.7445037095071237,"score_gpt":0.7413400588743285,"score_spread":0.003163650632795223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115563230","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16222216,0.0050322446,0.6364627,0.03184287,0.0019700513,0.025864866,0.00029591206,0.00032339306,0.1359858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18412402,0.0005518401,0.8117571,0.00033715114,0.00076427154,0.0019581073,0.000021906873,0.000046960326,0.00043863204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9318148,0.058554098,0.0022291827,0.002082141,0.0024701743,0.0028496238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8589893,0.13496771,0.00019779526,0.00079737033,0.0043668905,0.0006809423],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3155566,0.00036075796,0.0010862228,0.0040804623,0.001546661,0.00031688644,0.000765585,0.00062359276,0.000024435149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56115526,0.0003633177,0.000057209065,0.00673445,0.0028904264,0.000025688954,0.0021505652,0.0029325073,0.0000035477665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010407465,0.00094136305,0.00079296384,0.0003540416,0.00003829617,0.000024849585,0.10491936,0.00013054932,0.029092107,0.80121475,0.0021031587,0.049981114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015994217,0.00041565852,0.0008182703,0.00023820497,0.0000078549665,2.1672776e-7,0.045249183,0.0012516323,0.0045922743,0.54504687,0.40046597,0.0003144253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007962672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01523512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39836282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022245198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013984935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124294557","doi":"10.20472/iac.2025.068.003","title":"BECOMING AN ETHNOGRAPHER IN A DIGITAL WORLD: ASSEMBLAGES, ETHICS &amp; RHIZOMATIC PRACTICES","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Key (lock); Participant observation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.3030448837520841,"score_gpt":0.5527500700845462,"score_spread":0.24970518633246214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124294557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48307618,0.0022622126,0.01553677,0.023738021,0.0016400082,0.0010024628,0.000012986513,0.00017809217,0.47255328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88761604,0.0003618287,0.042221665,0.0023389473,0.0001972772,0.000059609534,0.000012098297,0.00003881214,0.06715371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891132,0.006520721,0.001298393,0.000982668,0.0010405051,0.0010445209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98071134,0.01700109,0.0009897423,0.0006241968,0.0003716215,0.00030200058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021314697,0.00047969306,0.000770574,0.0011597233,0.0011661911,0.001887493,0.0008914226,0.00061580783,0.0012791231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02111287,0.00045220088,0.00027757083,0.0068807364,0.0011475175,0.0036194865,0.00026584946,0.0022011858,0.00011000651],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010503007,0.0013807741,0.030552955,0.00043516027,0.00020230125,0.000013583642,0.39055553,0.00001960221,0.00012595262,0.4844769,0.0015238044,0.090608425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012907073,0.00022068202,0.012039077,0.0012026984,0.00017544028,9.4187214e-7,0.49422652,0.0011872723,0.000073539195,0.2291463,0.25915354,0.0012832666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013222887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24710727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40539956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002284896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009456237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148199252","doi":"","title":"Du service à la communauté au discours haineux : l’expression du mécontentement sur les sites Internet d’évaluation de professionnels","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Service (business); Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07599563705179223,"score_gpt":0.3195207123861146,"score_spread":0.24352507533432238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148199252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20375273,0.0023851085,0.20631884,0.18811017,0.0009715651,0.0015932557,0.0002148946,0.0003184547,0.39633498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7909523,0.001892401,0.023586193,0.00035640906,0.00020716332,0.00013176723,0.0003115051,0.00011952229,0.18244274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604078,0.035746664,0.0011059063,0.0009332108,0.0010407119,0.0007657203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790052,0.013831271,0.0013291909,0.001403897,0.0040132734,0.00041712745],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030049084,0.00069876574,0.0007386204,0.000234332,0.0016563744,0.00032597236,0.0017854429,0.0006479299,0.0017022883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005545127,0.00059498043,0.00041017728,0.0002939309,0.0015963638,0.000574891,0.0011408818,0.0008009286,0.00015658849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003900444,0.00047579352,0.004451887,0.00016498409,0.000103938764,0.0000067377086,0.12957856,0.00000532124,0.004841065,0.76894444,0.00071838923,0.090669855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006763003,0.000022985698,0.028813632,0.071585156,0.000793659,0.00005838169,0.038858704,0.025617683,0.0367213,0.15605071,0.62996936,0.0047454056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014364923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034096826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.629251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078425015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006483933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W795468015","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-04767-5_4","title":"Who’s Who: Support Strategies, Interests and Influence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Federal state; Computer science","score_opus":0.09713948357062047,"score_gpt":0.39816857540897715,"score_spread":0.3010290918383567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W795468015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036910092,0.000438448,0.0004013148,0.0005648191,0.00015909653,0.00022085075,0.000020684174,0.000078213896,0.9977475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039731534,0.0014029987,0.0017714251,0.0004154642,0.00021752204,0.000005119353,0.0000047146777,0.00003097539,0.9921786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832124,0.00018071952,0.00033626246,0.0004214413,0.00041484353,0.00032550973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888974,0.0003352245,0.00016644341,0.00021888159,0.00018082032,0.00020891118],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001124373,0.00027985938,0.00042545225,0.00010736131,0.00027456085,0.00029492256,0.00027402502,0.0003747276,0.007886852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014045917,0.0002447591,0.00009257899,0.000039749793,0.0010264042,0.00040646686,0.00009687113,0.0003681215,0.00019022977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034409506,0.0000043253103,0.00004605252,0.000024239434,0.000024160207,0.000014783382,0.008613579,1.850612e-7,0.0000017500104,0.96615756,0.009118645,0.015991278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008313901,0.00009952667,0.00028377987,0.000103517574,0.000018047762,0.0000015280903,0.0017792566,0.000002193805,0.0000017983052,0.14754978,0.84975475,0.00032266986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017823202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004220049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84063613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074443116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001828354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W941899258","doi":"10.2196/resprot.4404","title":"Lessons Learned From Using Focus Groups to Refine Digital Interventions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Research Protocols","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stollery Children's Hospital; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"eHealth; Psychological intervention; Focus group; Digital health; Qualitative research; Implementation research; Intervention (counseling); Knowledge management; Computer science; Process management; Medicine; Medical education; Health care; Nursing; Business; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.9076930669977159,"score_gpt":0.7293060649067175,"score_spread":0.17838700209099845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W941899258","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016580852,0.000051652107,0.038863093,0.037165023,0.00008927294,0.7776029,0.00032407744,0.00038380967,0.12893929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03888935,7.095769e-7,0.018931098,0.000050344395,0.0007899216,0.9325058,0.0000137554,0.00004939339,0.008769667],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937498,0.0032202185,0.00036390958,0.00047820006,0.0013906147,0.00079728814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727106,0.00075707777,0.00008124948,0.00041581527,0.00075916713,0.0007156035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008750301,0.00013728895,0.00025412283,0.00027430203,0.0007080296,0.0007809961,0.0006733143,0.00012635556,0.00031968975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044506225,0.00012378738,0.00016176702,0.0012261767,0.0005311497,0.0006208869,0.0004515174,0.00052421325,0.00045201328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009640999,0.0018550694,0.0025147197,0.00014821163,0.00008421618,0.000062304265,0.106849685,0.000021006676,0.0031828145,0.30376998,0.046631668,0.53391623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086403574,0.0007559457,0.00034036106,0.0009926249,0.0000016835571,3.6228246e-7,0.019927658,0.000038682367,0.00031172717,0.14092992,0.83560663,0.00023036351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039009973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015727306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78897494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043813378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047950557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7531163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}